Acute Cholangitis
Acute Cholangitis
I. Introduction
There are racial differences in the incidence of cholangitis. However, this turns out to be more
The mortality of this disease was very high, at 100%, especially if accompanied by
accompanying diseases. Currently, the mortality rate has significantly decreased to around 7
- 40%. If emergency surgery is performed, the mortality rate will increase.
that is 17 - 40 %. However, if a definitive surgical therapy is performed
elective, the mortality rate will decrease to only 3%.12,14)
II. Etiology
Choledocholithiasis
Biliary system stricture
Neoplasm in the biliary system
Iatrogenic complications due to manipulation of the 'CBD' (Common Bile Duct)
Bile duct stones are the most common cause (nearly 90%), followed by
followed by biliary system strictures and tumors in the biliary system. In Asian countries
Southeast Asia and China worms are often found as the cause, although the type
The worms found are various.1,4,5,10,12,15)
2
III. Pathophysiology
In normal conditions, the biliary system is sterile and the flow of bile does not experience
obstruction so that there is no backflow to the biliary system. Cholangitis occurs
due to stasis or obstruction in the biliary system accompanied by bacteria that
experiencing multiplication. Obstruction mainly caused by 'CBD' stones, strictures,
stenosis, or tumor, as well as endoscopic manipulation 'CBD'. Thus, the passage
bile becomes sluggish so that bacteria can multiply after experiencing
migration to the biliary system via the portal vein, the portal lymphatic system, or directly
from the duodenum. Therefore, there will be an ascending infection towards the duct.
hepatitic, which will eventually cause high intrabiliary pressure
and exceeded the limit of 250 mmH20. Therefore, there will be a back flow of bile.
which results in infections in the biliary canaliculi, hepatic veins, and lymphatics
perihepatic, which in turn will lead to bacteremia that can continue.
becomes sepsis (25-40%). If in that state accompanied by
the formation of pus leads to suppurative cholangitis.9,10,12)
This condition is often caused by small "CBD" stones, compression by the vesica.
bile / lymph nodes / pancreatitis, edema/spasms of the Oddi sphincter,
mucosal edema 'CBD', or hepatitis. (see image 1.)
2. "Acute Non Suppurative Cholangitis": There is biliary bacteria without pus in the system
biliary which is usually caused by partial obstruction. (Figure 2.)
3
Figure 3: Cholangitis accompanied by pus and partial obstruction
4. "Obstructive Acute Suppurative Cholangitis": Here there is a total obstruction of the system
biliary pressure exceeding the normal pressure in the biliary system, which is above 250
mm H20 resulting in bacteremia due to reflux of bile fluid accompanied by
with the influx of bacteria into the lymphatic system and hepatic vein. (See Figure)
5. If bacteremia continues, various complications will arise, namely sepsis.
sepsis, septic shock, multiple organ failure which is usually preceded by renal failure
caused by hepatorenal syndrome, pyogenic liver abscess (often multiple)
and even peritonitis. If there are already complications, then the prognosis
get worse. Some conditions that worsen the prognosis are
as follows (table 2.).
Age
Fever
Leukocytosis
Septic Shock
Blood culture (+)
Disruption of the phagocytosis system
Immunosuppression
The presence of liver neoplasm
IV. Bacteriology
4
should be found in bile liquid culture as well as in blood is the most numerous
consecutively, namely gram-negative bacteria, anaerobic and gram-positive that are primarily
originating from the small intestine. Table 2. Shows various types of bacteria that can
found in both bile and blood.14)
EMPEDU
Toloza EM & Wilson SF. In: Fry DE (ed). Surgical Infections 1995
There are various factors that can be used as predictors of the occurrence of bactibilia.
5
Biliary cannulation or bypass procedure
Diabetes mellitus
Hyperamylasemia
Obesity
Toloza EM & Wilson SF. In: Fry DE (ed). Surgical Infections 1995
Diagnosis
Fever > 38 C 87 - 90 %
Abdominal pain 40%
Jaundice 65%
The examination of assistive devices is especially useful for finding possible etiology.
Cholangitis is crucial in determining the type of therapy that must be undertaken as treatment.
6
definitive surgery as well as for temporary decompression purposes. Examination that
what is done is:1,6,10,12,14)
7
C-reactive protein: Usually found to be increased
VI. Management:
However, if the patient comes for the first time with shock and
severe tissue hypoperfusion requires:
Invasive monitoring
Non-narcotic analgesics, however, if there is a diagnostic confirmation, Meperidine.
or Fentanyl can be administered.
In 15% of cases, medication therapy does not improve the general condition.
the patient, so emergency decompression action is needed and can be performed
in the way:
8
Open surgery
Endoscopic drainage
Percutaneous biliary drainage system
After medication therapy and other supportive measures successfully improved the condition
9
Parenteral antibiotic therapy is also important, so
the selection of the appropriate empirical antibiotic type is as follows:14)
. Acute Cholecystitis
- Aminoglycoside - penicillin
Penicillin broad spectrum
Third generation cephalosporin
. Acute Cholangitis
Penicillin broad spectrum
Aminoglycoside - penicillin
Third generation cephalosporin
Imipenem-cilastatin
Second generation cephalosporin
. Prophylaxis:
Second generation cephalosporin
Broad spectrum penicillin
Of the three cephalosporins mentioned above, it seems that Ceftriaxone is the choice.
the best considering the following advantages: (14)
24-hour network penetration and a sufficiently high bile concentration.
10
24-hour protection with a dosage of 1 gram once a day.
3. 'Dual Excretion' refers to the kidneys and liver, enhancing safety.
4. The bactericidal activity is quite broad.
5. Economic advantages of pharmacoeconomics in terms of overall costs and staff workload.
hospital.
6. Low side effects.
A dose once a day has been clinically proven to be effective.
Baktibilia can continue to persist even though the obstruction has been successfully resolved. This condition
11
No jaundice
who handles it and of course the costs that must be incurred for
its management. There are advantages and disadvantages to both techniques. (See
table 6.
12
LC+LTCDCBDE LC + pre/post-op ERS
Advantages Advantages
Lower costs Shorter operating time
Shorter hospital stay Less technically
demanding
Potentially decreased morbidity Requires less equipment
Disadvantages Disadvantages
More technically demanding Longer hospital stay
Requires expensive equipment Increased total costs
Longer operative time Potentially increased
morbidity
Increased operating room cost Two separate procedures
Onestepapproachtosuspected
choledocholithiasis
Patient with suspected choledocholithiasis
Intraoperative cholangiography
13
In single-stage management technique, after experiencing improvements in general conditions
Two-stepapproachtopatientwith
suspectedchoe
l dochotilha
i ss
i
Yes No
ERCP / ERS Laparoscopic intraoperative
Stone Extraction cholangiography
Postoperative Yes
Stones cleared Retained stones
ERCP / ERS /
stone extraction No
Laparoscopic Open CBDE / percutaneous Done
cholecystectomy stone extraction
Rosenthal RJ et al. World J Surg 1998; 22: 1125-1132
14
Cholecystectomy can be performed after the patient's general condition improves.
Furthermore, if there are still stones after extraction through ERCP technique,
then an open exploration of the bile duct is carried out simultaneously
Cholecystectomy was performed and the remaining gallstones were removed. Option
Another action will be performed first, laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
if there are no high operational risks, then ERCP is performed to
removing the retained bile duct stones. The advantage of this approach is
relatively shorter operating time, does not require equipment and expertise
which is too high, but there is a disadvantage that it requires a maintenance time that
longer and higher morbidity.
A total of 1574 cases of surgery on the bile ducts were found as follows:
15
Mortality 3 cases (0.97%)
The handling carried out in those cases is in accordance with the protocol.
which has been described in this paper is the non-performance of surgical action
emergency, but first provided with conservative therapy to improve
general condition and then further examination was carried out to determine
the cause of the diagnosis. After sufficient preparation for the operation, which is the patient's condition that
Once repairs and the correct diagnosis have been established, surgery is performed.
definitive electively. With the management pattern as described above, the level
its mortality rate is very low at 0.97 %.
VIII. Conclusion:
1. Acute cholangitis, especially when accompanied by sepsis and shock, must receive
immediate handling because it is a hepatobiliary emergency.
Immediate operational actions are needed to address the causes, but they must
postponed until hemodynamics stabilize to reduce the numbers
mortality, in addition, the cause must be known during the perioperative period
cholangitis.
16
3. New developments have been found in means to accelerate diagnosis,
emergency measures for pus drainage or temporarily reducing obstruction, as well as
endoscopic intervention.
The type of surgical therapy chosen is adjusted according to the available facilities and
his surgical skills, but the most important thing is since the patient entered
treatment must involve intensive multidisciplinary care, which is collaboration.
between surgery specialists, internal medicine, anesthesiology, and radiology.
IX. References:
1. Benjamin I.S., Benign and Malignant Lesions of the Biliary Tract, in Garden O.J.
(Ed), Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, W.B. Saunders Company Ltd.1999 :
201 - 219.
2. Csendes A., Burdiles P., Diaz J.C., Present Role of Classic Open
Choledochostomy in the Surgical Management of Patients with Common Bile
Duct Stones, World Journal of Surgery 1998; 22: 1167 - 1170.
4. Liu C.L., Fan S.T., Wong J., Primary Biliary Stones: Diagnosis and Management,
World Journal of Surgery 1998; 22 : 1162 - 1166.
5. Lipsett P.A., Pitt H.A., Acute Cholangitis, in The Surgical Clinics of North
America, December 1990: 1297 - 1312.
6. Moston R.W., Menzies D., Gallstones in Garden O.J. (Ed), Hepatobiliary and
Pancreatic Surgery, W.B. Saunders Company Ltd. 1999: 175-197.
17
7. Microbiology and Pharmacokinetics of Parenteral Cephalosporins, Roche
Products 1985 – 621 – 93472 (Sydney).
9. Pitt H.A., Longmire W.P., Suppurative Cholangitis, in Hardy J.D. (Ed), Critical
Surgical Illness, Second Edition, W.B. Saunders Company, 1980 : 380 - 408.
10. Raraty M.G.T., Finch M., Neoptolemos J.P., Acute Cholangitis and Pancreatitis
Secondary to Common Bile Duct Stones: Management Update, World J Surg
1998; 22: 1151 - 1161.
11. Rosenthal R.J., Rossi R.L., Martin R.F., Options and Strategies for Management
of Choledocholithiasis, World J Surg 1998; 22: 1125-1132.
14. Toloza EM & Wilson SF. Cholecystitis and Cholangitis, In: Fry DE (ed). Surgical
Infections, 1995: 251 - 260.
15. Thistle J.L., Pathophysiology of Bile Duct Stones, World Journal of Surgery 1998;
22 : 1114 - 1118.
-------------------------
18
19