6.
Laser Frequency Measurements, the Speed of 
Light, and the Meter" 
K. M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
With 5  Figures 
The spectral characteristics of electromagnetic radiation are determined 
by  either  its vacuum  wavelength  or its  frequency  (and, of  course,  the 
speed  of  light  is  the  product  of  the  two). Before  the advent  of  lasers, 
infrared and visible spectra were measured using wavelength techniques. 
Lasers have fractional linewidths approaching those of radio and micro- 
wave  oscillators  and  have  many  orders  of  magnitude  more  spectral 
radiance  than  incoherent  sources,  as  shown  in  Fig.  6.1;  thus,  direct 
frequency  measuring  techniques  as  well  as wavelength  techniques  can 
be used and the frequency techniques provide much more resolution and 
accuracy  in  measuring  the  spectral  characteristics  of  the  radiation. 
Frequency measuring techniques are limited only by the accuracy of the 
fundamental standard and the stabilities of the sources available and, as 
a result, are better  by several orders of magnitude.  Hence, lasers which 
provide intense coherent sources of electromagnetic radiation extending 
from the microwave through the visible to the ultraviolet portion of the 
electromagnetic  spectrum  (see  Fig.  6.2)  can  be  considered  as  either 
wavelength or frequency sources. 
In spite of  the fact that lasers provided  coherent frequency  sources 
in the infrared and visible, frequencies could not immediately be measured 
because no device capable of  generating frequencies of  a few THz from 
harmonics of cw sources was known to exist. Secondly, the laser frequency 
was  not  very  stable; that  is,  in  the  case  of  the  gas  laser  although  its 
short term  linewidth  was  a  few  hundred  hertz, over a long period,  its 
frequency  could  vary within  the Doppler  and pressure broadened  gain 
curve of the laser. This gain curve might vary from less than a hundred 
to several thousand megahertz  depending on the laser. Therefore, even 
though  the  instantaneous  frequency  of  the  laser  could  be  measured, 
there was no reference point other than the broad gain curve whose center 
could not be located  very precisely. Happily, solutions to both of  these 
problems were found: for the first, the extension of  frequency measure- 
ments  into the infrared  by  means  of  the metal-on-metal  point  contact 
diode  C6.11, and  for  the  second,  the  development  of  the  technique  of 
* Contribution of the National  Bureau  of Standards, not subject to copyright. 
350  K. M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
3000' 
Bl ack  Body 
+
r-----  1 
I Monochr omat or  1
L - - -   - - J  
Charact eri st i cs : 
Dri ve  Power 
Band  Wi dth 
io3 wat t s 
30000  MHz 
And  k 5 mW/cm 
Spect r al   Range 
Angul ar   Div. 
Spect r al   Radi ance 
0.4-3pm 
4 ~ S r  
i o4 Watts 
I  MHz 
3  W/cm2 
0.4  -0.7~ 
3 x  I O - ~ S ~  
f or   I MHz  Bondwi dt h 
N= I 0-' W/ cm2/ MHz/ Sr   N= IO4 W/cm2/MHz/Sr  
N  (Laser )  = ioI2 N  (Lamp)  ! ! ! 
Fig. 6.1. Comparison of tunable light sources. The laser is characterized by its small spectral 
band  width and angular divergence  resulting  in  a  large spectral radiance  per  unit  band 
width. The narrow  tuning-range  disadvantage  of  a typical  gas laser  is to a large extent 
being removed  by  the development  of  the dye laser 
saturated absorption  [6.2]  (see e.g. Subsect. 1.4.2). These  two develop- 
ments meant  that  coherent,  highly stable, short  wavelength  sources of 
radiation  existed  whose  frequency  and  wavelength  could  be  directly 
related  to the primary  frequency and wavelength standards. 
With  the  perfection  of  highly  reproducible  and  stable  lasers,  their 
wavelength-frequency  duality  becomes  of  wider  interest. We  begin  to 
think of lasers as frequency references for certain kinds of problems such 
as high resolution optical heterodyne spectroscopy [6.3].  The extension 
of  absolute  frequency  measurements,  linking  the  cesium  standard 
(accurate to  about  2 x  [6.4]  to  these  lasers,  provides  accuracy 
as well as resolution  to the absolute frequencies involved. At  the same 
time,  we use  the  wavelength  aspect  of  the  radiation,  for  example,  in 
precision  long-path  interferometry  C6.51. Indeed, the increasing resolu- 
tion  which  these  new  spectroscopic techniques provide  may  very well 
usher in an era of precision and accuracy in frequency and length measure- 
ments undreamed of a few years ago. 
Laser Frequency Measurements,  the Speed of Light, and the Meter  351 
G - @ - i c 2 ~  
1 - %
KLYSTRONS  EWO  LASERS 
OSCILLATORS 
FREQUENCY  STANDARDS  WAVELENGTH 
FREQUENCY 
MEASUREMENTS - - I
1 , ACCURAT E LENGTH 
MEASUREMENTS 
ELECTROMAGNETIC  SPECTRUM 
Fig.  6.2.  The  electromagnetic  spectrum  showing  oscillators,  frequency  and  wavelength 
standards, and measurement  regions. The extension of  frequency measurements  into the 
infrared  has produced  an overlap of  the  accurate  ( <4 x  IO-')  wavelength measurement 
region  and the frequency measurement  region  for  the first time. The frequency standard 
is the zero field hyperfine structure separation  in  the ground state of  133Cs  which  is de- 
fined to be 9 192631 770 Hz. The wavelength standard is the transition between the 2 p , ,  and 
5d, levels of "Kr  with the vacuum wavelength of this radiation defined to be1/1650763.73 m. 
Recent advances in stabilizations with saturated absorption techniques 
(see Chapter 1) have produced lasers with one-second fractional frequency 
instabilities  C6.21 as  small  as  5 x  1 O- I 3 .   Although  the  fractional  un- 
certainty  in  frequency  reproducibility  is  somewhat  larger,  stabilized 
lasers  are  already  excellent  secondary  frequency  standards.  With  ad- 
ditional development in laser stabilization and infrared frequency synthesis 
some of  these devices can be considered  as contenders for the primary 
frequency standard role; the 3.39 pm He-Ne  laser, for example, currently 
has  a  fractional  frequency  uncertainty  in  reproducibility  [6.2]  of  less 
than  one part in  10".  The duality implies that the radiation  must have 
a  similar  wavelength  characteristics,  Le.,  A,?//? z 10-  which  is  more 
than  100 times better than the current length standard 16.61. Hence, the 
stabilized  laser  must  be  considered  to  have  tremendous  potential  in 
wavelength  as  well  as  frequency  standards applications  and  perhaps 
in both [6.7]. 
I t has been clear since the early days of  lasers that this wavelength- 
frequency duality could form the basis of a powerful method to measure 
the speed of light. However, the laser's  optical frequency was much too 
352  K. M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
high for conventional frequency measurement methods. This fact led to 
the invention of a variety of modulation or differential schemes, basically 
conceived  to  preserve the  small interferometric errors associated with 
the short optical wavelength, while utilizing microwave frequencies which 
were  still  readily  manipulated  and  measured.  These  microwave  fre- 
quencies were to be modulated  onto the laser  output or realized  as a 
difference  frequency  between  two  separate  laser  transitions  C6.81. 
Indeed, a  proposed  major  long-path  interferometric experiment  [6.9] 
based  on  the  latter  idea  has  been  made  obsolete  by  the  recent  high- 
precision direct frequency measurement [6. IO].  An ingenious modulation 
scheme, generally applicable to any laser transition, has recently produced 
successfully an improved value for the speed of  light  C6.1 I].  While this 
method  can  undoubtedly  be  perfected  further,  its  differential  nature 
leads to limitations which are not operative in direct frequency measure- 
ments. 
Recent ultrahigh resolution measurements of both the frequency and 
wavelength of the methane stabilized He-Ne  iaser yielded a value of the 
speed of light  100 times more accurate C6.121 than that of the previously 
accepted value  C6.131. This significant  increase in  accuracy  was  made 
possible by the extension of frequency measurements to the region of the 
electromagnetic  spectrum  where  wavelength  measurements  can  be 
made with high accuracy and by  the use of  very stable lasers. 
It is the purpose of this chapter to describe the stabilization of lasers 
by  saturated  absorption,  laser  frequency  measuring  techniques,  ex- 
perimental  details  of  the  speed  of  light  measurement,  and  some  pos- 
sibilities for a new standard of length. 
6.1.  Stabilization of  Lasers by Saturated Absorption 
Homogeneous  as  well  as  inhomogeneous  broadening  in  gas  lasers 
results in gain curves which are many  MHz wide while cavity linewidths 
are of  the order of  only  1 MHz. Therefore, the  frequency of  a gas laser 
is determined within the confines of the gain curve largely by the optical 
path  length  between  the  mirrors.  The  fractional  frequency  instability 
is equal to the fractional  change in  optical path  length, and since it  is 
difficult  to  keep  this  parameter  less  than  one  part  in  l op7,   passively 
stabilized  lasers have in general been free to drift many  MHz over long 
periods of time. 
The best  short term  stability is obtained by  taking steps  to control 
the optical path  length between the  mirrors. These steps have included 
use  of  cavity  materials  with  near  zero  expansion  coefficients,  cavity 
Laser Frequency Measurements,  the Speed of Light, and the Meter  353 
Ampl i f i er   Absorber 
I 
LOOP  P l T  
FILTER  DRI VER 
+-DET. 
+ I 
REF. OSC. 
r l  
Frequency  - 
Fig. 6.3aand b. Schematic for laser stabilization by  the technique of  molecular  saturated 
absorption.  Diagram  (a)  shows  the  servo-controlled  laser  with  an  internal  molecular 
absorption cell. Diagram (b) shows  I )   the gain curve of  the laser  without  absorber, and 
2) the  gain  curve  of  the  amplifier-absorber  combination.  The frequency  of  the  laser  is 
locked  to the peak  of the narrow emission-type feature shown  on curve 2 
temperature control, isolation from mechanical and acoustic disturbances, 
as well as other ingenious ideas and devices. Also in a discharge excited 
gas laser, it is necessary to use a highly stabilized power supply in order 
to maintain a constant index of refraction. Some of the most sophisticated 
passively  stabilized  gas  lasers  have  been  designed  by  FREED  and  the 
interested reader  is referred  there  C6.141 for more details. The observed 
spectral  width  is  always  controlled  by  environmental  perturbations 
giving  rise  to  frequency  modulation.  However,  with  care,  lasers  with 
short term spectral linewidths of the order of a kHz can be constructed. 
Long  term  stability  of  laser  oscillators  can  be  attained  by  servo 
controlling  the  frequency  to  some  more  stable  reference  device.  For 
354  K . M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
example, long term stability may be provided by locking the laser to the 
resonant  frequency of a temperature controlled, mechanically and ther- 
mally stable, passive cavity. However, for  good resetability  a molecular 
reference which is less subject  to  environmental  perturbations  is  more 
suitable, provided that Doppler and pressure broadening can be eliminat- 
ed  or  at  least  greatly  reduced.  Molecular  beam  type  devices  suggest 
themselves.  However,  the  molecular  saturated  absorption  technique 
attains  nearly  the  same goal and  yet  avoids most  of  the  experimental 
complications  of  beam  devices.  With  lasers,  the  technique  was  first 
demonstrated  by  LEE and  SKOLNICK  C6.151  with  the  6328 A  laser  and 
a  20Ne absorption  cell excited  by  a  dc gas discharge.  Later  a  similar 
technique was developed  by BARGER  and HALL  C6.161 with the 3.39 pm 
He-Ne  laser  to  the  point  where  one  second  fractional  frequency  in- 
stabilities are now only a few parts in  A schematic for laser stabiliza- 
tion by  the technique of  saturated absorption  is shown in  Fig. 6.3a +b. 
Since the linewidths are inversely proportional  to the molecular transit 
time  across the  laser  beam, HALL  and  BORDE C6.31,  by  increasing  the 
diameter of the laser beam and cooling the absorption cell, have observed 
saturated absorption  lines which are only 7 kHz  wide. This refinement 
represents  a  resolution  greater  than  10"  and  is  narrow  enough  for 
observation of the methane hyperfine structure. Other lasers of  interest 
here  wich  have  been  stabilized  by  saturated  absorption  include  the 
6328 8,  laser  which has been locked  to various iodine absorption  lines 
C6.171 and  all  of  the  lines  in  both  the 9 and  10pm bands of  the C02 
laser which have been stabilized to CO,  itself C6.18, 191. 
Since the  wavelength  of  the radiation  coming from an oscillator is 
simply related to the frequency through the velocity of  propagation, it is 
reasonable to assume that the wavelength stability will be the same as the 
frequency  stability.  Moreover,  since  the  coherence  length  is  inversely 
proportional to the spectral linewidth of the radiation source, lasers are 
excellent wavelength standards. Thus wehave laser oscillators which are 
excellent secondary frequency and wavelength standards at a number of 
convenient points in the electromagnetic spectrum. The frequencies of all 
the  aforementioned  molecular  stabilizing  transitions  except  those  at 
6328 8,  have  been  measured  absolutely  [6.10,20]  to  an  accuracy  ex- 
ceeding that of the length standard. 
6.2.  Frequency Measurement Techniques 
Direct frequency measurements  require counting the number of  cycles 
of  electromagnetic  radiation  in  a  given  period.  Modern  electronic 
circuitry permits direct cycle  counting  up  to  about  500 MHz  with  the 
Laser Frequency Measurements, the Speed of Light, and the Meter  355 
timing  generally  provided  by  a  quartz  crystal  oscillator,  or  for  the 
highest accuracy, directly by a cesium clock. A measurement of a higher 
frequency  requires  a  heterodyne  technique  in  which  two  oscillators 
(one whose frequency is known) are mixed together  so that a countable 
frequency difference is generated. The known frequency may be synthe- 
sized as an exact  harmonic  of  a directly countable  lower frequency  by 
irradiating  an appropriate  nonlinear  device. To synthesize  microwave 
frequencies,  oscillators  of  about a  hundred  MHz  irradiating  a  silicon 
diode  will  generate  useful  harmonics  as high  as  40GHz. The  desired 
harmonic  is generally  mixed  with  the  unknown  frequency  in the same 
diode so that the heterodyne beat note of a few MHz is finally generated 
and can be directly counted. 
The above process may be illustrated  in the following equation 
where  v,  is  the  unknown  frequency,  v,  the  reference  frequency,  and 
v,,  the countable beat note frequency. The harmonic number I  is generally 
determined  by making an approximate frequency determination from a 
wavelength measurement. At frequencies from about 40 GHz to 1000 GHz 
(1 THz), the  silicon  diode  is  still  operable;  however,  several  steps  are 
usually required in a frequency measurement chain extending from some 
countable  reference  frequency. For this  purpose, klystrons  between  60 
and 80GHz are often  phase  locked  to a lower  frequency klystron  and 
these are used to cover the range between  200 and  io00 GHz with less 
than  15 harmonics in each step. The harmonic number is kept below  15 
because  at frequencies above a  few  hundred  gigahertz  the  overall har- 
monic generation-mixing  process  is less efficient and consequently, one 
must use a lower harmonic number. 
6.3.  High-Frequency Diodes 
In  addition  to  the  silicon  diode  already  mentioned,  another  type  of 
harmonic  generator  mixer,  the  point  contact  J osephson  junction,  is 
a much  more efficient diode  in  the generation  of  high  harmonics  than 
is the silicon diode. Its use has been extended a little higher in frequency 
than  C6.211 the silicon diode to 3.8 THz by  the direct generation  of the 
401st  harmonic  from  an  X-band  source.  Work  is  continuing  on  this 
device to determine its high frequency  limit. 
A  third  type  of harmonic  generator-mixer,  the  metal-metal  diode, 
is the  only  device  which  has  been  used  at frequencies  above  3.8 THz. 
This metal-metal  point contact diode has been  the most useful at laser 
356  K. M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
frequencies,  and  has,  thus  far  C6.221,  operated  to  88 THz (3.39 pm). 
High  frequency  applications  of  this  diode  were  first  demonstrated  in 
J avan's  laboratory  [6. i]  by  generating and mixing the  third  harmonic 
of a pulsed water vapor laser with a CO,  laser. Specifically, the tungsten- 
nickel  diode has been more  useful  than  many  other metal-metal com- 
binations  which  were  tested.  At  these  laser  frequencies,  harmonic 
generation, sideband generation,  and mixing occur  in  the  same diode, 
that  is,  the  harmonics or sidebands are not  actually propagated  from 
diode to diode, but  a  single diode is radiated with all of  the necessary 
frequencies. As an example, one of the steps in measuring the frequency 
of a CO,  laser is to compare the frequency of its 9.3 pm R(i0) line with 
the third harmonic of a water vapor laser. 
In this case, 
where  vC02, R( 10)   is  the  unknown  frequency  (32.134267 THz), and  vHP 
=10.718069 THz,  vkly =0.019958 THz,  vbeat  =0.000020 THz.  In  thls 
heterodyning,  the  radiation  from  all  three  sources  simultaneously 
irradiates  the  diode  and  the  resulting  20MHz  beat  note  is  amplified 
and measured in a counter or spectrum analyzer. 
Some characteristics of this type of diode have been measured C6.231, 
and so far, attempts at extending its range to the visible have shown that 
it  mixes  at frequencies as high as 583 THz(5145 A). However, harmonic 
generation  beyond  88 THz  has  not  been  demonstrated. Although  the 
exact  physical  mechanism  by  which  the  harmonic  generation-mixing 
occurs is not  yet  understood, there are at least  three different possible 
explanations for the phenomena. One is a tunneling process through an 
oxide layer C6.241, another is a field emission process C6.251, and a third 
is a  quantum mechanical scattering model  C6.261. 
To illustrate the  way  in  which the diode is used in  laser  frequency 
measurement, a  direct measurement  of  the methane transition  used  to 
stabilize  the 3.39 pm He-Ne  laser will be described. It is this frequency 
which is multiplied by the precisely determined methane wavelength to 
yield a definitive value of the speed of light. 
6.4.  The Speed of Light 
The speed of  light,  c,  is  possibly  the most  important  of  all  the  funda- 
mental  constants  C6.271.  It  enters  into  the  conversion  between  elec- 
trostatic  and  electromagnetic  units;  it  relates  the  mass  of  a  particle 
to its energy in the well known equation E  =mc2;  and it is used as well 
Laser Frequency Measurements, the Speed of Light, and the Meter  357 
in many  relationships  connecting other physical  constants. In  ranging 
measurements,  very  accurately  measured  transit  times  for  electro- 
magnetic  waves are converted  to distance by multiplying  by  the  speed 
of  light.  Examples  are  geophysical  distance  measurepents  which  use 
modulated  electromagnetic  radiation  [6.28],  and  astronomical  mea- 
surements such  as microwave  planetary  radar  and laser  lunar  ranging 
C6.291. Recent experiments have set very restrictive limits on any possible 
speed dependence on direction  [6.30]  or frequency  C6.311. 
Because of  its importance,  more time and effort have  been devoted 
to the measurement  of c than any other fundamental constant.  In spite 
of this fact, a highly accurate result has remained elusive even in recent 
times-mainly  because  of  ever  present  systematic  errors  which  have 
been difficult to properly  evaluate.  Indeed, the probable value  of  c has 
changed, and the suggestion has been made that the real value may be 
changing linearly or even periodically with time C6.321. However, in view 
of  recent  electro-optical  measurements,  microwave  interferometer  mea- 
surements, spectroscopic measurements, and the laser measurement to be 
described here, it appears that the probable value of  c is converging to 
a constant within the stated errors and that the changing nature of c in 
the  past  was  related  to  unaccounted  inaccuracy  in  previous  experi- 
ments. 
Three different  techniques  have  been  used  to measure  the  speed of 
light:  1)  time  of  flight  techniques;  2)  ratio  of  electrostatic  to  electro- 
magnetic units; and 3) frequency and wavelength measurements (2v =c). 
The  first  quantitative  measurement  of  c  was  an  astronomical  one  in 
which the time of flight of light across the earths orbit around the sun was 
measured  by  ROEMER  in  1676. Early  time-of-flight  terrestrial  measure- 
ments  utilized  long accurately-measured  base  lines and either  rotating 
toothed  wheels or mirrors  for  measuring  the time  interval. One of the 
most accurate early measurements of  c was an electrostatic  to electro- 
magnetic ratio  experiment  by ROSA  and DORSEY  C6.331 in  1906. 
Measurements of c in which both the wavelength and frequency of an 
oscillator were measured  played  a significant role in proving that radio 
and light radiation were electromagnetic in nature. This method was used 
by FROOME  C6.131 to obtain the accepted value of c in use since 1958. His 
method  used  a  moving  reflector  type  of  microwave  interferometer 
operating at 72 GHz which was used to measure the microwave  wave- 
length  in  terms  of  the  length  standard. The vacuum  wavelength  thus 
obtained when corrected for diffraction and other systematic effects was 
multiplied by the measured frequency to give a value for the speed of light. 
The  frequency  could  be  related  to  the  primary  standard  with  good 
accuracy,  but  the  major  estimated  experimental  error  was  connected 
with uncertainties  in the wavelength  measurement.  At  these long wave- 
358  K.  M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
lengths the diffraction  problem  forced the use of a long air path which 
resulted  in  uncertainties in the measurement  of  the path length and in 
the index of refraction. 
Speed of  light  determinations from wavelength and frequency mea- 
surements  have  traditionally suffered from the  problems  illustrated  by 
FROOME'S  experiment. To  measure  the  frequency, it  is  best  to  do  the 
experiment at a  frequency  not  too  far  removed  from  the  primary  Cs 
frequency where extremely stable oscillators can be made and where fre- 
quencies are easily measurable. However, to measure the wavelength, it 
is best to do the experiment close to the visible 86Kr  wavelength standard 
where wavelengths can be more easily compared and where diffraction 
problems  are not  as severe. The extension of  frequency measurements 
into  the  infrared  portion  of  the  electromagnetic  spectrum  has  in  a 
sense solved  this  dilemma,  and  has  been  responsible  for  the  100 fold 
increase in the accuracy in the value of c. The frequency of  the methane 
stabilized  helium-neon laser is over  1000 times higher in frequency than 
that of the oscillator used in FROOME'S  measurement of c. Direct frequency 
measurements  were  recently  extended  to  this  frequency  [6.22]  and 
subsequently refined C6.101 to the present accuracy of 6 parts in 10".  The 
wavelength of this stabilized laser has been compared C6.34-371  with the 
krypton46 length standard  to the  limit  of  the  usefulness of  the  length 
standard (approximately 4parts in lo9)  C6.61. The product ofthe measured 
frequency and the wavelength yields a new, definitive value for the speed 
of light, c. That measurement will now be described. 
6.5.  Methane Frequency Measurement 
To measure the frequency of  methane, a chain of  oscillators extending 
from the  cesium frequency  standard  to  the  methane  stabilized  helium- 
neon laser was used. The chain is shown in Fig. 6.4. The three saturated- 
absorption-stabilized lasers are exhibited in the upper right-hand section, 
the transfer  chain oscillators are in  the center column, and the  cesium 
frequency standard is in the lower right-hand corner. The He-Ne  and 
CO,  lasers in  the transfer chain were offset locked  C6.161,  that  is, they 
were locked at a frequency a few megahertz different from the stabilized 
lasers. This offset-locking procedure produced He-Ne  and CO,  transfer 
oscillators  without  the  frequency  modulation  used  in  the  molecular- 
stabilized lasers. The measurements of the frequencies in the entire chain 
were made in three steps shown on the right-hand side, by using standard 
heterodyne techniques [6.22,38-401. 
Conventional silicon point-contact harmonic generator-mixers were 
used up to the frequency of the HCN laser. Above this frequency, tungsten- 
- 
Laser Frequency Measurements,  the Speed of Light, and the Meter  359 
p *
% - 34; - 0  019  938  900 
* 
V, -12&=0.028  942  00 
 TRANSFER  LASER  OSCI LLATOR  I l UNEO  1 0  APPROXIMATE  tlnt  CEWlER1
Fig. 6.4. Stabilized laser frequency synthesis chain. All frequencies are given in THz; those 
marked  with an asterisk  were measured  with a transfer  laser  oscillator  tuned  to approxi- 
mate line center 
on-nickel diodes were used as harmonic  generator-mixers. These metal- 
metal diodes required 50 or more mW of power from the lasers to obtain 
optimum signals. The 2-mm-long, 25 pm-diam.  tungsten  antenna, with 
a  sharpened  tip  which  lightly  contacted  the  nickel  surface,  seemed  to 
couple to the radiation  in two  separate manners. At 0.89 and  10.7THz 
it  acted  like  a  long  wire  antenna  [6.41,42],  while  at  29-88  THz  its 
concial tip behaved like one-half of a biconical antenna C6.421. Conven- 
tional  detectors were used in the offset-locking steps. 
The  methane-stabilized  He-Ne  laser  used  in  these  experiments  is 
quite similar in size and construction  to the device described  by  HALL 
360  K. M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
C6.21. The gain tube was dc excited, and slightly higher reflectivity mirrors 
were employed. The latter resulted in a higher energy density inside the 
resonator and consequently  a somewhat  broader  saturated  absorption. 
Pressure  in  the  internal  methane  absorption  cell was  about 0.01 Torr 
(1 Torr =133.3 N/mZ). 
The two  1.2-m-long CO,  lasers  used  in  the experiments  contained 
internal absorption cells and dc-excited sealed gain tubes. A grating was 
employed  on one end for line selection, and frequency modulation  was 
achieved by dithering the 4-m-radius-of-curvature mirror on the opposite 
end. CO,  pressure  in the  internal  absorption  cell was  0.020Torr. The 
laser frequency was locked to the zero-slope point on the dip in the 4.3 pm 
fluorescent radiation C6.181. The 0.89-, 10.7-, and 88-THz transfer lasers 
were 8-m-long linearly polarized cw oscillators with single-mode output 
power greater than 50 mW. The Michelson HCN laser has been described 
C6.431. The H, 0 laser used a double-silicon-disk  partially  transmitting 
end mirror, and a 0.5-mil polyethylene internal Brewster-angle membrane 
polarized the laser beam. The 8-m He-Ne  laser oscillated in a single mode 
without any mode selectors because of a 4-Torr pressure with a 7 : 1 ratio 
of  helium  to  neon.  The  resultant  pressure  width  was  approximately 
equal to the Doppler width, and a high degree of saturation allowed only 
one mode to oscillate. 
Conventional  klystrons  used  to  generate  the  four  difference  fre- 
quencies between the lasers were all stabilized by  standard phase-lock- 
techniques,  and  their  frequencies  were  determined  by  cycle  counting 
at X-band. 
An interpolating counter controlled by a cesium frequency standard of 
the NBS Atomic Time Scale [6.44,45]  counted  the  10.6-GHz klystron 
in the transfer chain. This same standard was used to calibrate the other 
counters and the spectrum-analyzer tracking-generator. 
I n step 1, a frequency synthesis chain was completed from the cesium 
standard to the stabilized R(10) CO,  laser. All difference frequencies in 
this chain were either measured  simultaneously or held  constant. Each 
main chain oscillator had its radiation divided so that all beat notes in the 
chain  could  be  measured  simultaneously.  For  example, a  silicon-disk 
beam splitter divided the  10.7-THz beam  into  two parts: one part  was 
focused on the diode which generated  the  i2th harmonic  of  the  HCN 
laser frequency, the remaining part irradiated another diode which mixed 
the third  harmonic  of  10.7-THz with the output from  the 9.3 pm  CO, 
laser and the 20-GHz klystron. 
Figure 6.4 shows the two different ways in which the experiment was 
carried out. In the first scheme (output from mixers in position A), the 
HCN laser was  frequency locked  to a quartz  crystal oscillator  via  the 
148- and 10.6-GHz klystrons, and the frequency of the 10.6-GHz klystron 
Laser Frequency Measurements, the Speed of Light, and the Meter  361 
was  counted.  The  H,O  laser  was  frequency  locked  to  the  stabilized 
CO, laser, and the beat frequency between the H,O  and HCN lasers was 
measured on the spectrum analyzer. In the second scheme (output from 
mixers  in  position  B), the  10.6-GHz klystron  was phase  locked  to  the 
74-GHz klystron,  which  in  turn was  phase  locked  to the  free-running 
HCN laser. The  10.6-GHz klystron  frequency  was again  counted. The 
free-running H, 0 laser frequency was monitored relative to the stabilized 
CO, laser frequency, and the beat frequency between the H,O  and HCN 
lasers was measured  as before on the spectrum analyzer. 
In  step 2, the difference between  the two  CO, lines was measured. 
The HCN laser remained focused on the diode used in step 1, which now 
also had  two CO,  laser beams focused on it. The sum of  the third  har- 
monic  of  the  HCN frequency,  plus  a  microwave  frequency,  plus  the 
measured rf beat signal is the difference frequency between these two CO, 
lines.  The  two  molecular-absorption-stabilized  CO, lasers  were  used 
directly,  and  the  relative  phase  and  amplitudes  of  the  modulating 
voltages were adjusted to minimize the width of the beat note. The beat 
note  was  again  measured  on  a  combination  spectrum  analyzer  and 
tracking-generator-counter.  The  roles  of  the  CO, lasers  were  inter- 
changed  to  detect  possible  systematic  differences  in  the  two  laser- 
stabilization systems. 
In  step  3,  the frequency of  the  P(7) line in  methane was  measured 
relative to the  10.18 pm R(30) line of  CO,.  Both the 8-m 3.39 pm  laser 
and the CO, laser were offset locked from saturated-absorption-stabilized 
lasers and thereby  not modulated.  The  10- to  100-MHz beat  note was 
again measured either on a spectrum analyzer and tracking generator, or 
in the final measurement  when the SIN  ratio of the beat note was large 
enough (about loo), directly on a counter. 
The measurements  were chronologically  divided into four runs, and 
values  for  each  of  the  steps  and  for  v4,   v 5 ,  and  v6  were  obtained  by 
weighting  the results of all runs inversely proportional  to the square of 
the standard deviations. The largest uncertainty came in step 1 ; however, 
a recent measurement by NPL [6.46] gave a value of the R(12) line which 
was only 2 x  lo-''  (7 kHz) different from the number obtained by adding 
the R(12kR(10) difference C6.201 to the present  R(i 0) value. Thus, the 
first step of  the experiment  has been  verified. 
The final result is: 
Molecule  Line  I  [ P I   Frequency [THz] 
2  ~( 30)   10.18  29.442483 315(25) 
2  R(10)  9.3  32.134266891 (24) 
l 2CI 60 
1 2 ~ 1 6 0  
"CH,  P( 7)   3.39  88.376 181 627(50) 
362  K. M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
r 
1 2   68  70 
Fig. 6.5. Accurate speed of light values in meters per second since  1958. The value recom- 
mended by  CCDM is 299792.458 m/s  with an uncertainty  of  about 4 parts in  lo9. This 
value maintains continuity  in the meter and may be used  when  the meter is redefined 
The numbers in parentheses  of the  right column are  i-standard-devia- 
tion-type errors indicating uncertainties in the last two digits. 
In a coordinated effort, the wavelength of the 3.39 pm line of methane 
was  measured  with  respect  to  the  86Kr 6058A  primary  standard  of 
length  by  BARGER  and  HALL C6.341.  Using  a  frequency-controlled 
Fabry-Perot interferometer with a pointing precision of about 2 x 
orders, a detailed search for systematic offsets inherent in the experiment, 
including effects due to the asymmetry of the Kr standard line, was made. 
Offsets due to various experimental effects (such as beam misalignments, 
mirror  curvatures and  phase  shifts, phase  shift  over  the  exit  aperture, 
Laser Frequency Measurements, the Speed of Light, and the Meter  363 
Table 6.1. Speed of light measurements since 1958 
Year  Author  Ref.  Method 
1958  FROOME 
196 1  CUTKOSKY  and 
THOMAS 
1965  KOLIBAYEV 
1965  RANK  et al. 
1966  KAROLUS 
1967  GROSSE 
1967  SIMKIN  et al. 
197 1  BJERHAMMAR 
1972  BAY  et al. 
1972  BAIRD  et al. 
1972  EVENSON  et al. 
1973  GUELACHVILI 
1973  BARD  and 
BLANEY  et al. 
1973  CCDM 
C6.131
[6.48] 
16.491 
C6.511
C6.521
C6.531
C6.541
[6.1 I ] 
C6.471
16.121 
16.551 
[6.50] 
[6.47,461 
16.6, 101 
Radio interferometer 
Ratio of units 
Electro-optical 
Spectroscopic 
Electro-optical 
Electro-optical 
Radio interferometer 
Electro-optical 
He-Ne  I v  (0.633 pm) 
CO,  I v  (9 and  10 pm, avg.) 
He-Ne  i . v   (3.39 pm) c.g. 
Spectroscopic 
CO, Iv (9.32 pn) 
He-Ne  Iv (3.39 pm) 
peak 
299792.5  0.1 
299791.96  0.8 
29 9792.6  0.06 
299792.8  0.4 
299792.44  0.2 
299792.5  0.05 
29 9792.56  0.1 I 
299792.375  0.060 
299792.462  0.018 
299792.460  0.006 
299792.4562  0.001 1 
299792.4587  0.001 1 
29 9792.46  0.07 
299192.457  0.006 
29 9792.458  0.001  2 
diffraction, etc.) were carefully measured and then removed from the data 
with  an uncertainty  of  about 2  parts  in  lo9. Their  results  indicate  an 
asymmetry in the krypton line which resulted in two different values of 
,ICH4. One value arises if  the center of gravity of the krypton line is used 
to define the meter, and another if  the peak  value  is used. This repro- 
ducibility  for  a  single  wavelength  measurement  illustrates  the  high 
precision  which  is available  using  the frequency-controlled  interferom- 
eter. 
At  the 5th session of the consultative committee on the definition of 
the meter (CCDM) C6.61, results of BARCER  and HALL  as well as measure- 
ments made at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures C6.361, 
the  National  Research  Council  C6.371,  and  the  National  Bureau  of 
Standards at Gaithersburg C6.351 were all combined  to give a  recom- 
mended value  for the wavelength  of  the transition  of  methane used to 
stabilize the He-Ne  laser. The recommended  value is 
&. H4[P(7, , bandvzl  =3392231.40 x  lo-  m . 
(6.3) 
Multiplying  this  recommended  wavelength  of  methane  by  the 
measured  frequency yields the value  for the speed of  light: 
c =299792458 m/sec ( Ac/ c  = 4 x  W9) ,   (6.4) 
364  K. M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
which was also recommended by the CCDM C6.61 to be used in distance 
measurements  where  time-of-flight  is  converted  to  length  and  for 
converting frequency to wavelength and vice versa. 
This  result  is  in  agreement  with  the  previously  accepted  value  of 
c =299 792 500( 100) m/sec  and  is  about  100  times  more  accurate.  A 
recent differential  measurement  of the speed of  light has been made by 
BAY  et  al. C6.111; their value is  299792462(18) m/sec, which  is  also  in 
agreement  with  the  presently  determined  value.  A  third  recent,  highly 
accurate value may be obtained by multiplying the frequency of the R( 12), 
9.3 pm line of CO,  measured by BLANEY  et al. C6.461 by the wavelength 
measured by BAIRD  et al. C6.471 which yields the value of 299 792458 (6) m/ 
sec for c. Also shown is another value by BAIRD  C6.471, however, it used 
the CO,  frequencies which were measured in this experiment, and hence, 
does not represent an independent value. 
arises  from  the  interferometric  measurements  with  the  incoherent 
krypton radiation which defines the international meter. This limitation 
is indicative  of the remarkable growth in optical physics in recent years; 
the present krypton-based length definition  was adopted only in  1960. 
Various measurements of c since FROOMES  work are listed in Table 6.1 
and are plotted  in  Fig. 6.5. One sees a  remarkable convergence of  the 
values of c for the first time in history! 
Thefractionaluncertaintyin thisvaluefor thespeedoflight, k 4 x 
6.6.  Possible New Standard of Length 
In addition to the recommended values of the wavelength of methane 
and the value of the speed of light made at the 5th CCDM meeting C6.61, 
a value for the wavelength of iodine was also recommended: 
These recommended values are in agreement with wavelength measure- 
ments to the limits  possible  with  the krypton  length standard  (that is, 
about  +4 x  It  is recommended  that either of  these  values be 
used  to make  length  measurements  using  these  stabilized  lasers  in  the 
interim before the meter is redefined. 
It is also significant  that no further work was recommended on the 
present  length  standard, the  krypton  lamp,  which  is  far  inferior  to  a 
laser and will probably soon be replaced by one. 
As a result of  the recommendations made by  CCDM, two different 
definitions of a new  length standard must be considered. First, we can 
continue as before with separate standards for the second and meter, but 
Laser Frequency Measurements, the Speed of Light, and the Meter  365 
with the meter defined as the length equal to 1//2  wavelengths in vacuum 
of the  radiation  from  a  stabilized  laser  instead  of  from  a  86Kr lamp. 
Either the methane-stabilized  C6.2, 161 He-Ne  laser at 3.39 pm (88 THz) 
or the 1,-stabilized  C6.171 He-Ne  laser at 0.633 pm (474 THz) appear to 
be  suitable  candidates.  The  3.39 pm  laser  is  already  a  secondary  fre- 
quency standard in the infrared, and  hopefully, direct measurements  of 
the frequency of the 0.633 pm radiation will give the latter laser the same 
status in the visible. The 3.39 pm laser frequency  is presently  known  to 
within  6 parts in  lo",  and the reproducibility  and long term  stability 
have been demonstrated  to be better by more than two orders of magni- 
tude.  Hence,  frequency measurements  with  improved  apparatus in  the 
next  year or two are expected to reduce this uncertainty  to a few parts 
in 10".  A new value of the speed of light with this accuracy would thus be 
achievable if the standard of length were redefined in terms of the wave- 
length of this laser. 
Alternately, one can consider defining the meter as a specified fraction 
of the distance light travels in one second in vacuum (that is, one can fix 
the value of the speed of light). The meter would thus be defined in terms 
of  the  second and, hence, a single unified  standard would  be  used  for 
frequency, time, and length. What at first sounds like a rather radical and 
new approach to defining the meter is actually nearly one hundred years 
old. It was first proposed  by Lord Kelvin in  1879 r6.561. With this def- 
inition,  the wavelength  of  all  stabilized  lasers  would  be  known  to the 
same accuracy with which their frequencies can be measured. Stabilized 
lasers  would  thus  provide  secondary  standards of  both  frequency  and 
length  for  laboratory  measurements,  with  the  accuracy  being  limited 
only  by  the  reproducibility,  measurability,  and  long  term  stability.  It 
should be noted  that an adopted nominal value for the speed of light is 
already  in  use  for  high-accuracy  astronomical  measurements  C6.571, 
thus, there are currently two different  standards of length  in existence : 
one for terrestrial measurement and one for astronomical measurements. 
A definition which fixes c and unites these two values of c would certainly 
be desirable from a philosophical point  of  view. 
Independent  of  which  type  of  definition  is chosen  we believe  that 
research  on  simplified  frequency  synthesis  chains  bridging  the  micro- 
wave-optical  gap will  be  of  great  interest,  as will  refined  experiments 
directed  toward  an understanding  of  the  factors  that  limit  optical  fre- 
quency reproducibility.  No matter how such research may turn out, it is 
clear that ultraprecise physical measurements made in the interim can be 
preserved through wavelength  or frequency comparison with a suitably 
stabilized laser such as the 3.39 pm methane device. 
Frequencies  are currently  measurable  to  parts  in  l Ol 3 ,   and  hence 
the over-all error of about six parts in  10"  for the frequency measure- 
366  K. M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
ment  can be reduced. This measurement  was performed  fairly quickly 
to obtain a frequency of better accuracy than the wavelength. It should 
be  possible  to  obtain  considerably  more  accuracy  by  using  tighter 
locks on the lasers. For example, the 8-m HCN laser has recently been 
phase  locked  [6.58,59]  to  a  multiplied  microwave  reference  which 
currently determines the HCN laser linewidths. An improved microwave 
reference could be a  superconducting cavity  stabilized  oscillator C6.601 
for  best  stability  in  short  term  (narrowest  linewidth)  coupled  with  a 
primary cesium beam standard for good long term stability. 
The  relative  ease  with  which  these  laser  harmonic  signals  were 
obtained  in  these  frequency measurements  indicates that  the  measure- 
ment of the frequencies of visible radiation now appears very near at hand. 
Even  if  the  point  contact  metal-on-metal  diode  is  inoperable  above 
88 THz, conventional nonlinear  optical  techniques (i.e., 2nd  harmonic 
generation  in  crystals) could  still  be  used  to  extend  direct  frequency 
measurements to the visible. Such measurements should greatly facilitate 
ones ability to accurately utilize the visible and infrared  portion of  the 
electromagnetic spectrum. 
Acknowledgement 
The authors which to acknowledge J . S.  WELLS,  B.  L. DANIELSON,  and 
G. W. DAY  who participated in the measurement of the frequency of the 
methane stabilized  He  Ne laser and R. L. BARGER  and J . L. HALL  who 
first stabilized the laser and measured its wavelength. We also express our 
gratitude to  D. G. MCDONALD  and  J . D. CUPP whose  work  with  the 
J osephson junction was a parallel effort to ours in trying to achieve near- 
infrared frequency measurements. We note here that experiments using 
the J osephson junction to measure laser frequencies are continuing, and 
may  well  lead  to better  methods  for  near-infrared frequency synthesis 
in the future. 
References 
6.1. 
6.2. 
6.3. 
V.DANEU,  D. SOKOLOFF,  A. SANCHEZ,  A. J AVAN:  Appl. Phys. Letters 15, 398 (1969). 
J . L. HALL: In  Esfahan  Symposium  on  Fundamental  and  Applied  Laser  Physics, 
ed. by M. FELD  and A. J AVAN  (Wiley, New York). To bepublished. 
J . L. HALL,  CH.  BORDE:  Phys.  Rev. Letters 30, 1101 (1973). 
6.4.  D. J .GLAZE,  H. HELLWIG,  S. J ARVIS,  J r.,  A.E. WAI NWRI GHT,  D. W.ALLAN:  27th 
Annual  Symposium on Frequency Control, Fort Monmouth, N. J ., USA (1973). 
6.5.  J . LEVINE,  J . L. HALL:  J . Geophys. Res. 77, 2592 (1972). 
6.6.  Comite  Consultatif  pour  la  Definition  du  Metre,  5th  session,  Rapport  (Bureau 
International des Poids et Mesures,  Sevres, France,  1973). 
6.7.  DONALD  HALFORD,  H.HELLWI G,  J .S. WELLS:  Proc. IEEE 60, 623 (1972). 
Laser Frequency Measurements, the Speed of Light, and the Meter  367 
6.8.  J .L.HALL,  W. W.MOREY:  Appl. Phys. Letters 10,  152 (1967). 
6.9.  J . HALL,  R. L. BARGER,  P. L. BENDER,  H. S. BOYNE,  J . E. FALLER,  J . WARD:  Electron. 
Techno]. 2, 53 (1969). 
6.10.  K. M. EVENSON,  J . S. WELLS, F. R. PETERSEN,  B. L. DANIELSON,  G. W. DAY  :  Appl. 
Phys. Letters 22, 192 (1973). 
6.1 1.  Z. BAY,  G. G. LUTHER,  J . A. WHITE:  Phys. Rev. Letters 29, 189 (1972). 
6.12.  K. M. EVENSON,  J . S. WELLS, F. R. PETERSEN,  B. L. DANIELSON,  G.  W. DAY, R. L. 
6.13.  K.D.F~oo~~:Proc.Roy.Soc.Ser.A247,  lOS(1958). 
6.14.  C.FREED:  IEEE J . Quant. Electron. QE 4,404 (1968). 
6.1 5.  P. H. LEE,  M. L. SKOLNICK  : Appl. Phys. Letters 10, 303 (1967). 
6.16.  R. L. BARGER.  J . L. HALL:  Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 4 (1969). 
6.17.  G.R. HAINES,  C. E. DAHLSTROM:  Appl. Phys. Letters 14, 362 (1969); 
G. R. HAINES,  K. M. BAIRD:  Metrologia  5, 32 (1969). 
6.18.  C.FREED,  A.J AVAN:  Appl. Phys. Letters 17, 53 (1970). 
6.19.  F. R. PETERSEN,  D. G. MCDONALD,  J . D. CUPP,  B. L. DANIELSON:  Phys. Rev. Letters 
31, 573 (1973). 
6.20.  F. R. PETERSEN,  D. G. MCDONALD,  I. D.CUPP,  B. L.  DANIELSON:  Accurate  Rota- 
tional Constants, Frequencies, and Wavelengths from 12C 602  Lasers Stabilized by 
Saturated Absorption. Laser Spectroscopy, R. G. BREWER  and A. MOORADIAN,  Ed. 
(Plenum, New York, 1974). 
6.21.  D. G. MCDONALD,  A. S. RISLEY,  J . D.CUPP, K. M. EVENSON,  J . R. ASHLEY:  Appl. 
Phys. Letters 20, 296 (1972). 
6.22.  K.M.EVENSON,  G.W.DAY , J .S.WELLS,  L.O.MULLEN:  Appl.  Phys.  Letters  20, 
133 (1972). 
6.23.  E. SAKUMA,  K. M. EVENSON:  IEEE I.  Quant. Electron. QE 10, 599 (1974). 
6.24.  S.M.PARI S,  T.K. GUSTAFSON,  J .C. WIESNER:  IEEE  J . Quant. Electron.  QE 9, 737 
(1973). 
6.25.  A. A. LUCAS,  P. H. CUTLER:  1st  European  Conf.  Condensed  Matter  Summaries, 
Florence, Italy (September  1971). 
6.26.  ERI C  G. J OHNSON,  J R.  : Paper in preparation. 
6.27.  The interested reader  will  find  a  useful, critical  discussion  of  the speed of light in 
K. D. FROOME,  L. ESSEN:  The  Velocity  of Light and  Radio  Waves (Academic Press, 
New York, 1969). 
BARGER,  J . L. HALL:  Phys. Rev. Letters 29, 1346 (1972). 
6.28.  E.BERGSTRAND:  Ark. Mat. Astr. Fys. %A,  l(1949). 
6.29.  P. L. BENDER,  D. G. CURRIE,  R. H. DICKE, D. H. ECKHARDT,  J . E. FALLER,  W. M. 
KAULA,  J . D. MULHOLLAND,  H. H. PLOTKIN,  S. K. POULTNEY,  E. C.SILVERBERG, D.T. 
WILKINSON,  J . G. WILLIAMS,  C. 0.  ALLEY:  Science 182, 229 (1973). 
6.30.  T.S.J ASEJ A,  A.J AVAN,  J .MURRAY ,  C.H.TOWNES:  Phys.  Rev.  133A,  1221 (1964), 
using infrared masers; 
D.C.CHAMPENEY,  G. R.ISAAK,  A.M. KHAN:  Phys.  Letters  7,  241  (1963),  using 
Mossbauer  effect. 
6.31.  B.WARNER,  R.E.NATHER:  Nature (London) 222, 157 (1969), from dispersion in the 
light  flash  from pulsar  NP 0532, obtain d cj c 5 5 x  over  the  range  E. -0.25 
to 0.55 pm. 
6.32.  For example. see M. E. J . GHEURY   DEBRAY:  Nature 133,464 and 948 (1934). 
6.33.  E. B. ROSA,  N. E. DORSEY:  Bull. Nat. Bureau of Standards 3, 433 (1907). 
6. 34.   R.L. BAKGER,  J. L. HALL:   Appl. Phys.  Letters 22,  196 (1973). 
6.35.  R. D. DESLATTES,  H. P. LAYER,  W. G. SCHWEITZER:  Paper  in preparation. 
6.36.  P.GIACOMO:  5th  session  of  the  Comite  Consultatif  pour  la  Definition  du  Metre, 
6.37.  K. M. BAIRD,  D. S. SMITH,  W. E. BERGER:  Opt. Commun. 7, 107 (1973). 
BIPM, Sevres, France, 1973. 
368  K. M. EVENSON  and F. R. PETERSEN 
6.38.  L. O.HOCKER,  A. J AVAN,  D. RAMACHANDRA  RAO, L. FRENKEL,  T. SULLIVAN:  Appl. 
6.39.  K. M. EVENSON,  J . S. WELLS,  L. M. MATARRESE,  L. B.ELWELL:  Appl. Phys. Letters 16, 
6.40.  K. M.EVENSON,  J . S. WELLS,  L. M. MATARRESE:  Appl.  Phys. Letters 16, 251  (1970). 
6.41.  L.M. MATARRESSEE,  K. M.EVENSON:  Appl. Phys. Letters 17, 8 (1970). 
6.42.  Antenna Engineering Handbook, ed. by HENRY  J ASIK  (McGraw-Hill, New York 1961) 
6.43.  K. M. EVENSON,  J . S. WELLS,  L. M. MATARRESE,  D. A. J ENNINGS:  J .  Appl.  Phys.  42, 
6.44.  D. W.ALLAN,  J .E.GRAY ,  H.E.MACHLAN:  IEEE  Trans.  Instr.  Meas.  I M 21,  388 
6.45.  H. HELLWIG,  R. F. C. VESSOT, M. W. LEVINE,  P. W. ZITZWITZ,  D. W. ALLAN, D. 
6.46.  T. G. BLANEY,  C. C. BRADLEY,  G.   J . EDWARDS,  D. J . E. KNIGHT,  P. T. WOODS,  B. W. 
6.47.  K.M. BAIRD,  H.D.Riccius, K. J . SIEMSEN:  Opt. Commun. 6, 91 (1972). 
6.48.  a) J . L.THOMAS,  C. PETERSON,  I. L.COOTER,  F. R. KOTLER:  J . Res. Nat. Bur. Std. 43, 
Phys. Letters 10, 5  (1967). 
1 59(1 970). 
Chapters 4 and 10. 
1233 (1971). 
(1972). 
GLAZE:  IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas. I M 19, 200 (1970). 
J OLLIFFE:  Nature 244, 504 (1973). 
291  (1949); 
b)  R.D.CUTKOSKY:  J .  Res.  Nat. Bur. Std. 65A,  147  (1961); 
c)  B. N.TAYLOR,  W. H. PARKER,  D. N. LANGENBERG:  Rev. Mod. Phys. 41,375 (1969). 
Note: Original work was reported in a) and b). The calculated value for the speed of 
light includes corrections which were reported  in b) and c). 
6.49.  V.A. KOLIBAYEV:  1965,  Geodesy and  Aerophotography,  No.  3,  p.  228  (translated 
for the American Geophysical Union). 
6.50.  D. H. RANK:  J . Mol. Spectrosc. 17, 50 (1965). 
6.51.  A. KAROLUS:  5th Intern. Conf. Geodetic Measurement, 1965, Deutsche Geodetische 
6.52.  H.GROSSE:  Nachr. Karten- und Vermessungswesen (Ser. I) 3593 (1967). 
6.53.  G.  S. SIMKIN,  I. V. LUKIN,  S. V. SIKORA,  V. E. STRELENKII:  Izmeritel,  Tekhn,  8,  92 
6.54.  A. BJ ERHAMMAR:  Tellus XXIV, 481 (1972). 
6.55.  G. GVELACHVI LI :  Ph.  D. Thesis,  Universite  de  Paris-Sud,  Centre  DOrsay (1973). 
6.56.  W.F.SNY DER:  IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas. I M 22,  99 (1973). 
6.57.  P.BENDER:  Science 168, 1012 (1970). 
6.58.  J .S. WELLS,  DONALD  HALFORD:  NBS Techn. Note No. 620 (May 1973). 
6.59.  J . S. WELLS,  D. G.   MCDONALD,  A. S. RISLEY,  S. J ARVIS,  J . D.CUPP: Rev. Appl. Phys. 
6.60.  S. R. STEIN,  J .P.TURNEAURE:  Electron. Letters 8, 431 (1972). 
Kommission, Miinchen (1966), p. 1 .  
(1967); [Translation: Meas. Tech. 1967,  1018]. 
9, 285 (1974).