Origin of Holism
Origin of Holism
The term Holism was coined by J C Smuts in Holism and Evolution and was the
Smuts' opinion is that Holism is a concept that represents all.
the complexities of the universe, in his opinion, holism also denoted a theory of
universe in the same vein as Materialism andSpiritism;for him the universe is neither
matter and spirit, but everything defined in Holism and Evolution. While offering
In these different definitions, Smuts clearly expressed that its primary use and
It was appropriate to denote the entirety of the sets that operate as real factors and
they give reality its dynamic evolutionary creative character.
Holism emphasizes the importance of the whole as something that propagates the sum of the
parts, emphasizing the importance of their interdependence. It should be mentioned that
holos (a Greek term meaning "whole" or "entire") outlines contexts and
complexities that come into play, as it is dynamic.
For holistic knowledge, the whole and each of the parts are connected to
constant interactions. That's why everyeventis related to others
events that produce new relationships and events in a process that involves
all.
Understanding of processes and situations must take place from one's own
holos, as its effectiveness brings forth a new synergy, new relationships are formed and
new events are generated. Therefore, the set is the definitive factor, although this
Recognition does not prevent the analysis of each particular case.
Concept of holism.
In the social sciences, especially in sociology, the opposite of the holistic approach would be
methodological individualism. A holistic sociological approach considers and analyzes the
behavior of individuals as a consequence of the social matrix in which
they are found, while methodological individualism privileges in its analysis the
subjective interpretation of social facts.
Forms of Holism
There are different meanings of the term holism, depending on its application. No
however, all senses are based on the idea of wholeness as the appropriate form of
to know the reality.
Ontological holism considers that a real object or subject is composed of a
multiplicity of elements or aspects, which together form (and not by
separated) from the object/subject in question. Ontological holism refers to a
consideration of what reality is in itself, and opposes reductionism
ontological, which posits that a single characteristic or element can be defining
of a phenomenon.
Epistemological holism consists in considering that scientific knowledge must
tender to the construction of study objects that are not fragmented due to the
separate study of its characteristics. This type of holism is the theoretical foundation.
of stances such as transdisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity, which
they propose to overcome the boundaries between different sciences through study
coordinated by the scientists.
Sociological holism, on the other hand, is based on the application of this consideration.
about the totality within the field of sociology. This stance
it proposes that society is an entity that explains itself, and not based on the
individual actions and behaviors, considering that the latter are the result of
the general and structural processes of society. Holism opposes, as long as
approach to social knowledge, to methodological individualism.
An example of the holistic perspective can be given in relation to the human organism.
A holistic explanation of it is one that states that the different systems that
they make up an organism, such as the digestive system, the system
respiratory, the circulatory system, the reproductive system, or the nervous system, only
they are explained from the organism as a whole and not vice versa. That is, the system
circulatory (lower instance) pumps blood to allow the organism
(superior instance) works, the digestive system obtains energy for the