0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views2 pages

Energy Efficiency Evaluation Guide

This section discusses the importance of post-project evaluations and continual monitoring to ensure that energy efficiency measures achieve predicted savings over time. Post-project evaluations should establish actual savings, costs, impacts on occupants, and lessons learned. Continual monitoring requires installing measurement equipment, maintaining records of energy use and comparing to targets, and reporting results regularly. Proper maintenance and management procedures also help sustain savings long-term. Formal monitoring helps assess performance and justify future investment in energy efficiency.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views2 pages

Energy Efficiency Evaluation Guide

This section discusses the importance of post-project evaluations and continual monitoring to ensure that energy efficiency measures achieve predicted savings over time. Post-project evaluations should establish actual savings, costs, impacts on occupants, and lessons learned. Continual monitoring requires installing measurement equipment, maintaining records of energy use and comparing to targets, and reporting results regularly. Proper maintenance and management procedures also help sustain savings long-term. Formal monitoring helps assess performance and justify future investment in energy efficiency.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

21-1

21

Maintaining the savings


Introduction
Designing the
building

21.1

Post project evaluation

21.2

Continual monitoring

Operating and upgrading


the building

The design process

Managing the building

Design strategy

Acquiring/refurbishing

Sketch design

Maintenance

Specific design

Upgrading energy
efficiency

Checking the
design
Handover

Checking by M & T
Maintaining the savings

This section summarises how and when checks should be made to ensure that energy efficiency measures have been installed
and are operating correctly, and that the savings originally predicted are actually being achieved. It should be read in
conjunction with sections 18 and 20. The PROBE studies(1) show the importance of post project evaluations.

21.1

Post project evaluation

21.2

Continual monitoring

Following the implementation of energy saving measures,


post project evaluation is desirable to establish that
measures have been correctly installed and are achieving
the predicted savings. Small measures may require only a
cursory check but larger projects, e.g. those involving
combined heat and power, require a thorough assessment.
Evaluations should establish:

Continual monitoring helps to maintain the level of savings


achieved over successive years. This requires:

actual savings

final capital cost

impact on occupants

management implications

maintenance issues

other benefits achieved

practical pitfalls.

It may also be possible to compare actual savings with the


savings achieved in published case study material.
Problems identified well after implementation are often
traced back to poor installation.
The energy manager should also provide a post project
evaluation report to senior management on the effectiveness of the investment. For those managing a number of
buildings, the evaluations can also help to indicate whether
similar measures should be incorporated in other parts of
the stock, while highlighting pitfalls to be avoided.

installing monitoring equipment where information is required to assess energy usage and savings

instituting a measuring and analysis scheme and


allocate tasks to personnel

maintaining records of energy use and comparing


them with targets

checking records against utility bills to ensure cost


savings are achieved

reporting results to the building operator on a


regular basis.

The following maintenance and management procedures


also play a large part in ensuring continued savings:

Review maintenance and operating procedures to


ensure that efficiency of plant and system operation
is sustained.

Keep all personnel informed of progress and of


results achieved.

Keep a record of changes to the building and its use


that may effect savings.

Regularly review the monitoring programme and


modify actions where necessary.

21-2

Energy efficiency in buildings: Part B: Operating and upgrading the building

A formal monitoring system is invaluable when assessing


performance and looking for further improvements,
including environmental impact(2). The whole programme
for improving energy efficiency may fall into disrepute if
savings cannot be proved. Confirming the results of
investment helps to justify future investment. Energy
performance monitoring and targeting is examined in more
detail in section 20.

Bibliography

References

Energy audit and survey guide: for commercial and industrial buildings. Energy
audit and survey guide: for building financiers and senior managers Good
Practice Guide GPG 27 (London: Department of Environment, Transport
and Regions) (1991)

Bordass W T, Bunn R, et al. PROBE: Some lessons learned from


the first eight buildings CIBSE National Conference 1997
(London: Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers)
(1997)

Bartlett P, Bishop T and Durrant H The office toolkit. The guide for
facilities and office managers for reducing costs and environmental
impact BR 285 (Garston: Building Research Establishment)
(1995)

Energy audits and surveys CIBSE Applications Manual AM5 (London:


Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers) (1991)
Energy audits and surveys Information Paper IP12/92 (Garston: Building
Research Establishment) (1992)
Energy audit and survey guide: for commercial and industrial buildings. Energy
audit and survey guide: for building managers and engineers Good Practice
Guide GPG 28 (London: Department of Environment, Transport and
Regions) (1991)

You might also like