0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views2 pages

Artar AC EY: N 2n 2n+1 N N 1

1. Luc Tartar provides solutions to 5 problems from previous Putnam exams for John Mackey's problem set. 2. The first problem involves proving that the sum of all divisors of a positive integer n is divisible by 24 under certain conditions. 3. The second problem asks to determine the number of ordered triples of sets with certain properties, and expresses the answer in the form 2a3b5c7d. 4. The third problem involves proving that the limit of the difference of successive terms of a sequence divided by n approaches 0, given a condition on the differences of every other term. 5. The fourth problem asks to show that a circumscribable quadrilateral with a given area
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views2 pages

Artar AC EY: N 2n 2n+1 N N 1

1. Luc Tartar provides solutions to 5 problems from previous Putnam exams for John Mackey's problem set. 2. The first problem involves proving that the sum of all divisors of a positive integer n is divisible by 24 under certain conditions. 3. The second problem asks to determine the number of ordered triples of sets with certain properties, and expresses the answer in the form 2a3b5c7d. 4. The third problem involves proving that the limit of the difference of successive terms of a sequence divided by n approaches 0, given a condition on the differences of every other term. 5. The fourth problem asks to show that a circumscribable quadrilateral with a given area
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Luc TARTAR to John MACKEY, September 29, 2009

For your problem set 6 of today, September 29, I had already written solutions in the preceding years.
Your problem 1 (Putnam 1969-B1): Let n be a positive integer such that n + 1 is divisible by 24. Prove that
the sum of all divisors of n is divisible by 24.
Hint: If d1 is a divisor of n, then n = d1 d2 and d2 is also a divisor of n and if one shows that d1 + d2 is
automatically a multiple of 24, and that n is not a square (so that d1 is different from d2 ), then the sum
of all divisors of n will be a multiple of 24. As n = 23 (mod 24), one has n = 2 (mod 3), so that n is
not a square (since squares are 0 or 1 modulo 3). Either d1 = 1 (mod 3), so that d2 = 2 (mod 3), or
d1 = 2 (mod 3), so that d2 = 1 (mod 3): in both cases d1 + d2 = 0 (mod 3). Similarly n = 7 (mod 8),
so that d1 must be congruent to 1, 3, 5 or 7 (mod 8), and in order to have d1 d2 = 7 (mod 8), d2 must be
congruent to respectively 7, 5, 3, or 1 (mod 8), and in each of these cases one has d1 + d2 = 0 (mod 8).
Then, d1 + d2 is a multiple of 3 and a multiple of 8, so that it is a multiple of 24.
Your problem 2 (Putnam 1985-A1): Determine, with proof, the number of ordered triples (A1 , A2 , A3 ) of
sets which have the property that
(i) A1 ∪ A2 ∪ A3 = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10},
and
(ii) A1 ∩ A2 ∩ A3 = ∅,
where ∅ denotes the empty set. Express the answer in the form 2a 3b 5c 7d , where a, b, c and d are nonnegative
integers.
Hint: Each of the ten integers i ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10} should be put in at least one of the three sets
A1 , A2 , A3 , but not in the three sets, and there are 6 possibilities for that (out of 23 possibilities, reject that
where i is put in none or in the three sets). The desired number is then 610 = 210 310 .
Your problem 3 (Putnam 1970-A4): Given a sequence xn , n = 1, 2, · · · such that

lim xn − xn−2 = 0.
n→∞

Prove that
xn − xn−1
lim = 0.
n→∞ n
Hint: The hypothesis is made up of two unrelated hypothesis, namely limn→∞ x2n − x2n−2 = 0 concerning
even indices, and limn→∞ x2n+1 − x2n−1 = 0 concerning odd indices, but the conclusion involves successive
terms. The reason is that one must show that if a sequence yn is such that limn→∞ yn − yn−1 = 0, then one
has limn→∞ ynn = 0; then, choosing yn = x2n shows that limn→∞ xn2n = 0, and choosing yn = x2n+1 shows
that limn→∞ x2n+1
n = 0, and a consequence is that limn→∞ xnn = limn→∞ xn−1 n = 0.
For ε > 0, one has |yn+1 − yn | ≤ ε for n ≥ n(ε), so that |yn(ε)+p − yn(ε) | ≤ p ε; from |yn | ≤ |yn(ε) | + ε n
|y |+ε n
for n ≥ n(ε), one deduces that lim supn→∞ |ynn | ≤ limn→∞ n(ε)n = ε, and then letting ε tend to 0 shows
that lim supn→∞ n = 0, and since n ≥ 0, one deduces that limn→∞ |ynn | = 0.
|yn | |yn |

Your problem 4 (Putnam 1970-B6): A quadrilateral which can be inscribed in a circle is said to be inscribable
or cyclic. A quadrilateral which can be circumscribed to √ a circle is said to be circumscribable. Show that if
a circumscribable quadrilateral of sides a, b, c, d has area a b c d, then it is also inscribable.
Hint: Let α be the angle whose sides are a, b and let β be the angle whose sides are c, d; if one shows that
α + β = π, then it proves that the quadrilateral is inscribable.
One has a2 + b2 − 2a b cos α = c2 + d2 − 2c d cos β, as it is the square of the diagonal opposite to the
angles α or β. Since the two tangents to the circle from any point outside it have the same length, one
deduces that any circumscribable quadrilateral satisfies a + c = b + d; one then has (a − b)2 = (c − d)2 , hence
a b (1 − cos α) = c d (1 − cos β). √
The area of the quadrilateral is a b sin
2
α
+ c d sin
2
β
, which is assumed to be a b c d, so that taking the square
gives 4a b c d = a2 b2 sin2 α + c2 d2 sin2 β + 2a b c d sin α sin β, but since a2 b2 sin2 α = a b (1 + cos α) c d (1 − cos β)
and c2 d2 sin2 β = a b (1−cos α) c d (1+cos β), one obtains 4 = 2−2 cos α cos β+2 sin α sin β = 2−2 cos(α+β),
i.e. α + β = π.

1
Your problem 5 (Putnam 1971-B2): Let F (x) be a real valued function defined for all real x except for x = 0
and x = 1 and satisfying the functional equation F (x) + F {(x − 1)/x} = 1 + x. Find all functions F (x)
satisfying these conditions.
−1 −1
Hint: Let ϕ(x) = x−1 x−1
 
x . Then ϕ ◦ ϕ(x) = ϕ x  = x−1 , and ϕ ◦ ϕ ◦ ϕ(x) = ϕ x−1 = x. Then, from
F (x)+F ϕ(x) = 1+x, one deduces that F ϕ(x) +F ϕ◦ϕ(x) = 1+ϕ(x) = 2x−1
  
x and F ϕ◦ϕ(x) +F (x) =
x−2 2x−1 x−2 x3 −x2 −1
1 + ϕ ◦ ϕ(x) = x−1 , so that 2F (x) = 1 + x − x + x−1 , i.e. F (x) = 2x(x−1) .

You might also like