0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views12 pages

Estimating Maximum Willingness To Pay: Jagmohan S. Raju Joseph J. Aresty Professor The Wharton School

This document discusses using conjoint analysis to estimate maximum willingness to pay. It describes designing a conjoint survey using an MP3 player example to estimate consumer preference weights for different product attributes. Regression analysis is used to calculate attribute partworths from survey ratings data. Willingness to pay is then estimated for a specific product configuration by calculating the total utility from attribute partworths and converting it to a dollar value using the utility-to-price exchange rate from the regression results.

Uploaded by

Doshi Vaibhav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views12 pages

Estimating Maximum Willingness To Pay: Jagmohan S. Raju Joseph J. Aresty Professor The Wharton School

This document discusses using conjoint analysis to estimate maximum willingness to pay. It describes designing a conjoint survey using an MP3 player example to estimate consumer preference weights for different product attributes. Regression analysis is used to calculate attribute partworths from survey ratings data. Willingness to pay is then estimated for a specific product configuration by calculating the total utility from attribute partworths and converting it to a dollar value using the utility-to-price exchange rate from the regression results.

Uploaded by

Doshi Vaibhav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Estimating Maximum Willingness to Pay

Jagmohan S. Raju
Joseph J. Aresty Professor
The Wharton School
Using Conjoint Analysis
to Estimate Reservation Prices
MP3 Player Survey – Sample Profiles

A) Brand Apple B) Brand Apple


Storage 5000 songs Storage 50 songs
Battery 18 hrs Battery 2 hrs
Display Color Display Monochrome
Warranty No Warranty No
Price $249 Price $249

C) Brand Generic D) Brand Generic


Storage 5000 songs Storage 50 songs
Battery 18 hrs Battery 2 hrs
Display Color Display Color
Warranty 1 yr Warranty No
Price $249 Price $99

3
Coding the Profiles

 Each player attribute in survey has two levels


Brand Capacity Battery Life Display Warranty Price
Attributes
(songs)
Apple 5000 18hrs Color 1 yr $249
Levels Generic Mono
50 2 hrs None $99

 Use 0 for lower level and 1 for higher level


Example: Profile - a Example: Profile - h
Attribute Value Coded as Attribute Value Coded as
Brand Apple 1 Brand Generic 0
Storage 5000 songs 1 Storage 50 songs 0
Battery 18 hrs 1 Battery 2 hrs 0
Display Color 1 Display Mono 0
Warranty No 0 Warranty No 0
Price $249 1 Price $99 0

4
Survey Data

 Ratings collected from one respondent


# Brand Price Capacity Battery Warranty Display Rating
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 73
2 1 1 0 1 1 0 42
3 1 0 1 0 1 0 87
4 1 0 0 0 0 1 80
5 0 1 1 1 0 0 38
6 0 1 0 1 1 1 28
7 0 0 1 0 1 1 80
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
9 1 1 0 1 0 1 51
10 1 0 1 1 1 0 95
11 1 1 0 0 1 0 32
12 1 1 1 0 0 1 47
13 0 0 0 1 0 0 64
14 0 0 1 1 1 1 75
15 0 1 0 0 1 1 27
16 0 1 1 0 0 0 18

5
Analyzing the Data

 Estimate consumer preference weights using regression


 Utility (Rating) = α + βBrand Brand + βCapacity Capacity
+ βBattery Battery + βDisplay Display
+ βWarranty Warranty + βPrice Price
 Regression results
Attribute Coefficient Value

Intercept a 30.9

Brand bBrand 25.7

Price bPrice -33.6 R2 = 0.85


Capacity bCapacity 18.8

Battery bBattery 15.5

Warranty bWarranty 7.0

Display bDisplay 14.2

6
Estimating Willingness to Pay

 What is the utility-to-$ “exchange rate”?


 Exchange rate = ($249 – $99) / 33.6 = 4. 45 $/util
 When price changes from $99 to $249, utility reduces by βPrice
 What is willingness to pay for a given product?
Attribute Value Dummy Level Utils
Brand Apple 1 25.7
Storage 5000 songs 1 18.8
Battery Life 10 hrs 0.5 7.75
Display Type Color 1 14.2
Warranty 1yr 1 7.0
Intercept - -

Total Utils = 73.45

73.45 utils = 73.45 x $4.45 = $326.85


7
Other Methods

 Economic Value to the Customer


 Estimation from Secondary Data
 Postulate a choice model that includes a reservation price
 Allow it to vary across buyers.
 Estimate is as a parameter (individual level)

8
ANNEXURES
Conjoint Utility Model

 Linear compensatory model

Utility = α + βBrand Brand + βCapacity Capacity


+ βBattery Battery + βDisplay Display
+ βWarranty Warranty + βPrice Price

 α is utility from other (invariant) attributes


 βs are known as the (attribute) partworths
 Attributes can be represented using dummy variables
Attribute Brand Capacity Battery Display Warranty Price
Dummy = 0 Generic 50 2 hrs Mono- None $99
Dummy = 1 Apple 5000 18 hrs Color 1 yr $249

10
Designing a Conjoint Survey

 How many product attributes do we include?


 Include only those that influence customer decision and (can) vary across
products
 MP3 Playback quality: little room for differentiation
 MP3 Player size: Determined by battery life, storage, display
 How many profiles should we use?
 Balance reliability with design cost and task complexity
 In the MP3 player example full factorial design is too large
 2 levels for 6 attributes => 26 = 64 possible profiles
 May cause respondent fatigue
 May include dominated or meaningless options
 We used a fractional factorial design (16 profiles)
 A subset of all profiles is sufficient to estimate our model
 Assumption: Effect of one attribute is independent of another
 7 parameters (including intercept) => minimum of 7 profiles
 Profiles can be determined using standard statistical packages
11
Variations and Extensions

 Choice data instead of preference data


 Use logistic regression to calculate attribute partworths
 Heterogeneity in consumer preferences
 Cluster analysis, Latent class or Bayesian models
 Non-linear pricing plans (e.g. cell phone plans)
 Structural models

12

You might also like