Art1 Bach
Art1 Bach
Páginas 43-56
                                                                                     IDESIA (Chile) Septiembre-Noviembre, 2014
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was evaluate the drying of the lemon grass plant (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf) at different air temperatures
(40 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C and 70 °C) to adjust the experimental data obtained with different mathematical models and assess the
quality of the plant after drying. A completely randomized design (CRD) was used with three drying replications for each speed
and temperature of the drying air. The essential oil content extracted from the dried plant at 0.8 m s–1 and 1.3 m s–1 with manual
control system was not affected by the drying process; the temperature of the drying air had a negative influence on the levels of
the essential oil of the plant; drying with automatic control decreased the essential oil content for all velocities studied compared
to the fresh plant; increments in the temperature of the drying air significantly reduced drying time. The mathematical model of
Two Terms is adequate to describe the drying process of lemon grass plant (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf); diffusion values i ncreased
with increasing temperature of the drying air, while the value of activation energy was 62.84 kJ mol–1.
          Key words: air, control, plant, velocity, temperature.
RESUMEN
El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el secado de la planta de hierba de limón (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf) a diferentes tempera-
turas de aire (40 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C y 70 °C) para ajustar los datos experimentales obtenidos con diferentes modelos matemáticos y
evaluar la calidad de la planta después del secado. Un diseño completamente al azar (DCA) se utilizó con tres repeticiones para
cada velocidad de secado y la temperatura del aire de secado. El contenido de aceite esencial extraído de la planta seca en 0,8 m
s–1 y 1,3 m s–1 con sistema de control manual no se vio afectado por el proceso de secado, la temperatura del aire de secado tuvo
una influencia negativa sobre la reducción de los niveles del aceite esencial de la planta, el secado con control automático de
disminución del contenido de aceite esencial para todas las velocidades estudiado en comparación la planta fresca; incrementa
el valor de la temperatura del aire de secado ha reducido significativamente el equipo de secado, el modelo matemático de Dos
Términos es adecuada para describir el proceso de secado de la planta de hierba de limón (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf), los
valores de difusión aumentó con el aumento de temperatura del aire de secado, mientras que el valor de la energía de activación
es 62.84 kJ mol–1.
          Palabras clave: aire, control, velocidad, temperatura.
between average moisture content and drying time.          Department at the Federal University of Viçosa-UFV
However, this method omits the fundamentals of the         (Minas Gerais, Brazil). The lemon grass was harvested
drying process and its parameters have no physical         between 8:00 and 9:00 am and the samples were taken
meaning, therefore it does not provide an accurate         immediately to the laboratory for selection, moisture
view of the important processes that occur during          content determination and cooled in refrigerated
the phenomenon while describing the drying curves          chamber at 5 °C for subsequent drying. A fixed-
for certain experimental conditions. The model of          bed dryer with upward air flow was used, which
Thompson et al. (1968) has traditionally been used in      contained 4 perforated trays with upward air flow
studies of drying agricultural products and foodstuffs.    and three electrical resistances for heating the drying
Much emphasis has been given to developing semi-           air (Figure 1). Another experiment was conducted
theoretical models for achieving harmony between           by varying the temperature of the drying air (40,
theory and ease of use. Such models are generally          50, 60 and 70 °C). Each drying test was performed
based on Newton’s Law of Cooling applied to mass           using 250 g of lemon grass leaves, making a layer of
transfer. When applying this law it is assumed that        5 cm thick in the drying chamber. The leaves were
conditions are isothermal and resistance to moisture       cut in 2 cm lengths and the drying air temperature
transfer is confined only to the surface of the product    was kept at 50 °C, because essential oil content and
(Brooker et al., 1992). Among semi-theoretical models,     active principle concentration are high at this length
the model of two terms, the Henderson and Pabis,           and temperature, as described by Martinazzo et al.
Lewis, Page and Modified Page and Panchariya et            (2010). Only one of the dryer trays, dryer chamber
al. (2002) have been widely used. Currently, research      three, was filled with lemon grass leaves (Figure 1a).
on the study of the kinetics of thin layer drying is       The reason for not completely filling all trays was due
performed with various agricultural products such          to the amount of plant sample available. The control
as seeds, grains, fruits and some plant species with       of the temperature and velocity of drying air were
economic importance. The conditions of the drying          done with an automatic controller as described by
process that fit different models to each specific         Prates et al. (2011). The dryer’s manual control was
situation are observed. Panchariya et al. (2002) set       by regulation (opening and closing) of the diaphragm
various equations to the drying process of black tea       (Figure 1b). Temperature data was taken with the use
and concluded that the model of Lewis reproduced best      of thermocouples previously calibrated and placed in
experimental data of thin layer drying in temperature      pre-set points of the dryer. Drying air velocity was
ranges from 80 to 120 °C. However, Demir et al.            tracked by an anemometer (0.8 m s1, 1.3 m s–1 and
(2004), evaluating different mathematical models for       1.8 m s–1). The data of temperature and velocity of
drying of laurel (Laurus nobilis L.), found the Page       drying air were taken in an automatic data acquisition
model to be the one that best described the process,       system that recorded their values in a microcomputer.
while Doymaz (2006), who evaluated drying of               The moisture content of the samples was determined
leaves of dill (Anethum graveolens L.) and parsley         using the gravimetric method recommended by ASAE
(Petroselinum crispum L.), defined the Midilli model       Standards (2000).
as the most suitable to describe the drying curves at
temperatures of 40 to 70 °C. The aim of the present        2.2. Determination of oil essential content
study is to fit mathematical models and evaluate
the quality of plants using thin layer drying and the           After drying, samples were packed in
experimental data obtained in drying leaves of lemon       polyethylene bags (40 μm) and stored in a refrigerated
grass Cymbopogon citratus (DC) Stapf at different          chamber at 5 ºC until being submitted to extraction
drying air temperatures.                                   of the essential oil. The essential oil was extracted
                                                           by hydro distillation utilizing Clevenger equipment
              Material and Methods                         adapted to a round-bottomed two liter flask.
     The species (Cymbopogon citratus (D.C.). Stapf)           The drying curves were fitted to the experimental
utilized for the drying tests was cultivated at the        data using thirteen different semi-empirical and
experimental area of the Agricultural Engineering          empirical equations detailed below.
             Mathematical modeling of the drying kinetics of the leaves of lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf)…          45
                                     Equation                                                    Model
                                 RU = exp ( −k ⋅t )                                              Newton                (1)
                                       (
                              RU = exp −k ⋅ t n )                                                 Page                 (2)
                             (        (
                  RU = exp − a − a 2 + 4 ⋅ b ⋅t       )
                                                      1/2
                                                            ) / 2⋅b                          Thompson                  (4)
               U – Ue 8 ∞        1                          t ⎤
     RU =             = ∑ n−0          exp ⎡⎢ −(2n + 1)π D                            Eight Diffusion Terms            (5)
               Ui – Ue π      (2n + 1)      ⎣              4L ⎥⎦
                             RU = a ⋅ exp(−k ⋅t)                                         Henderson and Pabis           (6)
                             RU = a exp ( −kt ) + c                                         Logarithmic                (7)
                             (        ) (
        RU = a ⋅exp −k ⋅t + 1− a ⋅exp −k ⋅ b⋅t   )           (           )           Diffusion approximation          (13)
L              : product thickness, m
                                                                      where
     To determine the ratios of moisture during                       T: air temperature, °C;
drying air under different conditions we used the                     UR: relative humidity, decimal
following expression:                                                 a, b, c: constants that depend on the nature of the
                                                                      product.
                         U * − Ue*                                    In the case of lemon grass: a = –1.0484, b = –0.0221
                  RU =                                      (14)      and c = –0.0628.
                         Ui* − Ue*
                                                                           It is usual to consider the value of the diffusion
where                                                                 coefficient constant or linearly dependent on the
U* : water content of product (% d.b.);                               temperature of the drying air. This relationship was
Ui* : initial water content of the product (% d.b.);                  expressed by the Arrhenius model (Park et al., 2002).
Ue* : equilibrium water content of the product (%
                                                                                               E ⎞
d.b.).                                                                            D = Aexp ⎛ −                          (16)
                                                                                           ⎝ RT ⎠
46                              IDESIA (Chile) Volumen 32, Nº 4, Septiembre-Noviembre, 2014
where                                                               (P) and the average estimated error (SE), and verified
A: constant (m2 s–1);                                               by the behavior of the distribution of residuals. The
E: activation energy (kJ kmol–1);                                   relative average error and the average error estimated
R: universal gas constant (8.314 kJ kmol–1 K–1);                    for each model were calculated according to the
Tabs: absolute temperature (K).                                     following expressions, respectively:
                                                                                             ∑ (Y − Ŷ )
                               E 1                                                                         2
             LnD = LnA −                                     (17)                                                    (19)
                               RT Ta                                                 SE =
                                                                                                GLR
    Data was analyzed using analysis of variance                    where
and regression by F test, adopting the 5% level of                  Y: experimentally observed value;
significance.                                                       Ŷ : value calculated by the model;
                                                                    N: number of experimental observations;
2.4. Statistical analysis                                           GLR: degrees of freedom of the model (the
                                                                    number of observations minus the number of
     The quantitative and qualitative factors were                  model parameters).
analyzed using the program SISVAR® 4.3 and
the results were compared by Tukey tests, using                                   Results and Discussion
5% probability. The experimental design was
a completely randomized design (CRD) with                           3.1. Drying velocity and essential oil content
three tests for each drying air velocity and drying
temperature. To adjust the mathematical models                           Table 1 shows the moisture content of fresh
analyses nonlinear regressions were performed                       plant and from dried samples, acquired during the
using the Quasi-Newton method in the computer                       drying process using manual and automatic control
program STATISTICA 7.0®. To check the degree of                     of air velocity, respectively. It also reports the mean
fit of each model the significance of the regression                of air temperature and total time of drying, with
coefficient was evaluated by t-tests, adopting the 5%               their standard deviations for the drying treatments
level of probability, the magnitude of the coefficient              with air velocity of 0.8 m s–1, 1.3 m s–1 and 1.8
of determination (R2), the mean relative error values             m s–1. The velocity of the drying air is one of the
          Mathematical modeling of the drying kinetics of the leaves of lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf)…                47
Table 1. Parameters evaluated during the drying process of lemon grass using manual and automatic control of air velocity.
parameters which must be controlled to obtain good                 m s–1 and 1.8 m s–1) and different control systems
quality products. According to Hansen et al. (1993),               (automatic and manual). From the results observed
increasing the flow rate of the drying air exerts a                in Figure 2 it may be concluded that the drying air
greater influence in reducing the drying time of                   velocities of 0.8 m s–1 and 1.3 m s–1 with manual
the temperature in places of low relative humidity.                control system increased the essential oil extraction
There are wide variations in the values of air velocity          from lemon grass leaves compared to the automatic
recommended for medicinal plants. Some authors                     control; however, when compared to fresh plants
such as Hansen et al. (1993) used a speed of 0.039                 (control) there was no significant difference. All
m s–1 in a fixed bed dryer working with thin layers                dried samples from the automatic control system
of shaved Taxus x media Hicksii. In the drying of                  at all drying air velocities decreased the essential
basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), the speed used by                     oil content compared to fresh plants. There was no
Baritaux et al. (1992) was 0.4 m s–1. The highest                  significant difference in the drying air velocity of
value found was 3.3 m s–1, used by Venskutonis et                  1.8 m s–1 with automatic and manual compared to
al. (1996) drying thyme (Thymus vulgarius L.) and                  the fresh plant reductions of 32 and 33% in essential
sage (Salvia L. officinales). Figure 2 shows the results           oil content, respectively. Akpinar (2006) studied
obtained in the statistical analysis of the essential oil          the influence of 4 drying air temperatures (40, 50,
content extracted from the fresh plant (control) and               60 and 70 °C), in thin layers and 2 air velocities
from the samples submitted to the drying process                   (0.9 and 1.9 m s–1) on the essential oil content
with different drying air velocities (0.8 m s–1, 1.3               of Ocimum basilicum. The highest essential oil
                Figure 2. Essential oil content from fresh and dried plant in different control systems (automatic
                and manual) and air velocities.
48                              IDESIA (Chile) Volumen 32, Nº 4, Septiembre-Noviembre, 2014
content was obtained in the drying process with                    from the leaves. Table 2 shows the adjustment of
an air temperature of 40 °C and air velocity of 1.9                experimental data to thirteen drying mathematical
m s–1. The essential oil of Ocimum basilicum was                   models using non-linear regression, taking into
affected by both temperature and air velocity during               account the different drying temperatures. In all
drying. Martins et al. (1998) in an experiment with                drying conditions the coefficient of determination
lemon grass leaves found no statistically significant              (R2) was greater than 0.99, signaling according
difference in essential oil content between the drying             Madamba et al. (1996) a satisfactory drying
air velocities used: 0.5 and 1.0 m s–1. To evaluate                process (Table 2). The Two Terms model gave the
air velocity effects in the drying of lemon grass,                 smallest estimated standard error of the mean (SE)
Martins et al. (1998) dried lemon grass at 40, 50                  and relative mean error magnitude (P) of less than
and 60 ºC with four conditions of air velocity (0.8,               10%, suitable for describing the process (Tables 3
0.6, 0.4 and 0.2 m s–1). The author observed that at               and 4) according to Mohapatra & Rao (2005).
the same temperature, the increase in air velocity                 Regarding the distribution of the residues (Table 5),
promoted an increase in essential oil extraction.                  the two terms model was the most random when
The highest essential oil content was obtained at                  fitted to the data by drying at 40, 50, 60 and 70 °C,
60 ºC and at 0.8 m s–1. The air velocity of 0.2 m s–1              providing the best fits to experimental data. The
provided the lowest mass of essential oil extracted.               Diffusion Eight Terms and Exponential models also
Figure 3 depicts the curves of thin layer drying leaves            represented satisfactory drying temperatures of 50,
Cymbopogon citratus for different temperatures.                    60 and 70 ºC. The values of the adjusted parameters
                                                                   obtained in each model are shown in Table 6 for
3.2. Mathematical modeling of drying lemon                         the different experimental conditions, especially
grass                                                              the model of two terms that best represented the fit
                                                                   of the experimental data of drying. Figure 5 shows
    The effects of drying temperature on the                       a chart that lists the observed and predicted values
moisture reduction from leaves of lemon grass                      of moisture due to the different conditions tested.
observed in Figure 3 indicate that the higher                      In this figure the adjustment of the humidity with
the drying temperature the faster water removal                    the two terms model to describe the kinetics of
Figure 3. Drying curves versus time for different temperatures of the drying air.
          Mathematical modeling of the drying kinetics of the leaves of lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf)…            49
Table 2. Coefficient of determination (R2) of drying of lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf) due to different temperatures.
          Mathematical                                                       R2 (%)
            models                         40 °C                  50 °C                    60 °C                 70 °C
Exponential                                98.15                  99.29                    99.76                 99.99
Page                                       99.85                  99.87                    99.97                 99.99
Page Modified                              99.85                  99.87                    99.97                 99.99
Thompson                                   93.99                  99.29                    97.91                 98.21
Eight Diffusion Terms                      96.70                  95.68                    94.25                 93.57
Henderson and Pabis                        98.16                  99.29                    99.76                 99.99
Logarithmic                                99.84                  99.96                    99.99                 99.99
Two terms                                  99.99                  99.99                    99.99                 99.99
Two exponential terms                      98.44                  99.39                    99.82                 99.99
Wang and Sing                              53.62                  70.82                    91.37                 99.99
Henderson and Modified Pabis               99.99                  99.99                    99.47                 99.99
Midilli et al.                             99.90                  99.92                    98.41                 98.85
Diffusion approximation                    99.56                  99.72                    99.99                 99.99
Table 3. Values of mean relative error (P) drying of lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf) due to different temperatures.
          Mathematical                                                        P (%)
            models                         40 °C                  50 °C                    60 °C                 70 °C
Exponential                               2.0631                  1.7956                  1.3303               0.1048
Page                                      0.0652                  0.1161                  0.1155               0.4567
Page Modified                             0.0652                  1.8079                  0.1155               1.6745
Thompson                                  3.5866                  1.8079                  3.9337               4.7050
Eight Diffusion Terms                     2.1356                  1.4567                  2.1245               0.8123
Henderson and Pabis                       5.6069                  1.8079                  1.3450               0.1076
Logarithmic                               2.3456                  1.8976                  0.0221               0.0007
Two terms                                 0.0038                  0.0019                  0.0226               0.0076
Two exponential terms                     1.8240                  1.5943                  1.0610               0.2146
Wang and Sing                             3.0291                  3.2652                  2.0560               0.0090
Henderson and Modified Pabis              2.0853                  0.0007                  13.9571              0.1076
Midilli et al.                            0.0188                  0.0398                   1.7369              1.4537
Diffusion approximation                   0.9270                  0.3038                   0.0225              33.3333
            Table 4. Estimated values of average error (SE) of drying of lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf)
                                                due to different temperatures.
          Mathematical                                                     SE (decimal)
            models                         40 °C                  50 °C                    60 °C                 70 °C
Exponential                               0.0501                  0.0357                  0.0270                0.0237
Page                                      0.0149                  0.0160                  0.0096                0.0053
Page Modified                             0.0149                  0.0160                  0.0096                0.0055
Thompson                                  0.0935                  0.0379                  0.0880                0.1416
Eight Diffusion Terms                     0.0321                  0.0125                  0.1235                0.4528
Henderson and Pabis                       0.0523                  0.0379                  0.0302                0.0053
Logarithmic                               0.0161                  0.0087                  0.0067                0.0063
Two terms                                 0.0036                  0.0038                  0.0014                0.0028
Two exponential terms                     0.0482                  0.0351                  0.0256                0.0187
Wang and Sing                             0.2313                  0.2256                  0.1756                0.0348
Henderson and Modified Pabis              0.0656                  0.0014                  0.0887                0.0053
Midilli et al.                            0.0131                  0.0140                  0.1085                0.0299
Diffusion approximation                   0.0267                  0.0251                  0.0011                0.0007
50                             IDESIA (Chile) Volumen 32, Nº 4, Septiembre-Noviembre, 2014
Figure 4. Experimental and estimated values of the moisture ratio by estimating the parameters of the equation of Two Terms.
Figure 5. Experimental data and estimated the moisture ratio, calculated by the model of Two Terms.
drying the lemon grass plant may be seen. There                   and 7.04x10–12 m2 s–1 for mint (Mentha spp.),
was an overestimation of the moisture ratio for                   parsley (Petroselinum crispum) and basil (Ocimum
most of the experimental values; however, with                    basilicum). According to Zhang & Xu (2003),
reduced amounts of the moisture there was a major                 the values of
                                                                              D for food products lie in the range
discrepancy between the experimental data and those               of 10–11 to 10-9 m2 s–1. According to equation
estimated by the model. The increased diffusivity                 20, the activation energy for liquid diffusion of
values (D)
         with increasing drying temperature are                 lemon grass plant was 62.84 kJ mol–1. In drying
shown in Figure 6. Doymaz (2006), drying sheets                   processes the lower the activation energy, the
of dill (Anethum graveolens L.), found values of                higher the diffusivity of water in the product. The
6.693x10–10, 9.205x10–10 and 1.434x10-9 m2 s–1                    activation energy found in this study was similar
at temperatures of 50, 60 and 70 °C, respectively.                to those obtained by Doymaz (2006) for leaves of
Akpinar (2006) gave values between
                                    4.53 x 10–12                Mentha spicata L. (62.96 kJ mol–1).
           Mathematical modeling of the drying kinetics of the leaves of lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf)…                 51
   Table 5. Evaluation of the distribution of residuals for         citratus Stapf varied from 2232.795 kJ kg–1 to
 models fitted to experimental data of drying of lemon grass        2144.423 kJ kg–1. Figure 8 shows that an increase
                (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf).
                                                                    of energy was required for the removal of product
                                                                    water, represented by integral values of isosteric
         Mathematical                Distribution of waste
                                                                    heat of desorption (Qst), as observed for several
           models                 40 °C 50 °C 60 °C 70 °C           agricultural products (Jayendra et al. 2005). Brooker
Exponential                         T       A      A       A        et al. (1992) and Khatchatourian (2012) stated that
Page                                A       T      A       A        in order to remove water from grains with low water
Page Modified                       A       T      T       A
Thompson                            T       T      T       A
                                                                    content a greater amount of energy is required
Eight Diffusion Terms               T       A      A       A        on average than that required for wet products.
Henderson and Pabis                 T       T      A       A        These results confirm the fact that in products with
Logarithmic                         T       T      A       A        higher water content the bonding force between
Two terms                           T       T      T       T        the molecules of water and dry matter decreases
Two exponential terms               T       T      T       A
Wang and Sing                       T       T      T       A
                                                                    significantly. Possible differences between the
Henderson and Modified Pabis        T       T      A       A        observed values of integral isosteric heat of sorption
Midilli et al.                      T       T      T       A        for different products can be justified, and the factors
Diffusion approximation             T       T      A       T        inherent in the products themselves; according to
                                                                    Hemis et al. (2012) there are possible errors in the
                                                                    determination of the values of
                                                                                                  water activity of each
                              6284.077 ⎞
    D = 3.17 × 10 −5 exp ⎛⎜ −                                       of equilibrium water content, since the values were
                                       ⎟                  (20)
                          ⎝     R.Ta ⎠                              obtained from the mathematical model. Despite
                                                                    these discrepancies, Zhang & Xu (2003), studying
    The Arrhenius representation showed uniform                     water sorption isotherms of some vegetables at
variation of diffusivity with temperature; the                      temperatures of 30 to 60 ºC, concluded that the
description of ln D as a function of reciprocal                     isosteric heat of desorption can be used to estimate
temperature (1/T) is shown in Figure 7. According to                the energy required in the process of dehydration
Figure 8, the heat isosteric integral of Cymbopogon                 of agricultural products.
                       the effective diffusion coefficient (m2 s–1), due to different air temperatures in the drying of lemon grass
Figure 6. Mean values for
(Cymbopogon citratus Stapf).
52                              IDESIA (Chile) Volumen 32, Nº 4, Septiembre-Noviembre, 2014
Table 6. Parameters obtained from models fitted to the data for drying of lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf)*.
Figure 7. Representation of the Arrhenius relationship for the effective diffusivity and air temperature drying of lemon grass
(Cymbopogon citratus Stapf).
Figure 8. Experimental values and estimated integral isosteric heat of sorption as a function of moisture content equilibrium.
Figure 9. Performance of essential oils according to the temperature of the drying air.
differences with fresh plants. In a study carried out               and 3 sizes of dried leaves fragments (pulverized, 1
to determine the drying type and fragmentation                      cm fragments and 20 cm fragments). The authors
of lemon grass leaves to optimize the essential                     concluded that the highest essential oil content was
oil content, 6 drying treatments were established,                  obtained with the samples dried at room temperature
including 2 drying types (oven with forced ventilation              with dehumidifiers, with no significant differences for
at 40 °C and room temperature with dehumidifiers)                   the leaf sizes (Martinazzo et al. (2010). Evaluating the
           Mathematical modeling of the drying kinetics of the leaves of lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf)…                   55
                                                       Literature Cited
Akpinar, E.K.                                                       Demir, V.; Gunhan, T.; Yagcioglu, A.K.; Degirmencioglu, A.
  2006. Mathematical modelling of thin layer drying process           2004. Mathematical modelling and the determination of
    under open sun of some aromatic plants. Journal of Food             some quality parameters of air-dried bay leaves. Biosystems
    Engineering, London, 77 (4): 864-870.                               Engineering, Edinburgh, 88 (3): 325-335.
ASAE Standards                                                      Doymaz, I.
  2000. Standards Engineering Practices Data: Moisture                2006.Thin-layer drying behaviour of mint leaves. Journal of
    measurement-forages, Adopted and published by: American             Food Engineering, Davis, 74 (3): 370-375.
    Society of Agricultural Engineers, 565-72.                      Hansen, J.A.; Nelssen, J.L.; Goodband, R.D.
Baritaux, O.; Richard, H.; Touche, J.; Derbesy, M.                    1993. Evaluation of animal protein supplements of early-
  1992. Effects of drying and storage of herbs and spices on            weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci., (71): 1853-1862.
    the essential oil. Part I. Basil, ocimum basilicum L. Flavour   Hemis, M.; Choudhary, R.; Watson, D.G.
                                                                      2012. A coupled mathematical model for simultaneous
    Fragr. J., (7): 267-271.
                                                                        microwave and convective drying of wheat seeds, Biosystems
Buggle, V.; Ming, L.C.; Furtado, E.L.; Rocha, S.F.R.; Marques,
                                                                        Engineering, 112 (3): 202-209.
M.O.M.
                                                                    Jayendra, K.A.; Singh, R.R.B.; Patil, G.R.; Patel, A.A.
  1999. Influence of different drying temperatures on the
                                                                      2005. Effect of temperature on moisture desorption isotherms
    amount of essential oils and citral content in cymbopogon           of kheer. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 38: 303-310.
    citratus (dc) stapf-poaceae. Acta Hort. (ISHS), (500):          Khatchatourian, O.A.
    71-74.                                                            2012. Experimental study and mathematical model for soya
Brooker, D.B.; Baker-Arkema, F.W.; Hall, C.W.                           bean drying in thin layer, Biosystems Engineering, 113 (1):
  1992. Drying and storage of grains and oilseeds. New York:            54-64.
    AVI Book, 450 p.                                                Madamba, P.S.; Driscoll, R.H.; Buckle, K.A.
Castro, H.G.; Ferreira, F.A.                                          1996. Thin layer drying characteristics of garlic slices. Journal
  2001. Contribuição ao estudo das Plantas Medicinais: carqueja         of Food Engineering, Davis, 29 (1): 75-97.
    (Baccharis genistelloides). Viçosa, 102 p.                      Martinazzo, A.P.; Melo, E.C.; Corrêa, P.C.; Santos, R.H.S.
Corrêa, P.C.; Afonso Junior, P.C.; Martins, P.M.; Melo, E.C.;         2010. Modelagem matemática e parâmetros qualitativos da
Radunz, L.L.                                                            secagem de folhas de capim-limão Cymbopogon citratus
  2002. Modelo matemático para representação da                         D. C. Stapf. Rev. bras. plantas med., 12: 488-498.
    higroscopicidade de plantas medicinais. Revista Brasileira      Martins, E.R.; Castro, D.M.; Castellani, D.M.; Dias, J.E.
    de Armazenamento, 27 (1): 10-16.                                  1998. Plantas Medicinais. Viçosa: Editora UFV, 220 p.
56                                 IDESIA (Chile) Volumen 32, Nº 4, Septiembre-Noviembre, 2014
Mohapatra, D.; Rao, P.S.                                                Radünz, L.L.; Melo, E.C.; Rocha, P.P.; Berbert, P.A.; Gracia,
   2005. A thin layer drying model of parboiled wheat. Journal          L.M.N.
     of Food Engineering, Davis, 66 (4): 513-518.                         2010. Study of essential oil from guaco leaves submitted to
Muller, J.; Koll-Weber, M.; Kraus, W.                                       different drying air temperature. Engenharia na Agricultura,
   1992. Effect of drying on the essential oil of Salvia officinalis.       18: 241-247.
     In Annual Congress on Medicinal Plant Research, 40, 1992,          Thompson, T.L.; Peart, R.M.; Foster, G.H.
     New York. Proceedings… New York: Thieme, p. 104.                     1968. Mathematical simulation of corn drying: A new model.
Panchariya, P.C.; Popovic, D.; Sharma, A.L.                                 Transactions of ASAE, St. Joseph, 11 (4): 582-586.
   2002. Thin-layer modeling of black tea drying process. Journal       Venskutonis, R.; Poll, L.; Larsen, M.
     of Food Engineering, Davis, 52 (4): 349-357.
                                                                          1996. Influence of drying and irradiation on the composition
Park, K.J.; Vohnikova, Z.; Brod, F.P.R.
                                                                            of volatile compounds of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.).
   2002. Evaluation of drying parameters and desorption isotherms
                                                                            Flavour and Fragance Journal, 11: 123-8.
     of garden mint leaves (Mentha crispa L.). Journal of Food
     Engineering, 51: 15-25.                                            Zhang, M.; Xu, Y.Y.
Prates, M.O.; Pizziolo, T.A.; Melo, E.C.; Rocha, R.P.; Nicácio, J.V.      2003. Research developments of combination drying
   2011. Controle da temperatura e velocidade do ar de secagem              technology for fruits and vegetables at home and abroad.
     em um secador de plantas medicinais. Revista Engenharia                Journal of Wuxi University of Light Industry, 22 (6):
     na Agricultura, 19: 101-111.                                           103-106.
Nomenclature