CALvinism OR Arminianism?
Let's look at five points in which these two great schools differ.
doctrinal interpretation.
One of the most exciting theological debates of the last 500 years has
what to see with the dispute between Calvinism and Arminianism. In short,
the controversy arose in 1610 when the followers of the Dutch theologian
Jacobus Arminius (1560-1609) reacted against the theology of the giant.
reformed John Calvin (1509-64) for five doctrinal reasons.
We are going to divide our article into five questions in order to explain the
differences between these two schools of thought that are still alive in
the evangelical world of today.
   1. FREE WILL OR TOTAL DEPRAVITY? The Arminians believe
      that the Fall has negatively affected all the descendants
      of Adam and Eve. However, human beings continue to have free
      free will, which they can exercise to repent and believe in the Gospel.
      The eternal destiny of the sinner depends on how he uses his will.
      You can choose the good or the bad. Your will is not enslaved by
      his sinful nature. If a man (or a woman) decides to put his faith
      in God, will be regenerated by the Holy Spirit. First faith then
      regeneration (that is, the new birth). Faith, therefore, is an act of
      the will of man.
        Calvinism, however, says that the Fall affected human beings.
        in such a way that they cannot believe the Gospel. Their will
        spiritual is deaf, blind, and dead. They have no free will because their
        will is enslaved by the power of sin. Man is
        only free to sin. Therefore, for this to be saved, the
        The Spirit of God must miraculously regenerate you. If someone is
        regenerated will then put his faith in the Gospel and will repent. First
        regeneration then faith. Without regeneration, saving faith is not possible.
        Faith is produced by the Spirit of God in man.
   2.     CONDITIONAL OR UNCONDITIONAL CHOICE? The choice
        conditional (the Arminian position) teaches that God's election is
        conditioned by man's decision. Given that God is omniscient,
        He already knew before the foundation of man who was going to follow him.
        and who was going to deny him. Consequently, God determined to save (or choose)
        to all those who were going to obey him. In other words, God chose to
        those who were going to choose Him. This means that the decision of
        man is the determining factor in the choice of God. The
        unconditional election (the Calvinist position) says that God's election
        it is not conditioned by anything. It depends exclusively on its own
   will. God chooses because He wants to choose. Period. God does not choose to
   someone in advance because they know what this is going to do in the future, if not
   that He chooses because it pleases Him to do so. The conversion of man,
   then, it is not the cause of God's election but the consequence of it
   the same. Sooner or later the son of God will accept Christ because God
   he has chosen him. And why did he choose him? Out of pure grace. Not for any reason foreseen.
   in the man.
3. UNIVERSAL OR PARTICULAR ATONEMENT? On one hand, the Arminians
   They believe that Jesus died for everyone potentially. He did not effectuate salvation.
   of no one but did make salvation possible for all those who believe
   in Him. Thanks to His atoning death, God can now forgive the
   fishermen. But this forgiveness depends on the will of man. The
   man must believe in the value of Christ's sacrifice so that he
   God's forgiveness may be activated. On the other hand, the Calvinists are
   convinced that Jesus did not die for everyone. He gave his life only for
   the chosen ones, the sheep, their people. Consequently, the death of
   Christ does guarantee the salvation of his people. And the Spirit takes care of
   apply the gift of faith to the hearts of all redeemed by the Son.
4. RESISTIBLE OR IRRESISTIBLE GRACE? Resisting grace or
   irresistible refers to the work of the Spirit of God. Arminianism believes that
   The Spirit does everything possible to lead sinners to salvation.
   Calls many through the announcement of the Gospel. But the step
   the definitive is in the will of the unbeliever. The Spirit will only save
   to those who cooperate with Him. Until the sinner responds
   positively to the call of God, the Spirit cannot give you life. From this
   In a way, it is possible to resist the grace of God. Man has to exercise faith.
   in the Gospel to be regenerated by the Spirit. However, the
   Calvinism believes that the Spirit will save the chosen ones by the Father, no matter what.
   In addition to calling the chosen through the Gospel, there is a
   an internal calling that turns your heart to Christ. Such work is
   irresistible. It always produces conversion. Always. The Spirit overcomes the
   human enmity and conquers the will of the sinner. It places in its
   heart the desire to believe and to repent. Thanks to this calling
   internally, the unbeliever is born again.
5. CAN SALVATION BE LOST? As a general rule, the
   Arminians believe that salvation can be lost. There are some in the
   Arminian field that think not. However, the majority thinks that
   salvation can be lost if the believer does not persevere in faith. From there
   that the Christian can never have full assurance of their salvation
   personal. On the contrary, the Calvinists agree that the chosen
   For God will persevere until the end. It is impossible for a child of ...
   God. God protects him with his power and therefore, the believer can
   enjoy the security of your salvation. Once saved, always saved!
   APPLICATION The most important thing in this debate is to recognize that there
   great servants of God in both fields. On the Arminian side,
   they find preachers such as John Wesley (1703-91), Charles
Finney (1792-1875), A.W. Tozer (1897-1963) and Leonard Ravenhill (1907-
94). On the Calvinist side are Jonathan Edwards (1703-58), George
Whitefield (1714-70), Charles Spurgeon (1834-92) and Martyn Lloyd Jones
(1899-1981).