PAPR Reduction of An MC-CDMA System Using SLM Technique: Gagandeep Kaur, Rajbir Kaur
PAPR Reduction of An MC-CDMA System Using SLM Technique: Gagandeep Kaur, Rajbir Kaur
  to  achieve  frequency 
diversity.  After  interleaving  the  symbol  element  are  then 
input to the IFFT block of size N M L =    .   
The  resultant  baseband  signal  for  one  MC-CDMA 
0 s t T s s  symbol is represented as  
( ) ( ) 2 ( ( 1) ( 1)) /
1 1 1
1
( )
K M L
k k j M l m t NT
m l
k m l
d c e
N
s t
  t     +   
=   =   =
=
  
                   (1) 
 
 
Fig. 1. MC-CDMA transmitter 
B.  PAPR 
The PAPR of the MC-CDMA symbol is defined as ratio 
of the peak power and the average power: 
10
2
max ( )
10log
2
( )
peak
average
s t
p
PAPR
p
E s t
=   =
     (
   (
   
   (
   (
                                   (2)
 
Where peak p represents  output  peak  power,  average p means 
output average power.
| |  denotes the expected value.  
The cumulative distribution function (CDF) is one of the 
most  regularly  used  parameters,  which  is  used  to  measure 
the  efficiency  on  any  PAPR  technique.  Normally,  the 
Complementary  CDF  (CCDF)  is  used  instead  of  CDF, 
which helps us to measure the probability that the PAPR of 
a certain data block exceeds the given threshold [4]. 
The CDF of the amplitude of a sample signal is given by  
( ) 1 exp( ) F z z = 
                                                                 (3)
 
The  CCDF  of  the  PAPR  of  the  data  block  is  desired  is 
our  case  to  compare  various  reduction  techniques.  This  is 
given by [3]: 
( ) 1 ( ) P PAPR z P PAPR z >   =    s  
                  1 ( )
N
F z =   
                   1 (1 exp( ))
N
z =       
                                     (4) 
When  calculating  the  PAPR,  we  have  to  consider  the 
actual time domain signal that is in analog form. The IFFT 
outputs,  which  are  symbol  spaced  sampling  values,  will 
miss  some  of  the  signal  peaks.  Therefore,  if  we  calculate 
PAPR  by  using  these  sample  values,  then  the  calculated 
PAPR is less than the actual PAPR [6]. This is an optimistic 
result  and  will  not  illustrate  the  real  situation.  However, 
they  are  enough  for  signal  reconstruction.  To  account  for 
this  issue,  oversampling  is  performed  by  low  pass  filtering 
the  IFFT  signal  and  then  sampled  at  higher  rate.  Now,  the 
increased  samples  are  close  to  the  real  analog  signal  and 
calculation  of  PAPR  based  on  these  samples  will  give  a 
better estimated PAPR.  
III.  SELECTED MAPPING (SLM) METHOD 
A block diagram of SLM is shown in fig.2.  In SLM, U-1 
statistically  independent  phase  sequences  are  generated. 
Symbol sequences are multiplied by the U-1 different phase 
sequences {b
u
, u = 1, 2, , U-1}, whose length is equal to 
number  of  carriers  before  IFFT  process.  The  PAPR  is 
calculated for U-1 phase rotated symbol sequences and one 
original  phase  sequence.  Then  the  symbol  sequence  with 
the  lowest  PAPR  is  selected  and  transmitted  as  side 
information. The receiver performs the reverse operation to 
recover the data symbol. Since SLM is a linear operation, it 
does  not  cause  non-linear  operation.  However,  SLM  needs 
the  IFFT  process  for  each  phase  sequence,  that  is,  U  IFFT 
processes. Thus, a large amount of calculation is needed in 
SLM. 
 
Fig. 2. A block diagram of selected mapping 
The  block  diagram  of  MC-CDMA  system  with  SLM 
technique  is  shown  in  fig.3.  The  input  data  sequences  of 
each  user 
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 2
[ , ,..., ]
k k k k
M
d d d d =   with  length  M  are  first 
converted  into  M  parallel  data  sequences 
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 2
[ , ,..., ]
k k k k
L
c c c c =   and  then  each  S/P  converted  output 
is  multiplied  with  the  spreading  code  with  length  L. 
Multiplexed  symbol  sequences 
( )
0 1 1
1
, ,..., ] [
K
k T
N
k
X X X X X
  
=
=   =
   
=
=   =
   
=
=   =
s s   
   =
|   |
=
     |
\   .
      
      
is 
also  transmitted  to  the  receiver  side  for  transmission  [10-
16]. 
 
Fig. 3. MC-CDMA system using SLM 
 
IV.  SIMULATIONS 
In  this  section  the  performance  MC-CDMA  system  is 
evaluated  using  SLM.  Table  I  below  shows  the  simulation 
parameters.  If  we  oversample  a  transmitted  signal  by  a 
factor  of  four,  the  discrete  PAPR  is  almost  the  same  as 
continuous PAPR [16]. Thus we oversample the transmitted 
signal by a factor of four in IFFT process. 
 
TABLE I 
SIMULATION PARAMETERS 
Spreading codes   Walsh Hadamard 
Modulation process  BPSK, QPSK, MSK 
Processing Gain (L)  8 
Number of data symbols per an 
MC-CDMA symbol (M) 
16 
Number of sub-carriers (N)  128 
Number of active users (K)  8 
Number  of  phase  sequences 
(U) 
4,8 and16 
Oversampling factor  4 
 
The  performance  metric  utilized  in  evaluating  PAPR 
reduction  scheme  is  CCDF  of  the  PAPR  of  transmitted 
continuous  time  signal.  The  resulting  CCDF  curves  are 
presented  for  1,000  input  symbol  sequences  for  different 
number  of  phase  sequences  (U=4,  8  and  16)  when 
considered  number  of  active  users  to  be  equal  to  8.  The 
phase  sequences  used  are  binary  phase  sequences  {1,-1}. 
The  rows  of  hadamard  matrix  are  used  in  phase  factor 
generation,  in  this  case,  with  processing  gain  equal  to  8. 
The  system  consists  of  128  subcarriers  with  modulation 
schemes  used  to  be  BPSK,  QPSK,  and  MSK.  The  results 
are compared with the original MC-CDMA signal. 
 
Fig.  4.  CCDF  of  PAPR  of  MC-CDMA  using  SLM  for  various 
U where QPSK is used as a modulation technique. 
In  fig.  4,  at  CCDF=10
-3
,  MC-CDMA  with  SLM  method 
applying  QPSK  as  modulation  technique,  the  PAPR  is 
reduced  by  0.7dB,  1.1dB,  1.5dB  for  values  of  U=4,  8  and 
16  respectively  when  compared  with  the  original  MC-
CDMA signal. 
 
Fig. 5. CCDF of PAPR of MC-CDMA using SLM for various U 
where BPSK is used as a modulation technique. 
ISSN: 2278  1323 
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology 
Volume 1, Issue 4, June 2012 
 
459 
All Rights Reserved  2012 IJARCET 
 
In  fig.  5,  at  CCDF=10
-3
,  MC-CDMA  with  SLM  method 
applying  BPSK  as  modulation  technique,  the  PAPR  is 
reduced by 0.9dB, 1.7dB, 2.45dB for values of U=4, 8 and 
16  respectively  when  compared  with  the  original  MC-
CDMA signal. 
 
Fig. 6. CCDF of PAPR of MC-CDMA using SLM for various U 
where MSK is used as a modulation technique. 
In  fig.  6,  at  CCDF=10
-3
,  MC-CDMA  with  SLM  method 
applying  MSK  as  modulation  technique,  the  PAPR  is 
reduced by 0.95dB, 1.9dB, 2.2dB for values of U=4, 8 and 
16  respectively  when  compared  with  the  original  MC-
CDMA signal. 
 
Fig. 7. Comparison of PAPR reduction performance for SLM at 
U=4 by different modulation techniques 
In  comparison  of  performance  on  PAPR  reduction  of 
MC-CDMA  system  using  SLM  at  U=4  for  described 
modulation schemes (BPSK, QPSK, MSK) as shown in fig. 
7  BPSK  has  better  performance  of  PAPR  reduction  than 
QPSK  and  MSK.  For  the  same  CCDF  probability  10
-3
,  the 
PAPR  value  equals  to  9.4dB  when  BPSK  is  employed, 
while the PAPR raise upto10.05dB for MSK  and the value 
further rises to 12.75dB when QPSK is employed under the 
same circumstances.  
 
V.  CONCLUSION 
In  this  paper  we  examined  the  effect  of  SLM  to  reduce 
PAPR  of  MC-CDMA  for  different  modulation  schemes. 
The  binary  phase  sequences  considered  in  this  paper  are 
generated  from  hadamard  matrix.    From  the  MATLAB 
simulation,  the  results  shows  that  PAPR  reduction 
performance  depends  upon  various  number  of  phase 
sequence  factors  (U)  and  it  significantly  improves  with 
increase  in  number  of  U.    PAPR  performance  is  also 
compared  for different  modulation  schemes  (QPSK,  BPSK 
and  MSK)  and  the  result  showed  that  SLM  is  more 
effective when BPSK is used as modulation scheme. 
ACKNOWLEDGMENT 
We are grateful to the University College of Engineering, 
Punjabi University, Patiala for providing necessary support 
and infrastructure. 
REFERENCES 
[1]  R.  van  Nee  and  R.  Prasad,  OFDM  for  Wireless  Multimedia 
Communications, Artech House, 2000. 
[2]  S.  Hara  and  R.  Prasad,  Overview  of  Multicarrier  CDMA,  IEEE 
Commun. Mag., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 126  133, Dec. 1997. 
[3]  Wang  Yi  Gu  linfeng  An  Investigation  of  Peak-to-Average   
Power      Reduction      in      MIMO-OFDM  Systems,  Blekinge 
Institute of Technology, October 2009. 
[4]  Md.  Abdullah  Al  Baki  and  Mohammad  Zavid  Parvez,  Peak  to 
Average  Power  Ratio  (PAPR)  Reduction  in  OFDM  Based  Radio 
Systems Blekinge Institute of Technology, May 2010. 
[5]  X.  Li  and  L.  J.  Cimini  Jr.,  Effects  of  clipping  and  filtering  on  the 
performance of OFDM, IEEE Commun. Lett. vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 131 
 133, May. 1998. 
[6]  C.  Tellambura,  A  coding  technique  for  reducing  peak-to-average 
power  ratio  in  OFDM,  IEEE  Transaction  on  Communications, 
Vol.47, No.6, pp 918-926, June 1999. 
[7]  S.H.  Muller  and  J.B.  Huber,  OFDM  with  reduced  peak-to-average 
power ratio by optimum combination of Partial Transmit Sequence, 
Elect. Let.,vol.33, no.5, pp 368-369, Feb. 1997 
[8]  N. Ruangsurat and R. M. A. P. Rajatheva, An investigation of peak 
to average power ratio in MC-CDMA combined with partial transmit 
sequence,  IEEE  VTC  2001    spring.  vol.1,  pp.  761    765, Rhodes, 
May. 2001. 
[9]  K.W. Bauml, R.F.H. Fischer and J.B. Huber, Reducing the peak to- 
average  power  ratio  of  multicarrier  modulation  by  selected 
mapping, Electron. Lett. vol. 32, no. 22, pp. 2056-2057, Oct. 1996. 
[10]  Lilin  Dan;  Oingsong  Wen;  Yue  Xiao  and  Shaoqian  Li,  A  Novel 
User  Grouping  Scheme  for  PAPR  Reduction  in  MC-CDMA 
System, Vehicular Technology Conference, pp 994-998, 2007 
[11]  Naoto  Ohkubo  and  Tomoaki  Ohtsuki,    Design    Criteria  for  Phase 
Sequences  in  Selected  Mapping,  IEEE  Vehicular  Technology 
Conference, 2003, pp 373-377 
[12]  S.  Ruangsuthinarupap;  K.M.  Ahmed;  W.A.C.  Fernando  and  M.E.R. 
Khan,    PAPR  Reduction  by  Combined    Selected  Mapping  and 
Selected  Spreading  Code  in  MC-CDMA  systems,  ,  Ninth 
ISSN: 2278  1323 
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology 
Volume 1, Issue 4, June 2012 
 
460 
All Rights Reserved  2012 IJARCET 
 
International Symposium on Computers and Communications, 2004. 
Proceedings. ISCC 2004. 2004, pp-725-728  
[13]  Naoto Ohkubo and Tomoaki Ohtsuki,  a peak to average power ratio 
reduction of multicarrier CDMA using selected mapping, IEEE 56
th
 
Vehicular Technology Conference 2002, pp 2086-2090 
[14]   Yan  Biao;  Yang  Juan;  and  Li  Ming,    Reduction  effect  of  SLM  on 
PAPR  in  MC-CDMA  systems,  Journal  of  Systems  in  Engineering 
and Electronics, 2005, pp 761-766 
[15]  Jizeng  Wang;  Jingyu  Luo;  Yanlong  Zhang;  A  New  Phase 
Sequence for SLM in MC-CDMA System, WiCom Sept. 2007.  
[16]  C. Tellambura,  Computation of the continuous-time PAR of an OFDM 
signal  with  BPSK  subcarriers,  IEEE  commn.  Let.  Vol.5, no.4, pp 135-
137, 2001 
[17]  Jizeng  Wang;  Jingyu  Luo;  Yanlong  Zhang;  A  New  Phase 
Sequence for SLM in MC-CDMA System, WiCom Sept. 2007.  
[18]  C. Tellambura,  Computation of the continuous-time PAR of an OFDM 
signal  with  BPSK  subcarriers,  IEEE  commn.  Let.  Vol.5, no.4, pp 135-
137, 2001 
 
 
  Gagandeep  Kaur:  Designation:  Student, 
Academic Qualifications: Currently pursuing M.Tech (ECE) from UCOE, 
Punjabi  University,  Patiala.  Done  B.Tech  (ECE)  from  RIMT-IET,  Mandi 
Gobindgarh.  Areas  of  interest:  Wireless  Communication  and  MATLAB. 
Published Work: International Conferences: 1 
 
 
 
  Rajbir  Kaur:  Designation:  Assistant 
Professor,  Electronics  and  Communication  Engineering.  Academic 
Qualifications:  M.Tech.,  pursuing  PhD.  Area  of  Specialization:  Analog 
and    Digital  communication  systems.  Published  Work:  National 
Conferences:  6,  International  Conferences:  1,  International  Journal:  1, 
National  Conference/Seminar  Presentation:  1.  M.Tech/M.Phil  Students 
Guided / Underguidance : 04