1

Focusing on Maxine Greene's "Wide Awakeness and the Moral Life," I am really influenced by

the ideology that stresses the vital role educators play in wide-awakeness or just a state of

heightened awareness, critical thinking, and moral engagement in the students. In this argument,

Greene challenges the educator to move away from traditional content-driven teaching and

mobilize to embrace their changed potential as facilitators of transformative learning. Her

philosophy is not just something to be read in class, but it is an action challenge to teachers to

bring education closer to social change and politics, environmental concerns, mental health, or

anything that would prepare her students for the happenings of the world.

What am I wondering?

One of the questions that I grapple with is how teachers can consistently cultivate wide-

awakeness within the constraints of rigid, standardized curricula. For example, in a school

system where there is an overemphasis on test scores and measurable results, there is little room

for discussing broader societal issues since teachers are often pressured to focus solely on core

subjects. How do teachers, within that constraint, open up possibilities for critical and moral

reflection by the students on the world? Another related question: What are the long-term effects

of wide-awakeness? If students learn to see the world in another way, how do they carry on this

sight into adulthood?

The other question is how the teachers themselves stay awake. Teachers themselves are part of

the very system that often discourages questioning and creativity. For example, an overburdened

teacher with a multiplicity of responsibilities may not have the focus to stay fully alert to the
 2

complexity of the world. Greene's philosophy challenges the educators themselves: it calls for

them to remain awake and morally active—something far from easy but also far from

impossible.

What stands out?

The thing that really stands out in Greene's article is the notion of teaching as a moral act. She

made a powerful appeal to teachers, urging them to press onward in awakening their student's

imaginations and fostering their capacity for empathy. It shows that education is not just about

imparting knowledge; it's about forming people who realize their moral duties toward others.

The most compelling idea is using imagination as a tool for cultivating wide-awakeness. For

example, when the student is asked to imagine the life of another—say, a refugee from war or a

family that has been impacted by climate change—their eyes start to see beyond their own

horizons. That kind of imaginative exercise can help students connect emotionally with issues

they might otherwise see as abstract or distant.

What questions do I have?

One major question I have about the feasibility of such ideas is whether they can actually be put

into practice in the setting of a resource-starved classroom—for example, within under-resourced

schools. In such situations, teachers might lack materials or time to actually host open-ended and
 3

creative discussions. How might one balance such real difficulties of the setting in order to be

critically transformative?

Now is another question, "How should we measure broad awakening?" If success in academics

often brings forth measures via grade levels and testing, how should this moral or social

awakening of a student be evaluated? Is the characteristic of wide-awakeness to be codified into

valid assessment tools, something so intensely subjective?

What connections do I make or not make to the article?

Greene's thoughts resonate with me as a student and now an educator. I remember, as a student,

those teachers who brought real-life issues into their lessons. I remember, in high school English

class, the analysis of such dystopian novels as 1984 and The Handmaid's Tale that led to

discussions on political systems, personal freedoms, and societal controls. These discussions

have really stuck with me and motivated me to think of the world in a critical way and my place

in it.

As an educator, it is my effort to provide such opportunities for my learners. In a recent science

lesson on environmental sustainability, I carried out the following project; the learners came up

with solutions on how to minimize waste within the community. For instance, some of the

students came up with creative ideas on how to use waste to make more products, which ended

up as a motivating factor in the discussion on how even minute changes make a difference

globally. It has created in them more awareness of problems arising from environmental issues
 4

and driven them to see themselves as active contributors capable of helping surmount these

challenges.

However, at the same time, I realize that there are divergences of Greene's ideology and

classroom experiences. Often adherence to strictness in teaching will not allow room to explore

general issues being created in the social world since time seems restricted. It gives me time-to-

time doubts over whether I am doing enough work toward inspiring all my students "wide-

awakeness" or I am in confinement of systems working against this mission.

Does this relate to my education experience or teaching experience?

Absolutely, Greene's philosophy relates directly to my experiences in education. The most recent

example of this is from a mental health awareness activity that I conducted for my students.

Based on the trend of increased stress and anxiety among the student population, I decided to

hold a class discussion on mental health. I encouraged them to share some of their personal

experiences and thoughts about the issue. This really opened up more meaningful conversations

because students could begin to see their struggles were not just something personal but rather,

seeking help proved to be something of strength. The experience aligns with Greene's vision of

education as a tool for moral and social awakening, as it dealt with real-life issues affecting the

students.

I have also done these discussions about social transformation into lessons. For instance, in the

history class, I had research and presentations on the local social justice movements. As a result

of this, the learners were then able to understand the historical contexts connecting the lessons
 5

they learned to some current issues that existed within their communities. The students leave the

class with much greater appreciation for the role activism played in shaping society, one that

bore an honest resemblance to Greene's own belief in the power of education as a force

prompting action.

Lastly, Maxine Greene's "Wide Awakeness and the Moral Life" is a deep reminder of the

transformative power of education. In an ongoing way, Greene, through a challenge to educators,

brings out into the open moral and social responsibilities attached to teaching by urging them to

nurture wide-awakeness in their students. While the realities of education systems may be tough,

the real-life experiences have shown that an environment can definitely be built wherein students

are inspired to think deeply, empathize, and connect meaningfully with the world. This ideal

inspires me as a teacher and has motivated me to be that good teacher who does not go by the

textbooks alone in preparing students for life and their duties as agents of change.