Sector Study For Education in Brazil: November 2005
Sector Study For Education in Brazil: November 2005
Summary
November 2005
Consortium of: Paulo Renato Souza Consultores Tendncias Consultoria Integrada Ncleo de Estudos de Polticas Pblicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas For Japan Bank for International Cooperation
CONTENTS 1. Overview of the education sector................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Achievements and Challenges ................................................................................................ 5 1.2. The organization of the Brazilian Educational System ....................................................... 7 1.3. Financing Education in Brazil ............................................................................................. 10 1.3.1. Distribution of Responsibilities .................................................................................... 10 1.3.2. The Fund for Development of Fundamental Education and Enhancement of the Teachers Profession - Fundef ..................................................................................................... 11 Basic Education ............................................................................................................................. 12 2.1. Recent expansion on access and enrolments in basic education ....................................... 13 2.2. The quality issues .................................................................................................................. 15 2.3. The content of Basic Education ........................................................................................... 17 2.4. Situation of teachers at the basic education level ............................................................... 18 2.5. Gender in Brazilian Basic Education .................................................................................. 18 2.6. Race and social imbalances .................................................................................................. 19 2.7. Technical and Vocational School at secondary level ......................................................... 19 Higher Education, Labour Market and Human Resources Development .............................. 20 3.1. Expansion and access to Higher Education ........................................................................ 21 3.2. Quality in Higher Education ................................................................................................ 23 3.3. Structure of the system and management........................................................................... 26 3.4. Research and technological development ........................................................................... 29 Higher Education and Human Resources Development ........................................................... 30 4.1. Education and the labour market ....................................................................................... 30 4.2. The returns to Education in Brazil...................................................................................... 31 4.3. Higher Education and labour market by careers and area of specialization .................. 32 4.3.1. Higher education: Fields of study ................................................................................ 32 4.3.2. Market driven courses in higher education ................................................................ 35 4.4. Implications for policy .......................................................................................................... 40 Considerations for JBIC support ................................................................................................ 42
2.
3.
4.
5.
Views presented and analyses made in this study are of the Consortium and do not necessarily represent those of JBIC. All rights reserved.
List of Tables Table 1: Teaching Posts according to their educational level................................................................. 18 Table 2: Active faculty in higher education by level of education ......................................................... 25 Table 3: The surveys applied to students taking the Provo................................................................... 25 Table 4: Total expenditure of Federal HEIs/ total number of undergraduates enrolled in Federal HEIs28 List of Figures Figure 1: Illiteracy rates in Brazil (among those aged 15 and over), 2003............................................... 6 Figure 2: Population over 10 years old according to years of completed education ................................ 7 Figure 3: The Brazilian educational system and regulation...................................................................... 8 Figure 4: Relation between the educational system and the world of work in Brazil .............................. 8 Figure 5: Private sector share, according to number of enrolments.......................................................... 9 Figure 6: Details of the structure of higher education .............................................................................. 9 Figure 7: Breakdown of public investments in education per sector 2003Est..................................... 10 Figure 8: Breakdown of public investments in education per governmental sphere 2003 .................. 10 Figure 9: Education investments in US$(000) per student 1999........................................................ 11 Figure 10: School attendance of children in the 7-14 age group, according to income levels (%) ........ 14 Figure 11: Number of enrolments and completions in higher education in Brazil................................. 21 Figure 12: Number of students entering higher education...................................................................... 22 Figure 13: Daytime Enrolments.............................................................................................................. 23 Figure 14: Evening Enrolments .............................................................................................................. 23 Figure 15: Percentage development of the relationship between candidates and places between 1996 and 2002 to in courses evaluated by the Provo ..................................................................................... 24 Figure 16: Organizational administrative structure of private and public HEIs ..................................... 26 Figure 17: Student/Faculty Ratio in Federal HEIs.................................................................................. 28 Figure 18: Distribution of the labour force according to years of schooling in 1992 and 2003 ............. 30 Figure 19: Unemployment rate by years of schooling............................................................................ 30 Figure 20: Return on education in Brazil in 1992 and 2003................................................................... 32 Figure 21: Public courses........................................................................................................................ 32 Figure 22: Private courses....................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 23: Public courses........................................................................................................................ 33 Figure 24: Private courses....................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 25: Distribution of completions by field of study in 2003 Public Sector ................................. 33 Figure 26: Distribution of completions by field of study in 2003 Private Sector................................ 33 Figure 27: Distribution of individuals with higher education by area of study (%) Brazil ................. 34 Figure 28: Earnings differentials of workers by area of study................................................................ 37 Figure 29: Unemployment rate by area of study..................................................................................... 37 Figure 30: Earnings premium in increasing order of unemployment rate Brazil ................................ 38 Figure 31: Expected earnings premium (II) by increasing order of risk Brazil................................... 39
Acronyms CEB CEFET CET CNE CONAES EAD EJA ENADE ENEM FUNDEB FUNDEF GDP HEI HRCT IBGE IDB IFES IMF INEP INPC INPI IPCA IPEA ISI LDB MEC NOG NSI OECD PAAIS PAS PCN PEC PISA PNAD PNE PROEP ProUni SAEB SAT SENAC SENAI SINAIS Basic Education Council Federal Technical Education Centres Technological Education Centres National Education Council National Committee for Evaluating Higher Education Distance Education Education of young people and adults National Student Performance Examination National Secondary School Examination Fund for Development of Basic Education and Enhancement of Education Fund for the Development of Fundamental Education and Enhancement of the Teaching Profession Gross Domestic Product Higher Education Institution Human resources in science and technology Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics Inter-American Development Bank Federal Higher Education Institution International Monetary Fund Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Ansio Teixeira (Ansio Teixeira National Institute for Educational Studies and Research) National Consumer Price Index National Institute of Industrial Property Extended Consumer Price Index Institute of Applied Economic Research Institute for Scientific Information Law of Guidelines and Foundations of National Education Ministry of Education Non-Governmental Organization National Science Indicators Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Affirmative Action for Social Inclusion Process of Continuous Evaluation National Curricular Parameters Proposals for Amendments to the Constitution Program for International Student Assessment Brazilian Household Surveys National Education Plan Programme for the Expansion of Professional Education The University for all Programme Basic Education National Evaluation System Scholastic Aptitude Test National Commerce Service National Industry Service National Higher Education Evaluation System
1. Overview of the education sector 1.1. Achievements and Challenges1 The educational situation in Brazil in the middle of the last decade of the 20th century can be summarized as follows: Basic Education: 87.5% of children in school; 12.5% not in school 17% of the population age 15 or over were illiterate 25% of children in the Northeast were not in school 25% of poor children were not in school 20% of black children were not in school Juvenile illiteracy (15 19 years old): Brazil: 6.8% - Northeast: 16.3% The difficulty poor children had in entering compulsory primary education High rates of repetition and dropout, resulting in a negative impact on the flow through school Low quality of teachers and absence of adequate teaching materials Vocational education system was extremely small Higher education system coverage was too modest Accreditation of new institutions was a heavily bureaucratic and paper-laden process Low-quality system where competition was nonexistent Captive markets earned education entrepreneurs huge profits; No comprehensive system to evaluate undergraduate education; Inefficient use of public funds by federal institutions
The development problems in the Brazilian educational system have their roots in the countrys history, as far back as the colonial period. Contrary to what occurred in other parts of the New World, Portuguese colonialism paid little attention to the area of education and public instruction. The first time concern was shown for organizing a public system of education was in the second half of the 19th century. With the advent of the Republic, interest in public instruction was rekindled. It was, however, only in the 1930s, with the creation of the Ministry of Education (MEC) that a consistent educational policy began to take shape. At that time, in a country that was essentially agrarian, education was available to only a few. In 1930, only two in every ten children attended schools in Brazil; and most of these went as far as the 5th grade of elementary school, because only the larger cities had the ginsio level (5th to 8th grades). Of the Brazilian population aged 15 and older, 60% were illiterate. In the first 30 years of the MECs existence, great emphasis was placed on building a good quality public education system. This objective was achieved to some degree at the cost of not having basic education available to all. Brazil has, however, greatly advanced over the last 70 years. A broad and diversified educational system has been created, based on public education. Brazil has one of the most important educational systems in developing countries, which has contributed fundamentally to modernizing the nation; this system ranges from early childhood education to a modern and sophisticated postgraduate and research level system created in the 1970s. However, the educational system is still elitist. In many aspects, at the end of the 20th century, the Brazilian educational system continued to reproduce and widen the enormous social inequalities in the country. The great and age-old social inequalities generated by the process of development in Brazil, explain for the most part the huge educational development problems of decades and the low average level of education of our population. This is shown by the fact that 45% of the heads of households in low-income families have never attended school or dropped out before completing one year of studies.
Over 30% of the students from the 1st to 8th grade level failed the school year and more than 5% dropped out. This led to a situation where 44% of the students in 4th grade were two years behind their age group, a proportion that rose to 53% among students at 8th grade. As a result, in the 3rd grade of secondary education, only 40% of all students were at the appropriate age, that is, 17 years old. For this reason the flow through school was very badly interrupted and held back pupils in the first grades of primary school. As a result, there were enormous deficiencies in the system. Less than half the students who started 1st grade completed 8th grade. Those who did complete this level took an average of 12 years to do so, making them 18 years old by that time. Not having the economic means to continue their studies at secondary school, they would go straight into the workforce. Figure 1, shows the percentage of illiteracy in 2003, according to age groups and regions. The illiteracy rate is far greater among older groups than among young ones, nine times greater among those aged 50 and over (27%) than among 15 to 19 year-olds (3%). Besides that, illiteracy has a strong regional concentration, with the average rate in the northeast being four times greater than that in the south. Figure 1: Illiteracy rates in Brazil (among those aged 15 and over), 2003
Groups of age
Country regions
12%
26.6% 23.2%
9.5%
10.1%
50 and over
30 to 49
20 to 29
15 to 19
South
Southeast
CenterWest
North*
Northeast
Source IBGE/PNAD
On the other side, as may be seen in Figure 2, the educational situation of the Brazilian people has improved appreciably in the last ten years. The percentage changes on the total population of over 10 years old are significant if we take into account the short period of time that has passed, the historical backwardness in education in Brazil, the size of the Brazilian population overall and the huge regional disparities of the country.
The burden of the past has not yet been overcome and there are still very important issues to be addressed in terms of access and quality at all levels of education. The main problem of the public finance system in Brazilian education continues to be its regressive nature. Directing a great part of the educational budget to financing federal higher education institutions reduces the amount of resources available for the other levels of education. Also, it is necessary to significantly increase the funding dedicated to the three levels of education, taking into account also the question of equality. 1.2. The organization of the Brazilian Educational System The Federal Constitution of 1988 and the General Law of Education in Brazil (LDB) of 1996 attributed to the Federal Government, states, Federal District and municipalities the responsibility of administering the Brazilian educational system, considering three educational public systems as a basis for collaboration between these federal systems. Each of these public educational systems is responsible for its own maintenance, which administers funds as well as mechanisms and sources for financial resources. The new Constitution reserves 25% of state and municipal taxes and 18% of federal taxes for education. As laid down by the Constitution, responsibility for basic education lies with the states and municipalities. Because of this, a historical feature of Brazilian basic education is its extremely decentralized nature, which gives great organizational autonomy to sub-national governments (27 states and 5,546 municipalities) in organizing their educational systems. Early childhood education, from 0-6 years, is the sole responsibility of the municipalities. Responsibility for compulsory primary education from 1st to 8th grades is shared between states and municipalities. Kindergarten and pre-school education are the responsibility of local levels of government, while secondary schools are the responsibility of the states. Maintenance of the system, including salaries, the definition of teacher career structures and supervision of early childhood, primary, and secondary levels (which make up basic education) is decentralized, and these levels are responsible for defining their respective curriculum content. Figure 3 shows the Brazilian educational system and regulation.
Kindergarten Pre-School
Level Regulated
(Creche)
0-3 years old
Primary High School Undergraduate School (Secondary) (Pr-Escola) (Ensino (Ensino Mdio) (Graduao) Fundamental)
4-6 years old 7-14 years old 15-17 years old 18+ years old
Categories
public private
public private
public private
Regulator
Municipal Secretary
Municipal Secretary
State Secretary
State Secretary
MEC*
MEC*
Age
Language Schools
Non-regulated
Entrance examination preparation Technical Courses
Brazil has 61 million students in the regulated sector. Figure 4 shows the structure of the Brazilian educational system as a whole and its correspondence with the labour market. Figure 5 shows the recent evolution of the shares of private sector in the enrolments for the educational system. Figure 4: Relation between the educational system and the world of work in Brazil
Age
Postgraduate Level
Sequential Courses
World of Work
19 18
18 17
Secondary School Eprimary Primary School - Compulsory Early childhood Pre School education Creche Kindergarten Entrance examinations Income Transfer programmes to keep children in School
14 7 4 0
Secondary Education
25%
9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 10%
Higher Education
75% 70% 65% 61% 61% 60% 55%
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
71%
Higher education begins with undergraduate or sequential courses, which may offer different specialization choices such as academic or vocational education. Depending on choice, students may improve their educational background with postgraduate courses Stricto Sensu or Lato Sensu. Higher education has three bases: teaching, research and extension, each with their own specific contribution to make to a particular course. Diplomas and certificates are proof of having passed through higher education. Figure 6 below describes this organization. Figure 6: Details of the structure of higher education
Stricto Sensu Post-doctorate
It has a social character and can be offered at any HEI. The certificates of such courses are not considered as an academic degree. Nevertheless, they may have positive impact in the curriculum vitae of a basic education teacher or a professional of areas that have practical contents, like administration or Information technology Certificate
Doctorate
Diploma
Master
Diploma
Technological
Diploma
Specific Formation.
Diploma
Complementation
Certificate
Undergraduate Courses
Extension Courses
Secondary School
Primary School
Infantile Education
Source: MEC
1.3. Financing Education in Brazil 1.3.1. Distribution of Responsibilities Total expenditure on education in Brazil corresponds to 5.2% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), while public spending related to education corresponded to 4.7%, which is not a small amount. Developed countries such as the United States and Japan invest a similar proportion in education. The Federal Constitution of 1988 gave more autonomy to the municipalities, allowing them to organize their own educational systems, independent of state or federal supervision. However, there were no legal criteria for the division of tasks in education; and financing of the educational network was chaotic. The new Constitution mandated that 25% of state and municipal income and 18% of federal government income go to education. In the years that followed, non-commitment to these constitutional provisions became generalized. The law had reserved the resources, but had not introduced efficient supervisory and control mechanisms. State and municipal governments made use of all types of artifices to include other administrative expenses in the educational budget. The accounting laws made it possible to conceal these artifices, through which resources that should have been invested in education disappeared. Another aspect that should be considered is the fact that Brazil is a country of great regional contrasts. In the poorer regions, the capacity of the public sector to invest in education is much lower than that of the wealthier regions such as the Southeast and the South. To make these regional imbalances even worse, historical characteristics have led to an unequal distribution of students between the state and municipal educational system. The states have always been able to invest more than the municipalities, especially in the poorer regions. However, it was in these poorer states  especially in the Northeast  that the municipalities had to deal with the majority of the students in basic education, since the financial contribution of the state government was negligible. In the wealthier regions, the opposite occurred, with the presence of the state government predominating. Public investments in education were approximately R$76 billion in 2003
Figure 7: Breakdown of public investments in education per sector  2003Est.
1st-8th grades 49%
Secondary 13%
Municipalities 38%
10
Based on data from the OECD, Brazil is one of the countries with the greatest disparity in public investment per student according to the various levels of education, as shown in Figure 9 below. Figure 9: Education investments in US$(000) per student  1999
19 , 2
13 ,6
10 ,2 8,1 6,6 6,0 5,2 4,1 2,2 7,9 7,1 5,2 4 ,8 3,6
9 ,5 8 ,0 6 ,9 5,6 3,6 1,4 1,9 1,6 2,3 1,0 2 ,2 1,3 1,1 1,5 1,8 1,0 0,9 1,1 1,5 0,8 5,7 4,9 5,6 4 ,8 5,5
US
Japan
France
Port ugal
UK
Spain
Chile
Argentina
Uruguay
M exico
M alasya
Brazil
Paraguay
Secondary Education
Higher education
Source: OECD Education at a Glance 2002
Compared with other countries, the financial effort Brazil is making to channel resources to education is relatively small in relation the proportion of children and young people in the population. According to OECD data for 2000, public education investment in Brazil in terms of GDP (4.1% of GDP) is significantly less than Argentinas 4.8% because 31% of Brazils population is aged from 5-19, while Argentina has only 28% of its population in this group. In the case of Mexico, where 33% of children are in this age group, public investment in relation to GDP is 5.1%. 1.3.2. The Fund for Development of Fundamental Education and Enhancement of the Teachers Profession - Fundef In 1995, the newly installed government made basic education its priority. The central point of the policy implemented for basic education was the approval and implementation of the Fund for the Development of Fundamental Education and Enhancement of the Teachers Profession Fundef. It was created by the 14th Constitutional Amendment and approved on 13th September 1996, with an expiry date of December, 2006. In essence the Amendment promoted a substantial redistribution of money and responsibilities among states and their municipalities. Its main points were the following: 1. For 10 years 15% of the fiscal revenues of states and municipalities must be only spent on elementary education (1st 8th grade). 2. This 15% is to be redistributed among the states and their municipalities according to the number of students enrolled in municipal or state primary schools. 3. The Federal Government guarantees a minimum expenditure per student (R$ 551,00 as of 2004). 4. 60% of those resources must be used only to pay the salaries of active teachers.
11
5. No bureaucracy. The amendment only fixed new criteria for the distribution of resources 6. The Fundef money is deposited in a specific account which may only be used for expenditure on primary education The Fundef had a revolutionary impact on Brazilian education in a short time. Besides making education accessible to all, the regional differences were dramatically reduced. This process was led by the 5,562 mayors in Brazil: in 1994 there were only 12 million students in municipal schools as compared to 18 million in the state schools. In 2002, municipal schools had 18 million students and numbers in the state system had decreased to 14 million. This occurred due to a process that gave the responsibility of the 1st to 4th grade education to the municipalities, and to a powerful movement to create new municipal schools and increase the number of students in those already existing. Teacher salaries in municipal educational systems in the Northeast increased 70% over a period of three years, in nominal terms, between 1997 and 2000. It is worth noting that during the same period inflation, as measured by the INPC (National Consumer Price Index) /IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics), was about 12%. In conclusion, the use of educational resources in the states and municipalities increased significantly, which reduced wastage and diversion of public resources. The current government has proposed a Constitutional Amendment to create the Fund for the Development of Basic Education - Fundeb, aimed at expanding the means of financing primary education from 1st to 8th grades for the whole of basic education (from pre-school to the 3rd year of secondary school). The proposal for the creation of the Fundeb, as a substitute for the current Fundef aims to improve the financing issue in basic education. The new Fund will create the means for the necessary growth to occur in secondary and early childhood education, which are stages of basic education not included in the Fundef. 2. Basic Education During the last years, Brazil has been able to put into practice a wide-ranging and successful process of educational reform involving educational, financial and administrative aspects. In spite of the short time that has passed and the long time that is needed for educational investments to mature, the indicators that are available already show very significant advances in both qualitative and quantitative aspects. There has been a dramatic process of expansion in basic education and in bringing large new groups of the population into the teaching system. At primary level, 10% more children came from precisely the poorest sections of the community, raising the attendance rate to 97% of the total in the age range. At secondary level, enrolments increased to 88% in the same period. Normally, we would expect a decline in the quality indicators of the system due to the speed with which this expansion occurred. Fortunately, this has not been the case since all quality indicators have also shown significant improvement. However, Brazil is still a long way from reaching the educational level necessary for a fairer society which is better adapted to meeting the needs of the age of knowledge. Brazil has more than 43 million people in primary and secondary education, of whom only 37 million are children and young people between 7 and 17 years of age. There is a surplus of 6 million people in the system who would already have left school if they had not had to repeat grades. The national aim of universalizing the completion of primary and secondary education can be achieved if only effective actions for substantially reducing repetition and dropout rates are maintained within the management of educational systems at the sub-national level. Because of that the gross enrolment rate in primary education is more than 100% and at the secondary level the figure is double the net enrolment rate.
12
The need now is to continue what has been started. There are two very distinct areas of concern that require an immediate solution. On the one hand there is the question of financing education. The question of universalizing the access to primary education has been solved, but it needs to be consolidated and adequate mechanisms must be formulated for preschool and secondary education. On the other hand, policies for improving quality must be continued, such as teacher-training programmes, improving access to reading books, introducing new technologies into basic education, lengthening the school day, etc. Summing up, the challenges Brazil must face in the immediate future in relation to its basic education system are the following: Invest more resources in education Improve the quality of Basic Education Expand access to infant education, especially to pre-school Make access to Secondary Education universal Improve the means of financing Basic Education Use the results of the Evaluation System in managing the public sector Invest in initial and in-service teacher training Improve access to new technologies in basic education
2.1. Recent expansion on access and enrolments in basic education During the 1990s, Brazil made a great effort to overcome the deleterious effects that had accumulated during the decades in which education was neglected. Today, 97% of children aged between 7 and 14 are in school and illiteracy rates are falling dramatically. Figure 10 shows clearly that the difference between levels of education between the 20% of the richest and the 20% of the poorest people decreased dramatically. The figure shows how provision of schooling for 7 to 14 year-olds developed, by quintiles of income. In 1992, only 75% of poorest children between 7 and 14 years of age were in school that is, out of every 4 poor children one was not in school as opposed to 97% of the children of the richest sector of society. In 2003, 95% of the poorest children were going to school, compared to 99% of the richest. The difference between rich and poor fell from 23% in 1992 to only 4%. With the poorest rapidly growing closer to the richest in terms of access to primary education, measures can be taken in terms of the social differences that derive from access to knowledge as expressed in the fact that 45% of heads of poor families have never been to school or dropped out before finishing one year of study.
13
Figure 10: School attendance2 of children in the 7-14 age group, according to income levels (%)
99 97 94 94 93 99 98 97 96 95
97 93
87 83
75
1992
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
3 percentile
Source IBGE/MEC
The fundamental instrument in getting all children between 7 and 14 into school was the Fundef, already mentioned, which had a huge effect on Brazilian education by reason of the short period of time between its creation and the signs of its first results. To maintain the momentum and ensure that children remain in school, the Bolsa Escola programme was launched by the Federal Government in 2001 to help keep the children of poorest families studying. The aim was to provide a monthly grant in money for all families whose per capita income was less than R$90.00 (at that time the equivalent of half a minimum wage) and who had children between 6 and 15 years of age enrolled in and attending primary school. The aims were: to make sure those children from low-income families remain in school; to transfer money directly to improve the situation of absolute poverty in families all over the country as long as those families kept their children in school, and to help eradicate child labour, which is an enormous social problem in Brazil even today. Under the present government, the Bolsa Escola programme has been linked to other already existing Federal Government grant programmes which have been combined as far as possible with state and municipal initiatives. With its new format, it was renamed the Bolsa Famlia. The demand for secondary education is coming from lower-income students. Middle and high-income students have always been in the classrooms at this level. Since lower-income students do not have means to pay for private schooling, the need for expansion in the services provided by the public sector was implied. The LDB contained another meaning for the constitutional concept of progressive universalizing of access to free secondary education, by including secondary education as the final stage of basic education in Brazil and inducing the states to create the necessary conditions, including the building of schools.
2
Data concerning the scale of provision for this segment of the population, that is, the initial enrolment of pupils from a specific age group at all levels of education. The rate of provision makes it possible to identify the percentage of the schoolage population that is going to school, regardless of the grade they are in.
14
Secondary education has grown in this way during the last ten years when compared to previous period because in former times there simply were not enough pupils who had completed primary education to create the pressure for places at secondary level. Between 1994 and 2003, ordinary secondary education absorbed 4.1 million new enrolments after 14 years of stagnant growth. In the period 198094 the system had grown by only 1.8 million on top of those already existing. Also, the number of pupils completing this level of education increased. From 1991 to 1994, the number of completions had increased by 40%, rising from 660 thousand to 917 thousand. After 1994 the flow through school improved and in 2003 the total number of completions reached almost 1.9 million. The recent growth in basic education enrolments is revealing another very important aspect, which is the decrease in differences between regions in terms of access to and completion of education, at both primary and secondary levels. The expansion of these levels of education between 1993 and 2002 was significantly greater in the Northeast and North than in the rest of the country. In addition, in recent years pupils who are behind in school and are over 18, and those who have needed to leave school, are increasingly seeking Education for Young People and Adults the level of education that has seen the highest level of growth in Brazil during the last ten years. By law, the young person over 18 years old is allowed to obtain the certificate of completing secondary education by means of highly condensed and quick preparatory courses if he or she can pass an official examination. Enrolments in this level of education tripled between 1995 and 2001, to 3.4 times what they had been in 1995 about 1.2 million enrolments. Success in completing education at this level has also increased. In 1995, calculations of flow through school estimated there were 71 completions for every 100 entrants The enormous expansion of secondary education has had two important consequences in Brazil: the high rate of unemployment of young people with this level of education, and the great differences in rates of return on education between those who only have secondary education and those who have continued their studies in higher education. As a consequence of the expansion in basic education and the relatively low rate of economic growth, the marginal return on primary and secondary education, in spite being still very high, has decreased in a relatively discrete manner faced with the relative increase in the supply of workers in these groups during the last decade of the 20th century. 2.2. The quality issues The inclusion of new educational cohorts in schools has thrown up evidence of problems in the quality of teaching. Educational evaluation in Brazil plays a central part in the strategy for reforming the teaching system and the process of improving quality. The contribution of evaluation procedures to monitoring policies implies an advance in the implementation of those policies. Until the mid-1990s it was not even known how big the problem was. The progress made until now, even with the realization that there are still many challenges left to face, has benefited enormously from the new culture of evaluation which began to gain ground in Brazil from the 1990s and from the use of evaluation results in formulating public policies. Quality in education led to serious problems on the transition rates in the system: 1. Rates of year repetition and dropout in Brazilian schools are very high 2. Rates of promotion, repetition and dropout in basic education are developing satisfactorily in general if seen from a long-term perspective starting from the 1980s.
15
3. Nevertheless, the rates of promotion have begun to decline, repetition rates are stable after a sharp decline during the 1990s and dropout rates are showing worrying signs of increasing, both in 4th and 8th grades of primary school as well as in the 3rd year of secondary. The change in the evolution of the transition rates from 1998 on coincides with the vigorous incorporation of new segments of the population both in fundamental and secondary education. The same pattern may be identified through the analysis of the evolution of the Sistema Brasileiro de Avaliao Educacional Saeb. The Saeb, as a central element of the National System of Basic Education, promotes the valuation of education systems and tries to identify the main problems in order to provide policies to improve the quality of teaching. The achievements of the Brazilian students from 4th and 8th grades of fundamental education and 3rd grade of secondary education are very low in general in comparison with the expected achievements according to the National Parameters for the Curricula (PCN). These results are differentiated according to regions. Although there is a certain uniformity in performance of pupils between the critical and intermediate levels (between 80% and 90% of results are found within this range), the critical level is higher in the North and Northeast regions. The process of making primary education universal that was carried out during the 1990s and the expansion of secondary education due to the entry into school of children and youngsters from social groups with the lowest incomes and lowest educational background led to a discrete fall in the average achievements of the students in the tests. Nevertheless, the latest measurement in 2003 showed a recovery from 1999 and 2001, due to the initial impact of quality policies implemented since 1995. In other words, the fact of there not having been a very significant fall in the performance levels of pupils in evaluations made after 2001 and that there was even found to be a rise in recent years in spite of the rapid inclusion of new students in the education system, may be attributed to the positive effect of the following factors: Better-qualified teachers National Curriculum Parameters Better textbooks available to more students (8 grades) The distribution of reading books Parent participation in schools
Besides the Saeb, two other instruments are components of the assessment system for basic education: the Enem and Brazils participation in Pisa. By building a framework of competencies and competences to be a measure for evaluation, the Enem laid down for the first time in Brazil a benchmark for the end of basic education in the same way that other international examinations like the SAT (Scholastic Aptitude Test) in the United States, the French Baccalaureate, and others. Pisa is a comparative assessment programme whose ultimate aim is to assess the performance of pupils at the age of 15 in order to produce indicators concerning the effectiveness of educational systems. The most recent tests were held in 2003 and given to 250 thousand 15 year-olds in 41 countries, most of them members of the OECD, which included the 30 member nations as well as invited countries. Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico represented Latin America.3
3
The theoretical framework for the Pisa is based on the concept of literacy in a broad sense, including the educational philosophy in the PCN, and curricular proposals in the states and municipalities in Brazil. The concept of literacy is defined as the ability of an individual to master the task of writing for various situations as required in every day life. According to the PCN, the ability to read and write texts of the most varied genre and themes with proficiency - is the most significant
16
Among the factors that can be highlighted as contributing to the improvement of the basic education students, is the decrease in the age/grade discrepancy, still high in Brazil, although lower than in 2000, which was the last year of the Pisa evaluation. The difference between the grades of the 15 year-old Brazilian students compared to those of other countries is pointed out as being the main cause of the relatively low Brazilian performance in this evaluation. Only half of the population, from which the sample was taken, was at the secondary level, while practically all of the 15 year-olds in the other OCDE countries were at the secondary level and had had an average of ten years of schooling. However, the improvement that began to occur in the lower grades that is correcting the discrepancy should, over the next few years, reach the higher grades. Even though there was improvement, in the Pisa evaluation as well as in the Saeb, the results are not satisfactory. Brazil occupies one of the lowest positions in the international evaluation and the proportion of students that demonstrate adequate grade-level competency is low. Because of those quality problems, while Brazil has almost achieved universal completion of 4th grade, it is still far from achieving universal completion of primary education 8th grade, and secondary school. At current rates, 89% of pupils are finishing 4th grade of primary education, 65% the 8th grade of primary and 45% 3rd grade at secondary level. Enrolments at secondary and primary levels should correspond respectively to the more or less 27 million children aged between 7 and 14 and to the 10.4 million young people aged between 15 and 17. 2.3. The content of Basic Education From 1995 on, in basic education great attention was given to formulating the curricular guidelines for all levels of education and to evaluating the textbooks that were bought and distributed by the Ministry to basic education institutions in the country. Systems for information and educational evaluation were developed which made it possible to take decisions at all levels of government in a timely manner. New technologies were systematically introduced into the public schools. Changes were also made in the programmes the Ministry traditionally carried out, such as the school lunch programme, where complete decentralization occurred. From 1995, the Ministry established National Parameters for the Curricula (PCN) for all levels of basic education, including education for indigenous nations and for older children and adults. The Parameters were defined for every subject of the curricula and for transversal themes that covered the interdisciplinary content aimed at educating the citizen. The curricular reform carried out in primary and secondary education emphasized the development of competences and skills in problem-solving and logical thinking, and the rationalization of curriculum content that required memorization to the detriment of reasoning. The basic training looked for in secondary education came to be achieved more by building competences, skills and behaviours than by quantity of information. Learning to learn and to think, relating knowledge to facts about everyday experience, giving meaning to what has been learned and capturing the meaning of the world, making a bridge between theory and practice, providing the basis for criticism, arguing on the basis of facts, dealing with the feelings that learning arouses, were the aims of the reforms.
indicator of good linguistic performance and thus literacy. Results of PISA 2003 showed that the Brazilian students had the greatest growth rate in two areas of Math, they improved in Science, and they remain at the same level in Reading in comparison with the last one Brazil participated in 2000.
17
2.4. Situation of teachers at the basic education level The LDB sanctioned in December 1996 and the Constitutional Amendment that created the FUNDEF, although very far reaching in their impact on education in Brazil, presented ambitious objectives related to teacher training. The LDB dealt specifically with two important topics: hiring of teachers only by concursos (public examination/selection process) in the public schools, and minimum teacher qualifications to be required for teachers at all levels of education including early childhood education. The Law set the deadlines for teachers to receive their higher education degrees, and defined criteria and norms for the teacher training programmes. The training of teachers to work in basic education should take place at the higher education level, in a teacher certification programme, that is a full fouryear programme, at universities and higher education institutions. The Fundef, on the other hand, has allowed, during the first five years, part of its resources to be used to train lay teachers. This is due to the legal permission given to utilize a portion of the 60% payment of the Fundef (related to teacher pay), to train lay teachers, that is, teachers without any prior teacher training. Approximately 85% of all the education systems showed a decrease in non-certified professionals on their staff. Thus, one of the priorities for the creation of the Fundef, the extinction of the category of lay teachers, resulting in the improvement in qualifications of the teaching staff, is rapidly being achieved throughout the entire country. See Table 1. There are also evidences that show important real increase in the salaries of the teachers because of Fundef in the country as a whole, and especially in the municipal systems of the Northeast region. Table 1: Teaching Posts according to their educational level
Teaching Posts with Basic Education (lay teachers) Early Childhood Education and 1st to 4th grade In thousands Proportion Teaching Posts with University Education In thousands Proportion 5th to 8th grade Secondary Education Total number of teachers (in thousands) 1995 262.5 24% 898.4 44% 72% 82% 2,026.1 2003 23.0 2% 1,453.3 61% 77% 90% 2,336.1
Source: MEC/ INEP
In the case of many teacher training programmes, it is necessary to correct low quality, as well as to guarantee greater opportunities for a good education, in order to satisfy the increased demand for teachers with high-quality training. To improve the quality of teachers, it is not enough to guarantee that they all have sufficient training, nor is it enough to change course content to train new teachers; programmes must be developed to bring them up to date and train them. One important aspect of the curriculum content in educational subjects is to require practical experience and to focus more on teaching experiences and results of student achievements than on education theories and ideologies 2.5. Gender in Brazilian Basic Education Educational indicators in recent years have shown a significant advance in the educational situation of the female population of Brazil in relation to their male counterparts. In ten years there has been a
18
marked improvement in the educational level of children and teenagers aged between 5 and 17 years and these results have been even more impressive within the female population. There is a clear difference between illiteracy rates of boys and girls aged 10 to 14 even though both rates have declined over the years. Among those aged 10 or over, male and female illiteracy rates were close to each other because, among the older age groups, female illiteracy was higher than men and the contrary occurs among the younger age groups. From 1993 to 2003, in the 10 to14 year-old group, male illiteracy fell from 14.1% to 4.7% and female illiteracy from 8.5% to 2.2%. The higher rate of education among the female population compared to men is confirmed when we observe the total number of people attending school in 2003. The female population is more highly represented than the male both in secondary school (54% and 46% respectively) and in higher education (57.2% and 42.8% respectively). The only exception is in primary education where the percentage of boys is still a little higher (50.8% and 49.2% respectively). The higher rate of repetition among male pupils should be taken into account. 2.6. Race and social imbalances Increasing access to basic education for the poorest sectors of the population has been of particular benefit to the poorest sections of the population, especially Afro-Brazilians. In 1992, school attendance among black children aged between 7 and 14 years was only 79%, a proportion that rose to 95% in 2003. Differences in access to education and school performance in Brazil are associated more with economic and social factors than with racial ones per se. Special data on the frequency of attendance in school by pupils who are at the correct age for the grade in which they are studying, according to age-groups, family income levels and self-declared race of the individual in the population census shows the following conclusions: In general, within each income per capita group, when it comes to school attendance at the correct grade, differences between races are small or imperceptible. The only exception is found in the systematically higher percentages of those of oriental origin in relation to their respective family income group. In general, the differences in percentages of school attendance at the correct grade among the white, black and mixed-race groups of each family income group per capita are far less than those found among individuals of whatever race among family income groups.
2.7. Technical and Vocational School at secondary level The concept of preparing for work is present in the Parameters for the Curriculum of secondary education. That preparation must be basic, in other words, it should be one that can serve as a basis for the training of everyone and for all types of work. The LDB assumes that there is a difference between general preparation for work and vocational training. This general preparation for work therefore, embraces the general content and skills needed to enter the world of work and those that are relevant or indispensable for entering a course of vocational training and practicing a technical career. In the first case, content would include general notions concerning the role and value of work, the end-products of work and conditions of production, among others.
19
At the beginning of the 1990s, the structure of the vocational education system in Brazil was very precarious and heterogeneous. There was a segment that contained Federal Technical Education Centres (CEFETs) and federal technical schools of good academic quality, although it was very small in relation to the countrys needs and largely unrelated to the employment market requirements of the regions where the institutions were located. In relation to this part of the system, a paradoxical situation existed: the better the school, the more dysfunctional was its role in light of its original mission of training technical manpower. The segments of the S system SENAI, SENAC, SENAR (National Service for Rural Training) had expanded and as a rule maintained good standards and close ties with the employment market. Nonetheless, they were still very small in terms of meeting social demands and their interconnection with the educational system as a whole was still difficult. According to the guidelines of the Reform of Technical Education implemented after the new LDB was approved, vocational training should complement basic education and be organized flexibly to allow frequent returns to the system of those that have left it, to guarantee that they will keep abreast of technical evolution. This new paradigm, which guided most of the educative reforms of secondary and vocational teaching in the world during the 90s, was the basic inspiration of the Brazilian reform. The main change in the legal situation under the current administration since January, 2003 was on the interface between vocational education and secondary education that now may occur in three ways: integrated, in the same educational establishment, with a single enrolment for each student; concomitantly, in the same educational establishment or in separate educational institutions, taking advantage of the educational opportunities available, or a complementary partnership; and finally, offered only to those who completed secondary education considered fundamental for obtaining a professional license of secondary education level. According to the 2004 School Census, technical vocational education in Brazil is offered by public and private institutions in 20 areas of training. There are 3,047 institutions with 676 thousand students. Most of the institutions offering technical courses in Brazil are private. In all, there are 2,172 private establishments, representing 71% of the total. Then there is the state sector with 600 establishments (20% of the total). The number of federal institutions is 143 (5%) and municipal institutions totalled 130 (4%). When we look at the distribution of enrolments, it is clear that most of them are in the private sector, accounting for more than half the number of students (585); while the state sector accounts for 27% of students and the federal and municipal sectors provide for 27% and 3% respectively. 3. Higher Education, Labour Market and Human Resources Development The main problems the Brazilian higher education system is facing at present are the following: 1. Access: in spite of the rapid expansion during the last ten years, the system is still small compared with those of other countries in Latin America. Also, most students in higher education come from medium- and high-income groups. The poorest sections of the population can only enter higher education today as a result of the great expansion at secondary level. 2. Finance: the new sections of the population trying to enter higher education lack sufficient financial backing. Places in the free public institutions are very restricted and the cost of private education is very high in terms of the incomes of these new groups aspiring to enter higher education.
20
3. Quality: the quality of higher education institutions in Brazil is very variable. Alongside institutions with international reputations we find many with low levels of teaching and little encouragement to undertake research. 4. Efficiency: public institutions - usually of better quality than the rest - suffer great problems of inefficiency in the use of public resources, resulting in a relatively small number of students attending them in terms of the amount of funds invested. 5. Curricular structure unrelated to the needs of the labour market: the content of higher education courses in Brazil lacks the flexibility to adapt to the needs of the labour market. 6. Little connection with the productive sector: in general, technological research and development is carried out in universities with little connection with the productive sector. 3.1. Expansion and access to Higher Education Higher education enrolments more than doubled in the last ten years. In spite of this significant growth, the gross rate of enrolments at the higher level in Brazil is very small when compared to international levels, even when compared to some of other comparable countries in Latin America. Nevertheless, there is a reasonable consensus of opinion on the need to settle on the most effective way to provide a more lasting solution to the problems of access and equity in higher education. In the 1980s growth in enrolments did not even keep up with population growth. Between 1980 and 1994 expansion of higher education was quite restricted: growth of only 20% in enrolments; reduction of 3.5% in the number of higher education institutions and 26% growth in the number of courses. In 1994, total enrolments on undergraduate courses were 1.7 million. The higher education system at that time consisted of 851 institutions. As may be seen in Figure 11, there was a significant increase in enrolments and completions of higher education courses in Brazil after 1995. Figure 11: Number of enrolments and completions in higher education in Brazil
4,5 4,0
Enrollments (millions)
0,60
Completions (millions)
Enrollments
Complentions
Source: MEC/INEP
21
The growth in supply of courses in recent years has being greater in towns in the interior than in state capitals. That an interiorization of higher education is occurring because of an appreciable growth in the numbers of courses, so that many towns which previously had no HEI now have one. This has brought great benefits to students who had been excluded on a regional basis. Many who had not been able to move to the state capital to study at the higher level and now have the chance to do so in their hometown. Socio-economic data concerning students in Brazilian higher education institutions show the marked presence of those coming from social groups with average and high incomes. It can even be stated that the supply of places is basically a response to the demand for higher education that these classes have created. With the ever-growing demand and a far greater number of students able and desiring to enter higher education, private institutions have had ample room to increase their supply. The growing expansion of secondary education and the increase in the number of students leaving this level of education suggests that there is greater pressure for obtaining chances of education at a higher level coming precisely from the poorer classes in society. The growth in supply of courses in recent years has been greater in the poorest states and in towns in the interior than in the southwest or south and state capitals. Projections concerning access to higher education indicate the growth among students from lower-income families in the total numbers of new entrants to higher education, as may be observed in Figure 12. This is happening due to the increased flow of students coming from public secondary education and the increasing demand for better-qualified personnel with university degrees for jobs which previously did not require them. Figure 12: Number of students entering higher education
Average family monthly income (R$):
0,7
0,7
0,8
0,8
R$ 927
B-
R$ 1.669
B+ AA+
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: MEC/ INEP, IBGE/ PNAD and Paulo Renato Souza Consultores
One of the main areas for public policy in relation to access is the design of the means of financing studies and maintaining lower-income students in the system. The policies of increasing rates of schooling at higher level with improved quality at this level, especially in public institutions, increasing the number of places on evening courses, the broad re-design of the means of financing studies and maintaining lower-income students in the system, are some of the possible initiatives being put into place. The country has experienced several mechanisms for increasing access to higher education,
22
including student loans programmes, scholarships in private institution in exchange of tax exemption and, quotas. The policy of quotas, which is very controversial, appears in this context as a transitional strategy. It is also important to emphasize that the expansion of evening classes in the public sector is still insufficient to meet the potential demand from students who are finishing their public secondary education during the evening shift. A great part of this potential demand has been met by the private sector. In Brazil, 68% of private enrolments are for the evening period, in which most courses do not require full-time attendance. (See figures 13 and 14) Number of Public and Private Enrolments by Shift (Daytime or Evening Courses)
Figure 13: Daytime Enrolments
2.500 2.000 1.500 1.000 514 500 535 0 1999 2000 2001 Public 2002 2003 573 597 611 699 801 887
2.500 2.000 1.500 1.000 500 0 297 1999 314 2000 342 2001 Public 377 2002 407 2003 1.024 1.196 1.393 1.627 1.863
675
730
Private
Source: MEC/INEP
Private
Source: MEC/INEP
3.2. Quality in Higher Education In 1995, the higher education system in Brazil suffered from very low quality in a significant number of institutions. This low quality was associated with the accreditation process for new institutions which was bureaucratic and hindered by the red tape, a situation that created a system without competition and of low quality, with oligopolies that provided huge profits for the owners of private educational institutions. It would be natural to assume that such a rapid expansion in the system would have been detrimental to its quality, that there would not be a sufficient number of qualified academic staff; that general teaching conditions would have deteriorated in comparison with the past; that the new institutions would be of worse quality than the old ones. In spite of the short time during which it has been possible to evaluate significant changes in quality, all the available indicators show precisely the opposite: (1) the higher education system today shows quality indicators better than those of 1995 and (2) the new institutions have received better appraisals than the old ones. Clearly, this does not mean that there is good quality in general nor that the present level of quality is satisfactory in relation to the country's needs. It merely means that some of the measurable quality indeed improved during the process of expansion. The higher education evaluation system showed that the process of expansion took place along with a general improvement in the quality of the system. Quality of teaching staff showed impressive improvement, as did indicators of better infrastructure. In the private sector, competition based on the search for quality and efficiency in providing the service also contributed to the overall improvement in the system. 23
The supposition, which proved to be correct, was that in dealing with a selected part of the population, both in terms of the clientele of the system as well as future users and employers of graduate personnel, the existence of objective evaluation criteria would exert an enormous social pressure on the worst institutions. The most important point was certainly the reaction of society to the information concerning the evaluation of HEIs. Students reacted in a surprisingly swift manner. Judging from demand  measured by the relationship of candidates to places  for private courses with grades A and B, this grew approximately 18% between 1996 and 2002, while demand for courses graded C and D in the test dropped approximately 41% during the same period, as we may see from Figure 15 below.4 This shows that the mere spread of information produces a social reaction which has a far greater force than possible administrative punishments. Figure 15: Percentage development of the relationship between candidates and places between 1996 and 2002 to in courses evaluated by the Provo
30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% -40% -50% -40.7% D or E C A or B 1.3% 18.0%
The improvement can also be observed in the case of qualification of teaching staff. Given the great expansion in private education, the number of teaching staff working in this area has doubled in the last 8 years. While in 1995, only 25% of them had masters or doctoral degrees, by 2003 more than half of them had this level of qualification. In federal universities, only 21% of teaching staff had doctorates in 1995, a figure which rose to over 40% in 2003. If we include those with masters degrees, they account for 70% of total teaching staff in this sector. Table 2 shows this very clearly.
The results of the Provo where presented in five grades (A to E, being A the highest). Those grades corresponded to the relative average of achievements of the students attending the last year of each school into 24 different careers. Those averages were grouped according to a normal curve.
24
private institutions
total master's or Ph.D. doctorate
federal institutions
total master's or Ph.D. doctorate
In the same way, topics relating to the condition of infrastructure in institutions show a gradual improvement in quality. Access to computers, for example, although still insufficient for the majority of students, has been improving year by year. From 1997-2002, several careers have shown an increase in the number of students who say they are using computers in their educational establishments. Institutions have been adopting computerized programs in their libraries and most students use local systems for bibliographical research. Computerized access to bibliographical research networks, both national and international, as well as by the Internet, is still low on some courses but is increasing. Aspects of the curriculum are also dealt with and the questionnaires are showing that supervised workexperience is being used more frequently in various areas of higher education. This provides another quality indicator because work-experience allows students to live and work under supervision in conditions of working life. Table 3 summarizes the replies of students to some of the most relevant questions. Table 3: The surveys applied to students taking the Provo
1997 Vs 2001: