Sugie 2017
Sugie 2017
Abstract
Aims This study aimed to investigate the relationship between skeletal muscle mass and cardiac functional parameters in
older adults during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).
Methods and results Sixty-three Japanese community-dwelling older adults were enrolled (20 men and 43 women; mean
age 80 years, range 65–97 years). Cardiac functional parameters during exercise were assessed using CPET. Skeletal muscle
mass index (SMI) was calculated by dividing the appendicular lean mass (measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry)
by height in metres squared. Subjects were divided into two groups: men with SMI ≥ 7.0 kg/m2 and women with
SMI ≥ 5.4 kg/m2 (non-sarcopenic group); or men with SMI < 7.0 kg/m2 and women with SMI < 5.4 kg/m2 (sarcopenic group).
There were significant positive correlations between SMI and peak oxygen uptake (VO2) (r = 0.631, P < 0.001), and between
SMI and peak VO2/heart rate (HR) (r = 0.683, P < 0.001). However, only peak VO2/HR significantly differed between groups in
both sexes. Multiple linear regression analyses with peak VO2/HR as a dependent variable showed that SMI was the only
independent determinant after adjusting for potential confounders. After 4 month follow-up of 47 participants, there was still
a significant positive correlation between SMI and peak VO2/HR (r = 0.567, P < 0.001), and between percent change of SMI
and percent change of peak VO2/HR (r = 0.305, P < 0.05).
Conclusions Peak VO2/HR, an index of stroke volume at peak exercise, was associated with SMI. This indicates that skeletal
muscle mass might affect cardiac function during exercise.
Keywords Community-dwelling older adults; Skeletal muscle mass index; Cardiopulmonary exercise testing; Peak oxygen pulse;
Sarcopenia
Received: 1 December 2016; Revised: 21 February 2017; Accepted: 25 February 2017
*Correspondence to: Masamitsu Sugie, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-0015 Japan. Tel: 03-3964-1141;
Fax: 03-3964-1982. Email: masamitsu_sugie@tmghig.jp
This work was performed at the Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology.
© 2017 The Authors ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
2                                                                                                                           M. Sugie et al.
heart failure (HF).3 Just like sarcopenia, chronic HF is highly            80 years (range 65–97 years). None of the subjects were
prevalent and a major cause of death in ageing populations.4               currently hospitalized, but all were being treated on an
Previous reports have suggested a relationship between                     outpatient basis at the Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital
skeletal muscle mass and HF, particularly among patients with              and Institute of Gerontology.
HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).5 However, the                    Exclusion criteria were as follows: unable to walk
clinical interrelationship between skeletal muscle mass and                independently and required nursing care, impaired vision,
cardiac function remains to be insufficiently defined. This is               impaired hearing, musculoskeletal impairments that might
particularly true in association with exercise. Therefore, it is           interfere with the ability to perform the symptom-limited
of an importance in super-ageing societies to better define                 exercise test, a clinically unstable condition, significant
the relationship between reduction in muscle mass and                      cognitive disorders and less than 64 years old. Potential
strength associated with sarcopenia and changes in cardiac                 participants that performed habitual exercise training were
function that are prevalent in patients with chronic HF. The               also excluded from the study. The clinical characteristics of
aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between              the subjects are summarized in Table 1A. A follow-up
skeletal muscle mass and parameters of cardiac function in                 assessment was conducted with 47 participants 4 months
community-dwelling older subjects.                                         after the baseline evaluation by using the methods and
                                                                           procedures similar to those used at the baseline.
Methods
                                                                           Skeletal muscle mass index and body mass index
Participants
                                                                           Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was measured
Sixty-three consecutive community-dwelling older adults (20                using total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA,
men and 43 women) living in the Tokyo metropolitan area                    Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan). Participants were
participated in this study. The mean age of subjects was                   positioned for whole-body scans in accordance with the
                                                          Participant characteristics
                                                    Male [n(%)]                                                        20(32%)
                                                    Age [years; mean(range)]                                           79(65–97)
                                                                                                                       Male: 82(68–97)
                                                                                                                       Female: 79(65–93)
                                                                             2
Physiological Assessment                            Body mass index, kg/m                                              22.2±3.5
                                                                                                                       Male: 21.8±3.5
                                                                                                                       Female: 22.4±3.5
                                                    Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, cm/min                         1881±445
                                                                                     2
                                                    Skeletal muscle mass index, kg/m                                   5.98±0.9
                                                                                                                       Male: 6.3±1.1
                                                                                                                       Female: 5.8±0.7
Cardiopulmonary exercise test                       Peak VO2, mL/min                                                   811±301
                                                    Peak VO2/weight, mL/min/weight                                     15.5±4.6
                                                    Peak VO2/heart rate, mL/beat                                       6.9±2.3
                                                    Peak heart rate, bpm                                               117±22
                                                    Peak watt                                                          63±25
                                                    Anaerobic threshold VO2, mL/min                                    581±173
                                                    Anaerobic threshold VO2/weight, mL/min/weight                      11.1±2.8
                                                    Anaerobic threshold VO2 /heart rate, mL/beat                       5.9±1.7
                                                    Anaerobic threshold heart rate, bpm                                99±13
                                                    Anaerobic threshold watt                                           38.1±14
                                                    ⊿VO2/⊿LOAD, mL/watt                                                8.0±2.0
                                                    VE vs. VCO2 slope                                                  35.7±11.1
Type of illness [n(%)]                              Hypertension                                                       36(57%)
                                                    Dyslipidemia                                                       28(44%)
                                                    Diabetes mellitus                                                  19(30%)
                                                    Coronary artery disease                                            17(27%)
                                                    Chronic heart failure                                              9(14%)
                                                    Atrial fibrillation                                                 8(13%)
Drug [n(%)]                                         Calcium channel blocker                                            25(39%)
                                                    Beta-blocker                                                       20(30%)
                                                    Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor                            14(22%)
VE vs. VCO2 slope, minute ventilation vs. carbon dioxide output slope; VO2, oxygen uptake.
Table 1B Univariate correlations between a skeletal muscle mass     previous study.9 The mean of the right and left baPWV values
index and age, body mass index, and the results of
cardiopulmonary exercise testing                                    were used for analysis.
                                       Correlation
Related factors                        coefficient       P value
                                                                    Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Age                                      0.127           n.s.
Body mass index                           0.770        P < 0.001
Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity       0.278        P < 0.05     All patients underwent symptom-limited bicycle ergometer
Peak VO2                                  0.631        P < 0.001    cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using an upright,
Peak VO2/weight                           0.274        P < 0.05
Peak VO2/heart rate                       0.683        P < 0.001    electromagnetically braked, cycle ergometer (Aerobike
Peak heart rate                          0.079           n.s.      Strength Ergo-8, Mitsubishi Electronic, Tokyo, Japan), a
Peak watts                                0.540        P < 0.001    metabolic analyser (Aeromonitor AE-310S, Minato Medical
Anaerobic threshold VO2                   0.584        P < 0.001
Anaerobic threshold VO2/weight            0.150           n.s.      Science, Osaka, Japan), and an electrocardiogram and heart
Anaerobic threshold VO2/heart rate        0.626        P < 0.001    rate (HR) (Stress test system ML-9000, Fukuda denshi, Tokyo,
Anaerobic threshold heart rate           0.017           n.s.      Japan). The exercise test began with a 3 min rest on the
Anaerobic threshold watts                 0.386        P < 0.01
ΔVO2/Δwork load                           0.297        P < 0.05     ergometer followed by a 4 min warm-up at 0 W at 60 rpm.
VE vs. VCO2 slope                        0.166           n.s.      The load was then increased incrementally by 15 W/min
                                                                    during the exercise test. All CPET parameters were measured
n.s., not significant; peak VO2/HR, peak oxygen uptake/heart rate;
VE vs. VCO2 slope, minute ventilation vs. carbon dioxide output     from the beginning of the initial resting period on the cycle
slope; VO2, oxygen uptake.                                          ergometer until the end of the exercise session.
P values were calculated using Student’s t-test.                       The CPET was terminated upon the patient’s request or if
                                                                    abnormal physiologic responses occurred.10 The CPET was
                                                                    also ceased if a patient was unable to continue to perform
manufacturer’s protocol. Participants lay in a supine position      the pedalling exercise correctly. Oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon
on the DEXA table with limbs close to the body. The                 dioxide output (VCO2), minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume,
whole-body lean soft tissue mass was divided into several           and frequency of respiration were smoothed with an
regions, that is, arms, legs, and the trunk. The sum of the         8-breath moving average. Peak VO2 was defined as the
muscle mass (lean soft tissue) of the four limbs was                highest value of VO2 obtained during the last minute of the
considered as ASM, and the skeletal muscle mass index               CPET. Peak watt was defined as the power at measured peak
(SMI) was calculated as ASM divided by the height in metres         VO2 with CPET. VO2/HR, known as oxygen pulse, was
squared (kg/m2). Subjects were then divided into two groups         calculated by dividing the moving averaged VO2 by the HR.
based on their SMI: men with an SMI ≥ 7.0 kg/m2 and women           When respiratory exchange ratio (VCO2/VO2, RER) was less
with an SMI ≥ 5.4 kg/m2 (non-sarcopenic group), or men with         than 1.0 at peak exercise, the test was considered insufficient
an SMI < 7.0 kg/m2 and women with an SMI < 5.4 kg/m2                because of the participant’s poor effort and the data at peak
(sarcopenic group). The threshold levels for group                  exercise were not used in the statistics. The anaerobic
assignment were based on the criteria of the Asian Working          threshold was determined synthetically by gas exchange
Group for sarcopenia.6 Body mass index (BMI) was calculated         criteria at the point of non-linear increase in the ventilatory
as bodyweight/height2 (kg/m2).                                      equivalent for oxygen and the V-slope analysis (VCO2–VO2
                                                                    plot). The slope of the VE–VCO2 relationship was calculated
                                                                    by linear regression analysis using the values from the
                                                                    beginning of ramp exercise to the respiratory compensation
Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement                      point during the CPET and was used as an index of the
                                                                    ventilatory efficiency.
Participants were observed under quiet resting conditions in
the supine position. The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity
(baPWV) and blood pressure were measured with a vascular            Statistical analysis
testing device (form PWV/ABI device; BP-203PREIII, Omron
Colin, Kyoto, Japan), according to the method previously            Pearson’s correlation analyses were performed to evaluate
described.7 Bilateral brachial and ankle arterial pressure          the relationship between SMI and age, BMI, and cardiac
waveforms were stored for 10 s by the extremity cuffs               function parameters during exercise, including peak VO2,
connected to a plethysmographic sensor and an oscillometric         peak VO2/HR, peak watts, ΔVO2/Δwork load, and the VE vs.
pressure sensor wrapped around the participant’s arms and           VCO2 slope. Comparisons of the clinical characteristics of
ankles. The baPWV was calculated from the distance                  patients in the non-sarcopenic and sarcopenic groups,
between the two arterial recording sites divided by the             including BMI, and cardiac functional parameters during
transit time.8 The reproducibility of baPWV was shown in a          exercise, were performed using unpaired Student’s t-test. In
Table 2 Comparison of clinical characteristics between the non-sarcopenic and sarcopenic groups
n.s., not significant; peak VO2/HR, peak oxygen uptake/heart rate; VE vs. VCO2 slope, minute ventilation vs. carbon dioxide output slope;
VO2, oxygen uptake.
Numerical data are expressed as mean ± SD.
P values were calculated using Student’s t-test.
Participants were classified as being in the non-sarcopenic group and sarcopenic group based on the Asian sarcopenia cut-off values for
                                       2                      2
muscle mass measurements (7.0 kg/m for men and 5.4 kg/m for women as measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry).6
1140 ± 350, P < 0.01), peak VO2/HR (mL/beat) (6.5 ± 2.0          Figure 1 (A) Statistically significant positive correlation between skeletal
vs. 10.2 ± 3.4, P < 0.01), peak watts (W) (51 ± 21 vs.           muscle mass index and peak oxygen pulse (r = 0.683, P < 0.001) in a
                                                                 population of 63 chronically ill older adults. (B) Statistically significant
87 ± 26, P < 0.01), and ⊿VO2/⊿work load (mL/W)                   positive correlation between per cent change of skeletal muscle mass
(7.5 ± 1.7 vs. 9.7 ± 1.3, P < 0.01) than male patients in        index and per cent change of peak oxygen pulse (r = 0.305, P < 0.05)
the non-sarcopenic group (Table 2). In contrast, 11 (26%)        in a population of 47 chronically ill older adults after 4 months of exercise
of the 43 female subjects were in the sarcopenic group           training.
and 32 (74%) were in the non-sarcopenic group. Female
patients in the sarcopenic group had lower peak VO2/HR
(mL/beat) values (5.6 ± 1.6 vs. 6.8 ± 1.6, P < 0.05) than
female patients in the non-sarcopenic group (Table 2).
Only peak VO2/HR and BMI significantly differed between
the two groups in both sexes. There were significant
positive correlations between SMI and peak VO2
(r = 0.631, P < 0.001), as well as between SMI and peak
VO2/HR (r = 0.683, P < 0.001) (Figure 1A). Moreover, there
were significant positive correlations between SMI and
peak watts (r = 0.540, P < 0.001), SMI and ⊿VO2/⊿work
load (r = 0.297, P < 0.05), and SMI and BMI (r = 0.770,
P < 0.001). Results of univariate correlation analyses are
shown in Table 1B.
   Table 3 shows the results of multiple linear regression
analyses with peak VO2/HR as dependent variable. The linear
regression models show that SMI is an independent
determinant of peak VO2/HR after adjustment for potential
confounders (age, sex, baPWV, hypertension, dyslipidemia,
diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, chronic HF, atrial
fibrillation, and treatment with beta-blockers; B = 1.561;
P < 0.001).
Table 3 Multiple linear regression analysis with peak VO2/HR as the   Moreover, it was previously reported that peak AVO2diff did
dependent variable
                                                                      not change after exercise training in either the young or in
                     B         β      P value      LCI       UCI      older adults.14 Based on the Fick principle and this previous
Skeletal muscle    1.561      0.625   <0.001      1.031      2.091    report, our results suggest that a reduction in SMI is one of
mass index                                                            the most important factors affecting the deterioration of
Age               0.103    0.304    <0.05      0.174    0.033
Sex               1.054    0.207     n.s.      2.158     0.051
                                                                      peak SV.
 2
R = 0.615                                                                Recently, the relationship between sarcopenia and
                                                                      cardiovascular disease has been recognized to be of a great
B, regression coefficient; LCI, lower 95% confidence interval; peak
VO2/HR, peak oxygen uptake/heart rate; UCI, upper 95%                 importance in super-ageing societies. Both sarcopenia and
confidence interval.                                                   chronic HF are highly prevalent in advanced ageing
Adjusted for conventional risk factors (age, sex, brachial-ankle      societies.1,4 In particular, HFpEF has received much attention
pulse wave velocity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus,
coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation,   in recent years because of its high prevalence among older
and treatment with beta-blockers) in addition to peak VO2/HR.         adults.15 It has been reported that HFpEF is associated with
P values were calculated using Student’s t-test.                      reduced lean body mass,5 and exercise intolerance is a
                                                                      hallmark of both sarcopenia and HFpEF.16,17 The association
Discussion                                                            between exercise intolerance and a lower peak VO2 is
                                                                      explained by the Fick principle. However, our finding that
Our study using data from unselected outpatients a geriatric          peak VO2/HR, an index of peak SV correlated with SMI,
outpatient clinic in Japan shows that 37% of subjects                 suggests, for the first time, a relationship between cardiac
presented with reduced skeletal muscle mass that fulfills the          functional reserve and muscle wasting. This may be the case
criteria of sarcopenia. Similarly, previous study reported that       with the exercise intolerance in patients with HFpEF, which
the prevalence rate of sarcopenia for community-dwelling              Phan et al. attributed to deterioration in peak SV.18 On the
Japanese women was less than 7% for ages 60–69 years, and             other hand, Dhakal et al. reported that a reduction in peak
24% for ages 70–80 years, and the prevalence rate of                  AVO2diff was the cause of the exercise intolerance in
sarcopenia for community-dwelling Japanese men was less than          HFpEF,19 although previous studies showed no changes in
33% for ages 60–69 years, and 47% for ages 70–85 years.11             peak AVO2diff with ageing.13
   We also showed that skeletal muscle mass assessed using               Both muscle wasting and HFpEF are associated with
DEXA scanning was a major determinant of exercise capacity            exercise intolerance. Muscle wasting is associated with a
in elderly subjects, and this fact remained true after                reduction in peak SV, whereas HFpEF is associated with a
restricting the analysis to those without beta-blocker use            reduction in peak SV and/or peak AVO2diff. Thus, muscle
and those without atrial fibrillation.                                 wasting in community-dwelling older adults might be one of
   Skeletal muscle mass remained a major predictor of                 several possible phenotypes of ageing, which may
exercise capacity in both groups and determines the level of          subsequently develop to HFpEF.
exercise that can be achieved in either group, even though               There are several potential mechanisms that may underlie
sarcopenic subjects had overall lower peak VO2 values than            the relationship between muscle wasting and deterioration
non-sarcopenic subjects.                                              of cardiac function. It was known that the most evident
   The loss of muscle mass that occurs with ageing is clinically      metabolic explanation for muscle wasting is an imbalance
important because it leads to diminished muscle strength,             between protein catabolism (e.g. members of the ubiquitin–
reduced exercise tolerance, and a decreased quality of life.12        proteasome system, myostatin, and apoptosis inducing
In the present study, SMI was positively correlated with VO2.         factors) and anabolism (e.g. members of the ubiquitin–
This suggests that there is a relationship between muscle             proteasome system, myostatin, and apoptosis inducing
wasting and exercise intolerance. However, ageing-related             factors).20,21 Even more, it was known that the muscle
muscle wasting is thought to be sex-dependent. In the                 wasting in HF is also an imbalance between protein
present study, the only CPET parameter that was significantly          catabolism and anabolism.22 Recently, Mangner and
correlated with SMI in both sexes was peak VO2/HR.                    colleagues show an animal model in that the antioxidative
   In general, peak VO2/HR is calculated using the Fick               and metabolic capacities are heterogeneous in their response
principle:                                                            to chronic HF between the diaphragm and quadriceps, but
                                                                      similar activation of protein degradation pathways (e.g. the
Peak VO2 =HR ¼ Stroke Volume ðSVÞ                                    ubiquitin–proteasome system) was evident in both
                                                                      muscles.23 Ubiquitin–proteasome system is known as the
    arterial-venous oxygen difference ðAVO2 diffÞ:
                                                                      system that induces degradation of sarcomeric proteins
                                                                      including cTnI,24 myosin heavy chain,25 and myosin-binding
  Peak VO2/HR strongly correlates with peak stroke                    protein.26 These changes occur in both skeletal muscle and
volume,13 and therefore, it is considered an index of SV.             cardiomyocytes. In addition, MuRF-1 affects fatty acid and
glucose oxidation, as well as mitochondrial function in                    proteasome system. Secondly, we did not measure SV
cardiomyocytes.27 These mechanisms might underlie the                      directly.
relationship between muscle wasting and cardiac function,                     In conclusion, peak VO2/HR (an index of stroke volume
in both of deconditioning and reconditioning.                              at peak exercise) was strongly associated with skeletal
   It was known that peripheral circulation significantly                   muscle mass. SMI was an independent determinant of peak
contribute to exercise intolerance in patients with chronic                VO2/HR after adjustment for potential confounders. These
HF.28 Therefore, we evaluated baPWV as a parameter of                      results suggest that there is a bidirectional relationship
peripheral circulation in this study. We found that there is a             between muscle wasting and cardiac function in
low negative correlation between SMI and baPWV, and there                  community-dwelling older adults. A large number of
is no difference of baPWV between sarcopenic group and                     longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate cardiac function
non-sarcopenic group (Table 3). Furthermore, in multiple                   over time and to prove a causal relationship between SMI
linear regression analyses, no relation was found between                  and peak VO2/HR.
baPWV and each of peak VO2/HR and SMI (Table 3). This
might be due to the difference of participant’s characteristics
between chronic HF patients in previous report28 and
community-dwelling older adults in this study.                             Conflict of interest
   This study had several limitations. Firstly, we did not
measure the biomarker which related with ubiquitine–                       None declared.
References
 1. Morley JE, Anker SD, von Haehling S.               the     Asian     Working     Group for      11. Abe T, Thiebaud RS, Loenneke JP, Loftin
    Prevalence, incidence, and clinical                Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;             M, Fukunaga T. Prevalence of site-
    impact of sarcopenia: facts, numbers,              15: 95–101.                                      specific thigh sarcopenia in Japanese
    and epidemiology-update 2014. J               7.   Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Takeda K,               men and women. Age (Dordr) 2014;
    Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2014; 5:                Tsuda H, Arai T, Hirose K, Koji Y, Hori          36: 417–426.
    253–259.                                           S, Yamamoto Y. Validity, reproducibility,    12. Thomas DR. Loss of skeletal muscle
 2. Atkins JL, Whincup PH, Morris RW,                  and clinical significance of noninvasive           mass in aging: examining the
    Lennon LT, Papacosta O, Wannamethee                brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity                relationship of starvation, sarcopenia
    SG. Sarcopenic obesity and risk of                 measurement. Hypertens Res 2002; 25:              and cachexia. Clin Nutr 2007; 26:
    cardiovascular disease and mortality: a            359–364.                                          389–399.
    population-based cohort study of older        8.   Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Yokoi T, Cortez-      13. Ehsani AA, Spina RJ, Peterson LR,
    men. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62: 253–260.           Cooper MY, DeVan AE, Anton MA,                   Rinder MR, Glover KL, Villareal DT,
 3. Narumi T, Watanabe T, Kadowaki S,                  Tanaka H. Brachial-ankle pulse wave              Binder EF, Holloszy JO. Attenuation of
    Takahashi T, Yokoyama M, Kinoshita                 velocity: an index of central arterial           cardiovascular adaptations to exercise
    D, Honda Y, Funayama A, Nishiyama                  stiffness? J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19:             in frail octogenarians. J Appl Physiol
    S, Takahashi H, Arimoto T, Shishido T,             401–406.                                         2003; 95: 1781–1788.
    Miyamoto T, Kubota I. Sarcopenia              9.   Matsui Y, Kario K, Ishikawa J, Eguchi K,     14. Wang E, Næss MS, Hoff J, Albert TL,
    evaluated by fat-free mass index is an             Hoshide S, Shimada K. Reproducibility            Pham Q, Richardson RS, Helgerud J.
    important prognostic factor in patients            of arterial stiffness indices (pulse wave        Exercise-training-induced changes in
    with chronic heart failure. Eur J Intern           velocity and augmentation index)                 metabolic capacity with age: the role of
    Med 2015; 26: 118–122.                             simultaneously assessed by automated             central cardiovascular plasticity. Age
 4. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH,                        pulse wave analysis and their associated         (Dordr) 2014; 36: 665–676.
    Cinquegrani MP, Feldman AM, Francis                risk factors in essential hypertensive       15. Senni M, Tribouilloy CM, Rodeheffer RJ,
    GS, Ganiats TG, Goldstein S, Gregoratos            patients. Hypertens Res 2004; 27:                 Jacobsen SJ, Evans JM, Bailey KR,
    G, Jessup ML, Noble RJ. ACC/AHA                    851–857.                                          Redfield MM. Congestive heart failure
    guidelines for the evaluation and            10.   Fletcher GF, Ades PA, Kligfield P, Arena           in the community: a study of all incident
    management of chronic heart failure in             R, Balady GJ, Bittner VA, Coke LA, Fleg           cases in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in
    the adult: executive summary. J Am Coll            JL, Forman DE, Gerber TC, Gulati M,               1991. Circulation 1998; 98: 2282–2289.
    Cardiol 2001; 38: 2101–2113.                       Madan K, Rhodes J, Thompson PD,              16. Evans WJ, Campbell WW. Sarcopenia
 5. Haykowsky MJ, Brubaker PH, Morgan                  Williams MA. American Heart Association          and age-related changes in body
    TM, Kritchevsky S, Eggebeen J, Kitzman             Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and            composition and functional capacity. J
    DW. Impaired aerobic capacity and                  Prevention Committee of the Council on           Nutr 1993; 123: 465–468.
    physical functional performance in older           Clinical Cardiology, Council on Nutrition,   17. Abudiab MM, Redfield MM, Melenovsky
    heart failure patients with preserved              Physical Activity and Metabolism,                V, Olson TP, Kass DA, Johnson BD,
    ejection fraction: role of lean body mass.         Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke             Borlaug BA. Cardiac output response to
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013; 68:            Nursing, and Council on Epidemiology             exercise in relation to metabolic demand
    968–975.                                           and Prevention. Exercise standards               in heart failure with preserved ejection
 6. Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, Assantachai P,             for testing and training: a scientific            fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2013; 15:
    Auyeung TW, Bahyah KS, Chou MY,                    statement from the American Heart                776–785.
    Chen LY, Hsu PS, Krairit O, Lee JS.                Association. Circulation 2013; 128:          18. Phan TT, Abozguia K, Shivu GN,
    Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of            873–934.                                         Mahadevan G, Ahmed I, Williams L,
    Dwivedi G, Patel K, Steendijk P, Ashrafian          Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2014; 5:               RING-finger 3 predisposes the heart to
    H, Henning A. Heart failure with                   193–198.                                          cardiac rupture after myocardial
    preserved       ejection    fraction    is   22.   von Haehling S, Steinbeck L, Doehner              infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007; 104:
    characterized by dynamic impairment of             W, Springer J, Anker SD. Muscle                   4377–4382.
    active relaxation and contraction of the           wasting in heart failure: an overview.        26. Mearini G, Gedicke C, Schlossarek S,
    left ventricle on exercise and associated          Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2013; 45:                 Witt CC, Krämer E, Cao P, Gomes MD,
    with myocardial energy deficiency. J Am             2257–2265.                                        Lecker SH, Labeit S, Willis MS,
    Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 402–409.              23.   Mangner N, Weikert B, Bowen TS,                   Eschenhagen T. Atrogin-1 and MuRF1
19. Dhakal BP, Malhotra R, Murphy RM,                  Sandri M, Höllriegel R, Erbs S,                   regulate cardiac MyBP-C levels via
    Pappagianopoulos PP, Baggish AL, Weiner            Hambrecht R, Schuler G, Linke A, Gielen           different mechanisms. Cardiovasc Res
    RB, Houstis NE, Eisman AS, Hough SS,               S, Adams V. Skeletal muscle alterations           2010; 85: 357–366.
    Lewis GD. Mechanisms of exercise                   in chronic heart failure: differential        27. Patterson C, Willis MS, Portbury A. Rise
    intolerance in heart failure with                  effects on quadriceps and diaphragm. J            above: muscle ring-finger-1 (MURF1)
    preserved ejection fraction: the role of           Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2015; 6:               regulation of cardiomyocyte size and
    abnormal peripheral oxygen extraction.             381–390.                                          energy metabolism. Trans Am Clin
    Circ Heart Fail 2014; DOI: 10.1161           24.   Kedar V, McDonough H, Arya R, Li HH,              Climatol Assoc 2011; 122: 70–81.
    CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001825.                       Rockman HA, Patterson C. Muscle-              28. Manetos C, Dimopoulos S, Tzanis G,
20. Lenk K, Schuler G, Adams V. Skeletal               specific RING finger 1 is a bona fide                Vakrou S, Tasoulis A, Kapelios C,
    muscle wasting in cachexia and                     ubiquitin ligase that degrades cardiac            Agapitou V, Ntalianis A, Terrovitis J,
    sarcopenia: molecular pathophysiology              troponin I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA                Nanas        S.      Skeletal     muscle
    and impact of exercise training. J                 2004; 101: 18135–18140.                           microcirculatory abnormalities are
    Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2010; 1:          25.   Fielitz J, van Rooij E, Spencer JA, Shelton       associated with exercise intolerance,
    9–21.                                              JM, Latif S, van der Nagel R,                     ventilatory inefficiency, and impaired
21. Palus S, von Haehling S, Springer S.               Bezprozvannaya S, de Windt L,                     autonomic control in heart failure. J
    Muscle wasting: an overview of recent              Richardson       JA,     Bassel-Duby     R,       Heart Lung Transplant. 2011; 30:
    developments in basic research. J                  Olson EN. Loss of muscle-specific                  1403–1408.