0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66K views4 pagesDP Mauricio Pava
The document is a legal communication from Mauricio Pava L. Abogados addressing the Fiscal General regarding the protection of attorney-client privilege in light of a court ruling against Álvaro Uribe Vélez. It argues that the court's decision improperly restricts this privilege and cites various legal precedents and constitutional articles that support the inviolability of attorney-client communications. The document seeks to clarify the legal standards surrounding the interception of communications and the conditions under which attorney-client privilege may be waived.
Uploaded by
Felipe Andrés Morales MogollónCopyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66K views4 pagesDP Mauricio Pava
The document is a legal communication from Mauricio Pava L. Abogados addressing the Fiscal General regarding the protection of attorney-client privilege in light of a court ruling against Álvaro Uribe Vélez. It argues that the court's decision improperly restricts this privilege and cites various legal precedents and constitutional articles that support the inviolability of attorney-client communications. The document seeks to clarify the legal standards surrounding the interception of communications and the conditions under which attorney-client privilege may be waived.
Uploaded by
Felipe Andrés Morales MogollónCopyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
/ 4
é “a ee
MAURICIO PAVA L. ABOGADOS:
DETTE CORPONAT HOD ESOS PUTO
Bogoté D. C., 15 de septiembre de 2025
Doctors
Luz Adriana Camargo Garzia Fiscal
General de Ia Nacién
Ciudad
Referencla; Derecho de peticidm srt, 23 Carta Politica - Coastancia de
itervenciOn técnica - art, 226 (inc, final) CGP, Alcance de! sccreto
profesional sbogado-cliente frente a la exigencia de poder escrito.
Respetada sefiora Fiscal General:
En mi calidad de sbogado inscrito dejo constancia de la Solicitud del 19 de agosto de 2025
preseniada por ¢! doctor Alvaro Uribe Vélez (“AUV"), comemiceda mediante el exerito
"Solicitud de Concept Juridico ~ Articula 226 CGP”. Con fundamento cn cl inciso final
del anticulo 226 del OGP rendiré concepto técnica-juridico sobre; sentido lingifstico forense:
(diclamen) de las expresiones judicialmente usidss contra AUV en el fallo sin firmeza
condenatoria. Hegalidad de las interceptaciones. Inviolabilidad del secroto profesional
abogado-cliente, ene otros aspecios.
Esta comunicacién se justifiea tas ls sentencia proferida contra AUY, El fallo restringié+ la
salvaguarda de! secreto profesional a In cxistencia de poder judicialmente reeonocid
Criteria restrictive y regresivo. Contrario a Ia normatividad iniema, al precedente
‘canstitucianal y al supranacional. Por ello dejo registo ante la. Fiscalia General de la
‘Nacidn, Srgano administrador dé Ios salas de excuchas (sala Diamante),
El articulo 226, inciso final, del CGP sutoriza servicios juridicos que implican
comunicacién constante con mi cliente. Esta modalidad no implica presentacién de poder.
Fundamentos. Bloque de consiitucionalidad. a) Anticulos 1S, 29 y 74 de la Constitucién
Politica: intimidad, defensa c inviolabilidad del sccrcto profesional. b) Convencidn
“Amerieana sobre Derechos Humanos, at, 8.2.d: derecho del acusado a comunicarse libre y
pPrivadamente con su defensor, sin formalidades.
‘Norma prosesal penal intema. a) Articulo 301, Ley 600 de 2000: prohibicidn absoluta de
inicrceptar comunicaciones entre procesade y su sbogado. b) Aniculo 235, Ley $06 de
7004: “en ningin caso podrin interceptarse las Comunicaciones del defensor’. Ninguna de
‘estas normas supedita la proteccién a protocolizar un poder.
Precedentc de-la Corte Constitucional. a) C-301 de 2012: el seereto profesional nace de la
relacién de confianza, no de formalidades. b) C-951 de 2014: la garantia cubre todas las
comunicaciones destinadas Ia ascsoria legal, salvo prucba directa y evidente de un
propésito delictivo. ¢) C-411 de 1993: extiende Ia reserva a todo vinculo abogado-
You might also like
- No ratings yetUnited States v. Robert Torres, Also Known as Roberto Torres-Amaro, Also Known as Papo, Also Known as Papo Biombo, Also Known as Papo Blue Moon, Also Known as El Brujo Ismael Pastrana, Also Known as Ismael Pastrana-Delgado, Also Known as Junior Pastrana, Also Known as Junior Grasa Miguel Millan, Also Known as Miguel Millan-Silva, Also Known as Mickey Millan, Also Known as Maneco Manuel Cruz, Also Known as Manuel Dejesus, Also Known as Manny, Also Known as Maneco Juan Lugo, Also Known as Juan A. Lugo-Castro, Also Known as Juan Angel Lugo, Also Known as Juan Antonio Lugo Melendez, Also Known as Johnny Lugo Edwin Torres, Also Known as Compy Elvin Reyes, Also Known as Tuti, Also Known as Tuty Gilberto Laguna, Also Known as Gilberto Ruben Laguna, Also Known as Nfn Ruben Pedro J. Merete, Also Known as Chucky Jose Espada, Also Known as Jose Espada Martinez, Also Known as Chan Carmelo Rodriguez, Also Known as Carmelo Rodriguez-Rosas Enrique Rodriguez, Also Known as Enrique Rodriguez-Narvaez, A16 pages