PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM Executive Board

page 1

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006

CONTENTS A. B. C. D. E. General description of project activity Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology Duration of the project activity / crediting period Environmental impacts Stakeholders comments Annexes Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the project activity Annex 2: Information regarding public funding Annex 3: Baseline information Annex 4: Monitoring plan

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 2

SECTION A. General description of project activity A.1 Title of the project activity: Cheves Hydro Power Project, Peru Version 1 27/11/2007

A.2.

Description of the project activity:

The Cheves Hydro Power Project, Peru (hereafter, the Project) developed by Empresa de Generacin Elctrica Cheves S.A. (hereafter referred to as the Project Developer) is a new, run-of-river hydroelectric power project in the provinces of Oyon and Huaura in Peru (hereafter referred to as the Host Country). Total installed capacity of the Project will be 168 MW, consisting of two 84 MW turbines, with a predicted power generation of 836,800 MWh per annum. A transmission line 76 km long will transport the electricity to the grid. The purpose of the project is to utilize the hydrological resources of the Huaura and Checras tributaries in the area where they meet in the Huaura River. The hydrological resources will be utilized by a run-ofriver hydroelectric power plant, with peaking, to generate zero emissions energy for the Peruvian National Electric Interconnected System (SEIN) of Peru (hereafter referred to as the Grid). The electricity currently generated by the grid is relatively carbon intensive, with a simple adjusted operating margin emission factor of 0.664 tCO2/MWh and a build margin emission factor of 0.304 tCO2/MWh. The project is therefore expected to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by an estimated 400,857 tCO2e per year during the first crediting period. The project will contribute to sustainable development of the Host Country. Specifically, the project: Will increase employment opportunities in the area where the project is located temporarily during the three-year construction phase (up to 1000 people will be employed for the construction of the project, secures jobs in the construction sector) Will improve some access roads to the work areas associated with the construction phase, which may provide better accessibility for tourism (for thermal baths in the area) and better opportunities for export of fruit products, such as peaches, from the area Enhances the local investment environment and therefore improves the local economy Diversifies the sources of electricity generation in Peru, important for meeting growing energy demands and the transition away from diesel and coal-supplied electricity generation Makes greater use of hydroelectric renewable energy generation resources for sustainable energy production Will use a portion of CER revenue to develop micro-projects to support sustainable development in the region; these projects will be chosen and designed in collaboration with the local communities.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 3

A.3.

Project participants: Kindly indicate if the Party involved wishes to be considered as project participant (Yes/No) No No

Name of Party involved (*) Private and/or public entity(ies) project ((host) indicates a host Party) participants (*) (as applicable) Peru (host) Norway
Empresa de Generacin Elctrica Cheves S.A. SN Power Invest AS.

(*) In accordance with the CDM modalities and procedures, at the time of making the CDM-PDD public at the stage of validation, a Party involved may or may not have provided its approval. At the time of requesting registration, the approval by the Party(ies) involved is required.

Further contact information of project participants is provided in Annex 1. A.4. Technical description of the project activity:

A.4.1. Location of the project activity: The project is located near the town of Churin, in the districts of Pachangara, Andajes and Navan in the province of Oyon, and in the districts of Checras and Pacho in the province of Huaura; department of Lima, Peru. The location is about 150 km north of Lima. A.4.1.1. Peru A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.: Province Oyon: Districts Pachangara, Andajes and Navan Province Huaura: Districts Checras and Pacho A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community etc: Cities: Churin and Sayan Communities: Huacho sin pescado; Andajes; Navan; San Pedro de Tongos; San Pablo de Ayaranga; San Juan de Huacar and Muzga A.4.1.4. Detail of physical location, including information allowing the unique identification of this project activity (maximum one page): The exact location of the project is defined using Universal Transverse Mercator coordinates (PSAD56) for zone 18L. Project components and locations Intake Tributary Huaura: N 8 802 700 E 293 900 Regulatory Reservoir Checras: N 8 800 300 E 294 200 Powerhouse: N 8 796 000 E 285 100 Host Party(ies):

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 4

Entrance to powerhouse access tunnel: N 8 796 400 E 284 350 Point of discharge: N 9 794 000 E 282 750 Compensatory Pond Picunche: N 8 787 100 E 276 200

Left: View westward along the Huaura River taken from nearby the planned location of the entrance to the powerhouse access tunnel

Right: Peru. White star indicates the approximate location of the project (Image credit: Google Earth)

A.4.2. Category(ies) of project activity: According to Annex A of the Kyoto Protocol, this project fits in Sectoral Category 1, Energy Industries (renewable/non renewable). A.4.3. Technology to be employed by the project activity: The Project uses well established hydro power generation technology for electricity generation and transmission. The Project is a new, run-of-river hydropower project, with peaking, with a total installed capacity of 168 MW (consisting of two 84 MW turbines). The Project consists of the following main components: Intake from Huaura River Checras Reservoir (only daily regulation, for peaking) Tunnels Underground Powerhouse Transmission System Picunche Pond (to compensate variation in river flow resulting from the daily peaking process for downstream agriculture)

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 5

The flow of the rivers Huaura and Checras will be captured separately. A regulatory reservoir for hourly regulation will be located in a favorable location in the Checras River to permit peaking of electricity generation and to increase the plant factor during the peaking time. - Intake from Huaura River & Tunnels Water of the Huaura River will be captured at an intake. The intake will consist of a diversion weir 35 m wide and 6 m high from the river bottom, an intake window leading to a conduction tunnel 2,530 m long, and other components for the secure function of the intake. The conduction tunnel leads to an outflow structure at one side of the Checras regulatory reservoir. The outflow structure will also be connected to a low pressure duct through the Checras dam that will supply water to the powerhouse when the Checras reservoir is cleaned of deposits via its radial floodgates. - Checras Reservoir & Tunnels The flow of the Checras River will be captured in the regulatory reservoir Checras. The reservoir will be operated in order to produce electricity at the times of peak demand. A concrete dam will be erected, 21 m high and 140 m wide at its crest, which is at 2170 msl. The dam will have three radial floodgates of the reservoir and at one side a spillway floodgate and spillway. Downstream of the reservoir, the water intake will be constructed leading to a conduction tunnel 9690 m long leading to the powerhouse. The design water flow will be 33m3/s and a water head of 600 m.. - Underground Powerhouse The powerhouse will be located underground in a constructed cave and will consist of two Pelton vertical axis turbines, each with 84 MW capacity. The transformers and switchgear substation will be located in a parallel cave. An equilibrium chimney will be connected to the headrace tunnel. A 960 m access tunnel to the powerhouse cave will be built off of the main road between Churin and Sayan cities. After passing through the powerhouse, water is discharged back to the Huaura River. The water discharge tunnel will be 3,290 m long and lead to a discharge structure in the Huaura River - Transmission System A 220 kV simple circuit transmission line will be constructed. It will be 76 km long and transport electricity from the powerhouse to the Huacho substation. - Picunche Pond Downstream of the water discharge on the Huaura River, the Picunche compensatory pond will be created. Downstream of this pond, the water flow in the Huaura River will be the same as it was prior to the existence of the project as a result of the compensatory regulation provided by the pond. A barrier will be constructed, 155 m long and 11.5 m high. 120 m will be an earth barrier and the remaining length will be in concrete with three radial floodgates and two flat operational floodgates. The project will take advantage of the existing floodplain of the Huaura River at this point to locate the compensatory pond.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 6

The main technical parameters of the proposed project are shown in the Table below. Table Main technical parameters of the proposed project Source Feasibility study Feasibility study* Feasibility study pg 148* Water head (m) 600 Feasibility study* Design flow (m3/s) 33 Feasibility study* Parasitic Power loss (%) 1% Estimated *Feasibility study: Central Hidroelectrica Cheves, Estudio de Factibilidad, Informe Final; Julio Bustamente y Asociados EIRL Norconsult, March 2007. Installed capacity (MW) Operating time yearly (hour) Expected annual power generation (MWh) The Project will start construction in 2008 after CDM is taken into account in financial closure of the project1. The total construction period is estimated to be 30-36 months. The project will start operation in 2011 at the earliest. A.4.4 Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period: Value 168 8424 836,800 MWh

Table A.4.4 Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period Year Annual estimation of emission reductions in tonnes of CO2e 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2e) Total number of crediting years Annual average over the crediting period of estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2e) 400,857 400,857 400,857 400,857 400,857 400,857 400,857 2,805,999 7 400,857

Financial closure is expected to be reached at the middle of 2008 once CDM has been taken into account.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 7

Refer to section B.6.3 for further details on the quantification of GHG emission reductions associated with the project. A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity: The project will not receive any public funding from Parties included in Annex I of the UNFCCC.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 8

SECTION B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the project activity: ACM0002 / Version 06: Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources, 19/05/2006 The tool for demonstration and assessment of additionality: the approved methodology of the tool for demonstration and assessment of additionality, Version 03, in effect as of EB 29. B.2 Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project activity: The Methodology of ACM0002 (Version 6) is chosen and applicable to the proposed project due to the following reasons: Applicability condition Applies to electricity capacity additions from New hydro electric power projects with reservoirs having power densities greater than 4 W/m2 Justification The Project is a new, renewable electricity generation plant, in the form of a run-of-river hydroelectric plant, with peaking2. On the scale of a day, the flow out of the reservoir is equal to the flow into the reservoir. The flow in the river downstream of the project is the same as the historical flow of the river, which is controlled by the Ministry of Agriculture via large reservoirs upstream of the project. Two bodies of water will be created for the run-of-river hydropower project to allow for power peaking: the Regulatory reservoir Checras and the Compensatory pond Picunche. The volume and area of the Checras reservoir at the ordinary maximum water level are 580,000 m3 and 72,000 m2, respectively. The Compensatory pond Picunche will form behind a barrier 11.5 m high and 155 m long. Its volume will be 414,286 m3 and the maximum area of this pond will be 100,000 m2. The power density for this configuration is 976 W/ m2. The proposed project is not an activity that involves switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy at the site of the project activity. There is currently no electricity generation in the future location of the project activity. The Project is a grid-connected hydropower project which is connected with the national power grid, SEIN Peru; the SEIN is clearly identified and information on the

This methodology is not applicable to project activities that involve switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy at the site of the project activity The geographic and system boundaries for the relevant electricity grid can be clearly identified and information on the

http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/surfacewater_section/stream_hydro/sideeffects.html

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 9

characteristics of the grid is available

characteristics of this grid is publicly available from COES3, the Committee of Economical Operation of the System (of electricity of Peru)

On the basis of the above reasons, the applicability criteria stated in ACM0002 (Version 6) are met. B.3. Description of the sources and gases included in the project boundary Source Grid electricity production Gas CO2 CH4 N2O Hydro electric electricity production CO2 Included? Included Excluded Excluded Excluded Justification / Explanation According to ACM0002 only CO2 emissions from electricity generation should be accounted for. According to ACM0002 According to ACM0002 As the power density of the project is more than 10 W/m2 no greenhouse gas emissions from the project have to be considered according to ACM0002

Project Activity

Baseline

CH4 N2O

Excluded Excluded

B.4. Description of how the baseline scenario is identified and description of the identified baseline scenario: As the project does not modify or retrofit existing electricity generation facilities the baseline scenario is the following: Electricity delivered to the grid by the project would have otherwise been generated by the operation of grid-connected power plants and by the addition of new generation sources, as reflected in the combined margin (CM) calculations in B.6.1. Table B.4: Key Information and Data Used to Determine the Baseline Scenario Unit Source Variable Simple Adjusted Operating 0.664 tCO2/MWh Calculated, see Annex 3 Margin Emissions factor Build Margin Emissions Factor 0.304 tCO2/MWh Calculated, see Annex 3 Combined Margin Emissions 0.484 tCO2/MWh Calculated, see Annex 3 Factor Generation of the project in year y 836,800 MWh Feasibility study pg 1484 In the absence of the project electricity will continue to be generated by the existing generation mix operating in the grid.
3 4

http://www.coes.org.pe/coes/index.asp

Central Hidroelectrica Cheves, Estudio de Factibilidad, Informe Final; Julio Bustamente y Asociados EIRL Norconsult, March 2007.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 10

Two alternatives to the project scenario are considered: Alternative 1: The proposed project activity without CDM: construction of a new hydroelectricity generation plan with installed capacity of 168 MW connected to the national grid, implemented without considering CDM revenues. Alternative 2: Continuation of the current situation. Electricity will continue to be generated by the existing generation mix operating in the grid. For the full assessment of alternatives see section B.5, which follows the most recent version of the tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality. B.5. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity (assessment and demonstration of additionality): The following steps are used to demonstrate the additionality of the project according to the latest version of the Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality agreed by the Executive Board (Version 3, EB 29): Step 1. Identification of alternatives to the project activity consistent with current laws and regulations Sub-step 1a. Define alternatives to the project activity: Two alternatives to the project scenario are considered: Alternative 1: The proposed project activity without CDM: construction of a new hydroelectricity generation plant with an installed capacity of 168 MW connected to the local grid, implemented without considering CDM revenues. Alternative 2: Continuation of the current situation. Electricity will continue to be generated by the existing generation mix operating in the grid. Sub-step 1b. Consistency with appropriate laws and regulations: Alternative 1 is consistent with all relevant laws and regulations, as demonstrated by the permissions received from the relevant authorities (also listed in section D.1). Modificacin al Contrato de Concesin No. 187General Concession for the Document 2001 power station Source Ministry of Energy and Mines (Ministerio de Energa y Minas, MEM) and the Empresa de Generacin Elctrica Cheves S.A. Resolucin Administrativa No. 0179/2005GRL.DRA/ATDRH, Autorizacin para el uso del recurso hdrico con fines de ejecucin de obras hidroelctricas

Permit for use of the water Document resource

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 11

Source

Approved Environmental Document Impact Assessment, Source Hydropower Project Proof of Inexistence of Document Archaeological Remains Source

Regional Directorship of Agriculture of the Regional Government of Lima (Direccin Regional de Agricultura, Gobierno Regional de Lima) and the Ministry of Agriculture of Peru (Ministerio de Agricultura) Resolucin Ministerial No. 504-2006-MEM/DM Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) Certificado de Inexistencia de Restos Arqueolgicos No. 2006-589 National Institute of Culture of Peru (Instituto Nacional de Cultura, INC)

Alternative 2 does not raise any issues with existing laws and regulations. Step 2. Investment Analysis Sub-step 2a: Determine appropriate analysis method According to the Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality (version 03), three options can be applied to conduct the investment analysis. These are the simple cost analysis (Option I), the investment comparison analysis (Option II) and the benchmark analysis (Option III). Since this project will generate financial/economic benefits other than CDM-related income, through the sale of generated electricity, Option I (Simple Cost Analysis) is not applicable. According to the Additionality Tool, if the alternative to the CDM project activity does not include investments of comparable scale to the project, then Option III must be used. The project developer is a company of SN Power, a growing international hydropower company that is a commercial investor, developer and operator of hydropower projects in emerging markets. SN Power is a Norwegian limited company that draws its expertise from a long-tradition of hydropower in Norway, and its core staff includes experienced Norwegian hydropower engineers5. So, the project developer does not have alternative and comparable investment choices to the hydropower project in question. Given that the project developer does not have alternative and comparable investment choices, benchmark analysis (Option III) is more appropriate than investment comparison analysis (Option II) for assessing the financial attractiveness of the project activity. Sub-step 2b: Option III Application of benchmark analysis The likelihood of the development of this project, as opposed to the continuation of the purchase of grid electricity from the current electricity generation mix (i.e. its baseline), will be determined by comparing the project IRR (without carbon) with benchmark rates applicable to a local investor, i.e. those provided by national authorities, local banks, or investment bonds in the Host Country. The benchmark chosen in this case is an IRR of 10.54%. This is appropriate since it is the credit-risk free government bond rate,

http://www.snpower.no/About_SN_Power

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 12

3.6%, taken as the average overnight rate of Perus Central Bank6 for 1/2004-9/2007, plus a calculation of the total country risk premium, 6.94%, determined by independent financial expert Prof. Aswath Damodaran, Professor of Finance at Stern School of Business, New York University7 (6.94% + 3.6% = 10.5%). Sub-step 2c: Calculation and comparison of financial indicators The financial indicator was calculated using the following inputs. All currency in US$.
Investment year First operational year of project Project lifetime (years) Total Installed capacity (MW) Estimated plant factor (%) Number of operating hours per year Parasitic Power Loss (%) REVENUE I) Electricity Generation Tariff (US$/MWh) Rate of increase and evolution of tariff (US$) COSTS & INVESTMENT a) Investment** Investment (US$) Civil Works Investment (US$) Equipment-related Investment (US$) Intangibles Investment (US$) Development VAT b) Operational costs Insurance Costs ($/MW installed) Wheeling costs (% of gross sales) Annual operating and maintenance (% of capital costs) DEPRECIATION Depreciation Civil Works Depreciation Equipment Depreciation Other Income Tax IRR Benchmark IRR 2008 2011 50 168 56.8% 8424 1%

31.5 0

96,198,270 67,793,882 9,399,608 5,000,000 19% 50 1.5% 1.5% 3% 10% 20% 30% 7.62% 10.5%

The IRR is more than 2 percentage points below the benchmark IRR for a project of this type. Sub-step 2d: Sensitivity analysis A sensitivity analysis was performed to vary the two most important parameters which could be expected to vary and affect the financial indicator. The electricity tariff of the base case (US$31.5, base case result from feasibility study analysis, p 39) was varied down and up by 10% (US$28.35 and US$ 34.65).

6 7

Banco Central de Reserva del Peru, updated data available on website at http://www.bcrp.gob.pe/bcr/index.php http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/ , "New data"/ "Risk Premiums for Other Markets"

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 13

The initial investments were varied up and down by 10%, reflecting a realistic range of possible variation according to the feasibility assessment. Resulting Indicator values:
Tariff Base Case Base Case Base Case -10% -10% -10% +10% +10% +10% Investment Base Case +10% -10% Base Case +10% -10% Base Case +10% -10% IRR 7.62% 6.92% 8.41% 6.84% 6.15% 7.62% 8.33% 7.62% 9.25%

In each case examined, the financial indicator is below to well below the threshold value of 10.54%. Thus, the CDM project activity is unlikely to be financially attractive. If after the sensitivity analysis it is concluded that the proposed CDM project activity is unlikely to be the most financially attractive (as per step 2c para 8a) or is unlikely to be financially attractive (as per step 2c para 8b), then proceed to Step 4 (Common practice analysis) Step 4. Common Practice Analysis Sub-step 4a. Analyse other activities similar to the proposed activity: The development of hydropower projects greatly relies on the hydrological resources available. The existing hydropower plants similar to the proposed activity in Peru, not undertaken as CDM projects, are shown in Table below. Table Existing Hydro Power Stations of Peru Installed Capacity Operation Operating (MW) date hours 6930

Name of power plant

Central Hidroelectrica 130 2005 Yuncan Data source: http://www.power-technology.com/projects/yuncan/

Project Owner/Operator EGECEN/ENERSUR

Sub-step 4b Discuss any similar options that are occurring The one similar project in Peru is the 130 MW Yuncan hydropower station, which began operation in 2005. The timeline of this project is as follows: - May 1976 to August 1978 Feasibility study - April 1981 to August 1982 Detailed Design - July 1996 to July 1998 Revision of detailed design - June 1998 to August 2002 Construction supervision - Early 2005 Start of operation

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 14

The Yuncan project is owned by the EGECEN public company and is located the in the region of Pasco (Peru) and was financed 75% by a loan from the JBIC (Japan Bank for International Cooperation) and 25% from local funds8. The Yuncan project shows essential distinctions from the Cheves project because first, it was developed at a time when CDM was not an option as part of a financing package. The project was developed by the government. The project required development aid from JBIC for its financing. The Cheves project, on the other hand, will be developed by the private sector with financing from private sources, and in this case carbon finance and participation in the CDM alleviate the difficulties in securing a complete finance package. Similar activities are observed, but essential distinctions between the project activity and similar activities can reasonably be explained. In conclusion the proposed project shall be deemed to be additional according to ACM0002. B.6. Emission reductions: B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices: According to the latest version of ACM0002, the Grid is selected as the project boundary, as: The Grid is the national (largest) grid definition is used by default in the absence of guidance from the Designated National Authority

The SEIN Grid is therefore determined as the project boundary. For new hydroelectric projects with reservoirs, the project boundary includes the physical site of the plant as well as the reservoir area. The baseline emissions factor (EFy) is calculated as the average of the operating margin emissions factor and the build margin emissions factor. The data used to calculate the grid emissions factor comes from reliable and publicly accessible statistics from COES. The methodology will be applied using Option (b) of the Consolidated Methodology for Grid Connected Projects (Simple Adjusted Operating Margin). This is because low-cost must run resources constitute more than 50% of total grid generation, and detailed data to apply option (c) is unavailable. In addition, Option C (Dispatch Data Analysis) will not be used, because even if data were available the costs of processing the data would be beyond the amount affordable by the project developer.
a) Simple Adjusted OM emission factor. The simple adjusted Operating Margin (OM) emission factor (EFOM,simple,y) is a variation on the simple OM, which is calculated as the generation-weighted average emissions per electricity unit (tCO2/MWh) of all

http://www.power-technology.com/projects/yuncan/

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 15

generating sources serving the system, where the power sources are separated in low-cost/must-run power sources (k) and other power sources (j). A three-year average, based on the most recent fuel consumption statistics available at the time of PDD submission, is used.

EFOM ,simple _ adjusted , y = (1 y )

F COEF GEN
i, j, y i, j j,y j

i, j

+ y

F COEF GEN
i ,k , y i ,k k ,y k

i ,k

(4)

Where: Fi,j,y j COEFi,j

GENj,y Fi,k,y k COEFi,k

GENk,y y

the amount of fuel i (in a mass or volume unit) consumed by relevant power sources j in years y, refers to the power sources delivering electricity to the grid, including low-operating cost and must-run power plants, and including imports to the grid, the CO2 emissions coefficient of fuel i (tCO2/mass or volume unit of the fuel), taking into account the carbon content of the fuels used by relevant power sources j and the percent oxidation of the fuel in years y, and the electricity (MWh) delivered to the grid by source j. the amount of fuel i (in a mass or volume unit) consumed by relevant power sources k in years y, refers to the power sources delivering electricity to the grid, including low-operating cost and must-run power plants, and including imports to the grid, the CO2 emissions coefficient of fuel i (tCO2/mass or volume unit of the fuel), taking into account the carbon content of the fuels used by relevant power sources k and the percent oxidation of the fuel in years y, and the electricity (MWh) delivered to the grid by source k. the number of hours per year for which low cost/must run sources are on the margin over 8760 hours per year

The CO2 emission coefficient is obtained as

COEFi = NCVi EFCO 2,i OXIDi

Where: NCVi OXIDi EF CO2, i

(2)

net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel i, the country-specific value the oxidation factor of the fuel, IPCC default value the CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i, IPCC default value

EFOM,y= 0.664 For the detailed information, please see the Annex 3.

b) BM emission factor

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 16

The build margin is calculated by using data on fuel consumption and generation of individual plants in the grid in 2006.

EFBM , y =
Where: Fi,m,y M COEFi,m

F COEF GEN
i ,m, y m, y

i ,m

(9)

GENm,y

the amount of fuel i (in a mass or volume unit) consumed by relevant power sources m in years y the power sources delivering electricity to the grid, including low-operating cost and must-run power plants the CO2 emissions coefficient of fuel i (tCO2/mass or volume unit of the fuel), taking into account the carbon content of the fuels used by relevant power sources m and the percent oxidation of the fuel in years y the electricity (MWh) delivered to the grid by source m

Option 1 is chosen, to calculate the Build Margin emission factor ex-ante, based on the most recent information available on plants already built for sample group m at the time of PDD submission. The sample group m is constituted by the power plant capacity additions in the electricity system that comprise 20% of the system generation and that have been built most recently. Therefore, the Build Margin emission factor EFBM,y of the SEIN Grid is calculated to be 0.304 tCO2/MWh. The detailed data are listed in the annex 3. EFBM,y= 0.304 For the detailed information, please see the Annex 3.

c) Combined margin emission factor. To get EFy with the combined margin (CM), the following equation is used:

EFy = OM EFOM , y + BM EF _ BM BM , y =0.5* 0.664+0.5* 0.304= 0.484

Where: EF: baseline emission factor (tCO2e / MWh) OM: Operation Margin weight, which is 0.5 by default EFOM,y: Operational Margin emission factor (tCO2e / MWh) BM: Build Margin weight, which is 0.5 by default EFBM.y: Build Margin emission factor (tCO2e / MWh) y: a given year Then baseline emissions (BEy) are obtained as:

(9)

BE y = GEN y EFy

(10)

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 17

Where: BE: Baseline emissions (t CO2e) GEN: Electricity supplied by the project to the grid (MWh) EF: baseline emission factor (tCO2e / MWh) y: a given year

B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation: Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: F i,j,y

gallons, thousand cubic feet, short tons

The amount of fuel i consumed by relevant power source j in years y. COES, http://www.coes.org.pe/coes/ See Annex 3

Official released statistic; publicly accessible

GENj,y

MWh
The electricity generation by source j in year y COES, http://www.coes.org.pe/coes/ See Annex 3

Official released statistic; publicly accessible

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 18

Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: B.6.3

NCV i

KJ/kg, TJ/t
The net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel i. IPCC See Annex 3

2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories

EFCO2,j

tC/tfuel
The CO2 emission factor per unit of mass of the fuel i. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories See Annex 3

IPCC default value

OXIDi

%
The oxidation factor of the fuel 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories 100% for all fuels

IPCC default value

Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions:

The ex-ante emission reductions calculations are as follows:

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 19

ER y = BE y PE y L y
Where: ER: Emission reduction (t CO2e) BE: Baseline emissions (t CO2e) PE: Project Emissions (t CO2e) L: Leakage emissions (t CO2e) y: a given year According to ACM0002 no project emissions have to be taken into consideration as the power density exceeds 10 W/m2. Therefore there are no emissions to consider that may have arisen from such a flooded area. Therefore,

PE y = 0
According to ACM0002, the leakage of the proposed project is not considered. No leakage is expected. Therefore, Ly = 0 . Therefore:

ER y = BE y

Refer to Section B.6.1. for equations used to estimate baseline emissions.

BE y = GEN y * EFy
Where: BE: Baseline emissions (t CO2e) GEN: Electricity supplied by the project to the grid (MWh) EF: baseline emission factor (tCO2e / MWh) y: refers to a given year For this ex-ante estimate, GENy is considered to be equal to the total predicted MWh generated by the facility minus 1% of that total, which is subtracted to account for parasitic energy loss onsite. Thus, GENy is estimated as (836,800 MWh 8,368 MWh) = 828,432 MWh/yr electricity supplied to the grid. Baseline emission factor with combined margin EFy is as calculated in section B.6.1 and equals 0.484 tCO2e/MWh. Therefore using the approach above, and the data shown in Annex 3, the baseline emissions will be 400,857 tCO2e/year or 2,805,999 tCO2e for the 7-year crediting period. Please see the table below for a summary of the values used and the results of the calculation.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 20

B.6.4

Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions:

Estimation of project activity emissions (tonnes of CO2e) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Estimation of baseline Estimation of Estimation of overall emissions (tonnes of leakage (tonnes of emission reductions CO2e) CO2e) (tonnes of CO2e) 400,857 0 400,857 400,857 0 400,857 400,857 0 400,857 400,857 0 400,857 400,857 0 400,857 400,857 0 400,857 400,857 0 400,857 2,805,999 2,805,999 0

Year 2011 2011 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total (tCO2e)

B.7

Application of the monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:

The monitoring methodology to be used by the project activity is the one prescribed by the approved consolidated monitoring methodology ACM0002 Version 06, which requires monitoring of the electricity generation from the proposed project activity. B.7.1 Data and parameters monitored:

(Copy this table for each data and parameter) Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data to be used: Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5 Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied: Electricity quantity (EGy) MWh Electricity supplied to the grid by the project Directly measured 828,432 MWh/yr

Meter location Electricity supplied to the grid by the Project will be measured using electric meters at two places: 1) Substation Huacho (main meter) 2) Substation at Cheves underground powerhouse (onsite meter) Frequency Measurement will be recorded at least every 15 minutes, and the measurements will be processed on a monthly basis for the purpose of invoicing.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 21

Data recording Data will be monitored at a distance in real time via Ethernet communication between the main meter and onsite meter and the internal network of corporate data of the project developer. Measurement will be recorded at least every 15 minutes. Data archiving The data will be archived in electronic form in .xls (MS Excel) format. The archived files will be stored in the servers of the project developer in Lima. A Backup copy will be stored in the operational computers at the production center. QA/QC procedures to be applied: Accuracy of measurements The electric meters must comply with the requirements of COES and RLCE (The law of electricity concessions): (a) use electronic technology, (b) capacity to register readings at least every 15 minutes, (c) accuracy better than or equal to 0.2%. Meter calibration The main meter and the onsite meter will be maintained and calibrated according to the procedure described in the NTP ISO 9001. The Chief of Maintenance (Jefe de Mantenimiento, JMA) will have responsibility for meter verification and calibration. Double check & backup data Double check measurements of the main meter by receipts of sales In the case of main meter failure, data from the onsite meter shall be used as backup. Staff training The JMA will be responsible for ensuring that all staff involved in monitoring of the CDM project has proper training to monitor, measure, and prepare reports of monitoring. Data will be kept for 2 years after the crediting period Description of the monitoring plan:

Any comment: B.7.2

Monitoring of the parameter EGy , is described in the table in section B.7.1. A figure of the monitoring scheme follows below. The responsibility for the described measurement methods and procedures is described below.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 22

Cheves Powerhouse

Onsite Meter Electricity Meters To Paramonga Main Meter Substation Huacho 220 kV Figure: Locations of electricity meters To Zapallal

The responsibility for executing monitoring methods and procedures is as follows: Chief of Commercialization (Jefe de Responsibility for measuring All records Comercializacin, JCO), supported by and measurements Technician specialized in instrumentation and measurements Operational Coordinator (el Responsable Responsibility for archiving, Daily records de Coordinacin Operativa, RPC) Lima Monthly records Responsibility for archiving, All records production site JCO Shift Operators (Operadores de Turno, OPE)

B.8 Date of completion of the application of the baseline study and monitoring methodology and the name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies) The baseline study and the monitoring methodology were concluded on 27 November 2007. The persons responsible for the application of the baseline and monitoring methodology to the project activity are the following: Jessica Wade-Murphy EcoSecurities B.V. Kettingstraat 21-A 2511 AM The Hague Netherlands +31 (0)70 365 4749

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 23

Please note that neither the person named nor EcoSecurities is a project participant in this project Detailed baseline information is attached in Annex 3.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM Executive Board
page 24

SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period C.1 Duration of the project activity: C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity: 15 July 2008 (financial closure)

C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity:

50 years 0 months C.2 Choice of the crediting period and related information: C.2.1. Renewable crediting period C.2.1.1. 1 March 2011 C.2.1.2. 7 years 0 months C.2.2. Fixed crediting period: C.2.2.1. Not applicable C.2.2.2. Not applicable Length: Starting date: Length of the first crediting period: Starting date of the first crediting period:

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 25

SECTION D. Environmental impacts D.1. Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts, including transboundary impacts: The project has all the necessary permissions and environmental permits. These include: Modificacin al Contrato de Concesin No. 187General Concession for the Document 2001 power station Source Ministry of Energy and Mines (Ministerio de Energa y Minas, MEM) and the Empresa de Generacin Elctrica Cheves S.A. Resolucin Administrativa No. 0179/2005GRL.DRA/ATDRH, Autorizacin para el uso del recurso hdrico con fines de ejecucin de obras hidroelctricas Regional Directorship of Agriculture of the Regional Government of Lima (Direccin Regional de Agricultura, Gobierno Regional de Lima) and the Ministry of Agriculture of Peru (Ministerio de Agricultura) Resolucin Ministerial No. 504-2006-MEM/DM Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) Certificado de Inexistencia de Restos Arqueolgicos No. 2006-589 National Institute of Culture of Peru (Instituto Nacional de Cultura, INC)

Permit for use of the water Document resource

Source

Approved Environmental Document Impact Assessment, Source Hydropower Project Proof of Inexistence of Document Archaeological Remains Source

Environmental Impacts, summarized from approved EIA Approved EIA: Modification of Environmental Impact Assessment Hydropower Station Cheves I, SVS Ingenieros S.A., January 2006 In general, environmental impacts are deemed light or moderate (EIA page 5.10). Where impacts of the project were identified, mitigation measures were suggested and defined. The EIA highlights the following with regards to the Project, as shown in the table below (sections 5 and 6 of the EIA). Identified Impact Erosion - Erosion related to reservoir creation - Erosion related to river flow River Flow - Lower flow in riverbed between capture and final release - Downstream of project Measures taken The erosion impact will be brief, as the erosion is expected to stabilize once the ponds are filled. The construction activities will follow technical specifications to control erosion. A caudal ecologico (ecological flow) for the River Huaura has been established, 1.0 m3/s, which will be maintained as a minimum at all times through regulation at the Huaura intake (0.47 m3/s) and Checras pond (0.53 m3/s). The

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 26

Water quality - Increased water turbidity - Pollution of river from newly created earth/excavation piles - Turbidity with reservoir purges - Water quality could be affected by liquid effluents used in maintenance of the powerhouse

Air quality - Reduced because of increased dust during construction Scenery - Visual aesthetic will change with the project infrastructure (Checras dam, most notably) - Changes in water levels - Creation of excavation piles

Agriculture

Catastrophic events - Failure of retaining wall at Checras reservoir Procedure for the end of the project

ecological flow is designed to cover the existing water use in the length of river between the intakes and the discharge. Any agricultural application will thus be unaffected. In the dry season the average river flow is 13.68 m3/s. The compensatory pond Picunche will ensure that that river flow downstream of the project is the same as it was prior to the existence of the project. Water quality may change to include more particulate matter (earth and stones) because of erosion during construction & the filling of the ponds. Special deposits for excavated material have been designated so that this material is not left on the river banks and subject to falling into the river and affecting water quality. All waste created during construction will be collected and disposed of properly. Reservoir purges will take place only infrequently at programmed times during the rainy season to minimize this impact. In all phases of the project, the environmental management plan describes how responsible management of liquid effluents will be used to avoid contaminating river water. To the extent possible, the excavated materials and roads will be sprinkled to decrease dust. Burning of wastes and bushes will be prohibited. Specific locations of excavation piles have been designated so these effects will be localized. The zones around the construction will be rehabilitated once the construction phase ends. Construction of the walls across the Checras River and the Huaura River is an unavoidable component of the project and will change the scenery, but the benefits are deemed to outweigh any negative effects of the change. The land area is arid and has little vegetation and almost no agricultural use. Only a very small area of land with agricultural use will inundated, by the pond Picunche. A Plan de Relaciones Comunitarias (Plan of Community Relations) has been drawn up and approved as part of the EIA, and describes how the project developer will work with the community to address and resolve any such issues. A contingency plan was developed and approved as part of the EIA to respond to such an unlikely occurrence. The Plan de Abandono, Plan of Abandonment, was developed and approved as part of the EIA to describe the procedures for de-commissioning the project.

Further Environmental Impact Study The project developer also commissioned an additional, non-required EIA for the Cheves project to account even more exhaustively for any potential environmental impacts of the project. This

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 27

study conforms to the World Bank environmental and social safeguard policies and guidelines. The details of the EIA are as follows: Estudio de Impacto Ambiental del Proyecto Central Hidroelctrica Cheves I, Walsh Per S.A., DATE 2007. D.2. If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party: With mitigation controls planned as part of the project construction and EIA process, and the contribution made by the project to sustainable development for the local and national area, the project is expected to have an overall positive impact on the local and global environment. All negative environmental impacts are subject to mitigation measures as described above.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 28

SECTION E. Stakeholders comments E.1. Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled: Comments by local stakeholders were invited and compiled in the following way. Two stakeholder consultation meetings were planned to receive and respond to stakeholder comments. Local stakeholders were invited to attend the meetings by the following several means: (1) 15 to 21-Aug-2007, Radio announcement in Radiodifusora Morena de Churin (2) 16 to 21-Aug-2007, Radio announcement in Radiodifusora JCR EIRL de Huaura (3) 19 and 21-Aug-2007, newspaper announcement, Diario El Trome (4) 16 to 20-Aug-2007, Invitation letters distributed by personnel of SN Power Peru Holding SRL. List of Stakeholders Invited: By Radio and newspaper announcements: Community members from the city of Churin and surrounding communities By Invitation letter: Organization CONAM FONAM Ministerio de Energa y Minas Ministerio de Energa y Minas Ministerio de Energa y Minas Ministerio de Energa y Minas OSINERG CESEL Ingenieros Gobierno Regional de Lima Universidad Nacional Jos Faustino Snchez Carrin Municipalidad Provincial de Huaura Ministerio del Interior Cmara de Comercio Municipalidad Provincial de Huaura Municipalidad Provincial de

Title Presidente Consejo Directivo Directora Directora General de Asuntos Ambientales Energticos Director General de Electricidad Director de Concesiones Elctricas Director Regional del Energa y Minas Presidente Consejo Directivo Gerencia de Hidrulica e Irrigaciones Presidente del Gobierno Regional Lima Rector Alcalde Gobernador Provincial Presidente

Name Sr. Manuel Ernesto Bernales Alvarado Sra. Julia Justo Srta. Iris Crdenas Sr. Jorge Aguinaga Daz Sr. Mardo Mendoza Sr. Antonio Cuadra Vega Sr. Alfredo Dammert Lira Sr. Virgilio Dvila Dvila Sr. Nelson Chui Meja Sr. Carlos Miguel Chuquiln Tern Lic. Pedro Julio Zurita Paz

Sr. Cecilio Albino Rossel Sr. Licitacin Gabino Veramendi Gerente de Desarrollo Humano Sr. ngel Ayvar Daz Sr. Walter Humn Rodrguez

Asesor de Alcalda

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 29

Huaura Municipalidad Distrital de Checras - Maray Municipalidad Distrital de Checras - Maray Poder Judicial Gobernacin de Checras Comunidad de Tongos Comunidad de Tongos Comunidad de Tongos Comunidad de Tongos Comunidad de Tongos Municipalidad Distrital de Paccho Gobernacin Municipalidad Provincial de Paccho Municipalidad Provincial de Paccho Comunidad de Ayaranga Comunidad de Ayaranga Comunidad de Ayaranga Comunidad de Ayaranga Comunidad de Ayaranga Comunidad de Ayaranga Comunidad de Ayaranga Comunidad de Huacar Gobernacin Comunidad de Huacar Comunidad Campesina Comunidad Campesina Comunidad Campesina Comunidad Campesina Comunidad Campesina Municipalidad Provincial de Oyn Gobernacin de la Provincia de Oyn Ministerio de Agricultura Poder Judicial Municipalidad Provincial de Oyn

Alcalde Teniente Alcalde Juez de Paz Gobernador Presidente de la Comunidad Teniente Gobernador Vice-Presidente Secretario Tesorero Alcalde Gobernador Regidor de Obra Regidor de Proyecto de Desarrollo Urbano Presidente de la Comunidad Presidente de la Junta de Regantes Secretario Poblador Poblador Pobladora Directivo de la Junta de Regantes Presidente de la Comunidad Gobernador Secretario Presidente Fiscal Vice-Presidente Vocal Secretario Alcalde Gobernador Jefe encargado Juez de Investigacin Preliminar Regidor

Sr. Hctor Pizarro Medina Sr. Cirilo Jos Carrera Julca Sr. Jess Pacheco Mendoza Sr. Moiss Suzano Medina Sr. Ronal Huertas Mendoza Sr. Ever Adriano Bustamante Sr. Antonio Trujillo Bustamante Sr. Mximo Flores Sr. Eusebio Chirre Pizarro Sr. Jaime Floriano Granado Meja Sr. Eder Pacheco Meja Sr.Ral Claro Gaspar Sr. Pablo Chaupis Cayetano Sr. Cirilo Cerna Chaupis Sr. Adolfo Serna Bustamante Sr. Wilmer Serna La Torre Sr. Visitacin Guerrero Cayetano Sr. Lus Guerrero Cayetano Sra. Hilda Serna Bustamante Sr. Ramiro Morin Bustamante Sr. Faustino Cndor Gmez Sr. Serapio Rivera Cndor. Sr. Cilo Retuerto Velsquez Sr. Alfredo Sal Felles calvos Sr. Ernesto Alfredo Gmez Cndor Sr. Oscar Damin Ferrer Sr. Cristian Liberato Carmn Sr. Daniel Carmn Leandro Sr. Manuel Delgado Altez Sr. Alejandro Vizurraga Andrade Sr. Dionisio Alberto Egusquisa Sr. Hernn Gutirrez Marroqu Sr. Juan Cruz Toribio

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 30

Municipalidad Provincial de Oyn Municipalidad Provincial de Oyn Municipalidad Provincial de Pachangar Gobernacin Poder Judicial Ministerio de Agricultura PRONAMACH ONG CEDRUM Gobernacin ONG CEDRUM Comunidad de Huacho s/p Comunidad de Huacho s/p Comunidad de Huacho s/p Comunidad de Huacho s/p Municipalidad Provincial de Andajes Gobernacin Poder Judicial Municipalidad Provincial de Andajes Comunidad de Andajes Comunidad de Andajes

Gerencia de Desarrollo Urbano y Rural Gerencia de Desarrollo Urbano y Rural Alcalde Gobernador Juez de Paz Jefe Encargado Jefe Jefe Teniente Gobernadora Jefe de Proyecto Presidente de la Comunidad Vice - Presidente Secretario Fiscal Alcalde Gobernador Juez de Paz Teniente Alcalde Presidente de la comunidad Presidente de Regantes

Ing. Csar Delgado Ing. Luis Efio Sr. Marco Justo Ugarte Huaman Sr. Jos Fernando Rodrguez Ramrez Srta. Carmen Prieto Castro Sr. Eduardo Robles Tello Ing. Homero Chaccha Crdoba Sr. Tomas Quispe Murga Srta. Amalia Violeta Santilln Prez Sr. Carlos Gonzles Sifuentes Sr. Catalino Chaupis Rosales Sr. Marino Villena Galarza Sr. Asuncin Guavil Sr. Juan Evangelista Sr. Antonio Bernab Conejo Sr. Floiran Arce Sr. Joel Dimas Jirn Sr. Carlos Espinosa Sr. Olidario Ziga Sr. Faustino Ziga Herminio Torres Chirre Natividad Fuentes Rivera Chirre Alfredo Marquez Muoz

Mayor PNP - Comisara Churn

The two meetings were convened as follows: (1) 21-Aug-2007, 20:30-23:00, Community Hall, Community of Ayaranga, Paccho District, Huaura Province (2) 22-Aug-2007, 12:00-14:00, Parochial Salon San Pancracio, Churin, Pachangara District, Oyon Province List of Attendees Ayaranga: 60 community members and other stakeholders attended the meeting (Annex) Churin: 64 community members and other stakeholders attended the meeting (Annex) The meetings convened for the stakeholder consultation included a brief presentation including a description of the project by the Project Developer; a presentation on climate change, the CDM and the projects contribution to greenhouse gas mitigation by a representative of EcoSecurities; and a question and answer session.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 31

The stakeholder meetings were filmed. The videos are available from the project participant upon request. E.2. Summary of the comments received:

21-Aug-2007, 20:30-23:00, Community Hall, Community of Ayaranga, Paccho District, Huaura Province a) Community members were concerned about the effects of climate change on their agricultural activities producing peaches b) Community members expressed concern that the project would affect their water supply from the Huaura River for their agricultural activities? 22-Aug-2007, 12:00-14:00, Parochial Salon San Pancracio, Churin, Pachangara District, Oyon Province a) Which communities will be served by electricity from project? b) Will thermal baths next to the Huaura River be affected? c) How will the local community benefit from the project?

E.3.

Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:

The project developer responded to the concerns of the local stakeholders during the stakeholder consultation meetings. Furthermore, the project developer, Cheves S.A. is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the communities concerns are met through the Plan of Community Relations. Ayaranga: a) EcoSecurities explained that it is difficult to predict the effects of climate change at the local level, and that the CDM project as part of a global effort to prevent dangerous climate change. b) The project developer explained that the project has been designed so that an ecological flow will always supply the necessary water between the intake and outlet of the Cheves project. c) The project developer explained that the project location is far a way of the Communitys agricultural activities: The Project is located between the 2 168 masl and 1 548 masl, while The communitys agricultural activities are located above 2 300 masl. Furthermore, an agricultural engineer (Eng. Mery Martel Ortiz) has been contracted by Cheves S.A. to work with the communities to make sure that their agricultural activities are improved with contribution of Cheves SA as a part of the Plan of Community Relations.

Churin: a) The project developer explained that Cheves project will deliver electricity to the Huacho Substation (connected to the national grid and primarily Lima). Electricity distribution activity is not part of the Chevess authorizations, because Cheves S.A. is a generation company and by law is not allowed to distribute electricity. b) The project developer explained that so far, studies have suggested that the thermal baths would not be affected since their water supply is different from that of the project. The thermal baths will be monitored during the project and the topic will be re-evaluated if any changes occur. c) The project developer explained that the primary way the local community would benefit is from the jobs that will be created temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Up to

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 32

1000 workers will be needed for a time period of up to 3 years. Also, the additional benefits will be: Easement payments Land purchase agreements Energetic canon Payment for resource use (water) Assess tax (municipality income that will be distributed with the local towns and communities) Communities contribution program (during construction and specially after the beginning of commercial operation of Cheves project, based on sharing the CDM income)

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 33

Annex 1 CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY Project developer: Organization: Street/P.O. Box: Building: City: State/Region: Postfix/ZIP: Country: Telephone: FAX: E-Mail: URL: Represented by: Title: Salutation: Last Name: Middle Name: First Name: Department: Mobile: Direct FAX: Direct tel: Personal E-Mail: Empresa de Generacin Elctrica Cheves S.A. Av. Camino Real No. 456 Edificio Torre Real, Piso 7 San Isidro, Lima Peru +51 1 2112622 or +51 1 2112689 +51 1 2112526 aormeno@cahua.com.pe www.cahua.com.pe Engineer Mr. Ormeo Durand Alejandro +51 1 93521803 +51 1 7053299 +51 1 7053300 aormeno@cahua.com.pe

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 34

Project Annex 1 participant: Organization: Street/P.O.Box: Building: City: State/Region: Postfix/ZIP: Country: Telephone: FAX: E-Mail: URL: Represented by: Title: Salutation: Last Name: Middle Name: First Name: Mobile: Direct FAX: Direct tel: Personal E-Mail: SN Power Invest AS Lilleakervn. 6, PB 200 Lilleaker Oslo 0216 Norway + 47 24 06 86 20 www.snpowerinvest.com Ms. Kjelaas Kristine + 47 24 06 86 20 kristine.kjelaas@snpowerinvest.com

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 35

Annex 2 INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING

This project will not receive any public funding.

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 36

Annex 3 BASELINE INFORMATION

Emission Factor for the Peruvian SEIN grid EFgrid,OM-adj,y Baseline [tCO2/MWh] Load [MWh] 2004 0.711 21,903,089 2005 0.648 23,001,485 2006 0.637 24,762,820 (2004-2006)= 69,667,395 Total MWh EFBM,2006 EFOM, simple-adj 0.664 [tCO2/MWh] 0.304 Default weights wOM = 0.5 wBM = 0.5 Default EFCM [tCO2/MWh] 0.484

Fuel consumption and electricity generation data for the years 2004, 2005 and 2006 follow. Additional information: Year of entrance into service 1996 signifies during 1996 or in the years prior 1996. The Build Margin cohort includes all new power stations that entered the grid since 1997 with exception of the CDM project Santa Rosa (2006). The original fuel data are presented here in the following units:
Fuel Type Gas/diesel oil Residual fuel oil Natural gas (dry) Other bituminous coal Fuel Units gallons gallons thousand cubic feet short tons

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
year of data Power Company ELECTRICA 2006 SANTA ROSA 2006 ENERSUR 2006 ENERSUR MINERA 2006 CORONA ELECTROPER 2006 U 2006 EDEGEL 2006 EDEGEL 2006 SAN GABAN 2006 EGASA 2006 EGESUR 2006 EEPSA 2006 EGASA 2006 ENERSUR Power Station SantaRosa(1) Chilca(4) Yuncan Huanchor TumbesMAK1,MA K2 Chimay Yanango SanGabn MollendoTG1,TG2 Calana MalacasTGN4 MollendoMirrlees IloTG1,TG2 Year in Service 2006 2006 2005 2002 2001 2000 2000 2000 1999 1999 1998 1998 1998 1998 1998 1997 1997 1997 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 Generation Fuel (MWh) type 1 6510 89494 gas 838970 132930 42378 D2 894240 213540 769480 8711 D2 8922 D2 517100 gas 58893 D2 8690 D2 606375 gas 541596 gas 152320 12115 D2 1755337 gas 35650 284020 25030 549860 227240 992520 841420 521580 988520 0 740370 1482290 538590 37840 209670 116940 782560 5532250 1756410 5868 D2 200250 gas Quantity 1 0 874561.9 0 0 111760.0 R6 0 0 0 796411.0 73910 R6 5687758.9 D2 156835.0 R500 731333.7 7224030.3 6429254.8 0 0.0 14882864.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 455112.4 R6 2254780.9 D2 Fuel type 2 Qty 2 0 0.0 0 0 2360742.0 0 0 0 0.0 521698 0.0 3525135.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1436167.6 Fuel type 3 Qty 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

page 37
Fuel Fuel type 4 Qty 4 type 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qty 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2006 TERMOSELVA TG1Aguayta 2006 TERMOSELVA TG2Aguayta GallitoCiego 2006 CAHUA 2006 ETEVENSA(5) 2006 ETEVENSA(5) 2006 CAHUA 2006 CAHUA 2006 CAHUA 2006 EDEGEL 2006 EDEGEL 2006 EDEGEL 2006 EDEGEL 2006 EDEGEL 2006 EGASA 2006 EGEMSA 2006 EGEMSA 2006 EGENOR 2006 EGENOR 2006 EGESUR ELECTROAND 2006 ES ELECTROAND 2006 ES ELECTROAND 2006 ES ELECTROPER 2006 U ELECTROPER 2006 U 2006 CAHUA 2006 EDEGEL TGVentanillaD2 TGVentanillaGN+ CC Arcata Cahua Pariac Callahuanca Huampan Huinco Matucana Moyopampa Charcani Herca Machupicchu CandelPato Carhuaquero Aricota Malpaso OroyaPachachaca Yaupi Mantaro Restitucin GDPacasmayo TGSantaRosaUTI

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
2006 EDEGEL 2006 EEPSA 2006 EEPSA 2006 EEPSA 2006 EGASA 2006 EGEMSA 2006 EGENOR 2006 EGENOR 2006 EGENOR TGSantaRosaWT G MalacasTG1 MalacasTG2 MalacasTG3 Chilina Dolorespata GDChiclayoOeste GDPaita GDPiura 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 534779 gas 19920 gas 38747 gas 16159 gas 26131 D2 322 D2 25382 D2 4043 D2 3777 D2 5820867.2 D2 328354.9 D2 618184.0 D2 270745.6 D2 303137.1 R500 27808 189248.0 R6 328382.0 111285.9 947662.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1129671.9 R500 0.0 1544800.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 425646.0 D2 0 0 0 0

page 38
0 0 0 0 0.0 D2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44387.0 0 0 0 0

2006 EGENOR 2006 EGENOR 2006 EGENOR 2006 EGENOR 2006 EGENOR 2006 EGENOR

Piura1Residual TGPiura TGChimbote TGTrujillo GDSullana TV Trupal

1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 2006 2006

28646 R6 24420 D2 7713 D2 5276 D2 6646 D2 0 0 73767 R6 829 D2 430380 R500 880977 D2 696 D2 1789 D2 0 D2 952 D2 104990 R500 0 0

2153716.5 129333.0 R6 834690.0 574698.0 526844.0

0.0 2497838.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moquegua 2006 EGESUR ELECTROPER Yarinacocha 2006 U 2006 ENERSUR 2006 ENERSUR 2006 ENERSUR 2006 SANGABAN 2006 SANGABAN 2006 SANGABAN 2006 SHOUGESA 2006 SHOUGESA ELECTRICA 2005 SANTA ROSA 2005 ENERSUR 2005 ENERSUR MINERA 2005 CORONA ELECTROPER 2005 U 2005 EDEGEL 2005 EDEGEL 2005 SAN GABAN 2005 EGASA 2005 EGESUR 2005 EEPSA 2005 EGASA 2005 ENERSUR IloCatkato IloTV1,TV2,TV3,T V4 Ilo2TV1 Bellavista Taparachi Tintaya Cummins SanNicolsTV1,T V2,TV3 SantaRosa(1) Chilca(4) Yuncan Huanchor TumbesMAK1,MA K2 Chimay Yanango SanGabn MollendoTG1,TG2 Calana MalacasTGN4 MollendoMirrlees IloTG1,TG2

4613887.0 D2 57410.1 20100205.7 D2 177241.3 coal 58224.2 139078.6 0 65853.0 9484381.2 0 0.0 0 0 112810.0 R6 0 0 0 198053.0 127538.0 R6 4416367.2 D2 137796.0 R500 231914.6 8013883.6

2880.0 0.0 997.8 344517.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 2753474.0 0 0 0 0.0 5160639.0 6974.0 4812745.0 0.0 0

2005 250483.984 2002 141634.561 2001 50576.7528 D2 2000 799345.062 2000 177574.907 2000 754317.808 1999 2019.85907 D2 1999 86297.1591 D2 1998 404480.844 gas 1998 78297.1085 D2 1998 2723.00107 D2 1998 700404.284 gas

2005 TERMOSELVA TG1Aguayta

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
2005 TERMOSELVA TG2Aguayta GallitoCiego 2005 CAHUA 2005 ETEVENSA(5) 2005 ETEVENSA(5) 2005 CAHUA 2005 CAHUA 2005 CAHUA 2005 EDEGEL 2005 EDEGEL 2005 EDEGEL 2005 EDEGEL 2005 EDEGEL 2005 EGASA 2005 EGEMSA 2005 EGEMSA 2005 EGENOR 2005 EGENOR 2005 EGESUR ELECTROAND 2005 ES ELECTROAND 2005 ES ELECTROAND 2005 ES ELECTROPER 2005 U ELECTROPER 2005 U 2005 CAHUA 2005 EDEGEL 2005 EDEGEL 2005 EEPSA 2005 EEPSA 2005 EEPSA 2005 EGASA 2005 EGEMSA 2005 EGENOR 2005 EGENOR 2005 EGENOR TGVentanillaD2 TGVentanillaGN+ CC Arcata Cahua Pariac Callahuanca Huampan Huinco Matucana Moyopampa Charcani Herca Machupicchu CandelPato Carhuaquero Aricota Malpaso OroyaPachachaca Yaupi Mantaro Restitucin GDPacasmayo TGSantaRosaUTI TGSantaRosaWT G MalacasTG1 MalacasTG2 MalacasTG3 Chilina Dolorespata GDChiclayoOeste GDPaita GDPiura 1998 590658.864 gas 1997 132201.976 1997 1997 5536.8 D2 1861367.5 gas 6874269.8 0 434340.2 17798817.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140157.4 R6 0 D2 4300296.7 D2 917338.6 D2 809832.5 D2 90251.5 D2 251836.6 R500 5620.1 79513.0 R6 260368.0 149595.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 233452.9 717618.8 1300439.2 0.0 0.0 12392.0 1063332.4 R500 0.0 1309688.3 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 591136.0 D2 0 0 0 0

page 39
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 D2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132266.0 0 0 0 0

1996 29773.3917 1996 286371.095 1996 1996 30553.753 546705.09

1996 234083.317 1996 1016839.28 1996 819481.297 1996 533106.968 1996 665639.373 1996 0 1996 748176.835 1996 1539791.42 1996 477522.352 1996 109066.269 1996 177723.732 1996 116619.293 1996 752919.386 1996 5116272.17 1996 1644634.79 1996 4819.30398 D2 1996 7059.284 gas

1996 418910.931 gas 1996 1996 54446.202 gas 5641.0848 gas 1996 51261.7464 gas 1996 26850.6952 D2 1996 56.613191 D2

1996 19759.4548 D2 1996 1996 3268.8535 D2 2064 D2

2005 EGENOR 2005 EGENOR 2005 EGENOR 2005 EGENOR 2005 EGENOR 2005 EGENOR 2005 EGESUR

Piura1Residual TGPiura TGChimbote TGTrujillo GDSullana TV Trupal Moquegua

1996

23158.301 R6

1584581.0 88756.0 R6 108336.0 26237.0 358618.0 0.0 0.0

0 1456920.0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1996 15167.8021 D2 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 689.6576 D2 204.236 D2 4576.83 D2 0 R6 0

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
ELECTROPER Yarinacocha 2005 U IloCatkato 2005 ENERSUR IloTV1,TV2,TV3,T V4 2005 ENERSUR 2005 ENERSUR 2005 SANGABAN 2005 SANGABAN 2005 SANGABAN 2005 SHOUGESA 2005 SHOUGESA ELECTRICA 2004 SANTA ROSA 2004 ENERSUR 2004 ENERSUR MINERA 2004 CORONA ELECTROPER 2004 U 2004 EDEGEL 2004 EDEGEL 2004 SAN GABAN 2004 EGASA 2004 EGESUR 2004 EEPSA 2004 EGASA 2004 ENERSUR Ilo2TV1 Bellavista Taparachi Tintaya Cummins SanNicolsTV1,T V2,TV3 SantaRosa(1) Chilca(4) Yuncan Huanchor TumbesMAK1,MA K2 Chimay Yanango SanGabn MollendoTG1,TG2 Calana MalacasTGN4 MollendoMirrlees IloTG1,TG2 1996 72453.842 R6 4490327.0 D2 96948.5 23360489.9 D2 128429.1 coal 71861.5 148805.7 0.0 52769.5 9231862.5 5084.0 0.0 44741.9 315031.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1996 1457.34373 D2 1996 1996 464842.93 R500 830880.58 D2

page 40
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1996 913.611598 D2 1996 1916.31092 D2 1996 1996 0 D2 768.48006 D2

1996 107116.732 R500 2006 2006 2005 0 0 0

2002 130532.227 2001 35874.0977 D2 2000 938018.76 2000 205609.302 2000 789300.098 1999 1489.05328 D2 1999 106492.156 D2 1998 455330.696 gas 1998 120223.067 D2 1998 2561.24671 D2 1998 543584.038 gas 1998 586728.382 gas 1997 25958.5494 182,576.0 104,088.0 R6 5114285.5 D2 104,365.0 R500 225,738.7 6144968.0 6951913.1 6,389,731.0 0.0 7,277,421.0 163252.0 R6 1887072.0

2004 TERMOSELVA TG1Aguayta 2004 TERMOSELVA TG2Aguayta GallitoCiego 2004 CAHUA

2004 ETEVENSA(5)

TGVentanillaD2 TGVentanillaGN+ CC Arcata Cahua Pariac Callahuanca Huampan Huinco Matucana Moyopampa Charcani Herca Machupicchu CandelPato Carhuaquero

1997 479111.937 D2

34050306.0

2004 ETEVENSA(5) 2004 CAHUA 2004 CAHUA 2004 CAHUA 2004 EDEGEL 2004 EDEGEL 2004 EDEGEL 2004 EDEGEL 2004 EDEGEL 2004 EGASA 2004 EGEMSA 2004 EGEMSA 2004 EGENOR 2004 EGENOR

1997 486305.215 gas 1996 36850.8318 1996 278612.406 1996 64306.1458 1996 547827.501 1996 213674.317 1996 861567.959 1996 748396.646 1996 518265.352 1996 864239.531 1996 1938.34776 1996 718467.806 1996 1446184.04 1996 592442.851 1996 96241.7764 1996 134147.002

4797234.9

Aricota 2004 EGESUR ELECTROAND Malpaso 2004 ES

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
2004 2004 2004 2004 ELECTROAND ES ELECTROAND ES ELECTROPER U ELECTROPER U OroyaPachachaca Yaupi Mantaro Restitucin 1996 84719.5327 1996 824079.776 1996 4965836.24 1996 1605781.82

page 41

2004 CAHUA 2004 EDEGEL 2004 EDEGEL 2004 EEPSA 2004 EEPSA 2004 EEPSA 2004 EGASA 2004 EGEMSA

GDPacasmayo TGSantaRosaUTI TGSantaRosaWT G MalacasTG1 MalacasTG2 MalacasTG3 Chilina Dolorespata

1996 26326.6697 D2 1996 27693.802 gas

290192.0 R6 0 D2 D2 537761.2 D2 666368.5 D2 369816.3 D2 452,722.1 R500 11,111.00

1669429.7 2641771.5 18236246.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,337,354.9 R500 489,980.0 D2 0.0 D2 155,398.0

1996 224102.218 gas 1996 32312.1798 gas 1996 42261.3936 gas 1996 23604.6888 gas 1996 49899.7467 D2 1996 133.367928 D2

2004 EGENOR 2004 EGENOR 2004 EGENOR

GDChiclayoOeste GDPaita GDPiura

1996 52012.8543 D2 1996 1996 5227.6245 D2 5579.81 D2

983023.0 R6 411712.0 2397395.0

2566343.8

2004 EGENOR 2004 EGENOR

Piura1Residual TGPiura

1996 59841.5518 R6 1996 297.0689 D2

2096463.0 34455.0 R6 0.0

2004 EGENOR

TGChimbote

1996

3540.7242 D2

392735.0

2004 EGENOR

TGTrujillo

1996

996.86 D2

107867.0

2004 EGENOR 2004 EGENOR

GDSullana TV Trupal

1996 13432.1687 D2 1996 252.54 R6

1033624.0 42825.0 36,823.0 6712686.9 D2 48,443.1 37,698,948.6 D2 138,211.1 coal 31,281.30 33,887.80 104,451.90 209896.7 29,902.9 359,479.5 5084.0

Moquegua 2004 EGESUR ELECTROPER Yarinacocha 2004 U 2004 ENERSUR 2004 ENERSUR 2004 ENERSUR 2004 SANGABAN 2004 SANGABAN 2004 SANGABAN 2004 SHOUGESA IloCatkato IloTV1,TV2,TV3,T V4 Ilo2TV1 Bellavista Taparachi Tintaya Cummins SanNicolsTV1,T V2,TV3

1996 487.068298 D2 1996 106903.575 R6 1996 715.945651 D2 1996 655068.207 R500 1996 993563.239 D2 1996 401.62491 D2

1996 440.634393 D2 1996 1420.734 D2

1996 3130.96992 D2

2004 SHOUGESA

1996

62743.427 R500

5454447.0

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 42

Determination of Lambda Dispatch data available in the spreadsheet that accompanies this PDD
2006 2005 2004 Lambda 0.006392694 0.003424658 0.002853881

2004

3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0

311 622 93 1234 1545 56 18 2167 2478 2889 3100 3411 3722 4033 4344 4655 4966 5277 5588 5999 6210 6521 6832 7143 7454 7765 8076 87

Hourly Load LCMR

2005

3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 311 2 62 933 12 4 1545 1856 67 21 2478 2 89 38 10 10 34 1 3722 4033 4 43 4654 5 4966 77 52 5588 99 59 6210 6521 32 68 7143 7454 65 77 8076 8387 98 87 09
This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

Hourly Load LCMR

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 43

2006

4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1 798 1595 2392 3189 3986 4783 5580 6377 7174 7971

MW

Hourly Load (MW) LCMR

hours

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM Executive Board
page 44

Annex 4 MONITORING INFORMATION Monitoring plan described in Section B.7

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.