Daniel Deli, Paul Hanouna, Christof W. Stahel, Yue Tang and William Yost
Daniel Deli, Paul Hanouna, Christof W. Stahel, Yue Tang and William Yost
Daniel Deli, Paul Hanouna, Christof W. Stahel, Yue Tang and William Yost 1
December 2015
1. Summary
Anecdotal evidence and press reports suggest the potential increased use of derivatives by investment
companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. However, granular information is not
available on the extent to which funds 2 may be making use of derivatives in pursuing their investment
strategies. To better understand how funds currently use derivatives, we gathered a detailed, handcollected random sample of 10% of funds based on Form N-CSR filed for 2014, assembling data on
certain of those funds derivatives positions. Because section 18 of the Investment Company Act
restricts the ability of a fund to issue senior securities, 3 we focused on those derivatives (and certain
financial commitment transactions) that implicate section 18 because a fund that enters into these
transactions is or may be required to make a payment or deliver cash or other assets during the life of
the instrument or at maturity or early termination. For brevity, we generally use the term derivatives
in this paper to refer only to these derivatives, which include, for example, futures, swaps, currency
forwards, and written options. In contrast, other derivatives, such as purchased options and purchased
swaptions, often provide the economic equivalent of leverage because they expose the fund to gains on
an amount in excess of the funds investment but do not impose a payment obligation on the fund
beyond its investment. While these transactions involve economic leverage, they generally do not
implicate section 18 of the Act, and we therefore did not focus on these kinds of derivatives. 4
Supplementing our random sample of Form N-CSR filings with information gathered from Morningstar
and Form N-SAR, we analyze the use of those derivatives together with certain financial commitment
This white paper was prepared for Mark Flannery, Director and Chief Economist of the Division of Economic and
Risk Analysis (DERA). Paul Hanounas contributions were made while he was a visiting scholar in DERA. The U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, as a matter of policy, disclaims responsibility for any private publication or
statement of any of its employees. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the Commission or of the authors colleagues on the staff of the Commission.
2
The term funds refers to mutual funds (other than money market funds), exchange-traded funds (ETFs),
closed-end funds and business development companies (BDCs). We classify funds using Morningstars nine broad
categories based on asset classes and investment strategies; see appendix for a list of these categories.
3
Section 18 of the Act imposes various limitations on the capital structure of funds, including, in part, by
restricting the ability of funds to issue senior securities. Section 18(g) of the Investment Company Act defines
senior security, in part, as any bond, debenture, note, or similar obligation or instrument constituting a security
and evidencing indebtedness.
4
As set forth in Appendix B, we have collected data regarding purchased options and purchased swaptions but
have not included that data in our descriptions of the use of derivatives by funds herein.
transactions 5 and other senior securities funds may issue, which similarly implicate section 18 of the
Investment Company Act. 6 We document the following empirical facts:
1. Based on data from Morningstar, total AUM of the U.S. registered fund industry was $17.9
trillion as of June 2015. With a share of 38%, US Equity represents the largest category of funds,
followed by Taxable Bond, Allocation, and International Equity funds with 19%, 17%, and 15%,
respectively. Alt Strategies funds 7 comprise 3% of total AUM with the bulk being invested in
Alternative funds and Nontraditional Bond funds. Between 2010 and 2014, the total number of
funds grew by an average of 8% per year. During the same period, the number of Alt Strategies
funds grew at an annual rate of 17%. While the industry experienced an annual growth rate in
AUM of 12% over this period, the Alt Strategies funds grew by only 10%. However, this appears
to be attributable to the fact that Commodity funds experienced significant contraction in AUM
over the period (-12% annually), while Alternative funds and Nontraditional Bond funds AUM
grew at an annual rate of 22%.
2. Form N-SAR data 8 indicates many funds often do not use derivatives even if their investment
policies allow them to do so. For example, 77% of all funds that completed Form N-SAR for 2014
have investment policies that allow the use of equity options, but only 6% report that they have
actually used equity options during the reporting period.
3. Based on the random sample drawn from N-CSR filings, 32% of funds held one or more
derivatives. The most commonly used derivatives were currency forwards (used by 13% of
funds), followed by equity futures (12%) and interest rate futures (11%). Equity swaps and
written equity options were used by around 5% of funds, and over-the-counter (OTC) interest
rate swaps, cleared or exchange-traded interest rate swaps and OTC credit default swaps (CDS)
were used by 4% of funds. Ten percent of funds used one or more financial commitment
transactions and 6% of funds issue other senior securities.
4. We define a funds derivatives exposure to be its gross notional amount of derivatives. This
measure of derivatives exposure averaged 20% of NAV. Among all funds, 68% had zero
exposure, 89% had less than 50% exposure. The average aggregate exposure 9 from derivatives,
financial commitment transactions and other senior securities was 23% of NAV. Among all funds,
96% had aggregate exposure below 150%.
5. Interest rate derivatives, equity derivatives, and currency derivatives were the most heavily used
with the notional amounts averaging 8%, 7%, and 4% of NAV, respectively. The average amounts
5
We use the term financial commitment transactions to refer to reverse repurchase agreements, short sale
borrowings, and firm or standby commitment agreements or similar agreements.
6
Other senior securities include bank borrowings, margin loans, and with respect to closed-end funds and BDCs,
senior debt and preferred shares.
7
We use Alt Strategies funds to refer collectively to Alternative funds, Commodities funds, and Nontraditional
Bond funds. Nontraditional Bond funds are a category of Taxable Bond funds in Morningstar. We consider them as
Alt Strategies funds primarily because many of the funds in this category aim to provide low correlations to the
Traditional bond indexes and often feature absolute-return mandates. Moreover, there are a substantial number
of funds within the category, primarily those with long-short credit strategies, that meet Morningstars shorting
criteria used to classify alternative funds. We refer to all other funds collectively as Traditional funds.
8
Form N-SAR does not distinguish between written and purchased options.
9
Aggregate exposure refers to the sum of the aggregate notional amounts of the funds derivatives, the aggregate
potential obligations of the fund under financial commitment transactions, and the aggregate indebtedness (and
with respect to any closed-end fund or business development company, involuntary liquidation preference) with
respect to any other senior securities.
of financial commitment transactions and issuance of other senior securities were each 2% of
NAV.
6. Alt Strategies mutual funds (which we define as Alternative mutual funds, Commodities
mutual funds, and Nontraditional Bond mutual funds) tended to use derivatives more often than
other fund types, which we describe collectively as Traditional mutual funds. Seventy-three
percent of Alt Strategies mutual funds used derivatives compared to 29% of Traditional mutual
funds, and their average gross notional amount was 121% of NAV compared to 10% among
Traditional mutual funds. Fifty-two percent of Alt Strategies mutual funds had derivatives with
gross notional amounts exceeding 50% of NAV compared to only 6% of the Traditional mutual
funds. Alt Strategies mutual funds aggregate exposure averaged 132% of NAV compared to 11%
among Traditional mutual funds, and 27% of Alt Strategies mutual funds had 150% or greater
aggregate exposure compared to less than 2% of the Traditional mutual funds.
7. Among closed-end funds and ETFs, 47% and 29%, respectively, had exposure to derivatives.
None of the BDCs in the sample had any exposure to derivatives. Nine percent of closed-end
funds and 18% of ETFs had derivatives with gross notional amounts exceeding 50% of NAV. No
closed-end fund had 150% or greater aggregate exposure, but 8% of ETFs did.
2. Introduction
A growing number of academic studies and press reports point to the importance or increased use of
derivatives by registered funds. 10 This trend may have been amplified by the advent of new derivatives
products and by the growing number and size of Alt Strategies funds that seek to implement hedge
fund-like strategies.
Despite the perceived increase in the use of derivatives, there is currently little systematic evidence on
their use by funds. It is likely the case that the paucity of investigation is driven by a lack of easily
accessible detailed data on funds derivatives transactions. As a result, studies have limited their
examinations to whether a fund uses any derivatives, investigated a small set of funds, or examined only
a single type of derivative. For example, Koski and Pontiff (1999) compare funds that use derivatives
with those that do not, using a sample of 679 funds they surveyed by phone. Frino, Lepone, and Wong
(2009) use survey data for 273 Australian fund managers. Cao, Ghysels, and Hatheway (2011) investigate
322 funds with information gathered from Form N-SAR and Form N-CSR. Adam and Guettler (2015)
examine the use of CDS by corporate bond funds in 2004, and Jiang and Zhu (2015) examine the
holdings for a sample of funds from 2007 and 2008. Each of these studies use information collected
from Form N-CSR. Finally, Cici and Palacios (2015) examine the use of equity and index options by 250
US Equity funds from 2003-2010 using information collected from Form N-CSR.
10
For example, Koski and Pontiff (1999) contend that the increasing use of derivatives in registered funds stems
from the 1997 repeal of the short-short rule which previously made derivatives usage disadvantageous from a tax
standpoint. Prior to The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, mutual funds were subject to the short-short rule, which
eliminates preferential pass-through tax status for funds that realize more than 30 percent of their capital gains
from positions held less than three months. The rule effectively inhibited derivative use because some derivative
securities such as options and futures contracts involve realizing capital gains for holding periods of less than three
months. The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 included the repeal of the short-short rule.
This paper provides data to inform the Commissions consideration of the regulation of funds use of
derivatives. To that end, we provide a comprehensive analysis of derivatives holdings based on a highly
detailed hand-collected cross-sectional dataset representing a 10% random sample of all funds. This
sample includes 1,188 open-end funds, closed-end funds, ETFs, and business development companies. 11
The data contain notional amounts on an extensive list of derivative instruments including written
options, swaps, forwards, and futures related to commodity, currency, credit, interest rate, and equity
market risks. The data also contain detailed information on financial commitment transactions and
other senior security issuances.
We investigate the extent of derivatives usage by funds, including the types of derivatives and types of
risk exposures taken, by analyzing the notional amounts of derivatives held by individual funds and
across different fund category groups and size quintiles. We also measure aggregate exposure as the
sum of the notional amount of derivatives, together with obligations under financial commitment
transactions and other senior securities.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows. In Section III we discuss the regulatory background
governing derivatives usage by funds. In Section IV we describe our data. Section V provides an overview
of the US fund industry and describes recent trends in industry growth. Section VI provides evidence on
fund policies regarding derivatives and a high-level analysis of their use. Section VII provides detailed
results on the use of derivatives by funds, and Section VIII concludes.
3. Regulatory background
The activities and capital structures of funds are regulated extensively under the Investment Company
Act, Commission rules, and Commission guidance. The use of derivatives by funds implicates certain
requirements under the Investment Company Act, including section 18 of that Act. Section 18 limits a
funds ability to obtain leverage, or incur obligations to persons other than the funds common
shareholders, through the issuance of senior securities as defined in that section. Funds current
practices with respect to derivatives and certain other transactions are based on their applications of
Commission guidance concerning the requirements of section 18 provided in a release issued by the
Commission in 1979, together with other guidance provided by the Commissions staff. 12
This examination of the use of derivatives is designed to evaluate the extent to which funds use
derivatives, in light of this framework, and to inform the Commissions consideration of the regulation of
funds use of derivatives, as described in more detail in a contemporaneous release published by the
Commission proposing a new regulatory framework for funds use of derivatives and financial
commitment transactions.
11
We include BDCs because they are closed-end investment companies and are subject to the requirements of
section 18 of the Investment Company Act (as made applicable to a BDC by section 61 of the Act).
12
For a discussion of certain of the requirements under the Investment Company Act that are applicable to funds
use of derivatives, see Use of Derivatives by Registered Investment Companies and Business Development
Companies, Investment Company Act Release No. 31933 (Dec. 11, 2015), at section II.B.
4. Data
Our base sample uses Morningstar Direct and allows us to provide a broad overview of the fund
industry. It consists of all funds registered under the Investment Company Act in the database as of June
2015. We include funds marketed as part of variable insurance products, because they have the same
legal structure as open-end funds and are subject to the Investment Company Act, but we exclude
Money Market Funds 13. The Morningstar sample consists of 11,973 funds.
The derivatives data currently provided by Morningstar (as well as other commercial vendors) is of
somewhat limited detail. 14 As a result, we create a second sample based on funds most recent Form NSAR filing with the Commission. Funds are required to indicate on Form N-SAR whether their fund
policies allow for investment in certain derivatives and whether they used those derivatives during the
reporting period. Therefore, this N-SAR sample offers the advantage of allowing us to examine the
ability to use derivatives as well as the actual usage of derivatives. The N-SAR sample consists of 12,360
funds. 15
Unfortunately, some Form N-SAR data are coarse. For example, not all types of derivatives are included
and certain data are only reported at an aggregate level. Form N-SAR also does not distinguish in all
cases between those derivatives that create potential future obligations (e.g., written options) and
those that do not (e.g., purchased options). Funds also report market values of certain derivatives
holdings, which do not necessarily represent the potential exposures of the holdings or the extent of
senior claims. 16
To facilitate a more detailed examination of derivatives usage, we create a third sample by drawing a
random sample of 10% of the funds in our base Morningstar sample 17 and hand collect data on
derivatives investments, financial commitment transactions and senior security issuances from each
funds annual Form N-CSR filings. If a fund has not yet filed a Form N-CSR for 2014, it is dropped from
the sample and replaced by one that has filed a Form N-CSR. The N-CSR sample consists of 1,188 funds.
13
Under rule 2a-7, money market funds are required to limit their investments to short-term, high-quality debt
securities that fluctuate very little in value under normal market conditions. Money market funds thus do not
engage in derivatives transactions.
14
The three vendors that provide fund holdings are Morningstar, Thomson Reuterss Lipper, and Bloomberg.
However, there are a large variety of derivatives and no standard reporting scheme exists. Many of the derivatives
are OTC and customized. Even for exchange-traded derivatives, no common identification scheme like CUSIP
exists. This leads to incomplete collection of information on derivatives in fund holdings. Even if derivatives are
collected in fund holdings, basic descriptors such as the notional amount of the derivatives are not readily
available.
15
See Appendix for a listing of the investment practices queried by Form N-SAR. In certain cases, funds omitted
answers if their answers were unchanged from a previous filing. We corrected the missing answers due to this
convention. After the correction, out of 12,360 funds that filed N-SAR, about 2.2% of funds still had missing
answers to these questions. The sample is larger than the Morningstar sample because we sample from all funds
filing Form N-SAR rather than requiring funds to be in the Morningstar database. We note that Form N-SAR is selfreported and not verified by a third party or the SEC.
16
For example, futures and swaps generally have zero market value at initiation.
17
To ensure that all subcategories of the Alt Strategies are represented in our sample, we randomly select funds
within each of the subcategory groups (subject to a minimum of three funds per category).
18
Alt Strategies funds tend to be smaller in size with a median size of $40-$70 million as compared to the median
size of $200-$300 million for equity or taxable bond funds.
19
When plotting the cumulative growth in the number of funds between 2010 and 2014, Figure 1.1 reveals the
large cross-sectional dispersion with positive growth rates in all category groups and Municipal Bond funds
experienced the lowest growth rate and Nontraditional Bond funds the highest.
Comparing net inflows to growth in AUM suggests that US Equity funds experienced growth in AUM
almost entirely driven by portfolio returns. In contrast, the growth in AUM of Alt Strategies funds was
driven by inflows, despite relatively poor returns. Figure 1.3 plots the cumulative net inflows from 2010
to 2014 as a percentage of 2010 AUM. Like the growth rates in AUM, there is significant variation in net
inflows across category groups with most of the dispersion coming from the years 2013 and 2014. While
Nontraditional Bond funds and Alternative funds received the largest net inflows in 2013, US Equity
funds had nearly zero net inflows and Commodity funds saw a net outflow of 10%. The long-term
growth rates for Alt Strategies funds presented in Figures 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 indicate that these funds have
grown rapidly over the past 10 years.
6. Derivatives policies and usage
As discussed above, the Morningstar data do not offer insight into the usage of derivatives. We turn to
the N-SAR Sample, which provides information on fund policies for investments in certain derivatives,
fund usage of those derivatives, and the market value of the derivatives positions during the reporting
period.
6.1. Fund policies allowing the use of derivatives and the actual use of derivatives
Funds are required to indicate on Form N-SAR whether their policies allow for investment in certain
derivatives and whether they used those derivatives during the reporting period. We sought to identify
funds filing Form N-SAR that pursue an Alternative 20 investment policy as defined by Morningstar.
This involved matching our Morningstar sample of Alternative funds to N-SAR data by fund name and
size. We also searched in the fund names for Alternative, Bear market, Long/Short and other
keywords that indicate the fund is an Alternative fund. Accordingly, the number of Alternative and
Traditional funds in Table 3 and 4 will not correspond identically to those identified using the
Morningstar criteria in Tables 1 and 2. Panel A in Table 3 reports descriptive statistics on the fund
responses to questions 70A through 70R on Form N-SAR as of 2014 21 for all funds and separately for
Alternative funds and Traditional funds. The last two columns report the difference between Alternative
fund responses and Traditional fund responses with a t-test for the difference reported in parentheses.
20
Because of the resources required to match N-SAR and Morningstar data, for the purposes of the analysis using
N-SAR data, we focus on Alternative funds rather than the combination of Nontraditional Bond funds, Alternative
funds, and Commodity funds (our definition of Alt Strategies funds). All funds other than Alternative funds are
treated as Traditional funds for this analysis. Note also that the category Traditional funds includes the small
number of Nontraditional Bond funds and Commodity funds and hence is distinct from Traditional Mutual funds
use elsewhere in the paper.
21
We also examined historical responses to question 70 from 1993 to 2014. We find no cyclical patterns or
increased use of derivatives during stressed market periods. We find a steadily increasing trend on the percentage
of funds reporting the use of derivatives over the period. We present only the current snapshot of the N-SAR
response.
The results in Table 3 indicate that on average 74% of funds had investment policies that allow the use
of certain derivatives 22 but that only 5% did so. There is significant variation in the policy provisions
across investment types. For example, investments in other investment company shares were allowed
by 95 of funds. Only 28% of funds had policies which allow margin purchases. The list of instruments
actually being used by funds is dominated by investments in other investment company shares with 67%
of all funds making such investments. Stock index futures and interest rate futures were used by 13%
and 12% of all funds while various option contracts were used by between 5% and 1% of all funds. While
64% of all funds were allowed to engage in short selling, only 5% of all funds actually did so.
Among Alternative funds, an average of 91% of funds had investment policies allowing the use of certain
derivatives. Alternative funds appear to have been less restricted than the Traditional funds in their
ability to use derivatives. Only 73% of Traditional funds policies allowed for the use of certain
derivatives. The largest differences between Alternative funds and Traditional funds, in terms of
investment policies, was short selling (for which allowed use was 94% compared to 63%), options on
index futures (96% compared to 74%), stock index futures (96% compared to 75%), options on equities
(97% compared to 76%), other commodity futures (71% compared to 50%), options on stock indexes
(97% compared to 76%),
With an average actual usage of 14%, Alternative funds are also more likely to use derivatives compared
to Traditional funds, of which 5% actually use derivatives, as reported on Form N-SAR. Alternative funds
were more likely to use short selling and options and futures and Traditional funds were more likely to
invest in securities of foreign issuers, loan portfolio securities, purchases and sales by exempted
affiliates, and invest in restricted securities. In particular, 38% of Alternative funds engaged in short
selling while only 4% of Traditional funds did so. Fifty-eight percent of Traditional funds invested in
securities of foreign issuers while only 40% of Alternative funds did so.
In Panel B of Table 3, we report results on derivatives policies for a subsample of equity funds within six
investment objectives: 23 Total Return, Aggressive Capital Appreciation, Capital Appreciation, Growth,
Growth and Income, and Income. These funds all invest in equities, but they likely differ in their
investment policies and potentially in their use of derivatives depending on their aggressiveness or
investment objectives. Indeed, the results suggest that funds with more aggressive investment
objectives were more likely to have investment policies that allowed the use of (equity) derivatives,
borrowing money, and engaging in short selling. For example, 92% of Aggressive Capital Appreciation
equity funds allowed the use of stock index futures but only 75% of Income equity funds allowed their
use. Ninety-three percent of Aggressive Capital Appreciation funds allowed borrowing compared to 81%
of Income funds. The same pattern emerges with respect to the actual usage of (equity) derivatives,
borrowing money, or engaging in short selling. For example, while 29% of Aggressive Capital
Appreciation equity funds invested in stock index futures, only between 10% and 20% of funds in the
other objectives did so. Finally, we note that income funds were more likely to use interest rate futures
than other equity fund types.
22
Average of percent of funds having: options on equities, options on debt securities, options on stock indexes,
interest rate futures, stock index futures, options on futures, options on index futures and other commodity
futures.
23
See question 66 on Form N-SAR.
Due to textual size limits, funds cannot enter any values greater than 99999999 and will therefore default to
99999999. To correct these errors, the actual values were inputted from the annual reports prior to the N-SAR
submission. Also, extreme outliers were compared to the annual statements to ensure the integrity of the data
and were corrected when values were significantly different.
funds financial statements. Other senior securities, such as bank borrowings, drawn credit lines, senior
debt and preferred shares are set forth in the funds financial statements.
7.1. Collecting and measuring derivatives exposure
Based on these data, we calculate the notional amount of each derivatives position. The choice of using
notional amount to measure derivatives usage reflects some compromise. On one hand, the notional
amount generally reflects an equivalent position in the underlying reference asset for the derivatives
transaction. Further, since the concept of notional amount is applicable across various derivatives
instrument types as well as underlying reference assets, notional amounts allow for aggregation. Markto-market value is an alternative measure of a derivatives position. The mark-to-market value of a
derivative on the funds financial statements generally only reflects the funds gain or loss on the
derivative and may be zero (as will generally be the case at the inception of a transaction). It does not
reflect the market exposure or potential leverage resulting from the derivative. The notional amount
achieves this goal to a greater extent.
On the other hand, there are drawbacks to using notional amounts. First, because of differences in
expected volatilities of the underlying assets, notional amounts of derivatives across different
underlying asset generally do not represent the same unit of risk. For example, the level of risk
associated with a $100 million notional of a S&P500 index futures is not equivalent to the level of risk of
a $100 million notional of interest rate swaps, currency forwards or commodity futures.
Second, data are not available to delta-adjust notional amounts of options. Funds do not report the
delta of their option positions and we are not able to obtain that information from other sources. We do
not delta-adjust due to this limitation in our data. This may lead to the deviation of notional amounts
from economic exposure. Delta-adjusting would tend to reduce the calculated exposure for options.
Collecting the notional amounts of derivatives from fund annual reports posed several challenges. First,
a significant percentage of funds do not clearly report the notional amounts for various derivatives or
provide precise descriptions of notional amounts. For options and futures, for example, we manually
looked up the contract size, historical value of the underlying, or spot price of the underlying asset (as
applicable) as of the report date. Second, there is no standardized reporting of derivatives. For example,
some funds reported numbers without units. In some cases the number of contracts for some options
was reported in the same column as the notional amount for other options. We applied our judgment
based on the magnitude, type of derivative, and consistency with other financial statement information
to assign an appropriate notional amount in such cases. Third, when notional amounts were reported,
there were instances where they were not consistent with other parameters of the derivatives. We
correct such errors wherever possible. Fourth, many derivatives or underlying assets were denominated
in foreign currencies. We converted their notional amounts to dollar amounts at the exchange rate on
the reporting date. Fifth, for some types of derivatives, funds may enter into offsetting transactions in
order to reduce or eliminate their economic exposure. In some cases, both initial and offsetting
transactions continued to be reported on the funds schedule of investments. For example, for some
futures contracts that trade on foreign exchanges, offseting positions remain open and carried forward
until the maturity date, whereas for futures that trade on US exchanges, offsetting positions generally
10
are extinguished. We manually matched offsetting derivatives and netted them out. We only net the
offsetting positions that have the same underlying asset, strike price and maturities, but we do not
require the same counterparty. 25 As a result, our calculations reflect cancelled notional amounts for
certain offsetting derivatives entered into with different counterparties. Sixth, for total return swaps, we
computed the notional amounts as the sum of the notional amounts of securities referenced in the
swaps. Finally, for short term interest rate futures, such as 90-day Euro-dollar futures, we followed the
apparent industry convention to divide the notional amount by the appropriate divisor to adjust any
interest rate future having a term shorter than one year. For example, with respect to 90-day Eurodollar futures, the notional amount is divided by four.
We collect notional amounts separately for long and short positions or record them as NA when a
direction is not applicable, categorize the derivatives positions by instrument, underlying risk factor, and
whether the derivative is exchange-traded, centrally cleared, or neither. 26 We aggregate notional
amounts for each fund by derivative instrument and primary underlying risk factor. The instrument
categories are forwards, futures, swaps, options, and swaptions, and the underlying risk factors are
interest rate risk, credit risk, equity market risk, currency risk, and commodity risk.
7.2. Descriptive statistics
The N-CSR random sample of 1,188 funds contains 81 Alt Strategies Mutual Funds 27, 899 Traditional
mutual funds, 58 Closed-end funds, 22 Alt Strategies ETFs, 118 Traditional ETFs and 10 BDCs. In Table 5
we report summary statistics on notional amounts of the derivatives as well as information on financial
commitment transactions and other senior securities. The first column shows the percentage of funds
that use a certain type of derivative. The most commonly used derivatives are currency forwards, equity
futures, and interest rate futures, with 13%, 12% and 11% of all funds using them, respectively. Five
percent of all funds write equity options or use equity swaps, and 4% of all funds use cleared or
exchange-traded interest rate swaps, OTC interest rate swaps, and OTC CDS. Cleared CDS are used by
3% of funds, 5% of all funds engage in short selling and 4% use bank borrowings. 28 All other types of
derivatives and financial commitment transactions are typically used by less than 2% of the funds.
Table 5 also shows that the average gross notional amount of interest rate futures as a percentage of
NAV is 4% across all funds and 38% among funds that use interest rate futures. The average notional
amounts relative to fund NAV for currency forwards, equity futures, cleared/exchange-traded interest
25
This provides a representation of the funds economic exposure in cases where a fund chooses to use an
offsetting transaction with a second counterparty rather than terminate its initial position, which could be less
efficient due to tax or other considerations. Counterparty risk could be different depending on the relative
riskiness of the two counterparties.
26
Many OTC derivatives are not cleared. For a comparison among OTC, cleared and exchange-traded derivatives,
see International Swaps and Derivatives Association FAQ at: http://www.isda.org/educat/faqs.html.
27
We further divided the Alt Strategies Mutual Funds into the two categories, Index Alt Strategies Mutual Funds
and Non-index Alt Strategies Mutual Funds. The sample contains 12 Index Alt Strategies Mutual Funds and 69 Nonindex Alt Strategies Mutual Funds. We define index Alt Strategies Mutual Funds later in this section.
28
Under section 18(g) of the Investment Company Act, certain loans for temporary purposes that do not exceed
5% of a funds total assets are excluded from the definition of senior security. It is possible that some funds in
the sample that had bank borrowings were relying on this provision.
11
rates swaps, and written equity options are between 1% and 3% for all funds, and between 16% and
33% conditional on holding any derivative. Obligations related to short sales are only between 1% and
2% of NAV for all funds and between 8% and 20% for funds that engage in these transactions. What
stands out is that, while the average notional amount of equity swaps is only 3% of NAV of all funds, the
average notional amount is 70% of NAV for those funds that do engage in equity swaps.
7.3. Notional amounts across different risk exposures and instruments
In Table 6 we summarize the notional amounts aggregated by reference asset and instrument type.
Panel A shows the statistics on the entire random sample. Overall, 32% of funds hold derivatives with an
average gross notional amount 20% of the NAV. Equity derivatives, the most commonly used
derivatives, are held by 18% of funds, currency derivatives by 14%, and cleared/exchange-traded
interest rate derivatives by 12%. Interest rate derivatives, equity derivatives, and currency derivatives
represent 8%, 7% and 4% of NAV, respectively. Classified by instrument type, 21% of funds use futures,
13% use currency forwards, 12% use swaps, 7% have written options. Average notional amounts as a
percentage of NAV for futures, swaps, and currency forwards are 7%, 7%, and 3%, respectively. Ten
percent of funds use some financial commitment transactions with an average of 2% of NAV. Only 5% of
funds issue other senior securities with an average amount of 2% of NAV.
Since derivatives, financial commitment transactions, and other senior securities all allow funds to
obtain additional market exposure and potentially create leverage, we calculate an aggregate exposure
for each fund. Specifically, we calculate aggregate exposure by adding (i) the gross notional amounts of
the derivatives; (ii) the aggregate obligations of the fund under financial commitment transactions; and
(iii) the aggregate indebtedness (and with respect to any closed-end fund or business development
company, involuntary liquidation preference) with respect to any other senior securities, including bank
borrowings, margin loans, senior debt issuances and preferred shares. While the leveraging effect of
derivatives transactions depends on a variety of factors, the aggregate exposure can be regarded as a
rough measure of the total potential leverage that a fund may obtain from different types of derivatives
and other senior securities transactions. For the entire random sample, the average aggregate exposure
is 23% of NAV.
In Panel B, we examine the mutual funds in the Alt Strategies fund group that are not index funds. These
non-index Alt Strategies mutual funds are more likely to use all types of derivatives and financial
commitment transactions, but are not more likely to issue other senior securities. For example, 71% of
the non-index Alt Strategies mutual funds use some type of derivative as compared to only 29% of
Traditional mutual funds. Furthermore, among non-index Alt Strategies mutual funds, 51% use equity
derivatives and 42% use currency derivatives whereas 15% and 14% of Traditional mutual funds use
these derivatives.
Alt Strategies funds also hold derivatives with significantly larger notional amounts compared to
Traditional mutual funds. For example, their interest rate derivatives represent 44% of NAV, currency
derivatives 34%, equity derivatives 32%, and commodity derivatives 12%. Aggregated by instruments,
futures represent 60% of NAV, swaps 30%, currency forwards 22% and written options 15%. On average,
12
their aggregate derivatives notional amount is 127% of NAV, their financial commitment transactions
12%, and other senior securities 0%.
Figure 3.1 shows individual fund usage of derivatives and financial commitment transactions for those
funds with the greatest use of derivatives relative to NAV, ranked by the aggregate exposures. 29
Managed futures funds tend to have the highest aggregate exposures, ranging between approximately
500% and 950% of NAV. Among funds with the greatest exposure relative to NAV, interest rate and
currency derivatives contribute significantly to the aggregate exposure. Many of the funds with the
greatest exposure also use equity derivatives. Financial commitment transactions appear to be a main
contributor to the aggregate exposures of Long/Short Equity funds. In Figure 4.1, when we aggregate
derivatives by instruments, we find futures being the main type of derivatives used by high exposure
funds, followed by swaps and currency forwards.
In panel C, we present information on index Alt Strategies mutual funds. Since a common goal of these
funds is to replicate a given index, a multiple of that index, or the inverse performance of the index,
funds commonly use simple futures or swaps to achieve index exposures and their aggregate exposure
to derivatives often matches their stated goals. Among these funds, 83% use some type of derivatives,
with 58%, 58%, and 42% using equity derivatives, swaps, and futures, respectively. Their average
aggregate notional amount of derivatives is 88% of NAV, with equity derivatives being 81% and swaps
77%. Figure 3.2 shows that equity derivatives are the dominant type used. Funds that claim to track a
multiple of an index use derivatives to achieve the exact exposures. Figure 4.2 shows that swaps are the
main instruments used by index Alt Strategies Funds.
Panel E of Table 6 reports results for the Traditional mutual funds in our sample. Traditional mutual
funds use significantly less derivatives than Alt Strategies funds. Approximately 29% of Traditional
mutual funds have used some type of derivative with an average notional amount of 10% of NAV. Figure
3.3 lists Traditional mutual funds that have aggregate exposures of more than 50% of NAV. Most of their
exposures come from interest rate derivatives, and Figure 4.3 shows that futures and swaps are the
major instruments that these high-exposure Traditional funds tend to use.
For closed-end funds in the sample, Panel G shows that derivatives usage is more common than it is for
mutual funds, but still significantly less than for the Alt Strategies funds. Among closed-end funds, 47%
use some type of derivative, 35% use financial commitment transactions, and 66% enter into other
senior securities. The gross notional amount of derivatives represents 14% of NAV on average. Financial
commitment transactions represent 4% of NAV on average and other senior securities represent 25% of
NAV on average. In Figure 3.4, other senior securities are the major contributor to the aggregate
exposure of closed-end funds. The highest aggregate exposure is around 125% of NAV.
For Alt Strategies ETFs in the sample, Panel H shows that derivatives usage is more common than it is for
Traditional ETFs. Among Alt Strategies ETFs, 95% use some type of derivative, 5% use financial
commitment transactions, and 0% enter into other senior securities. The gross notional amount of
derivatives represents 153% of NAV on average. Financial commitment transactions represent 4% of
NAV on average and other senior securities represent 0% of NAV on average.
29
13
For Traditional ETFs in the sample, 16% use some type of derivative, 1% use financial commitment
transactions, and 0% enter into other senior securities. The gross notional amount of derivatives
represents 7% of NAV on average; financial commitment transactions and other senior securities each
represent 0% of NAV on average.
None of the business development companies in the sample uses derivatives, but 80% use financial
commitment transactions, and 80% enter into other senior securities. The gross notional amount of
derivatives represents 0% of NAV on average. Financial commitment transactions represent 16% of NAV
on average and other senior securities represent 42% of NAV on average.
7.4. Gross notional amounts by fund category groups
In this subsection we examine how gross notional amounts differ across fund category groups. We use
Morningstar broader US category groups for Traditional funds and the detailed Morningstar categories
for Alt Strategies Funds.
Figures 5.1 and 6.1 show results for the entire sample. Overall, Alternative funds have the highest
average aggregate exposure with 142% of NAV. They use interest rate, equity, and currency derivatives,
mostly in the form of futures or swaps. Commodity funds have the second highest aggregate exposure
at 91%, with a majority of exposure coming from commodity futures. All other funds have aggregate
exposure below 50%.
Figures 5.2 and 6.2 present aggregate exposures for non-index Alt Strategies funds. With 450%,
Managed futures funds have the highest average aggregate exposure. Interest rate derivatives
represent more than half of their exposure, followed by equity and currency derivatives. These funds
achieve most of their exposures through futures. The remaining categories have average aggregate
exposures between 100% and 200% with the exception of Market neutral and Long/short equity, which
have average aggregate exposures of about 50% Furthermore, Market Neutral and Long/short equity all
have significant amounts of financial commitment transactions, most commonly in short sales,
contributing to their aggregate exposure.
Figures 5.3 and 6.3 show results for index Alt Strategies funds. The average aggregate exposure for
Trading-Inverse Equity is 200%, for Bear market 125%, and for Trading-leveraged Equity 123%, with
aggregate exposure mostly coming from equity swaps. Figures 5.4 and 6.4 present the information for
Traditional mutual funds. For all funds in this category, their average aggregate exposure is below 50%.
Figures 5.5 and 6.5 provide the results for closed-end funds. Municipal Bond, Taxable Bond, Allocation,
and Sector Equity funds all use significant amounts of other senior securities, and Taxable Bond funds
and Allocation funds also use financial commitment transactions. All funds, except international equity,
have between 40% to 50% exposures to financial commitment transactions and other senior securities.
Closed-end equity funds also hold notable amounts of written options.
For Alt Strategies ETFs, funds that are used as trading tools have the largest aggregate exposure. Inverse
debt ETFs have 290% aggregate exposure, leverage debt ETFs have 210%, inverse equity ETFs have 200%
and leverage equity ETFs have 190%. Most of these exposures are created through swaps. Commodities,
Single currency and Market Neutral ETFs have aggregate exposures around 100%.
14
For Traditional ETFs, the aggregate exposures are zero or close to zero. The exception is International
ETFs, which have an average aggregate exposure of 22%, which is mostly coming from currency
forwards.
7.5. Gross notional amounts by fund size
Figures 7 and 8 provide evidence on derivatives usage as a function of fund size. We group funds into
quintiles based on fund size and compute the average aggregate exposures. 30
Figures 7.2 and 8.2 show that non-index Alt Strategies funds in the smallest size quintile use less
derivatives with aggregate exposure about half that of other size quintiles. Small funds also do not seem
to use written options. Similarly, for Traditional mutual funds in Figures 7.4 and 8.4 small funds exhibit
only about half the average aggregate exposure of large funds. The funds in the smallest quintile do not
have financial commitment transactions. For the closed-end funds presented in Figures 7.5 and 8.5,
small funds use less equity derivatives and financial commitment transactions.
7.6. Distribution of number of funds and AUM across exposures
In this subsection we examine the distribution of aggregate exposures across fund types. Figures 9 and
10 present aggregate exposures grouped by exposure bins with the vertical bars showing the percentage
of funds in number and in AUM 31 that fall into a given bin. Across the entire random sample, 62% (48%
in AUM) of funds have zero aggregate exposure, 96% (95% in AUM) have aggregate exposures below
150%, and only 3% (3% in AUM) of the funds have aggregate exposures greater than 300%.
Few of the Alt Strategies funds and Alt Strategies ETFs have zero aggregate exposure. The majority of
exposure among Alt Strategies funds is below 150%, but 27% and 11% of the funds have exposures
larger than 150% and 300%, respectively. Among Alt Strategies ETFs, 45% of funds have exposures larger
than 150% but no fund has exposure above 300%.
This contrasts with aggregate exposures of the Traditional mutual funds and Traditional ETFs where 69%
and 84% respectively have zero exposure and 99% in both categories have exposures below 150%. No
Traditional mutual fund and only 1% of Traditional ETFs have aggregate exposure above 300%.
For the closed-end funds, 14% (5% in AUM) have zero aggregate exposure and none has exposure above
150%. For the business development companies, 20% (8% in AUM) have zero aggregate exposure and
for all, the aggregate exposure is below 150%.
30
Quantile 0 consists of funds with the smallest size and quantile 4 consists of funds with the largest size.
Figure 10 gives us the distribution of exposures across AUMs. We sum the AUMs of funds whose exposure falls
within certain ranges. This gives us an estimate of the total dollar amount of exposures instead of the number of
funds. It can also be seen as size weighted distribution, while in figure 9 small and large funds receive equal
weights.
31
15
70B:
70C:
70D:
70E:
70F:
16
70G:
70H:
70I:
70J:
70K:
70L:
70M:
70N:
70O:
Borrowing of money.
70P:
70Q:
Margin purchases.
70R:
Short selling.
Sector Equity:
International Equity: A group of similar funds that invests in non-US equities based on market
capitalization and growth or specific geographic area or country.
Allocation:
A group of similar funds that invest to maintain a target mix of assets over time.
The target mix may remained fixed, or vary over time.
Taxable Bond:
A group of similar funds that invest in debt securities whose returns are taxable
at the local, state, or federal level. 32
32
Nontraditional Bond category contains funds that pursue strategies divergent in one or more ways from
17
Municipal Bond:
A group of similar funds that all invest in municipal bond securities. These funds
may invest nationally, or they may invest primarily in one single state.
Alternative:
A group of funds that invest into one or more of the following three investment
types: 1) Nontraditional asset classes, 2) Nontraditional strategies, and 3) less
liquid assets.
Commodities:
Money Market:
A group of funds that invest in short-term securities that mature in less than one
year, and are low risk enough to be considered cash equivalents.
10. References
Adam, Tim, and Andre Guettler, 2015, Pitfalls and perils of financial innovation: The use of CDS by
corporate bond funds, Journal of Banking & Finance 55, 204214.
Cao, Charles, Eric Ghysels, and Frank Hatheway, 2011, Derivatives do affect mutual fund returns:
Evidence from the financial crisis of 1998, Journal of Futures Markets 31, 629658.
Cici, Gjergji, and Luis-Felipe Palacios, 2015, On the use of options by mutual funds: Do they know what
they are doing?, Journal of Banking & Finance 50, 157168.
Deli, Daniel N., and Raj Varma, 2002, Contracting in the investment management industry: evidence
from mutual funds, Journal of Financial Economics 63, 7998.
Frino, Alex, Andrew Lepone, and Brad Wong, 2009, Derivative use, fund flows and investment manager
performance, Journal of Banking & Finance 33, 925933.
conventional practice in the broader bond-fund universe. Many funds in this group describe themselves as
"absolute return" portfolios, which seek to avoid losses and produce returns uncorrelated with the overall bond
market; they employ a variety of methods to achieve those aims. Another large subset are self-described
"unconstrained" portfolios that have more flexibility to invest tactically across a wide swath of individual sectors,
including high-yield and foreign debt, and typically with very large allocations. Funds in the latter group typically
have broad freedom to manage interest-rate sensitivity, but attempt to tactically manage those exposures in order
to minimize volatility. The category is also home to a subset of portfolios that attempt to minimize volatility by
maintaining short or ultra-short duration portfolios, but explicitly court significant credit and foreign bond market
risk in order to generate high returns. Funds within this category often will use credit default swaps and other fixed
income derivatives to a significant level within their portfolios.
18
Galkiewicz, Dominika Paula, 2014, Similarities and differences between US and German regulation of the
use of derivatives and leverage by mutual funds: What can regulators learn from each other?, SFB 649
Discussion Paper.
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, ISDA Product Descriptions and FAQs, .
Jiang, Wei, and Zhongyan Zhu, 2015, Mutual Fund Holdings of Credit Default Swaps: Liquidity
Management and Risk Taking. SSRN Scholarly Paper, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
Koski, Jennifer Lynch, and Jeffrey Pontiff, 1999, How Are Derivatives Used? Evidence from the Mutual
Fund Industry, The Journal of Finance 54, 791816.
19
20
AUM
% of
Net
Industry
Flows
AUM
8,577 10,908,529
100% 553,012
2,756 4,053,996 37.16% -43,758
696
431,701 3.96% 27,189
1,199 1,739,078 15.94% 94,730
1,235 1,657,860 15.20% 141,288
721
513,992 4.71% 12,591
1,418 2,249,571 20.62% 269,983
39
58,074 0.53% 30,834
455
113,952 1.04% 25,905
97
148,379 1.36% 25,084
494
172,026 1.58% 56,739
591
320,405 2.94% 81,823
2014
Number
of fund
AUM
11,573 17,341,434
3,291 6,806,198
883
833,265
1,764 2,453,046
1,857 2,978,522
780
645,674
2,011 3,316,353
138
160,973
831
218,147
156
90,229
969
379,120
1,125
469,349
2010-2014
% of
Industry
AUM
100%
39.25%
4.81%
14.15%
17.18%
3.72%
19.12%
0.93%
1.26%
0.52%
2.19%
2.71%
Net
Flows
575,125
73,188
76,446
155,867
109,538
32,198
108,111
24,005
22,991
-3,214
46,996
43,782
Annual Change
Annual
Growth
AUM
in % of Annual
net
in
Growth Industry net flow flow as
number
Rate
AUM
% AUM
2,996 12.29%
535 13.83%
187 17.87%
565
8.98%
622 15.77%
59
5.87%
593 10.19%
99 29.03%
376 17.63%
59 -11.69%
475 21.84%
534 10.01%
0%
2.08%
0.85%
-1.80%
1.98%
-0.99%
-1.50%
0.40%
0.21%
-0.84%
0.61%
-0.23%
513,043
8,789
51,870
109,428
138,841
5,995
171,513
24,527
30,359
-3,750
54,886
51,136
4.05%
-0.03%
9.59%
5.68%
6.97%
1.41%
6.72%
29.18%
21.49%
-2.04%
27.80%
13.57%
Annual
net flow
as % of
Industry
100%
1.71%
10.11%
21.33%
27.06%
1.17%
33.43%
4.78%
5.92%
-0.73%
10.70%
9.97%
21
22
23
Cash
Repurchase Agreements
Other Short Term Debt
Long Term Debt
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Options On Equities
Options On All Futures
Other Investments
Portfolio Instruments
Receivable from Affiliate
Other Receivables
All Other Assets
Total Assets
Payables for Portfolio Purchases
Amounts Owed Affiliate
Senior Long Term Debt
Other liabilities
Reverse Repurchase Agreement
Short Sales
Written Options
All Other Liabilities
Senior Equity
Net Assets Shareholders
Value Segregated Accounts
Question
74A
74B
74C
74D
74E
74F
74G
74H
74I
74J
74K
74L
74M
74N
74O
74P
74Q
74R
74R1
74R2
74R3
74R4
74S
74T
74Y
Non-zero
54.2%
17.5%
30.7%
30.3%
16.2%
56.7%
3.1%
1.3%
63.8%
52.9%
22.8%
91.0%
65.7%
95.6%
57.2%
87.6%
1.1%
92.8%
1.3%
3.5%
6.1%
92.7%
1.2%
95.5%
25.4%
All
Cond.
Uncond.
Average % average as
NAV
% NAV
2.2%
1.26%
8.5%
1.57%
17.9%
5.87%
68.8%
22.29%
3.9%
0.69%
80.5%
48.23%
1.1%
0.04%
0.5%
0.01%
27.4%
18.51%
1.8%
0.98%
0.3%
0.08%
0.9%
0.85%
0.9%
0.62%
100.0%
100.0%
2.3%
1.39%
0.1%
0.12%
21.5%
0.25%
3.4%
3.31%
11.5%
0.16%
13.6%
0.51%
0.6%
0.04%
2.7%
2.61%
21.9%
0.29%
94.7%
94.68%
22.3%
6.01%
Non-zero
60.7%
28.7%
29.7%
18.3%
9.6%
49.8%
16.2%
2.6%
57.3%
38.3%
21.8%
80.8%
76.3%
90.1%
40.6%
78.9%
0.0%
89.0%
0.6%
28.2%
20.0%
88.3%
0.2%
90.1%
60.7%
Alternative
Cond.
Uncond.
Average % average as
NAV
% NAV
15.7%
11.63%
28.6%
6.49%
31.4%
9.59%
25.5%
6.10%
1.6%
0.21%
52.8%
30.57%
1.7%
0.37%
1.2%
0.04%
33.6%
24.24%
3.6%
1.69%
0.6%
0.14%
4.3%
3.89%
7.7%
6.34%
100.0%
100.00%
4.0%
1.92%
0.1%
0.11%
0.0%
0.00%
13.2%
13.08%
2.9%
0.03%
22.4%
8.24%
1.2%
0.33%
4.6%
4.55%
18.8%
0.04%
85.0%
84.98%
29.6%
19.04%
Non-zero
53.8%
16.9%
30.8%
30.9%
16.6%
57.1%
2.4%
1.2%
64.1%
53.7%
22.9%
91.5%
65.2%
95.8%
58.0%
88.0%
1.1%
93.0%
1.3%
2.2%
5.3%
92.9%
1.2%
95.8%
23.5%
Traditional
Alternative - Traditional
Cond.
Uncond.
Average % average as Cond. Average % Uncond. average
as % NAV
NAV
NAV
% NAV
1.5%
0.82%
14.25% (34.33)
10.82% (38.9)
7.5%
1.36%
21.08% (13.77)
5.12% (14.29)
17.3%
5.72%
14.05% (5.39)
3.87% (4.2)
70.1%
22.96% -44.66% (-13.65) -16.86% (-9.38)
4.0%
0.71%
-2.40% (-1.53)
-0.50% (-2.01)
81.6%
48.98% -28.86% (-16.44) -18.42% (-8.62)
0.9%
0.02%
0.81% (0.99)
0.35% (5.61)
0.4%
0.01%
0.81% (1.55)
0.04% (3.24)
27.1%
18.26%
6.51% (2.99)
5.97% (3.66)
1.7%
0.95%
1.94% (5.56)
0.74% (4.03)
0.3%
0.08%
0.27% (0.82)
0.06% (0.78)
0.8%
0.72%
3.56% (20.02)
3.17% (19.13)
0.5%
0.37%
7.12% (29.96)
5.96% (32.93)
100.0%
100.0%
0.01% (0.36)
0.01% (0.36)
2.3%
1.37%
1.70% (4.7)
0.55% (2.69)
0.1%
0.12%
0.00% (-0.03)
0.00% (-0.04)
21.5%
0.26%
0.0%
-0.26% (-2.14)
3.0%
2.90%
10.21% (28.57) 10.18% (28.91)
11.8%
0.17%
-8.81% (-1.35)
-0.14% (-1.43)
7.7%
0.18%
14.72% (13.3)
8.06% (51.77)
0.5%
0.03%
0.79% (3.86)
0.31% (11.62)
2.6%
2.53%
2.04% (6.77)
2.02% (6.85)
22.0%
0.30%
-3.13%
-0.26%
95.2%
95.09% -10.18% (-23.15) -10.12% (-22.31)
21.5%
5.45%
8.05% (0.88)
13.59% (3.68)
24
Cash
Repurchase Agreements
Other Short Term Debt
Long Term Debt
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Options On Equities
Options On All Futures
Other Investments
Portfolio Instruments
Receivalbe from Affiliate
Other Receivables
All Other Assets
Total Assets
Payables for Portfolio Purchases
Amounts Owed Affiliate
Senior Long Term Debt
Other liabilities
Reverse Repurchase Agreement
Short Sales
Written Options
All Other Liabilities
Senior Equity
Net Assets Shareholders
Value Segregated Accounts
QuestionNon-zero
74A
50.0%
74B
36.4%
74C
13.6%
74D
1.9%
74E
11.2%
74F
69.4%
74G
1.0%
74H
0.5%
74I
46.1%
74J
41.7%
74K
5.8%
74L
80.1%
74M
50.0%
74N
81.6%
74O
41.3%
74P
78.2%
74Q
0.0%
74R
77.2%
74R1
0.0%
74R2
1.5%
74R3
1.0%
74R4
81.1%
74S
0.0%
74T
81.6%
74Y
39.8%
Cond.
Average
% NAV
5.2%
31.0%
12.5%
7.9%
2.4%
78.7%
0.4%
0.4%
16.2%
2.1%
0.1%
2.8%
0.6%
100.0%
2.0%
0.1%
0.0%
4.0%
0.0%
9.1%
0.3%
3.9%
0.0%
94.8%
11.9%
Capital appreciation
Growth
Cond.
Average
% NAV
2.3%
4.5%
5.6%
13.0%
2.4%
89.4%
2.3%
1.4%
20.0%
1.8%
0.4%
0.6%
0.9%
100.0%
1.4%
0.1%
15.3%
3.6%
2.3%
19.3%
1.2%
2.6%
11.2%
95.6%
14.9%
Cond.
Average
% NAV
1.0%
3.2%
4.4%
12.6%
1.8%
92.3%
0.5%
0.2%
19.6%
0.9%
0.4%
0.5%
0.5%
100.0%
0.9%
0.1%
2.1%
2.4%
0.0%
19.3%
0.3%
2.0%
15.8%
97.0%
23.3%
Uncond.
Nonaverage
as % NAV zero
3.17%
49.2%
14.25%
17.0%
2.11%
20.8%
0.19%
6.6%
0.34%
16.6%
67.02%
84.9%
0.00%
3.6%
0.00%
0.3%
9.14%
70.8%
1.07%
57.4%
0.00%
22.9%
2.79%
92.0%
0.38%
69.2%
100.00%
96.7%
1.00%
58.0%
0.09%
88.7%
0.00%
0.0%
3.94%
91.4%
0.00%
0.1%
0.17%
4.7%
0.00%
3.9%
3.91%
94.6%
0.00%
0.1%
94.83%
96.6%
5.81%
16.1%
Uncond.
average Nonas % NAV zero
1.19%
50.4%
0.82%
17.3%
1.25%
29.2%
0.90%
7.5%
0.42%
18.9%
78.88%
87.0%
0.09%
2.2%
0.00%
0.3%
14.72%
64.3%
1.05%
61.6%
0.11%
23.2%
0.57%
95.3%
0.65%
70.0%
100.00%
97.9%
0.87%
65.8%
0.13%
94.1%
0.00%
0.2%
3.52%
92.6%
0.00%
0.0%
0.97%
2.2%
0.05%
4.0%
2.50%
95.3%
0.01%
0.2%
95.50%
97.8%
2.54%
19.6%
Cond.
Average
% NAV
0.8%
2.3%
4.3%
22.6%
8.2%
86.3%
0.2%
0.0%
33.1%
0.8%
0.4%
0.4%
0.2%
100.0%
1.0%
0.2%
20.2%
1.9%
25.7%
9.8%
0.9%
1.7%
8.2%
97.0%
17.9%
Uncond.
average
Nonas %
zero
NAV
0.40%
53.7%
0.28%
11.1%
1.35%
23.5%
4.12%
35.8%
1.45%
32.6%
69.74%
55.4%
0.00%
5.2%
0.00%
0.0%
22.19%
72.3%
0.46%
53.1%
0.11%
25.4%
0.41%
85.3%
0.15%
63.2%
100.0%
97.4%
0.62%
51.8%
0.16%
86.0%
0.20%
5.2%
1.89%
87.9%
0.06%
0.7%
0.08%
2.6%
0.07%
11.7%
1.66%
89.6%
0.06%
1.3%
97.01%
97.4%
4.22%
23.1%
Income
Cond.
Average
% NAV
1.4%
2.3%
18.9%
32.2%
19.1%
63.7%
0.3%
0.0%
51.0%
1.2%
0.2%
1.2%
0.5%
100.0%
2.1%
0.1%
25.4%
3.4%
16.3%
10.9%
0.8%
3.0%
11.2%
94.1%
29.3%
Total Return
Uncond.
average Nonas % NAV zero
0.80%
52.6%
0.26%
9.9%
4.67%
26.5%
11.98%
20.9%
6.48%
15.9%
36.35%
56.2%
0.02%
5.9%
0.00%
1.8%
37.99%
80.6%
0.64%
48.9%
0.05%
23.8%
1.01%
88.8%
0.33%
56.4%
100.00%
96.0%
1.10%
56.6%
0.06%
83.5%
1.39%
1.3%
3.19%
89.0%
0.11%
0.7%
0.29%
5.4%
0.10%
8.6%
2.74%
91.1%
0.15%
0.8%
94.10%
96.0%
7.07%
27.1%
Cond.
Average
% NAV
4.7%
3.4%
10.1%
27.1%
4.8%
76.5%
0.7%
0.7%
47.2%
1.7%
0.2%
1.2%
1.8%
100.0%
2.1%
0.1%
19.8%
4.3%
9.7%
12.0%
0.7%
3.4%
13.8%
94.2%
25.4%
Uncond.
average
as % NAV
2.59%
0.36%
2.86%
6.03%
0.82%
45.11%
0.04%
0.01%
39.94%
0.86%
0.04%
1.13%
1.09%
100.00%
1.24%
0.09%
0.28%
4.07%
0.07%
0.69%
0.06%
3.26%
0.11%
94.24%
7.32%
25
27
% non-zero
100%
42.03%
30.43%
26.09%
14.49%
20.29%
10.14%
17.39%
50.72%
14.49%
52.17%
39.13%
34.78%
30.43%
31.88%
13.04%
71.01%
40.58%
0.00%
88.41%
88.41%
Unconditional
mean
std
726
3,004
33.60
75.14
44.12 109.54
38.88 106.73
5.24
18.24
5.68
18.07
1.91
11.38
3.77
14.26
32.19
53.36
11.71
34.29
60.32 137.44
29.89
58.64
21.87
61.16
15.22
46.37
14.92
42.57
1.90
6.26
127.30 193.34
11.86
21.28
0.00
0.00
139.16 188.55
139.16 188.55
mean
726
79.94
144.98
149.06
36.15
27.98
18.79
21.68
63.47
80.81
115.61
76.39
62.89
50.01
46.80
14.56
179.26
29.23
std
3,004
99.36
159.50
167.87
35.68
32.19
33.14
28.86
60.43
51.77
173.57
72.83
91.47
74.05
65.61
11.21
208.44
24.78
157.41
157.41
193.31
193.31
Conditional
min
q1 median
0
28
91
0.10
10.03
43.88
0.61
34.10
87.44
0.61
13.25 101.87
0.68
8.92
23.34
1.89
5.07
13.97
0.51
4.76
8.42
1.62
3.34
7.84
0.91
19.17
39.65
14.58
54.47
77.61
2.81
23.98
54.04
1.97
17.84
75.73
1.10
9.24
24.72
0.18
9.24
29.84
0.43
8.11
26.45
1.61
3.59
19.24
0.91
42.72
98.91
0.73
4.39
25.22
0.91
0.91
44.08
44.08
86.57
86.57
q3
374
93.01
188.63
188.63
56.18
31.07
9.29
28.53
95.49
105.91
112.17
104.33
77.13
54.96
60.85
20.95
269.41
43.97
max
24,371
356.36
528.85
528.85
97.78
93.63
93.63
85.19
265.37
186.70
859.31
280.93
356.36
320.46
303.54
29.89
961.98
95.34
186.70
186.70
961.98
961.98
28
% non-zero
100%
8.33%
8.33%
8.33%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
58.33%
8.33%
41.67%
58.33%
8.33%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
83.33%
8.33%
8.33%
83.33%
83.33%
Unconditional
mean
std
26
22
2.81
9.73
2.65
9.19
2.65
9.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
81.35
84.62
1.23
4.27
8.64
11.40
76.59
81.17
2.81
9.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
88.04
78.35
4.76
16.48
0.00
0.00
92.80
76.34
92.80
76.34
mean
26
33.70
31.84
31.84
std
22
139.46
14.80
20.74
131.30
33.70
60.62
105.65
57.08
0.00
111.36
111.36
73.73
6.61
60.82
69.47
69.47
Conditional
min
q1 median
0
6
26
33.70
33.70
33.70
31.84
31.84
31.84
31.84
31.84
31.84
q3
39
33.70
31.84
31.84
max
64
33.70
31.84
31.84
70.34
14.80
14.80
70.34
33.70
70.63
14.80
17.43
70.63
33.70
136.06
14.80
18.44
114.85
33.70
199.83
14.80
21.20
199.83
33.70
200.16
14.80
31.84
200.16
33.70
14.80
57.08
0.00
14.80
14.80
33.70
57.08
0.00
70.34
70.34
85.14
57.08
0.00
94.28
94.28
199.52
57.08
0.00
199.52
199.52
200.16
57.08
0.00
200.16
200.16
29
% non-zero
100%
37.04%
27.16%
23.46%
12.35%
17.28%
8.64%
14.81%
51.85%
13.58%
50.62%
41.98%
30.86%
25.93%
27.16%
11.11%
72.84%
35.80%
1.23%
87.65%
87.65%
Unconditional
mean
std
623
2,781
29.04
70.23
37.98 102.13
33.52
99.31
4.46
16.92
4.84
16.78
1.62
10.52
3.21
13.21
39.48
60.94
10.16
31.87
52.66 128.13
36.81
64.09
19.05
56.91
12.96
43.09
12.71
39.61
1.62
5.81
121.49 181.15
10.81
20.70
0.00
0.00
132.29 176.90
132.29 176.90
mean
623
78.40
139.83
142.89
36.15
27.98
18.79
21.68
76.13
74.81
104.04
87.70
61.72
50.01
46.80
14.56
166.79
30.19
0.00
150.93
150.93
std
2,781
98.00
157.52
165.34
35.68
32.19
33.14
28.86
66.24
52.99
165.39
73.21
89.73
74.05
65.61
11.21
193.84
24.88
181.42
181.42
Conditional
min
q1 median
0
25
61
0.10
10.03
43.18
0.61
31.84
87.32
0.61
13.25
87.21
0.68
8.92
23.34
1.89
5.07
13.97
0.51
4.76
8.42
1.62
3.34
7.84
0.91
23.98
59.71
14.58
14.92
60.06
2.81
22.43
39.59
1.97
29.98
81.40
1.10
10.45
26.97
0.18
9.24
29.84
0.43
8.11
26.45
1.61
3.59
19.24
0.91
40.76
98.91
0.73
4.45
25.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.91
44.08
88.92
0.91
44.08
88.92
q3
275
93.01
188.63
188.63
56.18
31.07
9.29
28.53
99.65
105.91
104.74
116.54
74.05
54.96
60.85
20.95
227.94
44.08
0.00
199.52
199.52
max
24,371
356.36
528.85
528.85
97.78
93.63
93.63
85.19
265.37
186.70
859.31
280.93
356.36
320.46
303.54
29.89
961.98
95.34
0.00
961.98
961.98
30
% non-zero
100%
12.57%
13.68%
12.57%
4.78%
5.23%
3.23%
3.78%
14.57%
0.56%
19.58%
9.34%
11.90%
5.67%
4.23%
1.78%
28.59%
6.56%
2.00%
30.48%
31.37%
Unconditional
mean
std
1,537
5,361
2.09
10.90
5.34
24.26
4.32
19.97
1.01
8.17
0.70
5.65
0.41
4.33
0.30
3.34
1.98
12.30
0.05
1.05
4.39
20.19
3.08
17.51
1.74
8.42
0.96
7.33
1.05
7.82
0.30
4.13
10.15
35.87
0.53
4.37
0.00
0.01
10.68
36.53
10.68
36.53
mean
1,537
16.60
39.00
34.38
21.22
13.47
12.58
7.89
13.56
9.56
22.40
32.94
14.59
16.86
24.78
16.97
35.52
8.05
0.06
35.05
34.06
std
5,361
26.64
54.85
46.42
31.44
21.15
21.04
15.54
29.77
11.65
41.05
48.17
20.27
26.28
29.66
26.83
60.07
15.31
0.08
59.43
58.87
Conditional
min
q1 median
0
67
271
0.00
1.51
7.82
0.05
4.98
18.68
0.05
4.69
17.02
0.08
2.76
9.13
0.02
0.62
4.73
0.06
0.74
2.81
0.02
0.39
2.44
0.00
0.88
3.02
0.23
1.37
2.15
0.05
2.19
6.75
0.00
2.11
13.93
0.00
1.51
7.31
0.00
2.15
7.42
0.05
5.19
12.05
0.02
1.15
3.89
0.00
2.59
10.21
0.00
0.48
1.80
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.00
1.99
10.18
0.00
1.69
8.99
q3
1,205
21.41
56.29
51.76
32.13
20.64
13.56
8.61
11.97
18.62
28.14
43.24
20.28
19.23
32.42
17.78
39.01
9.49
0.10
38.43
36.14
max
96,793
200.18
330.19
288.42
147.27
83.80
83.80
80.90
199.78
25.42
399.96
217.05
112.62
141.09
143.44
84.62
399.96
76.79
0.32
399.96
399.96
31
% non-zero
100%
14.59%
14.80%
13.47%
5.41%
6.22%
3.67%
4.69%
17.65%
1.63%
22.14%
12.04%
13.47%
7.35%
6.12%
2.55%
32.24%
8.98%
1.94%
35.20%
36.02%
Unconditional
mean
std
1,462
5,202
4.31
23.82
8.03
38.38
6.73
35.16
1.30
9.25
1.05
7.32
0.51
5.13
0.54
5.01
5.08
23.43
0.89
9.58
8.38
43.50
5.87
26.52
3.17
18.77
1.95
14.56
2.01
13.95
0.41
4.31
19.36
69.30
1.38
7.78
0.00
0.01
20.73
70.03
20.74
70.03
mean
1,462
29.56
54.30
50.00
24.04
16.80
13.79
11.49
28.75
54.42
37.82
48.71
23.51
26.53
32.85
16.10
60.03
15.34
0.06
58.90
57.57
std
5,202
56.20
86.52
84.03
32.46
24.60
23.43
20.45
49.39
53.70
86.35
61.47
46.38
47.55
46.89
22.21
111.70
21.56
0.08
108.17
107.30
Conditional
min
q1 median
0
58
241
0.00
1.84
10.31
0.05
5.87
22.25
0.05
5.40
19.88
0.08
2.91
10.24
0.02
0.75
6.83
0.06
0.74
5.69
0.02
0.70
4.12
0.00
1.38
5.20
0.23
14.69
39.95
0.05
2.98
13.01
0.00
4.01
28.69
0.00
1.92
9.52
0.00
2.55
10.42
0.05
5.62
15.65
0.02
1.64
5.38
0.00
3.37
17.87
0.00
0.89
4.14
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
3.25
18.68
0.00
2.85
17.22
q3
1,081
28.07
71.51
57.68
36.47
21.02
11.71
10.70
32.42
97.03
36.14
72.77
24.46
30.09
43.36
19.41
65.98
24.62
0.10
70.34
67.63
max
96,793
356.36
528.85
528.85
147.27
93.63
93.63
85.19
265.37
186.70
859.31
280.93
356.36
320.46
303.54
84.62
961.98
95.34
0.32
961.98
961.98
32
% non-zero
100%
18.97%
17.24%
17.24%
1.72%
5.17%
1.72%
3.45%
22.41%
0.00%
15.52%
12.07%
18.97%
22.41%
1.72%
1.72%
46.55%
34.48%
65.52%
67.24%
86.21%
Unconditional
mean
std
430
524
1.53
3.92
3.54
11.65
2.83
7.45
0.72
5.46
0.11
0.54
0.06
0.47
0.05
0.27
8.96
20.86
0.00
0.00
1.64
4.41
1.56
5.55
1.53
3.92
9.41
21.18
0.19
1.45
0.53
4.01
14.15
23.26
4.18
11.52
24.74
24.07
18.32
26.69
43.06
28.59
mean
430
8.07
20.55
16.39
41.59
2.17
3.61
1.45
39.97
std
524
5.44
21.71
10.21
10.59
12.92
8.07
41.99
11.03
30.52
30.39
12.11
37.76
27.25
49.95
5.65
11.01
5.44
25.46
1.26
0.25
26.91
25.95
17.24
19.69
28.62
24.48
Conditional
min
q1 median
5
137
261
0.43
3.27
9.88
4.97
9.15
14.65
4.97
9.15
14.65
41.59
41.59
41.59
1.27
1.27
1.63
3.61
3.61
3.61
1.27
1.27
1.45
1.78
25.59
42.01
q3
456
10.36
20.49
20.49
41.59
3.61
3.61
1.63
48.66
max
3,198
18.86
79.00
37.41
41.59
3.61
3.61
1.63
91.22
2.02
0.95
0.43
0.83
11.03
30.52
0.43
0.07
0.02
0.07
0.20
14.00
20.49
10.36
48.66
11.03
30.52
46.92
23.16
53.28
45.30
63.46
19.74
28.85
18.86
91.22
11.03
30.52
91.22
46.95
66.42
124.78
124.78
5.61
1.27
3.27
25.83
11.03
30.52
9.90
0.22
24.22
2.02
41.43
12.15
16.00
9.88
42.01
11.03
30.52
22.03
1.65
41.12
21.07
52.17
33
% non-zero
100%
9.09%
18.18%
4.55%
18.18%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
68.18%
4.55%
36.36%
81.82%
9.09%
4.55%
4.55%
0.00%
95.45%
4.55%
0.00%
95.45%
95.45%
Unconditional
mean
std
197
369
6.04
22.21
38.70
90.97
0.13
0.60
38.57
90.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
103.10 102.53
4.83
22.64
8.11
22.65
136.11 104.25
6.04
22.21
2.41
11.32
1.13
5.31
0.00
0.00
152.66
90.91
4.04
18.96
0.00
0.00
156.71
86.67
156.71
86.67
mean
197
66.39
212.84
2.82
212.13
std
369
48.44
92.23
151.22
106.18
22.30
166.35
66.39
53.12
24.91
89.29
93.05
34.32
89.98
48.44
Conditional
min
q1 median
3
7
55
32.13
32.13
66.39
132.90 132.97 212.29
2.82
2.82
2.82
130.08 131.56 212.29
q3
176
100.64
292.71
2.82
292.71
max
1,626
100.64
293.87
2.82
293.87
15.99
106.18
2.82
15.99
32.13
53.12
24.91
53.12
106.18
5.93
106.45
32.13
53.12
24.91
199.88
106.18
12.45
191.60
66.39
53.12
24.91
200.49
106.18
16.31
207.32
100.64
53.12
24.91
283.12
106.18
106.18
293.87
100.64
53.12
24.91
159.93
88.94
86.35
15.99
88.94
106.18
88.94
133.04
88.94
200.49
88.94
293.87
88.94
164.17
164.17
81.25
81.25
15.99
15.99
110.35
110.35
133.04
133.04
200.49
200.49
293.87
293.87
34
% non-zero
100%
7.63%
0.85%
0.85%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
8.47%
0.00%
8.47%
0.85%
7.63%
0.85%
0.00%
0.00%
16.10%
0.85%
0.00%
16.10%
16.10%
Unconditional
mean
std
1,521
4,745
5.31
32.70
0.04
0.43
0.04
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.33
10.36
0.00
0.00
0.93
9.20
0.08
0.90
5.31
32.70
0.36
3.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.69
34.08
0.12
1.33
0.00
0.00
6.81
34.11
6.81
34.11
Conditional
min
q1 median
2
18
116
0.54
0.99
6.08
4.69
4.69
4.69
4.69
4.69
4.69
mean
1,521
69.68
4.69
4.69
std
4,745
102.91
15.73
33.82
0.01
0.10
10.93
9.82
69.68
42.92
31.30
0.01
9.82
0.54
42.92
102.91
q3
708
102.02
4.69
4.69
max
38,555
311.77
4.69
4.69
0.46
2.28
99.90
0.10
9.82
0.99
42.92
0.46
9.82
6.08
42.92
2.28
9.82
102.02
42.92
99.90
9.82
311.77
42.92
41.53
14.44
77.62
0.01
14.44
0.16
14.44
1.20
14.44
99.90
14.44
311.77
14.44
42.29
42.29
77.32
77.32
0.01
0.01
0.16
0.16
1.20
1.20
99.90
99.90
311.77
311.77
35
% non-zero
100%
7.86%
3.57%
1.43%
2.86%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
17.86%
0.71%
12.86%
13.57%
7.86%
1.43%
0.71%
0.00%
28.57%
1.43%
0.00%
28.57%
28.57%
Unconditional
mean
std
1,313
4,382
5.43
31.22
6.11
38.07
0.05
0.46
6.06
38.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.33
55.32
0.76
8.97
2.05
12.48
21.46
64.11
5.43
31.22
0.69
5.75
0.18
2.11
0.00
0.00
29.63
71.20
0.74
7.61
0.00
0.00
30.36
71.50
30.36
71.50
mean
1,313
69.08
171.21
3.76
212.13
std
4,382
93.32
122.65
1.33
93.05
97.02
106.18
15.98
158.11
69.08
48.02
24.91
98.33
32.21
94.53
93.32
7.21
Conditional
min
q1 median
2
17
103
0.54
0.99
32.13
4.69 132.90 133.04
2.82
2.82
3.76
130.08 131.56 212.29
q3
585
102.02
291.54
4.69
292.71
max
38,555
311.77
293.87
4.69
293.87
0.01
106.18
0.01
9.82
0.54
42.92
24.91
1.20
106.18
0.16
98.18
0.99
42.92
24.91
53.12
106.18
2.95
186.28
32.13
48.02
24.91
200.00
106.18
13.73
207.32
102.02
53.12
24.91
283.12
106.18
106.18
293.87
311.77
53.12
24.91
103.69
51.69
100.95
52.68
0.01
14.44
2.01
14.44
101.12
51.69
199.94
88.94
311.77
88.94
106.28
106.28
99.72
99.72
0.01
0.01
2.01
2.01
101.81
101.81
199.94
199.94
311.77
311.77
36
% non-zero
100%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
80.00%
80.00%
80.00%
80.00%
Unconditional
mean
std
973
1,256
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.95
23.10
42.44
28.84
15.95
23.10
58.39
39.55
mean
973
std
1,256
19.94
53.05
19.94
72.99
24.40
20.65
24.40
28.17
Conditional
min
q1 median
1
157
504
1.54
24.52
1.54
37.77
5.72
36.66
5.72
55.28
10.72
51.40
10.72
70.66
q3
1,084
max
3,695
25.35
71.48
25.35
82.13
74.39
80.77
74.39
129.97
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950 1000
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
44
2 Bear Market
3 T rading-Inverse Equity
4 T rading-Leveraged Equity
5 Bear Market
6 Bear Market
7 T rading-Leveraged Equity
8 T rading-Leveraged Equity
9 Multicurrency
11 Long/Short Equity
50
100
150
200
250
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
45
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
46
50
100
150
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
47
50
100
150
200
250
300
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
48
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
49
10
50
100
150
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
50
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950 1000
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
51
2 Bear Market
3 T rading-Inverse Equity
4 T rading-Leveraged Equity
5 Bear Market
6 Bear Market
7 T rading-Leveraged Equity
8 T rading-Leveraged Equity
9 Multicurrency
11 Long/Short Equity
50
100
150
200
250
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
52
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
53
50
100
150
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
54
50
100
150
200
250
300
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
55
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
56
10
50
100
150
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
57
Alternative
Commodities
Taxable Bond
Municipal Bond
International Equity
Allocation
Sector Equity
U.S. Equity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
Trading-Inverse Debt
Multicurrency
Nontraditional Bond
Bear Market
Multialternative
Market Neutral
Long/Short Equity
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
58
Trading-Inverse Equity
Bear Market
Trading-Leveraged Equity
Multicurrency
Long/Short Equity
0
50
150
100
200
250
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
Taxable Bond
Allocation
International Equity
Municipal Bond
U.S. Equity
Sector Equity
0
10
20
30
40
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
59
Municipal Bond
Taxable Bond
Allocation
Sector Equity
U.S. Equity
International Equity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
Trading-Leveraged Debt
Trading-Inverse Equity
Trading-Leveraged Equity
Trading-Miscellaneous
Single Currency
Market Neutral
Long/Short Equity
Nontraditional Bond
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
6
0
7
0
8
0
9
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
3
0
1
4
0
1
5
0
1
6
0
1
7
0
1
8
0
1
9
0
2
0
0
2
1
0
2
2
0
2
3
0
2
4
0
2
5
0
2
6
0
2
7
0
2
8
0
2
9
0
3
0
0
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
60
International Equity
Sector Equity
Taxable Bond
U.S. Equity
Allocation
Municipal Bond
0
10
20
30
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
61
Alternative
Commodities
Taxable Bond
Municipal Bond
International Equity
Allocation
Sector Equity
U.S. Equity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
Trading-Inverse Debt
Multicurrency
Nontraditional Bond
Bear Market
Multialternative
Market Neutral
Long/Short Equity
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
62
Trading-Inverse Equity
Bear Market
Trading-Leveraged Equity
Multicurrency
Long/Short Equity
0
50
100
150
200
250
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
Taxable Bond
Allocation
International Equity
Municipal Bond
U.S. Equity
Sector Equity
0
10
20
30
40
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
63
Municipal Bond
Taxable Bond
Allocation
Sector Equity
U.S. Equity
International Equity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
Trading-Leveraged Debt
Trading-Inverse Equity
Trading-Leveraged Equity
Trading-Miscellaneous
Single Currency
Market Neutral
Long/Short Equity
Nontraditional Bond
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
6
0
7
0
8
0
9
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
3
0
1
4
0
1
5
0
1
6
0
1
7
0
1
8
0
1
9
0
2
0
0
2
1
0
2
2
0
2
3
0
2
4
0
2
5
0
2
6
0
2
7
0
2
8
0
2
9
0
3
0
0
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
64
International Equity
Sector Equity
Taxable Bond
U.S. Equity
Allocation
Municipal Bond
0
10
20
30
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
65
Figure 7: Gross Notional Exposure by Derivative Reference: fund size quintile (4=largest)
F7.1 All funds
4
0
10
20
30
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
Size Quintile
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
66
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
13
14
170
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
Size Quintile
4
0
10
11
12
15
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
67
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
68
Size Quintile
4
0
10
11
12
13
14
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
CDS
Financing
Commodity
Interest rate
Currency
Senior security
Equity
69
Figure 8: Gross Notional Exposure by Derivative Instrument: fund size quintile (4=largest)
F8.1 All funds
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
70
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
13
14
170
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
Size Quintile
4
0
10
11
12
15
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
71
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
40
30
50
60
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
72
Size Quintile
4
0
10
11
12
13
14
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
Size Quintile
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Financing
Senior security
Forward
Swap
Future
Written option
73
800
62.04%
737
700
Number of funds
600
500
400
300
200
13.72%
163
7.15%
100
4.63%
55
5.39%
64
85
3.20%
38
1.85%
1.01%
12
22
0.67%
0.34%
150<200
200<300
300<400
>=400
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
Fund_Type
20
20
20.29%
Number of funds
14
10
11.59%
8.70%
7.25%
5.80%
5.80%
100<150
150<200
5.80%
4.35%
1.45%
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
200<300
300<400
>=400
74
Number of funds
16.67%
16.67%
8.33%
8.33%
8.33%
8.33%
0
=0
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
30
29.63%
24
Number of funds
20
18.52%
15
12.35%
10
10
8.64%
7.41%
6.17%
6.17%
4.94%
3.70%
2.47%
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
300<400
>=400
75
700
68.63%
617
600
Number of funds
500
400
300
200
15.91%
143
100
5.45%
49
3.67%
2.67%
33
2.22%
24
20
0.56%
0.67%
0.22%
200<300
300<400
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
700
63.98%
627
600
Number of funds
500
400
300
200
14.90%
146
100
5.20%
51
4.90%
48
4.90%
48
2.55%
25
1.33%
1.12%
13
0.71%
200<300
300<400
11
0.41%
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
>=400
76
30
46.55%
27
Number of funds
20
25.86%
15
10
13.79%
8.62%
3.45%
1.72%
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
9
36.36%
Number of funds
3
9.09%
4.55%
4.55%
=0
10<25
4.55%
0
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
77
100
99
90
80
Number of funds
70
60
50
40
30
20
10.17%
12
10
2.54%
0.85%
1.69%
0.85%
10<25
50<100
100<150
300<400
0
=0
0<10
100
100
90
80
Number of funds
70
60
50
40
30
20
8.57%
7.86%
12
11
10
1.43%
6.43%
2.86%
0.71%
0.71%
0
=0
0<10
10<25
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
300<400
Traditional ETFs
78
Number of funds
20.00%
10.00%
10.00%
0
=0
25<50
50<100
100<150
79
794,223
800,000
700,000
600,000
32.73%
540,413
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
4.79%
100,000
3.20%
79,034
52,888
4.43%
73,070
1.62%
26,770
1.96%
32,400
0.58%
2.50%
41,252
0.08%
9,649
1,247
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
300<400
>=400
Fund_Type
30,000
29,252
20,000
10,000
13.06%
6,548
11.39%
5,708
9.00%
4,512
3.65%
1,829
0.65%
324
0.01%
0<10
10<25
0
=0
0.90%
25<50
50<100
454
0.49%
100<150
150<200
2.49%
1,247
248
200<300
300<400
>=400
80
34.20%
107
100
27.29%
90
86
80
70
20.54%
64
60
50
40
10.31%
32
30
5.85%
18
20
1.79%
10
0.02%
0
=0
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
30,000
29,252
20,000
10,000
13.19%
6,655
11.33%
5,713
9.12%
4,598
3.69%
1,862
0.64%
324
0.01%
0<10
10<25
0
=0
1.03%
25<50
50<100
518
0.53%
100<150
150<200
2.47%
1,247
266
200<300
300<400
>=400
81
48.30%
667,543
600,000
35.43%
489,651
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
3.72%
51,370
4.38%
3.74%
60,577
51,710
1.71%
23,590
2.01%
0.68%
27,730
0.04%
9,361
558
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
300<400
47.06%
674,198
600,000
34.20%
489,975
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
3.59%
51,375
4.63%
66,291
3.93%
56,308
1.68%
24,108
2.07%
0.67%
29,592
2.08%
29,810
9,627
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
0.09%
1,247
0
200<300
300<400
>=400
82
11,000
10,718
40.11%
9,997
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
4.99%
1,244
5.03%
1,252
5.21%
1,298
1,000
1.65%
412
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
64.67%
2,808
2,000
32.83%
1,425
1,000
1.73%
0.11%
=0
75
0.16%
10<25
50<100
0.51%
22
100<150
150<200
200<300
83
120,000
118,008
110,000
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
27.41%
49,185
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
6.38%
11,442
10,000
0
=0
0<10
0.08%
0.33%
140
586
10<25
50<100
0.03%
62
100<150
300<400
120,000
118,013
110,000
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
26.77%
49,185
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
6.23%
11,442
10,000
0.81%
0.32%
593
1,487
0.01%
2,808
10<25
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
215
0
=0
0<10
1.53%
0.12%
22
300<400
Traditional ETFs
84
5,451
5,000
4,000
3,000
28.23%
2,746
2,000
1,000
7.89%
7.85%
763
768
0
=0
25<50
50<100
100<150
85
Figure 11: The Distribution of gross notional amounts of derivatives: number of funds
F11.1 All funds
900
67.76%
805
800
700
Number of funds
600
500
400
300
200
12.46%
148
5.30%
100
63
3.79%
45
3.96%
47
2.86%
34
1.01%
1.94%
12
23
0.59%
0.34%
150<200
200<300
300<400
>=400
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
Fund_Type
20
20
Number of funds
17.39%
12
10
11.59%
10.14%
5.80%
5.80%
5.80%
100<150
150<200
5.80%
5.80%
300<400
>=400
2.90%
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
200<300
86
16.67%
16.67%
16.67%
Number of funds
8.33%
8.33%
8.33%
0
=0
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
30
27.16%
22
Number of funds
20
18.52%
15
12.35%
10
10
9.88%
7.41%
6.17%
6.17%
4.94%
4.94%
300<400
>=400
2.47%
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
87
700
71.41%
642
600
Number of funds
500
400
300
200
14.02%
126
100
5.34%
48
3.11%
2.56%
28
2.11%
23
19
0.56%
0.67%
0.22%
200<300
300<400
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
700
67.76%
664
600
Number of funds
500
400
300
200
13.06%
128
100
5.41%
53
3.88%
38
3.88%
38
2.45%
24
1.12%
11
1.43%
14
0.61%
0.41%
200<300
300<400
>=400
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
88
40
53.45%
31
Number of funds
30
20
10
13.79%
12.07%
12.07%
8.62%
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
8
31.82%
Number of funds
3
9.09%
9.09%
4.55%
4.55%
0
=0
10<25
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
89
100
99
90
80
Number of funds
70
60
50
40
30
20
11.02%
13
10
2.54%
1.69%
0.85%
50<100
100<150
300<400
0
=0
0<10
100
100
90
80
Number of funds
70
60
50
40
30
20
9.29%
13
7.14%
6.43%
10
10
1.43%
2.86%
0.71%
0.71%
0
=0
0<10
10<25
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
300<400
Traditional ETFs
90
10
10
Number of funds
0
=0
91
52.97%
874,492
800,000
700,000
600,000
29.47%
486,479
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
3.43%
56,621
3.95%
65,178
3.56%
58,766
2.08%
1.51%
0.58%
24,861
9,649
34,272
2.39%
39,380
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
0.08%
1,247
0
200<300
300<400
>=400
Fund_Type
27,380
20,000
10,000
15.18%
7,609
7.58%
5.98%
3,798
2,999
7.38%
3,701
5.24%
2,626
2.49%
0.90%
0.13%
63
454
0.49%
100<150
150<200
1,247
248
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
200<300
300<400
>=400
92
34.20%
107
100
90
25.19%
79
80
70
20.54%
64
60
50
40
10.31%
32
30
5.85%
18
20
3.89%
12
10
0.02%
0
=0
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
27,380
20,000
10,000
15.30%
7,717
7.55%
5.95%
2,999
3,810
7.40%
3,734
5.36%
2,705
2.47%
1.03%
0.13%
63
518
0.53%
100<150
150<200
1,247
266
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
200<300
300<400
>=400
93
729,830
700,000
600,000
500,000
31.44%
434,523
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
3.67%
50,692
3.93%
3.77%
54,381
52,151
1.65%
22,863
0.68%
9,361
2.01%
27,730
0.04%
558
0
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
300<400
737,547
700,000
600,000
500,000
30.34%
434,587
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
3.75%
53,692
4.06%
58,191
3.83%
54,856
2.20%
1.63%
0.67%
23,381
9,627
31,464
1.95%
27,938
=0
0<10
10<25
25<50
50<100
100<150
150<200
0.09%
1,247
0
200<300
300<400
>=400
94
9,204
9,000
8,000
28.03%
6,986
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
13.31%
3,317
11.43%
3,000
10.30%
2,847
0<10
10<25
2,567
2,000
1,000
0
=0
25<50
50<100
64.67%
2,808
2,000
32.67%
1,419
1,000
1.88%
0.11%
82
=0
10<25
0.51%
0.16%
22
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
95
120,000
118,008
110,000
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
27.49%
49,325
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
6.38%
11,442
10,000
0.33%
0.03%
586
62
0
=0
0<10
50<100
100<150
300<400
120,000
118,013
110,000
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
26.84%
49,325
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
6.23%
11,442
10,000
0
=0
0<10
0.81%
1.53%
0.04%
0.32%
82
593
1,480
0.01%
2,808
10<25
50<100
100<150
150<200
200<300
22
300<400
Traditional ETFs
96
100.00%
9,729
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
=0
97