0% found this document useful (0 votes)
110 views1 page

Rule 26: Admission by Adverse Party Section 2

This document discusses Rule 26 of the Rules of Court regarding admissions by adverse parties. It summarizes three Supreme Court cases from 1992, 2010, and 1997 that deal with implied admissions as it relates to Rule 26 Section 2. The cases involve Salvador Briboneria vs. the Court of Appeals, Socorro Limos et al vs. Spouses Francisco and Arwenia Odones, and Concrete Aggregates Corporation vs. the Court of Appeals.

Uploaded by

daniel besina jr
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
110 views1 page

Rule 26: Admission by Adverse Party Section 2

This document discusses Rule 26 of the Rules of Court regarding admissions by adverse parties. It summarizes three Supreme Court cases from 1992, 2010, and 1997 that deal with implied admissions as it relates to Rule 26 Section 2. The cases involve Salvador Briboneria vs. the Court of Appeals, Socorro Limos et al vs. Spouses Francisco and Arwenia Odones, and Concrete Aggregates Corporation vs. the Court of Appeals.

Uploaded by

daniel besina jr
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

RULE 26

Admission by Adverse Party

Section 2.Implied admission.

[G.R. No. 101682. December 14, 1992.]


SALVADOR D. BRIBONERIA vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, GERTRUDES B. MAG-
ISA.

G.R. No. 186979. August 11, 2010


SOCORRO LIMOS et al vs. SPOUSES FRANCISCO and ARWENIA R. ODONES

[G.R. No. 117574. January 2, 1997.]


CONCRETE AGGREGATES CORPORATION vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS

You might also like