2017 MARINE AVIATION PLAN

MARINE CORPS AVIATION 2017-2027

The Marine Corps and Marine Aviation Our rotary wing (RW) and tiltrotor (TR) communities will be closer to complete
transition with AH-1Z, UH-1Y and MV-22B fully operational and deployed across
The Marine Corps is manned, trained, and equipped to be an “expeditionary force
the MAGTF. Our heavy lift assets (CH-53K) will be over halfway through transition,
in readiness”, ready and forward deployed, capable of crisis response, entry and
anticipating full operational capability by 2029.
sustained operations, across the range of military operations (ROMO). The Marine
Corps is by design a “middleweight force”, equipped with the requisite organic
We continue to develop and deploy our fleet of unmanned aircraft systems. The
capabilities to accomplish its mission, roles, and functions. Marine aviation, as one
RQ-21 is being upgraded to provide additional sensor and platform capabilities,
of the two combat arms of the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF), exists “to
while deploying organically with Marine Expeditionary Units. The Marine Corps’
conduct air operations, project combat power, and contribute to battlespace
Group 5 sea-baseable UAS—the Marine Unmanned Expeditionary (MUX)—has
dominance in support of the MAGTF’s mission.” 1
been formally approved by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council and will see
Where We Have Been major investment across the FYDP in order to field this capability in the mid-2020s.
As we ended the fiscal year (September 30, 2016), the Marine Corps executed Our expeditionary enablers are modernizing as well. We will introduce G/ATOR
more than 80 operations (15 from the sea), 130 theater security cooperation (TSC) radars, replacing five of the Marine Corps legacy systems and providing a
events, while participating in more than 150 exercises around the world. From significant upgrade in capabilities. We will also field the Common Aviation
31st MEU VMM disaster relief operations following the Kumamoto earthquakes in Command and Control System (CAC2S) to better integrate aviation command and
Japan, to 22 MEU VMA/HMLA strikes in Libya in support of counter-ISIL control functions.
operations, Marine aviation has been forward-deployed, ready, and relevant.
With our materiel modernization, Marine Operational Test and Evaluation
Where We Are Going Squadron 1 (VMX-1) is a key enabler in exploring and operationalizing our new
After fifteen years of emphasizing sustained operations ashore, the Marine Corps combat capabilities. Now co-located with MAWTS-1, VMX-1 is optimally postured
is refocusing on its naval and expeditionary roots and full-spectrum operations to conduct experimentation, tactical demonstrations (TACDEMOs), concept
across the ROMO. The Marine aviation portfolio continues to evolve as we development support, and operational testing in order to rapidly deliver
address the challenges and trends of the current and future operational warfighting capability to the fleet.
environment.
1U.S. Marine Corps, Marine Corps Operations, Marine Corps Doctrine Publication
Modernization (MCDP) 1-0 (Washington DC: Headquarters U.S. Marine Corps, 2011), 2-8.
Over the next five years, as Marine aviation continues with its modernization plan,
the MAGTF’s Aviation Combat Element will enter the heaviest years of aircraft
transition in its history.

Our TACAIR fleet will be in the middle of transition with a robust mix of F-35B, F-
35C, legacy F/A-18A-D, AV-8B and EA-6B platforms. F-35B squadrons will be
operational with both ARG/MEU and forward deployed land-based units, while our
AV-8B and F/A-18 squadrons will receive modernization upgrades to maintain
relevance in close air support, strike, and air defense missions through sundown.
Marine F-35C squadrons will integrate with Navy CVNs in accordance with our
TACAIR integration (TAI) commitments. Marine EA-6B squadrons will remain
ready and forward deployed until their sundown in 2019.

2
MARINE CORPS AVIATION 2017-2017

Readiness training opportunity; exercises provide venues for experimentation and allow us to
examine and validate current and emerging joint, naval and Marine Corps
Current readiness, at the squadrons and for Marine aviation as a whole, is below
concepts.4 Additionally, integrating “collective capabilities" at multi-T/M/S,
the level required to support steady-state requirements and provides limited
MAGTF, naval, joint and/or multi-national exercise venues are invaluable to
capability to surge during crisis response and/or major combat operations. The
exercising higher-level missions and functions and developing warfighting
combination of operational tempo, manpower challenges in critical military
relationships.
occupational specialties (MOSs), insufficient materiel support, and an aging aircraft
inventory has forced resource tradeoffs and reallocation across the Marine Let’s Move Out
aviation enterprise. HQMC Aviation has conducted a series of independent
readiness reviews to obtain impartial recommendations to improve Marine Corps As with our forebears in the interwar years, form follows function in today’s
aviation readiness (AV-8B, CH-53, MV-22). Readiness recovery initiatives are being Marine Corps. As we innovate and drive forward with new aircraft and new
applied across every platform in Marine aviation, focusing on people, process, systems, we also think hard about how we will maximize those systems; how we
parts and funding. will integrate with naval, ground, and allied expeditionary forces; and how we will
fight and win. We are leaning forward in the straps, finding ways to better support
Given the state of current readiness, coupled with an aging aircraft inventory, the MAGTF, making ourselves ready to be the first to fight. When we do think,
future readiness is an additional challenge that affects Marine aviation. Marine innovate, execute our missions, and put our lives on the line, we will take our
aviation is prioritizing current readiness initiatives and modernization in an effort proper place alongside the long line of Marines and sailors who came before us.
to secure future readiness. Continuing its modernization effort, Marine aviation is Their memory, and our nation, deserves nothing less.
halfway through the full transition of every tactical platform in its inventory. As 2 U.S. Marine Corps, Marine Aviation Training and Readiness Program, Navy-Marine Corps Instruction
older legacy aircraft are replaced by newer, more capable systems, materiel (NAVMC) 3500.14C (Washington DC: Headquarters U.S. Marine Corps, 2011), 1-3.
readiness will increase through planned efficiencies and the anticipated reduction 3 Six Functions of Marine Aviation- Anti-air Warfare, Offensive Air Support, Assault Support, Air
in unscheduled maintenance. Reconnaissance, Electronic Warfare, Control of Aircraft and Missiles (MCWP 3-2, Aviation Operations)

Training 4 Joint Operational Access Concept (JOAC), Joint Concept for Entry Operations (JCEO), Littoral
Operations in a Contested Environment (LOCE), Naval Operating Concept (NOC), Marine Corps
The training and readiness (T&R) program will remain the cornerstone for Marine Operating Concept (MOC), Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO), Distributed Aviation
aviation, generating and maintaining combat-capable units in support of Operations (DAO).
geographic combatant command’s OPLANs and global force management
requirements.2 By executing the T&R program, focusing on “brilliance in the
basics”, Marine Aviation will provide MAGTF commanders with an ACE capable of
executing the six functions of Marine aviation.3 Semper Fidelis,

Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One (MAWTS-1) will continue to
be Marine aviation’s premier schoolhouse, conducting the twice-annual Weapons
and Tactics Instructors (WTI) Course. Maintaining a robust WTI course/program
underwrites a competent and relevant ACE by providing standardized advanced LtGen Jon “Dog” Davis
tactical training and certification of unit instructors, enabling units to gain
maximum value and efficiency from the T&R program. Deputy Commandant for Aviation

Exercises are another essential line of effort in developing and training a combat-
capable ACE. We must extract every ounce of value from each exercise and
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1 Marine Corps Operational Landscape
1.1 Marine Corps Operating Concept / Aviation and the MAGTF
1.2 Aviation Combat Readiness
RBA Recovery / Independent Readiness Reviews
Section 2 Expeditionary Aviation Programs and Concepts
2.1 Marine Digital Interoperability
2.2 Marine Air Ground Task Force Electronic Warfare
2.3 Marine Air Command and Control System Plan
2.4 F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and Distributed STOVL Operations
2.5 Fixed-Wing Aviation
2.6 Tiltrotor Aviation
2.7 Rotary-Wing Aviation
2.8 Marine Unmanned Aircraft Systems
2.9 Marine Aviation Logistics
2.10 Marine Aviation Ground Support
2.11 Tactical Air Control Party
2.12 Science and Technology
2.13 Marine Aviation Training Systems
2.14 Marine Aviation Weapons and Munitions Plan
2.15 Aircraft Survivability Equipment Plan
2.16 Operational Support Airlift
Section 3 Marine Aviation Organization and Enterprise
3.1 Marine Reserve Aviation Plan
3.2 Marine Helicopter Squadron One
3.3 Marine Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron One
3.4 Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One
3.5 Naval Aviation Enterprise
3.6 Aviation Training and Readiness Program
3.7 Headquarters Marine Corps Aviation Organizational Charts
3.8 Marine Aviation Manpower
Section 4 Marine Aviation Almanac
4.1 Platform Quick Reference “Quad” Charts
4.2 Marine Corps Air Station Facilities Upgrade / MILCON
4.3 Aviation Training Systems Roadmap
 SECTION ONE
MARINE CORPS OPERATIONS AND READINESS

1.1 Marine Corps Operating Concept

Marine Aviation and the MAGTF
1.2 Aviation Combat Readiness
RBA Recovery
Moving the Needle
Independent Readiness Reviews
1.1 MARINE CORPS OPERATING CONCEPT

In September 2016, the Commandant released the Marine Corps’ new “The 21st century MAGTF conducts maneuver warfare in the physical and
capstone operating concept, the Marine Corps Operating Concept, or MOC. cognitive dimensions of conflict to generate and exploit psychological,
Recognizing the trends of the future operating environment and the changing technological, temporal, and spatial advantages over the adversary. The
character of war, the Marine Corps developed 21st Century Maneuver Warfare 21st century MAGTF executes maneuver warfare through a combined arms
as its new operating concept to addresses future adversaries, threats and approach that embraces information warfare as indispensable for achieving
challenges. complementary effects across five domains – air, land, sea, space, and
cyberspace. The 21st century MAGTF avoids linear, sequential, and phased
As we design and develop the capabilities and capacities necessary to execute approaches to operations and blends maneuver warfare and combined arms
21st Century Maneuver Warfare, the future force must have the following to generate the combat power needed for simultaneity of action in its full
characteristics: range of missions. The 21st century MAGTF operates and fights at sea, from
the sea, and ashore as an integrated part of the naval force and the larger
1) Naval- Contributes to deterrence, maritime security, sea control and power combined/joint force.”
projection

2) Expeditionary- Trained and equipped to operate in austere conditions and hostile

environments

3) Agile- Able to navigate the physical and cognitive dimensions of complex

situations and seize the initiative

4) Lethal- Uses combined arms, integrating and leveraging information warfare, to

destroy and defeat our enemies across the five domains (air, land, sea, space, and
cyberspace)

By designing this future force, the Marine Corps will be an integral part of the
naval, joint, and combined force: tailorable, flexible, versatile and capable of
responding to any crisis across the ROMO. As an integrated force, the Marine
Corps recognizes that Marines both contribute and benefit from unique and
complementary capabilities across the ROMO and all five domains.

6
Increased blue/green integration to support sea control and power projection

7
1.1 MARINE AVIATION AND THE MAGTF

“The ACE affords the MAGTF the ability to deliver fires, facilitate integrated
command and control, enhance mobility and maneuver, provide force protection,
sustain combat power, and collect intelligence.”

MCWP 3-2, Aviation Operations 1) Increased operational reach

Current and Emerging Supporting Concepts
2) Increased capacity (compliment/supplement sea-based sortie generation)
These concepts are nested and aligned with current and emerging joint and naval
concepts: joint operational access concept; joint concept for entry operations; 3) Distributes and reduces overall risk in A2/AD environments
littoral operations in a contested environment; and expeditionary advanced base
operations. • Threats to traditional/established land-based air bases and sea-based aircraft carriers
• Highly mobile site: occupation/duration determined by threat
Distributed Aviation Operations (DAO) 4) Economy of force options for major maneuver elements
Background- In some regions, the proliferation of long-range, precision
conventional threats, such as advanced SAMS and cruise missiles and armed UAVs, 5) Capitalizes on flexibility and surprise
has contested the use of traditional bases and methods of operations. While
advances have been made to counter such threats, such as interdiction,
5 U.S. Marine Corps, Aviation Ground Support, Marine Corps Tactical Publication (MCTP) 3-20B
interception, and base hardening, the complexity of the problem and sheer
(Quantico, VA: Marine Corps Combat Development Command, 2016), 3-2.
number of threats demands that more must be done. In traditional warfare mass
6 Ibid.
can be viewed as an asset however, in some scenarios mass, coupled with
predictability, is also a liability.

Concept- The aviation combat element (ACE) of the Marine Air Ground Task Force
(MAGTF) has the ability to conduct distributed aviation operations (DAO) in
support of land and/or naval campaigns. DAO is a task organized MAGTF
operation, employing ACE aircraft in a distributed force posture, independent of
specialized fixed infrastructure. Doctrinally, the ACE conducts these types of
operations from four types of forward operating bases (FOBs): main air base, air
facility, air site, and air point.5 FOBs are classified in relation to their size, location,
and characteristics in the form of airfield services, logistical supportability, and
maintenance capability.6 Benefits for conducting DAO include:

8
1.1 MARINE AVIATION AND THE MAGTF
Current and Emerging Supporting Concepts (Cont’d)

Distributed STOVL Operations (DSO) The DSO concept/sites are scalable based on the objective, operational
environment and threat. DSO concept/site employment includes four major
Background- Distributed STOVL Operations is a subset of Distributed Aviation
types/options:
Operations.

Concept 1) Air-Connected Mobile

Distributed STOVL Operations maximizes the capabilities of STOVL aircraft and
2) Light Mobile
expands basing options based on reduced runway requirements.7 DSO provides
the same benefits as Distributed Aviation Operations. Increased and
3) Medium Mobile
complementary basing options provide commanders with additional options to
leverage the F-35’s access, collection and strike capabilities. 4) Heavy Mobile

Fifth generation STOVL aircraft launch from a sea base or land base to conduct While DSO provides another employment option for MAGTF, naval, or joint forces,
multiple missions, with fuel and ordnance resupply conducted at mobile forward it may not be appropriate in every scenario. Employment of forces in a distributed
arming and refueling points (M-FARPS) located closer or within the operating area. STOVL fashion requires operational considerations including logistical support,
Aircraft return to the sea or land base at the conclusion of each flight day. command and control, and security.

Complementing and enabling the M-FARPs is the mobile distribution site (MDS) 7U.S. Marine Corps, MAGTF F-35B Distributed Short Take-Off Vertical Landing (STOVL) Operations - DSO
concept, a vehicle-mobile site located away from the M-FARP, intended to re-arm Concept of Operations, (Washington, DC: Headquarters, Marine Corps Department of Aviation, Aviation
Plans and Policies, 1 February 2015).
and re-fuel the M-FARP while maintaining an element of deception and decoy.
DSO is sustainable using surface connectors, land-based MDSs and host nation 8Marine Attack Squadron 542 (VMA-542). Hunter Army Airfield Distributed STOVL Operations After
support, enabling readiness and sortie generation for the MAGTF. Action Report. Marine Corps Center For Lessons Learned Report (CDR 15154). Cherry Point, NC, May
2016.

9
1.1 MARINE AVIATION AND THE MAGTF
Current and Emerging Supporting Concepts (Cont’d)

The Modular ACE and Aviation in the Future ARG/MEU

Background- Responding to demands of the global security environment, naval
force employment and trends are placing a premium on presence and posture.
The ARG/MEU is the Marine Corps’ primary forward-deployed MAGTF; an
ARG/MEU can operate independently, aggregate with other sea or land-based
units, or serve as the advanced force for larger joint operations. Examining the
current ARG/MEU construct, and looking forward to the LX(R) (Dock Landing Ship
(LSD) replacement), we must explore new and creative methods of deploying and
employing the ACE in order to provide maximum flexibility, capabilities and value
to the naval and joint force. Aviation in the Future ARG/MEU examines future
ARG/MEU constructs, employing LX(R), to maximize ARG/MEU (ACE) combat
power, specifically leveraging F-35B, to address future threats.9 As the LX(R)
replaces the LSD in the 2030 timeframe, the ARG will have additional flight deck Aviation in the Future ARG/MEU
and hangar space to accommodate a more robust ACE. 1) F-35- Eight (8) aircraft F-35 detachment

Concept- Marine aviation will deploy and employ in the most effective manner to 2) MV-22- V-22 Aerial Refueling System (VARS)
maximize the combat capabilities of the MAGTF. Amphibious assault ships serve
predominantly to project MEUs ashore but – as required – will be prepared to 3) UAS
“reconfigure” to provide ready decks for 16-20 F-35Bs and 4 VARS-equipped MV- •MQ-21
22s for a high-end fight or a mix of MV-22s, CH-53Es/Ks and UH-1Ys for •Expeditionary Group 5 UAS (MUX)
humanitarian or disaster relief missions.

9 Dickerson, Charles, Andrew Brown, Aviation in the Future ARG/MEU (Washington, DC: Center for Naval Analysis, May 2015), vi.

10
1.1 MARINE AVIATION AND THE MAGTF
Current and Emerging Supporting Concepts (Cont’d)

Lightning Carrier (CV-L) We might never need to employ this way - and may not want to, based upon the
need to employ our amphibious ships in a more traditional role - but to not lean
Background- In the 2017-2027 time frame the Marine Corps will possess the
forward to develop this capability, to train and exercise with it, is to deny
majority of naval 5th generation aircraft. By 2025, the Marine Corps will operate
ourselves a force multiplier that highlights the agility and opportunity only the
185 F-35Bs—enough to equip all seven L-Class ships. While the amphibious
Navy-Marine Corps team can provide.
assault ship will never replace the aircraft carrier, it can be complementary, if
employed in imaginative ways. The CVN-L concept has previous been employed 10Briefing, USS BATAAN OIF Post-Deployment Brief, subject: The Harrier Carrier Concept, OIF Execution,
(five times) utilizing AV-8B Harriers in a “Harrier Carrier” concept.10 The Lessons Learned & Template for the Future, May 2004.
ARG/MEU’s mission, and 13 mission essential tasks (METs), will not change; 11 Briefing, HQMC Aviation, subject: The Lightning Carrier Concept, June 2012.
however, a Lightning Carrier, taking full advantage of the amphibious assault ship
12Purdon, Jennifer, Robert Ward, Maximizing the Utility of LHA/LHDs as CV-Ls (Washington, DC: Center
as a sea base, can provide the naval and joint force with significant access,
for Naval Analysis, July 2016), 3.
collection and strike capabilities.

Concept- An amphibious assault ship (L-Class ship) equipped with 16-20 F-35Bs
with an embarked, organic aerial refueling capability will create opportunities for
the naval and joint force commander.11 A Lightning Carrier can be employed
independently, as part of an ARG or Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG), or in
conjunction with a Carrier Strike Group (CSG).12

1) F-35 employment- 16-20 x F-35B

2) Sortie Rate

• +40 sortie sustained rate (anticipated)

• Leverages organic MV-22 VARS air-to-air refueling and DAO FOBs to maximize sortie
generation and operational reach

11
1.1 MARINE AVIATION AND THE MAGTF

The Marine Corps provides unique capabilities to the naval and joint force and we are
manned, trained, equipped and funded appropriately.

MAGTF Digital Interoperability (Command and Control) - Digital interoperability is the seamless
integration of Marines, systems and exchange of data, across all domains and networks
throughout the MAGTF, naval, joint, and coalition forces in order to rapidly share accurate
information, provide greater situational awareness, accelerate kill-chains, and enhance
survivability. We continue to pursue integration and data exchange throughout the various
arenas; situational awareness, aircraft survivability, intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance (ISR), fire support, and logistics. (CAC2S, G/ATOR, CTN)

MAGTF EW (Electronic Warfare, Fires) - MAGTF EW transitions the Marine Corps from a focus
on the low-density/high-demand EA-6B, to a distributed, platform-agnostic strategy - where
every platform contributes/ functions as a sensor, shooter and sharer - to include EW. Under
MAGTF EW the Marine Corps is integrating multiple aviation platforms (unmanned, fixed wing,
tiltrotor, and rotary wing assets); payloads; and ground-based EW nodes to provide
commanders with an organic and persistent EW capability. Airborne electronic attack (AEA)
capabilities post-EA-6B sundown will be provided by EW payloads such as the Intrepid Tiger II
EW pod, UAS EW payloads, and the EW capabilities inherent to F-35.

TACAIR (Access, Intelligence, Fires) - Fifth-generation aircraft combines low observability with
unprecedented targeting systems and expanded weapons capabilities, and will provide MAGTF
ground commanders with a fighter, attack and electronic warfare platform unlike any other.
Combining the on-board capabilities of the F-35B with the flexible basing options it provides will
create difficultly for enemy planners; further enhance MAGTF commanders' fires capabilities;
and enhance the fleet commander’s ability to provide sea control to the joint force commander.

Assault Support (Maneuver) - With the speed and range of the MV-22B and the CH-53K,
combined with the KC-130J, the MAGTF will have the ability to move Marines and equipment
further, faster and with higher situational awareness than ever before. MAGTF and joint force
commanders will take advantage of the speed and expanded flight ranges that our AH-1Z, UH-
1Y, MV-22 and CH-53K provide, in order to give battle – or not – at the times and places of their
choosing.

Expeditionary Aviation Enablers (Maneuver, Sustainment) - The expeditionary nature of

Marine Aviation, coupled with the operational demand to disaggregate, re-aggregate and/or
conduct distributed operations, requires the niche aviation capabilities inherent in our MWSS
and MALS. Our expeditionary aviation enablers, with their ability to provide modular and task-
organized units/capabilities , facilitate and sustain aviation readiness and generate combat
power.
12
1.2 AVIATION COMBAT READINESS

To be the nation’s force in readiness, the Marine Corps depends upon its aviation
arm. Marine Corps aviation must be trained, manned and equipped to provide
Training level
that “A in MAGTF” - to support operations plans and joint and ground force
commanders to give battle at the time and place of their choosing. This endstate Hours per aircrew per month
demands a 2.0 standard: a squadron equipped with up aircraft and with aircrew to achieve T-2.0
trained to fly them in any clime and place.
Average number of RBA
1) We need to increase the amount of time our aviators spend in the air. aircraft to achieve T-2.0

2) Our Marine aviators need more “looks at the ball” which equates to more flight time # of IR A/C required for Squadron’s
Designed Mission
and more time in the simulator.

The Core Competency Resource Model (CCRM) developed for each T/M/S Type of squadron
(number of AC FOC squadrons)
calculates the number of hours each pilot/WSO/ECMO (or crew) must fly, based
on the T&R manual, for a squadron to achieve the standards mandated for a
Training Level of 2.0.

T-2.0: Squadron ≥ 70% METS trained

Our legacy gear will be ready until we are done with it. Improving the material Primary
Hours per
Mission Temporary RBA
readiness of our legacy gear—the key component to current readiness—is no easy Crew per
SQDN T/M/S Aircraft Degraded Required
task, but we must do it. Month
Authorized PMAI for T-2.0
(H/C/M)
(PMAA)
1) T-Rating is derived from all squadrons’ reported T-Levels.
HMH CH-53E 16 12 7 15.1
2) It is one of the primary assessment metrics for the naval aviation enterprise (NAE) to
determine whether squadrons have the resources to generate readiness. AH-1W 15.9
15 9
HMLA AH-1Z 18.2
Highlighted in RED are the Primary Mission Aircraft a squadron needs to achieve
training and wartime objectives. Highlighted in GREEN are temporary degraded UH-1Y 12 7 17.9
PMAI measures taken to spread load available assets across the HMH and VMFA
T/M/S to ensure squadrons were resourced with the minimum number of assets VMM MV-22B 12 7 16.2
to achieve the RBA requirements to train to T-2.0. Highlighted in BLACK are the
VMGR KC-130J 15 9 23.9
minimum number of RBA Aircraft required daily (on average) for a properly-
resourced squadron to maintain a ready posture. VMAQ EA-6B 6 3 15.1
Properly resourced = correct number of personnel, aircraft and parts, and the VMA AV-8B 16 11 15.4
training ranges to employ them.
VMFA F-35 16 11 16.0
VMFA
VMFA(AW)
F/A-18C/D 12 10 7 15.7

13
1.2 RBA RECOVERY

RBA RECOVERY PLAN People: Ensuring the right people with the right training, leadership and skill sets
are in positions of authority and responsibility.
After over a decade and a half of near surge operations for Marine Aviation,
combined with budget cuts, the Corps is currently 159 aircraft short to meet a T-
2.0 training goal and we are 45% short of the “up” aircraft we need to meet our 1) The Advanced Aviation Management Training (AAMT) Course and the Advanced
Maintenance Officer (AMO)Course initiatives are addressing this by providing skilled
Title 10 responsibilities. To increase the number of Ready Basic Aircraft and build
leadership at the deck plates.
the comprehensive strategies to recover our readiness to meet flight line
entitlement (FLE) warfighting requirements, we began a series of independent 2) Promotions will be based on demonstrated skills, knowledge, and qualifications.
readiness reviews (IRRs) to identify both the issues and the resources necessary to
turn this around. We have a POA&M to achieve our required readiness by type, 3) Additional MOSs to track qualified maintenance personnel.
model and series.
4) The Marine Corps intends to employ targeted bonuses and proficiency pay to keep
INDEPENDENT READINESS REVIEWS our most qualified people.
The Marine Corps conducted the first readiness review of AV-8B Harriers in 2014,
and followed with CH-53E Super Stallion in 2015 and MV-22B Osprey in 2016. H-1 Parts: From our newest fifth generation F-35B to our oldest legacy platforms, our
IRR is in process this year. These reviews are intensive and dispassionate, and give mission requires that we adequately fund our spare parts inventory. This detailed
us an in-depth look at the issues and concerns in each community. focus on supply chain means parts at the right time and in the right places to fulfill
our readiness requirements. NMCS is debilitating and is our #1 casual factor for
WHAT IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED low readiness in Marine Corps aviation.
Future Readiness: The real key to reducing risk in capacity and recovering
Process: Remove barriers to readiness recovery in our in-service repairs and
readiness is in transition. Due to our aging fleet, we have to focus on both current
depot backlogs (increasing throughput), and supply posture in our hangar decks
readiness while simultaneously recapitalize TACAIR with the F-35 B/C, completing
and maintenance departments.
the H-1 transition, and soon initiate the transition to the CH-53K.
We learned in the course of our DoN F/A-18 readiness recovery strategy and
Current Readiness: Four main components surfaced within each IRR (with
three independent readiness reviews that no one solution fits all
different combinations in each Type/Model/Series): People, Parts, Process, and
type/model/series aircraft. We are beginning an aggressive, tailored, funded and
Funding. The Marine Corps is tackling these components head-on and our
tracked roadmap to recover the readiness we need. We will hold our aviation
numbers are starting to trend up, with a full recovery planned for 2019 (as long as
general and flag officers accountable for executing that recovery process –
we keep these initiatives funded and stay on track with recapitalization).
beginning with the DCA.

Funding: Ensuring proper, sustained funding for legacy aircraft, flight hours and
spare parts, and for procurement of future aircraft and systems.

14
1.2 RBA RECOVERY: MOVING THE NEEDLE

NAE Goal (690)

As of 30 Sep
+33 +50 +57 613 +33

506

RBA at end of Sept 468

FY16 High: 478

POM-18 Pre-decisional
FY16

15
1.2 INDEPENDENT READINESS REVIEWS

HARRIER INDEPENDENT READINESS REVIEW (HIRR) HIRR output was tailored to two key areas for action:
The Harrier Independent Readiness Review (HIRR) identified a cost-effective
strategy through the remainder of the Harrier platform's service life to produce a 1) Maintenance and material, which included RBA degraders, depot maintenance
timeline management, and supply system transition from Boeing to NAVSUP.
daily 11 Ready Basic Aircraft average per squadron equivalent, and 15.4 flight
hours per pilot per month, in order to produce the required T-rating of 2.0.
2) Manpower, which included both contract maintenance and USMC manpower.

Since the HIRR, we have:

1) Established 55 RBA in operational squadrons as the single driven fleet goal for
readiness.

2) Identified key degraders, and ensured that the supply chains for these parts are re-
energized.

3) Conducted executive-level engagement with all DOD agencies that have a supporting
relationship with the AV-8B program.

4) Conducted executive-level engagement with key vendors and OEMs, ensuring that

5) known deficiencies are being addressed.

6) Conducted a holistic analysis of the supply forecasting model for both the F402
engine and the air vehicle as a whole, resulting in improvements in the logistics
system.

7) Ensured that funding levels for Program Related Logistics and Program Related
Engineering are kept at acceptable levels.

8) Analyzed maintenance training

The HIRR focused on three key areas, which were tied to aircraft To date, we have seen an increase in readiness across the fleet; however, the
reporting status: increase is lagging the HIRR forecast. HQMC Aviation, in concert with the TMS
lead (the MAG-14 commanding officer), is actively engaged at the executive level
1) Out of reporting aircraft. with OEMs, vendors, and all DOD commands that have a supporting relationship
with the AV-8B program, in an effort to continue to increase readiness to meet our
2) Manpower deficiencies and/or inefficiencies. readiness requirements. While readiness is lagging the forecast there has been a
marked improvement which has allowed us to more adequately meet out
3) Supply. readiness goals.

16
1.2 INDEPENDENT READINESS REVIEWS

SUPER STALLION INDEPENDENT READINESS REVIEW (SSIRR)

In response to CH-53E readiness challenges, the Super Stallion Independent

Readiness Review (SSIRR) was chartered to identify issues and gaps and conduct
root cause analysis for aircraft, aircrew and maintenance personnel readiness and
to recommend the best courses of action for the CH-53E community to produce
the Ready Basic Aircraft (RBA) for requisite flight hours per pilot per month, in
order to achieve and maintain T-2.0 until full operational capability (FOC) of the
CH-53K. Findings and recommendations were focused on areas to improve
combat readiness of the CH-53E fleet.

The SSIRR recommendations were categorized under surge and sustain

recommendations. With the purpose of returning fully mission capable aircraft to
the fleet, and of ensuring a ready, reliable, and relevant heavy-lift capability for
the Marine Corps through transition to the CH-53K, the CH-53E community has
taken several readiness recovery actions since the SSIRR:

1) Resetting all CH-53E fleet aircraft. The validation aircraft completed April 2016, with
follow-on verification aircraft inductions complete as well as full rate in order to reset
the entire fleet of CH-53Es in the next 3 years.

2) Building out Portable Electronic Maintenance Aids (PEMAS), now up to five per
aircraft;
Efforts are currently underway to expand the CH-53E Performance Based Logistics
3) Fixing technical publication discrepancies; (PBL) from 10 to 65 components with future growth potential. To increase
readiness, HQMC Aviation, in concert with the program office and TMS lead,
4) Enhancing and formalizing academic Functional Check Flight (FCF) training for both continue to be actively engaged with all who have a supporting relationship with
pilots and crew chiefs; the CH-53E program.

5) AcceleratingT-64-GE-419 engine modification; In summer 2014 our RBA gap was 23 aircraft. In the past two years we have
applied the readiness surge and sustainment recommendations from the IRR.
6) Restoring two AMARG MH-53Es for the FRS to use as basic stick-and-rudder aircraft Meeting an RBA of T-2.0 is a continuous process as we sustain CH-53E and prepare
to provide two CH-53Es back to the fleet; for FOC of the CH-53K. Based on this continuous process, we have lowered our
RBA gap to 12.
7) Procuring test equipment and IMRL; and

8) Hiring contract maintenance field teams to provide over the shoulder training to our
maintainers.

17
1.2 INDEPENDENT READINESS REVIEWS

The objective of the Osprey Independent Readiness Review (OIRR) was to identify
issues, gaps and to conduct a root cause analysis for aircraft, aircrew, and
maintenance personnel readiness. The OIRR recommended the best courses of
action to achieve and maintain T-2.0 for the MV-22 community.

MV-22 readiness has been stressed due to accelerated deployments, accelerated

squadron standups, continuous combat use since 2007 and emergent operational
tasking. This OPTEMPO has been sustained in parallel with the medium lift
transition from legacy assets which is only 75% complete. Additionally, the The current V-22 sustainment system cannot realize improved and sustained
SPMAGTF construct has driven the requirement to adjust the VMM Table of aircraft readiness / availability without significant change.
Organization (T/O) in order to support detachment operations. As MV-22
Since the OIRR, decisions have been made to implement the Common
employment grows and evolves to meet COCOM demand, the industrial and
Configuration, Readiness and Modernization Plan along with nacelle
logistics support base is working to keep pace. As a maturing platform that is
improvements. The V-22 program will also pursue a plan and strategy for PBL
scheduled to reach FOC in 2020, the support base is maturing in parallel. This
Implementation to select “best of breed”, confirm a Modification
base, both industrial and organic, has been challenged to meet established repair
Manager/authority, continue to implement a Long Term sustainment strategy,
timelines and required depot throughput. Across the enterprise, changes to
develop a detailed PMI plan, pursue commercial PMI capability, and improve the
manning are being made to support detachment operations, organic depot
supply chain. Many other initiatives were recommended and will all be considered
facilities are expanding, contracting strategies are evolving to support timely
and validated with respect to readiness improvements gained.
delivery of long lead items, and industry continues to grow their support
capability. These and other adjustments are being made to ensure the support The OIRR shall lead to improvement of aviation support programs in association
base is able to meet logistical requirements driven by current and future MV-22 with advanced maintenance concepts and equipment, in order to provide
operational requirements. increased and sustained levels of readiness across the Marine Corps.
Development of analytical modeling tools shall demonstrate the feasibility and
Readiness improvement opportunities span configuration management,
maturity of new technology and gain understanding in order to evaluate utility of
reliability, supply, manpower, and maintenance key issues limiting readiness:
this technology to expedite delivery of new capabilities.
1) There are over 77 V-22 aircraft configurations and modifications

2) System / Component improvements are under-resourced

3) The supply system is not able to keep pace with material demands (34% NMCS)

4) Depot-level maintenance cannot keep up with demand

5) The quality of maintenance training curricula, maturation, and standardization has

not kept pace with readiness requirements

6) Current maintenance manning levels are unable to support demands for labor

18
OPLAN READY
 SECTION TWO
EXPEDITIONARY AVIATION PROGRAMS AND CONCEPTS

2.1 Marine Digital Interoperability

2.2 Marine Electronic Warfare
2.3 Marine Aviation Command and Control System
2.4 F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and Distributed STOVL Operations
2.5 Fixed-Wing Aviation
2.6 Tiltrotor Aviation
2.7 Rotary-Wing Aviation
2.8 Marine Unmanned Aircraft Systems
2.9 Marine Aviation Logistics
2.10 Marine Aviation Ground Support
2.11 Tactical Air Control Party
2.12 Science & Technology
2.13 Marine Aviation Training Systems
2.14 Marine Aviation Weapons and Munitions
2.15 Marine Aircraft Survivability Equipment
2.16 Marine Operational Support Aircraft

20
 2.1 MAGTF DIGITAL INTEROPERABILITY

MAGTF Digital Interoperability (DI)

Digital interoperability is the seamless integration of systems and exchange of
data, across all domains and networks throughout the MAGTF, naval, joint, and
coalition forces, to include communication in degraded or denied environments,
to rapidly share accurate information, provide greater situational awareness,
accelerate the kill chain, and enhance survivability. Validation – The 2015 15th MEU assessment solidified the requirement for
software-defined radios, airborne gateways, mesh network data exchanges
The interoperability goal is to provide the required information to the right facilitating maneuvering within spectrum, and encrypted wireless tablets in the
participants at the right time, in order to ensure mission success, while improving hands of the operator. The ongoing efforts have and will continue to assist in the
efficiency and effectiveness. This approach provides the additional advantage of seamless integration, decreased kill-chain, and enhanced battlefield situational
responsible spectrum use, which becomes increasingly important as spectrum awareness throughout the MAGTF.
demands increase, as technology advances, and our MAGTFs continually operate
in more distributed and disaggregated manners. We continue to pursue Execution – Years of innovative efforts and collaborations across numerous
integration and data exchange throughout the various arenas: situational organizations i.e., NAVAIR, CD&I, MCWL, MARCORSYSCOM, HQMC C4 & Intel, NRL,
awareness; aircraft survivability; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and key industry partners have enabled transition from vision into execution. As a
(ISR); fire support; and logistics. result the MAGTF Agile Network Gateway Link (MANGL) system comprised of a
Software Reprogrammable Radio (SRP) Increment 2, Airborne Gateway, and
Vison – In order to validate our concepts, Marine aviation has adopted an Marine Air Ground Tablet (MAGTAB) is transitioning to a Program of Record.
“integration through innovation and experimentation” disruptive innovation MANGL will enable the seamless integration of the MAGTF in an A2AD
approach to enhance the MAGTF. This approach attempts to couple existing and environment while enroute and during objective area execution. When coupled
emerging technologies and integrate them into mission threads to assess their with systems such as Network on the Move Airborne (NOTM-A) access to SATCOM
operational viability inside of large scale MAGTF exercises i.e., MAWTS-1 Weapons networks further enables the robustness of the network and access to mission
and Tactics Instructor course, IOC Talon Reach exercises, MCWL MIX’s, and VMX thread information. Initially assault support platforms equipped with MANGL will
early integration opportunities. The inclusion of emerging technologies within enable information exchange amongst legacy systems such as H-1s equipped with
mission threads offers several benefits, which include the refinement of existing onboard Full Motion Video and walk on/off ANW2 network radios. TACAIR growth
MEU requirements
Construct and validation of the concepts leading to formal requirements through LPOD and internal platform upgrades will further enhance their
generation. participation within the network architecture. JSF’s capabilities when brought to
bear will expand the interoperability of the MAGTF. Efforts to ensure a future
Group 4/5 UAS equipped with MANGL will facilitate network access in the absence
of assault support platforms equipped for the Ground Combat Element.

Future – Miniaturization of Software defined radios will increase disembarked

Marines network access available down to the squad leader. Innovative efforts
such as NET-T AJ, Low Probably of Detection/Intercept, and data clouds remain on
the horizon. Sensor fusion through the existing program of record Minotaur seeks
2015 15th MEU Mesh Network Manager Risk Reduction system to consolidate the shared platform information automating sensor collaboration
for the operator interface. Technology advances are allowing us to use spectrum
coupled with the Marine Air Ground Tablet (MAGTAB) configuration
more efficiently and effectively in the areas of frequency, time, space, and
modulation. The adoption of future technology will position the Marine Corps to
21 be the warfighting force with the greatest flexibility in digital communications.
 117G
117G Joint CAS
Aircraft MUX
117G
Gateway
117G Aircraft
AV-8B

117G LPOD
117G
117G
CAC2S
Gateway
Aircraft FMV
117G
IT-II 117G/SIR
SIR 2.5 2.5
H-60
117G UAS R&S

117G/SIR Enemy
2.5 RadBn Rein
Assault
FMV LHD/ LX Force
Enemy TTNT
(R) w/ JFO Link-16
LPD COMMON DATA
LINK (CDL)
ANW2
Enemy LSD
SATCOM/HPW
VMF
BCDL

Linking every platform to be a sensor, shooter, node, and connector

22
2.1 MAGTF DIGITAL INTEROPERABILITY

Software Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) Increment 2 AN/ARC-254(C) MV-22, CH-53, and KC-130 Airborne Gateways
SRP is a software defined radio program that has the capability of hosting up to 7 Airborne gateways will serve as a conduit between disparate networks and
waveforms simultaneously while offering an advanced embedded multi-level waveforms on the current battlefield. Gateways possess the ability to receive one
security architecture known as the Programmable Embedded Infosec Product waveform/message type and process it into another waveform/message type
(PEIP). SRP Increment 1 has previously demonstrated forward deployed capability before off boarding the data. Due to the inherent difficulties of replacing or
on a Navy UAS platform, however it lacked the existing MAGTF waveforms. To adding new systems to some Marine aviation platforms, adding airborne gateways
align with the existing architecture of the MAGTF the following waveforms were enables information exchanges across a variety of systems and networks. This
coordinated for conveyance into the Increment 2; Link-16, ANW2, BE-CDL REV-B, increased prevalence of airborne gateways will provide data exchange capabilities
and TTNT. MV-22 is the lead platform for SRP Increment 2 integration immediately throughout the MAGTF without each platform having to be equipped with every
followed by the CH-53E/K and KC-130. Link-16 fulfills the air picture and enables waveform currently being used on the battlefield. Airborne gateways, such as the
growth for DACAS potential, ANW2 radios continue to be proliferated throughout Mesh Network Manager (MNM) utilizes a collection of radios and conducts
the Ground Combat Element, BE-CDL will expand on the existing CDL network message translation and processing for dissemination leveraging software that is
facilitating the Type 1 ISR mandate and a far more capable waveform that will interoperable with SOCOM.
enable the furthering of payload control , lastly TTNT continues to enable large
pipe traffic for information exchanges, range extension, and dynamic spectrum The SRP, when used in conjunction with a gateway, will deliver an unprecedented
maneuvering. Emerging waveforms as they become available can and will be capability to the MAGTF without significantly impacting current operations due to
implemented as the MAGTF continues to expand its interoperability. the reduced size, weight and power requirements. This construct is equally
applicable to multiple air and ground platforms. This capability is complementary
to the ongoing Network-On-The-Move Airborne (NOTM-A) initiative that provides
MANGL Beyond Line of Sight reach back for SPMAGTF KC-130’s and MV-22’s (MV-22
NOTM-A limited fielding in 2017-1018).

Persistent Airborne Gateways (UAS)

SRP Gateway Tablett
Airborne gateways intended to provide persistent coverage as MAGTF platforms
enter and depart the objective area will come in the form of a future Group 4/5
UAS. This will ensure post debarkation that the MAGTF in the absence of a MV-22,
CH-53, or KC-130 will retain access to the network. As technology miniaturizes
reduced size UAS platforms will become increasing valuable enablers and expand
upon opportunities for distributed manned/unmanned teaming.

23
2.1 MAGTF DIGITAL INTEROPERABILITY

Transition to SRP / Gateway Program of Record

1) 2014-15 VMX (1 A Kit MV-22, 1 A Kit CH-53)

2) 2015 15th MEU (6 A Kit MV-22, 4 A Kit CH-53, 10 MNM B Kits)

3) 2017-2018 SPMAGTF Enroute C4 MV-22 UUNS (30 A Kit MV-22, 18 MNM B Kits)

4) Facilitates interoperability between disparate / legacy systems

5) Link-16, ANW2, TTNT, CDL, HPW SATCOM , Message Translation (J, K, CoT, VMF)

6) Interfaces with Marine Air Ground Tablets (MAGTAB) over encrypted WiFi link

Meshed Network Manager Risk Reduction

(Data Forwarding, Message Translation, Mission Processing, Network Health Management) TTNT

PRC-117G w/CEWL Device

(WiFi Hub)

MAGTAB
TTNT CDL RFID
Link-16 ANW2 / SATCOM w/CEWL Device
QNT-200D VORTEX Antenna
STT PRC-117G Note 4 / Tab S 8.4
(Range Extension) (FMV) (PAX/Cargo
(Air C2) (GCE Network) (User Interface)
Tracking)
24
2.1 MAGTF DIGITAL INTEROPERABILTY

2019+ MAGTF Agile Network Gateway Link (MANGL) consolidates the Software Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) / Airborne Gateway / and tablet into a Program of Record
fielding on MV-22, CH-53, KC-130. MANGL is the overarching system of systems for brevity.

SRP path forward consolidates the Mesh Network Manager Risk Reduction proprietary radio capabilities into one box and ports the waveforms onto SRP Increment 2 cards.
This will gain back lost mission seats, and facilitates a future growth path for future MAGTF waveforms without repeat efforts for platform integration. The gateway
capability of Mesh Network Manager is retained facilitating data forwarding, message translation, network health management, and threat off boarding.

MANGL Participants
Network Access
ANW2

MANGL Participants
Network Access
Link-16 / FMV

25
2.1 MAGTF DIGITAL INTEROPERABILITY

Tablets
Android tablets continue to be the most effective way to deliver secure
consolidated information to aircrew and embarked Marines. New aviation
platforms come with highly integrated and complex operating systems that Miniature
require years of development and testing prior to fielding. While necessary, Encrypted WiFi Link
this process is typically both time-consuming and costly. In many cases,
(H-1) couples with
incorporation of a federated tablet offers the aircrew or embarked Marines
with new and relevant information while awaiting modification to the aircraft PRC-152A
operating systems.

This method of integration also allows for rapid modification to a particular

application without significant regression testing to determine the impact on
the aircrafts systems. Industry and general aviation have been successfully
employing this model for years. Wireless Android tablets integrated with
airborne gateway capabilities will enable our ground forces participation
enroute with aircrew collaborative planning and objective area real time
updates.

Marine Air Ground Tablets (MAGTABs)

The MAGTAB was sourced on the 2015 15th MEU, SPMAGTF, TACDEMO’s, and
Talon Reach as a scalable capability for information consolidation and display
for the aircrew operator as well as embarked Marines. While awaiting a fully
networked and classified Electronic Kneeboards (EKB) under the PMA-281
Program of Record which is intended to be interoperable with the Marine CoTs Encrypted WiFi
Corps Common Handheld in work under MARCORSYSCOM the MAGTAB and Link (H-1) couples
Encrypted WiFi Links will continue limited fielding facilitating scalable with PRC-117G
integration into systems such as Airborne Gateways. The MAGTAB and
Encrypted WiFi Link is covered with an Authority to Operate (ATO) that
capitalizes on the KNOX security container capability afforded by the Android
operating system. Applications such as RFID, ExChecks, Timeline, and Kinetic
Integrated Lightweight Software Individual Tactical Combat Handheld
(KILSWITCH) are some of the mission related applications that have continued
to be enablers.

26
2.1 MAGTF DIGITAL INTEROPERABILITY

Electronic Kneeboard (EKB) / Electronic Flight Bag

EKB devices approved under the PMA-281 flight clearance have been
introduced over the past two years in limited quantity. PMA-281 procured and
configured assets are planned for distribution over the next several years with
tactical applications such as Kinetic Integrated Lightweight Software Individual
Tactical Combat Handheld (KILSWITCH) and safety of flight applications such as
ForeFlight. The EKB Program of Record growth path over the next several
years is slated to begin fielding networkable devices that will capitalize on the
lessons learned from the MAGTAB. Future opportunities to infuse mission
related information extracted from aircraft sensors and data networks will
further enhance kill chain execution and battlefield awareness for the end
user.

27
2.1 MAGTF DIGITAL INTEROPERABILITY

Mesh Network Manager Risk Reduction & MAGTAB Integration

MAWTS-1 TACDEMO, Talon Reach, and VMX efforts ongoing

Video Feed into

MAGTAB

Sparrow
SparrowHawk
Hawk
Insert Complete
Insert Complete

~85km ANW2
Connection between
inbound MV-22
Sparrow Hawk assets
and established
objective area H-1s
Sparrow Hawk
Sparrow Hawk Alert @ Yuma • 2 MV-22s with 2
Awaiting Tasking
Squads Rampage 32
• 1 AH-1Z, 1 UH-1Y Fast Rope Insert at R220
28
2.1 MAGTF DIGITAL INTEROPERABILITY

Mesh Network Manager Risk Reduction & MAGTAB Integration

MAWTS-1 TACDEMO, Talon Reach, and VMX efforts ongoing

TRAP Force
• 1 Downed Pilot
• 2 CH-53Es
• 1 Squad w/3 FTs

Downed
Pilot

14 Pax on WARHORSE
(TRAP FORCE) Read by
MNM RR (RFID Tracking)

Network Connectivity Provided Ability to Inform All Players on

ExCheck, RFID Tracking, and Position Reporting in real time. TRAP
Force recovered downed pilot and brought to R220 COC to join CLT
forces.

29
2.1 MAGTF DIGITAL INTEROPERABILITY

Every platform will be a sensor, shooter, electronic warfare node and sharer – able to move information throughout the spectrum and across
the battlefield at light speed.

30
2.2 MAGTF ELECTRONIC WARFARE

MAGTF EW MISSION:
Support the MAGTF commander by conducting electronic warfare, day or night,
payloads; ground-based EW nodes; and cyber capabilities to provide commanders
under all weather conditions during expeditionary, joint, or combined operations.
with an organic and persistent EW capability – for every MAGTF – large and small.
Increase combat survivability of ground forces, assault support and strike aircraft
Airborne electronic attack (AEA) capabilities post-EA-6B sundown will be provided
and weapons by denying, degrading, and disrupting the enemy’s ability to target
by EW payloads such as the Intrepid Tiger II EW pod, UAS EW payloads, and the
and engage our forces.
EW capabilities inherent to F-35.
FUTURE INITIATIVES:
This integration of manned and unmanned airborne and ground EW capabilities
The Marine Corps is continuing to build an organic and distributed electronic will provide the MAGTF commander with greater flexibility and control of the
warfare system of systems known as MAGTF EW. MAGTF EW transitions the electromagnetic spectrum – and in many cases giving that MAGTF commander a
Marine Corps from a focus on the low-density/high-demand EA-6B, to a capability where previously they had none. MAGTF EW assets will be modular,
distributed, platform-agnostic strategy – where every platform contributes/ scalable, and networked, utilizing an open architecture that is rapidly adaptable
functions as a sensor, shooter and sharer – to include EW. Under MAGTF EW the and remotely re-programmable at the tactical level to support future Marine
Marine Corps is leveraging emerging technologies and integrating multiple Corps warfighting requirements.
aviation platforms (unmanned, fixed wing, tiltrotor, and rotary wing assets);

31
2.2 MAGTF ELECTRONIC WARFARE

UAS are a planned critical component of the MAGTF EW concept. As such, the
requirement for developing and maintaining Aviation specific EW expertise
that is historically resident within the VMAQ community will over time become
resident in the VMU community. The VMU community will begin to grow EW
expertise “from the ground up” as capabilities are developed and procured. A
payload for the MQ-21 is funded beginning in FY18; this will lay the foundation
for further expansion as the Marine Corps moves towards a Group 4/5 UAS
capability.

MAGTF EW AEA CAPABILITIES:

Intrepid Tiger II (IT-II): Precision EW pod providing organic distributed and net-
centric AEA capability.

EOC of IT-II pod in OEF conducted in 2012

Approved Acquisition Objective (AAO): 136 total pods

1) Deployed on AV-8B and F/A-18A++/C/D aircraft, KC-130J in development

2) Deployed on UH-1Y (EOC FY16), AH-1Z (Future)

3) Additional future IT-II platforms: MV-22B, CH-53K

4) Radar AEA variant of IT-II in development (Block X)

UAS Payloads:

1) EW Payload for RQ-21 in development, production in FY20-21

2) Proposed EW Payload for MUX in mid 2020s

F-35: Expansion of inherent JSF EW capabilities and target sets

32
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

33
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

Marine Air Command and Control System Overview Marine aviation. Dynamic re-tasking of missions quickly supported rapid changes in
battlefield events. Aircraft were diverted to trouble spots as needed within minutes.
Command and control is the means by which a commander recognizes what needs Further, ground-based fire support was requested, air cleared, and missions fired near
to be done and sees to it that appropriate actions are taken. It includes collecting simultaneously.
and analyzing information, resource management, planning, communicating
instructions, monitoring results, making decisions, supervising execution and Since 2001, our current systems and organization construct have proven successful during
making assessments. The Marine Air Command and Control System (MACCS) combat operations. Looking into the future, the Marine Corps is rebalancing to support
serves as the catalyst to the timely employment of Marine aviation assets, increasingly dispersed operations by smaller, task-organized forces over ever-greater
effective combined arms, and enabling MAGTF freedom of action throughout the distances. The fielding of CAC2S, and TPS-80 combined with CTN will allow the MACCS to
employ additional C2 nodes over a greater geographical area. The MACCS must examine
battle space. The MACCS structure embodies the Marine Corps belief that:
its organizational and training pillars to maximize capacity to support an increasingly
No activities in war are more important than command and control. Through command and control,
distributed MAGTF.
the commander recognizes what needs to be done and sees to it that appropriate actions are taken…it
provides purpose and direction to the varied activities of a military unit. If done well, command and The MACG commander must be able to employ task-organized AC2 nodes capable of
control add to the strength of a force. providing task-organized MACCS capabilities supporting military operations. These agencies
will be highly expeditionary and capable of seamless expansion based on evolving
-Marine Corps Doctrinal Publication 1-0, 2011 situations. There will also be a focused effort to support forces afloat. We will re-engage
with the Navy and recommend where integration of command arrangements and control
The MACCS provides the aviation combat element (ACE) commander with the functions may provide a more cooperative and integrated blue/green solution for the AC2
agencies and assets necessary to exercise aviation command and control (AC2) of MAGTF assets afloat.
and air defense in support of the MAGTF, naval, and joint operations. These
agencies provide the ACE commander with the ability to execute the six functions The MACCS is greater than the sum of its parts, a cohesive system made up of units from
of Marine aviation. throughout the Marine Air Control Group (MACG). The MAGTF’s structure, and our
training, allows Marines to enjoy decentralized control of both ground and air forces
The MACCS is greater than the sum of its parts, a cohesive system made up of units from providing greater flexibility and efficiency on the battlefield. Our philosophy is unique,
throughout the Marine Air Control Group (MACG). The MAGTF’s structure, and our resulting in closely integrated aviation and ground fires, reconnaissance, and other
training, allows Marines to enjoy decentralized control of both ground and air forces operations into an overall scheme of maneuver allowing for successful mission
providing greater flexibility and efficiency on the battlefield. Our philosophy is unique, accomplishment. This seamless integration is accomplished and provided by the MACCS
resulting in closely integrated aviation and ground fires, reconnaissance, and other and only exists when all of the MACCS agencies are on the battlefield and expertly
operations into an overall scheme of maneuver allowing for successful mission coordinating with their joint counterparts interpreting, integrating, and coordinating the
accomplishment. This seamless integration is accomplished and provided by the MACCS MAGTF battle plan into the joint battle.
and only exists when all of the MACCS agencies are on the battlefield and expertly
coordinating with their joint counterparts interpreting, integrating, and coordinating the
MAGTF battle plan into the joint battle.

Aviation command and control affords the MAGTF commander the most lethal and
responsive form of fire support available on the battlefield. Logistics occurs more rapidly
and targets are identified and destroyed well before friendly ground forces come in contact
with them. Efficient AC2 enhances safety of flight, giving the aviator an opportunity to assist
when needed or direct where required, ultimately working collectively to accomplish the
mission and satisfy the MAGTF commander’s intent. An example of efficient AC2 are
Operations IRAQI FREEDOM and ENDURING FREEDOM, where the MACCS functioned as a
system. Greater efficiency and flexibility were realized, resulting in swift action from

34
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

The future MACCS will be expeditionary; able to operate in a distributed manner;

capable of fusing and integrating MAGTF AC2, sensor and weapons data across the
joint force to provide shared situational awareness and increase the decision space
for the MAGTF commander. Because of the unique position as the integrator
between the ACE and GCE, the MACCS must ensure the ability to bridge divergent
communication efforts within the MAGTF and joint force by providing beyond line-
of-sight (BLOS) tactical data links (TDLs), data forwarding, radio relay, tactical
gateways, and ground-based air defense (GBAD) capable of engaging low RCS
targets. This vision will be realized with the fielding of CAC2S phase II, TPS-80,
CTN and future GBAD weapons systems:

Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) – will fuse weapons and
sensor data into a single integrated display, and serve as the integrator and
gateway of waveforms between the ACE and GCE. This will be a tool for the MEF
commander to see and shape his battlespace.

AN/TPS-80 Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR) is a 3-D, medium range

radar that gives the MAGTF commander unparalleled detection within their AO
while also providing fire control quality data supporting Integrated Fire Control
(IFC) concepts. The primary missions for our tactical agencies will remain intact throughout our
MACCS modernization. As new common sets of equipment are fielded, the ability
Composite Tracking Network (CTN) – is a land-based version of the US Navy's
to employ future hybrid options becomes relevant. For example, the clearance
(USN) Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) which is a fused radar network
requirements for extended range munitions have made knowledge of the ground
providing shared sensor quality data between the Marine Corps & Navy.
situation and MAGTF fires critical for all MACCS agencies. The proliferation and
persistent presence of UAS and civilian aircraft through the AO have highlighted
Directed Energy (DE) – Directed Energy (DE) – provides game changing capabilities
the fact that all MACCS agencies need an air picture. Integration with special
versus the low observable/low radar cross section (LO/LRCS) threat when
operations forces and the increased capabilities of new MAGTF platforms, such as
integrated with CAC2S, TPS-80, and CTN. DE provides a low shot cost, deep
the F-35 and MV-22, will enable hybrid employment options for the MACCS as we
magazine, precision accuracy, speed of light engagement solution for knocking
modernize and align our equipment and personnel.
down hostile UAS IEDs as well as hostile ISR UASs supporting indirect fires
threatening both our Marines in the field and our high value aircraft on the ramp. Marine Air Traffic Control (MATC), normally focused upon airspace requirements
in and around the airfield, has become more involved in the clearance of fires and
The most critical resource in the MACCS is the individual Marine. As we transition
the safe integration of new platforms and UAS into operational airspace. Recent
to a common set of equipment, new operational concepts, and operations in
history has also shown the need for the ACE to protect HVAs. This mission
complex battle spaces, we must transition to a training paradigm that provides
requires the close coordination and digital integration of MATC and the Low
baseline knowledge for all AC2 operators to excel. The goal for MACCS operators
Altitude Air Defense (LAAD) Battalion.
is to become air command and control experts who will assist the commanders
and decision makers in receiving and interpreting operational information and
translating this information into effective direction and control for the platforms
operated by Marine aviation.
35
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

Tactical Air Command Center Meteorological and Oceanographic

The TACC provides the MAGTF with the ability to plan and execute an air tasking The Meteorological and Oceanographic (METOC) section, resident in the Marine
order (ATO) in direct support of the MAGTF, integrate with the joint force, and Air Control Squadron, is tasked-organized to provide direct support to the ACE. It
seamlessly absorb the support of coalition forces through its flexible design. The is equipped to support a variety of MAGTF deployments and operations. With the
TACC will provide the functional interface for employment of MAGTF aviation in fielding of the Meteorological Mobile Facility (Replacement) Next Generation
joint and multinational operations. [METMF(R) NEXGEN], the METOC section has become a highly maneuverable
capability that provides environmental products and mission impact assessments
Tactical Air Operations Center to the MAGTF commander and is currently being employed in support of
The TAOC distributes the air picture to the MAGTF and joint commands while SPMAGTF CC-CR. Additionally, METOC Support Teams (MST), sourced from either
controlling deep air support, aerial refueling and anti-air-warfare (AAW) the MACS or the intelligence battalion, will utilize the stand-alone Naval Integrated
operations and routing itinerant aircraft. Newly fielded systems have transformed Tactical Environment Subsystem Variant (IV) (NITES IV) to provide expeditionary
the TAOC into a highly mobile AC2 agency. With the completed fielding of the METOC support to forward operating bases (FOBs), Marine Expeditionary Units
CTN, the TAOC will share date with the Navy’s Cooperative Engagement Capability and Special Purpose MAGTFs.
(CEC) network where it will exchange high fidelity radar track data. The combined
capabilities of CAC2S, CTN and the future TPS-80 have put the TAOC at the Low Altitude Air Defense Battalion
forefront of force protection for the MAGTF. Low Altitude Air Defense Battalion – The LAAD Bn’s capability to provide air and
ground defense of airbases and MAGTF HVAs in an evolving battlespace is a critical
Direct Air Support Center tool for the ACE commander to meet force protection and AAW responsibilities.
The DASC is the critical link between the ACE and GCE within the MACCS. During LAAD Bns have successfully conducted ground defense of FOBs and security force
OEF/OIF operations, the DASC has continued to conduct its core mission of (SECFOR) tasks during OEF/OIF for over a thirteen year period. The SECFOR tasks
processing immediate requests for air support and has also expanded its ability to included internal and external security along with tactical recovery of aircraft and
control ever increasing and complex volumes of airspace. With the fielding of personnel (TRAP), and training of Indigenous and coalition forces in
CAC2S Phase I, the DASC now has a standard set of equipment for a near real-time counterinsurgency operations. In the future, the LAAD Bn will leverage defense
air picture used to enhance situational awareness and increase safety of flight in innovation and technologies to provide three dimensional SECFOR capabilities to
the assigned airspace. defeat an adversary’s threat to destroy MAGTF HVAs.

Marine Air Traffic Control Marine Wing Communication Squadron

MATC detachments provide all-weather air traffic control services to friendly MWCSs will continue to be in demand for data pathways between ACE, MAGTF,
aircraft operating in support of the MAGTF or within their assigned airspace. The and joint/coalition elements. The MWCS incorporates numerous systems ranging
continued development of the highly expeditionary ATNAVICS has ensured MATC’s from single-channel radio to systems with an emphasis on interoperability and
ability to meet mission requirements across the range of military operations BLOS communications for a broad spectrum of information services. These
(ROMO) with increasing interoperability and functionality as an AC2 node within services include video, multimedia, data, and imagery which enable the ACE with a
the MACCS, until fielding of future systems. reliable communications architecture.

36
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

Aviation Command and Control Family of Systems

As we look to the future, the strategy to modernize the MACCS is synchronized with the arrival of our new, key platforms. The speed, range, and operational flexibility of the
MV-22, and the firepower and electromagnetic spectrum dominance of the F-35B are new capabilities the MACCS, via its own advances, must fully exploit for the MAGTF
commander. The AC2 family of systems (FoS) provides key material enablers that are on track to field to the operating forces and to modernize the ACE. The AC2 FoS is a set
of related, scalable, and modular systems, which the MACCS can arrange or interconnect in various configurations to provide different capabilities. The mix of systems can be
tailored to provide desired capabilities, dependent on the situation or mission assigned. The AC2 FoS includes the CAC2S, CTN, TPS-80 G/ATOR, and TPS-59 long-range radar.

Command and Control Systems

Common Aviation Command and Control System
CAC2S is the foundational command and control system of the future AC2 FoS. Increment 1 of CAC2S replaces equipment used by the TACC, TAOC, and DASC. Increment 1 is
being developed and fielded in two phases:

1) Phase 1 replaced equipment in the DASC and is employed in conjunction with the Mobile TAOM in the TAOC. The TACC received improved communications capability from Phase 1 by
upgrading the AN/MRQ-12v4 to the MRQ-13. CAC2S Phase 1 has completed fielding twenty systems.

2) Phase 2 completes the development and fielding of Increment 1 by including sensor integration and data fusion. Data fusion is accomplished through combining real-time sensor data
(TPS-59, TPS-80, external sensors via a sensor network) correlating tactical data links (TDLs) and associating non-real time track data (TBMCS, AFATDS, IOS) in order to develop and display
an integrated tactical picture. The result is an integrated situational display that can be manipulated by an operator to effectively command and control air operations. Phase 2 will also
translate GCE waveforms (K-Series messages) into ACE (Link 16) waveforms. CAC2S’s ability to translate these messages will increase situational awareness and information exchange
throughout the MAGTF. CAC2S phase 2 fields common software and hardware to the TACC, TAOC, and DASC providing a modular and scalable capability across the MACCS.

The size and capability of these agencies will vary based on mission requirements. The future concept of employment for CAC2S is to create operational facilities capable of
performing any AC2 function within the MACCS. The CAC2S Phase 2 Aviation Command and Control System (AC2S) will integrate the signal data element (UGS-4B) of CTN as
its sensor interface and utilize the CTN antenna trailer to link into the network.

Composite Tracking Network

CTN is a land-based version of the USN's Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC), which is a radar network that exchanges fire quality radar data between the Marine Corps
& Navy. CTN/CEC is the primary network that will enable future Integrated Fire Control (IFC) capabilities that will provide multiple engagement solutions for MAGTF & Navy
weapons systems. Specifically, CTN will extend USN Sea Shield/Sea Strike concepts inland by providing fire quality data to Aegis beyond its fire control radar. This accurate
high rate data can provide the Navy with an opportunity to expand Aegis engagement solutions that protect the sea-base and sustain combat forces ashore. CTN will be
employed with organic MACCS air defense radars ensuring a fused radar picture within the operational environment. Current Authorized Acquisition Objective (AAO) of ten
systems has completed fielding.

37
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

Theater Battle Management Core System

TBMCS is a Joint Chiefs of Staff- mandated air war planning tool for the generation, dissemination and execution of air tasking orders and airspace coordination. TBMCS is the
primary system utilized for airspace command and control, assault support processing and execution, and provides the ACE commander the ability to support the Joint Force
Air Component Commander (JFACC). In the future, TBMCS is programmed to be replaced by the Command and Control Air Operations Suite - Command and Control
Information Services (C2AOS-C2IS). This program is intended to develop, field, and sustain modular net-centric command and control applications and web-enabled
information that will allow operators to plan and execute joint air operations.

38
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

SENSORS AN/TPS-59 Long Range Radar

AN/TPS-80 Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar The improved TPS-59v3 radar provides the MAGTF and joint force with an
expeditionary long range radar capable of ballistic missile detection. Currently the
TPS-80 is a highly expeditionary, medium range multi-role radar able to detect
only MAGTF sensor that contributes composite track data to CTN/CEC networks
smaller radar cross section targets, such as cruise missiles, rockets, artillery, and
and integrates with CAC2S. TPS-59 provides the MAGTF with the ability to control
mortars (CRAM), UAS, and aircraft. TPS-80’s expeditionary multi-role capabilities
its airspace and conduct IAMD operations.
represent the next generation in ground radar technology and will provide greater
accuracy, detection, target classification, and performance against new and
Marine Air Traffic Control Systems
evolving threats and enemy countermeasures. TPS-80 is being developed and
fielded to cover both aviation and ground missions and will replace three in- The MATC equipment portfolio is a system of systems (SoS) that supports
service legacy systems. Each TPS-80 block consists of common hardware with expeditionary MATC from liaisons to the MATC Mobile Team (MMT) up through
different software applications that can be adjusted to pace the threat for multiple main airbases (MAB) in sustained operations. This SoS includes MATC
decades. command, control, and communications (C3); towers; navigational aids (NAVAIDS);
and air traffic control (ATC) radars.
TPS-80 Block I Air Surveillance Radar will provide the MACCS with a real-time
display of all medium range air activity. Its ability to detect LO/LRCS targets will MATC Towers
provide early warning and enhance force protection. TPS-80 Block I track data will
interface with CAC2S and augment other sensor data to create a single composite The AN/TSQ-120C expeditionary ATC tower will be modernized into an
track within the CTN/CEC network, improving opportunities for engagement of expeditionary tower system (ETS) that is lighter, more mobile, and scalable, with
airborne threats. In the littoral combat zone, it will enhance force protection for the AN/TSQ-216 Remote Site Landing Tower (RSLT), to meet the range of military
USN Sea Shield/Sea Strike concepts by providing target cueing and early warning operations, and maximizes use of existing infrastructure. The mobilization of the
through the CTN/CEC network. Fielding will begin for TPS-80 Block 1 in FY18 with TSQ-120C down shelter, combined with Tower Remoting Kits, provides the MATC
all seventeen systems fielded by FY24. Detachment with the flexibility and mobility necessary to maximize the use of
available resources.
TPS-80 Block II replaces the GCE’s AN/TPQ-46 and will provide counter battery
target acquisition and detection for CRAM. TPS-80 Block II, known as the Ground MATC Navigational Aids
Weapons Locator Radar (GWLR), will be capable of 90 or 360 degrees of coverage
while extending range and increasing accuracy when compared to currently The Legacy AN/TRN-44 TACAN is being replaced by the AN/TRN-47 v(2) Airfield
fielded counter battery/fire finder radars. Mobile TACAN (AMTAC), a trailer-mounted system that maintains current
capability while reducing size, weight, logistical requirements and setup time. The
TPS-80 Block IV Expeditionary Airport Surveillance Radar (EASR) is the ASR AMTAC will provide navigational assistance and non-precision approach capability
replacement for ATNAVICS. This radar will provide a common ASR radar within the in a GPS denied environment. While the AN/TRN-47 remains a viable mobile
MACCS and bring MATC fully into the MAGTF digital interoperable network. This TACAN for static operations, future developments will see a one man initial entry
will provide the MAGTF commander the interoperability required to support a Navigational Aid, designed to provide initial terminal guidance during the early
Base Defense Zone (BDZ) with longer range surveillance, increased TDL phases of a campaign, or while establishing short duration landing sites or points.
integration, weapons cueing, IFC, and MATC integration within the National
Airspace System (NAS) and International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) ATC
Systems.

39
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

AN/TPN-31A Air Traffic Navigation, Integration, and Coordination System

ATNAVICS is the fielded Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR) and Precision Approach Radar (PAR) for the MATC detachments. ATNAVICS will bridge expeditionary MATC to the
TPS-80 Block IV. As a bridging system, all modernization efforts in ATNAVICS are focused on MATC mission essential tasks (METs) including radar range extension to 60
nautical miles and fielding of the AN/TYQ-164 ATNAVICS Data Link System (ADLS) to support two-way TDL information exchange.

MATC Future Systems

The future MATC detachment will have CAC2S combined with TPS-80 Block IV. This will provide the MAGTF with state-of-the-art capability to launch and recover aircraft,
while contributing to the integrated air defense system by providing accurate track data to future GBAD weapons systems. Additional capabilities will be gained in providing
access to data communications down to the smallest of MATC capabilities. This will provide those elements the necessary interconnectivity for information exchange to the
most remote points and sites.

Precision Approach Landing Capability Roadmap

Future precision approach capabilities will be GPS based. The Joint Precision Approach Landing System (JPALS) program was initially going to produce this system, but was
dramatically scaled back to shipboard systems only. For the Marine Corps, this will provide a precision capability on all LHA and LHD amphibious ships to support the F-35B,
and on all carriers to support the F-35C. Marine aviation will leverage maturing GPS technology to bring a self-contained precision approach landing capability (PALC) to
MATC that is worldwide deployable.

METMF(R) NEXGEN
The METOC sensing equipment is the Meteorological Mobile Facility (Replacement) Next Generation [METMF(R) NEXGEN]. The METMF(R) NEXGEN is a mobile, fully
integrated, FORCENet compliant, tactical meteorological support system which delivers relevant, timely METOC products and mission impact assessments to the MAGTF and
joint force as required. The NEXGEN is a comprehensive environmental sensor capable of employing a Doppler weather radar, receiving weather satellite imagery, launching
weather balloons to receive upper-air data and predicting expeditionary airfield local weather.

When employed as a standalone sensor and production capability, the METMF(R) NEXGEN’s organic NOWCAST program downloads the Navy Global Environmental Model,
current alphanumeric and area of responsibility upper-air data to produce an initialized weather depiction. When both NIPR and SIPR are available, the METMF(R) NEXGEN
operates as a reach-back system, utilizing both national and international weather information which allows the MAGTF commander the ability to exploit environmental
information in support of combat and combat support operations.

Weapons
No existing system has demonstrated an inherent robust end to end capability against the LO/LRCS and LSS air threat-but a combination of several capabilities could reduce
the threat by neutralizing or destroying hostile UASs and CMs before and after launch. Marine Corps air defense is in the initial phases of defeating these threats by
transitioning to an improved Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) family of system while continuing to provide integrated, low-altitude, Ground Based Air Defense
(GBAD) and ground security of MAGTF HVAs.

40
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

The GBAD Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) was signed by the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps (ACMC) and identifies gaps and the required capabilities of the
Stinger Missile replacement system. The GBAD ICD identifies the primary threat to the MAGTF as the LO/LRCS UAS. The secondary threats are: Fixed Wing (F/W), Rotary
Wing (R/W), and CM.

The UAS and CM threat has outpaced the current program of record, the Stinger missile. In order to fill this capability gap and reverse current air defense kinetic strategy, the
Marine Corps intends to invest in non-kinetic (Directed Energy) and improved kinetic (missiles and guns) technologies that create a cost-exchange ratio that favors the
MAGTF and increases counter UAS and CM capabilities. The overall GBAD strategy to close all capability gaps will be accomplished in three phases:

1) Phase I: Field a roll-on, roll-off capability to detect, track, and exploit and/or destroy Group 1 UASs for MEUs, SPMAGTFs, and dismounted operations.

2) Phase II: Field non-kinetic/kinetic capabilities vs CMs, UASs, manned FW/RW aircraft in static defense of HVA such as main air bases and Division–level COCs.

3) Phase III: Field non-kinetic capabilities vs UAS, and manned FW/RW aircraft OTM in defense of maneuver force.

The LAAD Gunner will also transition from using the human eye to detect, identify, and engage targets to engagements that occur beyond visual range (BVR) to defeat the
asymmetric air and ground threats using organic/non-organic fire control quality data to protect HVAs. This data provides the LAAD Gunner with the situational awareness to
monitor and understand the air/ground battle space and evaluate friendly, enemy and neutrals that are in range of the future GBAD Weapon System. This requires the
ability to share, exchange, and correlate fused information and sensor data across multiple agencies to facilitate real time coordination, collaboration, and decision making;
therefore, we must leverage current investments in sensors and C2:

1) Sensor investment: TPS-80 G/ATOR provides the MAGTF with the increased ability to accurately detect smaller radar cross section air threats when compared to legacy systems.

2) C2 investment: Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) and Composite Tracking Network (CTN) provide integration into netted and distributed fire control architecture.

41
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

Future Marine Air Command and Control System Concepts determine where integration of command arrangements and control functions
may best provide a more cooperative and synergistic blue/green solution for the
MACCS agencies have proven their utility supporting combat operations for over
AC2 of MAGTF assets operating afloat.
seventy years. The future MACCS will continue to be tactically flexible, scalable,
and capable of rapid deployment. It will be manned by tactically and technically
The MAGTF commander must possess the ability to command and control their
proficient AC2 Marines positioned to support the ACE/MAGTF commander in the
forces in support of an ever distributed and increasingly diverse mission set. As
execution of missions across the ROMO and will be interoperable with the joint
part of this they must also be able to provide the full range of MACCS capabilities
force and aligned to support capstone operational concepts.
from the sea base during STOM operations.
Future MACCS Employment
USMC Aviation & Tactical Air Control Group (TACGRU) leadership are integrating
Marines in combat will always need varying degrees of air support, air aviation command & control Marines into sea-based operations in order to
defense/surveillance and a command post for the ACE. Current agencies and unit optimize MAGTF littoral capabilities. Current lines of effort include aviation
organization will remain the baseline and point of departure for any near-term command & control Marines attending Tactical Air Control Squadron (TACRON)
MACCS re-organization. As the Marine Corps rebalances its forces to support training to integrate with the Supporting Arms Coordination Center (SACC), Navy
increasingly dispersed operations with smaller forces over greater distances, Tactical Air Control Center (NTACC) and the Landing Force Operations Center
aviation must adapt by providing new AC2 employment options for the MAGTF (LFOC) for future MEU deployments. Additionally, Joint Interface Control Officers
commander both ashore and afloat. These options must continue to provide task- (JICO) are augmenting the TACRON staff on MEU deployments while TACRON
organized, expeditionary, and state-of-the-art AC2 functionality. personnel are attending WTI as Command, Control & Communications (C3)
students. To date, four Navy TACRON stduents have graduated WTI. The goal is to
MWCS detachments will provide the data communications requirements for a have at least one TACRON member per MEU who has graduated WTI.
multi-functional C2 node providing planners more flexibility as data and long range
communications will be internally sourced. Common data supporting shared This is required due to emerging aircraft capabilities aligning with an increase in
awareness, automated decision aides, and distributed collaborative planning disaggregated and distributed operations afloat. As new Marine aviation
enables the aviation command & control to link warriors, weapons platforms, and platforms begin to field, they will provide more capability and higher fidelity
targets, massing desired effects in a timely manner. The ability to command and information to ships via new sensors and gateways enabling such concepts as Sea
control dispersed forces as they aggregate will become a core competency in this Shield and Sea Strike. Also, forward-deployed C2 nodes equipped with netted
new force construct as highlighted by dispersed forward presence and quick crisis sensors, CAC2S and a TPS-80, will contribute fire control quality data to the naval
response. Balanced, expeditionary multi-functional nodes are ideally suited to force.
respond quickly to global contingencies and allow for the seamless expansion of
AC2 as the situation evolves Our sea-based C2 integration will enhance the command relationships and
partnerships among the Navy and Marine Corps team afloat. Properly employed
Amphibious Command and Control MACCS Marines afloat, supported by the right mix of AC2 systems, and working
The Commandant's updated planning guidance reaffirms that the Marine Corps is with their naval counterparts will be positioned to process, integrate, and
a critical portion of our integrated naval forces, designed to project power ashore operationalize this myriad of information in support of MAGTF operations.
from the sea. Our partnership with the Navy enables a forward-deployed and
engaged force that shapes, deters, responds, and projects power well into the
future. Marine aviation is actively engaged with their Navy counterparts to

42
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

Integrated Fire Control The MACCS will also be a key component of digital kill chains. Digital requests will
seamlessly flow from requesting to approving agency and back down the chain
IFC is a concept that teams sensors and shooters together to address challenging
with mission data or reason for denial after adjudication. End-to-end digital fires
AAW and air defense problem sets. Under the IFC concept, sensors from air, land,
will require the DASC and TAOC to serve as gateways/data-forwarders for these
or sea providing high fidelity target data enable weapons to be fired from any
digital requests which will enable the information and the corresponding tracks
domain, agnostic of platform. The IFC concept takes different forms (see
that are produced in this process to be managed. MACCS agencies will bind all of
operational graphic below):
the elements of the MAGTF and joint force.
Through the use of TDLs, composite tracking, and collaborative sensor sharing, the
CAC2S will implement standardized information exchanges, waveforms, and
Marine Corps will have the ability to develop fire control solutions from
commercial protocols. This will allow the exchange of relevant, timely and
information provided by one or more non-organic sensors. IFC provides several
actionable information between aviation, ground, naval platforms, agencies and
advantages for the MAGTF:
organizations. Through this implementation, operators will have the information
necessary to provide informed decisions, accelerate the kill chain, increase
1) Reaction time will be decreased as detection and target information can be provided
situational awareness, and enhance survivability. To facilitate the development
by both organic and non-organic airborne assets and ground-based radars.
and implementation of standardized information exchanges and employment
2) Combat identification will be enhanced through the ability to access multiple sensors, concepts, VMX-1 AC2 operational test Marines will work to ensure mission
providing better context of who is in the airspace. effective exchanges of relevant tactical information during exercises, limited user
evaluations, and quick reaction tests.
3) Defense-in-depth will be increased through the use of data from non-organic sensors
and weapons will be employed at their maximum effective kinematic range. This will
provide a higher probability of kill due to a better view of the target, thus increasing
the depth of defended airspace for the MAGTF.

4) Electronic attack (EA) resistance will be stronger, because weapons systems can rely
on multiple sensors for firing solutions and be used at maximum effective kinematic
range.

Digital Interoperability
Digital interoperability is a key component in synthesizing ACE combat power.
MACCS Marines and systems continue to serve as the integrator and are focused
on tactical air and ground command and control systems interoperability. They
continue to aggressively pursue advanced capabilities leveraging a mix of TDL,
proprietary waveforms, and commercial protocols. For the MACCS to be effective
for the MAGTF and ACE commander it requires the capability to coordinate
combat operations verbally and digitally using joint standard information exchange
standards, such as Link 16, Joint Range Extension Application Protocol (JREAP),
and Variable Message Format (VMF). The MACCS is the gateway for the MAGTF
and joint force commander and must be appropriately equipped, trained and
employed to fuse information from various sources, domains, and network
participants in order to achieve decision superiority for the MAGTF and joint force
commander. 43
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

VMX-1 Operational Test and Evaluation and Tactics, Techniques, A common set of equipment and new MACCS employment options will also drive
and Procedures Development us to look at the feasibility of a common controller in the DASC and TAOC.
Currently, controllers in the DASC are officers and a majority of controllers in the
In July 2013, DCA established a consolidated Marine Aviation Operational Test & TAOC are enlisted operators. Enlisted MACCS Marines will retain agency-specific
Evaluation Center at MCAS Yuma to provide a single source multi-platform USMC skill sets early in their careers and then transition to becoming common aircraft
aviation operational test center that can optimize the development of ACE tactics, controllers and finally to become MACCS specialists later in their careers. To do
techniques, and procedures (TTPs). The VMX-1 AC2 Department was established this we will need to greatly enhance our simulation capabilities and usage in the
as part of that effort. In concert with APX, MAWTS-1, MCSC, MCOTEA and the operating forces and in the supporting establishment.
operating forces, the VMX-1 AC2 department will assist in the conduct of
operational test and evaluation (OT&E) to ensure mission integration and The first step in this process was the creation of the Air Control Training Squadron
effectiveness of aviation platforms with MACCS equipment and other aviation (ACTS) at Marine Corps Communications Electronic School (MCCES) at MCAGCC
technologies across the force. The coordinated efforts of VMX-1 and MAWTS-1 Twentynine Palms, California. ACTS has successfully combined three of the four
define and refine employment concepts and TTP development that drives MACCS entry-level schoolhouses. The next steps will be to redesign enlisted and
system/platform evaluation and digital interoperability throughout the aviation officer training to address these new training paradigms.
community.
Officers
Marine Air Command and Control System Training
We envision our entry-level training paradigm creating MACCS officers who
Historically, the MACCS has trained in narrow specialties that develop specialized understand all facets of MACCS employment, not just that of their primary MOS.
Marines to operate and maintain unique systems developed to carry out specific In addition to learning their primary MOSs in air defense, air support, GBAD or
MACCS functions. As technology changes and more responsibility is levied on MATC, all MACCS officers will receive instruction in civil/military airspace, fires
MACCS Marines by commanders, there is a demand that we modernize our integration, digital interoperability, planning and employment of the MACCS
training approach. The desire is to produce entry level Marines that can exploit agencies, and instruction in joint and coalition operations. This shifts the emphasis
the full capabilities of their AC2 system and execute process driven information of company-grade officers away from initial controller qualifications and re-focuses
exchanges. them as agency directors and planners. This creates a more well-rounded AC2
officer much earlier in their careers, and better prepares them to perform duties
Once in the operating forces, Marines will become experts in planning and in the TACC as well as their primary agency. This early exposure would also
controlling MAGTF airspace, integrating organic Marine and joint fires, employing enhance an officer’s knowledge baseline as they approach their duties as
TDL and radio communications, and employing MACCS agencies, and will be department heads. Most importantly it will empower our MACCS officers to
trained to operate in a joint and coalition environment. This expertise comes with operate independently in a distributed operations environment.
a cost and requires a new emphasis on distributed learning capability, live-virtual-
constructive (LVC) environments, and standards-based assessments.

44
2.3 MARINE AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (MACCS) PLAN

Enlisted Maintenance Training

Early in their careers our enlisted Marines will hone their skills as operators in the Just as the lines between the agencies have been blurred with the introduction of
specific agency for which they were initially trained. CAC2S provides the new equipment, so have the maintenance concepts for the equipment. As
opportunity to be trained as common aircraft controller or a data link coordinator technology has advanced, troubleshooting has shifted from the traditional
to work in the DASC, TAOC, or potentially, a future MEU based light, mobile Air C2 component-level to the lowest replaceable unit. Additionally, almost every piece
element . A move toward creating a more efficient operator will baseline skills of modernized equipment is software- and network-driven. The complexity of
across the MACCS and provide a larger pool of capability that gives greater modernized equipment forces maintainers to take an active role in the setup,
professional continuity for an extremely perishable skillset. The ideal skillset we configuration, operation, and maintenance of this equipment.
will build is:
Maintenance officers, as restricted officers, will be crucial to transitioning to new
1) the ability to positively and procedurally control aircraft; equipment and training by providing the subject matter expertise allowing
operators to successfully employ their weapons system. The enlisted maintainer
2) an intimate knowledge of TDL, AC2 software applications, and communications of the future will have to be agile enough to adapt to the potential for rapid
equipment; and changes in capabilities and system implementation amongst this AC2 FoS, and will
be required to be as competent in basic data link implementation as operators.
3) expertise in MAGTF command and control and fires integration. The synchronization between the roles of the operators, maintainers, and tactical
users will continue to allow the MACCS to be successful in all future missions.
The career progression for a Marine in the DASC or TAOC will logically flow from
operator (Private - Corporal), to controller (Sergeant – Gunnery Sergeant), to
enlisted subject matter expert (Master Sergeant – Master Gunnery Sergeant).
This progression aligns and better defines the career paths of our TAOC and DASC
Marines. It also creates a better operator for the TACC because of their exposure
to different aspects of the MACCS prior to working in the wing commander’s
command post which is an extension of the MEF commander’s. Our enlisted
Marines are the technical and tactical bedrock of our community and we need to
ensure that we are making the best training available to them through all phases
of their careers.

45
2.4 F-35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER AND DISTRIBUTED STOVL OPERATIONS

46
2.4 F-35B AND F-35C LIGHTNING II

F-35 DESCRIPTION Transition Plan

The F-35 is the next generation strike weapons system designed to meet an The F-35B and F-35C will replace F/A-18, AV-8B and EA-6B. The Marine Corps will
advanced threat, while improving lethality, survivability, and supportability. It will procure a total of 353 F-35Bs and 67 F-35Cs in the following squadron bed down:
be the cornerstone of a multi-mission joint force possessing improved mission
flexibility and unprecedented effectiveness to engage and destroy both air and 1) 9 Squadrons x 16 F-35B
ground threats.
2) 5 Squadrons x 10 F-35B
The F-35 was developed using a complete analysis of legacy aircraft shortfalls,
emerging threats, and consideration of future operating locations. This approach 3) 4 Squadrons x 10 F-35C
led to an aircraft design that incorporates advanced stealth characteristics and a 4) 2 Squadrons x 10 F-35B reserve
powerful sensor suite that provides superior awareness to the pilot and ensures
increased survivability and lethality in all environments. 5) 2 Squadrons x 25 F-35B FRS

The F-35 has an autonomous capability to strike a broad range of moving or fixed The Marine Corps declared F-35B initial operational capability in July of 2015, five
targets, either day or night and in adverse weather conditions. These targets months ahead of the December threshold date. At IOC, the squadron underwent
include air and ground threats, as well as enemy surface units at sea and anti-ship an operational readiness inspection proving that it met the requirements with ten
or land attack cruise missiles. The F-35 can complete the entire kill chain without aircraft in the Block 2B configuration. The squadron demonstrated the capability
reliance on external sources by using fused information from its onboard systems to execute CAS, limited offensive and defensive counter-air, air interdiction, air
and/or other F-35s. This capability allows shortened engagement times, less support escort, armed reconnaissance, and limited suppression of enemy air
exposure to threats, and retains the element of surprise. defenses.

Together these elements allow the pilot to control the tactical environment using The aircraft is currently tracking to reach its full program-of-record operational
proactive tactics. The F-35 provides sensor data to Marine Air-Ground Task Force capability (Block 3F) in Q4 of CY 2017. The full transition from legacy to F-35 will
command and control agencies to enable intelligence collection and targeting complete with the transition of the second reserve squadron in 2031.
across the force.
2.0 2.0
16 16
11 RBA 7 RBA
16 10
F-35 VMFA F-35 VMFA (-)
16- plane F-35B squadron 10- plane F-35B squadron

47
2.4 F-35B AND 35C LIGHTNING

USMC F-35C INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY (Expeditionary 4) Home base supporting infrastructure and facilities ready and capable of supporting
and sustaining operations.
Operations):
The F-35C IOC is defined as: 5) Qualifications and certifications for deploying the F-35C to austere expeditionary sites
and conducting landings using M-31 Expeditionary Arresting Gear.
1) One squadron with a threshold of 6 F-35C and an objective of 10 F-35C aircraft with
required spares, support equipment, tools, technical publications, and a functional 6) Ability to execute close air support, offensive and defensive counter air, air
Autonomic Logistic Information System (ALIS V2) including enabling peripherals. interdiction, assault support escort, armed reconnaissance, and suppression of enemy
air defense missions in concert with Marine Air Ground Task Force resources and
2) Squadron manned with trained and certified personnel capable of conducting capabilities within the performance envelope, mission systems, sensors, and weapon
autonomous operations. clearances provided by the Block 3iP6.21 fleet release or better.

3) Aircraft in a Block 3iP6.21 software configuration or better with the requisite 7) Naval aviation enterprise (NAE), Joint Program Office (JPO) and contractor
performance envelope, mission systems, sensors, and weapon clearances. procedures, processes, and infrastructure capable of sustaining operations of the IOC
squadron.

48
FY17 TACAIR LEGACY TO JSF TRANSITION PLAN

49
F-35 BASING PLAN

CHERRY POINT
IWAKUNI 4 x 16 AC SQDN
1 x 16 AC SQDN 2 x 10 AC SQDN
(16 aircraft) 1 x 10 RC SQDN
(94 aircraft)

SecNav Basing Record of Decision

Dec 2010
Based on two USMC JSF Environmental Impact Studies
All hangars sized for 16-aircraft operations

MIRAMAR BEAUFORT
4 x 10 AC SQDN YUMA 2 x 25 FRS SQDN
EGLIN 2 x 10 AC SQDN
1 x 16 AC SQDN 3 x 16 AC SQDN
1 x 10 F-35C (70 aircraft)
1 X 10 RC SQDN 1 x 10 AC SQDN
FRS DET
(66 aircraft) 1 x 6 OT&E
(10 aircraft)
(64 aircraft)

50
DISTRIBUTED AVIATION OPERATIONS

Strategic Context DAO Characteristics

Potential adversaries are equipped with advanced anti-access / area denial Can be executed with sea-based or land-based logistics and land sites; shared
(A2/AD) long-range precision strike capabilities that threaten traditional US power logistics assets (whether from ships or main bases) support numerous dispersed
projection through fixed infrastructure and naval strike groups. The MAGTF is M-FARPs through mobile distribution sites.
challenged with developing asymmetric operating concepts which counter an
enemy A2/AD strategy, thereby allowing access for the joint force. Austere M-FARPs enable deployment at time of crisis rather than requiring years
of infrastructure preparation.
Distributed Aviation Operations
The future ACE will have the ability to operate effectively in the absence of DAO can rely on a passive defense if not operating in the vicinity of a main base or
traditional fixed infrastructure and supply lines for short periods of time. There from a damaged main base airfield. M-FARPs are only active for a limited period of
are several drivers for Distributed Aviation Operations (DAO), including: time to operate inside of an enemy’s targeting cycle (24-72 hrs). Deception and
decoys further increased efficacy.
1) to respond to a threat
Scalable in size, DAO can range from MEU-sized F-35B divisions supported by KC-
2) to capitalize on surprise and flexibility, and 130Js/MV-22s/CH-53s to MEB-sized multiple squadron packages. The specific
footprint ashore is scenario based for designated M-FARPs.
3) to overcome the challenge of distance.
The concept has been the subject of a feasibility study and wargame-informed
The proliferation of long-range, precision conventional threats, such as cruise CONOPS development process. It has been shown to be logistically feasible, using
missiles and armed UAVs, has contested the use of traditional bases and methods organic MEU/MEB air and surface connectors along with maritime prepositioning
of operations. While advances have been made to counter such threats, such as ship squadron (MPSRON) and combat logistics force (CLF) ships. Additionally, we
interdiction, interception, and base hardening, the complexity of the problem and have the opportunity to employ to and from allied STOVL carriers such as the 34
the sheer number of threats means that more needs to be done; while in jet capable Queen Elizabeth or Prince of Wales, the Garibaldi, and an assortment
traditional warfare mass can be seen as an asset, in this case mass, coupled with of amphibious carriers.
predictability, is also a liability.
Scheduled aircraft maintenance will be conducted on sea base (LHA, LHD or a
DAO will also allow the MAGTF to extend its operational reach and enable coalition carrier, such as the UK's Queen Elizabeth II) or at main base away from
maneuver at longer ranges. The use of aviation-delivered ground refueling and threat. DAO provides high sortie generation through fuel and ordnance reload
support will allow the ACE to support the MAGTF and operate at distances and in inside of the threat WEZ.
areas beyond the immediate coastline, extend the reach and maneuver capability
several hundred miles beyond the shore, and do so for greater periods of time.

Scalable, pre-planned force packages that balance the need for logistics,
maintenance, and ordnance with the ability to maintain a light footprint and ability
to move on short notice will be key to operating from austere bases. These force
packages can be tailored and used for any aircraft in the Marine Corps inventory,
and will be enabled by dedicated support from the aviation ground support and
command, control and communication communities.

51
52
2.5 MARINE FIXED-WING AVIATION PLAN
2.5 MARINE FIXED-WING AVIATION PLAN
TO TAL SQ UADRO NS FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
FA-18A+/C 8 7 6 6 6 6 6 4 3 3 3
FA-18D 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 1
AV-8B 5 5 5 5 4 3 1 1 1 0 0
EA-6B 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F-35B 2 3 3 4 5 5 7 8 9 10 10
F-35C 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 4
FA-18 FRS/FRD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
AV-8B FRS/FRD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
F-35B FRS 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
F-5N/F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
PAI PLAN FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
AC /RC PMAA
FA-18A+/C 96 84 72 72 72 72 72 48 36 36 36
FA-18D 48 48 48 36 36 36 36 24 12 12 12
AV-8B 80 80 80 80 64 48 16 16 16 0 0
F-35B 29 38 54 73 82 89 108 122 137 156 174
F-35C 0 0 5 10 10 15 20 30 39 40 40
EA-6B 18 18 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F-5N/F 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
TO TAL AC /RC TAC TIC AL 283 280 283 289 276 272 264 252 252 256 274
FRS/FRD PTAA
FA-18A/C 18 18 18 21 21 20 18 16 16 14 14
FA-18B 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FA-18D 19 19 19 20 20 19 16 14 14 12 12
AV-8B 13 13 13 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
T AV-8B 13 13 13 10 10 4 4 4 4 0 0
EA-6B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F-35B 20 20 25 25 41 41 44 46 50 50 50
F-35C 8 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10
TO TAL FRS/FRD PTAA 95 97 97 94 107 89 87 85 89 81 86
TO TAL PAA 378 377 380 383 383 361 351 337 341 337 360

* Operational commitments, contingency plans, and service life expenditure rates may change T/M/S turnover sequence

54
2.5 MARINE FIXED-WING AVIATION PLAN

MISSIONS MARINE TACTICAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE SQUADRON (VMAQ):

MARINE FIGHTER/ATTACK SQUADRON (VMFA);MARINE ATTACK SQUADRON Support the MAGTF commander by conducting airborne electronic warfare, day or
(VMA): night, under all weather conditions during expeditionary, joint, or combined
operations.
Support the MAGTF commander by destroying surface targets and enemy aircraft
and escort friendly aircraft, day or night, under all weather conditions during
MARINE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SQUADRON (VMU):
expeditionary, joint or combined operations.
Support the MAGTF commander by conducting electromagnetic spectrum
MARINE ALL-WEATHER FIGHTER/ATTACK SQUADRON (VMFA-AW); warfare, multi-sensor reconnaissance and surveillance, supporting arms
coordination and control, and destroying targets, day or night, under all-weather
Support the MAGTF commander by providing supporting arms coordination,
conditions, during expeditionary, joint, and combined operations.
conducting multi-sensor imagery, and destroying surface targets and enemy
aircraft day or night, under all weather conditions during expeditionary, joint or
MARINE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE TRAINING SQUADRON (VMUT):
combined operations.
Conduct core skill Introduction training for VMU aircrews in accordance with the
MARINE FIGHTER/ATTACK TRAINING SQUADRON (VMFAT): T&R syllabus.
Conduct combat capable fighter/attack training for selected aircrews in the Joint
MARINE FIGHTER TRAINING SQUADRON (VMFT):
Strike Fighter F-35B aircraft and the legacy F/A-18 aircraft, and provide technical
training for aviation maintenance personnel. Provide fixed-wing adversary support to Marine aviation and ground units to
enhance Marine Corps combat readiness with a focus on increasing Marine
MARINE ATTACK TRAINING SQUADRON (VMAT): aviation’s core capability in air-to-air combat.
Conduct combat capable attack training for selected aircrews in the AV-8B and
MARINE TRANSPORT SQUADRON (VMR):
provide technical training for aviation maintenance personnel.
Support the MAGTF commander by providing time sensitive air transport of high
MARINE REFUELING TRANSPORT SQUADRON (VMGR): priority passengers and cargo between and within a theater of war, day or night,
under all weather conditions, during expeditionary, joint or combined operations.
Support the MAGTF commander by providing aerial refueling, assault support,
conducting intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, target acquisition, indirect
and direct fires adjustment, battlefield damage assessment and destroying surface
targets day or night under all weather conditions during expeditionary, joint, or
combined operations.

55
TACAIR 2030 ROADMAP

The updated FY17 TACAIR transition meets current global commitments, optimizes
deployment to dwell, and assists Hornet inventory recovery in order to maximize
available Marine Corps combat power and TACAIR readiness.

F/A-18s remain the primary bridging platform to F-35B/C with a planned sunset of
2030. Hornets will consolidate on the west coast by 2027 with the exception of
maintaining VMFA (AW)-242 assigned to the western Pacific at MCAS Iwakuni until
the scheduled F-35B transition in 2028.

AV-8B Harriers consolidate on the east coast by the end of 2022 and continue to
support east coast MEUs and squadron(-) deployments through scheduled
sundown in early 2026.

*The Marine Corps and US Navy have synchronized a ten- year operational
deployment plan across all L class carrier, CVN aircraft carrier, and land based
TACAIR assets.

The TACAIR transition will remain flexible with regards to VMA/VMFA transition
order based on F-35 program progress and legacy readiness. In 2017 1stMAW will
have VMFA-121 and VMFA(AW)-242 assigned as forward-deployed forces at MCAS
Iwakuni. This is critical to meeting current deployed requirements, recovering
TACAIR readiness, and achieving a deployment to dwell of 1 to 2 for the TACAIR
community.

1) By the end of FY17, VMFA-121 will fill both the 31st MEU and forward deployed land-
based requirements as a 16-aircraft F-35B squadron.

2) VMFA-122 will transition from F/A-18 to F-35B and relocate to MAG-13 in FY18.

3) West coast MEUs are sourced solely with F-35B by end of FY19.

4) In FY19 VMFA-314 will be the first Marine Corps squadron to transition to the F-35C.

5) 31st MEU will be sourced with F-35B beginning late FY17.

*VMAT-203 shuts down FY21; VMA-231 FRD mission through FY25

*VMFAT-101 shuts down FY23, VMFA-323 FRD mission through FY29

56
F/A-18 PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

F/A-18A-D: FUTURE:
The F/A-18A-D community continues combat operations for the fifteenth straight In FY15 the USMC F/A-18 program, PMA-265, and industry began integration of
year as Hornets support OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE from both land-based the Advanced Capabilities Mission Computer (ACMC) for the F/A-18C/D that will
SPMAGTF-CR and the aircraft carrier. run High Order Language (HOL) based on FA-18E/F Super Hornet Operational
Flight Program software. The ACMC and upgraded displays will posture Marine
The USMC fleet currently has eleven active squadrons and one reserve squadron. F/A-18s as a fully digital interoperable platform to support the MAGTF and ensure
In recent years there has been an aircraft inventory shortage due to In Service tactical relevance as a lethal, interoperable, and survivable TACAIR aircraft.
Repairs (ISR) and depot maintenance backlog. HQMC has reset the force by
temporarily reducing squadron flight line entitlement (FLE) to 10 aircraft to TACAIR Integration (TAI): Currently the Marine Corps has two TAI squadrons
preserve future combat readiness while meeting today’s current operational allocated to USN CVWs. The Navy and Marine Corps will increase TAI levels to
requirements. As inventory continues to recover we will return to a community three, and eventually four, with the F-35C. The Marine Corps is committed to TAI
FLE of 12 with deploying squadrons beginning in 3rd quarter of FY17. VMFAT-101 and the F-35C program with IOC of the F-35C expected in August 2018. VMFA-314
will shut down in FY23, with VMFA-323 assuming the FRD mission through FY29 will transition in FY19 and execute the first USMC F-35C deployment in FY21 with
CVW-11.
SUSTAINMENT:
The F/A-18 Service Life Management Program (SLMP) consists of the Center
Barrel Replacement Plus (CBR+) and High Flight Hour (HFH) inspection programs.
The CBR+ has extended the service life of 210 Lot 17 and below aircraft and the
HFH inspection has extended the life of more than 160 DoN F/A-18A-D aircraft
beyond 8000 hours.

In parallel to HFH and CBR+ maintenance, the Service Life Extension Program
(SLEP) incorporates a combination of inspections, repairs and a number of
Engineering Change Proposals to extend additional F/A-18 A/C/D to 10,000 Flight
Hours. In FY15 the first Marine Hornet was authorized to 10,000 hours.

57
F/A-18 PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

*Note: throughout this document, items denoted in red are unfunded per
current budgeting
Final Fit:
Survivability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) ALR-67 v3 - 2017

2) ALQ-214 v5 - 2017

Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) High Order Language mission computers - 2020

2) DACAS / Gen 5 radios (software reprogrammable) - scheduled to field in 2017

3) MIDS JTRS (CMN-4/ TTNT 7.0) - scheduled to begin fielding in 2017

Lethality Upgrade Roadmap:

1) AIM-120D – 2016

2) Litening Air to Air functionality – 2016

3) AIM-9X Block II – 2017

4) Upgraded displays – 2021

5) Intrepid Tiger II V 1 Block X

6) JDAM-ER

7) APKWS

8) Stand-off net-enabled weapons: SDBII / JSOW-C1

Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) Solid-state recorders – 2016

58
AV-8B PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

AV-8B II: FUTURE:

Recent operations ODYSSEY DAWN (Libya), ENDURING FREEDOM (Afghanistan), The next major step for the aircraft will be OFP H7.0, which will provide Link 16 full
INHERENT RESOLVE (Iraq and Syria), and Marine Expeditionary Units (MEUs) integration into all AV-8B II+ Radar aircraft, as well as AIM-9X . Additionally, the
conducting national tasking in CENTCOM demonstrate the versatility of short program intends to integrate SRP into the airframe. This effort will include
takeoff / vertical landing (STOVL) Marine tactical aircraft. The AV-8B equipped hardware installation and an OFP upgrade to enable the aircraft to be digitally
with advanced precision weapons, the LITENING targeting pod (with streaming interoperable with the current and future network infrastructure.
video downlink), and beyond visual range air-to-air radar missiles provides relevant
and lethal capability to the Marine Air-to-Ground Task Force (MAGTF). Final Fit:
Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap:
The USMC currently maintains 5 active operational VMAs comprised of 16 AV-8B
aircraft each. This allows them to deploy as a full 16-plane squadron, a 10-plane 1) DACAS VMF terminals
and 6-plane (MEU) squadron, or an 8 and 8-plane (MEU) squadron. The most
recent TACAIR transition plan maintains these 5 squadrons until 2020; all of the 2) TPOD ADL
West Coast VMAs transition to the F-35B by 2022, and the East Coast VMAs
maintain operations until 2026. VMAT-203 will continue training AV-8B pilots 3) Link 16
until 2022, at which point responsibility will transition to the VMA-231 FRD
through FY25. 4) SATCOM

SUSTAINMENT: 5) Software Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) radio replacement

As an out-of-production aircraft, the AV-8B program will continue to focus on Lethality Upgrade Roadmap:
readiness by solving chronic material shortfalls.
1) 1760 Wiring on Station 1 and 7
In the first half of 2015 the AV-8B received the H6.1 Operational Flight Program
(OFP) enabling full integration of the Generation 4 LITENING targeting pod, as well 2) AIM-120 C
as correcting noted software deficiencies to smart weapon employment and
targeting. H6.1 also integrated a Common OFP for LITENING to the AV-8B, 3) AIM-9X block II
enabling the LITENING pod to be interchanged between F/A-18s and AV-8Bs
without software reloads. Airborne Variable Message Format (VMF) terminals will 4) Intrepid Tiger II V 1 Block X
be installed in the AV-8B, enabling the AV-8B to have the joint standard digital-
aided close air support (DACAS) technology. Other integration efforts include the Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:
digital video recorder, BRU-70/A digital improved triple ejector rack (DITER),
expanded carriage of the AIM-120, and the introduction of the Deployable Mission 1) Digital Video Recorder
Rehearsal Trainer which will enable deployed forces to continue to train and retain
2) RNP / RNAV (GPS Approach capable)
proficiency with the aircraft’s advanced systems.
3) IFF Mode 5/S
Then next major program update occurs In 2018. The program plans to field the
H6.2 OFP which will integrate Link 16 Positive Position Location and Identification
(PPLI) capability, FAA-compliant Required Navigation Performance / Area
Navigation capability, and will correct additional software deficiencies identified
through combat operations.
59
EA-6B PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

EA-6B
The USMC currently has three operational squadrons, each operating the
Improved Capabilities (ICAP) III version of the EA-6B Prowler. This variant will
support Marine and joint operational requirements through 2019. ICAP III Block 7
upgrades to software and hardware will improve EW performance and
interoperability through the end of service life.

SUSTAINMENT

1) 3 operational squadrons of 6 aircraft

2) Transition to ICAP III completed in 2012

3) Program of Record until 2019

FUTURE:

The sundown of Marine Prowlers began in May of FY16 with the FRS (VMAQT-1).
The sundown will continue with the one operational squadron decommissioning
each year until complete at the end of FY19.

1) Combat Radius – 30 min. out; 1 hr. 45 min. TOS - 30 min RTB; 20 min. reserve

2) Weapons Stations - 5

3) Top Speed – Subsonic

4) Empty Weight – 34,000 pounds

5) Max Gross Weight & Use Payload – 61,500 pounds

6) Cruise Speed w/ Attack Payload – 0.86 IMN with Stores

7) Offensive Systems –ICAP III ALQ-218 Receiver and ALQ-99 pods; USQ-113
Communications Jammer; AGM-88 HARM; LITENING Pod; ALE-43 Bulk Chaff Pod

8) Defensive Systems – ALE-47

9) Network Systems - Multi-functional Info

10) Distribution System (MIDS) with Link 16; Integrated Broadcast System (IBS)
60
EA-6B ROADMAP: SUNDOWN PLAN

61
F-5 PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

F-5E/F, N: squadrons beneath 4th MAW will also leverage on extensive TACAIR experience
and contribute to enhanced Reserve integration across aviation.
The F-5 fleet consistently meets readiness goals while supporting as many MAGTF
adversary commitments as possible based on limited structure. USMC adversary F-5 PROGRAM CAPACITY, CAPABILITY AND ACCESIBILITY
requirements have grown significantly over the past thirteen years of combat
operations. Today, the adversary capacity gap is growing, with VMFAT-501 (F-35B Current USMC inventory is 12 F-5s assigned to VMFT-401 at MCAS Yuma. Based
FRS) requiring more than 1,500 per year and MAWTS-1 requiring more than 420 on the low cost per flight hour and ease of maintenance of the F-5, plans to
annually from VMFT-401. Some of the additional requirements that have expand the adversary capacity and capability while improving accessibility are
increased adversary demands are: being sought.

FUTURE
1) FY10 MAWTS-1 reconstitutes Marine Division Tactics Course for the F/A-18 fleet
Procurement of numerous F-5s with significant service life remaining would allow
2) FY13 AV-8B training and readiness manual increases focus on additional air defense the USMC to meet, with organic assets, most requirements for adversary training.
capabilities The first phase of expanded adversary capacity will be to establish a detachment
on the East Coast in support of VMFAT-501 at MCAS Beaufort, S.C. for F-35 pilot
3) FY15 Continued transition of legacy TACAIR to F-35 production requirements.

4) TBD VMFAT-502 (2nd F-35 FRS) stand-up at MCAS Beaufort

F-5 SERVICE LIFE MANAGEMENT

The F-5 fleet is funded for life limited components of upper cockpit longerons,
wings, horizontal stabilator pairs, and vertical stabilators that will enable the F-5 to
achieve its 8000 hour life. This extends the Department of the Navy’s 44 F-5
airframes to 2025 and at least 12 aircraft to approximately 2028 in support of
fleet training.

CAPABILITY
The current configuration of the F-5 meets all MAGTF requirements except for F-
35 and F/A-18.

Upgrades to provide improved beyond visual range situational awareness, as well

as passive weapon systems are being studied. Advanced electronic attack
capabilities will continue to be fielded.

ACCESSIBILITY
Further desired expansion of the F-5 program, to potentially include a permanent
footprint at MCAS Beaufort in FY18, and conceptual plans for adversary elements
at MCASs Miramar, Yuma, and Cherry Point are being explored. Efficiently co-
locating adversary support with the operational forces generates the most
readiness for our operational forces at the least cost. Composite training
62
KC-130J HERCULES

KC-130J DESCRIPTION: Transition Plan:

The KC-130J is a new production aircraft that supports the Marine Air-Ground Task The transition is complete for the active component and is underway for the
Force commander by providing air-to-air refueling, aviation delivered ground reserve component. This AVPLAN provides the roadmap for completion of the
refueling, and assault support airlift, day or night in all weather conditions during transition, presents known operational commitments, and highlights future
expeditionary, joint, or combined operations. improvements:

The KC-130J carries up to 92 ground troops or 64 paratroops plus equipment. It 1) Enhanced aircraft survivability equipment beginning in FY16.
can be configured as a medical evacuation platform capable of carrying 74 litter
patients plus attendants. 2) Enhanced Harvest HAWK systems beginning in FY18.

The KC-130J is capable of operating from austere airfields in forward operating 3) Enhanced enlisted aircrew training devices deliver in FY17-FY19
areas and can provide mission support in emergency evacuation of personnel and
key equipment, advanced party reconnaissance, tactical recovery of aircraft and 4) VMGR-234 projected to reach full operational capability (FOC) in FY24 with 12 Primary
personnel, and special warfare operations. Mission Aircraft.

5) VMGR-452 will begin transition to the KC-130J in FY19 and reach FOC in FY26.

6) Planned EW / digital interoperability capabilities.

7) Backup aircraft procurement deferred until Reserve Component reaches FOC.

As the KC-130J evolves through its block upgrade program, the incorporation of
digital interoperability via Link 16 will enhance MAGTF command and control
agencies’ intelligence collection and targeting capability across the force.

KC-130T (Reserve only):

USMCR KC-130T squadrons began their transition to the KC-130J in FY14. KC-130T
aircraft will be divested incrementally as KC-130J aircraft are delivered to 4th
MAW VMGR squadrons.

Divested KC-130T aircraft will be sold via foreign military sales in order to offset
the cost of procuring KC-130J replacement aircraft.

63
KC-130 J AND T PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT, AND FUTURE

KC-130J
HARVEST HAWK: The USMC fielded a bolt-on/bolt-off ISR/weapon mission kit
for use on existing KC-130J aircraft. A total of 10 aircraft are modified to
employ the Harvest HAWK kits with 5 modified aircraft in 2d MAW and 5
modified aircraft in 3d MAW. The Marine Corps intends to outfit all KC-130J
aircraft with the Harvest HAWK system.

This mission kit enables the KC-130J aircraft into a platform capable of
performing persistent targeting ISR and delivering precision fires using Hellfire
or SOPGM family munitions such as the Griffin. This mission kit is a
complementary capability taking advantage of the aircraft's endurance and/or
range.

First deployed in October 2010, Harvest HAWK missions resulted in success in

theater. With the Harvest HAWK ISR / Weapon Mission kit installed, the KC-
130J provides the MAGTF commander with a platform capable of extended
endurance multi-sensor imagery reconnaissance and on-call close air support
in low threat scenarios.

Throughout 2017, the mission kit will continue installation and testing of
sensor and fire control system upgrades to address system obsolescence and
eliminate deficiencies, while sustaining relevancy through transition from P2A
Hellfire to the P4 Hellfire, and eventually JAGM. The VMGR Fleet utilization of
the new modifications to the Harvest HAWK aircraft are anticipated in FY18.

64
KC-130 J AND T PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT, AND FUTURE

KC-130J
Active component VMGR squadrons completed the transition to KC-130J in 2009 Final Fit:
and have consistently met readiness and operational commitments. Since IOC in Survivability Upgrade Roadmap:
2005, USMC KC-130Js have provided air-to-air refueling, aviation delivered ground
refueling, battlefield illumination, and aerial delivery and air-landed transportation 1) AAQ-24B(V)25 DoN LAIRCM/ATW –
of cargo and personnel in support of our troops engaged in ground combat in
multiple theaters of operation. 2) Fleet retrofit beginning in FY16.

RESERVE COMPONENT KC-130J TRANSITION Lethality Upgrade Roadmap:

In March 2014 the reserve component began the transition to the KC-130J with
1) Intrepid Tiger II V 1 : FY18, pending UNS approval
IOC for VMGR-234 declared in August 2015. FOC for VMGR-234 is projected to
occur in 2024. VMGR-452 will begin transition to KC-130J in FY19 and reach FOC Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap:
in FY26.
1) Dual Vortex – 2016 (TKI/Test) – Harvest HAWK retrofit beginning in 2016.
KC-130J BLOCK UPGRADE PROGRAM
The USMC participates in a joint users group with the USAF and seven 2) Block 7.0/8.1 with Link 16 - Fleet retrofit beginning in FY18.
international partner nations, to reduce costs associated with the development
and fielding of updated baseline configurations resulting from emerging 3) Software Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) radio replacement – FY20
requirements and diminishing manufacturing sources. These new configurations
include system and safety improvements and satisfy known CNS/ATM mandates. 4) Common EO/IR Sensor – FY23
Block 7.0/8.1 is the new baseline for all DoD and international C-130J users, which
Harvest HAWK Lethality Upgrade Roadmap:
includes Link 16, Mode 5 IFF, GPS approach capability, ADS-B (out), RNP/RNAV,
and includes a new flight management system.
1) Hellfire P+/P4 – 2018
KC-130T
2) TSS to MX-20 transition – 2018
Legacy KC-130T aircraft will continue operation in 4th MAW until VMGR-452
reaches KC-130J IOC planned for FY20. Efforts are currently underway to replace 3) Fire Control Station to Mission Operator Pallet transition – 2018
the hydraulic propeller valve housing with an Electronic Propeller Control System
and the analog engine instruments with an electronic Engine Instrument Display 4) JAGM – 2020
System. The TACAN and RADAR systems are also being replaced due to
obsolescence.

Additionally, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

as well as CNS/ATM mandates will need to be addressed in order to sustain and
maintain relevance through 2020. KC-130T Tactical Systems Operators and Flight
Engineers will continue to be required until KC-130J IOC at VMGR-452 in FY20.

65
MARINE AERIAL REFUELER / TRANSPORT (VMGR) PLAN

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
KC-130J/T TOAI PLAN
AC/RC KC-130J TOAI 53 54 58 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73
AC KC-130J PMAI 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
RC KC-130J PMAI 7 8 12 13 15 17 19 21 23 24 24
AC KC-130J BAI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3
RC KC-130J BAI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VX KC-130J PDAI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

KC-130J SHORTFALL 26 25 21 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6

RC KC-130T TAI 14 14 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

KC-130J/T TOAI 67 68 67 64 61 63 65 67 69 71 73

NOTES:
1) TOTAL OVERALL AIRCRAFT AUTHORIZED (TOAA) PROGRAM OF RECORD IS 79 KC-130J AIRCRAFT. MARINE CORPS WILL BE COMPLETE 2030
2) PMAI FOR EACH ACTIVE COMPONENT VMGR SQUADRON IS 15 AIRCRAFT AND PMAI FOR EACH RESERVE COMPONENT VMGR SQUADRON IS 12 AIRCRAFT.
3) KC-130J BAI AIRCRAFT DELIVERIES BEGIN FY26 (POST RC FOC DELIVERY COMPLETION).
4) KC-130T RETIREMENT SCHEDULE IS A PROJECTION AND REQUIRES CONTINUED ADJUSTMENT UNTIL THE RESERVE KC-130J TRANSITION IS COMPLETED.

66
MARINE AERIAL REFUELER / TRANSPORT (VMGR) PLAN
KEY
J = KC-130J TRANSITION BEGINS
V = KC-130J IOC (5) KJs
CURRENT FORCE: FORCE GOAL:
3 AC SQDN X 15 KC-130J 3 AC SQDN X 15 KC-130J
1 RC SQDN X 6 KC-130J 2 RC SQDN X 12 KC-130J
1 RC SQDN X 12 KC-130T
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
UNIT/LOCATION PMAI
MAG-11/MIRAMAR, CA
VMGR-352 15 KC-130J
WEST COAST MEU PTP
RFF SUPPORT
I MEF GENERAL SUPPORT
MAG-12/IWAKUNI, JA
VMGR-152 15 KC-130J
WESTPAC MEU
MRF-D/MRF-G/TSC
III MEF GENERAL SUPPORT
MAG-14/CHERRY POINT, NC
VMGR-252 15 KC-130J
EAST COAST MEU PTP
RFF SUPPORT
II MEF GENERAL SUPPORT
MAG-41/FORT WORTH, TX
VMGR-234 12 KC-130J (FY24)
RFF SUPPORT
I/II/III MEF GENERAL SUPPORT

MAG-49/NEWBURGH, NY
VMGR-452 12 KC-130J (FY26) J V
RFF SUPPORT
I/II/III MEF GENERAL SUPPORT

NOTES:
1) VMGR SOURCING IS UPDATED DURING QUARTERLY FORCE SYNCH CONFERENCES.
2) THE ABOVE DEPICTED REQUIREMENT RESULTS IN LESS THAN A 1:2 DEPLOYMENT TO DWELL.
3) VMGR SQUADRONS ARE STRUCTURED TO SUPPORT A CORE ELEMENT AND TWO (3) PLANE DETACHMENTS EACH.
4) DETACHMENT SIZE IS SCALABLE TO MEET THE ASSIGNED MAGTF MISSION.
5) MEU PTP SUPPORT REMAINS A REQUIREMENT, BUT NOT SOURCED WITH DEDICATED DETACHMENT UNTIL FUTURE FORCE SOURCING RELIEF IS REALIZED.

67
MARINE AERIAL REFUELER / TRANSPORT SQUADRON GEO-LOCATION

FY
3/2
2027 1 1 1 1 1
3/2
2026 1 1 1 1 1 MCAS Cherry Point
3/2
2025 1 1 1 1 1 MCAS Miramar
3/2
2024 1 1 1 1 1 MCAS Iwakuni
3/2 NAS JRB Ft Worth
2023 1 1 1 1 1
2022 1 1 1 1 1
3/2 Stewart ANGB
3/2
2021 1 1 1 1 1
2020 1 1 1 1 1 3/2

2019 1 1 1 1 1 3/2

2018 1 1 1 1 1 3/2

2017 1 1 1 1 1 3/2
AC/RC
0 2 4 6

68
2.6 MARINE CORPS TILTROTOR AVIATION PLAN

69
2.6 MARINE MEDIUM TILTROTOR(VMM) PLAN

MV-22 DESCRIPTION: component to complete. Two active component squadrons are scheduled to
relocate from Southern California to Hawaii in FY17 and FY18.
The MV-22 Osprey is the world’s first production tiltrotor aircraft and the medium
lift assault support platform for the Marine Corps. It blends the vertical flight
The transition of the two reserve squadrons began in the third quarter of FY13.
capabilities of helicopters with the speed, range, altitude, and endurance of fixed-
VMM-764 relocated from Edwards Air Force Base to MCAS Miramar in 2013 and
wing transport aircraft. Since the first deployment in 2007, the MV-22B’s
attained initial operational capable (IOC) in June 2014. The unit reached FOC in
revolutionary capability has been a cornerstone of the Marine Air-Ground Task
the third quarter of FY16.
Force.
In the beginning of FY17, VMM-268 will relocate to Kaneohe Bay. They will be
Due to the increasing demand for the Osprey, a detachment capability is being
followed by VMM-363, beginning in the first quarter of FY18. A 17th active
built into the VMMs. Staffing began in 2014 for detachment capability in two East
component squadron, VMM-362, will stand-up beginning in FY18 in Miramar, CA.
Coast squadrons. Sixteen additional squadrons will receive the increased staffing
In FY19, VMM-212 will stand -up in Jacksonville, NC to complete the active
in FY17. The 17th and 18th VMMs will stand-up with a detachment capability.
component transition.
Efforts are underway to adjust the spares, tools, and support equipment to match
the unit requirements of the detachment capability.

Current inventory of MV-22’s consist of over 70 different hardware configurations

and 7 different software configurations. These different configurations account
for more maintenance man hours and reduced RBA aircraft. A new plan targeting
2019 to start is the Common Configuration Readiness and Modernization (CCRAM)
Plan. This concept would first bring the entire fleet to a single common
configuration and then start improvements leveraging technologies from joint
multi-role (JMR), future vertical lift (FVL), and other emerging technology
initiatives. These will provide a capability leap to ensure relevance and improved
readiness at a lower cost for decades, will improve reliability and decrease direct
maintenance man-hours per flight hour.

Transition Plan:
The MV-22B has replaced the CH-46E and CH-53D. The Marine Corps will procure
a total of 360 MV-22B’s in the following squadron beddown:

1) 18 active squadrons x 12 MV-22B

2) 2 reserve squadrons x 12 MV-22B

3) 1 fleet replacement squadron x 20 MV-22B

The Marine Corps is 75% complete with the medium lift transition. There are
fourteen FOC squadrons in the active fleet. The units in Okinawa are complete
with the transition, leaving the West Coast, Hawaii, East Coast, and the reserve

70
2.6 MARINE MEDIUM TILTROTOR(VMM) PLAN

MISSIONS

MARINE MEDIUM TILTROTOR SQUADRON (VMM):

Support the MAGTF commander by providing assault support transport of combat troops, supplies and equipment, day or night under all weather conditions during
expeditionary, joint or combined operations.

MARINE MEDIUM TILTROTOR TRAINING SQUADRON (VMMT)

Conduct combat capable assault support tiltrotor training for selected aircrew in the MV-22B and provide technical training for aviation maintenance personnel.

1) Additional future MV-22 mission sets will include aerial refueling of fixed wing, tiltrotor, and rotary wing; command and control; and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR).
The VMM, through Link 16 and Software Reprogrammable Payload, will be digitally linked to the MAGTF, enhancing interoperability of ground and air forces during long range operations.

71
MV-22B PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

MV-22
Since the first deployment in 2007, the MV-22’s revolutionary capability has been
a cornerstone of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force. MV-22s provided essential
medium lift assault support to ground forces in multiple theaters of operation.

MV-22 readiness has been stressed due to accelerated deployments, accelerated

squadron standups, continuous combat use since 2007 and emergent operational
tasking. This OPTEMPO has been sustained in parallel with the medium lift
transition from legacy assets which is only 75% complete. Additionally, the Special
Purpose MAGTF construct has driven the requirement to adjust the VMM T/O in FUTURE:
order to support detachment operations. As MV-22 employment grows and
evolves to meet CCDR demand, the industrial and logistics support base is working
to keep pace.

The MV-22 is a maturing platform that is scheduled to reach FOC in 2020; the ASSAULT SUPPORT INTEGRATION
support base is maturing in parallel. This base, both industrial and organic, has
In the years ahead, the Osprey will remain the nation’s crisis response platform of
been challenged to meet established repair timelines and required depot
choice in support of the “new normal.” Due to the increasing demand for the
throughput. Across the enterprise, changes to manning are being made to support
Osprey, a detachment capability is being built into the VMMs. Staffing began in
detachment operations, organic depot facilities are expanding, contracting
2014 for detachment capability in two East Coast squadrons. An additional sixteen
strategies are evolving to support timely delivery of long lead items, and industry
squadrons will receive the increased staffing in FY17. The 17th and 18th VMMs will
continues to grow their support capability. These and other adjustments are being
stand-up with a detachment capability. Efforts are underway to adjust the spares,
made to ensure the support base is able to meet logistical requirements driven by
tools, and support equipment to match the unit requirements of the detachment
current and future MV-22 operational requirements.
capability.
SUSTAINMENT:
TIME ON WING IMPROVEMENTS
Readiness initiatives remain a focus of the MV-22 program in order to increase
mission capable rates and decrease operating cost. Improvements have been
achieved through team execution of a comprehensive plan which includes
implementation of R&M improvements, maintenance concept changes, repair
capability standup, and contract strategy changes.

72
MV-22B PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

Final Fit:
Survivability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) UUNS DON LAIRCM – 2016 (SPMAGTF)

2) JUONS DON LAIRCM – 2017 (MEU)

3) Intrepid Tiger II V1 Block X (2019-21)

Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) Iridium SATCOM in FY16 to provide Beyond Line Of Sight (BLOS) C2 capabilities. 2.0
2) C-4 UUNS – 2018 (SPMAGTF) Iridium, Link-16, ANW2, TTNT, CDL, and Ku
16.2
3) FY19 – MAGTF Agile Network Gateway Link (MANGL) consolidates the Software
Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) / Airborne Gateway / and tablet into a Program of
Record fielding on MV-22, CH-53, KC-130. MANGL is the overarching system of
systems including waveforms such as ANW2, Link-16, BE-CDL, and TTNT.
7 RBA
4) Radio frequency identification (RFID) of cargo and personnel to be fielded with SRP

Lethality Upgrade Roadmap:

1) V-22 Aerial Refueling System (VARS)

12
2) Traffic Collision and Avoidance System (TCAS)
VMM (15)
3) TFLIR; Advanced Targeting Sensor (ATS) with EO/IR optics, Laser Target Designator
and Ranging (LTD-R), IR Marker, and Video Data Link (VDL)

4) Enhanced Weapon System; Medium range immediate suppression

Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) Open Architecture / Modular Avionics

2) Nacelle Wiring / Blade Nickle Cap/ Electrical System)

3) Swashplate Actuator (SPA) / Infrared Suppressor (IRS)

73
2.6 MARINE MEDIUM TILTROTOR (VMM) PLAN

MV-22 Aircraft Test and Evaluation Updates

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST (DT): Ongoing DT efforts include:
1) Fleet sustainment – Vehicle Management System (VMS) and JVX Application System
Software (JASS) software drops

2) Nacelle sails for increased range

3) Envelope expansion for shipboard operations

4) High altitude operations and defensive maneuvering

5) Strategic tanker envelope expansion

OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION (OT&E): Ongoing OT efforts

include:
1) Support of integrated test for aircraft and mission planning software development

2) Operational assessments of flare effectiveness and Blue Force Tracker (BFT) Phase IV

3) Defensive weapon system envelope expansion V-22 Aerial Refueling System (VARS)
Planned to have the initial capability in mid FY18 being able to refuel fixed wing,
4) Digital interoperability tiltrotor and rotary wing aircraft. Fielding of the full capable system will be in
FY19. This system will be able to refuel all MAGTF aerial refuel capable aircraft
5) Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment
with approximately 10,000 pounds per VARS-equipped V-22.
6) Future Capabilities Enhanced Weapon System
Strategic Air-to-Air Refueling (AAR) Enhanced weapon systems is in early development to increase all-axis, stand-off,
The V-22 and KC-130 are a formidable tandem for the MAGTF commander. The and precision capabilities.
addition of joint and coalition strategic tankers will increase the flexibility of the
combatant commander to utilize the V-22. In 2014, a flight clearance was
Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment (IASE)
completed for the V-22 to conduct air-to-air refueling from the Air Force KC-10. An IASE urgent universal needs statement (UUNS) was approved in FY14. Delivery
Further testing and flight clearances are planned for the KC-46. OMEGA-707 test of the first 24 sets will be in FY16. Upgrading the remaining fleet will begin in
was completed in July 2016 and a flight clearance is expected by FY17. FY17.

74
2.6 MARINE MEDIUM TILTROTOR (VMM) PLAN

The next MV-22

The V-22 has proven its worth by transforming rotorcraft operations across the globe. The operational reach and versatility of this remarkable platform has created tactical
and strategic options where there previously were none. Building on this success is key to ensure the platform’s relevance and capability for the future force.

Initial planning has begun to map the next upgrade to the MV-22B, which will achieve a single configuration by the mid 2020s. This concept will take the reliability upgrades
in the current Block C and integrate them into fielded Block B aircraft. It will also be the initial step in the CCRAM Plan that will drive a capability leap to ensure relevance and
improved readiness at a lower cost for decades. New capabilities, such as open architecture, will allow the V-22 to remain lethal on the evolving modern battlefield.
Additionally, the modernization of the aircraft will increase its readiness and cost efficiency. The procurement of a new sensor, that can off-board IASE and DI gathered
threat information to friendly attack platforms, will reduce the steps in the kill chain.

Upgrades will take advantage of maturing technologies as well as incorporate improvements realized since the platform’s introduction to the fleet. The single configuration
aircraft will increase operational effectiveness, reliability and maintainability. It will also sustain the downward trend in operating costs while increasing readiness, which are
hallmarks of the platform's overall performance to date.

75
2.6 MARINE MEDIUM TILTROTOR (VMM) PLAN

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
TOTAL SQUADRONS / PRIMARY MISSION AIRCRAFT AUTHORIZED (PMAA) - REQUIREMENT
Active Component
12 MV-22B 16 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
Reserve Component
12 MV-22B 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
PRIMARY AIRCRAFT INVENTORY (PAI) PLAN - INVENTORY
AC/RC PMAI
MV-22B 216 216 228 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240

FRS PTAI
MV-22B BLOCK A 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MV-22B BLOCK B 18 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

HMX-1 PMAI
MV-22B 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12

PDAI / POAI
MV-22B 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

BAI/PIPE
MV-22B 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37

PROGRAM OF RECORD 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360

GENERAL NOTES:
1) TOTAL PROCUREMENT OBJECTIVE IS 360 MV-22B. A REQUIREMENTS-BASED ANALYSIS IS UNDERWAY TO INCREASE THE PROGRAM OF RECORD TO 380 WITH THE INTRODUCTION OF
VMM-362 and VMM-212 IN FY18 AND FY19.

2) FLEET SQUADRONS WILL CONTAIN A MIX OF BLOCK B AND BLOCK C. THE MIX WILL MOVE FROM 8 BLOCK B AND 4 BLOCK C TO A 6 AND 6 MIX.

3) VMMT-204 WILL CONTAIN BLOCK A AND BLOCK B AIRCRAFT UNTIL FY18.

76
 KEY
18 AC SQDN X 12 MV-22B
2 RC SQDN X 12 MV-22B M = TRANSITION BEGINS
FRS x 20 MV-22B
HMX-1 x 12 MV-22B 2.6 MARINE MEDIUM TILTROTOR(VMM) PLAN V = TRANSITION COMPLETE
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
UNIT/LOCATION PMAI 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
MAG-16
VMM-161 12 MV-22B
VMM-163 12 MV-22B
VMM-165 12 MV-22B
VMM-166 12 MV-22B
VMM-268 (1) 12 MV-22B MOVE TO MAG-24
VMM-363 (2) 12 MV-22B MOVE TO MAG-24
VMM-362 (3) 12 MV-22B M V
West Coast MEU 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 3 1
MAGTF Tasking A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B
MILCON HANGAR CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY
MILCON AIRFIELD TAXIWAY
MILCON LHD PAD
MAG-24
VMM-268 12 MV-22B
VMM-363 12 MV-22B
MAGTF Tasking A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B
MILCON LHD PAD AND LZ IMPROVEMENTS
MILCON V-22/H-1 WAREHOUSE
MILCON MAG-24 ARMORY EXPANSION
MILCON HANGAR
MAG-26
VMMT-204 20 MV-22B
VMM-162 12 MV-22B
VMM-261 12 MV-22B
VMM-263 12 MV-22B
VMM-264 12 MV-22B
VMM-266 12 MV-22B
VMM-365 12 MV-22B
VMM-212 (4) 12 MV-22B M V
East Coast MEU 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 6 2
MAGTF Tasking A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B
MILCON SQUADRON WAREHOUSE
MILCON
MAG-36
VMM-262 12 MV-22B
VMM-265 12 MV-22B
31ST MEU A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B
MILCON
MAG-39
VMM-164 (5) 12 MV-22B V
VMM-364 (6) 12 MV-22B V
SOCAL MEU 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 3 1
MILCON CONVERT LHA DECK TO CONCRETE
MILCON LHD PAD MODERNIZATION
MILCON VTOL PAD MODERNIZATION
MILCON SIMULATOR
MAG-41
VMM-764 (7) 12 MV-22B
MAG-49
VMM-774 (8) 12 MV-22B V
WHMO
HMX-1 12 MV-22B
NOTES:
1) VMM-268 FOC Q1 FY16. RELOCATE TO MAG-24 DURING Q1 FY17. 5) VMM-164 IOC Q2 FY16. FOC Q3 FY17.

2) VMM-363 RELOCATE TO MAG-24 DURING Q1 FY18. 6) VMM-364 FOC Q1 FY17.

3) VMM-362 WILL BEGIN STAND UP IN FY18 IN MIRAMAR. 7) VMM-764 FOC Q2 FY16.

4) VMM-212 WILL BEGIN STAND UP IN FY19 IN NEW RIVER. 8) HMM-774 TRANSITION WILL BE CONDUCTED AT NS NORFOLK. IOC Q3 FY16. FOC Q4 FY18

77
2.6 MARINE MEDIUM TILTROTOR(VMM) GEO-LOCATION

FY AC/RC

18/2
2027 7 2 2 6 2 1
18/2
2026 7 2 2 6 2 1 MCAS New River
18/2
2025 7 2 2 6 2 1
18/2 MCAS Camp
2024 7 2 2 6 2 1 Pendleton
18/2 MCAS Kaneohe Bay
2023 7 2 2 6 2 1
18/2
2022 7 2 2 6 2 1 MCAS Miramar
2021 7 2 2 6 2 1 18/2
MCAS Futenma
2020 7 2 2 6 2 1 18/2
NS Norfolk
2019 7 2 2 6 2 1 17/2

2018 6 2 2 6 2 1
16/2
2017 6 2 2 5 2 1
16/2
0 5 10 15 20

**Basing plans are subject to change**

78
2.7 MARINE CORPS ROTARY-WING AVIATION PLAN

79
2.7 MARINE CORPS ROTARY-WING AVIATION PLAN

Missions
MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER SQUADRON (HMH):

Support the MAGTF commander by providing assault support transport of

heavy equipment, combat troops, and supplies, day or night under all weather
conditions during expeditionary, joint or combined operations. Conduct
intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions and MAGTF electronic
warfare missions.

MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER TRAINING SQUADRON (HMHT):

Conduct combat capable assault support heavy lift helicopter training for
selected aircrews in the CH-53E aircraft and provide technical training for
aviation maintenance personnel.

MARINE LIGHT ATTACK HELICOPTER SQUADRON (HMLA):

Support the MAGTF commander by providing offensive air support, utility

support, armed escort and airborne supporting arms coordination, day or night
under all weather conditions during expeditionary, joint or combined
operations. Conduct intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions and
MAGTF electronic warfare missions.

MARINE LIGHT ATTACK HELICOPTER TRAINING SQUADRON (HMLAT) Conduct

combat capable attack training for selected aircrews in the UH-1Y, AH-1W and
AH-1Z aircraft, and provide technical training for aviation maintenance
personnel.

80
MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER (HMH) PLAN

CH-53K King Stallion: Operational Test (OT) B1 with all Marine aircrew beginning fall of 2016 will wrap
up in December 16 executing the envelope of 120kts, 30deg angle of bank/1.5g,
DEVELOPMENTAL TEST:
27,000lb external hover out of ground effect, and 12,000lb external lift 110nm
1st Qtr FY14 to 2nd Qtr FY18 drop off and return in preparation for a Milestone C decision 2QFY17 to approve
Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP). These 4 EDM test assets will move to Pax River,
OPERATIONAL TEST/OPEVAL: MD summer of 2017 to continue DT. Four System Demonstration Test Articles
(SDTAs) will deliver in FY17 in order to support operational test (OT).
OT-B1 testing in support of Milestone C Decision begins 1st Qtr FY17. Integrated
Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E ) commences in FY19 in support of Initial Tech Evaluation is scheduled to complete in January 2019 with Initial Operational
Operational Capability (IOC) / Full Rate Production (FRP). Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) complete by August of 2019 in support of IOC.

INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY:

Scheduled for 2019.

IOC shall be achieved when the first squadron receives four CH-53K aircraft with
required personnel suitably trained and certified, required primary and support
equipment and technical publications, to include initial spares with interim repair
support and initial training in place, ready to deploy in accordance with USMC
standards.

CH-53K programmatic IOC is currently on track for end of 2019. IOC will be
achieved when the first operational squadron (HMH-366) receives four CH-53K
aircraft with required personnel suitably trained and certified, required primary
support equipment and technical publications, to include spares with interim
repair support and initial training in place, ready to deploy in accordance with
USMC standards.

Currently the CH-53K has four Engineering Developmental Models (EDMs)

conducting Developmental Test (DT) in West Palm Beach, FL. The CH-53K T&R
conference was conducted during the summer of 2016 ensuring VMX-1 can
evaluate the T&R while conducting operational test ensuring an effective and
comprehensive training plan for conversion and initial accession pilots and
aircrew.

81
CH-53E PLAN: PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

CH-53E SUPER STALLION:

The CH-53E entered service in 1981 and is the only heavy lift helicopter in the DoD
rotorcraft inventory. Current force construct is eight active component HMHs and
one reserve component HMH(-). The Super Stallion fleet has enabled heavy lift
assault support operations in OEF, OIF, HOA, and is forward deployed in support of
MEUs, UDP Okinawa, MRF-Darwin and SPMAGTFs. The past 14 years of combat
operations and various humanitarian crises have validated the relevance of vertical
heavy lift by both MAGTF and joint force commanders alike.

The current CH-53E inventory is 146 aircraft. Replacement production capacity

does not exist nor are there CH-53Es available in war storage. Low aircraft
inventory is accentuated by pipeline aircraft (aircraft receiving modifications,
depot level repairs, and standard depot-level maintenance), obsolescence issues
and a supply posture associated with an aging airframe. The result is a lack of
physical assets ready for tasking on the flight line. Due to this shortfall a
squadron’s Primary Aircraft Inventory (PAI) is 12 aircraft. Transition to the CH-53K
will enable re-distribution of CH-53E aircraft, allowing squadrons to return to 16
aircraft. HMHT-302, Contract Maintenance Field Teams, and fully fund Program Related
Logistics (PRL).
CH-53E SUSTAINMENT:
CH-53E Readiness Recovery Effort is a continuous process addressing In the realm of Performance Based Logistics (PBL), the CH-53E currently has 10
recommendations from the Super Stallion Independent Readiness Review (SSIRR) components on contract. By summer of 2017 it is expected to have another 65
conducted in order to assist the CH-53E community to achieve and maintain T-2.0 components with efforts to pursue additional components in the near future.
until Full Operational Capability (FOC) of the CH-53K in 2029. The recovery plan is
expected to be a three year process extending through FY19.

The reset of all 146 aircraft is the main effort. Reset specification consists of all
Maintenance Requirement Cards (MRC) including phase cycle and calendar/special
inspections improving serviceability and material condition of the aircraft. Upon
completion, a full FCF will be conducted by the squadron to ensure the aircraft is
returned Full Mission Capable (FMC) with zero outstanding Awaiting Maintenance
Discrepancies (AWM). At any given time, 16 aircraft will be in reset. By 2020 all
146 CH-53Es will be reset.

Other readiness recovery efforts include procurement of the correct amount of

Individual Material Readiness List (IMRL) and Support Equipment (SE), Functional
Check Flight (FCF) training for pilots and crew chiefs, procure 5 Portable Electronic
Maintenance Aids (PEMAs) per aircraft, fix all Technical Publication Discrepancy
Reports (TPDRs), AMARG MH-53E reconstitution for stick and rudder aircraft at
82
CH-53E PLAN: PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

Future: LINK 16
The CH-53E will continue to support the full spectrum of assigned combat Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:
operations and scheduled deployments. It is imperative to sustain the current CH-
53E fleet throughout the transition to the CH-53K (IOC 2019 / FOC 2029). 1) 419 Engine Upgrade (increases payload by 5 to 8K pounds)

Final Fit: 2) Prognostic/Diagnostic Based Maintenance

Survivability Upgrade Roadmap:
3) Engine Nacelles
1) AAQ-24 DIRCM(V25)
4) Kapton Wiring Replacement
2) Dual Pod/Forward Firing Chaff and Flare Dispensers
Critical Systems Upgrade:
3) Hostile Fire Indication (HFI)
1) Mode V IFF, Master Zeroize Switch, GPS Inertial Navigation System (INS), Brown Out
Symbology Set (BOSS), Embedded SATCOM
4) Advanced Threat Warner/Missile Warner/Laser Warner
2) Smart Multifunction Color Display (SMFCD)
5) Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE)
3) APX-123 for ADSB-out FAA mandate
6) Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap:
4) Degraded Visual Environment (DVE) Phases 2 and 3
7) Software Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) radio replacement

83
MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER (HMH) PLAN CH-53K

CH-53K KING STALLION DESCRIPTION: Unique in aviation build and test history, the CH-53K program has a dedicated
Ground Test Vehicle (GTV) on which to test dynamic components, airframe
On 27 October 2015, the CH-53K King Stallion flew for the first time and
fatigue, systems and flight surfaces and controls. A separate, static test article,
developmental flight test continues with 4 Engineering Developmental Model
used to measure strain and critical loads under several thousand load conditions ,
(EDM) aircraft. OT-B1 testing is being conducted in order to support a Milestone C
allows a rigorous testing program in a safe environment, and data from these two
decision in 2nd QTR FY 17.
systems are implemented into the program far more quickly than if this were a
The CH-53K is a critical airborne connector which will enable ship to objective flying aircraft. The GTV, by discovering issues inherent in any helicopter test
maneuver and seabasing . The CH-53K will be capable of carrying a 36,000lb load program, bought down risk and made flight test safer and more efficient.
but has a Threshold Key Performance Parameter (KPP) to externally transport
The program entered Development Test 1st QTR FY 14 with the successful light off
27,000lbs 110 NM under high/hot conditions, loiter for 30 minutes and return.
of the ground test vehicle. The first of four Engineering Demonstration Models
This provides nearly three times the capability of the CH-53E under similar
(EDM) were delivered in the first quarter of FY 14. EDM 1’s first flight was
environmental conditions. Major system improvements of this new build
conducted on 27 Oct 15 with follow on EDMs 2-4 conducting their first flights
helicopter include: fly-by-wire flight controls; a composite airframe housing more
supporting developmental test.
capable and fuel efficient engines and a split torque main gearbox to enable
increased gross weight; advanced fourth-generation composite main rotor blades;
The first external was conducted with a 12,000lb load on 19 Apr 2016, followed by
modern interoperable glass cockpit; internal cargo handling systems compatible
a 20,000lb load on 27 May 16, and a 27,000lb load 17 June 16.
with USAF 463L pallets; triple hook external cargo system; and fourth- generation
aircraft survivability equipment. Additionally, the CH-53K will be supported by the Following the Advance Procurement Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM)
fleet common operating environment (FCOE) which will facilitate condition based approval by Mr. Kendall, the long lead item contract was awarded in Apr 2016,
maintenance. approving the purchase of the long lead items for the first Low Rate Initial
Production (LRIP) Lot of (2) CH-53Ks in FY17. In FY16 the first Marine
The CH-53K helicopter provides JTF and MAGTF commanders with a vertical heavy
Developmental test pilot and Operational test pilot flew the CH-53K marking a
lift capability to project, sustain and reconstitute combat forces. The CH-53K
major milestone in the program with Integrated Test. System Demonstration Test
operates at distances, airspeeds, and gross weights sufficient to support the full
Articles (SDTAs) 1-4 are in assembly, with follow on contracts pending for SDTAs 5
range of military operations, expeditionary maneuver warfare, operational
and 6.
maneuver from the sea and seabasing concepts. The aircraft affordably optimizes
performance, survivability, maintainability and supportability in a “best value”
solution to provide an effective heavy lift assault support platform.

84
MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER (HMH) PLAN CH-53K

Transition Plan:
The Marine Corps will procure a total of 200 airframes, fielding eight active component squadrons, one fleet replacement squadron, two HMH(-) reserve component
squadrons, and developmental / operational test squadrons.

The CH-53 transition begins in earnest in FY-19, when HMH-366 and HMHT- 302 enter transition. HMH-366 will be the first tactical squadron to deploy a detachment of CH-
53K King Stallions. Transition timelines are as follows:

1) 2nd MAW FY 19-25

2) 1st MAW FY 25-26

3) 3rd MAW FY 26-30

4) 4th MAW FY 29-31.

In FY 23, 4th MAW will restructure its single HMH into two separate HMH(-)s with the reactivation of HMH-769 at MCAS Miramar. CH-53K FOC will be achieved in
2029 with the transition of the last active component squadron. Backup aircraft inventory / attrition reserve deliveries will complete in FY31 when the program of
record reaches 200 aircraft.

85
MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER (HMH) PLAN

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
TOTAL SQUADRONS / PRIMARY MISSION AIRCRAFT AUTHORIZED (PMAA) - REQUIREMENT
Active Component
16 CH-53E 8 8 7 7 7 7 6 5 4 3 2
16 CH-53K 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reserve Component
8 CH-53E 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2
8 CH-53K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
PRIMARY AIRCRAFT INVENTORY (PAI) PLAN - INVENTORY
AC/RC PRIMARY MISSION AIRCRAFT INVENTORY (PMAI)
CH-53E 104 104 104 104 104 104 108 96 80 64 48
CH-53K 0 0 4 4 5 14 28 43 55 74 96
FRS PRIMARY TRAINING AIRCRAFT INVENTORY (PTAI)
CH-53E 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 8 6 4 0
MH-53E 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
CH-53K 0 0 0 2 6 7 8 8 10 12 14
TOTAL PTAI 12 12 12 14 18 19 16 16 16 16 14

PRIMARY DEVELOPMENTAL/TEST AIRCRAFT INVENTORY (PDAI)

CH-53E 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0
CH-53K 8 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
HX-21 CH-53K 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
VMX-22 CH-53K 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
TOTAL PDAI 10 10 6 6 6 6 6 4 3 3 3

BACKUP AIRCRAFT INVENTORY (BAI)/PIPELINE

CH-53E 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 23 19 19 19
CH-53K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL BAI 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 23 19 19 19

TOTAL PAI 157 157 153 155 159 160 159 139 118 102 84

GENERAL NOTES:
1) FOUR CH-53K ENGINEERING DEMONSTRATION MODELS (EDM) , NONPRODUCTION AIRCRAFT, WILL BE UTILIZED FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND RETAINED AT HX-21. IN FY19 (2) EDMs
WILL BE REMOVED FROM HX-21 TO BE CONVERTED TO PRACTICAL JOB TRAINERS (PJTs) FOR UTILIZATION AT CNATT NEW RIVER FOR INITIAL ACCESSION TRAINING. EDM AIRCRAFT DO
NOT COUNT AGAINST THE PROGRAM OF RECORD.

2) PROGRAM OF RECORD IS 200 CH-53K.

3) TWO AMARG MH-53Es CONVERTED TO HMHT-302 FAMILIARIZATION FLIGHT TRAINERS WITH EST DELIVERY IN FY17
86
CURRENT FORCE: FORCE GOAL:
MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER (HMH) PLAN
8 AC SQDN X 12 CH-53E (1) 8 AC SQDN X 16 CH-53K
1 RC SQDN X 6 CH-53E (2) 2 RC SQDN(-) X 8 CH-53K
1 FRS SQDN X 12 CH-53E (10 CH-53E / 2MH-53E) (3) 1 FRS SQDN X 21 CH-53K
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
UNIT/LOCATION PAI
MAG-16
HMH-361 12 CH-53E 16 CH-53E K
HMH-462 12 CH-53E 16 CH-53E K
HMH-465 12 CH-53E 16 CH-53E K
HMH-466 12 CH-53E 16 CH-53E
West Coast MEU 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 1 5 1 5
MAG-24
HMH-463 12 CH-53E 16 CH-53E K V
31st MEU A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B
MILCON M A LS M A INT EX
MILCON M A G-24 A RM ORY EX PA NSION
MILCON HA NGA R 102 M ODERIZA TION
MAG-29
HMHT-302 (3) 12 CH-53E K
2 MH-53E (4) 2 M H-53E
HMH-366 12 CH-53E K V
HMH-461 12 CH-53E K V
HMH-464 12 CH-53E K V
East Coast MEU 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 2 4 6 2
MAGTF Tasking
MILCON
MILCON 53K M A INT TRA INING

MAG-41
HMH-769 (-) (5) 8 CH-53E A
MAG-49
HMH-772 (-) 6 CH-53E 8 CH-53E
MILCON 53K TRA INER FA CILITY

A=ACTIVATE
K=ENTERS CH-53K TRANSITION 2) PAI OF 6 A/C PER SQUADRON UNTIL TOTAL INVENTORY SUPPORTS 8 A/C SQUADRON
V=TRANSITION COMPLETE FACILITATED BY CH-53K TRANSITIONING SQUADRONS.
NOTES: 3) HMHT-302 WILL BECOME A DUAL T/M/S (CH-53E/CH-53K) THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE
CH-53K TRANSITION.
1) SQUADRONS ARE TEMPORARILY RESOURCED TO A PRIMARY AIRCRAFT INVENTORY (PAI) OF 12
A/C PER SQUADRON DUE TO INVENTORY SHORTFALLS WHICH DO NOT SUPPORT PRIMARY 4) TWO AMARG MH-53Es ADDED TO INVENTORY IN FY15 FOR HMHT-302 FAMILIARIZATION
AIRCRAFT AUTHORIZATION OF 16 A/C. ONCE CH-53K TRANSITION BEGINS, CH-53E AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT CONVERSION, EST DELIVERY DATE OF FY17
WILL BE CAPITALIZED FROM TRANSITIONING SQUADRONS TO FACILITATE THE RETURN TO 16 A/C
SQUADRONS. 5) SQUADRON (-) ACTIVATES, LOCATION MCAS MIRAMAR FY23

87
MARINE HEAVY LIFT SQUADRON GEO-LOCATION

88
MARINE LIGHT ATTACK HELICOPTER (HMLA) PLAN

This AVPLAN represents a shift for the HMLA community in several key areas:

The end of the NATO mission in Afghanistan defines a transition point in the USMC’s reset to the Pacific, and the return of HMLAs to the Unit Deployment Program (UDP).
The USMC Pacific reset plan is a crossroads that represents both an operational shift and a pivotal point within the AH-1Z conversion. This period of transition is an
opportunity to align the resourcing and operational employment of the H-1 community based on mass and mutual support. The 2017 AVPLAN maximizes mutual support
within the HMLA community by changing the sequence and pace of the H-1 transition.

In order to mitigate fires risk within the MAGTF, an additional reserve component HMLA, HMLA-775(-), will be re-activated in Q1 FY17. The sequence of AH-1Z conversion is
now 3D MAW, 1st MAW, 2D MAW, then 4th MAW. The conversion of 1st MAW ahead of 2d MAW accelerates TMS mutual support by aligning 1st MAW and 3d MAW to the
AH-1Z, while 2d MAW and 4th MAW remain aligned to the AH-1W. This allows the last active component AH-1W squadron to be collocated with robust HMLA support
structure, thereby eliminating the challenges created by isolating the last AH-1W squadron on Hawaii.

Once each active component MAG fields to 15 AH-1Z aircraft per squadron, the AH-1Z conversion begins in the next MAG. The reserve component will begin AH-1Z
conversion when the active component is complete. The result of these changes is an acceleration of T/M/S alignment within MARFORPAC and increased mutual support for
all HMLAs, while mitigating the delay of the 2D MAW AH-1Z conversion.

Employment of these new aircraft systems will include updated missile technology. The JAGM program will implement a three-step incremental approach. The first
increment will provide a dual-mode semi-active laser (SAL) and millimeter wave (MMW) seeker. The MMW guidance can be activated while the weapon is still on the
aircraft, giving the operator a fire-and-forget missile. The second increment will increase the maximum range to twelve kilometers and add an imaging infrared (IIR) mode to
the seeker providing improved lethality, flexibility in modes of fire, advanced countermeasures capability, and additional capability in an obscured battlefield. The third
increment will expand the missile envelope to sixteen kilometers. Marine Corps integration on the AH-1Z began in FY15 with an expected IOC in FY19.

The H-1 program plans to execute a block upgrade that will encompass readiness and configuration management approach to integrate these airframes into the larger
digitally interoperable MAGTF electronic warfare concept. H-1 program is leveraging earlier success of other programs and conducting an Independent Readiness Review.
This effort will be complete in Q3FY17.

89
AH-1W : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

AH-1W:
The AH-1W SuperCobra is a combat-proven force multiplier for the MAGTF. The
SuperCobra provides close air support, strike coordination and reconnaissance,
armed reconnaissance, escort, forward air controller airborne, and air interdiction. 2.0
AH-1Ws are outfitted with the Night Targeting System Upgrade (NTSU), a third-
generation targeting FLIR with laser designator / rangefinder and color TV camera. 15.9
Ninety AH-1Ws have been outfitted with the Tactical Video Data Link (TVDL)
system, enabling aircrews to send and receive sensor video in C, L, and S bands in
support of reconnaissance and close air support missions.
9 RBA
The AH-1W employs the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) laser-
guided rocket system. The 20mm linkless feed system is compatible with both the
legacy and upgrade platform recently deployed, showcasing a marked increase in
gun reliability. 15
SUSTAINMENT:
Program management and supply support agencies continue to work with our
AH-1W HMLA (3)
industry partners ensuring a sustainment strategy in place to provide a high state
of readiness for the platform. Major current government and industry initiatives
include improving component reliability and optimizing the production of spare
Final Fit:
and repair components.
Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) Tactical Video Data Link

Lethality Upgrade Roadmap:

1) Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System

Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) Night Targeting System Upgrade

2) Helmet Display and Tracker System

3) Linkless Feed System

90
AH-1Z : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

AH-1Z: PLANS:
The H-1 program replaces the AH-1W aircraft with the AH-1Z Viper. The H-1 The details of unit conversion timelines will adjust with real time production
Upgrades Program is a single acquisition program which leverages 85% delivery schedule updates. These forecast dates reflect the current delivery
commonality of major components, whereby enhancing deployability and schedule.
maintainability.
3d MAW:
The Viper is the next generation of attack aircraft. Speed, range, and payload have
been increased significantly, while decreasing maintenance workloads, training 1) AH-1Z conversion complete in July 2017
timelines, and total ownership cost. The advanced cockpit, common to both
aircraft, not only reduces operator workload and improves SA but also provides 2d MAW:
growth potential for future weapons and joint digital interoperability
1) AH-1Z conversion begins 2018, complete by 2019
enhancements. The cockpit systems assimilate onboard planning,
communications, digital fire control, all weather navigation, day/night targeting, 1st MAW:
and weapons systems in mirror-imaged crew stations.
1) HMLA 367 AH-1Z conversion begins in 2017, complete by 2018
1) The procurement objective is 189 AH-1Zs; 152 are build new aircraft (ZBN).
2) UDP / 31st MEU conversion in 2016
2) Three of the eight active component HMLAs have completed their Z conversion and
are currently building inventory towards their full authorization of 15 aircraft.

3) 120 AH-1Zs (Lots 1-13) are currently on contract.

4) 54 AH-1Zs have been delivered to date.

SUSTAINMENT:
Program management and supply support agencies continue to work with our
industry partners ensuring a sustainment strategy is in place to provide a high
state of readiness for the platform. Major current government and industry
initiatives include improving component reliability, optimizing repair facility
output, and establishing organic repair capability, and moving towards a
performance-based approach to logistics support.

91
AH-1Z : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

Final Fit:
Survivability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) Advanced Hostile Fire Indicator (HFI), Missile, and Laser Warning System

2) Upgraded Navigation and Situational Awareness

3) Degraded Visual Environment solution

Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap: 2.0

1) DI FMV

2) Adaptive Networking Wideband 18.2

3) Waveform (ANW2)

4) LINK 16

5) Variable Message Format (VMF) 9 RBA

6) Intrepid Tiger 2 (V3)

Lethality Upgrade Roadmap:

1) APKWS Penetrator
15
2) Targeting Sight System (TSS) w/Laser Spot Tracker

3) JAGM AH-1Z HMLA (4)

4) AIM-9X

5) Digital Rocket Launcher

Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) Electrical Power Improvement

2) Dynamic Component Improvement

92
UH-1Y : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

UH-1Y: PLANS:
The H-1 program replaces the UH-1N aircraft with the UH-1Y Venom. The H-1 All active and reserve squadrons have completed their initial UH-1Y conversion
Upgrades Program is a single acquisition program which leverages 85% and now have their full authorization of 12 UH-1Ys.
commonality of major components, whereby enhancing deployability and
maintainability. Final Fit:
Survivability Upgrade Roadmap:
The Venom is the next generation of utility aircraft. Speed, range, and payload
have been increased significantly, while we have decreased supportability 1) Advanced Hostile Fire Indicator (HFI), Missile, and Laser Warning System
demands, training timelines, and total ownership cost. The advanced cockpit,
common to both aircraft, not only reduces operator workload and improves SA 2) Upgraded Navigation and Situational Awareness
but also provides growth potential for future weapons and joint digital
interoperability enhancements. The cockpit systems assimilate onboard planning, 3) Degraded Visual Environment solutions
communications, digital fire control, all weather navigation, day/night targeting,
and weapons systems in mirror-imaged crew stations. The UH-1Y employs the Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap: 2.0
Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS).
1) DI FMV 17.9
1) Procurement objective is 160 UH-1Ys, with FY16 planned as the last year of USMC UH-
1Y procurement.
2) Intrepid Tiger 2 (V3)
7 RBA
3) Adaptive Networking Wideband
2) 160 UH-1Ys (Lots 1-13) are currently on contract.
12
4) Waveform (ANW2)
3) 136 UH-1Ys have been delivered to date.
UH-1Y HMLA (7)
SUSTAINMENT: 5) LINK 16

Program management and supply support agencies continue to work with our 6) Variable Message Format (VMF)
industry partners ensuring a sustainment strategy is in place to provide a high
state of readiness for the platform. Major current government and industry Lethality Upgrade Roadmap:
initiatives include improving component reliability, optimizing repair facility
output, and establishing organic repair capability, and moving towards a 1) APKWS Penetrator
performance-based approach to logistics support.
2) BRITESTAR Block II w/Laser Spot Tracker

3) Digital Rocket Launcher

Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:

1) Structural and Electrical Power Improvement

2) Dynamic Component Improvement

93
 MARINE LIGHT ATTACK HELICOPTER (HMLA) PLAN
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26
TOTAL SQUADRONS / PRIMARY MISSION AIRCRAFT AUTHORIZED (PMAI) - REQUIREMENT
Act ive Component
18 AH-1W / 12 UH-1Y 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 AH-1Z / 12 UH-1Y 5 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Reserve Component
18 AH-1W / 12 UH-1Y 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 AH-1Z / 12 UH-1Y 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26

PRIMARY AIRCRAFT INVENTORY (PAI) PLAN - INVENTORY
AC/RC PMAI
AH-1W 66 48 36 6 0 0 0 0 0
AH-1Z 64 78 103 130 135 135 135 135 135
UH-1Y 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108
TOTAL AH PMAI 130 126 139 136 135 135 135 135 135
TOTAL UH PMAI 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108

FRS PTAI
AH-1W 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AH-1Z 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
UH-1Y 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
TOTAL AH PTAI 24 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
TOTAL UH PTAI 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13

PDAI
AH-1W 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
AH-1Z 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
UH-1Y 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
TOTAL AH PDAI 8 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5
TOTAL UH PDAI 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

BAI/PIPE
AH-1W 10 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0
AH-1Z 0 0 0 0 25 34 34 34 34
UH-1Y 0 29 30 31 31 31 31 31 31
TOTAL AH BAI 10 7 5 1 25 34 34 34 34
TOTAL UH BAI 0 29 30 31 31 31 31 31 31

PMAI PER HMLA (W) 17 16 18 0 0 0 0 0 0

PMAI PER HMLA (Z) 13 13 15 14 15 15 15 15 15
PMAI PER HMLA (Y) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
AH PAI 162 149 162 156 155 155 155 155 155

GENERAL NOTES: 2) THE PMAA CHANGE FROM 18 AH-1W / 9 UH-1Y TO 15 AH-1Z / 12 UH-1Y WILL BE COINCIDENT
WITH THE DIVESTITURE OF THE LAST AH-1W DURING A SQUADRON’S AH-1Z CONVERSION.
1) TOTAL PROCUREMENT OBJECTIVE IS 160 UH-1Y AND 189 AH-1Z, FOR A TOTAL OF 349 H-1
AIRCRAFT. 3) PMAI WILL ADJUST WITH REAL TIME PRODUCTION DELIVERY SCHEDULE UPDATES. TIMELINES
DEPICTED ABOVE REFLECT THE CURRENT DELIVERY SCHEDULE.

94
 : MARINE LIGHT ATTACK HELICOPTER (HMLA) PLAN Y = YANKEE TRANSITION BEGINS
AH-1W/12 UH-1Y Z = ZULU TRANSITION BEGINS
X = TRANSITION TO USCG BEGINS
AH-1Z/12 UH-1Y
V = TRANSITION COMPLETE
AH-1W/12 UH-1Y
1 AH-1W/9 UH-1Y
W/ 10 AH-1Z/13 UH-1Y FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

HE BAY
15 AH-1/12 UH-1 Z V
GTF Tasking
MILCON P-863 Hangar 101
VER
15 AH-1/12 UH-1 Z V
15 AH-1/12 UH-1 V Z
15 AH-1/12 UH-1 HMLA-467 Deactivation
t Coast MEU 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 6 2
MILCON P-674 Paint Barn
ENDLETON
15 AH-1Z/12 UH-1Y
15 AH-1Z/12 UH-1Y
15 AH-1Z/12 UH-1Y
15 AH-1Z/12 UH-1Y
15 AH-1Z/12 UH-1Y V
st Coast MEU 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1
31st MEU
GTF Tasking
MILCON NOTES: P-120 Hangar Expansion
MILCON 1) HMLA-775 BASED AT CAMP PENDLETON. P-134 Simulator Re-location
3) THE DETAILS OF UNIT CONVERSION TIMELINES WILL ADJUST WITH REAL TIME PRODUCTION
DELIVERY SCHEDULE UPDATES. TIMELINES DEPICTED ABOVE REFLECT THE CURRENT
WORTH 2) MRF-D REQUIRMENTS FILLED BY HMLA-367 STARTED IN FY-15 WITH GUAM DETS SOURCED
WITHIN MFP SCHEDULED TO BEGIN FY22.
PRODUCTION-DELIVERY SCHEDULE.
ENT 15 AH-1/12 UH-1 Z V
95
MARINE LIGHT ATTACK SQUADRON GEO-LOCATION

7/2
FY
2026 2 4 1
7/2 1 1
2025 2 4 1
7/2 1 1 MCAS New River
2024 2 4 1
7/2 1 1
MCAS CamPen
2023 2 4 1
7/2 1 1
2022 2 4 1 1 1 MCAS Kaneohe Bay
7/2
2021 2 4 1
7/2
1 1 HMLA-773 (NOLA/JB
McGuire)
2020 2 4 1
7/2
1 1
HMLA-775 (-) (CPEN)
2019 2 4 1
7/2
1 1
2018 2 4 1 1 1
7/2
2017 2 4 1 1 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
AC/RC
HMLAs

**Basing plans are subject to change and further environmental analysis**

96
MARINE SEARCH AND RESCUE (SAR) PLAN

Marine aviation completes its divestiture of organic SAR capability at MCAS Yuma.

1) The Search and Rescue Unit (SRU) in Yuma will cease operations in FY17.

2) The retirement of the HH-1N in FY-17 marks the completion of a SAR divestiture action the USMC and USN began in 1996.

3) Upon sundown of the HH-1N in MCAS Yuma, the Marine Corps will transition to contract SAR services.

CURRENT FORCE: FORCE GOAL: NO

No USMC ASSETS**
Assets, Contract

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25

12341234123 123412341234123412341234
UNIT/LOCATION POAA
MCAS YUMA 4 HH-1N
CONTRACT C

C = PLANNED CONTRACTUAL COVERAGE

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25

SAR PAI PLAN
SAR POAI
HH-1N 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL USMC SAR PAI 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

97
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

99
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

VMU Mission Statement In January 2016, VMU-2 successfully completed an Operational Readiness
Inspection (ORI) and was declared Initial Operations Capable (IOC) in the RQ-21A
The VMU mission statement was updated in April 2014 to read:
Blackjack system. As the fifth RQ-21 system arrives in September 2016, VMU-2
“Support the MAGTF commander by conducting electromagnetic spectrum will cease operations of the RQ-7Bv1 Shadow.
warfare, multi-sensor reconnaissance and surveillance, supporting arms
In June 2016, the first RQ-21A system arrived at VMU-1 aboard MCAS Yuma. As
coordination and control, and facilitating the destruction of targets, day or night,
the RQ-21A Blackjack systems arrive over the next year, VMU-1 will taper RQ-7Bv2
under all-weather conditions, during expeditionary, joint, and combined
flights, suspending Shadow operations by 1 October 2017.
operations.”
VMU-3 aboard MCAS Kaneohe Bay will transition last after VMU-1 and VMU-2
The current mission statement more accurately reflects the VMU’s role in the
achieve Full Operational Capability (FOC). VMU-3 will operate the RQ-7Bv2 until
MAGTF. It lays the foundation for the incorporation of a persistent, digitally
three systems (IOC) can be fielded to VMU-3 anticipated in FY20.
interoperable architecture for the MAGTF and the execution of full spectrum
offensive air support.
VMU-4 will undergo new equipment training with the RQ-7Bv2 and transition
Operations from RQ-7Bv1 to the RQ-7Bv2 in 2017. At this point, the USMC will conclude RQ-
7Bv1 operations.
In the 2017-2030 timeframe, the family of unmanned aircraft systems (FoUAS)
provides support to any sized MAGTF for influence of the electromagnetic
spectrum, battlespace awareness, offensive air support, target acquisition, force
protection, and digital communication backbone. Marine Corps UAS employment Squadron Marine Aircraft Group Air Station
will continue to enhance and extend the lethal and non-lethal capabilities of
MAGTF and joint force commanders, facilitating advancements in observation, VMU-1 MAG-13 (RQ-21) MCAS Yuma, AZ
understanding, and influence on the battlefield. The FoUAS will play a key role in
all USMC missions across the range of military operations to include forward VMU-2 MAG-14 (RQ-21) MCAS Cherry Point, NC
presence, security cooperation, counterterrorism, crisis response, forcible entry,
prolonged operations, and counterinsurgency.
VMU-3 MAG-24 (RQ-7) MCAS Kaneohe Bay, HI
Marine Unmanned Aircraft Squadrons Alignment
The VMUs operate and maintain Group 3 and above UAS. The realignment of VMU-4 (-) MAG-41 (RQ-7) Camp Pendleton, CA
VMUs from the Marine Aircraft Control Group (MACG) to the Marine Aircraft
Group (MAG) was completed in 2015. This command structure aligns the VMU
community with manned aviation units and enables a seamless relationship with VMX-1 (RQ-21 / CQ-24) MCAS Yuma, AZ
the Marine Aviation Logistics Squadrons (MALS). Other benefits include NAE
advocacy and the inculcation of over 100 years of naval aviation operating
procedures and safety practices. VMUT (FRS) MAG-14 (RQ-21) MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Marine aviation has deliberate plans to locate each VMU aboard a Marine Corps
VMU-5 (-) MAG-41 (CQ-24) TBD TBD
Air Station. Alignment aboard an air station will facilitate future UAS fielding and
provide the necessary infrastructure for the VMUs to establish habitual relations
with MALS and their Group headquarters.
100
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

Reserve Component VMUs and Training Squadron The MUX solution is envisioned as a USMC and USN program of record based on
leveraging technology maturation of programs and industry prototypes. Marine
The reserve VMU exists to augment, reinforce, and sustain the active component
Aviation will continue to pursue opportunities to inform programmatic decisions,
VMU mission. To this end, VMU-4 (-) will field RQ-7Bv2 in FY17 and this will
such as field users’ evaluations, science & technology (S&T) projects, and tactical
provide operational depth to the active component. The VMUT Fleet Replacement
demonstrations (TACDEMOS) in conjunction with large force exercises (LFE). The
Detachment (FRD) currently at MCAS Cherry Point will become a fully operational
DARPA Tern demonstrator system is planned to make its first flight in FY-18 as are
Fleet Replacement Squadron.
several of the industry prototypes.
MAGTF Unmanned Expeditionary Capabilities (MUX) ICD – MEF
VMX-1 and MAWTS-1 ADT&E teams will continue to conduct testing and
Level Support evaluation of UAS and UAS Payloads. The intent of these opportunities is to put
Recognizing our current recapitalization toward a more diverse, lethal, amphibious emerging UAS technologies into Marines’ hands and allow them to employ the
and middleweight expeditionary force, the Marine Corps requires a UAS that is systems in various training or real-world scenarios.
network-enabled, digitally interoperable, and built to execute responsive,
persistent, lethal, and adaptive full-spectrum operations. The MUX ICD will inform Additionally, during these iterative development processes UAS will be utilized to
a system that provides the MEF/MEB-sized MAGTF with an advanced multi- evaluate software defined radios to support multiple waveforms serving as key
mission platform. persistent nodes in distributed network concepts.

In accordance with the Department of Defense Unmanned Systems Integrated

Roadmap (FY2013-2038), the Marine Corps will seek opportunities to achieve
affordable and cost-effective technical solutions for MUX. The concept of
employment will be shipboard capable and expeditionary. It will be a multi-sensor,
electronic warfare, C4 bridge, AAW and strike capability at ranges complementary
to MV-22 and F-35, giving MAGTF commanders flexible, persistent, and lethal
reach. It will provide scalable MAGTF support deploying as detachments or
squadrons supporting commanders at the tactical, operational, and strategic
levels.

101
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

MAGTF Unmanned Expeditionary Capabilities (MUX) ICD – Utility

The Cargo Resupply UAS (CRUAS) effort began as a Military Utility Assessment (MUA) in response to a 2009 JUONS and has enhanced the Marine Corps’ assault support
capabilities. It has reduced the vulnerability of logistics convoys supporting Marines stationed at remote combat outposts. The Marine Corps operated the Lockheed Martin
K-MAX in OEF since December 2011. With a range of 84 miles and a payload capacity of 4500 pounds, it flew over 2000 sorties and delivered over 4.4 million pounds of cargo
from December 2011 to May 2014. It demonstrated a consistent 95% readiness rate and 1.5 maintenance man-hours per flight hour.

At the conclusion of OEF the K-MAX system returned to CONUS and underwent repair and reset at the OEM. The system is based with VMX-1 in MCAS Yuma. Several
incremental upgrades to include external fuel tanks, high definition EO/IR sensor ball and through-the-rotor beyond line of sight datalink will allow the KMAX to expand the
Group 4 CONOPS envelope and continue to refine MUX experimentation and risk reduction.

102
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

RQ-7Bv2 Shadow – MEF/MEB Level Support designator, a high-reliability engine, a beyond-line-of-sight (BLOS) control
capability, and an increased launch weight.
The RQ-7B Shadow replaced RQ-2 Pioneer in 2007. The Marine Corps has
continued to leverage interoperability and commonality with Army Shadow units
These initiatives will expand the capability and persistence of the Blackjack in the
conducting similar missions. The systems currently fielded among the VMUs are
battle space and are integral to realizing the future potential of the system. We
progressing with upgrades to be in compliance with DoD mandates for type 1
have already purchased a high reliability (GFE) engine and will integrate it in FY-18.
encryption on UAS. The RQ-7B is a rail launched aircraft that is dependent on a
short runway for landing. The RQ-7B remains a key component to the VMUs The RQ-21A Blackjack achieved Initial Operational Capability in January of 2016.
current readiness and continued ability to support the MAGTF. As of December VMU-2 currently has (5) RQ-21A systems and is planning to support the 24th MEU
2015 VMU-3 has completed its conversion to the RQ-7Bv2. VMU-4 is planned to in 2017 with one system and detachment of Marines. VMU-1 currently has (3) RQ-
complete conversion to RQ-7Bv2 in 2017. 21A systems and is planning to support the 15th MEU in 2017.
RQ-21A Blackjack – MEU/Regimental Level Support
RQ-21A provides UAS support to the Marine Expeditionary Unit, regiments, and
MARSOC. RQ-21A enhances the capabilities of MEU and regimental-sized units by
providing a long endurance, expeditionary, multi-mission platform that is
shipboard capable. RQ-21A is also able to operate from land based forward
operating bases. Characterized by its runway independence, multi-sensor, and
EMS capabilities RQ-21A will enhance the MAGTF commander’s battlespace
awareness and influence of the electromagnetic spectrum.

With its multiple payload capacity, the RQ-21A will continue to evolve to meet the
shifting priorities of the MAGTF commander. Several payloads with the
appropriate size, weight, and power (SWaP) are being developed for integration
on the Blackjack. Hyperspectral payloads capable of detecting explosives; EMS
payloads capable of monitoring spectrum; synthetic aperture radar (SAR) / ground
moving target indicator (GMTI) capable of detecting targets through clouds and
tree cover; miniature precision weapons and quadcopter launch and recovery
systems…these are examples of payloads in either research or development for
RQ-21A.

A key enabler for realizing the full capability of the RQ-21A is its L-class amphibious
carrier shipboard capability. Currently, ship installs are complete for LPD-17 thru
25 class ships with LPD-20/26 planned for late FY17. Additionally, one LHD install
will be completed in FY17 and one in FY18. Marine Aviation is pursuing RQ-21A
compatibility for all ARG shipping in order to provide maximum employment
flexibility for the MAGTF commander both afloat and ashore.

Initiatives are underway to increase the RQ-21A performance and capabilities. The
four highest priorities for Blackjack improvements are improved sensor with laser
103
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

UAS Payloads & Capabilities Simplified Electronic Warfare System Interface (SEWSI), Raptor-X, full-motion
video, and other software applications. The ability to display friendly, enemy
Acquisition paths for payloads will be defined by three (3) phases and each marked
units, aircraft, targets, and signals of interest to various disadvantaged users from
by a decision gate. Phase I establishes the preliminary integration design concept
the squad to MEF level will be an instrumental definition of this system. All of the
and conduct of technology demonstration with validation of a Technology
above listed kill-chain, digitally interoperable, and battle space awareness
Readiness Level (TRL) 5/6. Phase II establishes full payload-to-UAS integration and
applications are critical to the MAGTF commander’s ability to influence the EMS,
achievement of TRL 7 or higher constitute the decision gate for Phase III. Phase III
integrate fires, maneuver, and shorten kill chains. TIPS Block 3 will be the
is program of record transition, which supports a production decision based on the
interface for the fusion.
exit criteria from Phase II.

For SIGINT (Spectral Bat): Additionally, TIPS Block 3 will significantly augment the ability of the VMU to
efficiently execute the task, collect, process, exploit, and disseminate (TCPED)
In FY17 we will be deploying our second series of SIGINT/ES payloads to the MEU cycle. As the number and capability of airborne sensors on the battlefield
as a Field User Evaluation (FUE). In FY17 we move into a Phase 4 SIGINT effort and increases, so will the amount of data that is collected. TIPS Block 3 will act as a
will make the POR transition which will create an EW capability for the VMU. digitally interoperable hub for the collection, cataloguing and storage of full
motion video, multi-intelligence sensor data, topological data, and target
For RADAR (Split Aces):
information.
In FY17 we will be continuing field user evaluation on the first series of AESA
RADAR payloads for RQ-21. Venues for FUEs will be aboard deployed MEUs to TIPS Block 3 will be able to measure the available bandwidth and determine the
formulate CONOPS and TPP development as well as refined hardware and optimal means to disseminate intelligence products. Future iterations of TIPS Block
software designs. Additionally, in FY17 we will move into a version 2 RADAR effort 3 will use advanced algorithms to analyze the vast amount of data as it is collected
that increases RADAR payload capability and include key enablers such as inflight and autonomously cue operators to defined areas of interest. TIPS Block 3
selectable communications. completes the full capability of the digitally interoperable VMU. Incorporating TIPS
Block 3 into a program of record is an imperative for the UAS community.
Others:
In FY17, we begin work on a Wide Area Persistence Surveillance capability. These Headquarters Marine Corps Aviation is working with PMA-263, PMA-234, and
are POM-18 efforts for the USMC but are currently being supported but Office of C2CEWID for this requirement.
Naval Research (ONR) and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

Tactical ISR Processing, Exploitation, and Dissemination System

(TIPS) Block 3
A key enabler for realizing the full capability of the regimental to MEF level family
of UAS is TIPS Block 3. Currently in development, TIPS Block 3 will fuse information
collected from the unmanned aircraft with information from other off board data
systems. It will allow the UAS pilot to control the aircraft while fusing , displaying ,
and disseminating common operational picture data starting with Link 16,

104
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

Small Unit Remote Scouting System (SURSS) Family of Small UAS RQ-12A Wasp
(FoSUAS) – Battalion/Company/Platoon Level of Support The micro sized Wasp is a ruggedized, lightweight, portable UAS ideal for platoon
To out-think, out-maneuver and outpace the enemy, effective leadership and and squad operations. Its small size and quiet battery-driven propulsion system
decision-making at the lowest level requires decision-speed and decision-space. To makes Wasp nearly undetectable. The system is fully waterproofed, has a high
build speed and space before the pivot point, small unit leaders need the most tolerance to wind, and is well suited for amphibious operations. The Wasp was
current and accurate battlespace information at their disposal. designed for front-line day/night reconnaissance and surveillance with a weight of
2.75 pounds, wingspan of 3.3 feet, and up to 50 minutes endurance. Wasp uses
The aim of USMC SURSS FoSUAS is to equip the squad/platoon/company/battalion the same advanced technology found in the RQ-11B, is controllable through a
level operating force maneuver units with a capable, responsive, and organic common GCS, and video may be viewed from RVT devices.
airborne battle space awareness and kinetic capability.
RQ-20A Puma
SURSS are man portable, all-environment, ruggedized, low-cost, and simple to The Puma is the largest platform in the FoSUAS and is capable of integrating
operate. Ideally, SURSS shall be able to operate across the full spectrum of supplemental payloads such as communications/data relay and SIGINT devices.
conflict, in every environment and in the same conditions as the front line Puma also uses a DDL communications link and carries an electro-optical (EO)
operating forces that they support. Technology solutions that support a single- camera, infrared (IR) camera and laser illuminator on a lightweight mechanical
operator, multi-mission, and multi-intelligence capable platform shall be pursued gimbaled payload. The system is hand-launched, launchable from a vehicle while
whenever practicable. Additionally, Marine Aviation will pursue a VTOL, nano- on the move, and has an optional tactical launcher for reducing launch mishaps
VTOL and Lethal Miniature Aerial Munition System (LMAMS) capability. An open with heavier payloads. The Puma GCS is also compatible with the Raven and Wasp
architecture common SURSS controller is envisioned for the entire small GCS. The system is fully waterproof, capable of recovery on land or water
unmanned sensor portfolio; which may interface with target location, designation (supplemental payload dependent). It weighs 13.5 pounds with an 9.2 foot
and hand-off systems (TLDHS) to reduce the combat load of the infantryman while wingspan and has an endurance of over 3.5 hours.
facilitating responsive fires and MAGTF command and control. The current SURSS
FoSUAS is made up of three UAS platforms: RQ-11B Raven, RQ-12A Wasp, and RQ- VTOL and Nano-VTOL SUAS
20A Puma. Headquarters Marine Corps Aviation, working with FMID, FAA, Marine Future SURSS procurement strategy will move towards a more modular approach
Corps Installations, MARSOC, and PMA-263, will continue to streamline and with an eye towards cost reduction and more rapid capability introduction.
identify policy, training, and innovation necessary to address these burgeoning Development of a common ground control station (GCS) will eliminate the need to
future SURSSs requirements. procure a GCS with every system, and allow one GCS to control multiple types of
SURSSs. By moving towards standardized interfaces, the rapid technology
RQ-11B Raven development cycle for payloads can be capitalized upon without requiring more
Raven have a mini-gimbaled payload, can be manually operated or programmed costly replacements of the entire system.
for autonomous operation, and use an enhanced digital data link. With a
wingspan of 4.5 feet and a weight of 4.7 pounds, the hand-launched Raven VTOL and nano-VTOL SURSSs will complement the capabilities of the current
provides aerial observation, day or night, at line-of-sight ranges up to 10 family of SUAS in areas where vertical obstructions or confined operations create
kilometers. It is equipped with color electro-optical; black and white low light; and unique challenges. Lethal Miniaturized Aerial Munitions Systems will provide an
infrared (IR) payloads, and provides small units with day/night full motion video unprecedented organic precision low-yield precision strike and defensive fires
and laser illuminator capability via a laptop-based ground control station (GCS). capability that can be widely distributed to front line, forward deployed, and
The rechargeable batteries in the Raven provide an endurance of up to 90 isolated/independent units. VTOL quadcopters also offer exceptional promise as
minutes. expeditionary launch and recovery systems for Group 3 UAS.

105
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

UAS Training As the role of SURSSs expands, TALSAs will increase training throughput to meet
MAGTF demands by integrating military personnel with the current contractor
The VMU community, Headquarters Marine Corps Aviation, and PMA-263 are
staff. Forward Air Controllers (FACs) and Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTACs)
currently in the process of standing up a Fleet Replacement Detachment (FRD) for
will attend training as SURSSs capabilities increase. TALSAs will support the
RQ-21. MAWTS-1 Air Officer Course in order to ensure Air Officers are aware of the latest
capabilities and emerging trends with SURSSs.
RQ-21A aircrew and maintainers require an MOS producing curriculum and
school-house. Mobile Training Teams (MTT’s) have been the interim solution for FUTURE PLANS
RQ-21A training. As RQ-21A fielding progresses, MAG-14, as the T/M/S lead, will
Experimentation and Innovation
manage the Blackjack 1000-level T&R curriculum development and training. This
1000-level training will migrate from contractor provided Mobile Training Teams Led by MAWTS-1 and VMX-1, and in close coordination with MCTOG, MCLOG,
(MTTs) to the VMUT FRD. PMA-263 and CNATT will support MAG-14 with MCWL, MARSOC, national laboratories, and industry, Aviation will continue tactical
curriculum development and training execution. demonstrations to validate innovative uses for existing and emerging UAS
technologies. The lessons learned from this experimentation will inform
The current simulator program of record for RQ-21A are not funded to a level
programmatic and employment decisions across Marine Aviation’s FoUAS.
commensurate with a high fidelity simulation based syllabus. A robust, networked,
high fidelity simulation solution is required for RQ-21A curricula in order to realize
Marine Aviation’s vision for the VMU FRD. To this end UAS simulators and training
systems will be included in the Aviation Training Systems (ATS) plan.

The VMU FRD will evolve to a squadron (FRS) unit manned with instructors and
staff from across the VMU community. It will ensure the 1000 level training of the
VMUs is efficiently and effectively accomplished.

Training and Logistics Support Activity (TALSA)

Training and Logistics Support Activities(TALSAs) to support SURSSs has been

established at Camp Pendleton, CA and Camp Lejeune, NC. TALSAs reduce training
costs by 70% and are responsive to operating forces’ dynamic SURSS training
requirements. TALSAs were also established to reduce operations and
maintenance costs for fielded systems by providing a consolidated activity to
manage each MEF’s requirements. SURSS training and logistics support is an
enduring USMC capability and requires transition from OCO to base funding. This
initiative maintains Mobile Training Teams (MTT) funding for units not co-located
with TALSAs.

106
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

Joint Research and Collaboration

Programs such as the DARPA TERN, DARPA Aerial Reconfigurable Embedded
System (ARES), and ONR Autonomous Aerial Cargo Utility System (AACUS) will
inform future UAS capability decisions. Technologies developed in these, and
other, research programs will be critically evaluated to assess feasibility for
transfer to existing or future programs of record. The Marine Corps is working
closely with the Navy on MUX, with TERN as a potential solution, and is a co-
sponsor of the ARES effort with the Army.

Key Technology Development.

Aviation will pursue the following key technology areas:

Digital Interoperability.
Because of their persistence, unmanned systems are perfectly suited to serve as
airborne data network relays and gateways. Emerging technologies, such as SRP,
will be integrated onto unmanned platforms at the earliest opportunity.

Electronic Warfare (EW).

UAS are a component of the MAGTF EW concept. Coupling new UAS employment
concepts with emerging payloads provides the Marine Corps the ability to
influence the EM Spectrum--providing additional critical advantages in the battle
space. UAS provide the MAGTF commander with a persistent lethal and flexible
capability.

National Airspace (NAS) Integration.

The Marine Corps has taken a key role in ground based sense and avoid (GBSAA)
systems for UAS. It operated the first certified GBSAA system at MCAS Cherry
Point. In conjunction with DoD, NASA, and the FAA, the VMU community will
continue to develop standards and procedures for UAS integration in the NAS as
well as field similar systems to the rest of the MCASs that have VMU squadrons.

107
2.8 MARINE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

UAS SUSTAINMENT
Naval Aviation Enterprise (NAE) Inclusion

The RQ-7 is in the NAE briefing cycle, while the RQ-21A is being incorporated into
the NAE and moving forward towards full NAE incorporation. RQ-21A will be fully
integrated in the NAE no later than FY2017.

Current projects include:

Naval Aviation Maintenance Program (NAMP):
UAS Equipment Optimization
In an effort to bring UAS into compliance with Naval Aviation Maintenance
HQMC Aviation and the MARFORs conducted a comprehensive review of all
Program (NAMP), a 2014 comprehensive NAMP review was completed by HQMC
ground equipment used for UAS operations. The review identified excess ground
Aviation and NAVAIR. This was done in order to determine which aspects of the
gear for a proposed Table of Equipment (T/E) allowance reduction. Moreover,
NAMP require modification, deviation, or change so that UAS can be in compliance
certain RQ-21A Program Procured Equipment (PPE) items will not be fielded or
with established Commander, Naval Air Forces (CNAF) policy
fielded at a reduced quantity based upon the results of a thorough analysis of
(COMNAVAIRFORINST 4790.2B). Out of this review came several recommended
required equipment sets to support UAS operations. Finally, as the VMUs are
updates to the NAMP. The recommended updates have been processed by
aligned under the MAG, the Marine Wing Support Squadrons (MWSS) and Marine
Commander, Naval Air Forces (CNAF) and will be reflected in the next NAMP
Aviation Logistics Squadrons (MALS) will provide an increased level of aviation
update CY2016.
ground support to the UAS squadrons that is commensurate to the level of
support provided to fixed and rotary wing squadrons. MWSS and MALS aviation
Common Maintenance Reporting System for UAS:
support to the UAS squadrons will be an critical enabling factor in the squadrons’
Since the fielding of UAS to the Marine Corps, UAS have not been able to utilize ability to conduct expeditionary operations.
Naval Aviation Logistics Command Management Information System (NALCOMIS)
Optimized Organizational Maintenance Activity (OOMA). The Marine Corps in this
community has established MCC for maintainer proficiency and tracking.

With the fielding of RQ-21A, a way forward has been established to move UAS
onto NALCOMIS OOMA for NAMP compliance readiness reporting and tracking. As
RQ-21A is fielded to the VMUs, it will allow NAVAIR, working with HQMC Aviation
and SPAWAR, to baseline RQ-21A into NALCOMIS OOMA. The goal is to baseline
RQ-21A into NALCOMIS OOMA for all VMUs by FY-17.

108
2.8 FAMILY OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (FOUAS) ROADMAP

109
SURSS FIXED WING FIELD PLAN

Organization RQ-12 Wasp RQ-11 Raven RQ-20 Puma

FY19
FY17

FY18

FY20

FY21

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21
I MEF 30 30 30 30 30 48 44 44 44 44 13 20 23 23 23
II MEF 24 24 24 24 24 42 38 38 38 38 13 20 20 22 22
III MEF 8 8 8 8 8 18 14 14 14 14 2 14 14 14 14
MARFORRES 24 24 24 24 24 32 30 30 30 30 0 5 10 14 14
MARSOC 50 50 50 50 50 0 0 0 0 0 22 22 22 22 22
Support Est. 5 5 5 5 5 20 18 18 18 18 2 6 6 6 6
DMFA 2 2 2 2 2 4 4
TOTALS 143 143 143 143 143 160 144 144 144 144 52 87 95 105 105

110
SURSS VTOL FIELD PLAN

Organization Nano UAS VTOL UAS

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21
MARSOC 58 58 58 58 58 22 22 22 22 22
2X MEU 12 12 12 12 12 2 2 2 2 2
2Y MEU 12 12 12 12 12 2 2 2 2 2
2Z MEU 12 12 12 12 2 2 2 2
1X MEU 12 12 12 12 12 2 2 2 2 2
1Y MEU 12 12 12 12 12 2 2 2 2 2
1Z MEU 12 12 12 12 2 2 2 2
31 MEU 12 12 12 12 2 2 2 2
SPMAGTF (4) 48 48 48 48 48 8 8 8 8 8
I MEF 42 84 84 14
II MEF 24 48 48 8
III MEF 24 4
Support Est 12 24 24 24 24 2 4 4 6 6

TOTALS 166 214 280 346 370 40 48 48 50 76

111
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

112
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

The aviation logistics (AVLOG) community will continue to develop and lead Re-write, improve and standardize existing follow-on training curriculums:
operational and strategic level initiatives to improve and sustain Marine aviation
material readiness. Initiatives will modernize existing and time-tested AVLOG 1) Basic organizational structure & key processes
safety, training, and support strategies, as well as capitalize on emerging
capabilities and technologies offered by today’s commercial and military industrial 2) Practical application of skills & key processes (basic, intermediate and advanced)
base. Collectively, these efforts will enhance the ACE by improving the readiness
(e.g. safety, effectiveness, reliability and availability) of Marine Corps aircraft, as 3) Concepts & tools commensurate with squadron level responsibilities
well as improve the required depth and capacity of associated weapon systems,
4) Introduction to operational, strategic and joint level concepts
personnel and equipment. ASL leadership will pursue these objectives along three
primary Lines of Effort (LOEs):
5) Certification and standardization protocols
LOE 1: Deliberately target AVLOG professional development Non-Traditional Training Opportunities
ASL and the AVLOG community are aggressively pursuing and implementing ASL serves as the lead for MAGTF Logistics Integration for the Deputy
manpower and training related changes that will transform the professional Commandant for Aviation. 2016 saw an increase in the exploration of additive
development of our AVLOG community. These initiatives include: manufacturing techniques, such as 3D printing, as well as other non-standard
processes. In summer 2016 Marine Aviation sent its first Marine to 3D scanning
1) Strategically assign officers and enlisted Marines to key billets and printing training for assets usually reserved for science & technology experts
at NAVAIR. Marine Aviation, along with Marine Corps ground logistics leadership,
2) Facilitate the orderly escalation of experience and development milestones continue to explore training opportunities outside of the Marine Corps and Navy
to better leverage the creativity and problem-solving ability of our junior Marines.
3) Renew focus reviewing and improving MOS manuals and roadmaps
Avionics Officer and Avionics Chief Course
4) Pre-requisite professional qualifications for promotion to Sergeant and Staff Sergeant
ASL, in conjunction with TECOM and CNATT, will create a curriculum and formal
5) Implement industry “exchanges” for selected enlisted maintenance Marines course for newly promoted Avionics Officers and Avionics Chiefs at the Master
Sergeant Rank that addresses proficiency levels required by Commands from the
6) Increase AVLOG influence and representation in contracting officer billets subject matter expert to include Aircraft Survivability Equipment, Electronic
Countermeasures Equipment, Electronic Keying Material, Laser System Safety,
7) Facilitate and foster increased participation in fleet prioritization processes Digital Interoperability, and 5th Generation Avionics systems.

8) Capitalize on and improve the newly established T&R program

9) Increase Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA)

compliance/overmatch

10) Optimally align DAWIA certifications with key fleet and external support billets

113
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

Advanced Wire Repair Training

Declining material condition across every T/M/S is impacting all wiring types and severely affecting current readiness. There is inadequate training and familiarity within the
maintenance community. Lack of familiarity regarding the importance of wiring systems and apparent lack of focus on funding priorities for wiring at the system level are all
contributing factors needing resolution to affect current readiness.

1) Establish funding in order to maintain the Advanced Wiring Just in Time Training currently taught at CNATT New River and expand training to CNATT Camp Pendleton.

2) Implement a 4790 addition to include Electronic Wiring Interconnect System (EWIS) as a formal program.

3) Continue maximum fleet participation in biannual Joint Services Wire Action Group (JSWAG) and Joint Fiber Optic Working Group (JFOWG) events.

Advanced Aviation Management Training (AAMT) Course

The AAMT course is being developed in conjunction with TECOM and will provide instruction to maintenance Staff Non-Commissioned Officers on how to develop long term
maintenance, manpower, and materiel planning to improve aviation readiness. Focusing on four critical areas: Maintenance Management, Manpower Management,
Training Management, and Advanced Skills Management (ASM).

The challenge for the aviation maintenance manager is to ensure that the maintenance department is to provide safe, mission-capable aircraft to satisfy all mission
requirements. The key to the manager's success is to consistently make the right decisions that will result in successful mission accomplishment. The focus is developing skills
to understanding aviation management and the complexities of operating an effective maintenance department.

Advanced Maintenance Officers Course (AMOC)

The advanced maintenance officers course for 6002/6004/75XX, is currently in development which will compliment and build upon the highly successful WTI program at
MAWTS-1. This course will be taught by MAWTS-1 in conjunction with each WTI class , beginning in class 2-17.

114
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

LOE 2: Increase the depth, capacity and reach of our operations Maintenance
sustainment capability
1) Aligning maintenance and operations planning process
Marine aviation logistics is critical to the success of the ACE. Accordingly, AVLOG
capabilities will be shaped and refined in order to meet today’s and tomorrow’s 2) Accurately quantify the training levels across a squadron’s maintenance department
Marine Corps aviation (and overall MAGTF) readiness requirements. Specific
initiatives aimed at increasing the depth, capacity and reach of our operations 3) Identifying and sustaining requisite maintenance core capabilities
sustainment capability include:
4) Building, standardizing and sustaining a highly capable, mission-ready maintenance
workforce

5) Ensuring adequate infrastructure to execute assigned maintenance workload

6) Complete IMP/IMC/PMI events on the flight line as near to the squadrons as possible

Avionics
1) Sustain dedicated sea based capability for rapid movement and employment of USMC
aviation I-Level maintenance facilities, supply support and personnel to sustain fixed
and rotary wing aircraft operations by extending the hull life of the two dedicated
Aviation Logistics Support Ships (T-AVB) 10 years beyond 2019 and 2020, or until a
suitable replacement is in place to ensure a capability gap does not exist.

2) Ensure similar TAVB-like capabilities are fully exploited to meet USMC AVLOG
requirements.

3) Provide interjection during ESC level decisions on right sizing manpower, training and
support equipment to sustain the flight-line.

4) Implement I-Level and O-Level cross training.

5) Endorse configuration control, tracking and distribution of pool stock weapons

systems and support equipment.

6) Explore opportunities to increase avionics repair capability for all TMS aircraft.

7) Champion distributed laydown ISO rebalance to the Pacific.

8) Explore regionalization of Mobile Facilities for expeditionary use from centralized

locations focusing on maintainability and readiness as well as speed of deployment.

115
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

Ordnance ALIMS
The rapidly changing operational environment, combined with increased 1) CNA Study to effectively scope responsibilities and manning requirements for I-Level
operational tempo, poses challenges for the ordnance community that are and O-Level aviation information systems
magnified by the pace of technology, end strength reductions and fiscal
limitations. Creative responses are required to meet these challenges. To that 2) Align and synchronize efforts to Marine Corps Enterprise Network Unification
end, we will aggressively pursue: Campaign Plan

1) TMS Cross Training and strategic pairing of ordnance officers and chiefs 3) Constant communication of aviation information systems requirements to MITSCs,
MCNOSC, C4, OPFOR G6 and Navy IT department
2) Modernize Class V(A) support packages: MCAPP, MPSRON and MCPP-N
4) Sustaining cybersecurity certifications for ALIMS personnel and improve information
assurance for aviation information systems
3) Maximize efficient use of O&M,N; eliminate funding redundancies
5) Reformat current MCO 2020.1, ALIMS SOP, to NAVMC and align to CNAF inspection
4) Communicate valid and clearly defined requirements to resource sponsors
policies
5) Advocate for automated IT solutions and additive manufacturing solutions MAGTF Logistics Integration
6) Advocate for modern logistics solutions (e.g. additive Manufacturing) 1) Continue to synchronize the efforts of the cargo UAS proponents in both Aviation and
DC, I & L.
7) Implement CAD/PAD Fleet Returns process at all Marine Corps Air Stations.
2) Identify emerging technologies for use by maintainers closer to the flight line.
8) Reduce Aviation Armament System (AAS) maintenance (Level III preservation, right-
sizing the MAGs) 3) Initiate efforts to identify and leverage corollaries between aviation logistics and
ground logistics to enable increased unity of effort within the MAGTF.
9) Improve upon expeditionary and CONUS explosives safety posture

10) Review, improve and modernize formal schools course curriculum

Supply
1) We are attacking our current unacceptable NMCS rate, and the root causes for it.

2) Continue the roll-out of the Mission Essential Sub-System Matrix Strategy

3) Support and assist DLA/FRC in the effort to improve accuracy of bills of material

4) Support NAVSUP and FRC effort to improve depot component repair performance

5) CWO-2 embedded at DLA to monitor fleet demand for consumables on long-term

contracts and ensure vendors receive accurate demand forecasts.

6) Implement MALSP Mod allowancing to H-1, AV8-B, and C-130 in FY17

116
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

LOE 3: Modernize AVLOG support strategies and expand Supply

operational capability
The focused efforts to improve the supply chain that supports Marine Aviation
Today’s dynamic global environment demands flexible and scalable capabilities. have netted some important improvements. The FY16 AVPLAN spelled out the
Increased operational tempo, split and disaggregated operations and constrained intent to improve the way we organize spare parts at the tactical level to better
resources mandate the modernization of written doctrine and its associated support detachments and deployments. MARADMIN 175/16 announced the
enablers: implementation of MALSP Modernization allowancing methodology, which will
help to optimize use of material resources at the tactical level and better support
Maintenance distributed operations. The implementation of MALSP Mod is a significant
milestone for Marine aviation.
1) Achieve an optimally trained, skilled, and ready workforce
Another success is the addition of nine AVLOG Marines to DLA Aviation in
2) Improve aircraft readiness, safety, reliability, and availability posture
Richmond, including an aviation logistics Colonel. Management of demand signals
and consumable materials will be a critical part of readiness recovery. Accordingly,
3) Close the gap between required readiness and associated costs
the Marines assigned to DLA Richmond have been re-organized into a single cell to
4) Enhance deployed capacity & capability better focus on providing support directly to Marine Aviation.

5) Maintain minimal logistics footprint Although these recent successes are significant, there are many other challenges
that will require concerted effort and coordination across the various commands,
6) Enhance deployed capacity & capability by exploring emerging technologies such as supporting agencies, and stake-holders to overcome. The supply chain that
3D printing and metal coating processes supports Marine aviation is fragmented, antiquated, and not optimized to enable
the required state of readiness in our current fleet. This fact is clearly evidenced
7) Maintain minimal logistics footprint by utilizing MAGTF Distribution Liaison Teams by the low rate of Ready Basic Aircraft (RBA) and unsatisfactory high Non Mission
Capable Supply (NMCS) rates across nearly every T/M/S the Marine Corps
8) Power by the Hour and Contract Maintenance Support concepts currently operates.

9) Organizational, Intermediate, and Depot Level processes Each of the Independent Readiness Reviews conducted to date (AV-8B, CH-53E,
and V-22) identified systematic shortfalls in the sustainment organizations,
10) Accuracy and consistency of maintenance planning processes processes, and resources of the supply chain that supports Marine Aviation.
Accordingly, the focus of effort in FY17 and beyond will be on continuing to
11) Standardize scheduled maintenance stand-downs aggressively attack these daunting challenges.
12) Consolidate maintenance resources (personnel, equipment, facilities) The strategy to reduce the NMCS challenge will be focused on the areas of
consumables, repairable, and manpower.
13) Eliminate non-productive time of assigned maintenance personnel

117
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

Consumables:
1) HQMC continue teaming with DLA, NAVSUP, and NAVAIR to pursue the MESM
inventory strategy.

2) Consumable forecasting is an issue that was identified in by all three IRR’s. Lack of
consumable material accounts for greater than 80% of non-mission capable supply
(NMCS) demands. To address this issue HQMC will assist in developing local MALS
stocking procedures to include an enterprise-wide approach to managing consumable
demand data. A CW0-3 has been assigned to DLA-Richmond to assist with the effort,
and multiple software tools and allowancing parameters are being evaluated to
ensure the correct items and quantities are stocked “plane side” at each MALS and
included in pack-ups to support detachments and deployments.

Repairables:
1) HQMC will continue the MALSP Moderation effort by implementing AV8-B, H-1
W/Y/Z, and C-130 during FY17.

2) HQMC will champion the effort with DLA, NAVSUP, and NAVAIR to pursue
Performance Based Logistics opportunities wherever it makes sense in order to
recapture government/industry accountabilities.

Manpower:
1) HQMC is supporting the Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training (CNATT) effort
to relocate the Marine Corps Aviation Supply Officer Basic Qualification Course from
its current location at NAS Newport RI, to NAS Whiting Field, FL, to be co-located with
the Aviation Maintenance Officer and Aviation Ordnance courses. The long-term
benefits and synergy created by a single center for Marine Aviation-Ground officer
training will be significant.

2) HQMC, in conjunction with the Navy and Fleet, will continue to improve the Training
and Readiness Manual that governs the professional development of our Aviation
Supply Marines.

118
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

Avionics
Aviation Logistics Support Ship T-AVB

1) Explore alternative exercises for real world training that represents present day and future engagements.

2) Continue to explore Logistics Integration opportunities for MAGTF logistics support, to include integration with Combat Logistics Regiments at the Marine Logistics Group.

3) Coordinate Ship-to-Ship and Ship-to-Shore concepts of employment

4) Certify and modify for MV-22 operations aboard both T-AVBs.

5) Validate future MAGTF requirements and increase support beyond ground and aviation logistics requirements.

6) Improve upon MAGTF DI and CYBER/EW through the fielding, training and utilization of the ALQ-231 Intrepid Tiger II Pod

Align the Mobile Facilities Table of Allowance to meet the needs of changing IMRL inventories and supply pack ups for contingency operations to support the requirements of
the MALSP modernization concept. Implement a phased approach to right size the Mobile Facilities inventory and reduce the logistic foot print in support of deployed forces
while ensuring our capabilities meet our unique task.

Ordnance
We are working diligently to strengthen our relationships with service partners, resource sponsors, fleet subject matter experts and other common stakeholders in order to
develop and implement modern, safe and low cost logistics initiatives. These initiatives are intended to serve as the catalysts to drive immediate training and combat
capability force multipliers for the operational community. Specifically, we are seeking to deliver improved depth and capacity in an environment of limited resources and to
provide additional capability options to commanders.

1) Ship board and shore based aircraft hot-loading

2) Fixed-wing integration of the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System

3) Common Weapons Support Equipment (CWSE) enhancements for Distributed Short Take-Off/Vertical Landing (STOVL) Operations.

4) Flight clearances for improved and additional payload combinations

119
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

Collectively these efforts will assist operational commanders with reducing aircraft people, MLI will focus on maintaining the correct balance between combat
turnaround times and increase sortie generation. Additional benefits include, but effectiveness and logistics chain management efficiency, with an ultimate goal of
are not limited to the following: increasing MAGTF readiness.

1) Reduces footprint required at Forward Arming & Refueling Points (FARPs) On 12 September 2014, the Deputy Commandant for Aviation (DCA) and Deputy
Commandant for Installations and Logistics (DC I&L) signed a charter that reaffirms
2) Reduces mechanical problems at FARPs and FOBs the Marine Corps commitment to MLI and re-charters the MLI Group. The MLI
Group addresses and prioritizes MAGTF logistics initiatives with a focus on
3) Reduces aircraft flight hours when transiting to and from target areas leveraging and applying proven best practices to current logistics improvement
initiatives. The MLI Group is empowered to develop specific solutions and
Improves weapon flexibility, lethality and precision options approaches to logistics challenges and make recommendations to the DCA and DC
I&L. To this end, the MLI Group is guided by four principles:
Aviation Logistics Information Management Systems (ALIMS)
1) Provide uninterrupted levels of Aviation Information Systems support for Marine Partnership: Develop an integrated, enterprise approach to MAGTF readiness that
Aviation encompasses the entire logistics chain.

2) Effectively manage transition to next generation of aviation information systems Transformation: MAGTF logistics transformation harnesses the power of
equipment and personnel standardization and integration to develop a logistics enterprise that is focused on
warfighter support.
3) Mitigation of Aviation Information Systems transitional shortfalls
Balance: Ensuring the right balance between effectiveness and efficiency,
4) Manageable incorporation of new aviation information systems reducing cost while improving logistics responsiveness and flexibility internal &
MAGTF Logistics Integration (MLI) external to the MAGTF.

Future operating concepts and fiscal constraints are driving the need to Change/ Risk Management: Through effective management of both change and
modernize and increase the efficiency of MAGTF Logistics. In the past, the ground risk, we will challenge the status quo in the areas of science and technology, policy
and aviation communities embarked on separate modernization efforts, such as and doctrine, business practices and processes, and training and education.
Global Combat Support System-Marine Corps and Marine Aviation Logistics
Support Program II. Separately, each effort did not necessarily aim for integration
of the logistics function into MAGTF future operating concepts. Reviewing current
practices and aligning future initiatives towards the integration of internal MAGTF
logistics will minimize disparate and overlapping processes. MLI is a critical
component for future success of our naval expeditionary forces.

MLI focuses on logistics standardization and optimization across the MAGTF, with
specific concentration on convergent practices associated with expeditionary
(afloat and/or ashore) operations. When addressing processes, technologies and

120
2.9 MARINE AVIATION LOGISTICS PLAN

Summary

These three lines of effort will serve to focus the efforts of the AVLOG community
in FY16 and beyond. The actions and initiatives will enhance readiness through
improved institutional alignment, synchronization efforts, continued development
of our AVLOG Marines, and a relentless focus on sustainment of our aviation
platforms.

The AVLOG community remains focused on strategic and operational objectives

that must be accomplished to transform Marine aviation logistics so that we better
support ACE operations across the ROMO. ASL continually strives to train AVLOG
Marines to be the best in the world at deploying expeditionary AVLOG capabilities
that deliver and sustain aircraft readiness. Maintaining current capabilities, smartly
planning for the sundown of existing platforms and introducing replacement
aircraft are all areas that must be addressed. Keeping Marine aviation ever
present in the skies above our Marines on the ground is our single purpose, and all
that we do is a means to that end.

121
2.10 MARINE AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT PLAN

122
TODAY’S EXPEDITIONARY AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT FORCE

Enabling MAGTF Maneuver, Power Projection, Agility, Depth, and Readiness

The Marine Wing Support Squadron (MWSS) serves as our maneuverable carriers Proven Past Performance; presently responsive; poised for the
ashore and provides the functional support necessary to enable Marine aviation future
operations in an expeditionary environment. These capabilities are also relevant Fulfilling their legislated role as the nation’s “force in readiness,” Marines are
to the joint force commander, where forward basing and the rapid build-up and frequently called upon to rapidly respond to an emerging crisis or strategic
sustainment of aviation combat power are essential. The ability to maneuver the surprise. Even when engaged in “sustained operations ashore,” as experienced in
ACE ashore is critical to the Expeditionary Advanced Base concept set forth in the operations in Afghanistan and Iraq (OEF/OIF), the Marine Corps must retain its
Marine Corps Operating Concept. capabilities as an agile expeditionary force. An expeditionary force is
characterized by speed and versatility, often in austere conditions; it must be fully
Assault capable of engaging across the ROMO. Whether as a supporting component
within a joint force or as a supported joint force, the MAGTF will execute
Support operations and campaigns that range from humanitarian operations and crisis
Anti-Air Control of response, to limited contingency operations through major combat operation
Warfare Aircraft (MCO).
Aviation and Missiles
Marine Wing Support Squadrons are meeting and exceeding expectations across
Ground the globe. From Special Purpose MAGTF Crisis Response missions in Central
Command and Africa Command, to supporting Marine rotational forces – Darwin
Electronic Support Offensive and Australia. The Marines in Marine Wing Support Squadrons and detachments
Warfare Air Support are in every clime and place performing the functions of AGS and enabling Marine
Aerial Aviation to complete its assigned mission.
Reconnaissance
Planning for the future of Aviation Ground Support continues with modernization
of equipment, acquisition of new programs, updating training standards and
reassessing of core Mission Essential Tasks. Whether it be the reactivation of the
Marine Wing Support Groups’ HQ element, upgrading training opportunities,
establishment of alternative MOSs for AGS Weapons and Tactics Instructors, or the
Airfield Support Functions Air Base Support Functions research and development of enhanced equipment and tactics, techniques, and
1) Expeditionary Airfield Services (EAF) 1) Essential Engineer Services procedures (TTPs) that will enable the MAGTF to maneuver within the littorals to
2) Expeditionary Rescue and Firefighting 2) Internal Airfield Communications support power projection operations; the aviation ground support units will be
(EFR) 3) Routine/Emergency Sick Call ready.
3) Aircraft and Ground Refueling 4) Air Base Commandant
4) Explosive Ordnance Disposal 5) Motor Transport
6) Field Messing
7) Airfield Security Operations

123
TODAY’S EXPEDITIONARY AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT FORCE

Marine wing support group

We believe that the reactivation of the active duty Marine Wing Support Group
(MWSG) HQ is required In order to fill an operational command and control gap.
This initiative will place a task organized, effective, and efficient headquarters
capable of command and controlling subordinate units with efficiencies gained
through logical sharing of personnel and resources. The MWSG will enable
increased operational tempo of both the supported and supporting units. The
MWSG HQ ensures seamless AGS operations during major combat operations.

Marine wing support squadrons

The MWSS remains the ACEs premier task-organized unit, built specifically to
enable Marine aviation to conduct operations at the time and location of the
commander’s choice. Outfitted with the a specifically tailored table of
organization and equipment set, the MWSS maintains the capability to establish,
operate and play its role in the security of one main airbase and two forward
arming and refueling points simultaneously. FY 17 will see 8 active component
MWSSs, an MWSS (-) and 3 reserve component MWSSs manned, trained and
equipment for the future fight.

Marine wing support detachments

Marine Wing Support Detachments are task organized to meet the AGS
requirement of their supported MAG. They differ in size and capability. There are
two standing MWSDs, though the capability to task organize from an MWSS is
common practice.

Marine Wing Support

Squadron -273 and
British Army engineers
install a VTOL pad
in support of the F-35B
at Royal International
Air Tattoo, summer
2016

124
AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT THROUGH 2025

The first step toward the future Capabilities Description Documents (CDD) development, based from community CBAs
, that will potentially lead to material programs used to alleviate gaps within the EFR
The AGS community is actively updating doctrine to meet the rapidly changing and EAF MOSs.
future operational environment. The capstone to the effort is the MCWP 3-21.1,
Aviation Ground Support, which is near completion and should be published in 7) DOTmLPF-P Change Requests continue in the EFR and EAF MOSs to ensure
2017. In addition, to accurately reflect the capabilities of an MWSS, the Mission capabilities (doctrine, training, manpower, etc.) are in place to support the MAGTF
Essential Task List and the MWSS Training and Readiness Manual are being when conducting interrelated military activities involving combat, security,
updated. engagement, and relief/reconstruction activities in a distributed operations
environment.
Remaining responsive and relevant as an aviation combat
multiplier 8) Significant progress in the testing of a lightweight matting solution continues. This
effort will enable the ACE to project power and gain access to the littorals in support
In close coordination with MAWTS-1 and the AGS executive steering committee, of the MAGTF.
the AGS community continues to align AGS TTPs with existing and emergent
Marine aviation platforms such as the F-35, MV-22, MQ-21, and CH-53K.
Currently there are several significant efforts underway :

1) Enabling the concept of distributed operations. By continually testing and working

with T/M/S leads, HQMC and MAWTS-1 continue to refine the required support for
this distributed operation template.

2) Development of a new concept of employment for Airfield Damage Repair (ADR)

which will increase repair cycle times and improve the quality of repairs-in order to
ensure faster sortie generation. With the development of this new concept comes an
upgrade to the current ADR kit. The new ADR kit will be augmented by a mobile
mixer, upgraded tools, new Foreign Object Debris cover, and rapid setting crater fill
material.

3) Creation of the AGS WTI MOS (7077). This MOS will allow HQMC Aviation to track
and then properly align Marines with the skillsets and knowledge required to plan
and employ AGS units. This initiative will align the AGS Marines with students from
MCLOG, MCTOG and others from MAWTS-1.

4) Refinement of the AGS input and participation as a training unit at service level
exercises including WTI and ITX is imperative and an ongoing effort. An OAG
appointed OPT is leading this effort.

5) Integration of an AGS training cell at MAGTF-Training Command/Tactical Training and

Exercise Control Group will occur in 2016. Four AGS Coyotes will be put in place to
train and evaluate AGS units.

6) Initial Capabilities Documents for EFR and EAF have been completed that will lead to

125
AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT MATERIEL INITIATIVES

P-19R (P-19A replacement) (Fielding FY17-FY20) EAF Sustainment Lighting System (SLS) (FY19-FY20)
This initiative replaces the A/S32P-19A Aircraft Crash and Structure Fire Fighting Current EAF hard-wire lighting system utilizes 1960-era technology, is
Truck, known as the P-19A. The P-19A was introduced in 1984 with a service life of maintenance intensive, and consistently encounters logistical challenges due to
12 years and has undergone two depot level rebuilds. parts obsolescence.

1) The P-19A is the Marine Corps’ only major aircraft fire fighting vehicle utilized at 1) SLS will fill a capability gap by providing mandatory runway lighting required for
Marine Corps Air Stations and Forward Operating Bases for immediate response to Category I, precision Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) approaches. This will serve to
aircraft emergencies (primary) and structural fires (secondary). effectively integrate Air Traffic Control (ATC) and EAF capabilities to provide a safer
operational environment in degraded or reduced visibility landing environments.
2) The new vehicle is compliant with current National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
standards for aircraft rescue and fire fighting vehicles, resulting in a vehicle optimized 2) All available modern energy efficiency technology (Improved batteries, solar
for operator and crew safety. capability) will be leveraged to increase performance and sustainability. In addition,
the new lighting system will be lighter, easily adaptable to various airfield
3) Equipment updates and enhancements will significantly enhance the ability of ARFF configurations, and heat-resistant to support MV-22 and F-35 operations.
Marines to fulfill their secondary mission by providing more effective base camp
structural firefighting support.

4) The level of drivetrain and power-pack commonality (up to 75%) with current USMC
tactical vehicles (MTVR and LVSR) will result in more efficient supply and maintenance
supportability. Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) fire fighting components will
increase parts availability and sustainability. The addition of an Integral Auxiliary
Power Unit (APU) will greatly reduce engine idle time during standby, resulting in
increased fuel efficiency and engine longevity. The off road capability will ensure
operations in austere locations-such as those supporting distributed short take-off,
vertical land (STOVL) operations (DSO)-will be supported.

126
AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT MATERIEL INITIATIVES

MV-22 Capable light-weight matting

This initiative will develop and field, to the MWSS Expeditionary Airfield Platoon, a
light-weight matting solution that will withstand the heat signature produced by
the MV-22 aircraft. There are possible COTS solutions available that are currently
undergoing testing at Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) as part
of an Expeditionary Airfield (EAF) Congressional plus-up. A gap was identified in
the EAF 2014 Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA) for MV-22 capable light-weight
matting, subsequently, an EAF Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) has been staffed
and a light-weight matting Capabilities Description Document (CDD) is slated to
kick-off in late June 2016.

Replacement lightweight mat will is being tested to meet the following Key
Performance Parameters (KPP) and Key System Attributes (KSA):

1) The system shall support the operations of both aircraft and ground support vehicles

2) The matting shall withstand the heat/flux duration of MV-22 air and ground
operations with degradation of structural integrity

3) The system should require minimum ground preparation, minimum CBR of four

4) EAF Marines should be able to install the matting at a rate of 600 square feet per
man-hour using a four man crew

5) The matting system must contain a non-skid surface and mate with AM-2 medium
duty matting system

6) Matts shall be recoverable and suitable for reuse after being subject to a conditional
inspection, cleaned, and repackaged

7) The matt shall be able to withstand exposure to all POLs without degradation to
performance or structure

127
AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT MATERIEL INITIATIVES

Airfield Damage Repair

The Marine Corps requires an Airfield Damage Repair (ADR) Kit capable of
creating useable landing surfaces by new construction or repair of existing
surfaces. This mission has been repeatedly tested during recent operations in
Afghanistan and Iraq. The ADR Kit must take advantage of modern
developments in construction equipment and materials, must be easily
deployable, flexible enough to work in all geographic locations and
environments, and provide the capability to quickly repair craters and spalls of
all sizes. The required capability for one ADR Kit is to provide the tools and
materials to repair six 10-foot diameter craters, in a concrete surface, and/or
fifteen 10-foot diameter craters, in an asphalt surface, in less than 92 minutes
plus (+) a two hour curing period. One ADR Kit must also contain the materials
to repair 45 spalls in a concrete surface.

Concept of Employment
With the ever-changing face of future expeditionary operations, there will be
an increasingly significant reliance on the air component of the MAGTF. An
airfield damage repair capability that takes advantage of modern
developments in construction equipment and materials is key to any
expeditious preparation and/or rehabilitation of existing airfields. With the
current technology and updated engineering methods that have improved in
the past 15 years, the Marine Wing Support Squadrons (MWSS) and Engineer
Support Battalions (ESB) will possess and maintain a core capability that will
enable the Marine Corps to take advantage of existing airfields despite
damage.

Attributes
Based on requirements, the ADR Kit should contain all the tools and
equipment necessary to provide expedient repairs using established repair
techniques covered by an upgraded Foreign Object Debris (FOD) cover or more
durable temporary repairs using flowable fill and rapid setting cementitious
products. Key upgrades include:

1) Improved lightweight and scalable FOD cover system

2) Upgraded tracked skid steered/loader with concrete cutting saw and additional
attachments

3) Self-contained volumetric mixer

128
AERIAL PORT DAMAGE REPAIR

The USMC recently participated in a Joint Services Capabilities Based Assessment repair priorities include mitigating hazards on, and repairs to the minimum aircraft
on Aerial Port Damage Repair (APDR). As a result, the Marine Corps is pursuing operating surfaces. Once initial repair work on the operating surfaces is complete,
updated DOTMLPF-C solutions. These solutions include the modernization of the the priority of effort shifts to other facilities, utilities, and ancillary systems at an
current B0039 Airfield Damage Repair kit and an update to the tactics, techniques air operating location.
and procedures for conducting airfield damage repair.
Maintenance
Aerial Port Damage Repair Maintenance of repairs begins as soon as the first repair is completed, and extends
Aerial Port Damage Repair (APDR) comprises the activities required to fix, restore, until responsibility for the repairs is transferred to an appropriate authority.
replace, or rebuild damaged or disabled infrastructure or equipment at an air Repairs must be maintained in an acceptable condition in order to ensure
operating location (landing zone, airfield, aerial port, or air base) in order to meet continued operations. Repairs can be either periodic, such as repairing surfaces
the commander’s requirements. APDR activities can occur across the range of after a set number of passes, or emergent, such as a pipe that bursts after an
military operations and during any phase of a campaign. These activities can occur initial repair was conducted. The APDR mission is completed with the transfer of
at locations that span degrees of development from austere landing zones, to responsibility and property to a designated authority.
established air bases. APDR activities can provide four operational effects:

1) Contribute to countering anti access and area denial effects;

2) Ensure inter- and intra- theater logistics, and combat power for the commander;

3) Repair damage caused by natural disaster or catastrophic failure; and

4) Support the economic development of a region

5) APDR actions decompose to three primary tasks: Planning, Execution, and

Maintenance of repairs.

Planning
Planning for damage repair begins before damage occurs with the development of
contingency plans that can be adapted to specific situations. When damage
occurs, engineer forces contribute to crisis action planning by including APDR
considerations in plans. Planning extends through the execution and maintenance
phases as engineering forces respond to changing conditions and complete
repairs.

Execution
Execution of APDR requires the seamless integration of forces and means
conducting combat, general, and geospatial Engineering missions, as well as other
activities supporting Engineering work. A technical reconnaissance of damage
provides the detailed information necessary to execute repair operations. Initial

129
AERIAL PORT DAMAGE REPAIR

The thirteen APDR areas of interest are listed to the right. These areas of interest PRIORITIZED AREAS OF INTEREST
represent the gaps identified by the Joint Capabilities Based Assessment Team
1) Mitigate Explosive Threats
(CBAT). Without accepted Joint standards to measure task performance,
distinguishing among gaps, redundancies and shortfalls could not be
2) Engineering and Technical Recon & Assessment
accomplished. That is one reason why the lack of accepted joint standards
became a key finding. Joint standards are required to effectively pursue or develop
3) Expedient Air Operating Location Repair
joint solutions.
4) “Deployability” of Engineering Assets
Areas of interest provide the joint engineering community and the AF civil
engineer community with the opportunity to develop integrated solutions 5) Configuration and Prepositioning of Materiel
portfolios. By aggregating problems into defined groups, the community can seek
the biggest “bang-for-buck” solutions for APDR problems, can identify forms of 6) Joint Standards for Air Operating Location Repair
solutions across DOTmLPF-P, and supports the downstream integration of related
Capabilities Based Assessments. 7) (tie) – Geospatial Enterprise

The next steps in the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System (JCIDS) 8) (tie) – Capability Visibility
process are the development of formal JCIDS documents such as DOTMLPF-P
Change Recommendations (DCR) and Initial Capabilities Documents (ICD). The 9) Command and Control
DOTMLPF-P mapping provides an initial indication of which problems might
require a materiel or non-materiel solution, and therefore help to scope 10) Reachback (Institutional and Technical Support)
subsequent JCIDS documents.
11) Planning
CONCEPT OF EMPLOYMENT FOR USMC
12) Targeting and Assessing Engineering Effects
With the ever-changing face of future expeditionary operations, there will be an
increasingly significant reliance on the air component of the MAGTF. An airfield
13) Joint Engineer Development
damage repair capability that takes advantage of modern developments in
construction equipment and materials is key to any expeditious preparation
and/or rehabilitation of existing airfields. With the current technology and
updated engineering methods that have improved in the past 15 years, the Marine
Wing Support Squadrons (MWSS) and Engineer Support Battalions (ESB) will
possess and maintain a core capability that will enable the Marine Corps to take
advantage of existing airfields despite damage.

Based on identified future requirements, the upgrade ADR Kit will contain all the
tools and equipment necessary to provide expedient repairs using established
repair techniques covered by an upgraded Foreign Object Debris (FOD) cover or
more durable temporary repairs using flowable fill and rapid setting cementitious
products.

130
2.11 TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY PLAN

TACP SUPPORT, TRAINING, AND READINESS The TACP and JFO curricula must strive to collectively incorporate unmanned
aviation platforms to increase proficiency with persistent/simultaneous ISR, CAS,
The demand for Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC); Forward Air Controllers
and EW for the MAGTF and joint force.
(FACs); Forward Air Controllers (Airborne) (FAC(A)s) properly integrated with Joint
Fires Observers (JFOs) has increased dramatically over the past decade in support FUTURE
of USMC and joint force operations, and their collective fire support capabilities
are projected to be a major component of future force design. As specially The USMC TACP, fire support and aviation communities will work together to
qualified and certified service members and aviators who, from a forward position coordinate and align individual and collective live training opportunities and
or airborne, direct the action of combat aircraft engaged in close air support and augment live execution with real-world synergistic simulation. TACP equipment kit
offensive air operations, act as an extension of the TACP, and perform continues to be refined and will be driven by innovation tailored to the needs of
autonomous terminal guidance operations (TGO), the low density, high demand the warfighter. In addition to the TAC-T and simulation efforts that will advance
teams are sought after to support the ground fire support plan and have proven fire support integration proficiency, serious consideration and steps must be taken
absolutely critical to mission accomplishment. Initial certification and refresher to properly align and consolidate the various programs, policies, manning and
training for JTACs, FACs, and JFOs occurs through the period of instruction training efforts for the JTAC-JFO Team. A roadmap that will help define how the
provided by instructors employed at Expeditionary Warfare Training Group Pacific USMC will man, train, and equip terminal attack control teams is located at the
and Atlantic (EWTGPAC/LANT) . The Training and Readiness (T&R) training end of the TACP section and submitted for consideration.
continuum is facilitated in the fleet by air officers and SNCOs at the artillery
Future Capabilities and Interoperability (JTAC Kit)
regiments, ANGLICO, and divisions, ideally who have been designated Weapons
and Tactics Instructors (8077 MOS) after completing the course at MAWTS-1 COTS tablets + GOTS software
(formerly referred to as TACP(I)).
DPSS Project Office located at NAWCWD China Lake
JTAC / FAC PRODUCTION AND SUSTAINMENT
1) 100% government-owned, government civilian software team
Currently there exists a validated requirement for 354 JTACs and 272 FACs for a
total of 626 ground-based controllers. This need translates to a requirement to 2) Creators of PSS-SOF applications and software
produce 216 JTACs annually (equal to roughly maximum capacity for EWTGPAC
and LANT when fully supported with all required external assets). Air support KILSWITCH/APASS = Android App for Precision Fires Image Map Engine
requirements for certification and qualification has grown and will continue to be
more challenging. Initiatives have been and are in work to mitigate this situation; 1) Users: SOCOM (NSW), MARSOC, HMX-1, DOS, FBI, AZ firefighters, USMC
however, demand for JTACs and FACs continues to grow with expectations that
the total requirement will increase again. Studies about post-OEF JTAC 2) ~5000 tablets fielded since 2012, in widespread use throughout all MAGTFs
requirements in support of future force employment and design are on-going;
contract close air support (CCAS) providers exist to help offset some of the fleet air 3) Application is NGA validated
training requirements. Commercial Air Services who currently provide CAS to the
4) Same algorithms and engines employed in NGA certified PSS-SOF and APASS
Marine Corps at times provide up to 50% of the total FW certification
applications.
requirements. The USMC Terminal Attack Controller Trainer (TAC-T) program is
funded and will work to augment fleet air support with contractor-owned, USMC 5) KILSWITCH capabilities will increase even further with the next generation Target
attack pilot flown aircraft for terminal attack controller training. In addition to the Handoff System version 2 (THSv2), which will integrate KILSWITCH with MAFIA in a
fleet air that will directly support collective PTP, surrogate CAS contracted service Marine Fires Application, fielding in early 2017.
support, coupled with increased investment in and budget emphasis on high
fidelity, linked simulation will yield overall proficiency and combat readiness.
131
TACP CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS

Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC, MOS 8002) Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, a FAC(A) is defined as “a
A qualified (certified) service member who, from a forward position, specifically trained and qualified aviation officer who exercises control
directs the action of combat aircraft engaged in close air support and from the air of aircraft engaged in close air support (CAS) of ground
other offensive air operations. A qualified and current joint terminal troops.”
attack controller will be recognized across DOD as capable and USMC FAC(A) Platforms: AH-1, UH-1, F/A-18, AV-8, F-35
authorized to perform terminal attack control. Joint Fires Observer (JFO)
Primary officer feeder MOSs are 0802, 7315, 0302, 1802 and 1803 A JFO is a trained service member who can request, adjust, and control surface-to-surface
fires, provide targeting information in support of Type 2 and 3 close air support terminal
Primary enlisted feeder MOSs are 0861 and 0321. attack control, and perform autonomous terminal guidance operations.

Must be E-5 and above. In conjunction with a FAC, JTAC, or FAC (A), a JFO can facilitate a CAS attack up to the
clearance of fires. Clearance must be provided by a FAC, JTAC or FAC (A) who might not be
All these MOSs are listed on Unit TO&Es with a billet MOS of 8002. co-located with the JFO but who has situational awareness to control the attack.

Forward Air Controller (FAC, MOS 7502) The objective is to have at least one (1) JFO at each rifle squad who will act as a key
component of the JTAC-JFO terminal attack controller team.
An officer (aviator) member of the tactical air control party who, from
Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI, MOS 8077)
a forward ground or airborne position, controls aircraft in close air
Formerly the Tactical Air Control Party Instructor (TACP(I)).
support of ground troops. USMC is the only service that uses the
1) A SNCO or officer graduate of the MAWTS-1 Weapons and Tactics Instructor Course.
term, therefore in the joint community a FAC is a JTAC. Testing and evaluation into the
validity of the 7315 PMOS to augment 75XX aviators as 7502 is underway currently. A WTI has completed the transformation from an individual trained in terminal attack
control to an experienced aviation integrator and aviation integration training manager.
Forward Air Controller Airborne (FAC(A))
Each assigned Regimental and MEU Air Officer and ANGLICO Company Air Officer shall
FAC(A)s are an airborne extension of the Tactical Air Control Party attend the Air Officer Course and be a certified as a WTI.

(TACP) which operates as the forward element of the Theater Air- At the regimental and MEU level, WTIs shall supervise the development and
implementation of subordinate unit collective and individual aviation integration training
Ground System (TAGS). JP 3-09.3 states that current and qualified and shall facilitate the training and evaluation of adjacent units. (MCO 1301.25C)

FAC(A)s “will be recognized across the DOD as capable and authorized MOS 8077, Air Officer Weapons and Tactics Instructor (AirO WTI)) EMOS. Weapons and
tactics instructors provide a capability to fill associated operator force billets to develop and
to perform terminal attack control”. execute a unit training program in accordance with the Weapons and Tactics Training
Program (WTTP). This training is focused on achieving individual training and readiness
As defined in JP 1-02, DOD through collective operational unit training.

132
TACP MANNING PROGRESSION

133
GCE TACP T&R LIVE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS ACE FAC(A) T&R LIVE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS

134
TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY STRUCTURE (182K)

135
TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY FAMILY OF SYSTEMS

Target Handoff System (THS) Portable Laser Designator Rangefinder (PLDR)

THS is in the process of refreshing hardware and software to enable an increase in The PLDR replaced the interim laser designator, the Ground Laser Target
capability with the SLATE (Smaller Lighter Ancillary TLDHS Equipment) kit and Designator II. The PLDR provides a laser designation capability out to 5000m at a
Strikelink software version 1.2, with the goal of providing a better user interface. reduced weight than previous lesser equipment. Redistribution of PLDRs and GLTD
This capability will be replaced in 2017 by THSv2, which incorporates the Marine IIs is continuous to ensure units have a laser designation capability until
Fires Application, a combination of KILSWITCH and the Army’s MAFIA application. production can increase to expected rates.
THS has also assumed responsibility for the hand-held video downlink requirement
and began fielding this capability in FY 2013 with the Soldier ISR Receiver (SIR) In October 2011, The Joint Terminal Attack Controller Lightweight Target
versions 2.0 and 2.5. Designator (JTAC-LTD) was fielded in response to an UUNS. 150 systems have
been fielded.
Common Laser Range Finder (CLRF)/Vector 21
The Common Laser Rangefinder - Integrated Capability (CLRF-IC) will combine the Situational Awareness and Night Vision
components of the current CLRF in to a smaller lighter device. Fielding for the AN/PVS-17/14
CLRF-IC began in 2016.
The AN/PVS-17 provides extended range night vision capability. AN/PVS-14 is
issued as a component of the Vector 21.

Thermal Laser Spot Imager (TLSI)

TOTAL OF 384 SIR 2.5 The Kollsman TLSI with Enhanced Targeting Sight provides the capability to see the
-JULY 2016: I MEF x 97
1st RAIDER BN x 6 laser spot generated by the FAC/JTAC’s laser designator or a self-lasing aircraft as
-SEP 2016: III MEF x 46 well as providing thermal imaging capability.
-II MEF TBD (SEP 2016)
Fielding is complete.

Thermal Imager

The Kollsman Long Range Thermal Imager provides the FAC/JTAC a long range
target location capability for both day and night operations. Fielding to the
operating forces is complete.

Video Scout (VS)

Video Scout continues to be the standard for COC video downlink operations. The
Remote Video Viewing Terminal (RVVT) is undergoing a requirements re-write
that will affect the procurement of a COC video receiver capable of allowing
multiple users to subscribe to multiple video signals received on a local network.
The intent is to maintain a technical family of systems approach for the non-static
operator (THS operators) and static operators (COC operators). The Man Portable
Video Downlink Receiver, SIR 2.5, started fielding in June 2016 with a total AAO of
384 systems.
136
TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY FAMILY OF SYSTEMS

1) The Marine Corps continues to evaluate systems and to equip TACPs to this end state. Increased PRC-117G and SIR 2.5 AAOs will help ensure systems critical link in the digitally
interoperable MAGTF are fielded to the lowest levels for training and execution;

2) All systems should seek to integrate with joint and airborne systems such as SRP to enable full end-user interface and capability.

137
DIGITALLY AIDED CLOSE AIR SUPPORT

TACP and Tablets

Android tablets enable situational awareness and Digitally Aided Close Air Support
(DACAS), with applications like Kinetic Integrated Lightweight Software Individual
Tactical Combat Handheld (KILSWITCH)/Android Precision Assault Strike Suite
(APASS) [pictured]. KILSWITCH/APASS is a model example of rapid innovation in
support of our warfighting requirements.

Digital and sensor situational awareness (SA) for GCE embarked

aboard Assault Support
These are screen captures of the tablet-based SA applications available to troops
embarked aboard a KC-130J during the SPARROWHAWK insertion conducted at a
recent TALON REACH DI demo – along with PLI data shared via ANW2, sensor SA is
provided to the end user on a common operating interface and display – capability
currently deployed ISO SPMAGTFs and MEUs.

“We believe that implicit communication—to communicate through mutual understanding, is a faster,
more effective way to communicate…We develop this ability through familiarity and trust, which are
based on a shared philosophy and shared experience.” – MCDP 1

138
TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY INITIATIVES

Near Term: Group 1 Small UAS Training Far Term: UAS Expertise to the TACP
FACs and JTACs will complete group 1 small UAS training either: 7315 (UAS Officer) infusion into the TACP:

1) Prior to attending TACP school or Analysis ongoing to determine best way to gain and maintain UAS expertise at the
tactical edge
2) During 2100 level training once assigned to unit
1) As added member of TACP (requires structure change)
Training is conducted by the UAS TALSAs located aboard Camp Pendleton and
Camp Lejeune 2) 7315s are eligible for 8002 (JTAC) MOS and associated B-billet assignments;
manpower analysis ongoing

Marine Terminal Attack Controller and JFO Action Plan/Roadmap

The Action Plan/ Roadmap depicted to the right is required to help consolidate
efforts to create and foster properly manned, trained, and equipped JTAC-JFO
teams in support of MAGTF and joint force operations.

By examining the problem and endstate desired in support of future force design
and CMC strategic service guidance, the action plan indicates actions, efforts, and
policies that can be mapped to specific HQMC and fleet agents. It will help to
provide action items to various entities and ensure the force maximizes synergy
with programming, training, and tactical execution. The endstate is properly
trained and equipped JTAC-JFO teams that are capable of holistically integrating
digitally interoperable fire support, ISR, and EW.

139
MAWTS-1 AIR OFFICER CERTIFICATION

140
2.12 MARINE AVIATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PLAN
AVIATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC GUIDANCE

Introduction Airborne Electronic Warfare

The Marine aviation combat element must leverage S&T to transform into a The Marine Corps is continuing to build an organic and distributed electronic
digitally-interoperable expeditionary force which continues to dominate the air, warfare system of systems known as MAGTF EW. MAGTF EW transitions the
sea, space, land, and cyberspace domains in support of MAGTF operations. Marine Corps from a focus on the low-density/high-demand EA-6B, to a
Operating through the electromagnetic spectrum, the ACE must conduct effective distributed, platform-agnostic strategy – where every platform contributes/
missions for anti-air warfare, offensive air and assault support, air reconnaissance, functions as a sensor, shooter and sharer – to include EW.
control of aircraft and missiles, electronic /cyber warfare. Leveraging S&T, Marine
aviation seeks to identify, influence, and rapidly insert capability into new and Under MAGTF EW the Marine Corps is leveraging emerging technologies and
legacy airborne systems by upgrading or replacing existing systems at minimum integrating multiple aviation platforms (unmanned, fixed wing, tiltrotor, and rotary
cost. Highlighted Marine aviation S&T focus areas that require continuous S&T wing assets), payloads, ground-based EW nodes, and cyber capabilities to provide
investments are electronic warfare (EW); cyber operations; command and control commanders with an organic and persistent EW capability – for every MAGTF –
(C2); communication and networks; unmanned aircraft systems (UAS); weapons; large and small.
and rotorcraft and fixed wing technologies.
Airborne electronic attack (AEA) capabilities post-EA-6B sundown will be provided
Aviation S&T Strategic Guidance by EW payloads such as the Intrepid Tiger II EW pod, UAS EW payloads, and the
Expanding DoD capability is accomplished by integrating platforms and systems EW capabilities inherent to F-35. This integration of manned and unmanned
and promoting interoperability to deliver increased lethal or non-lethal effects airborne and ground EW capabilities will provide the MAGTF commander with
across the battlefield. By incorporating integration and interoperability tenets, greater flexibility and control of the electromagnetic spectrum – and in many
DoD systems with long acquisition development cycles, point-to-point solutions, cases giving that MAGTF commander a capability where previously they had none.
proprietary, and platform centric solutions will be minimized or eliminated. The
results provide increase warfighting effectiveness and produce open architecture, MAGTF EW assets will be modular, scalable, and networked, utilizing an open
common standards which enable more effective tactical systems. architecture that is rapidly adaptable and remotely re-programmable at the
tactical level to support future Marine Corps warfighting requirements.
Aviation S&T Sponsors
Marine aviation S&T strategic guidance describes how Marine Corps aviation must
rely on scientific research to meet their current, emerging, and future needs. The
Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC) and Chief of Naval
Operations Air Warfare facilitate the programming, budgeting, and resources for
Marine aviation programs. The Office of Naval Research (ONR), Naval Aviation
Enterprise (NAE) and MCDDC advocate for the S&T funding and solutions for the
Marine Corps aviation S&T programs. The Department of Army, Department of Air
Force, Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA), Federally Funded Research and Development Centers
(FFRDCs), National Security Agency (NSA), and Central Intelligence Agency also
provide significant S&T support for the future of Marine aviation.

142
AVIATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC GUIDANCE

Cyber Operations Command and Control (C2)

Marine Corps aviation will operate jointly with allied, coalition, and homeland The ACE will assimilate large volumes of information from airborne and ground tactical
security forces using information networks, each of which has varying security sensors distributed across air, land, sea, space, and cyber domains. The Common Aviation
requirements. USMC fixed, rotary and UAS systems will be employed as Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a major initiative for aviation command and
information systems conducting intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance control. CAC2S lays the foundation for an open architecture platform to fuse and visualize
(ISR), cyber and EW operations over the EM spectrum. The ACE must continue to airborne, ground, logistics, and intelligence data. The ACE command and control
develop cyber strategy to protect and defend USMC airborne assets against capability must evolve to provide the MAGTF commander with the ability to make timely
decisions, maintain situational awareness, coordinate and disseminate information to the
kinetic and non- kinetic threats. The Marine aviation cyber S&T focus areas are:
joint and collation forces. Utilizing reliable tactical communication links, volumes of data
will be transported and shared to provide an integrated seamless joint C2 system. The
1) Cyber Security: Develop technologies that facilitate rapid and secure information Marine aviation C2 S&T focus areas are:.
storage and sharing (down to the platform level) across multi-level security in joint
and coalition operations during intermittent/limited connectivity, and in restricted 1) Data fusion: Develop technologies to fuse real, near, and non-real time data from
and hostile environments. airborne and ground sensors, and intelligence systems to provide operators with
visualization tools for full situational awareness.
2) Full Spectrum Cyber Operations: Develop situational awareness and visualization
tools to understand the extent and status of cyberspace across the air, surface, and 2) Information Flow: Develop technologies to converge service networks to allow
land domains in order to plan and execute cyber operations. information to flow seamlessly and data exchange across classified and unclassified
networks and for joint and coalition operations to enable net-centric military
3) Cyber Intrusion: Develop technologies to protect information infrastructure from operations.
malware and other cyber threats by developing algorithms and techniques to detect,
deter, or defeat the threats. 3) Secure Information: Develop technologies to provide push/pull data across
bidirectional intra-, cross-, and inter-domain authentication, encryption, and
4) Cyber Defense: Develop technologies to holistically assure information through information assurance/integrity services.
proactive defensive measures that are not limited to conventional areas such as
multi-level security, real-time automated information guards and response, cross
domain solutions, inter-domain authentication, encryption, intrusion detection,
prevention, and response

143
AVIATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC GUIDANCE

Communication and Networks Unmanned Systems

Airborne communication networks provide the backbone to reliably exchange Marine aviation has successfully deployed and leveraged unmanned air systems
relevant information to/from airborne, ground, ship, and ground platforms. (UASs) in combat operations. The demand for dedicated UAS systems will
Marine aviation requires communication networks to connect all Marine fixed, continue to increase. The air vehicle platform and its associated payload directly
rotary, and UAS platforms with joint defense and coalition forces. determine the effectiveness of the UAS system during mission engagements.

Software Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) is a single common payload module that Group 1 - small UASs, Pumas, Wasp, and RQ-11 Raven – have excelled at providing
is flexible and reconfigurable to support simultaneous missions making maximum ISR and communications relay but are limited in carrying larger and heavier
use of available bandwidth and ensuring interoperability within joint standards payloads.
and protocols providing commonality across platforms. Equipped with SRP,
airborne platforms act as communication relays for over horizon missions, and Employing larger UASs, such as the Group 3 RQ-21A, allows larger and heavier
interpret, translate and relay heterogeneous waveforms to platforms distributed payloads with increased capability but still limited in providing effective electronic
throughout the battlefield. Marine aviators in the cockpit or on the ground will warfare and SIGNIT capability at long distances.
operate mobile devices and smartphones over 4G or xG wireless protocols to
provide up-to-date situational awareness using advanced visualization aids. The Marine Corps intends to have its Group 4/5 UAS and unmanned cargo systems
carry larger payloads with increase multifunction capability such as EW, cyber,
The communications networks S&T focus areas are: radar, communications, kinetic and non-kinetic payloads and logistics support.

The Marine Corps intends to field a sea-basing Group 5 UAS.

1) Software reprogrammable/cognitive payload:
The Marine aviation unmanned systems S&T focus areas are driving toward
manned/unmanned teaming:
• Develop an open architecture software programmable platform that supports
multiple and emerging advanced tactical datalinks;
1) Platforms: Develop platform and energy technologies to enable UAS platforms to
operate in all-weather environments, high altitudes, and long endurance operations
• Develop cognitive technologies that enable payloads to sense the environment,
from ship to maneuver.
select, and optimize waveforms to accomplish mission effectiveness based on
predefined operational objectives.
2) Payloads: Develop modular, standards, and open architecture technologies to
enable interchangeable UAS payloads such as electro-optical/infrared, electronic
2) Advanced Datalinks: Develop high frequency (HF), millimeter-wave, or laser
warfare, cyber, signals intelligence, synthetic aperture radar, communication relays,
communication networks to maintain over-the-horizon, air-to-air, and air-to-ground
and laser designators.
in a SATCOM limited or denied environment.
3) Autonomy: Develop techniques to provide capabilities to reduce manning
3) Bandwidth Compression: Develop compression or spread spectrum techniques to
requirements, increase the level of autonomous decisions, reasoning, and learning in
automatically transport large data files over limited bandwidths or over continuous or
uncertain operational environments to successfully conduct complex mission tasks.
unused spectrum.
4) Communications: Develop secure communication datalinks to semi or fully control
4) Survivable Networks: Develop mobile tactical wireless networks which dynamically
UAS over-the-horizon and line-of-sight with robust encrypted protocols. Develop
self-heal, self-organize in contested, multi-level security, degraded communications
common control station using iPad technology.
and jamming environments.

144
AVIATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC GUIDANCE

Directed Energy Weapons capability that supports multi-ship simultaneous flight operations in obscured
conditions (sand, dust, snow, fog, smoke, rain, flat light, night) in a GPS-denied
The Marine Corps is actively pursuing directed energy weapons (DEW) to provide
environment.
force protection against ballistic and cruise missile defense; defense against
manned and unmanned aircraft; counter-sensor applications; counter-rockets,
It will also provide a takeoff, en route, approach and landing capability throughout
artillery, and mortar (C-RAM); counter-man portable air defense systems (C-
all operational flight envelopes to include EMCON shipboard operations. The final
MANPADS); and non-lethal defense. DEW enables speed of light engagement to
goal is to significantly reduce pilot and aircrew workload to operate safely in DVE
the targets, provides an extremely lower cost per shot compared to bullets and
and transform adverse weather conditions into a tactical advantage on the
missiles cost per shot, and provides continuous magazine capacity to defeat
battlefield. Marine aviation continues the evolution from “owning the night” to
hostile UAS, missiles, or mortars. The Marine Corps and the Office of Naval
“owning the weather” in order to support ground operations 24/7/365.
Research are currently investing in a Ground Based Air Defense Capability (GBAD)
DEW as a counter-unmanned air systems (C-UAS) role. Mounted on a tactical The Marine aviation DVE S&T focus areas are:
vehicle, the DEW is envisioned to utilize a combination of guns and missiles,
command and control (C2), and radar cueing. Marine aviation is interested in 1) Advanced Sensors: Develop compact light weight millimeter-wave and terahertz
pursuing airborne DEW capability for F35 fixed, V-22, CH53 rotary wing aircraft radar, and 3D flash or scanning LIDAR sensor technologies that leverage
and unmanned air systems. The Marine aviation DEW S&T focus areas are: advancements in semiconductor devices and optics.

1) Power Generation and Energy Storage: Develop power generation and energy 2) Flight controls: Develop advanced techniques that automatically eliminate drift and
storage systems to increase the wall-plug efficiency and reduce wasted heat and provide hover stabilization. Develop advanced algorithms that fuse sensor data with
improve thermal efficiency. stored terrain data to provide a clear operational vision for landing on unpredictable
terrain.
2) Laser Systems: Develop solid-state lasers, fiber laser systems to increase power
output by investigation dielectric materials, components, and power combining 3) Situational Awareness: Develop visualization tools that provided the crew with clear
techniques while reducing the laser system volume, power consumption, and weight and accurate symbology and visual aid for situation awareness for all types of
for medium to small aircraft. brownout conditions.

3) EM Systems: Develop technologies to investigate EMP and high-power radio

frequency (HPRF) technologies payloads for missile or unmanned air systems. for
both offensive and defensive lethal and non-lethal effects.

4) Integration: Develop interfaces and techniques to integrate laser systems with

existing air platforms, develop automated techniques to coordinate and integrate
with kinetic and non- kinetic weapon systems.

Degraded Visual Environment

The Marine Corps is actively pursuing technology to mitigate risk in DVE. There
are three critical aspects to reducing mishaps in DVE: hover stability,
symbology/cueing and sensors. The ultimate technological solution would provide
a stable geo-located hover capability, intuitive cueing to drift and obstacles, and
sensors which can detecting and display obstacles (wires), terrain slope, or other
hazards on approach, landing, takeoff and en route phases of flight. The intent is a
145
AVIATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC GUIDANCE

Aircraft Enablers
Marine aviation is also interested in pursing additional S&T initiatives for fixed, rotary, and UAS platforms.

1) Tiltrotor/Tiltprop: Develop advanced technologies for rotors/props as components of 5) Composite materials: Develop technologies for health monitoring of composite
assault support propulsion as well as tactical UAS. As rotorcraft/helicopters structures enabling condition based maintenance and predictive failure of composite
requirements grow in terms of hover load and harsh environments (heat/dust/high structures on aircraft in order to reduce time in depot-level maintenance facilities as
altitude), as well as top-end speed (i.e., MV-22 escort), advanced rotor performance well as reducing NDI inspections. The increased use of composite structures requires
enhancement (dynamic blade shaping) will garner performance as well as efficiency an enhanced capability to rapidly make repairs to these structures in all
(fuel/load savings). environmental conditions (heat, cold, sand, humid, etc.) Marine aviation is
committed to high reliability in supply and parts, and to longer-life components.
2) Heavy Lift: Develop rotorcraft capability enhancements to sustain performance and
improve high altitude operations. Develop lift technologies to provide lift well beyond 6) Lightweight De-ice/Anti-ice capability for aircraft: Develop technologies to provide a
this ambient pressure/temperature for all potential deployment locations. Develop lightweight all de-ice/anti-ice capability for both rotor blades and fuselage that
technology that can increase vertical lift and increase operational radius. reduces both weight and electrical power requirements. Current de-ice/anti-ice
capabilities are heavy due to power requirements for heating and wiring.
3) Variable-speed air refueling drogue: Develop technologies that enable refueling
drogues to refuel fast tactical aircraft as well as slower rotorcraft. 7) Manned/Unmanned Teaming : Create aviation options for commanders to use
manned, unmanned, or a combination of the two.
4) Platform Protection & Weapons: Develop technology supporting a family of low
collateral damage/low energetic weapons. Existing methods of obtaining low 8) Artificial Intelligent (AI) Systems: Develop AI technologies to enable optimally piloted
collateral damage munitions include reducing the amount of explosive filler of aircraft providing commanders flexibility to fully man, partially man, or unman to use
existing weapons. Develop technologies to improve accuracy thereby reducing the an aircraft as a UAS to best suit mission requirements. AI technologies could also
risk of collateral damage when an appropriate lethality warhead and fuse are applied. provide intelligent cockpit systems increasing pilot effectiveness and enhancing
Develop technologies that ensure weapon fusing and weapon yield is selectable from Manned Unmanned Teaming.
within the cockpit.

146
2.13 MARINE AVIATION TRAINING SYSTEM (ATS) PLAN

147
USMC SIMULATOR LAYDOWN

148
149
AVIATION TRAINING SYSTEM (ATS) PLAN

Aviation Training System (ATS) Plan 3) Help proliferate standardization within the Marine aviation communities.

A combination of challenging operational environments, decreasing training 4) Develop concurrency management processes to ensure the training system
resources and budgets, and a lower deployment to dwell ratio, requires Marine (curriculum, courseware and training devices) remains relevant.
aviation to focus its training more effectively and efficiently to achieve and sustain
the highest levels of combat readiness. The USMC Aviation Training System (ATS) 5) Address training and safety issues through SAT derived curricula and improved use of
integrates Marine aviation training processes and structures into a single, Risk Management (RM) and Crew Resource Management (CRM) principles.
integrated training system; links training costs with readiness; and spans all Marine
aviation communities. A properly integrated training system requires evolving 6) Utilize Marine Aviation Training System Sites (MATSS) to facilitate the ATS program.
institutionalized processes that support our missions and provide on-time delivery
of tactically relevant training. With training and readiness (T&R) as its foundation, ATS Processes
ATS provides the MAGTF commander with core and mission skill proficient combat ATS is process intensive and includes the following:
ready units. Integrated ATS processes, governed by policy and supported by
appropriate resources, provide the catalyst for incremental training system Flight/Combat Leadership Standardization and Evaluation: process of training
improvements. ATS integrates and coordinates policy, manpower, equipment, and toward and achieving certifications, qualifications and designations consolidated
fiscal requirements of post initial accession training for Marine aviation officers and standardized, under the MAW ATS structure in accordance with platform and
and enlisted personnel as well as initial accession aircrew training (Core Skill community T&R Manuals and the MAWTS-1 governing Program Guides. It is
Introduction) for aviation units that conduct T/M/S specific aviation training (e.g. applicable to both flight leadership and non-aircrew certifications, qualifications,
Fleet Replacement Squadron (FRS) or Fleet Replacement Detachments (FRD)). ATS designations, contract instructor (CI) certifications, Naval Air Training and
processes and procedures shall be applicable to all current and future Marine Operating Procedures Standardization (NATOPS) Instrument training and
aviation training programs to include naval or joint-level programs in which the evaluation, as well as recurring generic training such as Instrument Ground School
USMC participates. ATS is outlined in the governing policy MCO 3710.6B NAVMC (IGS), Crew Resource Management (CRM), Risk Management (RM), and basic Navy
3500.14C. The ATS Systems Approach to Training (SAT) model is depicted in the Occupational Safety and Health (NAVOSH) or Naval Aviation Maintenance Program
following figure: (NAMP) training.

ATS Focus Concurrency Management (CCM): process whereby a change in tactics,

aircraft/operational systems configuration, publications or procedures is evaluated
ATS integrates processes and programs for training that institutionalize
to identify the impact of the change on T&R requirements. The T/M/S Simulator
“operational excellence” across Marine aviation. “Operational excellence”
Essential Equipment Support Matrix (EESM) is an MCO 3500.14 mandated
involves increased combat readiness and preservation of personnel and assets –
requirement that helps identify, track, and report simulator shortfalls. Once
risk mitigation through reduction in mishap causal factors from supervisory,
highlighted, appropriate and timely changes are made to curricula, courseware,
procedural, and human error. T&R manuals are source documents for
and devices to ensure alignment with operational systems and doctrine.
implementing ATS. ATS is intended to:
GOVERNING
DOCTRINE, POLICIES & DIRECTIVES
1) Provide operational commanders with a current, responsive and relevant training LEARNING
LIVE
TRAINING
VIRTUAL
TRAINING
CONSTRUCTIVE
TRAINING
ENVIRONMENT  Trng Req’ts
ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT

system for aircrew, aircraft maintenance, aviation ground support and C2 personnel.  TMP / ATS IG

MGMNT
TRNG
 TTF / OAG
- Instructor-led - Aircraft - Part Task Trainers - Scenario-based  Trng Info
(Web-based)
- Computer Aided - Vehicles - Full Flight Simulator Training  TMS
Instruction (CAI) - Operational Equipment - Distributed Mission - Mission Task Trainer  LMS
- Self-paced - Ranges Operations (DMO)
- Computer Based
Training (CBT)  Cert/Desig/Qual
 FLSE

& EVAL
- Web-accessed  Cmbt Ldr

STAN
- Publications  NATOPS / Inst
 TSC
 CCM

2) Develop a holistic training system across every Marine aviation community MAW ATS / MATSS
 MTT

MITIGATION
HQMC / SUPPORT
ESTABLISHMENT

ACQUISITIONS
 ORM

RISK
throughout the training continuum that supports aircrew (pilot/NFO/enlisted),  CRM
 RRM

operators and maintainers. RESOURCES

TRAINING & READINESS PROGRAM

(SAT DERIVED CURRICULUM)

150
AVIATION TRAINING SYSTEM (ATS) PLAN

Training Information Management Systems: ATS/MATSS MISSIONS:

process that integrates the employment of multiple information systems under a ATS Mission: Provide resources, processes and policies that deliver a standardized,
training information architecture. Resources that support the management and responsive, cost effective and integrated training system focused on tactically
integration of training information are Training Management Systems relevant training in order to provide combat ready aviation capabilities to the
(TMS), Learning Management Systems (LMS), and the ATS SharePoint MAGTF and joint commander.
maintained by Aviation Standards Branch (ASB) at TECOM.
https://www.intranet.tecom.usmc.mil/hq/branches/atb1/ATS/default.aspx . MATSS: The primary focus of each MAW’s ATS is the Marine Aviation Training
System Site (MATSS). It directly supports execution of ATS functions for the fleet.
The TMS tracks T&R progression and helps commanders ensure that training is While ATS as a whole is process intensive, the MATSS is resource and product
conducted in accordance with appropriate orders and regulations; currency and intensive. ATS resources available at the MATSS include simulators and training
qualification requirements are met; and RM principles are properly applied. The devices, web-based training and learning management systems, academic
TMS for aircraft maintenance training is the Advanced Skills Management (ASM). courseware, electronic classrooms, and the military, civilian and contractor
Marine Sierra-Hotel Aviation Readiness Program (MSHARP) is the authorized manpower to support, analyze, and provide input to improve training system
aviation training management system to be used to track all training governed by performance. MATSS contribute the following to the ATS process: 1) simulator and
aviation T&R manuals. The only exception is F-35B, which utilizes the Autonomic academic resource usage optimization; 2) flight leadership standardization and
Logistics Information System (ALIS). An LMS functions as an electronic repository evaluation (FLSE) support; and 3) aircraft platform and community training
of specific courseware and technical manuals. The LMS for Marine aviation is the management team (TMT) issue advocacy. The MATSS construct has migrated
Marine Corps Aviation Learning Management System (MCALMS). The ATS website across Marine aviation in the active and reserve components at thirteen sites. ATS
serves as a CAC enabled portal for access to other resources and training products are continually analyzed for ways to improve Marine aviation unit
information management systems such as the LMS. readiness and technically refreshed appropriately to meet the demand for changes
in the aviation training continuum with advancing technology. With increased ATS
1) Risk Mitigation: process that includes risk assessment, risk decision making, and awareness, the ability to leverage common solutions, coordinate and pool critical
implementation of effective risk controls. Emphasis placed on risk mitigation and resources, and support combat leadership development across the various
aviation fundamentals during all aspects of training is required in developing and platforms and communities has improved exponentially. The result is two-fold:
fostering a climate that promotes flight discipline and adherence to established
significant cost savings and cost avoidance by using a robust SAT process by
procedures and requirements. Such a climate leads to operational excellence and
mitigation of mishap causal factors. Training devices allow the control of specific
freeing funds for other requirements, and an enhanced training capability that
elements in scenarios that enhance the exercise of risk management abilities. Risk substantively increases reportable combat readiness across Marine aviation and
mitigation is a by-product of professionalism and safe practices, and must be stressed the MAGTF.
in all aviation training.
Training Future / Summary
2) Training Management Process (TMP): provides an effective forum for the operating For Marine aviation, ATS is risk mitigation that presents a game-changing
forces to identify training issues across the DOTMLPF spectrum as the impetus for opportunity. The USMC ATS MATSS shall be staffed with high quality uniformed
requirements generation and training improvement. The TMP helps determine FLSEs, Weapons and Tactics Instructors, and strike fighter tactics Instructors, as
common solutions to aviation training issues, eliminating redundant, “stovepipe”,
well as GS and contractor civilian support (device operators, fielded training
solutions which are wasteful and inefficient. The TMP is focused on the needs of the
warfighter through platform and community training management teams (TMT) and
system support personnel, contract instructors in support of all FRS and FRD
supported by Headquarters U.S. Marine Corp, Deputy Commandant for Aviation, activities) to ensure the functions of ATS are carried out with success and overall
Naval Air Systems Command , and industry. combat readiness is improved across the MAGTF.

151
MARINE CORPS AVIATION SIMULATOR MASTER PLAN (MCSAMP)

MCASMP Requirements
All new simulators function as a system of tactically relevant networked trainers. The MCASMP is intended to reduce overall procurement and sustainment training
All new simulator procurements shall be compatible with this Simulator Master costs by procuring training devices and training media (courseware and curricula)
Plan at a minimum. The following are standing requirements: with common hardware and software systems. The idea is to avoid the cost of
developing new or platform unique type-systems; to pursue only the most
1) CONUS bases: one section of networked simulators promising developmental and mature technologies for training; and mitigate
operational risks.
2) OCONUS & reserve bases: minimum of one simulator
The Marine Aviation simulator strategy outlines an increased reliance on
3) Marine Corps Common Visual Data Base (MCCVDb) via Navy Portable Source Initiative simulation to augment flight training and provide improved readiness. The
(NPSI) and in the future be able to run a USMC Common Synthetic Training (CSTA) foundation for simulator key performance parameters will be based on the ability
of the training device to provide and support a multi-ship capability for similar and
4) Tactical Environment (TEn), one per flight device : threat, emitters, emissions,
dissimilar platforms, the integration of aircrew training, and the ability for aviation
weapon flyouts, USMC and joint air/ground interoperability
systems to be networked with other aviation, ground, and future C2 systems to
5) Common hardware approach across all T/M/S and community simulators to ensure a support MAGTF level integrated training. At the micro-level, the ability of CONUS
high fidelity, cross domain, platform and community distributed mission networked and OCONUS systems to satisfy capacity, capability, and networking requirements
training capability is possible with other MAGTF and joint entities. will be essential for achieving the end state of enhanced pilot and aircrew
simulator training (Reference Figure 1.0).
6) Developed IAW current and/or draft T&R, Maneuver Description Guides (MDG), and
NATOPS manuals Fully integrated implementation of the MCASMP will foster a tipping point for
Marine aviation, whereby the aviation community accepts the full capacity and
capability of networked, high fidelity training systems as the “norm”. Its use is
DEMANDED as part of complex, persistent, and scalable pre-deployment mission
rehearsal training always by every unit in the fleet.

152
MARINE AVIATION DISTRIBUTED VIRTUAL TRAINING ENVIRONMENT (ADVTE)

Aviation Distributed Virtual Training Environment (ADVTE) is a Marine Network Exercise Control Center (NECC) is the training system connectivity “Hub”
aviation-specific network 1) Provides instructor/operator and observer stations and Tactical Environment (TEn)
functionality
1) ADVTE is an encrypted, closed-loop, persistent, simulation network under 2) Provides 2D/3D visualization from any geographic location or tactical environment
USMC administrative and operational control . entity.
3) Provides simulated tactical radios with the ability to communicate on multiple nets,
2) Enables interoperability between multiple USMC Aviation Training Devices point to point VTC Capability.
to facilitate distributed mission training.
4) Digitally capture data streams from selectable audio and video channels to support
joint brief/de-brief requirements.
3) Provides capability to link and train virtually with other services, Joint
5) Integrates with existing Deployable Virtual Training Environment (DVTE) capability.
Training and Experimentation Network (JTEn), Joint Strike Fighter (JSF),
and MAGTF GCE Trainers/Equipment
Tactical Environment (TEn) is a non-proprietary software application that models a
4) ADVTE Wide Area Network simulation data packet traffic moves across variety of threat systems, sensors, emissions, and weapons.
Marine Corps Network Operations and Security Command’s (MCNOSC) 1) USMC “owned” TEn provides doctrinally relevant, physics-based, real-time modeling
Marine Corps Intranet (MCI) circuits and connects the base ATS training and threat correlation.
locations.
2) TEn is an HLA (High Level Architecture) compliant networking gateway with
Designated MCNOSC controlled network = Persistent Wide Area Network (WAN) circuits Federation Object Model (FOM) compatibility with both JFCOM and NASMP FOMs.
that all ADVTE data traffic (visual/audio) travels acrossBase 3) Provides simulators with the capability to link to same site or offsite systems through
the NECC.
Demarcation Point (DEMARK) = Provides the bridge node to move off station
4) TEn Version 4.0 is currently available and operational; Ten v5.0 is in the installation
process.. It will be the new baseline required for ADVTE connectivity (Designed to be
NODE* = Secondary/Tertiary connection points (nodes) used as required to bridge to backwards compatible with v4.0 to support transition).
DEMARK

A future initiative for ADVTE is to connect and interface with the Joint Information Operations Range.

ADVTE
TEn TEn
Simulator 1 Simulator 1
N D D N
Network E E Network
Exercise O O Exercise
TEn M HDN M TEn
Simulator 2
Control
Center
D
E A A
D
E
Control
Center
Simulator 2 f
* R R *
TEn K K TEn
Additional Additional
Simulators (Typical MCAS) SITE 1 SITE 2 Simulators

NODE* * As Needed

153
MARINE CORPS COMMON SYNTHETIC TRAINING AREA

Concept of the Common Database The common visual database provides ATS simulators with commonality with
respect to the following visual/sensor database content and features:
The concept of the Marine Corps Common Visual Database originated from the
Marine Corps Aviation Simulator Master Plan (MCASMP) policy, which required all
1) Geographic region
newly acquired Marine Corps Aviation Training System simulators to function
together as a system of tactically relevant networked trainers, when linked. The 2) Terrain surface (terrain mesh and elevation)
first common databases was initially developed for and installed in a series of five
Weapon Systems Trainers (WSTs) delivered to the USMC under the MCASMP 3) Imagery (two dimensional surface features)
procurement in the mid-90’s. The term common database identified the collective
East Coast and West Coast United States visual databases installed in those same 4) Fixed 3D features (buildings, vertical obstructions, etc.).
five WSTs. Under the MCASMP program, these five trainers were produced by the
same contractor and, consequently, included a common visual system solution 5) Landing Zones (LZs, CALs, etc.)
which included a common image generator (IG), display system, and run-time
visual databases. The databases installed in each WST were exact copies of each 6) Terrain flight (TERF) routes
other and were rendered and displayed by image generators and projectors of the
exact same make and model. As a result, the training scenes presented to the 7) Moving models, ground and aviation
trainees across these five training systems were correlated to each other. That
was the origin of the common visual database concept. 8) Material attribution (not derived from NPSI)

Currently, the MCCVDb is comprised of a set of catalogued stand-alone

individual databases corresponding to the following geographic regions:

1) Eastern United States

2) Western United States

3) Western Pacific (Westpac)

4) Afghanistan

5) Iraq and the Gulf

6) Horn of Africa (HOA)

7) Southeast Asia (4 Quadrants)

8) Hawaii (under development)

9) Other regions (small DBs)

154
MARINE CORPS COMMON SYNTHETIC TRAINING AREA

A common synthetic training area will enable robust, realistic, The Goal:
virtual MAGTF training To further develop a single source, common visual database, a USMC Common
Visual database fidelity and content correlation remain key issues to optimize to Synthetic Training Area (CSTA), that will be woven together from existing and
ensure optimal scene accuracy and interoperability across networked simulators. future identified source code which is run time corrected for ATS Networked
The introduction of non-aviation training systems into distributed missions Devices and of sufficient fidelity to enable “fair fight” correlated simulated training
operations and networked training increases the complexity to ensuring aviation environments. This environment will not only be used in the USMC ATS but across
simulators can be successfully network with simulators designed to train ground the MAGTF and joint services solutions to promote interoperability within ATS, the
forces thereby creating a seamless, virtual, tactically relevant MAGTF training USMC GCE and Joint Distributed Mission Training (DMT) Circuits. Efforts by HQMC
environment and form a robust LVC training construct capable of supporting high AVN Weapons Requirements Branch, MARCORSYSCOM, NAVAIRSYSCOM, and
value integrated virtual MAGTF training. TECOM will continue to develop an acceptable CSTA solution with the GCE as well
as with the joint and multi-national partners. Distributed mission training
Moving forward: environments incorporating common arenas will yield a limitless enhanced
combat readiness training experience. Initial developmental focus will be in the
1) Improvements to the current common visual databases, culminating in one common southwestern United States with synthetic augmented operational environments
synthetic training area, consisting of new geographic regions, and updated source embedded to represent non-native other terrain and environments with
files, in order to support MAGTF virtual training. maximum fidelity.

2) This Common Synthetic Training Area will evolve in terms of geographic regions
available and improved fidelity and content - specifically with regard to imagery
resolution and available database features.

155
MARINE AVIATION VIRTUAL WARFIGHTING CENTER (MAVWC)

The MAVWC construct will bridge the gaps between live and synthetic training for allow a commander to evaluate a units performance in following commander’s
groups as small as detachments to as large as a Marine Expeditionary Force Air intent, mission accomplishment, and the determination of mission critical success
Combat Element. It will support individual and unit collaborative training and factors. Realistic training tools, models, and simulations enable the capability to
mission rehearsal based upon existing aircraft/community T&R manuals . It will practice the collaborative planning, decision-making, and execution processes and
leverage existing mandated academics, theoretical application, and weapon procedures. MAVWC training will provide high quality realistic, MAGTF level
systems employment. This will be accomplished by leveraging technology to link training that is essential to ensure future Marine forces are adequately trained to
or network simulators/training devices together in a classified training conduct the six functions of aviation and maintain the highest level of combat
environment for the accomplishment of prescribed T&R requirements. The readiness.
MAVWC will be Marine Aviation’s large-scale warfighting center that has the
capacity to train numerous units simultaneously using detailed scenario-based
missions to achieve the highest possible level of collaborative training and
operational integration. It will provide for maneuver space in training and mission
rehearsal for Marine Aviation combat units. It will allow for networked similar and
dissimilar simulators/training devices, both co-located and geographically
separated, in order to support Marine Corps T&R event training/mission rehearsal,
ultimately achieving exponentially increased combat readiness.

1) Provides a foundation for the integration and interoperability of aviation and ground
simulation to achieve true Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Live Virtual and
Constructive (LVC) training per the United States Marine Corps Commandant’s FRAGO
01-2016.

2) Tactics, test, and fleet units will be able to develop new or improve TTPs in which to
counter existing or developing threats.

3) System Integration Laboratory (SIL) capabilities co-located with simulators/training

devices can assist in the development and testing of future aircraft and weapon
system integration and interoperability.

4) Increase current and future readiness at the MAGTF level by increasing repetitions
and sets in the most challenging and dynamic environments.

The MAVWC will create a Virtual Warfighting Center on par with the Air Force
(Nellis AFB) and the Navy (NAS Fallon). The capability to conduct large-scale
(various units) aviation training events to facilitate integrated training will allow
the Fleet Marine Force to become more collaborative in T&R training, thereby
improving their combat readiness proficiency. It will allow for increased risk taking
using aggressive risk management to execute the mission safely, emphasize higher
order cognitive processes in complex full spectrum operations, and enable rapid
decision-making and effective Command and Control (C2). This will ultimately

156
2.14 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PLAN

Every platform a shooter

157
2.14 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PLAN

Marine aviation continues to develop and procure weapon systems that will Rockets:
increase lethality and survivability for the warfighter. Our focus of effort is to pace
The Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II (APKWS II) combined with the
enhancements to the USMC weapons portfolio with platform advances by
Mk152 warhead in its all-up-round configuration has been designated AGR-19A.
leveraging technology in order to achieve precision, discrimination, lower weight,
increased kills per sortie, and commonality wherever appropriate. New Initiative

GAU-21 on MV-22 APKWS II integrated with the M282 Multi-Purpose Penetrator (MPP) warhead is a
low-cost PGM capable of defeating light-armored vehicles and hardened
structures. The M282 MPP warhead is a 2.75-inch 13.7 pound penetrating and
incendiary warhead delivering penetration (40” reinforced concrete or 1” of steel),
blast (over 1500 fragments), and incendiary effects (2000˚F due to zirconium).
APKWS II’s nearly 90% hit rate, coupled with the M282 MPP warhead will provide
a lower yield and lower cost choice for attacking targets otherwise serviced by
Hellfire missiles or guided bombs, and provide more stowed-kills per sortie.
HQMC anticipates M282 integration on H-1s with IOC in Summer FY17.

Future Requirement

Marine aviation will continue to leverage APKWS II success by developing APKWS II

for TACAIR. The AV-8B was the first TACAIR platform to integrate APKWS II in April
2016 using a Rapid Development Capability during Operation INHERENT RESOLVE.
The F/A-18 will also be gaining APKWS II, complementing GBU-12 and Laser
Maverick with a lower collateral damage weapon providing more kills per sortie.

Missiles:
New Initiatives

To address TACAIR’s operational need for additional forward-firing missiles, more

than 500 legacy AGM-65F Infrared (IR) Mavericks are being converted into
modernized AGM-65E2 Laser Mavericks. These conversions will nearly double the
current inventory of Laser Mavericks. The AGM-65E2 seeker provides F/A-18 and
AV-8B with increased self-designation capability, greater chance of laser spot re-
acquisition if lost due to obscurants, and a more accurate laser spot scan than the
AGM-65E seeker.

M282 MPP Warhead 158

2.14 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PLAN
The AIM-9X Block II Sidewinder adds a lock-on-after-launch capability with data
link, allowing it to be launched and then guided to a target for 360 degree
engagements. The Block II+ variant will meet future requirements.

The AIM-120 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) allows TACAIR
platforms the ability for a single aircraft to engage multiple targets simultaneously
through the use of its own active RADAR for terminal guidance. The AIM-120D
JAGM JAGM fuzed for Height
variant will provide further refinements through the inclusion of an internal GPS,
an enhanced data link, improved software, and improved range and speed. Guns: of Burst
New Initiative
Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile – Extended Range (AARGM-ER) will
incorporate a new rocket motor onto AARGM in order to improve range and The GAU-21 Common Defensive Weapon System (CDWS) improves reliability,
survivability. AARGM-ER is fully-funded for F/A-18E/F and IOC is expected in FY23, lethality, and rate of fire. GAU-21 CDWS prototype procurement begins in FY15
with F-35B/C objective platforms. for MV-22 and FY16 for CH-53K.

The Joint Air-Ground Missile (JAGM) program is fully funded and recently passed Future requirement
the Milestone B Defense Acquisition Board. JAGM incorporates a dual-mode semi-
HQMC, in conjunction with NAVAIR, is researching improved 20mm and 25mm
active laser (SAL) and millimeter wave (MMW) seeker with a multi-mode fuze
ammunition for air-to-ground delivery. Potential capabilities include improved
(height of burst, delay, and point detonate). The shaped-charge warhead has
point detonation, increased armor penetration, and incendiary effects.
blast-frag capabilities that increases lethality. Survivability will be improved in
JAGM by an increased launch
Future Weapon Requirements:
acceptability region and countermeasure resistance versus HELLFIRE. The MMW Investment in weapons requirements for the future must leverage modular classes
guidance can be activated while still on the aircraft giving the operator a fire-and- of weapons in order to support operations ranging from crisis response to major
forget capability. JAGM will replace all variants of HELLFIRE and will be capable of combat operations. Weapons modularity will permit the flexibility required to
destroying armor, maritime craft, bunkers, and buildings, with an expected IOC on support the combatant commander's distributed forces with tactical flexibility.
AH-1Z in FY19.

Bombs: Flexible Link 16

Dimensions:
BRU-61/A and Universal Armament and UHF data link
New Initiatives
Interface (UAI) compatible Seeker: 7” diameter
with dome cover
The AGM-154 Joint Stand-Off Weapon (JSOW) C-1 is a net-enabled weapon that Fuselage: Tapers to
provides a Moving Maritime Target (MMT) capability with stand-off. JSOW C-1 will 6” diameter

IOC on F-35C in FY23. Deployable

wings and fins Weight : 200 pound
Length: 69.53”

The GBU-53 Small Diameter Bomb II (SDB II) is a 250-pound class, precision- Multi-Mode
Wingspan: 66” with
5° Anhedral wings
guided, all-weather munition, eight of which the F-35B and C will carry internally. Seeker Multi-effects
warhead
SDB II is a gliding, stand-off, direct-attack weapon suitable against fixed and
High Performance
moving targets in day, night, and adverse weather. It is network-enabled, utilizes Airframe
a tri-mode seeker with SAL, MMW, and Imaging Infra-Red (IIR), and will IOC on the SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II
F-35B in FY21.
159
2.14 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PLAN

Weapon Modularity

Datalink
Seekers Payload Fuzing Motors
optional

Mission- Fuzing
GPS/INS Blast/Frag Height of burst
tailorable

Dynamic
Semi-active
Shaped charge Instantaneous re-targeting
laser

Millimeter Cooperative
Thermobaric Delay engagement
wave

Imaging Non-kinetic: Synchronized

infrared • Electro-magnetic pulse attack
• Electronic warfare
• Cyber
Anti-radiation
homing

1) Increased kills per sortie 5) Counter measure resistant

2) Economies of scale 6) Open architecture / Reprogrammable

3) Maximize ship’s fill space 7) Common launchers / racks / LAUs

4) Low cost

160
161
2.15 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT PLAN

The Marine Corps aviation vision for ASE is to equip all USMC aircraft with integrated ASE Concept and Capabilities
aircraft survivability equipment (IASE) systems . IASE uses modular, open system
architectures that are optimized to ensure survivability across the platform’s full range of Achieve susceptibility reduction through radio frequency (RF) confusion, prevent self-
operations, providing threat engagement information and situational awareness across the identification, create deceptive targets, detect radar signals, threat signatures, threat lasers,
digital battlespace. identify hostile radar detectors and detect ballistic events (such as guided missiles,
unguided rockets and unguided ballistic fires, i.e. hostile fire).
Current baseline mission sensor capabilities equip Marine Corps fixed-wing, tiltrotor and
rotary-wing aircraft with a variety of situational awareness (SA) and countermeasure Address aircraft survivability equipment (ASE) for electronic support (ES), electronic attack
capabilities in the radio frequency (RF) and electro-optic (EO)/infrared (IR) spectrums. (EA) and advanced electro-optic/infrared (EO/IR) sensing that enable platforms to
Many of these capabilities are aircraft platform-specific solutions that support each successfully conduct operations in a battlefield.
platform’s required operational threat environments and contribute into platform tactics,
techniques and procedure (TTPs) for susceptibility reduction. Employ training tactics and procedures (TTPs) and countermeasures against threats using
directed RF and IR jamming, chaff dispensing, flares, decoys or other obscurants that
HQMC aviation collaborates with numerous DoD and service-specific entities, including prevent hostile weapons system effectiveness.
MAWTS, NAVAIR, PMA272, Joint Electronics Advanced Technology (JEAT), service aviation
training commands (NSAWC), Joint Aircraft Survivability Program Office (JASPO), all service
laboratories (DARPA, NRL, ONR, AFRL and ARL), and other services’ science and technology
development organizations to achieve desired goals

162
MARINE AVIATION ASSAULT SUPPORT ASE PLAN

The AAR-47 Missile Warning System (MWS) is an electronic warfare system The ALE-47 Countermeasure Dispensing Set (CMDS) receives threat data from the
designed to protect aircraft against IR guided missile threats, laser-guided / laser- aircraft’s survivability sensors (MWS or RWR), and then selects the appropriate
aided threats and unguided munitions. Upon detection of the threat, the system response to the threat in terms of expendables to be employed (Chaff and/or
will provide as audio and visual sector warning to the pilot. For IR missile threats, Flares), dispersal sequence and pattern, and when to dispense the selected
the system automatically initiates countermeasures by sending a command signal expendables
to the Countermeasure Dispensing Set. The AAR-47 is currently deployed on MV-
22B, AH-1W/Z, UH-1Y, and CH-53E aircraft The Distributed Aperture IRCM (DAIRCM) is a light weight MWS and integrated
IRCM being developed by NRL under an FY04 ONR FNC with additional risk
The AAQ-24 Department of Navy (DoN) Large Aircraft Infra-Red Countermeasure reduction funding from PMA-272. This system has been OSD approved in
(DAIRCM) system is an advanced Missile Warning System (MWS), Laser Warning, response to JUUONS SO-0010 and is a viable path forward as a Program of Record
and Hostile Fire Indicator “front end” and directed energy, Guardian Pointer for the H-1 community offering significant savings in size, weight and power
Tracker (GPT) IRCM “back end”, to be fielded on the CH-53E/K, KC-130J, and MV- (SWaP) as well as cost avoidance.
22 aircraft. The Advanced Threat Warner (ATW) upgrade will provide aircrew with
improved situational awareness using advanced two color IR MWS sensors to The APR-39 Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) series provides aircraft with a Radar
detect IR guided missiles (e.g. MANPADS), hostile fire (AAA, small arms/RPGs), and Signal Detecting Set (RSDS) designed for use on USMC, USN, and USA assault
Band A/B lasers and hand-off threat information to IRCM (GPT, flares.) The support aircraft in order to provide onboard situational awareness and warning of
current size and weight of the GPT and Central Processor excludes AAQ-24 as a radar threats. The system also provides control and display of the AAR-47 Missile
suitable IRCM solution for smaller aircraft (H-60/H-1). Warning System and Chaff dispense commands to the ALE-47 Countermeasure
Dispensing System (CMDS). The APR-39D(V)2 will correct major deficiencies and
obsolescence in the current version. The APR-39 System acts as EW Bus
Controller and is one of the pillars to fusing threat data and information for Digital
Interoperability applicability.

Technology Transition Agreements (TTA’s)

Helicopter Active RPG Protection (HARP): Will seek to develop an expendable
countermeasure that would offer a hard kill system to defeat unguided munitions
such as RPGs. This system will require the development of not only the
expendable but also the guidance system required to drive the expendable
countermeasure to intercept the threat

Multi-Spectral Electro-Optical/Infrared Seeker Defeat (MSSD): Will seek to

develop techniques, components, and technologies to improve the ability to
defeat advanced multi-spectral EO/IR MANPADS by (1) better understanding the
advanced MANPAD threat posed to rotor-craft and the current countermeasure
capabilities that are employed and (2) developing advanced flares/obscurants and
laser sources to better defeat advanced MANPADs

163
MARINE ASSAULT SUPPORT ASE ROADMAP

164
MARINE AVIATION STRIKE ASE PLAN

The AN/ALR-67 countermeasures warning and control system is the standard The ALE-47 Countermeasure Dispensing Set (CMDS) receives threat data from the
threat warning system for tactical aircraft and was specifically designed for the aircraft’s survivability sensors (MWS or RWR), and then selects the appropriate
F/A-18 and AV-8B aircraft. The system detects, identifies and displays radars and response to the threat in terms of expendables to be employed (Chaff and/or
radar-guided weapon systems in the C to J frequency range (about 0.5 to 20 GHz). Flares), dispersal sequence and pattern, and when to dispense the selected
The system also coordinates its operation with onboard fire control radars, expendables.
datalinks, jammers, missile detection systems and anti-radiation missiles. The
AN/ALR-67(V)3 is an upgrade to the ALR-67(V)2 system referred to as the Intrepid Tiger II (IT-II) is a Precision Electronic Warfare (EW) pod providing organic
Advanced Special Received (ASR) set. The receiver electronics unit has been distributed and net-centric Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA) capability. Early
upgraded to a fully channelized digital architecture with dual 32-bit processors, yet Operational Capability (EOC) of IT-II pod in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) was
with an overall reduction in system size and weight. The Azimuth Display Indicator conducted in 2012. The Approved Acquisition Objective (AAO) for USMC is 136
(ADI) is a 3 in (76.2 mm) diameter CRT or LCD cockpit display, carried over from total pods. IT-II(V)1 deployed on AV-8B and F/A-18A++/C/D aircraft in 2012, KC-
the AN/ALR-67(V)2, used to show intercepted threats. 130J capability is currently in development. IT-II(V)3 is currently deployed on UH-
1Y (EOC FY16), with AH-1Z capability in the future. Additional future IT-II
The ALQ-214 Integrated Defense Electronic Countermeasure (IDECM) will provide platforms include the MV-22B and CH-53K. Radar AEA variant of IT-II is currently
internal self-protection for the F/A-18 C/D by establishing a common on-board in development (Block X).
jammer solution to counter modern SAM and Air-to-Air RF Threats. Block V IOC is
slated for FY17. The Software Improvement Program (SWIP) is scheduled for IOC Future Naval Capability (FNC)
in FY18, and will provide for additional DRFM techniques to degrade a threat’s FNC programs will address expanded frequency threats through GAP analysis and
ability to engage while also improving interoperability, timeline challenges, and provide solution sets comprised, but not limited to ALQ-214, and advanced IR/RF
the ability to engage multiple threats simultaneously. The ALQ-165 Air Self- expendables in addition to smart dispense technology.
Protection Jammer (ASPJ) will be replaced by the ALQ-214(V)3 providing a baseline
ASE suite of ALR-67(V)3, ALQ-214(V)3, and ALE-47.

165
MARINE FIXED-WING ASE ROADMAP

166
INTEGRATED AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT

Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment (iASE) will provide the capability to DESIRED CAPABILITY
cooperatively use information derived from on-board and off-board systems or
1) LOCATE THREATS: ACCURATELY DISPLAY/REPORT THREATS TO HOST AIRCRAFT
networks to enhance aircraft protection, combat survivability, and mission
effectiveness by providing situational awareness of flight and mission
2) CLASSIFY/ID THREATS: SHARE THREATS WITH GRD FORCES,
environments to warfighters and the supporting network systems, thus enabling
AIRCRAFT, COMMANDERS
the most survivable and effective single or multi-system response available.
3) AVOID ENGAGEMENT: PREVENT TRACK OR LOCK-ON

4) EMBEDDED TRAINING: LOCATE OBSTACLES OR OTHER AIRCRAFT

LOCATE THREAT CLASSIFY AND ID THREAT

1 EW Detection 2 Multi-spectral sensor COMMON DATALINK/CLOUD
Single Ship – detection correlated to
Informed by Off- solve ambiguity
Board Information
ACCURATELY DISPLAY/REPORT ACCURATELY
3 IMPROVE CM RESPONSE 4 DISPLAY/REPORT TO
Correlated threat data informs OTHER A/C AND GROUND
CM system enabling effective Threat location off-boarded
response to network

Multi-ship geo-location/
5 Threat correlation

Cooperative threat
6 engagement

ALLOW HOST A/C TO

8 Embedded Training 7 OPERATE IN DVE
FSCC BATTLE Enhanced DVE Capability
MANAGEMENT

167
2.16 MARINE OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT

168
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT PLAN: PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

OVERVIEW:
The USMC operational support airlift (OSA) fleet supports the time-sensitive air
transport of high priority passengers and cargo to, within, and between theaters of
war. Current fleet consists of 12 UC-12F/M/W, 12 UC-35C/D, 2 C-9B and 1 C-20G.
These aircraft are distributed throughout USMC bases and stations and are
actively supporting forward deployed Marine Air Ground Task Forces.

TRANSITION PLAN:
The UC-12W transition has four legacy UC-12F/M aircraft required for
recapitalization. This transition, along with continued use of low-density, high-
demand UC-35C/D aircraft will posture the Marine Corps to support the forward
deployed MAGTFs with air mobility. The Marine Corps will divest of the obsolete
and expensive-to-operate C-9B aircraft no later than FY25.

1) UC-35C/D & C-20G do not have an established service life limit, and USMC will
continue to operate until sustainment costs become prohibitive

COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS:
USMC is invested in making the OSA fleet readily deployable throughout the
world. Aviation Survivability Equipment has been integrated onto UC-12W, UC-
35D and C-20G aircraft to allow operations in low-threat environments. 3rd flare
dispenser for the UC-12W has been incorporated. This allows forward-firing FUTURE:
kinematic flares, enhancing aircraft survivability. Testing and integration of night The shift in national strategy and emerging operating concepts such as the
vision compatible flight station and external lighting for the UC-12W, along with an expanded use of Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Forces, disaggregated
integrated satellite phone capability, enhancing forward deployed capability and Marine Expeditionary Units and distributed operations continues to increase
dynamic tasking through beyond-line-of-sight communications is funded for 4 of 8 demand for air mobility. To satisfy this need, the Deputy Commandant for
aircraft. Funding needs to be identified for the remaining 4 aircraft. Aviation (DCA) will expand the use of Operational Support Airlift assets outside of
the continental United States. DCA intent is to provide advocacy, oversight and
standards for aviation-specific issues for OSA operations, aircraft and aircrew
through the MAW CGs and in close coordination with the Deputy Commandant for
Installations and Logistics.

169
CURRENT USMC OSA LAYDOWN

170
PROPOSED FUTURE USMC OSA LAYDOWN

171
MARINE OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT (OSA) PLAN

172
MARINE OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT (OSA) PLAN

CURRENT FORCE: 12 UC-35C/D FORCE GOAL: 12 UC-35 Extended Range Replacement Aircraft
12 UC-12F/M/W 12 UC-12W
1 C-20G 1 C-20 Replacement Aircraft
2 C-9B 2 C-40A
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
UNIT/LOCATION PAI 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 PAI UNIT/LOCATION
MCAS CHERRY PT MCAS CHERRY PT
VMR-1 2 x C-9B T
2 x UC-35D 2 x UC-35D VMR-1
4 x UC-12F T D
T 3 x UC-12W
MCAS NEW RIVER
H&HS NEW RIVER 2 x UC-12F T
MCAS BEAUFORT
H&HS BEAUFORT 2 x UC-12M T
MCAS MIRAMAR MCAS MIRAMAR
H&HS MIRAMAR 2 x UC-35D 2 x UC-35D H&HS MIRAMAR
2 x UC-12M T D
2 x UC-12W T
T 3 x UC-12W
MCAS YUMA
H&HS YUMA 2 x UC-12F T
MCAF K-BAY MCAF K-BAY
H&HS K-BAY 1 x C-20G 1 x C-20G H&HS K-BAY
MCAS FUTENMA MCAS FUTENMA
H&HS FUTENMA 3 x UC-35D 3 x UC-35D H&HS FUTENMA
1 x UC-12W T
MCAS IWAKUNI MCAS IWAKUNI
H&HS IWAKUNI 2 x UC-12W T H&HS IWAKUNI
T 3 x UC-12W
JRB FORT WORTH JRB FORT WORTH
2 x C-9B T D
T 2xC-40A
NAF ANDREWS NAF ANDREWS
VMR-5 3 x UC-35D 3 x UC-35D VMR-5
NAS JRB NO NAS JRB NO
VMR-4 2 x UC-35C 2 x UC-35C VMR-4
2 x UC-12W T
T 3 x UC-12W

D = Divestiture
T = Transition

173
MARINE OSA TRANSITION

174
 SECTION THREE TOTAL FORCE, TRAINING, TEST, ACADEMICS, MANPOWER
3.1 MARINE RESERVE AVIATION PLAN

3.2 MARINE HELICOPTER SQUADRON ONE

3.3 MARINE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION SQUADRON ONE

3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

3.5 NAVAL AVIATION ENTERPRISE

3.6 MARINE AVIATION TRAINING AND READINESS PROGRAM

3.7 MARINE CORPS AVIATION ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS

3.8 MARINE AVIATION MANPOWER

175
3.1 Marine Reserve Aviation Plan

176
RESERVE INTEGRATION AND THE TOTAL FORCE

AUGMENT, REINFORCE AND SUSTAIN THE ACTIVE COMPONENT 3. THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION: 4th MAW remains postured to provide
forces to meet CCDR demand for forces in support of our allies and partner nations
The 4th Marine Aircraft Wing’s (4th MAW) mission is to augment, reinforce, and
around the globe.
sustain the active component as an operational aircraft wing under a total force
construct. In order to maintain the total force, reserve aviation must be postured
4. PRE-DEPLOYMENT TRAINING: 4th MAW will continue to support training for
to meet combatant commander (CCDR) requirements on an immediate, sustained
units preparing for deployment. Examples include recurring support for the
and enduring basis. As the draw-down, sequestration and resulting fiscal austerity
Integrated Training Exercises (ITX) aboard MCAGCC Twentynine Palms and
continues, reserve aviation units must be fully prepared for the current fight,
MARSOC’s Exercise Raven.
creating options and decision space for the Commandant and national leaders.
4th MAW will remain postured as an operational aircraft wing, prepared to “fight 5. OPLANS/CONPLANS: 4th MAW remains postured to support OPLAN/CONPLAN
today’s fight with today’s forces” as an integrated member of America’s exercises and contingency operations. Examples include participation in Exercises
expeditionary force in readiness. Ulchi Freedom Guardian, Key Resolve, RIMPAC, Valient Shield, and Cold Response.

6. STAFF AUGMENTATION: 4th MAW remains postured to provide highly-

qualified individual staff officers to augment and reinforce JTF, MARFOR, MEF,
4th MAW Priorities
MEB, and MEU command elements in support of the current fight.
In addition to its role as a force provider for aviation operations around the globe,
4th MAW units remain engaged in providing support along predefined lines of 7. SHOCK ABSORBER: 4th MAW conducts daily distributed operations and
operation to include: serves as the “shock absorber” for the active MAWs by providing regular frag
support for all three MEFs, MARSOC, and TECOM.
1. THE CURRENT FIGHT: 4th MAW continues to integrate and deploy aviation
forces in support of the current fight to meet our national security objectives. 4th
MAW will aggressively man, train, and equip units for expeditious deployment and
sustained combat operations as directed by the Commandant of the Marine Corps. “We will employ a total force approach to meet the Marine Corps’ force
Current operations include sustained VMR UC-35D and UC-12W deployments in generation requirements. We will pursue policies and operational practices to
support of SPMAGTF-CR-CENTCOM and SPMAGTF-CR-AFRICOM; 4th MAW’s better develop and access the skill, knowledge, and expertise of Marines in the
Aviation Command and Control Team (AC2T) individual augments in support of the Reserve component.”
CENTCOM Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC), VMGR operations across the
globe, HMH in support of SPMAGTF-SOUTHCOM, and VMM in support of -Marine Corps Vision and Strategy 2025
SPMAGTF-CR-AFRICOM.

2. UNIT DEPLOYMENT PROGRAM: 4th MAW will support the Unit Deployment
Program by providing OPTEMPO relief for the active component as required.

177
AVPLAN RESERVE INTEGRATED STRATEGY (AVRIS)
ALIGNING AND SYNCHRONIZING THE TOTAL FORCE
The success of the Marine Corps’ total force construct is based on enduring and
habitual relationships, standardized TTPs and common platforms. By ensuring RQ-21A:
the reserve and active components share common aircraft, equipment and TTPs; VMU-4 (-) will transition to the RQ-21A in FY2021 to provide operational depth for
the Marine Corps truly fosters an interoperable total force approach. Maintaining this high demand / low density asset. In the long-term, VMU-5 (-) is planned to
commonality is fundamental to recruiting, sustaining and employing this essential activate in FY2023 to provide additional flexibility and depth to the VMU
capability. community.
Programmed transitions include: F-5F/N:
With VMFT-401 scheduled to fly the F-5F/N into the foreseeable future, several
1) F/A-18 and AV-8B : The Marine Corps is reviewing options for reserve component
F/A-18 and AV-8B units aboard MCAS Miramar and MCAS Cherry Point. These units
upgrades are planned to maintain the currency and relevancy of this platform.
will be a buffer for operational requirements through the F-35 transition. Establishment of an East Coast based VMFT-401 Detachment at MCAS Beaufort is
under analysis IOT support to the JSF training requirements at VMFAT-501.
F-35B:
The proposed transition of VMFA-112 and VMFA-134 to the JSF remains a critical OSA:
part of the TACAIR roadmap and 4th MAW’s ability to augment, reinforce, and 4th MAW continues to play a pivotal role in the OSA community. With the
sustain the active component. Additionally, 4th MAW is pursuing a stand-up of a flexibility and experience base existent within 4th MAW, VMR-1 will re-locate to
VMFAT-501 SAU in support of F-35 FRS flight operations and student production in NAS JRB Ft Worth and re-flag as a 4th MAW unit in FY17. The aging C-9 fleet will
FY17. reach its service life in the 2025 timeframe and will eventually be replaced with C-
40s. Realigning the remaining CONUS-based OSA assets under 4th MAW remains
KC-130J: under analysis based on availability of additional structure.
The accelerated transition to the KC-130J remains a reserve aviation priority for
HQMC. VMGR-234 received their sixth aircraft during the 4th Quarter of FY2016. G/ATOR:
VMGR-452 is projected to receive it’s first KJ in FY19 and achieve IOC in FY20. The To maintain interoperable command and control systems with the active
KC-130T continues to deploy and support the active component with minimal loss component and update outdated capabilities, 4th MAW will transition to the TPS-
of core METS. 80 G/ATOR beginning in FY2019.

UH-1Y/AH-1Z: CH-53K:
Reserve transition to the AH-1Z remains programmed for FY2020. HMLA-773(-) At the start of the CH-53K transition in FY2019, HMH-772 (-) will return to its full
consolidation from three sites to two sites was completed the 4th quarter of T/E of CH-53E aircraft, followed by the reactivation of HMH-769 (-) aboard MCAS
FY2016. In addition, HMLA-775 (-) will reactivate aboard MCAS Camp Pendleton Miramar in FY2023. Both squadrons will eventually transition to the CH-53K
during the 1st Quarter of FY2017, adding strategic depth to reserve aviation and beginning in FY2029.
preserving HMLA operational capacity in support of the total force.
Aviation Training Systems (ATS):
MV-22B: 4th MAW continues to aggressively pursue procurement of flight training devices
VMM-764 achieved FOC in April 2016, a milestone for the squadron as they as part of ongoing and programmed transitions to next generation aircraft.
prepare to deploy in support of SPMAGTF(CR/AF). In addition, VMM-774 received Funding for the majority of these systems has been provided through annual
it’s initial complement of MV-22B and received their Safe for Flight certification in National Guard and Reserve Equipment Appropriations.
March 2016. VMM-774 is working towards a projected FOC in 4QFY18 aboard NS
Norfolk, where it remains best positioned to sustain reserve recruiting
requirements and support East Coast forces. 178
AVRIS OVERVIEW

179
MARINE COMPOSITE TRAINING SQUADRON CONCEPT

MARINE COMPOSITE TRAINING SQUADRON CONCEPT CAPABILITY

USMC fixed wing adversary and fleet Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) and Forward The current configuration and future upgrades to the F-5 do not meet all MAGTF
Air Controller (Airborne) (FAC(A)) training requirements will persist, and likely requirements for F-35 and F/A-18, but these aircraft can effectively service many
grow. Headquarters Marine Corps Aviation is examining alternatives and solutions fixed wing, rotary wing DACM, GBAD, and C2 training needs (see F-5 Plan).
for these high demand/low density adversary and CAS training platforms. Additionally, an ordnance-employing light attack turbo prop airframe with variable
communication and sensor suites would help support all air and ground terminal
The Marine Corps composite training squadron concept could address those attack control training requirements.
needs. This squadron, likely in 4th MAW, would provide low cost, regionally
distributed adversary and light attack-capable fixed-wing airframes to support FUTURE
fleet aviation and TACP/FAC(A) production, while improving readiness across the Procurement of additional F-5s with significant service life remaining along with
MAGTF. leasing or procuring a light ordnance capable turbo prop could allow the USMC to
meet, with a combination of organic assets and contracted solutions, most of the
Compositing two different aircraft regionally will support crucial local training requirements for adversary training and appropriately augment close air support
requirements: for TACP and FAC(A) training.

1) The F-5 (or similar aircraft) will support fixed-wing adversary support for fixed- and
rotary-wing squadrons, as well as for LAAD and command and control training.

2) The turboprop aircraft and/or unmanned platform will augment close air support
training for TACP and FAC(A)

SQUADRON COMPOSITION AND SUSTAINMENT

The USMC F-5 current fleet has a service life plan that extends the current
platforms to 2025 (see F-5 Plan). Research is ongoing to examine low-cost turbo
propeller aircraft alternatives to employ alongside the F-5. Marine aviation is
examining options to purchase and/or lease contractor-owned and -maintained
airframes that could be operated by USMC aviators from the composite training
squadron and local flying units.
* The turboprop aircraft shown here represents a possible option and does not indicate the solution.
CAPACITY AND ACCESIBILITY
Current USMC inventory is 12 F-5s assigned to VMFT-401 at MCAS Yuma that
execute detachments to away sites for training support.

Marine aviation is researching the requisite manning and logistics to expand

adversary and TACP/FAC(A) capacity and capability while improving accessibility by
possibly placing permanent resources at MCAS Beaufort, MCAS Cherry Point, and
MCAS Miramar.

180
MARINE COMPOSITE TRAINING SQUADRON CONCEPT

181
4TH MAW ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

182
4TH MAW FLYING SQUADRON AND GROUP LAYDOWN

183
4TH MAW AGS, MACCS, AND MALS LAYDOWN

184
F-5 PLAN : PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

F-5E/F, N: CAPABILITY
The F-5 fleet consistently meets readiness goals while supporting as many MAGTF The current configuration of the F-5 meets all MAGTF requirements except for F-
adversary commitments as possible based on limited structure. USMC adversary 35 and F/A-18.
requirements have grown significantly over the past thirteen years of combat
operations. Today, the adversary capacity gap is growing, with VMFAT-501 (F-35B Upgrades to provide improved beyond visual range situational awareness, as well
FRS) requiring more than 1,500 per year and MAWTS-1 requiring more than 420 as passive weapon systems are being studied. Advanced electronic attack
annually from VMFT-401. Some of the additional requirements that have capabilities will continue to be fielded.
increased adversary demands are:
ACCESSIBILITY
FY10 MAWTS-1 reconstitutes Marine Division Tactics Course for the F/A-18 fleet Further desired expansion of the F-5 program, to potentially include a permanent
FY13 AV-8B training and readiness manual increases focus on additional air defense capabilities footprint at MCAS Beaufort in FY18, and conceptual plans for adversary elements
FY15 Continued transition of legacy TACAIR to F-35 at MCASs Miramar, Yuma, and Cherry Point are being explored. Efficiently co-
locating adversary support with the operational forces generates the most
TBD VMFAT-502 (2nd F-35 FRS) stand-up at MCAS Beaufort
readiness for our operational forces at the least cost. Composite training
F-5 SERVICE LIFE MANAGEMENT squadrons beneath 4th MAW will also leverage on extensive TACAIR experience
The F-5 fleet is funded for life limited components of upper cockpit longerons, and contribute to enhanced Reserve integration across aviation.
wings, horizontal stabilator pairs, and vertical stabilators that will enable the F-5 to
achieve its 8000 hour life. This extends the Department of the Navy’s 44 F-5
F-5 PROGRAM CAPACITY, CAPABILITY AND ACCESIBILITY
airframes to 2025 and at least 12 aircraft to approximately 2028 in support of Current USMC inventory is 12 F-5s assigned to VMFT-401 at MCAS Yuma. Based
fleet training. on the low cost per flight hour and ease of maintenance of the F-5, plans to
expand the adversary capacity and capability while improving accessibility are
being sought.

FUTURE
Procurement of numerous F-5s with significant service life remaining would allow
the USMC to meet, with organic assets, most requirements for adversary training.
The first phase of expanded adversary capacity will be to establish a detachment
on the East Coast in support of VMFAT-501 at MCAS Beaufort, S.C. for F-35 pilot
production requirements.

185
3.2 MARINE HELICOPTER SQUADRON ONE

186
3.2 MARINE HELICOPTER SQUADRON ONE

Marine Helicopter Squadron One (HMX-1) was established 1 December 1947 as an The final component of the HMX-1 transformation is the Presidential Helicopter
experimental unit tasked with testing and evaluating military helicopters when Replacement Program (VXX). The VXX will replace both the VH-3D and VH-60N
rotary wing flight was still in its infancy. Founded to test tactics, techniques, aircraft. The VXX program entered the JCIDS process in FY09 with the JROC
procedures, and equipment, HMX-1 has since then become synonymous with approved Initial Capabilities Document (ICD). Since that time the program has
helicopter transport of the President of the United States. HMX-1’s missions completed the Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) phase and has a JROC approved
include the worldwide transportation for the President of the United States, Capability Development Document (CDD). Source selection efforts began during
transportation within the National Capital Region of the Vice President of the 3rd Qtr FY13 and the program achieved MS B during 2nd Qtr FY14. Shortly
United States, members of the President’s cabinet, and visiting heads of state. thereafter, the Sikorsky S-92 was selected and designated the VH-92A. The
Additionally HMX-1 provides support for the Commanding General, Marine Corps introduction of the VH-92A into HMX-1 operational missions will begin in 2020
Combat Development Command and continues to conduct operational test and with steady deliveries through 2023, coupled with commensurate retirement of
evaluation for rotary wing presidential lift aircraft. In-Service assets.

Marine aviation has been a force in transition for the past ten plus years and, like In addition to these aircraft transitions HMX-1 will be updating their training
the rest of the fleet, HMX-1 has been part of this evolving force. Historically HMX- systems to reflect the Marine aviation Training vision. As part of this update the
1 has been a four T/M/S squadron flying the VH-3D, VH-60N, CH-53E, and CH-46E squadron replaced its aging VH-60N Aircraft Procedures Trainer (APT) with a VH-
aircraft. However, beginning in FY11 HMX-1 began the preparatory work to both 60N Containerized Flight Training Device (CFTD) and in support of the MV-22B
aid the Fleet Marine Force in their transition efforts and also posture themselves transition HMX-1 added two MV-22B CFTDs to their training system. The addition
for their own success. The first step was divesting of their heavy lift aircraft and of these CFTDs has incorporated an expanded and more detailed visual database,
transitioning to an all CH-46E support element. Executed in less than nine months upgraded graphics presentation, and more representative flight models to better
this move provided much needed CH-53E assets to the fleet while posturing the replicate the characteristics of the actual aircraft they represent. To further
squadron for their own MV-22B transition. In FY13 HMX-1 began the one year reduce flight time on the VH aircraft the squadron received two training aircraft
transition from CH-46E to the MV-22B. This was completed during the 4th Qtr during FY16, one UH-3D and one UH-60N.
FY14 providing HMX-1 with 12 MV-22B aircraft for presidential support.

187
MARINE HELICOPTER SQUADRON ONE: PROGRAMMATICS, SUSTAINMENT AND FUTURE

VH-3D/VH-60N UPGRADE ROADMAP

The VH-3D/VH-60N have consistently and reliably supported the office of the VH-3D
President of the United States for decades. Deployed worldwide at a moment’s
notice, these aircraft provide a vital service ensuring the safe and timely travel of 1) Weight reduction program
each president, his family, and Cabinet officials.
2) Abbreviated Cockpit Upgrade Program
SUSTAINMENT
3) 1st install FY16
VH-3D/VH-60N SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM (SLEP):

The VH-3D/VH-60N will undergo a Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) beginning 4) Wide Band Line of Sight
in FY15 which will extend the service life by 4,000 flight hours (each airframe).
This SLEP is part of the necessary sustainment plan to maintain these aircraft until 5) Service Life Extension Program (FY15)
their planned replacement beginning in FY20.
6) Training asset development (UH-3D)
In addition to the SLEP both aircraft will also receive planned upgrades and
7) Delivered 1st Qtr FY16
sustainment modifications in order to ensure mission effectiveness during this
transition period. Some of these programs include weight reduction efforts, VH-60N
communications upgrades, and upgrading the VH-60N to the 401C engine to
improve high altitude performance. 1) 401C engine upgrade

FUTURE 2) In-progress upgrade

PRESIDENTIAL HELICOPTER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (VXX): 3) Planned completion 1st Qtr FY16
The VXX will replace both the VH-3D and VH-60N aircraft. The VXX program
4) Service Life Extension Program (FY15)
entered the JCIDS process in FY09 with the JROC approved Initial Capabilities
Document (ICD). Since that time the program has completed the Analysis of 5) Training asset development (UH-60N)
Alternatives (AoA) phase and has a JROC approved Capability Development
Document (CDD). Source selection efforts began during 3rd Qtr FY13 and the 6) Delivered 1st Qtr FY16
program achieved MS B during 2nd Qtr FY14. Shortly thereafter, the Sikorsky S-92
was selected and designated the VH-92A. The introduction of the VH-92A into FUTURE INITIATIVES
HMX-1 operational missions will begin in 2020 with steady deliveries through 1) Presidential Helicopter Replacement Program (VH-92A)
2023, coupled with commensurate retirement of In-Service assets
2) Planned IOC 4th Qtr FY20

3) Planned FOC 4th Qtr FY22

188
MARINE HELICOPTER SQUADRON ONE (HMX-1) PLAN

189
MARINE HELICOPTER SQUADRON ONE (HMX-1) PLAN

CURRENT FORCE: VH-3D X 11 FORCE GOAL: VH-92A x 21

VH-60N X 8 MV-22B X 14
MV-22B X 12
UH-3D X 1
UH-60N X 1

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
UNIT/LOCATION TAI
HMX-1 QUANTICO 11 x VH-3D H X
8 x VH-60N H X
21 x VH-92A H X
1 x UH-60N D
1 x UH-3D D
14 x MV-22B

H = VH AIRCRAFT TRANSITION BEGINS D = UH-60N DIVESTING

X = VH AIRCRAFT TRANSITION COMPLETE D = UH-3D DIVESTING

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26
AIRCRAFT TYPE/TAI
VH-3D 11 11 11 11 8 8 5 0 0 0 0
VH-60N 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 0 0 0 0
VH-92A 0 0 0 3 4 8 15 21 21 21 21
UH-3D 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
UH-60N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MV-22B 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
TO TAL HMX-1 TAI 35 35 35 38 36 38 41 35 35 35 35

GENERAL NOTES: TAI – Total Aircraft Inventory

1) HMX-1 is located at MCAF Quantico, VA. 1) Aircraft assigned to operating forces for mission, training, test, or maintenance
functions
2) The 13th and 14th MV-22B aircraft are part of the overall USMC MV-22B community
BAI and are depicted here for operational planning considerations. 2) Inclusive of mission, back-up, attrition, training, and depot aircraft

**Basing plans are subject to change and further environmental analysis**

190
3.3 MARINE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION SQUADRON ONE

191
3.3 MARINE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION SQUADRON ONE

Marine Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron 1 (VMX-1) has continued to MV-22
develop and grow the conduct of operational test and lead the way for the future
Upon relocation from MCAS New River to MCAS Yuma, three of four VMX-1 MV-
Marine Corps. The squadron has undergone an overhaul of its mission statement
22B Ospreys were equipped with the upgraded Department of the Navy Large
which has evolved to include a role in science and technology, unmanned
Aircraft Infrared Counter Measure (DoN LAIRCM) Advanced Threat Warning (ATW)
platforms, and aviation command and control systems. The spectrum of the VMX-
system. Testing was conducted from late-2015 through 2016 in order to assess
1 mission will continue to expand and enhance the Marine Corps ability to ensure
the performance of this new RADAR and missile defense system. Concurrent
that Marine aviation is equipped with the needs of today’s warfighter, as well as
Operational Test included follow-on live-fire testing of the GAU-21 Ramp Mounted
that of the future. VMX-1 continues to support the Commander, Operational Test
Weapon System (RMWS) and belly-mounted Defensive Weapon System (DWS).
and Evaluation Force, Marine Corps Operational Test and Evaluation Activity and
ATW testing continued into 2017 as part of both UUNS and JUONS requirements,
Air Test and Evaluation Squadron 21.
incorporating an updated RADAR warning system, with the MV-22B chosen as the
UAS lead platform for the APR-39D(v)2 testing. 2016 concluded with VMX-1 lead
support of the Navy’s Fleet Battle Experiment (FBE), which examined the logistical
We will build on the lessons learned from using unmanned cargo delivery aircraft footprint future Navy CMV-22s would require as they replace the aging COD C-2
in Afghanistan by assigning the UAS we used in OEF for cargo to VMX-22 in Yuma. Greyhound aircraft.
We will continue to expand the capability of unmanned aerial logistics support to
the MAGTF in a wider variety of employment scenarios than used in Afghanistan Improvements to the MV-22Bs navigation FLIR included an in-depth assessment
and we will also investigate adding BLOS, sensor and weapons capability to the K- of multiple EO/IR targeting sensor upgrades. Future capability growth will include
MAX to allow it to fill a utility role. the ability to off-board ATW threat data via a growing suite of Digital
Interoperability capabilities, as well as refinement of organic defensive weapons
In 2015, VMX-22 assumed responsibility for operational testing and capabilities. V-22 Aerial Refueling System (VARS) and Distributed STOVL
experimentation of unmanned systems, beginning with the MQ-21 Blackjack. In operations will continue to be developed and refined throughout 2017 and into
support of the Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) of the MQ-21, VMX- the future.
22 will operate a single system of five air vehicles in MCAS Yuma, AZ. Multiple
advanced payloads are currently in development for the MQ-21 to meet MAGTF
specific requirements for signals intelligence, electronic warfare, cyber warfare,
communications and data relay, and kinetic fires. VMX-22 will be ideally postured
to test future payloads as they are introduced. The co-location with MAWTS-1
(and VMU-1 in 2016) will ensure rapid development of TTP’s associated with new
weapons systems of the MQ-21 and follow-on unmanned aerial systems

192
3.3 MARINE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION SQUADRON ONE

Marine Air Command and Control Systems H-1

The VMX-1 C3 Department is charged with ensuring future aviation command and Two AH-1Z, two UH-1Y, and one AH-1W reside at VMX-1 as operational testing
control (C2) systems are operationally suitable and interoperable, and that those aircraft. In 2016, VMX-1 conducted a Quick Reaction Assessment of the Intrepid
systems meet warfighter requirements across the spectrum of military operations. Tiger II (V)3 pod in support of the Rapid Deployment Capability on the UH-1Y. The
To accomplish this, the C3 Department contributes to operational test and Light/Attack division also worked with NASA and NRL to collect acoustic
evaluation (OT&E) of aviation C2 systems through support to Marine Corps propagation data for the H-1 Upgrades aircraft. Future tests include software
Operational Test and Evaluation Activity (MCOTEA), and conducts concept and TTP upgrades, an improved APKWS warhead with penetration capability, and the Joint
development through integration with MAWTS-1 C3 Department and in Service Aircrew Mask.
coordination with the supporting establishment and operating forces. The C3
Department’s primary focus in 2016 was providing support to MCOTEA’s Common F-35B
Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) Phase 2 integrated and VMX-1 Det Edwards continues testing on four F-35B Lightning II aircraft. The Det
operational test events. C3 also provided OT&E planning support to MCOTEA for participated in Operation Steel Knight which assisted in TTP development for
G/ATOR Block 1, and Command and Control Air Operations Suite – Command and VMFA-121 and the future of F-35 employment. As part of the Joint Strike Fighter
Control Information Services (C2AOS-C2IS) developmental test (DT) assistance. In Operational Test Team (JOTT) at Edwards AFB, the detachment continues to train
addition to test support, C3 supported concept and TTP development on Counter- and receive aircraft modifications required for IOT&E of the F-35B that is
Small UAS projects, Integrated Fire Control (IFC) events and exercises, as well as scheduled to begin in 2017. The detachment will grow to six aircraft through the
development and refinement of the Tactical Air Control Element (TACE) concept, a IOT&E of the F-35B.
potential future replacement for the Marine Air Control Group MEU Detachment.
The Department’s activity in FY17 will retain primary emphasis on OT&E and DT Following the completion of IOT&E, the F-35Bs will transition from Edwards AFB to
assistance, as well as TACE concept refinement and demonstration. FY17 MCAS Yuma to join the VMX-1 aviation combat element. The detachment also
Department Focus Areas outside of test support are USMC/naval Integration supports initial tactics development and new software and weapon systems
ashore and afloat, Counter-UAS, MAGTF Digital Interoperability, and MACCS role in capabilities are introduced, and concept of employment for amphibious and
IFC. expeditionary operations

CH-53
CH-53: VMX-1's CH-53E/K Detachment is stationed at MCAS New River with two
CH-53E aircraft and supports various operational and developmental test efforts.
Additionally, the CH-53 Division supports the validation and certification of
external and internal cargo. VMX-1 will support the development of the CH-53K
by participation in integrated testing at Sikorsky's West Palm Beach, FL facility and
will assist in the training and standup of our first CH-53K fleet squadron in MCAS
New River. Once the CH-53K fleet introduction is complete, the VMX-1 CH-53E/K
Detachment will join the VMX-1 main body in Yuma with two CH-53E and two CH-
53K aircraft.

193
3.3 MARINE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION SQUADRON ONE

CH-53K IT IASE / DoN LAIRCM F-35B LHD DT-3

IT-2 / JAGM / FMV Digital Interoperability CVN Fleet Battle Experiment

194
3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

195
3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

MAWTS-1 MAWTS-1 provides assistance to Headquarters Marine Corps, industry, and the
Systems Commands in the development and employment of aviation weapons and
The origin of MAWTS-1 may be traced to the aftermath of World War II when
tactics through the Aviation Development, Tactics and Evaluation (ADT&E)
Marine pilots were first assigned to Navy Composite Squadrons (VCs). These
department. ADT&E’s enduring mission to develop weapon systems
squadrons, operating from shore bases and carriers, were assigned the special
requirements, create concepts of operation, manage Marine aviation doctrine,
weapons delivery mission. Special Weapons Training Units (SWTUs) were formed
and conduct tactical demonstrations (TACDEMOs) of advanced emerging concepts
to provide necessary training to the attack squadrons. In response to their
keeps Marine aviation engaged at the forefront of combat tactics.
growing mission, the size of the SWTUs was increased, and they were
redesignated as Marine Air Weapons Training Units, MAWTULant at Cherry Point,
Among these is the convergence of cyber and electronic warfare. MAWTS-1 is
North Carolina, and MAWTUPac at El Toro, California.
currently pursuing new and innovative techniques in the application of both
kinetic and non-kinetic combined arms in support of MAGTF objectives. The WTI
In 1975, a study group was formed at Headquarters Marine Corps to determine
course integrates the Cyber Electronic Warfare Coordination Cell (CEWCC) to plan
requirements for the enhancement and standardization of aviation training. A
and execute non-kinetic fires supporting major evolutions throughout the WTI
series of recommendations, labeled as numbered projects, were made to the head
course.
of Marine aviation and to CMC in early 1976. Project 19 recommended
establishment of the Weapons and Tactics Training Program (WTTP) for all of Centers of Excellence
Marine aviation.
MAWTS-1 is partnering with the Marine Corps Tactics and Operations Group
The cornerstone of the WTTP was the development of a graduate-level Weapons (MCTOG) and the Marine Corps Logistics Operations Group (MCLOG) to create a
and Tactics Instructor (WTI) Course and the placement of WTI graduates in training MAGTF Weapons School environment, responsible for the development of
billets in every tactical unit in Marine Corps aviation. Consolidated WTI Courses individual advanced tactical training, as well as exercise design supporting the
were subsequently conducted at Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma, Arizona, by a MAGTF Training Program. This construct creates both an individual and collective
combined MAWTU staff in May 1977 and February 1978. Due to the training environment supported by a MEB-level operational scenario, allowing our
overwhelming success of the consolidated WTI Courses, the Commandant of the Marines to train in an O PLAN-informed environment and perform with acumen
Marine Corps commissioned Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One across the spectrum of conflict.
at Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma, Arizona, on 1 June 1978.
Additionally, the combined arms integration of the WTI course and Talon exercise
MAWTS-1’s mission is to provide standardized graduate-level advanced tactical (TALONEX) continues to provide exceptional infantry battalion live fire training as
training for Marine aviation and assists in the development and employment of part of the MAGTF Training Program.
aviation weapons and tactics. Advanced tactical training is accomplished through
two Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) Courses and two Marine Division Leader
Tactics Courses each year, as well as home station fleet support throughout the
year.

196
3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) Course

MAWTS-1’s semi-annual training venue, the Weapons and Tactics Instructor
Course, is the Marine Corps’ only service- level exercise that provides students and
supporting units the full spectrum of combat operations - - from small unit inserts
to noncombatant evacuation operations (NEOs) to infantry battalion heliborne lifts
into the heart of a sophisticated enemy’s battlespace to the highest-threat strike
and air-to-air combat profiles. Exposing Marine, joint and partner nation
prospective WTIs to the unique array of capabilities our MAGTF possesses is the
hallmark of this training program.

Aside from a rigorous academic curriculum, students participate in numerous

graduate level exercises that integrate all six functions of Marine aviation. These
evolutions, such as anti-air warfare, air base ground defense, assault support
tactics, offensive air support, and ground based air defense culminate in a series of
final exercises that integrate joint, conventional and special operations forces.

WTI continues to serve as the best live and simulated training venue for the
Marine Air Control Group and the largest training exercise for which employs a
Marine Air Command and Control System (MACCS). The MACG deploys with more
than 900 personnel and over 90 million dollars' worth of equipment.

WTI continues to serve as the best live and simulated training venue for the
Marine Air Control Group and the largest training exercise for which employs a
Marine Air Command and Control System (MACCS). The MACG deploys with more
than 900 personnel and over 90 million dollars' worth of equipment.

197
3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

CONCEPT EXPERIMENTATION Black Core establishes and interconnects Link 16, TTNT, Net-T, CDL, and ANW2
networks through use of Mesh Network Manager (MNM) gateways installed on
As the Marine Corps pursues new concepts, MAWTS-1 continues to define and
the MV-22 and CH-53. This connectivity provides troop commanders enhanced
standardize the training the ACE requires to support future MAGTF operations.
situational awareness via Wi-Fi networked tablets, expanded C3, limited gateway
The strategic environment compels the Marine Corps to operate in an increasingly
functionality and mesh network range extension to the CEWCC and TACC.
distributed fashion. In order to respond rapidly to dispersed global threats, we are
Additionally, this venue provides a practical application to conduct radio
moving toward a model wherein infantry units deploy as battalions and employ as
frequency identification (RFID) operations in order to track Marines and logistical
companies. We are beginning to think of units as small as the company landing
support, and then disseminate the data across the tactical networks.
team (CLT) as separate maneuver elements. Marine aviation is central to
dispersed and effective maneuver elements and enables such rapid response now.
With aviation weapons systems like the KC-130J, F-35B, MV-22, and MQ-21, the
MAGTF will be equipped to quickly respond to crisis across the range of military
operations.

MAWTS-1 facilitates experimentation and collaboration across multiple venues

with different agencies. The movement of VMX-1 to MCAS Yuma has presented a
tremendous opportunity for synergistic planning and execution of TACDEMOS for
Marine Aviation innovation and experimentation advancement. MAWTS-1
continues to advance Digital Interoperability initiatives, advance counter-UAS
TTPs, and assists VMX-1 with UAS efforts such as the MQ-8C Firescout and K-Max.
The coordination of VMX-1 and MAWTS-1 will ultimately improve operational test,
link OT with MAWTS-1 IP aviation subject matter expertise, and improve TTP
development and innovation efforts across the Marine Corps.

As part of honing our collective skills when embarking for long range crisis
response, MAWTS-1 continues to partner with The Basic School during each WTI
course to execute long range missions in support of the Infantry Officers Course
through the Talon Reach exercises. These events are also supported by MCTOG
and MCLOG. These missions capitalize on the unique capabilities of Marine
aviation’s range and speed to deliver more effective, lethal, and survivable long-
range operations as well as advance innovation and out-of-the box thinking.

During the WTI course the MV-22, CH-53E and KC-130J communities further
explore our range of capabilities within this arena while conducting a humanitarian
assistance and embassy reinforcement missions between Yuma and Las Cruces,
New Mexico – nearly 500 miles. The ADT&E department takes advantage of the
evolutions to demonstrate multiple airborne and ground networks connected with
commercial level encryption (Black Core Network).

198
3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

C3 Cyber Electronic Warfare

MAWTS-1 continues to spearhead innovating concepts to increase our lethality via The WTI Course now features a fully-staffed Cyberspace / Electronic Warfare
the command, control, and communications (C3) department. With the Coordination Center (CEWCC) during the execution phase, with key support from
employment of the Advanced Simulation Combat Operations Trainer (ASCOT), the MACGs, Marine Corps Information Operations Center (MCIOC), Marine Corps
MAWTS-1 increases the scope and depth of knowledge of our command and Forces Cyberspace Command (MARFORCYBER), Marine Corps Forces Special
control Marines in the live / virtual / constructive (LVC) environment. Operations Command (MARSOC), and Radio Battalion. Integrating curricula from
C3, GCD, AOD, UAS and Prowler Divisions, as well as some new Spectrum-unique
Additionally, during previous WTI courses, a composite detachment of DASC and academics, the WTI course now validates the efficacy and relevance of the
TAOC Marines combined to perform a proof-of-concept for future MACCS agency curriculum for our target communities: 7588 Prowler ECMOs, 7315/7314 UAS EW
employment. In 2017, we will continue to experiment with aviation command specialists, 06xx and 26xx Cyberspace and EW (offensive and defensive) experts,
and control nodes capable of supporting both air support and air defense from a 8834 / 0550 Information Operations experts, and 8866 MAGTF Space Officers.
common set of equipment. MAWTS-1 C3 and VMX-22 are partnering to collect PWTIs are now being exposed to the planning, coordination and C2 of various
data and lessons learned in support of HQMC Aviation’s future MACCS roadmap. aspects of cyberspace, electronic warfare, information operations, spectrum
management and MAGTF space operations. CEWCC vignettes are deeply
The G/ATOR is an expeditionary radar able to detect and track low- integrated in every aspect of WTI execution, and execution on the Joint
observable/low-radar cross-section targets such as guided rockets, artillery, Information Operations / Cyberspace Range (JIOR) enables combined live kinetic
mortars, and missiles; this system also provides a new level of protection to and non-kinetic operations over a realistic network-in-depth, in support of live
ground forces. MAWTS-1’s C3 Department is deeply involved in implementing operating forces and across the full spectrum of the OPLAN-aligned WTI scenario.
CAC2S as a ground-based gateway, fusing real-, near-real, and non-real-time data
derived from the F–35, RQ–21, G/ATOR, and other inputs into an integrated
tactical picture providing the ground combat element new levels of situational
awareness and advanced decision support tools.

The new systems of the Marine air command and control system allow the MAGTF
commander to “see” and exploit opportunities with speed and precision.

199
3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

Trusted Handheld Tablets Distributed operations are also well-rehearsed during separate evolutions
involving reactive forward arming and refueling points (FARPs) supporting AH-1
MAWTS-1 continues to issue Trusted Handheld (TH2) tablets to the students
and UH-1 aircraft sorties. These rapidly deployable FARPS relocate on call based
during the academic phase of WTI courses. The tablets augment the student’s
on the enemy situation and mission requirements providing fuel and ordnance to
ability to study the courseware, take examinations, and operate as a publications
Marine attack and utility helicopters.
repository. Marine Air Ground Tablets (MAGTAB) are issued for the flight phase to
enable planning and execution of flight evolutions leveraging digital applications in
place of many traditional paper products. The MAGTABs are information
assurance (IA) compliant and were provided by APW-74’s Digital Interoperability
initiative. They are authorized to operate on a secure wireless network. The
tablet demonstrations pave the way for future expansion of tablet computing
across the Marine Corps and helps advance the Electronic Kneeboard initiative for
PMA-281.

Defense of the Expeditionary Airfield

WTI continues to incorporate air base ground defense operations through the
defense of the expeditionary airfield (DEAF) 1 & 2 evolutions. The focus of training
is on integration of live aircraft into the ground defense plan while conducting
simulated CAS using unqualified controllers. Another key objective is to
demonstrate the ability of defense forces to separate friendly forces from enemy
once the enemy is inside the perimeter. MCLOG has been involved providing
guest instructors who demonstrate the intricacies of how to run a combat
operations center. A portion of the AGS department academic instruction is
completed at MCLOG’s classrooms in Twentynine Palms, CA by the staff members
of MCLOG. This instruction continues to strengthen the collaborative efforts
between these institutions.

Distributed Operations
The Assault Support and Aviation Ground Support departments continue to refine
the procedures for the conduct of distributed operations missions with STOVAL
aircraft at Laguna Army Airfield. MV-22B aircraft conduct ADGR and weapons
reload for the AV-8B , increasing the number of sorties sent to the objective area
executing offensive air support. This falls in line with the F-35B’s desired capability
to fight in anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) environments. With the F-35B, our
MEUs and MEBs will have a fifth-generation low observable strike and sensor
platform providing a unique and critical role in joint forcible entry operations

200
3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

Air Officer WTI

Air Officer WTI started as a five week embedded course based on OIF 1 after-
actions to train forward air controllers (FACs) to be better Air Officers for fleet
units. It has since grown to a full seven-week, MOS- producing course
intended for MEU and regimental air officers. The primary focus is integrating
aviation capabilities within the ground combat element. Additionally the
course trains each graduate to be a JTAC evaluator and program manager,
empowered to develop a cadre of professional terminal controllers and
aviation integrators.

During the WTI exercise each prospective instructor has the opportunity to
control close air support in day and night conditions in urban and rural
environments, integrated with indirect fires and maneuver. In addition to the
live controls, the course includes a robust simulation phase integrating
multiple controllers using the distributed virtual training environment (DVTE)
and supporting arms virtual trainer (SAVT) into complex CAS scenarios. At the
conclusion of WTI, each graduate is certified as a WTI and receives the 8077
MOS.

201
3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

Tactical Risk Management The curriculum is constantly transforming as the blue threats change on the
battlefield. The next set of changes to the TRM curriculum will be based on an
Since 2005, MAWTS-1 has been striving to reshape the thinking of tactical leaders
analysis of the DoD Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)
in Marine aviation. They have made risk management an inherent part of the way
codes most frequently identified in aviation mishaps. Some of the most prevalent
we train, operate, and fight. A program called Tactical Risk Management (TRM)
blue threats include complacency, communicating critical information, making
was started in 2004 as a result of a spike in aviation mishaps. An analysis of the
adequate real-time risk assessments, and following published procedures. The
causal factors for these mishaps indicated that the spike was not due to enemy
course will bring in new relevant guest speakers presenting both a civilian and
action, despite the significant combat operations that the Marine Corps was
military perspective for managing high risk activities. WTI 2-16 incorporated a
involved in at the time. Mistakes or errors in judgement were the main causes of
sports psychologist to help WTI students learn how to operate at their peak
Marine aviation mishaps - indicating the need to examine and develop tactics to
potential, and brought in an expert from Delta Airlines to give a different
counter these "blue threats."
perspective on crew coordination and operational risk management. During WTI
MAWTS-1 restructured the curriculum during their semi-annual Weapons and 1-17 physiologists and nutrition experts will teach specially tailored classes on
Tactics Instructor (WTI) course to include instructing students how to balance the mental and physical preparedness.
blue threat and the red threat during mission planning and execution. Ultimately,
MAWTS-1 will also include several mentorship sessions with their students where
WTI graduates return to their squadrons and foster a culture of excellence in risk
they will talk about identifying hazards and preventing mishaps in a small group
management and tactical execution across the fleet.
setting. Guest speakers that have experienced Marine Corps mishaps will speak to
Tactical Risk Management is a two-day lecture series conducted during every WTI the students about lessons learned from their experience. The students will also
course. The course builds on the fundamentals of ORM by presenting the students review the most recent mishaps and the causal factors that were identified
with various safety topics through the lens of mission effectiveness. TRM teaches through investigation.
the students that a tactically sound plan is an inherently safe plan. The principles
Marine Corps aircraft are national assets; their preservation is essential to
taught during TRM are risk management, ethics, leadership, human performance,
continued success on the battlefields of tomorrow. Reshaping the thinking of
aerodynamics, managing red and blue threats, and professionalism in their trade.
future tactical leaders will transform the culture of aviation to include an
WTI students understand their role in managing risk is necessary to enhance
appreciation for the development and execution of blue threat tactics - ultimately
mission effectiveness by preventing injury to personnel and damage to critical
enhancing tactical excellence fleet wide while preserving assets.
assets.

TRM principles are reinforced throughout the execution phase. MAWTS-1

requires students come up with a mitigation strategy and brief the red and blue
threat (risk to mission/risk to force) during every confirmation brief. During
mission planning the WTI students are asked if their plan is tactically sound and
executable with the assets that have been allocated to the mission. If not, then
they fine tune their plan until the red and blue threats are mitigated appropriately.
Risk management is inherent to the mission planning conducted during WTI.

202
3.4 MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS SQUADRON ONE

F-35 Integration
During WTI 1-14, the initial F-35B sorties were flown in support of the course.
In every course since, the staff has continued to integrate additional F-35
participation, incorporating antiair warfare, deep air support, close air support,
electronic warfare, and assault support escort missions. With the July 2015
IOC declaration of VMFA-121, MAWTS-1 was positioned to take the next step
towards a complete F-35 student syllabus. The WTI 2-16 Course graduated the
first three F-35B students with support from MAG-13, specifically VMFA-121,
and VMX-1. The first WTI class with F-35B students was a tremendous success
and will pave the way for future courses as they evolve to incorporate the
capabilities of the Marine Corps’ newest TACAIR platform.

Summary
While there are many “new and different” aspects of the WTI course, the
central core persists as world class and unique. MAWTS-1 remains the
weapons school of the Marine Corps, dedicated to meeting the needs of the
operating forces. We continue to focus on relevance and responsiveness, with
a bias towards innovation and tactical excellence. Ultimately, the goal is to
continue to produce graduates who are well prepared to fight and win our
nation's battles.

203
3.5 NAVAL AVIATION ENTERPRISE

Naval Aviation Enterprise & Current Readiness Mission Goals

Advance and sustain naval aviation warfighting capabilities and readiness at best The goal of Marine aviation is to attain and maintain combat readiness to support
possible cost...today and in the future. expeditionary maneuver warfare while at the same time preserving and
conserving Marines and equipment. Embedded within this combat readiness goal
The mission of the naval aviation enterprise is unchanged: to keep naval aviation a is the ability to plan for crises and/or contingency operations, and the capacity to
warfighting force. It brings to bear the right capabilities, capacity, and wholeness deploy rapidly, effectively, and efficiently on short notice. The specific goals are
for fighting and winning. Advancing and sustaining these core functions at an as follows:
affordable cost is smart, prudent, and responsible.
1) Increase aircraft readiness
Naval aviation with an enterprise approach ensures a team effort dedicated to
working together and committed to open information sharing and process • Increase aircraft availability
improvement across naval aviation stakeholder organizations. This way of doing
business must be ingrained throughout naval aviation. It significantly and • Increase in-reporting (IR) rates / Decrease out-of-reporting (OOR) rates
measurably improves our ability to deliver warfighting readiness more efficiently.
It leads to a better understanding of our operational costs and readiness degraders • Increase depot throughput
from the deckplate to the flag and general officer level. It facilitates better
informed resource decisions for the overall good of the entire naval aviation 2) Reduce workload on Marines
enterprise.
3) Understand and manage costs and schedule
Within the NAE, it is our mission to intelligently optimize those resources to meet
today’s and tomorrow’s threats. 4) Extend service life for legacy aircraft / achieve programmed service life for new
platforms
Marine aviation commanders and leaders – in concert with the naval aviation
5) Improve health of organizational and intermediate level maintenance departments
enterprise – will plan, execute, and manage the current readiness (CR) process in
order to maximize equipment and personnel readiness. The focus must be on
6) Increase sortie generation and combat power
optimizing material resource allocations and expenditures while minimizing
logistics downtime and delays. Leaders will conduct CR operations to align Marine
7) Increase reliability of aircraft, components, and logistics process
aviation with enabling organizations. The purpose of this alignment is to
predictably and effectively achieve required levels of readiness to produce core
competent aviation units (squadrons / detachments) for warfighting missions

204
NAVAL AVIATION ENTERPRISE / CURRENT READINESS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

The Goal - A Core Competent Unit The Future of the NAE

The most direct measurable output of the CR process is the production of In order to reach these goals , the following stakeholder actions will be critical to
readiness: T-2.0. The design of CR, therefore, is to support mission essential task the success of naval aviation:
(MET)-based output standards that are consistent with a core competent unit
(squadron or detachment). 1) Improve readiness of each TMS to service targets

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 2) Reduce Cost Per Flight Hour (CPFH) by the percentage assigned for each TMS while
To create consistent and integrated performance-based measurements, meeting readiness requirements
type/model/series (TMS) teams have determined which processes should be
measured, what metrics would be used for the analysis, and which of those 3) Develop methodology for managing fully burdened operating and support (O&S)
costs
metrics are to be considered key performance indicators (KPIs).
4) Apply O&S cost reduction initiative across all TMS platforms
-Pilot Training: T-Rating shows the TMS pilot training readiness based on unit
inputs to the Defense Readiness Reporting System – Marine Corps (DRRS-MC).
5) Implement the Integrated Logistics Support Management System (ILSMS) tool across
TMSs are funded to a T-Rating of 2.0 all TMS Program Offices

-Trained Maintenance Manpower: Maintainer core competency (MCC), the 6) Expand Commander, Fleet Readiness Center (COMFRC) Aviation Rapid Action Team
maintenance department’s technical ability to maintain aircraft, is central to (ARAT) process to all TMS Teams
producing Ready for Tasking (RFT) aircraft. MCC includes, at a minimum,
qualifications and licensing , collateral duty inspector (CDI), collateral duty quality 7) Streamline depot business operations
assurance representative (CDQAR), aircraft sign off, and so forth to conduct the
assigned number of maintenance shifts. 8) Program executive office (PEO)/program manager (PM) address future O&S costs in
new acquisitions
-Ready for Tasking (RFT): A main goal of the CR cross-functional team (CFT) is
being able to provide the appropriate amount of RFT resources to support a 9) Modify TMS briefs
squadron’s current mission.
• Shorten the briefs to focus on exactly what flag/general officers need to know/can
-Aircraft Life Management: Proper management of aircraft utilization ensures impact/desire as needed
airframes attain the expected service life, including managing airframe usage
within an acceptable range of life-limiting parameters (flight hours, fatigue, etc.). • Provide mid-cycle reviews every four months after the Air Board

-Flight Hour Cost-Per-Hour: The goal of the NAE is to produce the required • Provide focus on both key readiness degraders and cost initiatives/progress
readiness and RFT aircraft while efficiently managing cost. In order to meet this
10) Increase PM engagement in submission of affordability initiatives Future Readiness
goal, TMS teams must be aware and critical of the rate at which, and how, fiscal
(FR) CFT
resources are expended.

205
MARINE AVIATION TYPE/ MODEL/ SERIES LEADS

206
3.6 MARINE AVIATION TRAINING AND READINESS PROGRAM

Marine aviation must be prepared to respond to operational tasking around the

world. Its effectiveness is directly related to unit sortie generation capability, the MARFOR
ability to command and control aviation assets, and our ability to train mission Requirements
(Core METs)
skill-proficient crews and combat leaders in a standardized manner to meet Combatant Commanders Scalable Operational
Mission Essential Task List output standards. Requirements Force Requirements
Joint Task Force
Requirements
Aviation Training and Readiness Program (Named Operations)

The Marine aviation training and readiness (T&R) program aligns with Department Core Competent Unit
of Defense (DoD) and joint requirements by prescribing training standards
required to develop core competent units that can fulfill operational requirements Aviation T&R Program Unit Readiness Training Resources
of combatant commanders. The T&R program implements a comprehensive,
Core Competency Model Defense Readiness Core Competency
capabilities-based training system providing mission skill-proficient crews and Reporting System – Resource Model (CCRM)
combat flight leaders to MAGTF and combatant commanders. The T&R program •Mission Statement Marine Corps (DRRS-MC)
has been updated to identify training resource requirements and assist in HQMC •Core METL •Flight Hours
•Output Standards •M-SHARP: CMTR and ACC (minimum mandatory)
planning and budgeting. The Marine aviation T&R program structure, unit •Unit Training Events Reports •Ordnance
readiness reporting methods, and training resources requirements’ contribution to •Core/Mission Skills •Collective Training •Ranges
•Combat Leadership •Core/Mission Skill •Targets
force readiness is depicted below. •Core Model Minimum Proficiency •Aggressors
Requirements (CMMR) •MET Output Standards •Other external support
T&R Program Manual •Combat Leadership
•MCC
NAVMC 3500.14D, Aviation Training and Readiness (T&R) Program Manual,
outlines the standards, regulations and policies regarding the training of Marine
Corps aircrew; command and control; airfield emergency and operations services;
and meteorological and oceanographic personnel.

The foundation of every Marine aviation community T&R is the Commandant of

the Marine Corps-approved Core Competency Model. The Core Competency
Model establishes the basic structure around which each T&R program is created
and links the following:

1) Mission statement

2) Mission Essential Task List (METL)

3) Core Model Minimum Requirement (CMMR)

4) Unit Core Capability (MET Output Standards)

5) Core/Mission Skill Proficiency (CSP/MSP), Crew CMMR, and combat leadership (CL)
requirements

207
3.6 MARINE AVIATION TRAINING AND READINESS PROGRAM

Mission Essential Task List Sortie-Based Training Program

Each aviation community has a unique Mission Essential Task List (METL) which The Marine Aviation Sortie-Based Training Program (SBTP) enables squadron
captures the capabilities for which a unit was designed. The METL is composed of commanders to develop their unit’s TEEP and train mission skill-proficient aircrew
Mission Essential Tasks (METs) derived and validated from the Marine Corps Task and combat leaders to their T/M/S T&R Core Model Minimum Requirement
List. Each unit-specific MET is defined as either Core (primary capability) or Core (CMMR) to maintain a T-2 level of readiness. A T-2 level of readiness allows a unit
Plus (on demand or theater specific capability) and forms the basis for community to fully execute its Mission Essential Task output standards in support of a Marine
T&R development. Air-Ground Task Force or joint force commander.

Mission Skills An annual SBTP forecast is developed at the squadron level, then reviewed and
T&R Program Manual establishes a framework whereby training is composed of approved through the MAG/MAW/MCI/MARFOR/DCA chain of command. Unit
essential events that act as enablers for advanced skills and events known as SBTP forecasts shall be submitted by each respective MARFOR NLT 1 September to
“mission skills.” Mission skills are linked to METs. Aircrew who are trained to HQMC Aviation Plans and Policies each year for the following fiscal year (FY) or as
standard in MET-specific mission skills enable a unit to execute that MET. specified by the SBTP Message.

MET to Core/Mission/Core Plus Skill Matrix

The MET to Core/Mission/Core Plus Skill Matrix ensures that skills are linked to
HQMC Aviation Plans and Policy (APP) consolidates the MARFOR-approved inputs
METs, thus laying a firm foundation for both training program structure and
into a single Marine aviation SBTP by T/M/S.
accurate readiness reporting. This matrix is produced in each T&R manual and
represents the training required to satisfy MET training and readiness
Monthly Unit SBTP Execution Submission: the monthly unit SBTP execution report
requirements. It is in the mission skills-to-MET correlation where a commander
provides Marine aviation organizations at all levels the required data to track unit
can best gauge the readiness of his unit to accomplish a specific MET.
SBTPs and FHP execution.

MET to Core/Mission/Core Plus

M-SHARP SBTP Forecast/Execution Reports Skill Matrix

Core METL to Core / Mission Skill

Matrix (KC-130J Example)

208
3.6 MARINE AVIATION TRAINING AND READINESS PROGRAM

Marine Corps Sierra-Hotel Aviation Readiness Program

(MSHARP)
M-SHARP provides Marine Aviation with user-friendly scheduling, event
tracking and objective operational risk management capabilities. M-SHARP is
the USMC authoritative data source for a multitude of Marine Aviation training
and readiness management, flight hour execution, and resource utilization
data points, and utilizes data warehousing to archive historical data for
enhanced trend analysis across a variety of aviation specific and related areas
of interest.

Marine aviation has made great advances in M-SHARP schedule automation,

providing commanders with scheduling risk management tools to identify and
advise on delinquent or unqualified aircrew without the requisite skills,
proficiency, or supervision.

The next step on Marine Aviation’s automated training management roadmap

enhances usability and efficiency through modernization of user interfaces and
system architecture, as well as continued implementation of information
assurance security and controls. TECOM (Aviation Standards Branch) is
responsible for the programmatic management of M-SHARP.

Squadrons’ utilization and data accuracy levels are reported monthly and are
critical to the validation and verification process. System Accuracy Status Level
1 data ensures squadrons’ utilization of M-SHARP is proper and the data is
valid.

Defense Readiness Reporting System – Marine Corps (DRRS-MC)

DRRS-MC captures the present state of a unit’s personnel, equipment,
resources and METL ability (training). It is a resourcing, force sourcing, and
readiness tool that feeds DRRS-Strategic. Marine aviation can assess DRRS-MC
METL ability though the development of highly objective T&R standards and
the use of MSHARP. M-SHARP provides various tools to assess a near real-time
picture of a unit’s aircrew readiness and provides the commander a ready-
reference to better inform the DRRS-MC assessment.

209
FLYING HOUR PROGRAM (FHP) AND CORE COMPETENCY RESOURCE MODEL (CCRM)

Marine Corps flying hour program management is detailed in MCO 3125.1B. Schedule D: Reserve FHP
Deployable and non-deployable RC FW/RW/TR squadrons and OSA aircraft
The term “flying hour program” refers to the allocation and obligation of funds
from the Operation and Maintenance, Navy (OMN) and Operation and Core Competency Resource Model (CCRM)
Maintenance, Navy Reserve (OMNR) accounts appropriated to the Marine Corps
for the operation and maintenance of Marine Corps aircraft. CG, Training and Education Command (TECOM) Aviation Standards Branch (ASB) is
the custodian of the CCRM for each T/M/S. The CCRM directly links the FHP, T&R
Marine Corps flight operations management is composed of two elements: the syllabi, and the readiness reporting system (DRRS-MC) in order to generate annual
Sortie Based Training Program (SBTP) and the FHP. The SBTP is the commander’s flying hour and sortie requirements (including training, support, or operational
execution tool while the FHP, which provides policy, guidance, and responsibilities sorties) for T-2.0 readiness level. The Deputy Commandant for Aviation uses CCRM
for the execution of the Marine Corps flight hours, is the HQMC’s budgeting tool. data as the primary guide/validation tool when providing annual TACAIR FHP
It is important to stress that the SBTP is the foundation for all that we do, while inputs to the USN OP-20 budgeting document.
the FHP is a measuring tool used by OPNAV to allocate resources. All commanders
shall use all available resources to ensure their commands are trained per the
Marine Corps SBTP Guidance
current editions of the appropriate type/model/series T&R manuals. Key sections In recent years the Marine Corps FHP experienced a negative trend in SBTP
of the FHP order include: baseline flight hour execution. The divergence between the annual CCRM
modeled training requirement and the execution of SBTP flight hours is typically
1) Marine Corps Flying Hour Programs due to aircraft availability, increased mission and T&R requirements. This has
resulted in an unfavorable optic in a pressurized budget environment potentially
2) Marine Corps Unit CCRM Guidelines placing funding for the T-2.0 flight hour requirement.

3) Marine Corps Sortie Based Training Program In order to promote accurate and executable SBTPs that successfully achieve
readiness goals that mirror the CCRM requirements, HQMC Aviation Plans, Policy,
4) Marine Corps FHP Reporting & Budget branch released the ‘FY16 Marine Corps Aviation SBTP’ guidance
message (261129ZMay15). This message defines the CCRM and SBTP, describes
Marine Corps Flying Hour Programs the utility of the Operational Forecasting tool to assist in the development of a
unit’s SBTP, and outlines those data points and variables that shall be factored into
Schedule A: Tactical Aircraft (TACAIR) FHP an accurate and executable SBTP.
Deployable active component (AC) fixed-wing, rotary-wing and tiltrotor squadrons.
Activated reserve component (RC) squadrons will also be funded from the gaining
MARFOR TACAIR FHP.

Schedule B: Fleet Air Training (FAT) FHP

All Marine Corps fleet replacement squadrons (FRS).

Schedule C: Fleet Air Support (FAS) FHP

Deployable and non-deployable AC operational support aircraft (OSA), SAR,
HMX-1, VMX-1, and VMFT-401 aircraft.

210
MARINE CORPS FLYING HOUR PROGRAM

Presidential Budget (PB) FY17

Fleet Aircraft FHP Requirement by T/M/S
T/M/S Hours
AV-8B 17,565
MV-22B 38,816
F-35B 9,226
CH-53E 24,633
KC-130J 18,963
AH-1W 10,560
AH-1Z 13,996
UH-1Y 18,124
F/A-18A/C/D 35,200
EA-6B 4,341
TOTAL 191,424
*Schedule A Schedule FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY22
Source: PB-17 Requirement Fleet aircraft (TACAIR)
v3888 Hours 173,439 176,340 177,750 175,245 172,684 TBD
Fleet Replacement
Squadron (FRS) Aircraft
Hours 29,933 27,242 27,170 27,668 27,459 TBD
Fleet Air Support Aircraft
Hours 28,207 25,924 27,608 28,431 22,808 TBD

Reserve aircraft Hours 26,301 26,349 27,046 28,111 26,868 TBD

USMC FHP TOTAL
BUDGETED HOURS 257,880 255,855 259,574 259,455 249,819 TBD
Source: PB-17 Control v3871 for FY17-21; POM-18 budgeted hours are pending

211
 MARINE CORPS AVIATION INVENTORY
CURRENT AVERAGE
T/M/S
INVENTORY AGE

AH-1W 109 25.25

AH-1Z 47 3.86
AV-8B 112 20.02
C-20G 1 21.87
C-9B 2 33.62
CH-53E 146 27.92
EA-6B 18 28.98
F-35B 43 2.56
F-5F 1 37.83
F-5N 11 35.22
FA-18A 52 29.82
FA-18B 7 31.48
FA-18C 122 23.99
FA-18D 92 22.60
HH-1N 4 43.77
KC-130J 48 9.18
KC-130T 14 26.15
MV-22B 250 5.23
RQ-21A 6 2.16
RQ-7B 47 6.25
T-34C 3 38.00
TAV-8B 16 26.78
UC-12F 4 29.47
UC-12M 3 28.36
UC-12W 6 5.55
UC-35C 2 16.50
UC-35D 10 11.90
UH-1Y 128 3.80
UH-3D 1 48.25
UH-60N 1 33.58
VH-3D 11 40.68
VH-60N 8 27.90

212
3.7 MARINE CORPS AVIATION ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS

213
AVIATION-UNIQUE ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS

214
AVIATION-UNIQUE ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS

215
CURRENT MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

216
FUTURE MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

217
CURRENT MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS WEST ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

MC INSTALLATIONS COMMAND
HQMC I&L

MC INSTALLATIONS WEST
MCB CAMP PENDLETON

MCAS MCAS
MCB MCAS YUMA MCLB
CAMP PENDLETON MIRAMAR
CAMP PENDLETON (NYL) BARSTOW, CA
(NFG) (NKX)

H&HS H&HS (1) H&HS (2)

1 x UC-12 2 x UC-12
2 x UC-35 3 x HH-1N

* Air station commanding officers have advocacy relationship with wing commander and staff for prioritization and planning for aviation issues.

218
FUTURE MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS WEST ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

MC INSTALLATIONS COMMAND
HQMC I&L

MC INSTALLATIONS WEST
MCB CAMP PENDLETON

MCAS MCAS
MCB MCAS YUMA MCLB
CAMP PENDLETON MIRAMAR
CAMP PENDLETON (NYL) BARSTOW, CA
(NFG) (NKX)

H&HS H&HS (1) H&HS (1)

3 x UC-12
2 x UC-35

NOTE:
1) UPON DIVESTURE OF SAR, MCAS YUMA OSA ASSETS WILL CONSOLIDATE AT MCAS MIRAMAR.

* Air station commanding officers have advocacy relationship with wing commander and staff for prioritization and planning for aviation issues.

219
CURRENT MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS PACIFIC ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

MC INSTALLATIONS COMMAND
HQMC I&L

MC INSTALLATIONS PACIFIC
MCB CAMP BUTLER

MCAS FUTENMA MCAS IWAKUNI MCB MCB

CAMP MUJUK CAMP FUJI
(ROTM) (RJOI) HAWAII CAMP BUTLER

H&HS (1) H&HS (2)

MCAS
2 x UC-12
1 x UC-12 KANEOHE BAY
3 x UC-35 (PHNG)

1 x C-20G

NOTES:
1) H&HS MCAS FUTENMA OPERATES 1 X UC-12W EQUIPPED WITH EXTENDED RANGE TANKS.

2) H&HS MCAS IWAKUNI OPERATES 1 X UC-12W NOT EQUIPPED WITH EXTENDED RANGE TANKS AND 1 X UC-12W EQUIPPED WITH EXTENDED RANGE TANKS.

* Air station commanding officers have advocacy relationship with wing commander and staff for prioritization and planning for aviation issues.

220
MARFORPAC/1st MAW ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

NOTES:
1) UDP SQUADRON SOURCED FROM 2d/3d MAW. MARFORPAC
CAMP SMITH
2) UDP SQUADRON SOURCED THROUGH GFMP (USMC/USN SQUADRON).

3) UDP SQUADRON (-) ISO 31ST MEU

III MEF
4) UDP SQUADRON TYPICALLY SOURCED FROM 3d MAW. CAMP COURTNEY
5) 31ST MEU DETACHMENT SOURCED BY1stMAW/3dMAW.

1st MAW
CAMP FOSTER MWHS-1

MAG-12 MAG-36 MAG-24 MACG-18

IWAKUNI FUTENMA MCAF K-BAY FUTENMA
(RJOI) (ROTM) (PHNG) (ROTM)

MALS-12 MALS-36 MALS-24 (-) MTACS-18

VMFA(AW)-242 VMM-262 HMLA-367 MACS-4

VMFA(AW)/VMFA (1) VMM-265 HMH-463

ATC DET A

HMH (-) (4) (5) MWSD-24

VMFA(AW)/VMFA (1) ATC DET B (RJOI)

HMLA (-) (4) (5) VMU 3

VMAQ/VAQ (2) TAOC DET

MWSS-172
VMA (-) (3) MASS-2

MWSS-171 MWCS-18

VMGR-152

221
MARFORCOM/2d MAW ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

NOTES: COMMARFORCOM
NORFOLK
1) MWSS-273 BECOMES MWSD-31 IN FY-17.

2) HMLA-467 DISESTABLISHES IN FY16.

II MEF
CAMP LEJEUNE
3) VMAQ SQUADRON SUNDOWN PLAN: VMAQ-4 in FY17; VMAQ-3 in FY18; VMAQ-2 in FY19

2d MAW MWHS-2
CHERRY POINT

MAG-14 MAG-29 MAG-26 MAG-31 MACG-28

CHERRY POINT NEW RIVER NEW RIVER BEAUFORT CHERRY POINT
(NKT) (NCA) (NCA) (NBC) (NKT)

MALS-14 MALS-29 MALS-26 MALS-31 MTACS-28

VMAQ-2 (3) HMHT-302 VMMT-204 VMFA-115 MACS-2

VMAQ-3 (3) VMM-162 ATC DET (NCA)

HMH-366 VMFA-122

ATC DET (NBC)

VMAQ-4 (3) HMH-461 VMM-261 VMFA-251
ATC DET (NJM)
VMAT-203 HMH-464 VMM-263 VMFA-312
TAOC DET
VMA-223 HMLA-167 VMM-264
VMFA(AW)-224
EWC DET (NBC)
VMA-231 HMLA-269 VMM-266
VMFA(AW)-533
VMA-542 HMLA-467 (2) VMM-365 MASS-1
MWSS-273 (1)
MWCS-28
VMGR-252 MWSS-274 MWSS-272
2d LAAD BN
MWSS-271

VMU-2

222
MARFORPAC/3d MAW ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

NOTES: MARFORPAC
CAMP SMITH
1) MWSS-374 BECOMES MWSS-374 (-) IN FY17

I MEF
CAMP PENDLETON

3d MAW
MIRAMAR MWHS-3

MAG-11 MAG-39 MAG-16 MAG-13 MACG-38

MIRAMAR PENDLETON MIRAMAR YUMA MIRAMAR
(NKX) (NFG) (NKX) (NYL) (NKX)

MALS-11 MALS-39 MALS-16 MALS-13 MTACS-38

VMFAT-101 HMLAT-303 VMM-161 MACS-1 (NYL)

VMFA-211

VMM-163
VMFA-232 HMLA-169 VMA-214 ATC DET A (NFG)
VMM-165
VMFA-314 HMLA-267 ATC DET B (NKX)
VMA-311
VMM-166
VMFA-323 HMLA-369 ATC DET C (NYL)
VMM-363 VMFA-121

VMFA(AW)-225 HMLA-469 TAOC DET (NYL)

HMH-361 MWSS-371

VMGR-352 VMM-268 HMH-462 EWC DET (NKX)

VMU-1
MWSS-373 VMM-364 HMH-465 MASS-3 (NFG)

HMH-466
VMM-164 MWCS-38

MWSS-374 (1)
MWSS-372 3d LAAD BN (NFG)

223
4TH MAW ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

NOTES:
1) VMR-1 RELOCATES AND REALIGNS
UNDER 4TH MAW IN FY17

2) HMLA-775 (-)/MALS-41 DET B

REACTIVATE ABOARD MCAS
CAMP PENDLETON IN FY17

3) HMH-769 (-) REACTIVATES

ABOARD MCAS MIRAMAR IN FY23

4) VMU-5 ACTIVATES AT TBD

LOCATION IN FY23

5) VMFA-134 (F/A-18) ACTIVATES

ABOARD MCAS MIRAMAR IN FY
TBD

6) VMFAT-501 SAU SPT PLANNED

START FY17

7) MALS DET ADMIN UICS

ESTABLISHED FY17

8) VMA-XXX (AV-8B) ACTIVATES

ABOARD MCAS CHERRY POINT IN
FY TBD

ADW – Joint Base Andrews, MD BKF – Buckley AFB, CO CEF – Westover ARB, MA CP – MCB Camp Pendleton, CA DM – Dam Neck/Oceana, VA JST – Johnstown, PA
MTC – Selfridge ANGB, MI MSP – Minneapolis, MN NBG – NAS JRB New Orleans, LA NFG – MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA NFW – NAS JRB Fort Worth, TX NGU – NS Norfolk, VA
NKX – MCAS Miramar, CA NLC – NAS Lemoore, CA NPA – NAS Pensacola, FL NSGL – NS Great Lakes, IL NYL – MCAS Yuma, AZ SWF – Stewart ANGB, NY
WPA – Wyoming, PA WRI – Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, NJ

224
3.8 MARINE AVIATION MANPOWER

225
3.8 MARINE AVIATION MANPOWER

Marine Aviation Manpower Plans Historically, aviation readiness has been inextricably linked to qualifications and
designation of our personnel. The MOS Initiative intends to improve our readiness
The focus of aviation manpower is to improve current and future readiness
through the creation of metrics that prevent inefficient manning and staffing while
through active management of structure and associated aviation policy. Aviation
also creating opportunities for directed retention incentives of our Marines who
Marines continue to stay highly engaged at home and abroad. Operational tempo,
have attained advanced qualifications.
legacy aircraft reset, and fleet upgrades continue to present challenges to
managing manpower. Force of the Future
In particular, Company Grade manpower shortfalls due to draw-down force Optimizing structure is only a portion of the equation. We demand much from our
shaping measures and delays in pilot production further taxed aviation readiness Marines and we will continue to do so as our Marines begin to operate and
recovery. HQMC Aviation is working with M&RA and Training Command on top- maintain our transitioning platforms with more complex technologies. As we look
down solutions. Additionally, bottom-up approaches are being utilized with at how to better train, man and equip our units to succeed operationally, we are
surveys and Operational Advisory Groups that provide feedback and input from seeking ways to improve the training institutions that provide aviation Marines
the fleet on where HQMC Aviation devotes its advocacy efforts toward. with the proper training to work on our evolving equipment while also reducing
timeline inadequacies that reduce our Marines impact on operational units.
End Strength
With the ever increasing resource demand to train and equipment our Marines, it
The Marine Corps’ end-strength has solidified at 182,000 active duty Marines.
is absolutely imperative that we continue to recruit, train, educate and RETAIN our
Meanwhile, aviation’s current operational needs, continued transitions, and future
most qualified Marines.
force requirements were factored into the Force Optimization Review Group’s
(FORG) strategy that supports our current end-strength level. With no anticipated
growth in end-strength, aviation structure will need to be managed with the
understanding that any increase in structure is at the expense of another
community. Any structure changes must result in a net zero change to USMC
manpower.

Aviation Structure
In FY15, 40,687 active duty Marines had primary military occupational specialties
(PMOS) that were aviation and aviation support-related. Over 22,000 pieces of the
Marine Corps structure are used within our fleet aviation units. Management of
this structure is aimed at optimization in order to support the attainment of
readiness that ensures success for our operational units while also meeting the
needs for transitioning platforms and training institutions.

MOS Initiative
The Deputy Commandant for Aviation has instituted an initiative that will assign
additional MOSs (AMOS) to aviation designations and qualifications that
contribute to the enhancement of combat readiness. As our enlisted and Marine
officers attain flight leadership, instructor and maintenance inspector ratings,
MOSs will be assigned to them to ensure their assignments to the correct units,
and in order to have a metric of the health of aviation.
226
MANPOWER CHANGES WITH A TRANSITIONING FORCE

HQMC Aviation Manpower and Support (ASM), Total Force Structure Division (TFSD) Prowler squadron will stand down until completion in FY19. The management and
and Manpower and Reserve Affairs (M&RA) continue to manage finite resources to redistribution of the VMAQ structure and its personnel will be closely monitored to
meet the expanding requirements associated with our transition plans and the ensure operational readiness is maintained while also responsibly managing the career
operational requirements of our force. paths of those that stay in the community through its final sundown. This will be
accomplished through the continued use of the Transition/Conversion board process
The Deputy Commandant for Aviation advocated for first- tour aviators to spend a and re-designation process of MMOA-3 to fill gaps in manpower.
dedicate period of years in their fleet squadrons before those aviators become eligible
for PCS orders. The goal is to maximize the return on investment while also allowing for MAGTF EW is the Marine Corps’ comprehensive plan to address post-EA-6B Prowler
their professional growth and maturity in their primary MOS. EW requirements. MAGTF EW will be an integration of manned and unmanned EW
capabilities. These capabilities fill operational requirements and also provide the
The TACAIR community has felt the greatest shortfalls in manpower. Solutions are in retention of the EW corporate knowledge that is currently held within the VMAQ
place to mitigate these current gaps. Through improved maintenance and resources in community.
our training commands, the target for improved “normal” pilot production is FY18.
KC-130J Conversion
F-35 Transition
Manpower requirements have been programmed to support all squadron transitions With the active component fully transitioned to the J model KC-130, the reserve
from legacy TACAIR T/M/S’s (F/A-18A/C/D, EA-6B and AV-8B) to F-35 and the component will continue transitioning to the KC-130J through its procurement life
activation of FRS squadrons through the end of the transition. The first F-35B FRS cycle. Additionally, as KC-130 pilots continue their training as Fire Control Officers
(VMFAT-501, which is transitioning to become an O-6 command) is located at MCAS (FCO) in the Harvest HAWK variant of the armed KC-130J, their capability will expand
Beaufort, while F-35B/C maintenance training is located at the Joint Integrated Training while minimizing the manpower impact on the squadrons and on Marine aviation.
Center (JITC), Eglin AFB. F-35C FRS training is conducted at VFA-101 at Eglin AFB. VMX-
22 has assumed the mission of F-35B OT&E.

Transition manpower plans are designed to support manpower requirements for the
introduction of F-35 squadrons while maintaining legacy TMS capability. Aviation will
continue to convene F-35 transition selection boards to harvest

fleet experience to meet squadron staffing requirements. The FY16

Transition/Conversion board selected nine aviators from all TACAIR T/M/S’s. This year
we will select our first two pure F-35 aviators from flight school.

F/A-18A/C/D FRS Training

VMFAT-101 serves as the Marine Corps’ sole F/A-18 aircrew producer for CAT I
aviators with the divesture of VFA-106’s legacy production in FY18.

VFA-106 will maintain a small cadre of Marine instructor pilots to support CAT Other
refresher training for aviators returning to the fleet. VMFAT-101 student production
will decrease beginning in FY22.

EA-6B Sundown and EW Way Ahead

Sundown of the EA-6B commenced in FY16 with VMAQT-1. Each subsequent year a

227
MANPOWER INITIATIVES WITH A TRANSITIONING FORCE

MV-22 Transition UH-1Y/AH-1Z Conversion

Active-duty Marine Aircraft Wings’ HMM-to-VMM transitions are complete and The conversion to the UH-1Y is complete in both active and reserve components of
the transitional focus is now on the reserve squadrons. The move of two 3d MAW Marine aviation. The AH-1Z conversion is still underway with the sequence
VMM squadrons to Hawaii is continuing. This move will provide a greater remaining 3d MAW, 1st MAW, 2d MAW, and then 4th MAW. As of the summer of
distribution of the MV-22 manpower structure across the globe, to better position 2015, 3d MAW has 42 UH-1Y aircraft and 34 AH-1Z aircraft. 2d MAW has 26 UH-1Y
and capitalize on Osprey capabilities while also improving deployment-to-dwell aircraft, and will begin converting to the AH-1Z in the third quarter of FY18. HMLA-
ratios. 469 is next to convert to the AH-1Z aircraft in FY16, followed by HMLA-367.

The detachment capabilities of the MV-22 community continues to expand and The change in Primary Mission Aircraft Authorization (PMAA) mix of HMLA
further highlights efforts to allow commanders to match the appropriate force squadrons to 15 AH-1Z and 12 UH-1Y has created an opportunity for growth in UH-
against our operational requirements in order to optimize our manpower 1Y pilot production. Transition/conversion boards will continue to provide
resources. As the community progresses to fill its ranks and to meet the growth of opportunities to fill available UH-1Y positions.
an additional squadron on both east and west coast, deployment to dwell ratio is
expected to increase which will allow our personnel and equipment more time to HMLA-467 is scheduled for deactivation at the end of FY16 while HMLA-775 will be
rest, refit, train and inevitably increase operational readiness. reactivated as the second reserve HMLA in FY17. The AH-1W production ends at
HMLAT-303 in Q1 of FY19. The AH-1W pilot population will continue to be closely
The annual transition/conversion board process for fixed and rotary-wing pilots monitored to ensure appropriate career progression opportunities are available
from outside the MV-22 community for transition to the MV-22 platform is under and communicated as its sundown nears.
review as the MOS-producing capability of the FRS becomes saturated. B-billets for
officers and enlisted will continue to be staffed by MMOA and MMEA as CH-53K Transition
community health improves. As the VMM community continues to mature, The CH-53K transition is scheduled for 2d MAW, 1st MAW, 3d MAW and then 4th
manpower requirements will continue to be evaluated and improved as required. MAW. Due to a shallow procurement ramp, the first squadron transition will take
four years. Once HMH-366 has completed its transition, squadron transitions will
take 18 months with two squadrons transitioning at a time.

The CH-53K is scheduled to achieve IOC in FY19. In order to ensure a successful

IOC, a large contingent of pilots and maintainers who participated in the initial
operational test of the CH-53K at VMX-22 will transition to HMH-366, the first
operational CH-53K squadron.

In order to capitalize on lessons learned from previous transitions and minimize

reliance on contract maintenance, a maintenance training support detachment
was established in West Palm Beach, Florida. Upon completion of the maintenance
detachment assignment, these Sikorsky engineer-trained Marines will be assigned
throughout the CH-53K fleet to pass on their expertise.

228
MANPOWER INITIATIVES WITH A TRANSITIONING FORCE

UAS Transition Marine Aviation Training Support Groups

The Marine Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Squadron (VMU) tables of organization Marine aviation will reduce time to train and increase the capabilities of our
are structured and manned to support the RQ-7 Shadow, MQ-21 Blackjack, Marines entering into fleet aviation. We are concerned about staffing
and now the Training and Logistics Support Activity (TALSA) for the Small shortfalls in our Marine Aviation Training Support Groups (MATSG). We know
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS). Previously staffed by contractor support Marine aviation MOS production’s linkage to fleet readiness; efforts are
personnel, the TALSA will now be manned and led by VMU-trained Marines in underway to improve instructor staffing.
order to continue the training, maintenance and development of SUAS
throughout the Marine Corps. Additionally, efforts are underway to implement tiltrotor training
modifications that reduce time to train by up to ten weeks while also reducing
A Fleet Replacement Detachment and eventually squadron for the Blackjack is resource requirements. Also underway is a review of the introductory flight
standing up at MCAS Cherry Point. The VMU FRD/S is intended to provide an syllabus (IFS). The goal is to ensure IFS maximizes its value to our future
MOS - producing school for the Blackjack as the Marine Corps proliferates its student naval aviators and student naval flight officers.
inventory with these new systems.
The last initiative under review is to reduce overall time to train for rotary wing
In FY16, VMU-1 completes its relocation from MCAGCC Twenty-nine Palms, CA aviators while also increasing the rotary wing hours to the syllabus. This effort
to MCAS Yuma, AZ. This move will provide more support to VMU-1 through its falls in line with the overall goal of getting our Marines into fleet aviation
physical location adjacent to its parent MAG, MAWTS-1, VMX-22 and the faster, while ensuring that the standards are upheld or improved. The Deputy
Yuma Training Range Complex. Commandant for Aviation will continue to work closely with our Navy brethren
to ensure our Marines’ time and training is optimized.

229
PERSONNEL EXCHANGE PROGRAM

Personnel Exchange Program (PEP)

The Marine Corps shares aviation exchange billets with our sister services, allies, and partners. In addition to these billets, the Marine Corps continues to expand exchange
programs to share tactical experience and operational employment concepts for a new generation of aircraft, unmanned aircraft systems, and C2 technology. Applicants for
PEP billets are thoroughly screened to ensure they are the most competitive and qualified individuals to represent their service and country. Tables 4-2 depicts current
USMC aviation exchanges. More information can be found on the HQMC Aviation website.
http://www.aviation.marines.mil/Branches/ManpowerandSupport/PersonnelExchange.aspx

Current Aviation Exchanges

Foreign Nation or Inter-service Billet with
Country/Service USMC Billets with Foreign Nation or Inter-Service
USMC
ARH Tiger (Aus Army) AH-1 (MAG-39)
F/A-18 (RAAF) F/A-18 (MAG-31)
Australia
F/A-18 Maintenance Officer (RAAF) F-35 Maintenance Officer (VMFAT-501)
Air Traffic Control (RAAF) Air Traffic Control (MACG-38)
CC-130 (CAF) KC-130J (VMGR-252)
Canada
F/A-18 (CAF) F/A-18 (MAG-31)
Finland F/A-18 (FINAF) F/A-18 (VMFAT-101)
Spain AV-8B (SPN) AV-8B (MAG-13)
C-130 (RAF) - A400 IN 2019 KC-130J (VMGR-352)
Mk3/4 (RN) MV-22 (MAG-26)
Mk7 (RM) AH-1 (MAG-39)
United Kingdom Air Defense Control (RAF) Air Defense Control (MAWTS-1)
Typhoon F2 (RAF) F/A-18 (VMFAT-101)
JSF Staff Exchange (RAF Air Cmd) JSF Staff Exchange (HQMC AVN)
Chinook (RAF) CH-53 (HMHT-302)
UAS (RN) UAS (VMU-2)
MC-130 (Cannon AFB) KC-130J (VMGR-252)
EC-130 EWO (Davis-Monthan AFB) EA-6B ECMO (MAG-14)
F-35 (Nellis AFB) F-35 (VMX-1, Fill in 2017)
F-35 (16 WPS, Nellis AFB) F-35 (MAWTS-1)
JTAC (AGOS/JFCC) (Nellis AFB) JTAC (EWTGPAC)
United States HH-60G (Davis-Monthan AFB) UH-1Y (MAG-39)
Air Force Air Traffic Control (Eglin AFB) Air Traffic Control (MACG-38)
Air Defense Control (Hill AFB) Air Defense Control (MACG-38)
F-16 (Shaw AFB) F-5 (VMFT-401)
F-16 (Luke AFB) F/A-18 (MAG-31)
CV-22 (Eglin AFB) MV-22 (MAWTS-1)
CV-22 (Cannon AFB) MV-22 (Fill in 2019)
United States Army AH-6 (160TH) AH-1 (MAWTS-1)
United States Navy F/A-18 (NSAWC, NAS Fallon) F/A-18 (MAWTS-1)

TABLE 4-2
230
 SECTION FOUR MARINE AVIATION ALMANAC

4.1 Platform Quick Reference “Quad” Charts

4.2 Marine Corps Air Station Facilities / MILCON
4.3 Aviation Training Systems Roadmap

231
 F-35 B/C Lightning II

Program Description Program Update

The F-35 brings strategic agility, operational flexibility and tactical supremacy to F-35B has flown more than 15,900 sorties and over 22,500 flight hours
the MAGTF and represents the centerpiece of Marine aviation transformation. F-35B completed successful ship test trials in 2011, 2013, 2015, 2016
The F-35B unites 5th generation stealth, precision weapons and multi-spectral
VMFAT-501
sensors with the expeditionary responsiveness of a Short Take-off and Vertical
Landing (STOVL) fighter-attack platform. The F-35C provides additional flexibility Combined US/UK training squadron
and persistence operating from conventional aircraft carriers. First 2 CAT I students in training February 2016
VMFA-121
The F-35 in 2016: First IOC squadron in F-35 Program
52 aircraft delivered into Marine Corps service PCS to Japan in January 2017
Three USMC F-35 squadrons in place VMFA-211
VMFA-121 Permanent Change of Station to Japan underway VMA-211 transitioned 30 June, MCAS Yuma
First F-35B shipboard deployments on track for 2018 VMX-1
F-35 Operational Test Det Edwards

Working Issues Performance / Systems

Transition Task Force (TTF) and Cross Functional Teams (CFT) Combat radius: Cruise speed w/ attack payload:
CFT 1: Test and Training F-35B = 450 nm; F-35C = 600 nm .94M / Top speed: 1.6M
CFT 2: Organization and Manpower Internal fuel: Offensive systems:
CFT 3A: Maintenance/Logistics F-35B = 14,000 pounds; F-35C = 20,000 APG-81 radar, Electro Optical Targeting
CFT 3B: Installations/Facilities/Environmental pounds System (EOTS)
CFT 4: Requirements Ordnance load-out: Defensive systems:
CFT 5: Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS) integration F-35B = 15,000 pounds; F-35C = 18,000 advanced Electronic Warfare / Electronic
pounds Protection (EP/EW), electro-optical
Internal carriage: Distributed Aperture System (DAS)
F-35B 2 x 1,000 pound class + 2 x AIM- Network systems:
120 AMRAAM Link 16, VMF, Multi-function Advanced
F-35C 2 x 2,000 pound class + 2 x AIM- Data Link (MADL)
120 AMRAAM Low observable, 360° integrated fused
Max gross weight: sensor information
F-35B = 61,500 pounds; F-35C = 70,400 Current software load is 2B / 3i:
initial combat capability
Aircraft will be full combat capable in
232 August 2017.
 F/A-18A-D Hornet

Program Description Program Update

VMFA Mission: Support the MAGTF commander by destroying surface targets and F/A-18A+/C/D Inventory Issues Electronic Warfare
enemy aircraft, and escorting friendly aircraft, day or night under all weather SLAP Phase II, SLEP Phase A and B ALR-67v3 ( 96 DoN ) 86 USMC)
conditions during expeditionary, joint, or combined operations. complete ALQ-214 ( 96 DoN ) (56 USMC)
Phase C (ECP Kit installs began in Intrepid Tiger II V 1 Block X
F/A-18 FY2014)
Weapons
Active: 11 Squadrons ECP-583 / 1153 (A++, C+) APKWS
FRS: 1 Squadron A++ complete Net Enabled Weapons study
Reserve: 1 Squadron C+: 30 aircraft FY16 to FY19 (AFC-638 23 AIM-9X Block II
Enduring Missions Both Coasts a/c from AMARG)
AIM-120D
TAI: 2 squadrons APG-73 RUG II Expand 4/5 (F/A-
UDP: 2 rotational squadrons + 1 assigned squadron 18D)
SPMAGTF-CR-CC: 1 rotational squadron commitment shared with AV-8B All-weather enhanced target resolution
Contingency Operations capability
VMFA(AW)-533 - SPMAGTF-CR-CC Litening Targeting Pod
Generation IV, A/A MSI integration

Working Issues Performance / Systems

F/A-18 Inventory managed to support JSF transition Combat radius: Aircraft gross weight:
500+ nm (900+ km) 24,000-25,000 pounds (13,700 pounds
Structural Life Management Program Goals (minimum) Seating capacity/crew options: external weapons and fuel payload)
SLEP Phase B complete Model F/A-18A++/C: one-seat (pilot- Armament: Air – Air
6,000 hrs 10,000 hrs only) AIM-9, AIM-120, AIM-7, 20mm Gun
2000 Traps 2700 (1500 B/D) Model F/A-18D: two-seats (pilot/WSO) Armament: Air – Ground
8,300 landings 14,500 (20,000 B/D) Dimensions: 20mm Gun, Rockets, GP bombs, Laser
.78 FLE 1.0 FLE (via 350 CBR+) length 56 ft (17.1 m), wing span 40 ft Guided, GPS weapons, Dual Mode
(12.3 m), height 15.3 ft (4.7 m) Sensors:
Mission System Goals to meet AVPLAN Requirements Propulsion: APG-65/73 RADAR,
HOL Mission Computer and upgraded displays two F404-GE-402 engines, each with Litening FLIR, Advanced Tactical Air
G4 LITENING 18,000 pounds of thrust Reconnaissance System (ATARS on F/A-
Digital CAS Interoperability – Gen 5 radio with 29C Top speed: 18D only)
EW Suite - ALR-67(v3) and ALQ-214 Mach 1.8 (Cruise 0.78M – 0.85M) Electronic Warfare:
JHMCS - Complete ALE-39 / 47, ALQ-126B / 165 / 214,
LINK 16 - Complete ALR-67v(2) / v(3)
AIM-120D and AIM-9X Block II
233
 AV-8B Harrier

Program Description Program Update

VMA Mission: Support the MAGTF commander by destroying surface targets and Tactical Data Link Efforts
escorting friendly aircraft, day or night under all weather conditions during Link 16 PPLI capability to be fielded with H6.2
expeditionary, joint, or combined operations.
Link 16 Fighter-to fighter capability with H7.0
AV-8B: Advanced Tactical data link to be fielded in Litening with H7.0
1) Active: 5 Squadrons/80 Aircraft Digital Video Recorder – funded drop-in replacement
2) FRS: 1 Squadron/30 Aircraft Digital Improved Triple Ejector Rack (DITER)
3) Test: 4 Aircraft Airborne VMF Terminal (AVT) procurement and installs
4) Total: 128 Aircraft CNS/ATM Efforts
Enduring Missions RNP/RNAV capability in H6.2
1) MEU: 12 Aircraft deployed / 12 in work ups
IFF Mode 5/S capability in H7.0
2) UDP: 8 Aircraft deployed ISO 31st MEU
Stores Modernization Efforts
3) SPMAGTF-CENT: 10 aircraft (biennial rotation with F/A-18)
APKWS II employment envelope expansion
AIM-9X in 7.0
Intrepid Tiger II V 1 Block X development

Working Issues Performance / Systems

Airframe/Engine Sustainment Combat Radius: ~300nm (500nm w/tanks)
1) Close Ready Basic Aircraft (RBA) gap Weapons Stations: 7
2) Readiness Management Program/Engineering support Empty Weight: 14,912 pounds
Reduce Ready for Tasking (RFT) gap Max Gross Weight: 32,000 pounds
1) Capitalize on the success of RBA gap reduction initiatives Propulsion: Rolls Royce F402-RR-408 turbo fan providing 23,400 pounds of thrust
Sustain Engine Readiness Goal Top Speed: 585 KCAS/1.0 IMN
1) Material availability/sustained production
Armament: 500/1000-pound GPS/Laser/General Purpose Bombs, CBU-99/100,
Post-production support to address obsolescence mitigation CBU-78, MK-77, 2.75/5.0 inch rockets, APKWS, AGM-65E, AIM-120B, AIM-9M,
Warfighter relevance upgrades to meet operational requirement GAU-12
Funded Tactical Relevance upgrades Sensors: APG-65 RADAR, AN/AAQ-28 LITENING Pod Gen 4, NavFLIR, Dual-mode
H6.2 OFP Upgrade Initial Operating Capability in FY18 tracker
1) Initial Link 16 capability Electronic Warfare: ALE-47 ECM, ALR-67 RWR, ALQ-164 DECM Pod
2) RNP/RNAV (GPS approach) Network Systems: Automatic Target Handoff System/VMF, LITENING C-band
3) Mission Planning update video downlink, Intrepid Tiger II
H7.0 OFP Upgrade Initial operating Capability in FY20
1) Full Link 16 capability
2) Weapons modernization 234
 EA-6B Prowler and MAGTF EW

Program Descriptions Program Update

MAGTF EW Mission: Support the MAGTF commander by conducting airborne EA-6B
electronic warfare, day or night, under all weather conditions during 1) Fully funded ICAP III Block 7 upgrades
expeditionary, joint, or combined operations. Increase combat survivability of
ground forces, assault support and strike aircraft & weapons by denying, ALQ-231 Intrepid Tiger II
degrading, disrupting the enemy’s ability to target and engage our forces. 1) Continued development of H-1 variant
2) Continued development of radar EA variant
EA-6B EW Payloads
1) 3 operational squadrons of 6 aircraft 1) Proposed EW Payload for MUX in development
2) Program of record into 2019 F-35B
MAGTF EW 1) Continued expansion of JSF EW capabilities and target sets
Intrepid Tiger II (ALQ-231)
1) AV-8B, F/A-18, H-1 series aircraft
2) EW pods for counter-comms and IW RF target sets
3) Technology and capacity to field radar EA variant of Intrepid Tiger II
4) MV-22B, KC-130J, CH-53K in development
EW Payloads
1) 28 EW Payload for MQ-21

Performance / Systems
EA-6B
1) Combat Radius – 30 min. out; 1 hr. 45 min. TOS - 30 min RTB; 20 min. reserve
2) Weapons Stations - 5
3) Top Speed – Subsonic
4) Empty Weight – 34,000 pounds
5) Max Gross Weight & Use Payload – 61,500 pounds
6) Cruise Speed w/ Attack Payload – 0.86 IMN with Stores
7) Offensive Systems –ICAP III ALQ-218 Receiver and ALQ-99 pods; USQ-113
Communications Jammer; AGM-88 HARM; LITENING Pod; ALE-43 Bulk Chaff Pod
8) Defensive Systems – ALE-47
9) Network Systems - Multi-functional Info Distribution System (MIDS) with
Link 16; Integrated Broadcast System (IBS)

235
 KC-130J Hercules

Program Description Program Update

Mission: Support the MAGTF commander by providing air-to-air refueling, USMC Program of Record (POR): 79 KC-130J aircraft (TOAI)
aviation delivered ground refueling, and assault support airlift, day or night in all 1) 3 active squadrons of 15 KC-130Js (PMAI)
weather conditions during expeditionary, joint, or combined operations.
2) 2 reserve squadrons of 12 KC-130Js (PMAI)
3) 9 pipeline assets (BAI), (1) asset T&E (PDAI)
52 KC-130J aircraft delivered as of the date of this publication.
1) 1 additional aircraft scheduled for delivery in FY17
2) 4 additional aircraft funded
3) 24 aircraft short of POR
Survivability Upgrade Roadmap:
1) AAQ-24B(V)25 DoN LAIRCM/ATW
2) Intrepid Tiger II : final fit, UNS in work
Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap:
1) Dual Vortex (Harvest HAWK)
2) Block 7.0/8.1 with Link 16
3) SRP
4) EO/IR Sensor

Working Issues Performance / Systems

Range (20,000-pound Payload) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,250 nm
1) 4th MAW KC-130J Transition: Accelerated KJ procurement to transition reserve Empty Weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91,000 pounds
component VMGR squadrons from the KC-130T to the KC-130J aircraft Fuel Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58,500 pounds
Maximum Normal Takeoff Weight (2.0g). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164,000 pounds
2) Procurement and integration delays of the C-130J block upgrade 7.0/8.1 will Maximum Cruise Speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320 kts
impact compliance with CNS/ATM mandates. Cruise Ceiling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25,000 ft
Fuel Offload @ 1200nm / 20,000 ft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,000 pounds
3) MILCON transition to an all Marine aircrew training solution requires Fuselage Passenger Capacity (Ground Troops) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Trainers (FuT), Cockpit Procedure Trainers (CPT), and Observer Trainers (ObsT).
Paratroop Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Air Ambulance Litter Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4) PFPS Mission Planning transition to JMPS.

Defensive Electronic Countermeasures:

Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .AN/ALR-56M
Advanced Missile Warning System and Laser Detecting Set .. AN/AAR-47(V)2
Advanced Countermeasure Dispenser System (CMDS) . . . . . . . . . AN/ALE-47
Advanced IR Countermeasure System . . . . . . . . . . . . . AN/ALQ-157 version 2
SATCOM BLOS………………………………………………………Hatchmount KuSS antenna
236
 KC-130J Harvest HAWK

Program Description Program Update

Mission: Support the MAGTF commander by conducting intelligence, surveillance, Status: The capability first deployed in support of OEF in October, 2010 and has
reconnaissance, target acquisition, indirect and direct fires adjustment, battlefield experienced overwhelming success in theater. Feedback from supported units is
damage assessment and destroying surface targets day or night, under all outstanding.
weather conditions, during expeditionary, joint, or combined operations.
Ten aircraft have been modified with A-kits to accept the Harvest HAWK mission
D-kit and six mission D-kits have been delivered to the Fleet. MROC Decision
Memorandum 19-2012 stated the baseline Harvest HAWK requirement is for
Description: The USMC has fielded a bolt-on/bolt-off ISR/weapon mission kit for continuous support to OEF with one mission kit, satisfied through six full (A+D)
use on existing KC-130J aircraft. This mission kit is designed to rapidly re- kits; three kits at 2nd MAW and three kits at 3rd MAW, and that global sourcing
configure a KC-130J aircraft with the appropriate modifications (A-kit) into a of Harvest HAWK assets will be required to support Westpac contingencies.
platform capable of performing persistent Multi-sensor Imagery Reconnaissance
(MIR) and Close Air Support (CAS). Harvest HAWK capability is postured to support each CONUS-based MEF as
directed.

The Harvest HAWK mission kit enables the aircraft to deliver precision fires using
Hellfire, as well as Griffin and Viper Strike, Stand Off Precision Guided Munitions
(SOPGM). The Harvest HAWK mission kit is designed as a complementary
capability that takes advantage of the aircraft’s extended range and endurance.

Working Issues Performance / Systems

Future upgrades (FY17 and beyond): Combat Radius . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300 nm
1) Relocate wing-mounted sensor to aircraft chin On-station time at radius. . . . . . . 8+hrs
2) Regain additional 18k pound fuel capacity. Maximum Speed . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 kts
3) Upgrade Mission Operators Pallet Operational Ceiling . . . . . . . . .25,000 ft
4) Hellfire P+ compatibility. Systems:
5) Full Motion Video (FMV)/Common Tactical Data Link. Sensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AN/AAQ-30 Target Sight System (TSS) FLIR/Camera, 3rd Gen
6) Digitally Aided CAS. Mid Wave FLIR with Color Camera optimizes D/R/I ranges, Laser Range Finder and
Designator
7) JAGM
Fire Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lockheed Martin Littoral Combat Ship Fire Control Station
(FCS), SOCOM Battle Management System (BMS)
Weapons: (2 Air to Ground Weapons Stations)
(4) wing-mounted AGM-114 Hellfire
(2) shot pressurized SOPGM launcher integrated into right hand paratroop door
Interoperability:
AN/ARC-210 HAVEQUICK/ SINCGARS Radio,
UHF frequency hopping system, SATCOM, Rover IV Down Link

237
 KC-130T Hercules

Program Description Program Update

Mission: Support the MAGTF commander by providing air-to-air refueling, KC-130J Transition: 4th MAW KC-130Ts will be sold via FMS or retired as KC-130Js
aviation delivered ground refueling, and assault support airlift, day or night in all are delivered. VMGR-234 (Fort Worth, TX) has transitioned to the KC-130J as of
weather conditions during expeditionary, joint, or combined operations. August 2015, followed by VMGR-452 (Newburgh, NY).

Projected IOC (5 KC-130Js):

1) VMGR-452 – FY20

Projected FOC: (12 KC-130Js):

1) VMGR-234 – FY24
2) VMGR-452 – FY26

NOTE: KC-130Ts will continue to operate in

4th MAW until the reserve KC-130J transition
timeline can be defined

Working Issues Performance / Systems

KC-130T Parts Obsolescence/Readiness Extension: Due to KC-130J procurement Range (20,000-pound Payload) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,000 nm
delays, the USMC is investing in upgrades as a bridge to KC-130J transition. Empty Weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,000 pounds
Fuel Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,500 pounds
Electronic Propeller Control System
Maximum Normal Takeoff Weight (2.0g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155,000 pounds
Engine Indicator Display System Maximum Cruise Speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300 kts
Cruise Ceiling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,000 ft
Weather RADAR Fuel Offload @ 1200nm / 20,000 ft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,000 pounds
GPS Passenger Capacity (Ground Troops) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Paratroop Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
TACAN Air Ambulance Litter Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

Defensive Electronic Countermeasures:

Tactical Systems Operator End of Mission: POA&M to manage sundown of Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AN/APR-39A(V)2
existing inventory of Warrant Officer and Enlisted Tactical Systems Operators. Advanced Missile Warning System and Laser Detecting Set . . AN/AAR-47(V)2
Advanced Countermeasure Dispenser System (CMDS) . . . . . . . . . AN/ALE-47
Advanced IR Countermeasure System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AN/ALQ-157A(V)1

238
 MV-22B Osprey

Program Description Program Update

The V-22 is the world’s first production tiltrotor aircraft. Unlike any aircraft before Survivability Upgrade Roadmap: cargo and personnel to be fielded with
it, the V-22 successfully blends the vertical flight capabilities of helicopters with UUNS DON LAIRCM – 2016 (SPMAGTF) SRP
the speed, range, altitude and endurance of fixed-wing transports. JUONS DON LAIRCM – 2017 (MEU) Lethality Upgrade Roadmap:
Intrepid Tiger II V 1 Block X FY19-21 V-22 Aerial Refueling System (VARS)
The incredible effectiveness and survivability of this versatile aircraft have been
demonstrated time and again, from land-based operations in Iraq, Afghanistan Interoperability Upgrade Traffic Collision and Avoidance System
and Special Purpose MAGTFs to sea-based operations in Haiti and Libya. Roadmap: (TCAS)
Iridium SATCOM in FY16 to provide TFLIR; Advanced Targeting Sensor (ATS)
The future of expeditionary operations and crisis response will leverage the speed Beyond Line Of Sight (BLOS) C2 with EO/IR optics, Laser Target
and flexibility of the V-22. Marine Air-Ground Task Force commanders will have capabilities. Designator and Ranging (LTD-R), IR
an expanded area of influence due to the enhanced capabilities of the C-4 UUNS – 2018 (SPMAGTF) Iridium, Marker, and Video Data Link (VDL)
cornerstone of the aviation combat element, the MV-22. Link-16, ANW2, TTNT, CDL, and Ku Enhanced Weapon System; Medium
Software Reprogrammable Payload range immediate suppression
(SRP) with a gateway functionality will Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:
be available in FY20 and will incorporate Open Architecture / Modular Avionics
voice, data, still photos, and video Nacelle Wiring / Blade Nickle Cap/
Airborne gateway functionality for Electrical System)
multiple waveforms, initially including Swashplate Actuator(SPA) / Infrared
Link 16, ANW2, TTNT, and BE-CDL Suppressor (IRS)
Radio frequency identification (RFID) of

Working Issues Performance / Systems

1) Detachment capability for all VMMs (Manpower, Equipment, Training) Combat Radius: 325nm
2) Facilities, readiness and sustainability for the growing fleet Empty Weight : 35,000 pounds
3) Aircraft Survivability Equipment upgrades Max Gross Weight: 52,600 pounds VTOL / 57,000 pounds STO
4) Software Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) with Link 16 Payload: Internal / External - 24 passengers / 12 litters / 12,500 pounds
5) Adding mission kits to support expanded mission sets (Aerial Refueling,
enhanced defensive weapons)
Top Speed: 280 KCAS OP DAMAYAN
Cruise Speed: 266 KCAS
6) Extended range (Aft Sponson, Additional receivers KC-10/KC-46) Defensive Systems: AAR-47 B(V)2, APR-39 C(V)2, ALE-47, M240D 7.62 / GAU-16 Ramp
Gun, GAU-17 IDWS

239
 UH-1Y Venom

Program Description Program Update

The H-1 program replaces the UH-1N and AH-1W aircraft with the AH-1Z “Viper” 1) Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap: Blue Force Tracking, Software
and the UH-1Y “Venom”. The H-1 Upgrades Program is a single acquisition Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) with LINK 16, FMV – 2016
program which leverages 85% commonality of major components, enhancing 2) Relevancy Enhancements: Structural / power upgrades – 2021
deployability and maintainability. 3) Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:– 2021
The Venom is the next generation of utility aircraft. Speed, range, and payload 4) Lethality Upgrade Roadmap: APKWS, Advanced Missile Warning System, DRL
have been increased significantly, while decreasing supportability demands, Digital Rocket Pod, Brite Star w/Laser Spot Tracker
training timelines, and total ownership cost. The advanced cockpit is common to 5) Intrepid Tiger II V 3
both aircraft, reduces operator workload, improves SA, and provides growth 6) Future Upgrades:
potential for future weapons and joint digital interoperability enhancements. 7) Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE)

The cockpit systems assimilate onboard planning, communications, digital fire

8) Degraded Visual Environment solutions
control, all weather navigation, day/night targeting, and weapons systems in
mirror-imaged crew stations.
9) Advanced Threat, Missile, and Laser Warning System
Procurement objective is 160 UH-1Ys, with FY16 planned as the last year of USMC
UH-1Y procurement.

Working Issues Performance / Systems

160 UH-1Ys (Lots 1-13) on contract Combat Radius*: 119 nm
Weapons Stations: Two
1) 136 aircraft delivered to date Empty Weight: 11,700 pounds
2) All active and reserve component HMLAs have complete conversion and have Max Gross Weight: 18,500 pounds
their full authorization of 12 UH-1Ys.
Use Payload (HOGE): 5,930 pounds
Cruise Speed: 139 kts
3) Full Motion Video (FMV)
Offensive Systems:
4) Fleet Installations to commence 3rd Qtr. 2016
2.75-inch rockets,fixed forward or crew served 7.62mm/GAU-17A gun and or crew served
M240D/GAU-16/GAU-21 machine guns
5) Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS)
Defensive Systems:
6) The UH-1Y employs the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS)
AAR-47, ALE-47, and APR-39
* (Mission radius with eight combat loaded troops, 5 minute mid-mission HOGE, 10
minutes on station, and 20 minute fuel reserve)

240
 AH-1W Super Cobra

Program Description Program Update

The AH-1W “Super Cobra” is a combat proven force multiplier for the MAGTF. 1) AH-1Ws are outfitted with the Night Targeting System Upgrade (NTSU), a 3rd
The Super Cobra provides close air support, strike coordination and Generation Targeting FLIR with Laser Designator / Rangefinder and color TV camera,
reconnaissance, armed reconnaissance, escort, forward air controller airborne, which has made significant contributions to the quality of offensive air support
and air interdiction. provided during Operation Enduring Freedom.
2) 90 AH-1Ws have been outfitted with the Tactical Video Data Link (TVDL) system,
enabling aircrews to send and receive sensor Full Motion Video (FMV) in C, L, and S
Bands in support of reconnaissance and close air support missions.
The Marine Corps has flown the AH-1W since 1986, with the last AH-1W delivery 3) The AH-1W employs the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) laser
occurring in 1998. The AH-1W will be replaced by the AH-1Z as part of the H-1 guided rocket system which achieved Initial Operational Capability (IOC) in Mar
Upgrades Program combined with the UH-1Y. 2012.
4) The 20mm Linkless Feed System recently deployed to contingency operations
has increased gun reliability.
Although the AH-1Z achieved Initial Operational Capability in 2011, the AH-1W 5) Systems forward fit to AH-1Z
will remain in service until 2021.

Working Issues Performance / Systems

The AH-1W will remain relevant through the end of its service life through the 1) Combat Radius*: 58 nm
incorporation of the systems below: 2) Weapons Stations: Four
3) Empty Weight: 10,750 pounds
Helmet Display and Tracker System (HDTS)
4) Max Gross Weight: 14,750 pounds
1) Full Rate production approved Jul 2012 5) Useful Payload (HOGE): 3,986 pounds
2) Fleet installs continue through 2015 6) Cruise Speed : 131 kts
7) Offensive Systems: 20mm cannon, 2.75 rockets (to include APKWS), TOW,
HELLFIRE with multiple warhead configurations and AIM-9 Sidewinder
Night Targeting System Upgrade 8) Defensive Systems: AAR-47, ALE-47 Dual Dispenser Pods, ALQ-144, and APR-39
9) * (Combat radius includes 30 minutes time on station and a 20 min fuel reserve)
1) GFE Reliability kits

Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) laser guided rocket system

241
 AH-1Z Viper

Program Description Program Update

The H-1 program replaces the UH-1N and AH-1W aircraft with the AH-1Z “Viper” Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap: Blue Force Tracking, Software
and the UH-1Y “Venom”. The H-1 Upgrades Program is a single Acquisition Reprogrammable Adaptive Networking Wideband Waveform (ANW2) with LINK
Program which leverages 85% commonality of major components, thereby 16
enhancing deployability and maintainability.
1) DI FMV – 2016
The Viper is the next generation of attack aircraft. Speed, range, and payload 2) Relevancy Enhancements: Power Upgrade – 2021
have been increased significantly, while decreasing supportability demands,
3) Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:– 2021
training timelines, and total ownership cost. The advanced cockpit is common to
both aircraft, reduces operator workload, improves SA, and provides growth 4) Lethality Upgrade Roadmap: APKWS, JAGM Advanced Missile Warning System,
potential for future weapons and joint digital interoperability enhancements. Digital Rocket Pod, TSS w/Laser Spot Tracker
5) Future Upgrades:
The cockpit systems assimilate onboard planning, communications, digital fire 6) Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE)
control, all weather navigation, day/night targeting, and weapons systems in 7) Degraded Visual Environment solutions
mirror-imaged crew stations.
8) Advanced Threat, Missile, and Laser Warning System
The procurement objective is 189 AH-1Zs; 152 are build new aircraft (ZBN). 9) Enhanced EW capability

Working Issues Performance / Systems

120 AH-1Zs (Lots 1-13) are currently on contract. 1) Combat Radius*: 139 nm
2) Weapons Stations: Six
1) 54 AH-1Zs have been delivered to date. 3) Empty Weight: 11,700 pounds
2) Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) 4) Max Gross Weight : 18,500 pounds
3) APKWS Initial Operational Capability (IOC) scheduled 1st Qtr. 2016 5) Useful Payload (HOGE): 5,764 pounds
4) Laser guided rocket system: 6) Cruise Speed: 139 kts
5) Full Motion Video (FMV) 7) Offensive Systems: 20mm cannon, 2.75 rockets, HELLFIRE with multiple warhead
6) Fleet installations to commence 3rd Qtr. 2016 configurations and AIM-9 Sidewinder
7) The AH-1Z achieved Full Rate Production (FRP) on 28 Nov 2010 and Initial 8) Defensive Systems: AAR-47 B(V)2, ALE-47, and APR-39
Operational Capability on 24 Feb 2011. 9) * (Combat radius includes (8) HELLFIRE, (14) 2.75” rockets, (650) 20mm, 120
8) First deployment of the AH-1Z occurred in the Fall of 2011 as part of the 11th chaff and flare, 30 minutes time on station and 20 minute fuel reserve)
MEU. It was also the first “all upgrades” detachment in which the AH-1Z and UH-1Y
deployed alongside one another, showcasing the advantages of 85% commonality.
9) Three of the eight active component HMLAs have completed their Z conversion,
and are currently building inventory towards their full authorization of 15 aircraft
10) Reserve component HMLAs will begin their Z conversion in FY19.

242
 CH-53E Super Stallion

Program Description Program Update

The CH-53E is a heavy lift helicopter designed to transport heavy equipment and supplies Interoperability Upgrade Roadmap:
during the ship-to-shore movement of an amphibious assault and during subsequent
operations ashore. Software Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) with LINK 16

The aircraft is capable of transporting 32,000 pounds externally at a cruise speed of 100 Reliability Upgrade Roadmap:
KIAS to a range of 50 NM, hover for 5 minutes, and return. The CH-53E was derived from
an engineering change proposal to the twin-engine CH-53D. Improvements include the Integrated Mechanical Diagnostics System, 419 Engine Upgrade (increases
addition of a third engine to give the aircraft the ability to lift the majority of the Fleet payload by 5000 to 8000 pounds), Prognostic/Diagnostic Based Maintenance
Marine Force's equipment, a dual point cargo hook system, improved main rotor blades, Engine Nacelles, Kapton Wiring Replacement
and composite tail rotor blades. A dual digital automatic flight control system and engine
anti-ice system give the aircraft an all-weather capability. Avionics Upgrade Roadmap:

The helicopter seats 32 passengers in its normal configuration and has provisions to carry Critical Systems Upgrade: Mode V IFF, Master Zeroize Switch, GPS Inertial
55 passengers with centerline seats installed. With the dual point hook systems, it can Navigation System (INS), Brown Out Symbology Set (BOSS), Embedded SATCOM,
carry external loads at increased airspeeds due to the stability achieved with the dual point Smart Multifunction Color Display (SMFCD), Day Heads-up Display (HUD),
system. Degraded Visual Environment (DVE) Phases 2 and 3

We will be flying the CH-53E until replaced by the CH-53K. CH-53E readiness recovery Future Upgrades:
continues to be a focus of the community until the CH-53K transition is complete in 2029.
Integrated Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE), Degraded Visual Environment
solutions Advanced Threat Warner Missile Warner/Laser Warning
Working Issues Performance / Systems
CH-53E Readiness Recovery Effort is a continuous process addressing recommendations from 1) Max range 540 nm; max endurance: 4 hours (unrefueled) / indefinite (HAAR)
the Super Stallion Independent Readiness Review (SSIRR) conducted in order to assist the CH-
2) Empty Weight: 37,500 pounds
53E community to achieve and maintain T-2.0 until Full Operational Capability (FOC) of the CH-
53K in 2029. The recovery plan is expected to be a three year process extending through FY19. 3) Max Weight on Wheels: 69,750 pounds
4) Max Gross Weight with External load: 73,500 pounds
Critical Survivability Upgrade (CSU): DIRCM threat message to CDNU, Smart Dispensing, 5) Internal Load: 32 troops or 24 litter patients or 7 40”x48” Warehouse pallets
Forward Firing Buckets, SMFCD, Day/Night HUD symbology for DVE, EGI data on 1553 Data bus, 6) External Load: Hook rated to 36,000 pounds
AAR-47 Hostile Fire Indication.
7) Flight Controls: Mechanical
Hot Day Performance Upgrade: Upgrading GE T64-416A to GE T64-419 8) External Hook system: Single-point or Dual-point hook system
9) Max Speed: 150 kts
Fleet Common Operational Environment (FCOE) continues to make progress and has done 10) Armament: 2 XM-218 or 2 GAU-21 .50 caliber machine guns, 1 Ramp-mount
recent work with the TRDCs, vibration analysis, and engines. This is a place where data comes in GAU-21 .50 caliber machine gun
from multiple entities, gets processed and analyzed. The FCOE enables fleet relevant outcomes
11) ASE: DIRCM, AAR-47(v)2, ALE-47, Dual Dispensing Pods, APR-39
by arriving at faster/safe solutions and assists with correct technical and business decisions,
based on root cause analysis, driving operational success while reducing total ownership cost.
12) Network Systems: FBCB2 Blue Force Tracker
The release of a new dashboard will provide single point of data displaying the current health of
the fleet using data collected from: DLA-supply status, NAVSUP-supply status, fleet retail sites,
AMSRR / hi-pri report, depot data, open work orders, and open requisitions. The dashboard
will reflect current status of fleet, with data viewing (down to the BuNo) of fleet to the
wing/group and squadron. 243
 CH-53K King Stallion

Program Description Program Update

The CH-53K new build helicopter is the only marinized helicopter that can lift 1) Acquisition Procurement Baseline (APB) approved Apr 2013, Program of Record
100% of the Marine Corps equipment designed for vertical lift from amphibious (POR) 200 aircraft
shipping to inland objectives under high altitude and hot atmospheric conditions. 2) Entered DT Dec 2013
The aircraft will be capable of externally transporting 27,000 pounds to a range of 3) Ground Test Vehicle (GTV) Bare Head Light Off and bladed turn in 2014.
110 NM in support of the baseline MEB and is the only heavy lift helicopter
4) Engineering Demonstration Model (EDM) 1 flew for the first time 27 Oct 2015
currently being developed within DoD.
and EDM 3 flew for the first time 22 Jan 2016.
5) First external was conducted on 19 Apr 2016 with a 12,000lb load.
6) 20,000lb load and 27,000lb load externals conducted on 27 May 16 and 17 June
CH-53K system and capability improvements include : the T408-GE-400 7500 SHP 16.
engine, 88,000 pounds max gross weight airborne, low maintenance drive train 7) System Demonstration Test Articles (SDTAs) 1-4 in assembly, and SDTA 5 and 6
and rotorhead, 4th generation composite rotor blades, CAAS cockpit, triple hook on contract
capability, integrated cargo pallet locking system, and the first DoD heavy-lift 8) Milestone C (LRIP authorization) scheduled for FY 2017
rotorcraft aircraft compatible with the Air Mobility Command (AMC) 463L pallet.
9) Initial Operational Capability (IOC) scheduled for 2019
The CH-53K is designed to reduce logistics shipboard footprint, reduce operating
costs per aircraft, reduce direct maintenance man hours per flight hours, and 10) Full Operational Capability (FOC) scheduled for 2029
significantly reduce threat vulnerable area compared to the CH-53E.

Working Issues Performance / Systems

Sikorsky and PMA-261 in concert with Fleet Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and 1) Max range 454 nm; Endurance: 4 hours (unrefueled) / indefinite (HAAR)
HQMC Aviation currently staffing courseware development to support Training & 2) Empty Weight: 43,750 pounds
Readiness Manuals 3) Max Weight on Wheels: 74,000 pounds
Lessons learned from CH-53E Fleet Common Operating Environment (FCOE) to 4) Max Gross Weight with External load: 88,000 pounds
support CH-53K Integrated Vehicle Health Monitoring System, leveraging 5) Internal Load: 30 troops or 24 litter patients, or 12 x 40”x48” Warehouse Pallets,
predictive Condition Based Maintenance 2 x 463L Pallets (Full) or 5 x 463L Pallets (Half)
6) External Load: Hook rated to 36,000 pounds
CH-53 Transition Task Force meets biannually to provide a proactive mechanism 7) Flight Controls: Fly-by-Wire
for operational forces, both Active and Reserve, to act in concert with the 8) External Hook system: Triple hook system (ability to independently lift and
Program Office and acquisition agencies in the formulation and implementation release three separate external loads)
of each pillar of the DOTMLPF (Doctrine, Organization, Training, Material,
9) Max Speed: 170 kts
Leadership, Personnel and Facilities)
10) Armament: 3 GAU-21 .50 caliber machine guns
On the horizon: Capability Production Document (CPD) is currently in joint staffing 11) ASE: Directional IR Countermeasures (DIRCM), APR-39(C)V2, ALE-47
for Milestone “C”, scheduled for FY17 12) Network Systems: Link 16, VMF, SATCOM

244
 Presidential Aircraft

Program Descriptions Program Update

HMX-1 Mission: Provide helicopter transportation for the President of the United Presidential Helicopter Replacement Program (VH-92A)
States, Vice President of the United States, members of the president’s cabinet, JROC approved ICD Aug 2009
and foreign dignitaries, as directed by the Director, White House Military Office
(WHMO). AoA kick-off Feb 2010
AoA completed Feb 2012
JROC approved CDD Nov 2012
VH-3D - 11 aircraft Source Selection Activities began 3rd Qtr FY13
MS B 2nd Qtr FY14
VH-60N - 8 aircraft
EMD contract award 3rd Qtr FY14
MV-22B - 14 aircraft 2 test articles
IOC planned for 4th QTR FY20
TH-3D – 1 aircraft
FOC planned for 4th QTR22
TH-60N – 1 aircraft 21 production aircraft

Working Issues Performance / Systems

VH-3D Max Ranges
Weight reduction program VH-3D - 90 nm
Abbreviated Cockpit Upgrade Program VH-60N - 200 nm
Wide Band Line of Sight Max Gross Weight:
Service Life Extension Program planned FY15 VH-3D – 21,500 pounds
Additional 4000 hours useful life VH-60N – 22,000 pounds
Training asset delivery 1st QTR FY16 (TH-3D) Cruise Speed:
VH-60N VH-3D – 120 kts
401C Engine Upgrade VH-60N – 150 kts
Service Life Extension Program planned FY15 Passenger Load:
Additional 4000 hours useful life VH-3D – 10 (plus pilot, co-pilot, and crew chief)
Training asset delivery 1st QTR FY16 (TH-60N) VH-60N – 10 (plus pilot, co-pilot, crew chief, and Communication Systems
Operator (CSO))

245
 MAGTF UAS Expeditionary Capability (MUX) ICD

Program Description Program Update

1) Technology demonstration flight in 2018.

• The MAGTF UAS Expeditionary Capability (MUX) ICD will inform a material 2) EOC in 2024
solution that will provide sea-based, high altitude, persistent capability with
ranges complimentary to MV-22 and F-35 missions.
3) IOC in 2026

• Envisioned as USMC/USN POR and teaming with N99

• Scalable MAGTF support; deploy as detachments or squadrons.

• Based on leverage and technical maturation of DARPA Tern/ONR program.

Working Issues System Specifications

Aviation and OPNAV will conduct Pre MS A Acquisition Start up activities to Multi-mission, long range, BLOS to fulfill missions in the battlespace awareness,
include: EMSO, C4 bridge, target acquisition, and strike roles.

Teaming with vendors to develop specifications, formal Technology Readiness Ship-board capable
Assessment (TRA), and develop the Life Cycle Cost estimates.

High-altitude - 30k’
Identify technology maturation efforts needed to augment DARPA/ONR concept
demonstrator to assess viability of aircraft for USMC missions.
24hr orbit at 600nm for 10 days with 2 aircraft

246
 MAGTF UAS Expeditionary Capability (MUX) ICD (Utility)

Program Description Program Update

CMC directed development of an “Immediate Cargo UAS” capability to “get trucks
off the road.” Cargo UAS was in response to 2009 UUNS and JUONS: USMC was
designated lead service. At the conclusion of OEF the K-MAX system returned to CONUS and underwent
repair and reset at the OEM. The system is based with VMX-1 in MCAS Yuma.

Several incremental upgrades to include external fuel tanks, high definition EO/IR
A GOCO Cargo UAS contract awarded to two vendors: Boeing A160 Hummingbird sensor ball and through-the-rotor beyond line of sight datalink will allow the
and Kaman/Lockheed Martin K-MAX. KMAX to expand the Group 4 CONOPS envelope and continue to refine MUX
experimentation and risk reduction.

The MUX ICD will help inform a material solution that provides the MAGTF
The K-MAX system was selected went forward to OEF as part of the Military Users commander with an autonomous tactical distribution and transportation
Assessment (MUA). capability.

Working Issues System Specifications

Combat radius – 84 nm (with cargo)

K-MAX deployed for a six month Military Utility Assessment (MUA) to OEF in 1Q Top speed – 80 kts
FY12; due to its success , that deployment continued for three years.
Delivery accuracy – 10m grid, homing beacon, drop on coordinates.

Payload Capability – 4500 pounds at 12,000’ MSL.

With a range of 84 miles and a payload capacity of 4500 pounds, it flew over 2000
sorties and delivered over 4.4 million pounds of cargo from December 2011 to Spiral Upgrades include:
May 2014.
HD EO/IR sensor

External fuel tanks – increase endurance to > 7hrs

It demonstrated a consistent 95% readiness rate and 1.5 maintenance man-hours
per flight hour. BLOS datalink – increase radius to > 300mi

247
 RQ-21 Blackjack

Program Description Program Update

Primarily an aerial reconnaissance system supporting target acquisition, VMU-2 currently has five systems and is deploying in support of East Coast MEUs
command & control and battlespace awareness support to the MEB or MEU and MARSOC.
commander and their subordinate units.

VMU-1 received its first system in 2016 and will deploy in support of West Coast
In 2005, the Marine Requirements Oversight Council validated an urgent need for MEUs in 2017.
aerial reconnaissance support to the MEB/MEU level MAGTF. Source selection
completed in 4th Qtr FY10 and Insitu Integrator was selected.

After VMU-1 and VMU-2 are FOC at 9 systems, VMU-3 and VMU-4 will receive
RQ-21 systems.
Each VMU squadron will possess nine systems with each system comprised of
five air vehicles and two ground control stations. Capable of operating ashore and
from ships in support of MEU/ARG.

Working Issues System Specifications

RQ-21 is a rail-launched, Sky Hook Recovery System (SRS) aircraft.

System is currently being fielded throughout all CONUS Active Duty VMUs; 5 aircraft, one launcher, one SRS, 2 Integrated Trailer-ECU-Generator (ITEG)
completion projected in FY-22. associated support equipment and 4 HMMVS constitute (1) RQ-21A system

Combat radius – 50 nm (control envelope)

Core Skill Introduction Training (1000 level) will transition from contractor Extended operational range (employing a “hub and spoke”) is 50-100 nm
instructors (Insitu) to USMC in 2017.
Payload – EO/IR/IR Marker/Laser range finder; with future payload capabilities of
EW, Laser designator, SAR, GMTI. 25lb useful load (fuel and payload)

In 2020, the Fleet Replacement Squadron will be stood up at MCAS Cherry Point. Automated Identification System (AIS)

248
 RQ-7Bv2 Shadow

Program Description Program Update

1) Primarily an aerial reconnaissance system supporting target acquisition and
designation, command & control and ISR support to the MEF commander and his 1) V2 Shadow - Tactical Common Datalink (TCDL)
subordinate units. • NSA Type 1 encrypted primary datalink
• STANAG message compliance
2) Marine Corps procurement began in 2007 through an existing Army UAS
program, the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) signed
the Mission Need Statement (MNS) for this capability in 1990. In 2007, Marine 2) As the RQ-21A is introduced, the RQ-7B will be phased out. This transition began
Requirements Oversight Council (MROC) adopted JROC documents and authorized in July 2016 with VMU-2 ceasing RQ-7B operations.
procurement to replace RQ-2 Pioneer UAS.
3) VMU-1 will transition in FY17 to an all RQ-21A Squadron.
3) VMU – 1 and VMU -3 squadron possesses three RQ-7B systems with each system
comprised four air vehicles and two ground control stations. VMUs are organized to 4) VMU-3 and VMU-4 will operate the RQ-7B until 2020.
provide up to three detachments of 50 Marines each providing up to 12 hours of
daily support or deploy as an intact squadron to provide continuous 24 hour daily 5) VMU-3 will actively deploy the RQ-7Bv2 Shadow in the Pacific
support.

Working Issues System Specifications

1) Combat radius – 67nm

1) TCDL (Tactical Common Data Link) initiative provides mandated Type 1 encrypted 2) Max Gross weight – 467 pounds
data link for C2 and FMV downlinks.
3) Payload – POP 300D, EO/IR/IR marker/laser designator
2) TCDL has been fully fielded to VMU-1 and VMU-3; further fielding and training
continues through FY-18 for VMU-4. 4) Rail launched / Runway and arresting gear recovered.

249
 RQ-11B, RQ-12A, RQ-20A (SURSS)

Program Description Program Update

The Small Unit Remote Scouting System includes the RQ-12A Wasp, RQ-11B
Raven, and RQ-20A Puma as the foundational tier of the USMC UAS Family of 1) RQ-11 Raven fully fielded to AAO requirement
Systems.

Organic to select regiments and battalions from the GCE, LCE, and ACE, these 2) RQ-12 Wasp procured to AAO requirement , fielding in progress
hand-launched systems are typically employed at the company level and below to
provide day/night RSTA for small units across the range of military operations. 3) Developing additional payloads for EW, Laser Designator and Communications
Wasp (2.2 pounds) and Raven (4.2 pounds) are man-portable while Puma (13 relay
pounds) is typically employed from vehicles or static positions due to its size.
4) Developing common ground station
Each system includes a laptop-based ground control station and a number of
Wasp, Raven, and/or Puma unmanned aircraft.

RQ-11B Raven

Working Issues System Specifications

1) Program office is continually working to fund and complete procurement to AAO. RQ-11B Battery Powered RQ-20A

2) Efforts to increase RDT&E funding to develop new payloads and improve

Battery Powered 2.5-5 km range Battery Powered
capabilities are essential in satisfying the demand signal for SURSS.
5-10 km range 45 kts Vmax 10-20 km range

44 kts Vmax 50+min endurance 40 kts Vmax

60-90 min endurance 500 ft AGL 120min endurance

150 – 1000 ft AGL 10,000 ft MSL 500 ft AGL

10,000 ft MSL Gimbaled EO/IR , 10,500 ft MSL

laser pointer
Gimbaled EO/IR, laser Gimbaled EO/IR, laser
pointer pointer, EW payload

RQ-20A Puma RQ-12A RQ-12A Wasp IV

250
 VTOL/Nano VTOL

Program Description Program Update

1) Both products are COTS, selected based on market research of available 1) Received final MROC approval (DM 03-2015) for MARSOC U-UNS
potential solutions 2) Fielded to MARSOC units Jan 2014
2) Very small, lightweight, organic ISR asset capable of operation in confined areas 3) Incremental approach phased with MARSOC orbits (deployments)
where vertical launch and recovery is necessary. Capable of operations in a wide 4) Future procurements based on results of field user evaluations
range of environmental conditions.
3) User: MARSOC

SkyRanger (VTOL)

Working Issues System Specifications

1) No funding identified for further procurement and sustainment SkyRanger InstantEye

2) Awaiting clarification of requirements for MAGTF units 1) Battery Powered 1) Battery Powered
2) 5 km range 2) 2 km range
3) 35 kts Vmax 3) 30 kts Vmax
4) 50 min endurance 4) 30 min endurance
5) 15,000 ft MSL 5) 12,000 ft MSL
6) 1,500 ft AGL 6) 1,500 ft AGL
7) Gimbaled EO/IR 7) 1 axis Gimbaled EO/IR

Mk-2 Gen 3 Instant Eye (Nano)

251
 OSA

CURRENT FUTURE
1) Operational Support Airlift (OSA) supports the MAGTF 1) MROC endorsed OSA Master Plan recapitalizes OSA:
2) commander by providing time sensitive air transport of high • 1 x C-20RA
3) priority passengers and cargo between and within theaters of • 2 x C-40A
4) war, day and night, under all weather conditions, during • 12 x UC-12W
5) expeditionary, joint or combined operations • 12 UC-35RA

6) The Marine Corps currently operates 27 OSA aircraft*: 2) Consolidation of CONUS OSA aircraft and personnel:
• 1 x C-20G • Enduring SPMAGTF requirements cannot be sustained under
• 2 x C-9B • current construct
• 12 x UC-12F/M/W • Plan consolidates active component CONUS based OSA assets aboard MCAS
• 12 x UC-35C/D Cherry Point and MCAS Miramar
• Reduction of 3 sites
7) * (2) aircraft remain forward deployed ISO SPMAGTF requirements 3) Creates a sustainable, deployable construct
4) Active/Reserve component construct under analysis

FY17 UPDATES FY17 UPDATES

1) UC-12W Transition:
• Aircraft #7 delivers in fall of 2016. 1) UC-35D ASE
• (8) of (10) aircraft currently equipped
1) UC-12W Upgrades: • Remaining 2 aircraft are funded for completion by 4QFY16
• 3rd ASE Dispenser
 All aircraft funded (2 complete) 2) C-9B Divestiture
• Extended Range (ER) Tanks • To be complete no later than 2025
 Increases range from 1500 – 2400 NM
 (4) aircraft currently equipped 3) OSA assets cannot operate from Futenma Replacement Facility
 Remaining aircraft are funded for completion by 4QFY16
• NVIS Compatibility (Interior and Exterior) 4) WESTPAC relocation alternatives currently under review
 (2) aircraft funded for completion 2QFY16
• Satellite Phone
 All aircraft are funded
 (2) installs complete

252
 C-9B

Program Description Program Update

USMC intent is to divest of the (2) C-9B’s and replace them with (2) C-40A’s

Mission: Provide time sensitive air transport of high priority passengers and 1) Mandate: Based on the current 510 month airframe life our A/C reach life limits:
2) 161529 March 2025
cargo between and within a theater of war.
3) 161530 April 2025
4) DOTMLPF conducted on 12Apr2016 to pursue moving VMR-1 (Flag) and (2) C-
9B’s to NAS JRB Fort Worth and place them under 4th MAW
Description:

1) Boeing / McDonnell Douglass C-9B

2) Capable of transporting 90 passengers
3) 20,000 lbs of cargo
4) Operational range of 1,740 nautical miles
5) Average Age: 33

Working Issues Performance / Systems

1) Range: 1,740 NM with 20,000 lbs
1) Sustaining C9B until divestiture 2,500 NM with 5,000 lbs
1) Crew: 5 to 8
2) FAA SFAR 88 Fuel Tank compliance is complete 2) Length: 119 ft 3 in
3) Wingspan: 93 ft 5 in
3) UNS-1FW funded, projected completion in 1st QTR 16 4) Height: 27 ft 6 in
5) Max takeoff weight: 110,000 lb
4) TCAS 7.1 funded, projected completion in 1st QTR 16 6) Empty weight: 59,700 lb
7) Powerplant: 2× P&W JT8D-9 turbofan
5) CNS-ATM 8) Max Speed: M.84/340 KIAS
• MANDATE: Automatic Dependent Surveillance- Broadcast out to DO 260B 9) Cruise Speed: M.78/485 KTAS
standard by 2020.

• Requires APN-5 funding in FY-17/18

253
 UC-35C/D Citation

Program Description Program Update

USMC intent is to replace current (12) UC-35C/D aircraft with (12) “Super Mid-
Size” class transport with improved range and payload capabilities.
Mission: Provide time sensitive air transport of high priority passengers and

cargo (limited cargo capability) between and within a theater of war.

Description:

1) UC-35C/D twin engine turbofan

2) Capable of transporting 7 passengers or 1,500 lbs of cargo
3) Operational range of 700 nautical miles
4) Cost: $9M (new cost)
5) Acquired: FY98-06

Working Issues Performance / Systems

1) Acquisition of “Super Mid-Size” class aircraft 1) Range: 1,300 NM Max Range
700 NM with 7 Passengers
2) Fleet submission of Universal Needs Statement for improved range and payload 1) Crew: 2
2) Length: 48 ft 11 in
3) Install ASE “A-Kits” in remaining UC-35D assets 3) Wingspan: 52 ft 2 in
• (8) aircraft complete 4) Height: 15 ft 0 in
5) Max takeoff weight: 16,300 lb for C/ 16,830 for D
4) CNS-ATM compliance 6) Empty weight: 9,395 lb for C / 10,642 for D
• MANDATE: Block III Avionics modification includes Future Air Navigation Systems 7) Powerplant: 2× P&WC JT15-D turbofans
1/A and Automatic Dependent Surveillance –Broadcast out to DO 260B standard. 8) Cruise Speed: M.755/420 KTAS
Prototype certification completed 1st QTR 16
• Remaining aircraft will be completed in FY16
• Requires APN-5 funding in FY16

254
 UC-12F/M Huron

Program Description Program Update

Mission: Provide time sensitive air transport of high priority passengers and cargo HQMC intent is to replace all UC-12F/M with UC-12W Huron aircraft.
between and within a theater of war.

Description:

1) Beechcraft UC12F/M (King Air 200)

2) Twin engine turbo-prop
3) Capable of transporting 7 passengers
4) 1,500 lbs of cargo
5) Operational range of 700 nautical miles
6) Cost: $6M
7) Average Age: 24 Yrs

Working Issues Performance / Systems

1) Funding of 4 X USMC UC-12W aircraft to replace legacy UC-12F/M 1) Range: 1,200 NM Max Range
700 NM with 7 Passengers
2) Sustaining UC-12F/M readiness until UC-12W acquisition complete 1) Crew: 2
2) Length: 43 feet 10 inches
3) CNS-ATM compliance 3) Wingspan: 54 ft 6 in
• Mandate Automatic Dependent Surveillance- Broadcast Out to DO 260B standard 4) Height: 15ft 0 in
by 2020. 5) Max takeoff weight: 12,500 lb
6) Empty weight: 7,755lb
• Funding Requires APN-5 funding in FY-17/18 7) Powerplant: 2× P&WC PT6A-41/42 turbo-prop
8) Max Speed: 294 KIAS

4) No install of Aircraft Survivability Equipment for legacy UC-12F/M planned

• - Negative impact to payload

255
 UC-12W Huron

Program Description Program Update

Mission: Provide time sensitive air transport of high priority passengers and cargo Marine aviation intent is to replace all UC-12F/M with UC-12W Huron aircraft.
between and within a theater of war.

Description:

1) Capable of transporting 8 passengers

2) 2,500 lbs of cargo
3) Operational range of 1,500 nautical miles
4) ASE installed
5) CNS/ATM compliant
6) RVSM compliant
7) Cargo door
8) Cost: $15.1M

Working Issues Performance / Systems

1) Funding of 4 x UC-12W aircraft to replace legacy UC-12F/M 1) Range: 2,100 NM Max Range
1,500 NM with 8 Passengers
2) Retrofit Extended Range Tanks for remaining (2) Block I aircraft 1) Crew: 2
2) Length: 46 feet 8 inches
3) Prototype of 3rd dispenser forward firing - kinematic flares has been certified 3) Wingspan: 57 ft 11 in
• Complete remaining (5) Block I aircraft 4) Height: 14ft 4 in
• Aircraft 7 will be delivered with 3rd dispenser installed 5) Max takeoff weight: 16,500 lb
6) Empty weight: 10,200lb
4) Investigating potential requirements for GPS Anti-Jam technology 7) Powerplant: 2× P&WC PT6A-60A turbo-prop
8) Max Speed: 300 KIAS
5) CNS-ATM compliance
• Mandate Automatic Dependent Surveillance- Broadcast out to DO 260B standard
by 2020.

• Funding Requires APN-5 funding in FY-17/18

256
 CAC2S

Program Description Program Update

CAC2S Increment I provides the command and control system to process, display, 1) Phase 1
and distribute air and ground data from sensors, other C2 nodes, and aircraft for • All (20) Phase 1 systems have been fielded to the MASS, MACS, MTACS and Air
the ACE commander to effectively command, control, direct and coordinate air Control Training Squadron (ACTS).
operations in support of the MAGTF and joint force. 2) Phase 2
• Contract awarded to General Dynamics for 3 year development effort: IOC FY17 /
1) CAC2S is an ACAT IAC MAIS program providing aviation command centers, air FOC FY20
defense and air support operation centers
• AAO (50) Aviation Command and Control Systems (AC2S)
2) Key Performance Parameters: Net Ready and Data Fusion
• (75) Communication Subsystems (CS)
3) Common hardware, software, equipment, and facilities
3) Phase 2: MS-C completed Q2FY15
4) Modular and scalable
4) Phase 2: IOT&E Q3FY16
5) Interoperable with MACCS organic sensors and weapons systems; fosters joint
interoperability

Working Issues Performance / Systems

CAC2S Increment I is separated into two phases. Phase 1, currently fielded, 1) Increment I replaces equipment within:
focused on core aviation C2 capabilities. Phase 2, under development, will achieve • TACC (176 seats)
the full CPD requirements of the TACC, TAOC and DASC. • TAOC (17 seats)
• DASC (17seats)
2) Operational Impact
1) Phase 1:
• Provide connectivity between ACE and GCE networks
• Combines non and near real-time data to provide a combined air/ground
Common Tactical Picture, communications, and operations facility. • Integrated air and ground picture providing critical battlespace awareness to the
MAGTF
• Sensor network provides real time composite air picture
2) Phase 2:
• Increases echeloning options between MACCS units
• Fuses real-time, near, and non real-time data
• Agencies not tethered to sensors
• Provides data fusion and sensor integration to TACC/TAOC/DASC
• Provides common HW/SW to TACC/TAOC/ DASC

257
 Marine Air Traffic Control

AN/TPN-31A (V) 7 Program Description Program Update

The AN/TPN-31A(V)7 is a fully autonomous Airport Surveillance Radar and In Operations Support/Sustainment Phase of Acquisition Life Cycle
Precision Approach Radar air traffic control system. When combined with the
AN/TSQ-263 Tactical Terminal Control System, it allows the Marine Air Traffic 1) Total systems: 15
Control Detachment to provide the full range of radar services. • IOC – FY07
• FOC – FY13
2) ECP
1) 2004 Army ORD adopted: ASPARCS over cost and delayed.
• Range Extension - In fielding. Increases primary radar range from 25NM and
2) 2007 System identified as complementary to legacy MATCALS. 10,000 feet to 60 NM and 60,000 feet.
3) Bridging system until G/ATOR and CAC2S. • ATNAVICS Tactical Data Link – Receive only to begin fielding in FY16. Planned
4) Replaced legacy MATCALS with fielding of extended range of version 7 two-way system in development.
5) Rapidly deployable, HMMWV based system transportable with organic USMC • Mode 5 – Developed jointly with Army lead. Installation to commence in FY16.
assets.

AN/TRN-47(V)2 Program Description Program Update

1) The AN/TRN-47(V)2 Airfield Mobile TACAN (AMTAC) is a highly mobile, rapidly Currently in testing as an ECP to the AN/TRN-47 portable TACAN
deployable navigational aid, capable of providing navigational assistance in a GPS
denied environment. Provides range and bearing information for navigational
assistance and forms the basis of non-precision approaches in supported airfields. 1) ECP Part 1 to be complete in FY16
2) ECP Part 2 to commence in 3rd Quarter FY16
2) Replaces AN/TRN-44, ISO-container based TACAN 3) Initial fielding planned for FY17
3) Entire system on one trailer
4) Power supplied by fielded generators
5) Increased deployability with no loss in capability

258
 CTN

Program Description Program Update

The Composite Tracking Network (CTN) system will distribute composite tracking 1) MS C Decision (Oct 08)
data to Command and Control (C2) and weapon systems participating in a 2) FOC: FY 16
Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) network. The system will significantly 3) Fielded to MACS-1,2,4, 24, MCTSSA and MCCES
contribute to real-time situational awareness and high fidelity track data.
4) AAO revised from 25 to 10 (Jan 24th, 2014)
1) ACAT III designation in Nov 01 5) CAB-E Array replacing the CSSA antenna
2) MDA: Program Executive Office, Land Systems-1 Feb 12
3) USMC led with US Navy and US Army cooperation
4) AAO: 10 systems

Working Issues Performance / Systems

1) Money put back into the CTN POM to support CAB-E array antenna 1) System supports WTI & CAC2S/GATOR testing – Can establish CTN/CEC network
development, procurement and fielding in 2017 through 2019 will ensure continued between E-2C, TPS-59 and TPS-80
connectivity with Navy CEC. 2) Fielding : 10 systems – Currently FOC
3) CTN will have two-way data transmission once CAC2S phase II is fielded
2) The NIFC-CA Flag Steering Committee (FSC) was briefed on CTN/TPS-80
operational concepts. The NIFC-CA FSC is exploring how to best include CTN & TPS-
80 into NIFC-CA concepts.

3) TPS-80, CTN & CAC2S need ECPs to ensure the correct message sets are
communicated throughout all three systems IOT use TPS-80 as a target provider for
Navy & Marine Corps IFC kill chains. These ECPs are expected to be low cost and low
risk. Industry & PEO LS currently establishing time/cost estimates for these ECPs.

259
 LAAD

Program Description Program Update

LAAD is the Marine Corps' only persistent air defense capability defending the The Marine Corps is investing in the modernization of current weapon systems
MAGTF against low altitude UAS, cruise missiles and rotary/fixed-wing (RW/FW) and LAAD equipment by:
aircraft. Marine aviation requires a replacement weapon system for the current
Program of Record, the Stinger missile, to mitigate the capability gap versus low 1) Fielding the remaining AMANPADS Inc 1 to provide a common tactical picture
observable/low radar cross-section threats (UASs/cruise missiles). To fill this gap, (CTP) that enables timely cueing for LAAD Firing Teams and enhances aircraft
Marine aviation intends to integrate kinetic (missile/gun system) and non-kinetic identification and target acquisition to engage hostile air threats against the MAGTF.
(directed energy) weapons to provide continuous, low altitude air defense of High AMANPADS Inc I is a C2 bridge for CAC2S and the Composite Tracking Network.
Value Asset (HVA) Aircraft, Combat Operation Centers (MEF COC, ACE TACC, 2) Completing a joint Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) for Stinger Block I
Division COC’s) and maneuvering units. Missiles. The SLEP extends the shelf life to 2028 and serves as a bridge until another
kinetic MDD capability is determined.
3) Transitioning the on-going High Energy Laser (HEL) weapon system Office of
Naval Research (ONR) Science and Technology (S&T) initiative to a Program of
Record with a planned Initial Operational Capability (IOC) of the future GBAD
Weapons System in FY28.
4) Developing, sourcing, and fielding a Mode 5 IFF capability by 2020 to conform to
DoD directed fielding requirements.

Working Issues Performance / Systems

1) Aviation is pursuing incremental approach since there’s no one size fits all 1) GBAD HEL performance includes a HEL cueing source, C2 system, and a GBAD
solution. HEL Weapon System.
2) The Ground Based Aerial Defense – Transformation (GBAD-T) program only
includes funding to maintain the Stinger missile system. 2) GBAD HEL weapon consists of a solid state ruggedized, expeditionary HEL
3) S&T, R&D, and PMC investment is needed to continue developing long-term mounted on a light tactical vehicle with a power source capable of supporting HEL
kinetic/non-kinetic GBAD solution to defeat the full spectrum of UAS, FW/RW, and target engagement rates during a joint engagement sequence (JES).
Cruise Missile threats. 3) The GBAD HEL concept demonstrator will be developed and provided to the
4) Current ONR 30kW HEL initiative is entering its final year of funding (ends 01 Oct transition sponsor to advise the formal acquisition of the GBAD Program of Record.
17) and requires a Technology Transition Agreement signed by ONR, PEO LS and
FPID. Lack of TTA puts this effort and field demonstrations in jeopardy.
5) AOA will be completed in August and will help determine technical maturity of
potential solutions in the 2020 timeframe.

260
 AN/TPS-59A(V)3

Program Description Program Update

The AN/TPS-59A(V)3 radar is the Marine Corps’ only transportable, solid-state, L- In operations support / sustainment phase of acquisition life cycle
band, long range, 3-dimensional, air surveillance, and TBM-capable radar.
1) Post Production Modification II (MK XIIA, IFF Mode 5, and Array Power Cabinet
The AN/TPS-59A(V)3 is the principal air surveillance radar of the MAGTF, used to Technical Refresh)
support aviation command and control required for sustained operations ashore 2) On-going ECPs to address obsolescence :
and as part of a joint theater air and missile defense architecture.
3) Antenna transmitter group ECPs
4) Radar console/servers tech refresh
1) Fielded in 1985: Upgraded in 1998 (Theater Ballistic Missile capability). 5) Information Assurance & SW Integration
2) Upgraded to A(V)3 designation in 2011 to address obsolescence within the 6) ECCM updates (HW & SW)
Control/Signal Processor Shelter. 7) Shelter Tech refresh (limited)
3) Post production sustainment efforts keep radar viable against threats. 8) TBM SW improvements
4) Contributes to CEC/CTN networks by providing early warning track data. 9) RES development
5) Supports ground sensor TBM data requirement to IAMD network via C2 node
(Link 16).
6) IAMD defense in depth, persistent surveillance-threat detection.

Working Issues Performance / Systems

1) HQMC DCA guidance to sustain radar to 2035. Addressed by Program Office
through incremental Engineering Change Proposals and Tech Refresh Initiatives to
address Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) and Obsolescence. MACS-4 1 MAW 2
2) Key Sustainment Metrics: MACS-2 2 MAW 2
3) Implement IFF Mode 5 technical solution per DoD mandates
4) Mitigate obsolescence/DMSMS and issues in array power supply, receiver and
MACS-1 3 MAW 2
exciter cabinets & control shelter op/console/servers MACS-24 4 MAW 2
5) Increase reliability availability and maintainability (RAM)
6) Maintain same frequency and signal strength
MCTSSA Camp Pendleton, CA 1
7) Improve mobility and survivability MCCES Twentynine Palms, CA 1
8) Reduce power requirements and weight Depot Tobyhanna, PA 1

Total 11

261
 METMF(R) NEXGEN

Program Update Top 2 Identified Issues

The Meteorological Mobile Facility (Replacement) Next Generation [MetMF(R) 1) Funding Issues
NEXGEN] is a mobile, fully integrated, FORCENet compliant USMC tactical • ~$7.5M OM/N required to sustain the NEXGEN program - FYDP
meteorological support system. The system delivers relevant, timely METOC • ~$4M.4 OP/N for tech refresh …maintain system baseline
products and mission impact assessments via Common Operating Picture to the
• ~$12-$14M OP/N …procure (3) NEXGENS organic to the INTEL BNs
MAGTF and joint force.
2) Viper Generator issue
1) CPD Approved Acquisition Objective (AAO): 15 modified to 14 per (CMC/APX- • OEM Generator may be unsupportable based upon possible vendor bankruptcy
1, OPNAV N2/N6E) Joint Letter of 17 May 2013 & unavailability of replacement parts.
• 11 of 14 systems delivered to the ATC Dets including MARFORRES. • The ISEA (SSC-PAC) requires ~$.5M funding to conduct AoA
• Funding shortfall for (3) systems remains = ~$12M-$14M 3) Software/Hardware issues
• A new competitive contract must be awarded upon funding • HQMC mandated Windows 10 migration NLT 31 Jan 2017. Effort previously
unplanned/unfunded - quoted at ~$227K by Prime contractor.
2) MACG-48, MACS-24, Det A (MARFORRES) NEXGEN Delivered Q3FY16.
• System remains susceptible to
3) NEXGEN supported deployments/exercises
• dirty power, FY17 plan in place
• Weapons & Tactics Instructor (WTI) Course, Large Scale Exercises (LSE),
Contingency Operations (Afghanistan), SPMAGTF-CR-CC. • to provide power
• Continues to provide METOC support to aviation operations around the world. • transformer/leveler.
• Currently deployed ISO SPMAGTF-CR-CC

Location Contract Delivery Date Smiths Delivery Date Govt Acceptance Date SOVT / Training MILCON Complete?
MCAS Futenma, Okinawa - MACG-18 Det A 11/20/2012 11/20/2012 11/30/2012 8/1/2013 No
MCAS Miramar, CA - MACG-38 Det B 11/30/2012 11/30/2012 12/21/2012 12/1/2012 No
SSC PAC – ISEA 12/31/2012 12/12/2012 1/24/2013 N/A Yes
MCAF Boque Field, NC - MACG-28 Det C 4/30/2013 4/26/2013 6/14/2013 6/1/2013 No
NAS Pensacola, FL 6/13/2013 5/21/2013 5/30/2013 5/21/2013 Yes
MCAS New River, NC - MACG-28 Det B 5/31/2013 5/29/2013 6/14/2013 6/1/2013 No
MCAS Yuma, AZ - MACG-38 Det C 6/28/2013 7/1/2013 7/20/2013 7/1/2013 No
MCAS Iwakuni, Japan - MACG-18 Det B 7/23/2013 7/15/2013 7/25/2013 8/1/2013 Yes
MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA - MACG-38 Det A 7/07/2014 7/07/2014 8/1/2014 10/1/2014 N/A
MCAS Beaufort, SC - MACG-28 Det A 7/31/2014 7/31/2014 9/22/2014 2/16/2015 N/A
NAS JRB Fort Worth Tx, MACG-48 Det A 9/25/2015 1/15/2016 2/11/2016 2/26/2016 Partially
1st Intelligence BN, Camp Pendleton CA
2nd Intelligence BN, Camp Lejeune, NC Unfunded Requirement
3rd Intelligence BN, Camp Hanson, Okinawa
262
 P-19A Replacement (P-19R)

Program Description Program Update

This initiative replaces the A/S32P-19A Aircraft Crash and Structure Fire Fighting 1) Training Curriculum Overview March 2015.
Truck, TAMCN D1064, known as the P-19A. The P-19A, introduced into service in 2) Milestone “C” achieved on 31 March 2015.
1984, with a service life of 12 years, has undergone depot level rebuild two times. 3) Field User Evaluation planned for November 2015.
Chart reflects current funding profile as of 4 Feb 2014
1) The P-19A is the Marine Corps’ only major aircraft fire fighting vehicle, utilized at
Marine Corps Air Stations and Forward Operating Bases for immediate response to
aircraft emergencies (primary) and structural fires (secondary).
2) At 30 years of service, the P-19A faces parts obsolescence, frame fatiguing, and FY1
APPN 3 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY13-19
possesses 1984-era mechanical and fire fighting technology.
3) The P-19R is compliant with current National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) RDTEN $6.5 $.9 $1.6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9.0
standards for aircraft rescue and fire fighting vehicles, resulting in a vehicle PMC $0 $16.9 $11.0 $30.1 $33.1 $16.0 $16.3 $123.4
optimized for crew/operator safety and fire fighting effectiveness.
OMMC $0 $.6 $1.1 $1.2 $1,5 $1,5 $1.6 $7.5
4) The P-19R drivetrain and power-pack maintains up to is 75% commonality with
current USMC tactical vehicles (MTVR and LVSR), resulting in greater logistical and OTHER $0 $0 $0 $.949 $.966 $.984 $1.0 $3,9
maintenance supportability. COTS fire fighting components (Pierce Mfg.) will
TOTAL $6.5 $18.4 $13.7 $32.2 $35.5 $18.5 $18.9 $143.8
increase parts availability and sustainability.

Working Issues Performance / Systems

1) P-19A Replacement initial operational capability (IOC) is planned for Fiscal Year 1) 4-man crew
(FY) 2017. IOC is achieved when one MAW has received a complete issue of P-19A 2) 1,000 gallon water tank, 130 gallon foam concentrate tank
Replacements, the assigned mechanics and crews have received initial training at the 3) Approximately 75% parts commonality between P-19R, LVSR, and MTVR
Operator/Crew, Field and Sustainment levels and sufficient repair parts are in place
to support operations. 4) Proven MTVR Transmission and chassis powered by LVSR engine
5) EPA approved chemical firefighting agent (minimum of 500 pounds)
2) P-19A Replacement full operational capability (FOC) is desired by FY 2020 to 6) National Fire Protection Association Standard 414 compliant
meet the Approved Acquisition Objective (AAO) of 164. 7) JP-8 capable with range of 150 miles @ 55 mph
8) 0 to 50 mph in 25 seconds or less
3) MARCORSYSCOM and I&L proceeding with the SLEP of MWSS and MCAS P-19As 9) Alternate Power Unit (APU) to reduce engine idle time
to extend service life . 10) Capability to draft water from a static supply source (structural panel-equipped)

263
 EAF Sustainment Lighting System (SLS)

Program Description Program Update

Current EAF hard-wire lighting system utilizes 1960-era technology, is
maintenance intensive, and consistently encounters logistical challenges due to
parts obsolescence.
TY$M FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY14-18
1) The EAF SLS will make use of all available modern energy efficiency technology OPN -- -- -- -- 0.0 0.0
(Improved batteries, solar capability, etc.). POM 14 Req -- -- -- -- 23.1 23.1
2) SLS will be lighter, easily adaptable to various airfield configurations, and heat-
resistant IOT support MV-22 and F-35B operations. Delta -- -- -- -- -23.1 -23.1
3) EAF SLS will fill existing capability gap by providing the visual cues required for TY$M FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY14-18
CAT I, precision IFR approaches. Effectively “marrying” MACG and EAF capabilities to
provide a safer operational environment for our aviators. RDTEN 3.1 7.6 20.3 15.0 11.0 0.0 59.2
POM 14 Req 5.2 9.3 18.2 19.5 10.1 67.6

Delta 2.4 11.2 -3.2 -8.5 -10.1 -8.2

TY$M FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY14-18

Total Delta 2.4 11.2 -3.2 -8.5 -33.2 -31.3

Working Issues
1) Milestone “B” achieved on 5 December 2014
2) Milestone “C” slated for 15 February 2019
3) Initial operational capability (IOC ) is expected on 11 December 2019
4) Full operational capability (FOC) is expected on 13 August 2020

264
 Light-weight Matting (MV-22 Cap)

Initiative Description Initiative Update

This initiative will develop and field, to the MWSS Expeditionary Airfield Platoon, a There are possible COTS solutions available that are currently undergoing testing
light-weight matting solution that will withstand the heat signature produced by at Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) as part of an Expeditionary
the MV-22 aircraft. Airfield (EAF) Congressional plus-up. A gap was identified in the EAF 2014
Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA) for MV-22 capable light-weight matting,
subsequently, an EAF Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) has been staffed and a
light-weight matting Capabilities Description Document (CDD) is slated to kick-off
in late June 2016.

Initiative Requirements
1) The system shall support the operations of both aircraft and ground support
vehicles
2) The matting shall withstand the heat/flux duration of MV-22 air and ground
operations with degradation of structural integrity
3) The system should require minimum ground preparation, minimum CBR of four
4) EAF Marines should be able to install the matting at a rate of 600 square feet
per man-hour using a four man crew
5) The matting system must contain a non-skid surface and mate with AM-2
medium duty matting system
6) Matts shall be recoverable and suitable for reuse after being subject to a
conditional inspection, cleaned, and repackaged
7) The matt shall be able to withstand exposure to all POLs without degradation to
performance or structure

265
 Airfield Damage Repair

Program Description Program Update

Marine Wing Support Squadron (MWSS) engineers supporting Marine Corps Task 1) Statement of Need Change request has been submitted to CD&I
(MCT) 6.3.3 Restore Mission Essential Operations/Communications have a critical 2) ADR kit allocations have been identified
requirement to upgrade their current ADR capability to support semi-permanent 3) Volumetric mixer is being tested by ERDC.
(concrete) repair of 12-24 small (< 10’) craters within 6 hours using organic
means. These repairs will provide a Minimum Operating Strip (MOS) of 50’ x
5000’ on an airfield that has experienced an attack, which will allow for the launch
and recovery of United States Marine Corps (USMC) KC-130 and fighter aircraft.

The required capability for one ADR Kit is to provide the tools and materials to
repair six 10-foot diameter craters, in a concrete surface, and/or fifteen 10-foot
diameter craters, in an asphalt surface, in less than 92 minutes plus (+) a two hour
curing period. One ADR Kit must also contain the materials to repair 45 spalls in a
concrete surface.

Working Issues Performance Systems

1) The total program cost is anticipated to be approximately $34,000,000. Current 1) Self-Contained Volumetric cementitious material mixing capability capable of
funding for this program consist of: $11.5M [FY17 -Family of Construction Equipment hydrating, mixing and placing cementitious flowable fill and rapid setting crater
(FCE)], $5M (FY18 - FCE), and $5M (FY19 - FCE), totaling $21.5M. Based upon the capping materials.
established AAO, this program will not be fully funded. Because of this, it has been 2) Material to enable small crater repair including a cementitious flowable fill.
designated to fund the following units (by priority): Marine Corps Engineer School, 3) A rapid setting crater capping material.
Marine Wing Support Squadrons, Engineer Support Battalions
4) Lightweight and scaleable FOD cover.
5) FOD cover anchoring system tools.
6) Rubber tracked skid-steered/loader capable of powering the existing ADR Kit
attachments, equipped with steel road wheels and a high flow hydraulic system
capable of powering a wheel saw attachment able to cut reinforced concrete to a
depth of 22 inches.
7) Drum type Concrete mixing attachment for skid steer that will allow the mixing,
transport and dumping of concrete where required.
8) Moil Points and rubber tracks for excavator.

266
 Aviation Training Systems

Current state of the USMC Aviation Training System Future AVPLAN FY18-28
1) Marine aviation will have significant growth in fielded simulators from 94 1) All new and upgraded trainers have USMC TEn and core database architecture
currently to 175 by the end of FY 19. enabling cross Type/Model/Series, community, and network circuit connectivity via
2) Currently 64 are enabled for local or wide area networked Distributed Mission ADVTE.
Training (DMT) over the Aviation Distributed Virtual Training Environment (ADVTE). 2) Of the 175 devices projected in the ATS by FY19, over 120 are programmed to be
3) The Marine Corps Automated Learning System (MCALMS) is the program of connected to ADVTE (H-1, V-22, H-53E/K, F/A-18, F-35, UAS, KC-130, and AV-8B).
record that delivers courseware via an approved .mil architecture. T&R simulation • ADTVE next generation and the TEn Technical Refreshers (TR) will target:
requirements account for 15-37% in the core and mission skill phase on average for • Integration of 1st and 4th MAW into the ADVTE architecture.
USMC aviation platforms; several incorporate over 50-90% simulation in the basic • Creation of a USMC Common Synthetic Training Area (CSTA).
skill, mission and core skill, and flight leadership development syllabi.
• Upgrades and updates to the TEn hard/software interface.
3) MAVWC procured and operational at MCAS Yuma enabling robust, MAGTF level
virtual training.
4) MCALMS upgrades will allow for local and central database access and more
tailored courseware delivery.

ATS Process incorporates:

1) Delivering higher fidelity simulation: 1) Flight Leadership Standardization and Evaluation – rigorous platform evaluation
• New acquisition and technical refreshes of existing devices using future modeling under the governing T&R and MAWTS-1 Program Guides.
and simulation industry technology. 2) Concurrency Management – evaluating and adjusting curricula, systems, and
• Development of a USMC CSTA of sufficient fidelity to enable “fair fight” courseware for changes in platform/OFP and tactics.
correlated simulated training environments; Goal to promote interoperability 3) Training Information Management Systems – MSHARP and ASM spiral
within ATS, the USMC GCE and joint DMT Circuits. development to track training, and MCALMS to deliver courseware
• Improved threat and weapons databases and interfaces. 4) Risk Mitigation – promoted by flight leadership discipline and adherence to
1) Restructuring of existing simulator policies and orders to capitalize on the established procedures and requirements.
current and future USMC simulator and ATS assets (classrooms, Brief/Debrief spaces, 5) Training Management Process – forum to identify and present training issues
mission planning spaces, training devices etc.) which will cement the uniformed and across DOTMLPF to efficiently and holistically develop funding strategies and
civilian manpower requirements that critically support the ATS mission. solutions within formal requirements process.
2) Improving MCALMS, enabling local and central updating and tailored instruction
delivery.

267
4.2 MARINE CORPS AIR STATION FACILITIES AND MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN

Aviation military construction (MILCON) projects are essential to achieving the Marine Corps air stations and air facilities must remain viable in the future. Where
Commandant’s vision for Marine Corps aviation. MILCON projects enable IOC possible, existing physical assets will be used as a bridge to the full funding and
fielding for introducing new weapon systems, such as the CH-53K, RQ-21A, and F- construction of MILCON programs. The introduction of F-35B and other weapon
35B to the operational forces and training commands. MILCON designs will focus systems will require additional MILCON resources to ensure programmatic and
on flexibility of use to allow new weapon systems, squadron relocations, and re- operational risk to both Marine Corps aviation and the Marine Corps as a whole
designations to serve MAGTF requirements as they evolve over time. Marine are mitigated. Consequently, Marine aviation has planned MILCON projects which
Corps aviation’s new weapon systems have a much greater range and more robust validate the commitment to establish a JSF capability within the MEFs as per the
capabilities than legacy platforms. As a result, the use of air station facilities, TACAIR Transition Plan. Some risk can be accepted in order to move forward with
ranges, and air space may differ to accommodate these enhanced capabilities. the modernization of the force, but the resources must eventually be found to
recapitalize air stations.
The MILCON, DPRI, and host nation projects listed in the following tables
represent projects required for the realization of the current AVPLAN, air safety or
required to address some deficiencies. The project tables represent a snapshot in
time, are subject to change and include pure AVPLAN and regular air station
projects.

268
4.2 MARINE CORPS AIR STATION FACILITIES AND MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN
MCI EAST
QUANTICO AIR FACILITY CHERRY POINT, CONT. LEJEUNE
FY14 P-1406 ATC TX/RX RELOCATION FY22 P-234 F-35 MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY FY19 P-456 REPAIR RUNWAY 5/23 CAMP DAVIS SOUTH
FY16 P-647 ATFP GATE FY22 P-205 VERTICAL LANDING PAD IMPROVEMENTS BEAUFORT
CHERRY POINT FY22 P-207 GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT SHOP FY13 P-459 RECYCLE/HAZWASTE FACILITY
FY13 P-163 MASS-1 COMPLEX FY22 P-209 ENGINE MAINTENANCE FACILITY FY14 P-465 AIRCRAFT HANGAR - VMFA
FY16 P-193 WATER SYSTEMS UPGRADES & IMPROVEMENTS
FY22 P-226 MALS 14 MAINT HANGAR / MAG14 HQs FY14 P-473 TOWNSEND BOMBING RANGE ACQ - PH 1
FY16 P-194 UAS FACILITIES EXPANSION FY22 P-562 POST OFFICE FY14 AM00037 LAUREL BAY ELEM/MIDDLE SCHOOL
FY16 P-229 KC-130 FUSELAGE TRAINER FY22 P-142 FIRE STATIONS FY15 DLA 1606 JET FUEL STORAGE & PIPELINE REPLACE
FY16 P-222 AIRFIELD SECURITY UPGRADES FY24 P-200 F-35 HANGAR (2 MODULES) FY16 P-474 TOWNSEND BOMBING RANGE ACQ - PH 2
FY17 P-224 CENTRAL HEATING PLANT CONV FY27 P-201 F-35 HANGAR (1 MODULE) RESERVE FY17 P-464 AIRCRAFT HANGAR - VMFAT
FY17 P-233 LHD TOWER - BOGUE NEW RIVER FY19 P-457 CRYOGENICS FACILITY
FY19 P-235 FLIGHTLINE UTILITIES UPGRADE, PH I FY14 P-726 REGIONAL COMM STATION FY19 P-476 REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
FY19 P-199 F-35 HANGAR (2 MODULES) FY14 P-676 CH-53K MAINTENANCE TRAINING FY19 P-484 F-35 MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY
FY19 P-658 INDOOR FITNESS FACILITY FY14 P-674 CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR FY19 P-458 LAUREL BAY FIRE STATION
FY19 P-134 PHYSICAL SECURITY - SLOCUM ROAD FY16 P-729 OPERATIONAL TRAINER FACILITY FY19 P-487 CLIMATE CONTROLLED WAREHOUSE
FY19 P-080 ATLANTIC FIELD SECURITY FY16 P-686 ATC FACILITY ADDITION FY20 P-471 MAG-31 HEADQUARTERS
FY19 P-129 MACS-2 OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE FY19 P-690 STATION ARMORY FY20 P-482 MACS-2 VEHICLE STORAGE & MAINT FAC
FY19 P-196 RIFLE RANGE OPERATIONS BUILDING FY19 P-675 REGIONAL STORMWATER BMP FY20 P-485 F-35 OPERATIONAL SUPPORT FACILITY
FY20 P-130 MWSS MOTOR TRANSPORT & COMM SHOP FY19 P-728 C-12 A/C MAINT HANGAR FY21 P-475 AIRCRAFT HANGAR - VMFAT
FY20 P-173 MWCS DETACHMENT FACILITIY FY19 P-389 GROUP HEAD QUARTERS MAG-29 FY21 P-488 WAREHOUSE
FY20 P-143 PHYSICAL SECURITY GRADES - MAINGATE FY19 P-709 ORDNANCE STORAGE FY21 P-481 MRAP STORAGE AND MAINT FACILITY
FY20 P-223 POTABLE WATER WELLS FY19 P-706 SQUADRON WAREHOUSE FY21 P-483 RUNWAY OVERRUNS
FY20 P-227 CONSTRUCT TARGET BERMS AT BT-11 FY19 P-724 LIBRARY AND EDUCATION CENTER FY22 P-477 JET FUEL SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION
FY20 P-232 CALA BERM FY19 P-713 THEATER FY22 P-480 UPGRADE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE
FY20 P-204 TRAINING AND SIMULATOR FACILITY FY19 P-366 CH-53K BRIDGE CRANE UPGRADES FY22 P-462 F-35B ASSAULT STRIP
FY20 P-167 ORDNANCE MAGAZINES FY19 P-378 CH-53K REPLACE AS3905 FY22 P-479 EXPEDITIONARY CONSTR COMPLEX
FY20 P-210 MCALF BOGUE AIRFIELD IMPROVEMENTS FY19 P-635 OSPREY SUPPORT CENTER FY22 P-478 STATION MAINTENANCE COMPLEX
FY20 P-228 ATC TOWER &AIRFIELD OPS FY19 P-721 MALS ADDITION FY23 P-489 WAREHOUSE
FY21 P-149 GUIDED MISSILE INTEGRATION FACILITY FY20 P-712 DOUGLASS GATE SECURITY UPGRADE FY23 P-486 ORDNANCE CONTROL BUNKERS
FY21 P-197 F-35 HANGAR (2 MODULES) FY21 P-386 REPLACE AS4108
FY21 P-162 SECURITY OFFICE FY22 P-660 REPLACE AS515
FY21 P-202 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT STORAGE FY23 P666 REPLACE AS518
FY21 P-203 AVIATION ARNAMENT SHOP FY24 P672 REPLACE AS4106
FY21 P-239 FLIGHTLINE UTILITIES UPGRADE, PH II

269
4.2 MARINE CORPS AIR STATION FACILITIES AND MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN
MCI WEST
YUMA YUMA, CONT. MIRAMAR, CONT.
FY13 P-378 SECURITY OPERATIONS FACILITY FY21 P-570 AIRCRAFT MAINT HANGAR (F-35) FY17 P-249 F-35 COMM BLDG & INFRA UPGRADE
FY15 P-617 MALS-13 FACILITIES UPGRADES (F-35) FY22 P-600 MAINT BUILT IN TEST PADS (F-35) FY17 P-203 F-35 AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON
FY16 P-602 MAWTS-1 CALA MAINT COMPLEX PH I FY22 P-572 COMPOSITE REPAIR FACILITY (F-35) FY18 P-198 F-35 AIRCRAFT MAINT HANGAR A
FY17 P-612 VMX-22 MAINT HANGAR (MV-22/CH-53K) FY22 P-587 TAXIWAY UPGRADES FY19 P-238 F-35 AIRFIELD SECURITY
FY18 P-539 ENLISTED DINING FACILITY FY22 P-598 CONSOLIDATED CHILLER FACILITY FY19 P-256 MALS HANGAR COMPLEX
FY19 P-538 BEQ (F-35) FY22 P-616 LOX/N2 FACILITY FY19 P-250 CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
FY19 P-596 HANGAR 95 REN & ADD (VMX -- F-35) FY22 P-605 UAS HANGAR (GROUP 4/5) FY19 P-166 LEGAL SERVICES CENTER
FY19 P-620 AME STORAGE ADDITION, HANGAR 80 FY22 P-553 POST OFFICE FY19 P-197 INDOOR FITNESS FACILITY
FY19 P-621 AME STORAGE ADDITION, HANGAR 78 FY23 P-585 RUNWAY UPGRADES (F-35) FY19 P-210 F-35 SIMULATOR FACILITY
FY19 P-623 MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY FY24 P-576 ALF PH II (F-35) FY19 P-222 F-35 VERTICAL LANDING PADS
FY19 P-364 FITNESS/WATER SURVIVAL TRAINING FAC FY25 P-532 SECURE ACCESS CONTROL FACILITY FY19 P-205 PLESS AVE ROAD EXTENSION
FY19 P-619 F-35 MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY FY27 P-580 FLIGHT LINE PARKING STRUCTURE (F-35) FY19 P-225 AIRFIELD TAXIWAY
FY19 P-504 CONSOLIDATED STATION ARMORY MCAS PENDLETON & MCB PENDLETON (AIR SUPPORT) FY20 P-244 MATCU OPERATIONS BUILDING
FY19 P-501 FIRE STATION FY16 P-1607MR CONSTRUCT SIMULATOR ROOMS IN B-23194 FY21 P-193 BACHELORS ENLISTED QUARTERS
FY19 P-421 STUDENT QUARTERS BOQ FY16 P-132 ORDNANCE BUILD UP FACILITY FY21 P-204 VEHICULAR BRIDGE
FY19 P-606 UAS AVIATION LOGISTICS SUPPORT COMPLEX
FY19 P-120 DOUBLE HANGAR EXPANSION FY22 P-254 CENTRAL ENGINE REPAIR FAC (CERF)
FY19 P-604 GROUP 3 UAS OPERATIONS FAC FY19 P-137 AVN CORROSION CONTROL FAC FY23 P-258 HANGAR 3 MOD AND ADDITION
FY19 P-568 CLC-16 COMPOUND FY19 P-134 MULTI-PLATFORM AVIATION SIM FAC FY23 P-190 TACTICAL COMM OPS & TRAINING FAC
FY19 P-579 AVIATION MAINTENANCE STORAGE FAC FY21 P-140 ARM AND DEARM TAXIWAY FY23 P-191 TACTICAL AIR CONTROL EQUIP FAC
FY19 P-536 MAG/MALS/STATION OPS FACILITY (F-35) FY21 P-135 AVIATION PRESERVATION WAREHOUSE FY23 P-194 ARMORY ADDITION
FY19 P-551 AIRCRAFT MAINT HANGAR (F-35) FY21 P-139 AIRCRAFT RESCUE & FIRE FIGHTING STA FY24 P-216 RUNWAY 24R PHASE 1
FY20 P-538 BEQ (F-35) FY22 P-138 MARINE AVIATION VMU-4 FACILITIES FY25 P-201 F-35 AIRCRAFT MAINT HANGAR B
FY20 P-640 AIRFIELD DUST ABATEMENT FY22 P-141 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 4&5 FY25 P-234 RUNWAY 24R PHASE 2
FY20 P-531 TAC AIR COMMAND CENTER FY20 PEN121 CONVERT SIM LHA DECK TO CONCRETE FY27 P-202 F-35 AIRCRAFT MAINT HANGAR C
FY20 P-446 CONSOLIDATED ORDNANCE DISPOSAL FY20 PEN1056 LHD PAD MODERNIZATION MFR MILCON -- VARIOUS LOCATIONS
FY20 P-589 VL PAD FY20 PEN1057 VTOL PAD MODERNIZATION FY18 P-077 MFR SIMULATOR FACILITY -- NAS FW
FY20 P-419 LIFELONG LEARNING CENTER FY20 PEN1058 HOLF RUNWAY LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS FY18 P-650 APRON, TAXIWAY & SUPPORT -- JBDIX
FY20 P-450 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION CENTER ADD MIRAMAR
FY20 P-493 RUNWAY 3R/21L EXTENSION FY13 P-181 HANGAR 5 MODIFICATION
FY20 P-503 TRANSIENT QUARTERS FY14 P-308 POL PIPELINE
FY20 P-542 MWSS-371 RELOCATION FY14 P-906 ENERGY SECURITY AND MICROGRID
FY20 P-591 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY FY16 P-242 DEHUMIDIFICATION AVN ARMAMENT
FY21 P-614 AIRFIELD LIGHTING AND POWER FY16 P-200 ENLISTED AIRCREW TRAINING SYSTEMS

270
4.2 MARINE CORPS AIR STATION FACILITIES AND MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN
MCI PAC
KANEOHE BAY OKINAWA IE SHIMA OKINAWA MARINE WING LIAISON KADENA
FY13 P-905 AIRCRAFT STAGING AREA (MV-22) FY15 P-801 LHD PRACTICE SITE IMPROVEMENTS FY15 P-803 AIRCRAFT MAINT HANGAR ALTS & SAPF
FY14 P-863 HMLA HANGAR RENOVATION OKINAWA CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM (DPRI) FY16 P-809 MODERNIZE APRON FOR F-35
FY14 P-884 MISSION SUPPORT FACILITY (ATS) TBD TBD 1st MARINE AIR WING HQ FACILITY FY17 P-807 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE COMPLEX
FY14 P-907 MV-22 PRKG APRON/INFRA (2ND SQD) TBD TBD MTACS-18 AIR SURVEILLANCE RADAR FAC FY19 P-810 MWLK BARRACKS
FY14 P-908 MV-22 HANGAR (2ND VMM SQND) TBD TBD MACG-18 AND MWCS-18 HQ FACILITY IWAKUNI (DPRI)
FY15 P-861 VMU INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES TBD TBD MWCS-18 WAREHOUSE 2013 MC159T MAG12/CVW-5 HQ BUILDING
FY15 P-924 MV22 EIS TRAFFIC MITIGATION TBD TBD MWCS-18 AUTO SHOP 2014 MC948 FIRE DRILL PIT (JFIP)
FY16 P-902 AIRFIELD LIGHTING AND ELEC UPGRADES TBD TBD BEQ (E6-E9) COURTNEY 2014 MC403 MWSS 171 FUEL STORAGE SHED (JFIP)
FY16 P-910 BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS PH I TBD TBD BEQ (E1-E5) COURTNEY 2014 MC407 CSSD-36 MAINT COMPOUND (JFIP)
FY17 P-949 FUEL PIT AND TAXIWAY IMPROVE MV-22 TBD TBD BEQ COURTNEY 2014 MC165T CVW-5 HANGAR
FY18 P-887 LHD PAD CONV & MV22 LZ IMPROVE TBD TBD ENLISTED DINING HALL CAMP COURTNEY 2014 MC166T CVW-5 AIRCRAFT HANGAR
FY19 P-929 VMU OPERATIONS SUPPORT SHED (WAAF) TBD TBD MACS-4 HEADQUARTERS FACILITY 2015 MC173T VMGR-152 APRON, WASHRACK & RINSE
FY19 P-936 VAN PAD MODERNIZATION TBD TBD MACS-4 ELECTRONICS MAINT FACILITY 2015 MC167T CVW-5 MAINT HANGAR
FY19 P-877 MCBH KBAY ENTRY CONTROL AT/FP TBD TBD MACS-4 WAREHOUSE 2015 MC175T CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE HANGAR
FY19 P-891 HANGAR 102 MODERNIZATION TBD TBD BEQ (E1-E5) HANSEN 2015 MC158T OPERATIONAL TRAINERS COMPLEX
FY19 P-931 PUULOA RANGE COMM/ELEC & GATE MODERN TBD TBD BEQ (E6-E9) HANSEN 2015 MC255T FLIGHT LINE INFRASTRUCTURE
FY19 P-946 MALS CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR TBD TBD BEQ HANSEN 2015 MC360T RANGE COMMUNICATION FACILITY
FY19 P-774 PTA EQUIPMENT STORAGE OKINAWA FUTENMA REPLACEMENT FACILITY (DPRI) 2015 MC975T ORDNACE OPERATIONS FIELD OFFICE
FY19 P-875 WATER RECLAMATION FAC FY21 MC1566-T MAINTENANCE HANGAR (HMH) 2016 MC164T STATION/VISTING AC APRON & SUPPORT
FY19 P-879 ORDNANACE STORAGE MAGAZINE FY21 MC1563-T MAINTENANCE HANGAR (VMM1) 2016 MC948T AIRFIELD FIRE TRAINING FACILITY PH2
FY19 P-911 BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS PH II FY24 MC1530-T RUNWAY 2016 MC194T JP5 FUEL STORAGE
FY19 P-913 MAG-24 ARMORY EXPANSION FY24 MC1531-T TAXIWAY 2016 MC908T HAZADOUS CARGO LOADING AREA
FY20 P-916 MV-22/HMLA WAREHOUSE FY24 MC1551-T AIRFIELD PARKING APRON 2016 MC0135 STATION AIRCRAFT MAINT HANAGER
FY20 P-926 MALS ORDNANCE STORAGE FY25 MC1562-T CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR 2016 MC263T CVW-5 MAINTENANCE TEST AREA
FY20 P-948 MALS-24 MAINTENANCE FACILITY FY25 MC1564-T MAINTENANCE HANGAR (VMM2) 2016 MC936T STATION AIR CARGO TERMINAL
FY21 P-882 RUNWAY CLEAR ZONE AIRFIELD IMPRV FY25 MC1565-T MAINTENANCE HANGAR (HMLA) 2017 MC320T FLIGHT LINE PERIMETER FENCING
FY21 P-928 PTA AMMUNITION STORAGE FY25 MC1567-T MAINTENANCE HANGAR (FRC WP/MALS) GUAM - ANDERSON AB (DPRI)
FY21 P-876 AIRFIELD SECURITY FENCING & UPGRADE FY25 MC1568-T MAINTENANCE HANGAR (OSA) 2014 J-200 AAFB NR UTILITIES PH II
FY21 P-836 MAG-24 HQ AND PARKING BUILDING IWAKUNI 2014 P-109 AIRCRAFT HANGAR #1
FY21 P-912 BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS PH III FY14 P-945 TYPE III HYDRANT FUELING STYEM (DESC) 2015 P-230 GSE SHOPS
FY25 P-883 RUNWAY UNDERPASS FY17 P-994 ALT TRUCK FUEL RECEIPT SYSTEM (DESC) 2015 P-240 MWSS FACILITIES
FY25 P-915 MCCS SELF STORAGE FY18 P-1006 KC130J ENLISTED AIR CREW TRAINER 2019 P-601 AIRCRAFT HANGAR #2
OKINAWA MCAS FUTENMA FY19 P-XXX F-35 MAINT TRAINER 2019 P-250 MALS FACILITIES
FY15 P-213 HANGAR & RINSE FAC MODERNIZATION FY19 P-1005 VTOL PAD – SOUTH 2019 P-260 CORR CONTROL HANGAR
FY19 P-202 GATE 1 UPGRADE FY19 P-1000 ACFT MAINT HANGAR IMPROVEMENTS, S. 2019 P-270 ACE GYM & DINING
FY19 P-205 AIRCRAFT RUNWAY OVERRUN FY19 P-993 PROVIDE T-5 CAPABLE PIER (DESC) 2019 P-295 ORDNANCE OPS
FY19 P-214 JP-5 FUEL TRUCK OFF-LOAD SYSTEM (DLA) FY18 P-992 BULK FUEL STRG TANKS-PACOM (DESC) 2019 P-280 AIR OPS BLDG
FY20 P-1001 ACFT MAINT HANGAR IMPROVEMENTS, N. 2022 P-290 EARTH MAG

271
4.3 AVIATION TRAINING SYSTEMS ROADMAP

272
 MARINE AVIATION DISTRIBUTED VIRTUAL TRAINING ENVIRONMENT (ADVTE)
Ne tworke d Training Live /Virtual/Cons tructive (LVC) Goals
Networked training began with the execution of the MCASMP and is a growing part of T&R execution across High‐fidelity networked simulators incorporated with instrumented and
several plaforms which directly contibutes to Aircrew Combat Readiness and Flight Leadership Development. embedded training systems support individual and collective T&R and LVC
MATSS incorporate Network Exercise Command Center (NECC) hubs, which are linked to other MATSS, MEF training yielding:
battle simulation centers, and to the Joint National Training Capability (JNTC) through nationwide network • Increased Core Skill, Mission Skill, Core Plus Skill and Mission
infrastructure. These NECCs are currently used to develop, plan, rehearse, execute , and review scenario‐based Proficiency.
network training event s for local and distributed aviation and limited integrated ground training. Future • Systems training capability for multi-ship, multi-type, multi-community in
upgrades and modifications will target wider intra- and inter-service joint exercise distributed training. support of small scale distributed mission training to Large Scale Exercises
(LSE).
• Improved flight safety through expanded CRM opportunities.

ADVTE & NECC ROADMAP

Common Integrated Products Team Lead: Kent Campbell PH: 407 380-4237 e-mail: kent.compbell@navy.mil
Locati on FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
COG Last Tech Ref
T/M/S Type Sim ADVTE
Name Date 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
ADVT E CONNECT IVIT Y (WIDE AREA NET WORK)
Cherry Pt/New River LAN/WAN 2013 N/A
M iramar/Pendleton LAN/WAN 2013 N/A
Yuma/Beaufort LAN/WAN 2013 N/A
BSC, M CAS Camp Pendleton
WAN 2017 N/A
Fort Worth LAN/WAN 2Q2020 N/A NOT E 1, 2 NOT E 3
M DL LAN/WAN 2Q2020 N/A NOT E 1, 2 NOT E 3
Norfolk LAN/WAN LAN/WAN 1Q2021 N/A NOT E 1, 2 NOT E 3
Bell Chase LAN/WAN 4Q2020 N/A NOT E 1, 2 NOT E 3
Kaneohe Bay LAN/WAN 1Q2020 N/A NOT E 3
Okinawa LAN/WAN 2Q2020 N/A NOT E 3
Iwakuni LAN/WAN 2Q2020 N/A NOT E 3
MCAS NEW RIVER
NECC1 2H157-4 2013 N/A
MCAS CHERRY POINT
NECC2 2H157-1 2013 N/A
MCAS MIRAMAR
NECC2 2H157-2 2013 N/A
MCAS CAMP PENDLETON
1
NECC 2H157-3 2013 N/A
MCAS BEAUFORT
NECC3 2H157-6 2013 N/A
MCAS YUMA
NECC3 2H157-5 2013 N/A
1st MAW
NECC (Iwa) TBD 2Q2020 N/A NOT E 3
NECC (Fut) TBD 3Q2020 N/A NOT E 3
NECC (KBay) TBD 1Q2020 N/A NOT E 3
4th MAW
NECC (FtW) TBD 2Q2020 N/A NOT E 1, 2 NOT E 3
NECC (BelleC) TBD 4Q2020 N/A NOT E 1, 2 NOT E 3
NECC (MDL) TBD 3Q2020 N/A NOT E 1, 2 NOT E 3
NECC (Norf) TBD 1Q2021 N/A NOT E 1, 2 NOT E 3

Roadmap Legend NOTE 1: Devices require NGREA funding and Office of Marine Forces Reserve Approval
Trainer Operational NOTE 2: Procurement of this system is Predecisional/Unfunded. Schedule is notional
New Build NOTE 3: Notional Fielding or "Go-Live" Date
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade
Planned Device Disposal
Trainer Relocation

273
 MARINE COMMON AIRCREW TRAINER (MCAT) ROADMAP
APMTS: Kent Campbell PH: 407-380-4237 e-mail: kent.campbell@navy.mil
Type COG Last Tech Ref FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
T/M/S ADVTE
Sim Name Date 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
NEW RIVER
CH-53/CH-46 MCAT-P1* 2H160A Feb-17 N/A
CH-53/MV-22/UH-1Y MCAT (CFTD) 2H166A-1 1Q19 N/A Nov
MIRAMAR
CH-53/MV-22/UH-1Y MCAT-P2* 2H160B Apr-14 N/A
CH-53/MV-22/UH-1Y MCAT (CFTD) 2H166A-3 2Q20 N/A Feb
PENDLETON
CH-53/MV-22/UH-1Y MCAT (FTD) 2H166B-1 2Q19 N/A Feb
KANEOHE BAY
CH-53/MV-22/UH-1Y MCAT (CFTD) 2H166A-2 3Q19 N/A Jun
FUTENMA (FRF)
CH-53/MV-22/UH-1Y MCAT (FTD) 2H166B-2 1Q20 N/A Oct
McGuire (4th MAW)
CH-53/MV-22/UH-1Y MCAT (CFTD) 2H166A-5 TBD N/A NOTE 1&2
Norlfolk (4th MAW)
CH-53/MV-22/UH-1Y MCAT (CFTD) 2H166A-6 TBD N/A NOTE 1&3

Roadmap Legend *: MCAT-P1/2 are demonstrator/prototype/proof of concept training devices

Trainer Operational NOTE 1: Devices require NGREA funding and Office of Marine Forces Reserve Approval
New Build NOTE 2: Approximately 3Q20
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade NOTE 3: Approximately 4Q20
Planned Device Disposal
Trainer Relocation

274
 UAS RQ-7 INTEGRATED/UNIVERSAL MISSION SIMULATOR ROADMAP
Assistant Program Manager, Training Systems: Don Sheehan PH: 301-757-0421 e-mail: donald.sheehan@navy.mil
Last Tech Ref FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
T/M/S Type Sim COG Name Db TEn IA Cert
Date 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
KANEOHE BAY
RQ-7B IMS (#3) 2F217 N/A 02-14
RQ-7B v2 UMS (#3) 2F240 TBD N/A TBD
RQ-7B v2 UMS (#4) 2F240 TBD N/A TBD
29 PALMS
RQ-7B IMS (#1) 2F217 N/A 02-14
RQ-7B v2 UMS (#1) 2F240 TBD N/A TBD Transfer/move to MCAS Yuma
RQ-7B v2 UMS (#2) 2F240 TBD N/A TBD Transfer/move to MCAS Yuma
CHERRY POINT
RQ-7B IMS (#2) 2F217 N/A 02-14
RQ-7B v2 UMS (#5) 2F240 TBD N/A TBD TBD
PENDLETON
RQ-7B IMS (#5) 2F217 N/A 02-14
RQ-7B v2 UMS (#6) 2F240 TBD N/A TBD TBD
YUMA
RQ-7B v2 UMS (#1) 2F240 TBD N/A TBD
RQ-7B v2 UMS (#2) 2F240 TBD N/A TBD

New Build
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade
Planned Device Disposal
Trainer Relocation

VH AIRCREW TRAINING SYSTEMS ROADMAP

Training Integrated Products Team Lead: Robert Peterson PH: 301-757- 8956 e-mail: rob.peterson@navy.mil
COG Last Tech Ref FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
T/M/S Type Sim Db TEn IA Cert
Name Date 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
QUANTICO
VH-3D APT 2F180 ESUSA V1.2 v4.0 12-Aug 12-Sep Note 1
VH-60N CFTD 2F233 ESUSA V1.2 v5.0 NA TBD Note 1
VH-92A FTD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD

Roadmap Legend
Trainer Operational Planned Device Disposal Note 1: Trainer Disposals are pre-decisional
New Build Trainer Relocation
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade

275
276
 CH-53E AIRCREW TRAINING SYSTEMS ROADMAP
Assistant Program Manager, Training Systems: Mark Elliott PH: 301-342-6688 e-mail: Mark.Elliott@navy.mil
Last Tech Ref FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
T/M/S Type Sim COG Name Db TEn IA Cert
Date 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
NEW RIVER
CH-53E WST 2F174-1 Aechelon v5.0 2008 Mar 12
CH-53E APT 2F190-1 Aechelon v5.0 2010 Nov 11
CH-53E EAET/AET 2H164-1 Aechelon v5.0 NA TBD
FUTENMA
CH-53E APT 2F171 Aechelon TBD 2009 TBD
CH-53E CFTD 2F246 T BD TBD New Build TBD
MIRAMAR
CH-53E WST 2F174-2 Aechelon v5.0 2009 Oct 11
CH-53E APT 2F190-2 Aechelon v5.0 2011 Nov 11
CH-53E EAET/AET 2H164-2 Aechelon v5.0 NA TBD
KANEOHE BAY
CH-53E CFTD 2F220 Aechelon v5.0 2012 TBD
CH-53E EAET 2H164-3 Aechelon v5.0 NA TBD
JB MCGUIRE-DIX-LAKEHURST
CH-53E FTD 2F239 Aechelon v5.0 NA TBD

CH-53K AIRCREW TRAINING SYSTEMS ROADMAP

Assistant Program Manager, Training Systems: Mark Elliott PH: 301 342-6688 e-mail: Mark.Elliott@navy.mil
Last Tech Ref FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
T/M/S TYPE SIM COG Name Db TEn IA Cert
Date 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
NEW RIVER
CH-53K CFTD #1 2F243 Aechelon v5.x
CH-53K CFTD #2
CH-53K AMSPTT
CH-53K CLT #1
CH-53K CFTD #3
CH-53K FTD #4
CH-53K FTD #5
KANEOHE BAY
CH-53K CFTD #6
CH-53K CLT #2
MIRAMAR
CH-53K CFTD #7
CH-53K CFTD #8
CH-53K CFTD #9
CH-53K CFTD #10
CH-53K CLT #3
JB MCGUIRE-DIX-LAKEHURST
CH-53K CFTD #11

Roadmap Legend
Trainer Operational Planned Device Disposal
New Build Trainer Relocation
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade

277
 H-1 AIRCREW TRAINING SYSTEMS ROADMAP
Training Integrated Products Team Lead: Mark Eagles PH: 301-995-3716 e-mail: mark.eagles@navy.mil
Type Last Tech Ref FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
T/M/S COG Name Db TEn IA Cert
Sim Date 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
KANEOHE BAY
AH-1W APT 2F170 S/N 3 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 Jan 2012 In Work
UH-1Y FTD 2F196B S/N 3 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 New (Lot 3) 2014
AH-1Z FTD 2F227 S/N 1 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 New (Lot 4) 2017
CAMP PENDLETON
AH-1W APT 2F170 S/N 1 Ft. Rucker Note-3 v4.0 Feb 2012 In Work Note 5
AH-1W WST 2F136A S/N 2 PSI/NPSI Note-1 v4.0 Oct 2005 Aug 2011
AH-1Z FTD 2F197 S/N 1 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 New Nov 2011
AH-1Z FFS 2F215 S/N 1 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 New Nov 2011
UH-1Y FFS 2F206 S/N 1 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 New 2014
UH-1Y FTD 2F196B S/N 2 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 Lot 3 2014
UH-1Y CPT 2C84 S/N 1 N/A N/A New Sep 2011
AH-1Z CPT 2C83 S/N 1 N/A N/A New Sep 2011
UH-1Y CPT 11H184 N/A N/A New Sep 2011
AH-1Z CPT 11H185 N/A N/A New Sep 2011
NEW RIVER
AH-1W WST 2F136A S/N 1 PSI/NPSI Note-1 v4.0 Oct 2005 May 2010
UH-1Y FTD 2F196 S/N 1 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 New Mar 2012
AH-1Z FTD 2F197B S/N 2 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 Lot 3 2016
UH-1Y FTD 2F226 S/N 1 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 Lot 4 2017
AH-1Z FTD 2F227 S/N 2 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 Lot 5 2019
ROBINS AFB
AH-1W APT 2F170 S/N 2 NPSI Note-2, 6 v4.0 Aug 2012 Dec 2012 Note 6
BELLE CHASSE
AH-1W APT 2F170 S/N 2 NPSI Note-2, 6 v4.0 Aug 2012 Dec 2012 Note 6
UH-1Y FTD 2F226 S/N 2 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 Lot 4 2017
AH-1Z FTD 2F227 S/N 4 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 Lot 5
MCGUIRE
AH-1W APT 2F170 S/N 1 NPSI Note-2, 5 v4.0 Feb 2012 In Work Note 5
UH-1Y FTD 2F196B S/N 4 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 Lot 4 2017
AH-1Z FTD 2F227 S/N 3 NPSI Note-2 v4.0 Lot 5 2019

Roadmap Legend
Trainer Operational Note 1: VITAL-9 Image Generator (IG) with areas: EC, WC, NY, Bridgeport,Okinawa, Mediterranean. Panama, & Norway
New Build Note 2: VITAL-X IG with gamng areas : NPSI (EC, WC, Bridgeport, Iraq, Afghanistan)
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade Note 3: Aechelon IG with gaming areas: NPSI (EC, WC, WestPac, Iraq, Afghanistan, Southeast Asia, and Horn of Africa
Planned Device Disposal Note 4: Aechelon IG with gaming areas: NPSI (EC, WC, WestPac, Iraq, Afghanistan)
Trainer Relocation Note 5: Trnr Move to JRB MDL
Proposed/Unfunded Note 6: Device move to New Orleans - unfunded move for MARFORRES, O&M/NR

278
 KC-130 AIRCREW TRAINING SYSTEMS ROADMAP
Assistant Program Manager, Training Systems: MGySgt E.J. Hammerquist PH: 301-757-8742 e-mail: eric.hammerquist@navy.mil
Last Tech Ref FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
T/M/S Type Sim COG Name Db TEn IA Cert
Date 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
CHERRY POINT
KC-130J WST 2F199-1 NPSI Note-1 v6.0 MAY 14 Note 5 Note 6
KC-130J HH PTT+ 2A85-1 Afghanistan N/A
KC-130J CPT 2C87 Note-7 N/A
KC-130J FuT 2A88 Note-2,4,7 N/A
KC-130J OBST TBD Note-2,7 N/A
MIRAMAR
KC-130J WST 2F199-2 NPSI Note-1 v6.0 DEC 15 Note 6 Note 5 Note 6
KC-130J HH PTT+ 2A85-2 Afghanistan N/A
KC-130J CPT 2C87 Note-7,8 N/A
KC-130J FuT 2A88 Note-2,4,7 N/A
KC-130J OBST TBD Note-2, 7, 8 N/A
FUTENMA/IWAKUNI
KC-130J WST 2F199-3 NPSI Note-1,3 v6.0 DEC 17 Note 3 Note 5,6 Note 6
KC-130J CPT 2C87 N/A N/A
KC-130J FuT 2A88 Note-2,4,7 N/A
KC-130J OBST TBD Note-2,7 N/A
FT WORTH (KC-130T/KC-130J)
C-130T OFT (USN) 2F107-1 NPSI Note-1 v2.4 DEC 14 Note 6
C-130T CPT (USN) 2F107A NPSI Note-1 N/A
KC-130T APT 2F176 NPSI Note-1 v2.1 SEP 12 Note 6
KC-130J WST 2F199-4 NPSI Note-1 v6.0 Note 9 Note 6
KC-130J CPT 2C87 Note-7,8 N/A
KC-130J FuT 2A88 Note-2,4,7 N/A
KC-130J OBST TBD Note-7,8 TBD
STEWART ANGB (KC-130T/KC-130J)
KC-130J WST 2F199-5 NPSI, Note 1,4 TBD
KC-130J CPT 2C87 Note-7,8 N/A
KC-130J FuT 2A88 Note-2,4,7 N/A
KC-130J OBST TBD Note-2,7 TBD
MDL (KC-130T)
C-130T OFT (USN) 2F152 NPSI Note-1,10 N/A Note 10 Note 6

Roadmap Legend *Notes* (These databases include:)

Trainer Operational 1 - East & West Coasts, Bridgeport, Afghanistan and Iraq
New Build 2 -This Trainer can perform in Standalone or connected to WST for full CRM Training
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade 3 - Move from Okinawa to Iwakuni
Planned Device Disposal 4 - New Building needed for this Trainer
Trainer Relocation 5 - LAIRCM Upgrade in WST
6 - Technology Refresh
7 - This Trainer will go into FuT building
8 - This Trainer will be in temp loction until FuT building is complete
9 - Ready For Training Oct 2017
10 - Move from MDL to Ft Worth, perform Tech Refresh and upgrade with AOU Suite

279
280
USMC F/A-18 C-D AIRCREW TRAINING SYSTEMS ROADMAP
Assistant Program Manager, Training Systems: Tim McDonald PH: 301-757-7333 e-mail: timothy.mcdonald@navy.mil
COG Last Tech FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
T/M/S Type Sim Db TEn IA Cert
Name Ref Date 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
IWAKUNI
F/A-18C TOFT #16 2F193A NASMP v1.4 Note 1
F/A-18D TOFT #37 2F193B NASMP v1.4 Note 1
F/A-18C TOFT #25 2F193A NASMP v1.4 NAS Lemoore Note 1
MIRAMAR
F/A-18D TOFT #30 2F193B NASMP v1.4
F/A-18D TOFT #31 2F193B NASMP v1.4
F/A-18C TOFT #32 2F193A NASMP v1.4
F/A-18C TOFT #33 2F193A NASMP v1.4
F/A-18C TOFT #35 2F193A NASMP v1.4
F/A-18C TOFT #38 2F193A NASMP v1.4
BEAUFORT
F/A-18C TOFT #28 2F193A NASMP v1.4 Note 2
F/A-18D TOFT #34 2F193B NASMP v1.4
F/A-18D TOFT #36 2F193B NASMP v1.4
F/A-18C TOFT #40 2F193A NASMP v1.4
FT WORTH
F/A-18C TOFT #43 2F193A NASMP v1.4
F/A-18C TOFT #XX XXXXX NASMP v1.4 Note 3

Roadmap Legend
Trainer Operational Note 1: New Facility Schedule in flux, driving timing of move. Effort is funded and will occur ICW Technology Refresh
New Build Note 2: SAN DISK Hardware upgrades will be installed at Beufort, Miramar and Iwakuni in late FY16-early FY17
Upgrades Note 3: Trainer move and MILCON funds need to be identified
Planned Device Disposal
Move/Relocation

281
282
 F-35 AIRCREW MISSION REHEARSAL DEVICE (MRD) TRAINING SYSTEMS ROADMAP
Device FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30
T/M/S Type Sim
S/N 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
YUMA
F-35 MRD #3
F-35 MRD #4
F-35 MRD #5
F-35 MRD #7
F-35 MRD #12
BEAUFORT
F-35 MRD #14
F-35 MRD#15
IWAKUNI
F-35 MRD #1
F-35 MRD #2
MIRAMAR
F-35 MRD #6
F-35 MRD #8
F-35 MRD #10
F-35 MRD #19
F-35 MRD#20
F-35 MRD #22
F-35 MRD #23
CHERRY POINT
F-35 MRD #9
F-35 MRD #11
F-35 MRD#13
F-35 MRD#16
F-35 MRD#17
F-35 MRD #18
F-35 MRD #21
F-35 MRD #24

Roadmap Legend
Trainer Operational Planned Device Disposal
New Build Trainer Relocation
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade

283
 Marine Aviation Virtual Warfighting Center (MAVWC)
Device FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30
T/M/S Type Sim
S/N 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
TACAIR
F-35 FM S #1
F-35 FM S #2
F-35 FM S #3
F-35 FM S #4
F-35 FM S #5
F-35 FM S #6
F-35 FM S #7
F-35 FM S #8
F/A-18C TOFT
F/A-18C TOFT
F/A-18D Note 1 TOFT
F/A-18D Note 1 TOFT
AV-8B Note 2 WST Notional
AV-8B Note 2 WST Notional
AS S AULT S UPPORT
KC-130J WST
M V-22 FTD #1
M V-22 FTD #2
M V-22 FTD #3
M V-22 FTD #4
M V-22 FTD #5
M V-22 FTD #6
CH-53E FTD #1 Notional
CH-53E FTD #2 Notional
CH-53K FTD #1
CH-53K FTD #2
CH-53K Note 3 FTD #3
CH-53K Note 3 FTD #4
UH-1Y FTD #1
UH-1Y FTD #2
UH-1Y FTD #3
UH-1Y FTD #4
AH-1Z FTD #1
AH-1Z FTD #2
AH-1Z FTD #3
AH-1Z FTD #4

Roadmap Legend
Trainer Operational Planned Device Disposal Notes
New Build Trainer Relocation 1 = F/A-18D TOFT Front and Rear Cockpit Device
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade 2 = Utilize existing devices/Storage and relocation
3 = "K" devices to replace "E" devices

284
 Marine Aviation Virtual Warfighting Center (MAVWC)
Device FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30
T/M/S Type Sim
S/N 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
EXPEDITIONARY ENABLERS
SAVT #1 Dome
SAVT #2 Dome
SAVT #3 Dome
SAVT #4 Dome
DASC (11/1/1) M ulti-Station
TACC (21/1/1) M ulti-Station
TAOC (17/1/1) M ulti-Station
ATC (7/2/1) M ulti-Station
LAAD/SHORAD Dome
JFACC (15/1/1) M ulti-Station
M Q-21 A2 UM S
M Q-21 A2 UM S
UAS Gen-5 A1 UM S
UAS Gen-5 A2 UM S
OTHER
H/H FCO A1 Fire Control
KC-130J AD/AR ObsT
RED AIR #1 Note 5 Desktop
RED AIR #2 Note 5 Desktop
RED AIR #3 Note 5 Desktop
RED AIR #4 Note 5 Desktop
RED AIR #5 Note 5 Desktop
RED AIR #6 Note 5 Desktop
RED AIR #7 Note 5 Desktop
RED AIR #8 Note 5 Desktop
NECC-1 Note 6 Controller
NECC-2 Note 6 Controller
NECC-3 Note 6 Controller
NECC-4 Note 6 Controller
NECC SAS Note 7 Controller
Red Cell (10/1/1) Note 8 M ulti-Station
White Cell (10/1/1) Note 8 M ulti-Station

Roadmap Legend
Trainer Operational Planned Device Disposal Notes
New Build Trainer Relocation 4 = Expeditionary Enabler device show (15/1/1) which is the Number of Agency Seats/Supervisor/Instructor Operating Station
Trainer Down for Mod/Upgrade 5 = Reconfigurable entity model to represent threat aircraft
6 = Multiple NECCs required for numerous federations of device with other simulators/sites
7 = System Admin Station (SAS). Used to control NECCs.
8 = Exercise and threat control stations to dynamically challenge simulators/simulations

285
Marine Aviation Plan 2017 link