Salbahe Salvaje: Extrajudicial Killings and Forced Disappearances in The Philippines Are
Salbahe Salvaje: Extrajudicial Killings and Forced Disappearances in The Philippines Are
pine Republic Act No. 7438[13] provides for the rights of persons
arrested, detained, it does not punish acts of enforced disappearances. Thus, on
Extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances in the Philippines are August 27, Bayan Muna(People First), Gabriela Women's Party (GWP),
illegal executions – unlawful or felonious killings – and forced disappearances in and Anakpawis (Toiling Masses) filed House Bill 2263 – "An act defining and
the Philippines.[1] These are forms of extrajudicial punishment, and include penalizing the crime of enforced or involuntary disappearance." Sen. Jinggoy
extrajudicial executions, summary executions, arbitrary arrest and detentions, and Estrada also filed last June 30, 2007, Senate Bill No. 7 – "An Act Penalizing the
failed prosecutions due to political activities of leading political, trade union Commission of Acts of Torture and Involuntary Disappearance of Persons Arrested,
members, dissident and/or social figures, left-wing political parties, non- Detained or Under Custodial Investigation, and Granting Jurisdiction to the
governmental organizations, political journalists, outspoken clergy, anti-mining Commission on Human Rights to Conduct Preliminary Investigation for Violation of
activists, agricultural reform activists, members of organizations that are allied or the Custodial Rights of the Accused, Amending for this Purpose Sections 2, 3 and 4
legal fronts of the communist movement like "Bayan group" or suspected supporters of RA 7438, and for Other Purposes."[14][15][16]
of the NPA and its political wing, the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP).[2][3]
Extrajudicial killings are most commonly referred to as "salvaging" in Philippine Background
English.[4][5][6] The word is believed to be a Marcos regime
direct Anglicization of Tagalog salbahe ("cruel", "barbaric"),
from Spanish salvaje ("wild", "savage").[7] In 1995, 10,000 Filipinos won a U.S. class-suit against the Ferdinand Marcos estate.
The charges were filed by victims or their surviving relatives for torture, execution
Extrajudicial killings (EJKs) is also synonymous with the term "extralegal killings" and disappearances.[17]Human rights groups placed the number of victims of
(ELKs). Extrajudicial/ extralegal killings (EJKs/ ELKs) and enforced disappearances extrajudicial killings under martial law[18] at 1500 and over 800
(EDs) are unique in the Philippines in as much as it is publicly and commonly known abductions; Karapatan (a local human rights group's) records show 759
to be committed also by non-state armed groups (NAGs) such as the New Peoples involuntarily disappeared (their bodies never found). Military historian Alfred
Army (NPA) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). Though cases have been McCoy in his book "Closer than Brothers: Manhood at the Philippine Military
well documented with conservative estimates of EJKs/ ELKs and EDs committed by Academy" and in his speech "Dark Legacy" cites 3,257 extrajudicial killings, 35,000
the NPAs numbering to about 900-1,000 victims based on the discovery of torture victims, and 70,000 incarcerated during the Marcos years.[19][20] The
numerous mass grave sites all over country, legal mechanisms for accountability of newspaper "Bulatlat" places the number of victims of arbitrary arrest and detention
non-state actors have been weak if not wholly non-existent. at 120,000.[21][22][23]
Nature The New People's Army (NPA) groups known as "Sparrow Units" were active in the
Philippine extrajudicial killings are politically motivated murders committed by mid-1980s, killing government officials, police personnel, military members, and
government officers, punished by local and international law or convention. They anyone else they targeted for elimination. They were also part of an NPA operation
include assassinations; deaths due to strafing or indiscriminate firing; called "Agaw Armas" (Filipino for "Stealing Weapons"), where they raided
massacre; summary execution is done if the victim becomes passive before the government armories as well as stealing weapons from slain military and police
moment of death (i.e., abduction leading to death); assassination means forthwith personnel. A low level civil war with south Muslims, Al-Qaeda sympathizers
or instant killing while massacre is akin to genocide or mass extermination; thus, and communist insurgents has led to a general break down of law and order.
killings occurred in many regions or places throughout the Philippines in different The Philippines government has promised to curb the killings, but is itself implicated
times - 136 killings in Southern Tagalog region were recorded by human rights in many of the killings.[24][25][26]
group Karapatan from 2001 to May 19, 2006.[8][9][10] Since 1975, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) was deeply concerned in
A forced disappearance (desaparecidos), on the other hand, as form of extrajudicial politics. Because of the armed conflict, the military continued its campaign versus
punishment is perpetrated by government officers, when any of its public officers the New People’s Army of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP). Since 1969
abducts an individual, to vanish from public view, resulting to murder or it aimed to establish a Marxist regime with armed rebellion against the government.
plain sequestration. The victim is first kidnapped, then illegally detained On top of all these chaos, left-wing non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
in concentration camps, often tortured, and finally executed and the corpse hidden. were/are critical of the Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo administration. The members who
In Spanish and Portuguese, "disappeared people" are called desaparecidos, a term associated with the CPP and NPA had been targeted as victims in the spate of
which specifically refers to the mostly South American victims of state political killings. Human Rights Watch investigated extrajudicial murders in the
terrorism during the 1970s and the 1980s, in particular concerning Operation Philippins in September 2007[19][27][28]
Condor. In the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from
Enforced Disappearance, "Enforced disappearance" is defined in Article 2 of Philip Alston
the United Nations Convention Against Torture as "the arrest, detention, abduction
or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the State or by persons or Three major investigation groups were commissioned and their final reports had
groups of persons acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence of the been submitted and published: the Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo government-appointed
State, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by bodies: a) Task Force Usig created by her on August; as a special police body, it
concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place was assigned to solve 10 cases of killings; it claimed having solved 21 cases, by
such a person outside the protection of the law."[11][12] initiating court cases, but only 12 suspects were arrested; b) the Melo Commission
(chaired by Supreme Court Associate Justice Jose Melo) with members National
Bureau of Investigation Director Nestor Mantaring, Chief State Prosecutor Jovencito
Zuño, Bishop Juan de dios Pueblos, and Nelia Torres Gonzales; its final report their oath to defend the constitution and enforce our laws, to a high standard of
states: "There is no official or sanctioned policy on the part of the military or its official conduct and hold them accountable to our people. The sovereign Filipino
civilian superiors to resort to what other countries euphemistically call "alternative people should be assured that if their right to life and liberty is threatened or
procedures" – meaning illegal executions. However, there is certainly evidence violated, they will find vindication in our courts of justice'."[41][42][43][44] Puno
pointing the finger of suspicion at some elements and personalities in the armed explained the interim reliefs under amparo: temporary protection order (TPO),
forces, in particular General Jovito Palparan, as responsible for an undetermined inspection order (IO), production order (PO), and witness protection order (WPO, RA
number of killings, by allowing, tolerating, and even encouraging the killings." (Melo 6981).[45] As supplement to Amparo, on August 30, 2007, Puno (at Silliman
Commission report, p. 53),[29] and c) Philip Alston, the United Nations Special University in Dumaguete City, Negros Oriental) promised to release also the writ of
Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions (February 12 to 21, 2007) habeas data (“you should have the idea” or “you should have the data”) another
new legal remedy to solve the extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances.
Remedies[edit Puno explained that the writ of amparo denies to authorities defense of simple
denial, and habeas data can find out what information is held by the officer, rectify
Malacañang's peace summit and Puno's killings summit[edit] or even the destroy erroneous data gathered. Brazil used the writ, followed
by Colombia, Paraguay, Peru, Argentina and Ecuador.[46]
Because of the magnitude of Philippine killings and desaparecidos, 22nd Chief
Justice Reynato Puno of the Supreme Court of the Philippines called a National On December 3, 2007, Reynato S. Puno stated that the writ released only three
Consultative Summit on extrajudicial killings on July 16 and 17, 2007 at victims (including Luisito Bustamante, Davao City), since amparo was enforced
the Manila Hotel. Invited representatives from the branches of the government on October 24: "I would like to think that after the enactment and effectivity
participated (including the Armed Forces of the Philippines, the (of the writ), the number of extrajudicial killings and disappearances have gone
PNP, Commission on Human Rights (Philippines), media, academe, civil down."[47]
society and other stakeholders). On the other hand, the Malacañang-sponsored
"Mindanao Peace and Security Summit" (July 8–10, 2007 at Cagayan de Oro On December 17, 2007, Iloilo regional trial court Judge Narciso Aguilar granted
City) concentrated on the anti-terror law, or the Human Security Act (HSA) of a writ of amparo against President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and 9 military and
2007, to make it more acceptable to the public.[30][31]At the July 16 summit, police officials to release Nilo Arado and Maria Luisa Posa-Dominado activists
Reynato Puno stated that he Commission on Human Rights reported the abducted on April 12.[48]
number of victims at 403 from 2001 to May 31, 2007, On December 19, 2007, Dra. Edita Burgos petitioned the Philippine Court of
while Karapatan reported 863 deaths[32] until 2007, and more than 900 as of Appeals to issue a writ of amparo against Armed Forces chief Gen. Hermogenes
May, 2008, and most of them were members of left wing groups. Karapatan Esperon Jr and Army chief Lt. Gen. Alexander Yano regarding her son Jonas's
further officially placed the number of victims of human rights violations: forced abduction on April 28.[49]
evacuations or displacement at 7,442, by indiscriminate firing with 5,459 On December 27, 2007, the 2nd Division, Court of Appeals 30-page decision
victims, and food and economic blockade with 3,042.[33] The rights group penned by Associate Justice Lucas Bersamin granted the writ of amparo filed by
Desparecidos officially reported as of May 15, 2008, 194 victims of enforced Reynaldo and Raymond Manalo, abducted activists.[50]
disappearances under the Arroyo administration, with the latest abduction of
For other legal remedies see also Writ of Amparo and Habeas Data
National Democratic Front political consultant for Cagayan Valley, activist
(Philippines)
Randy Felix Malayao, 39, a volunteer worker.[34]
International groups' 2006 and 2008 probe of killings[edit]
Counsels for the Defense of Liberties (CODAL), Philippines, a lawyers’
organization stated that since 2001, 26 lawyers and 10 judges were killed due In 2006, the Dutch Lawyers for Lawyers Foundation and Lawyers without
to their professions; 755 civilians had been killed extrajudicially, while 359 Borders with the support of the Netherlands Bar Association, the Amsterdam
survived attacks, but 184 persons were still missing.[35] Bar Association and the International Association of Democratic Lawyers
Bishop Deogracias Iñiguez stated that on the CBCP/Catholic Church's count, the created a fact-finding mission in different parts of the Philippines. The
number of victims of extrajudicial killings is 778, while survivors of "political international groups conducted interviews of various legal sectors from June 15
assassinations" reached 370; 203 "massacre" were victims, 186, missing or to June 20, 2006.
involuntarily disappeared, 502, tortured, or illegally arrested. Iñiguez From November 4–12, 2008, the Dutch Lawyers for Lawyers Foundation will
denounced the government's implementation of its Oplan Bantay Laya I and conduct a follow-up verification and fact finding mission (IVFFM) in Manila
II.[36][37][38][39][40] and Mindanao, with the National Host Committee, National Union of Peoples'
Promulgation of Writs of Amparo and Habeas Data[edit] Lawyers (NUPL) and the Counsels for the Defense of Liberties (CODAL). This
team is composed of 8 judges and lawyers from Belgium and Netherlands, who
Because of the inefficacy and insufficiency of the Philippines Writ of Habeas Corpus, had dialogue with Reynato Puno on the probe of killings.[51] [52][53]
on September 25, 2007, Chief Justice Reynato Puno signed and released the Writ of
Amparo: "This rule will provide the victims of extralegal killings and enforced International criticism[edit]
disappearances the protection they need and the promise of vindication for their
rights. This rule empowers our courts to issue reliefs that may be granted through On September 28, 2007, the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) criticized
judicial orders of protection, production, inspection and other relief to safeguard the Writ of Amparo and Habeas Data (Philippines) for being insufficient:
one's life and liberty The writ of amparo shall hold public authorities, those who took "Though it responds to practical areas it is still necessary that further action
must be taken in addition to this. The legislative bodies, House of Foreign Relations at Washington, D.C.John submitted his written
Representatives and Senate, should also initiate its own actions promptly and statement: a) the increase in extrajudicial killings, b) the “Huk Rebellion”
without delay. They must enact laws which ensure protection of rights—laws in the 1940s and 50s causing thousands of murdered victims; c) the
against torture and enforced disappearance and laws to afford adequate legal communist New People’s Army (NPA), which was listed in the U.S. State
remedies to victims." AHRC objected since the writ failed to protect non- Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations campaigned to
witnesses, even if they too face threats or risk to their lives.[54] overthrow the government since 1968; d) Extrajudicial killings by the
security forces, the NPA, etc. during the Marcos regime, were less; and e)
International reports - the root cause of killings[edit] noted the report of UN Special Rapporteur Alston which submitted the
Philippine Government’s recognition of the gravity of the problem,
Alston UN report[edit] expresses concern about the views of the Armed Forces of the Philippines
(AFP) regarding the problem, but much had to submitted that the reforms
Philip Alston submitted his final report on the killings; he found that the made did not and will not resolve the killings. Mr. Alston's March report
Armed Forces of the Philippines killed left-wing activists to get rid of stated that "the question of resources or technical expertise will partly
communist insurgents: "the executions had "eliminated civil society resolve the killings but the strong risk is that these measures will treat
leaders, including human rights defenders, trade unionists and land reform only some of the symptoms of the crisis, and will fail to address
advocates, intimidated a vast number of civil society actors, and narrowed meaningfully two of the most important underlying causes of a great many
the country’s political discourse." Alston denied for lack of merit the of the killings." (A/HRC/4/20/Add.3, March 22, 2007) Alston named two
government's claim that killings were perpetrated by communists to root causes of the killings: (1) 'vilification', 'labeling’, or 'guilt by
exterminate spies and to make negative propaganda versus government. association' – "characterization of most groups on the left of the political
Alston, on February, 2007 stated that the military made alibis or denials spectrum as ‘front organizations’ for armed groups whose aim is to destroy
on its role about 800 deaths of activists and journalists since 2001. Alston democracy" making the groups "considered to be legitimate targets; and
blamed "impunity" which caused the executions of journalists and leftist (2) the Government’s counter-insurgency strategy's extent of facilitating
activists: "the priorities of the criminal justice system had been killings of activists and others.[61][62] G. Eugene Martin specifically
"distorted," and had "increasingly focused on prosecuting civil society expanded the 2 causes of the violence and killings: a) weak political and
leaders rather than their killers." But Alston noted the government's social institutions, corrupt and ineffective judicial system, resulting to
creation of – special courts to try extrajudicial killings, the Melo failure to obtain justice from corrupt Philippine courts; and b) the legacy of
Commission and the Philippine National Police's Task Force Usig.[55][56] In the Ferdinand Marcos regime; Martial law caused the corrupt system
the November U.N. Alston report - the killings in 2007 was only 68, huge where soldiers, police, judges and prosecutors became principals of
drop from the 209 murdered in 2006. Karapatan published its report offenses like extralegal arrest, detention, incarceration, disappearances
however, listing 830 victims of extrajudicial killings since 2001, under and killings (salvaging), all permitted or allowed. He traced the spate of
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.[57] On March 1, 2007, the Supreme Court of the violence and killings to political instability of President Arroyo government;
Philippines issued Administrative Order No. 25-2007, which created by while she created the Independent Commission to Address Media and
designation 99 regional trial courts to try cases of killings and Activist Killings, Melo Commission, she had no capability to end the
desaparecidos.[58] killings, due to her political lameness because of the 2004 election
controversy.[62][62][63]
Failed investigations and prosecutions[edit]
FIDH report[edit]