A Project Report On "Study of After Sales Services" Undertaken at PRN JCB (Hubli)
A Project Report On "Study of After Sales Services" Undertaken at PRN JCB (Hubli)
PROJECT REPORT ON
UNDERTAKEN AT
             PRN JCB
              (HUBLI)
         Submitted By:
      RAKESH R SULAKE
         ID: 16MBA
           Guided By:
         ANUP KUMAR
        MBA PROGRAMME
         (Year 2016-18)
         I the undersign Mr. Rakesh R sulake declare that this summer project
   report entitled Study of after sales services at PRN JCB., HUBLI is the
   result of my own work for the fulfillment of the award of degree of Master of
   Business Administration and has not been previously submitted to any other
   University or Institute for any other examination and any other purpose by
   any other person.
         I further declare that the personal data and information received from
   any respondent during survey has not been shared with any one and is used
   for academic purpose only.
        Achieving anything isn't impossible but difficult without the help of other.
Each and every person needs someone who can help him to move on a right
track towards their goal and give them proper guideline to get successful in
him/her life by achieving their goals. None other than our teacher does this from
several years. They are who taught us from the very beginning how to tackle
different situation. It is because of their help that I was able to do my project
work.
First of all I would like to express my deeps serve of gratitude to the teacher and
my primary project guide Mrs. PRABHA HIREMATH, because without her help I
could not have done my work in academically proper manner. She was always
there to provide me with all kind of help I needed in doing my project. His
intelligence and knowledge in marketing field was really great help for me in my
project.. I would like to thank Dr. Shrinivas Patil, Director, Institute of Excellence
in Management Science, Tarihal Hubli, For making available all facilities in
fulfilling the requirement for the research work
        I would like to thank Mr. Naik, Branch manager of PRN JCB for allowing
me to undergo training in Empire motors.
Mr. ANUP KUMAR Service Advisor of the Empire Motors who provide me and
explain me about the important things related to the after sales services of PRN
JCB. I would also like to thank all the person of staff who helps me at whenever I
went to them for their help. I would like to thank all my friends who directly or
indirectly help me by showing his or her interest in conducting my project..
     I am thankful to all the respondents for their co-operation and kind behavior
for my project as without their willingness and supports, my project would have
not been completed and also thank all of them spearing valuable time for giving
response.
       I would also like to thank my parents and other family member for their
hard support by encouraging me in the preparation and completion of this
project.
PURPOSE
              for delivery.
      
              63.8 % of respondents problems resolved at first time only.
      
              10.8 % of respondent say different problems develop while service
              vehicle.
      
            70.8 % of respondents are not satisfied with PRN JCB due to
      expensive service charges.
      
           In delivery, paper work, commitment, improve ness, mechanics,
      commitment, over all experience, recommend,
              brand customer are near to agree.
      
             In facilities and solution provide by a PRN JCB customer are
      neutral.
      
           PRN JCB should increase the number of incentives provide to the
           customer i.e. discount to overcome expensive
           service charges.
      
           Satisfied customer will continue to purchase again in the future but
           dissatisfied will stop purchasing from PRN JCB & are
    likely to spreads the word among friends. So PRN JCB must work to
    satisfy the customer who have not visit an PRN JCB service center
    after competition of free services.
    Before introduce any new facilities in after sales service PRN JCB
    should meet existing customer & ask for their opinions.
    PRN JCB have to think carefully on its labors charges price cut off
    will enable a huge market share & it will force the
    customer's to switch off to other service provider.
              It is no longer enough
               to satisfy customers.
               You must delight them
EARTHMOVING INDUSTRY
The crawler/wheeled/compact loaders segment is estimated to account for nearly one-third of the
overall earth moving equipment market share during the forecast period
Among product types, the crawler/wheeled/compact loaders segment is estimated to account for a major
share and dominate the earth moving equipment market over the projected period. The segment is
estimated to gain 90 basis points between 2017 and 2025, owing to China remaining the biggest market
for wheeled loaders as the country accounts for the largest share of the earth moving equipment market.
The segment is estimated to create 2x incremental opportunity than that of the mini excavators segment
between 2017 and 2025. The crawler/wheeled/compact loaders segment is expected to create a total
incremental opportunity close to US$ 15 Bn between 2017 and 2025. The segment is projected to reach
a market value of more than US$ 65 Bn by 2025 end, expanding at a CAGR of 7.2%. The
crawler/wheeled/compact loaders segment is estimated to be an attractive segment in terms of market
share owing to the increasing demand from the construction industry in Asia Pacific.
Industry Overview
Increased usage of earth moving equipment in construction activities is driving the growth of the sector.
Lets take a look at this market in India.
The global heavy construction equipment industry is projected to grow at a CAGR of 6.80 per cent from
2015 to 2020 of which the heavy earthmoving equipment is the fastest growing segment across the
globe and India is no exception here.
Large investments in urban and rural infrastructure, such as the building of IT parks, shopping malls,
highway networks, residential areas, roads, ports and irrigation systems is driving the demand for heavy
earth moving and material handling equipment industry in the country.
Market Overview
The Indian construction equipment sector is made up of five main segments, namely, earth moving
equipment, road construction equipment, concrete equipment, material handling equipment, and
material processing equipment. Out of the five, heavy earth moving equipment and road construction
equipment segment accounts for close to 70 per cent of India's construction equipment market. In fact,
the earth moving equipment industry is the fastest growing segment in the heavy construction
equipment market not only in India but across the globe.
Coming to the definition of earth moving equipment, then they are generally referred to as heavy
equipment or heavy-duty vehicles designed especially for executing construction operation which
mostly involves earthwork operation. They are most commonly used in the construction industry to
move large amounts of earth or to dig foundations and landscape areas.
The heavy earth moving equipment operate through the mechanical advantage of a simple machine
where the ratio between input forces applied and force exerted is multiplied. They mostly use hydraulic
drives as a primary source of motion.
On the basis of operations performed by the various machines in the segment, the earth moving
equipment industry can be bifurcated into excavators (compact excavator, dredging, dragline excavator,
front shovel and others), loaders (skip loader and wheel loader), backhoe loaders, construction tractors
and others (grader, scraper, track loader and material handler etc). Out of all, backhoe loaders account
for 65 per cent of heavy earth moving equipment segment.
As a matter of fact, India is the second largest market for backhoe loaders in the world. The market for
backhoes is spreading eastwards, largely due to the way in which India is making progress in the
infrastructure segment. Backhoe loader segment is perhaps the only one in India amongst heavy
construction equipment that has reached a stage of maturity.
With the continuously changing operating conditions, it is becoming essential for the manufacturers and
service providers to continually invest in research and development activities and come up with
innovative solutions in the heavy earth moving equipment segment.
As a result, the heavy earth moving and material handling equipment segment is projected to grow at
the CAGR of 8.42 per cent from 2015 to 2020. It is believed that the key players in the segment will
implement different strategies such as expansions, agreements, contracts, joint ventures and
partnerships to garner a larger share in the market. Further, the leading heavy earth moving equipment
providers in the country will also focus on countries with emerging markets that are likely to show
potential for industrial development in the near future.
        The Indian Construction Industry an integral part of our national economy. The
         construction sector employs approximately 31 million people, accounts for some 6-
         8% GDP and after agriculture is the largest employment sector in the country. The
         construction industry has been growing at 9-11% per day
        The total market value of commercial and real estate schemes currently under
         construction in India is approx US$44 billion.
        Labour cost are also increasing and there is currently a shortage of high skilled
         labour in key city location.
   Construction Equipment  As per the study conducted by the confederation of
    India Industry (CII) and The Indian Earthmoving, Construction Industry
    Association Ltd. (IECIAL), the ECE industry has the potential to grow fivefold
    from US$ 12-13 billion by 2015, growing at rate of 24%. 200 companies are
    working in this field.
    Employment in construction materials and building hardware are as follows 
         India, in auto sector, is turning to be a sourcing base for the global auto
majors. The passenger car and the motorcycle segment is set to grow by 8-9
per cent in coming couple of years, says the ICRA report. The industry is likely
to maintain the growth momentum picked up in 2002-03.
       The ICRA's analysis points on the auto sector that the passenger car
market in the country was inching towards cars with higher displacements.
The sports-utility-vehicle (SUV) that was getting
crowded everyday, would witness intense competition as many SUVs had
been competitively priced, the report said.
       Honda, Suzuki, General Motors and Hyundai, the global automakers had
already launched their premium SUVs in the market to broaden their portfolio
and create product excitement in the segment estimated at about 10,000 units
annually.
       The commercial vehicles are likely to grow at a CAGR of 5.2 per cent.
Heavy commercial vehicles market would rise at 5.5 per cent and sales of light
buses and trucks would achieve 4.7 per cent growth. For the tractors, the
report predicts a growth at 4.6 per cent.
            The domestic automobile industry sales grew 12.8 per cent at 89,
10,224 units as against 78, 97,629 units in 2004-05.
            The automotive industry crossed a landmark with total vehicle
production of 10 million units.
            According to the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM),
car sales was 8, 82,094 units against 8, 20,179 units in 2004-05.
            Scooter segment grew by 1.5 per cent, fall at 9, 08,159 units against
9, 22,428 units in 2004-05.
         Commercial vehicles segment grew at 10.1 per cent with 3, 50,683
units against 3, 18,430 units in 2004-05.
         Medium and heavy commercial vehicles managed a growth of 4.5
per cent against 23 per cent growth in the year ended March 31, 2005.
Market Advantage
         Founde
                               1911
d
         Industr
                               Automobile
y
         Product
                               Cars and trucks
s
Website www.chevrolet.com/worldwide
History
      Chevrolet first used its "bowtie"logo in 1913. This logo is said to have
been designed from wallpaper Durant once saw in a French hotel. Another
theory of the design of the mark is from the Swiss cross, because Louis
Chevrolet was from Switzerland.
India
       Chevrolet also is the sole Engine supplier for the Formula Rolon single
seater series in India.
      Its king like entry happened in India in 1928 with its National
Series AB touring. Reliability of this car was proved by its 171 cubic inches,
24.7hp four cylinder engines.
     General Motors, parent company of Chevrolet, was the first in setting up
assembly plant in India. First office of Chevrolet was located at Mumbai and its
assembly plant was in Sewer.
    Aveo 1.4 E
    Aveo 1.4
     Aveo 1.4 LS
    Aveo 1.6 LT
Chevrolet Optra      Premium
     1.6 Elite
     1.6 LS Elite
     1.6 LT Royale
     1.8 LT
     1.8 LT AT
     Tavera B1
     Tavera B2
      Chevrolet Tavera Neo                SUV
              Neo LS-B3
              Neo SS-D1
              Spark 1.0 E
              Spark 1.0
              Spark 1.0 LS
              Spark 1.0 LT
Chevrolet                         Optra
Magnum 2.0 MAX TCDi
Chevrolet                         Optra
Magnum 2.0 LS TCDi
Chevrolet                         Optra
Magnum 2.0 LT TCDi
1. New opportunities.
4. Generate Referrals.
                Problem identification
                                        
Data collection
Problem identification:-
             The first & the foremost stage of the research process are to
identify the research problem. In a very real sense problem identification is the
heart of the research process. It is said that A problem well defined is half
solved, as poorly defined problem will not yield useful result. The problem must
give the maximum outcome from the research work.
             The time has gone when seller only concentrate on the selling of
the goods & not even following their customers about the liking & disliking about
product purchased. Now, the time has changed. The customers are cant as the
controlling function & marketing as the integrative function. Apart from that
importance of After Sales Service has increased, as consumer would come to
you for a free service & not for a paid service as outside a showroom a customer
would get service and parts at a low cost. Maruti Suzuki is not spaced out from
all, which
is dealing car wheeler industry. So, I have identified the research problem as
following.
Primary objective: -
Secondary objectives: -
Sampling type: -
Sampling unit: -
Sampling frame: -
Field area:-
Duration:-
                                                           st                th
               Duration of my project is of 8 weeks. [1         Jan. to 29
Feb.2008]
Data collection: -
1. Primary data
2. Secondary data
               These are the data, which are already exist and these data are
gathered for any other purpose but such data are also helpful to the present
study.
                Secondary data are collected from books, Internet &
newspaper.
Pilot testing: -
               One sample t  test is the statistical test which is used to test the
different between sample static & hypothesized population parameter. It is used
when the type of data are interval in nature.
                Cross tabulation & chi square test, which provide the method for
testing the association between the dependent, & independent variables.
   
       Since the duration of project is short, there may be a chance of same
       information left.
   
       All the information for doing the project is collected from consumer of
       specific region finding is limited to Navsari only.
   
       Responses to the questionnaire as per respondent understanding, which
       may differ from respondent to respondent.
   
       Due to the limitation of cost the question design can have limitation
       regarding the question and their options.
   
       Due to cost limitation the sample size of 130 surveys only could be
       collected which is small in size.
   
       The analysis and conclusion used is as per my knowledge of the
       concerned subject.
   
       In changing environment the recommendation given in the project may be
       out dated as year passed.
   
       Probability sampling was not used due to time and cost constantly and
       therefore the result cannot be generalized to the population.
   
       Interview and interviewee bias may be there which may distort the
       findings.
   
       Conclusion made be highly debatable.
To Err Is Human, To Forgive Is Divine!!!
CHAPTER 3: DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE:
INFERENCE:
Out of 130 customers interviewed, it is found that 7.7 % customers are of a age
18-27, 46.2 % people are of a age 28-37, 25.4% of customers are of 38-47 years
and 20.8 % customers are more than 47 years of age. So we can say that
majority of customer who come for service at Empire
Motors, Navsari are of age between 28 to 37 years as majority of a cars come
for a service are own by a travel agency business.
Education Status
INFERENCE:
Out of 130 customers interviewed, it is found that 59.9% % customers are
Under Graduate, 30% customers are Graduate, and 10.8% customers are
Postgraduate. So we can say that majority of customers who come for a
service at Empire Motors, Navsari belong to under graduate as a majority of a
customers interview are belong to a travel agency business.
Occupation
INFERENCE:
Out of 130 customer interviewed, it is found that student is 3.8%,
Service class is 0.8 %, businessman is of 33.1 %, professional is of 7.7 %, Driver
is of 54.6 %. So we can say that customer who come for service at
Empire Motors, Navsari are driver is majority numbers.
INFERENCE:
Out of 130 customer interviewed, it was found that customer who income is
less than 150,000 Rs. are found to be 28.5 % of total sample size, customer
whose income is between 150,001 to 250,000 Rs. are found to be 35.4 %,
customer whose income is between 250,001 to
350,001 Rs. are found to be 30 % and customer whose income group is more
than 350,001 Rs. are found to be 6.2% of population. So we can say that
customer who come for service at Empire Motors, Navsari are belong to
income group of Rs. 150,001 to 250,000 is found to be largest in Navsari
region.
INFERENCE:
Out of 130 customer interviewed, it is found that 90% of customer do there car
service on kms bases & 10% do on a time bases.
INFERENCE:
Out of 130 customers interviewed, it is found that 88.46% get repair work finisher
on time & 11.5% dont get on a time promised.
INFERENCE:
Income * Complete
                                            Crosstab
                                                          Complete                          Total
                                                                            Differen
                                          Resolve              Proble           t
                                          at First      Repair   m          Problem
                                           Time        Redone Remain            s
Inco   < 150,000         Count
                                                  29         4          1              3       37
me
                         % Within
                                              78.4%     10.8%      2.7%         8.1%       100.0%
                         Income
                         % Within
                                              34.9%     28.6%      5.3%        21.4%       28.5%
                         Complete
                         % Of Total           22.3%      3.1%        .8%        2.3%       28.5%
        150,001 -        Count
                                                  30         3          7              6       46
        250,000
                         % Within
                                              65.2%      6.5%     15.2%        13.0%       100.0%
                         Income
                         % Within
                                              36.1%     21.4%     36.8%        42.9%       35.4%
                         Complete
                         % Of Total           23.1%      2.3%      5.4%         4.6%       35.4%
        250,001 -        Count
                                                  18         7          9              5       39
        350,000
                         % Within
                                              46.2%     17.9%     23.1%        12.8%       100.0%
                         Income
                         % Within
                                              21.7%     50.0%     47.4%        35.7%       30.0%
                         Complete
                         % Of Total           13.8%      5.4%      6.9%         3.8%       30.0%
        > 350,000        Count                    6         0         2            0           8
                         % Within
                                              75.0%       .0%     25.0%          .0%       100.0%
                         Income
                         % Within
                                               7.2%       .0%     10.5%          .0%         6.2%
                         Complete
                         % Of Total            4.6%       .0%      1.5%          .0%         6.2%
Total                      Count                       83       14         19       14      130
                           % Within
                                                63.8%       10.8%      14.6%    10.8%    100.0%
                           Income
                           % Within
                                               100.0%       100.0%   100.0%     100.0%   100.0%
                           Complete
                           % Of Total           63.8%       10.8%      14.6%    10.8%    100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
                                            Asymp.
                                            Sig. (2-
                     Value         df       sided)
Pearson Chi-        14.387(
                                        9         .109
Square                    a)
Occupation * Dissatisfaction
Cross tab
                                                               Dissatisfaction
                                         Poor                          Not       Expensive
                                     Knowledge         Repair Long paying         Services
                                     of Mechanic          Time      Attention     Charges    Total
Occup Student Count
                                                   1              1          0           3           5
ation
                   % Within
                                            20.0%            20.0%         .0%      60.0%    100.0%
                   Occupation
                   % Within
                                            25.0%             4.3%         .0%       3.3%     3.8%
                   Dissatisfaction
% Of Total   .8%   .8%   .0%   2.3%   3.8%
        Service   Count
                                         0        1        0       0        1
        Class
                  % Within
                                      .0%    100.0%     .0%      .0% 100.0%
                  Occupation
                  % Within
                                      .0%     4.3%      .0%      .0%     .8%
                  Dissatisfaction
                  % Of Total          .0%      .8%      .0%      .0%     .8%
        Busines   Count
                                         1        6        6      30       43
        sman
                 % Within
                                     2.3%    14.0%    14.0%    69.8% 100.0%
                 Occupation
                 % Within
                                    25.0%    26.1%    54.5%    32.6%    33.1%
                 Dissatisfaction
                 % Of Total           .8%     4.6%     4.6%    23.1%    33.1%
        Professi Count
        onal                             1        5        1       3       10
                 % Within
                 Occupation         10.0%    50.0%    10.0%    30.0% 100.0%
                 % Within
                 Dissatisfaction    25.0%    21.7%     9.1%     3.3%    7.7%
                 % Of Total           .8%     3.8%      .8%     2.3%    7.7%
        Driver   Count                  1        10       4        56      71
                 % Within
                 Occupation          1.4%    14.1%     5.6%    78.9% 100.0%
                 % Within
                 Dissatisfaction    25.0%    43.5%    36.4%    60.9%    54.6%
                 % Of Total           .8%     7.7%     3.1%    43.1%    54.6%
Total            Count                  4        23       11       92     130
                 % Within
                 Occupation          3.1%    17.7%     8.5%    70.8% 100.0%
                 % Within
                 Dissatisfaction    100.0%            100.0%   100.0% 100.0%
                 % Of Total          3.1%    17.7%     8.5%    70.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
                                       Asymp.
                                       Sig. (2-
                   Value     df        sided)
Pearson Chi-
                   24.112(
Square                            12         .020
                        a)
Explanation of Pearsons Chi-square:
The Chi-square test is carried out at 95% confidence level (0.05 significance
level). The Pearson Chi-square value out as 0.020, which is less than the
significance level of 0.05, it means there exist a significant association between
occupation & dissatisfactions.
Purpose:
This question helps in getting information about what do customer
expectation from Empire motors.
INFERENCE:
Out of 130 customer interview 30% expect that there complain should be solve
at first time only, 3.1 % expect that Empire Motors should be open at weekend &
majority of customer expect that Empire Motors should charge fairly.
                                          Cross tab
                                                   Expectation               Total
                                    Solved                        Open at
                                    at First          Fair        Weeken
                                     Time           Charges         d
Occupat Student       Count
                                               2              2         1            5
ion
                      % Within
                                      40.0%             40.0%       20.0%   100.0%
                      Occupation
                      % Within
                                       5.1%              2.3%       25.0%     3.8%
                      Expectation
                      % Of Total       1.5%              1.5%         .8%     3.8%
         Service      Count
                                               1              0         0            1
         Class
                      % Within
                                     100.0%                .0%        .0%   100.0%
                      Occupation
                      % Within
                                       2.6%                .0%        .0%      .8%
                      Expectation
                      % Of Total         .8%               .0%        .0%      .8%
         Business     Count
                                               8            34          1       43
         man
                      % Within
                                      18.6%             79.1%        2.3%   100.0%
                      Occupation
                      % Within
                                      20.5%             39.1%       25.0%   33.1%
                      Expectation
                      % Of Total       6.2%             26.2%         .8%   33.1%
         Profession   Count
                                               4              5         1       10
         al
                      % Within
                                      40.0%             50.0%       10.0%   100.0%
                      Occupation
                      % Within
                                      10.3%              5.7%       25.0%     7.7%
                      Expectation
                      % Of Total       3.1%              3.8%         .8%     7.7%
         Driver       Count               24                46          1        71
                      % Within
                                      33.8%             64.8%        1.4%   100.0%
                      Occupation
                      % Within
                                      61.5%             52.9%       25.0%   54.6%
                      Expectation
                      % Of Total      18.5%             35.4%         .8%   54.6%
Total                 Count               39                87          4     130
                      % Within
                                      30.0%             66.9%        3.1%   100.0%
                      Occupation
                      % Within
                                     100.0%            100.0%      100.0%   100.0%
                      Expectation
                      % Of Total      30.0%             66.9%        3.1%   100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
                                            Asymp.
                                            Sig. (2-
                      Value       df        sided)
Pearson Chi-         13.935(
                                       8          .083
Square                     a)
                                  Ho: x =  =3
Alternative Hypothesis (H1): There is significant difference between the
calculated sample mean for individual service parameter and hypothesized
population mean (3.00). In other words, it means that we
hypothesized that for customer after sales service parameter respondent is no
neutral (either on agree or disagree) with the given statement.
                                     H1: x    3
Significance level: Here test of hypothesis is at 95% confidence level i.e. the
chance of occurring type 1 error is 5%.
One-Sample Statistics
                                                     Std.
                                         Std.        Error
                  N         Mean       Deviation     Mean
Delivery           130        3.90            .410    .036
Paper
                      130     3.97            .277    .024
work
Commitm
                      130     3.58            .745    .065
ent
Improve               130     3.84            .446    .039
Attention             130     3.85            .415    .036
Mechanics             130     3.95            .245    .021
Communi
                      130     3.95            .227    .020
cate
Experienc
                      130     3.83            .500    .044
e
Recomme
                      130     3.90            .370    .032
nd
Next car              130     3.72            .482    .042
Brand                 130     3.78            .436    .038
One-Sample Test
                                        Test Value = 3
                                                    Mean      95% Confidence
                                        Sig. (2-  Differen     Interval of the
                  t          df         tailed)      ce          Difference
               Lower        Upper       Lower    Upper        Lower      Upper
Delivery       25.020          129          .000   .900          .83        .97
Paper
                39.938        129             .000     .969       .92      1.02
work
Commitm
                 8.949         129         .000       .585        .46          .71
ent
Improve         21.457         129         .000       .838        .76       .92
Attention       23.455         129         .000       .854        .78       .93
Mechanics       44.448         129         .000       .954        .91      1.00
Communi
                47.610         129         .000       .946        .91          .99
cate
Experienc
                18.937         129         .000       .831        .74          .92
e
Recomme
                27.703         129         .000       .900        .84          .96
nd
Next car        17.087         129         .000       .723        .64          .81
Brand           20.314         129         .000       .777        .70          .85
INFERENCE:
                                       t-TEST
For Facilities & solution:
H o: x = = 4
H1: x 4
Significance level: Here test of hypothesis is at 95% confidence level i.e. the
chance of occurring type 1 error is 5%.
One-Sample Statistics
                                                                        Std.
                                                    Std.                Error
                                  N          Mean Deviation             Mean
           Facilities              130         3.67      .504               .044
             Solution                  130        3.42         .511          .045
One-Sample Test
                                                    Test Value = 4
                                                                              95% Confidence
                                              Sig. (2-         Mean            Interval of the
                          T           df      tailed)        Difference          Difference
                        Lower        Upper        Lower        Upper         Lower          Upper
Facilities              15.138         129            .000        .669          .58             .76
Solution                 9.433         129            .000        .423          .33             .51
Here sig. value for facilities & solution is 0.000, which is less than 0.05, so Null
Hypothesis (Ho) is rejected it means that there is significance difference between
the calculated sample mean and hypothesized population mean.
It means that respondents tend towards neutral regarding facilities & solution of
Empire Motorss service again in future. This level is not so strong towards
neutral level but it is nearer to positive response towards facilities & solution for
the customers by Empire Motors.
FACTOR ANALYSIS:
Different    respondents      rate    different     parameters    differently       for   their
Agreeness/Disagreeness level. For a firm it is not possible or feasible to focus on
each and every parameter. So here Factor Analysis test is used to reduce the
factors so that only those factors which are very important and need to focus
more are considered first.
                  Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of
                  Sampling Adequacy.                                  .708
                  Bartlett's Test      Approx. Chi-            525.47
                  of Sphericity        Square                       7
                                       Df                          78
                                       Sig.                      .000
KMO Value:
A significant value < 0.05 indicates that these data do not produce an identity
matrix or differ significantly from Identity matrix and are thus approximately
multivariate normal and acceptable for factor analysis. In this case the Bartlett
Test value is 0.000<0.05, so my set of distribution is multivariate normal and
acceptable for factor analysis.
        Here from total variance table it is interpreted that the four factors extracted
        together account for 62.279% of the total variance (information contained in the
        ten original variables.) Here while reducing these factors to four factors we lost
        (100-62.279=) 37.721% of the information content.
                                                                       Component
                                                              1         2      3               4
         Delivery                                             .220      .405    .689         -.011
         Facilities                                          -.038      .195    .361          .629
         Paper work                                           .174     -.014    .870          .091
         Commitment                                          -.009      .748    .243          .049
         Improve                                              .162      .635  -.014           .207
         Solution                                            -.049      .158  -.052           .785
         Attention                                            .293      .725    .047          .044
         Mechanics                                            .725      .032    .156         -.216
         Communicate                                          .672      .255    .224         -.142
         Experience                                           .785      .350    .152          .047
         Recommend                                            .705      .375   -.011          .158
         Next car                                             .538     -.045  -.239           .486
         Brand                                                .555     -.126    .196          .363
          Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation
            Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. a. Rotation
                          converged in 8 iterations.
Inferences:
Here there are 4 reduced factors that we get by Factor Analysis Test. These
factors are as follows:
   1. Factor 1: Experience, Mechanics & Recommend. We can call it as
                            Assurance of Service
           2. Factor 2: Commitment & Attention. We can call it as:
                             Reliability of Service
             3. Factor 3: Paper work & delivery. We can call it as:
                           Tangibility of Service
             4. Factor 4: Solution & Facilities. We can call it as:
                          Solution through facilities
From above table we can say that customers are considering more the
dimensions like Assurance, Reliability, Tangibility & solution through facilities.
                             RELIABILITY TEST
                           Case Processing Summary
                                                 N         %
                       C       Valid            130       100.0
                       a    Excluded(a)          0         .0
                       s
                       e          Total         130       100.0
                       s
Reliability Statistics
INFERENCE:
Reliability Analysis address the issues of whether this instrument will produce the
same result each time, it is administered to the person in the same setting. Here
Alpha is 0.770, almost 0.8. According to thumb rule of Alpha, here instrument
validity is near to Excellent.
                 FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS
       
                 90 % of respondents service their vehicle at certain kms.
       
                 88.46 % of respondents get their vehicle by time promised
for delivery.
       
                 63.8 % of respondents problems resolved at first time only.
       
                 10.8 % of respondent say different problems develop while service
vehicle.
       
             70.8 % of respondents are not satisfied with Empire Motors due to
expensive service charges.
       
             There do exist a dependency between occupation & repair work
done complete at Empire Motors, Navsari.
       
            There is an association between occupation & dissatisfactions with
empire motors.
       
               There do exist a dependency between occupation & customers
expectation from Empire Motors, Navsari after a service done
to their cars.
       
            In delivery, paper work, commitment, improve ness, mechanics,
commitment, over all experience, recommend, next car,
brand customer are near to agree.
       
                 In facilities and solution provide by an empire motors customer are
neutral.
       
             Assurance of service is a first factor, reliability of service is a
second factors, tangibility of service is third factor & solution through
facilities is fourth factors out of a thirteen factors analysis.
                    RECOMMENDATIONS
      Survey of any topic ends when surveyor with the help of the survey
notes suggestions. Company tries to increase the satisfaction level of
consumer. Following are the recommendation for this project:
  
      Dhru Motors should increase the number of incentives provide to the
      customer i.e. discount to overcome expensive service
      charges.
  
      Satisfied customer will continue to purchase again in the future but
      dissatisfied will stop purchasing from Dhru Motors & are
      likely to spreads the word among friends. So Empire motors must
      work to satisfy the customer who have not visit an Dhru motors
      service center after competition of free services.
  
      Before introduce any new facilities in after sales service Dhru Motors
      should meet existing customer & ask for their opinions.
  
      Dhru motors even think about to run award programs to
      recognize the best performing & outstanding employees.
  
      Dhru Motors can achieve 100% success in customers satisfaction
      in term of after sales service, if they will motivate
      their employees with handsome incentives & reward for creating
      customer delight. Many global automotives giant are practicing this
      marketing strategy these days. For example  Dhru Motors may set
      aside a special fund of Rs. 100,000 for those customers who complain
      regarding the service [cars]. If any customers complain, then after
      paying the actual amount whatever is left is distribute the remaining
      amount equally among the employees. This means that if no one
      complains, then Rs. 100,000 will be equally distributed among the staff
      members. If there are 100 employees, then each one will get Rs. 1000
      more
    their salary. This will definitely motivate the employees to 1005 satisfy
    customer & create customer delight.
    Dhru Motors have to think carefully on its labors charges price cut off
    will enable a huge market share & it will force the
    customers to switch off to other service provider.
                                                                           th
Donald R. Copper Pamela S. Schinler Business Research Methods [8 Edition]
McGraw-Hill, New Delhi. [Page no. 64, 65, 81,146,663]
                                                                                th
Richard M. Hill, Ralph S. Alexander, James S. Crisis, Industrial Marketing (4
Edition) Publication AITBS. [page no 188]
                                                               th
 Thompson Strickland, Strategic Mgt. Concepts & Cases (12           Edition)
Publication Tata McGraw Hill Edition. [Page no. 143-144]
Thomas L. Wheelen, David Hunger, Kish Rangarajan Strategic Mgt. & Business
Policy Publication Pearson Education [page no 86]
Website
www.surfindia.com/automobile/industrygrowth.html
www.indiamart.com/production.html
                       Questionnaire
   3) How the vehicle was after the repair work was complete?
        a) [ ] Problem resolved the first time
        b) [ ] Repair work had to be redone
        c) [ ] Problem remains
        d) [ ] Different problem[s] developed.
Demographic Profile
 Age group:
                [ ] 18-27                           [ ] 28-37
                [ ] 37-47                           [ ] > 47
 Education status:
              [ ] Under graduate                    [ ] Graduate
              [ ] Post graduate                     [ ] any other (specify)
 Occupation:
             [ ] Student                            [ ] Service class
             [ ] Businessman                        [ ] Professional
             [ ] Housewife                          [ ] Drivers
 Household annual income:
             [ ] < 150000                           [ ] 150001-250000
             [ ] 250001-350000                      [ ] > 350001