COURSE TITLE  Physical & Optical Properties
COURSE COORDINATOR  Mr. Xunlin Qiu  
EXPERIMENT NO  W5 
TOTAL PAGES  12 
SUBMISSION DATE  20th August 2012 
MEMBERS OF THE LAB GROUP 
STUDENT ID  STUDENT NAME  SIGNATURE 
764316  Muhammad Farooq   
526085  Muhammad Farhan   
PIEZOELECTRICITY  
Introduction 
A piezoelectric material is one that yields an electric charge when a mechanical stress is applied.  
Many crystals generate an electric charge when subjected to a mechanical load; this correlation has 
become known as the piezoelectric effect. Piezoelectric measuring technology is the perfect tool for 
carrying out measurement tasks with extreme requirements in terms of geometry, temperature range 
and dynamics. The piezoelectric effect was discovered in 1880 by the Curie brothers. The prefix piezo 
comes from the Greek piezein, to press. The two physicists found that the surfaces of certain crystals 
become electrically charged when the crystal is mechanically loaded. This electric charge is exactly 
proportional to the force acting on the crystal. It is measured in pico-coulombs (pC). This phenomenon 
is known as the direct effect. 
Piezoelectricity is a property of many non-centrosymmetric ceramics, polymers and other biological 
systems. A subset of piezoelectricity is pyroelectricity, whereby the polarization is a function of 
temperature. Some pyroelectric materials are ferroelectric, although not all ferroelectrics are 
pyroelectric. 
The properties of polymers are so different in comparison to inorganics that they are uniquely qualified 
to fill niche areas where single crystals and ceramics are incapable of performing as effectively. The 
piezoelectric strain constant for the polymer is lower than that of the ceramic. However, piezoelectric 
polymers have much higher piezoelectric stress constants indicating that they are much better sensors 
than ceramics. Piezoelectric polymeric sensors and actuators offer the advantage of processing 
flexibility because they are lightweight, tough, readily manufactured into large areas, and can be cut and 
formed into complex shapes. Polymers also exhibit high strength and high impact resistance. Other 
notable features of polymers are low dielectric constant, low elastic stiffness, and low density, which 
result in a high voltage sensitivity (excellent sensor characteristic), and low acoustic and mechanical 
impedance (crucial for medical and underwater applications). Polymers also typically possess a high 
dielectric breakdown and high. Based on these features, piezoelectric polymers possess their own 
established area for technical applications and useful device configurations.          
Fig 1. Piezoelectric Effect 
Piezoelectric 
Material 
Compression  
Production of Foams  
The most common method of producing foam is the use of chemical or physical nucleating agents in 
molten polymer. 
One method is stretching polymers that contain tiny mineral particles under suitable conditions. These 
particles serve as a stress concentrator for micro cracks during biaxial stretching of the film. 
The polymer foams produced show a lateral youngs modulus of the order of GPa and a thickness 
Youngs modulus of the order of MPa. The special mechanical characteristic is one of the most 
important origins for the large piezoelectricity of ferroelectrics.         
Fig 2. Schematic view of biaxial stretching of filler loaded polymer matrix  
Inflation 
Voids spontaneously open up during stretching of the polymers that contain tiny mineral particles are 
too flat for efficient charging by means of the internal micro plasma discharges because the plasma 
electron cannot be accelerated sufficiently to ionize the gas molecules. In addition, flat void lead to  
rather stiff films with reduced electromechanical response. By means of a suitable pressure and 
temperature treatment, the size of the internal voids can be adjusted.           
  Fig 3.Schematic view of inflation process    
Increase of pressure 
Saturation with gas  Releasing the external pressure  
Gas molecules  
Holes  
Polymer   
There are two reasons why inflation is very useful for the optimization of the electromechanical 
properties of ferroelectrets. Firstly, voids with proper size have higher charging efficiency. 
Secondly the piezoelectricity activity of ferroelectrets depends upon the materials structure, elastic 
modulus and effective polarization.                   
  Fig 4.  Dependence of Piezoelectric activity and elastic stiffness on sample density and cross 
section of the corresponding cellular structures 
Charging of ferroelectrets  
Polymer foams are charged to achieve piezoelectric effect. The voids inside the foam must be internally 
charged. This can be done by means of direct charging, corona discharge without a grid at high corona-
point voltage or electron beam charging. 
If the electric field in the voids is higher than the threshold value the internal breakdown of the voids 
occurs. Charges of opposite polarity are separated and finally deposited on the top and bottom surface 
of the voids. These internally charged voids act as macroscopic dipoles. With sufficiently high electric 
fields, the direction of macroscopic dipoles can be reversed and the resulting electric displacement 
versus electric field curves exhibit hysteresis behavior.  
P
i
e
z
o
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c 
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y  
E
l
a
s
t
i
c 
S
t
i
f
f
n
e
s
s  
Density              
  Fig 5. Hysteresis behavior of ferroelectrets  
Experimental procedure  
Charging of samples 
A direct contact method was used to charge the samples  
The process of charging the samples is as follows:   
   Turn off the HV power supplier before when touching any part of the setup 
   Sample was mounted between the two electrodes and high voltage supply  
   Output voltage was set as desired  
   switch on the voltage supply and charge the sample for 15 sec  
   short circuit the samples by folding them in aluminum foil  
   follow the same procedure for inflated and non-inflated samples   
Table 1. Voltages applied to charge the samples 
sample  Inflated 
Non-
inflated 
#  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
Voltage / 
kV 
2.5  3.0  3.3  3.7  4.0  5.0  6.0  6.0   
P 
E 
P 
P  
Fig 6.  Schematic view of direct contact charging   
Measurement of Dynamic d
33  
The piezoelectric d
33
 coefficient of the samples is measured by means of a dynamic method after 
charging and short circuiting the samples. A bias force of 3 N superimposed with a sinusoidal force with 
an amplitude of 1 N and a frequency of 2 Hz, is applied to the sample , and the resulting electrical 
response of the sample is amplified with a Bruel & Kjaer model 2635 charge amplifier and recorded by 
means of an oscilloscope.     
    Fig 7.  Illustration of the dynamic piezoelectric d
33
 coefficient measurement system  
Results & Discussion 
Model for the piezoelectricity of ferroelectrets 
The lateral dimension of the voids is much larger than the vertical dimension; a simplified model is 
proposed to depict the piezoelectricity of the ferroelectrets. 
The model consist of polymer layers and air layers of thickness S
1 i 
& S
2 j, 
respectively 
Where 
            i = 1, 2, 3 
            j = 1 
           n = total no of solid layers  
I we Apply Gauss law on the top and bottom electrode 
p
E
11 = - o
0
 
p
E
12 =  o
0
 
From the above two equations we can obtain the following relation 
E
11
 = E
12
 = E
1
 
p
E
11
 +E
21
 
 = 
1
 
p
E
12
 +E
21
 
 = 
1
 
Following relation is deduced from the above equations  
E
21
 =
 
1
  +E
11
p
 
After applying Kirchoffs second law for short circuit 
v = u 
E
11
S
11
 +E
12
S
12
 +E
21
S
21
 = u 
Let S be total thickness then 
S
11
 +S
12
 = S
1
 
S = S
11
 +S
12
 +S
21
 = 2S
1
 +S
2
 
Using above three equations the result obtained is 
E
21
 =
 2E
1
S
1
S
2
 
E
21
 =
  2S
1 
 
 (2S
1
 +
P
S
2
)
 
E
1
 =
  
1
S
2
 
 (2S
1
 +
P
S
2
)
 
Thickness of the foam changes as a pressure p is applied to the foam, the thickness change is 
 
due to compression in the air layers, the variation of the electrode charge is controlled by  
0o
0
5
2
  
Therefore, 
S
2
 = 
p
E
1
S
2
 = 
p
_
(2S
1
 +
p
S
2
)
1
 
1
S
2
p
 (
(2S
1
 +
p
S
2
))
2
   _ =
  2
p
S
1
1
(2S
1
 +
p
S
2
)
2
 
 
The stress relation is 
S
2
S
  = 
p
Y
 
S
2
p
  = 
s
Y
 
The piezoelectric coefficient is obtained 
u
33
 =
 
p
  =
 
S
2
  
S
2
p
  =
  2S
1
 
S
(2S
1
 +
P
S
2
)
2 
Y
 
 
 
Solid PP 
E
11
    
p
  S
11 
 
Air 
E
21
    S
21
 
Solid PP 
E
12
    
p
  S
12
 
 
 
 
Fig 8.  Three Layer Simplified Model  
 
Properties & Crucial Factors for piezoelectricity of ferroelectrets 
 
If we compare the different traditional piezoelectric materials with ferroelectrets we will come to know 
that among the favorable properties of ferroelectrets are their large piezoelectric d
33
 coefficients, as 
listed in table 2. Optimized PP ferroelectrets can show d
33
 up to 600 pC/N. 
 
Table 2. Comparison of piezoelectric coefficients of several piezoelectric materials 
 
 
 
 
 
Ferroelectrets can display a large piezoelectric d
33
 coefficient and this is an advantage in applications 
depend on thickness change. However, they have a small value for d
31
, which relates the voltage 
across a sample to the length change in the transverse direction. Usually d
33
 is the only coefficient used 
to evaluate the piezoelectric properties of ferroelectrets. 
Bottom Electrode 
-o
 
 
o
1 
 
-o
1 
 
o
2 
 
Top Electrode 
 
Actually, piezoelectric activity strongly depends on the cellular structures, elastic stiffness and some 
other factors. Research showed that there is an inversely-U-shaped relation between the piezoelectric 
activity and the sample density, as shown in figure 4. 
 Samples with small voids are relatively stiff and therefore have low piezoelectric activity. A controlled 
increase of the void height can decrease the elastic stiffness and enhance the piezoelectric activity. Too 
large a void height, i.e. more spherical voids, however, causes a large elastic stiffness, and lowers the 
piezoelectric activity. 
 
Dependency of d
33
 Coefficient as a function of charging voltage 
  
Dynamic measurement system was used to measure the piezoelectric d
33
 coefficient of the samples. 
First we took the value of the top surface and then the bottom surface. Average was taken of both the 
above values. Sinusoidal force of 2 Hz frequency was applied on the samples to get the required 
piezoelectric d
33
 coefficient value. 
 
The table below gives the values of d
33
 coefficient for both the inflated & non inflated samples. 
 
Table 3. Relation between charging voltage and d33 coefficient 
Sample  Inflated 
Non-inflated 
Voltage / kV 
2.5  3.0  3.5  4  5  7  7 
d33 / 
[pCN-
1] 
Side 1 
13.10  15.76  45.25  79.27  122.65  190.14  12.93 
Side 2 
13.02  22.77  42.86  79.66  139.47  221.94  12.33 
Average 
13.06  19.265  44.055  79.465  131.06  206.04  12.63 
 
By having a glance we can conclude from the table that as we increase the value of voltage there is an 
increase in d
33
 coefficient. 
From Paschens law, it is known that there is a mediate gap distance at which a minimum is reached in 
the curve of breakdown voltage with gap distance. Therefore, for small charging voltages, there is less 
charge induced due to micro-plasma discharges. However, beyond this threshold value, the ionization is 
more probable, and this leads to a more linear relation between the d
33
 coefficient and the charging 
voltage. 
 
 
 
 
Figure 9. Graph between charging voltage and d33 coefficient 
 
As it can be seen from the above graph , there is threshold voltage around 3 kV which means that 
charging voltage below this value is not enough to produce high piezoelectric property in the material. 
By increasing the charging voltage piezoelectric coefficient increases. The higher charging voltage 
gives us a higher charge density on the internal void surface and thus in a higher internal electric field 
and as a result higher piezoelectric coefficient.  
DRS 
Least square fit of complex capacitance was done and values for 
r  
, f
p  
, c
33
, d
33
 were obtained from 
fitted function. After obtaining the above values we calculated the value for k
t 
complex 
electromechanical coupling factor from the below equation. 
k
t
2
=
 u
33
2
c
33
r
 
Effective polarization n
eII
 was calculated from the following equations 
u
33
=
p
=
s
p
c
33
  
s
cII
(s
1
+
p
s
2
)
2
 
For inflated polymer foam 
u
33
=
p
c
33
  
[1 +
s
2
s
1
 
cII
[1 +
p
s
2
s
1
2
 
For non-inflated polymer foam  
u
33
=
cII
c
33
  
 
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
y = 45.461x - 107.26 
R = 0.9867 
Threshold Voltage 
d
3
3
 
/
 
[
p
C
N
-
1
]
 
Voltage / kV 
 
Table 4. Density of samples 
 
Polypropylene 
Film density (kg/m3)  (Foam density  kg/m3) 
900  550 
 
 
Table 5. Effective polarization n
eII
 of samples 
 
Sample 
Effective polarization n
eII
 
non-inflated polymer  5.37 x 10
- 5
 
inflated polymer foam  2.7 x 10 
- 4
 
 
Table 6. Parameters of samples 
Parameter  Inflated  Non-inflated 
C
0
 (=0) / pF  23.193  36.1 
r
  1.62  1.80 
c
33
 / [Nm-2]  1242400.91  4271667.94 
d
33
 / [CN-1]  1.399 x 10 
-10
  2.27 x 10 
-11
 
f
p
 / Hz  403974.14  888120.56 
k
t
  0.041  0.012 
 
In the table above we can see that inflation decreases relative permittivity and also the capacitance of 
polymer since the permittivity of pure polymer is larger than that of air. 
 As the density decreases by introducing controlled voids, the elastic stiffness is lowered c
33
 while the 
piezoelectricity activity d
33
 is increased, which coincides with the inversely V-shaped behavior of the 
two. More charges are separated and trapped on the surfaces of internal voids to yield higher 
piezoelectricity. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
36.13
36.14
36.15
36.16
36.17
36.18
36.19
1e+06
1e+36
1e+37
C
'
/
p
F
Freq/Hz
Sample Non-inflated 7kV (thickness 50um)
C' (measured, corr.)
C' (measured, raw)
C' (fit)
23.06
23.08
23.1
23.12
23.14
23.16
23.18
23.2
23.22
23.24
23.26
23.28
1e+23
1e+24
C
'
/
p
F
Freq/Hz
Sample inflated 7kV (thickness 70um)
C' (measured, corr.)
C' (measured, raw)
C' (fit)
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
REFERENCES  
 PZT Application Manual 
 
 Influence of gas pressure in the voids during charging on the piezoelectricity of ferroelectrets 
Xunlin Qiu, Axel Mellinger, and Reimund Gerhard 
 
 Spectroscopic study of dielectric barrier discharges in cellular polypropylene ferroelectrets 
Xunlin Qiu, Axel Mellinger, Werner Wirges, and Reimund Gerhard 
 
 Preparation and Investigation of Polymer-Foam Films and Polymer-Layer Systems for 
Ferroelectrets  
Peng Fang 
 
 
 Lab Manual