0% found this document useful (0 votes)
123 views2 pages

Human Impact Proficiency Scale

This document provides a rubric for assessing student proficiency on the standard of applying scientific principles to design a method for monitoring and minimizing human impact on the environment. It outlines four levels of proficiency: exceeds standard, meets standard, approaching standard, and not at standard. The meets standard level involves applying scientific principles to design a monitoring method and writing a proposal to the school principal about an energy source. The approaching standard level involves recognizing vocabulary and demonstrating the ability to use scientific information to generate a design solution that addresses human impacts and incorporates technology.

Uploaded by

api-368883407
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
123 views2 pages

Human Impact Proficiency Scale

This document provides a rubric for assessing student proficiency on the standard of applying scientific principles to design a method for monitoring and minimizing human impact on the environment. It outlines four levels of proficiency: exceeds standard, meets standard, approaching standard, and not at standard. The meets standard level involves applying scientific principles to design a monitoring method and writing a proposal to the school principal about an energy source. The approaching standard level involves recognizing vocabulary and demonstrating the ability to use scientific information to generate a design solution that addresses human impacts and incorporates technology.

Uploaded by

api-368883407
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Human Impact  

MS-ESS3-3 
8th 
Proficiency Scale Descriptors  Evidence of Meeting the Standard
4-Exceeds  Connect design to real world. ● Share with community.
Standard ● Build and test design.
3.5 Meets Level 3 and shows some evidence of Level 4
3-Meets  Apply scientific principles to design a method for monitoring and minimizing ● Write a letter of proposal to the school principal
Standard human impact on the environment. as to what energy source your school should
(Consistent rely on.
Evidence,
Independent)
2.5 Meets Level 2 and shows some evidence of Level 3
2-Approaching  Students recognize or recall specific vocabulary such as:  ● Comparing and contrasting renewable and
Standard nonrenewable resources
environmental impact, feasible, biosphere, per-capita, causal, correlational ● Know cause and effect of personal carbon
(Independent) footprint
Students demonstrate they have the ability to: 
● Infer that renewable technologies can be used
● use scientific information and principles to generate a design solution that as solutions for global climate change
addresses the results of a particular human activity and incorporates ● Distinguish the relationship between population
technology growth and natural resource availability
● distinguish between causal and correlational relationships ● Compare and contrast greenhouse effect and
● define and quantify criteria and constraints for a solution climate change
● describe how well a solution meets the criteria and constraints ● Identify patterns of climate change in given data
Supporting Standards:  ● Identify and describe maintaining biodiversity
and ecosystem services and the evidence
ESS3-4 Construct an argument supported by evidence for how increases in about their performance.
human population and per-capita consumption of natural resources impact ● Compare the ability, strengths and weaknesses,
Earth’s systems. and possible side effects of the design
solutions.
ESS3-5 Ask questions to clarify evidence of the factors that have caused the rise
in global temperatures over the past century.
LS2-5 Students will be able to evaluate competing design solutions for
maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services.
1-Not at  With help, partial success at score 2.0 content and score 3.0 content.
Standard
0-No Evidence With help, no success and/or no evidence of success.

You might also like