Gemology 1
Gemology 1
WINTER 2011
PAGES 259–336
Dyed Purple Ethiopian Opal
Garnet Composition from Gem Properties
Symmetry Boundaries for Round Brilliants
Odontolite in Antique Jewelry
VOLUME 47
EDITORIAL
259 Great Expectations
Jan Iverson
FEATURE ARTICLES
260 Dyed Purple Hydrophane Opal
Carat Points
Nathan Renfro and Shane F. McClure
Evidence indicates that opal with a vivid purple bodycolor, reportedly from a
new deposit in Mexico, is actually dyed hydrophane from Ethiopia.
272 Determining Garnet Composition from Magnetic Susceptibility
And Other Properties
Donald B. Hoover
Garnet compositions derived from measurements of physical properties
pg. 262
correspond closely with results obtained using chemical data.
286 GIA’s Symmetry Grading Boundaries for Round Brilliant Cut Diamonds
Ron H. Geurts, Ilene M. Reinitz, Troy Blodgett, and Al M. Gilbertson
GIA’s boundary limits for 10 symmetry parameters, measured by optical
scanners, will improve consistency in the symmetry grading of round brilliants.
SUBSCRIPTIONS Copies of the current issue may be purchased for $29.95 plus shipping. Online subscriptions are $74.95 for one year (4 issues).
Combination print + online subscriptions are $139.95 in the U.S. and $160 elsewhere for one year. Canadian subscribers should
add GST. Discounts are available for group subscriptions, renewals, GIA alumni, and current GIA students. For institutional
rates, contact the Associate Editor. Subscriptions include G&G’s monthly gemological e-newsletter, the G&G eBrief.
To purchase subscriptions and single issues (print or PDF), visit store.gia.edu or contact the Circulation Coordinator.
PDF versions of individual articles and sections from Spring 1981 forward can be purchased at gia.metapress.com for $12
each. Visit gia.edu/gandg for free online access to the 1934–2010 subject and author index and all 1934–1980 issues.
Gems & Gemology’s five-year impact factor (for 2005–2009) is 1.737, according to the 2010 Thomson Reuters Journal
DATABASE Citation Reports (issued June 2011). Gems & Gemology is abstracted in Thomson Reuters products (Current Contents:
COVERAGE Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences and Science Citation Index—Expanded, including the Web of Knowledge) and other
databases. For a complete list of sources abstracting G&G, go to gia.edu/gandg.
MANUSCRIPT Gems & Gemology welcomes the submission of articles on all aspects of the field. Please see the Guidelines for Authors at
SUBMISSIONS gia.edu/gandg or contact the Editor. Letters on articles published in Gems & Gemology are also welcome.
Abstracting is permitted with credit to the source. Libraries are permitted to photocopy beyond the limits of U.S. copyright law
COPYRIGHT for private use of patrons. Instructors are permitted to photocopy isolated articles for noncommercial classroom use without
AND REPRINT fee. Copying of the photographs by any means other than traditional photocopying techniques (Xerox, etc.) is prohibited with-
out the express permission of the photographer (where listed) or author of the article in which the photo appears (where no pho-
PERMISSIONS tographer is listed). For other copying, reprint, or republication permission, please contact the Editor.
Gems & Gemology is published quarterly by the Gemological Institute of America, a nonprofit educational organiza-
tion for the gem and jewelry industry.
Postmaster: Return undeliverable copies of Gems & Gemology to GIA, The Robert Mouawad Campus, 5345 Armada Drive,
Carlsbad, CA 92008.
Our Canadian goods and service registration number is 126142892RT.
Any opinions expressed in signed articles are understood to be opinions of the authors and not of the publisher.
ABOUT The recent appearance of purple play-of-color opal, reportedly from a new deposit in Mexico, has heightened interest in
THE COVER the origin and nature of this material. In this issue, Nathan Renfro and Shane McClure offer gemological and spectro-
scopic evidence that this opal is actually dyed hydrophane from Ethiopia’s Wollo Province. The fine untreated Wollo
opals on the cover consist of a 35.32 ct oval cabochon in the center courtesy of William Larson (Palagems.com,
Fallbrook, California) surrounded by two pieces of rough (8.16 and 12.78 g) and four polished stones (6.95–32.55 ct)
that are courtesy of David Artinian (Clear Cut Inc., Poway, California). Photos by Robert Weldon.
Color separations for Gems & Gemology are by Pacific Plus, Carlsbad, California.
Printing is by Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
GIA World Headquarters The Robert Mouawad Campus 5345 Armada Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 USA
W
e all have great expectations for 2012. I’ve gone a step further
with my New Year’s resolutions by creating a “goals” book.
Not only do I write down my goals, but I also add details such
as how and when I will achieve them, and include pictures to
make it more visual.
So, what new things can you expect from Gems & Gemology in the year
ahead? Our goal is to create an enhanced digital journal, one that offers a
more interactive experience for our online audience, in support of what we
already do. Digital is changing the way information is consumed, and it pro-
vides a unique opportunity to reinvent the way we engage with you, our
readers. Digital is beyond relevant: It is the future.
But first we finish 2011. Our final issue of the year includes a report by GIA
researchers on a new purple opal that’s been hitting the market. Although it
was reportedly natural material from Mexico, gemological investigation identified it as dyed opal
from Ethiopia. Because this hydro-
phane opal can be very absorbent,
Our goal is to create an enhanced digital journal, one we can expect to see many other
that offers a more interactive experience for our online treatments applied to it.
We also feature a set of six antique brooches, apparently from the early- to mid-19th century, set
with light blue cabochons that were once thought to be turquoise. Analysis revealed that most of
the supposed turquoise cabochons are actually fossilized dentine, also known as odontolite.
In this issue, we also highlight neutron-irradiated “London Blue” topaz. Some trace impurities in
this topaz become radioactive after neutron irradiation. The authors found
that irradiated samples from China contained up to four of these radioac-
tive impurities. Most of the samples were safe to handle 95 days after irra-
diation, but others will require several years to reach a safe level.
I suspect that many of us, when we were younger, thought we’d be flying
around in space pods by now instead of driving cars. Yet when the future
arrives, we find that technology never changes as fast as our minds imag-
ined it! As we progress in our digital offerings, we are going to keep it sim-
ple by delivering relevant content in innovative ways.
In 2012, I hope you achieve your goals and meet your expectations.
Cheers,
Opals with an unusual purple bodycolor and strong play-of-color have recently appeared in the
market. Reportedly from a new deposit in Mexico, they have a vivid bodycolor unlike that of any
natural play-of-color opal seen in the trade so far. This alone was enough to raise suspicion, and
gemological and spectroscopic evidence indicates that the purple coloration is artificial. A com-
parison of this purple opal with numerous samples from Ethiopia’s Wollo Province strongly sug-
gests that it is actually dyed hydrophane opal from those deposits. Several previously undocu-
mented characteristics of Wollo opals are described, including zeolite mineral inclusions.
N
ot often is a significant new deposit discov- has an important implication: Any gem material
ered of a well-known gem material. The that absorbs liquids so easily has the potential to be
1994 discovery of play-of-color opal in treated by methods such as dyeing or impregnation.
Ethiopia’s Shewa Province sparked the industry’s Recognizing this possibility, we performed several
attention. Unfortunately, much of this opal turned experiments to determine the effect of such treat-
out to be unstable, and spontaneous fracturing ren- ments on this opal, before they appeared in the mar-
dered it largely unusable for jewelry (Johnson et al., ket. These experiments—which were surprisingly
1996). In 2008, another large Ethiopian deposit was successful—led us to believe that it would only be a
found in the province of Wollo. While similar in matter of time until we encountered such treated
appearance to some of the Shewa material, this opal material in the trade.
appears to be much more stable than its predecessor Indeed, in October 2011, we were presented with
(Rondeau et al., 2010). The 2011 Tucson show saw several samples of hydrophane opal that had a bright
an abundant influx of beautiful and relatively inex- purple bodycolor (not known to occur naturally in
pensive opal from the Wollo deposit. play-of-color opal; e.g., figure 1), and our suspicions
The new Ethiopian material displayed a property were immediately raised (Renfro and McClure, 2011).
not often seen in opal. Much of the opal is hydro- In addition, these opals were said to be from a new
phane, meaning it is very porous and easily absorbs source in Mexico, but everything about them except
water (or other liquids), often turning translucent or the color reminded us of Ethiopian opal from Wollo.
transparent in the process. The degree to which Purple opal has been reported from several locali-
these stones show this property varies, but some ties, including Mexico. However, all of the material
absorb water so readily that the tiny bubbles escap- examined to date was opaque (or at best translucent)
ing from their surface give the impression of efferves- and did not possess play-of-color. The purple in these
cence. This property, while interesting to watch, also common opals has been attributed to inclusions of
fluorite (Fritsch et al., 2002).
See end of article for About the Authors and Acknowledgments.
While the color of the new play-of-color samples
GEMS & GEMOLOGY, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 260–270, was said to be natural, the authenticity of any gem
http://dx.doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.47.4.260. material can only be proven through scientific analy-
© 2011 Gemological Institute of America sis and observation. Our goal in this study is to
Chemical analysis of 15 samples (seven untreated absorbed. After removal from the solution, the sam-
white Wollo opals and eight purple samples) was ples were dried under a tensor lamp for several hours
performed using a Thermo X Series II ICP-MS with a until the acetone had completely evaporated.
New Wave Research UP-213 laser ablation sampling
system and a frequency-quintupled Nd:YAG laser RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
(213 nm wavelength) with a 4 ns pulse width. We Gemological Properties. All the opals provided by our
used 55-µm-diameter ablation spots, a fluence of client were clearly hydrophane, as they tended to feel
around 10 J/cm2, and a 7 Hz repetition rate. Quali- sticky when handled, a result of the opal trying to
tative chemical analysis of two rough samples (one draw moisture from the skin. The spot RI measure-
treated and one untreated) showing black surface ments of the nine purple opal cabochons ranged from
material was also performed with a Thermo ARL 1.37 to 1.41. The SG was between 1.70 and 1.77, as
Quant-X EDXRF system in a vacuum, utilizing no measured hydrostatically before allowing the stones
filter at 4 kV and 1.98 mA, and a cellulose filter at 8 to completely soak full of water. All samples showed
kV and 1.98 mA. a very weak blue reaction to long- and short-wave
As noted above, given the hydrophane character UV radiation. A broadband absorption was seen in
of Wollo opal, it should be amenable to dyeing. To the desk-model spectroscope from ~550 to 600 nm.
test this, eight rough (0.17–1.42 g) and three cabo- Magnification revealed octahedral to irregularly
chons (1.65–3.55 ct) of hydrophane opal from the shaped dark crystals of pyrite, tube-like inclusions
personal collection of author NR were immersed in that resembled fossilized plant matter, and cellular
variously colored solutions prepared from Sharpie play-of-color referred to as a “digit pattern” because
permanent markers and acetone. The samples were of its resemblance to fingers (figure 2; Rondeau et al.,
soaked for anywhere from several minutes to several 2010). The pattern consists of relatively large rounded
hours, depending on how rapidly the solution was cells separated by a thin network of potch (common
80
band was recorded at 627 nm (figure 7); the calculat-
60
ed color was again consistent with the opal’s body-
color.
40
0
400 500 600 700
0.8
WAVELENGTH (nm)
0.6
TRANSMISSION SPECTRUM
0.4
100
0.2
% TRANSMITTANCE
80
0
400 500 600 700
60
WAVELENGTH (nm)
40
Figure 6. After a purple opal was soaked in acetone, Comparison of Dyed Purple Opal to Wollo Hydro-
the solution’s visible-range spectrum revealed a broad phane. We compared the physical appearance, gemo-
asymmetrical absorption feature (top). The absorption logical properties, and other analytical results for the
from the artificially “concentrated” dye (center, trans- dyed material with opals from Wollo Province to
mission spectrum) generated a CIE L*a*b* color
assess the original source of the treated opal and help
space coordinate consistent with the opal’s purple
investigate claims of Mexican origin.
bodycolor. Two color components of the purple dye
were resolved from the transmission spectrum (bot-
tom). The 557 nm feature produced the purplish pink Gemological Properties. The RI and SG values of the
component, and the 594 nm feature contributed the dyed opal were virtually identical to those of Wollo
blue one. opal. This is notable because both properties are par-
ticularly low for play-of-color opal (Webster, 1996). purple opal. A similar pattern has been reported in
Ultraviolet fluorescence was also very similar some opal from Virgin Valley, Nevada, but it was
between the two (see also Rondeau et al., 2010). smaller and had a slightly different appearance
Most opal is porous to a minor degree, but it is (Gübelin and Koivula, 2005).
quite unusual for it to be so porous as to qualify as
hydrophane. Both Wollo opal and the purple opal dis- Inclusions. Microscopic characteristics are essential
play this property—sometimes it is so prominent to any comparison of gem materials. All of the fea-
that the transparency can be seen to improve as it tures described in this section were seen in both the
soaks up water. Mexican hydrophane opal is known, untreated Wollo samples and the purple opals.
but to our knowledge it is opaque and light pink or Among those reported previously in Ethiopian opal
brown (with or without play-of-color). are small black octahedral crystals that have been
The structure of the play-of-color is also notewor- suggested to be pyrite (Johnson et al., 1996; Rondeau
thy. Wollo opal sometimes displays an unusual et al., 2010; figure 8) and irregular tubular inclusions
“digit pattern” to its play-of-color that many consid- with a cellular structure that are probably fossilized
er unique to Ethiopian material (Rondeau et al., plant matter (Rondeau et al., 2011; figure 9). Though
2010). We observed this same pattern in some of the neither can be considered unique to Ethiopia, pyrite
Figure 9. Irregular tube-like inclusions that appear to be fossilized plant matter occurred in both the Wollo opal (left,
image width 4.4 mm) and the dyed opal (right, image width 5.0 mm) samples. Photomicrographs by S. F. McClure.
octahedra are certainly rare in gem opal. Plant mat- Surface Characteristics. Because we examined
ter is found included in opal from a number of other numerous rough samples of both natural Wollo and
deposits. dyed purple opal, we noted some surface features
We discovered another type of inclusion that to that would not be visible on cut stones.
the best of our knowledge has not been reported in Layers of a dark brown to black opaque material
opal: a zeolite mineral, possibly chabazite. It formed were present on many of the natural Wollo samples.
numerous small, transparent, colorless, euhedral The same material was found on the surface of the
pseudo-cubic crystals (figure 10). They were present rough purple opal we examined—the only difference
only in rough material, at or near the surface, but being that it was distinctly purplish (figure 12). We
always included within the opal, whether the natural were unable to obtain a conclusive Raman spectrum
Wollo or dyed purple material. The crystals appear to from this material, but the spectra did indicate the pres-
have been growing on the matrix before it was ence of amorphous carbon. EDXRF analysis detected
engulfed by the opal. considerable Mn. Previous studies of Ethiopian opal
Also found in the rough opal samples, either at or have identified such material as a manganese oxide
just below the surface, was a flat round brown material (Johnson et al., 1996; Rondeau et al., 2010).
with a radial structure (figure 11). These were typically The rough Ethiopian opal we examined some-
seen along fracture surfaces. We were unable to match times had a brownish pink to pink opaque material
their Raman spectra to anything in our database. on the surface that was very friable and had a matte
or dull fracture luster (figure 13, left). Raman spec- (1) transparent light brown hexagonal crystals of
troscopy gave a poor unidentifiable signal, and LA- quartz with very short prism faces (figure 14), some
ICP-MS analysis showed it was composed primarily of which showed dissolution features and contained
of Si. We suspect it is some kind of highly disordered rounded light green and black inclusions (figure 15);
common opal. This same material was found on the (2) prismatic colorless to light yellow crystals of K-
surface of some of the rough purple opal, the only feldspar; and (3) dark green prismatic fractured crys-
difference being the color: It was mostly dark gray tals of aegirine, a pyroxene (figure 16). The quartz
and uneven, with much darker fractures and an and feldspar were common, but we observed only
often purplish cast (figure 13, right). one example of the aegirine in a Wollo opal and one
in a purple sample.
Matrix. Many of the rough samples, both natural One question that arises is how the purple opal
Wollo and dyed purple, still had matrix attached to can be dyed if the matrix of some pieces is still the
them. The matrix was typically beige, though sever- natural beige color. Digging into an area of dark pur-
al pieces of the dyed opal had matrix that was very plish gray matrix with a needle probe showed the
dark purplish gray. In all cases, it was a soft clay-like normal beige color just below the surface (figure 17).
material that contained numerous mineral grains. This indicates that the dye did not penetrate the
These matrix-hosted mineral grains were found in matrix very deeply. Therefore, one possible explana-
both the Wollo and the purple opal, and consisted of: tion for the natural-colored matrix on the purple
opal is that the top layer of matrix was removed The small number of samples (15 total) analyzed
after the stones were dyed. The softness of the for this study makes it difficult to detect meaningful
matrix would make this easy to do. chemical trends. Overall, the Ca content of all sam-
ples was much higher than the threshold reported by
Chemical Composition. We suspected that chemi- Gaillou et al. (2008): 8,000–10,000 ppmw or higher.
cal analysis would provide important clues to the Additionally, all the samples contained trace amounts
origin of the purple opal. Gaillou et al. (2008) found of Nb. The Ba content of the purple opals tended to be
that opal from the initial Ethiopian deposits at lower (80–155 ppmw) but reached 475 ppmw. The Ba
Shewa was easily distinguished by its high Ca con- content of the untreated Wollo opal was higher over-
tent (>1000 ppmw), combined with the presence of all (175–285 ppmw), but ranged from 65 to 1400
Nb. That study found high Ca in orange to brown ppmw. There are several possible explanations for
opals only—white Ethiopian opals were not dis- this, one of which is that we do not know the starting
cussed. Two years later, in a report on Wollo opal, color of the dyed opal. It could have been yellowish or
Rondeau et al. (2010) noted a high Ba content (>100 orangy, in which case it would be expected to have a
ppmw) in white opals. This was based on a very lower Ba content, as reported by Rondeau et al. (2010).
small sample base, and the article acknowledged None of the other elements showed any meaningful
that further analyses were necessary. trends. Clearly, further investigation is necessary to
assess the compositional range of these opals.
Figure 19. This 1.75 ct Wollo opal with “GIA” scratched onto the surface shows how dye transport is
faster in localized regions with a high surface area, such as pits and scratches (left and center). After the
opal was soaked in pure acetone for several hours, the blue dye was homogeneously distributed, elimi-
nating visible dye concentrations (right). Photos by N. Renfro; center image width is 3.8 mm.
hedral inclusions of pyrite and rod- or tube-like the purple samples examined by GIA were dyed
inclusions that are probably fossilized plant matter. opals from Ethiopia. The distinct hydrophane
They have similar RI, SG, and UV fluorescence nature of Ethiopian opal makes it susceptible to
characteristics, as well as surface layers of man- many kinds of treatment—dyeing is just one.
ganese oxide. In addition to these properties, we Smoke treatment of this opal to turn it black was
observed some unusual inclusions in both Wollo recently described (Williams and Williams, 2011),
and dyed purple samples that have not been report- as was sugar treatment (see the Gem News
ed previously, such as transparent pseudo-cubic International entry on pp. 333–334 of this issue).
crystals of a zeolite mineral (probably chabazite) Dyeing this material to more believable colors,
and flat radial brown inclusions. such as the orange of Mexican fire opal, may pose
new identification challenges, and we can expect to
CONCLUSION see more treatments applied to this hydrophane
The evidence presented in this study indicates that opal in the future.
REFERENCES
Fritsch E., Ostrooumov M., Rondeau B., Barreau A., Albertini D., Research, Sept. 26, www.gia.edu/research-resources/news-
Marie A.-M., Lasnier B., Wery J. (2002) Mexican gem opals— from-research/Dyed%20Purple%20Opal%201004.pdf.
Nano and micro structure, origin of colour, and comparison Rondeau B., Fritsch E., Mazzero F., Gauthier J., Cenki-Tok B.,
with other common opals of gemological significance. Bekele E., Gaillou E. (2010) Play-of-color opal from Wegel
Australian Gemmologist, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 230–233. Tena, Wollo Province, Ethiopia. G&G, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp.
Gaillou E., Delaunay A., Rondeau B., Bouhnik-le-Coz M., Fritsch 90–105, http://dx.doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.46.2.90.
E., Cornen G., Monnier C. (2008) The geochemistry of gem Rondeau B., Fritsch E., Bodeur Y., Mazzero F., Cenki T., Bekele E.,
opals as evidence of their origin. Ore Geology Reviews, Vol. 34, Ayalew D., Cenki-Tok B., Gauthier J.-P. (2011) Wollo opals—A
pp. 113–126, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2007.07.004. powerful source from Ethiopia. InColor, No. 17 (Summer), pp.
Gübelin E., Koivula J. (2005) Photoatlas of Inclusions in 24–35.
Gemstones, Vol. 2. Opinio Publishers, Basel, Switzerland. Webster R. (1996) Gems: Their Sources, Descriptions and Identi-
Johnson M.L., Kammerling R.C., DeGhionno D.G., Koivula J.I. fication, 5th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford, UK.
(1996) Opal from Shewa Province, Ethiopia. G&G, Vol. 32, No. Williams B., Williams C. (2011) Smoke treatment in Wollo opal.
2, pp. 112–120, http://dx.doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.32.2.112. www.stonegrouplabs.com/SmokeTreatmentinWolloOpal.pdf
Renfro N., McClure S. (2011) A new dyed purple opal. News from [date accessed: Sept. 22, 2011].
G
arnet is a diverse gem material showing an measures, in combination with color and spectro-
attractive palette of colors (e.g., figure 1) and scopic data, to infer a garnet composition that is
incorporating a variety of chemical compo- most probable. These compositions were limited to
nents that are responsible for widely ranging values of one or two end members; for garnets in which three
physical properties. The several end-member species or more end members were important, gemologists
may occur as nearly pure compositions or, more com- had no effective recourse.
monly, complex assemblages. The principal species In recent years, with the availability of very
(table 1) are pyrope, almandine, and spessartine (pyral- strong rare-earth magnets, gemologists have started
spite garnets), and grossular, andradite and minor to apply magnetic attraction as a tool for gem identi-
uvarovite (ugrandite garnets). Other end-member fication (see, e.g., http://gemstonemagnetism.com).
species, including goldmanite (vanadium rich), knor- Although all materials respond to an applied mag-
ringite (chromium rich), and schorlomite (titanium netic field in some way (box A), it is the transition
rich) also may be present in small amounts, and these elements in garnet that give rise to a measureable
are mainly important for their effect on garnet col- magnetic attraction (reported here as the volume
oration. magnetic susceptibility) if they are present as princi-
In the past, gemologists have been limited in pal components. Recently, Hoover and Williams
their ability to determine garnet composition by (2007) developed a simple, inexpensive apparatus to
only having RI and possibly SG data as quantitative measure volume susceptibility on cut gems (box B).
Hoover et al. (2008) derived garnet composition from
plots of RI versus susceptibility, and followed the
See end of article for About the Author and Acknowledgments.
conventional characterization of Stockton and
GEMS & GEMOLOGY, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 272–285,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.47.4.272. Manson (1985) in defining garnet varieties (pyrope,
© 2011 Gemological Institute of America pyrope-almandine, almandine, almandine-spessar-
tine, etc.). Furthermore, the magnetic susceptibility accuracy of garnet compositions derived from the
technique permitted a quantitative measure of gar- various properties is assessed.
net composition consisting of three end members,
not two, when RI was the only other data available. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Unfortunately, Hoover et al. (2008) did not have gar- Materials. GIA initially supplied data for 539 garnets
net samples of known composition to test how well that included color, carat weight, RI, SG, cell con-
the technique agreed with quantitative chemical stant, and variety, although the data set was incom-
analysis. Using selected samples from the large plete for a number of the stones. The author then
group studied by Manson and Stockton, this article borrowed 28 of the samples for magnetic susceptibili-
compares garnet compositions from GIA’s electron ty measurements (see figure 1 table 2) that were
microprobe data to those inferred from the GIA- selected to cover the full range of compositions and
measured properties that were combined with the RI values. An additional constraint was that each
author’s measured magnetic susceptibilities. The stone be large enough for good susceptibility mea-
77 Rhodolite 2.42 1.752 3.83 11.493 16.0 Prp63Alm22Sps15 1.752 3.83 11.494 13.5 Prp63Alm32Grs3Sps1
79 Color-change 1.88 1.751 3.85 11.583 16.4 Prp63Sps20Alm17 1.752 3.82 11.571 15.9 Prp48Sps23Grs15Alm12Uv1
(pyralspite)
198 Mint green 2.73 1.735 3.61 11.850 0.4 Grs99Adr1 1.736 3.60 11.850 0 Grs94Prp1Adr1Go1
grossular
234 Malaya 2.27 1.765 3.91 11.549 24.6 Prp47Sps32Alm21 1.766 3.93 11.545 23.7 Prp43Sps34Alm18Grs4Adr1
491 Malaya 1.53 1.762 3.90 11.555 24.7 Prp47Sps46Alm7 1.759 3.88 11.558 21.8 Prp45Sps38Alm8Grs7Adr1
996 Almandine- 6.78 1.810 4.22 11.580 44.9 Sps63Alm37 1.811 4.24 11.580 44.4 Sps57Alm40Grs1
spessartine
2211 Pyrope- 2.14 1.762 3.87 11.530 16.2 Prp52Alm40Grs8 1.763 3.88 11.529 16.5 Prp50Alm39Grs9Adr1Sps1
almandine
2486 Rhodolite 2.20 1.762 3.85 11.509 15.7 Prp52Alm36Grs12 1.759 3.86 11.508 15.3 Prp57Alm36Grs4Sps1Adr1
2489 Hessonite 1.25 1.755 3.65 11.889 5.8 Grs83Adr9Alm1 or 1.760 3.64 11.882 5.0 Grs80Adr16Prp1
Grs41Prp40Adr19
2491 Demantoid 1.45 1.881 3.84 — 29.7 Adr96Grs4 1.887 3.86 12.048 30.8 Adr96
3429 Pyrope- 3.55 1.784 4.02 11.508 22.9 Alm57Grs33Prp10 1.781 4.00 11.510 23.6 Alm55Prp40Sps2Grs2
almandine
4967 Pyrope- 3.18 1.750 3.82 11.534 12.1 Prp66Alm30Grs4 1.751 3.80 11.529 11.8 Prp59Alm28Grs11Adr1
almandine
5821 Almandine- 2.52 1.810 4.19 — 46.6 (Outside the 1.804 4.22 11.601 46.3 Sps83Alm16
spessartine ternaries)
11089 Chrome- 1.96 1.744 3.70 11.537 6.2 Grs57Prp27Alm16 1.740 3.70 11.521 6.8 Prp72Alm14Grs7Uv6Adr1Sps1
pyrope
11090 Chrome- 5.37 1.742 3.72 — 8.0 Prp58Grs22Alm20 1.742 3.71 11.533 6.9 Prp71Alm14Grs7Uv6Adr1Sps1
pyrope
11568 Pyrope- 3.39 1.807 4.15 — 31.3 Alm77Grs19Prp4 1.804 4.16 11.525 32.4 Alm74Prp19Sps4Grs2
almandine
12487 Spessartine 1.41 1.800d 4.23 — 47.0 Sps97Alm3 1.805 4.22 11.580 45.6 Sps72Alm26
12588 Almandine- 1.62 1.812 4.26 — 44.3 Sps53Alm47 1.812 4.25 11.560 43.3 Alm52Sps47Grs1
spessartine
13047 Spessartine 1.91 1.800d 4.20 — 52.3 (Outside the 1.805 4.22 11.581 45.4 Sps72Alm26
ternaries)
13113 Chrome- 1.08 1.732e 3.74 11.535 8.0 Prp58Grs22Alm20 1.744 3.73 11.530 7.9 Pyp69Alm17Grs7Uv5Adr1Sps1
pyrope
13234 Demantoid 1.79 1.882 3.87 — 28.8 Adr90Uv7Grs3 1.887 3.86 12.048 30.8 Adr98
25000 Pyrope 1.27 1.744 3.77 11.492 10.9 Prp74Alm25Sps1 1.745 3.77 11.495 10.2 Prp68Alm24Grs3Adr1
(35A)
25867 Pyrope 0.18 1.730 — — 4.5 Prp79Alm12Grs9 1.733 3.68 11.512 5.3 Prp77Alm12Grs8Adr1Uv1
(4097D)
26620 Almandine 3.06 1.791 4.13 11.534 27.8 Alm64Prp32Sps4 1.795 4.10 11.531 28.8 Alm67Prp24Grs5Sps3
(5544A)
26767 Almandine 0.52 1.793 4.10 11.513 25.3 Alm62Grs35Prp3 1.798 4.13 11.513 30.4 Alm73Prp24
(6673F)
27257 Spessartine 1.42 1.800 d 4.25 — 46.6 Sps97Alm3 1.805 4.22 11.580 45.4 Sps69Alm26
(12822A)
27352 Hessonite 9.82 1.754 3.64 — 4.3 Grs87Adr13 1.757 3.64 11.875 4.8 Grs84Adr12Alm1Sps1
(13122A)
27423 Hessonite 9.10 1.755 3.65 — 3.9 Grs86Adr14 1.752 3.63 11.872 3.4 Grs86Adr12
(13167A)
a
Data that was not available from GIA is indicated by “–”.
b Numbers in parentheses are the former catalog numbers.
c Note that calculations from the oxide chemistry seldom give end-member compositions that add to 100%.
d
These RI values are problematic; see text.
e This RI was rechecked by the author and determined to be 1.742.
surements (e.g., >1 ct was preferred). When available, where X is commonly Ca2+, Mn2+, Fe2+, and/or
samples with measured SG and cell constant data Mg2+, and Y is commonly Al3+, Fe3+, Cr3+, and/or
were used; color was not part of the selection process. V3+. Because garnets form an isomorphous series,
the X and Y positions can hold any combination of
Determination of End-Member Compositions. Sili- the respective ions listed; substitutions may also
cate garnets have the general formula X32+Y23+Si3O12, occur for Si.
1.880 2491
Kn
1.870
Uv
1.860
1.850
12588
gles) against properties
13047
calculated from end- 1.810 11588
Prp
1.710
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
obtain the end-member compositions from the GIA where RI = refractive index, S = magnetic suscepti-
oxide chemical data. bility, m = measured, EM = end-member values, and
The second way to determine garnet end-mem- A, B, and C = percentages of end members. With two
ber composition is to use quantitative measured measured properties, one can solve for three possible
properties and solve a series of equations that are end members. With three measured properties, the
based on Vegard’s law, which showed that garnet end members increase to four, and so on. As with
properties are additive functions of the molar propor- compositions based on chemical analyses, the result
tions of end-member compositions (Hutchison, is not unique; there will be several (similar) possibili-
1974). The equations are: ties. Winchell (1958) showed how these equations
can be solved graphically in a rather simple way, and
1. RIm = ARIEM1 + BRIEM2 + CRIEM3 his diagram of RI vs. unit cell dimensions (or cell
2. Sm = ASEM1 + BSEM2 + CSEM3 constant) demonstrated the interrelation between
the pure end members and a particular garnet.
3. A + B + C = 1 However, the cell constant of an unknown garnet is
SGMS DIAGRAM
4.35
Alm
27257
12588
4.25
12487
13047
996
Sps
11588 5821
26767
4.15
3429
available. However,
sample numbers are not
3.95 shown for those samples
that plot toward the
234
2211
pyrope and grossular end
13234
Adr
members, which overlap
Uv 2468 491
3.85
on this diagram.
Kn
2491
79
77
Go
3.75
13113
Prp
3.55
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
RISG DIAGRAM
1.890
Adr
13234
2491
1.880
Kn
1.870
Uv
1.860
1.850
1.840
Go
Alm
1.830
Figure 4. This plot shows
996 RI vs. SG (RISG diagram)
1.820
REFRACTIVE INDEX
13047 12487
1.790
26620
3429
1.780
1.770
2211
234
1.760 2486
27352 2489 77
491
1.750 4967
27423
79
11089
1.740 25000
198
13113
Grs End member
1.730
11090 Measured value
1.720 Locock-derived value
Prp
1.710
3.55 3.65 3.75 3.85 3.95 4.05 4.15 4.25 4.35
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
1.880
Kn
1.870
Uv
1.860
1.850
1.840
Go
Alm
1.830
Figure 6. This con-
1.820 ventional Winchell
plot shows the RI vs.
REFRACTIVE INDEX
3429
1.780
1.770 2211
234
2486
491
1.760
2489
77 79
1.750
4967
25000
11089
1.740
198
13113
Grs
1.730
End member
1.720 Measured value
Prp
Locock-derived value
1.710
11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 12.0 12.1
average, slightly to the left of the join (nos. 26767, Winchell diagram used. In these cases, the differ-
3429, 2211, 2486, 77, and 25000). In figure 6 they are ences are due to grossular and/or uvarovite compo-
within the pyralspite ternary. But the malaya (no. nents. Note that in the RICC plot the ugrandite
491) and color-change (79) garnets are outside the ternary is very narrow, indicating that a ugrandite
pyralspite ternary. These differences reflect the with all three end members as major components
effects of end members other than pyralspite’s on the cannot be well characterized by this type of diagram.
measured properties. If the composition of a garnet is
purely pyralspite, its position within the ternary Usefulness of Modified Winchell Diagrams. These
would not change according to the particular diagrams provide a simple but powerful demonstra-
3
1.820 2
1.810
1 obtained from a microprobe or other chemical anal-
9
4
ysis. While chemical data typically give the percent-
1.800
Sps ages of oxides in a sample, these data are not of
1.790 8
prime interest to the gemologist, who seeks the pro-
1.780 5
portion of ideal end members. This proportion may
1.770
be obtained from either oxide chemistry or garnet
1.760
1. Pegmatites
properties, but neither method gives unique results.
1.750 2. Granites
3. Contact-altered Si-rich Rocks
When oxide percentages are used, the number of
1.740 6 4. Biotite Schists
5. Amphibole Schists
ideal end members will vary according to the num-
Grs 7
1.730 6. Eclogites ber of elements analyzed. Using garnet properties to
7. Kimberlite & Peridotites
1.720 8. Various Basic Rocks infer end-member composition limits the number
9. Calcareous Contact Rocks
1.710
Prp
of end members to one more than the number of
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
properties measured. Using RI and magnetic suscep-
VOLUME SUSCEPTIBILITY (x10-4 SI) tibility, then, we can infer a three end-member
composition.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author thanks GIA for providing access to the
enormous amount of data collected in the 1980s by D.
Vincent Manson and Carol M. Stockton for their classic
series of Gems & Gemology articles on the garnet
group. Particular thanks go to Terri Ottaway, museum
Figure 8. Gem garnets, such as these examples from the curator, for supplying samples from GIA’s Museum
Dr. Edward J. Gübelin Collection, show a variety of prop- Collection in Carlsbad, and to Ms. Stockton for provid-
erties and compositions. Magnetic susceptibility is one ing her raw data. Without their cooperation, this work
more measureable property the gemologist can use to help would not have been possible. The author is also
estimate garnet composition. Shown clockwise from the grateful to Bear and Cara Williams (Bear Essentials,
top: 44.28 ct pyrope-spessartine from Madagascar (GIA Jefferson City, Missouri) and Claire Mitchell (Gem-A,
Collection no. 34387a), 19.12 ct pyrope-almandine from London) for innumerable discussions on the nature and
Sri Lanka (34769), 4.24 ct demantoid (33303), 3.65 ct tsa- identification of the garnet group.
vorite from Tanzania (35569), and 19.90 ct spessartine
from Brazil (33238); photo by Robert Weldon.
REFERENCES j.cageo.2007.12.013.
Deer W.A., Howie R.A., Zussman J. (1982) Rock Forming Minerals, Manson D.V., Stockton C.M. (1981) Gem garnets in the red-to-
Vol. 1A—Orthosilicates. Longman, London, pp. 469–697. violet color range. G&G, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 191– 204,
Frost M.J. (1960) Magnetic susceptibility of garnets. Mineralogical http://dx.doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.17.4.191.
Magazine, Vol. 32, pp. 573–576, http://dx.doi.org/10.1180/ Meagher E.P. (1982) Silicate garnets. In Reviews in Mineralogy,
minmag.1960.032.250.07. Vol. 5, 2nd ed., Orthosilicates, Mineralogical Society of
Hoover D.B., Williams B. (2007) Magnetic susceptibility for gem- America, Washington, DC, pp. 25–66.
stone discrimination. Australian Gemmologist, Vol. 23, No. 4, Nathan Y., Katz A., Eyal M. (1965) Garnets from the Eilat area,
pp. 146–159. southern Israel. Mineralogical Magazine, Vol. 35, pp. 386–392,
Hoover D.B., Williams C., Williams B., Mitchell C. (2008) http://dx.doi.org/10.1180/minmag.1965.035.270.12.
Magnetic susceptibility, a better approach to defining garnets. Nixon P.H., Hornung G. (1968) A new chromium garnet end
Journal of Gemmology, Vol. 31, No. 3/4, pp. 91–103. member, knorringite, from kimberlite. American Miner-
Hutchison C.S. (1974) Laboratory Handbook of Petrographic alogist, Vol. 53, pp. 1833–1840.
Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 527 pp. Rickwood P.C. (1968) On recasting analyses of garnet into end-
Jackson B. (2006) The garnets. In M. O’Donoghue, Ed., Gems, 6th member molecules. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology,
ed., Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 195–237. Vol. 18, pp. 175–198, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00371808.
Kittel C. (1956) Introduction to Solid State Physics, 2nd ed. John Ringwood A.E. (1977) Synthesis of pyrope-knorringite solid solu-
Wiley & Sons, New York, 617 pp. tion series. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 36, pp.
Larsen E.S., Berman H. (1934) The microscopic determination of 443–448, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(77)90069-3.
the nonopaque minerals. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 848, Stockton C.M., Manson D.V. (1985) A proposed new classification
2nd ed., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, for gem-quality garnets. G&G, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 205–218,
266 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.21.4.205.
Locock A.J. (2008) An Excel spreadsheet to recast analyses of gar- Winchell H. (1958) The composition and physical properties of
net into end-member components, and a synopsis of the crys- garnet. American Mineralogist, Vol. 43, pp. 595–600.
tal chemistry of natural silicate garnets. Computers & Geo- Wright W.I. (1938) The composition and occurrence of garnets.
sciences, Vol. 34, pp. 1769–1780, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ American Mineralogist, Vol. 23, pp. 436–449.
S
ince 2006, GIA has used certain proportion mea- parameters that can be measured accurately enough
surements obtained with non-contact optical to support visual symmetry grading. Although mea-
scanners to grade the cut of round brilliant dia- sured values have been available to graders as a guide
monds. Improvements in the operation and accuracy for several years, beginning in 2012 GIA will use
of these instruments now enable us to also measure measured values and apply these boundary limits
some symmetry parameters during the grading pro- strictly when grading symmetry for round brilliant
cess. Although both Excellent and Very Good sym- cut diamonds. Facet-related symmetry features, and
metry grades meet GIA’s criteria for an Excellent cut the manner in which multiple features combine,
grade (Moses et al., 2004), there is a premium for may also affect the symmetry grade, and these
what the trade calls a “triple Excellent”: an aspects will continue to be evaluated visually, as
Excellent grade for cut, polish, and symmetry. they are presently beyond reproducible instrument
Therefore, many diamond manufacturers would like measurement.
to be able to predict GIA symmetry grades from Compared to visual assessment, instrumental
measurement data, so they can apply these consider- measurements provide a more consistent way of
establishing a symmetry grade, especially when a dia-
mond has very subtle symmetry deviations. Figure 1
shows a diamond with several symmetry flaws: a
See end of article for About the Authors.
GEMS & GEMOLOGY, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 286–295,
wavy and uneven girdle (resulting in an uneven
http://dx.doi.org/10.5741.GEMS.47.4.286. crown height), a table not parallel to the girdle, and
© 2011 Gemological Institute of America uneven bezel facets. In the past, the only means of
286 SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011
Figure 1. This 0.69 ct
standard round bril-
liant cut diamond
displays several
obvious symmetry
features that can be
quantified. Photo by
Robert Weldon.
determining this diamond’s symmetry grade would measure crown angle to three decimal places, but if
have been the judgment and experience of the grader. repeated measurements demonstrate an uncertainty
Quantifying these features by instrumental measure- in the first decimal place, the two additional digits
ment provides a more consistent basis for symmetry offer no meaningful precision (Reinitz et al., 2005).
grading, and gives cutters the details needed to Even detailed knowledge of the uncertainty does
improve their diamonds’ symmetry. not tell us whether measurements are accurate.
Accuracy can only be determined relative to the mea-
BACKGROUND surement of a known standard, such as an object
The repeated measurement of any attribute, such as with NIST-traceable values and reported uncertain-
weight or size, is accompanied by a certain degree of ties. Box A describes some basic metrology concepts,
uncertainty. For example, the repeated measurement including measurement uncertainty.
of a diamond’s weight, or its total depth, yields The proportion values used to determine a dia-
results that vary slightly within a certain range. For mond’s cut grade are normally the average of eight
the most accurate results, the measured value itself measurements; these are not greatly affected by a sin-
and the variation in repeated measurements—the gle outlying value. In contrast, symmetry parameters
uncertainty of that value—are both important. examine the range (the largest and smallest) of those
The U.S. National Institute of Standards and values, and they are much more affected by a single
Technology (NIST) notes that “a measurement result poor measurement. This means a higher level of con-
is complete only when accompanied by a quantita- fidence in the reproducibility and accuracy of each
tive statement of its uncertainty” (“Uncertainty of measured value is needed to predict a symmetry
measurement results,” 1998). Whatever the tool or grade, or to reinforce visual grading. GIA has
method, measurement results fall within a certain achieved this confidence through advances in the
allowable range of values—the tolerance. For our pur- devices used to measure polished diamonds, coupled
poses, the tolerance of a measuring device describes with efforts to ensure the diamonds are thoroughly
its contribution to the overall uncertainty of the mea- cleaned. For example, suppose eight crown angles are
sured values (GIA Research, 2005). individually measured at 34.1°, 34.5°, 34.9°, 35.3°,
Statistical examination of repeated independent 34.2°, 34.3°, 34.0°, and 34.1°. The average is
measurements provides one way to estimate their 34.43°, and the difference in values (maximum
uncertainty. The distribution of these measurements minus minimum) is 1.3°. A second set of measure-
also reveals information about reproducibility and ments yields values of 34.1°, 34.5°, 34.5°, 34.8°, 34.2°,
defensible precision. For example, a device might 34.3°, 34.0°, and 34.1°. The second average is 34.31°,
SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011 287
BOX A: BASIC MEASURING CONCEPTS
of the eight individual values. In a round brilliant of
T aking several independent measurements of the
same characteristic illustrates the difference
between precision and accuracy, as shown in figure
lower symmetry, the eight crown angle values may vary
by several degrees. The uncertainty of a symmetry
A-1. Accuracy refers to how close the measured val- assessment for such variation among the crown angles
ues are to the reference value, shown here as the
center of the target. Precision refers to how close the
values are to each other, and in practice this affects
Figure A-1. A measurement is accurate when it
how many significant figures should be used when agrees with an independently obtained reference
reporting the measurement. value (here, the center of the bull’s-eye). Measure-
When the difference between two measured val- ments are precise when they can be reproduced with
ues is less than or equal to the measurement uncer- small uncertainties. The ideal situation is to have
tainty, the values are within tolerance of each other, measurements that are both accurate and precise.
and by definition not readily distinguishable from
one another. Figure A-2 shows six measurements of
the total depth of one round brilliant, each with an
uncertainty of ±0.015 mm. The average value of
those measurements is 5.015 mm. Trial 4, with a
value of 5.00 mm, is just within tolerance of that
average. Trial 6, with a value of 5.04 mm, is not
within tolerance of the average. This is described as
an outlying value. Not Accurate
Not Precise
Accurate
Not Precise
Most gemologically important parameters for the
round brilliant cut diamond, such as the crown or
pavilion angle, represent averages rather than single
measurements. In metrology, averages of multiple
measurements are used to reduce measurement
uncertainty. But a quantity such as average crown
angle is calculated from eight values obtained from
different facets, rather than eight measurements of
Not Accurate Accurate
the same facet. As a result, this average has its own Precise Precise
only 0.12° below the previous average. But the differ- grade boundary. Multiple measurements, on one
ence in values is now 0.8°, considerably smaller than device or on different devices, can yield slightly dif-
the 1.3° from the first set of measurements. In other ferent results. All devices have a margin of error
words, the average changes less than the difference in (within the tolerance of the device) that could yield
values when one or two of the eight values is marred two different grades when one or more parameters
by dirt or some other measuring problem not specifi- are near a border. Since no measurement is exact,
cally related to that particular diamond. prudent cut planning acknowledges measuring toler-
Higher-quality measurements have a smaller ances and avoids placing parameters too close to the
uncertainty, but even the best measuring systems borders.
have some tolerance for each parameter. Box A
shows an example of measurement uncertainty at
the border between Very Good and Excellent. Even MEASURABLE SYMMETRY PARAMETERS AND
measurements of clean diamonds made on devices of ADDITIONAL FACTORS
proven accuracy and precision can produce one or Ten symmetry parameters are illustrated in figure 2.
more values that fall within tolerance of a symmetry GIA has developed procedures to measure these
288 SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011
COMPARING VALUES WITH UNCERTAINTIES UNCERTAINTY VS. A SYMMETRY BOUNDARY
1.6
5.06
TOTAL DEPTH (mm)
1.5
CROWN ANGLE
5.05
VARIATION (˚)
1.4
5.04
5.03 1.3
5.02 1.2
5.01 1.1
5.00 1.0
4.99 0.9
4.98 0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5
TRIAL
REPEATED MEASUREMENTS
OF SAME STONE
Figure A-2. These total-depth measurements are shown
with error bars that represent measurement uncertainty.
Figure A-3. A round brilliant measured five times
These bars overlap the average value of 5.015 mm for the
yields crown angle–variation values with uncertain-
first five trials, but not the sixth. It is important to recog-
ties that cross the symmetry grade limit for this
nize the distinction between (1) measurements within
parameter (1.2°). Although the third measurement of
tolerance of each other, and (2) measurements that clear-
1.3° would indicate Very Good symmetry, the most
ly differ from each other beyond the tolerance. If the error
reproducible value—the one most often obtained—is
bars overlap each other, the measurements can be consid-
within the limits for Excellent.
ered the same; if they do not overlap, the measurements
are different.
is also no smaller than the individual uncertainties. into two differing results. Figure A-3 shows such an
The uncertainty associated with a measured example, where all five measurements are within tol-
value can be thought of as a “bubble” around it. erance of each other, but one generates a symmetry
Overlap among these bubbles in a group of measure- grade of Very Good, based on this one parameter,
ments indicates agreement with each other. A fixed while the other four would score in the Excellent
boundary, such as a limit for symmetry grading, can range. From basic metrological principles, if the mea-
cut through such uncertainty bubbles, separating a suring device is sound, the more reproducible value
group of measurements that agree with each other is the correct one.
SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011 289
QUANTIFIED SYMMETRY FEATURES
Table off-center:
Out-of-round: deviation
deviation of the table
from the circular shape
from the central
of a round diamond
position on the crown
Culet off-center:
deviation of the culet from Table/culet alignment:
the central position on the displacement of the
pavilion table facet and culet in
opposite directions
Crown height variation: differing crown Crown angle variation: crown angles are
height measurements indicating a wavy unequal; typically related to table off-center
girdle or table/girdle not parallel
Pavilion depth variation: differing pavilion depth Pavilion angle variation: pavilion angles are
measurements indicating a wavy girdle unequal; typically related to culet off-center
Figure 2. These 10 symmetry features can be measured reliably enough by non-contact optical scanners to
determine the symmetry grade of round brilliant cut diamonds.
290 SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011
Figure 3. Three vertical lengths (A1–A3)
in this close-up of the 0.69 ct diamond in
figure 1 illustrate girdle thickness differ-
ences. Region B (green circle) shows
where the facet edges of the upper and
lower girdle do not meet (crown and
pavilion misalignment). Region C (yel-
B low circle) shows the junction where
three facets fail to meet (pointing
fault). Photo by Robert Weldon.
3. Culet off-center: the direct distance between interaction plays a large role in determining the
the culet center and the outline center project- overall symmetry grade for round brilliants with
ed into any horizontal plane such as the table lower symmetry. But for those with high symmetry,
plane, as a percentage of the average diameter the magnitude of a single feature may dominate the
4. Table/culet alignment: the direct distance evaluation.
between the table center and the culet center Facet-related symmetry features also play a role in
projected into the table plane, as a percentage of determining the symmetry grade (e.g., figure 3, fea-
the average diameter tures B and C), but they are not part of the grading pro-
5. Crown height variation: the difference between cedure described here. A full description of facet-relat-
the maximum and minimum crown height val- ed symmetry features can be found in Blodgett et al.
ues, as a percentage of the average diameter (2009). Open or short facets (non-pointing), misalign-
ment between the bezels and pavilion mains, and
6. Crown angle variation: the difference between
prominent naturals or extra facets are readily
the maximum and minimum crown angle val-
observed, but they may occur independently of the 10
ues, in degrees
measurable symmetry parameters listed above.
7. Pavilion depth variation: the difference Misshapen or uneven facets usually relate to a combi-
between the maximum and minimum pavilion nation of the 10 parameters, but the relationships can
depth values, as a percentage of the average be complex.
diameter
8. Pavilion angle variation: the difference between RECOMMENDED SYMMETRY BOUNDARIES
the maximum and minimum pavilion angle The limits given below were derived from a statisti-
values, in degrees cal comparison of measured values for the 10 param-
9. Girdle thickness variation: the difference eters and the final symmetry grades assigned to the
between the maximum and minimum girdle diamonds. This comparison was repeated four times
thickness values, as a percentage of the average over a period of 10 years, each time on newly
diameter, measured at the bezel-main junctions acquired data sets from several thousand diamonds.
(see also features A1–A3 in figure 3) Each analysis examined several sets of limits for the
10. Table size variation: the difference between the 10 parameters to identify robust matches with visual
maximum and minimum table size values, as a symmetry grading.
percentage of the average diameter Table 1 presents the ranges of allowed values for
individual symmetry features, measured in percent-
Because the facets of a round brilliant are con- age or degrees, that GIA uses to support and con-
nected to each other, these symmetry features fre- strain visual symmetry grading. The limits dividing
quently occur in combination. All of the symmetry Fair from Poor symmetry are not presented here
features combine to produce a general face-up visual because of the small number of round brilliants with
impression, so the symmetry grade is established by such low symmetry. Measured values should be
looking at the face-up diamond. Depending on rounded to the indicated precision, if necessary,
where they occur, and how they combine, different before calculating the differences. If the value for any
symmetry features can visually amplify or compen- one parameter falls into a range associated with a
sate for one another, as discussed in box B. This lower grade, the overall symmetry grade will be low-
SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011 291
BOX B: COMBINATIONS OF SYMMETRY FEATURES
ered accordingly. Combinations of symmetry fea- TABLE 1. Limits used by GIA to grade the symmetry of
tures, as well as facet-related features that are not round brilliant cut diamonds.
measured, will still be evaluated visually, which Parameter Excellent Very Good Good
may also contribute to a lower symmetry grade.
Out-of-round (%) 0–0.9 1.0–1.8 1.9–3.6
For example, if nine of the parameters are within Table off-center (%) 0–0.6 0.7–1.2 1.3–2.4
the Excellent range but the table is off-center by Culet off-center (%) 0–0.6 0.7–1.2 1.3–2.4
0.7%, the best possible symmetry grade is Very Table/culet alignment (%) 0–0.9 1.0–1.8 1.9–3.6
Good. If all 10 parameters are within the Excellent Crown height variation (%) 0–1.2 1.3–2.4 2.5–4.8
range, the expected symmetry grade would be Crown angle variation (°) 0–1.2 1.3–2.4 2.5–4.8
Excellent. But consider a round brilliant that is out Pavilion depth variation (%) 0–1.2 1.3–2.4 2.5–4.8
of round by 0.7%, with crown angle variation of 1.1° Pavilion angle variation (°) 0–0.9 1.0–1.8 1.9–3.6
and girdle thickness variation of 1.1%. Even though Girdle thickness variation (%) 0–1.2 1.3–2.4 2.5–4.8
all three parameters are within the limits for Table size variation (%) 0–1.2 1.3–2.4 2.5–4.8
292 SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011
Figure B-2. These two round brilliants have multiple measurable symmetry faults that limit them to
no better than a Good symmetry grade. Although both stones have equal culet off-center values, the
appearance of overall symmetry is different because of the relative placement of the various symmetry
faults. The green crosshair indicates the center of the outline, blue is the center of the table, and red
denotes the center of the culet. When the faults are aligned, the asymmetry appears less pronounced
(top). By comparison, when symmetry faults occur in different directions, the visual impression of
asymmetry is amplified (bottom). In either combination, these displacements are considerably more
subtle than those shown in figure B-1.
TABLE 2. Recommended limits for estimating the Excellent, the combination of these three symmetry
symmetry grade of round brilliant cut diamonds. features (and any others found on the diamond) may
Parameter Excellent Very Good Good result in either an Excellent or a Very Good symme-
Out-of-round (%) 0 – 0.7 0.8–1.4 1.5–2.8
try grade, depending on the visual assessment.
Table off-center (%) 0 – 0.5 0.6–1.0 1.1–1.9 Because every measurement contains uncertain-
Culet off-center (%) 0–0.5 0.6–1.0 1.1–1.9 ty, and symmetry features may combine to lower
Table/culet alignment (%) 0–0.7 0.8–1.4 1.5–2.8 the symmetry grade, we recommend a “safety mar-
Crown height variation (%) 0–1.0 1.1–2.0 2.1–3.9 gin” for the trade to use in estimating the symmetry
Crown angle variation (°) 0–1.0 1.1–2.0 2.1–3.9 grade. Accordingly, the values shown in table 2 are
Pavilion depth variation (%) 0–1.0 1.1–2.0 2.1–3.9 20% lower than those in table 1. When the values
Pavilion angle variation (°) 0–0.7 0.8–1.4 1.5–2.8 for all 10 parameters fall within these narrower rec-
Girdle thickness variation (%) 0–1.0 1.1–2.0 2.1–3.9 ommended borders, there is a strong likelihood that
Table size variation (%) 0–1.0 1.1–2.0 2.1–3.9
the visual symmetry assessment will agree with the
SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011 293
A
Figure 4. These three
round brilliants each dis-
play a combination of
symmetry faults. (A) The
table of this 1.00 ct dia-
mond (Fair symmetry) is
not an octagon (6.1%
table size variation, as
shown by the blue and
yellow lines) and the table
is off-center by 2.5%. The
asymmetry of the table is
associated with crown
angle variations and
uneven bezels (marked
red). (B) The culet of this
B
0.83 ct diamond (Fair
symmetry) is off-center by
2.9% (red dot). The table
is also off-center in an
opposing direction (green
dot), yielding a value for
table/culet alignment of
3.4%. These symmetry
faults are associated with
uneven bezels (marked
red) and pavilion mains.
Unlike the diamond in A,
the nearly equal quad-
rants defined by the yel-
low lines show that the
table is octagonal. (C) In
C
this 0.69 ct diamond (also
shown in figures 1 and 3;
Good symmetry), the gir-
dle is wavy and not paral-
lel to the table. Photos by
GIA (A and B) and Robert
Weldon (C).
measurement. Within these recommended limits, it though, it is more likely that multiple symmetry
is unlikely that a combination of measurable sym- features will limit the grade, because the interac-
metry features would lead to a lower symmetry tions among symmetry factors become more pro-
grade. Note that the second example in the previous nounced (again, see box B). Because combinations of
paragraph exceeds two of these recommended limits. minor symmetry features can create a significant
The boundary values presented for these 10 sym- visual impact, the limits in the tables must be
metry features are most useful along the viewed only as a guide.
Excellent–Very Good symmetry border, where a sin-
gle feature often dominates the final grade determi- DISCUSSION
nation. These individual parameter limits are also During the analysis of laboratory grading results, we
relevant for the border between Very Good and observed some variation in how strictly symmetry
Good. When symmetry problems become severe, was evaluated by our graders, particularly for mea-
294 SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011
sured features near the border between Excellent and emphasizes the visual impact of the off-center
Very Good. A common set of fixed numerical limits culet (again, see box B), but the measured values—
for these parameters can only improve the consisten- that is, Good for table-culet alignment, but Fair for
cy of symmetry grading for such stones. Diamonds table off-center—provide a context for evaluating
with at least one parameter beyond the limits shown the severity of the combination. In figure 4C, the
in table 1 will receive the lower symmetry grade. most prominent symmetry fault is displayed for
Symmetry features not captured by these 10 param- the diamond shown in figure 3. The table and gir-
eters will continue to be evaluated visually. If these dle are not parallel, a fault that is more severe than
additional facet-related features are sufficiently the uneven girdle thickness or the facet-related
prominent—an extra facet polished at the corner of symmetry features.
the table, for instance—they will reduce the sym-
metry grade even if all measured parameters fall
within the narrower limits in table 2. Visual sym- CONCLUSION
metry observations cannot raise a symmetry grade, Measurement is a process full of inherent uncertain-
but they can reveal instances when a cleaner, more ties, but GIA’s efforts to achieve smaller uncertain-
correct measurement of the diamond is needed. ties have been successful. Starting in early 2012, the
Measured values can be of great help for dia- measurable values presented in table 1 will be used
monds with multiple symmetry faults, such as the to attain greater consistency than is possible
three shown in figure 4. In such cases, some of the through visual assessment alone. Additional mea-
symmetry features are more easily noticed visual- surable parameters, aspects arising from combina-
ly, while others are captured more accurately by tions of these parameters, and facet-related symme-
measurement. In figure 4A, the asymmetry of the try variations will continue to be assessed visually.
table leads to variation in crown angles and A more restrictive set of limits is recommended for
uneven bezel facets. In other cases, similar faults manufacturers, to help ensure that the final symme-
with the table might be associated with a wavy try grade will not be undermined by combination
girdle that takes up the uneven aspects of the crown effects or measuring tolerances.
and allows little variation in the crown angles. Under
both sets of circumstances, the uneven bezels are a
prominent feature that does not describe the underly-
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
ing symmetry faults as clearly as the measured values Mr. Geurts is a manager of research and development at GIA
for crown angle variation, crown height variation, and in Antwerp. Dr. Reinitz is a project manager at GIA in New
girdle thickness variation. York. Dr. Blodgett is a research scientist, and Mr. Gilbertson a
In figure 4B, the off-center culet and table lead research associate, at GIA in Carlsbad.
to uneven bezels and pavilion mains. The displace-
ment between the table center and the culet
REFERENCES Moses T.M., Johnson M.L., Green B., Blodgett T., Cino K., Geurts
Blodgett T., Geurts R., Gilbertson A., Lucas A., Pay D., Reinitz I., R.H., Gilbertson A.M., Hemphill T.S., King J.M., Kornylak L.,
Shigley J., Yantzer K., Zink C. (2009) Finish, culet size and gir- Reinitz I.M., Shigley J.E. (2004) A foundation for grading the over-
dle thickness; Categories of the GIA Diamond Cut Grading all cut quality of round brilliant cut diamonds. G&G, Vol. 40,
System. www.gia.edu/diamondcut/pdf/poster_finish_culet_ No. 3, pp. 202–228, http://dx.doi.org/10.5741.GEMS.40.4.202.
girdle_highres.pdf [date accessed: June 14, 2011]. Reinitz I., Yantzer K., Johnson M., Blodgett T., Geurts R.,
GIA Research (2005) Measurement tolerances: Accuracy and pre- Gilbertson A. (2005) Proportion measurement: Tolerances for
cision in the gem industry. Rapaport Diamond Report, Vol. the GIA Diamond Cut Grading System. Rapaport Diamond
28, No. 13, pp. 183–185, www.gia.edu/diamondcut/pdf/4_05_ Report, Vol. 28, No. 30, pp. 34–39, www.gia.edu/diamondcut/
RDR_pg183_185.pdf. pdf/0805_pg34_39.pdf.
Gillen D.B., Lanzl B.F., Yantzer P.M. (2005) Polish and symmetry. Uncertainty of measurement results (1998) The NIST Reference
Rapaport Diamond Report, Vol. 28, No. 39, pp. 80–87, on Constants and Uncertainty. http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/
www.gia.edu/diamondcut/pdf/polish_and_symmetry.pdf. Uncertainty/international1.html [date accessed: June 14, 2011].
SYMMETRY GRADING FOR ROUND BRILLIANTS GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011 295
NOTES & NEW TECHNIQUES
T
he Swiss Gemmological Institute SSEF recent- 1985; Hurwit, 1988; Salanne, 2009).
ly received a set of six antique brooches for In this study, we report on a historic turquoise
identification (figure 1). These same pieces had substitute—fossilized dentine, also known as odon-
already been presented in Bennett and Mascetti tolite, ivory turquoise, bone turquoise, or French
(2003, p. 102) as turquoise jewelry. They were set turquoise. Much of this material consists of fos-
with numerous small rose-cut diamonds and a few silized mastodon ivory from Miocene-age (13–16
larger old-cut diamonds, but most prominent were a million years old) sedimentary rocks of the Gers
number of light blue to greenish blue cabochons that District between the Aquitaine and Languedoc
appeared to be turquoise. Visual examination quick- regions of southwestern France (Reiche et al., 2001).
ly revealed otherwise. Considering the historic back- The tusks are hosted by alluvial sediments (molasse
ground of these brooches, we were interested in alternating with fine sand and clay facies) that accu-
examining the blue gems in greater detail to shed mulated in basins during the erosion of the nearby
light on early turquoise imitations. Pyrenees Mountains (Crouzel, 1957; Antoine et al.,
Turquoise, a copper-bearing hydrated alu- 1997). The fossilized dentine consists mainly of fluo-
minophosphate with the chemical formula rapatite, Ca5(PO4)3F; since medieval times, local
Cistercian monks have used a heating process to
turn the material light blue (de La Brosse, 1626;
See end of article for About the Authors and Acknowledgment.
Réaumur, 1715; Fischer, 1819), which they thought
GEMS & GEMOLOGY, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 296–301, to be turquoise. These “stones” were originally set
http://dx.doi.org/10.5741.GEMS.47.4.296. in medieval religious artifacts, but came into fashion
© 2011 Gemological Institute of America in the early to mid-19th century (Brown, 2007),
296 NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011
Figure 1. These six
brooches are set with
313 light blue stones,
the majority of which
proved to be fossilized
dentine (odontolite),
mixed with a few
turquoise and glass
cabochons. Photo by
Luc Phan, Swiss
Gemmological
Institute SSEF.
when fossilized dentine was recovered commercially magnification (200×) using an Olympus microscope
in southwestern France. coupled with our Renishaw Raman system. For iden-
A similar set of brooches containing odontolite tification, Raman spectra were taken on a large num-
was described by Crowningshield (1993). The pre- ber of stones, using a 514 nm argon-ion laser (Hänni
sent study offers further data on this material. Odon- et al., 1998). The spectra were collected from 1800 to
tolite is rarely encountered in the market today, 100 cm–1 Raman shift, to include the vibrational
although it is occasionally present in historic jewels range of organic compounds, such as wax and artifi-
from private collections or museums. Gemologists cial resin, used for turquoise impregnation. In a few
seldom have the opportunity to test this material in cases, spectra were collected up to 5000 cm–1 to
the laboratory. check for OH bands in the dentine.
We also conducted semiquantitative energy-dis-
MATERIALS AND METHODS persive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) chemical analy-
Six brooches, all of very similar style (figure 1), were sis of two cabochons, using a Thermo Fisher
investigated. Their ornamental patterns of folded Scientific Quant’X unit. These analyses, carried out
and knotted bands are characteristic of early to mid- using a series of excitation energies from 4 to 25 kV,
19th century design (Bennett and Mascetti, 2003). covered a large range of elements, from Na to those
Several French assay marks were seen on the metal with high atomic number.
mounting. In total, the brooches contained 313
opaque light blue cabochons from approximately 2 RESULTS
to 11 mm long, set with numerous small rose-cut The 313 light blue cabochons in the brooches (table
diamonds and three old-cut diamond center-stones. 1) were categorized into three groups: odontolite (288
The brooches ranged
from approximately 2.5
to 14 cm long and from TABLE 1. Gems identified in the historic “turquoise” brooches.
6.6 to 53.6 g in weight. Brooch Location in No. No. analyzed
Odontolitea Turquoise Glass
All of the pieces figure 1 cabochons by Raman
were observed micro- A Top left 94 88 87 7 0
scopically with 10–50× B Center 59 52 57 0 2
magnification. A few C Top right 57 52 52 0 5
stones were very diffi- D Bottom right 54 44 52 0 2
cult to investigate due E Bottom left 24 24 21 1 2
F Bottom center 25 24 19 2 4
to the complexity of
Total 313 284 288 10 15
the mounting. Many of
the cabochons were a Due to the mountings, a few of the odontolites could only be identified by microscopic examination;
NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011 297
characteristic for elephant, mammoth, and masto-
don ivory (Campbell Pedersen, 2010).
The Raman spectra of the odontolite revealed a
distinct peak at 964 cm–1 and smaller peaks at about
1090, 580, and 430 cm–1 Raman shift (figure 5), and
only a weak, broad OH band at about 3540 cm–1.
This pattern showed a perfect correlation with fluo-
rapatite spectra taken from the SSEF reference min-
eral collection and with the published literature
(Reiche et al., 2000; Campillo et al., 2010). EDXRF
analyses of two cabochons confirmed their identity
as apatite, revealing Ca and P as major elements and
low concentrations of S, Cl, Sr, and Mn. Both analy-
ses also revealed traces of Cu.
The turquoise cabochons showed a smoothly pol-
298 NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011
RAMAN SPECTRA
964
Odontolite
Turquoise
Glass
1086
582 428
1041
COUNTS
420
644 244
NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011 299
Figure 8. The
largest brooch
(~14 cm long) con-
tained mostly
odontolite with
a few turquoise
cabochons.
Photo by M. S.
Krzemnicki.
Based on its appearance and historical availabili- There was no visual indication on any of the investi-
ty, we presume that the turquoise in this jewelry gated samples of artificial blue color concentrations,
originated from classical sources in the Middle East, as would be expected for dyeing with a copper-bear-
such as Persia. They showed no indications of any ing solution (e.g., copper sulfate).
treatment (waxing, stabilization, or dyeing), as The glass imitations were uncommon in these
expected for the time period of the jewelry. brooches. Whether they were set during the crafting
With its attractive light blue color, odontolite has or during subsequent repair is not known. Similar
been used as a turquoise simulant since the Middle glass, however, has a long history as a substitute
Ages (Reiche et al., 2001). Although the heat- (Hänni et al., 1998), and is often found in fashion
induced coloration was described in the early 18th jewelry from the 19th century.
century (Réaumur, 1715; Fischer, 1819), the cause of
the blue color has been a subject of debate. Reiche et CONCLUSIONS
al. (2000, 2001) only recently showed that the oxida- What started as routine testing of a set of brooches
tion of manganese traces within the fluorapatite dur- ultimately shed light on the widespread use of a rare
ing a heating process is responsible for the blue hue turquoise imitation—odontolite—in mid-19th cen-
of the originally light gray odontolite. Using X-ray tury jewelry that was much in fashion in Western
absorption spectroscopy, these authors found that Europe. The odontolite cabochons were mixed with
heating to about 600°C under oxidizing conditions turquoise and also set with glass either at the manu-
transforms octahedrally coordinated Mn2+ into tetra- facturing stage or during subsequent repair. The
hedrally coordinated Mn5+, which substitutes for most useful approach to identifying these materials
phosphorous in the fluorapatite (Reiche et al., 2002). is a combination of microscopic observation and
The traces of Cu that we detected in the two Raman spectroscopy. Both methods are fully nonde-
odontolite cabochons using EDXRF spectroscopy structive so they can be readily applied to valuable
may result from contamination during polishing. historic objects.
300 NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011
REFERENCES G&G, Vol. 19, No. 2, p. 117.
Ahmed A. (1999) Türkis aus dem ägyptischen Sinai. extraLapis Hänni H.A., Schubiger B., Kiefert L., Häberli S. (1998) Raman
No. 16: Türkise—Der Edelstein mit der Farbe des Himmels, investigations on two historical objects from Basel Cathedral:
Christian Weise Verlag, Munich, Germany, pp. 76–81. The Reliquary cross and Dorothy monstrance. G&G, Vol. 34,
Antoine P-O., Duranthon F., Tassy P. (1997) L’apport des grandes No. 2, pp. 102–113, http://dx.doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.34.2.102.
mammifères (Rinocérotides, Suoïdes, Proboscidiens) à la con- Hurwit K.N. (1988) Gem Trade Lab Notes: Imitation turquoise with
naissance des gisements du Miocène d’Aquitaine (France). In J.- “veins” and pyrite. G&G, Vol. 24, No. 1, p. 52.
P. Aguilar, S. Legendre., and J. Michaux, Eds., Actes du Congrès Kane R.E. (1985) Gem Trade Lab Notes: Turquoise simulant, dyed
BiochoM’97, Mémoires Travaux E.P.H.E., Institut Montpeillier, magnesite. G&G, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 47–48.
Vol. 21, pp. 581–591. Kiefert L., Hänni H.A., Chalain J.-P., Weber W. (1999)
Arnould H., Poirot J-.P. (1975) Infra-red reflection spectra of Identification of filler substances in emeralds by infrared and
turquoise (natural and synthetic) and its substitutes. Journal of Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Gemmology, Vol. 26, No. 8,
Gemmology, Vol. 14, pp. 375–377. pp. 501–520.
Bennett D., Mascetti D. (2003) Understanding Jewellery. Antique Lind T., Schmetzer K., Bank H. (1983) The identification of
Collectors Club Ltd., Woodbridge, Suffolk, England, 494 pp. turquoise by infrared spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffrac-
Brown G. (2007) Rare ivories—Challenging identifications. tion. G&G, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 164–168, http://dx.doi.org/
Lecture presented at the Federal Conference of the Gemmo- 10.5741/GEMS.19.3.164.
logical Association of Australia, Hobart, Tasmania, May 19, McMillan P. (1984) Structural studies of silicate glasses and
www.australiangemmologist.com.au/images/rareivories.pdf. melts—Applications and limitations of Raman spectroscopy.
Campbell Pedersen M. (2010) Gem and Ornamental Materials of American Mineralogist, Vol. 69, pp. 622–644.
Organic Origin. NAG Press, London. Réaumur R. (1715) Observations sur les mines de turquoises du
Campillo M., Lacharmoise P.D., Reparaz J.S., Goni A.R., Valiente royaume; sur la nature de la matière qu’on y trouve, et sur la
M. (2010) On the assessment of hydroxyapatite fluoridation matière dont on lui donne la couleur. Memoires de l’Académie
by means of Raman scattering. Journal of Chemical Physics, Royale des Sciences, pp. 174–202.
Vol. 132, No. 24, article no. 244501 [5 pp.], http://dx.doi.org/ Reiche I., Vignaud C., Menu M. (2000) Heat induced transforma-
10.1063/1.3428556. tion of fossil mastodon ivory into turquoise ‘odontolite’: Struc-
Chalker K., Dubin L.S., Whiteley P.M. (2004) Totems to tural and elemental characterisation. Solid State Sciences, Vol.
Turquoise: Native North American Jewelry Arts of the North- 2, No. 6, pp. 625–636, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1293-
west and Southwest. Published in association with the 2558(00)01067-0.
American Museum of Natural History by Harry N. Abrams, Reiche I., Vignaud C., Champagnon B., Panczer G., Brouder C.,
New York, 224 pp. Morin G., Solé V.A., Charlet L., Menu M. (2001) From
Crouzel F. (1957) Le Miocène continental du Bassin d’Aquitaine. mastodon ivory to gemstone: The origin of turquoise color in
Bulletin du Service de la Carte Géologique de la France, Vol. odontolite. American Mineralogist, Vol. 86, pp. 1519–1524.
54, No. 248, 264 pp. Reiche I., Morin G., Brouder C., Solé V.A., Petit P.-E., Vignaudi C.,
Crowningshield G.R. (1993) Gem Trade Lab Notes: Odontolite. Calligaro T., Menu M. (2002) Manganese accommodation in
G&G, Vol. 29, No. 2, p. 127. fossilised mastodon ivory and heat-induced colour transforma-
de La Brosse G. (1626) Livre sur la Nature, vertu et Utilité des tion: Evidence by EXAFS. European Journal of Mineralogy,
Plantes. Bibliothèque Interuniversitaire de Médecine et d’Odon- Vol. 14, pp. 1069–1073, http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0935-
tologie, Paris. 1221/2002/0014-10693.
Fischer G. (1819) Essay on the turquoise and the calcite. In T. Salanne C. (2009) Etude de la Turquoise, de ses Traitements et
Thomson, Ed., Annals of Philosophy, Vol. 14, pp. 406–420. Imitations. Diplôme d’Université de Gemmologie, University
Fryer C.W. (1983) Gem Trade Lab Notes: Turquoise imitation. of Nantes, France, 88 pp.
NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES GEMS & GEMOLOGY WINTER 2011 301
Rapid Communications
NEED TO KNOW
Figure 3. The HPGe digital spectrometer at the China • Neutron irradiation is commonly used to create
Institute of Atomic Energy in Beijing was used in this an attractive “London Blue” color in near-color-
study. Photo by J. Zhang. less topaz.
• Topaz may contain trace impurities that become
radioactive after neutron irradiation.
To explore the decay pattern of the irradiated blue • Gamma-ray spectroscopy showed that irradiated
topaz, we conducted four measurements of the residual topaz samples from China contained up to four
radioactivity in the 15 samples. The samples were radionuclides.
removed from the reactor on September 28, 2005, and • Most of the samples were safe to handle when
gamma-ray spectroscopy was subsequently performed on measured 95 days after irradiation, but some will
January 1, 2006 (day 95); March 14 (day 167); April 19 require several years to “cool down.”
(day 203); and November 30 (day 428). We tested all sam-
ples at day 95, and then focused on four samples (figure 4)
with residual radioactivity higher than the exemption
value (74 Bq/g). The goal of studying the decay pattern of irradiated
blue topaz is to determine the time needed for the residual
radioactivity to decay to a safe level (Miraglia, 1986;
Miraglia and Cunningham, 1988). The half-life decay for-
TABLE 2. Residual radioactivity (Bq/g) of irradiated mula of radioactive nuclides is necessary for these calcula-
blue topaz samples after four periods of decay.a tions. De Soete et al. (1972) defined the formula as follows:
If the probability of decay for radioactive elements in unit
Decay time (days)
Sample
Nuclide
time is 1/τ, and if the number of radioactive elements is N,
no. 95 167 203 428 then the number of decayed radioactive elements in the
134
time span of dt should be dN, where
Topaz-8 Cs 417.6 392.1 379.2 309.3
182
Ta 19,800 12,800 10,290 2,668 dN/N = −1/τ dt (1)
Total 20,218 13,192 10,669 2,977 In formula (1), the negative sign indicates a reduction
Topaz-9 134
Cs 1,617 1,512 1,462 1,187 in the number of subatomic particles that constitute ioniz-
46
Sc 296.3 162.1 120.7 18.4 ing radiation. Integrating both sides of the equation yields:
182
Ta 495.9 321.1 258.1 66.8
N = N0e−t/τ (2)
Total 2,409 1,996 1,840 1,273
In formula (2), N0 is the original value of radioactivity
182
Topaz-10 Ta 195,000 125,800 100,800 25,750 from a given nuclide, and τ represents the decay time con-
Total 195,000 125,800 100,800 25,750 stant, after which the element has been reduced to e−1 of
134 the original value of radioactivity. The relationship
Topaz-15 Cs 106.2 100.2 96.5 78.7
46
Sc 237.9 132.1 98.6 15.0 between τ and half-life (T1/2) can be expressed as:
160
Tb 3,909 1,961 1,389 160.5 T1/2 = 0.693τ (3)
Total 4,253 2,193 1,585 254.2 Applying formula (3) to formula (2), we can derive the
a
Although Fe was detected in the samples by EDXRF analysis, no half-life decay formula of radioactive nuclides:
iron radionuclides were detected by gamma-ray spectroscopy.
N = N0e−0.693t/T /
1 2
(4)
CONCLUSIONS
Blue topaz (e.g., figure 5) typically takes two to three years
to decay below the exemption level after neutron irradia-
tion. The actual quarantine time necessary for specific
samples depends on several factors. There are three scenar-
Figure 4. These four samples (9.5–16.5 mm long) had ios that can contribute to high levels of residual radioactiv-
residual radioactivity higher than the exemption ity in irradiated gems.
level when initially measured after 95 days. From left The first is the presence of activated impurities with a
to right: Topaz-8, Topaz-9, Topaz-10, and Topaz-15. long half-life (i.e., a comparatively slow rate of decay). For
Photo by J. Zhang. example, 134Cs has a half-life of 2.06 years. This radionu-
clide was present in three of the four topaz samples show-
ing residual radioactivity, and for Topaz-9 the time required
In formula (4), N0 is the initial value of radioactivity to decay below the exemption level was calculated at 3,440
and N is the unknown value of radioactivity, expressed in days (~9.4 years).
units of Bq. T1/2 is the half-life of the nuclide, and t is its Second, high concentrations of activated impurities
decay time. (even those that do not have a long half-life) may produce
The specific activity of each radionuclide present in a high residual radioactivity. Sample Topaz-10, for example,
given sample was calculated. The values obtained at the contained a large amount of 182Ta (half-life of 114 days).
first stage of radiation detection (after 95 days) can be set Consequently, the sample’s radioactivity upon removal
as the initial values. Values for each subsequent stage can from the reactor was 347,600 Bq/g, and it took 1,391 days
then be calculated and compared with the detected values, (~3.8 years) for the sample to decay below the exemption
as shown in table 3. In addition, the radioactivity of the level.
samples upon their removal from the reactor (day 0) can be The third scenario contributing to high levels of residual
WAVELENGTH (nm)
INTENSITY (counts)
GIA laboratory. The present dia-
mond’s 500 nm band had a much
4000 longer half-life and a stronger intensi-
ty than most natural type IIb dia-
monds; this combination produced
the unusually long phosphorescence.
This diamond also exhibited ther-
0 moluminescence, as described in the
20
Spring 2011 Lab Notes (pp. 50–51). It
was immersed in a liquid-nitrogen
c)
se
40
bath (–196ºC) and simultaneously
E(
M
60 exposed to short-wave UV. After
TI
400 500 600 700 removal from the bath, it warmed up
WAVELENGTH (nm) rapidly and displayed a flash of blue
thermoluminescence. After a few sec-
onds of additional warming, it exhib-
Figure 9. The three-dimensional spectral plot for the diamond in figure 8 ited the long-lasting phosphorescence
shows its long-lasting phosphorescence corresponding to the 500 nm band. described above. A second video doc-
The diamond was exposed to UV radiation for 20 seconds and data were umenting both luminescence behav-
collected over one second intervals. iors is available in the G&G Data
Depository.
Andy H. Shen and
Sally Eaton-Magaña
displayed very weak to weak greenish Magaña et al., “Using phosphores-
blue fluorescence to long- and short- cence as a fingerprint for the Hope
wave UV radiation. During UV expo-
sure, the fluorescence appeared to
intensify due to the sample’s strong Figure 10. Data compiled for 300 natural type IIb diamonds show varia-
phosphorescence. After 5 seconds of tions in the average half-life of phosphorescence bands (with error bars
exposure to short-wave UV radiation, showing standard deviations) at 500 and 660 nm according to their body-
the diamond displayed bright blue color. Colorless type IIb diamonds generally do not show a red phospho-
phosphorescence (see video in the rescence band at 660 nm, and their blue 500 nm band has a long half-life.
G&G Data Depository at gia.edu/ Type IIb diamonds with stronger blue coloration have both 500 and 660
gandg), and it continued to luminesce nm bands, and the half-life of their blue phosphorescence is much shorter.
for several minutes.
Phosphorescence spectroscopy
revealed a band at 500 nm (also docu-
HALF-LIFE VS. BODYCOLOR
mented in type IIb diamonds by S. 18
Average 500 nm band half-life
Eaton-Magaña et al., “Luminescence
AVERAGE CALCULATED HALF-LIFE (sec)
Figure 13. This 10.67 ct opal Figure 15. This strand contains 17 large (up to 29.46 mm), coated,
cabochon is reportedly from the baroque-shaped, bead-cultured freshwater pearls.
Wollo Province of Ethiopia. The
black bodycolor is caused by
natural manganese oxides incor-
porated during formation.
For online access to all issues of GEMS & GEMOLOGY from 1981 to the present, visit:
store.gia.edu
Contributing Editors
Emmanuel Fritsch, CNRS, Team 6502, Institut des Matériaux Jean Rouxel (IMN), University of Nantes, France (fritsch@cnrs-imn.fr)
Michael S. Krzemnicki, Swiss Gemmological Institute SSEF, Basel, Switzerland (gemlab@ssef.ch)
Franck Notari, GGTL GemLab–GemTechLab, Geneva, Switzerland (franck.notari@gemtechlab.ch)
Kenneth Scarratt, GIA, Bangkok, Thailand (ken.scarratt@gia.edu)
Figure 3. The dolomite contained tiny jagged three-phase inclusions associated with other fluid inclusions
(left, magnified 110×). An albite inclusion broke the surface of one rough dolomite sample (right, magnified
80×). Photomicrographs by K. S. Moe.
we believe this is the first report of blue dolomite being Windhoek, Namibia) about a new find of fluorite located
used as a gemstone. several kilometers from Klein Spitzkoppe toward the
Kyaw Soe Moe (kmoe@gia.edu) and Wai L. Win Khan River. The material shows distinctive color zoning
GIA, New York and inclusions, and Mr. Brunner reported that only a
small amount has been mined so far. He indicated that a
Fluorite from Namibia. The Klein Spitzkoppe area in few dozen polished slabs have been produced in sizes up
Namibia is known as a source of attractive crystals of to 10+ cm in longest dimension, and some of them have
topaz, aquamarine, and other minerals from miarolitic been set in silver pendants (e.g., figure 4). Mr. Brunner
cavities (see, e.g., B. Cairncross et al., “Topaz, aquama- donated to GIA one polished slab (89.47 ct, or 37.05 ×
rine, and other beryls from Klein Spitzkoppe, Namibia,” 39.75 × 5.60 mm) and seven rough pieces of this fluorite
Summer 1998 G&G, pp. 114–125). In mid-2011, GIA (9.83 to 45.97 g) for examination.
was informed by Jo-Hannes Brunner (Pangolin Trading, Gemological examination of the slab revealed the fol-
lowing properties: RI—1.434; hydrostatic SG—3.12;
Chelsea filter reaction—none; fluorescence—inert to long-
Figure 5. Color zoning and several prismatic inclu- wave UV radiation, and weak yellow to short-wave UV in
sions containing dickite are visible in this Namibian the yellow to orangy yellow portions; and no clear absorp-
fluorite slab (gift of Jo-Hannes Brunner; GIA tion lines visible with the desk-model spectroscope. These
Collection no. 38388). Photomicrograph by C. Ito; properties are consistent with fluorite, and the identity of
magnified 16×. all the samples was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy.
The fluorite was distinctly color zoned, with cubic vio-
let zones inside yellow to orangy yellow areas. Whitish,
prismatic inclusions with generally square cross-sections
(figure 5) appeared opaque in transmitted light and were
predominantly hosted by the violet areas of the fluorite.
These inclusions were identified by Raman spectroscopy
as dickite, a clay mineral with the formula Al2Si2O5(OH)4.
Many of them consisted of partially hollow tubes, appar-
ently created when some of the soft dickite weathered
away or was removed during the polishing of the slab. A
few yellow areas within the dickite inclusions were identi-
fied as sulfur, and Raman analysis also detected quartz
inclusions in the fluorite. In addition, microscopic exami-
nation revealed reflective, iridescent fluid inclusions with
geometric patterns.
LA-ICP-MS analysis of both the yellow and violet por-
tions of the fluorite showed trace amounts of Ti, Sr, La,
and Ce. The violet area tended to show higher concentra-
tions of these elements, as well as trace amounts of addi- Central Road at coordinates 28°22′10′′ S, 122°35′59′′ E.
tional rare-earth elements. According to local geologic maps, this region consists
UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy of a yellow portion of the mainly of weathered biotite monzogranite or kaolinized
slab showed a broad band at 434 nm, while a violet section granites. The opal seam appears to be associated with a
displayed a 306 nm peak with broad bands at approximate- fault trending northeast/southwest. In September 2008,
ly 410 and 570 nm. The band in the yellow region is con- Holdfast Exploration was granted a five-year exploration
sistent with the “yellow center” attributed to an O3– ion license, and prospecting has been carried out since
replacing two adjacent F– ions (H. Bill and G. Calas, “Color November 2008. Pits were excavated up to about 1.5 m
centers, associated rare-earth ions and the origin of col- deep in six different areas using mainly hand tools, a jack-
oration in natural fluorites,” Physics and Chemistry of hammer, and an excavator.
Minerals, Vol. 3, 1978, pp. 117–131). The violet portion Samples of opal in host rock, loose pieces of rough, and
showed an absorption spectrum similar to those of purple faceted stones were donated to GIA in December 2010.
fluorites in that article, with a 570–580 nm band (possibly Eight samples weighing 0.49–4.39 ct studied for this report
attributed to colloidal calcium) and other possible Y- or represented the color range of the Laverton material: two
Ce-associated F-center features. rough specimens (yellow and brownish orange) and six
Absorption spectra of the fluorite and Raman spectra of faceted stones (two colorless, two yellow, and two brown-
the inclusions are available in the G&G Data Depository ish orange). Some of the matrix specimens contained col-
at gia.edu/gandg. The delicate color patterns and interest- orless, yellow, and brownish orange opal within the same
ing inclusion scene displayed by this fluorite makes it an piece. Most of the opal in matrix showed some unhealed
attractive option for jewelry use when cut as slabs. surface-reaching fissures that were present before the
Claire Ito (cito@gia.edu) stones were brought to GIA. Observations over an 11-
GIA, New York month period showed some evidence of crazing in one of
them, the colorless round brilliant shown in figure 6.
Common opal from Laverton, Western Australia. In early Gemological properties of the opal are summarized in
2011, Peter Piromanski from Holdfast Exploration Pty. table 1. Most of the samples showed some turbidity and
Ltd., Wannero, Western Australia, showed this contributor flow patterns. One of the two colorless pieces contained
some attractive potch opals (e.g., figure 6), to be marketed clusters of minute crystals (figure 7, top left). In most of the
as Piroman Opal, that were reportedly from a new deposit yellow material, small spheres were seen individually (fig-
31 km north of the town of Laverton, near the Great ure 7, top right) or in groups (figure 7, bottom left). In the
brownish orange opal, the most common inclusions were A bicolor, bi-pattern hydrophane opal. The Laboratoire
tiny angular, often reddish crystals associated with ran- Français de Gemmologie in Paris recently examined an
domly oriented reflective (sometimes iridescent) discoid unusual 17.15 ct opal cabochon, measuring approximately
tension fissures, reminiscent of the “lily pads” seen in peri- 20.95 × 15.96 × 11.69 mm. Play-of-color in the full rain-
dot (figure 7, bottom right). We have been unable to identi- bow of hues was visible throughout the stone (figure 8,
fy any of these inclusions with Raman microspectroscopy. left), but the bodycolor was not even. One end of the cabo-
EDXRF analysis of five opals (colorless, yellow, and chon was medium brown, while the rest of the gem had a
brownish orange) showed traces of Cu and Zr in all sam- translucent whitish color (figure 8, right). The color
ples, while Ca, Fe, and Sr were detected in all but the color- boundary formed a well-defined line along the base of the
less pieces. The three darker brownish orange stones con- stone. Such a zoning pattern has been occasionally seen in
tained the highest Fe contents, as expected from the litera- common opal but is unusual for play-of-color opal.
ture (E. Fritsch et al., “Découvertes récentes sur l’opale,” To better characterize the opal, we weighed it after 12
hours of drying in air in the laboratory, and again after stronger fluorescence than the rest of the opal.
immersion in water. Water fills the pores of opals that Another peculiarity was that the two color zones
show hydrophane character. After immersion the stone showed different patterns in their play-of-color. The brown
weighed 17.99 ct, which clearly indicated a hydrophane zone had fairly large patches and a striated appearance,
character, but its appearance remained unaltered. sometimes referred to as a “straw” or “chaff” pattern (fig-
To avoid introducing foreign substances into the ure 9). This feature is due to polysynthetic twinning of the
porous opal, we did not test for RI or SG. The gem emitted network of silica spheres found in many opals, particularly
a weak whitish fluorescence to long-wave UV radiation, those from Ethiopia. This pattern was absent from the
with a slightly less intense reaction to short-wave UV. The light-colored portion, which had smaller patches, less-visi-
emission was zoned, with the brown portion nearly inert. ble borders, and somewhat “rolling” color flashes.
The cap of the white zone at the top of the cabochon had a The base of the cabochon showed a cellular pattern of
Figure 14. The inclusions displayed an acicular habit (left, magnified 32×), which is usually not associated with
emeralds. However, their green color and hexagonal profile (right, magnified 48×) helped identify them as emer-
ald. (The green material in some quartz fractures is polishing powder.) Photomicrographs by G. Choudhary.
Quartz carving with inclusions of izoklakeite. These con- percussion mortar. This freed numerous fragments of the
tributors recently examined a life-size quartz skull (figure silver-gray included crystals. Powder X-ray diffraction
15) carved by noted gem photographer and lapidary Harold analysis at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles
Van Pelt (Los Angeles). The hollowed skull contained two County pointed to either izoklakeite or giessenite, and an
articulated pieces and a jaw hinge that opened and closed. electron back-scattered diffraction pattern done at Caltech,
Starting with a 250 lb. colorless quartz crystal, Mr. Van
Pelt produced this 6.5 lb. (2.9 kg) sculpture.
One of the carving’s interesting features was its abun- Figure 16. Izoklakeite and possibly other sulfides
dance of conspicuous submetallic silver-gray inclusions form these inclusions in the quartz used in the carv-
(e.g., figure 16). These were initially believed to be ing from figure 15. Photomicrograph by G. R.
jamesonite, a lead-iron-antimony sulfide mineral often Rossman; image width 3.2 mm.
found in fibrous form. Initial analyses with a scanning elec-
tron microscope (SEM) quickly determined otherwise. No
iron was detected, which meant the fibers consisted of a
different material.
A more detailed SEM and electron microprobe investi-
gation at Caltech revealed a lead-antimony-bismuth sulfide
with a minor amount of copper. Its formula was initially
determined as (Pb2.65Cu0.25)(Sb1.14,Bi0.95)S6. Areas of some of
the fibers also consisted of several alteration products: gale-
na (PbS), bismuthinite (B2S3), some CuPb(Sb,Bi)S3 minerals,
and small amounts of native bismuth.
To identify the original lead-antimony-bismuth sul-
fide, we obtained a ~1 cm3 piece of the quartz from which
the skull was originally carved. It was cooled in liquid
nitrogen to make it brittle and immediately shattered in a
together with the chemical analyses, confirmed that the (Syed Trading Co., Peshawar, Pakistan), we traveled first to
phase was izoklakeite. northern Pakistan to visit ruby deposits near Hunza and
Izoklakeite is the antimony member of a solid-solution Bisil. Author VP, with assistance from Zulfiqar Ali Abbas
series with giessenite, the bismuth-dominant member. It (Kashmir Gems Ltd., Abbottabad, Pakistan), then proceed-
was first described from a sulfide body near Izok Lake, ed to the ruby and sapphire deposits in the Kaghan Valley
Canada (D. C. Harris et al., “Izoklakeite, a new mineral near Batakundi. This report provides an update on the
species from Izok Lake, Northwest Territories,” Canadian mining and production at some of the Pakistani deposits
Mineralogist, Vol. 24, 1986, pp. 1–5). The mineral was described in the Fall 2007 (pp. 263–264) and Winter 2010
later found in Sweden and as inclusions in quartz crystals (pp. 319–320) GNI entries.
from Switzerland. Its ideal chemical formula is About 100 miners and local dealers were involved with
Cu4Pb54Sb38S114. ruby mining and trading around the Hunza Valley, at sev-
The quartz skull, named “Izok” in honor of its unusual eral deposits that initially started producing in the 1960s
inclusions, is part of an exhibit of Harold Van Pelt’s carv- and 1980s. The rubies are found in marbles, sometimes
ings on display at the Houston Museum of Natural associated with mica and blue and pink spinel. The
Science through October 2012. deposits are located north of the valley, from Datum-
George R. Rossman (grr@gps.caltech.edu) and Chi Ma baresho (figure 17) in the northwest to the Aliabad and
California Institute of Technology Karimabad areas (Bajoring, Gharei Chhar, Phudan Daar,
Pasadena, California Gafinas), Altit, Ahmedabad, and Dong-e-Das (also known
Anthony R. Kampf as Ganesh) in the east. Most of the workings are located
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 500–1,000 m above the villages at an elevation around
3,000 m (nearly 10,000 feet), and they are difficult to
Update on ruby and sapphire mining in Pakistan. In access because of the steep terrain. The color of the ruby
August and September 2011, these contributors visited generally ranges from deep red at Datumbaresho to pink-
Pakistan to collect reference samples for GIA’s laboratory. ish red at Aliabad/Karimabad to pinkish and bluish red
With the support of gem merchant Syed Iftikhar Hussein around Dong-e-Das. The size of the stones appears to
Vanadium-bearing color-change sphene from Pakistan/ more than 2400 ppmw V (and no Cr), which is presum-
Afghanistan. Recently seen in the Carlsbad laboratory ably the cause of the color change. The visible spectrum
was a parcel of rough and cut sphene (e.g., figure 20) showed a broad absorption feature centered at approxi-
loaned for examination by Eric Braunwart (Columbia mately 603 nm (figure 22). Transmission windows on
Gem House, Vancouver, Washington). According to him, either side of this broad band are consistent with the spec-
the sphene originated near the Pakistan/Afghanistan bor- trum expected for a color-change gem.
der. The most interesting feature of this material was that The coloration of this sphene is much different from
many of the stones showed a slight to moderate color the typically “golden” orange material previously
change. In daylight-equivalent lighting, the sphene was described from Pakistan’s North West Frontier Province
dominantly vivid green to yellowish green, changing to (Spring 2006 GNI, pp. 68–69), and also from the yellow
brownish orange or brown under incandescent light sphene known from Badakhshan, Afghanistan (Summer
(again, see figure 20). However, strong pleochroism was 2006 GNI, pp. 180–182).
responsible for the multiple colors seen in the faceted Nathan Renfro (nrenfro@gia.edu)
stones. GIA, Carlsbad
The rough consisted of well-formed blade-like crys-
tals, so it is apparent that the material was mined from a
primary deposit. Rough production as of July 2011 was
estimated by Mr. Braunwart to be around 600 g, from Figure 21. The most notable inclusions in the sphene
which approximately 200 carats of finished material have were crystals of near-colorless apatite and dark elon-
been produced. The cut stones ranged from calibrated gated amphibole. Also present were numerous fluid
sizes as small as 3 mm in diameter up to larger stones fingerprints. Photomicrograph by N. Renfro; magni-
weighing several carats. The largest faceted stone from fied 35×.
the production so far was a 5.45 ct oval brilliant.
Gemological properties of the material were consis-
tent with sphene. The RI was over-the-limit of the refrac-
tometer, and the average SG (measured hydrostatically)
was 3.54. A strong red reaction was observed with a
Chelsea filter. Microscopic observation revealed strong
doubling and numerous included crystals. These were
identified by Raman microspectroscopy as transparent
near-colorless apatite and dark elongated needle-like crys-
tals of an amphibole mineral (figure 21). Several stones
also contained fluid “fingerprints.” A few rough pieces
showed prominent zoning, and the color change was less
apparent across these zoned areas.
EDXRF spectroscopy of all samples showed major
amounts of Ca, Ti, and Si that are expected for sphene, as
well as traces of V, but no Cr. LA-ICP-MS measurements
of several spots on a faceted sample detected an average of
0.4
603
0.3
0.2
0.1
400 500 600 700
WAVELENGTH (nm)
Khuoi Ngan spinel (0.24–0.80 ct) were examined at GIA’s consistent with spinel, except for an inert reaction to UV
Carlsbad laboratory. SG values ranged from 3.50 to 3.57, radiation. Raman spectroscopy confirmed the spinel iden-
and the RI of the largest stone was 1.716. LA-ICP-MS anal- tification. Six arms were easily recognized in each tablet,
yses showed 60–290 ppmw Co. Iron was 7,400–10,500 though the trapiche structure was not well defined.
ppmw, and significant traces of Zn, Ga, Ni, Mn, V, and Li Rather than a core, the 3.64 ct sample contained a point
also were recorded. As expected, all three samples where the arms intersected. The 6.76 ct tablet had an
appeared red in the Chelsea filter.
Thomas W. Overton
Figure 25. These spinels from Khuoi Ngan weigh up
Andy H. Shen
to 0.80 ct. Photo by Robert Weldon.
GIA, Carlsbad
indistinct core that was cloudy and full of cracks. The The spinels had not been exposed to heat treatment, as
arms were created by concentrations of gray wispy clouds confirmed by their PL spectrum, which featured a sharp
and a denser network of cracks than in the surrounding band at 685 nm.
material. Similar samples of trapiche spinel from Myanmar were
In both tablets, tiny black graphite inclusions (identi- characterized by M. Okano and A. Abduriyim (“Trapiche
fied by Raman analysis) were visible throughout with a spinel,” Gemmology, Vol. 41, No. 485, Issue 2, 2010, pp.
gemological microscope. In the 3.64 ct tablet, minute 14–15 [in Japanese]), who suggested that the trapiche struc-
inclusions of molybdenite, magnesite, goethite, and ture formed during the growth of tabular spinel crystals. A
hematite were detected in the arms (e.g., figure 27; see the pseudomorphic origin of this trapiche spinel after ruby is
G&G Data Depository for more images). Hematite crys- also possible, and is supported by the remnant ruby inclu-
tals were found between the arms, and hematite, magne- sion detected in one of the samples.
site, molybdenite, and calcite were found along the outer Editor’s note: Consistent with its mission, GIA has a
rim of the samples. In the 6.76 ct tablet, dolomite crystals vital role in conducting research, characterizing gem-
were detected in the core and the arms; goethite crystals stones, and gaining knowledge that leads to the determina-
were identified between the arms and in the rim. Notably, tion of gemstone origins. The samples studied in this
Cr3+ photoluminescence bands at 692 and 694 nm, which report are not subject to the Tom Lantos Block Burmese
are characteristic of ruby, were detected in one tiny includ- JADE Act of 2008, and their import was in accordance
ed crystal along the rim of this sample (figure 28). with U.S. law.
Numerous cracks and cavities were observed through- Kyaw Soe Moe
out the tablets. DiamondView images revealed bright blue
and purple zones in the cracks, while the host spinel
showed a faint blue color. In the 3.69 ct tablet, orange-red SYNTHETICS AND SIMULANTS
stains were seen with the microscope inside the fractures “Cat’s-eye pearls”: Unusual non-nacreous calcitic pearl
between the arms. Qualitative EDXRF analysis revealed imitations. Imitations of non-nacreous pearls are abundant
Mg, Al, Ti, V, Cr, Fe, Zn, Ga, Ca, and Mn in both samples. in the market. They can be made of just about any materi-
Figure 27. Micro-inclusions in the trapiche spinel identified using Raman spectroscopy included a molybdenite
crystal along the rim (left), a rhombohedral magnesite crystal in an arm (center), and a dark-appearing calcite
crystal along the rim (right). Raman microscope photomicrographs by K. S. Moe.
694
ed from region A is
slightly different from
region B. Interestingly,
692
687
region A showed ruby
PL bands at 692 and
689 694 nm in addition to
spinel PL bands at
a 685, 687, and 689 nm;
region B showed only
b
spinel PL bands, as
640 660 680 700 720 740 recorded at several
other spots on the
WAVELENGTH (nm) sample.
al but are usually sculpted from shell. Shells thick enough making them easy to identify.
to yield such pearl imitations are rather common, though This contributor recently received for testing six
generally they are restricted to aragonitic mollusks such as unusual black “pearls” (figure 29) from two different
Strombus sp., Tridacna sp., and Cassis sp. Calcitic shells, clients. Represented as non-nacreous natural pearls, the
including those of Pinna sp. and Atrina sp., tend to be thin pieces weighed between 2.52 and 10.26 ct and exhibited
and are therefore not suitable. Shell imitations show a lay- chatoyancy when illuminated with an intense light
ered structure when viewed with strong transmitted light, source. The chatoyancy was displayed all around the
samples when they were rotated about an axis perpendic- Large synthetic quartz. Recently, the Gübelin Gem Lab
ular to the band, but it was not visible along this axis. received four large gems (figure 31) submitted for analysis
The phenomenon was caused by light reflections from by Erwin Walti (Oetwil am See, Switzerland). They were
their fibrous structure (figure 30, left). Viewed from the represented as amethyst (surprising for a dark green gem),
side, no fibrous structure was visible, but hexagonal out- aquamarine (greenish blue and light blue concave cuts),
lines of the fibers could be seen. These parallel layers of and citrine (yellow oval cut), and they weighed 162.00,
very fine hexagonal prisms are characteristic of calcitic 33.20, 36.30, and 38.40 ct, respectively. To improve work-
pearls and shell. As expected, reflectance infrared spec- flow, the laboratory occasionally puts stones through more
troscopy identified the samples as calcite. Distinct con- advanced analyses, such as FTIR and EDXRF spec-
centrations of Sr, detected by EDXRF chemical analysis, troscopy, prior to gemological testing. Such was the case
confirmed that they were of marine origin. with these samples.
The surface of the samples showed obvious polishing We noticed immediately that the analytical data did
lines, a common feature in polished and worked non- not match either natural quartz or aquamarine. All four
nacreous natural pearls. The telltale layered structure of FTIR spectra showed total absorption below approxi-
sculpted shell was not visible since the samples were mately 3600 cm−1 and only a weak, broad absorption
practically opaque to strong fiber-optic light. X-radio- band at 5196 cm−1 (e.g., figure 32). These IR features are
graphs did not reveal any structure, which is very unusu- consistent with those reported for some synthetic quartz
al for brown to black calcitic natural pearls; those from (e.g., P. Zecchini and M. Smaali, “Identification de l’orig-
Pinnidae mollusks typically show distinct concentric ine naturelle ou artificielle des quartz,” Revue de Gem-
structures. mologie a.f.g., Vol. 138–139, 1999, pp. 74–83). EDXRF
Because the orientation of the prismatic fibers and the spectroscopy of all four stones showed major amounts of
resulting chatoyancy clearly indicated a layered structure, Si with traces of Fe. The dark green sample also con-
and none of the properties were consistent with natural tained small but significant amounts of cobalt (0.005
pearls, these objects could only be sculpted shell. To more wt.% Co3O4), indicative of synthetic origin, while the
closely examine the layered structure of these “cat’s-eye yellow sample showed traces of calcium (0.068 wt.%
pearls,” we were granted permission to grind down one of CaO). All other measured elements were below the
the smaller samples until it was transparent. This section detection limit.
displayed a distinct layered structure perpendicular to the Microscopic examination of the dark green gem
direction of the fibrous prismatic calcite crystals (figure 30, showed a colorless seed plate with fine particles on each
right), as expected for shell. side (figure 33) and parallel green banding. The other gems
Having confirmed that these “cat’s-eye pearls” were were very clean, with only the light blue one showing
sculpted from calcitic shell, the question remained: reflective breadcrumb-like particles. No growth or color
Which mollusk could form a dark brown to black shell zoning was observed in those stones. Refractive indices
thick enough to cut a 10 mm pearl imitation? After some were 1.54–1.55, consistent with quartz, and Raman analy-
research, we found a private collection with a few mas- sis of the light blue and the yellow samples confirmed this
sive shells from Atrina vexillum (a pen shell) that were identification. We therefore identified all four samples as
thick enough to cut pearl imitations such as the ones synthetic quartz. While synthetic citrine is well known,
described in this report. dark green synthetic quartz is less common, and the aqua-
Thomas Hainschwang marine-like color varieties reported here are not often seen
(thomas.hainschwang@ggtl-lab.org) in the market.
GGTL Gemlab–GemTechLab Lore Kiefert (l.kiefert@gubelingemlab.ch)
Balzers, Liechtenstein Gübelin Gem Lab, Lucerne, Switzerland
TREATMENTS acid process similar to that used for matrix opal from
Andamooka, Australia.
Sugar-acid treatment of opal from Wollo, Ethiopia. Several
For this experiment, we chose 12 mostly low-grade
gemological laboratories have recently identified “black”
opals from Ethiopia’s Wollo Province as smoke treated
(e.g., www.stonegrouplabs.com/SmokeTreatmentinWollo
Opal.pdf). The effectiveness of the smoke treatment is Figure 33. A close-up view of the dark green sample
probably related to the hydrophane character that is com- shows a seed plate (defined by arrows) and numerous
monly shown by Wollo opal. The porosity allows the fine particles. Photomicrograph by Lore Kiefert,
smoke to penetrate the opal structure deep enough to cre- © Gübelin Gem Lab; magnified 20×.
ate a dark bodycolor. Accordingly, one of us (FM) investi-
gated the possibility of treating Wollo opal using a sugar-
IR ABSORPTION SPECTRUM
ABSORBANCE
5196
1
-1
WAVENUMBER (cm )
opals tumbled as irregular pebbles, with a white to yellow- land. More than 70 gemologists from 31 countries gath-
ish white bodycolor typical for opals from Wollo (figure ered to discuss developments in the field. The organizing
34, left). The samples were first heated at 90°C for 2 hours committee was led by Dr. Michael Krzemnicki, in collab-
in a solution containing 25% sugar by weight. Next they oration with colleagues at the Swiss Gemmological Insti-
were heated at 100°C for 3 hours in a 60% solution of tute SSEF, the Swiss Gemmological Society, George and
hydrochloric acid. All the opals turned a darker color (fig- Anne Bosshart, and Dr. Henry A. Hänni. The conference
ure 34, right). Some acquired a homogeneous, opaque, featured 12 sessions on topics ranging from colored stones
black bodycolor, while others darkened unevenly from to pearls and diamonds, analytical methods and gem treat-
grayish brown to gray. The play-of-color became more ments, and special sessions on Canadian gems, rare
intense in some samples and less vivid in others. Two of stones, and organic materials. The 48 talks and 14 interac-
the opals were broken open, revealing that the dark col- tive poster presentations covered a wide range of topics
oration penetrated only a few millimeters into the stones. and regions. The conference proceedings and excursion
The samples with the greatest hydrophane character (as guides are available at www.igc2011.org; some of the pre-
indicated by their ability to stick to the tongue) showed sentations are summarized below.
the darkest colors after treatment. Conversely, the more Dr. Thomas Armbruster (University of Bern, Switzer-
transparent and least hydrophane-like opals were least land) delivered the opening keynote address on gemology’s
affected by the treatment (e.g., inner portion of the upper- position at the interface of mineralogy and crystallography.
right sample in figure 34). As expected, the hydrophane Using the beryl group as an example, he demonstrated the
character appears to have facilitated the penetration of the similarities and differences in the crystal structures within
sugar and acid solutions into the opal. this group of minerals. Dr. Karl Schmetzer (Petershausen,
Even darker coloration in hydrophane opal may be Germany) described chemical zoning in trapiche tourma-
attainable by varying the carbon source and its concentra- line from Zambia, which is characterized by a strong nega-
tion, the nature of the acid and its concentration, and final- tive correlation between Ca and Na. Dr. Jürgen Schnellrath
ly the temperature and duration of heating in both solu- (Centro de Tecnologia Mineral, Rio de Janeiro) discussed
tions. Such experiments are in progress, and the results will unusual fiber distribution patterns in Brazilian cat’s-eye
give gemologists a better idea of what to expect for future quartz. Dr. Shang-i Liu (Hong Kong Institute of Gem-
treatments of this prolific type of opal. mology) presented results of a study on Cs- and Li-rich
Benjamin Rondeau (benjamin.rondeau@univ-nantes.fr) beryl from Madagascar, using electron microprobe, LA-
Emmanuel Fritsch ICP-MS, FTIR, Raman analysis, and electron paramagnetic
Francesco Mazzero resonance spectroscopy.
Opalinda, Paris The pearl session included presentations by Dr.
Michael S. Krzemnicki on formation models for Tokki
Jean-Pierre Gauthier
cultured pearls, which form as attachments to larger bead-
Centre de Recherches Gemmologiques, Nantes, France
ed cultured pearls; Nick Sturman (GIA, Bangkok) on sepa-
rating natural from cultured Queen conch pearls (Strom-
CONFERENCE REPORTS bus gigas); and Federico Bärlocher (Farlang, Cernobbio,
32nd International Gemmological Conference. The bien- Italy) on the production and trade of Melo pearls from
nial IGC was held July 13–17, 2011, in Interlaken, Switzer- Myanmar.
The Diamond Compendium gy for airborne gravity gradient sur- role in the corridors of luxury—and in
veying are out of place and should be civil conflict. But Ms. Oltuski, whose
By DeeDee Cunningham, 888 pp.,
reworked to avoid confusion with father and grandfather were both dia-
illus., publ. by NAG Press, London,
magnetic surveying. Apart from these mond dealers, understands the book
2011. US$225.00
items, the information is well editors’ maxim and manages to cap-
This hardcover tome of nearly 900 researched and clearly written. ture all of these topics honestly and in
pages is filled with pertinent illustra- The author takes great care in pre- a deeply personal way to create an
tions. The book is comprised of 20 senting the correct terminology. She engaging, well-written work.
chapters divided into sections that explains the different meanings of Ms. Oltuski is a skilled writer
cover all aspects of diamonds: origin, form and habit in crystallography, and who can transform the everyday deal-
crystallography, global occurrences, why lonsdaleite (a hexagonal poly- ings of a diamond office into enter-
exploration, mining methods, cutting, morph of diamond) is not a kind of taining stories, without resorting to
polishing, grading, and identification. diamond but a different mineral. The the sensationalist tales of chasing
Simulants and synthetic diamonds chapters on evaluating carat weight, multimillion dollar stones and dodg-
are also reviewed. clarity, color, and cut offer useful tips ing international jewel thieves that
The compendium is not meant to on how to hold and angle the diamond other authors have created to pack
be read cover to cover; it is a reference for best results. The chapter on color drama into an essentially mundane
work to be consulted on specific top- examines how color is perceived, buy-and-sell world. The result is a
ics, some of which are explored in while others review color treatments realistic account of New York’s dia-
greater scientific depth. As expected and recutting to enhance brilliance. mond community, down to the duct-
from a highly skilled gemologist and The chapters on identification of natu- taped jewelry cases.
jeweler, the sections on crystallogra- ral diamond, simulants, and synthetic The early chapters focus on the art
phy, physical properties, cutting, pol- diamond are very good. of the deal. Stories are told of her
ishing, and grading are the strongest, The Diamond Compendium took father’s negotiations with clients
while the text on global occurrences seven years to compile, and the infor- (who’s fibbing and who’s really offer-
contains a few inaccuracies. For mation is up to date to 2007. The wide ing genuine prices), her mother’s stops
instance: range of topics makes it an important to help with stone deliveries on the
• The Lomonosov kimberlite cluster, reference source and handbook with way to her own job, the weight her
100 km north of Arkhangelsk in practical tips for use in gemology. grandparents’ reputation still carried
northwestern Russia, is not close to A. J. A. (BRAM) JANSE years later, and a childhood where
the Finnish border but 500 km to Archon Exploration security and secrecy came home from
the east of it. Carine, Western Australia the office.
• The Golconda alluvial diamond In the middle chapters she artfully
field is not located near the ancient weaves in personal anecdotes and
observations to transform the oft-told
Golconda fortress but at least 250 Precious Objects: A Story of clichés about New York’s diamond
km to the southeast.
Diamonds, Family, and a industry into fresh, appealing reading.
• No kimberlites or other primary The accounts of how diamonds are
diamondiferous rocks have ever
Way of Life
formed deep beneath the earth, the
been found in Guyana, and certain- By Alicia Oltuski, 370 pp., publ. by workings of De Beers’s sight system
ly not the 14 kimberlites quoted on Scribner, New York, 2011. US$24.00 (albeit a bit out of date in today’s
page 119. Book editors often say every story has multi-source environment), the mores
There is also a slight problem on been told before, so the secret of a of the Hasidic Jewish community, and
page 207, in the paragraph on airborne good book lies in the telling. Cer- 47th Street’s love-hate relationship
prospecting. Most airborne prospect- tainly, the past two decades have seen with Martin Rapaport’s price list—
ing is carried out to detect local differ- numerous books describing how dia- they are all here, but in a new dress.
ences in the earth’s magnetic field monds are formed deep within the Her portrait of her grandfather
caused by mineral deposits (such a earth, how De Beers gained control of Yankel (“Jack” to the New Yorkers) is
survey is shown in photo 5.1). The rough diamond production, how an intimate account of how diamond
two sentences about Falcon technolo- stones are bought and sold, and their families came into being after the
SUBJECT INDEX
This index gives the first author (in parentheses), issue, and inclusive pages of the article in which the subject occurs for all feature
articles, Notes & New Techniques, and Rapid Communications that appeared in Volume 47 of Gems & Gemology. Also included
are abstracts of presentations from the Summer 2011 (S11) issue, the proceedings of the Fifth International Gemological
Symposium. For the Gem News International (GNI) and Lab Notes (LN) sections, inclusive pages are given for the item. The Book
Reviews section is available only as an online supplement, with the page numbers preceded by S. The Author Index (p. S19) pro-
vides the full title and coauthors of the articles cited.
A Aquamarine simulants
synthetic quartz (GNI)W11:332-333
Book reviews
Collectors Guide to Granite
Afghanistan Argon isotope analysis Pegmatites (King)F11:S4
afghanite from Badakhshan of andesine, from Tibet and other Collectors Guide to Silicate Crystal
(GNI)F11:235 claimed localities (Rossman)Sp11:16- Structures (Lauf)F11:S4
emerald mining in (GNI)F11:238-239 300 Colour of Paradise: The Emerald in the
sapphire from, beryllium- and tungsten- Age of Gunpowder Empires
Argyle diamond mine
bearing (LN)Sp11:53-54 (Lane)Sp11:S2-S3
colored diamonds from
scapolite from (GNI)Sp11:65-66 (Chapman)Su11:130 The Diamond Compendium
sphene from border area with Pakistan, (Cunningham)W11:S1
color-change (GNI)W11:327-328 Assembled gem materials Diamond Math (Glasser)F11:S4
agate and reconstituted turquoise dou- Diamonds in Nature: A Guide to
Afghanite blet, marketed as Coral Sea agate
from Afghanistan (GNI)F11:235 Rough Diamonds (Tappert and
(GNI)Sp11:62 Tappert)W11:S2
Agate corundum and lead-glass triplet The Extraordinary World of Diamonds
dendritic, in jewelry (GNI)Sp11:62-63 (GNI)F11:251-252 (Norman)F11:S1-S2
and reconstituted turquoise doublet, glass triplet imitation of “mystic” Gems and Gemology in Pakistan
marketed as Coral Sea (GNI)Sp11:62 treated topaz (GNI)F11:252-253 (Khan and Kausar)F11:S4
Amethyst opal with artificial matrix Jewellery from the Orient: Treasures
separation from synthetic, using (LN)W11:312 from the Bir Collection
infrared spectroscopy Asterism (Siewert)Sp11:S3
(Karampelas)F11:196-201 artificial (Steinbach)Su11:152-153 Living Jewels: Masterpieces from
from southern Brazil in quartz, caused by cinnabar inclu- Nature (Peltason)F11:S1
(Juchem)Su11:137-138 sions (GNI)W11:322-323 Mineral Treasures of the World (The
Amethyst, synthetic Auctions Geological Museum of China and
separation from natural, using infrared of luxury jewelry (Luke)Su11:100-102 The Collector’s Edge Minerals
spectroscopy (Karampelas)F11:196- Australia Inc.)F11:S4
201 colored diamonds from Argyle Pearls (Bari and Lam)Sp11:S1
Ametrine [amethyst-citrine] (Chapman)Su11:130 Precious Objects: A Story of
from Bolivia, Anahí mine opal from—Laverton, Western Diamonds, Family, and a Way of
(Weldon)Su11:163-164 Australia (GNI)W11:319-320; Life (Oltuski)W11:S1-S2
Ammonite nomenclature and characterization Terra Spinel Terra Firma (Yavorsky and
iridescent, from Madagascar (Beattie)Su11:116 Hughes)Sp11:S1-S2
(GNI)F11:235-236 zircon from, exhibiting tenebrescence Twentieth-Century Jewellery: From Art
(LN)W11:314-315 Nouveau to Contemporary Design in
Analytical techniques [general] Europe and the United States
to characterize gem materials (Cappellieri)Sp11:S3
(Rossman)Su11:124-125
What’s Hot in Tucson 2010 (Blue Cap
Andesine B Productions)W11:S2
reportedly from Tibet (Rossman)Sp11:16- The Workbench Guide to Jewelry
30, (Abduriyim)Su11:167-180 Beryl, see Aquamarine, Emerald
Techniques (Young)F11:S2
Andradite Beryllium World Hallmarks, Volume I: Europe,
demantoid from northern Madagascar natural, in blue sapphire—(LN)F11:232- 19th to 21st Centuries, 2nd ed.
(Pezzotta)Sp11:2-14 233; from Afghanistan (LN)Sp11:53- (Whetstone, Niklewicz, and
54 Matula)F11:S3-S4
Annealing, see Diamond treatment
Aquamarine Beryllium diffusion, see Diffusion treatment Boxes [article sidebars]
from Thanh Hoa, Vietnam Bolivia andesine from Tibet and other claimed
(Huong)Sp11:42-48, (GNI)F11:236- ametrine from the Anahí mine localities—feldspar nomenclature
237 (Weldon)Su11:163-164 (Rossman)Sp11:16-30; samples and
AUTHOR INDEX
This index lists, in alphabetical order, the authors of all feature articles, Notes & New Techniques, and Rapid Communications that
appeared in the four issues of Volume 47 of Gems & Gemology, together with the full title and inclusive page numbers of each arti-
cle and the issue (in parentheses). Full citation is given under the first author only, with reference made from coauthors. Also includ-
ed are presenters whose abstracts were published in the Summer 2011 (S11) issue, the proceedings of the Fifth International
Gemological Symposium.