Micromulaton
Micromulaton
Received on 07 April, 2011; received in revised form 12 May, 2011; accepted 16 July, 2011
ABSTRACT
Keywords: Microemulsions are clear, stable, isotropic mixtures of oil, water and
Microemulsion, surfactant, frequently in combination with a cosurfactant. Microemulsions
Surfactants, act as potential drug carrier systems for oral, topical, and parenteral
Co-surfactants, administration. They offer the advantage of spontaneous formation, ease of
Oil manufacturing and scale-up, thermodynamic stability, and improved drug
Correspondence to Author: solubilization and bioavailability. Preparing a pharmaceutically acceptable
dosage form demands a clear understanding of the micro-emulsion
Prof. (Dr.) N. V. Satheesh Madhav
structure, phase behavior, factors leading to its thermodynamic stability and
Director, Faculty of Pharmacy, D.I.T, the potential uses and limitations of the microemulsion system. Knowledge
Makkawala green, P.O Bhagwatpur, of the various methods available to thoroughly characterize a microemulsion
Mussorie Diversion Road, Dehradun, system is essential. While microemulsion is used in several fields, in this
Uttarakhand, India
review the pharmaceutical applications are emphasized. Several references
are cited, but the list is by no means exhaustive. The review is written so that
a newcomer to the field can easily grasp the important facts pertaining to
this novel delivery system.
INTRODUCTION: Microemulsions are clear, stable, groups in the aqueous phase. As in the binary systems
isotropic liquid mixtures of oil, water and surfactant, (water/surfactant or oil/surfactant), self-assembled
frequently in combination with a cosurfactant. The structures of different types can be formed, ranging,
aqueous phase may contain salt(s) and/or other for example, from (inverted) spherical and cylindrical
ingredients, and the "oil" may actually be a complex micelles to lamellar phases and bi-continuous
mixture of different hydrocarbons and olefins. In microemulsions, which may coexist with
contrast to ordinary emulsions, microemulsions form predominantly oil or aqueous phases.
upon simple mixing of the components and do not
require the high shear conditions generally used in the
formation of ordinary emulsions. The two basic types
of microemulsions are direct (oil dispersed in water,
o/w) and reversed (water dispersed in oil, w/o) 1-3.
Type IV: Single phase homogeneous mixture. systems can be in equilibrium with other phases, many
systems, especially those with high volume fractions of
In 1959, Schulman et al., 22 titrated a multiphase both the two immiscible phases, can be easily
system (consisting of water, oil and surfactant) with destabilized by anything that changes this equilibrium
alcohol and obtained a transparent solution which e.g. high or low temperature or addition of surface
they termed ’a microemulsion’. At that early stage tension modifying agents.
some researchers preferred to identify these systems
with ‘swollen micelles’ 23, others used the term However, examples of relatively stable microemulsions
‘micellar emulsion’ 24. Nevertheless, the term can be found. It is believed that the mechanism for
‘microemulsion’ is a commonly used name nowadays. removing acid build up in car engine oils involves low
A detailed historical background of microemulsions water phase volume, water-in-oil (w/o)
can be found elsewhere 25. microemulsions. Theoretically, transport of the
aqueous acid droplets through the engine oil to micro-
Phase Diagrams: The microemulsion region is usually dispersed calcium carbonate particles in the oil should
characterized by constructing ternary-phase diagrams. be most efficient when the droplets are small enough
Three components are the basic requirement to form a to transport a single hydrogen ion (the smaller the
microemulsion: an oil phase, an aqueous phase and a droplets, the greater the number of droplets, the
surfactant. If a cosurfactant is used, it may sometimes faster the neutralization). Such microemulsions are
be represented at a fixed ratio to surfactant as a single probably very stable across a reasonably wide range of
component, and treated as a single "pseudo- elevated temperatures.
component". The relative amounts of these three
components can be represented in a ternary phase
diagram. Gibbs phase diagrams can be used to show
the influence of changes in the volume fractions of the
different phases on the phase behavior of the system
26
.
In all three types of microemulsions, the interface is emulsions are cloudy while microemulsions are clear
stabilized by an appropriate combination of the or translucent. In addition, there are distinct
surfactants and/or co-surfactants. The key difference differences in their method of preparation, since
between emulsions and microemulsions are that the emulsions require a large input of energy while
former, whilst they may exhibit excellent kinetic microemulsions do not. The latter point has obvious
stability, are fundamentally thermodynamically implications when considering the relative cost of
unstable and will eventually phase separate 1. Another commercial production of the two types of system.
important difference concerns their appearance;
TABLE 1: COMPARISON WITH EMULSIONS (MACROEMULSIONS) 28-33
Emulsions (Macroemulsions) Microemulsions
Most emulsions are opaque (white) because bulk of their droplets is Microemulsions are transparent or translucent as their
greater than wavelength of light and most oils have higher refractive droplet diameter are less than ¼ of the wavelength of light,
indices than water. they scatter little light.
Require intense agitation for their formation. Generally obtained by gentle mixing of ingredients.
Theory of microemulsion formulation: Microemulsion the surface tension of the oil–water interface and the
formation and stability can be explained on the basis change in entropy of the system such that 34,
of a simplified thermodynamic rationalization. The free
energy of microemulsion formation can be considered DG f = γDA - T DS
to depend on the extent to which surfactant lowers
Where, DG f =free energy of formation, γ = Surface
tension of the oil–water interface, DA =Change in
interfacial area on microemulsification, DS = Change in account the relative contribution of hydrophilic and
entropy of the system which is effectively the hydrophobic fragments of the surfactant molecule. It is
dispersion entropy, and T = Temperature. generally accepted that low HLB (3-6) surfactants are
favored for the formation of w/o microemulsions
It should be noted that when a microemulsion is whereas surfactants with high HLBs (8-18) are
formed, the change in DA is very large due to the large preferred for the formation of o/w microemulsion
number of nanodroplets are formed. It is seen that systems. Ionic surfactants such as sodium dodecyl
while the value of γ is positive at all times, it is very sulphate which have HLBs greater than 20, often
small (of the order of fractions of mN/m), and is offset require the presence of a co-surfactant to reduce their
by the entropic component. The dominant favorable effective HLB to a value within the range required for
entropic contribution is the very large dispersion microemulsion formation. In contrast, the CPP relates
entropy arising from the mixing of one phase in the the ability of surfactant to form particular aggregates
other in the form of large numbers of nanodroplets. to the geometry of the molecule itself.
However, favorable entropic contributions also arise
from other dynamic processes such as surfactant A combination of these, particularly ionic and non-
diffusion in the interfacial layer and monomer-micelle ionic, can be very effective at increasing the extent of
surfactant exchange. the microemulsion region. Examples of non-Ionics
include polyoxyethylene surfactants such as Brij
Thus, a negative free energy of formation is achieved 35(C12E35) or sugar esters such as sorbitan monooleate
when large reductions in surface tension are (Span 80). Phospholipids are a notable example of
accompanied by significant favorable entropic change. zwitter ionic surfactants and exhibit excellent
In such cases, microemulsification is spontaneous and biocompatibility. Lecithin preparations from a variety
the resulting dispersion is thermodynamically stable. of sources including soybean and egg are available
Though, it has been know that several factors commercially and contain diacylphosphatidylcholine as
determine whether a w/o or o/w microemulsion its major constituent 38-41.
system will be formed but in general it could be Quaternary ammonium alkyl salts form one of the best
summarized that the most likely microemulsion would known classes of cationic surfactants, with
be that in which the phase with the smaller volume hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) (Rees
fraction forms. et al., 1995), and the twin-tailed surfactant
Surfactants, co-surfactants and oil used in didodcecylammonium bromide (DDAB) are amongst
microemulsion formulation: the most well known (Olla et al., 1999). The most
widely studied anionic surfactant is probably sodium
Surfactants- used to stabilize the system; -non- bis-2-ethylhexylsulphosuccinate (AOT) which is twin-
ionic, zwitter ion, cationic or anionic. tailed and is a particularly effective stabiliser of w/o
microemulsions 42.
Co-surfactant- decrease the interfacial tension;
-and increase the microemulsion region; - In most cases, single-chain surfactants alone are
alcohols, amines, and cholesterol unable to reduce the oil /water interfacial tension
sufficiently to enable a microemulsion to form, a point
Oils- hydrocarbon oils such as heptane or - made in a number of pertinent microemulsions
cyclic oils like cyclohexane the droplets i.e., reviews43-47. Medium chain length alcohols which are
internal phase. commonly added as co-surfactants have the effect of
further reducing the interfacial tension, whilst
Attempts have been made to rationalize surfactant
increasing the fluidity of the interface thereby
behavior in terms of the hydrophilic- lipophilic balance
increasing the entropy of the system. Medium chain
(HLB) 35, as well as the critical packing parameter (CPP)
36, 37 length alcohols also increase the mobility of the
. Both approaches are fairly empirical but can be a
hydrocarbon tail and also allow greater 44, 45.
useful guide to surfactant selection. The HLB takes into
ternary phase diagram. Ultrasonicator can finally be microemulsion region was considerably large since 1-
used so to achieve the desired size range for dispersed butanol acted as a cosurfactant and interacted with
globules. It is then allowed to equilibrate. Gel may be the surfactant monolayer to increase the flexibility of
prepared by adding a gelling agent to the above the interfacial film.
microemulsion. Carbomers (crosslinked polyacrylic
acid polymers) are the most widely used gelling agent. Characterization of Microemulsion: The droplet size,
viscosity, density, turbidity, refractive index, phase
Construction of Phase Diagram: Pseudo-ternary phase separation and pH measurements shall be performed
diagrams of oil, water, and co-surfactant/surfactants to characterize the microemulsion.
mixtures are constructed at fixed cosurfactant/
surfactant weight ratios. Phase diagrams are obtained 1. Droplet size: The droplet size distribution of
by mixing of the ingredients, which are pre-weighed microemulsion can be determined by either light
into glass vials and titrated with water and stirred well scattering technique or electron microscopy. This
at room temperature. Formation of technique has been suggested as the best method
Monophasic/Biphasic system is confirmed by visual for predicting microemulsion stability.
inspection. In case turbidity appears followed by a Dynamic Light-Scattering Measurements: The
phase separation, the samples are considered as
DLS measurements are taken at 90° in a
biphasic system. Monophasic, clear and transparent dynamic light-scattering spectrophotometer
mixtures are visualized after stirring and the samples using a neon laser of wavelength 632 nm. The
are marked as points in the phase diagram. The area data is processed by the built-in computer with
covered by these points is considered as the the instrument.
microemulsion region of existence.
Polydispersity: Polydispersity is studied using
Abbe refractometer.
200C for later use. Alternatively the full Pharmacological Studies: Therapeutic effectiveness is
thickness dorsal skin of male hairless mice may evaluated for the specific pharmacological action that
be used. The skin shall be excised, washed with the drug purports to show as per stated guidelines.
normal saline and then used. The passive
permeability of lipophilic drug through the skin Estimation of Skin Irritancy: As the formulation is
is investigated using Franz diffusion cells with intended for dermal application skin irritancy should
known effective diffusional area. The hydrated be tested. The dorsal area of the trunk is shaved with
skin samples are used for the study. The clippers 24 hours before the experiment. The skin shall
receiver compartment contains a complexing be scarred with a lancet. 0.5 ml of product is applied
agent like cyclodextrin in the receiver phase, and then covered with gauze and a polyethylene film
which increases the solubility and allows the and fixed with hypoallergenic adhesive bandage. The
maintenance of sink conditions in the test be removed after 24 hours and the exposed skin is
experiments. Samples are withdrawn at regular graded for formation of edema and erythema. Scoring
interval and analyzed for amount of drug is repeated 72 hours later. Based on the scoring the
released. formulation shall be graded as ‘non-irritant’, ‘irritant’
and ‘highly irritant’.
4. In- vivo Studies:
Stability Studies: The physical stability of the
Bioavailability studies: Skin bioavailability of microemulsion shall be determined under different
topical applied microemulsion on rats: Male storage conditions (4, 25 and 40°C) for 12 months.
Sprague–Dawley rats (400–500 g) are needed
to be anesthetized (15 mg/kg pentobarbital Fresh preparations as well as those that have been
sodium i.p.) and placed on their back. The hair kept under various stress conditions for extended
on abdominal skin is trimmed off and then period of time are subjected to droplet size
bathed gently with distilled water. Anesthesia distribution analysis. Effect of surfactant and their
should be maintained with 0.1-ml concentration on size of droplet are also studied.
pentobarbital (15 mg/ml) along the Applications of Microemulsions:
experiment. Microemulsions is applied on the
skin surface (1.8 cm2) and glued to the skin by a Pharmaceutical Applications
silicon rubber. After 10, 30 and 60 min of invivo
study, the rats are killed by aspiration of ethyl 1. Parenteral delivery.
ether. The drug exposed skin areas is swabbed 2. Oral drug delivery.
three to four times with three layers of gauze
pads, then bathed for 30 s with running water, 3. Topical drug delivery.
wiped carefully, tape-stripped (X10 strips) and
harvested from the animals. 4. Ocular and pulmonary delivery.
Both o/w and w/o microemulsion are used for of the drug to affected area of the skin or eyes. Both
parenteral delivery. The literature contains the details O/W and W/O microemulsions have been evaluated in
of the many microemulsion systems, few of these can a hairless mouse model for the delivery of
be used for the parenteral delivery because the prostaglandin E1 53.The microemulsions were based on
toxicity of the surfactant and parenteral use. An oleic acid or Gelucire 44/14 as the oil phase and were
alternative approach was taken by Von Corsewant and stabilized by a mixture of Labrasol (C8 and C10
Thoren 50 in which C3-C4 alcohols were replaced with polyglycolysed glycerides) and Plurol Oleique CC 497 as
parenterally acceptable co-surfactants, polyethylene surfactant.
glycol (400) / polyethylene glycol (660) 12-
hydroxystearate / ethanol, while maintaining a flexible Although enhanced delivery rates were observed in
surfactant film and spontaneous curvature near zero the case of the o/w microemulsion, the authors
to obtain and almost balanced middle phase concluded that the penetration rates were inadequate
microemulsion. The middle phase structure was for practical use from either system. The use of
preferred in this application, because it has been able lecithin/IPP/water microemulsion for the transdermal
to incorporate large volumes of oil and water with a transport of indomethacin and diclofenac has also
minimal concentration of surfactant. been reported. Fourier transform infra red (FTIR)
spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry
Oral Delivery: Microemulsion formulations offer the (DSC) showed the IPP organogel had disrupted the
several benefits over conventional oral formulation for lipid organisation in human stratum corneum after a 1
oral administration including increased absorption, day incubation 54.
improved clinical potency and decreased drug toxicity
51
. Therefore, microemulsion has been reported to be The transdermal delivery of the hydrophilic drug
ideal delivery of drugs such as steroids, hormones, diphenhydramine hydrochloride from a w/o
diuretic and antibiotics. microemulsion through the excised human skin has
also been investigated. The formulation was based on
Pharmaceutical drugs of peptides and proteins are combinations of Tween 80 and Span 20 (surfactants)
highly potent and specific in their physiological with IPM. However two additional formulations were
functions. However, most are difficult to administer tested containing cholesterol and oleic acid,
orally. With on oral bioavailability in conventional (i.e. respectively. Cholesterol increased drug penetration
non-microemulsion based) formulation of less than whereas oleic acid had no measurable effect, but the
10%, they are usually not therapeutically active by oral authors clearly demonstrated that penetration
administration. Because of their low oral characteristics can be modulated by compositional
bioavailability, most protein drugs are only available as selection 55.
parenteral formulations. However, peptide drugs have
an extremely short biological half life when Ocular and Pulmonary Delivery: For the treatment of
administered parenterally, so require multiple dosing. eye diseases, drugs are essentially delivered topically.
O/W microemulsions have been investigated for ocular
A microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine, named administration, to dissolve poorly soluble drugs, to
Neoral® has been introduced to replace Sandimmune®, increase absorption and to attain prolong release
a crude oil-in-water emulsion of cyclosporine profile.
formulation. Neoral® is formulated with a finer
dispersion, giving it a more rapid and predictable The microemulsions containing pilocarpine were
absorption and less inter and intra patient variability 52. formulated using lecithin, propylene glycol and PEG
200 as co-surfactant and IPM as the oil phase. The
Topical Delivery: Topical administration of drugs can formulations were of low viscosity with a refractive
have advantages over other methods for several index lending to ophthalmologic applications 56. The
reasons, one of which is the avoidance of hepatic first formation of a water-in-HFA propellant microemulsion
pass metabolism of the drug and related toxicity stabilized by fluorocarbon non-ionic surfactant and
effects. Second is the direct delivery and targetability intended for pulmonary delivery has been described.
Microemulsions in Biotechnology: Many enzymatic CONCLUSION: Till date, microemulsions have been
and bio-catalytic reactions are conducted in pure shown to be able to protect labile drug, control drug
organic or aqua-organic media. Biphasic media are release, increase drug solubility, increase
also used for these types of reactions. The use of pure bioavailability and reduce patient variability.
apolar media causes the denaturation of biocatalysts. Furthermore, it has proven possible to formulate
The use of water-proof media is relatively preparations suitable for most routes of
advantageous. Enzymes in low water content display administration. There is still however a considerable
and have; amount of fundamental work characterizing the
physico-chemical behavior of microemulsions that
1. Increased solubility in non-polar reactants needs to be performed before they can live up to their
2. Possibility of shifting thermodynamic potential as multipurpose drug delivery vehicles.
equilibrium in favor of condensations
3. Improvement of thermal stability of the Recently, several research papers have been published
enzymes, enabling reactions to be carried out for the improvement of drug delivery, but still there is
at higher temperatures. a need to put an emphasis on its characterization part
including in vitro evaluation. Besides this, research
Many enzymes, including lipases, esterases, papers shows higher percentage of surfactant (much
dehydrogenases and oxidases often function in the higher than CMC level) used for the formation of
cells in microenvironments that are hydrophobic in microemulsion, irrespective of different routes of
nature. In biological systems many enzymes operate administration, but there is a lack of toxicological
at the interface between hydrophobic and hydrophilic evaluation of the prepared microemulsion, which can
domains and these usually interfaces are stabilized by be a broad research area in future.
polar lipids and other natural amphiphiles. Enzymatic
catalysis in microemulsions has been used for a variety ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Authors thank the Director,
of reactions, such as synthesis of esters, peptides and Dehradun Institute of Technology, Dehradun, for
sugar acetals transesterification; various hydrolysis providing me with the necessary guidance for this
reactions and steroid transformation. The most widely work.
used class of enzymes in microemulsion-based
reactions is of lipases 57. Declaration of Interest section: None
9. Alvarez-Figueroa, M.J., Blanco-Méndez, J: Transdermal delivery of 32. Betageri, G., Prabhu, S: Semisolid preparations In Encyclopaedia
methotrexate: iontophoretic delivery from hydrogels and passive of Pharmaceutical Technology, Second Edition; Ed: Swarbrick, J.,
delivery from microemulsions. Int. J. Pharm. 215, 57–65. Boylan, J.C.; Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2002, Vol-3; 2441 –
10. Pershing, L.K., Lambert, L.D., Knutson, K: Mechanism of ethanol- 2442.
enhanced estradiol permeation across human skin in vivo. Pharm. 33. Ghosh, P.K., Murthy, R.S.R: Microemulsions: A Potential Drug
Res. 7, 170–175. Delivery System, C. Drug. Del., 2006, 3; 167-180.
11. Liu, P., Kurihara-Bergstrom, T., Good, W.R: Cotransport of 34. Hoar, T.P., Schulman, J.H: Transparent water-in-oil dispersions:
estradiol and ethanol through human skin in vitro: understanding the oleopathic hydro-micelle, Nature, 1943, 152; 102-103.
the permeant/enhancer flux relationship. Pharm. Res. 8, 938– 35. Carlfors, J.,Blute, I. , Schmidt, V: Lidocaine in microemulsion — a
944. dermal delivery system, J. Disp. Sci. Technol. 12, 467–482.
12. Kim, Y.-H., Ghanem, A.-H., Mahmoud, H., Higuchi, W.I: Short 36. Israelachvilli, J.N., Mitchell, D.J., Ninham, B.W: Theory of self
chain alkanols as transport enhancers for lipophilic and assembly of hydrocarbon amphiphiles into micelles and bilayers,
polar/ionic permeants in hairless mouse skin: mechanism(s) of J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II 72, 1525–1567.
action. Int. J. Pharm. 80, 17–31. 37. Mitchell, D.J., Ninham, B.W: Micelles, vesicles and
13. Pershing, L.K., Parry, G.E., Lambert, L.D: Disparity of in vitro and microemulsions, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday. Trans. II 77, 601–629.
in vivo oleic acid-enhanced b-estradiol percutaneous absorption 38. Attwood, D., Mallon, C., Taylor, C.J: Phase studies of oil-in water
across human skin. Pharm. Res. 10, 1745– 1750. phospholipid microemulsions, Int. J. Pharm. 84, R5–R8.
14. Tanojo, H., Junginger, H.E., Boddé, H.E: In vivo human skin 39. Aboofazeli, R., Lawrence, C.B., Wicks, S.R., Lawrence, M.J:
permeability enhancement by oleic acid: transepidermal water Investigations into the formation and characterisation of
loss and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy studies. J. phospholipid microemulsions. III. Pseudo-ternary phase diagrams
Control. Release 47, 31–39. of systems containing water–lecithin–isopropyl myristate and
15. Hadgraft, J: Skin, the final frontier. Int. J. Pharm. 224, 1–18. either an alkanoic acid, amine, alkanediol, polyethylene glycol
16. Goldberg-Cettina, M., Liu, P., Nightingale, J., Kurihara-Bergstrom, alkyl ether or alcohol as cosurfactant, Int. J. Pharm. 111, 63–72.
T: Enhanced transdermal delivery of estradiol in vitro using binary 40. Aboofazeli, R., Lawrence, M. J: Investigations into the formation
vehicles of isopropyl myristate and short-chain alkanols. Int. J. and characterization of phospholipid microemulsions: I Pseudo-
Pharm. 114, 237–245. ternary phase diagrams of systems containing water–lecithin–
17. Fang, J.-Y., Yu, S.-Y., Wu, P.-C., Huang, Y.-B., Tsai, Y.-H: In vitro alcohol–isopropyl myristate, Int. J. Pharm. 93, 161–175.
skin permeation of estradiol from various proniosome 41. Shinoda, K., Araki, M., Sadaghiani, A., Khan, A., Lindman, B:
formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 215, 91–99. Lecithin-Based Microemulsions: Phase Behaviour and Micro-
18. Acharya, S. P., Moulik, S. K. Sanyal, Mishra, B. K. and Puri, P. M: Structure, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 989–93.
Physicochemical Investigations of Microemulsification of Coconut 42. Angelo, M.D., Fioretto, D., Onori, G., Palmieri, L., Santucvelocity,
Oil and Water Using Polyoxyethylene 2-Cetyl Ether (Brij 52) and A: Dynamics of water-containing sodium bis(2-ethylhex-
Isopropanol or Ethanol, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science yl)sulfosuccinate (AOT) reverse micelles: a high-frequency
245 , 163–170. dielectric study, Phys. Rev. E 54, 993–996.
19. Winsor, P. A. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1948, 44, 376. 43. Bhargava, H.N., Narurkar, A., Lieb, L. M: Using microemulsions for
20. Schulman, J. H.; Stoeckenius, W.; Prince, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1959, drug delivery, Pharm. Tech. 11, 46–52.
63, 1677. 44. Attwood: Microemulsions, in: J. Kreuter (Ed.), Colloidal Drug
21. Friberg, S. E.; Mandell, L.; Larsson, M. J: Colloid Interface Sci. Delivery Systems, Dekker , New York , 31–71.
1969, 29, 155. 45. Eccleston: Microemulsions, in: J. Swarbrick, J.C. Boylan (Eds.),
22. Adamson, A. W. J: Colloid Interface Sci. 1969, 29, 261. Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology, Vol. 9, Marcel
23. Prince, L. M: Microemulsions, Theory and Practice; Prince, L. M., Dekker, New York, 375–421.
Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1977. 46. Lawrence, M.J: Surfactant systems: microemulsions and vesicles
24. Tadros, Th. F.; Vincent, B: Encyclopaedia of Emulsion Technology; as vehicles for drug delivery, Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet.
Becher, P., Ed.; Vol 1; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1980. 3, 257-269.
25. Hunter, R. J: Introduction to Modern Colloid Science; 1st ed.; 47. Lawrence, M.J: Microemulsions as drug delivery vehicles, Curr.
Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1994. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 1, 826–832.
26. Martin, A: Coarse Dispersions In Physical Pharmacy, Fourth 48. Vyas, S.P., Khar, R.K: Submicron emulsions in targeted and
Edition; B.I. Waverly Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1994; 495 – 496. controlled drug delivery, Novel Carrier Systems; CBS Publishers
27. Shaji, J., Reddy, M.S: Microemulsions as drug delivery systems, and Distributors, New Delhi, 2002; 282 – 302.
Pharma Times, 2004, 36 (7); 17 – 24. 49. Prapaporn Boonme et al., Mahidol University, Bangkok:
28. Kayes, F.B: Disperse systems In Pharmaceutics: The Science of Characterization of Microemulsion Structures in the
Dosage Form Design, International Student Edition; Ed: Aulton, Pseudoternary Phase Diagram of Isopropyl Palmitate/Water/Brij
M.E.; Churchill Livingstone, 1999; 110. 97:1-Butanol. Published: May 12, 2006
29. Rieger, M.M: Emulsions In Theory and Practice of Industrial 50. Corswant, V.C., Thoren, P., Engstrom, S: Triglyceride – based
Pharmacy, Third Edition; Ed: Lachman, L., Lieberman, H.A., Kanig, microemulsion by Intravenous administration of sparingly soluble
J.L.; Varghese Publishing House, Bombay, 1987; 507 – 519. substances, J .Pharm. Sci., 1998, 87 (2); 200.
30. Emsap, W.J., Siepmann, J., Paeratakul, O: Disperse Systems In 51. Ho, H.O., Hsiao, C.C., Sheu, M.T: Preparation of Microemulsions
Modern Pharmaceutics, Fourth Edition; Ed: Banker, G.S., Rhodes, Using Polyglyceryl Fatty acid Esters as Surfactant for the Delivery
C.T.; Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2002, Vol-121; 260 – 261. of Protein Drugs, J.Pharm Sci, 1996, 85 (2) ; 138.
31. Eccleston, G.M: Emulsion and Microemulsions In Encyclopedia of 52. Kovarik, J.M., Muller, E.A., Van Bree, J.B., Tetzioff, W., Kutz, K:
Pharmaceutical Technology, Second Edition; Ed: Swarbrick, J., Reduced Inter and Intra Individual Variability in Cyclosporin
Boylan, J.C.; Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2002, Vol-2; 1080 – Pharmacokinetics From Microemulsion Formulation, J. Pharm.
1085. Sci., 1994, 83 (3); 444.
53. Ho, H.O., Huang, M.C., Chen, L.C., Hsia, A., Chen, K.T., Chiang, 56. Hasse, A., Keipert, S: Development and characterisation of
H.S., Spur, B.W., Wong, P.Y.K., Sheu, M.Y: The percutaneous microemulsions for ocular application, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.,
delivery of prostaglandin E1 and its alkyl esters by 1997, 43; - 179–183.
microemulsions, Chin. Pharm. J., 1998, 50; 257–266. 57. Malmsten, M: Microemulsions in pharmaceuticals In Handbook
54. Schmalfun,U., Neubert, R., Wohlrab, W: Modification of drug of Microemulsion, Science and Technology; Ed : Kumar, P., Mittal,
penetration into human skin using microemulsions, J. Control. K.L.; Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1999; 755 – 771.
Rel., 1997, 46; 279–285. 58. Paul, B.K., Moulik, S.P: Uses and Applications of Microemulsions,
55. Dreher, F., Walde, P., Walther, P., Wehrli, E: Interaction of a Current Science, 2001, 80 (8); 990 – 1001.
lecithin microemulsion gel with human stratum corneum and its
effect on transdermal transport, J. Control. Rel., 1997, 45; 131–
140.
***********