Good morning to our honorable adjudicator, chair person, time keeper, to our respected

pro/opposition team, ladies and gentlemen.

As the first speaker of the pro/opposition team, I firmly believe of today’s motion..
In today’s debate I will explain.. my second speaker will continue by explain or discuss.. and my
third speaker will summarize everything.
But before that let me define the key terms in this motion and present our first argument.

Motion 3 – THIS HOUSE BELIEVE THAT THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF SOCIAL

MEDIA ON TEENAGERS
GOVERNMENT TEAM
First Speaker – Social media causes mental health issues
Defines:
Negative impact refers to the harmful effects or bad consequences.
Social media is a digital platform where users create and share content or communicate.
Teenagers are the young people between the ages 13 up to 19. a group that is vulnerable to peer
pressure, identity issues, and mental health concerns.
Assertion:
We strongly believe that social media has more negative effects than positive for teenager,
especially on their mental health.
Reasoning:
This is mainly because social media creates pressure to look perfect, Be popular, and gain likes
and followers. Teenagers are often comparing themselves for others online.
Evidence;
for example, a study by the Royal Society for public health in the UK founded Instagram is the
worst social media platforms for young people’s mental health. It increases anxiety, depression
and body image issues.

In Indonesia, research from Universitas Indonesia in 2023 shows that 60% of teenagers felt
insecure after scrolling social media. Many felt not good enough because they kept comparing
themselves with influencers.
Link back:
So, it is clear that social media is not just an online platforms - it is a source of emotional stress
that damaged teenagers mental health.

Second speaker– Social Media Encourages Cyberbullying and Addiction

Assertion:
We firmly believe that social media increases the risk of cyberbullying and technology addiction
among teenagers.
Reasoning:
This is because social media allows people to hide behind a screen. Teenagers become targets of
hate, insults, and online bullying that often go unpunished.
Evidence:
For instance, in 2022, the Indonesian Ministry of Communication and Information reported that
over 50% of online bullying victims were teenagers. Additionally, Komnas Anak stated that
cyberbullying has led to depression and even suicide among youth. Also, many teens are
addicted to scrolling—using social media more than 5 hours per day, which hurts their sleep and
focus.
Link Back:
Thus, we can clearly see that social media is not safe. It creates a toxic space that harms
teenagers’ well-being and peace of mind.

Third speaker – Summarize

Without a doubt, the harms of social media outweigh the benefits for teenagers.

Our first speaker has shown how social media causes mental health problems such as anxiety and
insecurity. Our second speaker explained how it increases cyberbullying and addiction.
These are not small issues—they are serious threats to the future of young people. For these
reasons, we believe that the negative impact of social media on teenagers is far greater than any
benefit.

REPLAY SPEECH
Team Government (Pro)
Ladies and gentlemen,
Today, the Government has clearly shown why the negative impacts of social media on teenagers
are more serious than the positives.

Our first speaker proved how social media causes mental health issues, including anxiety,
depression, and low self-esteem—especially due to constant comparison with unrealistic online
images. This is backed by data from WHO and studies showing rising depression among teenage
users.

Our second speaker added that social media is a platform for cyberbullying, with thousands of
cases reported each year in Indonesia. It also reduces real-life interaction, making teens feel
isolated even when online.

Yes, we agree that social media can be useful—but the harms are deeper and more damaging
when left unchecked. A few benefits do not outweigh the serious risks it creates for the next
generation.

That is why we stand by the motion.

Thank you.

OPPOSITION TEAM
First Speaker – Social Media Builds Confidence and Connections
Assertion:
I strongly disagree with the motion. Social media does not always harm teenagers—in fact, it
helps them grow and express themselves.
Reasoning:
Teenagers today use social media to make friends, express their talents, and share their voices.
Evidence:
For example, in Indonesia, many teens become confident through TikTok or Instagram by
joining creative challenges or posting their artwork and music. According to a survey by
Katadata in 2021, 64% of Indonesian teens feel inspired and supported through social media
communities.
Link Back:
So, social media can be a space for connection and creativity—not destruction.

Second Speaker – Education and Digital Literacy Make Social Media Safer
Assertion:
I absolutely believe that the solution is not to blame social media, but to educate teenagers to use
it wisely.
Reasoning:
With good digital literacy, teens can avoid negative effects and use social media in a positive
way.
Evidence:
In 2022, the Indonesian government launched digital literacy programs through Siberkreasi.
Thousands of students joined online classes to learn about privacy, online ethics, and how to
avoid cyberbullying. Also, schools now teach how to manage screen time and balance online life
with real life.
Link Back:
Hence, social media itself is not the problem—it is how we use it. With proper education and
support, teens can benefit more from it.
Third Speaker – Summary and Conclusion

It is clear that the proposition side has ignored the positive power of social media.

Our first speaker explained how social media helps teens find their voice and confidence. Our
second speaker showed how digital literacy and education make online life safer and healthier.

So, instead of banning or blaming social media, we should guide teenagers. That is why we
strongly oppose the motion.

REPLAY SPEECH
Honorable adjudicators, ladies and gentlemen,
The Opposition team has clearly proven that social media’s positive impacts for teenagers are far
more meaningful than the negatives.

Our first speaker showed how social media connects teens socially—especially during isolation
like the pandemic—and gives them access to supportive communities. We shared a real story
from Indonesia showing how it helps teens grow and feel accepted.

Our second speaker highlighted how social media can boost emotional support, share mental
health resources, and help teens find role models. With proper education and parental support,
these platforms become tools for growth, not destruction.

While the Government focused only on risks, they ignored that these risks come from misuse—
not from the platforms themselves. Social media, when guided well, helps teens grow, learn, and
connect.
For all these reasons, we strongly oppose the motion.
Thank you.

Motion 4 -This House Believe That Social Media Has a Positive Impact on Society

GOVERNMENT TEAM

First Speaker Communication & Awareness

Social Media
Refers to digital platforms where users can create, share, and interact with content or other users.
Examples include: Instagram, Facebook, Twitter (X), TikTok, YouTube, etc.

Positive Impact
Means beneficial effects or good influence — things that improve or help people or society in
some way.

Society
Refers to a group of people living together, including communities, nations, or even the world
population — how people interact and function together.

Assertion
Ladies and gentlemen, I strongly believe that social media has brought more good than harm to
our society, especially in communication and awareness.

Reasoning
Before social media, connecting with others took days, even weeks. Now, people can share news,
emotions, and ideas instantly. Not only that, but social media also spreads awareness of
important social issues that were once ignored.

Evidence
For example, the #BlackLivesMatter movement went viral in 2020 because of social media.
Millions of people across the world joined the cause, attended protests, and signed petitions. In
Indonesia, during the COVID-19 pandemic, platforms like Twitter and Instagram were used to
share info about oxygen donations, hospital updates, and emergency needs.

Link back
This shows how social media unites people, spreads awareness fast, and supports real-world
change. That’s a strong and positive social impact.

Second Speaker – Education & Opportunity

Assertion
I firmly believe that social media opens access to education and life-changing opportunities.

Reasoning
Many young people today learn new skills from social media. It has become a platform where
knowledge is shared widely and freely. It also provides a space for young entrepreneurs, artists,
and activists to grow.

Evidence
Take Ruangguru or Zenius – Indonesian education platforms that use social media to reach
students in remote areas. Or consider the many teenagers who have grown small businesses on
Instagram and TikTok. A 2023 report from Katadata showed that over 40% of Gen Z in
Indonesia learned a new skill—like design, coding, or marketing—via social media.
Link back
Clearly, social media empowers people with access to learning and career growth, making
society more educated and economically active.

Third Speaker – Summary

Ladies and gentlemen, we’ve heard two strong arguments from our team.
First, social media improves communication and builds global awareness of important issues.
Second, it opens doors to education and opportunities, helping society grow smarter and more
skilled.

Movements like #BlackLivesMatter and platforms like Ruangguru prove social media’s power to
connect, educate, and uplift. It brings people together and creates positive action.

So, to conclude: social media is not just a distraction—it’s a modern tool for progress. We
strongly believe that social media has a positive impact on society.

REPLAY SPEECH
Ladies and gentlemen, honorable adjudicators,
Today, the Government team has shown clearly how social media creates real, positive impact in
our society.

Our first speaker highlighted how social media revolutionized communication and global
awareness. In the past, it took days to send a message—now we can instantly connect, support,
and inform each other. We gave strong examples: the #BlackLivesMatter movement, which
united millions globally, and how Indonesians used Twitter and Instagram during COVID-19 to
share urgent health needs. These aren’t just words—they’re proof of how social media saves
lives and drives social change.
Our second speaker showed how social media expands access to education and opportunity.
Many young people learn coding, design, or language skills through TikTok and YouTube. In
Indonesia, platforms like Ruangguru reach even remote students thanks to social media. Katadata
reported in 2023 that over 40% of Gen Z gained useful new skills from these platforms.

So what have we proven? That social media doesn’t isolate or harm—it connects, educates, and
empowers.

That is why, as the Government, we firmly stand by the motion:

Social media has a positive impact on society.
Thank you.

OPPOSITION TEAM

Opening:
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, the honorable adjudicators, the proposition team, and all
participants.
As the first speaker of the opposition, I strongly stand against today’s motion: “This House
believes that social media has a positive impact on society.”

While we acknowledge that social media has brought certain benefits, we cannot ignore the very
real and dangerous harms it has caused to our society.

First speaker - Hoaxes and Online Scams Are Widespread

Assertion
Social media has become a breeding ground for hoaxes, fake news, and online scams that harm
individuals and communities.

Reasoning
Because social media allows anyone to post anything at any time, false information can spread
faster than ever. Many users are not equipped to verify what they see and share. This leads to
serious consequences such as public confusion, fear, or financial loss.

Evidence
For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a 2020 study by Kominfo Indonesia found that
more than 800 hoaxes related to the virus were spread on social media, misleading people about
vaccines, cures, and prevention methods.
Another example: According to OJK (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan) in 2023, more than 11,000 online
fraud cases were reported in Indonesia, many of them happening through social media platforms
like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. Victims lost billions of rupiah.

Link back
This clearly shows that social media is not simply a tool for positive change—it can also be a
powerful weapon for deception. These scams and hoaxes destroy public trust, cause panic, and
hurt innocent people. So, how can we say this is positive?

Second Speaker – Social Isolation & Addiction

Assertion
Social media disconnects people from real life and causes serious addiction.

Reasoning
Instead of spending time with family or friends, many people—especially teens—spend hours
scrolling, comparing themselves, and feeling left out.
Evidence
A study by We Are Social (2023) showed that Indonesians spend an average of 3 hours per day
on social media. That’s 1,000 hours a year! This leads to sleep problems, lower academic
performance, and weak real-life relationships. Many also face FOMO (fear of missing out),
leading to anxiety and loneliness.

Link
This proves social media is not only time-consuming but also makes people feel worse, not
better.

Third Speaker – Summary

Assertion
Ladies and gentlemen, let me sum up why this motion must fall.

Reasoning
Our first speaker explained how misinformation and cyberbullying hurt society. Our second
speaker showed how social media causes disconnection, addiction, and poor mental health.

Evidence Recap
With over 1,500 hoaxes and rising mental health issues among teens, the negative impact is very
real.

Link
In conclusion: social media is not improving society—it’s damaging it. That’s why we strongly
oppose this motion.
REPLAY SPEECH
Ladies and gentlemen, honorable judges,
Let me remind you of what the Opposition team has proven today.
Our first speaker explained how social media is full of hoaxes and scams. We gave real proof:
during the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 800 hoaxes were spread online, confusing people
about the virus. In 2023, over 11,000 fraud cases happened on platforms like Instagram and
WhatsApp. These are not small numbers—people lost their money and their trust.

Our second speaker showed how social media causes addiction and isolation. Indonesians now
spend 3 hours a day online. That means less sleep, more anxiety, and worse relationships in real
life. Teens feel sad, left out, and alone.

So what’s the point of saying social media is “positive,” if it spreads lies, breaks trust, and makes
people feel worse?

We are not saying all technology is bad. But we must be honest—the harm social media causes
to society today is too big to ignore.

That’s why, as the Opposition team,

We strongly reject this motion.
Thank you.