Scribd
Upload
243 views1 page

PCI Automation vs. NLRC: Employment Ruling

1) PCI Automation Center (PCI-AC) contracted with Philippine Commercial International Bank (PCIB) to develop software for linking PCIB's computer systems. As part of the agreement, PCIB provided PCI-AC with encoders and attendants. 2) PCIB hired Prime Manpower to supply manpower to PCI-AC, including hiring the private respondent Hector as a data encoder. Hector was later dismissed. 3) Hector filed a complaint against Prime and PCI-AC for illegal dismissal. The issue was whether Hector was an employee of Prime. The court ruled that as Prime was a labor-only contractor, Hector should be considered an employee of PCI-AC, the principal

Uploaded by

Alyanna Barre
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
243 views1 page

PCI Automation vs. NLRC: Employment Ruling

1) PCI Automation Center (PCI-AC) contracted with Philippine Commercial International Bank (PCIB) to develop software for linking PCIB's computer systems. As part of the agreement, PCIB provided PCI-AC with encoders and attendants. 2) PCIB hired Prime Manpower to supply manpower to PCI-AC, including hiring the private respondent Hector as a data encoder. Hector was later dismissed. 3) Hector filed a complaint against Prime and PCI-AC for illegal dismissal. The issue was whether Hector was an employee of Prime. The court ruled that as Prime was a labor-only contractor, Hector should be considered an employee of PCI-AC, the principal

Uploaded by

Alyanna Barre
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PCI Automation Center, Inc. vs. NLRC, GR No.

115920, 29 January 1996


FACTS:
Philippine Commercial International Bank (PCIB) commenced its Project intended to
link all existing computer systems within PCIB and its various branches around the
country. It entered into a Computer Services Agreement with petitioner PCI Automation
Center (PCI-AC) under which petitioner obligated itself to direct, supervise and run the
development of the software of PCIB.
PCIB agreed to provide the petitioner with encoders and computer attendants, among
others.
To comply with its obligation to procure manpower for the petitioner, PCIB engaged the
services of Prime Manpower. PCIB and Prime entered into an External Job Contract
Private respondent Hector was hired by Prime and assigned to petitioner as a data
encoder.
Prime decided to terminate private respondents services after it was informed by the
petitioner that his services were no longer needed in the project.
Private respondent filed before the NLRC a complaint for illegal dismissal against Prime
and PCI-AC
ISSUE:
Whether private respondent is an employee of Prime
RULING:
NO. As Prime is a labor-only contractor, the workers it supplied to the petitioner,
including private respondent, should be considered employees of the petitioner. The
admissions made by private respondent in his affidavits and position paper that he is a
regular employee of Prime are not conclusive on this Court as the existence of an
employer-employee relationship is a question of law which may not be made the subject
of stipulation
The legitimate job contractor provides services while the labor-only contractor provides
only manpower. The legitimate job contractor undertakes to perform a specific job for the
principal employer while the labor-only contractor merely provides the personnel to work
for the principal employer.
An employer who engages the services of a bona fide independent contractor is merely an
indirect employer, by operation of law, of his contractor's employees.

You might also like