The Bible and the Quran
In preparing this brief foreword to Ignatius Presss very welcome reprint of Jacques
Jomiers impressive The Bible and the Quran, the title of another book, written a half-century
ago, springs to mind: Ideas Have Consequences by Richard M. Weaver of the University of
Chicago. The title is a lesson in itself.
Two searing examples from the last century and a half amply demonstrate the truth of this
assertion: The Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf. Millions died; and more millions were
ruined because of the odious opinions set forth in these two documents. Streams of refugees,
hopeless and broken, irrigated the no mans land of the twentieth century.
Ideas indeed have consequences. If, for example, a society is persuaded that cows are
sacred, those beasts will wander about unhindered and be treated with an almost liturgical
deference, even if large sections of the populace are often on the brink of starvation. This holds
famously true in parts of India, whereas we in Europe and the Americas have a different
perspective on cows, seeing them as producers of dairy products and meat.
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam each have their respective sacred books. And each has
had and will continue to have far-reaching consequences. Frequently, they will be consequences
in deadly conflict.
The Hebrew Scriptures are, of course, the Christian Old Testament. To these Hebrew
Scriptures, Christianity added the New Testament. And Islam claims that its sacred book, the
Quran, is the word of God. All three of these religions and their scriptures have important things
in common, especially the doctrine that there is only one God. Yet this commonality is limited by
insurmountable disagreements about Gods nature, man, and salvation.
Some questions immediately present themselves: To whom has God revealed his truth? Is
God one person or three? Does God have a son? Could God become man: the Incarnation? Or is
the very idea blasphemous? Is he a Father of sons and daughters as in the Judeo-Christian
tradition, or a Master of slaves as Islam maintains? These are not small matters, and the
disagreements issuing from the differences are potentially explosive: cultures and nations
historically have been at each others throats.
The Old Testament is the book of Gods revelation to the people of Israel. It is a record of
Gods law; his covenants; his signs and wonders; and the religious life and history of his
covenant people. It also contains the promise of a coming Messiahthe Anointed Onethe one
who will extend the covenant and salvation to all the nations. The Jews awaited this Messiah.
Finally, he came. He fulfilled the prophecies of the Jewish Scriptures, but his own people
rejected him because they could not accept the idea that God could become flesh. No one had
seen God since he is a spirit. How could God become a man? Such a claim was ludicrous to the
Jews. And even if God had taken on flesh, it was inconceivable that he would suffer such an
ignominious death as crucifixion. But this is precisely what Jesus Christ did.
Most refused to believe; but many did, giving rise to historical Christianity. The bodily
resurrection of Jesus from the dead at a certain time and at a certain place guaranteed the truth of
the Christian claim. God had taken on human nature so that men could become partakers of the
divine nature. Catholic philosopher Frederick D. Wilhelmsen sums it up most eloquently in the
opening sentences of his philosophical masterstroke The Metaphysics of Love:
When God descended from heaven, man arose from the grave of antiquity and
shook off the winding sheet of despair. He walked erect and spoke the name
which is His being: Son of God in Christ His Brother
As in Judaism, in Islam the very idea of a God-Man is impossible. It is blasphemous.
Indeed, Islam understands itself to be a return to basics, as it were: a linking back to the pristine
monotheism of Abraham, shorn of all the impurities and accretions of Judaism and Christianity.
It teaches that the greatest of prophets" came from seventh-century Arabia. Muhammad is his
name. He is The Prophet. Though God spoke through men such as Adam, Noah, Abraham,
Moses, David, and Jesus, Muhammad is the seal of the prophets, for through him came the
perfect revelation, the Quran.
Muhammad supposedly accepted the revelation of God to the Israelites and in the gospel
of Jesus; but, the Quran contradicts the Bible in very important ways. And this raises very
important questions. For instance, does the Bible give any grounds for thinking God intended to
give a further revelation after the revelation of Jesus? Does it tell us that it will be superseded by
a new revelation? Does it foretell another prophet, who would complete the New Testament?
Christians will of necessity argue that the answer to all of these questions is No. Islams
claim to the fullness of divine revelation cannot be correct, for God has already sent his Son, his
final Word (John 1:1). There is no fuller revelation to come. There is no greater prophet than the
Word made flesh. The writer of Hebrews puts it best: In many and various ways God spoke of
old to our fathers by the prophets; but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son (Heb 1:1).
The Catechism adds, Christ, the Son of God made man, is the Fathers one, perfect, and
unsurpassable Word. In him he has said everything; there will be no other word than this one
(CCC, 65).
What more could God say? He revealed the mystery by giving us his very self. Jude tells
us that we are to contend for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 3).
Catholics believe that the revelation given once for all can be more deeply understood and that
doctrine can develop as this understanding increases, but they (along with Protestants and
Orthodox Christians) reject claims of other prophets having a fuller message from God than that
of Jesus.
How do Muslims account for the differences between the Quran and the biblical books
of previous divine revelation that they supposedly also accept? If there is discontinuity between
the Bible and the Quran, they argue, then it must be that the Jews and Christians have
manipulated and altered the truth that God revealed to them.
Perhaps the most glaring theological difference between the Quran and the Christian
Scriptures is in how the respective books treat the doctrine of the Incarnation. The New
Testament, based on the historical fact of the Virgin Birth of the Eternal Son of God, who died
for our sins and rose again, proclaims salvation for men and their inclusion into the family of
God through the work of the Incarnate Word, Jesus Christ: In the beginning was the Word and
the Word was with God and the Word was God... and the Word became flesh and dwelt among
us (Jn 1:1, 14). The Quran on the other hand rejects the idea of God becoming man. Muslims
affirm the Virgin Birth of Jesus but vehemently deny his divinity. God can have no son, in the
Muslim scheme of things, because that would imply that God had a consort, which is clearly
impossible. The Christian view that Gods omnipotence means, among other things, that he can
have a son without a consort is not addressed.
The word Islam means submission and Muslims submit to the teaching of the
Quran as the word of God. Muhammad and the Quran are simply not to be questioned. Since
Islam considers the religion of the Jews and Christians to be greatly inferior, Muslims usually
dont compare their beliefs with the Bible.
Does the Quran teach truth? For the Christian, the answer is Yes, but... The Quran
contains truth alongside error. Christianity and Islam, though having important doctrines in
common, hold different views of Gods relation to man. In some important respects, these views
are mutually exclusive. Thus, both religions cannot be right. On certain important pointssuch
as the identity and significance of Jesus ChristChristianity and Islam fundamentally disagree.
Jerusalem showcases, as no other city does, the clash of these religions. A walk through
the streets of Old Jerusalem reveals how deeply these related yet different religions can affect
everyday life. Profound contrasts are found at every turn: the chanted prayers and blast of the
rams horn as Jews celebrate and weep at the Western Wall; the sound of bells ringing from
Christian churches; and the wailing call to prayer sung by the muezzin from the Muslim minarets
five times a day. Even differences about such things as how their respective adherents dress,
what they eat, the kind of schools they create, their family lives, and architecture are shaped by
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
This war of ideas is made unmistakably manifest in the streets of the Holy City by the
rumble of tanks and the sound of distant gunfire. The heart of Jerusalem is divided. It beats with
the revealed truth of one God; yet is torn by this conflict of theologies.
As Christians we are to preach the gospel in season and out. To be better prepared to face
the challenges presented by Islam, we must be at least acquainted with its tenets. Islam cannot be
ignored. In numbers, it rivals Christianity, having over a billion adherents. It is a powerful force
in the world and all indications are that it will continue to gain ground. Christians must engage
this religion, which can be both an ally and an intransigent enemy.
Jacques Jomiers analysis and insight will prove extremely helpful.
Stephen K. Ray
August 6, 2002
Jerusalem
