Hospital Autonomy Cost Analysis
Hospital Autonomy Cost Analysis
Hospital
Autonomy in
Jordan: An
Economic Cost
Analysis of Al
Karak Hospital
June 2002
Prepared by:
Alia Muhtaseb, BS
Abt Associates Inc.
Partners for Health Reformplus
In collaboration with:
Development Associates, Inc. Emory University Rollins School of Public
Health Philoxenia International Travel, Inc. Program for Appropriate
Training in Health SAG Corporation Social Sectors Development
Strategies, Inc. Training Resource Group Tulane University School of
Public Health and Tropical Medicine University Research Co., LLC.
Funded by:
U.S. Agency for International Development Order No. TE 014
Contributors
The following persons are members of workgroups established at the Al Karak hospital to
assist with the hospital decentralization effort. Their contributions to data gathering made this
report possible.
Dr. Sultan Ma`ad Allah El Tarawneh
Dr. Youssef Mostafa El Sararyeh
Dr. Ali Mansi El Hamaideh
Dr. Ibrahim Ahmad El Adaileh
Dr. Abd El Khader Msarkfm
ahmoud El Habashneh
Dr. Zakaria Hassan El Nawaiseh
Pharmacist Zeena Atallah El Halaseh
Engineer Rashad Taha Kassasbeh
Mr. Naser Ghadeer El Sareireh
Mr. Amjad Khalil El Ma`dnat
Mr. Wajdi Ayed El Ma`jali
Mr. Radi Hasan El Ja`afreh
Mrs. Rehab Micha`eel El Halaseh
Mrs. Mahdeyeh Ibraheem Aka`wei
Miss Fayzeh Yakoub El Houra`ni
Mr. Nabeel Hasan El Houra`ni
Mrs. Hya`at Yaseen El Nawaiseh
Miss Fawzayeh Abd El Mahdi El Bou`toush
Mrs. Enshra`h Hamoud El Nawaiseh
Mr. Sakher Loutfi El Ha`addin
Mrs. Em`an Ali Mo`uafi
Mr. Amjad Kame`l El Majali
Mr. Falah Za`al El Tarawneh
Mr. Isma`el Hassan El Jara`ah
Mr. Noor El Deen Salem El Maiyt`eh
Mission
Partners for Health Reformplus is USAID’s flagship project for health policy and health
system strengthening in developing and transitional countries. The five-year project (2000-2005)
builds on the predecessor Partnerships for Health Reform Project, continuing PHR’s focus on
health policy, financing, and organization, with new emphasis on community participation,
infectious disease surveillance, and information systems that support the management and delivery
of appropriate health services. PHRplus will focus on the following results:
▲ Generation of new financing for health care, as well as more effective use of existing
funds.
June 2002
Recommended Citation
Ayyoub S.K. As-Sayaideh, Abdel Razzaq S.H. Shafei, Banks, Dwayne A., and Alia Muhtaseb. June
2002. Implementing Hospital Autonomy in Jordan : An Economic Cost Analysis of Al –Karak Hospital
, Bethesda , MD : The Partners for Health Reform Plus Project , Abt Associates Inc.
For additional copies of this report, contact the PHRplus Resource Center at PHR-
InfoCenter@abtassoc.com or visit our website at www.phrproject.com.
The opinions stated in this document are solely those of the authors and do
not necessarily reflect the views of USAID USAID.
Abstract
Faced with limited resources and increased demands being placed upon its health care
sector due to the changing pattern of diseases and rising consumer expectations, the Ministry of
Health (MOH) of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is seeking ways to improve the operating
efficiency of its 23 public hospitals. One way to achieve the objective is to provide hospital
directors with greater managerial control over their daily decision-making. As such, the
government of Jordan has been engaged during the past three years in a hospital autonomy
(hospital decentralization) pilot project with Princess Raya and Al Karak hospitals. To date the
MOH has completed the first three phases of that project: Phase 1 (the pilot site selection
process), Phase 2 (the implementation of short-run changes in operating procedures), and Phase
3 (estimating the costs of services at the hospitals). This document details Phase 3 activities,
presenting the first-ever detailed cost analysis of Al Karak hospital. This analysis is of import,
given that the MOH is considering the allocation of a partial or complete operating budget to
the hospital director, at a later date.
Table of Contents
Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................................xiii
Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................... xv
Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................xvii
1. Background ................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Decentralization of Jordan’s Public Hospitals..................................................................1
1.2 Al Karak Hospital................................................................................................................2
1.3 Organization of This Report...............................................................................................3
2. Background on Hospital Cost Analysis ...................................................................................... 5
2.1 Basic Concepts of Hospital Costing ...................................................................................5
2.2 Basic Methodology...............................................................................................................8
3. Accounting for Variable Input Costs........................................................................................ 11
3.1 Labor Costs Estimations...................................................................................................11
3.2 Labor Costs per Unit Output ...........................................................................................17
3.3 Nonlabor Variable Factors of Production.......................................................................23
3.4 Nonlabor Variable Factors by Cost Center ....................................................................26
3.5 Estimations of Per Unit Variable Cost ............................................................................28
3.6 Distribution of Variable Drug Costs................................................................................31
4. Accounting for Fixed Input Costs ............................................................................................. 33
4.1 Estimating Costs of Fixed Inputs .....................................................................................33
4.2 Distribution of Fixed Costs by Cost Center ....................................................................35
4.3 Estimating Per Unit Fixed Cost........................................................................................36
5. Estimating Total Hospital Costs................................................................................................ 41
5.1 Distribution of Total Costs by Cost Center.....................................................................41
5.2 Total Costs Per Unit of Output ........................................................................................43
6. Policy Implications and Conclusion .......................................................................................... 47
Annex A: Summary Tables of Allocation Rules .............................................................................. 49
Annex B: Service Inventory of Al Karak Hospital.......................................................................... 53
Annex C: Fixed Assets (Equipment and Furniture Inventory) of Al Karak ................................ 57
Annex D: Bibliography ...................................................................................................................... 77
List of Tables
Table ES-1: Total Labor Costs per Patient Day and Adjusted Patient Day ................................xix
Table 1. Snapshot of Al Karak Hospital............................................................................................. 2
Table 2: Labor Costs, by Employee Category (in JD) .................................................................... 12
Table of Contents ix
Table 3: Labor Costs in Full-time Equivalents, by Employee Category ....................................... 12
Table 4: Percent Distribution of Labor Costs, by Employee Category ......................................... 13
Table 5: Labor Distribution by Cost Center.................................................................................... 14
Table 6: Labor Costs by Cost Center ............................................................................................... 15
Table 7: Total Labor Costs by Cost Center, Patient Days, Patients, and Adjusted Patient Days
17
Table 8: Total Labor Costs by Cost Center, Bed Days, and Occupancy Rate.............................. 18
Table 9: Labor Costs by Cost Center, Admissions, and Adjusted Admissions ............................ 18
Table 10: Distribution of Total Physician Labor Cost, by Cost Center ........................................ 19
Table 11: Distribution of Physician Labor Cost by Cost Center, Patients, Patient Days, and
Adjusted Patient Days........................................................................................................................ 20
Table 12: Distribution of Nursing/Midwives Labor Costs, by Cost Center .................................. 20
Table 13: Distribution of Nurses/Midwives Labor Cost by Cost Center, Patients, Patient Days
and Adjusted Patient Days ................................................................................................................ 21
Table 14: Distribution of Physician and Nurse/Midwife Labor Cost (Lpn) by Cost Center,
Patients, Patient Days, and Adjusted Patient Days ......................................................................... 22
Table 15: Average Product of Labor Estimations, by Hospital Cost Center................................ 22
Table 16: Utility Costs Estimates ...................................................................................................... 23
Table 17: Variable Structure and Equipment Estimates................................................................ 23
Table 18: Variable Hospital Consumables....................................................................................... 25
Table 19: Contracted Services........................................................................................................... 25
Table 20: Non-clinical Supplies......................................................................................................... 25
Table 21: Distribution of Utility Cost, by Cost Center ................................................................... 26
Table 22: Distribution of Non-utility Variable Cost (Nc), by Cost Center .................................... 27
Table 23: Distribution of Total Variable Costs (Vc), by Cost Center ............................................ 28
Table 24: Distribution of Total Variable Costs, by Cost Center, Patient Days, and Adjusted
Patient Days ............................................................................................................................................
30
Table 25: Distribution of Total Variable Costs, by Cost Center, Admissions, and Adjusted
Admissions .......................................................................................................................................... 30
Table 26: Distribution of Total Variable Costs, by Emergency Room and Outpatient Visits .... 31
Table 27: Distribution of Drug Costs, by Cost Center, Patient Days, Adjusted Patient Days,
and Patients......................................................................................................................................... 32
Table 28: Distribution of Drug Costs by Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinic Visit............ 32
Table 29: Annualized Economic Costs of Fixed Hospital Structures ............................................ 34
Table 30: Annualized Economic Costs of Hospital Vehicles .......................................................... 34
Table 31: Annualized Economic Costs of Equipment and Furniture............................................ 35
Table of Contents
Table 32: Distribution of Fixed Costs (Fc), by Cost Center ............................................................ 36
Table 33: Distribution of Total Fixed Costs, by Cost Center, Patient Days, and Adjusted
Patient Days ............................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................... 37
Table 34: Distribution of Total Fixed Costs, by Cost Center, Admissions, and Adjusted
Admissions .......................................................................................................................................... 37
Table 35: Distribution of Total Fixed Costs, by Emergency Room Visits..................................... 39
Table 36: Distribution of Total Costs, by Cost Center.................................................................... 41
Table 37: Percent Distribution of Total Costs, by Cost Center...................................................... 42
Table 38: Distribution of Total Costs, by Cost Center, Patient Days, and Adjusted Patient Days
43
Table 39: Distribution of Total Costs, by Cost Center, Admissions and Adjusted Admissions.. 44
Table 40: Distribution of Total Costs, by Emergency Room and Outpatient Visits .................... 44
Table 41: Per Unit Daily Hospital Services Loaded With Admin/Finance Costs......................... 44
Table of Contents xi
Acronyms
Currency Conversion
JD 1 = US$ 1.41
Acronyms xiii
Acknowledgments
The United States Agency for International Development has made this study possible. We
express our sincerest gratitude to the Minister of Health, His Excellency Dr. Faleh Al Nasser, as
well as his predecessors, for supporting and sustaining the hospital decentralization effort in
Jordan. In addition, we express our sincerest gratitude to the Ministry of Health’s Hospital
Decentralization Steering Committee members (Chairman Dr. Ismail Saedi, Dr. Abdullah Al-
Shawawreh, Dr. Suleiman Oweiss, Dr. Taher Abu Samen, Dr. Hani Brosk, Dr. Ahmad
Shugran, and Dr. Sultan Tarawneh) for their dedication and efforts during this third phase of
implementing hospital decentralization in Jordan. In addition, we would like to thank Dr. Salah
Dhiyab, Dr. Osamah Samawi, Dr. Saif Al-Din Al-Irani, Mr. Bassam Al-Muneir, and Mr.
Mohammed Ismail for their ongoing assistance with this activity. Furthermore, the level of
dedication and effort during this phase of implementation, as exhibited by the personnel at Al
Karak hospital, cannot be overstated. For the past three years, the personnel at this hospital
have worked relentlessly towards achieving their goals of enhanced quality of care for their
patients and increased operating efficiency for their hospital.
Finally, we would like to acknowledge the participation and support of our Ministry of
Health and PHRplus colleagues in Jordan and the United States.
nowledgments xv
Executive Summary
The Ministry of Health (MOH) of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan has expressed keen
interest in granting at least partial autonomy to its MOH-owned and -operated hospitals. The
Partnerships for Health Reform (PHR), a United States Agency for International Development
(USAID)-sponsored project and predecessor to Partners for Health Reformplus, began
providing ongoing technical assistance during Phase 1 of the Ministry’s short-run hospital
decentralization effort. Initial assistance was the sponsorship of a national workshop entitled
“Hospital Autonomy in Jordan,” held in Amman on 4 October 1998, at the behest of then-
Minister of Health, His Excellency Dr. Na’el Al-Ajlouni. The directors general of the 12 health
governorates, as well as the directors of all MOH hospitals, attended the workshop (Sindaha-
Muna, 1998). During subsequent meetings between PHR and the Minister of Health, it was
decided that the MOH would proceed with Phase 1 of its decentralization efforts. This entailed
the selection of two MOH facilities for piloting hospital autonomy in Jordan. The hospitals
selected were Princess Raya, in the Irbid governorate, and Al Karak, in the Al Karak
governorate. Their selection in April 1999 concluded Phase 1 (Banks, 1999).
During Phase 2, PHR engaged in several activities to achieve the following set of objectives:
(1) to establish “Reference Committees” and “Workgroups” within each pilot hospital; (2) to
guide each pilot hospital toward achieving its targeted short-run decentralization objectives; (3)
to facilitate the implementation of a detailed training plan, consistent with the expected needs of
each pilot hospital; and (4) to facilitate the overall implementation of the short-run
recommendations, as explicated by the hospital-based workgroups. This information, as well as
the short-run procedural changes that were approved and implemented by the MOH, was
detailed in a document entitled Implementing Hospital Autonomy in Jordan: Changing MOH
Operating Procedures (Banks, As-Sayaideh, Shafei, and Ghanoum, 2000).
Background
mmary xvii
that is, identifying the existing cost structure at MOH hospitals, and the establishment of a
Hospital Policy Forum to coordinate and disseminate information among various MOH hospital
directors.
Phase 3 Activities
The Hospital Decentralization Implementation Team worked closely with the staff at Al
Karak hospital, visiting the site weekly throughout the period of this study. In addition to
educating hospital staff on the theory and applications of hospital costing, the team guided
hospital personnel through the following activities:
▲ Guiding workgroups on the principles of data validation and various allocation rules
for distributing costs among various hospital cost centers. Working with the
Implementation Team members, hospital personnel devised allocation rules to
distribute various input costs among cost centers.
Once these steps had taken place, the Implementation Team cooperated with the
workgroups to develop a strategy for compiling ongoing hospital economic data. For example, a
strategy was developed such that the staff at Al Karak hospital is better able to track the flow of
drug consumption throughout the hospital, by cost centers.
Among the most important accomplishments of Phase 3 were the findings of this first-ever
detailed cost analysis of Al Karak hospital, as well as the policy implications of such findings.
Below are highlights of the findings:
▲ The total 1999 operating costs for Al Karak hospital amounted to JD 3,360,523
($4,738,337).
▲ Total variable costs including labor amounted to JD 2,403,434 ($3,388,842) and total
fixed costs were JD 957,089 ($1,349,495).
▲ Administrative costs within the hospital are JD 438,989 ($618,974). This amounts to
more than 13 percent of the hospital’s total operating costs.
▲ In terms of total costs per patient day, which is a proxy for average total costs, the
Intensive Care/Critical Care Unit (ICU/CCU) department exhibited the highest, JD 173
($244). This is in contrast to the amounts estimated for Surgery, JD 37; Obstetrics and
Gynecology (OB/GYN), JD 25; Internal Medicine, JD 27; and Pediatrics, JD 49.
▲ The ICU/CCU also exhibited the highest total costs per admission, JD 467 ($658). This
is in contrast to Surgery, JD 107; OB/GYN, JD 47; Internal Medicine, JD 78; and
Pediatrics, JD 162.
▲ Total labor costs at Al Karak hospital were JD 1,069,288 ($1,507,696). Of this amount,
JD 1,009,940 ($1,424,015) was for salaries, JD 53,108 ($74,882) for incentives (bonuses),
and JD 6,240 ($8,798) for transportation allowances—the three largest components of
employee compensation within the hospital.
▲ The lowest adjusted labor costs per unit are found within the OB/GYN department,
which also had one of the highest estimated average products of labor (a proxy for
labor productivity), as illustrated by Table ES-1.
Table ES-1: Total Labor Costs per Patient Day and Adjusted Patient Day
Unit Total labor costs Total days per Total costs per
per patient day unit of labor adjusted patient
day
Internal JD 9 284 JD 42
Medicine
Surgery 19 154 52
OB/GYN 11 248 40
ICU/CCU 27 88 187
Pediatrics 22 133 64
Total 16 180 JD 55
▲ There is a need for greater communication between the MOH Accounting Department
and Al Karak hospital on the issue of payroll-related expenses. Oftentimes, the
personnel files at the hospital do not match the personnel payment records of the
Accounting Department. A management information system that provides systematic
updates concerning the placement of personnel throughout the MOH is warranted.
▲ The average variable cost of an ER and clinic visit is JD 4.76 and JD 3.71, respectively.
The implications are that under existing cost-sharing rules the MOH is not recovering
its average variable cost for each ER and clinic encounter. In fact, for a certain
category of patients, the MOH can recover its average variable costs by increasing its
ER co-payment by JD 3.11, and its clinic co-payment for clinic visits by JD 2.06.
However, without a more detailed study of the relative productivity of Al Karak
mmary xix
hospital, one cannot rule out that the higher average variable costs estimates are the
result of production inefficiencies. Hence, any attempt to recover average variable costs
based upon the findings in this study would be premature.
▲ Total drug costs for Al Karak inpatient services were JD 128,230 ($180,804). This
amounted to roughly JD 4 per inpatient day, and more than JD 12 per patient.
▲ Once daily hospital services, such as Surgery, OB/GYN, Internal Medicine, ICU/CCU,
and Pediatrics are loaded with their administrative overhead, the total costs per
adjusted patient day is JD 54, JD 38, JD 85, JD 131, and JD 65, respectively.
Conclusions
With the completion of Phase 3, the MOH has taken another step forward in its efforts to
decentralize its network of publicly owned and operated hospitals. Hospital workgroups, in
collaboration with the Hospital Decentralization Implementation Team, have provided the
MOH with detailed information on the costs of operating each pilot hospital. This information
will provide the MOH with its first information on the cost structure of each hospital and the
distribution of such costs across hospital costs centers. Moreover, this study highlights various
areas for policy intervention, such as the establishment of a cost-reporting system that tracks
and coordinates hospital expenditures throughout the MOH.
During Phase 2, the directors of Princess Raya and Al Karak hospitals were provided
limited authority over certain aspects of their daily decision making through changes in MOH
operating procedures (Banks, As-Sayaideh, Shafei, and Ghanoum, 2000); this included the
establishment of workgroups and committees at each hospital, as well as the training of
administrative and technical personnel in various aspects of hospital management and finance.
Over the long run the MOH seeks to provide Princess Raya and Al Karak hospitals with
additional limited authority over aspects of their budgetary, planning, and procurement
matters. To achieve this, however, the MOH, as well as the hospital directors, need to
understand in detail the cost structures at the two hospitals.
During autumn 2000, the Implementation Team initiated Phase 3 of the decentralization
effort. Phase 3 had two primary components. The first was the development of an
organizational development plan for each hospital. The plan provided the MOH with a detailed
understanding of the governance structure of each hospital, based upon their short-run
decentralization objectives. The second was the aforementioned look at the cost structures at
each hospital. Hence, an essential activity of Phase 3 was a detailed cost analysis at each
hospital. This document details the results of that analysis for Al Karak hospital.
1
1.2 Al Karak Hospital
Al Karak hospital was established in 1996. The hospital is located approximately 145
kilometers south of Amman, in the governorate of Al Karak. The hospital was originally
established in 1956 on another site. During the period of this study, the hospital’s outpatient
facilities were located at that site, which is approximately 7 kilometers from the present location.
However, as of spring 2002, a significant share of outpatient care is being provided at a newly
established facility that is adjacent to the hospital. Construction of what is currently Al Karak
hospital was completed in 1996, as part of a Jordanian and Italian government cooperative. The
hospital has a nursing training facility sponsored by the Italian government. Table 1 provides a
snapshot of the hospital, as well as a few summary statistics of the governorate.
Table 1. Snapshot of Al Karak Hospital
Al Karak Governorate
Hospital Statistics
Hospital director: Dr. Sultan
Tarawneh
Physical size (m2): 8,500m2
2
Land area (m ): 60,000m2
Occupancy rate: 74%
Bed size: 110
Admissions: 11,066
Outpatient visits1: 63,514
Emergency room visits: 36,366
Average length of stay: 2.7 days
Inpatient days: 29,543
Patient coverage:
Percent MOH (Civil Insurance Program): 45.7%
Percent RMS: 4.2%
Percent uninsured 33.0%
Staff:
Administrative/Finance: 32
Physicians: 57
Nurses/Midwives: 173
Pharmacists: 7
Technical: 48
Other: 35
1
These are outpatient visits that Al Karak physicians are responsible for at the speciality
clinic.
This document is divided into six chapters. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the basic
concepts and methodology of hospital costing. Chapter 3 describes the methods for estimating
variable input costs as well as the cost estimates themselves. Chapter 4 presents Al Karak
hospital’s fixed costs estimates, and Chapter 5 contains the estimation of total hospital costs.
Chapter 6 provides policy implications and conclusions.
3
2. Background on Hospital Cost Analysis
Over the past 30 years a vast literature has described theoretical and empirical aspects of
methodologies for conducting economic analyses of hospital costs. Prominent among these
studies is the seminal work that was conducted by Feldstein (1967), and Carr and Feldstein
(1967), which describes the production process of the hospital in terms of the economic
behavior of a multi-product firm. More recent work in this area includes that of Breyer (1987),
Cowing and Holtmann (1983), Granneman, Brown, and Pauly (1986), and Vita (1990). While
the vast majority of this work over the past 30 years focused on the economic behavior of
hospitals in developed economies, a more recent work by Barnum and Kutzin (1993) examined
the developing country context. The hospital costing work that was conducted at Al Karak
hospital emanates from this rich body of literature.
Economists define the economic costs of an institution in two ways. In the first, economic
costs are defined as the “market value” of all inputs (both variable and fixed) that are utilized
during the production process. Alternatively, economic costs are defined as the market value of
inputs in their next best alternative use (Binger and Hoffman, 1988). This latter definition is
most often associated with contemporary approaches to economic cost analysis in that it
directly associates with the concept of opportunity costs. For example, when economists
estimate the cost of fixed capital inputs, they consider not only the cash outlay, but also the fact
that those funds alternatively could have been invested in an interest-earning bank account. In
Jordan, anecdotal evidence suggests that current MOH procurement policies provide some
MOH hospitals with equipment for which they have no use. Such idle equipment imposes a cost
to the government in that the money used to purchase the equipment might have been invested
in an interest-bearing account, or used to purchase needed equipment. Hence, the total cost to
the hospital for the purchase of the unneeded equipment is the sum of the explicit costs (i.e., the
cash payment) and the implicit costs (e.g., the forgone interest payment). It is this distinction
between explicit and implicit costs that differentiates an economic cost analysis from an
accounting or financial cost analysis, which would consider only the explicit costs.
To estimate the total economic costs of operating Al Karak hospital, the various inputs
utilized to produce the array of hospital services were divided into two categories: variable
inputs and fixed inputs (see also Annex B). Economists refer to each of these inputs as “factors
of production.” Each is described below:
▲ Variable Inputs (Variable Factors of Production): Variable inputs are those factors of
production whose quantity varies with the level of output. For a hospital, the most
common variable input is the labor it employs, i.e., the numbers of nurses, doctors, and
ancillary personnel that are optimal for the size of their patient populations. Other
variable factors are butane gas, electricity, and medical consumables, which also vary
with the number of patients treated. However, it is not uncommon for hospitals in
developing economies, such as Jordan, to have labor categories that are constrained by
government regulatory policies. In Jordan, MOH and Civil Service rules allow certain
labor categories in MOH facilities to be more variable (flexible) than others. For
▲ Fixed Inputs (Fixed Factors of Production): Fixed inputs are those factors of production
that cannot be readily changed as the quantity of service production increases or
decreases. Examples are capital inputs such as large medical equipment and the
hospital structure itself. Costs that are associated with such fixed factors are often
referred to as “sunk costs.”
Economic costs are estimated according to two “temporal” dimensions: the long run and
the short run. These dimensions, however, refer less to a defined period of time and more to the
way a hospital can treat the various factors of production. For example, long-run cost
estimations assume that all factors of production are variable; hence, the hospital has
significant flexibility in altering its labor/capital mix. Alternatively, short-run cost estimates
assume that at least one factor of production remains fixed throughout the production process.
The current study—a single case, Al Karak hospital, for a defined period of time, 1999—is a
short-run cost estimation.1 Such short-run estimations adhere to the following set of economic
principles:
▲ Total Variable Costs (VC): Total variable costs are the sum of the costs of variable
factors of production. A few examples are labor, utility, structure and equipment, and
nonclinical supplies. Chapter 3 discusses these costs at Al Karak hospital.
▲ Total Fixed Costs (FC): Total fixed costs are the sum of the costs of the various fixed
factors of production. Chapter 4 estimates the total costs of such factors, examples of
which are structure, vehicle, equipment, and furniture.
▲ Total Cost (TC): Total costs are the summation of total variable costs and total fixed
costs. Unlike variable factors of production, the costs of fixed factors must be
considered in terms of their annualized depreciation costs as well. As stated previously,
this report estimates short-run total costs, given the existence of fixed factors of
production.
▲ Average Variable Costs (AVC): Average variable cost is the ratio of total variable costs
to a particular output category. Several AVC combinations can be estimated for
hospitals, because a hospital can be viewed as a multi-product institution. Several
standard output proxies capture this multi-product nature of hospital services
production. The output proxies that were utilized in this study are inpatient days (both
adjusted and unadjusted), admissions (both adjusted and unadjusted), bed-days,
patients, and visits. The most commonly estimated AVC is the ratio of total variable
costs to total inpatient days.
▲ Average Fixed Costs (AFC): Average fixed cost is the ratio of total fixed costs to a
particular output category. The hospital as a multi-product institution is relevant to
1
Long-run cost functions are typically estimated through the employment of time-series data for a statistically
significant sample of facilities.
There is one additional common and most important category of cost: marginal cost.
Marginal cost is the change in total costs over a defined time period, relative to a particular
output category. Estimating marginal costs of a particular output requires data on unit costs
from at least two time periods. In cross-sectional studies, such as the current study, which uses
data from a single period of time, marginal costs estimates are unobtainable.
With the oversight of the Hospital Decentralization Implementation Team and using a
detailed list of all services offered by Al Karak hospital (see Annex A for an inventory of
services), the hospital workgroups divided the services into two major “cost center” categories:
Daily Hospital Services and Ancillary and Support Services. Once agreement was reached on
the two broad classifications, the workgroups further divided the services into cost center
subcategories. Under Daily Hospital Services, services that require similar labor and capital
inputs and that treat patients with similar maladies were grouped into a single cost
subcategory; those that require distinctly different inputs and treatment patterns were
classified separately. For example, the Surgery cost center includes urological, gastrointestinal,
ophthalmic, and other categories of general surgery, as well as its subspecialties. Intensive care
surgical, coronary, and burn services were placed in the Intensive Care Unit/Critical Care Unit
(ICU/CCU) cost center. Other cost centers include Obstetrics/Gynecology (OB/GYN), Internal
Medicine, Operating Room (OR), Pediatrics, Emergency Room (ER), and Outpatient Clinic
departments.
Once the cost centers were defined, the workgroups and Implementation Team created a
detailed list of variable and fixed factors that the hospital utilizes. The variable factors, and the
methodology employed to estimate these costs, are summarized below and detailed in Chapter
3.
▲ Nonlabor Variable Factors: This variable input was divided into five specific
categories: utility inputs, structure and equipment inputs, consumable inputs,
contracted services, and nonclinical supplies. Utility inputs include fuel, butane gas,
telephone services, electricity, and water. Structure and equipment inputs include
building renovations, rental unit for technicians’ quarters, building maintenance and
renewal, equipment maintenance, and supplies. Consumable inputs include drugs and
The fixed factors and the methodology employed to estimate and distribute their costs
among the cost centers are contained in Chapter 4. The fixed factors employed by Al Karak
hospital during the period of this study are listed below:
▲ Fixed Hospital Structure: the hospital building, electrical structures, sewage and
plumbing structures, and CT-Scan facility
▲ Equipment and Furniture: medical equipment and hospital furniture. Equipment and
furniture costing JD 100 (US$140) are listed in annexes A and B.
Variable and fixed factors were distributed among the various hospital cost centers
according to the allocation rules that are summarized in Tables A1–A3 of Annex A.
This chapter presents cost estimates for the various labor and nonlabor cost categories at
Al Karak hospital. It also discusses the rules utilized for dispersing the costs to the various
hospital cost centers.
As discussed in Chapter 2, the cost of labor is the major contributor to hospitals’ variable
costs. At Al Karak hospital, labor was grouped into eight categories: medical doctors,
nurses/midwives, pharmacists, administrative, finance, technical/medical, technical/nonmedical,
and “other.”
In Jordan, employee remuneration, paid in cash by the Ministry of Health, consists of three
identifiable components: wages, incentives (bonuses), and transportation.2 The distribution of
these components varies by employee classification and entitlements. For example, all physician
personnel within the MOH are eligible for “incentive” payments, which are largely determined
by category and class.
The study took the following steps to derive the cost of labor at Al Karak hospital:
▲ It first obtained from the hospital an accurate list of all employees in 1999.
▲ Using employee ID numbers, it then checked the hospital list against monthly
compensation records obtained from the MOH Division of Accounting and Finance.
▲ Total annual compensation paid to employees for work directly related to Al Karak
hospital was obtained from the division and checked against the hospital’s records, and
used in the analysis.
As shown in Table 2, the hospital’s labor costs for 1999 totaled JD 1,069,288. In nominal
terms the most costly labor input was the nursing staff (registered nurses, nurse assistants, and
midwives) at JD 409,470 ($577,353), followed by physician labor, JD 392,034 ($552,768).
2
Under optimal costing rules, payroll-related employee benefits—sick leave, paid holidays, paid vacations, and
maternity leave—would be accounted for. However, given the existing system of documentation within the
MOH, estimating the costs of these benefits would have necessitated the study to exceed its time constraints.
nput Costs 11
Table 2: Labor Costs, by Employee Category (in JD)
Table 3 lists the total number of Al Karak personnel and their per-unit labor costs. In
addition, it converts the total number of employees into full-time equivalent (FTE) estimates.
The MOH does not compile information on the productive and nonproductive hours worked by
employees. The FTEs here (hypothetical-FTEs, or h-FTEs) begin to allow for nonproductive
hours by looking at paid holidays per year to which all hospital employees are entitled.
Labor Categories Numbers FTE Hours h-FTE Total Costs Lc per Unit (per FTE)
Medical Doctors 57 136,344 51 JD 392,034 JD 6,878
(JD 7,687)
Nurses/Midwives 173 323,856 156 409,470 2,367
(2,625)
Pharmacists 7 13,104 6 15,196 2,171
(2,533)
Administrative 24 44,928 22 46,792 1,956
(2,127)
Finance 8 14,976 7 18,494 2,312
(2,642)
Technical/Medical 46 86,112 41 102,493 2,228
(2,500)
Technical/Nonmedical 2 3,744 2 4,278 2,139
(2,139)
Other 35 65,520 32 80,531 2,301
It should be noted that even this FTE number fails to account for the additional
nonproductive hours of employee sick leave and vacation time. A more accurate FTE estimate
would take each of these into account; however, such an effort was outside the scope of this
study. In short, it is important that Al Karak hospital begin to implement an effective system of
compiling employee work hours that differentiates productive from nonproductive time. A
follow-on study of hospital worker productivity would form an excellent forum for such an
analysis.
Table 4 depicts the percent distribution of employees in each labor category and the
proportion of labor costs consumed by each category. As the table shows, each category’s labor
costs are quite proportionate to their input distribution. Approximately 49 percent of all
employees are classified as nurses (both registered nurses and nursing assistants) or midwives.
Their share of labor costs amounts to approximately 38.3 percent of the total. The next largest
category is that of physician personnel, at 16.2 percent of labor input and 36.6 percent of labor
costs. Pharmacists and their assistants account for roughly 2 percent of hospital-based
personnel and 1.4 percent of labor costs. Administrative/ finance and technical personnel
represent 4.4 percent and 10 percent of input, and 0.6 percent and 0.4 percent of costs,
respectively.
3
Once the FTE hours were calculated, the total number of hours of paid government holidays per year were
subtracted from the FTE hours for each labor category. The net figure obtained was then divided by the total
number of FTE hours to obtain the FTE estimate.
nput Costs 13
Table 5 presents the distribution of personnel by hospital cost center. Of the two broad
categories (Daily Hospital Services and Ancillary and Support Services), the larger share, 64
percent, is employed by cost centers that are directly involved in the provision of daily hospital
services. Four of these cost centers account for 70 percent of daily hospital services costs:
Pediatrics, 21 percent; Surgery, 19 percent; Obstetrics/Gynecology, 15 percent; and Emergency
Room, 14 percent. Thirty-six percent of hospital personnel provide ancillary and support
services, with approximately 61 percent of them assigned full time to administrative tasks.
Table 6 allocates labor costs by cost center. To be consistent with hospital costing rules, all
payroll-related expenses incurred by employees must be charged to the relevant cost centers.
Incentives (bonuses), severance pay, and benefits are typically charged to such centers.
▲ If an employee worked in more than one center, his/her labor remuneration was
apportioned among each center as determined by the percentage of time allocated to
each. Hence, employees conducting outpatient, inpatient, and administrative services
for the hospital would have their salaries apportioned among categories, according to
the percentage of hours dedicated to each service category.
nput Costs 15
Clinics4 accounted for approximately 17 percent of the labor costs associated with the delivery
of those services. OB/GYN, Pediatrics, and ER accounted for 13 percent, 19 percent, and 13
percent, respectively. Of the 30 percent (JD 323,334) of labor cost allocated to ancillary and
support services, 58 percent was consumed by administrative and financial services. In fact,
these services account for the single largest component of overall hospital labor expenses,
roughly 17 percent.
4
It is important to note that Al Karak hospital provides physician labor to the outpatient clinics that are located 7
kilometers from the hospitals. Hence, the time that physicians spend outside the hospital is viewed as the
opportunity cost that is imposed upon the hospital as a result of their absence. Hence, this cost must be
factored into the hospital’s economic costs even though the clinics are not under the hospital director’s
management.
Table 7 lists labor costs per unit of output (patient days), one of several flow variables
employed in this study. As is typically the case, a patient (census) day includes the day of
admission but not the day of discharge or death. Other information contained within this
section is number of bed days,5 visits,6 and hospital occupancy rates,7 by cost center. In
addition, the total number of adjusted patient days8 was estimated by employing a case-mix
proxy to account for variations in patients treated across hospital cost centers. This allows for a
more accurate comparison of per-unit labor costs across centers. As illustrated in Table 7, the
highest adjusted and unadjusted labor cost per patient days is in the ICU/CCU Department of
the hospital, JD 27 for each. A more informative comparison, across centers, is conducted later
in this section as per-unit costs in terms of total variable costs.
Table 7: Total Labor Costs by Cost Center, Patient Days, Patients, and Adjusted Patient Days
Table 8 distributes labor costs by bed days across the various hospital cost centers. Surgery
exhibits the highest cost per bed day. Table 8 also provides information on the overall hospital
occupancy rate (74 percent), as well as the occupancy rate for each inpatient department. It is
of import to note that the occupancy rates for the Surgery and OB/GYN departments include
patients that are categorized as “day service” patients. Such patients may occupy an inpatient
bed for up to 23 hours from their time of admission. These patients are categorized as
5
Bed day = [(number of licensed beds x number of days in the reporting period)]. Number of licensed beds is
the official number of MOH-approved beds; the reporting period is the period of this study 1 January 1999 to 31
December 1999.
6
A “visit” is defined as the appearance of a patient at the hospital for ancillary or ambulatory treatment.
7
Occupancy rate = [(patient days/bed days)]
8
Adjusted Patient Day = [(patient days)/(group-average length of stay (alos)/population-alos)]
nput Costs 17
inpatients by the hospital; however, a more appropriate classification would be “outpatient,
day-surgical” or “outpatient, day-obstetrics/gynecology” patients.
Table 8: Total Labor Costs by Cost Center, Bed Days, and Occupancy Rate
Cost Center Bed Days Patient Days Lc per Bed Day Occupancy Rate
Daily Hospital Services
Surgery 10,220 7,180 JD 12 70%
OB/GYN 7,665 5,987 13 78%
1
Internal Medicine 8,760 7,091 7 81%
2
ICU/CCU 1,460 1,340 25 92%
Pediatrics 12,045 7,945 11 66%
Total 40,150 29,543 JD 11 74%
1
Includes physician time spent doing ICU rounds.
2
Only includes nursing staff labor expenditures.
Table 9 list labor costs per admissions and adjusted admissions.9 Unlike a patient day,
which typically pertains to a full day of hospitalization, a patient may be admitted and then
discharged prior to completing a full day of treatment. Hence, this variable is often considered
a flow variable that captures the input costs associated with treating an average case,
irrespective of the patient’s hospital stay. Moreover, patients may be admitted into a particular
cost center and then transferred to another.
As illustrated in Table 9, the highest labor cost per admission, unadjusted and adjusted, is
within the ICU/CCU Department (JD 72 and JD 73, respectively). However, as previously
mentioned, considering labor cost within this context is primarily for illustrative purposes,
given that labor costs are only one component of variable inputs. Other variable inputs include
utilities, gases, renovations, and contracted services. Hence, a more informative method of
9
Adjusted Admission = [(admissions)/(group-alos/population-alos)]
Table 10 allocates physician labor costs among hospital cost centers according to physician
labor distribution throughout the inpatient, outpatient, and ancillary departments. It is not
unusual for a physician’s work hours to be allocated to more than one cost center. For example,
the hospital director at Al Kara hospital may also be a hospital-based pediatrician. As a result,
his total labor cost to the hospital is allocated to both administrative and clinical cost centers.
As is true throughout this study, the costs in Table 10 include the three major components of
physician remuneration: salaries, incentives, and transportation.
As Table 10 shows, in nominal terms, physician labor costs that are associated with the
provision of surgical services (JD 75,501) constitute the largest category of physician
remuneration (19 percent), as a function of the amount of time allocated towards the provision
of a particular service category. This is followed by OR and the Outpatient Clinics10, each of
which accounts for 15 percent of total physician costs. Roughly 5 percent of physician labor
10
During the period of this study, Al Karak hospital did not have outpatient clinic facilities. The outpatient clinic
services were provided at the MOH clinics that are located 7 kilometers from the hospital. Al Karak physicians’
are required to send part of their work hours at these facilities. Hence, their time spent must be counted as cost
imposed upon the hospital (i.e., opportunity costs).
nput Costs 19
costs is associated with the provision of administrative and financial services, primarily with the
duties of hospital director.
Table 11 shows the allocation of physician labor costs to the various cost centers that are
engaged in the delivery of daily hospital services. Labor cost per patient day and adjusted
patient day were estimated. The highest physician labor cost (both adjusted and unadjusted) is
found within the Internal Medicine department. Anecdotal evidence suggests that this
department is overstaffed; hence, it is suspected this result is driven by the staffing patterns at
the hospital. However, this cannot be substantiated until further studies of labor productivity
within the hospital are performed.
Table 11: Distribution of Physician Labor Cost by Cost Center, Patients, Patient Days, and
Adjusted Patient Days
Table 12 allocates the largest labor costs component—nursing costs—among the various
hospital cost centers. As noted above, the cost estimates include all nursing categories:
registered nurses, nursing assistants, and nurse midwives. Nurses are currently ineligible for
MOH incentives (bonuses), and they received no transportation allowances during the period of
this study. Hence, the sole component of nursing labor remunerations in 1999 was salary
compensation. The highest category of nursing labor cost is that associated with the delivery of
Pediatrics services, JD 94,310, or 23 percent of total nursing remuneration. The second largest
category of nursing labor is found in the OB/GYN department at 16 percent.
Table 12 also considers the per-unit cost of nursing labor that is involved in the delivery of
daily hospital services. The highest per-unit nursing cost is found within the Emergency Room
(JD 2,457), followed OB/GYN, ICU/CCU, Internal Medicine, and Pediatrics.
Table 13 allocates nursing labor costs by cost center, patient days, and adjusted patient
days. The highest nursing labor costs per adjusted inpatient day are found in the ICU/CCU
departments. This is expected, given that ICU/CCU patients are the most ill of all patients
within the hospital. As such, they require more intensive nursing labor inputs per patient
treated.
Table 13: Distribution of Nurses/Midwives Labor Cost by Cost Center, Patients, Patient Days and
Adjusted Patient Days
Table 14 estimates combined total physician and nursing labor costs, and looks at them
relative to the hospital’s patient days and adjusted patient days. The highest labor cost center
per adjusted patient day is the Pediatrics department. This is due primarily to the higher
number of health care personnel (physicians and nurses) that are assigned to this department,
relative to others. For example, when one considers the information contained in Tables 5 and
14, the number of patients per health care worker in non-ICU/CCU departments, the Pediatrics
department exhibits the lowest rate (50 patients per health care worker), indicating a higher
nput Costs 21
concentration of labor. Conversely, Internal Medicine, Surgery, and OB/GYN exhibit ratios of
106, 104, and 92 patients per health care worker, respectively.11
Table 14: Distribution of Physician and Nurse/Midwife Labor Cost (Lpn) by Cost Center, Patients,
Patient Days, and Adjusted Patient Days
Cost Center Patient Patients Lpn Lpn Per Lpn Per Adj.
Days (Lp+ Ln) Patient Day Patient Day
Daily Hospital Services
Surgery 7,180 4,483 JD 123,032 JD 17 JD 19
OB/GYN 5,987 3,234 98,803 17 11
Internal Medicine 7,091 2,446 62,895 9 10
Pediatrics 7,945 2,407 137,382 17 21
Total 28,203 10,570 JD 422,112 JD 15 JD 15
As illustrated in Table 15, the average product of labor for Internal Medicine is
significantly higher than other departments: 284 adjusted patient days per labor input.12 Hence,
taking into account the information contained in Tables 7 and 15, it appears that the Internal
Medicine department is a low-cost and high-product department, relative to others. Conversely,
ICU/CCU represents a high-cost and low-product department, relative to others. Its labor cost
of JD 27 per adjusted patient day, coupled with its relatively low average product of labor (88
adjusted patient days per unit) suggest that further research into the hospital’s labor policies
within this department be conducted.
11
This difference is likely due to case-mix differences among cost centers.
12
Given that the capital input of the hospital is assumed fixed in the short run, it is possible to estimate a point
on the hospital’s short-run expansion path for its variable factor (labor). Hence, the ratio of its total product of
labor to the number of labor units employed yields the hospital’s average product of labor. A more
comprehensive estimate would have entailed the calculation of total productive hours. This would have yielded
a more precise estimate of average product by department. However, as explained above, study researchers
were precluded from such estimations given the lack of data on productive and nonproductive hours.
The next section will consider additional variable factors that are utilized in the production
of hospital services. These factors, coupled with the hospital’s labor input, provide a
comprehensive estimate of the total variable cost for producing hospital services at Al Karak in
1999.
Nonlabor variable factors of production include utilities (fuel, butane gas, telephone,
electricity, and water); structure and equipment (building renovations, housing quarters,
building maintenance and renewal, equipment maintenance and supplies); consumables (drugs
and medications, gases, medical consumables, laboratory and X-ray consumables); contracted
services (food services, housekeeping, laundry, other); and other (stationeries, textiles and linen,
perishables). Expenditure information on each was obtained from the MOH Directorates of
Supplies and Procurement and Building Maintenance and other agencies.
Table 16 lists the utility cost estimates. Total utility costs were obtained from the MOH
Accounting Division, as well as the hospital’s accounting department. Using hospital blueprints
obtained from the Ministry of Planning (MOP) and the MOH Department of Buildings, a step-
down method was employed to distribute fuel, butane, electrical, and water expenses among
costs centers within the hospital, relative to their proportion of the structure’s square meters.
Telephone expenditures were estimated similarly; however, the allocation rule entailed
distributing costs based upon the proportion of telephone lines available within a given cost
center.
Table 17 lists the variable structure and equipment estimates. The costs of building
renovations and building maintenance were obtained from the MOH Directorate of Building
Maintenance and the Directorate of Planning and Projects. Other building maintenance costs
and costs of building supplies were obtained from the hospital’s accounting records and the
MOH Accounting Division.
nput Costs 23
Building Maintenance and Renewal 40,000
Equipment Maintenance and Supplies 97,300
Vehicles maintenance & supplies 15,725
Total Structure and Equipment JD 157,764
Table 18 lists the various medical consumables. The costs of drugs, gases, and other
medical consumables, as well as laboratory and radiological consumables, were obtained from
the MOH Directorate of Supplies and Procurement and the MOH Central Drug Directorate.
Drugs and other consumable prices were estimated according to price per unit. Drugs and
medical consumables consumption was allocated across cost centers using a survey designed by
the Hospital Decentralization Implementation Team. Al Karak hospital did not employ a drug
consumption tracking system prior to the implementation of this study. The survey tracked the
distribution of drugs from the pharmaceutical department to the various costs centers over a
period of 60 days. The costs of gases were distributed across each cost center based upon the
proportion of cylinder connections operating within each center.
Table 19 lists the various hospital-based services contracted to the private sector.
Contracted services are negotiated at the central ministry level, and a single contractor is
responsible for providing the indicated services to all 23 MOH hospitals. MOH records of
payment for Al Karak hospital were obtained from the MOH Accounting Division, and
compared to those of the contractor, for data verification.
Table 20 lists nonclinical supplies. Estimates for nonclinical supplies were obtained from
the Accounting Department at the hospital and the MOH Accounting and Finance Division.
They include total expenditure for stationeries, textiles and linen, and perishable items. During
the period of this study, the single largest nonclinical supply was perishable items, primarily
foodstuffs (JD 116,970).
Stationeries JD 8,643
Textiles and Linen 15,726
Perishables 116,970
Total Non-clinical Supplies JD 141,339
nput Costs 25
3.4 Nonlabor Variable Factors by Cost Center
Employing the aforementioned allocation rules, Table 21 distributes utility costs across
hospital cost centers. During the period of this study, the Pediatric department exhibited the
highest nominal utility costs, JD 9,394, followed by OB/GYN with total utility costs of JD 9,338.
The relatively low OR utility costs are unexpected, given the high voltage equipment that an OR
typically utilizes. In addition, the OR, with its relatively large and open space, typically
consumes significant amounts of fuel. In 1999, the Al Karak OR consumed fuel cost of
approximately JD 3,526. This is far less than what one would expect, relative to other cost
centers. This finding requires further investigation.
Table 22 lists other nonlabor variable inputs across hospital costs centers. Even though Al
Karak hospital did not have Outpatient Clinic facilities during the period of this study, it was
responsible for the dispensation of drugs to the outpatient clinics that are located 7 kilometers
from the hospital. Hence, the only nonlabor entry for Outpatient Clinic expenditures is the drug
expenditures that were realized by the hospital for such services during the period of this study.
That amounted to roughly JD 174,800, approximately 2.75 JD per visit.
Cost Center Eq. Maint Bldg Maint Contract Drugs Other Total
& Supplies & Renewal Services Nonutility Nonutility
Daily Hosp Services
Surgery JD 2,639 JD 2,800 JD 19,713 JD 32,682 JD 4,097 JD 61,931
OB/GYN 3,731 3,200 24,268 11,006 4,095 46,300
Internal Medicine 677 2,400 17,874 36,176 3,441 60,568
Emergency Room 4,810 2,400 16,657 41,094 2,433 67,394
ICU/CCU 4,792 1,600 10,483 9,247 1,572 27,694
Operating Room 36,762 1,600 10,870 13,986 6,012 69,230
Pediatrics 5,140 3,200 24,088 39,119 5,691 77,238
Outpatient Clinics -- -- -- 174,800 -- 174,800
Subtotal 58,551 17,200 123,953 358,110 27,341 585,155
Ancillary & Support Services
Administration -- 10,400 74,610 -- 28,729 113,739
Rehabilitation 1,532 400 3,386 -- 534 5,852
X-ray 31,463 2,000 15,002 -- 30,106 78,571
Laboratory 4,615 800 4,946 -- 36,715 47,076
Pharmacy -- 800 5,513 -- 190,750 197,063
Food & Beverage -- 6,000 42,170 -- 118,070 166,240
Legal Medicine 1,139 800 4,766 -- -- 6,705
Medical Instruments -- 1,600 10,766 -- -- 12,366
Subtotal 38,749 22,800 161,159 -- 404,904 627,612
Table 23 represents the total variable costs of operating Al Karak hospital. This amount
includes the sum of total labor cost (Lc), total utility cost (Uc) and total nonutility costs (Nc).
During the period of this study the total variable costs for Al Karak amounted to JD 2,403,434.
The next section will consider the distribution of this cost in terms of per-unit output. Al
Karak’s support of physician and drug inputs for the MOH outpatient clinics that are not
under its management have resulted in that support leading to the single highest variable cost
for the hospital in the delivery of daily hospital services. In fact, roughly 26 percent of the
variable costs associated with the provision of clinic services is the result of the hospital’s
expenditures on the labor input13 that is employed to provide such services. What is most
significant, however, is the amount of variable costs incurred for administrative/financial
services (JD 339,116), the largest of any service category. Approximately 55 percent of these
13
It must be noted that the Al Karak hospital only supplies labor to the outpatient clinics that are located 7
kilometers away. The structural costs and utilities are funded and maintained by the General Directorate of
Health.
nput Costs 27
costs are due to labor expenditures. The implications of this will become more apparent in
Chapter 6, which considers administrative/financial costs as a proportion of total hospital costs.
This section looks at total variable costs (labor and nonlabor) at Al Karak and at the
distribution of these costs relative to the number of patients, patient days, and adjusted patient
days.
The total variable costs Al Karak hospital incurred are the total costs of utilizing inputs
that vary according to the volume of hospital output. As previously explained, hospital output is
approximated through the use of various flow variables, typically the number of patient days
(adjusted or unadjusted), bed days, patients, admissions, and visits. When total variable costs
nput Costs 29
Table 24 shows AVCs for five departmental cost centers at Al Karak hospital. The AVC in
terms of an adjusted patient day in the ICU/CCU department is JD 51, the most expensive
service in the hospital. However, this amount is not surprising, given the patient population
treated within the ICU/CCU. The second highest AVC occurs in the provision of Pediatric
services (JD 35), followed by Surgery, OB/GYN, and Internal Medicine, which incur AVCs of
JD 29, JD 18, and JD 19, respectively.
Table 24: Distribution of Total Variable Costs, by Cost Center, Patient Days,
and Adjusted Patient Days
Additional information can be extrapolated from the variable cost data in Table 24. For
example, of particular concern to the central ministry are the variable costs associated with the
delivery of inpatient care within the OB/GYN department, in particular such costs relative to
the number of births that have taken place within that department. It is known that Al Karak
hospital delivered 2,249 newborns in 1999. Given its total variable OB/GYN costs of JD 154,441,
that amounted to an AVC of roughly JD 69 per delivery. This cost approximation may be
extrapolated to other MOH hospitals, which exhibit similar cost structures.
Table 25 estimates AVC in terms of hospital admissions, both adjusted and unadjusted.
The highest AVC is found in the ICU/CCU department. The lowest is in the OB/GYN
department.
Table 26 shows the total number of Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinic visits to Al
Karak hospital in 1999. A visit is the appearance of a patient for ambulatory and/or ancillary
services. A clinic visit may consist of diagnostic, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative
services. An ER visit occurs with the provision of emergency treatment to an ill or injured
person, but may also include services to patients who utilize the ER for nonemergency reasons.
Table 26: Distribution of Total Variable Costs, by Emergency Room and Outpatient Visits
Cost Center Total Visits Total Variable Costs Variable Cost Per Visit
Daily Hospital Services
Emergency Room 36,366 JD 172,130 JD 4.76
1
Outpatient Clinics 63,514 235,953 3.71
Total 99,880 408,083 JD 4.09
1
clinic figures represent physician and drug cost only.
In 1999, there were 36,366 ER visits and 63,514 clinic visits to the hospital. The number of
clinic visits includes only those patients that were treated by full-time Al Karak physicians, with
part-time assignment to the outpatient clinic facilities located 7 kilometer from the hospital. The
AVC of an ER visit was JD 4.76 and of a clinic visit, JD 3.71. When one considers this
information in terms of the MOH patient cost-sharing rules for nonemergency ER patients and
clinic patients, the cost-sharing implications are quite interesting. For example, the MOH
requires ER patients to pay JD 1.65 at the point of services, while it requires clinic patients to
pay JD 1.65 and JD .55 for the first and consecutive visits, respectively.
According to recent National Health Account estimates, Jordanians spent roughly JD 158
million on drugs. This represents approximately 35 percent of all expenditures on health care
services, a substantial amount for any country. In fact, total expenditures on drugs amounted to
more than 3 percent of the country’s Gross Domestic Product. This makes the cost of drugs
within MOH hospitals a paramount concern for policymakers.
Table 27 lists the distribution of drug costs among hospital costs centers. The ICU/CCU
department exhibits the highest drug costs per patient, JD 19, roughly 46 percent higher than
the cost per surgical patient. However, the costs per patient day for ICU/CCU and Pediatric
patients are the highest. The lowest drug costs, in terms of patients and patient days, is within
the OB/GYN department: JD 3 per patient and JD 1 per patient day. In fact, its drug costs per
patient is 425 percent less than the second lowest hospital cost center, Surgery. In terms of
overall patients treated, the hospital’s average drug costs amounted to JD 12 per patient, or JD
4 per adjusted patient day.
nput Costs 31
Table 27: Distribution of Drug Costs, by Cost Center, Patient Days, Adjusted Patient Days,
and Patients
The outpatient clinics that are located 7 kilometers from the hospital and staffed part time
by Al Karak physicians were responsible for 60 percent (JD 215,894) of all drug costs incurred
by the hospital. The average drug costs amounted to JD 1.13 per ER visit and JD 2.75 per
outpatient visit. Under existing MOH cost-sharing rules, the outpatient co-payment for
prescription drugs at all MOH hospitals is 250 fils per prescription. Given that the hospital
lacks information on the average number of prescriptions per patient, it is impossible to draw
any substantive policy implications from the data presented in Table 28. However, anecdotal
evidence suggests that the cost-sharing rules are slightly lower than the hospital’s average drug
cost, warranting a more detailed study of drug consumption.
Table 28: Distribution of Drug Costs by Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinic Visit
This chapter reports on the costs of fixed inputs at Al Karak hospital. As discussed in
Chapter 2, fixed inputs are those factors of production whose quantity does not vary according
to the volume of output. At Al Karak hospital, those inputs are hospital structure, vehicles,
equipment, and furniture. This chapter first determines the costs of the fixed inputs, then
discusses their distribution among hospital cost centers. It closes with a discussion of the unit
costs for fixed inputs.
The structural components of Al Karak hospital are the hospital building, electrical
structures, plumbing and sewage system, and kidney dialysis unit. The replacement costs of the
structural components were estimated based on the original 1995 purchase prices, obtained
from the Ministry of Finance (MOF),14 which then were inflated over the 1996 to 1999 period.
The costs of other fixed factors, such as vehicles, equipment, and furniture were based upon
their replacement costs in 1999 Jordanian dinars.
The replacement cost of each fixed input then was annualized based on its useful working
life. To do this, a definition of working life of each input, along with its depreciation factor, was
obtained from the MOF, according to ministry rules for estimating the useful working life of
public sector capital inputs. The annualized economic costs of all fixed factors were estimated
as follows: an annualization factor was estimated according to Equation (1), using a real
interest rate of 3 percent and the relevant depreciation factor.15 The replacement cost of the
fixed factor was then divided by the annualization factor.16 This yields the base year capital
costs of employing the fixed factor (i.e., its 1999 economic costs).
The annualized economic costs of the hospital’s structural components are shown in Table
29. Assuming a total working life of 40 years, an average real interest rate of 3 percent, and a
depreciation factor of 2.5 percent, the table lists the annualized economic costs that must be
imputed onto the base year. The annualization factor calculated under this set of assumptions
equaled 16.05.
14
As is traditional, this study excludes land value from estimates about structural components, because land
values typically exhibit significant geographic variation and overstate the capital costs of operating a facility.
15
Real interest rates were obtained from the Export and Finance Bank, Research and Studies Investment
Banking Unit.
16
This procedure yields the discounted present value of the fixed factor during the base year.
osts 33
Table 29: Annualized Economic Costs of Fixed Hospital Structures
Fixed Factor Replacement Costs (1999 JD) Annualized Capital Costs 1999
Table 30 presents the annualized economic costs of each hospital vehicle. Replacement
costs are based upon the 1999 insurance value of each vehicle model. Employing Equation (1),
and assuming the MOF working life of seven years for each vehicle and a depreciation factor of
14.28 percent, the estimated annualization factor was 3.89.
Table 31 presents the estimated annualized economic costs of the hospital’s medical
equipment and furniture inputs. (Annex A contains a complete list of the hospital’s equipment
and furniture inputs.) Replacement cost was obtained from the MOH Directorate of
Procurement and Supplies. The MOF working life of both equipment and furniture is 10 years,
and each has a depreciation factor of 10 percent. Based upon this set of assumptions, the
annualization factor estimated equaled 5.43.
Table 32 shows the distribution of fixed cost components by cost center. The distribution
was determined according to the following allocation rules:
▲ The hospital’s annualized structural costs were allocated to each cost center in
proportion to the total number of square meters occupied by each center according to
hospital blueprints obtained from the MOH Department of Buildings.
▲ The total annualized costs of the hospital’s vehicles were apportioned as follows: total
ambulance costs were allocated to departments, based upon their proportion of
patients transported. Hearse costs were allocated to the legal medicine department.
Costs of hospital buses, used primarily for transporting nursing personnel from their
residences to Al Karak hospital, were allocated based upon the proportion of nursing
personnel employed within each center. Costs of the pickup vehicle utilized for
transporting small equipment and supplies to various hospital cost centers were
distributed based upon the proportion of personnel assigned to a particular center, and
the same procedure was followed for the passenger vehicle that is utilized for
transporting administrative documents and small supplies.
▲ Medical equipment and furniture costs were apportioned to costs centers after an
inventory of all such items was conducted and their 1999 replacement cost obtained
from the MOH Directorate of Procurement and Supplies.
The rightmost column of Table 32 presents the total fixed costs, by cost center, of operating
Al Karak hospital: JD 957,089 ($1,349,495). The ICU/CCU exhibits the highest fixed costs of
any center directly involved in the delivery of daily hospital services, JD 161,369. This amount
is roughly 80 percent higher than that of the Pediatric department, the second highest cost
center in terms of fixed costs. The majority of the fixed costs (86 percent) for the ICU/CCU are
due to the hospital’s expenditures on the fixed medical equipment that is associated with this
center. With respect to ancillary and support services, the highest category of fixed costs is that
associated with the allocation of X-ray services, JD 110,196 ($155,376). Of such costs, nearly
three-fourths are allocated for the employment of medical equipment.
osts 35
Table 32: Distribution of Fixed Costs (Fc), by Cost Center
Cost Center Structure Vehicles Medical Equipment Medical Furniture Total Fixed Cos
Furniture
Daily Hospital Services
Surgery JD 36,783 JD 6,642 JD 2,954 JD 511 JD 4,960 JD 51,850
OB/GYN 45,979 3,013 12,187 699 4,788 66,666
1
Internal Medicine 32,186 5,728 3,693 341 5,159 47,107
Emergency Room 32,186 10,576 9,602 2,346 3,201 57,911
2
ICU/CCU 18,392 2,617 138,859 605 896 161,369
Operating Room 18,392 2,479 38,777 13,847 644 74,139
Pediatrics 45,979 6,311 32,499 568 4,502 89,859
Outpatient Clinics N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal JD JD 37,366 JD 238,571 JD 18,917 JD 24,150 JD 548,901
229,897
Ancillary & Support Services
Admin/Finance JD 78,164 JD 1,317 JD -- -- JD 20,392 JD 99,873
Rehabilitation --- 113 13,295 -- 425 13,833
X-ray Services 27,588 283 81,986 -- 339 110,196
Laboratory 9,196 170 18,096 -- 2,078 29,540
Services
Pharmacy Services 9,196 113 -- -- 558 9,867
Food & Beverage 78,164 113 -- -- 18,014 96,291
Legal Medicine 9,196 3,085 17,357 -- 40 29,678
Medical Instruments 18,392 113 -- -- 405 18,910
Subtotal JD 229,896 JD 5,307 JD 130,734 -- JD JD
142,251 408,188
Total JD 459,793 JD 42,673 JD 369,305 JD 18,917 JD 166,401 JD 957,089
This section of the report distributes Al Karak hospital’s total fixed costs by cost center,
patient days, and adjusted patient days. Where appropriate, that information is presented as
the hospital’s AFC of producing a particular service category.
Table 33: Distribution of Total Fixed Costs, by Cost Center, Patient Days,
and Adjusted Patient Days
Table 34 shows AFCs in terms of hospital admissions, both adjusted and unadjusted.
Again, the highest AFC (JD 325) is found in the ICU/CCU department. As has been noted
throughout this report, the OB/GYN department consistently exhibits the lowest per-unit cost
of all centers that are involved in the allocation of daily hospital services.
Table 34: Distribution of Total Fixed Costs, by Cost Center, Admissions, and Adjusted Admissions
Table 35 provides information on AFCs in terms of variables that are associated with the
distribution of ER services. As noted earlier, Al Karak hospital did not have outpatient clinic
facilities on its premises during the period of this study. Clinic services were provided by the
osts 37
Health Directorate of Al Karak, and were managed and financed by the same source. However,
Al Karak hospital provided physician labor to the facilities, which were located 7 kilometers
from the hospital.
osts 39
5. Estimating Total Hospital Costs
This chapter estimates the total costs of providing services at Al Karak hospital. As was
illustrated in Chapter 2, total economic cost is the sum of the total variable costs and total fixed
costs of operating an institution. Chapter 3 provided a detailed estimation of Al Karak
hospital’s total variable costs, based on the hospital’s labor and nonlabor variable inputs.
Chapter 4 estimated the hospital’s total fixed costs by considering the costs of its fixed
structure, vehicle, furniture, and equipment inputs.
Table 36 summarizes the total variable costs, total fixed costs, and total operating costs of
Al Karak hospital in 1999, by cost center. Table 37 shows the percent distribution of those same
costs.
41
Table 37: Percent Distribution of Total Costs, by Cost Center
As the tables show, nearly two-thirds of the hospital’s operating costs—whether variable,
fixed, or total—is consumed by centers directly engaged in the delivery of daily hospital
services. This finding is not surprising. Also unsurprising is that the highest percent of variable
and fixed costs are those allocated to the distribution of administrative/financial and operating
room services, respectively.
What is startling, however, is that the highest percentage (13.1 percent, or, in nominal
terms, JD 438,989, or $618,974) of total costs is allocated towards the distribution of
administrative/financial services.17 In fact, this represents a lower bound estimate, given that
this analysis excludes the proportion of administrative/financial services that are conducted by
the central ministry on behalf of Al Karak hospital. For example, the central ministry conducts
all procurement (e.g., drugs, devices, and equipment) and most administrative functions that
are associated with personnel issues. Under optimal circumstances, such costs would be
17
This amount is significantly lower than the national average of 25 percent for U.S. hospitals.
This section discusses Al Karak operating costs per unit of output, using the flow variables
that have been employed throughout this study: patient days (adjusted and unadjusted), bed
days, patients, admissions, and visits. The result is equivalent to estimating the ATC in terms of
that variable. This section also considers various ATC estimates of operating Al Karak
hospitals in terms of the aforementioned flow variables.
As Table 38 shows, the costs of ICU/CCU services is the highest among all categories of
daily hospital services in terms of both unadjusted and adjusted patient days, JD 171 and JD
173, respectively. This is expected given the significant amounts of variable and fixed factors
that are used in the treatment of ICU/CCU patients. The lowest ATCs are found in the
treatment of OB/GYN patients, JD 25 for adjusted patient days. Additional information
concerning the hospital’s total costs may be extrapolated from the data. For example, as was
discussed in Section 3.5, Al Karak hospital delivered 2,249 newborns in its OB/GYN
department. Given total operating costs of JD 181,992 for this cost center, the ATC is roughly
JD 98 ($138) per delivery.18
Table 38: Distribution of Total Costs, by Cost Center, Patient Days, and Adjusted Patient Days
Table 39 shows estimates of ATCs in terms of hospital admissions, both adjusted and
unadjusted. The highest ATC occurs in the production of ICU/CCU services. The lowest ATC
occurs during the production of OB/GYN services. In fact, with an adjusted ATC relative to the
number of admissions of roughly JD 47 ($66), OB/GYN service production is 66 percent lower
than that of Internal Medicine service production and 128 percent lower than that of surgery
service production.
18
Utilizing the data obtained in this document, the PHRplus Health Insurance Pilot project has estimated the
total costs per maternity case, including outpatient and inpatient treatment, as well as making adjustments for
vaginal and Caesarean cases, to be JD158 per case at Al Karak hospital. See Duffy, 2002.
43
Table 39: Distribution of Total Costs, by Cost Center, Admissions and Adjusted Admissions
Table 40 presents total costs per ER visits at Al Karak hospital. A visit is the appearance of
a patient in the hospital for ambulatory and/or ancillary services. As shown in Table 26, the
AVC of an ER visit is JD 4.76, and as illustrated in Table 40, the ATC of such services is JD
6.33. This information implies that 75 percent of the average costs that are associated with the
production of emergency room services are consumed by variable factor inputs.
Table 40: Distribution of Total Costs, by Emergency Room and Outpatient Visits
Table 41 contains the unit costs of hospital services, loaded with administrative/financial
costs. These administrative/financial costs represent an average of 38.5 percent of total costs of
daily hospital services.
Table 41: Per Unit Daily Hospital Services Loaded With Admin/Finance Costs
This detailed economic analysis of the cost of producing hospital services at Al Karak
hospital marks completion of an additional step in the Ministry of Health’s decentralization of
its 23 publicly owned and operated hospitals. The first phase of this process began nearly four
years ago when the MOH, with the technical assistance of the Hospital Decentralization
Implementation Team, selected Princess Raya and Al Karak hospitals as its two pilot
institutions from which this process would begin. Since then, under Phase 2, the MOH has
made significant strides in this effort. In addition to implementing several short-run changes in
existing rules and regulations, the MOH has designed and approved the establishment of
hospital governing boards at each hospital, as well as supported the extensive training activities
that both PHR and PHRplus have provided to hospital personnel. The information contained in
this cost study will provide the MOH with needed information that will assist it in its future
design of an appropriate operating budget for each hospital. However, prior to implementing
such a budget, several key issues must be addressed.
First, an appropriate managerial cost accounting system does not exist at either hospital.
Having such a system in place is a necessary condition for keeping track of monetary flows
throughout the system, and it is an essential tool for assisting department managers, i.e., cost
center managers, to manage their resources efficiently. For example, currently the hospitals do
not effectively track the costs and amounts of drugs consumed by each department. As a result,
in order to estimate drug expenditures by costs center (department), the Implementation Team
had to design a survey instrument to track drug consumption. In tracking consumption, the
survey found that both hospitals have excess inventory of certain drug categories and a
shortage of others, which they attribute to the highly centralized MOH procurement and supply
process. An effective managerial cost accounting system and better coordination between the
hospital and the MOH Procurement and Supplies division should allow for more efficiency in
hospital drug inventories. PHRplus will assist Princess Raya and Al Karak hospitals in the
development of a managerial cost accounting system.
Secondly, because labor costs represent 32 percent of Al Karak hospital’s total operating
costs, the employment and distribution of labor throughout the hospital has significant overall
cost implications. As this study shows, the Internal Medicine department of the hospital
appears to be quite productive. While this finding cannot be substantiated without further
studies on the relative productivity of employees within each department, it implies that the
MOH should make a greater effort in tracking the total number of work hours, both productive
and nonproductive, for all hospital employees and develop a system to accurately estimate the
number of full-time equivalent hours that are worked by hospital employees, not only at Al
Karak, but at other MOH hospitals as well. In looking at labor costs the study also revealed
that, due to existing MOH and Civil Service rules, personnel records at the central ministry are
not updated and matched against the hospital’s personnel records on a regular basis. For
example, the study found that personnel reassigned from Al Karak hospital to other MOH
facilities often are still listed as Al Karak employees in central ministry records. This problem
can be eliminated through the development of a more effective system of communication and
reporting between the MOH personnel division and the hospital. In this study labor costs were
treated as a variable factor. The ability of a hospital manager to vary labor inputs is a matter of
47
MOH policy. The implementation of a managerial cost accounting system will provide MOH
policymakers and hospital managers with additional data to recommend hospital workforce
policies that increase efficiency within each cost center.
Finally, it would be inappropriate to use this study to make any conclusion about cost
sharing. More analysis of the hospital’s services production and the economic and demographic
profiles of its patients are needed prior to implementing changes in the existing policies.
However, implementation of managerial cost accounting systems, based on the framework
suggested by this study, is a logical next step that will add to the complete understanding of
hospital costs. This understanding is essential before accurate cost-sharing systems can be
designed and implemented.
Table A1: Allocation Rules for Utility Cost Estimates, and Variable Structure and Equipment
Estimates (See Tables 15 and 16)
Input Category Allocation Rule Note
s 49
Table A2: Allocation Rules Variable Hospital Consumables, Contracted Services, and Nonclinical
Supplies (See Tables 17 thru 19)
Input Category Allocation Rule Note
Drugs and Distributed based upon the Based upon a survey of drug
Medications percent of medications consumption, by cost center,
allocated to a particular cost that was conducted over a two-
center month period
Gases Distributed based upon the Example, 10% of gas valve
percent of gas valve connections connectors implied 10% of total
that were available in a cost to be distributed to the
particular cost center relevant cost center
Medical Consumables Distributed based upon the Example, cost center that
percent of patient days represented 5% of patient days
received 5% of total costs
Laboratory and Distributed based upon the
Radiological percent of patient days
Consumables
Contracted Services Distributed based upon the
percent of patient days
Nonclinical Supplies Distributed based upon the
percent of patient days
Table A3: Allocation Rules for Fixed Hospital Structure, Vehicles, Equipment and Furniture (see
Tables 28 thru 30)
Input Category Allocation Rule Note
Hospital Building, Costs distributed based upon Blueprints obtained from the
Electrical Structures, the proportion of square MOH Department of Buildings
Sewage and Plumbing meters
Kidney Dialysis Unit Costs allocated to the Internal Kidney dialysis unit is located
Medicine cost center within the internal medicine
department
Ambulances Costs allocated to Emergency Emergency transport vehicle
Room cost center
Tanker Costs allocated based upon Vehicle used for waste disposal
inpatient days
Buses Costs allocated according to Buses are used for transporting
percent of nursing personnel nursing personnel from
assigned to a particular costs residences to hospital
center
Pickup and Isuzu Salon Costs allocated according to Vehicles are utilized for
the percent of total personnel transporting documents and
other small material from the
s 51
Annex B: Service Inventory of Al-Karak Hospital
REPORTING REQUIREMENT
SERVICES INVENTORY
(“X” indicates that service is offered)
Offer Offer Offer
DAILY HOSPITAL LABORATORY CLINIC
SERVICE SERVICES SERVICES
INTENSIVE CARE Microbiology Dental
SERVICES
Burn Necropsy Dermatology X
Coronary Serology X Diabetes X
Medical X Surgical Pathology X Drug Abuse X
Neonatal X DIAGNOSTIC Family Therapy
IMAGING SERVICES
Neurosurgical Computed Tomography X Group Therapy
Pediatrics X Cystoscopy X Hypertension X
Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Metabolic
Imaging
Surgical X Position Emission X Neurology
Tomography
Definitive X Ultrasonography X Neonatal X
Observation Care
ACUTE CARE X-Ray Radiology X Obesity
SERVICES
Alternate Birthing X DIAGNOSTIC Obstetrics X
Center (licensed THERAPEUTIC
beds) SERVICES
Geriatric Audiology X Ophthalmology X
Medical X Biofeedback therapy Orthopedic X
Neonatal X Cardiac Catheterization Otolaryngology X
Oncology Cohart Therapy Pediatrics X
Orthopedic X Diagnostic Radioisotope Pediatrics
Surgery
Pediatric X Echocardiology X Podiatry
Physical Electro cardiology X Psychiatric X
Rehabilitation
Post Partum X Electroencephalography Renal X
Surgical X Electromyography Rheumatic X
Transitional X
Inpatient care (
Acute beds )
NEWBORN CARE Endoscopy Rural Health
SERVICES
Developmentally X Gastro – Intestinal Surgery X
Disabled Nursery Laboratory
53
Care
New born Nursery X Hyperbaric Chamber
care Services
Premature Nursery X Lithotripsy HOME CARE
Care SERVICES
Hospice care X Nuclear Medicine Home Health Aids
Services
Inpatient care under Occupational Therapy Home Nursing
custody ( Jail ) Care (visiting
Nurse)
LONG –TERM Physical Therapy Home Physical
CARE Medicine Care
Behavioral disorder Peripheral Vascular Home Social
care Laboratory Service care
Developmentally Pulmonary Function Home dialysis
disabled care Services Training
Intermediate care Radiation Therapy Home Hospice
Care
Residential / Radium Therapy Home I.V
Custodial care Therapy Services
Self care Radioactive Implants Jail Care
Skilled nursing care Recreational Therapy Psychiatric Foster
Home Care
Sub –acute Care Respiratory Therapy
Services
Sub –acute care
Pediatric
Transitional
Inpatient Care (SNF
Beds)
CHEMICAL Speech –Language AMBULATORY
DEPENDENCY – Pathology SERVICES
DETOX
Alcohol Sports care Medicine Adult Day Health
Care Center
Drug Stress Testing Ambulatory
Surgery Services
CHEMICAL Therapeutic Comprehensive
DEPENCY – Radioisotope Outpatient
Rehabilitation Rehab. Facility
Gynecologic X Extracorporeal
Membrane
Oxygenation
Heart Pharmacy MEDICAL
EDUCATIONAL
PROGRAMS
Kidney Approved Residency
55
Technician
ntory) of Al Karak 57
Medical tools / Gynecology Department
Items with Replacement of JD 100($140) or more
Item Name of the Medical Tool Number Cost Total Date of
No. cost receipt
Dinars Fils
1 Stretcher Trolley 1 200 200
2 Mayo table (Mayo tray) 1 300 300
3 Wheel chair 1 300 300
ntory) of Al Karak 59
Implementing Hospital Autonomy in Jordan: An Economic Cost Analysis of Al Karak Hospital
Medical Equipment / Physical Therapy Department
Items with Replacement of JD 100($140) or more
Item Name of the Medical Number Cost Total Date of
No. Equipment/ Device cost receipt
Dinars Fils
1 Fixed bicycle 1 600 600
2 Hand finger table 1 2500 2500
3 Wall pulley 1 100 100
4 Quadriceps bench 1 1800 1800
5 Tilt table mobile 1 200 2000
6 Standing firm table 2 300 600
7 Suspension frame 1 2000 2000
8 Short wave 3 3000 9000
9 Akron- rythmatic traction 3 2000 6000
10 Hydro collator 3 3000 9000
11 Paraffin wax therapy 3 1000 3000
12 Parallel bar 2 200 400
13 Massage machine vibrator 2 500 1000
14 Dynatron 438 1 2000 2000
15 Therasonic five (US) 1 1500 1500
16 Interferential med frequency 2 2500 5000
(current with vacuum)
17 Combined US and ES 1 2800 2800
machine
18 Whirl pool 2 4000 8000
19 Cold pack machine 1 1000 1000
20 BR2 export pulse 1 2000 2000
21 Cervical traction machine- 1 2000 2000
Electra 471
22 Mobile traction firm for 1 1000 1000
retraction
23 Shoulder wheel 2 1000 2000
ntory) of Al Karak 61
Medical Equipment / Emergency Department
Items with Replacement of JD 100($140) or more
Item Name of the Medical Number Cost Total Date of
No. Equipment/ Device cost receipt
Dinars Fils
1 Hot air oven 1 400 400
2 Operating light 1 2000 2000
3 Minor operating table 1 2000 2000
4 Orthopedic plastering bed 2 2500 5000
5 Anesthetics apparatus 1 6000 6000
6 Electro surgical unit 1 3000 3000
7 Suction theater 2 bottle 1 300 300
8 Sphygmomanometer stand 4 200 800
9 Diagnostic set 2 150 300
10 E.C.G Machine 3 800 2400
11 Ventilator Nebulizer 1 300 300
12 DC Shock 1 3500 3500
13 Autoscope standard 1 250 250
14 Ophthalmoscope 1 10,000 10,000
ntory) of Al Karak 63
Medical Tools / Pediatrics Department
Items with Replacement of JD 100($140) or more
Item Name of the Medical Tool Number Cost Total Date of
No. cost receipt
Dinars Fils
1 Stretcher trolley 1 100 100
2 Rectangular instrument 2 150 300
trolley
3 Hot air oven 1 400 400
ntory) of Al Karak 67
Furniture / Laboratory Department
Items with Replacement of JD 100($140) or More
Item No. Item Name / Description Number Cost Total Cost
Dinars Fils Dinars Fils
1 Metallic office table (melanin ٣ 150 450
coated)
2 Metallic cabinet with two doors 3 150 450
and open shelves
٣ S.S Refrigerator (capacity of ٤ 1500 6000
700 liters)
٤ Deep stainless steel freezer ١ 2000 2000
ntory) of Al Karak 69
Furniture / Emergency Department
Items with Replacement of JD 100 ($140) Or more
Item No. Item Name / Description Number Item Total Cost
Cost
Dinars Fils Dinars Fils
1 Metallic large office desk 3 150 450
(melanin coated)
2 Medium size metallic office 1 100 100
desk (melanin coated)
3 Metallic closet with movable ٩ 150 1350
shelves
4 Metallic closet with two doors 2 150 300
and movable shelves
5 Wooden closet with 4 doors ٤ 450 1800
6 Metallic closet inserted beside 8 100 800
the patient bed
7 Laced metallic low back, fixed ٥ 300 1500
base chair
8 Metallic closet with opened 8 150 1200
shelves and without a door
9 Wooden counter ٣ 600 1800
10 Patient bed ٨ 500 4000
11 Electrical Refrigerator 3 feet ١ 110 110
ntory) of Al Karak 71
14 Television set 3 250 750
ntory) of Al Karak 73
Furniture (Non Medical Items) / Administration Department
Items with Replacement of JD 100 ($140) Or more
Item No. Item Name / Description Number Item Total Cost
Cost
Dinars Fils Dinars Fils
1 Wooden counter 3 600 1800
2 Wardrobe for the employees 28 100 2800
with six drawers
3 Metallic closet with opened 21 150 3150
exposed shelves
4 Metallic large office desk 21 150 3150
(melanin coated)
5 Medium size metallic office 11 100 1100
desk (melanin coated)
6 Metallic closet with shelves 4 150 600
(without a door)
7 Fixed base, waiting metallic 7 250 1750
filigreed chair
8 Computer sets 7 500 3500
9 Electrical printer 4 450 1800
10 Photocopy machine (large – 2 750 1500
size)
11 Photocopy machine (small– 2 500 1000
size)
12 Fax machine 2 450 900
13 Electrical sewing machine 3 150 450
14 Large panel meeting room 1 250 250
table
15 Electrical washer (capacity 5 2 120 240
kilograms )
16 Iron sharp cutter 3 165 495
17 Aluminum closet 4 150 600
18 Wooden wardrobe with three 10 198 1980
drawers
19 Aluminum closet with glass 6 250 1500
facet
20 B.C .F fire extinguisher (12 12 100 1200
kgm)
21 Drug trolley 1 150 150
22 Loudspeaker 1 300 300
23 Air conditioner 3 2000 6000
24 Electronic switchboard 1 1800 1800
25 Stainless steel unit with four 3 200 600
drawers
26 Line for distributing food 1 6000 6000
consisting of (tray holder , fork
holder, knife holder, spoons,
bread keeper, cold and hot
ntory) of Al Karak 75
with different shapes)
9 Meat slicer with two blades 1 750 750
10 Electrical meat slicer 1 800 800
11 Stainless steel dessert oven 1 850 850
1٢ Electrical oil fryer with grill( 1 150 150
stainless steel )
1٣ Electrical steak grill stainless 1 150 150
steel )
1٤ Electric oven with four hot 1 150 150
burners ( tainless steel )
1٥ Electrical cooking pan grilled 2 1000 2000
rice (stainless steel)
1٦ Deep electrical steamer for the 2 1200 2400
meat and soups
1٧ Ventilator or filter (stainless 1 2000 2000
steel with dimensional size 420
x 180)
1٨ Stainless steel refrigerator with 1 900 900
drawers and shelves
19 Multipurpose stainless steel 1 2000 2000
refrigerator with two doors (24
feet)
20 Electrical food heater trolley 2 400 800
with three trays (S.S)
21 Trolley for food distribution 2 250 500
(S.S)
22 Stainless steel ,dishwasher with 1 1000 1000
two shelves
23 Plates rack with three shelves 1 250 250
24 Large size central refrigerator 1 10,000 10,000
with deep freezer
25 Stereo and recorder 1 300 300
26 Small ventilator (filter) 1 1200 1200
27 Stainless steel two wash basins 1 500 500
28 Balance (300 kgm) 2 400 800
29 Stainless steel trolley for 1 250 250
holding food (with two shelves)
30 Wooden block for cutting and 1 250 250
slicing meat
31 Stainless steel trolley with two 1 250 250
shelves
32 Kitchen utensils rack (stainless 1 200 200
steel)
Banks, D. 1999. Implementing Hospital Autonomy in Jordan: The Selection Process. Amman:
Partnerships for Health Reform/Jordan. April.
Banks, D., A. As-Sayaideh., A. Shafei, and R. Ghanoum. 2000. Implementing Hospital Autonomy in
Jordan: Changing MOH Operating Procedures. Technical Report 44. Bethesda, MD:
Partnerships for Health Reform, Abt Associates Inc. March.
Banks, D., A.As-Sayaideh., A. Shafei, and A. Muhtaseb. 2002. Implementing Hospital Autonomy in
Jordan: An Economic Cost Analysis of Princess Raya Hospital. Technical Report 7. Bethesda, MD:
Partners for Health Reformplus, Abt Associates Inc. January.
Banks, D. 1993. Voluntary and Proprietary Hospital Behavioral Response to Socioeconomic Stimuli,
Applied Economics, 28, July: 853-868.
Barnum, H., and J. Kutzin. 1993. Public Hospitals in Developing Countries: Resource Use, Cost,
Financing. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Binger, R., and E. Hoffman. 1988. Microeconomics with Calculus. Illinois: Scott, Foresman and
Company.
Breyer, F. 1987. “The Specification of a Hospital Cost Function: A Comment on the Recent
Literature.” Journal of Health Economics 6, 2:147-57.
Brown, R., D. Caves, and L. Christensen. 1979. “Modeling the Structure of Cost and Production for
Multiproduct Firms.” Southern Economic Journal 46, 1:256-273.
Carr, W., and P. Feldstein. 1967. “The Relationship of Cost to Hospital Sizes.” Inquiry 4, 6:45,65.
Cowing, T., and A. Holtman. 1983. “Multiproduct Short-run Hospital Cost Function: Empirical
Evidence and Policy Implication from Cross Section Data.” Southern Economic Journal
49:637-653.
Duffy, D. 2002. Health Insurance Pilot Project: Maternity Costs Estimates at Princess Raya Hospital.
Trip Report. Bethesda, MD: Partners for Health Reformplus, Abt Associates Inc.
Evans, R. 1971. “Behavioural Cost Functions for Hospitals.” Canadian Journal of Economics 4,
2:198-215.
Feldstein M. 1967. Economic Analysis for Health Service Efficiency. Amsterdam: North Holland
Press.
Grannemann, T., R. Brown, and M. Pauly. 1986. “Estimating Hospital Costs: A Multi-output
Analysis.” Journal of Health Economics 5, 2:107-127.
Lave, J., and L. Lave. 1970. “Hospital Cost Functions.” American Economic Review 60, 3:379-395.
77
Sindaha-Muna, Narmine. 1998. Summary Proceedings: Hospital Autonomy Workshop in Jordan.
Bethesda, MD: Partnerships for Health Reform, Abt Associates Inc. October.
Vita, M. 1990. “Exploring Hospital Production Relationships with Flexible Form Functions.”
Journal of Health Economics 9, 1:1-21.