JBI QARI Data Extraction Tool Form for
Interpretive and Critical research 
Reviewer: Ai-Ni O. Bautista 
Author: Gary J Macfarlane 
Journal: BMJ (Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study) 
Date: January 29, 1998 
Year: 1998 
Record Number: N/A  
Study Description 
Methodology: Prospective study design (Cross-sectional study) 
Method:  Cross  sectional  survey  was  used  at  the  start  of  the  study  to  determine  factors  that  might 
predict the outcome of a subsequent episode of low back pain and they also used an interview 
Intervention:  
Setting: Two general practices in south Manchester.  
Geographical: N/A 
Cultural: N/A 
Participants: 490 subjects (203 men, 287 women) aged 18-75 years. 
Data  Analysis:  Evaluated  the  outcome  of  each  new  consulting  episode  by  means  of  two  approaches. 
First,  reviewed  the  patients'  records  for  subsequent  consultations  up  to  six  months  after  the  index 
consultation and classified patients into three  groups. Second, they evaluated outcome from follow  up 
visits among the subgroup of survey responders. 
Authors  Conclusion:  The  results  are  consistent  with  the  interpretation  that  90%  of  patients  with  low 
back  pain  in  primary  care  will  have  stopped  consulting  with  symptoms  within  three  months.  However 
most will still be experiencing low back pain and related disability one year after consultation.  
Comments: 
Findings  Illustration from 
publication (page 
number) 
Evidence 
Unequivocal  Credible  Unsupported 
Annual cumulative 
consultation rate 
among adults in 
the practices was 
6.4%.  
-  Yes  Yes  No 
Of the 463 
patients who 
consulted with a 
new episode of 
low back pain, 275 
(59%) had only a 
single 
consultation, and 
150 (32%) had 
repeat 
consultations 
confined to the 3 
months after 
initial 
consultation.  
-  Yes   Yes  No 
People 
interviewed at 3 
and 12 months 
follow up, only 
39/188 (21%) and 
42/170 (25%) 
respectively had 
completely 
recovered in terms 
of pain and 
disability. 
-  Yes  Yes  No  
Extraction of findings complete YES/NO  
JBI QARI Data Extraction Tool Form for 
Interpretive and Critical research 
Reviewer: Ai-Ni O. Bautista 
Author: Brian R. Waterman, MD, Philip J. Belmont Jr., MD, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, MD 
Journal:  Journal  The  Spine  Journal  (Low  back  pain  in  the  United  States:  incidence  and  risk  factors  for 
presentation in the emergency setting) 
Date: January 2012 
Year: 2012 
Record Number: Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 63-70  
Study Description 
Methodology: Cross-sectional study 
Method:  The  National  Electronic  Injury  Surveillance  System  was  queried  for  all  cases  of  low  back  pain 
presenting  to  emergency  departments  between  2004  and  2008.  Incidence  rate  ratios  were  then 
calculated  with  respect  to  age,  sex,  and  race.  The  chi-square  statistic  was  used  to  identify  statistically 
significant differences in the incidence of low back pain requiring emergent medical evaluation between 
subgroups. 
Intervention:  
Setting: United States of America 
Geographical: 
Cultural: 
Participants: United States population estimates. 
Data Analysis: Incidence rate ratios were calculated to determine the influence of age, sex, and race on 
the development of low back pain requiring emergent medical evaluation. 
Authors Conclusion: Age, sex, and race are significant risk factors for the development of low back pain 
necessitating treatment in an emergency department. 
Comments: 
Findings  Illustration from 
publication (page 
number) 
Evidence 
Unequivocal  Credible  Unsupported 
An estimated 2.06 
million episodes of 
low back pain 
63-70  No  No  Yes 
occurred among a 
population at risk 
of over 1.48 billion 
person-years for 
an incidence rate 
of 1.39 per 1,000 
person-years in 
the United States. 
Low back pain 
accounted for 
3.15% of all 
emergency visits. 
63-70  No  No  Yes 
Injuries sustained 
at home (65%) 
accounted for 
most patients 
presenting with 
low back pain. 
63-70  No  No  Yes 
When compared 
with females, 
males showed no 
significant 
differences in the 
rates of low back 
pain. 
63-70  Yes  Yes  No 
Low back pain 
demonstrates a 
bimodal 
distribution with 
peaks between 25 
and 29 years of 
age (2.58/1,000 
person-years) and 
95 to 99 years of 
age (1.47/1,000) 
without 
differentiation by 
underlying 
etiology. 
63-70  No  No  Yes 
When analyzed by 
5-year age group, 
males aged 10 to 
49 years and 
females aged 65 
to 94 years had 
increased risk of 
low back pain than 
63-70  No  No  Yes 
their opposite sex 
counterparts. 
When compared 
with Asian race, 
patients of black 
and white race 
were found to 
have significantly 
higher rates of low 
back pain. 
63-70  No  No  Yes 
Older patients 
were found to be 
at a greater risk of 
hospital admission 
for low back pain. 
63-70  Yes  Yes  No  
Extraction of findings complete YES/NO  
JBI QARI Data Extraction Tool Form for 
Interpretive and Critical research 
Reviewer: Ai-Ni O. Bautista 
Author: Dr. P. Dobkin, Dr. J. Hanley, Dr. S. Wood-Dauphinee, Dr. J. Klvanna, and A. 
Journal:  Risk  American  Journal  of  Epidemiology  (Factors  for  the  Development  of  Low  Back  Pain  in 
Adolescence)   
Date: November 7, 2000 
Year: 2000 
Record Number: Vol. 154, No. 1, pages 30-36  
Study Description 
Methodology: Repeated-measures design (cohort study) 
Method:  A cohort of high school students in Montreal, Canada, was followed prospectively over a 12-
month period. Students in grades 79 were assessed from three schools two public inner-city schools 
and one smaller private school. In accordance with the laws of the province of Qubec, all students and 
the parents of those aged less than 14 years provided a signed, informed consent before entry into the 
study. Data were collected three times over the year: at inception (t1, fall of 1995), 6 months (t2, spring 
of 1996), and 12 months (t3, fall of 1996). Each time, students were asked to complete a questionnaire 
that  addressed  lifestyle  and  musculoskeletal  health. They  also  underwent  a  series  of  measurements  of 
their height, weight, abdominal muscle strength, and trunk and lower limb flexibility  
Intervention: 
Setting: Montreal, Canada 
Geographical: 
Cultural: 
Participants: Students in grades 79 
Data Analysis: Univariate comparisons were carried out on the two 6- month time periods separately. In 
this way, seasonal influences of activity and work were separated.  
Authors  Conclusion:  The  results  of  this  study  indicate  that  low  back  pain  is  common  in  adolescents, 
with a cumulative annual incidence of 17 percent. Factors associated with development of low back pain 
in adolescents were a high growth spurt, poor quadriceps and hamstrings flexibility, working during the 
school  year,  and  smoking.  Although  prevention  strategies  have  been  addressed  in  the  occupational 
setting  (59,  60),  our  results  suggest  that  more  research  is  needed  regarding  prevention  before  people 
enter the workforce. Improved knowledge and awareness of the vulnerability of the back, the need for 
good flexibility, and refraining from smoking are all areas that require further investigation.  
Comments: 
Findings  Illustration from 
publication (page 
number) 
Evidence 
Unequivocal  Credible  Unsupported 
The study found 
an increased 
incidence in the 
first 6-month 
interval (fall to 
spring), which 
corresponded to 
most of the school 
year, compared 
with the second 6 
30-36 
Yes  Yes  No 
months (spring to 
fall).  
Students who 
underwent a high 
growth spurt were 
more likely to 
develop low back 
pain. 
30-36 
Yes  Yes  No 
Study did not find 
an association 
between 
development of 
low back pain and 
Schober lumbar 
flexion or sit and 
reach flexibility. 
30-36 
Yes  Yes  No 
Poor isometric 
muscle strength of 
the abdominals 
was not found to 
be a risk factor for 
development of 
low back pain in 
this study.  
30-36 
No  No  Yes 
Physical activity 
was not associated 
with the 
development of 
low back pain in 
this cohort of 
adolescents.  
30-36 
No  No  Yes 
Smokers were 
more likely to 
develop low back 
pain in this cohort 
of adolescents. 
30-36 
Yes  Yes  No 
Analysis of 
medication use 
(for low back pain) 
supports the 
notion that those 
students who 
smoked or worked 
tended to use 
medication more. 
30-36 
No  Yes  No  
Extraction of findings complete YES/NO