Dental Amalgam
By: Naghman Zuberi
Overview
Basic composition
Basic setting reactions
Classifications
Manufacturing
Variables in amalgam
performance
Naghman Zuberi
Amalgam
An alloy of mercury with another metal.
Naghman Zuberi
Why Amalgam?
Inexpensive
Ease of use
Proven track record
>100 years
Familiarity
Resin-free
less allergies than composite
Naghman Zuberi
Constituents in Amalgam
Basic
Silver
Tin
Copper
Mercury
Other
Zinc
Indium
Palladium
Naghman Zuberi
Basic Constituents
Silver (Ag)
increases strength
increases expansion
Tin (Sn)
decreases expansion
decreased strength
increases setting time
Naghman Zuberi
6
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Basic Constituents
Copper (Cu)
ties up tin
reducing gamma-2 formation
increases strength
reduces tarnish and corrosion
reduces creep
reduces marginal deterioration
Naghman Zuberi
7
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Basic Constituents
Mercury (Hg)
activates reaction
only pure metal that is liquid
at room temperature
spherical alloys
require less mercury
smaller surface area easier to wet
40 to 45% Hg
admixed alloys
require more mercury
lathe-cut particles more difficult to wet
45 to 50% Hg
Naghman Zuberi
8
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Other Constituents
Zinc (Zn)
used in manufacturing
decreases oxidation of other elements
sacrificial anode
provides better clinical performance
less marginal breakdown
Osborne JW Am J Dent 1992
causes delayed expansion with low Cu alloys
if contaminated with moisture during condensation
Phillips RW JADA 1954
H2O + Zn ZnO + H2
Naghman Zuberi
9
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Other Constituents
Indium (In)
decreases surface tension
reduces amount of mercury necessary
reduces emitted mercury vapor
reduces creep and marginal breakdown
increases strength
must be used in admixed alloys
example
Indisperse (Indisperse Distributing Company)
5% indium
Naghman Zuberi
Powell J Dent Res 1989
10
Other Constituents
Palladium (Pd)
reduced corrosion
greater luster
example
Valiant PhD (Ivoclar Vivadent)
0.5% palladium
Naghman Zuberi
Mahler J Dent Res 1990
11
Basic Composition
A silver-mercury matrix containing filler
particles of silver-tin
Filler (bricks)
Ag3Sn called gamma
can be in various shapes
irregular (lathe-cut), spherical,
or a combination
Matrix
Ag2Hg3 called gamma 1
cement
Sn8Hg called gamma 2
voids
Naghman Zuberi
12
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Basic Setting Reactions
Conventional low-copper alloys
Admixed high-copper alloys
Single composition high-copper alloys
Naghman Zuberi
13
Conventional Low-Copper Alloys
Dissolution and precipitation
Hg dissolves Ag and Sn
from alloy
Intermetallic compounds
formed
Ag-Sn Alloy
Hg
Hg
Ag Ag
Ag
Sn
Sn
Ag-Sn
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Alloy
Mercury
(Hg)
Sn
Ag3Sn + Hg Ag3Sn + Ag2Hg3 + Sn8Hg
Naghman Zuberi
14
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Conventional Low-Copper Alloys
Gamma () = Ag3Sn
unreacted alloy
strongest phase and
corrodes the least
forms 30% of volume
of set amalgam
Hg
Ag-Sn Alloy
Hg
Hg
Ag
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Sn
Sn
Ag
Ag
Sn
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Mercury
Ag3Sn + Hg Ag3Sn + Ag2Hg3 + Sn8Hg
Naghman Zuberi
15
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Conventional Low-Copper Alloys
Gamma 1 (1) = Ag2Hg3
matrix for unreacted alloy
and 2nd strongest phase
10 micron grains
binding gamma ()
60% of volume
Ag-Sn Alloy
1
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Ag3Sn + Hg Ag3Sn + Ag2Hg3 + Sn8Hg
Naghman Zuberi
16
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Conventional Low-Copper Alloys
Gamma 2 (2) = Sn8Hg
weakest and softest phase
corrodes fast, voids form
corrosion yields Hg which
reacts with more gamma ()
10% of volume
volume decreases with time
due to corrosion
Ag-Sn Alloy
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Ag3Sn + Hg Ag3Sn + Ag2Hg3 + Sn8Hg
Naghman Zuberi
17
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Admixed High-Copper Alloys
Ag enters Hg from Ag-Cu
spherical eutectic particles
Ag-Cu Alloy
eutectic
an alloy in which the elements
are completely soluble in liquid
solution but separate into distinct
areas upon solidification
Both Ag and Sn enter Hg
from Ag3Sn particles
Hg
Ag Ag
Ag
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Sn
Hg
Ag
Sn
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Mercury
Ag3Sn + Ag-Cu + Hg Ag3Sn + Ag-Cu + Ag2Hg3 + Cu6Sn5
Naghman Zuberi
18
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Admixed High-Copper Alloys
Sn diffuses to surface of
Ag-Cu particles
Ag-Cu Alloy
reacts with Cu to form
(eta) Cu6Sn5 ()
around unconsumed
Ag-Cu particles
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Ag3Sn + Ag-Cu + Hg Ag3Sn + Ag-Cu + Ag2Hg3 + Cu6Sn5
Naghman Zuberi
19
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Admixed High-Copper Alloys
Gamma 1 (1) (Ag2Hg3)
surrounds () eta phase
(Cu6Sn5) and gamma ()
alloy particles (Ag3Sn)
Ag-Cu Alloy
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Ag-Sn
Alloy
Ag3Sn + Ag-Cu + Hg Ag3Sn + Ag-Cu + Ag2Hg3 + Cu6Sn5
Naghman Zuberi
20
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Single Composition
High-Copper Alloys
Gamma sphere () (Ag3Sn)
Ag-Sn Alloy
with epsilon coating ()
Ag
(Cu3Sn)
Sn
Sn
Ag
Ag-Sn Alloy
Ag and Sn dissolve in Hg
Ag-Sn Alloy
Mercury (Hg)
Ag3Sn + Cu3Sn + Hg Ag3Sn + Cu3Sn + Ag2Hg3 + Cu6Sn5
Naghman Zuberi
21
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Single Composition
High-Copper Alloys
Gamma 1 (1) (Ag2Hg3) crystals
grow binding together partiallydissolved gamma () alloy
particles (Ag3Sn)
Epsilon () (Cu3Sn) develops
crystals on surface of
gamma particle (Ag3Sn)
in the form of eta () (Cu6Sn5)
Ag-Sn Alloy
Ag-Sn Alloy
Ag-Sn Alloy
reduces creep
prevents gamma-2 formation
Ag3Sn + Cu3Sn + Hg Ag3Sn + Cu3Sn + Ag2Hg3 + Cu6Sn5
Naghman Zuberi
22
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Classifications
Based on copper content
Based on particle shape
Based on method of adding
copper
Naghman Zuberi
23
Copper Content
Low-copper alloys
4 to 6% Cu
High-copper alloys
thought that 6% Cu was maximum amount
due to fear of excessive corrosion and expansion
Now contain 9 to 30% Cu
at expense of Ag
Naghman Zuberi
24
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Particle Shape
Lathe cut
low Cu
high Cu
Spherical
low Cu
high Cu
Admixture
high Cu
Naghman Zuberi
25
Method of Adding Copper
Single Composition Lathe-Cut (SCL)
Single Composition Spherical (SCS)
Admixture: Lathe-cut + Spherical Eutectic (ALE)
Admixture: Lathe-cut + Single Composition
Spherical (ALSCS)
Naghman Zuberi
26
Single Composition Lathe-Cut
(SCL)
More Hg needed than spherical alloys
High condensation force needed due to
lathe cut
20% Cu
Naghman Zuberi
27
Single Composition Spherical
(SCS)
Spherical particles wet easier with Hg
less Hg needed (42%)
Less condensation force, larger condenser
Gamma particles as 20 micron spheres
with epsilon layer on surface
Naghman Zuberi
28
Admixture:
Lathe-cut + Spherical Eutectic
(ALE)
Composition
2/3 conventional lathe cut (3% Cu)
1/3 high Cu spherical eutectic (28% Cu)
overall 12% Cu, 1% Zn
Initial reaction produces gamma 2
no gamma 2 within two years
Naghman Zuberi
29
Admixture:
Lathe-cut + Single Composition
Spherical (ALSCS)
High Cu in both lathe-cut and spherical
components
19% Cu
Epsilon layer forms on both components
0.5% palladium added
reinforce grain boundaries on gamma 1
Naghman Zuberi
30
Manufacturing Process
Lathe-cut alloys
Ag & Sn melted together
alloy cooled
heat treat
phases solidify
400 C for 8 hours
grind, then mill to 25 - 50 microns
heat treat to release stresses of grinding
Naghman Zuberi
31
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Manufacturing Process
Spherical alloys
melt alloy
atomize
spheres form as particles cool
sizes range from 5 - 40 microns
variety improves condensability
Naghman Zuberi
32
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Material-Related Variables
Dimensional change
Strength
Corrosion
Creep
Naghman Zuberi
33
Dimensional Change
Most high-copper amalgams undergo a
net contraction
Contraction leaves marginal gap
initial leakage
post-operative sensitivity
reduced with corrosion over time
Naghman Zuberi
34
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Dimensional Change
Net contraction
type of alloy
spherical alloys have more
contraction
less mercury
condensation technique
greater condensation = higher contraction
trituration time
overtrituration causes higher contraction
Naghman Zuberi
35
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Strength
Develops slowly
1 hr: 40 to 60% of maximum
24 hrs: 90% of maximum
Spherical alloys strengthen faster
require less mercury
Higher compressive vs. tensile strength
Weak in thin sections
unsupported edges fracture
Naghman Zuberi
36
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Corrosion
Reduces strength
Seals margins
low copper
6 months
SnO2, SnCl
gamma-2 phase
high copper
6 - 24 months
SnO2 , SnCl, CuCl
eta-phase (Cu6Sn5)
Naghman Zuberi
Sutow J Dent Res 1991
37
Creep
Slow deformation of amalgam placed under
a constant load
load less than that necessary to produce
fracture
Gamma 2 dramatically affects creep rate
slow strain rates produces plastic deformation
allows gamma-1 grains to slide
Correlates with marginal breakdown
Naghman Zuberi
38
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Creep
High-copper amalgams have creep
resistance
prevention of gamma-2 phase
requires >12% Cu total
single composition spherical
eta (Cu6Sn5) embedded in gamma-1 grains
interlock
admixture
eta (Cu6Sn5) around Ag-Cu particles
Naghman Zuberi
improves bonding to gamma 1
39
Dentist-Controlled Variables
Manipulation
trituration
condensation
burnishing
polishing
Naghman Zuberi
40
Trituration
Mixing time
refer to manufacturer
recommendations
Click here for details
Overtrituration
hot mix
sticks to capsule
decreases working / setting time
slight increase in setting contraction
Undertrituration
grainy, crumbly mix
Naghman Zuberi
41
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Condensation
Forces
lathe-cut alloys
small condensers
high force
spherical alloys
large condensers
less sensitive to amount of force
vertical / lateral with vibratory motion
admixture alloys
intermediate handling between lathe-cut and spherical
Naghman Zuberi
42
Burnishing
Pre-carve
removes excess mercury
improves margin adaptation
Post-carve
improves smoothness
Combined
less leakage
Naghman Zuberi
Ben-Amar Dent Mater 1987
43
Early Finishing
After initial set
prophy cup with pumice
provides initial smoothness to restorations
recommended for spherical amalgams
Naghman Zuberi
44
Polishing
Increased smoothness
Decreased plaque retention
Decreased corrosion
Clinically effective?
no improvement in marginal integrity
Mayhew Oper Dent 1986
Collins J Dent 1992
Naghman Zuberi
45
Alloy Selection
Handling characteristics
Mechanical and physical
properties
Clinical performance
Naghman Zuberi
46
Handling Characteristics
Spherical
advantages
easier to condense
around pins
hardens rapidly
smoother polish
disadvantages
difficult to achieve tight contacts
higher tendency for overhangs
Naghman Zuberi
47
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Handling Characteristics
Admixed
advantages
easy to achieve tight contacts
good polish
disadvantages
hardens slowly
lower early strength
Naghman Zuberi
48
Amalgam Properties
Compressive
Strength (MPa)
% Creep
Tensile
Strength
(24 hrs) (MPa)
Amalgam Type
1 hr
7 days
Low Copper1
145
343
2.0
60
Admixture2
137
431
0.4
48
Single
Composition3
262
510
0.13
64
1Fine
Cut, Caulk
Naghman
ZuberiCaulk
3Tytin, Kerr
2 Dispersalloy,
49
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 2003
Thanks A Lot
Naghman Zuberi
50