0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40K views8 pages

Kohn Amicus

This document is a proposed brief amicus curiae submitted by Bob Kohn in the case United States v. Apple, Inc. et al. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The brief argues that the Department of Justice's proposed settlement in the case fails to properly analyze the economics of the publishing industry and the alleged price-fixing arrangement between Apple and the publisher defendants under antitrust law precedents. The brief cites numerous cases and economic analyses to argue that the proposed settlement does not adequately consider the procompetitive effects that could result from the publishers' arrangement with Apple.

Uploaded by

laurahazardowen
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40K views8 pages

Kohn Amicus

This document is a proposed brief amicus curiae submitted by Bob Kohn in the case United States v. Apple, Inc. et al. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The brief argues that the Department of Justice's proposed settlement in the case fails to properly analyze the economics of the publishing industry and the alleged price-fixing arrangement between Apple and the publisher defendants under antitrust law precedents. The brief cites numerous cases and economic analyses to argue that the proposed settlement does not adequately consider the procompetitive effects that could result from the publishers' arrangement with Apple.

Uploaded by

laurahazardowen
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 110

Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
__________________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE, INC.,
HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC.,
HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS, L.L.C.
VERLAGSGRUPPE GEORG VON
HOLTZBRINK PUBLISHERS, LLC
d/b/a MACMILLAN,
THE PENGUIN GROUP,
A DIVISION OF PEARSON PLC,
PENGUIN GROUP (USA), INC. and
SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC.,
Defendants.

Civil Action No.12-CV-2826 (DLC)

BRIEF OF BOB KOHN AS AMICUS CURIAE *

Five-page version of Proposed Brief Amicus Curiae at Docket No. 97.

Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 110

Filed 09/04/12 Page 2 of 8

T ABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
Barry Wright Corp. v. ITT Grinnell Corp., 724 F.2d 227, 231-33 (1st Cir. 1983) ...........................................3
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, 441 U.S. 1, 8-12, 21, fn 34 (1979) .......................................................... 2, 3, 5
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Moor-Law, Inc., 527 F.Supp. 758, 763-5 (D. Del. 1981) ........................................2
CBS v. ASCAP, 337 F.Supp. 394 (S.D.N.Y. 1972) ..........................................................................................5
CBS v. ASCAP, 400 F.Supp. 737, 755-56, 760-61, 765 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) .......................................................5
CBS v. ASCAP, 562 F.2d 130, 134-40 (2d Cir. 1977)......................................................................................5
CBS v. ASCAP, 620 F.2d 930 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 970 (1981) ............................................5
FTC v. Indiana Fedn of Dentists, 476 U.S. 457, 459 (1986)......................................................................2, 5
Northeastern Telephone v. AT&T, 651 F.2d 76, 87-9 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 (1982) ..3, 4
Todd v. Exxon Corp., 275 F.3d 191, 201 (2d Cir. 2001)..................................................................................3
United States v. Keyspan Corp., 783 F. Supp.2d 633, 637 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)........................................... 1, 4, 5

Statutes
Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 101, et. seq. ...........................................................................................................1
Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 2 ..............................................................................................................................4
Tunney Act, 15 U.S.C.16(f) ............................................................................................................................3

Rules
Antitrust Guidelines for Licensing of Intellectual Property, 2.3, 2.3.1, 3.2.1, 3.4, 4.1 (DOJ/FTC 1995)1, 2
Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 2.2.3, 4, 12 (DOJ/FTC 2010) ....................................................................2

Articles & Treatises


John Cirace, CBS v. ASCAP: An Economic Analysis of a Political Problem, 47 FORDHAM L. REV. 277,
293-94 (1978-79) ................................................................................................................................. 2, 3, 5
Philip E. Areeda & Donald F. Turner, Predatory Pricing and Related Practices Under Section 2 of the
Sherman Act, 88 HARV. L. REV. 697, 712 (1975)........................................................................................4
Richard S. Wirtz, Rethinking Price-Fixing, 20 INDIANA L. REV. 531, 627 (1987) .........................................4
Christopher R. Leshe, Achieving Efficiency Through Collusion: A Market Failure Defense to Horizontal
Price Fixing, 81 CALIFORNIA LAW REV. 243, 267-272 (1993) ...................................................................4
Roger D. Blair & Jeffrey L. Harrison, Antitrust Policy and Monopsony, 76 CORNELL LAW REV. 297, 308
(1991) ...........................................................................................................................................................3

Court Documents & Public Comments


Comments of Bob Kohn, ATC-0143 (May 30, 2012) .....................................................................................1
Complaint, 12-02826 (DLC), Docket No. 1 (April 11, 2012) .........................................................................3
Competitive Impact Statement, 12-02826 (DLC), Docket No. 5 (April 11, 2012) .........................................3
Proposed Final Judgment 12-02826 (DLC), Docket No. 4 (April 11, 2012)...................................................5
DOJ Response to Public Comments, 12-02826, Docket No. 81 (July 23, 2012) .........................................3,4
Memorandum & Proposed Brief Amicus Curiae of Bob Kohn, Docket No.97 (August 13, 2012).....i
ii

Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 110

Filed 09/04/12 Page 3 of 8

Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 110

Filed 09/04/12 Page 4 of 8

Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 110

Filed 09/04/12 Page 5 of 8

Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 110

Filed 09/04/12 Page 6 of 8

Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 110

Filed 09/04/12 Page 7 of 8

Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 110

Dated: September 4, 2012

Filed 09/04/12 Page 8 of 8

Respectfully submitted,

______________________
BOB KOHN
BOB KOHN
(California Bar No. 100793)
140 E. 28th St.
New York, NY 10016
+1-408-602-5646
bob@bobkohn.com

You might also like