Teacher-Student Communication
Teacher-Student Communication
A culture of dialogue and peace would be guaranteed if the learning of these skills,
necessary for this century, be included in teacher training curricula.
Learning to communicate effectively ensures an institutional climate where all actors
students seek to focus their actions on tolerance, solidarity, non-discrimination and the
respect for diversity.
Teachers recognize that the tools they have to face the challenges are scarce.
situations that arise in school. Rather than denying or shutting themselves off, teachers ask for
educational resources and forms of intervention that serve as tools in their task
daily. Our obligation as researchers is not only to convey the state of
situation of the topic, but also provide them with training that includes techniques and strategies
to address these situations. This option is a priority today.
For a long time excluded, communication in the classroom is a very important area for
reflect and act. It is hardly conceivable for educational action without a teacher and a
student, that is why we find it necessary to review the relationships that are established between them, not
not only the educational bond but also the communicative one. There are authors who consider man
as a social being, producer and agent of relationships who gradually elaborates information and
search and discover others. The link between the concepts of education and communication must
to be analyzed from the perspective that education is a social phenomenon that involves relationships of
teaching-learning (Meléndez, 1985). Interpersonal and intermediate communication is
characteristic of the school environment since the participants interact face to face and
they share a certain purpose. However, bidirectional communication is not only
A matter between two personalities is also an internal communication process.
When the student manages to express an idea in a way that others can understand it is when
he himself learns it and truly understands it, it is what we now call internalization
from cognition to metacognition.
It is a challenge to avoid lecture-style classes (they are convenient for the teacher even though it has been
advised and trained), expressive poverty (they do not have appropriate vocabulary or expressions
for everyday language) and the lack of enthusiasm in the classroom (they only get excited
outside the classroom and in other spaces in general) (Prieto C. 1994).
The traditional system is disheartening, it is sad. Reviewing the suggestions and addressing them as a challenge.
it should be the most important since it is where we can take advantage of the opportunity.
Communication among teachers is necessary as their relationship reflects in the school environment.
perception of other social systems: cordiality, affection, tolerance, and willingness must
reflect in their daily attitude towards young people. Here appears the renewal or update.
like a new path that opens the possibility of combating the teacher's confusion when
allowing the trial of innovations (Samarrona, 1988)
Students and teachers are senders and then receivers of messages and their purpose is
common in their school education at different levels. Learning occurs when there is a
significant behavior change that results from the interaction of the sender and the receiver in the
attempt for the appropriation of knowledge (Santoyo, 1981).
Education, more than a space for learning, has become a process that
it characterizes individuals in the same way, without considering their differences and characteristics
peculiar, they must be processing information and regulating controlled goals in the
different levels. Homogenized teaching does not require the student to speak and express a
own thinking (Kaplún, 1998).
For this author, education seeks to transform, and it is the social context that conditions it.
It is necessary to review the context, and this will help us define the area that requires our attention.
intervention as teachers. Education must be the axis of the internal revolution of the concept
same.
Within the context, technologies in the classroom appear, television, the Internet, newspapers and
mass media. With the emergence of the information society, the sources of knowledge have
They multiplied, the transformation has affected many scholars.
The Internet is the current means of communication where you find all the information that
desires and that you can reproduce and adjust to your needs, the speed at which they are recorded
Updated and recent electronic materials have surpassed the imagination of adults. Magazines
and newspapers also have a purely commercial trend, only that the printed word
express situations with greater objectivity allowing for comparison with other publications. The
Books are losing value due to the number of electronic publications available.
access and probably tend to get lost, this implies updating for whoever requires it but
inside the school trying to promote the true habit of reading.
We must not forget that thanks to language we can express the experiences that will give rise to
a new lifestyle, different, innovative or on the other end, passive and desolate.
Communication with young people is considered essential for the construction of the concept.
of himself; it is the way through which the teenager creates that concept and understands the value that
As a person, it is important to feel recognized by the environment.
formation of personal identity, due to the quality of primary relationships
it largely depends on how the individual perceives and considers themselves afterwards, and
how he/she sees the world around him/her.
Creating the necessary environment and fostering that awareness in teachers is a challenge in daily life.
easily falls (the majority) into a play on words, verbal fight and of course, the teacher
As an adult, you dominate the situation because the teenager knows they are defeated in front of an authority. They are
young people who, due to their age characteristics, constantly express injustices and abuse
your rights as students of an institution, often discuss and argue without
reason or only handling the part of the situation that suits them, a dialogue with is not easy
respect for the expressed ideas and even less for the freedom to manifest them. If the adult, who is the
teacher, reflects on this situation and every time they engage in dialogue with the adolescents
grasp awareness and control of their verbal phrases and body attitudes, with full intention
to address the expressed manifestation and quickly reviewing the context in which it is taking place
I believe that progress will be made in that process. Cordial communication,
understanding and tolerance must be sought in the classrooms, the teacher must be perceptive to the
reason for anger or displeasure of someone who approaches in such an emotional state, otherwise the mind
the young person will work with a distraction that will prevent them from getting involved in classroom work, the reason
of their presence in an educational institution.
Contradictory communication and monologues are a problem with teenagers because they
double messages confuse the one receiving information, causing little credibility or
anguish, generate confusion and provoke reactions of indiscipline, concern of all
that participate in educational centers.
Discipline and the educational learning environment should begin with interaction.
between the teacher and their students. The teacher in basic grades is in unbeatable conditions
to lay the foundations of positive attitudes upon which future education can be built
From each of them or in another way, it will fill their daily work with indifference and contempt.
Educational work is not limited to information and activities within the institution, it is a
work that will transcend when our trained students graduate and participate actively
in our society, developing it for the application of school theory in new environments.
The performance of the students, their process of integration through communication, their
work training, as well as role analysis, is not provided with a written technique, it is a
a process that is being achieved and that mainly falls on the teacher since it is the one who will elaborate
the means and moments to reach the willingness of young people.
Indeed, that unlimited capacity for learning that human beings possess is possible if not
there existed someone who played the social role of teaching the following generations: the
teacher.
At the same time, alongside all their functions, a teacher must teach by researching and sharing
thesis that the quality of teaching is not (nor will it be) possible if the teacher is not provided with resources
appropriate educational technologies that facilitate the fulfillment of their communicative action
more effectively; what has been said previously must be upheld as long as the circumstances of the
Modernization and reform of educational systems overlook the internal state of teachers.
Well, as José M. Esteve points out: "... the quality education currently existing, wherever
it is fundamentally the product of the voluntarism of a teaching staff that, in the face of the
temptation of abandonment and divisionism, wasting energies and enthusiasm compensating with his
activity the lack of existing resources.
According to the constructivist perspective, educational communication constitutes the process through which
which structures the personality of the student; achieved through the information that
this receives and reworks them in interaction with the environment and with the concepts themselves
built. That said, the learning process cannot be reduced to a scheme.
communication mechanic, as the learner as a receiver is not a passive entity, but
What is a being that reworks messages according to its own cognitive schemas.
It should be added that for educational communication to be effective, it must meet certain
characteristics, such as:
Open posture in the sender and the receiver to achieve an atmosphere of mutual understanding.
Bidirectionality of the process, so that the flow of messages can circulate in both directions.
senses, although mostly it occurs from educator to educated.
Interaction in the process, which implies the possibility of modifying messages and
intentions according to the established dynamics.
Morality in the task, to reject temptations of manipulation.
Although in educational systems it is the teacher who largely performs the functions of
sender and influence on the learners, it should be considered that the personal configuration of the
students are achieved through multiple personal and institutional sources and no longer
exclusively due to the communicative action of the teachers; a special mention is the case of the
strong influence of the mass media, whose influence is so
controversial as evident.
Currently, there is an emphasis on a New Role for the Teacher (Carlson, J and Thorpe, C: 1990; Mager,
Robert F: 1988), suggesting, in that sense, the responsibility to act as a mediator
between the student and the complex informational network that converges on him; such suggestions in
reality is supported by Communication Theory, which along with Systems Theory and the
Cognitive Theories of Learning constitute one of the fundamental pillars of the new
conception of Educational Technology
(Castillejo, J: 1986).
From the Humanist perspective, the teacher must consider that communication in the classroom
It must have a clinical or didactic character in the sense that the teacher must recognize
that its mission is to optimize the development of learning by applying strategies and
methods of scientific rigor and acting in a deeply objective manner. This
recognition eliminates the conventionalisms of overbearing and aggressive teachers that generate
stress in students and promotes the awareness that communication is an act in the
Both the teacher and the student find themselves among each other as what they are: human beings.
in a learning process.