Energy Storage Systems for Electric Vehicles: Fuel

Cell Technologies - Comprehensive Study Notes

1. Overview of Key Fuel Cell Technologies
Fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) are powered by hydrogen and represent a promising zero-
emission transportation solution that converts chemical energy directly into electrical energy
through electrochemical reactions [1] [2] . Unlike conventional internal combustion engines that
burn fuel to create heat, fuel cells harness electrons as they move from high-energy reactant
bonds to low-energy product bonds, producing electricity directly from the chemical reaction
[3] .

Detailed diagram of a fuel cell system showing components including electrodes, electrolyte
membrane, and gas flows
The fundamental principle of fuel cell operation involves spatially separating hydrogen and
oxygen reactants so that electron transfer occurs over an extended length scale, allowing
electrons to be harnessed as electrical current [3] . Fuel cells are electrochemical devices that
consist of two electrodes separated by an electrolyte, where hydrogen oxidation occurs at the
anode and oxygen reduction occurs at the cathode [3] .
Key Advantages of Fuel Cell Technology
Fuel cell electric vehicles offer several significant advantages over conventional vehicles and
battery electric vehicles [1] [2] :
Zero Emissions: FCEVs produce no harmful tailpipe emissions, only emitting water vapor
and warm air
Fast Refueling: Hydrogen refueling takes approximately 3-5 minutes, similar to conventional
gasoline vehicles
Extended Range: FCEVs can achieve driving ranges of more than 300 miles on a single fill
High Efficiency: More efficient than conventional internal combustion engine vehicles
Instant Torque: Provide smooth, consistent power delivery with instant torque

2. Fuel Cell Types and Technologies

2.1 Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFC)

Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cells are the most common type used in vehicle applications,
operating at relatively low temperatures of 60-100°C [4] [5] . PEMFCs use a solid polymer
membrane as the electrolyte and hydrogen as the fuel, offering high power densities and fast
start-up times due to their low operating temperatures [4] .
Key Electrochemical Reactions in PEMFC:
At the anode:
H₂ → 2H⁺ + 2e⁻ (E° = 0 V) [5]

At the cathode:
½O₂ + 2H⁺ + 2e⁻ → H₂O [5]

Overall reaction:
H₂ + ½O₂ → H₂O [5]

2.2 Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC)

Solid Oxide fuel cells operate at very high temperatures (500-1,000°C) and use a solid ceramic
electrolyte [4] [6] . SOFCs can utilize various fuels including hydrogen, natural gas, biogas, and
other hydrocarbons, offering high combined heat and power efficiency and long-term stability
[4] .

Recent developments show that SOFCs have achieved record-setting efficiency levels of 75%
stack efficiency, demonstrating their potential for high-efficiency power generation [6] . The high
operating temperature enables fuel flexibility and allows for internal reforming of hydrocarbon
fuels [6] .
2.3 Alkaline Fuel Cells (AFC)
Alkaline fuel cells use an alkaline electrolyte, typically potassium hydroxide (KOH), and can
provide sustainable energy at lower cost and higher power density compared to most other fuel
cell types [4] [7] . The electrolyte typically used is 30-percent potassium hydroxide, which yields
optimal ionic conductivity when operated at 60-80°C [7] .
AFC Electrochemical Reactions:
At the fuel electrode:
H₂ + 2OH⁻ → 2H₂O + 2e⁻ [7]
At the air electrode:
½O₂ + H₂O + 2e⁻ → 2OH⁻ [7]

2.4 Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cells (PAFC)

Phosphoric Acid fuel cells use concentrated phosphoric acid as the electrolyte and operate at
approximately 200°C [7] . PAFCs do not suffer from carbon dioxide-induced electrolyte
degeneration seen in alkaline fuel cells and can use reformed gas derived from fossil fuels,
though expensive platinum catalyst is necessary [7] .
PAFC Reactions:
Fuel electrode: H₂ → 2H⁺ + 2e⁻ [7]
Air electrode: ½O₂ + 2H⁺ + 2e⁻ → H₂O [7]

2.5 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFC)

Molten Carbonate fuel cells operate at high temperatures (600-700°C) and use a molten
carbonate salt mixture as the electrolyte [4] . These cells are primarily used for large-scale
stationary power generation applications due to their high operating temperatures and excellent
fuel flexibility.

3. Electrode Materials and Components

3.1 Catalyst Materials

Catalyst materials are critical components that reduce the activation energy of electrochemical
reactions and enable highly efficient fuel cell operation [8] [9] . Platinum and platinum alloys
remain the most commonly utilized catalyst materials due to their excellent catalytic properties
for both hydrogen oxidation and oxygen reduction reactions [8] .
Key Catalyst Functions:
Anode Catalyst: Enables hydrogen molecules to be split into protons and electrons
Cathode Catalyst: Facilitates oxygen reduction by reacting with protons to produce water
[10]
Recent advances in catalyst technology focus on reducing or replacing expensive platinum with
alternative materials [11] . Nanostructured carbon supports with Fe-N-C catalysts have
demonstrated significant improvements, achieving 30.13% enhancement in oxygen reduction
reaction (ORR) activity and 25.02% improvement in current density compared to traditional
platinum-group-metal-free catalysts [12] .

3.2 Advanced Catalyst Developments

Research breakthroughs in 2025 have led to catalyst designs capable of extending fuel cell
lifespans to over 200,000 hours, marking a significant step toward widespread adoption of fuel
cell technology [13] . These advances include:
Nanostructured Supports: Enhanced surface area and conductivity networks
PGM-free Catalysts: Cost-effective alternatives to platinum-based materials
Improved Durability: Extended operational life under automotive conditions [12]

3.3 Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA)

The membrane electrode assembly forms the heart of a PEM fuel cell, consisting of the
membrane, catalyst layers, and gas diffusion layers [10] . The polymer electrolyte membrane
conducts only positively charged ions while blocking electrons, with typical thicknesses under
20 microns for transportation applications [10] .
MEA Components:
Proton Exchange Membrane: Nafion® membranes are the current state-of-the-art for low-
temperature operation [7]
Gas Diffusion Layers: Provide pathways for reactant gases and product removal
Catalyst Layers: Contain nanometer-sized platinum particles dispersed on carbon support
[10]

4. Electrolytes and Ionic Conductors

4.1 Polymer Electrolyte Membranes

Perfluorosulfonic acid polymers such as Nafion® are successfully used due to their high proton
conductivity and good chemical and mechanical properties at temperatures below 90°C under
high relative humidity conditions [7] . The main limitation of Nafion membranes is their expensive
manufacturing process and decreased conductivity at temperatures above 90°C [7] .

4.2 Alternative Electrolyte Systems

Development of intermediate-temperature (100-150°C) and high-temperature (120-200°C)
PEMFCs has led to new electrolyte materials that operate in the absence of water [7] . These
advanced electrolytes address the limitations of conventional low-temperature systems and
enable operation under more diverse conditions.
4.3 Solid Electrolytes
Solid oxide fuel cells utilize ceramic electrolytes that conduct oxygen ions at high temperatures,
enabling fuel flexibility and high efficiency operation [6] . These solid electrolytes avoid the need
for rare or expensive materials and provide excellent chemical stability under operating
conditions [6] .

5. Working Principles and Thermodynamic Analysis

5.1 Fundamental Electrochemical Principles

The basic energy conversion in a fuel cell can be described by the equation [14] :
Chemical Energy of Fuel = Electrical Energy + Heat Energy
The thermodynamic analysis follows the First and Second Laws of thermodynamics [14] :
First Law: ΔH = Q - NFE
Where:
ΔH = change in enthalpy
Q = heat supplied
N = number of electrons transferred
F = Faraday's constant (96,493 coulombs)
E = cell voltage
Gibbs Free Energy Relationship: NFE = -ΔG
Maximum Efficiency: η = NFE/ΔH [14]

5.2 Nernst Equation Application

The cell potential is governed by the Nernst equation [14] :
E_cell = E°_cell - (RT/nF) ln Q
At 298K, this simplifies to:
E_cell = E°_cell - (0.0591/n) log Q

5.3 Performance Characteristics

Fuel cell performance is typically measured by the ratio of actual voltage to theoretical open
circuit voltage [14] :
Efficiency (η) = On-load voltage / Theoretical open circuit voltage
The electrical work performed by the fuel cell is calculated as:
W = EIΔt = NFE [14]
6. Hydrogen Generation and Storage

6.1 Hydrogen Production Methods

There are three prominent methods of hydrogen electrolysis for fuel cell applications [15] :

6.1.1 Alkaline Electrolysis

Alkaline electrolysis uses potassium hydroxide (KOH) or sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as the
electrolyte [15] .
Reactions:
Anode: 4OH⁻ → O₂ + 2H₂O + 4e⁻
Cathode: 2H₂O + 2e⁻ → H₂ + 2OH⁻
Overall: 2H₂O → 2H₂ + O₂ [15]

6.1.2 Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Electrolysis

PEM electrolysis uses a solid polymer electrolyte membrane, typically Nafion, for proton
conduction [15] .
Reactions:
Anode: 2H₂O → O₂ + 4H⁺ + 4e⁻
Cathode: 4H⁺ + 4e⁻ → 2H₂
Overall: 2H₂O → 2H₂ + O₂ [15]

6.2 Hydrogen Storage Technologies

Flowchart showing different hydrogen storage methods including compressed gas, liquid
hydrogen, and metal hydrides
Hydrogen storage presents significant challenges due to hydrogen's unique properties,
including low density and high diffusivity [16] . Five primary storage methods have been
developed to address these challenges [17] [18] :

6.2.1 Compressed Gas Storage

Compressed hydrogen storage involves storing hydrogen in high-pressure cylinders at 350-700
bar (5,000-10,000 psi) [17] [16] . Modern Type 4 cylinders use advanced fiberglass/carbon fiber
composite materials with plastic liners to ensure exceptional performance and low weight [16] .
Advantages:
Well-understood and commercially available technology
Scalable from small portable cylinders to large-scale systems
Fast refueling capability [17]

Disadvantages:
Energy-intensive compression process
Safety concerns with high-pressure storage
Large storage volumes required due to low hydrogen density [17]
6.2.2 Liquid Hydrogen Storage
Liquid hydrogen storage involves cooling hydrogen to cryogenic temperatures (-253°C or
-423°F) and storing it in insulated cryogenic vessels [18] . NASA utilizes this technology for
space applications, including the Space Launch System [18] .
Benefits:
Higher energy density compared to compressed gas
Suitable for applications requiring high energy storage [18]

Challenges:
High energy requirements for liquefaction
Boil-off losses during storage
Complex cryogenic handling requirements [18]

6.2.3 Metal Hydride Storage

Metal hydrides can store hydrogen at higher densities compared to compressed gas systems
and offer enhanced safety characteristics [17] . These materials absorb hydrogen into their
crystal structure, forming stable metal-hydrogen compounds.
Advantages:
High volumetric storage density
Enhanced safety due to stable hydrogen bonding
Operation at moderate pressures [17]
Disadvantages:
High material costs
Weight penalty due to metal content
Limited cycle life in some materials [17]

6.2.4 Chemical Hydride Storage

Chemical hydrides release hydrogen through chemical reactions and can provide high hydrogen
storage capacities [17] . These systems typically use materials like sodium borohydride or
ammonia borane as hydrogen carriers.

6.2.5 Cryo-Compressed Storage

Cryo-compressed storage combines benefits of both liquid and compressed storage by
maintaining hydrogen at cryogenic temperatures under moderate pressure [17] [16] . This
approach offers higher density than compressed gas while avoiding the complexity of full
liquefaction.
7. Limitations and Challenges

7.1 Cost Challenges

Cost remains the major barrier to fuel cell commercialization, with current automotive fuel cell
systems requiring significant cost reduction to compete with conventional technologies [19] . For
transportation applications, fuel cell systems need to cost approximately $30/kW compared to
$25-35/kW for internal combustion engines [19] .
Cost Breakdown by Application:
Transportation: Target $30/kW for competitiveness
Stationary Power: $400-750/kW for widespread commercialization
Initial Applications: Up to $1000/kW acceptable [19]

7.2 Durability and Reliability

Fuel cell durability has not been fully established for automotive applications, requiring 5,000-
hour lifespan (150,000 miles) and operation across temperature ranges from -40°C to 80°C [19] .
For stationary applications, more than 40,000 hours of reliable operation is required for market
acceptance [19] .

7.3 System Integration Challenges

Size and Weight: Current fuel cell systems must be further reduced to meet automotive
packaging requirements, including the fuel cell stack and ancillary components [19] .
Thermal Management: The small temperature difference between operating and ambient
temperatures necessitates large heat exchangers for effective thermal management [19] .
Air Management: Current compressor technologies are not suitable for automotive fuel cell
applications, requiring development of advanced air management systems [19] .

7.4 Infrastructure Limitations

The widespread adoption of fuel cell vehicles depends on the development of hydrogen
refueling infrastructure [20] . Japan's 'Basic Hydrogen Strategy' aims to deploy 900 stations by
2030, while Europe's Hydrogen Mobility initiative is similarly advancing infrastructure
development [11] .

8. Recent Progress in Fuel Cell Technologies

8.1 Advanced Materials Development

Recent advances in fuel cell technology focus on improved membrane materials, optimized
catalyst designs, and advanced electrode structures [21] . Key areas of progress include:
Cost Reductions: Innovations in catalyst materials, including reducing or replacing platinum,
have lowered fuel cell costs significantly [11] .
Enhanced Durability: New catalyst designs have achieved projected lifespans exceeding
200,000 hours, representing a major breakthrough for commercial viability [13] .
Improved Efficiency: Nanostructured carbon supports have demonstrated 30.13%
enhancement in ORR activity and 25.02% improvement in current density [12] .

8.2 Next-Generation Fuel Cell Modules

Honda's next-generation fuel cell module, scheduled for mass production in 2027, represents
significant technological advancement [22] :
Cost Reduction: 50% reduction in production cost compared to current models
Enhanced Durability: More than double the durability of existing systems
Increased Power Density: Over three times volumetric power density improvement
Higher Output: 150 kW rated output with 59.8% maximum efficiency [22]

8.3 Market Growth and Commercialization

The global fuel cell market reached $6.6 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $43.7 billion
by 2033, exhibiting a growth rate of 20.81% [23] . Asia Pacific currently dominates the market
with over 56.6% market share, driven by strong government support and infrastructure
investments [23] .

8.4 Emerging Applications

Maritime and Aviation: Companies like Airbus are developing hydrogen-based propulsion
systems, aiming to launch commercial hydrogen-powered aircraft by 2035 [11] .
Industrial Applications: Green hydrogen is replacing coal in steel manufacturing through the
Direct Reduced Iron process, significantly reducing emissions [11] .
Grid Stabilization: Fuel cells are increasingly used for grid stabilization and backup power, with
major partnerships in logistics and supply chain operations [11] .

9. Safety Issues and Risk Assessment

9.1 Hydrogen Safety Characteristics

Hydrogen presents safety risks of the same order of magnitude as other fuels, with many
aspects actually making it safer than gasoline and natural gas [24] . Hydrogen has an excellent
safety record as a constituent of town gas used in Europe and the USA in the 19th and early
20th centuries [24] .
9.2 Key Safety Considerations
Fire and Explosion Risks: Hydrogen's broad flammability limits (4-75% in air) require stringent
safety measures, though the lack of toxicity eliminates poisoning risks [24] .
Leak Detection: The greatest potential risk appears to be slow leaks in enclosed spaces such as
home garages, where hydrogen accumulation could lead to fire or explosion without proper
detection or ventilation systems [24] .
Cryogenic Hazards: Liquid hydrogen presents additional safety issues including risk of cold
burns and increased duration of leaked cryogenic fuel [24] .

9.3 Comparative Safety Analysis

Computer simulations comparing hydrogen fuel cell vehicles with conventional fuels show that
[24] :

Open Spaces: Hydrogen FCVs have less potential hazard than gasoline or natural gas
vehicles
Tunnel Collisions: Hydrogen FCVs are nearly as safe as natural gas vehicles and potentially
less hazardous than gasoline vehicles
Enclosed Spaces: Proper hydrogen detection and ventilation systems are essential for safe
operation

9.4 Fuel Cell System Safety

Fuel cells pose minimal hazard despite hydrogen and oxygen separation by thin polymer
membranes (20-30 μm) [24] . The fuel cell operating temperature (60-90°C) is too low to be a
thermal ignition source, and control systems can easily detect membrane ruptures through
potential loss monitoring [24] .

10. Cost Aspects and Economic Analysis

10.1 Current Cost Structure

Fuel cell technology has experienced dramatic changes due to government regulations, cost
reductions, and material breakthroughs [11] . The production and assembly stages of raw
materials are the primary sources of carbon footprints and costs during the fuel cell lifecycle
[25] .

10.2 Cost Reduction Strategies

Material Innovations: Development of platinum-group-metal-free (PGM-free) catalysts reduces
dependency on expensive platinum, lowering overall production costs [12] .
Manufacturing Scale: Economies of scale in fuel cell production are reducing unit costs as
production volumes increase [11] .
System Integration: Improved manufacturing processes and assembly techniques are
contributing to cost reductions across the supply chain [22] .

10.3 Economic Competitiveness

The total cost of ownership for fuel cell vehicles is improving through [11] :
Reduced Infrastructure Costs: Government and private investment in hydrogen refueling
stations
Lower Operating Costs: Minimal maintenance requirements and high efficiency
Incentive Programs: Government subsidies and tax credits supporting adoption

10.4 Future Cost Projections

Industry projections indicate that fuel cell costs will continue declining as technology matures
and production scales increase [23] . The target of $30/kW for automotive applications is
expected to be achieved through continued material innovations and manufacturing
improvements.

11. Lifecycle Analysis

11.1 Lifecycle Assessment Framework

Lifecycle assessment of fuel cell systems encompasses six stages: raw material preparation,
manufacturing and assembly, transportation and logistics, utilization, maintenance and repair,
and scrap and recycling [25] . The carbon footprint analysis uses the GREET (Greenhouse gases,
Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation) model to evaluate environmental
impacts [25] .
Lifecycle assessment diagram for fuel cells showing different stages and carbon footprint
analysis

11.2 Carbon Footprint Analysis

Research shows that the production and assembly stages of raw materials are the primary
sources of carbon footprints during the fuel cell lifecycle, assuming a system life of 150,000 km
[25] . The PLCA (Process-based Life Cycle Assessment) method enables analysis of carbon
footprints and pollutant emissions from each fuel cell vehicle system component [25] .

11.3 Environmental Impact Assessment

Manufacturing Phase: The highest environmental impact occurs during raw material extraction
and manufacturing, particularly for platinum-based catalysts and specialized membrane
materials [25] .
Operational Phase: Fuel cell vehicles produce zero direct emissions during operation when
powered by green hydrogen from renewable sources [11] .
End-of-Life: Recycling of fuel cell components, particularly precious metal catalysts, can
significantly reduce lifecycle environmental impacts [13] .
11.4 Sustainability Metrics
Green Hydrogen Dependency: The environmental benefits of fuel cell vehicles are maximized
when powered by green hydrogen produced from renewable energy sources [20] [11] .
Comparative Analysis: Lifecycle assessments show fuel cell vehicles can achieve lower overall
carbon footprints compared to conventional vehicles when considering the entire system
lifecycle [25] .

12. Advanced and Emerging Fuel Cell Technologies

12.1 Hybrid Fuel Cell Systems

12.1.1 Fuel Cell-Supercapacitor Hybrid Systems

Hybrid fuel cell-supercapacitor systems combine the high energy density of fuel cells with the
high power density of supercapacitors to optimize performance [26] [27] . These systems enable
downsizing of fuel cell stacks while maintaining power delivery capability, with research showing
fuel cell stacks can be downsized to one-third of load peak power [26] .
System Benefits:
Reduced Fuel Cell Stress: Supercapacitors handle transient power demands
Extended Durability: Hybridization reduces fuel cell voltage and current variation rates by
one order of magnitude [28]
Improved Efficiency: Fuel economy improvements of up to 28% on FUDS cycle and 24%
on US06 cycle [29]

12.1.2 Energy Management Strategies

Advanced energy management systems utilize low-pass filter algorithms to distribute energy
between fuel cells and supercapacitors [27] . These systems optimize the state-of-charge of
supercapacitors and voltage efficiency of fuel cells across different operating frequencies [27] .

12.2 Regenerative Fuel Cells

Regenerative fuel cells (RFC) operate in reverse mode, consuming electricity to produce
hydrogen and oxygen through water electrolysis [30] . These systems can function both as fuel
cells generating electricity and as electrolyzers producing hydrogen, enabling energy storage
applications [30] .
Regenerative Operation Reactions:
Electrolysis Mode: H₂O → ½O₂ + H₂
Fuel Cell Mode: H₂ + ½O₂ → H₂O [30]

Applications:
Grid Energy Storage: Peak load leveling and renewable energy integration
 Aerospace: NASA's development for space applications
Renewable Integration: Storing excess renewable energy as hydrogen [31]

12.3 Microfluidic Fuel Cells

Microfluidic fuel cells (MFCs) utilize microfluidic flows as electrolyte instead of conventional
polymer membranes, targeting portable electronics applications [32] . These systems can
achieve power densities exceeding 200 mW/cm² with various fuel types including formate,
methanol, and hydrogen peroxide [32] .
Key Features:
Membrane-Free Operation: Eliminates expensive polymer electrolyte membranes
High Power Density: Up to several W/cm² at room temperature
Compact Design: Suitable for portable and wearable applications [32]

12.4 Biological Fuel Cells

Biological fuel cells (BFCs) or microbial fuel cells (MFCs) convert biochemical energy into
electrical energy using microorganisms or enzymes as catalysts [33] . These systems operate in
aqueous media at near-neutral pH and low temperatures, eliminating the need for noble metal
catalysts [33] .
Operating Principles:
Biocatalyst: Microorganisms or enzymes replace platinum catalysts
Substrate Utilization: Glucose, methanol, and organic waste as fuel sources
Low Cost: Elimination of expensive platinum catalysts [33]
Applications:
Wastewater Treatment: Simultaneous waste treatment and electricity generation
Remote Sensing: Low-power sensors in challenging environments
Portable Power: Small-scale power generation for electronic devices

13. Future Perspectives and Research Directions

13.1 Technology Roadmap

The fuel cell industry is advancing toward several key milestones [21] [13] :
Short-term (2025-2030):
Cost reduction to automotive targets ($30/kW)
Durability improvement to 200,000+ hours
Infrastructure expansion to support commercial deployment
Medium-term (2030-2040):
Integration with renewable energy systems
Advanced manufacturing techniques for cost reduction
Expansion into aviation and maritime applications
Long-term (2040+):
Full integration into hydrogen economy
Advanced materials eliminating platinum dependence
Widespread commercial adoption across all transport sectors

13.2 Research Priorities

Material Science: Development of advanced catalysts, membranes, and support materials to
improve performance while reducing costs [12] [13] .
System Integration: Optimization of fuel cell systems with hybrid energy storage and advanced
thermal management [27] .
Manufacturing: Scaling production processes to achieve automotive cost targets and quality
requirements [22] .

13.3 Market Development

The fuel cell market is projected to experience significant growth, with the Asia Pacific region
leading adoption through government support and infrastructure investment [23] . Key growth
drivers include environmental regulations, energy security concerns, and technological maturity
[11] .

13.4 Challenges and Opportunities

Infrastructure Development: Continued expansion of hydrogen production and distribution
infrastructure is essential for market growth [20] .
Policy Support: Government incentives and regulations will continue driving adoption and
technology development [11] .
Technology Integration: Integration with renewable energy sources and grid stabilization
applications presents significant opportunities [6] .

These comprehensive notes cover all aspects of fuel cell technologies for electric vehicles,
providing detailed technical information with equations, working principles, and recent
developments suitable for academic study and professional reference. The material includes
both fundamental concepts and cutting-edge research directions, supporting a complete
understanding of fuel cell energy storage systems.
⁂
 1. https://driveclean.ca.gov/hydrogen-fuel-cell
2. https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/fuel-cell
3. https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2017/17/epjconf_eps-sif2017_00013.pdf
4. https://www.intelligent-energy.com/news/types-of-fuel-cells/
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-exchange_membrane_fuel_cell
6. https://elcogen.com/insights/the-case-for-solid-oxide-fuel-cell-technology/
7. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/know-every-thing-fuel-cells-pemfc-dmfc-afc-pafc-mcfc-sofc-tharad
-bwyce
8. https://www.fuelcellstore.com/catalyst
9. https://hyfindr.com/en/hydrogen-knowledge/hydrogen-fuel-cell-catalyst
10. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/parts-fuel-cell
11. https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/blog/fuel-cell-technology-2025.asp
12. https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/doi/10.1093/ijlct/ctaf008/8006312
13. https://www.sciencedaily.com/news/matter_energy/fuel_cells/
14. https://webstor.srmist.edu.in/web_assets/srm_mainsite/files/files/NS 316 UNIT III and IV Supporting
PPT.pdf
15. https://stargatehydrogen.com/blog/basics-of-hydrogen-electrolysis/
16. https://hexagonpurus.com/modern-technologies-for-hydrogen-storage
17. https://www.hydrogenergy.in/5-types-of-hydrogen-storage
18. https://www.fuelcellstore.com/blog-section/component-information/hydrogen-storage-information/hydr
ogen-storage-methods
19. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1005/ML100500161.pdf
20. https://www.toyota-europe.com/electrification/fcev
21. https://www.nexanteca.com/reports/​advances-fuel-cells-technologies-and-applications-2025-program
22. https://global.honda/en/newsroom/news/2025/c250219eng.html
23. https://www.imarcgroup.com/fuel-cell-market
24. https://courses.grainger.illinois.edu/npre470/sp2019/web/readings/Hydrogen safety issues.pdf
25. https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2025-01-7086/
26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X2031940X
27. https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/view/32364
28. https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/energy.2021059?viewType=HTML
29. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/23w1m5bb
30. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regenerative_fuel_cell
31. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitized_regenerative_fuel_cell
32. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c03840
33. https://www.fuelcellstore.com/blog-section/fuel-cell-information/biological-fuel-cells-and-the-bio-prod
uction-of-hydrogen