0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views10 pages

ITAct 2000,2008

The document summarizes key provisions and implementation challenges of the Information Technology Act 2000 and its subsequent amendments in 2009. It introduces definitions added in the amended 2008 Act for "communication device" and "intermediary" to clarify the scope of entities covered. Sections 7A and 10A reinforce the legal validity of electronic documents and contracts. The amendment introduced corporate responsibility for data protection under Section 43A and empowered the central government to prescribe encryption standards. However, challenges remain in elaborating "reasonable security practices" and "sensitive personal data." Other challenges include implementing electronic signatures and authentication technologies, assigning duties to subscribers of digital signatures, and ensuring privacy of signatures with the certification authority role replacing the controller. The

Uploaded by

MubashirAnza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views10 pages

ITAct 2000,2008

The document summarizes key provisions and implementation challenges of the Information Technology Act 2000 and its subsequent amendments in 2009. It introduces definitions added in the amended 2008 Act for "communication device" and "intermediary" to clarify the scope of entities covered. Sections 7A and 10A reinforce the legal validity of electronic documents and contracts. The amendment introduced corporate responsibility for data protection under Section 43A and empowered the central government to prescribe encryption standards. However, challenges remain in elaborating "reasonable security practices" and "sensitive personal data." Other challenges include implementing electronic signatures and authentication technologies, assigning duties to subscribers of digital signatures, and ensuring privacy of signatures with the certification authority role replacing the controller. The

Uploaded by

MubashirAnza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Information Technology Act

The Information Technology Act 2000 (also known as ITA-2000, or the IT Act) is an Act of
the Indian Parliament (No 21 of 2000) notified on October 17, 2000 This act is bein! o""osed
b# $a%e &o'r (oice cam"ai!n and other ci%il societ# or!ani)ations in India *ser+re%iew and
cons'mer social networkin! site ,o'th$h'tcom has filed a writ "etition in the $'"reme -o'rt
of India to re"eal and n'llif# "arts of IT Act 2000
History
The *nited Nations .eneral Assembl# b# resol'tion A/01$/21/132, dated the 40 5an'ar# 1667
has ado"ted the ,odel 7aw on 1lectronic -ommerce ado"ted b# the *nited Nations
-ommission on International Trade 7aw This is referred to as the *N-IT0A7 ,odel 7aw on 1+
-ommerce 8ollowin! the *N 0esol'tion India "assed the Information Technolo!# Act 2000 in
,a# 2000, which came into force on October 17, 2000 The Information Technolo!# Act 2000
has been s'bstantiall# amended thro'!h the Information Technolo!# (Amendment) Act 2009
which was "assed b# the two ho'ses of the Indian Parliament on :ecember 24, and 2;, 2009 It
!ot the Presidential assent on 8ebr'ar# 2, 2006 and came into force on October 27, 2006 The
amended Act has "ro%ided additional foc's on information sec'rit# It has added se%eral new
sections on offences incl'din! c#ber terrorism and data "rotection A set of 0'les related to
sensiti%e "ersonal information and reasonable sec'rit# "ractices (mentioned in section ;4A of the
ITAA, 2009) was notified in A"ril 2011
Provisions
Information technolo!# Act 2000 consisted of 6; sections se!re!ated into 14 cha"ters 8o'r
sched'les form "art of the Act In the 2009 %ersion of the Act, there are 12; sections (e<cl'din! 2
sections that ha%e been omitted from the earlier %ersion) and 1; cha"ters $ched'le I and II ha%e
been re"laced $ched'les III and I( are deleted
Information Technolo!# Act 2000 addressed the followin! iss'es=
7e!al reco!nition of electronic doc'ments
7e!al 0eco!nition of di!ital si!nat'res
Offenses and contra%entions
5'stice dis"ensation s#stems for c#bercrimes
Accordin! to $ection 10A of information technolo!# Act, 2000(amended in 2009) it also
%alidates 1+contracts
I.T Act 2000/2008- Implementation, Challenges, an the !ole of A"#icating
$lectronic signat#res intro#ce
>ith the "assa!e of the IT (Amendment) Act, 2009 India has become technolo!icall# ne'tral d'e
to ado"tion of electronic si!nat'res as a le!all# %alid mode of e<ec'tin! si!nat'res This incl'des
di!ital si!nat'res as one of the modes of si!nat'res and is far broader in ambit co%erin!
biometrics and other new forms of creatin! electronic si!nat'res This is a "ositi%e chan!e as
India has different se!ments "eo"le and all ma# not be technolo!icall# ade"t to 'nderstand and
'se the di!ital si!nat'res Therefore, allowin! forms of a'thentication that are sim"ler to 'se
s'ch as retina scannin! can be ?'ite 'sef'l in effecti%e im"lementation of the Act @owe%er, the
challen!e it "oses is accessibilit# to a'thentication tools and im"artin! ed'cation to "eo"le to 'se
the same It is a challen!in! task for the -entral !o%ernment to "rescribe conditions for
considerin! reliabilit# of electronic si!nat'res or electronic a'thentication techni?'es 'nder
$ection 4A (2), the "roced're for ascertainin! electronic si!nat're or a'thentication 'nder
$ection 4A(4),the manner in which information ma# be a'thenticated b# electronic si!nat'res in
$ection 2 It also in%ol%es e<"endit're as s'ch a'thentication tools will re?'ire "'rchase,
installation A trainin!, "artic'larl# in all !o%ernment de"artments where it is "ro"osed to be
'sed 1?'all# challen!in! will be the draftin! of d'ties of s'bscriber of electronic si!nat're
certificate 'nder $ection ;0 A of the Act which will need to incor"orate sec'rit# meas'res
s'bscribers can ado"t de"endin! on electronic si!nat're bein! 'sed for si!nat'res 8'rther, in a
mo%e to sec're the flow of data and information on the internet, and "romote e+commerce A e+
!o%ernance, the amended Act in $ection 9;A has em"owered the -entral .o%ernment to
"rescribe modes or methods for encr#"tion These "arameters sho'ld be laid down in
cons'ltation with or!ani)ations s'ch as Nasscom and/or !o%ernmental a!encies that can assist in
form'lation of necessar# standards and related r'les
Corporate responsi%ility intro#ce in &. '(A
The cor"orate res"onsibilit# for data "rotection is incor"orated in $ ;4A in the amended IT Act,
2000 whereb# cor"orate bodies handlin! sensiti%e "ersonal information or data in a com"'ter
reso'rce are 'nder an obli!ation to ens're ado"tion of reasonable security practicesB to maintain
its secrec#, failin! which the# ma# be liable to "a# dama!es Also, there is no limit to the amo'nt
of com"ensation that ma# be awarded b# %irt'e of this section This section m'st be read with
$ection 92 of the IT Act, 2000 whereb# all "ersons res"onsible to the com"an# for cond'ct of its
b'siness shall be held !'ilt# incase offence was committed b# a com"an# 'nless no knowled!e
or d'e dili!ence to "re%ent the contra%ention is "ro%ed
Insertion of this "ro%ision is "artic'lar si!nificance to CPO com"anies that handle s'ch sensiti%e
information in the re!'lar co'rse of their b'siness This "ro%ision is im"ortant to sec're sensiti%e
data and is hence a ste" in the ri!ht direction @owe%er, the challen!e is to
8irst el'cidate what we ?'alif# as Dreasonable security practicesE The Act in e<"lanation to
$ection ;4A indicates these "roced'res desi!ned to "rotect s'ch information from F'na'thori)ed
access, dama!e, 'se, modification, disclos're, or im"airment, as ma# be s"ecified in an
a!reement between "artiesB or as ma# be s"ecified b# an# law for the time bein! in force and in
absence of both, as ma# be "rescribed b# -entral .o%ernment in cons'ltation with "rofessional
bodies/associations The law e<"lainin! the definition of Freasonable sec'rit# "racticesB is #et to
be laid down and/or -entral !o%ernment is #et to frame its r'les thereon Perha"s, we can take
!'idance from certain forei!n laws on data "rotection A standards laid down in 1'ro"ean *nion
or b# or!ani)ations s'ch as O1-: in "rotection of sensiti%e "ersonal data It is a challen!e for
the -entral .o%ernment to "rescribe in cons'ltation with "rofessional bodies the information that
will fall within the meanin! of Dsensiti%e "ersonal data or informationE To describe what these
"arameters sho'ld be is be#ond the sco"e of this Article b't is an interestin! iss'e for disc'ssion
Important efinitions ae in Act, 2008
Two %er# im"ortant definitions are added to the IT Act thro'!h IT Amendment Act,2009+
$ection 2(ha)+ DCommunication device and $ection 2 (w) GDintermediaryE Altho'!h cell
"hones and other de%ices 'sed to comm'nicate wo'ld fall 'nder the definition of com"'ter in the
IT Act This amendment remo%es an# ambi!'it# and brin!s within the ambit of the Act all
comm'nication de%ices, cell"hones, iPod or other de%ices 'sed to comm'nicate, send or transmit
an# te<t ,%ideo ,a'dio or ima!e The insertion of definition of Fintermediar#B similarl# clarifies
the cate!ories of ser%ice "ro%iders that come within its definition that incl'des telecom ser%ice
"ro%iders, network ser%ice "ro%iders, internet ser%ice "ro%ider, webhostin! ser%ice "ro%iders,
search en!ines, online "a#ment sites, online a'ction sites, online market "laces and c#ber cafes
)egal valiity of electronic oc#ments re-emphasi*e- &ection +A an ,0A
Two new sections $ection 7A and 10A in the amended Act reinforce the e?'i%alence of "a"er
based doc'ments to electronic doc'ments $ection 7A in the amended Act makes a'dit of
electronic doc'ments also necessar# where%er "a"er based doc'ments are re?'ired to be a'dited
b# law $ection 10A confers le!al %alidit# A enforceabilit# on contracts formed thro'!h
electronic means These "ro%isions are inserted to clarif# and stren!then the le!al "rinci"le in
$ection ; of the IT Act, 2000 that electronic doc'ments are at"ar with electronic doc'ments and
e+contracts are le!all# reco!ni)ed and acce"table in law This will facilitate !rowth of e+
commerce acti%it# on the internet and b'ild deni)enBs confidence
Criti-#e on Po.er of Controller #ner the amene Act- &ection 28
$ection 29 of the Act "ro%ides that the -ontroller or an# a'thori)ed officer shall in%esti!ate Fan#
contra%ention of the "ro%isions of this Act, r'les or re!'lations made there'nder B
These words sho'ld be re"laced with words Fany contravention of the provisions of this Chapter
in li!ht of the fact that the amendment in $ection 26 for -ontrollers "ower to access com"'ters
and data has been c'rtailed b# remo%al of words Dan# contra%ention of the "ro%isions of this Act,
r'les or re!'lations made there'nderE for insertion of words Dan# contravention of the provisions
of this ChapterE Also, the -ontrollerBs "ower cannot mean to o%erla" with AdH'dicatin! officers
who are a'thori)ed to adH'dicate on cases of contra%ention that fall 'nder $ection ;4 or the
s'bHect matter H'risdiction of -AT or the Police Therefore, the "ower of -ontroller has to be
inter"reted kee"in! in %iew the intent A obHecti%es of the Act which can be clarified
The role of the -ontroller to act as repository of igital signat#res has been re"ealed b# the IT
Amendment Act, 2009 This role has now been assi!ned to the -ertif#in! A'thorit# in $ection
40 of the IT Act This chan!e "oses a maHor challen!e to ens'rin! the secrec# and "ri%ac# of
electronic si!nat'res is maintained The -ertif#in! a'thorities will bear !reater res"onsibilit# and
need to stren!then their sec'rit# infrastr'ct're to ens're its role as re"ositor# is deli%ered with
efficac# It will need to allocate more reso'rces and man"ower to re!'larl# "'blish information
re!ardin! its "ractices, electronic si!nat'res certificates and "'blish the c'rrent stat's of each
certificate
&ection /+ C to play a significant role in cy%ercrime prosec#tion-
$ection 37 - brin!s a %er# si!nificant chan!e in the IT Act, 2000 Accordin! to this section,
intermediaries shall be bo'nd to "reser%e and retain s'ch information as ma# be "rescribed b#
the -entral !o%ernment and for s'ch d'ration and format as it ma# "rescribe An# intermediar#
that contra%enes this "ro%ision intentionall# or knowin!l# shall be liable on con%iction for
im"risonment for a term not e<ceedin! 2 #rs or fine not e<ceedin! one lac or both ,an#
c#bercrime cases cannot be sol%ed d'e to lack of e%idence and in man# cases this is d'e to the
fact that I$P failed to "reser%e the record "ertainin! to rele%ant time This "ro%ision is %er#
hel"f'l in collection of e%idence that can "ro%e indis"ensable in c#bercrime cases
&ection /0- Po.er of the controller to intercept amene
$ection 36 that deals with "ower of -ontroller to interce"t information bein! transmitted thro'!h
a com"'ter reso'rce when necessar# in national interest is amended b# $ection 36In fact the
"ower %ests now with the -entral .o%ernment or $tate .o%ernment that em"owers it to a""oint
for reasons in writin!, an# a!enc# to interce"t, monitor or decr#"t an# information !enerated,
transmitted, recei%ed or stored in an# com"'ter reso'rce This "ower is to be e<ercised 'nder
!reat ca'tion and onl# when it is satisfied that it is necessar# or e<"edient to do so in interests of
so%erei!nt#, or inte!rit# of India, defense of India, sec'rit# of the $tate, friendl# relations with
forei!n states or "'blic order or for "re%entin! incitement to the commission of an# co!ni)able
offence relatin! to abo%e or for in%esti!ation of an# offence The "roced're and safe!'ards to
e<ercise this "ower are laid o't b# the Information Technolo!# ("roced're and safe!'ards for
interce"tion, monitorin! and decr#"tion of Information) 0'les, 2006 The s'bscriber or
intermediar# that fails to e<tend coo"eration in this res"ect is "'nishable offence with a term
which ma# e<tend to 7 #rs and im"osition of fine The element of fine did not e<ist in the
erstwhile $ection 36 The said r'les "ro%ide am"le safe!'ards to ens're the "ower in this section
is dili!entl# e<ercised, with d'e a'thori)ation "roced'res com"lied with and not ab'sed b# an#
a!enc#/intermediar# incl'din! maintainin! confidentialit# and r'les for maintainin! or
destr'ction of s'ch records
Po.er to %loc1 #nla.f#l .e%sites sho#l %e e2ercise .ith ca#tion- &ection /0A
$ection 36A has been inserted in the IT Act b# the amendments in 2009 and !i%es "ower to
-entral !o%ernment or an# a'thori)ed officer to direct an# a!enc# or intermediar#(for reasons
recorded in writin! ) to block websites in s"ecial circ'mstances as a""licable in $ection
36*nder this $ection the !ro'nds on which s'ch blockin! is "ossible are ?'ite wide In this
res"ect, the Information Technolo!# (Proced're and $afe!'ards for Clockin! for Access of
Information b# P'blic ) 0'les, 2006 were "assed %ide .$0 791(1) dated 27 Oct 2006 whereb#
websites "romotin! hate content, slander, defamation, "romotin! !amblin!,racism,%iolence and
terrorism, "orno!ra"h#, %iolent se< can reasonabl# be blocked The r'les also allow the blockin!
of websites b# a co'rt order It f'rther "ro%ides for re%iew committee to re%iew the decision to
block websites The intermediar# that fails to e<tend coo"eration in this res"ect is "'nishable
offence with a term which ma# e<tend to 7 #rs and im"osition of fine >e need to 'se this "ower
with ca'tion as it has a thin line that distin!'ishes reasonable e<ercise of "ower for -ensorshi"
&ection /03 ae to confer Po.er to collect, monitor traffic ata
As a res'lt of the amendments in 2009, $ection 36 C confers on the -entral !o%ernment "ower to
a""oint an# a!enc# to monitor and collect traffic data or information !enerated, transmitted,
recei%ed, or stored in an# com"'ter reso'rce in order to enhance its c#ber sec'rit# and for
identification, anal#sis, and "re%ention of intr'sion or s"read of com"'ter contaminant in the
co'ntr# The Information Technolo!# ("roced're and safe!'ard for monitorin! and collectin!
traffic data or information ) 0'les, 2006 ha%e been laid down to monitor and collect the traffic
data or information for c#ber sec'rit# "'r"oses 'nder $ection 36C It "laces res"onsibilit# to
maintain confidentialit# on intermediaries, "ro%ides for "rohibition of monitorin! or collection of
data witho't a'thori)ation This "rescribes strin!ent "ermissions re?'ired to e<ercise the "owers
'nder this $ection which are f'll# H'stified as ab'se of this "ower can infrein!e the ri!ht to
"ri%ac# of neti)ens It also "ro%ides for re%iew of its decisions and destr'ction of records The
intermediar# that fails to e<tend coo"eration in this res"ect is "'nishable offence with a term
which ma# e<tend to 4 #rs and im"osition of fine
&ignificance of the term 4Critical Information Infrastr#ct#re5 &ection +0
$ection 70 has a %er# im"ortant definition added b# the IT (amendment) Act, 2009 The
e<"lanation to $ection 70 defines what is Dcritical information infrastr'ct'reE It encom"asses
the com"'ter reso'rce the destr'ction of which not onl# has an ad%erse im"act on defence of
India b't also econom#, "'blic health or safet# This is %er# si!nificant ste" as toda# o'r IT
infrastr'ct're ma# also be 'sed to mana!e certain ser%ices offered to "'blic at lar!e, destr'ction
of which ma# directl# affect "'blic health and safet# @ence, their "rotection is e?'all# im"ortant
as is the maintainin! of sec'rit# and so%erei!nt# of India
C# %irt'e of $ection 70 A and C Indian -10T has been a""ointed as the National nodal a!enc#
for critical information infrastr'ct're "rotection The -10T shall "la# an indis"ensable role in
maintainin! c#ber sec'rit# within the co'ntr# A %er# im"ortant ste" is coordination between
-10T and ser%ice "ro%iders, data centers, bod# cor"orates, and other "ersons ($ection 70C (3))
That will lead to effecti%e "erformance of the role of -10T in It has m'lti"le roles ed'cation,
alert s#stem, emer!enc# res"onse, iss'in! !'idelines, re"ortin! of c#ber incident amon!st other
f'nctions In case an# "erson fails to com"l# with its directions, s'ch "erson shall be "'nishable
with im"risonment of term that ma# e<tend to one #ear and fine of one lakh or both It also
e<cl'des the co'rt from takin! co!ni)ance of an# offence 'nder this section e<ce"t on a
com"laint made b# a'thori)ed officer of -10T to "re%ent mis'se of the $ection
Important clarifications on the Act6s application 7 effect &ection ++ in the amene
Act
C# %irt'e of $ection 77 in the amended Act, it has been clarified that awardin! of
com"ensation, "enalt# im"osed or confiscation made 'nder this Act shall not "re%ent the
award of com"ensation, or im"osition of an# other "enalt# or "'nishment 'nder an# law for
the time bein! in force This $ection can be read with $ection 91 "ro%iso wherein it is
clarified that IT Act shall not restrict an# "erson from e<ercisin! an# ri!ht conferred 'nder
co"#ri!ht Act, 1627 or "atents Act, 1670
The com%ine effect of &ection ++ an ++ 3
C# %irt'e of $ection 77 -om"o'ndin! of offences other than offences for which im"risonment
for life or "'nishment for a term e<ceedin! has been "ro%ided has been made "ossible $ection
77 C makes offences "'nishable with im"risonment of three #ears and abo%e as co!ni)able and
offence "'nishable with 4 #ears of "'nishment as bailable $ince the maHorit# of c#bercrime
offences defined 'nder the amended IT Act are "'nishable with im"risonment for three #ears, the
net effect of all amendments is that a maHorit# of these c#bercrimes are bailable This means that
the moment a c#bercriminal is arrested b# the "olice, barrin! a few offences, in almost all other
c#bercrimes, he has to be released on bail as a matter of ri!ht, b# the "olice A c#bercriminal,
once released on bail, will immediatel# attem"t at destro#in! or deletin! all electronic traces and
trails of his ha%in! committed an# c#bercrime This makes the task of law enforcement a!encies
e<tremel# challen!in!
Com%ine effect of &ection +8 7 80
The $ection 79 of the Act is amended to confer "ower to in%esti!ate offences 'nder the Act from
:$P le%el to Ins"ector le%el This will be instr'mental in ?'icker in%esti!ation in the c#bercrime
cases "ro%ided ade?'ate tools and trainin! is "ro%ided
$ection 90 has been amended and "ower to enter and search in a "'blic "lace is now %ested in
an# "olice officer not below the rank of ins"ector or an# a'thori)ed officer of central !o%ernment
or state !o%ernment $'ch officer is em"owered to arrest witho't warrant a "erson fo'nd therein
who is reasonabl# s's"ected of ha%in! committed or of committin! or bein! abo't to commit
an# offence 'nder this Act @owe%er, this section ma# be mis'sed easil# *nless it is reasonabl#
s's"ected that a "erson has committed, is committin! or is abo't to commit an offence, he sho'ld
not be arrested witho't warrant Otherwise c#bercafIs, in "artic'lar co'ld be ad%ersel# affected
$2aminer of $lectronic $vience create, amenments in 2008, &ection +0 A
>ith amendments in 2009, $ection 76 A is added that em"owers the -entral !o%ernment to
a""oint an# de"artment or a!enc# of -entral or $tate !o%ernment as 1<aminer of 1lectronic
1%idence This a!enc# will "la# a cr'cial role in "ro%idin! e<"ert o"inion on electronic form of
e%idence The e<"lanation to the $ection has an incl'si%e definition of Delectronic form evidenceE
that means an# information of "robati%e %al'e that is either stored or transmitted in electronic
form and incl'des com"'ter e%idence, di!ital a'dio, di!ital %ideo, cell"hones , di!ital fa<
machines >ith the increasin! n'mber of c#bercrime cases it will become necessar# to set '" at
least one 1<aminer of 1lectronic 1%idence in each $tate The -8$I7 laborator# in @#derabad is
"la#in! similar role at "resent in c#bercrime cases where forensic st'd# of hard discs and other
com"'ter accessories, di!ital e?'i"ment is 'ndertaken to "ro%ide e<"ert o"inion on the di!ital
e%idence anal#)ed
Concl#sion
The IT (Amendment) Act, 2009 from an o%erall "ers"ecti%e has introd'ced remarkable
"ro%isions and amendments that will facilitate the effecti%e enforcement of c#ber law in India
India is now technolo!icall# ne'tral with electronic si!nat'res re"lacin! the re?'irement of
di!ital si!nat'res The im"ortance of data "rotection in toda#Bs information technolo!# a!e
cannot be 'ndermined and it finds "lace in $ection ;4, ;4A,33, 72 of the IT Act,2000 In this era
of con%er!ence the definition of Fcomm'nication de%iceB and Fintermediar#B ha%e been ri!htl#
inserted/re%isited and %alidit# of e+contracts is reinforced b# insertion of $ection 10 A $ection
;3(2)J of the IT Act is a welcome "ro%ision that em"owers the AdH'dicatin! officers b#
conferrin! "owers of e<ec'tion on the office of AdH'dicatin! officer at "ar with a ci%il co'rt
Plethora of new c#bercrimes ha%e been incor"orated 'nder cha"ter KI as offences 'nder the
amended Act to combat !rowin! kinds of c#bercrimes "artic'larl#, serio's crimes s'ch as child
"orno!ra"h#, and c#ber terrorism The Intermediaries ha%e been "laced 'nder an obli!ation to
maintain and "ro%ide access to sensiti%e information to a""ro"riate a!encies to assist in sol%in!
c#bercrime cases 'nder $ection 37-, $ection 36 @owe%er, liabilit# of I$Ps has been re%isited
and on's shall lie on com"lainant to "ro%e lack of d'e dili!ence or "resence of act'al knowled!e
b# intermediar# as "ro%in! cons"irac# wo'ld be diffic'lt These are some of the challen!es that
c#ber law enforcement teams will be faced with the "ower of interce"tion of traffic data and
comm'nications o%er internet will need to be e<ercised in strict com"liance of r'les framed
'nder res"ecti%e $ections in the Act conferrin! s'ch "owers of monitorin!, collection, decr#"tion
or interce"tion Power for blockin! websites sho'ld also be e<ercised caref'll# and sho'ld not
trans!ress into areas that amo'nts to 'nreasonable censorshi" ,an# of the offences added to the
Act are co!ni)able b't bailable which increases the likelihood of tam"erin! of e%idence b#
c#bercriminal once he is released on bail The "olice m'st therefore "la# a %i!ilant role to collect
and "reser%e e%idence in a timel# manner 8or this, the "olice force will need to be well
e?'i""ed with forensic knowled!e and trained in c#ber laws to effecti%el# in%esti!ate c#bercrime
cases The introd'ction of 1<aminer of 1lectronic 1%idence will also aid in effecti%e anal#sis of
di!ital e%idence A c#bercrime "rosec'tion
IT (Amendment) Act, 2009 is a ste" in the ri!ht direction, howe%er, there are still certain lac'nae
in the Act, (few of which were briefl# "ointed o't in this "a"er) which will s'rface while the
amendments are tested on the an%il of time and ad%ancin! technolo!iesL

You might also like