Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives
Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives
Received: July 15, 2004; Revised: August 16, 2004; Accepted: August 18, 2004; DOI: 10.1002/marc.200400313
Keywords: microwave irradiation; monomodal microwave reactor; radical polymerization; ring-opening polymerization; step-
growth polymerization
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764   DOI: 10.1002/marc.200400313          ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1740                                                                                                   F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       accessible for reactions performed in closed vessels, faci-             received broad interest in all branches of chemistry ever
       litating the use of low boiling solvents and thereby paving             since then.
       the way to environmentally benign reaction conditions.                     Monomodal microwave systems (Figure 1) heat only one
          It should be mentioned, however, that these ameliora-                reaction vessel at a time. Consequently, the volume of the
       tions might be mainly ascribed to the one main character-               reaction (heating) chamber is diminished, and the resulting
       istic of reactions performed under microwave irradiation: a             homogenous irradiation field uniformly heats the reaction
       combination of the large increase in reaction speed (caused             liquor. Most of these microwave reactors operate with
       by the high temperatures utilized) and the selective                    standardized reaction vessels that are closed by septa,
       excitation that circumvents the formation of by-products                allowing for accurate control of the pressure (by the bowing
       or the exhaustion of catalysts and reduces the time available           of the septum) as well as the temperature inside the reaction
       for the desired product to decompose.[2] In the literature, on          vial (detected by an IR sensor that is directed towards the
       the other hand, a controversial discussion has arisen as to             walls of the vessel). Depending on this online monitoring,
       whether the increase in reaction speed not only emerges                 the irradiation power may be adjusted (‘‘dynamic field
       from thermal effects, but also from (nonthermal) ‘‘micro-               tuning’’, DFT) to maintain the desired reaction conditions
       wave effects’’.[2–5] These days, a strong tendency to dismiss           (like a fixed temperature and a threshold for maximum
       microwave effects is discernible, benefiting from the                   pressure), or be switched off, when the chosen parameters
       observations made during reactions performed in mono-                   are exceeded. This way, a powerful tool is provided for
       modal microwave systems as reaction devices. This                       minimizing the risk of hazardous explosions that are
       new class of reactors[6] was introduced to a large group of             associated with reactions performed in domestic micro-
       scientists at the beginning of the millennium and has                   wave ovens;[3] furthermore, exothermic reactions may be
                                 Frank Wiesbrock was born in Gütersloh (Germany) in 1976. He studied chemistry at the Technische
                                 Universität München (Germany) where he received his degree in 2001. During his studies, he
                                 additionally attended a practical course dealing with switchable adhesives at the EADS (Ottobrunn,
                                 Germany) for six months. In the course of his PhD thesis under the supervision of Prof. H. Schmidbaur
                                 (chair of inorganic chemistry at the Technische Universität München), he investigated the complexation
                                 behavior of b-amino carboxylates towards biologically important metal ions. He was awarded his
                                 doctorate in 2003. In January 2004, he joined the research group of Prof. U. S. Schubert at the
                                 Eindhoven University of Technology (The Netherlands) as a postdoctoral research associate on
                                 microwave-assisted polymerization reactions. His main research interests are metal complexation,
                                 bioinorganic chemistry and polymer synthesis.
                                 Richard Hoogenboom was born in 1978 in Rotterdam (The Netherlands). In 2001 he obtained his M.Sc.
                                 degree in chemical engineering at the Eindhoven University of Technology. His undergraduate research
                                 concerning the quadruple hydrogen bonding of the 2-ureido-4[1H]-pyrimidinone unit in water was
                                 carried out in the group of Bert Meijer (Eindhoven, The Netherlands). After a three months internship
                                 within the group of Andrew Holmes (Cambridge, United Kingdom), he started in November 2001 his
                                 PhD work under the supervision of Ulrich Schubert (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) focusing on
                                 supramolecular initiators for controlled polymerization techniques and automated parallel synthesis of
                                 well-defined polymers.
                                 Ulrich S. Schubert was born in Tübingen in 1969. He studied chemistry at the Universities of Frankfurt
                                 and Bayreuth (both Germany) and the Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (USA). His PhD
                                 work was performed under the supervision of Professor Eisenbach (Bayreuth, Germany) and Professor
                                 Newkome (Florida, USA). In 1995 he obtained his doctorate with Professor Eisenbach. After
                                 postdoctoral training with Professor Lehn at the Université Strasbourg (France) he moved to the
                                 Technische Universität München (Germany) to obtain his habilitation in 1999 (with Professor Nuyken).
                                 From 1999 to spring 2000 he held a temporal position as a professor at the Center for NanoScience at
                                 the Universität München (Germany). Since the summer of 2000 he has been a Full-Professor at the
                                 Eindhoven University of Technology (Chair for Macromolecular Chemistry and Nanoscience). His
                                 awards include the Bayerischen Habilitations-Förderpreis, the Habilitandenpreis of the GDCh
                                 (Makromolekulare Chemie), the Heisenberg-Stipendium of the DFG, the Dozenten-Stipendium of the
                                 Fonds der Chemischen Industrie and a VICI award of NWO. The major focus of his research is organic
                                 heterocyclic chemistry, supramolecular materials, combinatorial material research, nanoscience and
                                 tailor-made macromolecules.
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764        www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                      1741
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1742                                                                                                    F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       microwave oven.[19] The stock mixture was composed of                   not determined. The type of solvent did not influence the
       equimolar amounts of glycinamide, alaninamide, valin-                   inherent viscosity (therefore, neither the molecular weight)
       amide, and aspartic acid a-amide as model substances for                of the polymers. The amount of solvent, however, played a
       molecules formed at an early stage of the chemical evolu-               (minor) role, as the use of a smaller amount of solvent
       tion. Continued solvation in aqueous solution and subse-                resulted in a higher final temperature in a shorter reaction
       quent evaporation of the water in a microwave oven resulted             time, affording polymers with higher inherent viscosities.
       in the formation of polypeptides with molecular weights of                 Similar observations have been made for the polymer-
       up to 4 000 Dalton. The molecular weights were found to                 ization of equimolar amounts of diamines and dicarboxylic
       be independent of the number of hydration–dehydration                   acids, the ‘‘nylon salts’’. Imai et al. investigated the poly-
       cycles; a saturating yield of 10% was obtained after ten                merizations of aliphatic diamines and dicarboxylic acids
       cycles. Comparison experiments with conventional heating                for the preparation of polymers of the composition
       showed that the microwave did not affect the maximum                    [–NH(CH2)xNHCO(CH2)yCO–]n (with the combinations
       molecular weight attainable, but it improved the yield of the           x/y ¼ 6/4, 6/6, 6/8, 6/10, 8/4, 12/4, 12/6, 12/8, 12/10)[20–22]
       polypeptides by a factor of 100. The authors ascribe this               as well as the polymerizations of aromatic diamines (like
       success to the shortness of the heating periods, keeping                4,40 -methylenedianiline, 4,40 -oxydianiline, 1,3- and 1,4-
       undesired side reactions, such as the hydrolysis of the                 phenylenediamine) and dicarboxylic acids (like isophthalic
       terminal active amide groups, to a minimum.                             acid and terephthalic acid) to yield polymers of the structure
          Artificial polyamides have been derived from amino                   [–NH–Ar–NHCO–Ar0 –CO–]n after a Yamazaki phospho-
       acids as well as nylon salts (for the synthesis of polyamides           rylation reaction (Scheme 1b and c).[23] For the polymeriza-
       from caprolactam, see Section 3). Utilizing a domestic                  tions involving aromatic monomers, a domestic microwave
       microwave oven, Imai et al. polymerized amino acids of                  reactor was additionally supplied with a Teflon insulated
       the composition H2N(CH2)xCOOH (x ¼ 5, 6, 10, 11, 12)                    thermocouple (Figure 3). Like the polymerizations of amino
       (Scheme 1a).[20,21] As a result of the incapability of the              acids, these reactions were also carried out in high-boiling
       monomers to absorb microwave irradiation, the polymer-                  solvents with high dielectric moments. The products were
       ization reactions were carried out in solution with the                 obtained after short reaction times (less than one minute) in
       solvent additionally acting as absorber. Solvents with high             high yields (85–96%), and the polyamides exhibited
       boiling points and high dielectric constants, like m-cresol,            medium to high inherent viscosities (up to 0.86 dL  g1).
       o-chlorophenol, ethylene glycol, sulfolane, and N-cyclo-                For one series of aliphatic diamines and dicarboxylic acids
       hexyl-2-pyrrolidone, proved to be most successful. As                   (x ¼ 6, 8, 12; y ¼ 4), the difference between continuous and
       expected, diphenyl ether, with a high boiling point but a low           periodic microwave irradiation was investigated.[22] In final
       dielectric constant, failed to support the polymerization.              consequence, the polymerizations carried out under peri-
       The syntheses of the polyamides were carried out in open                odic microwave irradiation allowed for easier temperature
       reaction vials that allowed for the evaporation of the                  control and gave polymers with a higher inherent viscosity
       solvents; within five minutes, polymers with large inherent             (compared with continuous heating). These findings are
       viscosities of around 0.5 dL  g1 were obtained. Average               taken into account in the monomodal microwave systems
       molecular weights and their distributions, however, were                available today in dynamic field tuning (see Section 1).
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764        www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                      1743
                                                                                   2.2. Polyimides
                                                                                   A large number of the presented polyimides contain the
                                                                                   pyromellitoyl unit in their polymer chains. Imai et al.
                                                                                   investigated the step-growth polymerization of aliphatic
                                                                                   diamines H2N–(CH2)x–NH2 (x ¼ 6–12) with both pyro-
                                                                                   mellitic acid and its diethyl ester (Scheme 2a).[21,26,27]
                                                                                   Analogously to the synthesis of polyamides (Section 2.1.),
                                                                                   the reactions were performed in solution in a domestic
Figure 3. Experimental setup for the measurement of tempera-                       microwave oven. Among the investigated solvents, all of
ture in a domestic microwave oven (according to reference [23]).
                                                                                   them with high boiling points and high dielectric constants,
                                                                                   1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidone (DMI) proved to be best
                                                                                   suited as primary microwave absorber and solvent for the
Mallon and Ray, moreover, showed that the increase in                              monomers and polymers. Polyimides with inherent vis-
reaction rates (for nylon 6,6) was determined by the enhan-                        cosities of 0.7 dL  g1 (for x ¼ 12) were obtained within
ced diffusion rates under microwave irradiation (Figure 4;                         two minutes from pyromellitic acid as starting material.
cf. Section 2.2).[24]                                                              Especially for pyromellitic acid diethyl ester as monomer,
   The high-pressure synthesis of polyamides was investi-                          the microwave-assisted polymerization proved its virtues
gated by Pourjavadi et al. for the Yamazaki phosphorylation                        by producing a series of polyimides with inherent visco-
reaction of aliphatic dicarboxylic acids (x ¼ 2, 4, 6, 8) and                      sities of up to 1.6 dL  g1. For the reaction of dodecameth-
aromatic diamines (like 1,4-phenylendiamine and 2,5-bis-                           ylene diamine with pyromellitic acid, a direct comparison
(4-aminophenyl)-3,4-diphenylthiophene).[25] The educts                             between microwave irradiation and conventional heating
were dissolved in N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) and trans-                             was made by control experiments. The solution polymer-
ferred to the (domestic) microwave oven in a polyethylene                          ization in the microwave was shown to proceed much
screw-capped cylinder. With this reaction, polymers with                           faster than the corresponding solid-state synthesis under
                          Figure 4. Setup for the determination of the diffusion rates in the course of the
                          polymerizations of nylon 6,6 and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (according to reference [24]).
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1744                                                                                                    F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       conventional heating during the initial five minutes. After              polyimides with rigid structures from pyromellitic acid
       these five minutes and with concomitant inherent viscos-                 dianhydride and aromatic diamines (such as benzoguan-
       ities of around 1 dL  g1, however, the inherent viscosities            amine or 3,30 -diaminobenzophenone) or polyurethane-
       of the polymers that were prepared in the microwave oven                 prepolymers prepared from benzoguanamine and toluene-
       only slightly increased with prolonged irradiation times,                2,4-diisocyanate (Scheme 2b and c).[28–32] The preparation
       while those from the polymers that were synthesized                      of the polymers followed a two-step procedure, the first step
       with conventional heating still increased to values of up to             of which was aimed at the microwave-assisted synthesis of
       2 dL  g1. No explanation was provided for these                        a polyamic acid precursor under reflux conditions (in
       observations; instead, Imai et al. emphasized the micro-                 methanol or tetrahydrofuran). This precursor polymer
       wave’s superiority to conventional heating during the first              was recovered from the reaction liquor, mixed with pyro-
       five minutes.                                                            mellitic acid dianhydride, and was subjected to a solid-
          In order to provide a new series of polymers with third-              phase polymerization in a domestic microwave oven. The
       order nonlinear optical properties, Lu et al. synthesized                imidization reaction strongly profited from microwave
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764         www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                      1745
irradiation and the reaction time was decreased from 5 h to                        that was assessed as further proof for the postulated
8 min.[30] Furthermore, increased inherent viscosities and,                        mechanism. A direct comparison of microwave irradiation
hence, improved third-order nonlinear optical properties of                        and conventional heating for the synthesis of poly(ethylene
the polymers were observed and referred to the reduced                             terephthalate) was carried out by Gilmer et al. at 140 8C.[35]
reaction times.                                                                    They reported that microwave irradiation did not enhance
   The use of polyamic acid prepared under microwave                               the reaction speed in the case of identical temperatures and
irradiation for grafting procedures has been also described                        reaction times.
by Lu et al.[33] For that reaction, a domestic microwave oven                         Currently, with a major debate concerning the existence
was supplied with an external voltage controller to allow for                      or nonexistence of microwave effects, all three reports
the modulation of the power. In this way, the temperature                          should be taken into critical account. A steadily growing
inside the reaction vial could be manually maintained at a                         number of experiments gives rise to the last of the presented
favored value (Figure 5).                                                          theories and predicts the microwave to be a fast and efficient
   Kinetic measurements were performed for the imidiza-                            heating device with no further influence on most of the
tion reaction under microwave irradiation. For the polyamic                        reactions performed. For the other two theories, however, it
acid derived from 3,30 ,4,40 -benzophenone-tetracarboxylic                         should be mentioned that the observed ameliorations may
acid and diaminodiphenylsulfone, Ward and co-workers                               originate from the selective excitation of dipoles (which is
showed that the increase in reaction rates and the concomi-                        characteristically most pronounced for water molecules).
tant decrease of the apparent activation energy was a
consequence of the microwave irradiation’s selectivity to
                                                                                   2.3. Poly(amide imide)s
excite dipoles.[34] According to that theory, a temperature
enhancement of 50 K in the vicinity of the excited                                 Mallakpour et al. synthesized optically active pyromellitoyl
dipole moment was predicted. Mallon and Ray also ascrib-                           polymers as model substances for column materials in
ed the increase in reaction speed [for nylon 6,6 and                               enantioselective chromatography.[36,37] The polymeriza-
poly(ethylene terephthalate)] to the selectivity of the                            tion reaction was proceeded by the preparation of optically
microwave irradiation, based on findings from a specially                          active pyromellitoyl derivatives (under conventional heat-
designed microwave reactor setup (Figure 4).[24] However,                          ing), namely N,N0 -(pyromellitoyl)-bis-L-phenylalanine di-
they proposed that enhanced diffusion rates (of small                              acid chloride and the corresponding L-leucine compound.
molecules involved in the ring-closing imidization reac-                           Starting from these monomers, two series of optically
tion) were responsible for the observable increase of                              active poly(amide imide)s were investigated: The bis-L-
reaction rates and the decrease of the apparent activation                         phenylalanine compound was reacted with six differently
energy. This increase in the reaction speed was found to be                        5,5-disubstituted hydantoin compounds (Scheme 3a) and a
most pronounced for water molecules that are known to                              bis-L-leucine derivative with six aromatic diamines, respec-
optimally absorb microwave irradiation, a phenomenon                               tively. The polymerizations were carried out in a domestic
                                                                                   microwave oven in o-cresol solution because of the low
                                                                                   absorbance of the monomers. Polymers with inherent
                                                                                   viscosities of up to 0.5 dL  g1 were obtained within 10 min.
                                                                                   Longer exposure times led to partial degradation of the
                                                                                   polymers.
                                                                                      Another library of poly(amide imide)s was prepared by
                                                                                   Mallakpour et al. from the reactions of optically active
                                                                                   N,N0 -(4,40 -carbonyldiphthaloyl)-bis-L-phenylalanine di-
                                                                                   acid chloride and the corresponding L-alanine and L-leucine
                                                                                   compounds, with eight aromatic diamines, all of them with
                                                                                   a rigid scaffold (Scheme 3b).[38–40] The two monomers
                                                                                   were dissolved in o-cresol and exposed to microwave
                                                                                   irradiation for 7 to 10 min in a domestic microwave oven to
                                                                                   yield polymers with large inherent viscosities in the range
                                                                                   of 0.22 to 0.85 dL  g1. A comparison of microwave-
                                                                                   assisted polymerization in a Teflon vessel with that in a
                                                                                   porcelain dish showed that (for identical reaction times) the
                                                                                   polymers recovered from the porcelain dish had larger
                                                                                   inherent viscosities.[38] Furthermore, for two series of
Figure 5. Modification of a domestic microwave oven in order to                    compounds, the microwave-assisted polycondensation
maintain the favored reaction temperatures by adjusting the                        was compared with a solution polymerization supported
supplied power (according to reference [33]).                                      by trimethylsilyl chloride (for the activation of the
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1746                                                                                                     F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
                              Scheme 3. Poly(amide imide)s prepared in microwave reactors, Part I: (a) optically active
                              poly(amide imide)s from pyromellitic diacid anhydride, L-amino acids, and 5,5-disubstituted
                              hydantoin derivatives; (b) polymers containing a carbonyldiphthaloyl unit; (c) poly(amide
                              imide)s with tetrahydro-2-thioxopyrimidines in the main chain.
       diamines).[38,39] These reference experiments were per-                   step-growth polymerizations of N,N0 -(pyromellitoyl)-bis-
       formed under a nitrogen blanket, followed by a subsequent                 L-isoleucine diacid chloride and six aromatic diamines (cf.
       increase of the temperature to ambient conditions. From the               beginning of this Section).[41]
       properties of the polymers, it could be concluded that the                   Findings from the above-described series were suc-
       microwave irradiation was superior to the catalyzed solu-                 cessfully transferred to the synthesis of polymers from
       tion polymerization. In a more recent publication, these                  N,N0 -(4,40 -carbonyldiphthaloyl)-bis-L-alanine diacid chlor-
       findings were repeatedly observed for the corresponding                   ide with bulky derivatives of tetrahydropyrimidone and
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764          www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                     1747
tetrahydro-2-thioxopyrimidine (six compounds) (Scheme                              of compounds was synthesized by Mallakpour et al. from
3c).[42] The monomers were dissolved in o-cresol and                               N,N0 -(4,40 -hexafluoroisopropylidene)-bis-phthaloyl-L-leu-
irradiated for 10 min in a domestic microwave oven to yield,                       cine diacid chloride and a group of ten aromatic diamines
(quasi) quantitatively, polymers with inherent viscosities of                      (Scheme 4a); the polymers exhibited viscosities of 0.50 to
0.25 to 0.45 dL  g1.                                                             1.93 dL  g1.[45]
   A similar group of optically active poly(amide imide)s                             The synthesis of optically active poly(amide imide)s
was prepared by Faghihi et al. from N,N0 -(4,40 -carbonyl-                         containing Epiclon as structural unit additionally empha-
diphthaloyl)-bis-L-alanine diacid chloride and six repres-                         sized the universality of the concept for the microwave-
entative hydantoin and thiohydantoin derivatives.[43]                              assisted step-growth polymerization introduced by
Analogously, the polymerizations were carried out in solu-                         Mallakpour et al.[45,46] The Epiclon-containing diacid
tion in o-cresol in a domestic microwave oven to produce                           chlorides were obtained with conventional heating from
polymers within irradiation times of 10 min. Viscosity                             reactions involving L-leucine and L-phenylalanine
measurements, however, were not performed. A similar set                           (Scheme 4b). The polymerizations themselves with seven
                          Scheme 4. Poly(amide imide)s prepared in microwave reactors, Part II: (a) polymers from
                          N,N0 -(4,40 -hexafluoroisopropylidene)-bisphthaloyl-L-leucine diacid chloride and aromatic
                          diamines; (b) Epiclon-containing polymers; (c) polymers from 4-(40 -N-1,8-naphthalimido-
                          phenyl)-1,2,4-triazolidine-3,5-dione and isophorone diisocyanate.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1748                                                                                                 F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       different aromatic diamines were carried out in N-                   conventional and within 20 min with microwave heating
       methylpyrrolidone solution in a domestic microwave oven.             (domestic microwave oven, 650 W), respectively, exhibit-
       After exposure times of 5 min, poly(amide imide)s with               ing an acceleration factor of 70 for the transfer to the micro-
       inherent viscosities of 0.12 to 0.22 dL  g1 were obtained.         wave reactor. Prolonged exposure times to microwave
       For both series, control experiments were carried out to             irradiation were found to induce the undesirable formation
       elucidate the microwave’s superiority over formerly                  of cyclic oligomers as shown by matrix-assisted laser-
       exercised polymerization techniques: The low-temperature             desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
       solution polycondensation (in N-methylpyrrolidone with               (MALDI-TOF MS) (Figure 6).
       trimethylsilyl chloride as promotor), as well as the high-              The polymerization of a derivative of lactic acid, namely
       temperature analogon, rendered polymers with comparable              L-2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoic acid, was studied by Liu
       properties. However, significantly longer reaction times in          et al. (Scheme 5a).[53] The polymerizations were carried out
       the range of hours were employed for these alternatives to           with variable time and power in a domestic microwave oven.
       microwave-assisted polymerizations.                                  With maximum power (510 W), polymers with number-
          Similar variations in the polymerization techniques               average molecular weights of 1 800/3 900/5 400 and PDI
       for the synthesis of poly(amide imide)s from N,N0 -(4,40 -           values of 1.8/1.0/1.4 (given by the authors) were obtained
       sulfonediphthaloyl)-bis-L-phenylalanine diacid chloride              within 0.5/1.5/2.5 h, respectively. The formation or non-
       and its L-leucine congener with seven aromatic diamines              formation of cyclic by-products was not discussed.
       showed analogous tendencies.[47,48]                                     Like poly(lactic acid), polyanhydrides also belong to the
          The approach to polymers with another type of amide               class of biodegradable polymers and represent potential
       linkages in the main chain, the polyureas, has also been             materials for drug delivery applications. The preparation of
       described by Mallakpour et al.[49–51] From 4-(40 -acetami-           polyanhydrides is a two-step process under conventional
       dophenyl)-1,2,4-triazolidine-3,5-dione and the 40 -N-1,8-            heating, comprising the synthesis of a polyanhydride pre-
       naphthalimidophenyl derivative, as well as 4-(40 -tert-butyl-        polymer, its isolation, purification, and subsequent poly-
       phenyl)-1,2,4-triazolidine-3,5-dione, the three of them              merization. Mallapragada and co-workers showed that
       prepared under conventional heating, the targeted polymers           the polymerization can be carried out in a single step,
       were obtained by the reaction with three different diiso-            admittedly with intermediate removal of unreacted acetic
       cyanates (hexamethylene diisocyanate, isophorone diiso-              anhydride (Scheme 5b).[54] The dicarboxylic acid (like
       cyanate, and toluene-2,4-diisocyanate) (Scheme 4c). The              sebacic acid) and excessive acetic anhydride were placed in
       polymerizations were carried out in a domestic micro-                a high-pressure vial that was capped and irradiated for 2 min
       wave oven in solution in dimethylacetamide[49,51] and                in a microwave oven (General Electrics, 1 100 W). Imme-
       N-methylpyrrolidone[50], with pyridine,[49,51] triethyl-             diately after the reaction, the vial was decapped and the
       amine,[50,51] or dibutyltin dilaurate[51] as catalysts. Poly-        unreacted acetic anhydride was evaporated from the hot
       ureas with inherent viscosities of 0.06 to 0.20 dL  g1 were        reaction solution by an inert gas flow. After eventual addi-
       obtained after 8 min irradiation time. Control experiments           tion of a catalyst (SiO2, Al2O3, or glass beads), the vial was
       were performed comprising steplike heating procedures as             recapped and heated for 4 to 25 min in order to produce the
       well as reflux conditions, both of them performed under              polyanhydride (Scheme 5b). As a result of the elimination
       conventional heating. Even with a broad variation of the             of a complete step of the reaction procedure, reaction times
       catalysts utilized, it was found that microwave irradiation          were shortened from four days to a few minutes. Glass
       was superior to the other polymerization techniques,                 beads proved to be the most successful support for that kind
       shortening reaction times from up to 24 h down to 8 min.             of microwave-assisted polymerizations: Polymers with
                                                                            number-average molecular weights of 11 400 Dalton were
                                                                            obtained within 25 min.
       2.4. Polyethers and Polyesters
                                                                               The only example of a polyether synthesized in a micro-
       Currently, few data on the microwave-assisted preparation            wave so far is a poly(phenylene vinylene)-ether (PPVether)
       of polyethers and polyesters by step-growth polymeriza-              obtained from the polymerization of 1-chloro-4-methox-
       tions have been collected (the use of phase-transfer                 ylbenzene in solution in alkaline dimethyl sulfoxide
       catalysis in the microwave-assisted synthesis of polyethers          (Scheme 5c).[55] Alimi et al. heated the reaction mixture
       will be discussed in Section 2.7). The homopolymerization            to 200 8C in a domestic microwave oven (that was modified
       of D,L-lactic acid (2-hydroxypropanoic acid) was suc-                to enable online measurement of the temperature), stopped
       cessfully applied to microwave reactors by Zsuga and co-             the exposure as soon as the targeted temperature was
       workers.[52] This reaction can be performed as bulk                  reached, and continued stirring at room temperature for six
       polymerization with conventional as well as with micro-              hours. The polymer was obtained in 43% yield; two dif-
       wave heating because of the high dipole moment of the                ferent oligomer fractions soluble in chloroform and dich-
       monomer. Oligomers with molecular weights in the range               loromethane were additionally recovered with yields of
       of 600 to 1 000 Dalton were obtained after 24 h with                 52 and 5%.
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764     www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                      1749
2.5. Poly(ether imide)s and Poly(ester imide)s                                     decreased from 115 to 60 8C when the reaction was
                                                                                   performed in a (domestic) microwave reactor instead of an
Yu and co-workers observed a significant increase in reaction                      oil bath. The authors ascribed these adavantages to the good
rates for the imidization reaction between poly(tetramethyl-                       absorbance of the microwave irradiation by the water
ene oxide)glycol di-p-aminobenzoate and benzene-tetracar-                          molecules released during the imidization reaction.
boxylic acid dianhydride.[56] The reaction times were                                 Analogously to the synthesis of optically active poly-
reduced from 12 to 3 h and the reaction temperatures were                          (amide imide)s, Mallakpour et al. also prepared poly(ester
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1750                                                                                                  F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       imide)s with chiral carbon atoms in the polymer chain that            ide, however, were found not to be formed under microwave
       additionally contained pyromellitoyl units (cf. Section               irradiation, but from low-temperature polycondensation in
       2.3.).[57,58] The compounds N,N0 -(pyromellitoyl)-bis-L-              chloroform with triethylamine as catalyst.[62]
       phenylalanine diacid chloride and N,N0 -(pyromellitoyl)-
       bis-L-leucine diacid chloride were synthesized with
                                                                             2.6. Polymerizations Involving C–C
       conventional heating. The step-growth polymerizations
                                                                                  Coupling Reactions
       involving these diacid chlorides and a series of aromatic
       diols with rigid scaffolds (like phenolphthalein, bisphenol           Contrary to their well-established use in organic chemistry
       A, 4,4-hydroquinone, and others) were performed in a                  and the resulting numerous applications in microwave-
       domestic microwave oven. In this way, a basic library of              improved organic synthesis,[7–14] microwave-assisted poly-
       14 optically active poly(ester imides) was synthesized (cf.           merizations by C–C coupling reactions have gained
       Scheme 3). As a result of the low dipole moments and the              attention only very recently. Apart from the C–C coupling
       corresponding low absorbance of the educts, the polymer-              reactions described hereinafter, so far only one metathesis
       ization reactions were carried out in o-cresol, with o-cresol         polymerization of phenylacetylene under microwave irra-
       acting as solvent and as primary microwave absorber at the            diation has been reported. Utilizing in situ generated
       same time; 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane was added as                 [(arene)M(CO)3] complexes (M ¼ Cr, Mo, W) as catalysts,
       catalyst. Within reaction times of 10 min, polymers with              the reaction time was reduced from 24 h (under reflux
       inherent viscosities in the range of 0.10 to 0.27 dL  g1            conditions of a solution in 1,2-dichloroethane) to 1 h (in a
       were readily obtained. Comparison experiments under                   domestic microwave oven).[63] The temperature for the
       solution conditions using triethylammonium chloride as a              microwave-assisted polymerizations was not measured. It
       phase-transfer catalyst only produced oligomers as was                may be concluded, however, that it was higher than conven-
       concluded from the improved solubility in methanol.                   tional reflux conditions as specially designed long-necked
          A similar synthetic study resulted in a 14-membered                round-bottom flasks were utilized in order to perform the
       library with optically active carbonyldiphthaloyl anhydride           reactions under high pressure.
       derivatives, namely N,N0 -(4,40 -carbonyldiphthaloyl)-bis-L-             Carter investigated the nickel(O)-mediated coupling
       phenylalanine diacid chloride as well as the corresponding            polymerization of 2,7-dibromo-9,9-dihexylfluorene in
       L-alanine compound, and a set of aromatic diols with rigid            solution in toluene.[64] Previous findings for the reaction
       scaffolds (cf. Scheme 3).[59,60] It was found that the poly-          performed under conventional heating had shown that the
       merizations involving the L-phenylalanine derivative[59]              polymerization reaction has to be preceded by an activation
       could not be performed under microwave irradiation, but               step for the preparation of the catalyst. The polymerization
       only at low temperatures under phase-transfer catalysis.              reaction itself may last up to 24 h and characteristically
       With the L-alanine compound,[60] on the other hand, a                 shows a low reproducibility and a hindered access to high-
       microwave-assisted synthesis was successfully carried                 molecular-weight polymers because of the decreasing
       out in o-cresol without the addition of catalysts. Polymers           solubility of the polymers with an increasing degree of
       with inherent viscosities of 0.35 to 0.58 dL  g1 were               polymerization. Under microwave irradiation, the reaction
       obtained within 12 min in a domestic microwave                        was carried out in capped vials in a microwave reactor
       oven. The difference in reactivity for the two carbonyl-              specially designed for chemical synthesis (SmithCreator,
       diphthaloyl anhydride derivatives is not explained by                 PersonalChemistry), resulting in high-temperature and
       Mallakpour et al.                                                     high-pressure synthesis. The polymers were obtained in
          A similar study focused on the reaction of 4,40 -                  almost quantitative yield after 10 min at 250 8C. As a result
       (hexafluoroisopropylidene)-N,N0 -bis-(phthaloyl-L-leucine)            of this tremendous decrease in reaction times, side reactions
       diacid chloride with aromatic diols, all of them with rigid           were kept to a minimum, and the polymerization conse-
       fixation of the hydroxy function (cf. Scheme 4).[61] For a            quently could be run as a one-step routine with no prior
       systematic investigation, three different solvents (with a            activation of the catalyst in a separate procedure. In addition,
       bifunctional role as solvent and primary microwave absor-             polymers with high molecular weights of 100 000 Dalton (or
       ber) were tested; o-cresol proved to be best suited for those         even higher) were formed. The molecular weights could be
       purposes compared with m-cresol and 1,2-dichloroben-                  controlled by the addition of a monofunctional end-capping
       zene. Reactions in a domestic microwave oven were                     unit (4-bromobiphenyl) to yield polymers with molecular
       completed within five minutes and yielded polymers with               weights from 5 000 to 40 000 Dalton and PDI values from
       inherent viscosities of 0.50 to 1.12 dL  g1. Comparison             1.65 to 2.22, respectively (Scheme 6a).
       experiments with conventional heating, carried out in 1,2-               The preparation of poly(pyrazine-2,5-diyl) from 2,5-
       dichlorobenzene, only yielded polymers with inherent                  dibromopyrazine in a CEM Discover apparatus has been
       viscosities of 0.09 to 0.18 dL  g1, even after 24 h reaction        described by Yamamoto et al.[65] Using the same nickel(O)-
       time. The corresponding polymers derived from N,N0 -[4,40 -           based catalyst system, a similar shortening of reaction times
       carbonyl-bis-(phthaloylimido)]-bis-L-leucine diacid chlor-            down to 10 min was observed.
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764      www.mrc-journal.de                  ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                      1751
   The Suzuki coupling reaction has been transferred to                            temperatures, for both microwave irradiation and conven-
microwave conditions by Barbarella and co-workers for the                          tional heating, will be published in the near future.
preparation of thiophene oligomers.[66] The synthesis of
quinquethiophenes, for example, was achieved from bulk
                                                                                   2.7. Phase-Transfer Catalysis
conditions of 2-thiophene boronic acid and dibromo precur-
sors with three thiophene units, catalyzed and promoted by                         Only a few examples of microwave-assisted phase-transfer
[PdCl2(dppf)], KF, and KOH in a Synthewave 402 appara-                             catalyzed polymerizations have been collected so far, all of
tus (Prolabo) (Scheme 6b). With a maximum temperature of                           them aiming at the preparation of polyethers. A first set of
70 8C, yields of 74% were obtained after reaction times of                         investigations, performed by Hurduc et al., focused on
10 min. The synthesis of polymers instead of oligomers,                            polymers from the step-growth polymerization of 3,3-
however, was not carried out.                                                      bis(chloromethyl)oxetane and several bisphenols.[69] The
   Leadbeater et al. described the successful preparation of                       targeted compounds were prepared both with conventional
biaryl compounds by Suzuki coupling reactions in a micro-                          heating and microwave assistance (domestic microwave
wave reactor.[67] First applications of Suzuki and Stille                          oven) from a water/nitrobenzene two-phase system with
cross-coupling reactions for the preparation of semicon-                           tetrabutylammonium bromide as phase-transfer catalyst.
ducting polymers were carried out in a monomodal                                   Compared with conventional heating for 5 h, the same
microwave reactor (CEM Discovery) by Scherf and co-                                polymer yields could be obtained under microwave irradi-
workers.[68] Reaction times for the preparation of five                            ation in the temperature range of 95 to 100 8C (depending
representative polymers with number-average molecular                              on the bisphenol’s chemical structure) within 90 min. The
weights in the range of 11 300 to 15 400 Dalton (and                               decrease in reaction times is not commented on in detail;
comparably narrow molecular-weight distributions with                              the acceleration observed, however, may depend on the
PDI values around 1.8) were found to decrease from 3 days                          enhanced reaction temperatures. The analysis of the ther-
in the case of conventional heating down to a few minutes                          mal behavior of the polymer revealed higher glass
under microwave irradiation. The corresponding reaction                            temperatures and melting points for the polymers synthe-
temperatures, however, were not measured automatically in                          sized in the microwave oven, indicative of higher molecular
a straightforward manner. Instead, the applied power was                           weights. In a more recent publication,[70] a similar set of
varied and found to require optimization for each specific                         microwave-assisted polymerizations of 3,3-bis(chloro-
reaction. The microwave reactor proved its virtues partic-                         methyl)oxetane and several bisphenols has been performed
ularly in the case of the Stille cross-coupling polymeriza-                        in a monomodal microwave system (Synthewave 402,
tion between the electron rich (and consequently less                              Prolabo) and compared with results from conventional
active) 1,5-dioctyloxy-2,6-dibromonaphthalene and 5,50 -                           heating. The difference in reaction times, 4 to 6 h in the case
bis(trimethylstannyl)-2,20 -bithiophene by yielding poly-                          of conventional heating as opposed to 20 min under
mers with higher molecular weights (13 700 compared with                           microwave irradiation (for the preparation of oligomers
5 100 Dalton, the latter under conventional heating). In                           with oligomers’ degrees of 6 to 8 and comparable yields in
order to determine the reasons for this pronounced                                 the range from 64 to 97%), was found to be very pronounc-
microwave effect, results from experiments at identical                            ed. However, explanations for the increase in reaction rates
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1752                                                                                                   F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764        www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                      1753
by the synthesis of copolymers[76] or the involvement of                           ing polymerization of e-caprolactone with stannous octoate
more advanced structures like comb-shaped, hyper-                                  [Sn(Oct)2] as catalyst and maleic acid as initiator.[82] Up to
branched, or graft (co)polymers.[77] In this section, the                          maximum irradiation times of 135 min (360 W), the molec-
microwave-assisted polymerization of cyclic lactones (and                          ular weights were found to increase. If the reaction time was
similar monomers) is described in detail. In addition, the                         elongated further, the molecular weights decreased as may
polymerization of other cyclic monomers (e.g., e-capro-                            be depicted from Figure 9 (left). This phenomenon was
lactams and 2-oxazolines) will be discussed.                                       ascribed to the occurrence of transesterification reactions.
                                                                                   Irradiation of a mixture of e-caprolactone, maleic acid
                                                                                   (20:1), and stannous octoate [Sn(Oct)2] for 25 min with
3.1. Aliphatic Polyesters
                                                                                   different microwave powers, on the other hand, induced a
The microwave-assisted ring-opening polymerization of e-                           nearly linear increase of the (weight) average molecular
caprolactone, exploiting a home-built monomodal micro-                             weights of the polymers with microwave power (Figure 9,
wave reactor (Figure 8), was first reported by Albert et al.[78]                   right). In addition, the microwave-assisted polymerization
The microwave was equipped with a temperature control                              was performed in the presence of Ibuprofen (Ibuprofen is a
and an online viscometry determination. It was demon-                              nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug)[86] in order to synthe-
strated that e-caprolactone could be successfully polymer-                         size a poly(e-caprolactone)-based system for the controlled
ized with titanium tetrabutylate as catalyst. A comparison                         release of Ibuprofen. Moreover, the microwave-assisted
of the microwave-assisted polymerization with thermal                              polymerization was performed in the presence of Sn(Oct)2
polymerization did not show a microwave effect since the                           without additional initiator, whereby a higher polyme-
observed changes were minor and within the experimental                            rization rate was observed (compared with thermal
error. Ever since, many reports have appeared in the liter-                        heating).[81,83,84] Zhuo and co-workers demonstrated the
ature dealing with the microwave-assisted ring-opening                             possibility of using various acids (maleic acid, adipic acid,
polymerization of e-caprolactone. The contributions are                            succinic acid, benzoic acid, and chlorinated acetic acids)
divided according to the catalysts applied and discussed in                        as initiators for the microwave-assisted synthesis of poly-
the following section.                                                             (e-caprolactone).[87–90] The main advantage of solely using
   The most commonly used catalyst for the ring-opening                            an acid as initiator is the exclusion of metal ions (as
polymerization is stannous octoate [Sn(Oct)2]. Consequen-                          catalysts) from the reaction mixture. Those acid-initiated
tly, most microwave-assisted polymerizations were also                             polymerizations also showed an increased reaction speed
performed utilizing this catalyst.[79–85] Scola and                                compared with thermal polymerizations. The maleic acid-
co-workers have shown the possibility of producing poly-                           initiated polymerizations were also performed in the pres-
(e-caprolactone) under microwave irradiation (multimode                            ence of different amounts of Ibuprofen, yielding a drug
with temperature control) at temperatures ranging from 150                         release system for which the release rate could be tuned by
to 200 8C with water or butanediol as initiator.[79,80] The                        the amount of incorporated Ibuprofen.[87,88] In addition, it
polymerizations were accelerated from 12 h under thermal                           was shown that the molecular weights of the synthesized
heating (110 8C) to 2 h in the microwave (150, 180, and                            poly(e-caprolactone)s depend on the strength of the utilized
200 8C), whereby the polymers obtained under microwave                             acid initiator: The molecular weights decreased with an
irradiation showed thermal and tensile properties similar to                       increasing acid strength. Those new insights were subse-
those of the conventionally produced materials. Zhuo and                           quently applied for the degradation of poly(e-caprolactone)
co-workers investigated the microwave-assisted ring-open-                          under microwave irradiation in the presence of a strong
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1754                                                                                                     F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
                              Figure 9. Left: Increase of molecular weight (squares) and conversion (circles) with time
                              for the microwave polymerization of e-caprolactone. Right: Increase of molecular weight
                              against applied microwave power. Reprinted with permission from reference [88], Copyright
                              VSP International Science Publishers.
       acid.[89,90] Increased polymerization rates were also obtain-               To summarize, numerous studies have been performed
       ed by Koroskenyi and McCarthy who reported kinetic                       on the microwave-assisted polymerization of e-caprolac-
       investigations on the microwave-assisted polymerization of               tone. For a large number of reactions, enhanced polymer-
       e-caprolactone.[85,91] Furthermore, the optimal conditions               ization rates were observed (mainly with multimodal
       were applied for the successful grafting of poly(e-caprolac-             microwaves).
       tone) onto potato starch (for a review on the properties                    Similar to the polymerization of e-caprolactone, the poly-
       of potato starch, for example, see reference [92]). Zinc-                merization of L-lactide,[85] D,L-lactide,[95] and trimethylene
       catalyzed polymerizations of e-caprolactone were reported                carbonate[96] with stannous octoate were reported to
       by both Zhuo and co-workers[81] and by Madras and co-                    proceed faster under (multimodal) microwave irradiation
       workers.[93] The latter used a multimodal microwave oven                 if compared with thermal polymerizations.
       without controlling devices for temperature or pressure. To
       prevent overheating, the microwave irradiation was sup-
                                                                                3.2. Other Ring-Opening Polymerizations
       plied in cycles of 40 or 50 s as it is commonly done with
       multimodal (domestic) microwaves ovens. Figure 10 shows                  Besides the ring-opening polymerization of e-caprolactone,
       the heating profile discernible for the polymerization of                some other cyclic monomers were also successfully poly-
       e-caprolactone with heating cycles of 50 s. The nonlinear                merized utilizing microwave synthesizers. Scola and
       regression of the temperature could be used as a kinetic                 co-workers reported the o-caproic acid-initiated polymer-
       parameter. In addition, the activation energy for pulsed                 ization of e-caprolactam resulting in the formation of nylon
       microwave-assisted polymerizations (5.3 kcal  mol1) was                6.[79,80] The comparison of the microwave-synthesized
       calculated to be lower than that for polymerizations
       performed with continuous thermal heating (13.4 kcal 
       mol1). The activation energy for the microwave polymer-
       izations (with cycled microwave irradiation) was calculated
       from the molecular weight variation during the polymer-
       ization. Therefore, the calculated activation energy for the
       microwave polymerization might be questioned since it
       excludes any depolymerization and transesterification
       reactions that might occur with applied temperatures up
       to 200 8C. Barbier-Baudry et al. studied the ring-opening
       polymerization of e-caprolactone using lanthanide halides
       as catalysts.[94] The polymerizations performed in a mono-
       modal microwave system yielded polymers with higher
       molecular weights and lower PDI values compared with
       polymers synthesized thermally at the same temperature. In
       addition, it was shown that the PDI of the resulting poly-
       mers could be decreased from 3.18 to 1.58 by increasing the
                                                                                Figure 10. Temperature profile obtained for the pulsed micro-
       microwave power from 200 to 300 W. This effect is assign-                wave (50 s cycles) irradiated polymerization of e-caprolactone.
       ed to faster heating that suppressed secondary transfer                  Reprinted with permission from reference [93], Copyright John
       reactions.                                                               Wiley and Sons.
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764         www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                      1755
polymers with commercial nylon 6 showed that the melting                           4. Radical Polymerizations
points of the polymers synthesized in a microwave oven
                                                                                   Free radical polymerization is a widely used technique in
were lower because of different crystalline domains. Accor-
                                                                                   industry for the production of numerous bulk materials, for
ding to the authors, tensile testing exhibited smaller yield
                                                                                   example, polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate). The
strain and strain to break and, in addition, an eight times
                                                                                   main drawback of the free radical polymerization technique
larger tensile modulus for the microwave-synthesized nylon
                                                                                   is the poor control of the molecular weights and poly-
6. The polydispersity indices, however, were not determin-
                                                                                   dispersity indices. Therefore, controlled free radical techni-
ed and, thus, no definite explanation could be given for
                                                                                   ques have been introduced during the last decades. In this
those phenomena. The same group also described the
                                                                                   section, investigations on the different radical polymeriza-
microwave-assisted copolymerizations of e-caprolactone
                                                                                   tions (‘‘classical’’, emulsion, and controlled free radical
and e-caprolactame.[97] Compared with thermal polymer-
                                                                                   polymerizations) under microwave-irradiation will be
ization, higher yields and higher amide contents were ob-
                                                                                   discussed.
tained using microwave irradiation, although similar
molecular weights were found. As a result of the higher
amide content, the glass-transition temperature of the
                                                                                   4.1. Free Radical Polymerization
microwave-synthesized polymers was also higher.
   Takeuchi and co-workers described the microwave-                                Microwave-assisted free radical polymerizations were
assisted copolymerization of ethylene isophtalate cyclic                           initially investigated by Gourdenne et al. in 1979.[100] The
dimer with bis(hydroxyethyl)terephthalate and titanium                             cross-linking of an unsaturated polyester with styrene was
potassium oxilate.[98] The polymerization could be per-                            performed under microwave irradiation. In a later contribu-
formed successfully in bulk within 60 min.                                         tion, it was shown that hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)
   Very recently, Schubert and co-workers investigated the                         could be polymerized under microwave irradiation without
microwave-assisted living cationic ring-opening polymer-                           the addition of a radical initiator.[101] It was demonstrated
ization of 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline.[99] Performing the poly-                           that the temperature of the reaction mixture for both, a
merization at temperatures of up to 200 8C in acetonitrile,                        microwave-irradiated polymerization and a thermal poly-
the polymerization was accelerated by a factor of 400,                             merization, gave similar profiles, although the microwave-
maintaining the living character of the polymerization.                            assisted polymerization was significantly faster. Madras
Figure 11 shows the conversion (represented by ln{[M0]/                            and Karmore reported the accelerated polymerization of
[Mt]}) plotted against time for the microwave-assisted                             methyl methacrylate (MMA) under microwave irradia-
polymerization of 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline at several temper-                           tion.[102] According to the authors, an equilibrium between
atures in the range of 80 to 180 8C, demonstrating the first                       polymerization and depolymerization was reached within
order kinetics of the monomer consumption. Comparison                              10 min, resulting in equal polymer distributions for diffe-
with thermal polymerizations elucidated that the accelera-                         rent initiator and monomer concentrations as shown in
tion resulted only from thermal effects and not from                               Figure 12. Boey and co-workers described an increase in
(nonthermal) microwave effects, as the polymerization                              polymerization rates for the microwave-assisted polymer-
with thermal heating (well beyond the boiling point of                             izations of methyl methacrylate (MMA), styrene (S), and
acetonitrile) in a high-pressure NMR tube revealed                                 methyl acrylate (MA).[103,104] The corresponding polymer-
analogous polymerization rates.                                                    izations were performed at three different microwave
                                                                                   powers (200, 300, and 500 W). The conversion profiles
                                                                                   were shown to be similar for the different microwave
                                                                                   powers in terms of radiation energy. Recently, Ritter and co-
                                                                                   workers reported the synthesis of (meth)acrylamides and
                                                                                   the subsequent polymerization of those monomers in a
                                                                                   monomodal microwave synthesizer.[105] The (meth)acry-
                                                                                   lamides could be synthesized from (meth)acrylic acid and
                                                                                   the corresponding amines in a single step. The polymeriza-
                                                                                   tion of these new monomers (using azodiisobutyronitrile
                                                                                   (AIBN) as initiator) under microwave irradiation has also
                                                                                   proved to be successful. In a final step, it was demonstrated
                                                                                   that the microwave-assisted polymerization of acrylic acid
                                                                                   (initiated by AIBN) in the presence of hexylamine or
                                                                                   benzylamine resulted in the in situ formation of a copoly-
Figure 11. Kinetic results for the microwave-assisted cationic                     mer of acrylic acid and acrylamide (Scheme 8a). Sitaram
ring-opening polymerization of 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline (according to                   and Stoffer described the microwave-assisted polymeriza-
reference [99]).                                                                   tion of styrene with different radical initiators:[106,107]
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1756                                                                                                     F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764          www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                          1757
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                  ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1758                                                                                                      F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
                        Figure 15. Photographs of the TEMPO-methyl resin before (left) and after loading with
                        p-bromostyrene (middle) and a mix of m- and p-chloromethylstyrene (right). Reprinted with permission
                        from reference [121], Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd.
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764          www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                      1759
N,N-dimethylformamide; bpy: 2,20 -bipyridine; AIBN: 2,20 -                         it was shown that for reaction temperatures higher than
azoisobutyronitrile; ACN: acetonitrile; TMEDA: tetra-                              110 8C, the molecular weight distributions became sig-
methyethylenediamine; pTsCl: p-tosyl chloride).[123–130]                           nificantly broader (PDI > 1.4), exhibiting severe deviations
The temperatures of the reaction mixtures were adjusted,                           from an ideally controlled radical polymerization and
if appropriate, by the boiling points of the solvents in an                        thereby limiting the use of microwave reactors for the
open reflux system, or by placing the reactors into a ther-                        reaction conditions employed.
mostat bath. Especially for low concentrations of the
corresponding initiators and catalysts, the (modified)
                                                                                   4.3. Emulsion Polymerizations
domestic microwave reactor proved to be superior to con-
ventional heating in terms of reaction speed, molecular                            Zhu et al. performed the emulsion polymerization of
weights, and the narrowness of the molecular weight                                styrene with potassium persulfate as initiator and sodium
distributions. Influences of the microwave irradiation on the                      dodecyl sulfonate as emulsifier under conventional heating
glass temperatures or stereoregularities of the poly(methyl                        as well as under microwave irradiation.[134] To ensure a
methacrylate)s, however, were negligible.[130] The first-                          direct comparison of the polymerizations performed under
order kinetics for the monomer consumption were illu-                              the two different activation modes, the reactions in the
strated by the linear dependency of the ln{[M0]/[Mt]}                              modified domestic microwave oven with adjustable mean
values on reaction time. An explanation for the fivefold                           output power were performed at a constant temperature
increase in reaction rates, however, was not provided in                           (around 70 8C) that was held by a thermostat with tetra-
these references. Corresponding findings were also obtain-                         chloroethylene, which hardly absorbs microwave irradia-
ed for the atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of                          tion (Figure 16). Compared with conventional heating, the
octyl acrylate with the initiator/catalyst/solvent system                          polymerization rate was effectively enhanced because of
EBB/CuCl,bpy/CCl4.[131] In a more recent publication,                              the increase of the decomposition rate of potassium
Zhu and co-workers performed the atom transfer radical                             persulfate by a factor of 2.4. Consequently, the amount of
polymerization (ATRP) of methyl methacrylate in hexane,                            particles formed within identical reaction times was higher
with the initiator a,a0 -dichloroxylene and the catalysts CuCl                     in the case of microwave activation. Although polymers
and PMDETA.[132] During the course of this polymeriza-                             with higher average molecular weights were formed under
tion, and by additional investigations that aimed at deter-                        microwave irradiation, almost identical glass-transition
mining the nature of the increase in reaction rates under                          temperatures and similar atacticity/isotacticity ratios of
microwave irradiation, it was observed that the dissociation                       around 75:25 (determined by 13C NMR spectroscopy) for
of CuCl and consequently the concentration of copper ions                          the polymers obtained from conventional as well as micro-
in solution were enhanced when the polymerization was                              wave heating exhibited that their physical properties and
performed in a microwave reactor. The authors attributed                           microstructures were almost independent of the type of
the increase in reaction speed observable for all the ATRP                         activation source. The corresponding findings were obtain-
reactions under microwave assistance to this finding. On                           ed for the emulsion polymerization of methyl methacrylate
this occasion, it should be pointed out that the use of
thermostat baths does not necessarily reveal the reaction
temperatures in the reaction vial, especially if solid ionic
particles are involved in the reaction. These particles optim-
ally absorb microwave irradiation because of its elec-
tromagnetic character (cf. Section 1). Consequently, the
noncontact heating in the microwave reactors might heat
the reaction mixture well beyond the temperature of the
thermostat bath. Hence, a direct comparison with findings
from reactions performed under conventional heating
would be no longer valid.
   For the atom transfer radical polymerizations (ATRP)
of methyl methacrylate with the initiator/catalyst/solvent
systems EBIB/CuCl-NHPMI/p-xylene and EBIB/CuCl-
NHPMI/DMF, however, Zhang and Schubert observed no
acceleration with microwave irradiation [EBIB: ethyl-2-
bromo-isobutyrate, NHPMI: N-Hexyl-2-pyridylmethani-
mine].[133] To ensure a valid comparison of the experiments,                       Figure 16. Experimental setup for the emulsion polymerization
                                                                                   of styrene in a domestic microwave oven additionally equipped
the polymerizations were conducted under conventional                              with adjustable mean output power and a thermostatic bath.
heating and in a monomodal microwave reactor (Emrys                                Reprinted with permission from reference [134], Copyright John
Liberator, Biotage) at identical temperatures. Furthermore,                        Wiley and Sons.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1760                                                                                                     F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764         www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                      1761
                          Figure 18. SEM images of PMMA particles obtained from (a) conventional heating, (b)
                          microwave heating, and (c) microwave heating with europium ions present in the reaction
                          mixture. Reprinted with permission from reference [141], Copyright John Wiley and Sons.
under microwave irradiation.[143] Control experiments with                         irradiation (compared with conventional heating). The
conventional heating showed a tenfold increase in reaction                         enhanced reaction rates have been found to originate from
rates for the polymerization under microwave assistance,                           thermal effects (higher temperatures) for a large number of
originating from the accelerated decomposition of the                              these reactions. Concomitant with shorter reaction times,
persulfate anion. The influences of the monomer/initiator                          side reactions are reduced to a minimum, and consequently
amounts and the addition of ethanol on the monomer                                 the purity and the polymer properties improve.
conversion, the particle sizes, and their distributions were                          For some reactions, however, it seems that these advan-
examined and found to be in full agreement with trends                             tages do not result from higher reaction temperatures, but
observable under conventional heating.                                             from the selective excitation of one of the educts involved.
                                                                                   This might be especially true for ions and (zerovalent)
                                                                                   metals that are known to intrinsically absorb microwave
                                                                                   irradiation. Pronounced effects of that type are significantly
5. Conclusion and Outlook
                                                                                   related to the fields of metal catalysis (cf. C–C coupling
The use of microwave irradiation as a heating source for                           reactions) and reactions involving ionic species (cf. ring-
polymerization reactions is a rapidly growing branch in                            opening polymerizations). Shifts in selectivity, originating
polymer science as may be determined from the exponen-                             from the specific excitation by the microwave irradiation,
tial increase in the number of publications originating from                       have been observed as well (cf. the phase-transfer catalyzed
that field (Figure 2). With the advent of monomodal                                step-growth polymerization of sorbide and 1,8-dibromooc-
microwave reactors (Figure 1) at the beginning of the                              tane, for example).
millennium, the safety uncertainties, like fires or explosions                        In this respect, some of the findings and the correspond-
that are likely to accompany organic reactions under                               ing explanations might be taken into account: With
microwave irradiation, have been overcome. Controlling                             comparably few data on (monomodal) microwave-assisted
the temperature and pressure inside the reaction vials not                         polymerizations available these days, general conclusions,
only shifts the reliability of this type of reactors from                          valid for a whole series of (similar) educts or a specific
hazardous to safe, but also allows for a more detailed insight                     reaction type, cannot be drawn. Further problems might
into the run of the polymerization.                                                also arise from the lack of knowledge of the actual reaction
   So far, most of the polymerizations performed under                             conditions, such as temperature or pressure in the case of
microwave irradiation may be entitled as ‘‘well-estab-                             domestic microwave ovens (resulting from cold and hot
lished’’ polymerization reactions, including the step-                             spots), especially in the cases where thermostat baths are
growth preparation of polyamides, polyimides, polyethers,                          utilized, disallowing a direct comparison with conventional
and polyesters, the ring-opening polymerizations of (almost                        heating experiments.
exclusively) e-caprolactams and e-caprolactones, and the                              With the polymerizations reviewed in this article, how-
free radical polymerizations of some well-investigated                             ever, (monomodal) microwave reactors have been intro-
monomers like styrene or methyl methacrylate. More                                 duced as powerful tools for the synthesis of polymers:
advanced techniques among the reactions investigated com-                          Reaction times are greatly shortened, paving the way to
prise the phase-transfer catalyzed polymerizations and C–C                         higher yields, improved selectivities, and environmentally
coupling reactions, as well as controlled radical and                              benign methods (shorter reaction times, low-boiling
emulsion polymerizations.                                                          solvents). Consequently, more data is very likely to be
   For the vast majority of reactions, a significant increase in                   accumulated in the near future, probably focusing on more
reaction speed becomes discernible under microwave                                 and more advanced techniques. A direct comparison with
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1762                                                                                                     F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       experiments under conventional heating can be made by the                [25] A. Pourjavadi, M. R. Zamanlu, M. J. Zohuriaan-Mehr,
       accurate measurements of temperature and pressure. In the                     Angew. Macromol. Chem. 1999, 269, 54.
       course of an increasing collection of reliable data, general             [26] Y. Imai, ACS Symp. Ser. 1996, 624, 421.
                                                                                [27] Y. Imai, H. Nemoto, M. Kakimoto, J. Polym. Sci., Part A:
       trends will become discernible and allow for the establish-                   Polym. Chem. 1996, 34, 701.
       ment of general rules for predictions concerning the                     [28] X. Tang, J. Lu, Z. Zhang, X. Zhu, L. Wang, N. Li, Z. Sun,
       performance of a specific polymerization under microwave                      J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 88, 1121.
       irradiation. This way, reaction times for future polymeriza-             [29] J. Lu, N. Chen, S. Ji, Z. Sun, M. Ding, X. Zhu, J. Appl.
       tions can be decreased and the way to environmentally                         Polym. Sci. 2001, 82, 1356.
                                                                                [30] J. Lu, S. Ji, N. Chen, Z. Sun, X. Zhu, W. Shi, Z. Wang,
       benign conditions will be paved.                                              J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 2611.
                                                                                [31] J. Lu, N. Chen, S. Ji, Z. Jia, Z. Sun, X. Zhu, W. Shi,
                                                                                     www.chemistrymag.org 2003, 5, 12.
         Acknowledgements: This study was generously supported by               [32] J. Lu, S. Ji, N. Chen, Z. Zhang, Z. Sun, X. Zhu, W. Shi,
       the Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI), the Nederlandse                            J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 87, 1739.
       Wetenschappelijke Organisatie (NWO), and the Fonds der                   [33] J. Lu, X. Tang, Z. Zhang, N. Li, H. Li, L. Wang, X. Zhu,
       Chemischen Industrie.                                                         www.chemistrymag.org 2003, 5, 10.
                                                                                [34] D. A. Lewis, J. D. Summers, T. C. Ward, J. E. McGrath,
                                                                                     J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 1992, 30, 1647.
                                                                                [35] J. W. Gilmer, M. T. Demeuse, Y. J. Liu, D. L. Routzahn,
                                                                                     D. M. Applegate, E. Occhiello, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng.
                                                                                     1994, 71, 531.
         [1] D. Bogdal, P. Penczek, J. Pielichowski, A. Prociak, Adv.           [36] K. Faghihi, K. Zamani, A. Mirsamie, S. Mallakpour,
             Polym. Sci. 2003, 163, 193.                                             J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91, 516.
         [2] P. Lidström, J. Tierney, B. Wathey, J. Westman, Tetra-            [37] S. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, S. Habibi, Eur. Polym. J. 2001,
             hedron 2001, 57, 9225.                                                  37, 2435.
         [3] D. Adams, Nature 2003, 421, 571.                                   [38] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, M. R. Zamanlou, J. Polym.
         [4] C. O. Kappe, A. Stadler, ‘‘Microwaves in Organic                        Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2001, 39, 177.
             Synthesis’’, A. Loupy, Ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2002,              [39] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, M. R. Zamanlou, Eur.
             pp. 405–433.                                                            Polym. J. 2002, 38, 475.
         [5] N. Kuhnert, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1863.                  [40] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, K. Faghihi, Eur. Polym. J.
         [6] S. Barlow, S. R. Marder, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2003, 13, 517.              2001, 37, 119.
         [7] A. Stadler, C. O. Kappe, J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 624.              [41] S. Mallakpour, M. H. Shahmohammadi, J. Appl. Polym.
         [8] H.-K. Lee, T. M. Rana, J. Comb. Chem. 2004, 6, 504.                     Sci. 2004, 92, 951.
         [9] M. D. Evans, J. Ring, A. Schoen, A. Bell, P. Edwards,              [42] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, K. Faghihi, N. Foroughifar,
             D. Berthelot, R. Nicewonger, C. M. Baldino, Tetrahedron                 J. Bagheri, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80, 2416.
             Lett. 2003, 44, 9337.                                              [43] K. Faghihi, K. Zamani, A. Mirsamie, M. R. Sangi, Eur.
        [10] N. S. Wilson, C. R. Sarko, G. P. Roth, Tetrahedron Lett.                Polym. J. 2003, 39, 247.
             2001, 42, 8939.                                                    [44] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, S. Khoee, J. Polym. Sci.,
        [11] P. Lidström, J. Westman, A. Lewis, Comb. Chem. High                    Part A: Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 1154.
             Throughput Screen. 2002, 5, 441.                                   [45] S. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, M. R. Zamanlou, J. Polym.
        [12] W.-M. Dai, D.-S. Guo, L.-P. Sun, X.-H. Huang, Org. Lett.                Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2003, 41, 1077.
             2003, 5, 2919.                                                     [46] S. Mallakpour, M. R. Zamanlou, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004,
        [13] A. Finaru, A. Berthault, T. Besson, G. Guillaumet,                      91, 3281.
             S. Berteina-Raboin, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2613.                      [47] S. Mallakpour, E. Kowsari, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym.
        [14] A. M. L. Hoel, J. Nielsen, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3941.            Chem. 2003, 41, 3974.
        [15] Results from the search ‘‘Microwave and Polymerization’’           [48] S. Mallakpour, E. Kowsari, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91,
             in the SciFinder database on June 23, 2004.                             2992.
        [16] D. E. Clark, W. H. Sutton, Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1996, 26,         [49] S. Mallakpour, Z. Rafiee, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91,
             299.                                                                    2103.
        [17] A. J. Gourdenne, Ceramic Trans. 1997, 80, 425.                     [50] S. Mallakpour, Z. Rafiee, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 90,
        [18] J. B. Wei, T. Shidaker, M. C. Hawley, Trends Polym. Sci.                2861.
             1996, 4, 18.                                                       [51] S. Mallakpour, S. Rezazadeh, Iran. Polym. J. 2004, 13, 29.
        [19] H. Yanagawa, K. Kojima, M. Ito, N. Handa, J. Mol. Evol.            [52] S. Keki, I. Bodnar, J. Borda, G. Deák, M. Zsuga, Macromol.
             1990, 31, 180.                                                          Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 1063.
        [20] Y. Imai, H. Nemoto, S. Watanabe, M. Kakimoto, Polym. J.            [53] L. Liu, L. Q. Liao, C. Zhang, F. He, R. X. Zhuo, Chin.
             1996, 28, 256.                                                          Chem. Lett. 2001, 12, 761.
        [21] Y. Imai, Polym. Prepr. (Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem.)          [54] B. M. Vogel, S. K. Mallapragada, B. Narasimhan,
             1995, 36, 711.                                                          Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 330.
        [22] S. Watanabe, K. Hayama, K. H. Park, M. Kakimoto, Y.                [55] K. Alimi, P. Molinie, M. Majdoub, J. C. Bernede, J. L.
             Imai, Macromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 1993, 14, 481.                      Fave, H. Bouchriha, M. Ghedira, Eur. Polym. J. 2001, 37,
        [23] K. H. Park, S. Watanabe, M. Kakimoto, Y. Imai, Polym. J.                781.
             1993, 25, 209.                                                     [56] J. Chen, Q. Chen, X. Yu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 62,
        [24] F. K. Mallon, W. H. Ray, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69,                 2135.
             1203.                                                              [57] S. Mallakpour, S. Habibi, Eur. Polym. J. 2003, 39, 1823.
       Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764         www.mrc-journal.de                 ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
 Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives                                                                            1763
 [58] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, S. Habibi, J. Appl. Polym.                     [92] C. T. Greenwood, Proc. Plant Sci. Symp. 1966, 41.
      Sci. 2002, 86, 2211.                                                          [93] G. Sivalingam, N. Agarwal, G. Madras, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
 [59] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, M. Zamanlou, J. Appl.                               2004, 91, 1450.
      Polym. Sci. 2002, 85, 315.                                                    [94] D. Barbier-Baudry, C.-H. Brachais, A. Cretu, A. Loupy,
 [60] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, K. Faghihi, Polym. Int.                             D. Stuerga, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 200.
      2000, 49, 1383.                                                               [95] L. J. Liu, C. Zhang, L. Q. Liao, X. L. Wang, R. X. Zhuo,
 [61] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, S. Khoee, J. Appl. Polym.                           Chin. Chem. Lett. 2001, 12, 663.
      Sci. 2000, 77, 3003.                                                          [96] C. Zhang, L. J. Liu, L. Q. Liao, R. X. Zhuo, Polym. Prepr.
 [62] S. E. Mallakpour, A. Hajipour, M. Zamanlou, Polym. Sci.                            (Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem.) 2003, 44, 874.
      Ser. A 2002, 44, 243.                                                         [97] X. Fang, R. Hutcheon, D. A. Scola, J. Polym. Sci., Part A:
 [63] K. Dhanalakshmi, G. Sundararajan, Polym. Bull. 1997, 39,                           Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 1379.
      333.                                                                          [98] R. Nagahata, J.-I. Sugiyama, Y. Nakao, H. Hirata,
 [64] K. R. Carter, Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6757.                                       T. Hagiwara, M. Asai, K. Takeuchi, Polym. Prepr. (Am.
 [65] T. Yamamoto, Y. Fujiwara, H. Fukumoto, Y. Nakamura,                                Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem.) 2003, 44, 1033.
      S. Koshihara, T. Ishikawa, Polymer 2003, 44, 4487.                            [99] F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, C. H. Abeln, U. S.
 [66] M. Melucci, G. Barbarella, G. Sotgiu, J. Org. Chem. 2002,                          Schubert, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, in press.
      67, 8877.                                                                    [100] A. Gourdenne, A.-H. Maassarant, P. Monchaux, Polym.
 [67] N. E. Leadbeater, M. Marco, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003,                            Prepr. (Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem.) 1979, 20,
      42, 1407.                                                                          471.
 [68] B. S. Nehls, U. Asawapirom, S. Füldner, E. Preis, T. Farrell.               [101] M. Teffal, A. Gourdenne, Eur. Polym. J. 1983, 19, 543.
      U. Scherf, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2004, 14, 352.                                 [102] G. Madras, V. Karmore, Polym. Int. 2001, 50, 1324.
 [69] N. Hurduc, D. Abdelylah, J.-M. Buisine, P. Decock,                           [103] J. Jacob, L. H. L. Chia, F. Y. C. Boey, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
      G. Surpateanu, Eur. Polym. J. 1997, 33, 187.                                       1997, 63, 787.
 [70] V. Baudel, F. Cazier, P. Woisel, G. Surpateanu, Eur. Polym.                  [104] J. Jacob, F. Y. C. Boey, L. H. L. Chia, Ceramic Trans. 1997,
      J. 2002, 38, 615.                                                                  80, 417.
 [71] C. Gao, S. Zhang, L. Gao, M. Ding, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.                      [105] C. Goretzki, A. Krlej, C. Steffens, H. Ritter, Macromol.
      2004, 92, 2415.                                                                    Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 513.
 [72] S. Chatti, M. Bortolussi, A. Loupy, J. C. Blais, D. Bogdal,                  [106] S. P. Sitaram, J. O. Stoffer, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1993,
      M. Majdoub, Eur. Polym. J. 2002, 38, 1851.                                         69, 382.
 [73] S. Chatti, M. Bortolussi, A. Loupy, J. C. Blais, D. Bogdal,                  [107] J. O. Stoffer, S. P. Sitaram, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1994,
      P. Roger, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 90, 1255.                                     71, 55.
 [74] S. Chatti, M. Bortolussi, D. Bogdal, J. C. Blais, A. Loupy,                  [108] L. H. L. Chia, J. Jacob, F. Y. C. Boey, J. Polym. Sci., Part A:
      Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40, 561.                                                      Polym. Chem. 1996, 34, 2087.
 [75] K. M. Stridsberg, M. Ryner, A.-C. Albertsson, Adv. Polym.                    [109] M. A. Dikusar, I. V. Kubrakova, A. A. Chinarev, N. V.
      Sci. 2002, 157, 41.                                                                Bovin, Rus. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2001, 27, 408.
 [76] K. M. Huh, Y. W. Cho, K. Park, Drug Deliv. Technol. 2003,                    [110] Y. Chen, J. Wang, D. Zhang, R. Cai, H. Yu, C. Su,
      3, 44.                                                                             Z.-E. Huang, Polymer 2000, 41, 7877.
 [77] T. Ouchi, Y. Ohya, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem.                      [111] A. F. Porto, B. L. Sadicoff, M. C. V. Amorim, M. C. S.
      2003, 42, 453.                                                                     Mattos, Polym. Test. 2002, 21, 145.
 [78] P. Albert, H. Warth, R. Mülhaupt, R. Janda, Macromol.                       [112] H. F. Naguib, G. R. Saad, M. Z. Alsabee, Polym. Int. 2003,
      Chem. Phys. 1996, 197, 1633.                                                       52, 1217.
 [79] X. Fang, S. J. Huang, D. A. Scola, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng.                   [113] J. Palacios, J. Sierra, P. Rodriguez, Polym. Prepr. (Am.
      1998, 79, 518.                                                                     Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem.) 1991, 32, 244.
 [80] X. Fang, C. D. Simone, E. Vaccaro, S. J. Huang, D. A.                        [114] J. Palacios, J. Sierra, P. Rodriguez, New Polym. Mater.
      Scola, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 2264.                        1992, 3, 273.
 [81] L. Q. Liao, L. J. Liu, C. Zhang, F. He, R. X. Zhuo, K. Wan,                  [115] J. Lu, X. Zhu, J. Zhu, J. Yu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 66,
      J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 1749.                               129.
 [82] Y. Song, L. J. Liu, R. X. Zhuo, Chin. Chem. Lett. 2003, 14, 32.              [116] J. Lu, X. Zhu, S. Ji, J. Zhu, Z. Chen, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
 [83] L. Q. Liao, L. J. Liu, F. He, R. X. Zhuo, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.                     1998, 67, 1563.
      2003, 90, 2657.                                                              [117] J. Lu, Q. Jiang, X. Zhu, F. Wang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001,
 [84] L. Liao, L. Liu, C. Zhang, R. Zhuo, Polym. Prepr. (Am.                             79, 312.
      Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem.) 2003, 44, 864.                                 [118] J. Lu, S. Ji, J. Wu, X. Zhu, Chem. J. Internet 2001, 3, 41.
 [85] B. Koroskenyi, S. P. McCarthy, J. Polym. Environ. 2002,                      [119] J. Lu, S. Ji, J. Wu, F. Guo, H Zhuo, W. Dai, X. Zhu,
      10, 93.                                                                            J. Macromol. Sci. Pure. Appl. Chem. 2002, A39, 351.
 [86] M. Busson, J. Int. Med. Res. 1986, 14, 53.                                   [120] J. Lu, S. Ji, J. Wu, F. Guo, H Zhuo, X. Zhu, J. Appl. Polym.
 [87] Y. Song, L. J. Liu, Z. J. Yu, X. C. Weng, R. X. Zhuo, Polym.                       Sci. 2004, 91, 1519.
      Prepr. (Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem.) 2003, 44, 936.                     [121] D. D. Wisnoski, W. H. Leister, K. A. Strauss, Z. Zhao, C. W.
 [88] Y. Song, L. J. Liu, X. C. Weng, R. X. Zhuo, J. Biomat. Sci.                        Lindsley, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4321.
      Polym. Edn. 2003, 14, 241.                                                   [122] N. V. Zelentzova, Y. D. Semchikov, N. A. Kopylova, M. V.
 [89] Z. J. Yu, L. J. Liu, R. X. Zhuo, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym.                    Kuznetsov, S. V. Zelentsov, A. N. Konev, J. Polym. Sci.,
      Chem. 2002, 41, 13.                                                                Part B: Polym. Phys. 2003, 45, 65.
 [90] Z. J. Yu, L. J. Liu, Y. Song, R. X. Zhuo, Polym. Prepr. (Am.                 [123] Z. Cheng, X. Zhu, M. Chen, J. Chen, L. Zhang, Polymer
      Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem.) 2003, 44, 868.                                       2003, 44, 2243.
 [91] S. P. McCarthy, B. Koroskenyi, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng.                       [124] Z. Cheng, X. Zhu, J. Chen, J. Lu, J. Macromol. Sci. 2003,
      2002, 86, 350.                                                                     A40, 1157.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764                   www.mrc-journal.de                   ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1764                                                                                                        F. Wiesbrock, R. Hoogenboom, U. S. Schubert
       [125] X. Zhu, N. Zhou, X. He, Z. Cheng, J. Lu, J. Appl. Polym.            [134] X. Zhu, J. Chen, Z. Cheng, J. Lu, J. Zhu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci
             Sci. 2003, 88, 1787.                                                      2003, 89, 28.
       [126] G. Wang, X. Zhu, Z. Cheng, N. Zhou, J. Lu, Polym. J. 2003,          [135] X. Zhu, J. Chen, N. Zhou, Z. Cheng, J. Lu, Eur. Polym. J.
             35, 399.                                                                  2003, 39, 1187.
       [127] G. Chen, X. Zhu, Z. Cheng, W. Xu, J. Lu, Radiation. Phys.           [136] J. Palacios, C. Valverde, New Polym. Mater. 1996, 5,
             Chem. 2004, 69, 129.                                                      93.
       [128] Z. Cheng, X. Zhu, L. Zhang, N. Zhou, X. Xue, Polym. Bull.           [137] W. V. Smith, E. J. Ewart, J. Chem. Phys. 1948, 16, 592.
             2003, 49, 363.                                                      [138] W. V. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 3695.
       [129] Z. Cheng, X. Zhu, G. Chen, W. Xu, J. Lu, J. Polym. Sci.             [139] R. Correa, G. Gonzalez, V. Dougar, Polymer 1998, 39,
             2002, 40, 3823.                                                           1471.
       [130] G. Chen, X. Zhu, Z. Cheng, J. Lu, J. Chen, Polym. Int. 2004,        [140] L.-S. You, H.-Q. Wu, W.-M. Zhang, Z. Fu, L.-J. Shen, Chin.
             53, 357.                                                                  J. Chem. 2001, 19, 814.
       [131] W. Xu, X. Zhu, Z. Cheng, G. Chen, J. Lu, Eur. Polym. J.             [141] J. Hu, H. Zhao, Q. Zhang, W. He, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003,
             2003, 39, 1349.                                                           89, 1124.
       [132] X. Li, X. Zhu, Z. Cheng, W. Xu, G. Chen, J. Appl. Polym.            [142] P. Albert, M. Hölderle, R. Mülhaupt, R. Janda, Acta
             Sci. 2004, 92, 2189.                                                      Polymer 1996, 47, 74.
       [133] H. Zhang, U. S. Schubert, Macromol. Rapid Commun.                   [143] W.-D. He, C.-Y. Pan, T. Lu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80,
             2004, 25, 1225.                                                           2455.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1739–1764 www.mrc-journal.de ß 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim