7 Official Opinions of the Compliance Board 269 (2011)
Meeting
Determined not to be a meeting Gathering of fewer than
a quorum when quorum not present
Determined to be a meeting Social gathering and chance
encounter exception not applicable when used to
discuss public business
Administrative Function Within Exclusion Assignment of
members to attend another entitys event
July 26, 2011
Jason Keirn Mayor and Town Council of Brentwood
Complainant Respondent
We have considered the complaint of Jason Keirn (Complainant) that the
Town Council of Brentwood (the Town) violated the Open Meetings Act
(the Act) by holding a meeting without giving public notice or otherwise
complying with the Act. We conclude that the Act did not apply to the
discussion in question and therefore find no violation.
I
Discussion
Complainant states that he observed three members of the Town Council
the Mayor and two council members - meeting at a Dunkin Donuts in
Hyattsville. He states that he does not know what they discussed.
The Town responds that the Town Council is comprised of five members,
including the Mayor; that the Mayor and Council Member Harrison met at
Dunkin Donuts for coffee; that they discussed attending the Mt. Rainier Day
Celebration that day and planning for the Towns own celebration event; that
Council Member Brooks then came in unexpectedly; that the three members
talked about the Mt. Rainier event; and that the Mayor asked the other two to
represent the Town at the Mt. Rainier event until the Mayor could get there.
The Mayor then left. The Town asserts that the event was a social gathering
and chance encounter during which no public business was discussed and
269
7 Official Opinions of the Compliance Board 269 (2011) 270
that the Act therefore did not apply. We begin, however, with whether the
gathering was a meeting subject to the Act.
The Act requires a public body to hold its meetings in open session,
unless the Act expressly permits otherwise. Annotated Code of Maryland,
State Government Article (SG), 10-505. A meeting for purposes of the
Act occurs when a quorum of the public bodys members convenes to consider
or transact public business. SG 10-502(g). The Act thus does not apply
when fewer than a quorum are present. A quorum is a majority of the
members, unless otherwise provided by law. SG 10-502(k). A quorum of
Brentwoods five-member Town Council is at least three members. The
conversation between the Mayor and Council Member Harrison about the
Towns own Celebration Day involved public business, but it did not occur in
the presence of a quorum, and so the Act did not apply. The discussion
1
among the three members after Council Member Brooks arrived did occur in
the presence of a quorum, and so we turn to the Towns contention that the
discussion occurred during a chance encounter or social gathering and was
thereby exempt from the Act.
The Act does not apply to a chance encounter, social gathering, or other
occasion that is not intended to circumvent [the Act]. SG 10-503(a). That
exclusion does not confer on a public body a blanket permission to discuss
public business at such gatherings. Instead, the exclusion evaporates, and the
Act applies, when an event that begins as a chance encounter or social
gathering is then used to convey information that constitutes public business
within the Act. See, e.g. 3 OMCB Opinions 30,34 (2001) (finding that the Act
applied when public business within the Act was conducted by an accidental
quorum created by a members unexpected appearance); 3 OMCB Opinions
78, 83 (2001) (finding that the Act applied to a social gathering where a
nonvoting member told the members how he would present an agenda item at
the boards meeting later that evening); 2 OMCB Opinions 74, 76 (1999)
(cautioning that a public body meeting socially must refrain from conducting
public business during that time). We have thus found that the Act will apply
to a meeting originating by chance or for purely social reasons when the
discussion turns to public business within the Act.
Public business falls within the Act when the public body is exercising an
advisory, legislative, or quasi-legislative function. See SG 10-502(b) and
Complainant later referred us to a video of a town meeting during which the
1
Mayor referred to visiting a certain site that day with one other council member.
Again, no quorum was created.
7 Official Opinions of the Compliance Board 269 (2011) 271
10-503. As relevant here, the Act does not apply when the public body is
exercising the administrative function. Id. A public bodys discussion of
2
such matters as the committee assignments of its own members is generally
administrative in nature when those assignments are made by the public body
itself. See 7 OMCB Opinions 142, 144, n.1 (2011). For example, we have
found that a public bodys discussion about which member should attend a
conference fell within the administrative function exclusion because it
concerned a housekeeping matter of that body and did not implicate a
policy-making or other function within the Act. 3 OMCB Opinions 39, 43
(2000).
According to the Town, the members discussed two topics: first, Mt.
Rainiers celebration day, and, second, the Mayors request that the other
members represent the Town at that event until he arrived. The first topic
perhaps involved Mt. Rainiers business; it apparently did not involve the
Towns business. The Mayors request did involve the Towns business. That
topic, however, was analogous to a discussion of committee assignments or
selection of conference attendees and was thus administrative in nature. We
find that the Act did not apply to either topic.
II
Conclusion
We conclude that no violation occurred because the Act did not apply to
the event in question.
OPEN MEETINGS COMPLIANCE BOARD
Elizabeth L. Nilson, Esquire
Courtney J. McKeldin
Julio A. Morales, Esquire
The other express exclusions relate generally to the grant of licenses or
2
permits and the performance of judicial or quasi-judicial functions, see SG 10-503;
they do not apply here.
