0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views7 pages

Charge in Electromagnetic Fields

In quantum mechanics one needs to have a hamiltonian for a charged particle in electric and magnetic field. A derivation of the lagrangian and hamiltonian is compiled from several sources.

Uploaded by

lad.kocb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views7 pages

Charge in Electromagnetic Fields

In quantum mechanics one needs to have a hamiltonian for a charged particle in electric and magnetic field. A derivation of the lagrangian and hamiltonian is compiled from several sources.

Uploaded by

lad.kocb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Charge in Electric and Magnetic

Fields
Based on
Bransden and Joachain: Physics of Atoms and
Molecules
and
Goldstein: Classical Mechanics
09.11.2013

Lagrange equations
d
dt

L
ri

L
=0
ri

i = 1, 2, ....

For conservative systems, i.e. with usual forces from potential energy
L(ri , ri , t) = T (ri ) V (ri )
but the Lorentz force depends on velocity. Lagrange function L(ri , ri , t) must
be modified.
Lorentz force

1
F = q E + [v B]
c
With and A the scalar and vector potentials
E =

1 A
c t

B=A

the Lorentz force becomes




1 A 1
F = q
+ v [ A]
c t
c
with (r, t) and A(r, t) describing the fields
2

With only the scalar potential (r, t) the Lagrange function would be
L(r, r , t) =

m
r r q(r, t) =
2

1
m v2 q(r, t)
2

and the Lagrange equation would lead to the electrostatic


mr = q
It can be shown that the Newton equation with the electromagnetic Lorentz
force


1 A 1
mr = q +
+ v [ A]
c t
c
can be derived from a surprisingly simple Lagrange function (see below)
L(r, r , t) =

1
q
m v2 q(r, t) + v A(r, t)
2
c

when inserted into the three Lagrange equations (r1 x, r2 y , r3 z)


 
d L
L

=0
i = 1, 2, 3
dt ri
ri
This is because the term v[ A] can be expressed without vector products.
3

Transforming the term v [ A]


This contains time derivatives as well as the x, y, z derivatives
v [ A] r [ A]

consider first the total time derivative A,


= dA = A + A dx + A dy + A dz = A + vx A + vy A + vz A
A
dt
t
x dt
y dt
z dt
t
x
y
z
Take now its x-component and re-arrange
Ax
Ax
Ax
dAx Ax

= vx
+ vy
+ vz
dt
t
x
y
z
Take now x-component of v [ A]




Ay Ax
Ax Az
vz
{v [ A]}x = vy

x
y
z
x
and now re-arrange - adding and subtracting (and compare with above)
vx

Ax
Ay
Az
+ vy
+ vz
x
x
x

vx

Ax
Ax
Ax
vy
vz
x
y
z

Comparing those expressions we can replace the second term


{v [ A]}x =

dAx Ax
(vx Ax + vy Ay + vz Az )
+
x
dt
t

and now it can be written for all components as


v [ A] = (v A)

dA A
+
dt
t

Now we insert this expression into the Lorentz force




1 A 1
+ v [ A]
F = q
c t
c
So that the Lorentz force becomes


1 dA 1
F = q
+ (v A)
c dt
c
This can be also written as


1d
1
F = q
v (v A) + (v A)
c dt
c

Lagrange equations in vector form


 
d L
L

= 0 i = 1, 2, ....
dt ri
ri

1
q
m r 2 q(r, t) + r A(r, t)
2
c
q
q
m r + A
r L = qr + r (r A)
c
c

L(r, r , t) =
r L =

d
(r L) (r L) = 0
dt

Hamiltonian formalism results from a Legendre transform from xi and its


derivative x i to a pair of conjugated variables xi and pi where
pi =

L
ri

p = r L

when L(xi , x i , t) is replaced by H(xi , pi , t) with


X
H(xi , pi , t) =
(x i pi ) L(xi , x i , t)

H = r p L

We have from above


L=

q
1
m r 2 q + r A
2
c

p = r L

p=

m r +

q
A
c

You might also like