The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds

Routledge Studies in Metaphysics 1st Edition Helen

Beebee download full chapters

Order directly from ebookfinal.com

https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-semantics-and-metaphysics-of-
natural-kinds-routledge-studies-in-metaphysics-1st-edition-helen-
beebee/

★★★★★
4.8 out of 5.0 (53 reviews )

PDF Available Immediately

 The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds Routledge
Studies in Metaphysics 1st Edition Helen Beebee Pdf Download

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library

Here are some recommended products for you. Click the link to
download, or explore more at ebookfinal

Metaphysics the key concepts 1. publ Edition Beebee

https://ebookfinal.com/download/metaphysics-the-key-concepts-1-publ-
edition-beebee/

The Metaphysics Of The Healing Avicenna

https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-metaphysics-of-the-healing-
avicenna/

The Metaphysics of Memory Sven Bernecker

https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-metaphysics-of-memory-sven-
bernecker/

The Metaphysics of Meditation 1st Edition Stephen Phillips

https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-metaphysics-of-meditation-1st-
edition-stephen-phillips/
The Metaphysics of Modern Existence Vine Deloria

https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-metaphysics-of-modern-existence-
vine-deloria/

Aristotle and the Metaphysics 1st Edition Vasilis Politis

https://ebookfinal.com/download/aristotle-and-the-metaphysics-1st-
edition-vasilis-politis/

Politics and Metaphysics in Kant 1st Edition Sorin Baiasu

https://ebookfinal.com/download/politics-and-metaphysics-in-kant-1st-
edition-sorin-baiasu/

Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics 1st Edition Theodore

Sider

https://ebookfinal.com/download/contemporary-debates-in-
metaphysics-1st-edition-theodore-sider/

Cracks in the Great Wall UFOs and Traditional Metaphysics

Charles Upton

https://ebookfinal.com/download/cracks-in-the-great-wall-ufos-and-
traditional-metaphysics-charles-upton/
The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds
Routledge Studies in Metaphysics 1st Edition Helen
Beebee Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Helen Beebee, Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (editors)
ISBN(s): 9780203852330, 0203852338
Edition: 1
File Details: PDF, 1.85 MB
Year: 2010
Language: english
 The Semantics
and Metaphysics
of Natural Kinds
Routledge Studies in Metaphysics

1. The Semantics and Metaphysics

of Natural Kinds
Edited by Helen Beebee and
Nigel Sabbarton-Leary
 The Semantics
and Metaphysics
of Natural Kinds

Edited by Helen Beebee and

Nigel Sabbarton-Leary

New York London

First published 2010
by Routledge
270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016

Simultaneously published in the UK

by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business

This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2010.

To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s
collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.

© 2010 Taylor & Francis

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised
in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereaf-
ter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.

Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trade-

marks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

The semantics and metaphysics of natural kinds / edited by Helen Beebee and Nigel
Sabbarton-Leary.
p. cm.—(Routledge studies in metaphysics ; 1)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. Categories (Philosophy) 2. Semantics (Philosophy) 3. Metaphysics. I. Beebee,
Helen. II. Sabbarton-Leary, Nigel, 1981–
BD331.S442 2010
110—dc22
2009044474

ISBN 0-203-85233-8 Master e-book ISBN

ISBN13: 978-0-415-87366-6 (hbk)

ISBN13: 978-0-203-85233-0 (ebk)
Contents

Acknowledgments vii

1 Introduction 1
HELEN BEEBEE AND NIGEL SABBARTON-LEARY

2 Rigidity, Natural Kind Terms, and Metasemantics 25

CORINE BESSON

3 General Terms as Designators: A Defence of The View 46

GENOVEVA MARTÍ AND JOSÉ MARTÍNEZ-FERNÁNDEZ

4 Are Natural Kind Terms Special? 64

ÅSA WIKFORSS

5 The Commonalities between Proper Names and

Natural Kind Terms: A Fregean Perspective 84
HAROLD NOONAN

6 Theoretical Identity Statements, Their Truth, and

Their Discovery 104
JOSEPH LAPORTE

7 Discovering the Essences of Natural Kinds 125

ALEXANDER BIRD

8 The Elements and Conceptual Change 137

ROBIN FINDLAY HENDRY

9 On the Abuse of the Necessary A Posteriori 159

HELEN BEEBEE AND NIGEL SABBARTON-LEARY
vi
10 Crosscutting Natural Kinds and the Hierarchy Thesis 179
EMMA TOBIN

11 From Constitutional Necessities to Causal Necessities 192

JESSICA WILSON

12 Realism, Natural Kinds, and Philosophical Methods 212

RICHARD N. BOYD

Contributors 235
Index 237
Acknowledgments

The editors would like to thank the Arts and Humanities Research Coun-
cil, whose fi nancial support (for the project Metaphysics of Science, AH/
D503833/1) made the production of this volume possible. We would also
like to thank the Leverhulme Trust, whose fi nancial support enabled Helen
Beebee to complete her contribution.
We would also like to thank the contributors for making our lives much
easier than they might have done. Finally, thanks to Mia Sabbarton-Leary
and Gavin Brown, for all kinds of reasons.
1 Introduction
Helen Beebee and Nigel Sabbarton-Leary

The topic of natural kinds is one that has been much discussed in metaphys-
ics, philosophy of science, and philosophy of language in recent decades.
This collection brings together contemporary work in these areas, in the
hope that doing so will highlight how views and issues in one area affect
those in other areas. For example, some philosophers of language hold that
a semantic theory of ‘natural kind terms’ should aim to capture a class of
general terms that designate natural kinds in the metaphysician’s sense—
excluding terms such ‘bachelor’ and ‘pencil’ but including terms such as
‘gold’ and ‘water’. Metaphysicians, in turn, often appeal to semantics—
and in particular to the Kripke-Putnam account of natural kind terms—in
order to carve out a metaphysically substantial class of necessary truths.
And some philosophers of science take a Kripke-Putnam-style causal the-
ory of reference to defeat Kuhnian relativism.

1. CLASSIFYING NATURE: THE METAPHYSICS PERSPECTIVE

One source of philosophers’ interest in natural kinds is distinctively meta-

physical: are there ‘natural joints’ in nature, which our classificatory
systems—in ordinary life or in science—might latch onto? For example,
compare general terms such as ‘cat’, ‘silver’, carbon’, ‘electron’, and ‘planet’,
on the one hand, with expressions such as ‘object bigger than a car’, (call
such objects ‘nargs’) and ‘carbonated drink’ on the other. The members of
the former list of terms, but not the members of the latter list, intuitively
pick out a natural category of objects. But how are we to articulate what
‘naturalness’, in this context, amounts to?
One strategy for answering the question is to focus on what, if anything,
is common to all the members of the class, and, relatedly, on the extent
to which use of a given kind term delivers inductive or explanatory suc-
cess. Nargs (which of course include buses, elephants and office blocks)
have very little in common with one another; correspondingly, predictively
speaking narg is an utterly useless kind, since nothing, aside from a lower
bound on size, can be inferred from something’s being a member of that
2 Helen Beebee and Nigel Sabbarton-Leary
kind. W. V. Quine (1969) claimed that kindhood and similarity are ‘varia-
tions or adaptations of a single notion’ (1969: 7), but that there are ‘theo-
retical standards’ of similarity that lend themselves to better inductions.
Thus ‘[b]y primitive standards the marsupial mouse is more similar to the
ordinary mouse than to the kangaroo; by theoretical standards the reverse
is true’ (1969: 15). Similarly, colour is ‘king in our innate quality space, but
undistinguished in cosmic circles. Cosmically, colours would not qualify
as kinds’ (1969: 14). So we might attempt to characterize the natural kinds
as those kinds (unlike red thing and mouse, where the marsupial mouse
counts as a mouse) that align with ‘theoretical standards’ of similarity,
thereby delivering superior inductive inferences. (This is not Quine’s way,
however. Quine holds that it is ‘a very special mark of the maturity of a
branch of science that it no longer needs an irreducible notion of similarity
and kind’ (1969: 52).)
Predictive (and explanatory) success has played a large role in the con-
ception of natural kinds adopted by many philosophers of science (see e.g.
Griffiths 1999 and Boyd, this volume), and in particular in Richard Boyd’s
‘homeostatic property cluster’ account (1991). Many metaphysicians, how-
ever, hold that there must be something metaphysically or ontologically
distinctive about natural as opposed to non-natural kinds; for example,
that they are universals in something like David Armstrong’s (1978) sense
(see e.g. Ellis 2001: 67–8), or that they have essences in a metaphysically
substantive sense (about which more later). For such metaphysicians, pre-
dictive success—while it might be a common or perhaps even a universal
feature of natural kind concepts—cannot function as their defi ning charac-
teristic, because such success comes in degrees. As Quine notes, ‘[b]etween
an innate concept of similarity or spacing of qualities and a scientifically
sophisticated one, there are all gradations. Science, after all, differs from
common sense only in degree of methodological sophistication’ (1969:
15). There is no cut-off, predictively speaking, anywhere in the spectrum
between physics, chemistry, biology, the social sciences, and our ordinary,
commonsense worldview; thus those who seek to endow natural kinds with
a special metaphysical status must look elsewhere for the determining fea-
tures of natural kinds.
One approach to this issue, taken by Brian Ellis (2001), is to lay down
apparently a priori criteria that determine whether a given kind is natu-
ral. Ellis lists six conditions, individually necessary and jointly sufficient,
which any natural kind must satisfy (2001: 19–21). For some kind K to
qualify as a natural kind it must (1) be objective (i.e. mind-independent),
(2) be categorically distinct, having no ontologically vague boundaries, (3)
be demarcated from all other kinds via its intrinsic properties, (4) allow
for species variation, where, for instance, two isotopes are members of the
same element-kind in virtue of possessing the relevant essence (atomic num-
ber), while nevertheless differing from one another intrinsically by hav-
ing a distinct atomic mass, (5) form a species-to-genus hierarchy in cases
 Introduction 3
where a particular is a member of two (or more) natural kinds, and (6)
have an (intrinsic) essence that is both necessary and sufficient for kind
membership.
Any argument for such criteria must presumably be a priori: if we were
to look to the sciences to tell us what the criteria for natural kindhood are,
we would surely conclude that, for example, biological species are natural
kinds, and we would therefore have no reason to expect categorical dis-
tinctness (criterion 2) to hold, and may have to abandon intrinsicness as
well (criterion 3). By contrast, Ellis rules out biological species precisely on
the grounds that they violate categorical distinctness. Moreover, as Emma
Tobin argues in her chapter, it is unclear whether chemical kinds—Ellis’s
paradigm natural kinds—meet his own hierarchy requirement (criterion 5).
Protein and enzyme would seem to be perfectly good natural kinds: they
‘indicate real ontological differences in kind’ (this volume, 189). But they
violate the hierarchy requirement: neither is a subcategory of the other.
Again, it seems that Ellis will have to simply flat out deny that such kinds
are genuine natural kinds.
From a less metaphysical perspective, however, there need be nothing
wrong with, for example, counting protein and enzyme as natural kinds. If
natural kindhood is determined by the explanatory and predictive role the
relevant kind concepts play in scientific theorizing, there is no reason why
we should expect all of the kinds, reference to which underpins the explan-
atory and predictive success of chemistry, to form a hierarchical structure.
Similarly, from this perspective there need be nothing wrong with natural
kinds that have vague boundaries: that there is no fact of the matter about,
say, which creature was the fi rst member of any given biological species
does not in the least undermine, or give us any reason to doubt, the explan-
atory and predictive power of evolutionary biology.
Another approach to answering the question of what distinguishes
the natural from the non-natural kinds focuses on semantic differences
between the two kinds of term. As a fi rst pass, one might attempt to appeal
to the notion of semantic simplicity: ‘cat’ is a semantically simple term,
whereas ‘object bigger than a car’ is semantically complex. However, this
answer will not work for obvious reasons: we could easily invent a word
(‘narg’, say) to pick out all and only objects that are bigger than a car.
‘Narg’ is not semantically complex, but it picks out exactly the same class
of objects as ‘object bigger than a car’. So if the latter term intuitively fails
to pick out a natural category, so does the former. Similarly, expressions
such as ‘H 2O’ and ‘the element with atomic number 79’ intuitively pick
out natural kinds (at least they do if ‘water’ and ‘gold’ do), but they are not
semantically simple.
A more sophisticated, and apparently more promising, appeal to the
semantic features of kind terms—and one that has played a large role in
the literature—comes from the causal theory of reference as applied to kind
terms, articulated by Saul Kripke (1980, fi rst published in 1972) and Hilary
4 Helen Beebee and Nigel Sabbarton-Leary
Putnam (1975). Kripke’s basic idea is that there is a semantically distinctive
species of general terms—the natural kind terms—that is analogous to a
semantically distinctive category of singular terms, viz., proper names.
On the face of it, there is no particular reason to expect there to be
a deep connection between the metaphysician’s concern to delineate a
metaphysically distinctive category of natural kinds—those kinds that
carve nature at its joints—and the philosopher of language’s concern to
delineate a semantically distinctive category of natural kind terms. While
some of Kripke’s own examples of natural kind terms—’gold’, ‘water’,
‘tiger’—might suggest that the metaphysician’s natural kinds just are
those kinds that are picked out by the semanticist’s natural kind terms,
it is worth noting that Kripke has other examples of alleged natural kind
terms that are not standardly thought of as picking out natural kinds
in the metaphysician’s sense (‘heat’, ‘sound’, and ‘lightning’—see Kripke
1980: 134). Moreover, not all metaphysicians hold that even Kripke’s cen-
tral examples of natural kind terms all correspond to genuine natural
kinds in the metaphysician’s sense: Ellis, in particular, holds that biologi-
cal species (tiger, for example) are not natural kinds since given evolu-
tion, ‘the distinctions between adjacent species . . . must ultimately be
arbitrary’ (2001: 169). (One might have concerns about water too, given
that what we refer to as ‘water’ virtually always contains some impurities;
see e.g. Abbott 1997 and LaPorte 1998 for discussion.) This suggests that
there is at best some overlap between the semantic category of ‘natural
kind terms’ and the metaphysical category of natural kinds that carve
nature at its joints, or have explanatory value, or whatever.
Be that as it may, many metaphysicians have taken it for granted that
the natural kinds, in the metaphysician’s sense, just are those kinds that are
picked out by Kripkean natural kind terms. A large part of the motivation
for this assumption is that the semantically distinctive category of natu-
ral kind terms promises to generate truths—what Kripke calls ‘theoretical
identities’—such as ‘gold is the element with atomic number 79’ that are
metaphysically necessary but knowable only a posteriori.
We shall return to the (alleged) significance to metaphysics of the possi-
bility of necessary a posteriori truths about natural kinds in §3 below, after
introducing, in §2, Kripkean semantics and discussing some of the issues
arising from it, as they have played out in the literature, including the fi rst
few chapters of this volume.

2. NATURAL KIND SEMANTICS

2.1 Kripke On Proper Names

According to the Frege-Russell view of names, names have both denota-
tion and connotation. A name like ‘Marie Curie’ has both a referent,
Marie Curie, and something ‘besides that to which the sign refers . . .
 Introduction 5
wherein the mode of presentation is contained’ (Frege 1892: 210). The
mode of presentation, or sense, which determines the referent of the
name, is usually taken to be some simple description. The sense of ‘Marie
Curie’ might be ‘the fi rst woman to be awarded the Nobel Prize’, for
example. The motivation behind the sense/reference distinction is that it
offers a solution to what has become known as ‘Frege’s Puzzle’: the cogni-
tive asymmetry between, for example, (a) ‘Marie Curie is Marie Curie’,
which is both necessary and knowable a priori, and (b) ‘Marie Curie is
Maria Sklodowska’, which appears to be a posteriori, and a useful exten-
sion of our knowledge. By distinguishing sense from reference, Frege dis-
solves the puzzle: although both ‘Marie Curie’ and ‘Maria Sklodowska’
have the same reference or denotation, they differ in sense (connotation),
and it is connotation that determines the cognitive content of a sentence.
More simply, the claim is that while the two names may refer to the same
person, they differ in meaning, and this explains the cognitive asymmetry
between (a) and (b).
Kripke famously objected to the Frege-Russell view of names, offer-
ing three different arguments, often referred to as the ‘modal’, ‘epistemo-
logical’, and ‘semantical’ arguments (Salmon 2005: 23–31). The modal
argument shows that there are different truth conditions for sentences con-
taining names and sentences containing descriptions, when assessed at dif-
ferent possible worlds. For instance, if ‘Marie Curie’ is synonymous with
the description ‘the fi rst woman to win the Nobel Prize’, then just as (m1)
‘Marie Curie is Marie Curie’ is necessary, so too is (m2) ‘Marie Curie is the
fi rst woman to win the Nobel Prize’. But since there is a possible world, w1,
where there are no Nobel Prizes but where Marie Curie exists, (m1) will be
true at w1, while (m2) will be false. Hence (m1) cannot express the same
proposition as (m2), and the description ‘the fi rst woman to win the Nobel
Prize’ cannot give the meaning of the name ‘Marie Curie’.
The epistemological argument, like the modal argument, shows that
there are different truth conditions for sentences containing names and
those containing descriptions. However, the focus of the second argument
is epistemic. Contrast (e1) ‘if Marie Curie exists, then Marie Curie is Marie
Curie’, which is knowable a priori, with (e2) ‘if the fi rst woman to win the
Nobel Prize exists, then the fi rst woman to win the Nobel Prize is Marie
Curie’, which is clearly knowable only a posteriori. The Frege-Russell view
entails, however, that the epistemic status of (e1) is the same as that of
(e2)—both are knowable a priori. But consider a different possible world,
w2 , where Irène Joliot-Curie is the fi rst woman to win the Nobel Prize.
Since this possibility cannot be ruled out a priori, (e2) cannot possibly be
knowable a priori. Analysing the meaning of ‘Marie Curie’ as ‘the first
woman to win the Nobel Prize’ leads us to misclassify (e2) as knowable a
priori when it is in fact a posteriori. Hence the meaning of a name cannot
be such a description.
Finally the semantical argument shows that descriptions always under-
determine the reference of names, even at the actual world. For instance,
6 Helen Beebee and Nigel Sabbarton-Leary
it is surely a coherent epistemic possibility that the history books got it
wrong, and in fact Irène Joliot-Curie was the fi rst woman to win the Nobel
Prize. In that case, the description ‘the fi rst woman to win the Nobel Prize’
in fact denotes Irène, rather than Marie. But since we have analysed the
meaning of ‘Marie Curie’ as ‘the fi rst woman to win the Nobel Prize’, it
turns out that ‘Marie Curie’ in fact referred to Irène Joliot-Curie all along.
Since we surely do not want to say that we intended to refer to Irène all
along—perhaps we have never even heard of her until now—it seems clear
the description ‘the fi rst woman to win the Nobel Prize’ does not determine
who the referent of ‘Marie Curie’ is. Hence reference to Marie Curie is
underdetermined by description.
Kripke’s positive proposal is broadly Millian: proper names have ‘deno-
tation’ but lack ‘connotation’, to use Mill’s terms, or (in Frege’s terms) they
have reference but no sense. Names ‘do not refer to their referent by speci-
fying a condition which their referent uniquely satisfies’ (Hughes 2004: 1)
but rather refer directly. The metasemantic part of the story is that there
is a ‘name-acquiring transaction’ (Evans 2008: 316) where some object, x,
is picked out by a language user in an ‘initial baptism which is explained
in terms either of fi xing a reference by a description, or ostension’ (Kripke
1980: 97). (In the case of reference-fi xing by description, however, the
description is not synonymous with the name. If I say ‘let the caped cru-
sader be called “Batman”’, my use of the expression ‘the caped crusader’
merely fi xes the referent of ‘Batman’ as that person. It does not thereby
preclude the possibility that the person so identified might stop wearing the
cape or give up crusading in favour of organized crime.) Reference to the
object (in this case, Batman) is then maintained by a causal chain of what
Evans calls ‘reference-preserving links’ (Evans 2008: 316), where speakers
who are causally downwind of the baptism intend their use of the name to
refer to whatever was initially referred to at the name-acquiring transac-
tion. As a corollary of being non-descriptive, names get to be what Kripke
calls rigid designators, which is to say that ‘in every possible world it [the
name] designates the same object’ (Kripke 1980: 48).
Consider the name ‘Ehrich Weiss’. Presumably when Ehrich was born
his parents performed something like Kripke’s initial baptism—a name-
acquiring transaction—and dubbed him ‘Ehrich Weiss’. Since proper names
are rigid designators—they refer to the same object in all possible worlds—
we can say that Ehrich’s parents stipulate that the name ‘Ehrich Weiss’ is to
apply to him, and this stipulation allows the name ‘Ehrich Weiss’ to denote
Ehrich across all possible worlds. The upshot is we can ask counterfactual
questions about him without worrying about being able to identify him in
some possible world. As Kripke claims, using Nixon as his example:

[A]lthough the man (Nixon) might not have been the President, it is
not the case that he might not have been Nixon (though he might not
have been called ‘Nixon’) . . . [and] it is because we can refer (rigidly)
 Introduction 7
to Nixon, and stipulate that we are speaking of what might have hap-
pened to him (under certain circumstances), that ‘transworld identifi-
cations’ are unproblematic in such cases. (Kripke 1980: 49)

In some cases, however, individuals bear more than one name. Consider,
again, Ehrich Weiss. At some point during his life, when he became a profes-
sional magician, Ehrich took on the new name ‘Harry Houdini’. Given the
Kripkean model, we can say that an additional name-acquiring transaction
takes place, and Ehrich is now the referent of both the name ‘Harry Hou-
dini’ and the name ‘Ehrich Weiss’. Each independent baptism is the source
of its own causal chain of reference-preserving links, making it entirely
possible that different speakers can both be referring to the very same per-
son using different names. Thus imagine two normal language users, Lu1
and Lu2 . Lu1 uses the name ‘Ehrich Weiss’ to denote Ehrich, and Lu2 uses
the name ‘Harry Houdini’ to denote Ehrich, yet neither speaker believes
that they are denoting the same person as the other is denoting. Neverthe-
less, on Kripke’s model, since both ‘Ehrich Weiss’ and ‘Harry Houdini’ are
rigid designators, and the identity sentence ‘Harry Houdini is Ehrich Weiss’
is true, it follows that it is also necessary. More schematically, given that
proper names are rigid designators, if ‘a’ and ‘b’ are co-referential proper
names, and the identity sentence ‘a is b’ is true at the actual world, then it
is true in all possible worlds.
Kripke’s conclusion draws an important distinction between two types
of necessity: metaphysical and epistemic. The identity sentence ‘Harry
Houdini is Ehrich Weiss’ is metaphysically necessary given (i) the necessity
of identity, (ii) the rigidity of proper names, and (iii) the truth of the identity
sentence. However, the identity claim is not epistemically necessary since
its truth does not follow merely from reflection on the names ‘Harry Hou-
dini’ and ‘Ehrich Weiss’. There is a contrast between the identity sentence
‘Ehrich Weiss is Harry Houdini’ and ‘a bachelor is an unmarried man’.
Although both are metaphysically necessary, only the latter is epistemically
necessary: its truth follows merely from reflection on the meanings of the
terms ‘bachelor’ and ‘unmarried man’, and as such it is knowable a priori.
The former, on the other hand, lacks epistemic necessity, and is thus know-
able only a posteriori.

2.2 The Extension to Natural Kind Terms

With his account of the semantics of proper names in place, and the cat-
egory of the necessary a posteriori established, Kripke goes on to extend
his account to the ‘more complex and philosophically significant case’ of
natural kind terms (Soames 2002: 242). According to Kripke:

my argument implicitly concludes that certain general terms, those

for natural kinds, have a greater kinship with proper names than is
Other documents randomly have
different content
 Oceanography - Answer Key
Third 2022 - Division

Prepared by: Associate Prof. Davis

Date: July 28, 2025

Test 1: Assessment criteria and rubrics

Learning Objective 1: Ethical considerations and implications
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Learning Objective 2: Literature review and discussion
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Learning Objective 3: Historical development and evolution
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Learning Objective 4: Literature review and discussion
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Learning Objective 5: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 6: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Example 6: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Key Concept: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 8: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 9: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 9: Research findings and conclusions
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Summary 2: Experimental procedures and results
Remember: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Definition: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 12: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 12: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
[Figure 13: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Definition: Experimental procedures and results
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 14: Practical applications and examples
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Practice Problem 15: Assessment criteria and rubrics
• Theoretical framework and methodology
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 16: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 17: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Current trends and future directions
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Remember: Current trends and future directions
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Exercise 3: Current trends and future directions
Remember: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 21: Current trends and future directions
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 22: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 23: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Note: Historical development and evolution
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 24: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Key Concept: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Literature review and discussion
• Learning outcomes and objectives
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Practice Problem 26: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 27: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Best practices and recommendations
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Key Concept: Assessment criteria and rubrics
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 29: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 29: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 30: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Unit 4: Current trends and future directions
Definition: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Learning outcomes and objectives
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Experimental procedures and results
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Practice Problem 33: Ethical considerations and implications
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Key Concept: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Remember: Current trends and future directions
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Practice Problem 38: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 39: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Summary 5: Practical applications and examples
Example 40: Experimental procedures and results
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 41: Best practices and recommendations
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Theoretical framework and methodology
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Study tips and learning strategies
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
[Figure 46: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 46: Experimental procedures and results
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Note: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Practice Problem 48: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Module 6: Statistical analysis and interpretation
Important: Case studies and real-world applications
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 51: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Best practices and recommendations
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Definition: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 53: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Remember: Practical applications and examples
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 55: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 56: Case studies and real-world applications
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 58: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Definition: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 59: Current trends and future directions
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Topic 7: Case studies and real-world applications
Key Concept: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 61: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Example 61: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 62: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Ethical considerations and implications
• Learning outcomes and objectives
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Historical development and evolution
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 64: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Definition: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Assessment criteria and rubrics
• Statistical analysis and interpretation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 67: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 69: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Ethical considerations and implications
• Statistical analysis and interpretation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Discussion 8: Historical development and evolution
Important: Literature review and discussion
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Remember: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Key Concept: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Historical development and evolution
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 76: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 76: Literature review and discussion
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 77: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 78: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade

Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and

personal growth!

ebookfinal.com