Summary: 5 pages. 7 sources. APA format.
International kidnappings are on the rise and have become one of the fastest growing industries in the world. This paper looks at kidnapping as a thriving business. International Kidnapping as a Business Introduction The kidnapping and ransom of individuals for profit has dramatically increased in the past decade throughout the world. While
the majority of victims are wealthy businessmen, more recently, the average tourist has become a target for kidnappers looking for monetary and material gain. In recent years, kidnappers have also
become more organized and are demanding more money for the safe return of hostages. Why has international kidnapping been on the increase? The
simple answer is because it has become an extremely profitable form of business transaction for the kidnappers. This paper analyzes and
scrutinizes international kidnapping as a thriving business.
The Business of Kidnapping Kidnappings around the world have typically had one of two major goals: publicity for a local political cause or as a form of fundraising for the kidnappers. Recently, kidnappings for political
reasons have been on the decrease, whereas kidnapping for profit has seen a dramatic increase. A prime example of this trend is in Colombia. According to
writer David Williams, Colombia is considered to be the kidnapping capital of the world, with rival guerrilla and paramilitary groups consistently abducting civilians - including businessmen, tourists and aid workers (2001, para.1). The ransom money obtained from these
activities is used primarily to finance a 37-year civil war in Colombia (Williams, 2001, para.1). The U.S. State Department estimates that more than 3,000 people are kidnapped in Colombia each year (Williams, 2001, para.2). Most
kidnap victims are Colombians who are either wealthy or who can at least come up with a few thousand dollars. And, according to
Williams, although the kidnappings are most often performed by political dissidents, the motivation for the kidnappings is usually money, not politics (para.11). Mike Ackerman, founder of The Ackerman
Group, a Miami, Florida-based firm that consults companies in kidnap and ransom cases, said "They are political groups that do the kidnapping, but they're out for money. The political groups have to
support themselves and one of the ways that they support themselves is through these ransoms" (Williams, 2001, para.12). Others have echoed this opinion as well. "It's strictly a
business for the experienced groups in Latin America; they don't want to harm the victim," said Chris Marquet who heads the risk assessment division of Kroll Associates, a leading international security firm. "You play the game, the guy's going to come back." (Wall, 1997, para.5). Colombia is not the only country to be plagued with this increase in kidnappings for profit. Ransom kidnappings are becoming more
common in Mexico, Central America, Brazil, Chechnya, the Philippines, Haiti, and many other developing countries throughout the world (Williams, 2001, para.13). A dramatic account of the increase in global abductions can be found in Ransom: The Untold Story of International Kidnapping by Ann Hagedorn Auerbach (1998). This book focuses on kidnappings that took
place throughout the world between 1995 and 1997.
Auerbach's writes
of kidnappings that occurred in places like Kashmir, Papua New Guinea, and others. And, again, although many kidnappings are politically
motivated, Auerbach asserts that a growing number are simply fundraising exercises by guerrillas or common criminals (1998). For
example, when a new rebel group, the Popular Revolutionary Army, surfaced in Mexico in 1996, experts concluded that the group financed itself through kidnappings carried out over the previous two years. Auerbach emphasizes that one of the causes of the worldwide increase in kidnappings for profit is that billions of dollars in foreign investment has only marginally assisted the poor throughout the Third World. This has created a growing resentment of the elites Therefore,
who have hoarded much of the wealth (Auerbach, 1998).
often times, kidnappings for profit throughout the Third World are a backlash by the poor against the elites, in an attempt to even the score by obtaining some of their money. Moreover, there is increasing risk of kidnapping for tourists and expatriate executives throughout the world. This is particularly so
for Americans, who are perceived as rich even when they are not. Their substantial numbers--3.2 million living overseas and 50 million traveling internationally each year--have left Americans more at risk than citizens of other countries (The Expatriation Trend, 1997-2003, para.6). In many countries, the kidnapping of business people,
especially American executives and mid-level managers, as well as tourists has become a thriving business. For example, during the last
several years, the FARC and ELN, two Colombian terrorist groups, have extorted more than $632 million from foreign companies and individuals (Clancy, 2001, para.4).
In fact, the problem of kidnapping has become so bad internationally that several insurance and security companies are offering either international kidnapping insurance or, at least, detailed instructions on how to avoid a kidnapping. become a thriving business. This too has
According to Fielding Worldwide, Inc., a
typical KRE (Kidnap, Ransom and Extortion) insurance policy has a $1 million limit (1998, para.2). An annual policy would cost between
US$7,000 in Brazil or up to a maximum of US$26,000 in Colombia - this is an incredible cost (Fielding Worldwide, Inc., 1998, para.2). Corporations usually buy blanket policies that cover all employees, but often business is intertwined with extended family from grandparents down to grandchildren (Fielding Worldwide, Inc., 1998, para.2). Therefore, often the entire family must be included in the
policy to ensure maximum coverage. Since kidnappers are aware of these KRE policies, the insurance policies have inadvertently created a way for them to make even more money than if they were to kidnap a typical man off the street. is it necessary to obtain one of these policies? So,
Seitlin & Company (a
KRE insurance provider) believes that you would be crazy to do business in Latin America without US$5-$10 million in KRE coverage since, for example, in Colombia a ransom less than a million is considered a joke (Fielding Worldwide, Inc., 1998, para.3). Unless
your family can afford this price tag, a KRE policy will provide payment if you happen to be kidnapped. Consequently, kidnap
prevention and hostage-release services are growth enterprises and more and more KRE policies are being written all the time. On the other side of this enterprise are the kidnappers. are skilled professionals who are experienced in surveillance They
techniques, communications, logistics and command control, as well as weaponry (Wall, 1997, para.3). The kidnappers continue the kidnapping
because they know that frequently it is an insurance company who will pay out - and pay out big. As a result, there is a known range
within which the eventual price will be agreed upon, depending on the caliber of the executive, his or her country of origin and the type of kidnapper. Thus, even if the initial counter-offer is far below the
initial demand, kidnappers know it is part of the business to keep negotiations going. In Walls article, an international security
expert states that the kidnappers, if they possess any degree of professionalism, are not going to throw away [money] for the fleeting pleasure of slitting someone's throat (Wall, 1997, para.7). Unfortunately, not everyone can afford kidnap-negotiation services or a KRE policy. For example, Thomas Hargrove, a Texas
science writer working in Colombia, was held for 334 days until his wife, frustrated by his company's refusal to pay a ransom, hired her own negotiators. She paid $500,000 for his release (Hargrove, 2001).
Clearly, kidnapping has become big business in many parts of the world.
Conclusion Kidnapping around the globe seems to be evolving from a crime that used to be primarily based in political motivations to one that is based on economic motivations. Kidnapping for ransom has quickly
become a worldwide epidemic as it has become a relatively easy way for kidnappers to make substantial amounts of money with rather little effort and time. Since kidnapping has become so profitable due to
payouts by family members or KRE insurance policies, one can surmise
that kidnappings for profit will continue to increase throughout the world and continue to grow as a business.
Bibliography Auerbach, A. H., (1998). Ransom The Untold Story of International Kidnapping. New York: Henry Holt and Company. Clancy, C. (2001). Kidnapping businesspeople has become big business. Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal. Retrieved May 22, 2003, from http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2001/09/24/smallb2 .html Expatriation Trend, The. (1997-2003). Cyberhaven.com. Retrieved May 22, 2003, from http://www.cyberhaven.com/offshorelibrary/expatriation.html Fielding Worldwide, Inc. (1998). Kidnap, Rescue and Extortion Insurance. Retrieved May 22, 2003, from http://www.comebackalive.com/df/kidnapp/kdnapins.htm Hargrove, T. R., (2001). Long March to Freedom. New York: Random House, Inc. Wall, T. (February 26, 1997). The Kidnap Business. Salon.com. Retrieved May 22, 2003, from http://www.salon.com/feb97/news/news2970226.html Williams, D. (May 7, 2001). Kidnapping is Big Business in Colombia. CNN.com/World. Retrieved May 22, 2003, from: http://www-cgi.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/americas / 05/07/colombia.kidnapping/
