3798-2007 (A1)
3798-2007 (A1)
Australian Standard®
• AUSTROADS
• Association of Consulting Engineers Australia
• Association of Geotechnical Testing Authorities (Qld)
• Australian Building Codes Board
• Australian Geomechanics Society
• Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia
• National Association of Testing Authorities Australia
• University of New South Wales
This document has expired. To access the current document, please go to
your on-line service.
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
not intended for off-line storage, and such storage is contrary to the
licence under which the service is supplied.
This Standard was issued in draft form for comment as DR 05390.
Standards Australia wishes to acknowledge the participation of the expert individuals that
contributed to the development of this Standard through their representation on the
Committee and through the public comment period.
Standards may also be withdrawn. It is important that readers assure themselves they are
using a current Standard, which should include any amendments that may have been
published since the Standard was published.
Detailed information about Australian Standards, drafts, amendments and new projects can
be found by visiting www.standards.org.au
Australian Standard®
Originated as AS 3798—1990.
Third edition 2007.
Reissued incorporating Amendment No. 1 (August 2008).
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
COPYRIGHT
© Standards Australia
All rights are reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or copied in any form or by
any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without the written
permission of the publisher.
Published by Standards Australia GPO Box 476, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia
ISBN 0 7337 8096 2
AS 3798—2007 2
PREFACE
This Standard was prepared by the Standards Australia Committee CE-027, Earthworks, to
supersede AS 3798—1996.
This Standard incorporates Amendment No. 1 (August 2008). The changes required by the
Amendment are indicated in the text by a marginal bar and amendment number against the
clause, note, table, figure or part thereof affected.
The objective of this Standard is to provide guidance to those responsible for or involved in
the design, specification, supervision and control testing of earthworks for commercial and
residential developments.
This Standard is a guideline, which is an informative document only.
A1
CONTENTS
Page
SECTION 3 DOCUMENTATION
3.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................ 12
3.2 INVESTIGATION AND PLANNING ...................................................................... 12
3.3 DESIGN AND SPECIFICATION ............................................................................. 12
3.4 CONSTRUCTION..................................................................................................... 13
This document has expired. To access the current document, please go to
3.5 SITE RECORDS ....................................................................................................... 14
SECTION 6 CONSTRUCTION
6.1 SITE PREPARATION............................................................................................... 21
6.2 FILL CONSTRUCTION ........................................................................................... 23
APPENDICES
A REFERENCED DOCUMENTS ................................................................................ 32
B TYPICAL SITE RECORD SHEETS ......................................................................... 34
C STATISTICAL METHODS IN EARTHWORKS ..................................................... 40
D SUITABILITY OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF
FILL MATERIALS ................................................................................................... 42
STANDARDS AUSTRALIA
Australian Standard
Guidelines on earthworks for commercial and residential developments
1.1 SCOPE
This Standard provides guidance on the specification, execution, and control testing of
earthworks and associated site preparation works for commercial and residential
developments. This Standard does not in itself constitute a specification for earthworks and
the specifier should consider the applicability of these guidelines to the project under
consideration.
This document hasis not
The Standard expired.
intended toTo access
be used the major
for pavements, current document,
roadworks, please go to
or water-retaining
your on-line service.
structures. Such works require special consideration.
Poorly graded sand and gravel mixture, generally with less than 5% fines (i.e., particles
finer than 75 µm diameter), which is non-plastic and which does not exhibit a well-defined
moisture-density relationship when tested in accordance with AS 1289.5.1.1 or
AS 1289.5.2.1.
1.2.2 Cohesive soil
Material that has a well-defined moisture-density relationship when tested in accordance
with AS 1289.5.1.1 or AS 1289.5.2.1.
NOTE: This may include well-graded granular materials such as crushed rock.
1.2.3 Collapsing soil
Soil that may suffer a significant decrease in volume under load or when it becomes nearly
saturated, which may have existed in this metastable state for a long period.
1.2.4 Compaction
The process whereby the density of a soil mass is increased by mechanical, usually
dynamic, means. This typically involves tamping, rolling, impact or vibration, or a
combination of these processes. This process results in a relocation of the soil particles and
in the expulsion of air from the soil mass, usually without significantly altering the amount
of water in the soil.
1.2.5 Consolidation
The process by which water, and sometimes air, is expelled from a soil mass over time due
to the action of an imposed static stress and causes settlement.
NOTE: The terms compaction and consolidation are not interchangeable and consolidation should
not be referred to in earthworks specifications.
1.2.6 Dispersive soil
Soil that has the ability to pass rapidly into suspension in the presence of water.
1.2.7 Foundation
This document
The earthhas expired.
material immediatelyTo access
underlying the current
and supporting document,
any engineering please go to
structure; thus,
the foundation for a fill is the stripped surface and a fill itself can be a foundation for a
your on-line service.
building.
Please note1.2.8that
Lot material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
not intended
A lotfor
is anoff-line
area of workstorage, and homogeneous
that is essentially such storage istocontrary
in relation material typeto
andthe
licence under
moisturewhich the
condition, service
rolling response is
andsupplied.
compaction technique, and which has been used
for the assessment of the relative compaction of an area of work.
1.2.9 Pavement material
Material that is used in the construction of pavements.
NOTE: Pavement material is generally granular and often manufactured from hard rock sources
(e.g., crushed rock).
1.2.10 Reactive soil
Clay soil, for which a change in moisture content results in a sufficient change in volume to
affect the engineering performance of any structure in contact with it.
1.2.11 Relative compaction
1 For cohesive soils, the dry density ratio determined in accordance with
AS 1289.5.4.1, or the Hilf density ratio determined in accordance with AS 1289.5.7.1.
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
1.2.15 Topsoil
A surficial soil containing some organic matter, usually darker than the underlying soils.
may affect the quantity or quality, or both, of the stormwater run-off. Therefore,
special provisions may be necessary to minimize the effects and to protect the legal
rights of adjacent and downstream landowners. Failure in providing for such
provisions could lead to litigation and delay in completion of the earthworks project.
Approval from the relevant authorities should be obtained prior to either the
placement of fill on flood-prone lands or construction of drainage structures, i.e.,
culverts in natural watercourses.
The placement of fill or construction of cuts may impact the flow of subsurface water
and may lead to localized instability. Special provisions may be necessary to account
for the potential effect of the works in this situation.
(h) Erosion and siltation Protection of the earthworks from erosion, both during
construction and after construction, needs to be taken into account. Run-off from the
works, and areas affected by the works, may be subject to special provisions (see
Item (g) above).
(i) Sloping ground Special precautions where the earthworks are constructed on sloping
ground include—
(i) benching of the surface of the natural ground to assist in the placing of the fill
and to key the fill to the foundation soil;
(ii) berms or benches above, within, or at the foot of cuts to intercept stormwater
run-off or detritus; and
(iii) special works.
(j) Slope stability The basis for the assessment of the short- and long-term stabilities of
natural slopes, cut-face slopes and fill slopes is—
(i) local experience with similar materials under similar conditions; or
(ii) geotechnical investigation and analysis.
Each stability assessment needs to take into account any existing slopes, proposed
undercut and surcharge of the slopes and the effect of water seepage on the slopes.
Each slope should be selected with regard to the required access, including
This document has expired. To access the current document, please go to
maintenance, e.g., mowing.
(k) Zoning Zones for fill may be designated by specific locations and levels within the
your on-line service.
earthworks. The bases for the selection of fill within zones are—
Please note that
(i) material
easily compactedaccessed viastructures,
fill near existing our on-line subscription
to minimize services is
the compactive effort
not intended for off-line storage,
and consequent and such storage is contrary to the
risk of damage;
The calculation of quantities needs to take into account the effect of compression of
the foundation soils.
(m) Reactive soils The moisture content of reactive soils after compaction of fills should
approximate the estimated long-term moisture content, which may be about the same
as the moisture content for the undisturbed reactive soils at or about the depth of
seasonal influence.
(n) Low density or potentially collapsing soils Low density or potentially collapsing
soils lose volume when compacted in or beneath the earthworks. Calculation of
quantities needs to take into account the effect of compression of the fill or
foundation, or both.
(o) Existing filled ground Existing filled ground, for which the conditions of the
placement are not adequately documented as described in Clause 3.4, should not be
assumed to be either of the standard of compaction or of the composition adequate to
support fill or any other loads.
Site investigations, which may include test pits, test bores, test rolling (see
Clause 5.5), or other methods, are necessary to assess the degree of compaction and
composition of the existing filled ground. Analysis of the results obtained from these
investigations will allow an assessment of the adequacy of the existing filled ground
or the extent of remedial works that may be required. Such remedial works could
include complete removal.
(p) Non-potable water The suitability of non-potable water for increasing the moisture
content of fill should be evaluated by field and laboratory trials. Saline waters should
not be used—
(i) in the upper layers of fill, beneath either bituminous sealed pavements or areas
where vegetation may be established; and
(ii) in fill where steel is buried.
(q) Trenches Excavations for trenches require special consideration for support.
Relevant authorities place limitations on the maximum depth to which trenches may
be excavated without shoring.
This document
(r) has expired.
Compaction To access
moisture content the current
The optimum document,
moisture content determined please
laboratory methods is only a guide for field construction, as the optimum moisture
by go to
your on-line service.
content for compaction under field conditions will depend on the material type,
equipment used, the layer thickness and the nature of the foundation. In general, the
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
heavier the compaction effort or the thinner the layer, the lower the optimum moisture
not intended for off-line
content. storage,
Increased andmay
compaction effort suchcausestorage is contrary
the soil to approach saturationto
andthe
higher densities may not result.
licence under which the service is supplied.
(s) Surcharging of slopes Cut face and fill slopes, sides of trenches and slopes
supported by retaining walls should not be loaded, e.g., by construction equipment,
materials, soil and the like, unless the assessment of the slope stability (see Item (j))
included an allowance for particular load(s).
(t) Calculation of quantities In calculating quantities of fill, the following should be
taken into account:
(i) Volume changes due to excavation, spreading and compaction.
A1 NOTE: The degree of volume change is dependent on the type and geological origin of
the material and required relative compaction. It can be assessed as part of the site
investigation, using field density tests and laboratory compaction tests.
(ii) Compression of the foundation (see Items (l) and (n)).
(u) Physical separation of dissimilar materials Filters, comprising material of selected
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
particle size distribution and geosynthetics (see Item (v)), may be used to avoid the
mixing of materials after placement. Filters and geosynthetics are used to avoid—
(i) soft materials being forced into voids of granular material; or
(ii) erosion of fine material into adjacent granular material.
(v) Geosynthetics Proprietary products are available with particular properties suitable
to act as a filter, drainage layer and/or physical separator to allow water flow whilst
avoiding migration of soil particles or as a tensile reinforcement layer. Such materials
may be construction expedients, or may form part of the permanent earthworks.
Geosynthetics should be carefully chosen for the intended purpose and have an
adequate service life under the intended conditions.
(w) Vibration Construction activities, particularly those using equipment such as
compactors or blasting, may cause vibrations that could damage nearby structures,
either directly (due to the vibration transmitted to the structure) or indirectly (for
example, by causing settlement of the foundations).
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
not intended for off-line storage, and such storage is contrary to the
licence under which the service is supplied.
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
3.1 GENERAL
This Section includes details of the documentation for the design and construction of an
earthworks project.
The functional requirements of the design should be documented in the specification and
drawings for the earthworks project. This documentation should be sufficiently complete to
allow the constructor to unambiguously carry out the works, and for the superintendent (and
the geotechnical inspection and testing authority, as necessary) to be able to interpret the
design and administer the contract.
Such documentation will typically include (or have consciously excluded), the following, as
well as any other matters that may be of particular importance to the particular project:
(a) Adequate specification and drawings to allow the proper pricing, planning, execution
and supervision of the works. Plans, sections and elevations should clearly show areas
of earthworks, identifying areas requiring specific treatments. Particularly on larger
projects, the specification and drawings should adequately define the following:
(i) The areas in which spoil may be dumped or stockpiled.
(ii) Restrictions on clearing and stripping.
(iii) Drainage requirements during and after construction.
(iv) Criteria for selection of materials for placement in various parts of the fill and
for material to be excluded from fill. Material descriptions should be clear,
unambiguous and in accordance with AS 1726.
(v) Criteria for standard of surface trim of completed earthworks.
(vi) Details of tests, including minimum frequency, to be carried out for testing to
ensure the fill complies with the specified criteria.
(vii) The scope of the commission to be given to the geotechnical inspection and
testing authority (see Clause 1.3).
(viii) Either the methods to be used for construction or the requirements to be met by
test in the finished project. It is generally unwise to mix performance and
method specifications. Where a performance specification is adopted,
restrictions on methods should be limited to those absolutely necessary (for
example, to limit the risk of damage to nearby structures).
(b) Site investigation information, including that given in Clause 3.2(b), together with
details of, and provision for, access to any further relevant information for the
This document has expired. To access the current document, please go to
purpose of design or construction planning. Selective provision of available site
investigation data can give rise to serious problems, either engineering or legal, or
your on-line service. both, and should not be done without due consideration of the issues involved. An
overview of the issues is given in a monograph on this subject.*
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
(c) Any other relevant information in the possession of the designer.
not intended for off-line storage, and such storage is contrary to the
licence under which the service is supplied.
3.4 CONSTRUCTION
Adequate records need to be kept during construction, including conditions encountered,
works as executed, testing and any alterations to the specification and drawings. As a
minimum, these records should show the following:
(a) The areas in which fill is placed.
(b) Levels after stripping.
(c) Location of any trees or large shrubs that may have been removed.
(d) Materials exposed after stripping and the criteria upon which the decision to cease
stripping was made.
(e) Levels after completion of the filling.
(f) Details of test rolling, if undertaken.
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
*Guidelines for the provision of geotechnical information in construction contracts, Canberra, The Institution
of Engineers, Australia, 1987
S E C T I ON 4 M A T E R I A L S
4.1 GENERAL
The earthworks for most projects for which this Standard is intended will involve cut-to-fill
operations using on-site materials. Importation of suitable material on to the site may also
be required.
In some instances, materials may be encountered which are unsuitable for use as fill, or
which may require particular attention in their placement and control, if they are to be used.
This Section provides guidelines regarding material acceptance and control. It is important
to note that the primary requirement of a fill is dimensional stability, that is, a fill should
not settle nor heave excessively in service. This relies upon control of (among other things)
the shrink-swell properties of the near surface materials and the modulus or stiffness of the
material. It is neither usual nor convenient for these properties to be directly controlled in
works and as such the usual forms of specification only indirectly consider these properties.
This document has expired. To access the current document, please go to
4.2 MATERIALS SOURCED ON SITE
your on-line service.
On many projects it may be assessed that material, or portion of the material, to be won
Please notefromthat
cuts ormaterial accessed
borrow pits on via our
site will be suitable for theon-line subscription
works. In such services is
cases, the specifier
may have an adequate understanding of this material to be able to relax the requirements
not intended for off-line storage, and such storage is contrary to the
that might apply to imported or other material.
licence under which the service is supplied.
4.3 UNSUITABLE MATERIALS
Some materials are unsuitable for forming structural fill and should be either removed to
spoil or used in non-critical areas. Unsuitable materials may include—
(a) organic soils, such as many topsoils, severely root-affected subsoils and peat;
(b) materials contaminated through past site usage which may contain toxic substances or
soluble compounds harmful to water supply or agriculture;
NOTE: Disposal of such materials will generally require special consideration, and often will
be subject to control by regulatory authorities.
(c) materials containing substances that can be dissolved or leached out in the presence
of moisture (e.g., gypsum), or which undergo volume change or loss of strength when
disturbed and exposed to moisture (e.g., some shales and sandstones), unless these
matters are specifically addressed in the design;
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
(d) silts, or materials that have the deleterious engineering properties of silt;
(e) other materials with properties that are unsuitable for the forming of structural fill;
and
(f) fill that contains wood, metal, plastic, boulders or other deleterious material, in
sufficient proportions to affect the required performance of the fill.
A1
In some circumstances a design may allow for the use of some of these materials in
structural fill. Before allowing for such use, advice from a geotechnical professional should
be sought.
SE C T I O N 5 CO M PA CT I O N CR I T E RI A
5.1 GENERAL
In most situations, the required compaction should be specified as a minimum relative
compaction and not as an absolute dry density. The means by which such minimum relative
compaction will be specified will vary for each earthworks project. Projects involving large
areas of fill may use ‘statistical’ acceptance criteria (see Note), but otherwise it will be
common to adopt a ‘no value to be less than’ acceptance criterion. It should be appreciated
that the minimum value of relative compaction specified may be different for each type of
acceptance criterion for the same expected overall level of compaction.
NOTE: The use of averaging or so-called ‘statistical’ acceptance criteria for earthworks is
common practice for large projects and is likely to further increase as this method of quality
acceptance testing becomes familiar; however, control-testing schemes involving statistical
acceptance criteria will be generally outside the scope of the projects to which this Standard
applies. Some notes on the basis of such schemes are given in Appendix C. If, in the view of the
This document has expired. To access the current document, please go to
project personnel, statistical criteria should be applied, specific advice should be obtained from a
geotechnical professional.
your on-line service.
5.2 COMPACTION OF SOILS
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
This Section is applicable to soils that contain less than 20% by mass of particles coarser
not intended
than for off-line
37.5 mm storage,
after field compaction.andThis such storage
will include many ofis thecontrary tointhe
materials used
licence under which
earthworks the
projects service
to which is supplied.
this Standard is applicable. Soils containing more than 20% of
particles coarser than 37.5 mm cannot be tested for relative compaction using the
procedures of AS 1289. Clause 5.4 discusses this situation.
Minimum relative compaction values for different applications of various projects are given
in Table 5.1. The values are based on historical data, which have taken into account the
uncertainty of measurement for each of the tests involved. They have been found to deliver
acceptable performance, and are for a specification of the ‘no value to be less than’ type.
They are not applicable where statistical control criteria (see Note to Clause 5.1) are
applied. In the latter circumstances, the minimum acceptance criteria will be different, and
dependent upon the scheme adopted. This Standard does not give guidance on such values.
Guidelines for minimum relative compaction values are given below. These should be taken
as minimum values in areas of structural fill. It is possible that more stringent criteria may
be applicable in some circumstances, e.g., to assist in settlement control, shrink-swell
behaviour or to provide increased strength. Similarly, in non-structural fill areas, the
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
TABLE 5.1
MINIMUM RELATIVE COMPACTION
Minimum relative compaction, %
Minimum density ratio Minimum density
Item Application (at standard compactive effort) index
(Cohesive soils) (Cohesionless soils)
(see Note 1) (see Note 2)
1 Residential—lot, fill, house, sites 95
70
(see Note 3)
2 Commercial—fills to support minor loadings,
98
including floor loadings of up to 20 kPa and 75
(see Note 4)
isolated pad or strip footings to 100 kPa
3 Fill to support pavements (see Note 5)
(a) General fill 95 70
(b) Subgrade (to a depth of 0.3 m) 98 75
NOTES:
This document has expired. To access the current document, please go to
1 Density ratio may be either dry density ratio (see AS 1289.5.4.1) or Hilf density ratio (see AS 1289.5.7.1) as
your on-lineapplicable.
service. These test methods require reporting to the nearest 0.5% and this is assumed in these values.
2 Density index as a means for control of achieved relative compaction may be difficult to use and interpret.
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
Local correlations with other methods may exist and can be used where these are well established.
not intended for off-line
3 Development on this fill storage,
will be restricted and
to single-such
and some storage is contrary
double-storey houses, to the
with floor slab average
imposed bearing pressure not exceeding 20 kPa, and strip or pad footings not exceeding imposed bearing
licence under which
pressures the
of 100 kPa. service
Residential is supplied.
developments imposing higher pressures other than these are considered as
commercial. A minimum dry density ratio of 98% or higher may need to be considered if collapse on
saturation or excessive settlement is likely to occur.
4 Commercial developments are likely to impose loads on fills that will have a more severe effect than those of
houses, even where contact pressures are limited to those stated. The designer, in association with a
geotechnical professional, should assess the load-carrying capacity and expected deformations associated
with proposed filling and be satisfied the fill can perform its required function. Where highly loaded fills are
proposed, the minimum relative compaction may need to be increased.
5 Where pavements will be required to carry a significant volume of heavy vehicles, the minimum compaction
criteria for the upper levels of the fill may need to be reviewed. For all pavements, it is essential that the
specification for compaction of subgrade materials reflects the condition under which tests carried out for
pavement thickness design are conducted.
6 Local practice in some areas for well-known materials may rely on acceptance criteria based on other
parameters, e.g., penetrometers as described in AS 1289.6.3.2 and AS 1289.6.3.3.
7 The ground surface exposed after stripping should also be compacted in accordance with Table 5.1, to a depth
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
of not less than 150 mm. If this is not carried out or not possible (for example, due to presence of soft
ground), the consequences should be taken into account by the designer.
8 The above criteria should be applied in conjunction with visual appraisal of the standard of compaction by
the superintendent or as otherwise provided in the contract. The specification should define the circumstances
where visual appraisal (including test rolling, if appropriate) may override test results for relative
compaction, as per Section 7.1.
9 It is recognized that in some parts of Australia, such as Central Australia and much of Western Australia, the
use of modified compactive effort is preferred, because the natural moisture content more closely
approximates the modified optimum rather than the standard optimum. This Standard does not give guidance
on minimum relative compaction requirements in these areas.
In clay soils, large modern compaction equipment will often operate more effectively at
moisture contents that are substantially lower than the optimum moisture content
determined in the standard compaction test (see AS 1289.5.1.1); however, many types of
clays placed in this manner may swell significantly and lose strength if they are wetted up
after compaction. Such compaction of fill may affect the site classification determined in
accordance with AS 2870, or result in subgrade strengths less than assumed in design.
Some materials degrade rapidly during compaction (e.g., some weak or weathered rocks);
therefore, care is required to avoid over-compaction of such materials. In such a situation,
the designer may need to consider revision of the relative compaction guidelines of
Table 5.1 to take account of the associated changing compaction characteristics. This will
be particularly important where further breakdown occurs during laboratory compaction.
NOTE: If further breakdown occurs during laboratory compaction, the resulting moisture density
relationship may not satisfactorily relate to that which existed at the time of field compaction. As
a consequence, comparison of the field dry density to the laboratory maximum dry density
(MDD) may not adequately reflect the design intent (if MDD reduces with breakdown), or may
unfairly penalize the constructor (if MDD increases with breakdown). Where such variations are
likely, testing should be carried out at the time of design and realistic requirements, which reflect
This document has expired. To access the current document, please go to
the design intentions, should then be specified. It is not appropriate in these circumstances to
sample material for laboratory testing before field compaction (see Clause 7.4).
your on-line service.
5.3 PLACEMENT MOISTURE CONTENT
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
For potentially reactive or moisture-sensitive soils it will be necessary to specify a range of
not intended forcontent
moisture off-linewithinstorage,
which the filland such
is to be placedstorage is contrary
and compacted, to the
as their subsequent
licence under which
engineering the service
performance is supplied.
may be dependent upon their placement moisture.
It is not necessary to routinely specify and enforce moisture control in other non-critical
areas, or in materials where subsequent engineering performance is unlikely to be adversely
affected by placement moisture. Inclusion of such a requirement is likely to increase the
cost of placement.
Where it is required to reduce the potential for swelling of reactive clays when placed as
compacted fill, it may be desirable to specify a maximum as well as a minimum level of
relative compaction, and to be quite specific about the moisture content at which the
compacted fill is to be placed and maintained, until topsoiling or similar takes place. It is
desirable for reactive clays to be placed close to their equilibrium moisture content (not a
soil property, but dependent on the soil and environment). In temperate climates, the
equilibrium moisture content is often close to the optimum moisture content (standard
compaction). In arid and semi-arid environments, the equilibrium moisture content may be
considerably drier than in temperate climates. Material in borrow areas at or about the depth
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
of seasonal influence is often close to the equilibrium moisture content and, therefore, the
potential for problems may be minimized by placing material directly from cut to fill.
Where reactive soils are to be used as fill, it will normally be necessary to specify the
placement moisture content to be within a specified range, e.g., ‘90% to 110% of the
standard optimum moisture content (see AS 1289.5.1.1), or ‘moisture variation to not
exceed ± 2%’.
5.7 TRENCHES
Trenching infill for service installation, or like works, is common in commercial and
residential developments. It is important that, in such areas, rapid lateral changes in the
engineering properties of the ground do not occur. Compaction of backfill is important and
should be clearly specified, in terms of relative compaction, and controlled. The compaction
of the backfill should be compatible with that specified by the designer and the minimum
requirements of the relevant statutory authority. The practice of flooding sands may be
insufficient to achieve compaction of backfill and additional compaction methods may be
required.
should be stripped of all vegetation and of such soils as may be unsuitable to support the
proposed loadings or for incorporation in fills subject to density, moisture or other specified
controls. Topsoil and severely root-affected soils may need to be stripped as unsuitable
A1 material or as required for subsequent revegetation.
Geotechnical assessment of the depth and quality of topsoil or vegetal cover of the
underlying soils and of the quality and depth of the proposed fill may obviate the need for
such stripping in some circumstances.
All stripped materials should be deposited in temporary stockpiles or permanent dumps in
locations available for subsequent re-use if required, and where there is no possibility of the
material being unintentionally covered by, or incorporated in, the earthworks.
A1
Special care is needed to ensure that materials that will inhibit or prevent the satisfactory
placement of subsequent fill layers are not allowed to remain in the foundations of fills.
provide a suitable foundation for subsequent filling. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
place geosynthetics across the natural or stripped surface before such fill placement is
carried out.
Localized springs or seepages in the foundation area, detected during site investigation for
the work, should be noted and allowed for in the design. If such problems are not detected
until the works are in progress, they should be investigated so that measures such as subsoil
or rock rubble drains may be designed for incorporation in the works.
6.1.8 Off-site disposal
All materials arising from site preparation works should be managed in accordance with the
requirements of the relevant regulatory authorities. This may require segregation by
material type, classification and, where required, disposal at facilities appropriately licensed
to receive the particular materials.
number of passes, the relative economy of various options may need to be examined, if a
particular layer thickness is not specified.
Before any loose layer of fill is compacted, the material and its moisture condition should
be as uniform as practicable throughout its depth.
The maximum particle size of any rocks or other lumps within the layer, after compaction,
generally should not exceed two-thirds of the compacted layer thickness.
If there is a delay in the placement of subsequent fill layers, previously accepted layers
should conform with the specification before further fill is placed. If these layers have
wetted up or dried out, they may inhibit compaction or cause heaving of subsequent layers.
In some instances, drying of the fill may be deleterious, especially with reactive soils.
The standard of surface trim of the completed earthworks should be specified in the
documentation (see Clause 3.3).
Additional moisture blending or drying out may be required to facilitate recompaction. The
surfaces of all fill layers should be shaped to provide drainage and to prevent ponding,
which will cause deterioration of previously compacted fill layers.
6.2.5 Surface heaving
Surface heaving results from the compaction of materials approaching saturation and
inhibits further compaction. The development of surface heaving on fills may be avoided by
the following:
(a) Ensuring that the moisture content of materials during placement avoids near
saturation at the specified density.
(b) Providing drainage on the surface of fills and preventing the ponding of water on fill
layers.
(c) Selecting appropriate earthmoving and compaction equipment.
SE C T I ON 7 M E T H O D S O F T E ST I N G
7.1 GENERAL
This Section describes the procedures to be followed when carrying out acceptance testing
of field compaction. In considering this Section, it will be necessary to have established the
requirements of the specification for the work to be tested and of the relevant test
procedures.
Acceptance testing, based on a comparison of the density achieved in the field with that of
some reference density established in a laboratory, provides an indirect measurement of the
performance of the compacted fill material. Consequently, it is essential that the
documentation (see Clause 3.3) include a satisfactory basis for achieving the required
performance. Measurement of relative compaction in general is not sufficient to assess
compliance and should be used in conjunction with visual inspection of the compaction
process and, where applicable, test rolling.
project or site.
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
not intended for off-line storage, and such storage is contrary to the
licence under which the service is supplied.
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
8.1 GENERAL
To assess whether the quality of materials and workmanship provided on a project are
consistent with the design requirements, the earthworks for a project should be inspected
and tested at regular and appropriate intervals, having regard to the nature of the work, its
required function and the specification. The specification should detail the level of
inspection and testing required as detailed in Clauses 8.2 and 8.3.
Adequate control of earthworks will require appropriate inspection and should not rely on
test results alone. These inspection measures may include visual assessment of fill or
foundation materials, test rolling, surveillance of compaction procedures and compaction
trials. Relative compaction testing may be supplemented by other testing.
express an opinion that the works (as far as it has been able to determine) comply with the
specification and drawings.
A1
8.3 LEVEL 2 SAMPLING AND TESTING
A geotechnical testing authority (GTA) will be appointed to carry out sampling and testing
as required or specified. The GTA is responsible for selecting the location of sampling and
testing operations within each visit made to the site. The superintendent is responsible for
advice as to when such visits are required and is responsible for ensuring that sufficient
samples and tests are taken over the project.
On completion of the earthworks, the GTA may be required to provide a report, setting out
the sampling and testing it has carried out, and the locations and results thereof. The GTA
will not be in a position to express any opinion beyond this as to the compliance of the
works with the specification or their suitability for any particular purpose.
testing.
The precise scope of services to be provided by the GITA or the GTA may differ from one
contract to another and, therefore, should be ascertained before work begins. A testing
strategy established at the commencement of work may be reassessed if a high degree of
uniformity becomes evident during construction.
A guide to the required frequency of testing for earthworks projects, to which this Standard
is applicable, is given in Table 8.1. In variable or difficult conditions, more frequent testing
may be required. These testing frequencies relate to acceptance on a ‘not one to fail’ basis,
and may need to be varied if statistical control techniques are employed (see Appendix C).
For projects requiring more than just a few tests to check compliance, the testing should
essentially be carried out in a number of randomly chosen locations and at the frequencies
given in Table 8.1. However, for small projects, it may be appropriate to undertake testing
in specific locations, based on visual appearance or past experience (e.g., compaction may
be more difficult to achieve adjacent to access holes, kerbs or over backfilled service
trenches).
It should not be assumed that a test result applies only to the area immediately surrounding
it. Where any test in a lot (see Clause 1.2.8) indicates that compliance with the specification
has not been achieved, the lot is considered to have failed. On this basis, the entire lot needs
to be reworked and retested. Selection of a lot for testing requires careful consideration.
TABLE 8.1
FREQUENCY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Type of earthworks Frequency of tests (see Note 2)
Type 1 Large scale operations 1 test per layer per material type per 2500m 2;
(greater than 1500m 2 e.g., or
subdivisions, large industrial lots,
1 test per 500m 3 distributed reasonably evenly throughout full depth and
road embankments)
area;
or
3 tests per lot (Clause 1.2.8)
Whichever requires the most tests
2
Type 2 Small scale operations 1 test per layer (see Note 3) per 1000m ;
This document hasresidential
(e.g., individual expired.lots) To
or access the current document, please go to
your on-line service. 1 test per 200m distributed reasonably evenly throughout full depth and 3
area;
Please note that material accessed or via our on-line subscription services is
not intended for off-line storage, and
1 test per such
residential lot perstorage
layer is contrary to the
Whichever requires the most tests
licence under which the service
Type 3 Concentrated operations
is supplied.
1 test per layer (see Note 3) per 500m ; 2
2
less than 500m (e.g., back filling of or
small farm dams, gullies and similar)
1 test per 100m 3 distributed reasonably evenly throughout full depth and
area;
or
3 tests per visit
Whichever requires the most tests
Type 4 Confined operations 1 test per 2 layers per 50m 2
(e.g., filling behind structures)
(see Note 4)
A1 Trenches 1 test per 2 layers per 40 linear metres
NOTES:
1 The above guidelines refer to the determination of relative compaction using a direct method; however,
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
where an indirect method is used, e.g., Perth sand penetrometer (AS 1289.6.3.3), some interpretation of
the guidelines may be required.
2 Tests in areas of uncertain compaction and retests of failed areas should be carried out. These are
additional to the testing recommended in this Table.
A1
3 Where Level 2 sampling and testing has been specified it may be acceptable to test more than one layer
per site visit, by excavating to the test level. When testing a layer that has already been overlain by
additional earthworks, the test site should be prepared by scraping off the overlying layer(s) and preparing
a suitable pad for testing as required by AS 1289.5.3.1, AS 1289.5.3.2 or AS 1289.5.8.1.
4 Implies hand-operated or small equipment.
APPENDIX A
REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
AS
1289 Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes
1289.1.1 Method 1.1: Sampling and preparation of soils—Preparation of disturbed
soil samples for testing
1289.1.4.2 Method 1.4.2: Sampling and preparation of soils—Selection of sampling or
test sites—Stratified random number method
1289.5.1.1 Method 5.1.1: Soil compaction and density tests—Determination of the dry
density/moisture content relation of a soil using standard
compactive effort
1289.5.2.1 Method 5.2.1: Soil compaction and density tests—Determination of the dry
density or moisture content relation of a soil using modified
compactive effort
1289.5.3.1 Method 5.3.1: Determination of the field density of a soil—Sand
This document has expired. To access the current document, please go to replacement method using a sand-cone pouring apparatus
your on-line service.
1289.5.3.2 Method 5.3.2: Soil compaction and density tests—Determination of the
field dry density of a soil—Sand replacement method using a
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is sand pouring can, with or without a volume displacer
1289.5.3.5 Method 5.3.5: Soil compaction and density tests—Determination of the
not intended for off-line storage, and such storage is contrary to the field dry density of a soil—Water replacement method
licence under which the service is supplied.
1289.5.4.1 Method 5.4.1: Soil compaction and density tests—Compaction control
test— Dry density ratio, moisture variation and moisture
ratio
1289.5.5.1 Method 5.5.1: Soil compaction and density tests—Determination of the
minimum and maximum dry density of a cohesionless
material— Standard method
1289.5.6.1 Method 5.6.1: Soil compaction and density tests—Compaction control
test— Density index method for a cohesionless material
1289.5.7.1 Method 5.7.1: Soil compaction and density tests—Compaction control
test— Hilf density ratio and Hilf moisture variation (rapid
method)
1289.5.8.1 Method 5.8.1: Soil compaction and density tests—Determination of field
density and field moisture content of a soil using a nuclear
surface moisture-density gauge—Direct transmission mode
1289.6.3.2 Method 6.3.2: Soil strength and consolidation tests—Determination of the
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
ISO
ISO/IEC General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing
17020 inspection
17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration
laboratories
AUSTROADS
NTR-09 Pavement materials: statistical assessment of quality
APPENDIX B
TYPICAL SITE RECORD SHEETS
This Appendix sets out typical site records, which may be appropriate to keep in respect of
the earthworks undertaken for projects to which this Standard applies; however, each
project will have its own specific needs, which should also be addressed. Modifications to
the given examples may be necessary to suit individual requirements.
your on-lineSuperintendent:
service.
Inspection and testing by (GITA/GTA):
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
Level 1 or 2:
not intended for off-line
GITA/GTA retained by:storage, and such storage is contrary to the
Materials testing: Refer to material, type, source, purpose of testing, sampling methods
and locations, test types, sample reference numbers, results obtained, and to whom
distributed.
Field density testing: Refer to types of test, section of work to which tests apply, test
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
locations and levels, test reference numbers, results obtained, and to whom distributed.
Works meeting geotechnical requirements: Refer to work type (e.g. stripping, subgrade
compaction), basis of assessment (e.g. inspection, test reference numbers, and the like),
extent of works apparently complying and requirements met.†
Project:
Owner:
Constructor:
Superintendent:
This document
Level of has expired.
engagement To access
of geotechnical inspection the current
and testing authoritydocument, please go to
in accordance with
AS 3798, Section 8.
your on-line service.
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
not intended
Priorfor off-line
usage of project storage,
site: and such storage is contrary to the
Purpose of present development:
licence under which the service is supplied.
Remarks:
Note—Unless engaged at Level 1 (see AS 3798 Clause 8.2) a testing authority is not in a
position to express an opinion as to whether the works comply with the drawings or
specification or are suitable for a particular purpose.
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
Signed: _______________________________________
APPENDIX C
STATISTICAL METHODS IN EARTHWORKS
C1 GENERAL
Earth materials are inherently variable and, whilst working from borrow to fill often acts to
reduce the variability, compacted fill is also variable. Thus the density and moisture content
of a fill will vary from any one location to other locations, even if considerable care is
taken to attempt to achieve a uniform result.
The ‘not any to fail’ specification commonly applied to small earthwork projects is based
on a successful history of producing suitable fills and only indirectly accounts for the
inherent variability. So-called ‘statistical’ methods have been applied to earthworks, in an
attempt to quantify the variability. These methods are used for two general purposes as
follows:
(a) Quality control (QC)—to control the process, the contractor uses quality control to
This document hasadvance
provide expired.
warningTo access
of any changes inthe current
the earthwork document,
quality please go to
so that the method
your on-line service.
can be changed to ensure continuing satisfactory placement. It can also be used to
estimate the in situ properties of the fill.
Please note that material accessed via our on-line subscription services is
(b) Quality assurance (QA)—to ensure that the product (fill) quality is within
not intended for off-line
specification storage,
requirements. In and such itstorage
this Standard, is contrary
is quality assurance to the
that is being
considered and two terms require definition as follows:
licence under which the service is supplied.
(i) Owner’s risk (often B)—the risk of accepting fill as having a certain quality
when, in fact, it does not.
(ii) Contractor’s risk (often α)—the risk of fill being rejected as not having a
certain quality when, in fact, it does.
The owner’s risk can always be reduced to zero simply by always rejecting the product.
There is then no chance of accepting poor quality material. The obvious problem with this
is that the contractor’s risk is 100% and good quality material is always rejected. Statistical
methods should aim to balance these risks. To reduce both risks simultaneously requires a
reduction in the uncertainty regarding the actual quality of the product, which is generally
achieved by increasing the number of samples used in decision-making.
At present, statistical QA schemes find little application in works within the scope of this
Standard. In Australia, such schemes find their main use in larger road construction
Accessed by CALIBRE GLOBAL PTY LTD on 07 Jan 2011
C3 ACCEPTANCE
When using statistical acceptance schemes, the acceptance values are based on
characteristic values of the properties, e.g., density ratio.
The characteristic values are calculated using the following equation:
AUSTROADS NTR-09.
C4 OUTLIER RESULTS
AUSTROADS NTR-09 provides information on the treatment of outlier results. In cases
where a result or results are outliers, it is preferable to retest the lot rather than to adjust the
acceptance criteria based on a reduced number of samples in order to reduce bias.
APPENDIX D
SUITABILITY OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF
FILL MATERIALS
AS 3798—2007
CORRECTION
SUMMARY: This Amendment applies to the Preface, Section 2, Clauses 4.3, 4.4, 6.1.5, 6.2.6, 8.3 and 8.4, and
Table 8.1.
Published on 5 August 2008.
NOTES
International Involvement
Standards Australia is responsible for ensuring the Australian viewpoint is considered in the formulation of
International Standards and that the latest international experience is incorporated in national Standards. This role is
vital in assisting local industry to compete in international markets. Standards Australia represents Australia at both
the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).