Blake Emblematic Tradition
Blake Emblematic Tradition
V o l u m e 15 N u m b e r 3 W i n t e r 1981-82
&3Ue
G. E . BENTLEY, J R . , o f the U n i v e r s i t y o f T o r o n t o ,
c l a i m s t o be a s t u d e n t o f l e a r n e d p i g s by p r o f e s -
s i o n and a c a t c h e r o f bears by a v o c a t i o n .
M A R T I N B U T L I N i s Keeper o f t h e H i s t o r i c B r i t i s h
C o l l e c t i o n a t t h e Tate G a l l e r y , London, a u t h o r o f
numerous works on Blake and T u r n e r , and f r e q u e n t
c o n t r i b u t o r t o Blake. His c a t a l o g u e o f The Paint-
AN ILLUSTRATED QUARTERLY 5 9 ings and Drawings of William Blake was p u b l i s h e d
by Yale U n i v e r s i t y Press e a r l i e r t h i s y e a r .
CONTENTS D E T L E F DORRBECKER t e a c h e s a r t
University of Trier.
history at the
NEWSLETTER
B L A K E / A N I L L U S T R A T E D Q U A R T E R L Y is published under
the sponsorship of the Department of English,
University of New Mexico.
INFORMATION
108
EMBLEMATIC T R A D I T I O N I N
B L A K E ' S THE GATES OF PARADISE
JOSEPH S. SALEMI
31 Blake, Plate 16, "I have said to the Worm: The form and meaning of Plate 16 should be
Thou art my mother and my sister." examined in the light of three older emblems. The
first two are from Perriere's Le Theatre, and both
32 "Flateurs de court . . .," Perriere, he Theatre depict a dead man lying on the earth. One shows a
de8 bons engine (1539). body attacked by crows that pick and tear at its
flesh; the other a corpse from which lice and similar
121
In each of these emblems animal or insect life
serves as an image of the evil, the corrupt, or the
anti-human. By using the insect or the reptile as
a vehicle for derogatory metaphor and invidious
comparison, the emblematists deliberately keep clear
the traditional distinction between high and low,
life and death, good and evil. Blake, however,
transcends these orthodox divisions; he has reached
the point in Plate 16 where simple dualities do not
represent true vision. Snake and worm are not the
repulsive blights familiar in traditional iconography
--they are "mother and sister" to the traveller,
whose perspective on life and death has been
infinitely deepened to include even the darker side
of existence. 28
DETLEF W. DORRBECKER
THE COLOGNE COPY OF INNOCENCE, PLATE BY PLATE PI. 7: "The Ecchoing Green," II. Leaf-size 20.9 x
14.7 cm. The group of figures is set against a
Note: The printing color is a pale, somewhat sepia- blue background which changes first to pink, and
like brown, unless stated otherwise. All the then to yellow, with some orange added in the upper
strengthening of outlines has been executed with pen part of the design. As in many other copies, the
and gray or black ink. Generally, this pen work and two grape-plucking figures are clothed in pink and
the coloring follow closely the etched lines of the blue dress. Below them, the man wears a gray-green
designs. There is no colorprinting, of course, and overcoat, and the surrounding figures are clad in
the following glosses all apply to watercolor washes dresses of pink, yellow, and orange. Some of the
which have been added to the printed design by hand. contours and faces of the figures have been worked
Blake's foliation, running from 3 to 17, is to be over with pen and ink. The large vine has a brown
found in the upper right corners of each page and stem and green leaves (which, with Blake, is not a
has been written with grayish ink. In the measure- matter-of-fact).
ments height precedes width.
PI. 8: "The Lamb." Leaf-size 20.5 x 14.3 cm.,
PI. 4: "Introduction." Leaf-size 20.1 x 14.5 cm. printed in a somewhat darker brown than the rest of
At three sides the design is surrounded by a light the plates. All in all, the coloring here is more
blue wash; at the bottom, however, there is no subdued; there are yellowish greens for the fore-
indication of "the water clear" (as, e.g., in Copies ground and the tree's foliage in mid-distance, a
T and Z of the Songs), but a simple horizontal strip warm quality of yellow for the upper and rose color
of brown color from which the Tree-of-Jesse foliage for the lower portion of the sky. The same hue of
shoots up into the margins. These vines are colored pink has also been employed for the child's skin.
green and yellow, and, from the tiny panels they The outlines of the child's arms, its hands, and the
enclose, streaks of rose color are drawn horizontally central lamb have all been reworked with the pen,
into the area of the text. On both sides the figures and the child's right hand even shows some
in the third vignette from the bottom, as well as pentimenti.
the foliage itself, have been strengthened with pen
and ink. PI. 9: "The Little Black Boy," I. Leaf-size 20.6
x 14.2 cm., printed in brown. The mother and child
PI. 5 (illus. 1): "The Shepherd." Leaf-size 20.1 are the usual dark brown; the mother's skirt, though
x 14.0 cm. Elaborately colored, with much modulation partly shaded, is of the same color in a brighter,
of the various hues, creating a completely convincing nougat-like mixture. The foliage of the tree,
image of an Arcadian sunset. Behind the ochre printed in brown, has been enriched by yellow and
colored flock extends a line of bushes in varied green washes. These contrast with the blue and
tones of green; the hill in the background is of a reddish tints which have been employed for the sky.
saturated dark blue. Above, pink washes have been The orb of the sun on the horizon of the qreen hills
laid over some gray shading. Behind the text panel does not at all act as a source of light (here then,
the sky has been tinted with a light blue which also the sun itself appears to be "bereav'd of light").
reappears at the top of the design where it has been Its dull yellowish-brown color seems to belie the
applied in a darker pigmentation. The plant twining luminosity of both the sky in the design, and the
up the trunk of the tree in other copies has been bright yellow, pink, and blue washes which streak
127
^s
130
5
t u r n , cannot be i d e n t i f i e d with any other of the As i n other copies of the i l l u m i n a t e d books which are generally
untraced copies of e i t h e r the Songs of Innocence or assumed to have been numbered by Blake h i m s e l f , the f o l i a t i o n of
the Neuerburg copy has been executed i n i n k . The color of the
the combined Songs of Innocence and of Experience. ink i s of the same l i g h t gray which was employed f o r the s i n g l e
framing l i n e s in most of the p l a t e s . The numbers themselves I
Obviously, Dr. Walter Neuerburg bought Copy Y have compared w i t h those in facsimiles of the Notebook, the
from Rauch (who may well have acted on behalf of the "Pickering Manuscript" of post1803, and copies of the i l l u m i n a t e d
books where the hand has been accepted as Blake's own. Since the
distinguished German c o l l e c t o r ) or some intermediary character of the s c r i p t i n the Cologne copy o stronaly
agent soon a f t e r the sale at Sotheby's was over. resembles that i n the other examples, I see no reason to doubt
This is confirmed by the correspondence between the the a u t h e n t i c i t y of the present p a g i n a t i o n .
c o l l e c t o r and Mr. and Mrs. Kastner of Wolfenbuttel 6
See Bentley 1977, pp. 37576; according to the Keynes & Wolf
which is s t i l l preserved with the p r i n t s at the WRM. ordering of Tnnocenct , the Cologne copy shows the f o l l o w i n q
The f i r s t of these l e t t e r s i s dated 6 April 1962, sequence of p l a t e s : 3. 15. 1011. 8. 2930. 9. 13. 2021. 28.
and i t refers to the projected r e s t o r a t i o n of Blake's 1819. 12.
newly acquired p r i n t s . This r e s t o r a t i o n had been
'' Bentley's entry under the respective heading i n his table of
brought to a successful end by 19 May 1962. 1 7 The watermarks, ".',>... (3 p i s . ) , " r e f e r s to the three plates i n
present owner himself, however, was r e l u c t a n t to ( Y ) , i . e . our copy (see Bentley 1977, p. 7 1 ; Professor
supply me with f u r t h e r information about the Bentley agreed to t h i s c o r r e c t i o n i n correspondence). The
provenance of his treasure; yet he was kind enough watermark fragments of the Neuerburg copy both appear i n the
lower r i g h t corner of the sheet, and i t seems l i k e l y that w i t h
to t e l l me t h a t " a l l in a l l " t h e reconstruction the edge o f the paper not j u s t h a l f of the maker's name ( t o the
of the l a s t stages i n the h i s t o r y of his copy, as r i g h t ) but also a datewhich o r i g i n a l l y may have been v i s i b l e
offered here, is c o r r e c t . 1 8 belowhas been trimmed o f f . At the same time I ought to point
out that Bentley's source f o r the d e s c r i p t i o n of Copy
Y (see below) mentioned the Buttanshaw watermark f o r plates 6,
Songs, Copy BB, and Innocence, Copy Y, have been 1516 (see Bentley 1977, p. 366); I cannot f i n d any s u f f i c i e n t
merely ^ d i s c o v e r e d . And y e t , the f i r s t of Blake's explanation for t h i s discrepancy, but I hope t h a t the remaining
i l l u m i n a t e d books ever to appear in a c o l l e c t i o n on evidence w i l l prove to be strong enough to confirm my i d e n t i f i c a
t i o n of :>.>. tenet (Y) with the f i f t e e n p r i n t s at Cologne.
the Continent, outside of the Englishspeaking
world, may raise hopes f o r more and even bigger . , pp. 7 1 , 366, 368.
surprises in the f u t u r e . I do not expect the
"Ancient B r i t o n s , " or the painted version of the . , p. 383. An i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of the p l a t e numbers i n the
Cologne copy that concludes that the sequence here chosen by the
"Last Judgement" stored away on the backstairs of p o e t p r i n t e r a c t u a l l y a n t i c i p a t e d the order of the l a t e copies i n
some provincial museum on the Continent. But the f u l l , must remain h y p o t h e t i c a l . The Neuerburg copy i s a fragment,
unexpected f i n d i n g at Cologne c e r t a i n l y h i g h l i g h t s and the order of plates 418 does not necessarily imply that the
another "work needed" in the f i e l d of Blake studies sequence of the remaining pages, now lacking from i t ,
must also have been the same as in the l a t e copies. In t h i s
which is missing from Gerald Bentley's l i s t . Our context i t is of p a r t i c u l a r importance that plates 227 (with
knowledge of the e n t i r e corpus of the graphic work plates 53 and 54 i n t e r p o l a t e d ) i n Copy S of w i t h an
of William Blake w i l l be l i m i t e d i n an almost 1808 Whatman watermarkreally are in the same order as i n the
:
inexcusable way u n t i l a thorough i n v e s t i g a t i o n i n t o l a t e copies and in the fragmented Copy Y (:'. :'.:., p. 377). Thus,
the holdings of at least the major public c o l l e c t i o n s the e x i s t i n g evidence c e r t a i n l y makes the Coloqne copy and
Innoaenae (S) the most l i k e l y candidates to t e s t i f y f o r a much
in France, Germany, I t a l y , and the Scandinavian e a r l i e r date of the s o c a l l e d "standard o r d e r . "
countries has been undertaken. 1 9
I
In the l e f t margin of t h i s sheet the fragment of a lower case
roman l e t t e r , probably a " d , " is v i s i b l e . At f i r s t glance i t
looks as i f p r i n t e d , but i n f a c t i t appears to be the only
s u r v i v i n g part of an ink i n s c r i p t i o n which was cut o f f when the
leaves were prepared f o r binding.
1
See Robert N. Essick's a r t i c l e w i t h "New Information on Blake's II
I l l u m i n a t e d Books.", , 15 (1981), Blake's reason f o r doing t h i s must have been the weak
413. l e g i b i l i t y of the t e x t i n t h i s impression of p l a t e 13, not the
decision to tolor the words themselves ( a s , e . g . , i n the l a t e
The p r i v a t e c o l l e c t i o n of Dr. Walter and Marlis Neuerburg, Copy H o f thi at the F i t z w i l l i a m Museum). I could
which since 1978 has been on permanent loan at the w a l l r a f detect no textual variants caused by t h i s reworking except the
RichartzMuseum, covers European printmaking from Goya to the commas a f t e r the " f a t h e r s " i n 11. 1 and 3, at the end of 1. 4 ,
Brucke masters. Among many other English i l l u s t r a t e d books of and a f t e r "deep" in 1. 7, and the colon at the end of 1 . 8,
t h i s period i t also includes a proof copy of Blake's I which found no consideration in the "strengthened v e r s i o n . "
A preliminary review of the holdings of the
c o l l e c t i o n is given by Barbara C a t o i r , "Panorama der europaischen ' Copy P of .'.. noi (now at Yale) was p r i n t e d on d i f f e r e n t
Graphik: Die Sammlung Neuerburg im Kblner W a l l r a f R i c h a r t z makes of paper, which, however, are dated 1802 and 1804. The
Museum/Von der Dauerleihgabe zum B e s i t z ? " . copy was given by Mai kin to one of his f r i e n d s in 1805, and thus
., 22 July 1980, p. 19. I am much indebted to Dr." i t was e v i d e n t l y produced at about the same time when Blake
Neuerburg f o r his ' . .it the same time, I would l i k e to probably also executed the present copy (see Bentley 1977, pp.
thank Dr. H ella Robels, curator of p r i n t s and drawings at the 366, 409). The sequence of plates in Copy P d i f f e r s l a r g e l y
WRM, and her s t a f f f o r organizational h e l p . Neither the from that of the Cologne fragment, y e t the c o l o r i n g of the two
"rediscovery" nor t h i s p u b l i c a t i o n of the . cries a t copies may have a l o t in common. David Bindman i ' ts an
Cologne would have been possible w i t h o u t H orst Meller of the Artist (Oxford: Phaidon, 1977), p. 59, described Copy P as
Dept. of English at the U n i v e r s i t y of H eidelberg and Robert N. follows: ". . . the o u t l i n e s are f i r m l y o u t l i n e d i n pen. . .
Essick, who both played a v i t a l part in the series of coincidences The predominant color note is a cerulean b l u e , which acts
mentioned above. The reproductions were supplied by the i 1 1 u s i o n i s t i c a l l y , usually over the whole page, g i v i n g the
Rheinisches B i l d a r c h i v , Cologne (where p r i n t s can be ordered, suggestion that the t e x t is f l o a t i n g i n the sky. The e f f e c t s of
quoting t h e i r negative nos. 180629180643). luminosity are correspondingly more s u b t l e . "
1
' G. E. Bentley, J r . . . (Oxford: Clarendon Press, ' This becomes even more evident when the leaves are measured
1977), pp. 364432. My paramount indebtedness to t h i s work w i l l at a l l four sides. In most cases the measurements provided above,
be evident throughout the f o l l o w i n g pages. which have been taken at the l e f t and bottom edges of the paper,
do not e x a c t l y match those of the opposite s i d e s . For p l a t e 8 ,
" The xeroxed TS of the catalogue is a v a i l a b l e at the WRM P r i n t s e . g . , I noted 20.4 ( l e f t ) x 14.6 (bottom) cm., and 20.6 ( r i g h t ) x
Dept.; i t l i s t s the set from Tnnooeno* as i n v . nos. 15611575. 14.1 (top) cm.
131
14
The o r i g i n a l (?paper) covers or any other remains of a former taken w i t h both the f r a g i l e p r i n t i n g r e l i e f and the d e l i c a t e
binding have not been preserved w i t h the p r i n t s . layers of p a i n t . Consequently her r e s t o r a t i o n concentrated on
lb
cleaning the paper i n the margins, leaving the actual p r i n t i n g
I have not been able to obtain a copy of t h i s p a r t i c u l a r sales surface unaffected.
catalogue from a German l i b r a r y . The sale was probably devoted
e x c l u s i v e l y to books, since there i s also no copy of a Sotheby's Each o f the f i f t e e n leaves has been b l i n d stamped with a
catalogue w i t h t h i s date in the Dept. of Prints and Drawings of c o l l e c t o r ' s mark (showing the Neuerburg coat of arms) in the
the B r i t i s h Museum. I did not go any f u r t h e r ; I have r e l i e d lower r i g h t corner of the sheets. This mark i s b a s i c a l l y the
e n t i r e l y on Bentley's account of the f i r s t s u r f a c i n g of Innocence same as the one described f o r Heinrich Neuerburg, the present
(Y); see Bentley 1977, p. 412. owner's f a t h e r , under no. 1344a i n F r i t s Lugt's'/,ec Marques de
16
collections de dessins et d'estampes, supplement [ i . e . v o l . 2]
Ibid., p. 412, n. 1. (La Haye: Martinus N i j h o f f , 1956), p. 190.
17
The r e s t o r a t i o n was executed by Mrs. Anita Kastner, who has 9
This attempt at b i b l i o g r a p h i c exactness and i t s amateur author
done expert work f o r the Herzog-August-Bibliothek a t Wolfenbuttel have p r o f i t t e d enormously from the help of three f r i e n d s who we
From her reportwhich is s t i l l i n s e r t e d i n the respective box at professionals i n the f i e l d . Wihtout the questions and suggestions
the WRM--and from the p r i n t s themselves one gets the impression of G. E. Bentley, J r . , Robert N. Essick, and S i r Geoffrey Keynes
that she t r e a t e d the fragment of Blake's i l l u m i n a t e d book w i t h my d e s c r i p t i o n would have lacked much relevant i n f o r m a t i o n .
a l l the care and knowledge that are required f o r a d i f f i c u l t job Those flaws in the argument which c e r t a i n l y remain, however, are
l i k e t h i s . From her correspondence w i t h the owner i t i s clear e n t i r e l y my own.
that Mrs. Kastner knew beforehand how much special care must be
132
measuring about 3 1/4 x 6 i n . (9.5 x 15 cm.), i s a
MINUTE
v a r i a n t of the group on the recto of God the Father
and attendant angels. God the Father is shown holding
a s c r o l l that forms a great arc above his head, and
I t was perhaps to be expected that even in the the colors of the figures as f o l l o w s : "The maiden
short time between the l a s t p o s s i b i l i t y of on his [ J o b ' s ] l e f t is robed in pale pink, she on
making corrections and additions and the his r i g h t in yellow, while the t h i r d , who s i t s
actual p u b l i c a t i o n of my catalogue of The Paintings facing him upon the ground, is in palest b l u e . " 5
and Drawings of William Blake, there would be changes Again only the blue can be seen. However, in the
of ownership and new discoveries. Given that t h i s t h i r d of the group, "Job's S a c r i f i c e , " 6 most of the
had to happen, i t is g r a t i f y i n g that the Tate colors described by Graham Robertson can s t i l l be
Gallery is the beneficiary in both respects. discerned, as has been kindly confirmed by Miss
Miranda Strickland-Constable and Mr. Alexander w.
Robertson of the City Art Gallery, Leeds. Blue i s
The d e l i c a t e pencil and watercolor sketch for usually the f i r s t color to fade from Blake water-
the a l t e r n a t i v e composition of '"Every Man also gave c o l o r s , so the presence of t h i s color and the absence
him a Piece of Money'" has led a checkered career of those described by Graham Robertson i n the f i r s t
since i t was sold from the c o l l e c t i o n of Kerrison two watercolors i s a l l the more mysterious.
Preston at Sotheby's in 1974. Bought by Colnaghi's
and included in t h e i r e x h i b i t i o n of English Drawings,
Watercolours and Paintings i n 1976, i t was stolen only While updating my catalogue I should perhaps
to be recovered two years l a t e r i n a v e r i t a b l e point out that three names of owners, i f not more,
Aladdin's Cave of stolen works of a r t . The drawing are missing from the general index: Besterman, Dr.
'had been acquired by Kerrison Preston at the sale of Theodore, f o r catalogue nos. 119 and 179A; Bindman,
the famous Blake c o l l e c t i o n of W. Graham Robertson David, f o r nos. 147 and 232, with an i n d i r e c t
and i t s h i s t o r y before that can be t r a c e d , with near reference under no. 152; and Clayton-Stamm, M. D. E.,
c e r t a i n t y , back to Frederick Tatham and Blake's widow. for no. 692. I should be most g r a t e f u l f o r any
However, t h i s good and e x c i t i n g h i s t o r y seems not to f u r t h e r errors or omissions to be pointed out to me;
have enhanced i t s i n t e r e s t ; the work f a i l e d to obviously, i f they are of importance, they should
a t t r a c t a single bid when offered again at Sotheby's be published in Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly.
in 1979. I t was at t h i s point in i t s h i s t o r y that
i t was recorded in my catalogue, somewhat d i s i n -
genuously, as being in a "Private C o l l e c t i o n , Great
B r i t a i n . " 1 Thanks to the help of Mr. James M i l l e r
1
of Sotheby's, the sketch has now been bought by the Martin B u t l i n , Th
1981, I , 423-24 no. 553, reproduced i n c o l o r , I I p i . 718;
Friends of the Tate Gallery f o r presentation to the re-examination under ideal conditions i n the Tate Gallery
Tate. Considerably improved i n appearance by Conservation Department has revealed t h a t Blake began to r e i n f o r c e
conservation treatment, i t is now on view in the some of the o u t l i n e s in pen, and has also s l i g h t l y modified the
Tate's Blake g a l l e r y , hanging with the companion dimensions which should read, "framinq l i n e 8 x 7 (22.8 x 17.8)
on paper 9 1 / 2 x 7 1/2 (24.2 x 1 9 ) . "
watercolor of "Job and his Daughters" on long loan
to the Tate from Dr. R. E. Hemphill; 2 both works were B u t l i n no. 556, repr. p i . 757.
executed i n the early 1820s at the time when Blake 3
was repeating his series of Job watercolors for John Butlin nos. 554 and 557;.', repr. pis. 755 and 779.
Linnell and preparing the engravings from them. '* Kerrison Preston, -rsan
, 1952, p. 138 no. 50.
However, in addition to improving the sketch's
5
appearance conservation treatment has also revealed Preston, p. 140 no. 51.
a h i t h e r t o unknown pencil sketch on the back. This, 1
Preston, p. 136 no. 49; Butlin p. 423 no. 552.
133
*
G r e g Crossan
',
*
> 1
1
> \
I dried my tears and armd my fears
With ten thousand shields and spears.
I
Inflamed by jealousy of Philocles' love for Candiope, n t h e i r exhaustive research, the editors of
and unwilling to reveal her own love, she so William Blake's Designs for Edward Young's
completely baffles Philocles with her erratic moods Night Thoughts (1980')1 were able to add*
that he decides to flee, but a series of twists in four "new" copies to the two e a r l i e r censuses of
the plot sees him return to court, by now aware of colored copies of the engraved work, 2 and they s t a t e ,
her true feelings and half-inclined to woo her. "At present twenty-three coloured copies are believed
Honor, however, and the conventions of comedy, to e x i s t , a l l but one of which have recently been
determine otherwise, and at the end of the play the studied by one or more of the e d i t o r s of the present
Queen resigns herself to remaining a maid. e d i t i o n . " Somewhat l a t e r i n t h e i r commentary they
continue, " S t i l l untraced i s the w e l l - a t t e s t e d
The parallels between poem and play are naturally Gaisford-Macgeorge copy, called G i n the Bentley
limited, yet Dryden's maiden Queen and Blake's share census and l a s t located i n 1926." The editors
the same basic predicament: obscure t h i s " w e l l - a t t e s t e d " copy, since they choose
to omit a l l mention of i t from t h e i r census of
And I wept both day and niqht, colored copies. The only physical description
And hid from him my hearts delight . . . appears i n footnote 8 1 , some f o r t y pages a f t e r the
census.
("The Angel," 7-8)
While engaged i n research quite unrelated to
. . . I have conceal'd my passion Blake f o r the Lutheran Church i n America, I
With such care from him, that he knows not yet discovered t h i s untraced colored copy of Night
I love . . . Thoughts i n a disused c l o s e t , among the books
bequeathed to the Church by Mrs. William T. Tonner
i n 1971. Upon her death, a portion of Mrs. Tonner's
(Secret Love, III, i,
distinguished Blake c o l l e c t i o n passed to the
48-50, in Beaurline and
Lutheran Church, including one o f the two recorded
Bowers, eds., John Dryden:
impressions of the c o l o r - p r i n t "Newton" ( B u t l i n
Four Comedies, 1967)
307), an early state of the copper engraving, "The
Canterbury P i l g r i m s , " and a drawing, "Moses s t r i k i n g
Philocles is not exactly an "Angel mild," yet when the rock" ( B u t l i n 445). The remainder of the Tonner
he contemplates union with the maiden Queen he is Blake c o l l e c t i o n was given to the Philadelphia
moved to remark: Museum of A r t , and was described by Martin B u t l i n
i n the Museum's Bulletin.3 Hereafter I w i l l r e f e r
Sure I had one of the fallen Angels Dreams; to the Gaisford-Macgeorge copy as the Tonner-
All Heav'n within this hour was mine! Lutheran Church copy.
(V, i, 448-49)
The purpose of t h i s b r i e f note i s to describe
t h i s newly discovered copy of Night Thoughts, and
But the lines from Dryden's play which might provide to correct and update the provenance information.
the most enlightening gloss on Blake's poem are the The following entry follows the format used by the
words of the maiden Queen's song in IV, ii, of which e d i t o r s of the recently published e d i t i o n of Night
I quote here the opening stanza: Thoughts:
I feed a flame within which so torments me I-12A (Moss-Bentley G). White Death.
That it both pains my heart, and yet contents
me: Bound i n three-quarter red-brown morocco over
'Tis such a pleasing smart, and I so love it, greenish-blue marbled paper by R i v i e r e , marbled
That I had rather die, than once remove it. end-papers. The spine i s tooled i n the s t y l e of
Roger Payne. Top edge g i l t , others uncut. Lacks
(IV, ii, 23-26) the Explanation of the Engravings, which i s ,
however, supplied i n 19th century t y p e - f a c s i m i l e .
Watermarks on twelve leaves. 16-3/4 x 12-3/4
Witless woe, i f you l i k e , but not without beguile- inches. (42.5 x 32.8 cm.). Grotesque color on
ment! The "hearts d e l i g h t " that causes Blake's p. 10 (6E), p. 31 (18E), p. 35 (20E). No JC
dreamer to weep is c l e a r l y akin to the "pleasing monogram.
smart" of t h i s l i t t l e song o f secret l o v e , and Blake's
one and only use of the phrase "maiden Queen," I 1) Acquired by Thomas Gaisford (1779-1855) of
suggest, i s a deliberate nod in t h i s d i r e c t i o n . O f f i n g t o n , Worthing. He added his engraved book-
135
W
engravings. The newlydiscovered copy of Night e are s t i l l \/ery far from understanding the
Thoughts cannot be placed as copy 116 since that passage about M ars in plate 5 of America,
would put i t in the midst of seriously defective despite the recent proposal, put f o r t h by
copies. Since i t contains "grotesque c o l o u r i n g , " Rodney M . and M ary R. Baine i n Englis h Language Notes ,
lacks the Explanation l e a f , and has demonstrable 13 (1975), 1418, that Swedenborg i s behind i t . I
provenance closest to copy 112, t h i s new copy can have been puzzling f o r several years over the Sweden
best be located as copy I12A. I t must be pointed borg quotations they o f f e r , but I cannot see t h e i r
out that the e d i t o r s of Night Thoughts are incon bearing, however i n t e r e s t i n g they may be i n them
s i s t e n t in the arrangement by earliness of pro selves, on the meaning of the America passage. The
venance, and one might at the same time question the idea that the s p i r i t s of M ars are the best s p i r i t s ,
wisdom of organizing a census in part on such s l i g h t the notion that M ars represents a balance of i n t e l l e c t
grounds as the binder's l o c a t i o n of the ExDlanation and emotions, and the other odd Swedenborgian
leaf. speculations seem at best only vaguely relevant and
at worst quite contrary to the tenor of the r e s t of
I t may well be that t h i s colored copy of Night the poem. They come up f i r s t against our i n e v i t a b l e
Thoughts has escaped the notice of Blake b i b l i o association of M ars with warfare, an association
graphers since i t appeared i n the Bishop sale under Blake gives no suggestion we should break. As the
Young's name at the very end of the l a s t catalogue Baines admit, moreover, Swedenborg cannot account
volume, and was not mentioned under the general f o r "the planets t h r e e . " Even, f i n a l l y , i f we some
Blake heading. When one considers the prices how knew that Swedenborg's Earths in our Solar Sys tem
fetched by other Blake works at that sale, i t seems were the "source," we would s t i l l be faced with the
that t h i s copy of Night Thoughts might well have problem, worse than the one we had before, of how
brought more i f catalogued w i t h the other Blakeana i t s meanings f i t together with the rest of the poem.
e a r l i e r i n the sale.
In any case, I have a few t e n t a t i v e suggestions
about the passage. I cannot make i t a l l cohere, but
the connections I o f f e r are the s o r t of thing we
1
William Blake' s Ui Edward Yi '," ought to do to i t ; someone with a fresher eye w i l l
edited w i t h conmentary by John E. Grant, Edward J . Rose, M ichael doubtless recast these suggestions to make b e t t e r
J . T o l l e y , c o o r d i n a t i n g e d i t o r David V. Erdman (Oxford Univ. sense of the passage.
Press, 1980).
' W. E. M oss, "The Coloured Copies of Blake's Night '.' When the wrathful Prince of Albion arises dragon
Blake .7. ,v.\ v, 2 (1968), 1923; G. E. Bentley, J r . , "A Census l i k e at midnight, he "flam'd red meteors" (3:1416);
of Coloured Copies of Young's . (1797),"
, 2 (1968), 4145.
t h i s alone would make him resemble the red planet
with i t s t e r r i b l e wandering comets ( 5 : 2 3 ) . When
3
"The Blake C o l l e c t i o n of M rs. W i l l i a m F. Tonner," Philadelphia Albion's Angel sees the t e r r i b l e Ore r i s i n g over the
Museum of A r t , 67 (JulySeptember 1972), 5 3 1 . A t l a n t i c , Ore f i r s t seems a comet and then seems the
' I am g r a t e f u l to M r. Donald Trued, Lutheran Church i n America red planet M ars which once enclosed such t e r r i b l e
(New York), f o r permission to p u b l i s h t h i s note. Inquiries comets in i t s sphere. At that time "the planets
concerning t h i s volume should be addressed to him at 231 M adison three" flew round the crimson disk. I take i t that
Avenue, New York, NY 10016. Blake is not d i s t i n g u i s h i n g comets from p l a n e t s ,
I t i s possible that t h i s leaf was p r i n t e d to complete t h i s copy
except f o r the planet red i t s e l f ; the t e r r i b l e comets
of the book, and that i t is not t h e r e f o r e otherwise recorded. are "wandering," a f t e r a l l , and "wanderer" is what
137
"planet" means. To be enclosed in Mars's sphere, as 'Ares, took Priam's side in the Trojan War. In
as the comets are, and to fly round the disk, as the his first appearance in western literature, in fact,
three planets do, are the same thing, for "sphere" Ares arrives on the plain of Troy with three com-
probably has something of its older cosmological panions about him, Phobos, Deimos, and Eris, or Fear,
meaning as one of the concentric transparent globes Terror, and Strife {Iliad 4.439-41). Britain,
around the earth; it can mean "orb" or "orbit" but founded by a son of a royal Trojan who founded Rome,
probably not "disk." So we have the suggestion that became, in John of Gaunt's words, "this seat of
Ore was once one of these three planets revolving Mars" {Richard I I , II, i, 41), and Gaunt should know,
about Mars. having fought beside the Black Prince, whom Blake
portrays in his King Edward the Third as insatiably
But then the Sun becomes a problem. It too battle-hungry: "It is my sin to love the noise of
seems to have been orbiting Mars, either as one of war" (3:232).
the three or, as I think, a fourth planet-comet,
before it was "rent" from the red sphere. Two lines Whether the passage in America 5 can be brought
later a voice comes forth and gives the great speech into line with other astronomical passages in Blake
on plate 6 beginning "The morning comes." Isn't I am not sure. In cancelled plate b of America
this speech about the arrival of the sun from its itself there are some difficult lines about a
orbit about Mars? True, the song the redeemed comparable eruption, but they bring in the stars and
captives sing begins "The Sun has left his blackness," the moon as well. The cancelled lines seem less
not "redness," but from an earthly vantage the former susceptible of a political reading than the Mars
age seemed black, a dark age of Empire dominated by section, and may be about the altering of perceptions
warfare, or Mars, which of course is only visible at when reason subjugates the stars and creates a
night. Since Ore presides over this dawn, we may theory of a heliocentric system governed by laws of
associate him with the Sun, once of Mars's sphere. gravity. Whatever the lines mean, Blake did cancel
Now he seems, to Albion's Angel or Prince, to be them.
Mars, because he rises warlike against him, but it
is the wrathful Prince himself who is the original I think Blake did not care \/ery much about
Mars. It is he who "burns in his nightly tent" astronomy or astrology or cosmological speculations
before he rises at midnight flaming the red meteors of the Swedenborgian sort. All of his astronomical
like comets (3:1, 3:14-16). passages seem to be functions of his phenomenology
of consciousness or his political and historical
When Ore the Sun (and son) leaves Mars the myth. The Mars passage has an ad hoc character that
wrathful Prince, Ore presumably takes the three tempts one to seek a source, but that character is
planets with him, or threatens to. Who are they? due to its nonce role as a political allegory.
Since Ore-America is wandering out of the British Whatever the details of this allegory, the language
Empire, we should look to see who else may be drawn of stars and planets has been the common vehicle
into orbit around him. I think Blake tells us: it since ancient times of discourse about political
is "Ireland and Scotland and Wales" (15:13), who made events, as the phrase "sphere of influence" should
up the original Empire. (A less likely threesome is doubly remind us. In Blake's day "revolution" still
"France Spain & Italy" (16:16), but they seem to be had more to do with "revolving" than with "revolting,1
little empires themselves.) The "burning winds" of and the vast wheels of blood over the Atlantic (4:6)
revolutionary fervor driven by Ore and the fierce may alert us to the cyclical paradigm that governed
Americans cause the Guardians of the three original most of Blake's thinking about political change.
colonies to forsake their frontiers (abandon the The American colonists themselves were happy to evoke
original Empire) and "deform their ancient heavens" ancient astronomical terms for their revolution.
(15:11-15). "Ancient heavens," which brings back The "Novus Ordo Saeclorum" on the back of our dollar
the astronomical theme, is a phrase we have met bill hearkens to the theory of the apocatastasis or
before, when the frightened Angel of Albion addresses cosmic renewal in Virgil's Fourth Eclogue, and with
Ore: "Ah rebel form that rent the ancient / Heavens" each new state we add a new star to the blue firma-
(9:14-15). And "rent" we have met once before this, ment of our flag.
when "the Sun was rent from thy red sphere." The
connections seem clear enough. America is the new
center, the new sun, for the satellite nations that
once revolved around warlike, imperial England, but
in erupting out of England's sphere of influence
America has taken on the features of its father, at
least from the father's point of view.
WILLIAM
BLAKE
BLAKE'S LETTERS AND LITERALS WITH RELATED DOCUMENTS
T here have been separate e d i t i o n s of William Documents than there were in the 1956 or 1968
Blake's l e t t e r s edited by A. G. B. Russell editions.
in 1906 and by Geoffrey Keynes in 1926
(facsimiles of those to B u t t s ) , 1956, 1968 (second The chief addition in the 1980 edition is thus
e d i t i o n ) , and now 1980 ( t h i r d e d i t i o n ) , and of course in the related documents, which are all valuable,
a l l the l e t t e r s are p r i n t e d in Writings of William though most have been printed previously; almost
Blake, ed. Geoffrey Keynes (1925 f f . ) ' a n d William all are in Blake Records (1969), and a number derive
Blake's Writings, ed. G. E. Bentley, J r . (1978). directly from it. In a few cases, Sir Geoffrey has
given a whole document, whereas only the part re-
What are the differences among the Keynes lating to Blake had previously been printed. One
e d i t i o n s of the Letters? Well, the 1956 e d i t i o n of the documents reproduced though not reprinted
had 261 pages, 13 p l a t e s , and 151 numbered related is the lines by R. B. Sheridan copied for unknown
l e t t e r s and documents; the 1968 e d i t i o n had 224 reasons by Blake and previously referred to only
smaller, denser pages, 13 p l a t e s , and 151 l e t t e r s (I believe) in Sir Geoffrey's Bibliotheca Biblio-
e t c . ; the 1980 e d i t i o n has 235 yet denser pages, graphiai (1964). The additions in the 1980 edition
28 reproductions, and 183 numbered l e t t e r s e t c . In are thus small in novelty but of distinct interest
each there are Blake's surviving receipts as well to Blake students and scholars.
as his l e t t e r s , plus an elaborate Register of
Documents (pp. 181-227 in 1980), g i v i n g , normally,
address, date, description ("A single l e a f , w r i t t e n The standards of the edition are those which
on one side. No watermark"), size ( o c c a s i o n a l l y ) , Sir Geoffrey has made his own since he first began
l o c a t i o n , where p r i n t e d , and source of t e x t , though publishing Blake seventy years before: extraordinary
the e d i t i o n omits the postmark and whether sealed industry, a wonderfully shrewd instinct for
with wax or a wafer, and missing l e t t e r s are alluded discovering new materials, and a deep respect for
to ( e . g . , 1980 p. x i x ) rather than i d e n t i f i e d or his subject. In the transcriptions of the letters,
l i s t e d . The 1980 e d i t i o n adds to that of 1968 two the substantive features of meaning are very
l e t t e r s from Mrs. Blake to the Earl of Egremont reliable; I have carefully proofread the letters of
f i r s t printed i n the Times Literary Supplement in 12 September 1800, 14 September 1800, and 12 April
1978, a l e t t e r from Blake to Flaxman of 31 July 1801 1827 and have identified no reading with which I
f i r s t printed in Harvard Library Bulletin i n 1972, disagree substantially. As to accidental features
a receipt of 29 June 1809 recorded i n a Sotheby such as punctuation and capitalization, Sir Geoffrey
catalogue of 19 December 1932, and 25 more Related has allowed himself rather more latitude:
139
I have followed Russell [1906} in supplying (printed on pp. 147-150) are said to be "now f i r s t
punctuation where i t seems to help the sense, p r i n t e d " (p. 218), but a l l are in Blake Books (1969),
even though Blake so frequently omitted i t . pp. 584-97. Further, the readings here from the
To humour him in t h i s respect seemed to place Cash Account Book are sometimes rather approximate.
an unnecessary obstacle in the way of his The e n t r i e s f o r payments to Blake i n 1818-1821 are
readers. . . .l omitted, as are a number of receipts from customers
f o r Job; "M r Behnes" (p. 149) should be "M r Bonnes",
When a sentence seems to require a f u l l stop, Sir i . e . , John Bohn, who offered the copy of Job he
Geoffrey c a p i t a l i z e s the next word as w e l l , even i f bought here in his Catalogue (1829) f o r L-3.3.0;
Blake l e f t i t lower-case. He has both added the entry f o r 5 May 1825 ("of coals to be sent to
punctuation extensively and changed i t , added Mr Blake") should read "to W Palmer f o r one chaldron
apostrophes ( " a r r i v ' d " ) , lowered some but not a l l of Coals to be sent to Mr B l a k e . - - " (and a s i m i l a r
superscript l e t t e r s ( " M r s " ) , and generally normalized entry f o r 27 January 1826 i s omitted e n t i r e l y ) . In
the accidental features of Blake's t e x t . For sum, there i s valuable information here, but i t s
instance, in the poem i n Blake's l e t t e r of 14 currency and completeness are sometimes uncertain.
September 1800 Blake o f f e r s not a single mark of
punctuation, and Sir Geoffrey has supplied twenty- No e d i t i o n of Blake's l e t t e r s is ever complete.
four. In no case, i t seems to me, does the added The l e t t e r (or rather sentence of g i f t ) from
punctuation s i g n i f i c a n t l y a l t e r Blake's meaning, and Catherine Blake to C. H. Tatham [ o f ?4 August 1824]
f o r many general readers i t w i l l be a real is omitted here (see Blake Records [1969], 288).
convenience. But the apparatus of the e d i t i o n 2 is And of course each new e d i t i o n of Blake's l e t t e r s
aimed at scholars, and the best practice of scholars, appears on the eve of the discovery of more l e t t e r s ;
today and f o r many years past, has been to l e t the Dr. Stanley Gardner has recently found an important
author's punctuation stand or to i d e n t i f y in detail l e t t e r from Blake's brother James which he w i l l
where and how i t has been changed. Judged by the publish in his new book on Blake's Songs.
standard of the general p u b l i c , the 1980 e d i t i o n is
considerably richer than that of 1968 (though at Sir Geoffrey has been publishing e d i t i o n s of
$55.00 i t should be very r i c h i n d e e d - - i t s English Blake for almost three quarters of a century, and
price o f L-18.50 is a good deal cheaper). For the each has added something to our knowledge. For such
scholar, most of t h i s material is e a s i l y available endless labor, no praise and honor can be enough.
elsewhere, though some i s new. For at least f i f t y years his name has been synonymous
with Blake scholarship. Long may they both f l o u r i s h .
The work is handsomely produced and a pleasure
to handle, and the typographical blemishes are r a r e . 3
1
Many of the footnotes are improved commendably P. x v i i i . Indeed, in a l e t t e r from Hayley about Blake,
from the e a r l i e r e d i t i o n s , but some of the informa- omissions and . . . misspellings . . . have been silently
formalized" (p. 94).
t i o n i s rather out of date. For example: (1)
Blake's t r a n s c r i p t of Tasso, said to be "now in 2
The index leaves a great deal to be d e s i r e d ; most of the proper
private hands in America" (p. 4 3 ) , was given by names checked i n the Register of Documents were not i n the index.
Grace Lambert to Princeton University in 1960. (2) 3
E . g . , p. 3 1 , n. 1 ("This r e f e r s o t water-colour
The 1 A p r i l 1800 l e t t e r , which i s here l a s t traced p a i n t i n g " ) ; p. 207 (No. 99: "rperduced"; No. 100: "BLAKE {letter]
in 1934 (p. 185), has been for years i n The B r i t i s h to THOMAS BUTTS" f o r "BLAKE [account] w i t h THOMAS BUTTS"), p.
Library (see Blake Books [1977], 275). (3) The 209 (No. 106, the leading has risen t y p e - h i g h ) ; pp. 209, 210 n. 1
l e t t e r of 16 July 1804, said to be "Now in the ( " J . R. Smith" f o r " J . T. S m i t h " ) .
c o l l e c t i o n of Prof. F. W. H i l l e s " (p. 201), was
bequeathed by Professor H i l l e s to Yale in 1976.
(4) The prospectus f o r B l a i r ' s Grave "presumably
naming Blake as the engraver" (which i s referred to
i n Blake's l e t t e r of 27 November 1805) is "not . . .
known" to Sir Geoffrey (p. 119 n. 1 ) , though he
c i t e s (p. 208) the a r t i c l e in Modern Philology (1971)
in which t h i s prospectus was r e p r i n t e d . (5) The
receipt of 9 September 1806, said merely to have
belonged to Ruthven Todd "In 1942" (p. 207), was
sold at Parke Bernet on 23 May 1979, l o t 1 ($2,500)
and offered in 1980 in The Rendells Catalogue 152,
l o t 3 ($25,000.00). (6) The untraced (indeed,
unmentioned) address leaf f o r Blake's l e t t e r to
Ozias Humphry [May 1809] has been in the Huntington
Library since 1926. (7) The l e t t e r of 26 July 1826
"Now in the possession of Mrs. Edward L. Doheny"
(p. 221) was given by Countess Doheny to St. John's
Seminary, Camarillo, C a l i f o r n i a , in 1940. (8)
George Richmond's eloquent l e t t e r of 15 August 1827
about Blake's death is scarcely traced since 1928
(p. 226), but i t has long been in the c o l l e c t i o n of
Mr. Joseph Holland (see Blake Records [1969], 347 n.
1). (9) Parts of "John L i n n e l l ' s Cash Account Book"
140
Robert N. Essick. W i l l i a m B l a k e
P r i n t m a k e r . Princeton, New Jersey:
Princeton University Press, 1980. $ 5 0 . 0 0 .
the plate-marks, i n the Job India proofs? How many iron pot. Let i t b o i l u n t i l i t fumes and gives o f f
know that t h i s paper is of extremely smooth surface, smoke, then set f i r e to i t w i t h a match and l e t i t
capable of receiving more detailed and b r i l l i a n t burn, s t i r u n t i l the o i l becomes so thick that you
impressions than ordinary copper p r i n t e r ' s papers, have great d i f f i c u l t y in grinding i t . " 1 After t h i s
but too b r i t t l e to allow p r i n t i n g , unless i t i s l a i d the pigment, lampblack burnt without the access of
on top of an ordinary copper p r i n t e r ' s paper, both a i r , should be mixed with a decoct of g a l l apples
wetted, and pulled through the press, thereby in water, and allowed to dry. Ultimately the lamp-
pasting the India paper to the supporting paper? black should be ground i n t o the burnt o i l .
I have asked about 15 trained a r t h i s t o r i a n s , some
of them experts i n graphic techniques, and only the This process of burning w i l l make the o i l as
l a t e Arnold Fawcus knew anything about the process, t h i c k as honey, but at the same time as black as
and he was the one who informed me about i t . coffee. Such a binding medium i s sure to d i s c o l o r
every d e l i c a t e t i n t mixed with i t . I t is suitable
Generally, Essick does not go wery deep i n t o only f o r blacks and other dark pigments. This is
the technology of papermaking. Watermarks are dealt why color p r i n t i n g has been rare i n the west u n t i l
with in many places, but there i s no attempt at a quite recent times. Today i t is possible to increase
general estimation of the information offered by the v i s c o s i t y of an o i l without d i s c o l o r i n g i t , by
them. The same is true of w e t t i n g , and the reason b o i l i n g the o i l i n vacuum. Such stand oil is used
why wetting i s necessary is not s u f f i c i e n t l y i n modern color p r i n t i n g , but i t was not available'
explained. A l l these omissions are not necessarily in Dossie's or Blake's t i m e . 2 I t i s , however, much
defects (although I think that the omission of the slower in drying than the burnt o i l , and a s i c c a t i v e
India proofs i s ) ; they are mentioned mainly in order must be added to i t f o r p r i n t i n g .
to indicate along which lines f u r t h e r research miqht
be p r o f i t a b l e . The binder used, f o r instance, f o r Japanese
color woodcuts is starch s i z e . Such a binder is of
The binding media used in p r i n t i n g are hardly l i g h t color and moreover does not attack the paper.
mentioned at a l l . This needs special consideration, I strongly suspect that whenever Blake wanted to
because the neglect of binders occasionally leads p r i n t in colors he used an aqueous binder. This
Essick i n t o e r r o r . On p. 24 Essick w r i t e s , quoting problem w i l l have to be dealt with more f u l l y l a t e r .
Dossie's Handmaid to the Arts (1764), that the
engraver could make his own p r i n t i n g ink from "burnt Since color p r i n t i n g was practiced i n the
''nut o i l ' . . . and 'Frankfort b l a c k , ' " and explains eighteenth century, p r i n t e r s and engravers must have
the "nut o i l " as " o i l rendered from kernels of hazel had recipesmore or less secret onesfor s u i t a b l e
or walnut." As f a r as I am aware, hazelnut o i l i s binders. Some of the pioneers of color p r i n t i n g
a non-drier, and I do not know of any method of published t h e i r methods. In the 1720s Jacob
making i t d r y i n g . I t could be added in small Christoph Le Blon's Coloritto appeared, and in 1753-
q u a n t i t i e s to o i l paint in order to f a c i l i t a t e 57 Jacques Fabien Gautier d'Agoty's Observations sur
painting wet i n wet over a long periodthough o l i v e I 'histoire naturelle, sur la physique3 et sur la
o i l or o i l of cloves i s more commonly used for that peinture. George Baxter described his process of
purposebut in p r i n t i n g every retarding of drying color p r i n t i n g in his Pictorial Album or Cabinet of
times would be undesirable. I f Essick knows of any Paintings, 1837. I cannot here attempt any i d e n t i f i -
method of making hazelnut o i l suitable for p r i n t i n g cation of binders used by the above mentioned
he should have quoted the evidence. To my knowledge, w r i t e r s . 3 Be i t s u f f i c i e n t to say that none of them
whenever "nut o i l " is mentioned in connection with i s mentioned in Essick's book.
painting or p r i n t i n g , walnut o i l is meant.
One should consider especially the p o s s i b i l i t y
When Essick adds that the "manufacture of of making a l i g h t - c o l o r e d , viscous, f a s t d r y i n g o i l
colored inks required only the s u b s t i t u t i o n of by cooking i t over white lead in the sun. Such o i l s
another pigment f o r the Frankfort b l a c k , " I doubt are mentioned i n medieval sources, though they are
the p r a c t i c a b i l i t y of t h i s simple recipe. F i r s t i t there recommended for painting rather than f o r
must be realized that the normal binder f o r p r i n t i n g printing.4
ink in the west was and i s o i l , mostly linseed and
walnut o i l , which are the best d r i e r s . I f o i l color For black-and-white p r i n t s Blake probably
i s printed on paper, the paper w i l l absorb more or preferred the customary b u r n t - o i l binder, e s p e c i a l l y
less of the o i l . This would hinder the p r i n t i n g f o r i n t a g l i o p r i n t i n g . In t h i s case p r i n t i n g would
and also make the paper stained and d i s c o l o r e d , and have to be done on wet paper, and then a water-
i n the end brown and b r i t t l e , since o i l accelerates soluble binder would e a s i l y cause b l u r r i n g of the
the decomposition of the c e l l u l o s e f i b e r s in the o u t l i n e s . I have never seen t h i s e f f e c t i n any of
paper to oxycellulose. Blake's i n t a g l i o engravings. In i n t a g l i o p r i n t i n g
wetting is necessary; otherwise i t would be yery
In order to make the o i l s u i t a b l e f o r p r i n t i n g d i f f i c u l t to force the paper i n t o the incised lines
on paper i t i s necessary to increase i t s v i s c o s i t y to receive the ink. In stereotype p r i n t i n g wetting
beyond the point where the paper ceases to imbibe i t . i s often omitted, especially when the ink contains
The established method f o r doing so was, as Dossie a water-soluble binder.
e x p l i c i t l y w r i t e s , to burn i t ; that i s , to cook i t
i n an open vessel f o r a long time and, i n the end, I t is l i k e l y that Blake used aqueous binders
to set i t a f i r e . Theodore de Mayerne gives the f o r most o f his stereotype p r i n t s . Printed surfaces
following d i r e c t i o n s , said to be those of C a l l o t : i n the i l l u m i n a t e d books seem to have taken water-
"Burn also some nut o i l ( t r y that of linseed) in an color washes remarkably w e l l , which would hardly be
142
the case if an oily vehicle had been used (it is, of intaglio would preclude the usual way of making
course, possible to paint in watercolor on oil, if corrections by cutting away the copper around
only the oily surface is prepared beforehand with defective lines and levelling the hollows by
ox gall or the juice of garlic, onions or potatoes, hammering from the back--this process would disfigure
but there is no indication that Blake ever did this). the back. It would have been very difficult for
The reticulation of the surface in many of Blake's Blake to use both sides of the same plate for such
stereotype prints indicates that the paper was not extensively reworked engravings as the second states
wetted. Why? Most probably because the binder was of Job and Ezekiel. In that case Blake would have
soluble in water, and would have caused blurring on had to spoil the first state of one of them, say,
moist paper. the Job, in order to rework the Ezekiel; pull all
the prints needed, and then destroy it, in order to
It seems that Essick in passing over the rework the Job. Very cumbersome! And how get rid
difficulties of color printing was misled by the of the plate-maker's stamp? He would have had to
remove it in the same way as above, alternately from
light-colored stand oils available today. the back and from the front, and that already in the
first states, even if he did no other corrections at
It should be noted that Essick on p. 102 says this early stage. For this reason I cannot agree
that "well soaked paper usually tends to absorb the with Essick's suggestion that the companions Ezekiel
ink."5 This is what many experienced practitioners and Job were done on both sides of the same plate.
believe, but it is only what seems to happen.
Actually the reverse is true, as long as oily binders The use of both sides of the plate is rational
are used. The wet paper assists the effect of the only for stereotype etchings, and only in this case
viscous oil and hinders absorption of ink. It is can it be proved that Blake did so. Whenever he did
common knowledge that oil and water do not mix intaglio work on the back of a used plate the
easily. For this reason printing on wet paper gives original design was treated as something that could
a smoother result. It is just because dry paper be sacrificed without lossin some cases inartistic
absorbs some of the oily binder that printing in oil illustrations done by others than Blake, such as
on dry paper results in rough reticulation of the plates 14 and 16 of the Job series.
printed surface. Part of the binder leaves the
pigment, and the ink gets so stiff that it adheres Essick's solution of the difficult problem of
to the plate. It should also be noted, as already dating Albion Rose is a great improvement upon
pointed out, that the dry paper is more difficult previous attempts (pp. 70 ff.). The ruled sky is
to bring into uniform contact with the plate. For recognized as a survivor from the lost first state,
these two reasons the plate regularly remains dirtier and the final state is dated after 1803. The color-
after printing on dry paper, than if well soaked prints, printed in stereotype from the intaglio plate
paper is used. 1794-95, show much of the intaglio work in white
line against the color. This fact has made possible
the reconstruction of the appearance of the plate
Essick's chapter 8 deals admirably with before the work that was added after 1803. The worm
technical evidence for dating some of Blake's and the moth are missing in this state, and, of
intaglio engravings. I am happy to see that he course, the caption. Yet Essick has missed the fact
dates the first state of the Job (the companion of that the BM color print does show a "worm," or what
Ezekiel) 1793, and I think that his redating of the looks like a worm, below Albion's left foot. It is
second state probably after 1820 is a great improve- not engraved in the plate, and is possibly only an
ment on my own tentative dating 1797-98. Especially accident of color printing. I think that this
valuable is Essick's remark (p. 220) that no datable accident is the origin of the introduction of the
prints by Blake are on laid India paper until the worm in the final intaglio state. The date 1780
published proofs of the Job series printed in the belongs, according to Essick, to the invention of
winter of 1825-26. But four of the six known copies the design, not to the execution. I would like to
of Job and its companion Ezekiel are on that paper. suggest another possibility: that the date and the
Essick also thinks, rightly, that all extant states ruled sky belong to a lost first state, actually
of Ezekiel are second states, and that the date 1794 executed in 1780, that the lines underlying the
is a survival from the lost first state. The two colorprints of 1794-95 show added work from an other-
companion plates seem to have been reworked at about wise lost second state, and that the final state is
the time Blake was engraving the Job set. the third. The radical juxtapositions of style
visible in Essick's "second" state are as much a
part of his "first" state. This indicates that
Essick's remark on p. 67 about the bevelling there was a state earlier than Essick's first.
of the edges of copperplates is a memento to anyone Notice also that the signature "WB inv" is not on a
who, by measuring the plate-marks, tries to establish line'with the date, and that spacing indicates that
which prints were done from the recto or verso of it is a later addition. Therefore I believe that the
the same plate. Since the necessary bevelling could date is a survivor from the first state, and that the
vary, the platemarks from both sides of a bevelled signature was added in the third.
plate are unlikely to correspond exactly. Printing
from unbevelled plates is not safe, because the
sharp edges are then likely to damage the paper--in A minor carelessness on pp. 70, 71, should be
fact they often cut off the margins. pointed out. Blake certainly did not print with
"pigment" alone, without a binder; an expert on
I would like to add that the use of both sides technique of Essick's capacity should write "ink" or
of the plate for works meant to be printed in "paint."
143
I feel that Essick is r i g h t when he says that placed, face down, on a hot copper plate and passed
the i l l u s t r a t i o n s for Young were published in an through the press. The stopping melted and stuck
unfinished s t a t e . I also agree with him that most to the p l a t e . After t h i s the plate was immersed i n
of them are unsuccessful. water, the gum was dissolved and the paper f l o a t e d
o f f , leaving the l e t t e r i n g in reverse on the p l a t e .
Essick 1 s chapter on Blake's r e l i e f and white- Then the design could be drawn with the stopping
l i n e etching (pp. 85-120) is by f a r the best t r e a t - d i r e c t l y on the copper and the t e x t could be
ment of the subject so far published: excellent corrected i f necessary. F i n a l l y the f l a t s were
research along both h i s t o r i c a l and experimental etched down, leaving l e t t e r i n g and design in
paths. Appropriate quotes from manuals and t r e a t i s e s stereotype. I t should be noted that in some early
that were known to Blake and his contemporaries are p r i n t s the t e x t is s l i g h t l y slanted compared to the
followed by a step-by-step reconstruction of Blake's design, which seems to support the hypothesis that
methods. Essick has s c r u t i n i z e d Blake's p r i n t s and the l e t t e r i n g was not transferred to the copper at
the one surviving plate fragment f o r technical the same time as the d e s i g n . 1 1
evidence, and has himself executed graphic works
according to the processes l i k e l y to have been There is no d i r e c t documentary evidence in
employed by Blake. He is able to show that Blake support of t h i s r e c o n s t r u c t i o n , but i t i s clear that
could step-etch his stereotype plates in order to Blake knew an o f f s e t process for t r a n s f e r r i n g a
hinder underbiting and insure s u f f i c i e n t depth of drawing to a metal p l a t e . In his Note-Book Blake
b i t i n g , that he could make corrections by b u i l d i n g wrote a memorandum on how to "Engrave on Pewter.
up l e t t e r s , e t c . , on bitten-down areas, that he Let there be f i r s t a drawing made c o r r e c t l y with
could p r i n t successfully from extremely low r e l i e f s , black lead pencil [on a sheet of paper]. Let nothing
that he could control the effects of granulation i n be to seek. Then rub i t o f f on the plate covered with
p r i n t i n g , and much more. There is also an excellent white wax, or perhaps pass i t through the press.
account of how electrotype replicas of copperplates This w i l l produce c e r t a i n & determind forms on the
are made, which explains why the electrotype Songs plate & time w i l l not be wasted in seeking them
cannot be used as evidence f o r estimating the depth a f t e r w a r d s . " 1 2 The o f f s e t t r a c i n g would then serve
of b i t i n g in Blake's stereotype p l a t e s : the hollows as a guide f o r the graver. The same process could
were deepened in order to f a c i l i t a t e clean i n k i n g . be used on copper, and the traced l i n e s e i t h e r f o l -
lowed w i t h the etching needle, which would cut
Yet I s t i l l think that Blake did not w r i t e the through the wax ground and lay the copper bare, ex-
l e t t e r i n g backwards as Essick maintains, and I posing i t to the subsequent action of the a c i d , or
believe that more could be made of Cumberland's cut w i t h the graver d i r e c t l y into the metal. L e t t e r -
l e t t e r s and Blake's own technical memoranda than ing could be transferred in t h i s way as well as de-
Essick does. s i g n , but in the case of l e t t e r i n g the p r i n t i n g
would appear uncolored against an inked background,
According to John L i n n e l l , i n a l a t e r - d e l e t e d which would make them d i f f i c u l t to read.
annotation i n his copy of J . T. Smith, an " e x t r a -
ordinary f a c i l i t y seems to have been attained by We are thus brought back to Cumberland's method
Blake in w r i t i n g backwards." 6 Notice the force of of p r i n t i n g t e x t in i n t a g l i o , but with the essential
the word "seems": Linnell was not sure about Blake's addition of a r e l i a b l e method for t r a n s f e r r i n g
way of working. Cumberland wrote that Blake excelled l e t t e r i n g , w r i t t e n rightways on a sheet of paper, to
i n the a r t of "perusing backwards"--whatever that the etching ground, thus overcoming the d i f f i c u l t y
may mean.7 Essick thinks that Blake in Cumberland's Cumberland experienced in g e t t i n g the printed t e x t
view wrote backwardsbut why did Cumberland not reversed. I t i s only natural that Blake should
say so? inform Cumberland of t h i s method, which he did in
his l e t t e r of 9 December 1795: "Take a cake of
Whatever Blake's method, he was l u c k i e r than V i r g i n ' s Wax ( I don't know what animal produces i t )
Cumberland himself, whose invention of etching t e x t & stroke i t r e g u l a r l y over the surface of a warm
on copper-plates l a t e r to be printed i n i n t a g l i o plate (the Plate must be warm enough to melt the
produced reversed l e t t e r i n g , which had to be read Wax as i t passes o v e r ) , then immediately draw a
w i t h the aid of a m i r r o r . 8 I t is i n t e r e s t i n g to see feather over i t & you w i l l get an even surface which,
that Cumberland had a remedy for t h i s : to o f f s e t when cooled, w i l l recieve any impression m i n u t e l y . " 1 3
the l e t t e r i n g by taking counter-proofs of the This is c e r t a i n l y how Blake did those of his
reversed p r i n t s before they had d r i e d . This was, illuminated books which were printed in i n t a g l i o ,
of course, a makeshift: such counter-proofs look namely The Book of Ahania, The Book of Los (both
weak and t h i n , and have no a r t i s t i c value, as Hind etched), For Children (etched) and For the Sexes
points o u t . 9 Blake would not have found t h i s method (engraved). These works were therefore done i n
satisfactory. Cumberland's method, perfected by Blake.
In two memoranda in the Note Book Blake described We still do not know if he wrote the text
the method of such "woodcuts on pewter" and "woodcuts directly on the copper backwards, or if he used an
on copper": "To Woodcut on Pewter. Lay a ground on offset process similar to that reconstructed by Todd
the Plate & smoke it as for Etching, then trace your and Hayter, and also, it should be noted, similar to
outlines [& draw them in with a needle del.'}, and the transfer process Blake used for etching on a
beginning with the spots of light on each object wax ground. We only know that he could not have
with an oval pointed needle scrape off the ground, used the wax ground for the lettering of works
[& instead of etching the shadowy strokes del.] as a printed in stereotype.
direction for your graver then proceed to graving
with the ground on the plate being as careful as Personally I doubt that Blake wrote the bulk of
possible not to hurt the ground because it being the lettering directly on the plates. There are no
black will shew perfectly what is wanted [word del.]" mistakes characteristic of backwards writing in, for
"To Woodcut on Copper Lay a ground as for Etching, instance, the 50 plates of Milton and the 100 plates
trace & c & instead of Etching the blacks Etch the of Jerusalem. But there are reversed letters in
whites & bite it in." 1 5 short texts, such as titles. The "Y" is reversed in
the title of AMERICA A PROPHECY (Y instead of Y ) ,
Evidently the tracing on the black ground was likewise in Europe pi. 3 "A PROPHECY," and in the
to be done in the same way as on the white ground. title of Job the "A" in "ILLUSTRATIONS" is reversed
In that case red chalk lines would show better than (Ainstead of A ) . The most likely explanation is
black lead pencil lines, but also black lead lines that these texts requiring only a few letters were
would be plainly visible, especially facing the done directly on the copper, with the result that
lightand it is known that Blake worked facing the Blake got a few letters reversed, but that the bulk
light. 16 Both of the processes described are meant of the lettering of Blake's illuminated books, not
for white line work, that is, stereotype. But Blake showing any reversed letters, was written rightways
almost never used the process for etching lettering, on paper and transferred to the plates in an offset
for obvious reasons: since the whole plate was process.
covered with a wax ground, inked lettering of the
kind forming the bulk of Blake's illuminated printing My main reason for supposing that Blake used a
could have been done only by removing the ground transfer process for lettering is that the bulk of
around the letters. Considering the amount of text text in his illuminated books does not have the
in most of Blake's books, and its minute size, this characteristics of reversed writing. The uniform
would have been impossible. The processes described right-hand slant typical of his mature penmanship
in the two memoranda quoted above were suitable only never occurs in texts known to have been executed
for making designs. I think that most of Blake's directly on the copper (e.g., Job marginalia of the
white line etchings were made according to his recipe 1820s). It does not occur, either, in his earliest
for "woodcut on copper": the frontispiece of America* experiments with illuminated printing, such as the
most of the whole-page designs for Milton and tractates on religion (1788) or The Songs of
Jerusalem, etc. It would also be possible to cover Innocence (1789). It is first seen in Thel (1789),
only part of a plate with the wax ground and execute and from then on remains a constant feature of his
plates combining white-line designs with inked work. Therefore I think that Blake's illuminated
lettering done with the asphaltum stopper. printing, invented in 1788, was perfected in 1789,
when he added a method for transferring lettering
Whichever combinations were used or not used, to the plates. 18
for work on the plates, the plate was printed in
I agree that we cannot be one hundred percent
stereotype, and had to go through the press only once.
sure about how Blake proceeded, but in the light of
the evidence available today I would prefer the
I know of only two possible examples of lettering above interpretation to Essick's.
to be printed black from a stereotype plate, and not
painted on the plate but picked out by removing the To summarize the preceding discussion: Blake
black-printing ground around the letters. One is used two types of ground for his stereotype plates:
the title of Jerusalem* showing large lettering, and (1) an ordinary wax etching ground, white or smoked,
the other is the line afterwards added to the top of capable of receiving a counterproof impression of a
plate 33 [37]: "And One stood forth from the Divine pencil study, mainly used for the execution of
Family & said." In this case Blake etched the black- pictorial designs in white line etching, and (2) a
printing text free of the ground as far as the word stopper of asphaltum and linseed oil, much more
"the," the rest of the line being in white on black. fluid, and, after drying, harder than the wax ground,
Thus we know that Blake found it too cumbersome to intended for lettering and black line illustrations
pick out even a single line of normal-sized lettering. for Blake's poems.
For other such additions he preferred simple white-
line against black: the words "SHEEP" "GOATS" on pi. That Blake's work was divided thus is made
3, the quotation "Movos o Lsous" on pi. 4, and the clear by the appearance of his books. Ii the
line added at the bottom of pi. 40 [45]. This should white-line etching is reserved for separate plates
make it clear that none of Blake's surviving recipes bearing whole-page designs similar to the
for etching gives us any information about his main frontispiece, in Jerusalem for clearly defined parts
technical invention, that of etching text and design of plates (4, 11, 28, 31 [35], 33 [37], 41 [46], 50,
145
T
t r a c t a t e s on r e l i g i o n , w i t h o u t date, are s t y l i s t i c a l l y e a r l i e r his l i t t l e work seems to have been overlooked
than these, and generally assigned to the year 1788. Thus a l l
evidence supports the year 1788, and nothing but confusion could
in the bibliographies o f Blake i n Blake: An
a r i s e i f we suppose that Blake could have invented the method Illustrated Quarterly, the MLA annual
e a r l i e r . I t i s true that p a r t o f a recipe f o r i l l u m i n a t e d bibliography, The Romantic Movement bibliography, and
p r i n t i n g has survived i n An Island in the Moon, almost c e r t a i n l y elsewhere. The reason f o r such oversight i s p l a i n
w r i t t e n i n the w i n t e r o f 1784-85, but the reference i s c l e a r l y t o enough, f o r i t i s only the size o f a thumb-nail:
Cumberland's method, not t o Blake's own.
5/3" x 3/4" (1.5 x 2.0 cm.), and i t i s " l i m i t e d to
19
Blake Records, p. 472. Tatham supports t h i s , ibid,, p. 517. 300 numbered, signed copies," according to the
20
colophon.
Blake Records, p. 472.
21
Blake Records, p. 33 n. 3, and p. 472. The contents are moderately s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d ; an
anonymous "I n t r o d u c t i o n " (pp. 5-6) and "many" (nine)
Giuseppe Tambroni's e d i t i o n o f Cennini was the f i r s t , and bears poems from the Song s. The " In t r o d u c t i o n " says, on
the date 1821 ( r e p r i n t e d 1965). The next was by Carlo and Gaetano
Milanesi i n 1859, r e p r i n t e d 1975 a aura di Fernando Tempesti .
the whole t r u l y enough, that the t e x t "retains h i s
The t h i r d was by Renzo S i m i , 1913, r e p r i n t e d without notes and archaic s p e l l i n g and unconventional c a p i t a l i z a t i o n
i n t r o d u c t i o n i n 1943; and the second e d i t i o n of Renzo Simi supplied where p o s s i b l e . " The second most s t r i k i n g feature
the t e x t f o r Franco B r u n e l l o ' s annotated e d i t i o n o f 1971. The o f the t i n y t e x t , however, i s the way i t has been
most recent e d i t i o n from the o r i g i n a l mss. i s by Daniel V.
Thompson, 1932. Blake scholars should quote Tambroni. Later abbreviated. The t i t l e and the word " I " i n 1 . 18
e d i t i o n s , based on manuscripts inaccessible to him (he knew o f have dropped out o f the " In t r o d u c t i o n " t o Innocence,
the B i b l i o t e c a Laurenziana ms., but had not seen i t ) are very and h a l f o f "I nfant Joy," the second stanza, has
d i f f e r e n t from Tambroni's. disappeared.
3
Giorgio V a s a r i , Le pit ' eooelenti pittori, scultori
ed architettori (ed. Milanesi) (Florence 1878-79), I , 184, II, The price o f the work, at least the price paid
pp. 565 f . , 569. for i t to an antiquarian bookseller (k29 = about $70),
2U may make i t the most expensive uncolored l i t e r a r y
Alexander G i l c h r i s t , Life of William Blake (1942), p. 366;
(1863), p. 376. See Blake Records, p. 34 n. 1 . work by Blake per square centimeter ever sold--68c7
cm2. I t i s f a r beyond the Blake Trust facsimiles
25
K 562, 563, 577. and even surpasses uncolored Blake o r i g i n a l s ; Song s
2t of Innocence and of Experience copy h, which sold
' K 481 ( ' : p i . 2 ) . A s i m i l a r idea was put forward by
Michelangelo i n h i s sonnett no. XV i n the Guasti e d i t i o n : "Non ha for $15,000 i n 1981, comes to only 47c per square
l ' o t t i m o a r t i s t a alcun concetto, / Ch' un marmo solo i n se non centimeter.
c i r c o n s c r i v a / Col suo soverchio; e solo a q u e l l o a r r i v a / La man
che ubbidisce a l l ' i n t e l l e t t o . " See Louisa Maclehose and G.
Baldwin Brown, Vaecan on (1907; r p t . New York: Dover,
1960), p. 180.
149
The Poems of
WILLIAM
John D. Baird and Charles Ryskamp, eds.
COWPER
The P o e m s o f W i l l i a m C o w p e r . V o l . 1: VOLUME I
1 7 4 8 - 1 7 8 2 . Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1748-1782
Kl
The conference w i l l take place from Thursday
evening, 19 May, through Saturday, 21 May. With the
The second p r i n t i n g of Blake's Poetry and Designs: exception of an opening address by Hazard Adams,
A Norton Critical Edition appears to have a secure there w i l l be no formal paper presentations. I n -
binding. Anyone whose duly purchased copy of the stead, papers w i l l be turned in by l a t e March so
f i r s t p r i n t i n g f e l l apart may receive a new book by that they may be c i r c u l a t e d among the p a r t i c i p a n t s
w r i t i n g to Mr. James L. Mairs, W. W. Norton & Com- well before the conference. At the conference i t s e l f ,
pany, I n c . , 500 F i f t h Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10036. each author w i l l o f f e r a precis of the paper; t h i s
I t is necessary to return the f i r s t two pages of w i l l be followed by the s o l i c i t e d response of
any damaged copy (the f a l s e t i t l e and t i t l e pages) another p a r t i c i p a n t , and then general discussion.
for replacement. I t would be appreciated i f teachers "Audience" and " p a r t i c i p a n t s " w i l l be one and the
would batch the necessary pages for a l l students 1 same.
copies needing replacing and mail in bulk to Mr. Those c o n t r i b u t i n g papers and/or responses
Mairs' a t t e n t i o n . These pages must be returned so include Hazard Adams, Donald A u l t , Vince De Luca,
that Norton can back up i t s complaints to the sub- Morris Eaves, Gavin Edwards, Michael Fischer,
contractor who provided the "Perfect B i n d i n g , " as Geoffrey Hartman, Nelson H i l t o n , Paul Mann, Jerome
the trade name has i t . Complimentary copies, except McGann, W. J . T. M i t c h e l l , A l i c i a O s t r i k e r , Morton
f o r l e g i t i m a t e desk copies, cannot be replaced. The Paley, David Simpson, Daniel Stempel, Thomas Vogler,
editors apologize f o r the inconvenience to a l l con- and Hayden White.
cerned and urge that r e c i p i e n t s of replacement copies Accomodations have been arranged at the Holiday
request the second (corrected) p r i n t i n g from Norton. Inn in Santa Cruz, which is o f f e r i n g a special rate
o f $35 single/$40 double f o r reservations made up
to one month before the conference; please specify
that you w i l l be attending the conference.
HUNTINGTON S Y M P O S I U M & EXHIBITION Please address any questions to "Blake &
C r i t i c i s m , " L i t e r a t u r e Board, UCSC, Santa Cruz,
In conjunction with an e x h i b i t i o n of "Prints by the CA 95064 ( t e l . 408-429-4591).
Blake Followers" to be held November through February
1982, the Henry E. Huntington Library and A r t Gallery
is holding a symposium on Saturday, 13 February. The
t e n t a t i v e program includes papers by G. E. Bentley,
Jr. ("Blake and the Blake Followers: Biographical HILP M l M
I n f o r m a t i o n " ) , Robert N. Essick ("John Linnell as
a Printmaker"), Shelley M. Bennett ("The Blake
Followers i n the Context of Contemporary English According to a notice in G i r l About Town magazine,
A r t " ) , and Morton D. Paley ("Samuel Palmer's I l l u s - St. James's Church i n P i c c a d i l l y was to stage "the
t r a t i o n s to M i l t o n " ) . There w i l l be a r e g i s t r a t i o n f i r s t ever continuous reading of the complete works
fee o f $3.00. For reservations to attend the sym- of William Blake" on 10-11 November. The reading,
posium, w r i t e to the Henry E. Huntington A r t Gallery, called "A Day and a Night in the L i f e of William
1151 Oxford Rd., San Marino. CA 91108, or c a l l Blake," was part of the P i c c a d i l l y F e s t i v a l .
(213) 792-6141, e x t . 317. Admission was 75p, and food and drink were a v a i l a b l e .