0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views2 pages

Multimedia Project: World War II Project Rubric: Category 4

This rubric outlines the criteria and scoring for a World War II multimedia project. Students will be evaluated on their mastery of content about the topic, use of proper mechanics, presentation skills, attractiveness of presentation, inclusion of a self-produced video, and contributions to their group. Points will be awarded on a scale of 1 to 4 in each category, with 4 being the highest score for having in-depth content knowledge, no errors, a well-rehearsed delivery, visually appealing presentation, a high quality video of sufficient length, and routinely providing useful ideas to their group.

Uploaded by

Nicole
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views2 pages

Multimedia Project: World War II Project Rubric: Category 4

This rubric outlines the criteria and scoring for a World War II multimedia project. Students will be evaluated on their mastery of content about the topic, use of proper mechanics, presentation skills, attractiveness of presentation, inclusion of a self-produced video, and contributions to their group. Points will be awarded on a scale of 1 to 4 in each category, with 4 being the highest score for having in-depth content knowledge, no errors, a well-rehearsed delivery, visually appealing presentation, a high quality video of sufficient length, and routinely providing useful ideas to their group.

Uploaded by

Nicole
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Multimedia Project : World War II Project

Rubric
Teacher Name: Mrs. Bell
Student Name:

CATEGORY

________________________________________

Content

Covers topic indepth with


details and
examples.
Subject
knowledge is
excellent.
Developed a
position based
on their sources.

Includes
essential
knowledge about
the topic. Subject
knowledge
appears to be
good. Somewhat
developed a
position based
on their sources.

Includes
essential
information
about the topic
but there are 12 factual errors.
Developed a
position but not
on research.

Content is
minimal OR
there are
several factual
errors. Did not
develop a
position.

Mechanics

No misspellings
or grammatical
errors.

Three or fewer
misspellings
and/or
mechanical
errors.

Four
misspellings
and/or
grammatical
errors.

More than 4
errors in
spelling or
grammar.

Presentation

Well-rehearsed
with smooth
delivery that
holds audience
attention.

Rehearsed with
fairly smooth
delivery that
holds audience
attention most of
the time.

Delivery not
smooth, but
able to maintain
interest of the
audience most
of the time.

Delivery not
smooth and
audience
attention often
lost.

Attractivenes Makes excellent Makes good use Makes use of


use of font, color, of font, color,
font, color,
s

Use of font,
color, graphics,
graphics, effects, graphics, effects, graphics,
effects etc. but
etc. to enhance etc. to enhance effects, etc. but these often
the presentation. to presentation. occasionally
distract from
these detract
the
from the
presentaion
presentation
content.
content.

Video

A minimum of
two minutes of
selfproduced/edited
video is included
(as one or
several clips).
Video is of high
quality and is
clearly audible.

A minimum of
two minutes of
selfproduced/edited
video is included
(as one or
several clips).
Video has quality
and/or audio
issues.

Video is present No video


but does not
present - 0
meet length
points
requirements.
Video has
quality and/or
audio issues.

Contributions Routinely

provides useful
ideas when
participating in
the group. A
definite leader
who contributes
a lot of effort.

Usually provides
useful ideas
when
participating in
the group. A
strong group
member who
tries hard!

Sometimes
provides useful
ideas when
participating in
the group. A
satisfactory
group member
who does what
is required.

Rarely
provides useful
ideas when
participating in
the group. May
refuse to
participate.

You might also like