Religion & Athiesm
Religion & Athiesm
Hamidun Abdullah
     I was reading the Independence news the other day when I was caught by this headline The March of
the Atheists Movement . The comments that followed, was very enlightening but rather vague in their
statements and comments. I must admit that I do believe in the existence of God and in Creationism and
that Atheists have so far been unable to convincingly prove that God does not exists. So for the moment,
religion is still over and above the atheists with regard to the existence of God.
    To deny God means to deny so many things those humans cherished in this world, especially man,
which is the most perfect of all creations. Man must admit that amongst all that exists in this world, he is
the only creature capable of so many things. That he is able to overcome so many hardships in his historical
path and that he is able to develop his environment from cave dwellers to skyscrapers shows that man is
no ordinary animal. He was created to be something special and above all other creatures.
    In the time of the prophet Muhammad (Pbuh), the Arabs do not believe in the life after death despite
their believe in God. But atheists today rejected God and therefore they rejected life after death and the
Final Judgement. Atheists rejected religions because of their frustrations with Christianity. When the
Muslim world was developing science and medicine and chemistry, Europe was believing in ghosts and
magic and witchcraft. They denounce science and accused science of going against God. But science was
God s creation so how can science be against God?
    Their rejection of religion did not stop at Christianity. They denounce all religions; especially Islam. They
accused Islam of using swords to further their aspirations without for a moment to sit back and reflect the
truth of their accusations. They never endeavour to want to understand why in the early part of Islamic
expansions, Muslims were studying chemistry and medicine and astronomy and Muslims were developing
scientific equipments, which later were used by Europeans after they had subdued the Church.
     Unfortunately atheists today were far off track. When their slogan read Probably there is no God, Now
stop worrying and enjoy life , seems to indicate that they do not want to believe in God for the simple
reason that they wanted to absolved themselves of all responsibilities in their life. They wanted to live like
animals. They just eat, sleep, mate and have off-springs and when they die, that is the end of history. This is
will be a very sad end to the history of man. Man s life cannot just end with death. There must be life after
death so that man can be rewarded for his good deeds on the earth and to be punished for his bad deeds.
This final reward and punishment will be the ultimate of all moral actions.
   I have been reading articles regarding atheism which is now coming forward to convince the religious
world that God probably does not exists. I wouldn t say it is a new phenomena but it is now bravely
coming into the open to challenged religion. Communism too rejected God. They accused religion as
drugs, which make people ideal and unproductive.
   I find that most of the statements were rather agnostic, that good and bad has got nothing to do with
God, that the idea of punishment and reward is something unacceptable. Despite their rejection, I find that
                                                                                                               1
they could not substantiate their statements other then quoting scientific discoveries, which like all
sciences, were not conclusive. The rest of their argument was that they could not comprehend what their
senses could not absorb. Depending on the senses alone when dealing with God is faulty. This is because
God is outside human senses. He is outside of time and He is over and above His creations. He is not
affected by His creations.
     Europeans received their idea of God thru Christianity. But Christianity was flawed. Those who claim to
uphold the Christian faith corrupted the teachings of Jesus. They added into Christianity what was not
taught by Jesus to such and extend that they deified Jesus and lifted him to the status of God. As a result
atheists reject God and religion. Instead, atheists turn to science as a new faith. They believed all that
science says as the truth. In actuality they do not reject religion, but they shifted from their belief in God
to a belief in no God . It is still a belief system and therefore it is religion. Unfortunately this belief is also
flawed. Science has no answer to things that are beyond the senses. And God is beyond human senses; . .
but there is nothing unto like Him (Qur'an 42:11) and in another verse the Qur'an said; And there is none
like unto Him. (Qur'an 112:1-4). Thus, man cannot describe what his eyes have not seen and what his ears
have not heard. But man can know the existence of God through His signs , for man to see and perceived
His existence.
    People that do not believe in God were mostly those who were frustrated by religion. The main
argument, as the history of secularism in the West has presented it, is that religion is a vested interest of
one section of society, the Church, over all others. Since the internal structure and the decision-making
process of the Church are authoritarian, and since society is not therein represented, determination of
public affairs by the Church is tantamount to tyranny, a form of exploitation and suppression of the nation
by one group. This argument is certainly true of the West where the Catholic Church represented a part of
the population, and where religion, namely, Catholic Christianity, established itself as authoritarian, and
developed vested interests in competition with the people. Because the Catholic Church was for many
long centuries the wielder of the greatest political and economic power in Europe, it was natural for any
movement of social, political and economic liberation to assume the form of a struggle against the Church.
(Ismail Faruqi, Al-Tawhid: Its Implications for Thought and Life, p.90, 1992)
     In medieval Europe, the states were theocratic. Religion controlled the life of the community. The
words of priests and rabbis were God s word and therefore cannot be challenged. But as new knowledge
in science and medicine from the Islamic world began to enter Europe, it began to attract the attentions of
some very creative minds. They began to experiment with this new knowledge. The result was science
began to emerge into a new field of study. Unfortunately medieval Europe was living in the world of
sorcery, magic and witchcraft and was not ready for science. Therefore science was looked upon as part of
sorcery and witchcraft. Many scientists were tortured and killed. The authorities of the priests and rabbis
were unchallengeable. Science was regarded as ungodly and a challenged against God. For hundreds of
years the situations remain unchanged until scientists could not tolerate any more persecutions and
revolted against the theocratic states. Science won and religion was relegated to the personal life of
European. With religion out of the way, Europe began to developed and prospered into a progressive
states to finally became a world empire. Europeans of the Renaissance Era were so euphoric of their new
                                                                                                                 2
technology and progress that they left the church to the priests and rabbis while they concentrated upon
their materialistic life.
     With the development of science, many scientific theories emerged and some began to challenge the
religious beliefs. They began to question the concept of Creation and the idea of God as the Creator. Slowly
small groups of those who do not believe in the idea of Creation began to emerge, challenging the
authority of the church. But in those days, such topics were only discussed within the confine of
institutions. The idea was not accepted by the masses. But with the development of logical sciences,
rejection of religion became more convincing and able to penetrate the universities, especially those
frustrated by religion. Then came men like Darwin and latter Einstein with their hypothesis and theories of
the origin of men and physics. For a while, the religious rejectionists accepted with enthusiasm these new
suppositions. Despite all that Darwin proposed, yet many remain skeptical including those amongst the
scientists. There were too many questions, which were not addressed, and too many complexities that
refuse to ignore God. Today much of what was put forward by Darwin has not been proven.
    As religion was left to the life of the individual, many European neglected it. Church attendance began
to dwindle and today many westerners could not comprehend the Bible. Not that they were
incomprehensible, but rather they were too illogical to the Westerners, now exposed to science and logic.
The concept of three god in one, of God having a son, and that god had to sacrifice himself in order to save
mankind, that all humans were born guilty; these were several of the Christian teachings that do not attract
the young western mind. They also saw in the earlier history that there were religious wars. So without any
academic research and with their hatred for religion, they made assumptions that religion kill people in the
name of God.
    Let me quote some of the statements made by the modern day atheists. Atheists have felt threatened
and bullied by religious fundamentalists for far too long. It has almost become dangerous for those who
wish to preserve free speech and liberty. We are fighting back . . . . . Other statements reflected this
rebellious attitude against religion; Why is religion given such a special status in government, culture and
the media? Why is belief in a higher power an indication of greater moral fortitude, character and acumen?
No opinion should be protected from criticism simply by virtue of being religiously held . To me these
statements reflected their frustrations of religion.
     Recent development, reflected that secularise society has presented as its opposition to religious
values in determining public affairs, as untrustworthy, irrational, superstitious and dogmatic. But to apply
such opposition towards all religion is most unfortunate. It may be true of Christianity and other religion
which based its doctrine on dogma or against other religion in certain decaying periods of their history.
The same cannot be said of those religions endowed with a natural, rational, theology which acknowledges
the universal validity of the criteria of reason and rational appeal to premises which they presented
critically, as embodying real humanistic values. Unfortunately, secularism or atheism only pursued upon
superficial ground but nonetheless claimed to be indentified with the age of science, realism and progress
while at the same time accused religion of pursuing the opposite direction. Of course such claims were
never conclusively proven rather they were hypothetical since no society can claim determination of its
affairs by no values at all, or by values totally not derived from its own religious legacy.
    Unfortunately the western mind, while they were analytical and conscientious in some aspects of life,
they were very simplistic when it comes to religion. They just brush aside any religious facts as mumbo-
                                                                                                          3
jumbo and fairytale only fit for kids. I quote; circulate fraudulent claims about contraception and scientific
research and create laws that protect them from criticism . This is the level of hatred of religion existing in
the western society. While atheists claimed that their disbelief in the existence of God is based on
scientific research, yet they brush aside religious claims of scientific research that God do exists.
    Since the west have been looked upon by the developing countries as models of progress and
development, these idea of non-God too became part of its export to these developing countries. Thus
we find that these movements begin to attract people in Muslim countries as well. Though some of them
were not so bold as to reject God, but their liberal ideas, reflected this trend.
What Is Atheism?
    Atheism is the belief that God does not exist.1 It is related to secularism and humanists ideals. They
reject Creationism, which states that God created human beings and the universe. They believe in the
evolutionary theory expound by Darwin two hundred years ago. Since they do not believe in the existence
of God, they therefore could not admit that there will be life after death. By rejecting life after death, they
regard human beings living in this world, are like any other creatures. They assume that humans only live
to eat, to bare children, and to die and that is the end of the story of man. That is why in the bus campaign
in England, the slogan reads; There s probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy life .
     Enjoy life ; that is what the Atheists wants. By rejecting religion and God, they are free to act and do
whatever and whenever they want. By rejecting God, they absolved themselves of any responsibilities.
After all what is the different between being good and being bad? What is the different of having a proper
marriage and just living together? Other animals do not have marriage ceremonies, yet they bare offspring,
so why should we? And since animals live by so many mates, so can we. And when we die, we will be
buried like all other animals and that is the end of our life. No responsibilities.
     There was a quotation by Mark Twain that reads; If Christ were here, there is one thing he would not
be: a Christian . I do agree with Mark Twain on this statement. Because in the first place, Jesus never taught
any of those concepts that Christians are claiming, i.e. the trinity, that Jesus was the Son of God, that there
is salvation. Jesus never taught these. And of course Jesus wasn t a Christian. He was a Muslim. All of God s
prophets were Muslims and they preached the same message; There is only One God and that all humans
must submit themselves to God .
    There seems to be similarity between these atheists proclamation that religions were stifling freedom
of speech and ideas while they themselves are proclaiming to fight religious dominion. While atheists
demand free speech, yet they are working to deny religion that same free speech to say their piece, to
defend and response to atheists accusations without being called mumbo-jumbo , silly and stupid.
    Someone said that atheist do not have faith . But faith is something that you have complete trust or
confident in.2 If one who believes in the existence of God is regarded as religious than the one who do not
believe in God is also religious. It is a belief system and therefore it is religious. While religion claims itself to
originate from God, Atheism comes from human ideas and concepts. There was someone who says that
1   Oxford Dictionary
2   Oxford Dictionary.
                                                                                                                    4
 religion is a flawed concept; a human concept . But don t you think that Atheism is also a human concept
and therefore it too is flawed? Anything that comes from human mind cannot be perfect. But then religion
did not attribute its beliefs and its existence upon human ideas, only atheists says so. But atheists speaks
thus so that he can reject religion. Atheists hated religion and therefore they come up with their own idea
that there is no God. And to follow upon their assumptions, they begin to search for evidence to support
their assumptions and whatever little that science discovered, they immediately conclude these as proof
that God does not exists. Yet science itself could not be conclusive. What science claimed yesterday,
science dispute today. So what science claim today science may dispute the next day. Science itself is very
unstable. It can only conclude what evidence it has at that particular time. So science can be very unreliable
especially when it comes to things that are beyond human senses and perceptions. So that makes Atheism
a religion based on hypothetical belief.
     O men! It is you, who stand in need of God, whereas He alone is self-sufficient, the One to whom all
praise is due (Qur'an 35:15).
    How do humans experience the world around him? Whatever he perceives, and understands about his
world, comes to him through his five senses. His mind decides because of information he received through
his senses. If he losses any one of his senses, then that much information about his environment and
knowledge will be lost and he will be unable to comprehend that part that he lose. To him that part does
not exists. Unfortunately his inability to comprehend does not necessarily mean that it does not exist, only
that he loses the ability to comprehend. Assuming that a person loses his hearing, then to him sound does
not exist. We may provide some proof to him, like a sound modulator but he will not be able to hear
sound. We may say that to him the sound modulator is a sign , that sound do exist though he does not
hear sound. If he accepts this sign as proof of the existence of sound, then his believe in the existence of
sound is faith. Physically he cannot say that sound exists; yet there are signs of its existence. If he refused
to believe in the signs presented to him, then to him sound does not exist at all. No matter how hard
people around him, those who can hear sound, tried to convince him, he still will not believe.
    Scientists study the universe through their senses. What lies beyond their senses, they will not be able
to compute. Therefore they cannot comprehend God because God is beyond human senses. Man lives
within a time frame. Time to humans is very essentials. Man has to move along with time because time
waits for no man. But God created time and therefore He is outside of time and outside of human senses.
Any attempt to analyse what is beyond our senses is futile. So how can you know what is beyond our
senses? The answer is religion and the other is to study the signs of God s existence.
     Scientists cannot study God, but scientists can study His signs ; the perfection of the universe; the
human beings; the environments. All these are signs of God s existence. Science needs to assume that the
nature functions according to patterns ‒ that is an orderly system. This requirement is absolutely essential
for science, for without it, there is the possibility that nature is arbitrary, erratic and happenstance. Under
such a situation, no science is possible. Science rest its whole claim on the assumption that every time a
cause is provided, its effect will follow upon it, that is what scientists called true law of nature. This means
that for the same causes, the same effects will appear.
                                                                                                              5
    Next, from where is the source of this assumption? Some western scientists, especially of the
nineteenth century, have claimed that the patterned fabric of nature is deducible from nature itself; from
empirical observations. But George Santayana called the scientists trust in cosmic orderliness a piece of
 animal faith . This is because such belief is utterly without foundation in empirical truth. Remember Pavlov
and his dog? Each time a bell rings, the dog will find food. This conditioning made the dog accustomed to
the sound of the bell, that the dog finally believes that the ring was the source of food. Of cause the dog
was wrong. There is a human hand that is giving the food.
     Muslims believe the God (Allah) is the cause of this orderliness. The cosmos is indeed a cosmos, not a
chaos. God implanted this orderliness in its eternal pattern. These patterns are knowable; discoverable by
observation and intellection. These are faculties that God have implanted and equipped humans to enable
them to survive in this world, to fulfill a purpose. All creatures are interdependent, and the whole creation
runs because of the perfect harmony, which exists between its parts ‒ these we called The Eco-System. And
this eco-system did not happen by chance. It was design by a perfect Designer. Can you imagine a design
with a designer?
Assumptions
    Let us go back to the slogan on the bus that reads; There s probably no God. Now stop worrying and
enjoy life . The word probably indicated two possibilities. One; that there is no God and second; that
 there is a God . Let us take these two assumptions with two people, one who do not believe in God and
the second person, and one who believe in God. I would like to clarify here that when we speak of
believing in God, it means that believing also in that there is life after death and that there will be The Final
Judgement. The first person that claims that there is no God will not do anything to prepare him for life
after death. Since there is no God, there is no life after death. So this person will just enjoy the life of this
world (like what the slogan says, Now stop worrying and enjoy life ) in whatever way he wants. On the
other hand the second person that believe in God and the life after death and the Final Judgement, will
prepare himself for that Final Judgement. He will of course enjoy his life in this world in the way he
believes. Then both of them died and buried.
    Let us take the first assumption that there is no God and no life after death and no Final Judgement.
Then the first person was right and the second person was wrong. But does the first person gain anything
or the second person loses anything? Definitely no! Neither of them gains nor loses. It is only the end of life.
Their body will rot and becomes part of the earth. Would you say that the second person loses because he
did not enjoy himself when he was alive? No! Because he enjoyed his life, as he believes it to be, just like
the first person who enjoyed life, as he believes it. So in this instance, nobody gains and nobody loses.
    Now let us take the second assumption that there is a God and there is life after death and there is The
Final Judgement. Then the second person was right and the first person was wrong. Now what will happen
to the first person? He did not prepare himself for this life after death. There he is faced with the thread of
God s punishment and the thread of being in Hell. He cannot escape out of the situation, even if he
regretted he could not return to earth, because earth was no more. He is now in a different world. He can
only regret and suffered in Hell. God will not forgive him because he never believed in God s existence, but
what about the second person? He is safe; he had already prepared himself for such an eventuality. He will
face his Creator with confidant that he will be rewarded for his belief. With God s blessings he will be in
                                                                                                               6
Heaven.
    Conclusion; a person believing in God will not lose in any of the two situations but on the other hand, a
person not believing in God posses a great potential to lose. And the lost is no small matter. Imagine being
in Hell for eternity.
    Some atheists may say all this is rubbish or mambo-jumbo. But the possibilities are there. Only those
who could not gather enough courage to admit such a possibility will react in such a manner. This is what
we called prejudice. Gerry Spence in his book3 referred to prejudice as The Impenetrable Wall . When the
 other realises that his self-interest is at stake, no winning argument is possible. This is because the core
prejudice of any living creature, man or forest fern is for its continued existence. No matter how skillfully we
may argue, we cannot win when the other is asked to decide against his self-interest.
    Thus for the moment the question of where did we come from? seems rather confused to an atheist.
He could not accept that God created man, because to him God does not exist. Yet he could not prove for
certain that human beings come into existence by itself. The perfection of the universe and of humans
simply could not have happen by chance. Every scientist will have to agree that all scientific research must
be planned and executed with precisions and with proper planning and documentations for the result to
be creditable. No scientific research can be acceptable if done in an ad-hoc and haphazard manner.
    If we accept that the universe is a perfect piece of creation than we have to accept that it cannot
come into existence by chance. Perfection cannot derive from imperfection or from chaos. Perfection can
only derived from a more perfect entity . Can you imagine a design without a designer?
                                              ---------------
    Before we proceed, I would like to raise these questions, which every atheist should ask and answer.
Since man can remember they have been asking three basic questions. Namely; where did we come from?
What are we doing in this world? Or rather why are we in this world? And finally, where do we go after our
death?
    If we were to assume the atheists stand that there is no God and that there is no life after death, then
we have to assume Darwin s theory that men evolved from apes. Probably this is what atheists believe. But
Darwin or any of those who came after him could not convincingly explain why this evolution stopped.
Why for millennium apes have been remaining as apes and man as man. Not only apes and man have
remained the same, even the smallest insects have not evolved to anything but itself. Why there were no
more man evolving from apes? Thus many scientists today could not accept Darwin s theory of evolution. If
we deny Darwin s theory then man just appear on earth out of nothing? And if we accept Darwin s theory
then the questions that followed will be; if man were to evolve from apes, then what did apes evolved
from? If you were to ask these questions backwards, finally you will come to nothing. So can something
evolve from nothing? This is even more absurd.
                                                                                                              7
    I think that nobody will deny that this universe is perfect. Its solar and planetary systems work in
perfect motions. Its timing is so consistent that man has been able to harness its perfectness to his
advantage. The eco-system of our planet is so well designed that it has been able to sustain us for so long is
astonishing. Its perfection makes it illogical for anyone to say that it comes into existence by chance. Not
only is the eco-system of the earth; but the planetary system and the whole cosmos is so perfect.
    Muslims believe in the Creation of man. Thus, the Qur'an says; It was We Who created man (Qur'an
50:16) and Verily it is We Who give life and death: and to Us is the final Goal . (Qur'an 50:45). . . thy
Sustainer said unto the angels: behold I am about to establish upon earth one who shall inherit it (Qur'an
2:30). And the Qur'an, more then 1400 years ago, also question those who deny God s existence; [Or do
they deny the existence of God?] Have they themselves been created without anything [that might have
caused their creation] ‒ or were they, perchance, their own creators? And have they created the Heavens
and the Earth? No, but they have no certainty of anything (Qur'an 52:35)
     Since man was created, he was created for something. He does not come into this world just to eat,
sleep, have children, and then to die. His existence must have a purpose. Thus we come to the second
question: Why are we here in this world? The Qur'an very specifically states that God, The Al-Mighty said; I
have not created the jinn and humankind but to serve Me (Qur'an 51:56). So man was created to serve
God, which means that he has a special function and Muslims believe that the special function is to fulfill
God s trust. God said in the Qur'an, We offered Our trust to the heavens, the earth and the mountains; but
they refused to carry it and were frightened by its burden. However, man accepted to carry it (Qur'an
33:72). In philosophical terms, this is tantamount to saying that the purpose of man s existence is the
realization of the highest good ; i.e. the purposefulness of human life and its denial means a cynical
assertion of meaninglessness. Such good, which is the purpose of all creation, is according to Islam, the
fulfillment of the Divine Will. Whereas this fulfillment takes place involuntarily as in the physiological and
psychic function, it is voluntary in the ethical function. The ethical function realise the moral values and
these are the higher occupants of that realm, the higher imperatives of the Divine Will. There is also the
lesser order of the Divine Will such as food, shelter, comfort, sex etc. The physical need of the body should
not be the sole purpose of man s creations, except that it is only necessary so as to allow the ethical to
function uninterrupted or hindered by physical weakness. Thus in Islamic terms, this physical aspect of man
is placed on the lesser level to the ethical. It is only when man reversed the hierarchal order so that the
physical is place on a higher level then the ethical, than we will experience conflict. This happened to
everybody; religious or atheists. But if we maintained the hierarchical order as was decreed by the Divine
Will, there will be a more harmonious environment not only between humans but also between humans
and his environment.
    But the fulfillment of the Divine Will cannot function within a controlled and oppressed environment. It
must function under the real possibility of man s capacity to do otherwise than he ought. This freedom to
obey or not to obey, to cheat or not to cheat, to take advantage or not to take advantage against a small
defenseless group and so on, it is in this sense that he is God s vicegerent on earth. Only man can realise
the ethical and therefore a higher value and only he can have for an objective the realisation of the whole
realm in its totality.
                                                                                                            8
    Unlike Christianity, Muslims believe that man is created innocent. His life in this world begins after birth
not before. No matter whom his parents were or who his ancestors were, it will not affect his innocence at
birth. Therefore there is no original sin in Islam. Everybody will be responsible for his own action. The
Qur'an states; No person is responsible for the guilt of another . . . . to every person belongs the merit or
demerit of what he has wrought (Qur'an 53:38-39) and the Qur'an continue in another verse; Therefore, to
everyone belongs the credit or discredit which he has personally earned (Qur'an 2:286). Again the Qur'an
stressed that each person is responsible for his own action, his own choice; We have sent down to you
[Muhammad] the Book [Qur'an] in truth. Whosoever is guided by it, is to his own credit; whoever goes
astray does so to his own discredit (Qur'an 38:41).
     While Christianity forces others to their religion, Islam is against coercion; There shall be no coercion in
matters of faith (Qur'an 2:256). Faith or beliefs cannot be forced upon a people. Beliefs must come from a
person in a voluntary manner. If a person is forced or threatened to be a Muslims, then God will not accept
his declaration, simply because such declaration is not genuine. So the idea that Islam was spread by the
sword is in reality a Christian idea and a Christian propaganda to discredit Islam. Likewise the idea of Islamic
terrorists is also a Christian and Jewish misinformation. By promoting the idea, they are able to prevent
Europeans from seeing the true image of Islam. Thus, the Qur'an denied all accusations by Christians and
Jews; Say [O Muhammad], the truth has come from our Lord and become manifest. Whoever wishes to
believe, let him do so; and whoever wishes to disbelieve, let him do so (Qur'an 18:29). This verse is very
explicit about Islam s openness in its teachings. And it goes against those who accused Islam of using the
sword to convert others to Islam. Islam only asked that it be given the freedom to convey its message and
to open itself to intellectual assessment. Unfortunately the Christian Western democracies have denied this
despite their so call open democratic society. Today Muslims in Western countries were painted with horror
and revulsion by their mainstream media and thereby influence the Western societies against Islam.
Muslims do not retaliate when they are harassed, ridiculed or mistreated, but they will response when their
religion and prophet is being derided, scorn, mock and so on. Christians will never find, not now not ever, a
single Muslim doing the same to any of God s prophets, including Moses and Jesus.
    History have shown us that Christian missionaries moving into Muslim countries together with their
colonising armies, which painted negative images of Islam, have been going on for centuries. Today this
attack against Islam is still continuing in the west added by the mainstream media, which we all know,
were controlled by Jewish interest.
    Are we here just to eat, enjoy life, have children and then die? We see so many cheatings, killings, wars,
corruptions, dictatorships, injustice and so on that is going on in this world; are all these will just disappear
when we die? We say that Saddam Hussein was dictator. He killed so many innocent people. Then came
Bush and killed Saddam Hussein. But Bush in the process of killing Saddam Hussein, has kill thousands of
innocent people too. Now let us assume that one day Bush also died. Between these three groups, Saddam
Hussein, Bush and those innocent people, are there no differences between them? If there are, what are
the differences? If the answer is no, why do we call Saddam Hussein a dictator; Bush a liar and those
women and children who were murdered by Saddam and Bush as innocent people?
It will be a sad thing if we assume that all these three groups after they die, nothing happens and that
                                                                                                               9
is the end of their life story. Is the death of a dictator, a liar and the death of innocence has no meaning?
This is what we are assuming if we deny that there is life after death. Life in this world will be bizarre and
the laws of the jungle will prevail. We are already seeing this happening. A strong nation zooming upon
weak nations with impunity and the death of thousands of innocent lives including women and children is
being condoned by the Western world. They simply turn a blind eye against all these atrocities without for
a moment feeling regret. Instead they happily defended these murderers as justifiable and necessary. All
this is happening because their belief that there is no Final Justice . That when they die that will be the
end of everything.
    It is a very dangerous idea to deny the existence of life after death. To deny the existence of God as the
Final Arbiter and Judge of man s action on earth is to create a chaotic world. Religion and especially Islam
do not allow this. The Qur'an says; If anyone did a righteous deed he ensures to the benefit of his own
soul; if he does evil it works against (his own soul). In the end you (all) will be brought back to your Lord
(Qur'an 45:15). So there must be a difference between good and bad. Someone said that as long as you are
good and be good always, you do not need God. He is wrong. Good has no meaning without God.
Choice
     As I have said earlier, God created man and God gave to man the ability to choose. This, God had not
give to any other creatures. At the same time, God taught man what he should do and what he shouldn t
do. Thus the Qur'an says; and shown him the two highways [of good and evil] (Qur'an 90:10). God does
not just leave him alone to make the choice, but God in the first place show him, which way he should
follow and which way he should avoid. Then God leave it to him to choose. This ability to choose comes
with it responsibilities and consequences. Thus the choice that man did, becomes an act of his own
choosing with responsibilities and consequences, which God have already prescribed; Reward of Heavens
and punishment of Hell. Man will then carry the consequences of his choice that he had made in this world
to his death, and finally to the Day of Judgement, where God will reward or punish (based on the
consequences of man s choice on earth) as God had promised.
    This ability to choose and act is only inherent in man. It is the process of evaluating between two or
more actions; if a person is in a position to steal, yet he chooses not to, that is morality. That is, not acting
upon something, which he should not do but could do, is what makes it ethical and moral. The ethical
moral imperatives become relevant because of the thought of the Final Judgement as consequence of his
action. Because if his choice goes against the Divine Will that God had decreed, then man will be carrying
the consequence of his choice to his grave and then to The Final Judgement and to reward and
punishment. Here lies the difference between Saddam Hussein, Bush and all those whom we say were
innocent people. Saddam Hussein and all his cronies will have to answer for all their murderous act and
Bush and Blair and all their cronies for their lies.
    So man s action, whoever he is; Muslims or Christians or Jews or Atheists will carry his actions and
consequences of his choice into his grave. God does not differentiate between Muslims or non-Muslims.
God do not differentiate between those who believe and fear Him and those who do not believe nor do
they fear Him. Even Muslims will go to Hell if he goes against God s Divine Will. The Qur'an says; God has
                                                                                                              10
promised the hypocrites4, both men and women ‒ as well as the [outright] deniers of the truth ‒ the fire of
Hell (Qur'an 9:68). Today there are too many hypocrite Muslims around and only God knows them. But as
for the outright deniers of the existence of God that is very obvious. Thus Islam differentiates itself from
Jews and Christians. Jews declared that only Jews will enter Heavens and that all other beings will go to
Hell. This racist concept gave Jews the right to steal Palestinian lands, to cheat, to kill Palestinians and other
people and they will still be favourable with God and they will not be punish by God. Thus the concepts of
ethic and morality have no meaning to the Jews. As to the Christians they denied the Unity of God. They
attribute three gods in one and that they say that Jesus was God s son and then he became God and then
God had to die on the cross. All this does not reflect the definition of the One True God. Thus the Christians
attribute partnership to God and this is the grievous sin. God said; Allah does not forgive any ascription of
associates to Him, but He forgives all other offenses to whomever He wills. Whoever therefore, prescribes
partners to Allah has committed a sin most heinous indeed (Qur'an 4:48).
                                                         ---
Men s Choice
     Verily never will Allah change the condition of a people until they change it themselves. (Qur'an
13:11)
    Thus the life in this world is a serious affair. Muslims believe that what God disposes history to be in the
end is the direct consequence of his own conduct in history, on the personal, individual as well as on the
communal level. That is why Muslims praised God; O Lord, You have not created all this in vain. To You is
the praise. Protect us from the punishment of eternal fire (Qur'an 3:191)
     God s wisdom does not allow him to impose upon man what He has given to man the ability and
freedom to choose. Therefore if atheists choose to ignore God, to reject that God really exists then they did
it at their own expense. For that choice is left to them. Since the right to choose also comes with its stated
effect and consequences, thus each time someone makes a choice he will have to be responsible for his
choice. As God stated; [Remember all this; for] in the end when He will call you forth from the earth (from
your grave) with a single call ‒ lo! You will [all] emerge [for Judgement] (Qur'an 30:25). God will judge man
according to his choice. And man will have to answer to God why he chooses a particular action.
                                               ----------------
     But Islam rejected the Christian concept of God and the Jewish racists concept of the chosen people .
Islam did not claim its followers to be the chosen people, but claims that Islam is the religion of God; that
all of God s prophets were Muslims. They were Muslims because all of them submitted themselves to God s
Divine Will. They carry the same God s message to all mankind. Unfortunately the followers of these
prophets later begin to deviate from their prophet s true teachings. Moses never taught the Jews that they
were God s chosen people . Neither did David nor Solomon. Jesus was sent to the Jews to correct the false
believe of the chosen people and to bring them out of their cocoon, but instead they tried to kill him.
Unfortunately the followers of Jesus chose to deify Jesus after his death and they turn him into a god. But
Moses or David or Solomon or Jesus, they were neither Jew nor Christian. They were all Muslims. And those
4   Hypocrites are Muslims, outwardly, but Allah does not accept their actions and Allah promised
    them Hell.
                                                                                                              11
people who followed their prophets when they were alive were also Muslims. Muslims are those who
follow their prophets and obey God s Divine Will and do not attribute partners to God. If they die in that
state, then they were all Muslims. Today s Muslims who claim to be followers of prophet Muhammad, if
they deviated from the prophet s teaching and attribute partners to God, they are no more Muslims than
any non-Muslims around today.
    So man is here on earth to fulfill God s Trust. For only man, have the ability to carry out The Trust.
Among the uppermost of God s Trust is that man should not attribute partners to God. That man should
submit himself only to The One True God. That he should only asked from The One True God and that he
should believe in The One True God. God described Himself in the Qur'an; Say: He is Allah; the One and
Only; Allah The Eternal, the Uncaused Cause of all Beings; He begets not, and neither is He begotten; and
there is nothing that could be compared with Him . (Qur'an 112:1-4). The Uncaused cause of all Being ;
mean that it comprises the concepts of primary Cause and eternal, independent Being, combined with the
idea that everything existing or conceivable goes back to Him as its source and is, therefore, dependent on
Him for its beginning as well as for its continues existence.5
     Are they, then, not aware that God, Who has created the heavens and the earth, has the power to
create them anew in their own likeness, having beyond any doubt, set a term for their resurrection?
However, all [such] evildoers are unwilling to accept anything but blasphemy (Qur'an 17:99)
     Are, then, they [who deny the truth] not aware of how God creates [life] in the first instance, and then
bring it forth anew? (Qur'an 29:19)
    While Judaism and Christianity do give a comprehensive picture of life after death other then the
reward of Heaven and the punishment of Hell, Islam on the other hand, gave a more complete picture from
the moment a person die and the process that he has to undergo till the day when all human beings will
be brought back to life to face his Creator. It was conceived as a moral climax to all life on earth, which is
never to be repeated. Once this world comes to an end, only award and the execution of judgement and
then reward and punishment follows. All this happens out of space-time, a transcendent way utterly
removed from human knowledge, except given to us by revelations.
   Nay, but they [who refused to believe in resurrection] have been wont to give the lie to this truth
whenever it was proffered to them; and so they are in a state of confusion (Qur'an 50:5).
    Why are they in a state of confusion? Because they reject a priori all thought of life after death. They
are perplexed by the lack of any answer to the why and what for of man s life, and by the evident of
inequality of human destinies and by what appears to them as a senseless, blind cruelty of nature:
problems which can be resolved only against the background of a belief in a continuation of life after
bodily death and hence, in the existence of a purpose and a plan underlying all creation. (Muhammad
                                                                                                           12
Asad, Qur'an 50:5).
    God also tells us this idea that there is no life after death is not a new idea. The people of ancient
times also rejected the idea of life after death. [Long] before those [who now deny resurrection] did Noah s
people give the lie to this truth, and [so did] the folk of Ar-Rass, and [the tribes of] Thamud and Ad, and
Pharaoh, and Lot s brethren, and the dwellers of the wooded dales [of Madyan], and the people of Tubba :
they all give the lie to the apostles ‒ and thereupon that whereof I had warned [them] came true (Qur'an
50:12-14).
                                           ------------------
Signs of God
   Say: He is Allah; the One and Only; Allah The Eternal, Absolute; He begetecth not, no is He begotten;
And there is none like unto Him. (Qur'an 112:1-4)
     On earth are signs for those of assured faith. As also in your own selves; will you not then see? (Qur'an
51:20-21). Do not ask about God but do reflect upon His creations and you will know that God exists.
     On the Day of Judgment, man will be given that other senses which was inherent in him when he was
alive in this world. The Qur'an says; (It will be said) Thou was heedless of this; now have We removed thy
veil, and sharp is thy sight this day . (Qur'an 50:22). The veil that have covered their ability to perceived the
truth was the result of their stubbornness to reject God s signs; He hears the signs of Allah rehearse to him,
yet is obstinate and lofty, as if he had not heard them . . . (Qur'an 45:8) and And when he learns
something of Our signs, he takes them in jest: . . . (Qur'an 45:9). As a result of this stubbornness, a veil
appears over him and he loses the ability to see beyond his five senses. God said in the Qur'an; God has
sealed their hearts and their hearing and over their eyes is a veil and awesome suffering awaits them .
(Qur'an 2:6). All this happened out of their own action. They choose not to hear warning by religious
people. They denied what they hear with jest and therefore they closed themselves from hearing the truth.
Then, when they were shown God s signs , with jest they refused to see until finally they closed their sight
and mind and hearts from seeing the truth. So it is out of their own actions that God s sealing their hearts
and hearing and veiling their eyes is to be understood.
Fitrah Allah
     And so see thy face steadfastly towards the [one ever-true] faith, turning away from all that is false, in
accordance with the natural disposition which God has instill into man: [for] not to allow any change to
corrupt what God has thus created ‒ this is the [purpose of the one] ever-true faith: but most people know
not . (Qur'an 30:30).
    Such being God s way which has ever obtained in the past ‒ and never will you find any change in
God s way! (Qur'an 48:23).
      And thus clearly do We spell out Our messages: and [We do it] so that the path of those who are lost
in sin might be distinct [from that of the righteous] (Qur'an 6:55).
                                                                                                              13
     But Satan whispered unto him, saying: O Adam! Shall I lead thee to the tree of life eternal, and [thus]
to a kingdom that will never decay? (Qur'an, 20:120)
     This symbolic tree is designated in the Bible as the tree of life and the tree of knowledge of good and
evil (Genesis ii, 9), while in the above Qur'anic account Satan speaks of it as the tree of life eternal (al-
khuld =  ) ﺍﳋﹸ ﹾﻠ ِﺪSeeing that Adam and Eve did not achieve immortality despite their tasting the forbidden
fruit, it is obvious that Satan s suggestion was, as it always is, deceptive. On the other hand, the Qur'an tells
us nothing about the real nature of that tree beyond pointing out that it was Satan who described it ‒
falsely ‒ as the tree of mortality : and so we may assume that the forbidden tree is simple an allegory of
the limits which the Creator has set to man s desires and actions: limits beyond which he may not go
without offending against his own, God-willed nature. Man s desire for immortality on earth implies a
wishful denial of death and resurrection, and thus of the ultimate reality of what the Qur'an describes as
 the hereafter or the life to come (al-akhirah). This desire is intimately connected with Satan s insinuation
that it is within man s reach to become the master of a kingdom that will never decay : in other words, to
become free of all limitations and thus, in the last resort, of the very concept of God ‒ the only concept
which endows humans with real meaning and purpose .6
Creator
   Because of man s limited senses, man s vision cannot encompass God. No human vision can
encompass Him, whereas He encompasses all human vision: for He alone is unfathomable, All-Aware
(Qur'an 6:103). This is because God is outside of human senses.
   What men conceive of, as time has no meaning with regard to God, because He is timeless, without
beginning and without end, so that in relation to Him, one day and a thousand years are alike.
     Unto God you all must return; and He will make you truly understand all that on which you were wont
to differ (Qur'an 5:48)
                                                                                                              14
     He will assuredly gather you all together on the Day of Resurrection (Qur'an 6:12)
    And [then,] the twilight of death brings with it the [full] truth ‒ that [very thing, O man] from which
thou wouldst always look away! ‒ (Qur'an 50:19)
     indeed unmindful hast thou been of this [Day of Judgement]: but now We have lifted from thy veil,
and sharp is thy sight today! (Qur'an 50:22).
    Then they will realise their folly of rejecting God; and one part of him will say: This it is that has been
ever-present with me! (Qur'an 50:23).
    Their regret is of no avail, for at that time it is too late; Man s other self will say: O our Sustainer! It was
not I that led this conscious mind into evil ‒ [nay] but it had gone far away [of its own accord]! (Qur'an
50:27). But unfortunately God cannot and will not accept such excuses; [And] He will say: contend not
before Me, [O you sinners,] for I gave you a forewarning [of this Day of Reckoning]. The judgement passed
by Me shall not be altered; but never do I do the least wrong unto My creatures! (Qur'an 50:28-29).
    Look into Allah s creation once, twice and more [for any flaw or discrepancy]. You will find none. Your
quizzical sight will return to you humbled but convinced [of the perfection of Allah s creation] (Qur'an
67:4).
    Nay ‒ who is it that create life in the first instance, and then brings it forth anew? And who is it that
provides you with sustenance out of heaven and earth . (Qur'an 27:64)
     Verily in the creation of the heavens and of the earth, and the succession of night and day: (Qur'an
2:164).
    Verily in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and in the succession of night and day, there
indeed messages for all who are endowed with insight . (Qur'an 3:190).
15