Electromagnetic Transmission Through Fractal Apertures in Infinite Conducting Screen B. Ghosh, S. N. Sinha, and M. V. Kartikeyan
Electromagnetic Transmission Through Fractal Apertures in Infinite Conducting Screen B. Ghosh, S. N. Sinha, and M. V. Kartikeyan
n=1
V
n
M
n
, and applying the method
of moments, the problem can be expressed in terms of the following
matrix equation:
[Y ]
V =
I
i
(1)
where
[Y ] = 4
__
W
m
, H
fs
t
_
M
n
_
__
NN
(2)
I
i
= 2
__
W
m
, H
io
t
__
N1
(3)
and
V = [V
n
]
N1
(4)
Here, W
m
and M
n
are the mth and nth weighting and basis
functions, respectively, H
fs
t
(M
n
) is the tangential component of
magnetic eld on the apertures due to an equivalent surface magnetic
current M
n
radiating in free space, and H
io
t
is the tangential
component of magnetic eld over the apertures due to an incident
plane wave. Using Galerkins method, i.e., W
m
= M
m
, the admittance
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 109
matrix can be expressed as
Y
mn
= 4
_
M
m
, H
fs
t
_
M
n
_
_
(5)
Following the procedure described in [17], an element of admittance
matrix can be expressed in terms of RWG function over the nth source
triangle with observation point at the centroid of mth triangle as
Y
mn
=
jl
m
l
n
4
_
c
+
m
(r) .
1
A
+
n
__
T
+
n
+
n
(r
) G(r
c+
m
|r
) ds
+
c
+
m
(r) .
1
A
n
__
T
n
(r
) G(r
c+
m
|r
) ds
+
c
m
(r) .
1
A
+
n
__
T
+
n
+
n
(r
) G(r
c
m
|r
) ds
+
c
m
(r) .
1
A
n
__
T
n
(r
) G(r
c
m
|r
) ds
_
+
l
m
l
n
j
_
1
A
+
n
__
T
+
n
G(r
c+
m
|r
) ds
1
A
n
__
T
n
G(r
c+
m
|r
) ds
1
A
+
n
__
T
+
n
G(r
c
m
|r
) ds
+
1
A
n
__
T
n
G(r
c
m
|r
) ds
_
(6)
where l
m
and l
n
are the lengths of the mth and nth edges shared by
triangle pairs T
m
and T
n
, respectively and G(r|r
) =
exp(jk|rr
|)
|rr
|
.
Equation (6) involves integrals of the following form
F
j
pq
=
__
Tq
j
_
r
_
G
_
r
p
|r
_
ds
p, q = 1, 2, 3, . . . , P
j = 1, 2, 3
(7)
and
pq
=
__
Tq
G
_
r
p
|r
_
ds
; p, q = 1, 2, 3, . . . , P (8)
where P is the total number of triangles. Integrals in (7) and (8)
are singular when the source and observation triangles coincide i.e.,
p = q and hence, require some special numerical considerations for
their evaluation. A number of research works have been reported
based on singularity subtraction approach [1316]. However, as has
been pointed out in [22], a singularity cancellation method is not only
more accurate but also has the advantage that the integrals can be
evaluated using purely numerical quadrature schemes. Therefore, the
singularity cancellation method proposed in [22] has been used in this
paper. Once the integrals are calculated and stored, the complete
110 Ghosh, Sinha, and Kartikeyan
admittance matrix can be expressed in the following form
Y
mn
=
jl
m
l
n
4
_
_
_
1
A
+
n
c+
m
F
j(n
+
)
p(m
+
)q(n
+
)
1
A
c+
m
F
j(n
)
p(m
+
)q(n
)
+
1
A
+
n
c
m
F
j(n
+
)
p(m
)q(n
+
)
1
A
c
m
F
j(n
)
p(m
)q(n
)
_
_
_
+
l
m
l
n
j
_
1
A
+
n
p(m
+
)q(n
+
)
1
A
p(m
+
)q(n
1
A
+
n
p(m
)q(n
+
)
+
1
A
p(m
)q(n
)
_
(9)
Here, the subscript p(m
) is the free
vertex number of either plus or minus triangle associated with the
nth RWG function. Hence, by using this admittance matrix lling
approach, possible double calculation of the same surface integral can
be avoided.
For plane wave incidence, an element of the excitation vector
I
i
can be expressed as
I
i
m
= l
m
_
c+
m
H
io
t
_
r
c+
m
_
+
c
m
H
io
t
_
r
c
m
_
_
(10)
where
H
io
t
_
r
c
m
_
=
_
u
H
i
+ u
H
i
_
e
jk
i
r
c
m
k
i
= k( xsin
i
cos
i
+ y sin
i
sin
i
+ z cos
i
)
By solving (1) for the unknown coecients, the transmitted power
P
trans
and the far-eld magnetic eld H
m
can be computed. From
these quantities, the transmission coecient, T, and the transmission
cross-section, , can be determined by following [15] and are given by
T =
1
2
Re
_
I
i
_
|H
io
|
2
Acos
i
(11)
=
2
2
8
I
m
2
/
H
io
2
(12)
where A is the total area of the aperture,
i
is the angle of incidence
of the plane wave and is the intrinsic impedance of the medium.
In this work, the transmission cross-section has been normalized
with respect to the rst resonant wavelength,
1
, of fractal geometry
and is expressed in dB as
(dB) = 10 log
_
(
1
)
2
_
(13)
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 111
(a) x-polarized incident wave (b) y-polarized incident wave
Figure 4. Transmission coecient for a row of 4 square apertures
versus the spacing between the apertures at normal incidence.
3. NUMERICAL RESULTS
Based on the formulation described in Section 2, a MATLAB code has
been developed to nd the transmission properties of various fractal
apertures. In all the numerical examples, we have considered free space
on either side of the screen. In order to verify the accuracy of the
developed code, rst we have computed the transmission coecient
for a row of four square apertures at normal incidence with dierent
spacing between the apertures. Fig. 4 compares the results obtained
from the present analysis with those reported in [3], where an excellent
agreement can be seen. Fig. 5 shows the transmission cross section of
six apertures for perpendicular polarization with angle of incidence
equal to 45
1
= 0.4
2h
2
= 1.13 (14)
where
1
and
2
are the free space wavelength for rst two resonant
frequencies. According to (14), the rst two resonant frequencies for
the present geometry should be at 1.35 GHz and 3.81 GHz. From
Table 1, it can be seen that the rst two resonant frequencies occur at
1.32 GHz and 3.90 GHz which are within 2% of those predicted by (14).
Also, the frequency ratios between successive resonant frequencies tend
to approach 2, which is the scale factor of gasket geometry, for higher
order bands as the number of iterations increases. Since the initial
Figure 9. Sierpinski gasket aperture of 2nd iteration in innite
conducting screen. The white portions denote the aperture regions.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 115
(a) x-polarized incident wave (b) y-polarized incident wave
Figure 10. Transmission coecient of Sierpinski gasket aperture for
dierent iterations at normal incidence.
(a) x-polarized incident wave (b) y-polarized incident wave
Figure 11. Variation of transmission coecient of 2nd iterated
Sierpinski gasket aperture for dierent are angle at normal incidence.
triangle was an equilateral triangle, the response of the aperture for x-
and y-polarized incident wave is almost similar.
Next, the are angle of the triangle was varied. The transmission
characteristics of the gasket aperture for three values of are angles,
= 30
, = 45
and = 60
and = 90
i
f
1
f
2
f
3
f
4
f
5
h
1
/
2
h
2
/
4
0 1.32 - 3.88 - 8.90 - -
20 1.32 - 3.88 - 8.90 - -
40 1.31 2.81 3.84 5.98 8.01 0.83 0.89
60 1.31 2.80 3.76 5.97 7.29 0.83 0.88
Table 3. Transmission parameters of Sierpinski gasket aperture for
dierent angle of incidence with perpendicular polarization.
i
f
1
f
2
f
3
f
4
f
5
h
1
/
2
h
2
/
4
0 1.32 - 3.88 - 8.95 - -
20 1.32 2.75 3.88 5.78 8.18 0.94 0.99
40 1.31 2.78 3.92 5.80 8.81 0.95 0.99
60 1.31 2.78 4.24 5.99 8.71 0.95 1.03
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 119
(a) Primary resonance at f = 1.15 GHz (b) Secondary resonance at f = 2.4 GHz
Figure 14. Variation of current distribution of a triangular aperture
with dierent angles of incidence at primary and secondary resonances
with parallel polarization.
(a) Primary resonance at f = 1.30 GHz (b) Secondary resonance at f = 2.8 GHz
Figure 15. Variation of current distribution of a triangular aperture
with dierent angle of incidence at primary and secondary resonances
with perpendicular polarization.
3.2. Koch Curve
Koch curve monopole and dipole antennas have multiband property
and are widely used in antenna miniaturization. In [26], a multi-
resonant dipole antenna based on Koch curve has been studied. It
has been shown that by changing the indentation angle of the curve,
which in turn changes the fractal dimension, the input characteristics
of the Koch antennas can be changed. Iterated Function System (IFS)
for a generalized Koch curve with a scale factor s and indentation angle
120 Ghosh, Sinha, and Kartikeyan
(a) Parallel polarization (b) Perpendicular polarization
Figure 16. Variation of transmission coecient of 2nd iterated
Sierpinski gasket aperture for dierent angles of incidence.
can be expressed as [26],
W
1
_
x
y
_
=
_
1
s
0
0
1
s
__
x
_
(15)
W
2
_
x
y
_
=
_
1
s
cos
1
s
sin
1
s
sin
1
s
cos
__
x
_
+
_
1
s
0
_
(16)
W
3
_
x
y
_
=
_
1
s
cos
1
s
sin
1
s
sin
1
s
cos
__
x
_
+
_
1
2
1
s
sin
_
(17)
W
4
_
x
y
_
=
_
1
s
0
0
1
s
__
x
_
+
_
s1
s
0
_
(18)
where
s = 2(1 + cos()) (19)
The self-similarity dimension of the curve is given by
D =
log 4
log s
(20)
Hence, by changing the indentation angle, we can change the fractal
dimension. Generalized Koch curve geometries for two indentation
angles are shown in Fig. 17.
Here, we have investigated the transmission properties of the
Koch fractal slot of varying fractal dimension in an innite conducting
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 121
(a) Indentation angle = 20
o
(b) Indentation angle = 60
o
Figure 17. Koch curve with dierent indentation angles.
screen illuminated by a plane wave. For the present analysis, we have
considered a rectangular slot of length 20 cm along the x-axis and
width 5 mm along the y-axis as the initiator. A y-polarized wave is
assumed to be normally incident on the Koch slot. Fig. 18 shows the
transmission coecients of a Koch slot of 60
indenta-
tion angle.
Figure 19. Variation of trans-
mission coecient with dierent
indentation angle at primary res-
onant frequency of Koch fractal
slot of 3rd iteration.
122 Ghosh, Sinha, and Kartikeyan
Figure 20. Variation of resonant frequencies with dierent
indentation angle for Koch fractal slot.
of magnitude of transmission coecient at f
r1
for dierent indentation
angle is shown in Fig. 19, for a 3rd iterated Koch slot. From a study of
surface current distribution of Koch slot at the primary resonance, it
is found that the current is maximum at the center of the slot and the
magnitude of the maxima increases with the increase in indentation
angle, which causes the increase in transmission coecient. Thus,
the indentation angle can be made a design parameter in order to
achieve a good transmission property at a particular frequency. The
variations of resonant frequencies for three iterations with dierent
indentation angles are shown in Fig. 20. It may be noted that the
higher order resonant frequencies shift by larger amount than the lower
order resonant frequencies. The ratio between successive resonant
frequencies also changes with the change in indentation angle. The
ratios of successive resonant frequencies with the indentation angle
are tabulated in Table 5 from which it is evident that the indentation
angle can be varied in order to place the transmission bands at desired
locations. It is evident that the ratios are dierent for each interval,
but they remain nearly constant for dierent iterations of the same
dimension. It may be mentioned here that a Koch fractal slot is
expected to have characteristics similar to those of Koch monopole.
The results presented here agree very well with those presented in [26]
for a Koch dipole antenna.
The transmission cross-section of a third iteration standard Koch
slot for two orthogonal planes is shown in Fig. 21. It should be noted
that the transmission cross-section at the resonant frequencies are
similar to that of a linear slot. As the frequency is increased, some
ripples are found in the transmission cross-section pattern. Also, it
may be noticed that the transmission cross-section patterns remain
almost symmetric for both the planes.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 123
Table 4. Variation of f
r1
for Koch aperture with indentation angle.
First Resonant frequency for
Indentation various iterations of Koch slot (GHz)
Angle (deg) Iteration 1 Iteration 2 Iteration 3
10 0.710 0.707 0.706
20 0.698 0.686 0.678
30 0.678 0.651 0.633
40 0.651 0.604 0.573
50 0.618 0.547 0.500
60 0.577 0.482 0.420
70 0.529 0.410 0.335
80 0.484 0.342 0.258
Next, the angle of incidence was varied for a Koch curve of 3rd
iteration with 60
,
(a) = 0
o
(b) = 90
o
Figure 21. Transmission cross-section pattern of 3rd iterated Koch
fractal slot with indentation angle equal to 60
.
124 Ghosh, Sinha, and Kartikeyan
Table 5. Ratios between successive resonant frequencies of generalized
Koch slot.
Indentation
Angle
Fractal
Dimension
Fractal
Iteration
f
2
/f
1
f
3
/f
2
f
4
/f
3
1 3.09 1.68 1.41
10 1.006 2 3.08 1.68 1.40
3 3.08 1.68 1.40
1 3.08 1.68 1.41
20 1.023 2 3.06 1.68 1.40
3 3.06 1.68 1.40
1 3.07 1.68 1.41
30 1.053 2 3.04 1.63 1.44
3 3.03 1.67 1.40
1 3.05 1.68 1.42
40 1.099 2 3.00 1.67 1.42
3 2.98 1.65 1.42
1 3.02 1.67 1.42
50 1.165 2 2.95 1.65 1.40
3 2.92 1.63 1.39
1 2.98 1.66 1.42
60 1.262 2 2.88 1.63 1.41
3 2.83 1.62 1.40
1 2.94 1.66 1.42
70 1.404 2 2.79 1.63 1.40
3 2.73 1.60 1.36
1 2.81 1.68 1.40
80 1.625 2 2.67 1.62 1.36
3 2.59 1.58 1.34
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 125
Figure 22. Variation of transmission coecient with dierent angle
of incidence for 3rd iterated Koch fractal slot with indentation angle
is 60
.
the response becomes almost at for frequencies greater than 1 GHz.
Although, the transmission coecient at the new resonant frequencies
increases with increase in angle of incidence up to around 40
, it
again decreases with increase in
i
beyond 40
. To understand
this phenomena, we studied the magnetic current distribution of a
rectangular slot. It was found that, similar to the behavior obtained for
a triangular aperture, an additional weak secondary resonance appears
around L = for inclined incidence, where L is the length of the slot.
Also, the phase of the dominant component of current undergoes a
phase reversal at the secondary resonant frequency, a behavior similar
to that of the triangular aperture. The magnitude of current shows
two maxima which are L/2 distance apart. The same behavior was
seen in case of Koch curve for oblique incidence.
3.3. Hilbert Curve
Due to their space lling properties, the Hilbert curve can enclose
longer curves in a given area than the Koch curve; hence it has been
used for further miniaturization of monopole and dipole antennas [27].
The self-similarity of this geometry leads to a multi-band operation.
The topological dimension of Hilbert curve is 1, since it is a simple
curve. But, for a large number of iterations, the fractal dimension of
the curve approaches 2. Considering the length and number of line
segments in rst and second iterations, the fractal dimension is 1.465.
The corresponding fractal dimensions for next two iterations are 1.694
and 1.834, respectively. A fourth iterated Hilbert curve is shown in
Fig. 23. In our analysis, the Hilbert geometry is assumed to occupy
an area of 7.5 cm7.5 cm with the width of the slot taken to be 1 mm.
126 Ghosh, Sinha, and Kartikeyan
The transmission characteristics of dierent iterations of Hilbert curve
fractal aperture illuminated by a plane wave of x- and y-polarizations
with normal incidence are shown in Fig. 24. The dierence in the
transmission coecient plots for x- and y-polarization is due to the
fact that the curve is symmetric with respect to y-axis but asymmetric
with respect to x-axis. It can be seen from the plot that the Hilbert
aperture oers a multi-band behavior and the resonant frequencies
decrease as the order of iteration increases due to the increase in the
length of the slot. The variation of rst resonant frequency for dierent
iterations of Hilbert curve aperture is summarized in Table 6. The
transmission bandwidth increases for higher order resonances, whereas,
it decreases signicantly as the order of iteration increases. Since
the transmission coecient plots show sharp transmission bands with
very low transmission between two resonant peaks, it oers excellent
band stop characteristics. Again from the current distribution plots,
it was found that the current is distributed over the entire aperture
region and at the higher resonances, the current is concentrated in the
scaled copies of the geometry. Also, the magnitude of surface current
decreases with increase in order of resonance which causes the decreases
in transmission coecient.
Figure 23. Hilbert fractal slot of 4th iteration.
The transmission cross-section patterns for a 4th iterated Hilbert
aperture at its rst four resonant frequencies are shown in Fig. 25.
From the transmission cross-section plots for both x- and y-
polarizations, it may be stated that the pattern are symmetric at all
resonant frequencies, although, the patterns get narrower for higher
order resonant frequencies.
The variation of transmission coecient of a 4th iterated Hilbert
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 127
(a) x-polarized incident wave (b) y-polarized incident wave
Figure 24. Transmission coecient of Hilbert slot for dierent
iterations at normal incidence.
Table 6. Primary resonant frequency of Hilbert curve aperture of
dierent iteration
Primary resonant frequency (GHz)
Iteration x-polarized y-polarized
1 1.383 0.666
2 0.908 0.452
3 0.614 0.306
4 0.440.4 0.2172
aperture with angle of incidence is shown in Fig. 26. Again, some
additional resonances occur as the angle of incidence is increased.
The transmission coecients at these additional resonant frequencies
increase with the increase in angle of incidence. The occurrence of
these resonance can again be explained in similar manner as in Koch
slot from the current distribution which shows additional maxima at
inclined incidence. For perpendicular polarization, some additional
resonant frequencies appear but, the transmission coecients at these
frequencies are very small as compared to those at the resonant
frequencies for normal incidence. Also, the transmission coecient
at a particular resonant frequency decreases with increase in angle
of incidence and the decrease is sharper in case of perpendicular
polarization.
128 Ghosh, Sinha, and Kartikeyan
(a) x-polarized; = 0
o
cut (b) x-polarized; = 90
o
cut
(c) y-polarized; = 0
o
cut (d) y-polarized; = 90
o
cut
Figure 25. Transmission cross-section pattern of 4th iterated Hilbert
slot at the rst four resonant frequencies.
(a) Parallel polarization (b) Perpendicular polarization
Figure 26. Variation of transmission coecient with dierent angle
of incidence of 4th iterated Hilbert slot.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 129
Figure 27. Sierpinski carpet aperture of 3rd iteration.
3.4. Sierpinski Carpet
Another fractal that can be used in multi-band antennas and FSS
is Sierpinski carpet fractal [9]. The geometry of a third iterated
Sierpinski carpet structure is shown in Fig. 27. The dimension
used in the present analysis has an initial rectangular geometry
of dimensions 1.2 cm12 cm. The transmission characteristics of
dierent iterations of the fractal aperture for x-polarized incident wave
at normal incidence are shown in Fig. 28. Again, it can be noted
from the plots that the resonant frequency decreases as the order of
iteration increases. Basically, the rst iteration consists of a single
aperture of dimension 0.4 cm4 cm with the larger dimension along
y direction. The rst resonance occurs at a frequency of 3.30 GHz
whose corresponding wavelength is twice the length of the slot in y-
direction. In the next iteration, the aperture dimension gets reduced
by a factor 3, and hence it is expected to have the second resonant
frequency which is three times the rst resonant frequency. Thus, the
ratio between the successive resonant frequencies is approximately 3.
For a 3rd iteration Sierpinski carpet aperture the resonant frequencies
occurs at 3.3 GHz, 10.4 GHz and 33.7 GHz with frequency ratios as
f
2
/f
1
= 3.15 and f
3
/f
2
= 3.24. Hence, the resonant frequencies are
separated by a factor approximately equal to the theoretical value 3.
The transmission cross-section patterns of 3rd iterated Sierpinski
carpet fractal aperture for x-polarized incident wave in two orthogonal
planes are shown in Fig. 29. It can be seen from the plots that the
maximum value of transmission cross section increases for higher order
130 Ghosh, Sinha, and Kartikeyan
Figure 28. Variation of transmission coecient for Sierpinski carpet
aperture with dierent iterations.
(a) = 0
o
(b) = 90
o
Figure 29. Transmission cross-section of 3rd iteration Sierpinski
carpet aperture at rst three resonant frequencies.
Figure 30. Variation of transmission coecient with dierent angle
of incidence for 3rd iterated Sierpinski carpet aperture.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 131
resonant frequencies. Also, for = 90
and 60
, respectively. The
corresponding wavelengths are 61.98 cm and 51.99 cm which are much
larger than the Koch curve length. Since, the increase in indentation
angle causes the resonant frequency to shift downward and also, the
magnitude of transmission coecient increases, it can be said that
at higher indentation angle there is a more enhanced subwavelength
transmission. For Minkowski fractal aperture, the lowest resonant
frequency is 0.92 GHz for a 2nd iterated fractal with a = 0.3,
corresponding to a wavelength of 32.6 cm. Again the wavelength is
much larger than the lateral dimension of fractal geometry.
On the other hand, self similar structures like Sierpinski gasket and
Sierpinski carpet do not exhibit subwavelength transmission, since for
these structures the reduction in the rst resonance frequency is very
small for higher order iterations.
REFERENCES
1. Rahmat-Samii, Y. and R. Mittra, Electromagnetic coupling
through small apertures in a conducting screen, IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propagat., Vol. 25, 180187, Mar. 1977.
2. Sarkar, T. K., M. F. Costa, I. Chin-Lin, and R. F. Harrington,
Electromagnetic transmission through mesh covered apertures
and aperture arrays of apertures in a conducting screen, IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 32, 908913, Sept. 1984.
136 Ghosh, Sinha, and Kartikeyan
3. Andersson, T., Moment-Method calculations on apertures using
basis singular function, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat.,
Vol. 41, 17091716, Dec. 1993.
4. Park, H. and H. J. Eom, Electromagnetic scattering from
multiple rectangular apertures in a thick conducting screen,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 47, No. 6, 10561060,
June 1999.
5. Park, Y. B. and H. J. Eom, Electromagnetic transmission
through multiple circular apertures in a thick conducting plane,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 52, No. 4, 10491055,
Apr. 2004.
6. Chen, C. C., Transmission of microwave through perforated at
plates of nite thickness, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.,
Vol. 21, 16, Jan. 1973.
7. Werner, D. H. and R. Mittra (eds.), Frontiers in Electromagnetics,
Chapter 13, Piscataway, NJ, IEEE Press, 2000.
8. Romeu, J. and Y. Rahmat-Samii, Fractal FSS: A novel dual-band
frequency selective surface, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat.,
Vol. 48, 10971105, July 2000
9. Gianvittorio, J. P., J. Romeu, S. Blanch, and Y. Rahmat-
Samii, Self-similar prefractal frequency selective surfaces for
multiband and dual polarized applications, IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propagat., Vol. 51, 30883096, Nov. 2003.
10. McVay, J., N. Engheta, and A. Hoorfar, High impedance
metamaterial surfaces using Hilbert curve inclusions, IEEE
Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, Vol. 14, 130132,
Mar. 2004.
11. Wen, W., L. Zhou, J. Li, W. Ge, C. T. Chan and P. Sheng,
Subwavelength photonic band gaps from planar fractals,
Physical Review Lett., vol. 89, No. 22, 223901, Nov. 2002.
12. Zhou, L., C. T. Chan, and P. Sheng, Theoritical studies on the
transmission and reection properties of metallic planar fractals,
J. Phys. D: Applied Phys., Vol. 37, 368373, 2004.
13. Hou, B., G. Xu, and W. Wen, Tunable band gap properties of
planar metallic fractals, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 95, No. 6, 32313233,
Mar. 2004.
14. Wen, W., L. Zhou, B. Hou, C. T. Chan, and P. Sheng, Resonant
transmission of microwaves through subwavelength fractal slits in
a metallic plate, Physical Review B72, 153406, 2005.
15. Harrington, R. F. and J. R. Mautz, A generalized network
formulation for aperture problems, IEEE Trans. Antennas
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 12, 2009 137
Propagat., Vol. 24, 870873, Nov. 1976.
16. Rao, S. M., D. R. Wilton, and A. W. Glisson, Electromagnetic
scattering by surfaces of arbitrary shape, IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propagat., Vol. 30, 409418, May 1982.
17. Chin-Lin, I. and R. F. Harrington, Electromagnetic transmission
through an aperture of arbitrary shape in a conducting screen,
Tech Rep-82-5 on Contract N00014-76-C-0025, Syracuse Univ.,
Apr. 1982.
18. Wilton, D. R., S. M. Rao, A. W. Glisson, D. H. Schaubert,
O. M. Al-Bundak, and C. M. Butler, Potential integrals
for uniform and linear source distributions on polygonal and
polyhedral domains, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 32,
276281, Mar. 1984.
19. Graglia, R. D., On the numerical integration of the linear shape
functions times the 3D Greens function or its gradient on a plane
triangle, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 41, 14481455,
Oct. 1993.
20. Eibert, T. F. and V. Hansen, On the calculation of potential
integrals for linear source distributions on triangular domains,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 43, 14991502, Dec. 1995.
21. Rossi, L. and P. J. Cullen, On the fully numerical evaluation
of the linear shape function times 3D Greens function on a plane
triangle, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Vol. 47, 398402,
Apr. 1999.
22. Khayat, M. A. and D. R. Wilton, Numerical evaluation of
singular and near-singular potential integrals, IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propagat., Vol. 53, 31803190, Oct. 2005.
23. Peitgen, H. O., H. Jurgens, and D. Saupe, Chaos and Fractals,
New Frontiers in Science, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992.
24. Puente, C., J. Romeu, R. Pous, and A. Cardama, On the
behavior of Sierpinski multiband fractal antenna, IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propagat., Vol. 46, 517524, Apr. 1998.
25. Baliarda, C. P., C. B. Borau, M. N. Rodero, and J. Romeu, An
iterative model for fractal antennas: Application to the Sierpinski
gasket antenna, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 48, 713
719, May 2000.
26. Vinoy, K. J., J. K. Abraham, and V. K. Varadan, On the
relationship between fractal dimension and the performance of
multi-resonant dipole antennas using Koch curves, IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propagat., Vol. 51, 22962303, Sept. 2003.
27. Vinoy, K. J., K. A. Jose, V. K. Varadan, and V. V. Varadan,
138 Ghosh, Sinha, and Kartikeyan
Hilbert curve fractal antenna: A small resonant antenna for
VHF/UHF applications, Microwave and Optical Technology
Letters, Vol. 29, 215219, 2001.
28. Ataeiseresht, R., C. Ghobadi, and J. Nourinia, A novel analysis
of Minkowski fractal microstrip patch antenna, Journal of
Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 20, No. 8, 1115
1127, 2006.