stem cell research
meets nanotechnology
Ricardo Pires das Neves 1,2 e Lino Ferreira 1,2
SUMMARY
The recent application of nanotechnolo-
1 CNC - Center of Neurosciences and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal
gies into the stem cell field promises to
2 Biocant - Center of Innovation in Biotechnology, Cantanhede, Portugal
open new avenues in regenerative medicine. Nanotechnologies can be a valu-
Corresponding Author Contact: lino@biocant.pt
able tool to track and image stem cells,
to drive their differentiation into specific
cell lineages, and ultimately to under-
INTRODUCTION
and other nanomaterials with sizes down to
stand their biology. This will hopefully
The existence of a multipotent hematopoi-
10 nm. In 1959, Richard Feynman launched
lead to stem cell-based therapeutics for
etic stem cell was demonstrated for the first
the foundation of the nanotechnology field.
the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment
time by Till and McCulloch in 1961. They
Since then, several extraordinary discover-
of human diseases. Despite these op-
demonstrated that a single hematopoietic
ies have been made: Richard Smalley dis-
portunities, nanotechnologies also pose
stem cell could (i) give rise to a mixed popu-
covered fullerenes in 1985, Sumio Iijima
several risks since they can be cytotoxic
lation of blood cells (granulocytes, macro-
discovered carbon nanotubes in 1991, and
and affect the differentiation program of
phages, red blood cells, etc) and (ii) had
Louis Brus the quantum dots in 1996.
stem cells. Here, we discuss the future
the ability to self-renew [1]. The isolation
The intersection of nanotechnologies with
opportunities and challenges that face
of mouse embryonic stem cells by Martin
stem cell research is recent and has been re-
this young field of research.
Evans in 1981, human embryonic stem cells
viewed by us elsewhere [2, 3]. In this work we
by James Thompson in 1998, and inducible
will review the current research topics in this
pluripotent stem cells by Shinya Yamanaka
area: stem cell microenvironment and tissue
in 2006, propelled the scientific community
engineering, stem cell tracking and imaging,
to understand the properties of these cells
stem cell transfection, isolation and sorting,
and evaluate their therapeutic effect in the
and molecular detection (Fig. 1). When ap-
context of the regenerative medicine.
propriate, we will describe some examples
The first observation of nanomaterials was
about the research that we are conducting
made by Richard Adolf Asigmondy in 1914.
at Centre for Neuroscience and Cell Biology
He performed a detailed study of gold sols
(CNC) and Biocant in this research area.
Figure 1. Nanotechnology applications in Stem Cell Biology and Medicine. Nanodevices can be used in stem cell tracking and imaging but also
in isolation and sorting of stem celis, both for basic science and translational medicine. Stem cell fate can be modulated by internalization
of nanocarriers with biological molecules or by external cues given by biomimetic scaffolds. Stem cell transfection and molecular detection
make use of nanodevices for intracellular access but also for intelligent delivery and sensing of biomolecules. These technologies have a
great impact in stem cell microenvironment and tissue engineering studies and have a great potential for biomedical applications.
38.
canalBQ_n. 7_DEZEMBRO_2010
Modulation of stem cell-fate by the microen-
the following aspects: (i) Laser fabricated
vironment
nanogrooves to study cell-cell interactions;
Stem-cell biology has been studied mainly
(ii) nanowires to study intra- and intercel-
in vitro with cells cultured on flat substrates
lular biological processes; (iii) nanophase
coated, for example, with collagen or lam-
thin film to study cell adhesion and pro-
inin, or in co-culture systems where feed-
liferation; (iv) Lab-on-a-chip with nano-
er-cell layers are used to support stem cell
reservoir to study environmental cues; (v)
ters in a given tissue is critical in deter-
growth. These culture conditions are very
Self-assembly peptides and nanofibers to
mining how cells behave within that tissue.
different from the environment that stem
mimic ECM; (vi) Nanoliter-scale synthesis
The ECM can be reproduced in vitro by the
cells experience in the body. For example,
of arrayed biomaterials; (vii) Micro/nanopat-
use of 3D scaffolds. For that purpose, sev-
the extracellular matrix (ECM) is difficult to
terned surface to study stem cell response
eral natural (fibrin, collagen, hyaluronic
mimic in plastic dishes; most frequently
to topography and mechano-transduction;
acid, etc) or synthetic (polyethylene
stem cells are cultured in rigid polystyrene
and (viii) Nanoparticles to control release
glycol, poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid),
tissue-culture plastic where cells are ex-
growth factors and biochemicals.
poly(glycerol sebacate) etc) biomaterials
posed to soluble factors in liquid media.
It is clear from this previous list that bio-
can be used. Recently, we have prepared
This is different in the body where the ECM
material design for stem cell applications
a hyaluronic acid-based gel to create a 3D
creates a soft microenvironment where
is progressively abandoning the strategy
microenvironment for the self-renewal of
these molecules are anchored in close
of developing an inert mechanical sup-
human embryonic stem cells [5].
proximity to cell surfaces. This much more
port and adopting the notion that this type
When a greater control over the properties
constrained three-dimensional (3D) niche
of cells need a more dynamic substrate
of the material is required the best option
is a unique microenvironment that has a
capable of directing interactions at the
is to produce synthetic bioactive scaffolds.
prominent role in the maintenance and dif-
cell-material interface and may stimulate
Issues like immunogenicity, pathogen
ferentiation of stem cells. This micro-envi-
and commit cell behaviour through physi-
transmission and purification difficulties
ronment is formed by different components
cal forces, biochemical interactions or to-
have encouraged this option. An example
including cell-cell interactions, extracellu-
pography. This interaction of biomaterials
of a synthetic scaffold is (polyethylene gly-
lar matrix, mechanical properties and se-
with the chemical and physical features of
col) (PEG) gels which can be chemically
creted factors. Collectively, they constitute
stem cells occurs at the micro- and nano
modified to incorporate a compendium of
a complex microenvironment that is diffi-
scales.
bioactive molecules [6]. Immobilization
cult to recapitulate in vitro. Stem cell niche
Cell-cell interaction studies generally rely
seems to increase the stability of the mol-
research uses nanotechnologies to mimic
on co-culture strategies where the effects
ecules, promote persistent signalling and
this microenvironment in order to deter-
of particular molecules are hidden in the
induce receptor clustering [7]. It was re-
mine what are the mechanisms underlying
great complexity of the culturing system.
cently shown that the covalent attachment
the conversion of a stem cell into different
It is therefore difficult to discern the role
of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) to a
cell types. On the other hand, these biomi-
of soluble or tethered molecules in terms
synthetic nanofibrillar surface composed
metic approaches to create synthetic mi-
of cell-cell interactions. In tissues, the
of a network of polyamide nanofibers re-
croenvironments are very challenging be-
ECM contains many macromolecules such
sulted in the stabilization of the growth
cause there is much we do not understand
as proteoglycans, collagens, laminins,
factor and increased its potency 100-fold
about the natural stem cell niche. Several
fibronectin and sequestered growth fac-
relative to FGF2 in solution. In response to
researchers believe that it may be possible
tors. This molecular repertoire is respon-
the tethered FGF2, embryonic stem cells
to create synthetic stem cell niches that are
sible for the bioactivity of the ECM. For
exhibited increased proliferation through
more bioinspired than biomimetic and po-
example, the sequences of many ECM pro-
activation of mitogenic pathways [8]. An-
tentially more efficient than those observed
teins or receptor ligands are presented to
other example that illustrates the impor-
in nature. Therapeutically, it may be more
stem cells and are recognized by dimeric
tance of ligand presentation in stem-cell
useful to take this bioinspired approach in
cell-surface receptors known as integrins.
fate and function is the immobilization of
the design of the synthetic niche so that it
Binding of integrins to these molecules
leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), which led
acts on the stem cells in an unnatural way
can trigger a cascade of signalling events
to more efficient and prolonged activation
to achieve a therapeutic goal [4].
that will impact the gene expression pat-
of LIF targets and maintenance of embry-
Current research efforts in both biomimetic
tern of the stem cell. Therefore, the type of
onic stem cells in an undifferentiated state
and bioinspired strategies are focussing in
ECM molecules that a stem cell encoun-
when compared with soluble LIF [9].
canalBQ_n. 7_DEZEMBRO_2010
39.
ness has a primary role in stem cell line-
factors, and small chemicals present an
age specification. This study reported that
excellent tool to control the differentia-
human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)
tion of stem cells. Some of these biomol-
were able to differentiate into tissues that
ecules/chemicals have (i) poor solubil-
had their mechanical properties more
ity, (ii) can be quickly cleaved by cellular
closely mimicked by the polyacrylamide
enzymes, (iii) and have side effects when
A major challenge in tissue engineering is
substrate upon which they were cultured.
administered systemically. Therefore, bio-
to vascularise the transplanted tissue con-
Thus, MSCs that were cultured on rigid
degradable and biocompatible nanoparti-
structs to meet the metabolic demands of
(bonelike) gels differentiated into osteob-
cles able to target stem cells and release
recovery and integration into the organism.
lasts, those that were cultured on medium
the payload in their cytoplasm with conse-
Therapeutic application of the main vas-
stiffness (muscle-like) gels differentiated
quent activation of signalling cascades will
cular signalling molecules (e.g. vascular
into muscle cells, and those that were cul-
be of great interest. Recently, we have re-
endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), FGFs,
tured on more elastic gels (neural-like)
ported the successful delivery of vascular
TGFs, angiopoietins, ephrins and various
differentiated into neural cells [12]. The
growth factors into hESCs, by incorporat-
chemokines) can be a promising approach
acknowledgment that matrix mechanical
ing growth factor-release particles in hu-
to enhance blood supply and neovasculari-
properties impact on stem-cell fate led to
man embryoid bodies (EBs) [15]. These bio-
sation processes around the transplanted
the exploration of further links between
degradable nanoparticles are compatible
tissue. For example, the immobilization of
stem cell behaviour and matrix elasticity.
with cell viability and proliferation and are
VEGF onto a metal substrate using a bio-
Since then, several studies have reported
extremely effective in terms of differentia-
mimetic polymer film was able to promote
that substrate stiffness modulates the
tion. In some cases, the effect on vascu-
the survival and proliferation of endothe-
proliferation and differentiation of em-
lar differentiation of particles containing
lial cells and to induce the differentiation
bryonic stem cells and certain types of
growth factors was superior to the one ob-
of hMSCs into endothelial cells[10].
adult stem cells. For example, adult neu-
served by exposing EBs to large extrinsic
In order to discover novel biomaterials that
ral stem cells cultured on a relatively soft
doses of the same growth factors. Moreo-
have effects on stem cells, high-through-
matrix to mimic brain tissue gave origin to
ver, nanoparticles were taken up by human
put approaches are likely needed. Recent
more neurons than cells grown on a stiffer
embryonic stem cells and accumulated in
efforts have used acrylate-based poly-
synthetic matrix, where glial cells were
the perinuclear region indicating that they
mers spotted in arrays composed of hun-
predominant [13]. Another study found that
could constitute a delivery platform not
dreds of different polymer combinations
the rate of adult skeletal-muscle stem-
only for growth factors but also for other
and found several platforms that could
cell proliferation increased with substrate
type of biomolecules [15].
promote embryonic stem cell attachment,
stiffness [14]. We predict that more stud-
proliferation and differentiation [11]. Simi-
ies will show that the physical properties
Stem Cell Engineering
lar studies must be conducted this time
of culture substrate have a major impact
Various micro-/nanofabrication technolo-
aiming at incorporating many other bio-
on stem-cell fate. With time different cul-
gies have been used to design scaffolds
physical and biochemical parameters in
ture platforms based on soft biomaterials
able to drive the differentiation of stem
this type of high throughput approaches.
are likely to largely replace those made of
cells into specific cell lineages. For ex-
Different matrices, natural and/ or syn-
the standard, rigid, tissue-culture plastic
ample, nanofibers are able to provide an
thetic, can be produced to generate cell-
in order to specifically modulate differen-
in vivo-like extracellular scaffolding to
culture substrates with defined physical
tiation into different fates.
promote regeneration of specific tissues.
characteristics like rigidity (stiffness) and
Usually stem cell cultures are presented
Nanopatterned or nanostructured scaf-
topography. Unlike regular tissue culture
with soluble growth factors and biochemi-
folds are designed to trigger stem cells to
plastic substrates, they provide diffusion of
cals in their culture media. This approach
become specific cell types comprising the
soluble molecules to the basal surface, as
may not always be possible due to specific
tissues and organs in the body.
well as the apical surface. They are espe-
chemical properties of the molecules to
Current research efforts in nanotechnol-
cially interesting in the context of studies
be delivered. Instead, it may be more ben-
ogy applications in tissue engineering are
of homeostatic and disease-related matrix
eficial to deliver these molecules directly
focussing in the following aspects: (i) Mi-
stiffness impact on stem-cell behaviour.
inside the cell to better control their bio-
cro/nano structured scaffolds for tissue
A groundbreaking study by Engler and
availability. Nanoparticles that can carry
engineering; (ii) magnetic nanoparticles
collaborators [12] found that matrix stiff-
molecular payloads of proteins, growth
for magnetic force-based tissue engineer-
40.
canalBQ_n. 7_DEZEMBRO_2010
ing; (iii) nanocomposites for bone tissue
timing and delivery methods, etcIt is of
engineering; and (iv) micro/nanoencapsu-
utmost importance to demonstrate the
lation for cell therapy
long-term safety of these cell-based ther-
The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is
apies. For example, studies in mice have
to recreate the right conditions to support
showed that stem cells injected into the
the massive growth, physical folds and
heart following myocardial infarction gave
twists and cellular and molecular events
origin to mineralized tissue [17]. This was
and ECM derived from the pericardium
of great complexity that occur during re-
possibly due to the reaction of the trans-
of horses can be used as a reconstruc-
generation or replacement of a tissue. The
planted cells to the stiffer mechanical en-
tive material in the dura mater layer of the
general strategy is to grow cells in a scaf-
vironment of the scar tissue that was not
brain meninges following a craniotomy.
fold engineered to define the geometry of
appropriate to induce cardiogenesis.
In a recent development, it was possible
the replacement tissue and provide the
Stem cell based therapy is in hand when
to engineer a bioartificial heart through
right environmental cues that promote tis-
compared with the major challenge that
a decellularization process with deter-
sue regeneration.
is replacing an entire organ with a com-
gents to produce a biocompatible cardiac
Stem cell research has been showing that
plex repertoire of cell types carefully or-
ECM scaffold with a perfusable vascular
stem cells or at least progenitor cells can
ganized to maximize its functional output.
tree, patent valves and a four-chamber-
be isolated from almost every tissue in
Self-organization seems to be an intrinsic
geometry template for biomimetic tissue
the body. With the appropriate conditions
characteristic of cells; cells will cluster
engineering. These researchers man-
it may be possible to stimulate these cells
and communicate with cells that express
aged to populate this ECM scaffold with
to form new tissue. Several studies have
the same cellular adhesion molecules and
an appropriate cell composition, and the
tried to use this biologic intrinsic regener-
under the right conditions can form com-
maturation of this construct developed a
ative potential. Stevens and collaborators
plex structures like the sprouting tubular
nascent pump function [19]. Almost at the
have injected alginate gels or modified hy-
networks formed by endothelial cells lining
same time another group reported the
aluronic acid gels into an artificial space
blood vessels. Simple artificial cell adhe-
transplant of a tissue engineered airway
between the tibia and the periosteum (the
sions have been engineered using biotin
confirming that this approach can in fact
outer lining of the bone). This stimulated
conjugated to cell surfaces and the addition
produce whole-organ tissue engineering
bone and cartilage formation from resi-
of avidin to trigger the assembly of multi-
products that are clinically relevant [20].
dent progenitor cells in the inner layer of
cellular clusters due to the biotin-avidin in-
The scaffold in this case was a decellular-
the periosteum [16]. This is an example of
teraction in order to aid in the development
ized human donor trachea that was seeded
how simple biomaterials can support the
of more complex cellular interactions [18].
with the patients own bone marrow cells
generation of complex tissue by using the
Communication between cells in the tis-
that had been differentiated into cartilage
body as a bioreactor and without the need
sue is essential but a lot of information is
cells. In contrast with traditional trans-
of exogenous cell transplants. In situa-
also coming to cells from their extracel-
plant surgery, the decellularization proc-
tions where the regenerative potential is
lular environment; the scaffold that sur-
ess solved the problem of tissue rejection
low due to different factors like age, trau-
rounds and separates cells within a tissue
because it removed human leukocyte an-
ma, scarring or inflammation like the ones
is a complex material called the Extracel-
tigen traces that are major determinants
that follow myocardial infarction or brain
lular Matrix (ECM). Tissue engineering
in tissue compatibility with the advantage
stroke for example, biomaterial interven-
takes lessons from the characterization
that the patient did not need any immuno-
tions that include cells of external origins
of natural bioactive scaffolds in order to
suppressive drugs [20].
must be included.
construct artificial ones. When possible, a
Both decellularized tissues and synthetic
Several clinical studies with stem cell-
very efficacious strategy is to use cadaver-
scaffolds offer distinct and important
based therapies are currently being per-
or animal-derived decellularized ECM be-
benefits for tissue engineering. Typically,
formed worldwide. Despite the consider-
cause these products have an inherent bi-
biomaterials-engineering approaches fo-
able knowledge gathered in the last years
oactivity to induce regeneration. This type
cus on chemical and/ or physical mecha-
in stem cells biology, further pre-clinical
of approach has found clinical applications
nisms by which the ECM influences cells
and clinical studies are needed to clarify
in routine medical procedures and in life-
and try to reproduce those effectively for a
what is the best stem cell source for cer-
saving scenarios. Products derived from
given tissue. For instance, it may be some-
tain medical applications, the mechanism
the small intestinal submucosa of pigs are
times necessary to work the anisotropic
underlying their regenerative effect, the
used routinely in reconstructive surgery,
features of the culturing system to better
canalBQ_n. 7_DEZEMBRO_2010
41.
teraction of cells with these nanogrooved
electrophysiological application; and (iv)
surfaces was recently analysed by live cell
photothermal nanospectroscopy to identify
imaging [23]. These studies have shown
stem cells in the body.
that cells acquire elongated morphologies
Nanotechnology enables labelling stem
on a surface with nanogrooved patterns and
cells using magnetic, genetic or fluores-
align along that pattern. In this study, the
cent probes which can be monitored by
mimic the tissue. Nanogrooves induced by
dynamic behaviours of living mesenchymal
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or fluo-
laser irradiation are an example of this type
stem cells on a nanogroove substrate with
rescence imaging. For example, super-
of approach in bone differentiation studies.
a 200 nm groove depth, an 870 nm ridge
paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanopar-
The alignment of bone cells and collagen
width and a 670 nm groove width were ob-
ticles can be used to label stem cells and
matrix is closely related to the mechani-
served using time-lapse microscopy. These
analyse their fate in transplantation assays
cal properties of bone. Scaffolds that are
researchers found that filopodia moved
by MRI. In fact, several SPIO nanoparticle
able to promote osteoblast differentiation
as if they were probing the surroundings
formulations (e.g., Feridex/ Endorem and
and modulate their orientation to generate
of the cell protrusion, and then some cell
Ferucarbotran) have FDA (United States
mineralization in a preferred direction are
protrusions invaded the probed areas. Cell
Food and Drug Administration) approval
essential for the generation of biomimetic
protrusions that extended perpendicular to
for human use as MRI contrast agents.
bone tissue. Bangshang Zhu and collabora-
the nanogroove direction tended to retract
The development of nanoparticles for cell
tors, used nanogrooves to induce alignment
more rapidly than those that were parallel
tracking is a multidisciplinary task that
of rabbit mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-de-
to it. From these observations, the authors
needs highly skilled biological, physical
rived osteoblast-like cells and collagen fi-
hypothesize that the retracting phase of
and chemical expertise. In most cell types,
bres. Nanoscale grooveridge patterns (300
cell protrusions play a role in cell align-
the nanoparticles are taken up through
nm in periodicity, 6070 nm in depth) on the
ment along the nanogroove patterns. Fur-
endocytosis during in vitro cell cultiva-
surface of polystyrene were made by polar-
ther studies using similar live cell imaging
tion and accumulate in the endosomes. Al-
ized laser irradiation. The cells and actin
strategies are required to clearly elucidate
though, some cell types are easier to label
stress fibbers were aligned and elongated
the role of filopodia-mediated cell align-
than others, one has to take into account
along the direction of the nanogrooves. The
ment in these nanopatterned substrates.
the biological features of the cells to be la-
results suggested that nanoscale fibrous
belled and sometimes use chemical tricks
cues in the longitudinal direction might
Stem Cell Tracking and Imaging
to promote the internalization of the nano-
contribute to the aligned formation of bone
To better understand stem cell biology
particles; e.g. mononuclear blood cells are
tissue [21]. A recent study has shown that
and realize the full potential of stem cell
easier to label because by their nature they
osteoblasts are responsive to nanopatterns
therapy, it is essential to monitor the traf-
are primed for internalization of other cells
down to 75 nm in width and 33 nm in depth.
ficking of labelled stem cells by molecular
or molecules by phagocytosis. Also, quite
Nanotexture-driven mineral deposition is
and cellular imaging. Monitorization and
often the internalization of nanoparticles
induced and responsive to even smaller na-
tracking of these cells inside an organism
requires the use of excipients, which may
nopatterns of 50 nm in width and 17 nm in
is a difficult task. This is why stem cells
include peptides and cationic agents [2].
depth. In addition, gene expression of os-
are usually tracked invasively by immuno-
The labelling of stem/ progenitor cells and
teoblast specific markers is upregulated by
histochemistry after removal of tissues or
their transplantation and tracking inside
nanogrooves [22]. These studies indicate
organs from small animals. On the other
the organism may enlighten the dynam-
that nanogrooves can be a very promising
hand, for pre-clinical and clinical trials,
ics of stem cell differentiation, migration
tool to direct the bone response at the in-
it will be fundamental to track stem cells
and therapeutic benefit in several disease
terface between an implant and the bone
noninvasively in order to assess their graft-
scenarios like myocardial infarction, cancer
tissue, which can benefit the installation of
ing and therapeutic effect. Research in this
and neurological conditions. In fact, not so
implants in compromised patients.
area is focussing on the development of the
long ago, Lewis and collaborators succeed-
Although various models have been pro-
following nanotechnologic approaches: (i)
ed in demonstrating that stem/progenitor
posed for how this alignment of cells in
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparti-
cells labelled with magnetic nanoparticles
response to nanopatterns occurs, much
cles for stem cell labelling and diagnostics;
when injected in the blood stream of small
remains to be clarified. Studies with fixed
(ii) quantum dots and fluorophore nanoc-
animals can later be isolated by magnetic
cells do not lend themselves to answering
rystals for stem cell tracking and imaging;
separation after in vivo migration to study
these questions. The dynamics of the in-
(iii) nanoprobes for stem cell detection and
the differentiation of the cells exposed to a
42.
canalBQ_n. 7_DEZEMBRO_2010
biological environment [24]. Although fea-
row emission and broad excitation spec-
sible these type of studies are still limited
trum which allows simultaneous analysis
by technical challenges. In some cases, it
of multiple cell targets by using a single
is difficult to distinguish SPIO-labelled cells
wavelength activation [27]. Qdot conjuga-
from other hypointense regions on MRI im-
tion has been used to follow biomolecules
ages. Such signals can arise from regions
like growth factor receptors, integrins,
containing blood hemoglobin, or blood
phospholipids, and enzymes among oth-
to pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Also,
clots/trombi [25]. The development of new
ers, when stem cells are exposed to differ-
the long-term effects of these nanopar-
nanoparticle formulations based on probes
ent environments or soluble factors [28].
ticles and their degradation products on
other than iron oxide will be of great inter-
In vivo, small animal-tracking of delivered
stem cells should be also assessed at
est for stem cell applications. Some exam-
stem cells has been difficult due to tech-
gene and protein level. Indeed, qdots may
ples have been recently reported based on
nical limitations in terms of labelling but
induce cytotoxic effects due to release of
nanoparticles containing fluorine or man-
also due to the autofluorescent nature of
cadmium triggered by their oxidative deg-
ganese [26].
animal tissues. With imaging platforms
radation [32]. This metal can bind to the
Stem cell differentiation programs are highly
like Calipers IVIS it is now possible to do
sulfhydryl groups of critical mitochondrial
regulated processes that may be sensitive
qdot-tracking in whole animals. Rosen
proteins and induce the production of re-
to nanoparticle internalization. Therefore, it
and collaborators (2007) have reported
active oxygen species, leading to mito-
will be essential to evaluate the long-term
the optimization and validation of a qdot
chondrial dysfunction and ultimately cell
effects of these nanomaterials in the biology
long-term tracking technique of labelled
death [33]. However, it might be possible to
of stem cells. It is possible that the intracel-
mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the
coat qdots in a way that circumvents their
lular degradation of the nanoparticles pro-
mammalian heart. These researchers
in vivo degradation.
duces molecules that are bioactive and have
found that bright qdot crystals were able
potential to activate signalling cascades that
to illuminate MSCs in histological sections
Stem Cell Transfection
can change the differentiation program of
for at least 8 weeks following delivery
Efficient gene delivery systems are re-
the stem cells. The prospect of tracking stem
enabling the complete three-dimensional
quired to fully manipulate stem cell be-
cells with nanoparticle labelling technolo-
reconstruction of the locations of all stem
haviour. This ability is essential for studies
gies is dependent on a careful evaluation of
cells following injection into the heart [29].
of gene function, control of stem cell dif-
their impact on stem cell biology and solving
The use of these nanocrystals for stem
ferentiation, cellular labelling and purifi-
issues like dilution of nanoparticle content
cell-labelling depends on their origin and
cation, and cellular secretion of therapeu-
(and consequent decrease of signal) during
surface modification, mode of internaliza-
tic drugs. Viral methods have been widely
cell division and release by exocytosis. There-
tion and type of stem cells used [30]. Stem
used and have good transduction efficien-
fore, complementary techniques like fluores-
cells are labelled with qdots in several
cies; however they integrate into the ge-
cence must be developed to validate the MRI
ways, including receptor-mediated up-
nome of the host cell. Because of safety
results. Our group is developing nanoparticle
take, lipofection, electroporation, or pas-
issues, non-viral gene delivery systems
formulations that escape the endosome and
sive loading. Under appropriate conditions,
are preferred for stem cell transfection.
combine fluorescent and magnetic labelling
qdots are effective at labelling stem cells
The key challenge in this case is to deliver
to circumvent these issues.
without affecting their self-renewal and
genes to stem cells with high efficiency and
Other nanoparticles that are increas-
differentiation potentials. For example,
low cytotoxicity. Nanotechnology provides
ingly used in cell biology are quantum dots
hMSCs labelled with qdots (0.250 to 16 nM)
invaluable tools for stem cell transfection.
(qdots). These are another class of nano-
maintained their osteogenic differentiation
The main efforts in this area are focuss-
materials usually in the size range of 2-10
potential[30]. Also, intravenous injection of
ing on: (i) Nanomaterials for in vivo gene
nm that can be used for long-term label-
Qdots-labelled mesenchymal stem cells
delivery; (ii) nanowires for gene delivery to
ling of stem cells. Qdots have become a
into NOD/SCID mice (1106 cells) showed
stem cells; and (iii) micro/nanofluidic de-
commercial success because they exhibit
an accumulation after 24 h in the lungs,
vices for stem cell electroporation.
a brighter fluorescent signal, have higher
liver and spleen, but not in the heart, brain
Nanoparticles have been shown to be ef-
photostability (hours) and large stokes
or kidneys [31]. At the moment, most stud-
fective vectors for gene transfection. Green
shift (difference between excitation and
ies were dedicated to labelling multipotent
and collaborators developed a class of pol-
emission wavelengths) than organic dyes
mesenchymal stem cells. Therefore, it
ymers (poly(B-amino esters)) that are able
and fluorescent proteins. They have nar-
will be important to extend these studies
to condense DNA into nanoparticles that
canalBQ_n. 7_DEZEMBRO_2010
43.
These nanodevices are helical structures
a ferromagnetic matrix and is placed in a
of approximately 130 nm in diameter with
MACS Separator. The separator contains a
lengths >100 nm [39], that are able to
strong permanent magnet creating a high-
encapsulate drugs and genetic material.
gradient magnetic field in the magnetisable
These CNTs are internalized by an endocy-
column matrix. Labelled target cells are
tosis independent way and reach the peri-
retained in the column via magnetic force,
facilitate cellular uptake and endosomal
nuclear region after a few hours of contact
whereas unlabeled cells flow through. By
escape. These particles can be coated for
with the cells [40]. After 24 h, a significant
simply rinsing the column with buffer, the
ligand-specific delivery, are biodegradable
number of CNTs have been observed at the
entire untouched cell fraction can be eluted.
and have low toxicity [34]. Another approach
cell nucleus of mesenchymal stem cells
3) Elution of the labelled cell fraction: after re-
used specific recognition of cell surface
[41]. Recent advances on this type of strat-
moving the column from the magnetic field
molecules coupled to an organic-inorganic
egy have produced a novel platform for in-
of the MACS Separator, the retained labelled
hybrid carrier where carbonate apatite na-
tracellular delivery of genetic material and
cells can easily be eluted with buffer.
noparticles were coated electrostatically
nanoparticles, based on vertically aligned
The entire procedure can be performed in
with fibronectin and E-cadherin producing
carbon nanosyringe arrays of controllable
less than 30 min, and both cell fractions,
an efficient gene delivery system for embry-
height. Using this technology, Park and
magnetically labelled and untouched cells,
onic stem cells [35, 36]. These studies with
collaborators have shown that plasmid
are immediately ready for further use, such
nanoparticles reported higher efficiencies
and quantum dots can be efficiently deliv-
as flow cytometry, molecular analysis, cell
for gene delivery and expression than the
ered to the cytoplasm of cancer cells and
culture, transfer into animals, or clinical cell
ones obtained with the leading commer-
human mesenchymal stem cells [42].
therapy applications.
cially available transfection agent, Lipo-
MACS MicroBeads are superparamagnetic
fectamine 2000 [34-36].
Stem Cell Isolation and Sorting
particles made of an iron oxide core and a
Nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) can be deliv-
A key challenge in stem cell research is to
dextran coating. They are nano-sized, rang-
ered in the cytoplasm by the nanoparticles
identify and isolate stem cells from a hetero-
ing between 20 and 150 nm in diameter, and
in a gradual release profile or suddenly,
geneous cell population by a low cost, fast
form colloidal solutions, i.e., they remain
depending if the genetic modulation is in-
and easy procedure. Magnetic or fluorescent
dispersed [43]. Superparamagnetism means
tended to be sustained in time or not. This is
nanoparticles can be used to label stem cells
that in a magnetic field the iron oxide cores
of great advantage when compared with the
followed by magnetic force or flow cytometry
magnetize strongly like ferromagnetic mate-
commercially available options. Indeed, na-
sorting. In the stem cell biology research field
rial, but when removed from the magnetic
noparticles with covalently immobilized DNA
the MACS technology, briefly described
field the particles do not retain any residual
or siRNA were shown to be a very effective
below, is the leading commercial brand and
magnetism. The dextran coating of the Mi-
strategy to regulate gene expression [37,38].
has made the separation of certain stem and
croBeads permits chemical conjugation of bi-
Rosi and collaborators have shown that
progenitor cells a routine procedure.
omolecules. Numerous highly specific mAb,
DNA-gold nanoparticles can have effective
The MACS System is characterized by the
fluorochromes, oligonucleotides and various
intracellular target recognition and binding
use of nano-sized superparamagnetic parti-
other moieties have all been covalently linked
and can be used for antisense gene regula-
cles (approx. 50 nm in diameter), cell sepa-
to MicroBeads, thereby transferring addi-
tion on stem cells [37]. For somatic cells, it
ration columns, and MACS Separators which
tional biochemical and physical properties to
has been reported that these systems have
provide the required strong magnetic field
them [43]. The nano-sized iron-dextran parti-
high resistance to nuclease degradation and
[43]. Magnetic cell separation is performed
cles confer several unique features on MACS
high cellular uptake as a result of their oligo-
in three steps:
Technology. MACS MicroBeads are biode-
nucleotide functionalization. These nanopar-
1) Labelling: cell preparation and labelling
gradable and do not alter cell function. Ef-
ticle systems offer exciting opportunities for
methods are similar to those used in flow cy-
fects on the functional status of cells by mag-
gene expression regulation and the control of
tometry. Each target cell in a cell suspension
netic labelling with MicroBeads are primarily
stem cell fate. Our research group has sev-
is immunomagnetically labelled using MACS
dependent on the target cell surface antigen
eral projects in this area aiming to modulate
MicroBeads, which typically are covalently
and on the degree of crosslinking by mAb or
the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells
conjugated to a monoclonal antibody (mAb)
ligands conjugated to the MicroBeads, but
by the use of nanomaterials.
or to a ligand specific for a certain cell type.
not on the MicroBeads themselves. Cells la-
Other good delivery strategies to transfect
2) Separation: the cell suspension is passed
belled with MicroBeads have been used for
stem cells are carbon nanotubes (CNTs).
through the separation column that contains
numerous functional in vitro assays, experi-
44.
canalBQ_n. 7_DEZEMBRO_2010
mental transfers into animals, and therapeu-
expression of intracellular targets with the
tic transplantations in humans.
fluorescence-quenching beacon [44]. Other
examples include pH nano-sensors [45]
Molecular Detection and Biosensors
and nanoparticles able to quantify enzy-
In addition to detect labelled stem cells, it
matic activities [46]. A recent study reported
is of paramount importance to detect par-
the preparation of polymeric nanoparticles
ticular molecules in the stem cell pathway at
bearing a kinase peptide substrate and
2. Ferreira L, Karp JM, Nobre L & Langer R (2008) New
the cellular level. Nanotechnology provides
near-infrared fluorophore chemically cou-
opportunities: the use of nanotechnologies to manipu-
advanced probes and devices for molecular
pled to the nanoparticle. In the nonphos-
late and track stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 3, 136-146.
detection. For example, (i) carbon nanotube
phorylated state, these nanoparticles have
3. Ferreira L (2009) Nanoparticles as tools to study and
optical probes for single molecule detection
low levels of fluorescence because of the
control stem cells. J Cell Biochem 108, 746-752.
in living cells; (ii) carbon nanotube nanoelec-
short distance between each fluorescence
4. Fisher OZ, Khademhosseini A, Langer R & Peppas NA
trode array for deep brain stimulation; (iii)
probe in the nanoparticle. Upon kinase
(2010) Bioinspired materials for controlling stem cell
nanoparticles for neurochemical detection
phosphorylation of the phosphate groups
fate. Acc Chem Res 43, 419-428.
and biosensors; (iv) nanowires for molecu-
that are incorporated into the peptide sub-
5. Gerecht S, Burdick JA, Ferreira LS, Townsend SA,
lar detection in stem cells; (v) self-assem-
strate the polymeric nanoparticles dissolve
Langer R & Vunjak-Novakovic G (2007) Hyaluronic acid
bly polymeric micelle-based bioassays; (vi)
due to charge unbalance and the fluores-
hydrogel for controlled self-renewal and differentiation
nanoarrays in mass spectrometry for pro-
cence is recovered [46].
of human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
teomic and metabolomic applications; (vii)
104, 11298-11303.
nanofluidic device for single cell genomic
6. Kraehenbuehl TP, Ferreira LS, Zammaretti P, Hubbell
analysis on a chip.
Conclusion
JA & Langer R (2009) Cell-responsive hydrogel for encap-
The aim of these tools is to monitor biomol-
This report identifies challenges and op-
sulation of vascular cells. Biomaterials 30, 4318-4324.
ecules in real time without using invasive
portunities where nanotechnology can be
7. Irvine DJ, Hue KA, Mayes AM & Griffith LG (2002) Sim-
or endpoint procedures. Currently, most
utilized to advance stem cell research. Al-
ulations of cell-surface integrin binding to nanoscale-
strategies to analyse intracellular bio-
though stem cell nanotechnology is still a
clustered adhesion ligands. Biophys J 82, 120-132.
chemical processes rely on several steps
young discipline, it is already contributing
8. Nur EKA, Ahmed I, Kamal J, Babu AN, Schindler M
of cell-processing like fixation, permeabi-
for new discoveries in stem cell research
& Meiners S (2008) Covalently attached FGF-2 to three-
lization and labelling, which are time con-
and the development of better stem cell
dimensional polyamide nanofibrillar surfaces demon-
suming and expensive when scale-up or
technology. This survey of research topics
strates enhanced biological stability and activity. Mol
high throughput screening is needed. Na-
in stem cell nanotechnology will allow non-
Cell Biochem 309, 157-166.
noparticles can be an appropriate solution
nano-experts to realize the impact that na-
9. Alberti K, Davey RE, Onishi K, George S, Salchert K,
for bio-sensing inside stem cells. Sensors
notechnology is having in both basic stem
Seib FP, Bornhauser M, Pompe T, Nagy A, Werner C &
are usually composed of two parts: one that
cell biology and in translational applica-
Zandstra PW (2008) Functional immobilization of sign-
recognizes and binds the target molecule
tions of stem cell research into medicine.
aling proteins enables control of stem cell fate. Nature
and another that signals the binding event.
Methods 5, 645-650.
One way of doing this is to immobilize the
10. Poh CK, Shi ZL, Lim TY, Neoh KG & Wang W (2010)
recognition molecule to the surface of a na-
Acknowledgements
The effect of VEGF functionalization of titanium on en-
noparticle. This type of approach was used
We acknowledge the support of Crioestaminal, MIT- Por-
dothelial cells in vitro. Biomaterials 31, 1578-1585.
by Hwang and collaborators to monitor
tugal Program, Marie Curie Reintegration Grant, and
11. Anderson DG, Levenberg S & Langer R (2004) Nano-
neuronal differentiation in vivo using a mo-
FCT funding (PTDC/SAU-BEB/098468/2008; PTDC/CTM/
liter-scale synthesis of arrayed biomaterials and appli-
lecular beacon [44]. They have generated a
099659/2008; PTDC/SAU-ENB/113696/2009).
cation to human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol
quencher-based fluorescent beacon sys-
22, 863-866.
tem to sense the neuron-specific miR124a
12. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL & Discher DE (2006)
expression. Moreover this beacon was built
References
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification.
upon a cobalt ferrite magnetic core which
1. Weissman IL & Shizuru JA (2008) The origins of the
Cell 126, 677-689.
enables the dual-imaging nanoparticle
identification and isolation of hematopoietic stem cells,
13. Saha K, Keung AJ, Irwin EF, Li Y, Little L, Schaffer
beacon system to be used for in vivo cel-
and their capability to induce donor-specific transplan-
DV & Healy KE (2008) Substrate modulus directs neural
lular tracking by magnetic resonance as
tation tolerance and treat autoimmune diseases. Blood
stem cell behavior. Biophys J 95, 4426-4438.
well as for monitoring the changes in the
112, 3543-3553.
14. Boonen KJ, Rosaria-Chak KY, Baaijens FP, van der
canalBQ_n. 7_DEZEMBRO_2010
45.
tized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and
herin and fibronectin embedded in carbonate-apatite
recovery of progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol 18, 410-414.
DNA carrier on transgene delivery and expression in
25. Gilad AA, Walczak P, McMahon MT, Na HB, Lee JH,
a mouse embryonic stem cell line. Biomaterials 29,
An K, Hyeon T, van Zijl PC & Bulte JW (2008) MR track-
370-376.
ing of transplanted cells with positive contrast using
36. Kutsuzawa K, Chowdhury EH, Nagaoka M, Maru-
manganese oxide nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med 60,
yama K, Akiyama Y & Akaike T (2006) Surface func-
Schaft DW & Post MJ (2009) Essential environmental
1-7.
tionalization of inorganic nano-crystals with fi-
cues from the satellite cell niche: optimizing prolifera-
26. Ruiz-Cabello J, Walczak P, Kedziorek DA, Chacko
bronectin and E-cadherin chimera synergistically
tion and differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 296,
VP, Schmieder AH, Wickline SA, Lanza GM & Bulte JW
accelerates trans-gene delivery into embryonic stem
C1338-1345.
(2008) In vivo hot spot MR imaging of neural stem
cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 350, 514-520.
15. Ferreira L, Squier T, Park H, Choe H, Kohane DS
cells using fluorinated nanoparticles. Magn Reson
37. Rosi NL, Giljohann DA, Thaxton CS, Lytton-Jean
& Langer R (2008) Human embryoid bodies containing
Med 60, 1506-1511.
AKR, Han MS & Mirkin CA (2006) Oligonucleotide-
nano- and microparticulate delivery vehicles. Advanced
27. Michalet X, Pinaud FF, Bentolila LA, Tsay JM,
modified gold nanoparticles for intracellular gene
Materials 20, 2285-+.
Doose S, Li JJ, Sundaresan G, Wu AM, Gambhir SS &
regulation. Science 312, 1027-1030.
16. Stevens MM, Marini RP, Schaefer D, Aronson J,
Weiss S (2005) Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo im-
38. Giljohann DA, Seferos DS, Prigodich AE, Patel
Langer R & Shastri VP (2005) In vivo engineering of or-
aging, and diagnostics. Science 307, 538-544.
PC & Mirkin CA (2009) Gene Regulation with Polyva-
gans: the bone bioreactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102,
28. Chen H, Titushkin I, Stroscio M & Cho M (2007) Al-
lent siRNA-Nanoparticle Conjugates. Journal of the
11450-11455.
tered membrane dynamics of quantum dot-conjugat-
American Chemical Society 131, 2072-+.
17. Breitbach M, Bostani T, Roell W, Xia Y, Dewald O, Ny-
ed integrins during osteogenic differentiation of hu-
39. Iijima S (1991) Helical Microtubules of Graphitic
gren JM, Fries JW, Tiemann K, Bohlen H, Hescheler J,
man bone marrow derived progenitor cells. Biophys
Carbon. Nature 354, 56-58.
Welz A, Bloch W, Jacobsen SE & Fleischmann BK (2007)
J 92, 1399-1408.
40. Kostarelos K, Lacerda L, Pastorin G, Wu W, Wieck-
Potential risks of bone marrow cell transplantation into
29. Rosen AB, Kelly DJ, Schuldt AJ, Lu J, Potapova IA,
owski S, Luangsivilay J, Godefroy S, Pantarotto D,
infarcted hearts. Blood 110, 1362-1369.
Doronin SV, Robichaud KJ, Robinson RB, Rosen MR,
Briand JP, Muller S, Prato M & Bianco A (2007) Cel-
18. De Bank PA, Kellam B, Kendall DA & Shakesheff KM
Brink PR, Gaudette GR & Cohen IS (2007) Finding
lular uptake of functionalized carbon nanotubes is
(2003) Surface engineering of living myoblasts via selec-
fluorescent needles in the cardiac haystack: tracking
independent of functional group and cell type. Nat
tive periodate oxidation. Biotechnol Bioeng 81, 800-808.
human mesenchymal stem cells labeled with quan-
Nanotechnol 2, 108-113.
19. Ott HC, Matthiesen TS, Goh SK, Black LD, Kren SM,
tum dots for quantitative in vivo three-dimensional
41. Mooney E, Dockery P, Greiser U, Murphy M & Bar-
Netoff TI & Taylor DA (2008) Perfusion-decellularized
fluorescence analysis. Stem Cells 25, 2128-2138.
ron V (2008) Carbon nanotubes and mesenchymal
matrix: using natures platform to engineer a bioartifi-
30. Chakraborty SK, Fitzpatrick JA, Phillippi JA, An-
stem cells: biocompatibility, proliferation and differ-
cial heart. Nat Med 14, 213-221.
dreko S, Waggoner AS, Bruchez MP & Ballou B (2007)
entiation. Nano Lett 8, 2137-2143.
20. Macchiarini P, Jungebluth P, Go T, Asnaghi MA,
Cholera toxin B conjugated quantum dots for live cell
42. Park S, Kim YS, Kim WB & Jon S (2009) Carbon
Rees LE, Cogan TA, Dodson A, Martorell J, Bellini S,
labeling. Nano Lett 7, 2618-2626.
nanosyringe array as a platform for intracellular de-
Parnigotto PP, Dickinson SC, Hollander AP, Mantero
31. Lei Y, Tang H, Yao L, Yu R, Feng M & Zou B (2008)
livery. Nano Lett 9, 1325-1329.
S, Conconi MT & Birchall MA (2008) Clinical trans-
Applications of mesenchymal stem cells labeled with
43. Miltenyi S, Muller W, Weichel W & Radbruch A
plantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet 372,
Tat peptide conjugated quantum dots to cell tracking
(1990) High gradient magnetic cell separation with
2023-2030.
in mouse body. Bioconjug Chem 19, 421-427.
MACS. Cytometry 11, 231-238.
21. Zhu B, Lu Q, Yin J, Hu J & Wang Z (2005) Alignment of
32. Derfus AM, Chan WCW & Bhatia SN (2004) Probing
44. Hwang DW, Song IC, Lee DS & Kim S (2010) Smart
osteoblast-like cells and cell-produced collagen matrix
the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum dots. Nano
Magnetic Fluorescent Nanoparticle Imaging Probes
induced by nanogrooves. Tissue Eng 11, 825-834.
Letters 4, 11-18.
to Monitor MicroRNAs. Small 6, 81-88.
22. Lamers E, Walboomers XF, Domanski M, te Riet J,
33. Lovric J, Cho SJ, Winnik FM & Maysinger D (2005) Un-
45. Coupland PG, Fisher KA, Jones DR & Aylott JW (2008)
van Delft FC, Luttge R, Winnubst LA, Gardeniers HJ &
modified cadmium telluride quantum dots induce reactive
Internalisation of polymeric nanosensors in mesenchy-
Jansen JA (2010) The influence of nanoscale grooved
oxygen species formation leading to multiple organelle
mal stem cells: analysis by flow cytometry and confocal
substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular
damage and cell death. Chem Biol 12, 1227-1234.
microscopy. J Control Release 130, 115-120.
matrix deposition. Biomaterials 31, 3307-3316.
34. Green JJ, Zhou BY, Mitalipova MM, Beard C, Lang-
46. Kim JH, Lee S, Park K, Nam HY, Jang SY, Youn I,
23. Fujita S, Ohshima M & Iwata H (2009) Time-lapse ob-
er R, Jaenisch R & Anderson DG (2008) Nanoparticles
Kim K, Jeon H, Park RW, Kim IS, Choi K & Kwon IC
servation of cell alignment on nanogrooved patterns. J
for gene transfer to human embryonic stem cell colo-
(2007)
R Soc Interface 6 Suppl 3, S269-277.
nies. Nano Lett 8, 3126-3130.
meric nanoparticles for imaging protein kinase ac-
24. Lewin M, Carlesso N, Tung CH, Tang XW, Cory D,
35. Kutsuzawa K, Akaike T & Chowdhury EH (2008)
tivities in single living cells. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
Scadden DT & Weissleder R (2000) Tat peptide-deriva-
The influence of the cell-adhesive proteins E-cad-
46, 5779-5782.
46.
canalBQ_n. 7_DEZEMBRO_2010
Protein-phosphorylation-responsive
poly-