Scribd
Upload
39 views1 page

Bonilla v. Barcena, 71 SCRA 491 - Angliongto

Fortunata Barcena filed a case to quiet title over land in Abra. After her death, the defendants argued the case should be dismissed because she lacked legal capacity as a deceased person. The court dismissed the case. However, the Supreme Court held that while a deceased person cannot sue, their heirs can substitute them in ongoing cases. Here, Fortunata was alive when she filed the case, so the lower court had jurisdiction, and her heirs could substitute for her after her death to allow the case to continue.

Uploaded by

Mika
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views1 page

Bonilla v. Barcena, 71 SCRA 491 - Angliongto

Fortunata Barcena filed a case to quiet title over land in Abra. After her death, the defendants argued the case should be dismissed because she lacked legal capacity as a deceased person. The court dismissed the case. However, the Supreme Court held that while a deceased person cannot sue, their heirs can substitute them in ongoing cases. Here, Fortunata was alive when she filed the case, so the lower court had jurisdiction, and her heirs could substitute for her after her death to allow the case to continue.

Uploaded by

Mika
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Bonilla v.

Barcena, 71 SCRA 491 | Angliongto

FACTS: On March 31, 1975 Fortunata Barcena, mother of minors Rosalio


Bonilla and Salvacion Bonilla and wife of Ponciano Bonilla, instituted a civil
action in the CFI of Abra, to quiet title over certain parcels of land located in
Abra.

The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that
Fortunata Barcena is dead and, therefore, has no legal capacity to sue. In the
hearing for the motion to dismiss, counsel for the plaintiff confirmed the
death of Fortunata Barcena, and asked for substitution by her minor children
and her husband; but the court after the hearing immediately dismissed the
case on the ground that a dead person cannot be a real party in interest and
has no legal personality to sue.

ISSUE: W/N the CFI erred in dismissing the complaint.

HELD: While it is true that a person who is dead cannot sue in court, yet he
can be substituted by his heirs in pursuing the case up to its completion.

The records of this case show that the death of Fortunata Barcena took place
on July 9, 1975 while the complaint was filed on March 31, 1975. This means
that when the complaint was filed on March 31, 1975, Fortunata Barcena was
still alive, and therefore, the court had acquired jurisdiction over her person.

You might also like