0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views6 pages

In 1H United States Banuptcy Court: Inre: Case No. 09-1 0785 L

The response objects to the Fee Auditor's recommendation to reduce fees by $6,000 for travel time during two trips to China on the grounds that: 1) Millstream had already limited billable hours to 8 per day instead of the actual 12-14 worked each day, forfeiting over $15,000 in fees; 2) the Debtors had requested Millstream make the trips and were aware of the long work days required but did not inform Millstream of the 50% travel time rate under Delaware rules; and 3) Millstream is a Texas firm unfamiliar with Delaware law. Millstream argues further reductions would be unreasonable given the concessions already made at the Debtors' request regarding work done during the trips.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views6 pages

In 1H United States Banuptcy Court: Inre: Case No. 09-1 0785 L

The response objects to the Fee Auditor's recommendation to reduce fees by $6,000 for travel time during two trips to China on the grounds that: 1) Millstream had already limited billable hours to 8 per day instead of the actual 12-14 worked each day, forfeiting over $15,000 in fees; 2) the Debtors had requested Millstream make the trips and were aware of the long work days required but did not inform Millstream of the 50% travel time rate under Delaware rules; and 3) Millstream is a Texas firm unfamiliar with Delaware law. Millstream argues further reductions would be unreasonable given the concessions already made at the Debtors' request regarding work done during the trips.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

IN 1H UNITED STATES BANUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELA WAR

Inre:
PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES LTD., et ai., 1

) Chapter 1 1

)
)

Case No. 09-1 0785~L-

Debtor.

)
) )

A~ 614'47&'c'
l..

lf ~PtrJtt-F MILLSTREAM ENERGY, LLC TO THE FEE AUDITOR'S FINAL REPORT REGARING THE FIRST INTERIM APPLICATION OF MILLSTREAM ENERGY, LLC FOR THE PERIOD MACH 9, 2009 THROUGH MAY 31.2009
Comes now Mlstrea Energy, LLC ("Milstream") and fes its response to the
Fee Auditor's Final Report (the "Final Report") (Docket No. 786) regarding the Firt Quaerly
Application for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses of

Mlstream Energy, LLC, as

Engineering consultant to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession, for the Period from March 9,
2009, though May 3 1,2009 (the "First Interi Fee Application") (Docket No. 614), and

respectfly states as follows:


The followig comments and rebutts are offered to the Discussion section of the
'Fee Auditor's Final Report Regarding Interi Fee Application of

Millstream Energy, LLC, for

the Interi Period', as prepared by Waren H. Smith & Associates, P.C.

The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each of the Debtors' federal tax identification number, are: Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. (3442); Petrocal Acquisition Corp. (6249); Pacific Energy Alaska Holdings, LLC (ta I.D. # not available); Cameros Acquisition Corp. (5866); Pacifc Energy Alaska Operating LLC (7021); San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (1234); Cameros Energy, Inc. (9487); and Gotland Oil, Inc. (5463). The mailing address for all of

the Debtors is I i I W. Ocea Boulevard, Suite 1240, Long Beach, CA 90802.

68773-o02\DOCS_LA:209240. i

Report Item 3.IDiscussion)

Millstream disagrees with the recommendation to reduce fees by $6000.00 for the
business between Houston, LAX and the Peoples Republic of China (pRq for the two trps

made durng the period May 9, 2009 to May 22,2009. The Fee Auditor references Delaware

Local Rule 2016-2(d)(vi) which assets that trvel tie durng which no work is pedormed shall
be bil separatly and at no more tht 50% of

the reguar hourly rate. Ths discount was not

applied for the forty (40) bilable hours in question and Milstream should not be required to do
so for the following reasons:

In an effort to lift the ficial burden to the Debtors given their Chapter 1 1
status, and prior to the first trp to the PRC, Pacific Energy's CFO, Mr. Gerald Tywoniuk,
requested Milstream to limit chargeable consulting fee hours to 8 hours per day regardless of

the

actu number of hours worked durng the trps. Milstream honored ths request in an effort
limit fees for both of

the subject trps even though work days averaged 12-14 hours per day.

There were 13 work days which all exceeded 8 hours per day to accommodate the numerous

work presentations and meetings that ha to be concluded durg the short period of time in
countr. Using the low end of

the average hour per day actu worked of 12 hours per day,

Milstream fodeited legitimate consulting fees of $15,600 (4 additiona hours per day x 13
workig days x $300 per hours). To fuer limit the trvel time to 50% of

reguar hour and

fodeit an additional sum of

$6000.00 is uneaonable in the context of

the time and fees that

were conceded based on the agreement with Debtors.

Milstream is an engineering consultig firm registered and operating under Texas

68773-002\DS _LA:209240. i

law and would have no knowledge of Delaware law regarding the discount issue relating to non-

working travel hours. The Debtors, Zol For Copper (CRO), and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones
LLP (Chapter 11 Counel) were all awar of

the trps to PRe in an effort to secure potential

equity ficing. None of

these paries advised Milstream that travel time was to be limted to

50% of reguar hours. If there would have been an awareness of ths restrction, Milstream
would not have agreed to limit reguar work hours to 8 hours per day knowing the extended

hours and amount of work tht was required for the extensive travel, long presentations,
meetings with local companes, and the substatial volume of follow-up consulting work that

was involved to meet restrctive deadlines.

.L
Dated: November 30 , 2009 MILLSTREAM ENERGY, LLC

Mark A. Clemans, P.E.

fl~A~__

4918 Menlo Park Drive Sugar Land, TX 77479


Telephone: 281/910-0245

Emal: txac65)comcast.net
Engineering Consultant for Debtor and Debtor in Possession Pacific Energy Resources Ltd.

68773-002\DS_LA209240.!

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

In re: )
STATE OF

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE


Chapter 1 1
)

PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES LTD., et al., i )

Case No. 09- 1 0785 (KJC)

Debtors. )
DELAWARE )
) ss:

(Jointly Administered)

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

COUNTY OF NEW CASTLE )


Kathleen Forte Finlayson, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says
that she is employed by the law firm of

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, attorneys for the

Debtors in the above-captioned action, and that on the 1 st day of December, 2009 she caused a
copy of

the following document(s) to be served upon the parties on the attached service lists in

the manner indicated:

Response of Milstream Energy, LLC to Fee Auditor's Final Report


Regarding First Quarterly Fee Application

DEBR L. YOU
NOTARY PUBIC STATE OF DELAWAR
.. cemiJiup.u 18. 3)11

i The Debtors in the s, along with the last four digits of each of the Debtors' federal tax

identification number, are: Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. (3442); Petrocal Acquisition Corp. (6249); Pacific Energy Alaska Holdings, LLC (tax I.D. # not available); Cameros Acquisition Corp. (5866); Pacific Energy Alaska Operating LLC (7021); San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (1234); Cameros
Energy, Inc. (9487); and Gotland Oil, Inc. (5463). The mailing address for all of

the Debtors is 111 W.

Ocean Boulevard, Suite 1240, Long Beach, CA 90802.

Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. Fec App Service List


Case No. 09- 1 0785 Document No. 147432

03 - Hand Delivery 06 - First Class Mail

Hand Delivery (Counsel to Offcial Committee of Unsecured Creditors) David B. Stratton, Esquire James C. Carignan, Esquire Pepper Hamilton LLP
Hercules Plaza, Suite 1500

01 - Interoffice Pouch

1313 Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899

(Counsel for Debtors) Laura Davis Jones, Esquire James E. O'Neil, Esquire Kathleen P. Makowski, Esquire Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP 919 North Market Street, 17th Floor P.O. Box 8705 Wilmington, DE 19899-8705

First Class Mail (Debtors)


Mr. Gerry Tywoniuk Senior Vice President & CFO Pacific Energy Resources
1 1 1 We. Ocean Boulevard, Ste 1240

Long Beach, CA 90802

Interoffice Pouch to Los Angeles (Counsel for Debtors) Robert M. Saunders, Esquire Ira b. Kharasch, Esquire Scotta E. McFarland, Esquire
-Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP
10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 11 Floor

First Class Mail


(De,btors) Mr.'Scott W. Winn
Seiior Managing Director

. th

Zolfo Cooper 1 l6q Sixth Avenue, 24 Floor


Ne~York, NY 10026

, , th

Los Angeles, CA 90067


(via First Class Mail)

Hand Delivery (United States Tf!Jstee) Joseph McMahon, Esquire Office of the United States Trustee 1. Caleb Boggs Federal Building 844 North King Street, Suite 2207
Lockbox 35

(The Fee Auditor) Warren H. Smith Warren H. Smith & Associates, P.C. Repiiblic Center
3251... S1. Paul, Ste 1250

Dallas, Texas 75201

Wilmington, DE ' 19801

Hand Delivery (Copy Service)


Parcels, Inc.

Vito 1. DiMaio 230 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801

'!.-'.

\..

"

First Class Mail


(Counsel to Official Committee of

Unsecured

Creditors) 'Francis J. Lawall, Esquire :Pepper Hamilton LLP 3000 Two Logaii Square Eighteenth & Arch Streets

Philadelphia, PAl 9103

First Class Mail


(counsel to Official Committee of

Unsecured Creditors)

Filiberto Agusti, Esquire


Steven Reed, Esquire

Joshua Taylor, Esquire Steptoe & Johnson LLP 1330 Connecticut Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036

First Class Mail


(counsel to Official Committee of

Unsecured Creditors)

Robbin Itkin, Esauire Katherine Piper, Esquire Kelly Frazier, Esquire Steptoe & Johnson LLP
2121 Avenue of

the Stars, 28th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067


68773-00 i \DOCS _DE: 14432. i

You might also like