Republic of the Philippines

Department of Public Works and Highways

DPWH PRIORITIES AND

STRATEGIES
2010--2016
2010

By

MARIA CATALINA E
E. CABRAL
CABRAL, PhD
Assistant Secretary for Planning
 OUTLINE
• WHERE WE ARE NOW IN ROAD DEVELOPMENT
• ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE POLICIES AND
STRATEGIES
• KEY POLICIES AND STRATEGIES IN FLOOD
CONTROL
• INSTITUTIONAL POLICY REFORMS
• CANDIDATE PPP PROJECTS
 Road Densities and Paved Road Ratios in the
Phili i
Philippines and
d other
th ASEAN Developing
D l i Countries
C ti
Countries Total Road Paved Land 2007 Paved Road Density
Length Road Area Population km/sq km km/1000
(km) Ratio sq km population
Philippines 205,497 0.23 300,000 88,574,614 0.15 0.50
Indonesia 268,030 0.48 1,919,500 234,693,997 0.07 0.55
Malaysia 64,373 0.75 329,733 24,821,286 0.15 1.95
Thailand 201,855 0.82 513,115 65,068,149 0.32 2.54
Vietnam 153,312 0.35 330,991 85,262,356 0.16 0.63
Philippine Road Network

Overall road
network as of
December 2009:
206,027 km

Road Density :
0.671 km Per
square km.
km of land
area

Overall paved
road ratio: low
level of 0.23 (due
to huge inventory
of ‘barangay
barangay
roads’ or farm to
village roads)

Road Classification
North-South Backbone
East-West Lateral
Other Road of Strategic Importance
Secondary National Road DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
Philippine Road Network

Total Road Lengths and Paved Road Ratio, by Classification

Classification Length (km) Paved Road

Ratio
National Roads 29,899 0.70
National Arterial 15 731
15,731 0 79
0.79
National Secondary 14,168 0.60
Provincial Roads 31,284 0.25
City Roads 7,052 0.77
Municipal Roads 15,803 0.34
Barangay Roads 121,989 0.07
TOTAL 206,027 0.23
 DPWH BASIC MANDATE

DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND

DESIGN
MAINTENANCE OF NATIONAL
ROADS AND BRIDGES AND
FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEMS IN
MAJOR AND PRINCIPAL RIVERS

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS

 Condition
Co dto o of tthe
e National
at o a Road
oad Network
et o :
• OF THE 15,731 KMS NATIONAL ARTERIAL ROADS,
13,525 KMS OR 86% IS PAVED WHILE THE 14% IS
STILL UNPAVED. OF THE PAVED ARTERIAL ROADS,
3,625 KMS OR 27% ALREADY DUE TO BE
REHABILITATED.

• OF THE 14,168 KMS OF NATIONAL SECONDARY ROADS,

8,943 KMS OR 63% IS PAVED WHILE THE 37% IS
STILL UNPAVED. OF THE PAVED SECONDARY ROADS,
2,212 KMS OR 25% ALREADY DUE TO BE
REHABILITATED.

• ALONG THE NATIONAL ROAD NETWORK, THERE ARE

7,793 BRIDGES WITH LENGTH OF 330,089 LM. OF
THESE, 778 (15,109 LMS) ARE STILL TEMPORARY.
TARGET
G OU
OUTCOMES
CO SOOVER THE MEDIUM-TERM
U
a. National arterial roads (15,731 km) will be 100 % paved
and made g good byy 2016,, compared
p to 86 % in 2009. This
will require the paving of 2,206 kms and the rehabilitation
of 3,625 kms.

b. National secondary roads (13,987 km) will be 93% paved

and made good by 2016, compared to the existing 63% in
2009. This will entail the paving of 3,743 kms and the
rehabilitation of 1,189 kms.

c. National bridges will be 100 % permanent by 2016,

compared to the 93%. This will involve the replacement
,
of 15,109 LMs of temporary
p y bridges
g and the improvement
p
of 6,047 lm of existing bridges. Construction of 2,154 LMs
of new bridges is also targetted. By end of 2016, there will
be 332,243 LMS of national bridges.
 INFRASTRUCTURE ROAD POLICIES AND
STRATEGIES
• FOCUS ON PAVING AND UPGRADING THE NATIONAL ROAD NETWORK, ESPECIALLY THE
ARTERIAL SYSTEM

• ENHANCE MAJOR THOROUGHFARES TO IMPROVE TRAFFIC AND SAFETY STANDARDS IN

URBAN CENTERS.

• STRATEGIC TOURISM SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IN COORDINATION WITH DOT

• DEVELOP MORE PPP PROJECTS FOR MUCH NEEDED INFRASTRUCTURE AND LEVEL
PLAYING FIELD FOR INVESTMENTS

• STUDY THE MECHANISM FOR INCLUDING LONGER MAINTENANCE PERIOD (5-10 YEARS) IN
CONTRACT PROVISIONS
 KEY PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIES ON FLOOD
CONTROL
• PRIORITIZE FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS IN MAJOR AND PRINCIPAL RIVER BASINS TO
ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE

• PROVIDE ADEQUATE FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES IN FLOOD-DISASTER

PRONE AREAS TO MITIGATE FLOODING WITHIN TOLERABLE LEVELS

• SUPPORT OTHER AGENCIES’ EFFORTS (DENR, DOST, NDCC, NEDA, MMDA AND LGUs) IN
NON-STRUCTURAL MEASURES SUCH AS HAZARD MAPPING, COMMUNITY-BASED DISASTER
MANAGEMENT PLAN,
PLAN PROPER GARBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL,
DISPOSAL RELOCATION OF
INFORMAL SETTLERS LIVING ALONG BANKS OR RIVERS/CREEKS, ESTERO/CREEK
CLEANING

• PROMOTE INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY (i.e. GEO-NETTING IN SLOPE PROTECTION WORKS)

• PROMOTE RETARDING BASINS AND RAINWATER HARVESTING FOR NON-DOMESTIC USE

 INSTITUTIONAL POLICY REFORMS

• FULL TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE PEOPLE

• OPTIMIZE THE BUDGET THROUGH PRUDENT AND OBJECTIVE SELECTION OF

PROJECTS TO ENSURE DESIRED SOCIAL OUTCOMES

• OPEN COMPETITVE BIDDING/SIMPLICATION OF BIDDING AND AWARD PROCESS

• TIGHTEN QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE IN PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

• ENGAGE THE PUBLIC IN GOVERNANCE, MONITORING AND FEEDBACK

• CHANGE IN CULTURE AND VALUES OF EMPLOYEES AND ENGAGE THE PUBLIC

THAT DEAL WITH DPWH – CONTRACTORS,, POLITICIANS,, LGUs AND GENERAL
PUBLIC - TO SHARE THE NEW VISION AND MISSION OF THE PRESIDENT.
CANDIDATE PPP PROJECTS BASED ON JICA
STUDY
Summary
  of Priority of Projects
Priority  Score  Name of Project  PPP  Recommen‐ Remarks 
Ranking  Modality  dation 
1  82.5  NLEx‐SLEx Link Type‐3  • MNTC  submitted  unsolicited 
Expressway  proposal. 
• DPWH under evaluation of proposal.
2  77.0  CALA Expressway Type‐3 • WB will provide assistance to Manila 
side section. 
• F/S of South section by JICA in 2006. 
3  74.0  NAIA Expressway  Type‐2 • METI F/S
 
4  71.5  SLEx Extension Type‐3  • SLTC announced to start D/D. 
 
5  70.5  CLEx (Phase‐1) Type‐5 • F/S done by Yen loan fund. 
 
6  69.5  C‐5 / FTI / Skyway  Type‐2 • D/D by DPWH. 
Connector 
‐  • 2‐lane elevated expressway. 
7  68.0  R‐7 Expressway Type‐2 • How to utilize this corridor should be 
‐  studied including BRT. 
8
8  65 5
65.5  C 6 Expressway
C‐6 Expressway Type 3
Type‐3 • KOICA will study.
KOICA will study
‐  
9  55.5  Calamba – Los  Type‐2 • Business Case Study by PEGR. 
Baños Expressway 
‐ 
10  51.5  NLEx East / La  Type‐3 
yp • Original proponent status for La 
g p p
Mesa Parkway 
‐ Mesa Parkway given to ATC. 
Legend:    Recommended for Japan’s ODA Projects. 
     Priority project, but needs to watch private sector’s action. 
            ‐  Recommended for GRP fund or other sources of fund 
Proposed Expressway Network
Project Priority Ranking
Priority  Name of Project                                           Length 
Score  Priority Group 
Rank  (km) 
   
1  89.0  NLEx‐SLEx Link Expressway  13.4
2  88.0  CALA Expressway  41.8  
3  87.0  C‐5/FTI/Skyway Connector Road  3.0 First 
4  78.0  NAIA Expressway (Phase II)  4.9 Priority 
4
4  78 0
78.0  C 6 Expressway (Global City Link)
C‐6 Expressway (Global City Link) 66 5
66.5 Group
4  78.0  CLEx    63.9
7  76.5  SLEx Extension (to Lucena City)  47.8
8  71.5  Calamba‐Los Bañ Expressway  15.5
Sub‐total  256.8
256.8

   
9  71.0  R‐7 Expressway  16.1
10  66.0  NLEx East/La Mesa Parkway  103.0 Second 
11  64.5  C‐6 Extension  43.6 Priority 
12
12  63 5
63.5  Manila Bay Expressway
Manila Bay Expressway 80
8.0 Group
13  55.0  Pasig‐Marikina Expressway  15.7
Sub‐Total  319.5
319.5
 
   
  Manila‐Bataan Coastal Road
M il B t C t lR d 70 3
70.3
  NLEx (Phase III)  36.2 Beyond 
  East‐West Connection Expressway  26.6 Year 2030 
Sub‐total                                                            133.1
133.1
   
 Present HSH Network +
Expressway On-going Projects
(420 km)
Network

Present Expressway
Network
+
On-going Projects

ON‐GOING PROJECTS
ƒSkyway (Phase 2)
ƒR-1 Extension
ƒSLEx (Bation-Sto.Tomas)
ƒNLEx (Seg 8, 9 and 10)
ƒTPLEx
ƒDaang Hari- SLEx Link
Expressway HSH Network 2020
420 + 206 626 km
Network

Future
Expressway
Network
2020 PROJECTS
2020 PROJECTS
ƒC. Luzon Ex (Phase 1)
ƒC6 (N. Section)
ƒC6 (S-E Section)
ƒLa Mesa Parkway
ƒNLEx (Segment 8-2)
ƒC5/FTI/Skywa y Connector
Road
ƒGlobal City Link
CALA Expressway
ƒCALA
ƒCalamba-Los Banos
ƒSLEx Extension
ƒNLEx-SLEx Link
ƒNAIA Ex (Phase 2)
Expressway HSH Network 2030
626 + 236 862 km
Network

Future
Expressway
Network

2030 PROJECTS
• C. Luzon Ex (Phase 2)
• NLEx-East
• C6 (E. Section)
• Pasig-Marikina
i i i Ex
• R7 Expressway
• Manila Bay Ex
• C6 Extension
Expressway HSH Network (Beyond 2030)
862 + 133 995 km
Network

Future Expressway
Network

BEYOND 2030
• NLEx (Phase 3)
• Manila-Bataan
Manila Bataan
Coastal Road
• E-W Connection
Expressway
 Republic of the Philippines
Department
p of Public Works and Highways
g y

Thank You!

DPWH website: www.dpwh.gov.ph