0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 275 views4 pagesMun Hall
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
N 7X PRI
Cy
‘Unknowing’: Toward Another
Pattern of Knowing in Nursing
Patricia L. Munhall, an, Edo, Psya, FAAN
There is an important rationale for nurses
to learn how to “unknow’’—to be
authentically present
for the patient.
AsIsiton this hatd bench Isuddenly
yearn for one last long look, and not
‘only ofthe phenomenon of litte joe
and little Michael, but ofthe others
too: Ellen, four, and Annie, seven
months, sharing a peach... AS I
watch, them now as adults the fact
that I will never see their toddler
selves again is tormenting
[ane Smiley,| Ordinary Loveand
Good Will, 1989
When you are thirty, the child is
two. At forty, you realize that the
child inthe house, the child you live
with, is stil, when you close your
eyes, or the moment he has walked
from the room, two years old. When
you ate sixty and the ebild is gone,
the child will also be ewo, bur then.
you will be more certain, Wersheets,
wet kisses. A flood of tars. AS you
remember him the child is always
wo.
Ann Beattie? Piewring Will,
1989)
I “ye foregoing literary excerpts
illustrate the power of individ
ual perceptions and the different struc-
Presented at the annual caring confer.
‘ence sponsored by lota Xi and the Col
lege of Nursing, Florida Atlantic Univer
sity, Florida
‘Nuts Ouoox 1993;41:125-8,
‘Copyright © 1983 by Mosty-Yew Book, I
15s 0009 5854/9376100 1 10" 35/1/4460
NURSING OUTLOOK MAY/JUNE 1993,
tures of subjectivity that call for a fifth
pattern of knowing in nursing to be ac
knowledged, that of “unknowing.”
Many nurses have endorsed in our
nursing literature, and in some curric-
ula, a structural, categorical approach
to knowledge, reflected in Carper's
Fundamental Patterns of Knowing in
Nursing. These four patternsof know-
ing are part of Faweetts' proposed
“metaparadigm’ for nursing.*
This article focuses on the state of
‘mind of unknowing as a condition of
‘openness. Knowing,” incontrast leads
toa form of confidence that has inher-
entin ita state of closure. The “art” of
unknowing is discussed as a decenter”
ing process from one’s own organizing
principles f the world Unknowingis
not simple, but it isessential to the unr
derstanding of subjectivity and per
spectivity, These concepts are di
cussed, and a suggestion is offered that
for understanding to emerge the per
cceptual field that evolves when two or
‘mote personal universes come together
‘ust be clearly focused upon by the
involved individuals. Italsois proposed
that in this perceptual field of two or
more subjective perspectives, called the
“intersubjective space,” all sources of
human understanding, empathy ~and
also conflictcan and will evolve.
THE ART OF UNKNOWING
Unknowing, paradoxically, is another
pattern of knowing, Knowing that one
does not know something, that one
does not understand someone who
stands before them and that perhaps
this process does not fit into some pre
existing paradigm or theory is critical
to the evolution and development of
knowledge
To engage in an authentic encoun:
ter, one must stand in one's own 50°
cially constructed world and unearth
the other's world by admitting, "don’t
know you. {do not know your subjee
tive world.”
When a nurse stands with another
human being, forming impressions,
making a diagnosis, formulating a per
ception, and knowing whatis best, that
nurse may indeed practice an efficient
type of nursing based on the empirical,
ethical, personal, and esthetic patterns
of knowing,
Still, knowing of this kind leads toa
form of confidence that has inherent in
ita state of closure, To be authentically
present to a patient is to situate know:
ingly in one’s own life and interact
with full unknowingness about the
other’ life. In this way unknowing
equals openness (Figure 1).
This is by no means easy. Unknow:
ing a5 an artis not presently acknowl:
edged and calls for a great amount of
introspection, However unknowing e
tnains essential to the understanding of
intersubjectivity and perspectivity. In
other words, itis essential that we un
derstand our self and our patient to be
two distinctive beings, one of whom
we do not know.
Munhall 125
1Plucing aside a cogent argument that
Individual Openness
might speak co inst how well nurses hee
kkaow themselves, there can be little 1 dont know you
doubt that they do not know the pa 3 t :
tient. Each patient has a unique per- theoretical stance "bias
spective of their situated context and a ~
ee cancion oie aes Go the extent possible) preudice held
petson in the world, This is their per preconceptions in i
spectvity, theie worldview, thei reat :
ity. When urses and patients meet, stereorypes abeyance
two perspectives ofa situation need to ae
be recognized. Thus the process of ir 7
rersubjectivity begins to create the per
ceptual field (Figure 2) |
Figure 1. The art of unknowing,
INTERSUBJECTIVITY tually interpreted, The mutuality here These ideas of unknowing and de-
Intersubjectivity is not a difficult con reflects the nurse and patient commu centering ate very practical realities to
cept tounderstand, though many writ- nicating, reflecting, and validating the nursing practice and esearch. Without
ingsabout itseem intent at making the meaning of the patient’s experience. extensive examination and introspe
concept complex. What ischallenging The unknowing stance of the nurse is tion of and about the substance of the
is practicing in a wideawake manner. primarily motivated by the intent to intersubiective space, two dangers
Tntersubjectivity is the verbal and come to know the patient's world, The might occur that ate counterproducy
nonverbal interplay between the orga’ patient "knows" the nurse as one who tive to understanding and to patients’
tized subjective world of one person is engaging in the process of coming to health, growth, and becoming. Nurses
and the organized subjective world of know so that the nurse can better un must understand that their perceptions
another? Itis one person's subjectiv- derstand, empathize, and care in an of the world and of health may or may
ity interseeting with another's subjec- authentically individualized manner, not assist the patient, Stemming from
tivity. Incach person’ssubiective world the nurses’ subjectivity, if not eclipsed
is organization of feeling, thoughts, A DE-CENTERING PROCESS temporarily by the patients’, are two
ideas, principles, theories, illusions, This art of unknowing when two sub dangers of knowing. They are inter
distortions, and whatever else helps ot jective worlds intersect is discussed as subjective conjunction and intersuby
hinders 2 person. Individuals do not ade-centering process, one that deen’ jective disjunction.*
know about another's subjective world ters us from our own organizing prin
| unless they are told about it, and even ciples of the world.’ This unknowing Personal Universes -
| then one cannot be sure, Figures 2 and art enables empathy of the situated Subjective Views of Reality
3 illustrate visually the concept of in+ context where nurses understand the
tersubjectivity actual essence of meaning the patients
In Figure 3 the illustration depicts experiences hold for them.
where many nurse theorists say nurs: Figure 3 might be what Sartre!?
ingtakesplace. Sometimes thisiscalled thought of as utmost importance in
the “‘in-between,"* but visually it de- understanding and evaluating his com Intersubjectivity -
picts a connection that for the purpose ception of the human situation, Thisis a
of this article is called a “shared per- called “being for others.” Sartre feared
ceptual field.” When this shared per: in this the loss of self, but what is por: Person]
ceptual feld is pulted out by the nurse, ayed here as de-centering isa tempor 1
it becomes a whole, 3s shown in Fig? rary suspending of self as the nurse a:
ure 4. lows the patient's subjective structure [A Shared Percepwual Field
Ieis in this field that caring, under- of reality wo become known, The nurse | gyhere subjectivties interact
standing, empathy, conflict, and mis" is metaphorically eclipsed by a patient
understandings take place. This, then, in order to”know’ che patient. Nurses
is no small matter. For cating to be re- encourage patients to reveal their per” leas
alized, this perceptual field that spectives without interuption or the
emerges, this inelligible whole or in- inttoduetion of alternative interpret | | Some a
ive space, must be clearly fo: tions. Nurses allow patients to be seen | Figure 2. Personatuniverses. neces
Staion ual sndyeed inde and etd iscsi conda redpneruus #2
426 Munball VOLUME 41 +NUMBER 3. NURSING OUTLOOKFigure 3. The nursepatient shared
perceptual field
INTERSUBJECTIVE
CONJUNCTION
In the instance of intersubjective con-
junction nurses are alerted to this cit~
ccumstance by feelings of comfort with
the patient. Nurses need to understand
that this comfort is originating from
their own perceptions of knowing, We
have yet to explore the meaning of this
comfort for the patient. Although this
initial compatability may feel good, it
could cause problems unless an atti-
ude of questioning and unknowing
precedes the continuation of the per
ceived shared subjective stance.
In intersubjective conjunction it
seems the two subjective interpreta
tions of the world match. The patient
is an analogue model of the nutse, oF
vice versa, Thoughts such as “We
think alike" “We feel alike” “We see
things the same way” “We agree on
Perceptual Field
Figure 4. Perceptual field
what's to be done" and “We have good
rapport” should alert the nurse to this
situation.
‘What is occurring is that both per-
sons share closely similar perceptions
of the experience. However, before gor
ing further, it is suggested here that the
nurse proceed with an air of mystery
and an attitude open to alternative in
terpretations.
Difficulties inherent in
intersubjective conjunctions
Closure is the main difficulty inherent
in intersubjective conjunetions. While
two persons (inthis instance a patient
and a nurse) may share common atti-
tudes, the reasons and the histories
may be very different. So shared 35°
sumptions of reality, or conjunction,
ay
Imersubjeciviy
Intersabjecivty
Pasent Eclipses Nurse
®
+
Ineligible whole
De-Centering Nurses line opens
‘Coming to Know the Patient
Knowing the Other
Figure 5. Knowing the other.
MUIRSING OUTLOOK MAY/IUNE 1993
+ Close further exploration
+ Achieve the status of obiective re
ality (when ie may not be $0)
+ Representa shared defensive solu
tion
«+ Represent a shared illusion or de-
lusion
+ Close off testing other alternatives
«Eliminate exploring origin of per
cxption
An example of this could be a nusse
and a patient sharing negative feelings
about various things~people, places,
or an experience. Their agreement be
comes an agreed on truthful objective
reality. In actuality, these shared per
ceptions could bea way that both these
individuals pecject inner difficulties
conto the outside world. The danger, of
course, is that the inner difficulties go
left unexplored and the conjunction
becomes collusion. Iti critical fn this
intersubjective space to go beyond ot
underneath the agreed on perceptions
of the experience
The art of unknowing in
intersubjective conjunction
Unknowing can be the impetus 10
finding out. Where there is agreement
about the world, nurses should de-cen:
ter, hold theis beliefs in abeyance, and
allow others totell their stories, Nurses
allow others to enlarge their construc:
tion of their social reality. Before,
nurses said, “T know how you're feel
ing,” which is doubrful, The knowing
part comes from allowing the other to
be known from individual perceptions,
not those of the nurse. So agreement in
the intersubjective space does not mean
‘mutual knowing. Unknowing is een
tial o "knowing," just asin intersubiec”
tive disuntion,
INTERSUBJECTIVE
DISJUNCTION
In the instance of intersubjective dis:
junction there is disparity and disagree
ment with the subjective perceptions
of the two socialy constructed realities
of individuals. [tis in this disjunction
that misunderstanding and conilict
may be counterproductive and non
therapeutic for patients, ndisiunenion,
Munhall 127nurses believe that their interpretation
of a situation isthe better one and that
the patient’s interpretation would be
improved if it were altered. Rather
than assuming an unknowing posture
regarding the patient's perception, the
nurse attempts to change the subjective
meaning for the patient. In contrast,
then, to conjunction, in which there is
agreement about the world (which
may be obstructional 2s well), in
disjunction there is disagreement, and
this too may be extremely counterpro"
ductive to understanding and empathy.
Difficulties inherent in
intersubjective disjunction
‘The danger in disiunetion or disagree
‘ment is mainly one ofthe projection of
a nurse's perception on a patient. Once
again, there is closure to the meaning
and desires of an individual person—
the patient. Disagreed upon assump-
tions of reality, or disjunction, may:
* Close further exploration
+ Become self-fulfilling
+ Alter the patients perception of
reality
+ Give the patient the impression
that he is wrong
+ Interfere with patient's defense
‘mechanisms
‘An example ofthis could be “know:
ing what is best forthe patient. A case
that comes to mind is a nurse who dis
‘couraged a patient from marrying a
man who was obviously a poor choice
for this patient. The patient did not
‘marry; instead she had a series of psy~
cchotic episodes. Would they have hap-
pened anyway! We do not know. But
de-centering here to find out what was
going on with this patient from her
perspective was essential Instead of di
agnosing and prescribing, the nurse
needed to unknow, listen, and under
stand the meaning ofthis patient's per-
ceptions
The art of unknowing in
intersubjective disjunction
Where there is disjunction, there is the
potential for misunderstanding the
meaning an experience has for a pa-
tient. If the nurse "knows" what is best
and attempts to communicate this to
128° Munhalt
1
the patient, the patient may fee! mis: SUMMARY :
understood, coniicted, and may be- Knowing is wonceerul, but itis just a
come resistant to the “knower.” After guiding means. U=xnowing isa condi-
all, the patient is a “knower" as well. tion of openness. This unknowing in
‘Again, nurses must hold their own the intersubjective space of two people
beliefs and assumptions aside. For in- or people of two culnures allows others
stance, if nurse believes the situation to he. This art of unknowing may en-
ta be hopeless and 2 patient is hopeful able a nurse to uncerstand, with empa-
despite all evidence, to be empathic thy, the actual essence of the meaning.
and tohelp the patient feel understood, an experience has for # patient, This
the nurse tooshould attempt hopeful pattern of unknowing focused herein
attitude. Many nurses can speak to a on the intersubjective whole between
patient they had every cause tobelieve patient and nurse is applicable 3é well
to be hopeless as far as improving or to learning in a more formal sense. To
becoming more differentially inte- be open to learning one needs to pos:
grated only to find that their “know- ture oneself in a postion of unknowing
ing” was based on usual cases in simi- to hear colleague a teacher, astudent
lar circumstances. The danger here is To provide and find openness isto be
obvious, in that the self-fulfilling able to say, “I never thought about it
prophecy may be operating and the par that way,”” and at once experience
tient may begin to perceive hiscireum the wonderment of coming upon an
stance as the nurse does. "unknown."
THE FIFTH PATTERN OF
KNOWING: UNKNOWING
“"Knowledge screens the sound the Salley Ordinary lve and good wll. New
York Random Howse 198910.
third ea hears, so we ear nly what ee na
we know. dora House, 1989.38,
Our listening characteristics are of+ 3. Caer 8 Fundamentals pater of kaow-
ten those of dignosing and preseib- int Ads Nu Si Bot1303
i ne ethan, 4 Faweet |, The acuperdign of nang:
The diagnosing and prescribing" greene sunsand rare renenens Ite
comes from our knowledge and our yiaayatr
subjective perceptions. This may lead 5. Atwood D, Siolorow R. Structures of subiee:
to premature closure to other possibil- Sve. New ney Lawrence Elous Aas
lates, 19844753
ities, interpretations, and perceptions, pat TSS ae
REFERENCES:
‘The fact that this occurs isa result of "New York: Nasional League for Nunang,
someone else's knowing. Someone else 1990!
teaching us to know, to put together, co” Wt |. Nursing. human sence and i>
man are, Norwalk, Connecticut. Appleton
eae eee Cencury Cros, 1985
“The compulsion to make sense is2 4, Mais, Theory development and eursing
resistance to unknowing.”"' The pat practice a syopssol «study ofthe theo
tem of unknowing can lead toa much
deeper knowledge of another being, of Etat age for Nuning. 1988
different meanings, and interpretations 9, genner P, Wrubel J. The primacy of caring,
of all our various perceptions of expe: sues and coping in bedi ad lst
rience. The intent of bracketing in oe Park, California, Addison-Wesley,
qualitative research isone in which the 45. 7p seing and nothingness New Yee
researcher assumes the posture of the '” wanes erst
baive listener. ores Teste unknowing New ese
ey aa Armin, fc, 198967
12, Hse IH Scene and meicne Bou
ee de Cou Shimbhal 9822
chil, and be prepared ive wp
vey preconcsived exon, flow
ing humbly wherever and'o what. PATRICIA L, MUNHALL isa professor at
ver ays nature lead, oc you shall Florida Atlante University, Boca Raton,
team noching Florida,
VOLUME 41 «NUMBER 3 NURSING OUTLOOK
practice diabetic In, Mocca Ped. New ap
proaches cotheory development New Yorks