IN THE UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT COURT
FOR  THE DISTRICT  OF SOUTH  CAROLTNA
COLUMBIA DIVTSION
UNITED STATES  OF AMERICA
TAI{ES  R.  METTS
a/k/a 
",fimmy 
Metts"
a/k/a 
"sheriff  Metts,,
a/k/ a 
"Lexingrton
Sheriff"
THE  GRAND  .JURY  CHARGES:
At  all  t,imes  rel_evant
otherwise stated:
1.  Lexington County
friends  t.o buy favors when
the  identification  and
al-iens.
NO.  :
U. S. C. 
S 371
U. S. C. 
S 19s2 
(a)
u. s. c.  s r-s05
u. s. c. 
s 1343
u. s. c. 
s 1346
u.s.c. 
s 132+(a)
U.S.C. 
S 1324(a)
u.s.c. 
s 2
INDTCTMENT
CR.
18
1B
18
18
18
8
8
1_8
(3)
(1) (A) (v) (r)
(1) (A) (iii)
t.o  this  Indictment,  unLess
Sherif f  ,JAMES  R.  METTS allowed
he accepted  cash to  int.erfere  in
processing 
of  certain  illegaI
A.  Individuals  Involved in  the Criminal  Sctreme
2 .  The Def  endant,  .IAMES R.  METTS,  was and  is  the
Sherif f  of  Lexington  County,  Sout.h Carolina.  METTS has
served  as  the  Sheriff  of  Lexington County  since  L972. As
the  Lexingt.on County  Sherif f 
, 
METTS'  of f icial  duties
incLude overseeing  county-wide  law enforcement;  running t.he
Lexington 
count.y  sherif f 
, 
s  Department; 
hiring,  f iring,  and
supervising 
deputies  and  other  department 
empl0yees;
maintaining 
records,-  and coordinating 
wit.h f ederal,  sEate,
and  ot,her  local  law  enforcement. 
As  Lexington  county
sheriff,  METTS is  ar-so  responsibre 
for  operating  the
Lexington  County  Detention 
Center,  which, 
among other
things,  accepts  and  houses individuals 
arrested  in  and
around  Lexington County.
3.  From 2005 through 20L3, Danny Frazier  served  as a
member  of  the  Lexington  Town council_.  As  a  favor,  METTS
hired  Frazier  as  an  employee  of  t.he  Lexington  county
sherif f 
's 
Department  to  serve as  a 
,,business 
riaison,,  in
20L2.
4.  Greg Leon  was the  owner and operator  of  severa]
Mexican  restaurants in  and around columbia,  sc.  rn  at  reast
20L1,  Leon employed  i11ega]  ariens in  those rest,aurants.
B.  section ze1 
G) 
Federar rmmigration  cooperat,ive
5.  u.s.  rmmigration  and customs Enforcement.  (rcE), 
an
investigat.ive agency in  the Department  of  Homeland  security
(DHs) 
, 
'enforces 
fed.eral  immigration  l-aws as  part  of  its
homel-and security  mission.
6.  Section 287 (g) 
of  t,he Immigration 
and Nationality
Act  authorizes DHS  to  enter  into  written  agreements with
local  and  state  law  enforcement 
depart.ments  (such 
as  a
sheri f f ' s  department 
)  to  aut.hori ze 
. 
the  state  or  ]ocal
department' s officers 
to perf 
orm  cert.ain  Iimited
immigration  functi-ons. This  agreement  is  entered  pursuant
to  a 
joint 
Memorandum 
of  Agreement  (MOA) 
.  Under a  287 
(g)
MOA, ICE provides 
certain  law enforcement officers  with  t.he
t.raining,  supervision, 
and  authorization  to  ident ify,
process, 
and detain  i1]ega1 
al-iens they  encounter  within
their 
jurisdictions 
as  part 
of  their  l-aw-enforcement
activity.  The purpose 
of  this  corraboration  is  to  enhance
the  safety  and security  of  communities  by  permitting 
the
identification  and processing 
of  arrested i1legal  aliens  so
that. t.hose  who pose 
a  threat  to  public  safety  or  a  danger
to  the communit.y can be removed.
7 .  Designat.ed state  or  l-ocal- l-aw enforcement  of f icers
under  a  Sect.ion 287 
(g) 
MOA become Task Force Of f icers  wit.h
limit.ed  immigration  enforcement  authority.  rmmigration
enforcement activities  conducted  by these 297 
(g) 
Task Force
officers  must be supervised  and directed  by  rcE supervisory
officers 
(r.e., 
an  Enforcement Removal_ Officer 
(ERO) 
or
supervisory  Deportation 
Detention  officer (sDDo) 
) 
.
Participating  2e7 
(g) 
Task Force Officers  are not  authorized
to  perform 
immigration 
officer  functions  except  when
working  under  the  supervision  and  d.irect.ion  of  an  rcE
supervisor.  while  a  participating 
l_ocal_ law  enf orcement
depart,ment  retains  supervision 
outside  immigration
enforcement  functions, 
t.he l-ocal department  lacks  authority
to  direct,  control,  or  int.erf  ere  with  a  297 
(g) 
Task Force
Officer' s  immigration enforcement functions.
8.  rn  July  of  20L0,  METTS,  and the  Lexington county
Sherif f 
's 
Depart.ment, entered  into  a  287 
(g) 
MOA with  ICE.
The Lexington 287 
(g)  program 
began shortly  t.hereaf  ter  and
was ful1y-st,af  fed  by  early  2otl.  under the  287 
(g) 
program,
certain  Lexingt.on  county  of f icers  received  t.raining  and
became 287 
(g) 
Task Force Of f icers 
(also 
known as Designat.ed
rmmigration  officers)  for  rcE.  These 287 
(g) 
Task  Force
officers  were granted limited  immigration  authority  under
the 287 
(g) program.
9.  Under  the  Lexington  287 
(g)  program, the  Ze7 
(g)
Task Force  officers  were provided daily  with  a  Foreign Born
Report, l-isting  all  potential 
illegaI  aliens  who had been
arrested  and  placed  in  the  Lexingt.on County Detention
center.  These suspected foreign-born arrestees were then
screened  to  determine t.heir proper identificat.ion  based on
biometric and biographical information. Properly
identif ying  i11ega1  al-iens  through  the  use  of  the
computerized  rcE  system 
(referred 
t.o  as  ENFoRCE/TDENT)
permits ICE to  understand an al-ien, s  immigration status  in
t.he United States,  to  know t.he aLien's  criminal-  background,
and to  track  the al-ien  in  the f uture.
10.  Pending  this  identity  screening, l imited-  t.erm
immigration hold  or  detainer  was placed on  each foreign-
born arrest,ee by the  287 
(g) 
Task Force Of f icers.  Absent f CE
supervisory  approval,  alL  suspected  i1IegaI  aliens  were
required to  be processed  by  the  287 
(g) 
Task Force  Officers
through  t.he ICE system 
(ENFORCE/IDENT) 
.  Each arrestee  that
was screened  but  not  identified  and processed  as an i11ega1
alien  was recorded in  an  Interview  Log  along  with  the
reason  the  arrestee was not  identified  and processed  in  the
ICE syst.em 
(ENFORCE/IDENT) 
.  If  an arrestee  was ent.ered into
rcE  system 
(ENFORCE/TDENT) 
, 
then  the  287 
(g) 
Task
officer  would record  that  arrestee  in  the  Detainer
Force
Log-
case Each entry  into  the  Detainer  Log  included  an  fCE
number  along with  other  information 
about the  arrestee and
the reason  for  his  arrest.
11.  Entering  an  i11ega1 
arien  into  the  rcE  system
(ENFORCE/IDENT) 
was  a  crucial  step  in  the  immigration
process. 
Entry  into  the  rcE  syst.em  included 
the  use  of
TDENT,  which permit,s 
an  analysis  of  t.he  i1lega]  arien,s
biometric information ( 
including
fingerprints 
and
photographs) 
to  determine  the  t.rue identity  of  t.he i11ega1
al-ien  as  well-  as  biographical- 
inf ormation  such  as
nationality,  previous 
criminar  convictions,  presence 
on
terrorist  watch 1ists,  and prior  immigration 
encount.ers.
12.  fn  processing 
an identified  illegal  arien,  drr rcE
supervisor  not  a  zel 
G) 
Task Force  officer  was reguired
to  determine  t,he appropriat.e  immigration treatment of  the
al-ien.  Based  on  inf ormation  f rom  the  rcE  system
(ENFORCE/fDENT), 
fCE determined  whether  the  i11ega1 alien
had  any  aggravating  circumstances 
such  as  serious
criminaL convictions  or  prior 
deportat.ions. If  processing
aggravating
circumstances,  then  the  alien  coul-d be  rel-eased  by  an rcE
supervisor  and required  to  report  to  immigration officials
at  a  l-ater  time.  If  the  ICE system  reveal-ed  aggravating
revea]ed  that,  the  al-ien lacked these
circumstances,  then only  an rcE supervisor  courd require
t.hat. Ehe al-ien  be detained  beyond the time of  the rimited
immigration  ho1d.
13.  Members of the Lexington  County  Sheriff, s
Department, including  287 
(g) 
Task Force Of f icers,  l-acked
the  aut.hority  t.o circumvent  the  section 297(g)  program. The
287 
(g) 
Task Force of f icers  were required  t.o enEer illegal
al-iens  in  the  rCE system 
(ENFORCE/TDENT) 
.  An iI1ega]  al_ien
that  was not  entered into  the  rcE  system 
(ENFORCE/TDENT)
would not  be identified  and processed  by ICE, and ICE wouLd
not  l-earn  if  the  iIIegaI  al-ien.  had  aggravating
circumstances  such as serious  prior  convictions.
C.  Sheriff  Metts Allowed  Friends to  Buy Favors  when
Metts  Accepted  Cash in  Return  for  Agreeing  to
Assist  Detained lllegal  Aliens
1-4. Beginning in  or  around September  of  20L!,  METTS
agreed with  Frazier  and Leon to  use his  position,  power,
and infl-uence t.o  affect  the  identification  and processing
of  i1lega1  aliens  held  in  the  Lexington  County  Detention
Cent.er.  Based on  that.  agreement, METTS directed  and
interfered,  and attempted  to  direct. and int,erfere,  with  the
immigrat.ion enforcement activities  of  DHS, ICE,  and  the
Lexington County officers  serving  as  2e7 
G) 
Task  Force
officers.  rn return for  his  agreement and assistance,  METTS
accepted cash  payments.
15.  When METTS was informed of  an arrest  and detent,ion
of  an i1Iega1 al-ien working for  Leon, METTS wourd contact
his  command staf f  and  other  employees  to 
j_nstruct 
that
preferential- 
t,reatment  be  provided 
to  those  specific
i11ega] aLiens.  rn  doing  So, METTS was aware t.hat  Leon, s
employees were i11ega1 aliens.  For example:
a.  On  l-ate  Friday  night.,  September  2 
, 
207_1_,
Il1egal 
#f  an illega1  aLien employed  by Leon
was  arrested  by  West  Columbia 
police
Department  and  transported  to  the  Lexington
County  Detention Center,  arriving  on September
3.  At  t.he detention cenLer, a  287 
(g) 
Task Force
Officer  placed 
an  immigration hold  on  l11ega1
#f.  After  Labor Day, on Tuesday, September 6,
201,1, dt  around  2:27pm, Danny  Frazier  used his
cellphone to  contacE. METTS on  his  cellphone.
After  the  approximately nine  minute cal-I  with
METTS,  Frazier  then used his  cellphone  to  call
Greg Leon at  approximately 2:36pm. At  3:01pm,
METTS'  then used his  cellphone  t,o cal-I Frazier
b.
on  his  cellphone 
for  an  approximately  five-
minut.e cal1.  Then Frazier used his  cellphone to
cal-l  Leon on  his  cellphone  at  3 : 09pm. During
Ehese caLl-s and  otherwise,  Frazier  inf ormed
METTS t.hat one of  Leon,s employees  I11ega1 
#f
had been arrested and sent  t.o the  Lexington
County  Detention Center.  METTS agreed  to  assist,
with  the  i1IegaI  al-ien.  METTS  subsequently
informed  Frazier  that  a  hotd  had already been
placed 
on  f1lega1 
#f  and. instructed  Frazier
that  Leon needed  t.o  be  quicker  in  provid.ing
METTS  with  notice  of  an i11ega1 aLien, s  arrest.
In  return  f or  METTS,  agreement  and att.empted
assist.ance,  METTS accepted  cash  from  Frazier
that. had been  provided 
by Leon.
On Friday night., September  16, 2OLL, Illegal 
#Z
an  i11egaI  al-ien  employed  by  Leon  was
arrested  by West.  Col-umbia 
police 
Department and
t.ransported  to  Lexington  County  Detention
Center. On the  morning of  September  17 
, 
201,1 
,
Leon used his  cellphone to  contact. Frazier.
Af t,er  Frazier  and Leon spoke on  their  ceI1
phones 
at  approximately 9:42am, Frazier used
his  cellphone to  contact METTS on his  cellphone
at  9:48am. At  approximately 9:52am, METTS  then
used his  cellphone to  call_ the Lexington County
Sheriff's  Department  at  803-785-2400.  Shortly
thereaf ter,  at  l-0 : O7am, a  member of  the
Lexington  Count,y Sheriff 
, 
s  Department command
st,aff  used his  cellphone  to  call  METTS  on his
celI  phone. METTS then caLl-ed Frazier  back via
cellphone  at  approximat.ely 10:11-am  and  then
immediately  t.hereafter  METTS called  back to  the
member  of  the  Lexington  County  Sheriff, s
Department  command staff.  Frazier  then  cal_led
Leon  at.  L0:15am. During  t.hese  ca1ls  and
ot.herwise, Leon asked Frazier  to  contact METTS
about f1Iega1 
#2's  arrest  and incarceration  at
Lexingt.on County Detention Center. METTS  agreed
t.o  assist  with  lllega1 
#2. PeT  METTS,
not  fu11y interventJ-on,
ident.i f ied,
rllegal 
#Z 
was
entered  into  the  ICE  system
(ENFORCE/IDENT) 
,  or  processed  to  determine  t.he
appropriate  immigration treatment. fnstead, the
10
immigration 
hold was removed  and rrlegal 
#z was
rel-eased wit,hout.  being identified  or  processed
by  ICE.  In  return  for  METTS,  agreement,,
assistance,  and  attempted. assistance,  METTS
accepted  cash  f rom  Frazier  t,hat  had  been
provided 
by Leon.
c.  On Tuesd.ay  af ternoon,  November B,  20]11,, f 1lega1
#g  an  i1IegaI  alien  employed.  by  Leon  was
arrested  by west columbia 
po]ice 
Department.  and.
transport,ed  to  Lexingt.on  Count.y  Detention
Cent.er  .  On November  8 - 10 
, 
207-1_ 
, 
Fraz ier  used
his  cel-I phone 
to  communicate  with  Leon, METTS,
and a member of  METTS,  Lexington County  Sheriff
Department command  staff  on  their  respective
cellphones about f 1IegaI 
#3. During these call_s
and ot.herwise,  they discussed having I1Iega1 
#:
released and METTS agreed  to  assist.  fn  return
for  METTS'  agreement.  and attempted  assistance,
METTS  accepted cash.
d.  On Sunday morning,  November 13,  2oll,  fllegal
#+  an  i1Iega1  alien  employed  by  Leon  was
arrested  by West  Columbia 
police 
Department and
11
transported  to  Lexington County Detention
Center.  On  Monday, November a4 
, 
201,1,,  dL
approximately  9:25am 
, 
Frazier  ca1led  METTS
concerning I1IegaI 
#q.  METTS t.old  Frazj-er t.o
contact  a  cert.ain  member  of  the  Lexington
Count,y Sheriff  Department  command  staff  on his
cellphone.  At  9:35am,  Frazier  cont.acted the
member of  the  Lexington  County  Sheriff
Department  command  staff  on his  cellphone. At
9:51am, the  same  member  of  t.he Lexington County
Sheriff  Depart,ment  command  staff  call_ed  Frazier
on  his  cellphone.  Ihen,  dt  1-O:26am,  Frazier
called  Leon  on  his  cellphone.  At  11:31am and
L2:0  5pm, Leon called  METTS on  his  cellphone.
Leon met with  METTS at.  the  Lexington  County
Sherriff's  Department; during  this  meetirg,
METTS  accepted  an envelope  with  cash in  return
for  METTS'  agreement,  assistance,  and attempted
assistance  with  i1IegaI  aliens  employed  by
Leon,  including  I11egaI  #q.  Based on  the
int,ervention of  MET'fS, and his  staf f 
, 
I11ega1
#q was not  fuIIy  identified,  ent,ered into  the
L2
ICE system 
(ENFORCE/fDpUf), 
or  processed 
to
determine the appropriate immigration
treatment.. Instead,  the  immigration hold  was
removed  and  I11ega1 
#+  was rel_eased without.
being identified 
or  processed  by ICE.
COI'IiIIT  1
(conspiracy 
to  violate  Federal Law and rnterfere  with
Government  function)
]-6.  The allegations  set  forth  in  paragraphs 1  t.hrough
1-5 are repeat.ed and realleged as if  set. forth  ful1y  herein.
1,7. At  times unknown to  the  grand jury, 
but  beginning
at  least  in  or  around September 201,L, and  continuing
thereaf  Ler,  up  to  and  including  the  dat.e  of  this
Indictment,  in  t.he  District  of  South  Carolina,  the
Defendant  METTS, Danny  Frazier,  Greg Leon, and others known
and  unknown  knowingly
conspired,  confederated,
understanding
and  intentionally  combined,
agreed,  and  had  a  tacit
a.  tso eommit the  offense  of  Use of  an Interstate
Facility  to  Facilitate  Bribery:  Lhat is,  to  use
a  cellphone 
(i.e., 
a  facility  in  interstate
commerce), with  intent  to  promote, establish,
13
carry oD, and facilitate 
an unlawful activity,
to  wit.  bribery  in  viol_ation 
of  the  l_aws of
South Carolina  (SC 
Code 
SS8-13-705  and 16_9_
220) 
, 
and t.hereaf ter  perf ormed and. attempted to
perform 
an act  to  promot.e, 
establish,  carry orf 
,
and  facilitat.e  the  bribery,  in  violation  of
Titl-e  18,
7es2 (a) (3 
) ;
United Stat.es Code, Section
b.  tso commit  the  offense  of  Use of  fnterstate
Wires  to  Further Scheme to  Defraud  Citizens  of
Lexington  County  of  their  Right  to  Honest
Services:  that  is, to  devise  and  int.end to
devise  a  scheme  and art.if ice  to  def raud  t.he
citizens  of  Lexington  County, South CaroLina,
of  their  right  to  the  honest services  of  the
Sherif  f  of  Lexington  County  t,hrough  bribery,
and transmitted  and caused to  be t.ransmit.ted by
means  of  wire  communication  in  interstate
commerce  signals,  signs,  and  sounds for  the
purpose of  executi-ng such scheme  and artifice,
in  vioLation  of  Title  18 
, 
United Stat.es Code,
Sections 1343 and 1-346;
l4
c.  Eo  commit  the  offense  of  obstructing
Proceedings 
before united  states  Department  of
Homeland Security: 
that  is,  to  corruptly
influence,  obstruct,  and. impede, and endeavor
to  influence, 
obstruct,  and impede the  due and
proper 
administration 
of  the  ]aw under  which  a
pending  proceeding 
to  ident,if y  and  process
iIlegal  aliens  was being had before t,he united
States  Department 
of  Homel_and  Security,  in
viol-ation  of  Titl_e  1g 
, 
United  States  Cod.e,
Section  1505;
d.  to  impede, impair,  defeat,  and  obstruct  t,he
identification 
and processing 
of  iIIegaI  aliens
by  the  UniEed StaEes and  DHS: that  is,  to
defraud t.he United  States and an agency  of  the
United  St,ates  in  the  exercise  of  ]awf ul_
government.  functions .
Purposes of  the Conspiracy
L8.  rt  was a  purpose 
of  the  conspiracy for  Defendant
METTS to  enrich  himsel-f by  using  and agreeing to  use his
official  position,  power, 
and  infl-uence  in  exchange  for
cash.
15
19. It  was a 
purpose 
of  the eonspiraey for  Defendant
METTS t.o  enrich  ot.hers by  corruptly  and knowingly using
METTS'position,  power,  and  influence  to  obtain  special
treat.ment.  for  certain  known i1]ega1  aLiens secured in  the
Lexington  County Detent.ion Center.
20.  It.  was the purpose 
of  the  conspiracy for  Defendant.
METTS  to  use his  position,  power, and infl-uence  to  obtain
special treatment  for  METTS'  frj-ends.
21,. ft  was a  purpose 
of  the  conspiracy for  Defendant
METTS and  others  to  conceal  the  i1Iega1  cash  payments
received  by METTS.
22.  It  was a  purpose of  the  conspiracy for  Defendant
METTS and ot.hers to  conceal- METTS' improper use  of  the
posit,ion, power, and inf luence as Sherif f .
23.  It  was a  purpose of  the  conspiracy for  Defendant
METTS to  use  METTS  ' 
pos it ion,  power 
, 
and  inf l-uence  to
obtain  special  treatment for  cert.ain iI1egaI  aLiens secured
in  the Lexington  County Detention Center.
24.  It  was a  purpose  the  conspiracy that  Defendant
METTS  and his  co-conspirators to  impede,  impair,  defeat,
and obstruct  t.he lawful  government functions  of  DHS in  the
identification  and 
processing  of  i11ega1 al-iens.
1,5
25.
but  were
The
not
a.
Manner and Means of the Conspiraey
manner  and means of  the  conspiracy included,
limit.ed to,  the following:
Def  endant METTS,  while  serving  as  the  el_ected
Sheriff  of  Lexington  County,  accepted,
received,  and agreed to  accept  and  receive,
things  of  value and promises  to  supply things
of  vaLue,  Lo wi-t, cash,  from Leon and Frazier.
Def  endant. METTS  t,ook  st.eps  to  conceal  the
improper  use  of  METTS'position,  power, and
influence  and  the  payments  received  from
Frazier  and Leon in  order  to  hide  the  nature
and  scope of  his  deal-ings  wit.h  Frazier  and
Leon.
Defendant  METTS engaged  in  official-  actions  as
Lexingt.on  County Sherif f 
, 
and improperly  used
the  power and  influence  of  his  position  as
Sheriff  including  intervening  in  the  Section
287 
(g) 
immigrat,ion  enforcement program  operated
by  the  Lexington  County Sheriff's  Department
and the  Lexington County  Detention Center  on
behal-f  of  and  benefiting  Greg  Leon,  known
b.
c.
L7
ilIegaI  aliens, and restaurants  that  employed
i11egaI  al-iens.
d.  Defendant  METTS  obstructed,  impeded, impaired,
and defeated  the  lawful-  government  funct.ions  of
the DHS in  the identification  and processing  of
i1Iega1  aliens.
Overt Acts in  Furtherance  of  the Conspiracy
26.  In  furtherance  of  the  conspiracy  and to  achieve
its  purposes, the  Defendant METTS,  Danny Frazier,  Greg
Leon, and others  known  and unknown  committed  the  following
overt  acts,  amongi others  described  above in  Paragraph  15,
in  the District  of  South Carolina:
On September 2,  201L, I11ega1 #f  was arresEed  in  West
Columbia;  the  following  overt  acLs were done by members
of  this  conspiracy in  rel-aEion to  his  arrest:
a.  Leon spoke with  Frazier  and asked  if  Frazier
could  assist  in  getting  an employee  who was an
i11ega1 alien  rel-eased  f rom Lexingt.on County
Detention  Center.
b.  After  Labor Ddy, on Tuesday, Sept.ember  6,  201-L,
Frazier  spoke  wit.h METTS and discussed  METTS
assist,ing  with  providing  special  treatment  for
18
an  ilIega1 
alien  detained  in  the  Lexington
County  Detention 
Cent.er. Frazier  explained that
the  i1Iega1  alien  was employed.  by Leon and. t,hat
Leon woul-d be generous  (r.e., 
make payment.s) in
ret.urn for  METTS,  assistance. METTS  agreed.
METTS  checked  wit.h his  staff  to  determine the
status  of  the  i11egaI alien  in  the  d.et.ention
center  and to  provide  what special  treatment
METTS couLd provide
After  speaking  with  his  staff,  METTS  contacted
Frazier  to  instruct  Frazi_er t.hat METTS needed
to  be  informed  of  the  detention  of  i11egaI
a1iens quicker in  order to  best provide 
special
treatment.  to  those i1Iega1 al_iens.
e.  Leon provided  Frazier  with  money for  Frazier to
del-iver  to  METTS.  Frazier  delivered. cash t.o
METTS,  which  METTS accepted,  in  return  for  his
agreement.  and  at.t.empted  assistance  with  the
i1IegaI  alien.
On September  A6, 201-L, fIIegal 
#Z was arrested in  West
Col-umbia;  the  following  overt  acts were done by members
of  this  conspiracy in  relation  to  his  arrest:
d.
19
f .  On Saturday  morning, September  17 
, 
2Ot1_,  Leon
cal-1ed  Frazier 
Eo discuss  Frazi-er contacting
METTS  about  assisting  with  an  ilregal  alien
arrested  the  night  before  and placed. 
in  the
Lexington County Detent.ion Cent.er.
g.  Frazier  calIed  METTS  and.  discussed  METTS
providing 
special  treatment  for  the  i11ega1
alien.
METTS  spoke with  his  staff  about  providing
special  treatment, for  t.he i1Iega1  al_ien.
Shortly  after  these conversations  and according
to  METTS'  direction,  a  member of  METTS 
, 
st.af f
h.
l_.
j
removed the  hold  previously  placed
iIIegaI  alien.
the
Approximately 
a  week  Iat.er,  Leon  provided.
Frazier  wit.h money f or  Frazier  to  deliver  to
METTS. Frazier  then  del-ivered cash to  METTS,
which  METTS accepted,  in  return  for  his
agreement,  assj-stance, and attempted assistance
wit.h t.he i11ega1  al_ien.
20
On November  8,  2011, Illegal  #3 was arrested in  West
CoLumbia;  the  following  overt  acts were done by members
of  this  conspiracy in  relation  to  his  arrest:
k.  On November 8-9,  201L, Leon spoke with  Frazier
to  discuss  Frazier  cont.acting  METTS about.
assist.ing  wit.h  an  i1Iega1  alien  arrested  on
Tuesday  aft.ernoon  and placed in  Ehe Lexington
County Detention Cent.er.
1.  On Wednesday  November  9 
, 
201-L,  Frazier  spoke
with  METTS  and a member  of  METTS'  command  staff
about  providing  special  treatment  for  the
illegal  alien.
m.  On November  10 
, 
2071 
, 
Frazler  spoke wit.h  a
member of  METTS' command staff  about providing
special  t,reatment  for  the i11ega1 al-ien.
On November 13,  20LL, If1egal  #q was arrested  in  West
Columbia;  t.he following  overt  act.s were done by members
of  this  conspiracy in  relat.ion to  his  arrest:
n.  On Monday,  November 14, 20LL,  Frazier  contacted
METTS about  an  iIlegal  alien  arrested  and.
placed  in  the  Lexington  County  Detention
Center.
2t
p.
o.  Per METTS' instruetion,  Frazier  then called a
member of  METTS' command staff  to  discuss
obt.aining  special  treatment  for  t.he  i11ega1
al-ien.
After  speaking with  Sheriff  DeparLment  staff
about  the  iI1egaI  alien,  the  member of  METTS'
command  staff  called  Frazier  back.  Shortly
thereaf ter,  Frazier call-ed Leon.
Around l-uncht 
j-me, 
Leon called  METTS  directly
and arranged to  meet METTS at  the  Lexington
County  Sherif f 's  Department. At  that  meet 
j-ng,
Leon provided and METTS  accepted an  envelope
with  cash  in  return  for  METTS'  agreement,
assistance,  and  attempted  assistance  with
illegal  al-iens, 
j-ncluding 
the  alien  arrested on
November 13, 20L1,.
r .  Based on  t.he int,ervention  of  METTS, and his
staff,  Illegal  #+ 
was not  fuIly  identified,
entered  into  the IcE system 
(ENFoRCE/TDENT),  or
processed  to  determine  the  appropriate
immigration  treatment.  Inst.ead, the  immigration
q.
22
hold was removed and lllegal 
#4 was released
without being identified  or  processed 
by ICE.
All  in  viol-ation  of  Title  18,  United  Stat.es Code,
Section 37]-.
couMrs 2 -5
(Use 
of  Interstate  Faeility  to  Facilitate  Bribery)
27 .  The allegat.ions set  forth  in  paragraphs  1  t,hrough
26 are repeated and real-Ieged as if  set  forth  fu11y herein.
28.  On or  about the  respective  dates seE forth  beIow,
in  the  District  of  Sout,h Carol-ina,  t.he Def endant METTS,
Danny Frazier 
, 
Greg Leon, and ot.hers  known and unknown used
a  f acility  in  int,erstat.e commerce, wit.h intent  to  promote,
establish,  carry  oD,  and facilitat.e  unl-awful  act.ivit,y;  to
wit,
a.  bribery  in  viol-ation of  SC Code S8-l-3-705;  that
is,  METTS,  directly  and indirectly,  knowingly
accepEed, received,  and  agreed  to  receive
something of  val-ue as  a  public  of f icial  in
South  Carolina  for  himseLf  and  another  in
return  for  being  influenced  in  the discharge  of
his  of f icial-  responsibilities;  and
23
b.  bribery in violation of SC Code 516-9-220; 
that
is,  METTS corruptty  accepted  something  of  value
and a  promise  to  supply something  of  value as
an officer  in  South Carol-ina  for  his  benefit  in
exchange  for  the  improper  use of  Lhe power of
his  position  as Sheriff;
and thereafter 
performed  and attempted to  perform acts  to
promote,  establish t 
canrl^y OD, and faciLit.ate  the  unlawful
activity.
Count Dates
Description
2 Sept.  6,  20lL Used  cellular 
Phones 
to
communicate followed  bY  METTS'
intervention  in  the  SecEion
287 
(g)  immigration  enforcement
program  and accePt.ance of  cash in
return
3 Sept..1,7,  207-L Used  celluIar 
Phones 
to
communicate folfowed  bY  METTS'
intervention 
in  the  Section
287 
(g)  immigrat.ion  enforcement
program  and accePtance  of  cash in
return
4
5
Nov.  9 
, 
20Ll Used  cellu1ar 
Phones 
to
communicate 
f o1l-owed bY  METTS'
intervention 
in  the  Section
287 
(g)  immigration  enforcement
program  and acceptance  of  cash in
return
Nov.  !4 
, 
201,1 Used  cellu1ar 
Phones 
to
communicate 
followed  bY  METTS'
intervention 
in  Ehe  Section
287 
(g)  immigration 
enforcement
program  and. accePtance 
of  cash in
return
24
A11  in  violat,ion  of  Title  18,
Sections ]-952 
(a) (3) 
and 2.
Unit,ed  States  Code,
corr}flrs  6 - 9
(Use 
of  Int,erstate Wire to  Defraud  the Citizens of
Lexington  County  of  Their Right to  Honest Services)
l-.  The allegations  set  f orth  in  paragraphs  1- through
26 are repeated and real-Ieged as if  set  forth  fu11y herein.
2.  On or  about  the  respective dates shown  below, in
the  District  of  South Carolina,  the  Defendant  METTS,  Danny
Frazier,  Greg Leon, and others  known  and unknown,  having
d.evised  and intending  to  devise a  scheme  and art.if ice  t.o
defraud,  and to  deprive  Lexington  County, South Carolina,
and it,s  citizens  of  their  intangible  right  to  METTS'  honest
services  as  the  Sheriff  of  Lexington  County  through
bribery,  knowingly and intentionally  transmitted and caused
to  be  transmitted  by  means  of  wire  communication  in
int.erstate  commerce signals,  signs,  and  sounds f or  t.he
purpose  of  executing  such scheme and artifice  -
25
Count Dates Description
6 Sept.  5,  20lL Used  cellular  phones  Lo
communicate  followed  by  METTS'
intervention  in  the  Section 287 
(g)
immigration  enforcement  program
and acceptance  of  cash in  ret.urn
7 Sept.17,  201-1- Used  cel-luLar  phones  t.o
communicate  followed  by  METTS'
intervent.ion  in  the  Section 287 
(g)
immigration  enforcement  program
and accepEance  of  cash  in  ret.urn
B Nov.  9 
, 
20LL Used  ceLlular  phones  to
communj.cate  f ol-lowed  by  METTS'
intervention  in  the  Section 287 
(g)
immigration  enforcement  program
and acceptance  of  cash in  return
9 Nov.  L4 
, 
201-1- Used  celluIar  phones  to
communicate  f oLl-owed by  METTS'
intervention  in  the  Section 287 
(g)
immigration  enforcement  program
and acceptance  of  cash  in  return
A11  in  violation  of  Tit.le  18 
, 
Unit,ed  States  Code,
Sections 1,343 
, 
1346, and 2.
26
eorrllT  L0
(Conspiracy 
to  Harbor  ll1ega1  aliens)
3.  The allegations  set  forth  in  paragraphs  1  Ehrough
26 are repeated and realleged as if  set. forth  fuIIy  herein.
4.  At  times  unknown to  the  grand jury, 
but  beginning
at.  least  in  or  around  September 201"1,, and  cont.inuing
thereaf  ter,  up  t.o  and  including  the  date  of  this
Indictment,  in  the  District  of  South  Caroli-na,  the
Defendant. METTS, Danny Frazl-er, Greg Leon, and others known
and  unknown knowingly  and intentionally combined,
conspj-red,  conf ederated,  agreed,  and  had tacit
understanding  to  vio]ate  Sect ion  ]-324 
(a) ( 
1) 
(A) (iii 
)  of
Tit.le  8  of  the  united  stat.es code;  that  is,  to  harbor,
conceal,  and shield  from detection,  and atLempt to  harbor,
conceal-, and shield  f rom detection,  an  a1ien knowing, and
in  reckless disregard  of  the  fact,  that  the  a]ien  had come
Lo, entered,  and remained in  the United States in  violation
of  l-aw.
A11  in  violation  of  Tit1e  8,
Section 1,324 
(a) (1) (A) (v) (I) 
.
United  States  Code,
27
" 
BiI]
WILLTAM N.  NETTLES  (JnT)
UNTTED STATES  ATTORNEY
28