0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views3 pages

Economy Notes Textasis

Economy notes taxes

Uploaded by

kamalpanchal3181
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views3 pages

Economy Notes Textasis

Economy notes taxes

Uploaded by

kamalpanchal3181
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

1) Challenges of Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT)

What it is: DBT is the system where government subsidies or welfare payments are sent directly
to a person’s bank account.
Why it matters: It reduces leakages, ensures money reaches intended people, and speeds up
delivery — but it has problems too.
Key challenges (simple):
Aadhaar authentication issues: If Aadhaar data has errors, duplicates, or authentication fails,
payments can be delayed or blocked.
Lack of awareness: Many people don’t understand DBT, so they don’t enroll or resist digital
transactions — especially marginalized groups.
Infrastructure constraints: Remote areas may lack bank branches, mobile networks, internet or
reliable electricity — so transfers or cash-outs are hard.
Last-mile delivery problems: Physical issues (transport, storage) can delay cash transfers or
delivery of perishable goods.
Data security & privacy: Storing Aadhaar and other data risks breaches, identity theft, and loss of
trust in DBT if data is misused.
---
2) JAM Trinity
What it stands for: Jan Dhan (bank accounts) + Aadhaar (biometric ID) + Mobile (digital access).
Purpose / Why used:
Bring more people into the formal financial system.
Make direct benefit transfers (DBT) easier and more reliable.
Improve service delivery (faster, lower leakages).
Benefits (simple):
Makes authentication and transactions simple and secure.
Reduces fraud and leakages in welfare schemes.
Helps fast transfers directly to beneficiaries.
---
3) Universal Basic Income (UBI)
What it is: A policy where the government gives every citizen a regular, unconditional cash
payment — regardless of income or job status.
Why people propose it: To ensure everyone has a basic level of financial security, reduce
poverty and inequality.
Key features (simple):
Unconditional: No paperwork or proof of need — everyone eligible gets it.
Regular: Payments come at steady intervals (e.g., monthly) so people can plan.
Universal: Offered to all citizens, no exclusion.
Basic amount: The payment is meant to cover essential living costs (may differ by region).
Pros: Reduces poverty quickly, simplifies welfare systems, gives people freedom to use money
as they need. Cons/concerns: Costly for government; might reduce work incentives (debatable);
needs careful design to avoid inflation or crowding out other welfare.
---
4) Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act (FRBMA), 2003
What it is: A law passed in 2003 to make government finances more disciplined, transparent, and
accountable.
Who runs it: Department of Economic Affairs (Ministry of Finance) administers it.
Main objectives (simple):
Ensure fairness across generations in fiscal policy (don’t pass huge debt to future generations).
Achieve long-term macroeconomic stability by reducing deficits.
Help monetary policy work better.
Promote prudent debt management for fiscal sustainability.
Key provisions (what the Central Government must do):
Limit fiscal deficit: (target was to move towards 3% of GDP — specific deadlines have been set
in different budgets).
Manage debt levels: Keep total central government debt under a certain limit (e.g., targets like
not exceeding 60% of GDP were proposed).
Limit guarantees: Avoid providing extra guarantees for loans beyond a small percent of GDP (to
control contingent liabilities).
Strive for fiscal targets: Work to meet targets and deadlines; but law allows limited deviations for
disasters or severe shocks.
Amendments: FRBMA was amended several times (2004, 2012, 2015, 2018) — the 2018 (4th)
amendment made significant changes.
N.K. Singh Committee recommendations (short):
Use debt-to-GDP ratio as main target (e.g., aim for 60% overall; 40% for Centre by certain year).
Set annual targets to reduce fiscal and revenue deficits gradually.
Create an Autonomous Fiscal Council to oversee fiscal policy and advise the government.
---
5) Finance Commission (general)
Constitutional basis: Created under Article 280 of the Constitution — it is a constitutional body.
Purpose: To ensure fiscal federalism — recommend how tax revenues should be split between
the Centre and states and among states themselves.
Composition: Appointed by the President every five years; usually includes a Chairperson and
members with finance/economics/public administration expertise.
Key functions (simple):
Recommend how to share central tax revenues with states (vertical devolution).
Suggest grants-in-aid to revenue-deficient states.
Recommend measures to strengthen state consolidated funds (state finances).
Advise on disaster management financing and other fiscal matters referred by the President.
---
6) 15th Finance Commission — key points (summary)
Timeframe: Recommendations cover 2021–22 to 2025–26 (the Commission was constituted in
2017, chaired by N.K. Singh).
Major recommendations:
Vertical devolution (Centre → States): Maintain 41% of the divisible pool to states (this is the
share of central taxes to be given to states).
Horizontal devolution (among states): The formula (weights) used to split that 41% among
states:
Income distance: 45% (measures how far a state is from highest per capita income — helps
poorer states)
Population (2011): 15%
Area: 15%
Demographic performance: 12.5%
Forest & ecology: 10%
Tax & fiscal efforts: 2.5%
Revenue deficit grants: Recommended around ■3 trillion over the award period to help states
with revenue shortfalls.
Performance-based incentives: Grants tied to outcomes in health, education, rural roads,
governance reforms, power sector — to encourage better performance.
Grants to local governments: Funds and incentives for rural and urban local bodies (e.g., health,
incubation of new cities).
Million-Plus Cities Challenge Fund (MCF): Grants for cities with >1 million population for air
quality, drinking water, sanitation and waste management.
Fiscal space for Centre: After transfers, about 34% of gross revenue receipts remain for central
priorities.
Criticism: Performance-based incentives can limit state autonomy and conditional borrowing
rules might hinder state development spending.
---
7) Fiscal accountability & Union accountability (short)
Criticism noted: There’s limited mechanism to hold the Union (central) government fully
accountable for fiscal prudence — meaning joint fiscal responsibility between Centre and states
can be diluted if Centre is not restrained.
---
8) 16th Finance Commission (short)
What it is: The next Finance Commission (for five years starting April 1, 2026).
Constitutional role: Like earlier Commissions, it will recommend tax sharing, grants, and fiscal
measures for its five-year award period.
Composition (as in your notes):
Chairperson: Dr. Arvind Panagariya.
Members: Ajay Narayan Jha, Annie George Mathew, Manoj Panda, Soumya Kanti Ghosh
(part-time), etc.
Secretary: Ritvik Ranjan Pandey.
Mandate & Responsibilities (what they’ll do):
Propose how to divide net tax proceeds between Centre and states.
Define principles for grants-in-aid to states.
Recommend measures to strengthen state consolidated funds.
Review and suggest improvements in disaster management financing framework (under Disaster
Management Act, 2005).

You might also like